Slashdot Mirror


Laptop Thief Caught via AOL Login

Mundocani writes "Yahoo (Reuters) is reporting that the FBI has caught the guy who stole computers from Wells Fargo. The interesting part is that 'Investigators traced the computer to Krastof when he logged onto his own America Online account at home through one of the stolen computers.' Makes you wonder what sort of hooks the FBI has into AOL or other ISPs and what hardware identification is being transmitted at login."

44 of 524 comments (clear)

  1. last thing the thief heard... by dark_day · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You've got jail!"

  2. Moral of the story... by jkrise · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. When you steal computers, don't steal laptops.
    2. After stealing a dedsktop PC, even if it has the latest Windows OS and Service Pack, format the disk and load RedHat.
    3. If you steal a Linux PC, install Windows on it for a year, then switch back - even AOL can't maintain that big a log!
    4. Don't use AOl - switch over to MSN - it's much more secure - instead of the FBI, it'll be the BSA that's after you!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  3. ...or maybe... by cnelzie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well's Fargo is using some cool 'Phone Home' software that was described on Slashdot several times that MOST everyone thought was a good idea...

    Why is it a good idea when it will protect your laptop or employer's laptop, but suddenly, the FBI has some nefarious hooks into AOL when they publish that they captured a laptop thief because the thief logged into AOL?

    Anyone care to give that answer that?

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  4. Re:Good vs Bad by leerpm · · Score: 4, Informative

    It not's very difficult. Once you have the IP address, you just do a query at ARIN. That will tell you which ISP the address belongs to, so you phone the ISP and ask them for the information about which subscriber had that IP address at the time you are concerned about. Almost All ISPs maintain this sort of information for auditing/logging purposes.

  5. You know... by mental_telepathy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to say that Slashdot readers have obvious biases, but why is it that when the police do something smart with computers, you get:
    Makes you wonder what sort of hooks the FBI has into AOL or other ISPs and what hardware identification is being transmitted at login.
    And when they can't solve a computer crime case, you get 100 posts about how the police are computer dummys. I'll be honest, I'm not too worried about my ISP having my MAC address, or even the make and model of my video card if they are interested. It's just nice to see a criminal get busted

    1. Re:You know... by jkleid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I'll be honest, I'm not too worried about my ISP having my MAC address, or even the make and model of my video card if they are interested."

      Authorities now have a sizable fraction of the technology possessed by big brother in the book 1984. Whether or not to fear that power is a matter of trust.
      _______

    2. Re:You know... by Alsee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      why is it that when the police do something smart with computers...
      And when they can't solve a computer crime case...


      Because the issue is how they do it. News items appear slam the police for success and ridicule them for failure simply becuase news items are not a representitve sampling of reality! The police have a hundreds of successes every day, but who cares to write about them or read them? It only becomes a news item when the police have a success AND they did something wrong or controvercial in the process. The same goes for their failures - it only becomes newsworthy when someone really screwed up.

      As for this particular story it is all about how the police caught the guy. It appears that Slashdot botched the story in this case. Another news site reports that the guy did NOT log into his own AOL account, he logged into an AOL account belonging to the owner of the machine. If that's the case then there really isn't any story here. If some moron steals my wallet and then shows up at bank trying to use my safety deposit key then there's no problem grabbing him and throwing him in prision.

      I was going to continue with an example of police methods that would not have been acceptable, but lets skip arguing over specifics. Suffice it to say that there *are* a wide variety of unacceptable methods. If you don't agree with that then you are a far greater threat to this country than any terrorist with a bomb.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Wait a minute... by cnelzie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How was this thief even able to use this stolen laptop? Were they not running a password protected operating system, at least Windows 2000 or Windows XP?

    I know that if ANY of the laptops and roughly ALL of our desktop PC's would be useless to any thieves unless they format each and every machine, since there isn't a single account that doesn't have a password that isn't controlled by our Domain Controller...

    I am not so happy about Wells Fargo's apparent disinterest in keeping things secure...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Wait a minute... by leenoble_uk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Running Jaguar I set up a fake account with no password on purpose. If my laptop was stolen I WANTED the thief to use it to get online. My real accounts were hidden from the login screen and my home folder was invisible. I had a penny-per-minute dialup ISP set up to make it easy for the thief to get connected. Using DNS update software I would be able to see the IP address at Dyndns.org if it was ever used.
      If the thief was to find the computer locked down from the start then they'd be far more likely to wipe and restore making this a lot more difficult.
      Unfortunately, now running Panther and making user account invisible makes the fast user switching a buggy nightmare. So in spite of the extra security features like FileVault I think it less likely I would ever see it again if it were stolen. I liked my security through obscurity.

    2. Re:Wait a minute... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you do want to implement e-mail, it's very simple. You don't need a local MTA; SMTP is very simple, and a server will accept a message for a user at its domain, no matter where you're connecting from. (Or nearly so....)

      So all you have to do is know the SMTP server for your e-mail address, and a bit of scripting with netcat does the rest. Just make a file with:

      helo phone_home@domain.blah
      mail from:phone_home@domain.blah
      rcpt to:phone_home@domain.blah
      data
      Subject: subject

      contents go here
      .
      quit

      Then you can send it with 'nc smtp.isp.blah 25 file'.

      I do this for my phone-home program. It doesn't send mail by default, but it checks a private page on my web site. If it finds the right command on that page, then it will send e-mail. I can also have it execute commands and open up an ssh tunnel so I can ssh in.

      Of course, like a dumbass, I don't have an easy way for them to get online unless they have a wireless network. Do you have a suggestion for how to do that without having a password-free admin account? I don't want random people to be able to do nastiness on my machine.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  7. Re:PC call home by mental_telepathy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, I would say that is less than likely. I haven't heard of any company that installs software like that by default, even on laptops. And it would be much easier for AOL to check for a MAC address Wells Fargo provided.

  8. Re:PC call home by miu · · Score: 5, Informative
    Nope, the slashdot blurb about him using his own aol account is wrong.

    According to another source "He logged onto an (America Online) account that was registered on that computer and we traced it back to his phone number and address''.

    It's the 4th item down on the page, under "Suspected thief arrested".

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  9. Re:PC call home by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the kind of security software implied by the original poster does work on IPs since you can't track a MAC address back across the Internet. When you log in, the laptop transmits its current IP address back to the servers of the "phone home" application vendor along with an ID. If that ID is flagged as belonging to a stolen system, then that IP is used to identify the ISP, who will then be informed of the situation and will hopefully be able to identify which user was using that IP at the time. Tie that user back to a person and contact details through billing records and you can proceed to make an arrest.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  10. Re:PC call home by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Though why AOL should be tracking mac addresses to user logins is beyond me.
    Its called good administration. AOL is a large ISP if you didn't know. They have a lot of members and non-members trying to send Spam threw them, hack other computers threw them, and hack and Spam their own systems. So when someone puts out a complaint that so and so spam them threw AOL or was being tracked threw AOL and you show them proof then they can check the logs to see when they logged in and if they actually did that, at least coinciding with the login times and the times the incident occurred. I am pretty sure that they are also recording your telephone number that you used to call in as well. This is not a part of some Evil scheme or government plot. It is a way that a company the size of AOL uses to protect its butt. Because if they don't track this information and enforce it, (And yes some times they may need to call the police and some times the police asked them for some information) then they will be getting lawsuits left and right saying your servers attacked my computer, and AOL is not even showing good faith to remedy the situation. System Administration is sometimes public administration as well, especially when the public uses your systems.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  11. Re:MAC addresses? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The MAC address goes no further than the first router , in this case his broadband modem if thats what he's using.
    If he's using dialup the MAC address doesn't even come into it.

  12. There is no story here by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From SFGate:
    Investigators knew where to look for the gear not because of unusually intrepid sleuthing but because Krastof allegedly used the computer to log on to an AOL account belonging to the system's owner, Peter Gascoyne.
    Please remove your tin foil hats, the idiot logged onto the AOL account of the person he stole the laptop from. The police and AOL merely traced it back to his house.
    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:There is no story here by trystanu · · Score: 5, Informative
      ... and even then AOL didn't help *that* much:

      White said investigators had asked AOL as a routine precaution to watch for any log-ons in Gascoyne's name. He said the world's biggest online service had reported a hit earlier this month but then dragged its feet in providing information about the phone line used in the connection.
  13. Re:so how did they get his addy? by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative
    Logs, logs, and yet more logs. The process works like this (although not in this case, since apparently Yahoo is wrong and Krastoff actually used the original owners account):

    1. Use WHOIS to find out which ISP owns the IP address
    2. Get the ISP to look at their logs to determine which dial-up session was assigned that IP at the time.
    3. Look at the logs for the access platform to identify the caller's line ID. This is usually the same as the telephone number, but not necessarily, and is *always* known to the remote system, even if you withhold you phone number because it's used in call setup.
    4. Take that number to the Telco that owns it and look at *their* logs to give you the physical location of the phone that made the connection (or owner of the mobile).
    5. Arrest the perp.
    While that glosses over the paperwork, and assumes that the ISP maintain sufficiently details logs of calls and authentication, which many small ones don't, that's pretty much it.
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  14. Re:MAC addresses? by crevette · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why make it so complex? The computer was reported stolen by Wells Fargo with all the information, so the FBI issued a request to AOL to notify them if anybody logs into such and such accounts. Once it happens, the FBI simply had to check the phone records to know what is the number of the guys connected and voila!

    I work at a phone company in a country without secret services and sophisticated hooks into any ISP and we would be able to pull that out in a matter of minutes.

  15. I bet they tracked him down by IM by H8X55 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Makes you wonder what sort of hooks the FBI has into AOL or other ISPs and what hardware identification is being transmitted at login.

    i bet it wasn't that complicated.

    fbiAgentd00d99: Yo man, what's up?
    LaptopThief2310: Not much, i just ripped off some computers! HA HA WOOT!
    fbiAgentd00d99: SWEET!
    LaptopThief2310: Yeah I rockxxorz. Now I'm takin' a pic of me, an all the computers i stoled w/ a sony cybershot i "found".
    fbiAgentd00d99: You pwn3! Send me that pic! I'm gonna put it on my website!

    There we have it folks, probable cause, as well as an IP address.

  16. Re:PC call home by Mattcelt · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are several software packages including Ztrace and Absolute Software's Computrace which deal with the issue of laptop theft directly. It seems very likely that these computers were protected with one of these type of programs.

  17. Re:Password protected? by rduke15 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Were they not running a password protected operating system, at least Windows 2000 or Windows XP?

    You must be kidding, but I'm not sure.

    It takes only a few minutes to change the administrator password on a Windows box with a Linux boot floppy.

    Done it a couple of times (on Windows 2000), for users who didn't know the admin password.

  18. Re:PC call home by miu · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One continuing problem that IT has is locking down computers. It is very common for employees to install their own software and dial connections on laptops.

    I agree with you that a laptop with the sort of sensitive data that this one contained should never be connected directly to a public network - but such is the state of data security these days.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  19. Re:PC call home by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I kind of get the impression, that with this being a laptop and all, it would have been using a modem to connect. Last I heard a modem does not actually have a static MAC address in firmware like a network card. Since this is Slashdot, we might as well blame Microsoft for this confusion since they gernerate a MAC with the vendor ID of 44:45:53 to "internal adapters" such as modems.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  20. Re:PC call home by miu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I should state exactly why I felt the Herald version is more credible.

    The Yahoo statement:

    Investigators traced the computer to Krastof when he logged onto his own America Online account at home through one of the stolen computers, White said.

    and the Herald statement:

    "He logged onto an (America Online) account that was registered on that computer and we traced it back to his phone number and address,'' White said.

    I felt that the direct quote of Chief White was more credible, and less likely to be subject to an error of interpretation on the part of the reporter.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  21. Not spyware. The story is much simpler than that by Raphael · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no need for any "Phone Home" software or anything sending the CPUID to AOL. The story is much simpler than that and rather low-tech:

    • Thief steals computer.
    • Thief tries AOL account found on stolen computer.
    • Account is known to have been compromised.
    • Connection type = dialup = phone number.
    • Phone number = address.
    • Address = thief gets caught.

    Nothing exceptional here. The FBI does not need any strange hooks into AOL. They only need stupid thieves. Case closed.

    --
    -Raphaël
  22. Re:PC call home by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Companies server receives the unique ID. Sysadmin: "Hey, Fred just logged in, but his machine was stolen. WTF? Hmm.. what IP did his request come from? Aaaah.. 69.69.69.69. Let's do a lookup.. hey.. it seems to be an AOL modem-pool". Company goes to police, policy goes to judge, police show credible evidence that a crime was committed, judge gives warrant, AOL gives info (login account or the phonenumber that was dialed in from) on who was logged in at that time on that modem in that modempool. Police goes to address, takes laptop, returns it to Fred, jails crook. Fred: "1337!".

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  23. Similar Experience by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had one of my notebooks stolen at the LA airport. I had one in my suitcase (there's only so many I can carry) because of a conference. One of the baggage handlers must have helped himself to my notebook.

    The funny thing is that the notebook was my personal, and because I did travel a lot at the time, I had an AOL account for convenience. Out of a whim, I called AOL and asked them for a log of my sign-ins. Lo and behold, turns out whoever stole my notebook was using my AOL account to surf! I pleaded with the tech person to at least give me the IP address so I can track the thief down. He sympathized with my problem and passed me to one of the network engineers who was very keen on helping me. I got the IP address and the phone number that he used to dial-in. He said that the Telecom department could give me the number that was used to dial in to AOL but I would have to get law involved as certain FCC regulations prevented him from sharing that info.

    So I collected all the info and sent the report to the security officer at the Airport, a copy to the LA sherrif's dept and another one to my insurance company (who I had hoped would be keen to solve the problem). After a few calls, I got nothing. Turns out that theft like that happens a lot at the LAX and the LAPD is way too busy with serious crime to investigate a crime committed to an out-of-towner.

    The good thing is, my home insurance covered the theft, so I got a better model for basically the amount I paid for my notebook a year prior (minus deductible).

    This was pre-2001 btw ...

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:Similar Experience by qtp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you had demonstrated the common decency to be a large financial institution, as Wells Fargo so considerately did, then the police would have been more than happy to help you.

      The absolute gall that you demonstrated by being a lowly private citizen cannot be tollerated and our law enforcement agencies cannot and will not encourage such anti-social behavior.

      --
      Read, L
    2. Re:Similar Experience by crashnbur · · Score: 4, Interesting
      ...the LAPD is way too busy with serious crime to investigate a crime committed to an out-of-towner.

      It's sad, really... but police officers have essentially been reduced to insurance claims officers when it comes to theft or vandalism. Unless someone is in clear and present danger, the police often can't or won't act because there is just too much crime.

      I read a sociological report about persons who have committed felonies recently, and the results shocked me. The statistics in particular that got my attention:

      Of all the grand theft (generally $500+) that occurs in the US, only 6% of it is even reported.

      Of all the grand theft that is reported, only 1% of the thieves are ever caught.

      Of course, you have to understand that sociology isn't the most exact science in the world, and that these stats most likely include career thieves who only get caught once. I guess you can tell any story you want if you've got the stats to back it up.

      But still, according to these numbers, 99.94% of all thefts of $500 value or more are lost causes for the theft victims, because either the thieves are too good or the police forces are not good (or willing) enough to catch them.

    3. Re:Similar Experience by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you had demonstrated the common decency to be a large financial institution, as Wells Fargo so considerately did, then the police would have been more than happy to help you.

      In fairness, this laptop represented a pretty serious amount of crime potential.

      The laptop was stolen from a Wells Fargo contractor, and if contained a whole mess of Really Important customer data (social security numbers and what have you) that would have enabled any halfway competent identity thief to get all they needed to start opening credit lines.

      The real issue here (which nobody's talking about) is how can Wells Fargo get away with this? Seriously, they left a mess of Real Important confidential customer data unencrypted on a highly mobile computer. Talk about negligence! This'd the the same as if they had customers dropping their night deposits into a large suitcase they left outside the front door of the bank (except in that situation all you stand to lose is one deposit).

      Is it so much to ask that institutions who have our Really Import Data take some basic steps to protect it? This whole thing could have been rendered moot with something as simple and easy as an encrypted filesystem.

      But nobody, nobody is talking about it. So they'll continue putting customer data on laptops, HMOs will keel putting patient records on tablet PCs or shipping it overseas for testing or whatever... I wonder what it'll take to change it...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  24. Re:PC call home by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Informative
    ISPs usually knows ARP address of computers (network interfaces actually) that are connected to their gateways because DHCP-servers are caching them. I don't have details about this but I'm pretty sure about that DHCP stuff.

    Machines which dial in don't use ARP. ARP only applies to Ethernet

    . Nontheless, I can easily see a machine with sensitive information wanting to report it's IP address to a central location whenever it connects. Cookies in the web browser might also help identify a stolen machine.

    Using the default account and password stored on a machine seems stupid at first, until you consider that the guy had ID theft equipment... I don't use AOL, but I wouldn't be to surprised if you could fetch some ID-associated info by logging into the account of a stolen computer. In this case, the computer was of special interest, so the guy was picked up.

    I wouldn't be surprised if more people could be caught by this same method, it's just that police aren't interested enough in following such tracks for 'normal' owners.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  25. Re:PC call home by beacher · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nah.. I have a copy of the evidence right here....

    Subject: ME TOO
    From: Krastof (Krastof@AOL.com)
    Reply-To: Krastof@AOL.com
    Newsgroups: comp.laptops.stolen
    Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:18:22 -0500

  26. Re:Good vs Bad by jridley · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, but it's not clear that's what really happened; it appears that the actual info may have been muddled by the reporter. I suggest looking for Krastof in news.google.com and read some other articles.

    Here's an excerpt from another article on this matter:

    The suspect led the police right to his door when he decided to go online. Gascoyne alerted the police that someone had used his account since the burglary. America Online helped investigators link the dial-up computer connection to a phone number, which SBC then linked to a phone jack at Krastof's home.


    This is TOTALLY un-scary. The Wells-Fargo guy apparently has his password cached on the machine. This guy just clicks "login" and logs in AS THE GUY WHOS COMPUTER WAS STOLEN. At this point it's a trivial bit of work to go catch the guy.
  27. "You've got jail" by trance9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet the machine had some email software on it (Outlook?) that checked for new mail once an internet connection was available. The mail server logs would show the IP address.

    1. Re:"You've got jail" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work for WF but do not mean to represent my employer here. Your answer pretty close to right on. Our network logs ALL accesses, but of course denies access to our intranet from the internet at large. Ergo, any request in the access log (like when OutLook tries to connect to our mailserver, for example)that originate outside the intranet are automatically red-flagged. Requests to certain ports within our network are a more serious red-flag as it indicates someone is starting internal application from outside the intranet. IPs are logged, tracert to AOL, have FBI get AOL's access log to match temporary IP/date/time to originating login... not exactly rocket science, folks... There are other applications that as a matter of operation 'call home', so really the moral of the story is that it is a dumb idea to steal computers from work unless you really know how the computer is configured.

  28. no warrant needed by js7a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fred sets his laptop up to log into AOL with a default account and password. The crook seals the laptop. Fred calls AOL asking what ANI-reported telephone number his account has logged in on since the theft. AOL tells Fred the phone number. Fred reports the number to the cops. The cops get reverse directory information from the phone company (without a warrant unless the number is unlisted.) The cops ask Fred to ask AOL to inform the cops upon the next login. The crook logs in again. AOL calls the cops. The phone numbers match. Cops bust down Crook's door without a warrant because they have knowledge that a crime is taking place. The crook is busted.

  29. 99% clueless techie-wannabees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First, hat's off to all who don't know and say so, or simply state it. It's OK if you don't know your NIC's vendor ID/prefix by heart, or if you can't dissect the IP header without a reference.
    Really.

    To the rest: Offering complete goofball theory after complete goofball theory, briefly resting only to scream 'violation of privacy' then going back and suggesting another goofball theory impresses nobody. CPUID/NIC MAC/Windows/Office/[you-name-it] identifers or serial numbers are not immediately accesssible just because you have a PPP sesion going over your modem. If a phone-home feature was installed, then fine, but that's a completely different story.

    Another hilarious example was the the default-route theory, which someone suggested as a 'dead giveaway' to the feds. Hello!? Even if the routing table was accessible, routes associated with a NIC wouldn't be *in* the table unless the NIC was active, and the setting would only be visible in the registry, not typically accessible to the world, nor routinely queried by an ISP. And never mind the statistical probability that a corporate NIC is configured for DHCP, thus it wouldn't have a default route to begin with.

    I simply can't believe the amount of idiotic pseudo-techies posting and feeling BIG because they could incorrectly apply page 254 of the MSCE prep guide to formulate a crackpot theory.

    Bleeeeeeeeeeeechhhh.

  30. How about this? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Known stolen AOL account + phone number recorded by any ISP (radius does it by default) + call to phone comany by FBI = physical location.

    No magic.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  31. Re:PC call home by mess31173 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at Wells Fargo and there is a pile of 8 laptops on my desk and the images I apply to them don't have any "call home" software. FYI.

  32. Resetting/deleting WinXP admin pass takes seconds by horza · · Score: 4, Informative

    I downloaded onto floppy disc the program here and had reset the admin password on my Win XP box within seconds. Never seen anything so simple in my life. Though others recommend LC4 which also works.

    Phillip.

  33. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by frehe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read ifconfig(8) to see how you can do it under Linux. Google for "sea.c" to see how you can do it under OpenBSD.

  34. Re:Not spyware. The story is much simpler than tha by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Informative
    An even better quote from another source reads:

    Investigators knew where to look for the gear not because of unusually intrepid sleuthing but because Krastof allegedly used the computer to log on to an AOL account belonging to the system's owner, Peter Gascoyne.

    Seems Reuters screwed up on the facts.
  35. NO, he used owners AOL account. by babazaroni · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ne ws/archive/2003/11/26/financial1853EST0113.DTL