Slashdot Mirror


Miramax C&Ds Kung Fu Movie Reviewer

Mirkon writes "When a movie distributor attains rights to a film, it's rather predictable that they go after individuals offering the movie for sale or free. But Miramax took it a step further - as reported by Wired and on the site itself, Mark Pollard of Kung Fu Cinema received a Cease & Desist letter from Miramax concerning a link on Kung Fu Cinema to a movie purchasing site for the Jet Li movie Hero (set to be officially released in North America in April 2004). Fearing Miramax (and thus Disney) and their army of lawyers, Pollard deleted the link, as well as another for Shaolin Soccer, also unreleased in North America. Pollard criticized the studio for not permitting the original version of such films to hit the states, saying "If they own the rights to this film, then this film is not available to U.S. consumers -- period." The EFF also has some comments regarding the fact that Pollard has done nothing wrong in the first place."

278 comments

  1. In other news .. by junkymailbox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot links to a story that links to Kung Fu Cinema that links to a movie purchasing site.

    Beware the wrath of Miramax lawyers!

    fp?
    1. Re:In other news .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this marked as a troll? I actually thought it was kinda funny...

    2. Re:In other news .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct, you did aquire the fp. well done.

    3. Re:In other news .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miramax? I thought they only made classy pictures like The Piano and The Crying Game?

    4. Re:In other news .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put the links up as well.

  2. I have mixed feelings... by eurleif · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But it seems like this is somewhere along the lines of telling someone where the nearest drug dealer ir (not comparing the two crimes). Isn't/shouldn't that be illegal?

    1. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Please explain how ordering a DVD from Hong Kong is the same as buying drugs.

      Hold on, let me strap my self in for this one, I'm sure its going to be good.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:I have mixed feelings... by eurleif · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this was a legal movie purchasing site? If so, ignore what I said.

    3. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not comparing the two crimes

      But you are comparing the two crimes. Otherwise, you would have made a more appropriate analogy along the lines of "Isn't this like pointing a person toward an eBay seller, who ships worldwide, when they are looking for an out-of-print CD."

    4. Re:I have mixed feelings... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But it seems like this is somewhere along the lines of telling someone where the nearest drug dealer is.[sic] Isn't/shouldn't that be illegal?
      Um, no.
      Talking isn't/shouldn't be illegal.
      Doing things that harm others is/should be illegal.
      If person A is selling drugs, and person B is saying where person A can be found, then go and prosecute person A.

      --
    5. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny
      Owning drugs is illegal. Owning a movie isn't illegal. Playing a movie you own shouldn't be illegal.

      Corporations are brainless organisms which only care about making profit. They're like yeast. They'll merrily shit in their environment until everything that forces them to work is illegal and anything that reduces their profit (IE, competition) is illegal. Like yeast, their shit will probably eventually kill off the colony, then someone will drink it like a fine port. Er... or something.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    6. Re:I have mixed feelings... by the_consumer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who did person A harm?

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    7. Re:I have mixed feelings... by gaijin99 · · Score: 4, Informative
      But it seems like this is somewhere along the lines of telling someone where the nearest drug dealer ir (not comparing the two crimes). Isn't/shouldn't that be illegal?
      Generally, telling people how to commit crimes, or telling them where they can obtain illegal things isn't illegal itself. The "Anarchist's Cookbook", for example, includes detailed (if boobytrapped) information on all manner of things ranging from cooking up Meth, to building pipe-bombs. Its perfectly legal.

      This makes sense from pretty much anystandpoint you want to look at it from, even though it does sometimes produce odd results. It goes back to the basic idea that crimes are actions, you can't arrest someone for speculating about how nifty it would be to rob a bank (you can, however arrest someone for *planning* to rob the bank, you don't have to actually wait for them to do it). If it were otherwise we'd be entering the wonderful world of Thought Crimes (TM).

      Besides, the way it works now leads to some very amusing situations, such as the "wine brick" that was sold during prohibition. This was basically a compressed bunch of raisens. The instruction sheet contained an interesting warning:
      Caution: Never mix contents in two gallons of warm water
      to which you have added a pinch of yeast, and one pound of sugar.
      If this mixture is left to stand in a cloth covered container
      for two weeks, an ALCOHOLIC beverage will result, which is illegal.

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    8. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The profitability of paper manufacturers and cotton growers!

    9. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      wait a minute....
      (not comparing the two crimes). Isn't/shouldn't that be illegal?

      why is it that people automatically assume that something is illegal?

      These were links to a place where you could buy the 100% LEGAL origional version of the movies listed.

      The american public has been brainwashed into believeing that if a company sends their lawyers after you then you must be doing something illegal or commiting a crime.

      No crime is happening, corperate america does not make laws (they buy them).

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The american public has been brainwashed into believeing that if a company sends their lawyers after you then you must be doing something illegal or commiting a crime.

      Mirimax owns the US rights to the film - so they have the right to control the sale of that movie in the US - which includes preventing imports. Companies prevent the drect import of their goods at many times.

      I don't think they should be able to do that (but they can) - I wonder how companies get around import (trademark, in this case, IFAIR) woth grey market electronic and camera gear.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    11. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see some basis for your assumption that a company owning the copyright to something prevents people from buying or importing from another country.

      Keep in mind that these are not knockoffs or illegal versions, they are 100% legit for their country of origin.

      The companies have no right whatsoever to restrict buyers from purchasing foreign versions, or selling those foreign versions in North America. Sending out a C&D is just legalspeak to frighten people off.

      The webmaster of that site should've stuck to his guns. At the very least, it would've brought Miramax a LOT of bad press, which is exactly what companies fear the most.

      Miramax has already alienated plenty of people with their "put big red dots on movie screens to help 'prevent' movie pirates". In reality, all it does is annoy customers that paid up to $15 to see their movie in a real theatre...

      Maybe it's time to rethink actually paying to see Miramax films...

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    12. Re:I have mixed feelings... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Why? The other person still decides if he's going to break the law or not by seeking the dealer out and purchasing from him. I don't see why it should be illegal for you to tell someone where he is.

    13. Re:I have mixed feelings... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      The grey market is not illegal. It is just not officially sanctioned. Often the manufacturer will not warranty the product, but on something like a DVD- who cares.

      In this World market economy, Companies need to offer thier products for a price that people are willing to pay or else they will go elsewhere.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    14. Re:I have mixed feelings... by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the fuck are you smoking? This isn't about selling illegal substances, this is about selling movies. Not bootlegs, either - these are perfectly legit copies.

      What's happening is that Miramax is taking its sweet time releasing the movies in the US - so the free market steps in, and people start buying DVDs from overseas retailers. If that's illegal now, then we got big problems.

    15. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Peer · · Score: 1

      Mirimax owns the US rights to the film - so they have the right to control the sale of that movie in the US - which includes preventing imports. Companies prevent the drect import of their goods at many times.

      So this means you cannot provide a link for non-US visitors on your site??

    16. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Potentially his/her customers, of course. If the drugs he/she is selling are harmful, or cut with something harmful. I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive drug like heroin is doing its users harm, although obviously something like cannabis is a different matter.

    17. Re:I have mixed feelings... by hymie3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, no.
      Talking isn't/shouldn't be illegal.
      Doing things that harm others is/should be illegal.
      If person A is selling drugs, and person B is saying where person A can be found, then go and prosecute person A.


      Yes, it should be illegal. If I were to say "There's a lot of drugs in [insert name of local "urban" housing project]", that would be okay. If I were to say "Go down to the corner of 4th and MLK Blvd, and talk to the guy in the red stocking cap. Tell him Leroy sent you", then that would be an accessory to a crime (purchasing drugs).

      I *should* be able to report facts. As in "These movies have been out for years and are legally purchaseable by non-US residents at these sites."

      It's all about intent. If the intent is to get around importation regulations, then it's wrong. (Personally, I believe the restrictions are detestable, but that's another story). If the intent is to point out how corporations buy distribution rights and sit on them for a really long time to prevent competition with their home-grown crap movies, well, that's just reporting facts/giving opinions.
    18. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Please let me know what LAW that is violating. as I cannot find any federal law that says that ordering something from outside the unites states is a crime.

      Miramax has a contract with the company that made the origional film. they do not have a contract with anyone else and therefore have no right to tell anyone else what to do.

      It's a contract dispute between Mirimax and the company that signed it, it is not ILLEGAL or a CRIME and they have no right to harass someone that is pointing to a link to buy it from a company outside the USA.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:I have mixed feelings... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      Generally, telling people how to commit crimes, or telling them where they can obtain illegal things isn't illegal itself. The "Anarchist's Cookbook", for example, includes detailed (if boobytrapped) information on all manner of things ranging from cooking up Meth, to building pipe-bombs. Its perfectly legal. This makes sense from pretty much anystandpoint you want to look at it from, even though it does sometimes produce odd results. It goes back to the basic idea that crimes are actions, you can't arrest someone for speculating about how nifty it would be to rob a bank (you can, however arrest someone for *planning* to rob the bank, you don't have to actually wait for them to do it). If it were otherwise we'd be entering the wonderful world of Thought Crimes (TM).

      I prefer a simpler one-question approach: Does he weigh less than a duck?

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    20. Re:I have mixed feelings... by imbaczek · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by 'harm'?

    21. Re:I have mixed feelings... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Although I've never tried to build anything difficult from "The Anarchist's Cookbook", I was always under the impression that most of the info was fake and wouldn't work.

      Of course I didn't find out about that until I tried smoking banana peels way back in high school. And is that where I got the drinking nutmeg idea or was that from a William S Burroughs book?

      I think the US is getting close to making things like the Anarchist's Cookbook illegal to own anyway. But that's okay, it's all in the name of Patriotism.

    22. Re:I have mixed feelings... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive drug like heroin is doing its users harm

      The problem with that statement is that the Dealer (person A) still isn't causing the harm. The user is causing themselves harm.

    23. Re:I have mixed feelings... by PhrackCreak · · Score: 1

      Outside the realm of being an accessory to a crime, there is a notable exception to this rule - pandering. It is illegal to tell someone who sells sex services, ie, pimping.

      --
      - You don't know how to maintain a station wagon either!
    24. Re:I have mixed feelings... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You have caused me my first pounding headache for the week. I salute you with this lovely port...

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    25. Re:I have mixed feelings... by the_consumer · · Score: 1
      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive drug like tobacco is doing its users harm.

      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive drug like alcohol is doing its users harm.

      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive food like sugar is doing its users harm.

      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive technology like television is doing its users harm.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    26. Re:I have mixed feelings... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Ah! But copyright is a strict liability statute. Intent rarely matters at all. If you infringe, even innocently, you're still infringing. It might lessen damages, or help in a fair use defense, but it generally doesn't matter what you intended.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    27. Re:I have mixed feelings... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd like to see some basis for your assumption that a company owning the copyright to something prevents people from buying or importing from another country.

      The relevant laws are 17 USC 106 (the right to distribute), 109 (first sale), and 602 (importation).

      The relevant case is Quality King v. Lanza Research, 523 US 135 (1998).

      "[The prohibition] encompasses copies that are not subject to the first sale doctrine-e.g., copies that are lawfully made under the law of another country...."

      The importation is direct infringement -- the linking is likely contributory infringement, as there is an underlying direct infringement, probably constructive knowledge of infringement, and material contribution to the infringement.

      Keep in mind that these are not knockoffs or illegal versions, they are 100% legit for their country of origin.

      Of course -- 602 doesn't _just_ apply to piratical copies though; it applies to copies that were lawfully made, just not lawfully made under US law. If Miramax owns the rights under US law, only it can lawfully make, or cause to be made, copies. The fact that it was lawfully made in DVDistan is basically irrelevant.

      The companies have no right whatsoever to restrict buyers from purchasing foreign versions, or selling those foreign versions in North America. Sending out a C&D is just legalspeak to frighten people off.

      No, they've got this right. It's not often used, and it's not well known, but they have got it. It's pretty stupid though, I admit.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    28. Re:I have mixed feelings... by V_drive · · Score: 1

      what about the guy who had a website giving names, photos, and addresses of abortion doctors? should he have been forced to shut it down? some of those doctors turned up dead if i remember correctly. obviously, the killer should be prosecuted, but should the website be allowed to continue? i'm not sure what my opinion is on the subject, but i'm giving the question for your thoughts and a general consistancy check.

      --
      char *mySig;
    29. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "[The prohibition] encompasses copies that are not subject to the first sale doctrine-e.g., copies that are lawfully made under the law of another country...."

      Is this in regards to buying the product in the United States? Is it illegal to go to Hong Kong and buy the legal copies there and then bring them back? Is it illegal to order them from Hong Kong? Or is it only illegal to sell the Hong Kong copies in the United States?

    30. Re:I have mixed feelings... by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Funny
      If I were to say "Go down to the corner of 4th and MLK Blvd, and talk to the guy in the red stocking cap. Tell him Leroy sent you", then that would be an accessory to a crime (purchasing drugs).

      <div style="voice:jayLeno">Didja ever wonder why "Martin Luther King Boulevard" is always in the scariest, most violent neighborhoods around the country? Why is that, huh?

    31. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Thank you for a very informative post, however section 602 contains numerous exceptions which would seem to allow for linking, since importation isn't automatically infringing. Further 602 refers back to 601, which is extremely confusing to me, but seems to apply mainly to English language non-dramatic works. In any case, both of these sections seem to allow for personal importation of works for private use and not intended for resale. So it would seem that there is a large grey area here that would still allow for both web stores and links to web stores where the customers were private persons in the U.S.... am I missing something?

    32. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ownership is an abstract concept. You own the disc that the movie is pressed on but you don't own the movie

    33. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...that's not pimping, according to any reasonable definition. If you have an arrangement with the sex worker and you get part of the money, then it is.

    34. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except that importation for personal use, rather than resale (which is clearly the intent in this case) is permitted under 602 (a) (2)

    35. Re:I have mixed feelings... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      True, but I don't see any facts as to whether it was coming straight from other countries, or whether there was a US-based intermediary importing and reselling domestically. The EFF response might've been useful -- had /. linked to it, since I don't have time to go looking for it.

      Good catch though.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    36. Re:I have mixed feelings... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But uhh, gee.. We're not COPYING anything.

      I fail to see how buying an import DVD from Hong Kong is copying.

      Personally, I detest artificial market restrictions. It's just as bad as DVD region coding.

      -Z

    37. Re:I have mixed feelings... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I didn't say copying, I said infringing.

      There are many ways to infringe, and copying is just one of them. Importation can be infringement too.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    38. Re:I have mixed feelings... by KendyForTheState · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank goodness I'm not 'most people'... they sound pretty stupid!

      --
      ...I just came for the free beer.
    39. Re:I have mixed feelings... by tenton · · Score: 1

      Yes, t'was a link for legal movies (not pirated stuff). The issue is that Miramax is blocking the importation of these things. They've successfully blocked companies in the US from selling import discs (not pirate/bootleg ones, but officially licensed ones) and now they're going above and beyond that.

    40. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive drug like tobacco is doing its users harm.

      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive drug like alcohol is doing its users harm.

      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive food like sugar is doing its users harm.

      I think most people would agree that a heavily addictive technology like television is doing its users harm.


      And your point, I guess, is that if some potentially addictive things are for sale, then all potentially addictive things should be for sale.


      Your argument has a major logical flaw: the Fallacy of Exclusion. It appears commonly on Slashdot and also in the community of legalized drug advocates. Your (unstated) conclusion is predicated on your four arguments, but you leave out a significant element that would tend to undercut the conclusion, that of the social cost (both literally and figuratively) of addictive behavior. If you made an inclusive argument, then your conclusion would be that addictive behavior should be controlled. Oh, and it's also a classic straw man argument, too.


      If you want to make a pursuasive argument, then you'd better get your logical ducks in a row. Trotting out the same old, tired argument isn't going to get you anywhere.


      Oh, and before you go off on your high horse, I never said that I disagreed with your conclusion, only that your arguments don't support it. I'm sure that you can do better.

    41. Re:I have mixed feelings... by gaijin99 · · Score: 1
      Although I've never tried to build anything difficult from "The Anarchist's Cookbook", I was always under the impression that most of the info was fake and wouldn't work.
      I'm not a chemist, but I have heard that the Anarchist's Cookbook features several vital bits of information that are backwards from the way they should be and will result in possibly fatal accidents if the directions are followed as written. I don't know myself, I'm just quoting what I've heard various places.
      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    42. Re:I have mixed feelings... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Ah, okay, my mistake - being a Canuck though, I don't think we're covered under US laws north of the border :)

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    43. Re:I have mixed feelings... by the_consumer · · Score: 1
      And your point, I guess, is that if some potentially addictive things are for sale, then all potentially addictive things should be for sale.

      Firstly, you're a pompous fuck. That said, no, that wasn't the point. The point was that labeling things "harmful and addictive" is not sufficient to proscribe their trade. There may be other good reasons for drug prohibition, such as the social cost. If you'd like to argue these other points I'd be happy to do so, only show some balls and use your account.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    44. Re:I have mixed feelings... by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1
      Republican Alert!!

      it's dumbasses like you that are helping idiot's like George Bush take away our freedoms. do you seriously believe that telling someone where a drug dealer is should be illegal?

      nothing that you say should be illegal as long as it doesn't put someone in danger just by saying it, like telling someone it's ok to cross the street when you know there's a car coming. and i don't want to hear that drugs are dangerous. the person you told has a choice between here and there and can simply walk away.

      you are responsible for your own actions. just because i mention where a crime can be committed doesn't mean you have to do it. i'm just answering your question, and that should be protected speech.

      stay off my rights!

  3. Uh... by hookedup · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Hello McFly!

    You sell something in one country, other people in other countries are going to want it!
    How exactly does this make marketing sense?

    1. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its their movie, their decision. Make your own movies and market them were you want. Oh wait, I forgot what site I am on... freedom... FREEDOM FROM CAPITALIST OPRESSION!

    2. Re:Uh... by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, but they idea that they can stop free trade of legal copies of their movies from one country to another is what is rediculus. Yes they have the freedom to market as they wish, but you simply can't control the aftermarket of legal copies.

    3. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Its their movie, their decision. Make your own movies and market them were you want. Oh wait, I forgot what site I am on... freedom... FREEDOM FROM CAPITALIST OPRESSION!

      It's not "their" movie. It is a movie. One to which they happen to have the right of first sale. This means that if they sell a copy to a store in Japan or Hong Kong or wherever, that store has every right to resell that copy of the movie to whomever they want. Normally, in order to prevent this, movie production firms make stores agree to certain conditions, like not selling before a certain date or not shipping outside the country. But unless the store also screens its buyers against agreement to those same conditions, I don't see why Miramax or anyone else should be able to prevent resale of the movie to anyone, anywhere, at any price the buyer and seller can agree to.

      It's hardly capitalist oppression that's being objected to here. In fact, copyright as a system has nothing to do with free markets (you'll notice that the Constitutional clause establishing copyright does not say "to promote free markets" but rather "to promote the useful arts and sciences")... And preventing people from buying or selling or even linking to legally produced materials is definitely interference with free markets. Thankfully, Miramax's legal claims here are of dubious value... and unfortunately the site did not feel it worthwhile to challenge them on it.

      In fact, because the stated goal of copyright law is to promote the arts and sciences, it is clearly counter-productive for a movie studio to be able to prevent people from having legal access to their products. How does it promote the art if no one is able to experience it? If the movie company is not willing to make their product available in certain places at any price, then most certainly they should not be able to prevent the importation of that product to that place... and some of us might even go a step further and say that they lose the right to exclude others from making copies in those places as well.

    4. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should point out an error in my post here: Title 17 does contain clauses that allow copyright holders to prevent the importation in some cases of works to which they hold rights. Obviously this stuff is intended to prevent bootleg operations in countries with lax copyright laws from having free reign to sell the stuff in the U.S.. However, my own thought is "how can Miramax actually sell the stuff themselves in SomeWhereInTheWorld and then prevent anyone from either bringing it to the U.S. or ordering from a reseller in SomeWhereInTheWorld?" That don't seem right to me.

    5. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this down for poor spelling.

  4. Not a fan, but if I was.. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be fairly To'd. links should not be illeagal under any circumstances. I really think that this is a freedom of speech issue which should be tried. We need a lager group to support him, or for Miramax to attack someone who already has support.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Not a fan, but if I was.. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      This has been tried and lost.

      On appeal, 2600 lost the right to link to deCSS.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  5. I recently bought both DVDs... by elysian1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    at my local Chinatown. They're both pretty easy to find.

    1. Re:I recently bought both DVDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I _love_ Shaolin Soccer!

      It's been almost two years since I've seen it, and I've watched it about 4 times since.

      FUCK YOU MIRAMAX!

  6. that is retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the guy was just linking. Like everyone that visits the site is in America. What about all the international readers of the site. the only thing this does is make the movie companies look retarded. People can still go the sites directly and order, so it doesn't actually stop the purchase of the original movies.

  7. I cannot believe this by mirko · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was in San Francisco in September and I bought the Hero DVD in Chinatown !
    (I also got a French subtitled version of Shaolin Soccer one year and a half ago !?)
    How can Miramax be *that* late and how can they ignore that one may find these DVDs in Chinese shops ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:I cannot believe this by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Miramax isn't late, they're just busy releasing the other crap that marketing thinks middle America will like. Really good movies get the shaft with alarming regularity.

      The studios ignore the mass pirates because it's sexier and easier to go after file sharers with a big marketing campaign. To combat the pirates in China, Russia, etc, they'd need actual guns and stuff, because there are real pirates out there that will kill you if you raid their CD duplication factories.

    2. Re:I cannot believe this by mirko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the other crap
      Well, as perceived from Europe, "Hero" had was outstanding bith in terms of picture and storytelling : not just another blockbuster. IMHO, it was the best picture of 2003, ex-aequo with Devdas, an Indian "opera".

      You'll understand if you watch the Chinese army hailing...

      About "Shaolin soccer", I have to say it was really funny, but of course, soccer doesn't seem as popular in America as in Europe...
      (I personally don't like to watch soccer but the movie made it quite enjoyable)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:I cannot believe this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devdas, an Indian "opera".

      ALL Indian movies are an opera, man.

      IF a movie is released WITHOUT song and dance routines the fans will be PISSED!

    4. Re:I cannot believe this by mirko · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the double quotes ?

      And BTW, have you heard of "Monsoon wedding" ?

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    5. Re:I cannot believe this by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      Hm, I just looked at the list of movies that Miramax has released, and I really enjoyed a lot of them (Amelie, Clerks, Heavenly Creatures, etc). OK, it isn't that they're cranking out junk movies, although I really can't endorse or forgive Bridget Jones' Diary. I attribute the late release of Hero and Shaolin Soccer to laziness instead. Get on the stick, Miramax!

      I'm feeling cranky today, can you tell?

    6. Re:I cannot believe this by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      If you liked "Shaolin Soccer", then you must check out "God of Cookery", also by Stephen Chow. It was one of the funniest movies I've ever seen, and I bet half the jokes were lost in translation. Imagine "Iron Chef" with kung-fu and bearded schoolgirls, and you'll have some inkling of what it's all about.

    7. Re:I cannot believe this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miramax has been sitting on these movies for awhile. Shaolin Soccer had a release date of summer 2003 but that's passed us by and Hero was suppose to be out in November but now it's pushed back to April 2004. They've delayed this stuff for too long. And they'll edit it to pieces. They're adding a rap soundtrack to Shaolin Soccer and cutting a good portion of the film.

      if you want uncut Asian cinema then you've got to import or buy bootlegs, it's sad but true.

    8. Re:I cannot believe this by mirko · · Score: 1

      They're adding a rap soundtrack to Shaolin Soccer and cutting a good portion of the film

      What about the real thing ?
      Couldn't they just keep it as it is ?

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  8. This is why.... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is why I ordered a copy of this killer movie from Hong Kong the day Miramax said they where going to be doing the US release. Every movie Miramax has gotten its hands on has ended up being ripped apart in re-editing.

    The movie realy is good. A simple story told from several view points using a diferrent color scheme for each one. If you can, watch the original and do not go to the US release.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:This is why.... by LeoDV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I did the same for Shaolin Soccer, the U.S. version of which 20 minutes were cut and the movie was re-scored with shitty hip hop instead of the brilliant orchestral music of the first movie. I had the DVD one year before it came out in the U.S. and when that version finally came here I didn't even budge -- I had owned the movie for three years.

      As far as Hero is concerned, it's a fantastic movie, and definitely meant for the big screen, that's why I'm happy and grateful that it was released here (France) in its full version and glory. I saw it three times, the photography is purely brilliant, as is the storytelling, writing, fight choereography (it was refreshing to see someone else than the ubiquitous Yuen Wo-Ping).

      Why is it that Miramax is often the last studio promoting good, independent American filmmakers, but butchering the good foreign filmmakers?

  9. Please... by telekon · · Score: 1
    At this rate, the only thing it will be acceptable to discuss online is oneself... and then only if your lawyer tells you it's okay. I can just imagine some contractual obligation to not link to something about oneself...

    In an age where intellectual property laws interfere with our ability to communicate efficiently to this degree and with such frequency, piracy is a virtue... perhaps even a right.

    --

    To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.

  10. Miramax release dates -- hah by ceenvee703 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    the Jet Li movie Hero (set to be officially released in North America in April 2004).

    Yeah, I believe that one. Shaolin Soccer was supposed to have come out this past summer... saw trailers for it during Bend It Like Beckham and saw movie posters for it hanging in theaters. Has it been released theatrically here? No. Even if it had been, it was going to be a highly-edited version.

    That's why people end up having to buy things like Hero "illegally." In fact, I think I'll go order a copy right now... before Miramax tells eBay to cease and desist...

    --
    "This? I can make a hat, I can make a brooch, I can make a pterodactyl..."
    1. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Kenja · · Score: 1

      The Shaolin temple is sueing to stop people from using there name. That may have stopped US distrabution of Shaloin Soccer.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i got this from http://www.kfccinema.com/features/articles/letter_ miramax/letter_miramax.html

      Miramax has already stopped North American-based DVD sellers on the Internet, including eBay, from selling the import versions (uncut with subtitles) of the movies they own the rights of..

    3. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by ansible · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bah. I've seen the original Shaolin Soccer, and it was hilarious. Please, do we really need Hollywood editors to "fix" it for American release?

    4. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Heh...

      Funny story, true story...

      So, the other day I decided to order the rerelease of the old Shaw Brothers' movie, The Magic Blade. I ordered it off of the Internet (http://Sensasian.com, I think) and put it in my Likko player. It was great, I was happy I purchased it. So, the next day or so, I took it over to my parents' house, where my brother lives, so he could see it too. Well, I tried it in several DVD players, and none would play it. My parents' house is bursting with conventional DVD players. One of them helpfully explained that it was the "wrong region." Normally, I check DVDs to make sure they are region free before I buy them, but I forgot in this case.

      Bleh, hooray for the pirates and those who help them! o/~You can't take the sky from me o/~

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    5. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Dexx · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the deal is about Shaolin Soccer - my local rental place has had it in for the last 2 years - we've rented it a few times already. It'll be interesting to see what a hack job Mirimax makes of it tho..

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    6. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious my ass. Perhaps if you like silly special effects and a movie without a hint of plot or wit.

    7. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      It came out in Canada a few months ago.

      Sadly I missed it, just couldn't make it out for the one weekend it played here. And its soo much better than any of the hollywood crap.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    8. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by alphaseven · · Score: 1
      Please, do we really need Hollywood editors to "fix" it for American release?

      I came across this quote from a Sony exec named Barker:

      "Run Lola Run and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon became huge because the younger generation, who are used to reading instant messaging on their home computers and CNN crawls at the bottom of the screen, are much more open to subtitles than people in their 40s and 50s," he said.

      Personally, I can't remember the last time a dubbed film was hugely popular, but Shaolin Soccer has been sitting around being tinkered with because, I'm guessing, Harvey Weinstein is obsessed with dubbing and still can't comprehend that young audiences can enjoy a subtitled film.

    9. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      Don't know what things are like elsewhere, but in San Francisco, where I live, foreign movies are never dubbed. No one would watch them. We like to hear the voices of the actors and actresses.

      I guess I should add that I'm not too sure about Chinese movies for Chinese-speaking audiences, since I can't read or understnad Chinese. There might, for example, be movies dubbed from Mandarin into Cantonese, for all I know.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    10. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by wrenkin · · Score: 1

      In fact, in Toronto there was a giant 60' billboard for Shaolin Soccer above Eglinton Station in Toronto where all the commuters could see it, and I saw the trailer at least a couple times before mainstream movies.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    11. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Bleh, hooray for the pirates and those who help them!

      Are you suggesting that region coding of DVDs is an anti-piracy measure? The reason discs are region-coded is to allow the prices to be fixed in each region, and to allow staggered releasing. It has nothing to do with piracy.

    12. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      There might, for example, be movies dubbed from Mandarin into Cantonese, for all I know.

      In the case of SF, the Chinese population is mixed Cantonese/Mandarin. In this area, it's a good idea to make sure that both groups can watch the movie.

      My VCD of Hero was subtitled in both English and Chinese. The Chinese subtitles for the Cantonese speakers.

      I got this one other VCD, it was subtitled in both Chinese and English but the voices sounded terrible. I realized that the left sound channel was Cantonese and the right sound channel was Mandarin. A poor-man's version of SAP...

      Cantonese was the original language since this was a HK movie. One of the characters spoke both English and Cantonese on one channel and Mandarin only on the other channel.

      -cmh

    13. Re:Miramax release dates -- hah by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      I must have missed the trailers, theres so little I see in the theatres....

      I saw the film on VCD import which I picked up at a Chinese Store.

      Unfortunately I made the mistake of playing the film (well most of it) to some nephews and everytime they come over now the ask to see it. I must have watched it over 15 times by now....

      But its still fun everytime (just grindingly familiar).

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  11. Miramax gets p2p'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope Miramax do realise, that by the time they release these movies - most of their core audience will have already seen the movies.
    Thanks to this thing called p2p.

  12. Not wrong, maybe... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The EFF also has some comments regarding the fact that Pollard has done nothing wrong in the first place.

    Whether or not he did something wrong is irrelevent. It's whether or not he did something unprofitable. Some corporations these days seem to believe they have a god-given right to profit, and that censorship and lawsuit chill is an acceptable tool to that end.

    Until the average freedom-loving American starts to wake up to this and works to get the courts to adjust, it's probably only going to get worse. What happens when they realize that not talking about it on a website doesn't curb the problem? Tinfoil hats, people, they'll be after your thoughts next.

    I'm sort of kidding, but not really. They're already blaming text messaging for ruining movie profits.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by splattertrousers · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Whether or not he did something wrong is irrelevent. It's whether or not he did something unprofitable. Some corporations these days seem to believe they have a god-given right to profit

      Companies that are out to make a profit stick around. They get investors. Most companies that aren't out to make a profit disappear rather quickly. Therefore, most companies that exist are out to make a profit. It's not evil. It's pure business.

      Companies will do what they feel they need to do to make profit or to stop losing profit.

      and that censorship and lawsuit chill is an acceptable tool to that end.

      It's both acceptable and successful. They said, "please stop telling people where to buy this DVD that our contract says shouldn't be sold in the US", and the guy in question said, "OK".

      It's not as if they passed a law that trampled this guy's rights. They just asked him to stop and he did. IMHO, he should have said "no", but he's allowed so say "OK" if he wants.

      It's just unfortunate that saying "no" would cost the guy a lot of money and time. Something needs to be done about that, IMHO.

    2. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this "think they have the right to profit" troll over and over modded up and I really have to wonder why? No one thinks that they have the "right to profit". Its not insightful, its just dumb and wrong.

      The rest of your post however was ok tho... but the whole "right to profit" call doesnt wash.

    3. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Until the average freedom-loving American

      What planet are you from? The average American cares only for his own freedom and believes that money is enough to protect his own freedom.

    4. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know, I saw a story about that somewhere and I didn't know if I should laugh or cry. They (the movie studios) were bitching that people shouldn't be allowed to have text messaging tools like cell-phones and whatnot in movie theaters because people were leaving the Hulk and similarly lame movies and TM'ing their friends not to see it. They would leave the studio and immediately let a dozen people know that the movie was a bonafide peice of Hulking (sorry) crap-a-roo.

      The justification for this idiotic "thought" process? Yep, you guessed it! It's cutting into our profits when people TM other people not to go see a movie! Ohhh... boo-frickin-hoo. At what point does the fact that your product is total shit actually kick in around here anymore? I love how these big interests are so conveniently redefining the rules so that they have a right to steal people's money in the name of "profits".

      By the way.. if you're wondering what a crap-a-roo is, it's like a kangaroo, only crappier.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

      It's like a bully telling you to hand over your lunch money or else he'll beat the crap out of you.

      If you give him your lunch money you've lost, but if you say no, then he'll kick the crap out of you AND THEN take your lunch money!

      This is exactly what Miramax is doing - bullying - and there's no way that this guy would be able to survive financially if he would have been sued, hence either way Miramax would have won.

      It's NOT okay for this to happen.

    6. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      The sooner we get rid of that foul language-mangling stench known as text messaging, the better we'll all be.

      "OMG hi2u kthxby 4 evar!!" -- evil must die.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    7. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Interesting
      IMHO, the problem is that defense is too expensive. You ought to be able to hire a lawyer for one hour (e.g. $200) to get your facts straight, and then not have to pay another dollar (unless your case really needs it) until after the judge/jury has given the verdict.

      I haven't been sued yet, so I don't know what all the damned expenses are. But I strongly suspect they're bullshit. I wish someone who has stood up to a bully, would post about what all the costs were. Then we can start attacking the parts of the system that are creating these costs.

      For great justice...

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    8. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not only is the private citizen doing nothing wrong when posting methods that the US consumer can purchase a product, or get the best deal on product, but the firm that thinks they can suppress such information is exhibiting increasingly unsustainable historical behavior.

      US firms pretty much want the opportunity to purchase source material or finished parts anywhere in the world, put those items together into a product anywhere in the world, engineer those products anywhere in the world, support those products anywhere in the world, and then sell those products to US consumers without any tariffs, tolls or taxes. The firms say any government imposed fees will cause unnecessary friction in trade that will only hurt the consumer. OTOH, these same firms want the government to create as much friction as possible for the consumer that attempts to find the best way to spend his or her money.

      This is really just modern imperialism pushed by multinationals. It is no different from the British government forcing the Indian people to pay a tax on a critical produce they could easily purchase themselves. This is really no different from certain countries denying their women independence by denying them an education. This is really no different from the imperialistic method of stealing local resources, manufacturing them in the imperialist country, and then selling them back to the oppressed savages. These are really just laws that limit arbitrage opportunities to a privileged few.

      US firms cannot have it all. Firms cannot claim the right to destroy communities by exporting production to cheaper labor markets, and then deny those communities the opportunity to bypass US firms in their purchasing decision. Firms cannot claim the right to limit the availability of product to the US consumer, the one basic right we still enjoy in the US, just because it will hurt the bottom line.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    9. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      You ought to be able to hire a lawyer for one hour (e.g. $200) to get your facts straight, and then not have to pay another dollar (unless your case really needs it) until after the judge/jury has given the verdict.

      I did this once. The lawyer charged by the 10th of an hour (6 minutes) at $125/hour or something. I met with him in his office for two hours, then called him for another 10 minutes to clarify something.

      I had about 30 pages of stock option contracts I wanted an opinion on. It would have been a fortune to have him read the whole thing, so I pointed out the sections that confused me & he clarified the contract law issues.

      The main legal doctrine I learned about was that when a point in a contract is ambiguous, courts are supposed to favor the interpretation of the party who didn't write the contract.

      I didn't have to put him on retainer, but if things had not turned out my way (the company hadn't bought back my stock when I quit), he would have been available for more questions & either filing suit or referring to someone who could have.

      That referral mechanism is the key-- I called this particular lawyer from a listing (not an ad) in the yellow pages. Some of the lawyers I called never returned my messages. It's an insular club that if you don't have a brother who has a friend who plays raquetball with a lawyer, can be hard to penetrate (unless it's injury claims).

      By the way, I think the rumor that I'd consulted a lawyer helped to make management take the whiners more seriously. In retrospect, I wish we'd buckled down & made the best damn code around, but the "lottery factor" (possibility that you might get a whole lot of something for nearly nothing) clouded our judgement.

    10. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's damn right. The USA preaches free trade, but practices anything but.

      Free trade, according to the USA, appears to mean "you open your markets to our products, while we subsidise our own industries and slap illegal tariffs on your products. And don't bother running crying to the WTO, cos we fucking own it."

    11. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Miramax would have sent the lawyers after him and harassed that link off the site, legal or not. Contrary to your simplistic notion of competition, businesses exist and survive by the grace of the laws protecting them. You might admire when they twist legislation and legislative processes to extract a profit, but that doesn't make it admirable. Nor does it imply it should be tolerated.

      How did we get to this place where the industry with arguably the most trivial and disposable product (to use the term they prefer) command so much legislative clout?

    12. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with companies working to make a profit, but there is plenty wrong with companies using threats and coercion to protect their business models.

      Why is it that many people assume that it's perfectly acceptable for corporations to use any means they can get away with to maximize their profits? That competition should mean that everyone uses increasingly ruthless tactics until nobody with any sense of ethics can compete?

    13. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If you give him your lunch money you've lost, but if you say no, then he'll kick the crap out of you AND THEN take your lunch money!

      You forgot the third option: you give him the lunch money, but then come to school the next day with your daddy's 38 and blow his fuking face off.

    14. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by awebus · · Score: 1

      This article appeared on slashdot, and was largely misunderstood at the time. I'm not surprised that after a few months it is being referred to with even more venom and misinformation.

      The article did comment on technologies like SMS and IM allowing word of mouth reviews to spread between friends quickly. It was never suggested by the industry figure interviewed that the technologies be illegal, or even that the public were doing anything wrong. It was used as part of an explanation for the different trends in box office takings for modern movies. Blockbusters relied very heavily on opening weekend takings and dropped of dramatically if they weren't well liked. Conversely, smaller high quality movies could build up an increased public interest.

      Not meaning any disrespect to the poster, but I really hate seeing this brand of pseudo-propaganda; whether it's a troll or not. It makes me question alot of the things I read here, particularly reagarding the widely disliked parties like RIAA, MPAA, SCO and Microsoft.

    15. Re:Not wrong, maybe... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Here, found the actual quote (from Miramax's Rick Sands, conveniently enough):

      "In the old days, there used to be a term, 'buying your gross'. You could buy your gross for the weekend and overcome bad word of mouth, because it took time to filter out into the general audience."

      Ok - I stand corrected. They weren't saying it should be banned, just being whiny, bitch-ass crybabies because they can't push their crap-ola down peoples' throats as easily as they used to. In fact, now I'm more pissed off because they have a code word for "anally raping the consumer". They call it "buying your gross".

      And dude... honestly... if you take anything on Slashdot without a HUGE grain of salt and without backing it up, you have a serious problem and I have a bridge to sell you.

      I congratulate you for being smart enough NOT to just believe whatever dredge people post (note, however, that posting unsupported dredge is obviously a good way to reap karma).

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  13. The Failure of the Region System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "Region system" for CD's makes no sense, as all it does is hinder sales.

    If I am in Region 1 and want one of the many Region 2 DVD's (that will never come out in Region 1), I have to get a hacked DVD player, or get a pirated/cracked version of the CD.

    Next time you see those "Movies: They're worth it" anti-piracy ads about lost revenues, remember that the movie industry is throwing roadblocks in the way of those who want to legally purchase AND view legitimately-pressed DVD's. If they wanted money, they'd make the DVD's available to those who want to buy them.

    1. Re:The Failure of the Region System by DigitumDei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I live in a region 2 area and I have to say that 2 out of every 3 DVD players here is "region free". That said, I think the regioning helps people like MiraMax think they can easily get away with stopping release of movies in certain regions. All part of the greater scheme of sucking as much profit out of you as possible. :P

    2. Re:The Failure of the Region System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're importing different region discs enough don't bother hacking your dvd player, just get a second dvd-rom drive and configure it to Region 2 or 3. I've got an older computer that acts as Region 2 player. Either that or put down two or three hundred bucks and buy a multi-region player.

    3. Re:The Failure of the Region System by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Of course, for those of us who watch DVDs on our computers, all we really need is a flashable DVD drive and Remote Selector. It's really trivial if you're going to watch DVDs on your computer anyway.

      (Ironically, after specifically making sure I had region-hack capability on my machine, I only have one non-region 1-or-0 DVD so far: Das Leztze Einhorn, or The Last Unicorn, which has only been released in Germany in region 2 so far.)

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  14. Another case of idiots in legal departments by downix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And here is Miramax proclaiming it a grand victory. It is such a victory that they just forced hundreds of formerly potential customers into p2p file sharers. Miramax must love how they're encouraging the illegal file sharing that their other movie studio bretheren have damned as dangerous. Give a hand for Miramax, another promoter of P2P technology.

    A file swapper is not born, he is created when something desired is not availible at the price desired. When that something is not availible at all, that turns all of those that wish it into p2p file junkies.

    Sorry state of affairs, honestly.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:Another case of idiots in legal departments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That thing, in this case, is available for the price of parking in your neighborhood chinatown. As many have mentioned.

      But it's pretty hard to feel sorry for the guy who feels he's entitled to set up a toll booth on a public road (curiously illegal) like Weinstien. Maybe he should take a lufa into the shower and try to wash out some the millions stuck under his roles of fat.

      He's a real world analogue for Jabba the Hut, I don't want to hear about how the people aren't willing submitting to his rule, I don't want to hear him plead poverty, I just want to hear the sound of his silence. Good job passing on Lord Of The Rings too, I don't know if I'll ever be able to express how much I appreciated that.

    2. Re:Another case of idiots in legal departments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A file swapper is not born, he is created when something desired is not availible at the price desired.

      I became I file swapper the day I learned stuff isn't free.

    3. Re:Another case of idiots in legal departments by stuph · · Score: 1

      That thing, in this case, is available for the price of parking in your neighborhood chinatown. As many have mentioned.


      Which is great.. if you have a neighborhood Chinatown. Down here in Florida.. not so much....

      --
      --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    4. Re:Another case of idiots in legal departments by nai · · Score: 1

      I'm a big movie watcher located in France.
      Here we had lately another example of the slow worldwide distribution effect with Disney's Nemo: it was released at the end of November... 6 month after the american release! 3 weeks after the zone 1 DVD release!
      With a french speaking track on the canadian release, I know a lot of people who bought the movie before it hits the theaters... and of course, this was the most downloaded divx on the net!
      When your 8 years old little sister/daughter complains that every kid in her school have already seen it, what can you do?

  15. This is why....PAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "This is why I ordered a copy of this killer movie from Hong Kong the day Miramax said they where going to be doing the US release."

    Dont you need a PAL capable DVD player?

    1. Re:This is why....PAL. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As it turns out, no. The DVD I got is 100% real, multi region NTSC. The original company knew there was a US market for the movie and released several versions of the DVD that work fine in the US and UK.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:This is why....PAL. by inquisitor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hong Kong is NTSC. It is also very cheap, even for legitimate discs (as this site sells). After all, if it's legal there, it's usually legal for you to import it, although not to sell. You might need an all-region player (HK being in region 3), but a lot of legit HK discs - like Shaolin Soccer - are code 0 anyway.

      Over in the UK, all of our our DVD players can play both PAL and NTSC, almost all of the cheap supermarket ones are already or can be made multiregion by remote, and certain high-street hi-fi chains sell modded MR product (I have a MR Pioneer 360 from them). Even our version of Amazon sells modded multiregion kit - the current top spot is a modded Sony DVP-NS330. Multiregion is much more widespread here, and that's a good thing for British consumers (even though most of them don't know about it). I try to let my friends know.

    3. Re:This is why....PAL. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      This is something I've been wondering. Is the PAL/NTSC formatting a function of the DVD-player, or is it a function of the DVD-disk? It seems to me that the video data on the disk would converted by the player to whatever is needed: eg, stick a disk in a North American DVD player and you get NTSC out. Stick it in a European DVD player, and you get PAL, or SECAM. In other words, the disk is generic, and the player determines the signal format.

      Surely they wouldn't put the signal formatting on the disk, would they? That would mean that they would have to press an NTSC version , and a PAL version, and an <insert video format here> version of every disk.

    4. Re:This is why....PAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference is in fps. NTSC has 29.97 (or 23.976) fps, while PAL has 25 fps. If you speed-up/slow-down decoding, you will run into sound issues and you have to resample sound too.

      In short, it is simpler to output NTSC signal for NTSC discs and PAL signal for PAL discs.

    5. Re:This is why....PAL. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Another good Hong Kong importer is Poker Industries. Since they're an importer-reseller, they have to avoid selling titles to which Miramax or other importers like Tai Seng have laid claim...but OTOH, the ship time is much faster than Hong Kong exporters like HiViZone which will ship you anything but will often take a couple of months to do it.

      You can often find discount coupon codes for Poker on DVDPriceSearch.net.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    6. Re:This is why....PAL. by Felius · · Score: 1

      PAL and NTSC are quite different formats. They are different resolutions (PAL has more vertical lines), different framerates (NTSC is slightly faster) and use different colour encodings.

      The video signal type is on the disc - some players are capable of converting between the two, but almost any relatively recent TV (in Australia, at least) can display both formats. My DVD player is set to output whatever is on the disc, and my TV copes fine.

      --
      ..and I'll form the head!!
    7. Re:This is why....PAL. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Seems its a lot easier to get a PAL TV that plays NTSC (or PAL 60 at elast) than it is to get an NTSC TV that plays PAL. Not that I care. I live in PALLand.

      Oddly enough, my player (and my last player) will convert an NTSC disc to 50Hz PAL but will not convert PAL50 to an NTSC signal. This one simply refuses to play the disc, and my last one output it as PAL.

  16. Unbelievable... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

    Well, not totally unbelievable (coughcoughriaa/mpaa/dmcacoughcough). But it's pretty crappy. 1. Offering a link is not illegal, is it? 2. What are they doing to prevent the seller from selling to U.S. customers? Isn't that a more logical target if you want to stop these sales? One of these days I'm going to give up and go live on Mars. Ooh, and what luck! There's a Java Mars clock available!

    1. Re:Unbelievable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CEASE AND DESIST ORDER

      We at Mars, Inc. believe Slashdot readers are confusing your references to "Mars" with our fine candy products. You speak of Mars as a sort of "last resort", tarnishing the image of our delicious snacks. Please remove any references to our name in all your comments.

      Thank you,

      Mars, Inc.
      Legal Dept.

  17. Reasons by panxerox · · Score: 1

    there may be real reasons why they don't want it available in the US market, legal reasons, copyright reasons hell mabee they don't want to be exposed to the US legal system do you know how many ways somebody could be sued these days?

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  18. Changing regions on DVD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone here aware of a utility that actually changes the Region designation on DVD's during copying?

    1. Re:Changing regions on DVD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. vobedit.

      edit the vob file, change the region code.

      Voila... there ya go.

    2. Re:Changing regions on DVD's by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      DVD Decrypter

      http://www.dvddecrypter.com/

      Put your DVD in and it'll create an iso of the disc for you with 1 or 2 clicks while removing regionj coding (IIRC). Free too. Great product (and fully legal in Canada, at least, right now it is).

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  19. What a pain in the ass by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

    I had a hard time finding Hero also. Know what I did? Downloaded it from eDonkey. And if they don't fuck up the release over here (ie: chop it up, dub and/or dubtitle it without making the original vocal available), I will still purchase it. Idiots.

    Sorry, no ed2k link provided. I don't want to get my own C&D. Shouldn't be too hard to find though.

    BTW, I bought a copy of Wasango (sp? Volcano High in English) on eBay for $10. Region free. Wanna bet that's legit?

    1. Re:What a pain in the ass by jasonisgodzilla · · Score: 1

      Go to ebay. I bought hero, musa the warrior, shaolin soccer, and volcano high for 7 bucks a piece there. All of them work great and if they are pirated copies, they are labelled pretty well.

  20. Exclusive rights to movies? by yar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It appears that Miramax is stating that their exclusive rights to movie distribution include the purchase of IMPORTS. Since when is it illegal to import a legal copy of a video from another country? There are import CD and movies available at video and music stores all the time.

    1. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      It appears that Miramax is on crack, and is assigning itself far too much power. If someone sells me a used copy, and they're from another country, Miramax can do nothing. If a foreign website is offering videos for sale, and I choose to buy some, Miramax can do nothing. (Okay, sure, they can try to close the website, but let's face it... they do not and should not have absolute control over every video/DVD that bears their coporate logo.)

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since when is it illegal to import a legal copy of a video from another country?

      Since always, actually. It's quite annoying.

      Remember how anal-retentive the folks who make "Beanie Babies" were a few years back? They were exercising their import-control rights so strongly that people buying legal, licensed beanies from abroad were having them seized at customs.

      Essentially, if someone owns the copyright for a product in this country, they can restrict the importation of any copies of that product from abroad, even if that product was purchased legally (and for which they already received payment).

      So, technically, I shouldn't be allowed to buy a copy of West Wing in the UK, even though WB gets a cut of the sale from their UK arm. (of course, now that they finally released it in the US, it doesn't matter).

      This has been the case for years, but it's rarely strongly enforced. Personally, I'd love to see something like this go before the courts -- I can see (but don't agree with) companies having an interest in (and rights to) regulate the wholesale importation of goods, but for individual purchases, they should go away.

      As for this particular story (which I haven't read yet), if the movies in question were available for legal sale elsewhere, there shouldn't be anything wrong with having a link on the site, even on a US-hosted site for US-based audiences, just because the web's a global medium and they could argue the link was a service for overseas readers.

    3. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by ScooterBill · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe that Miramax's rights pertain to whatever contracts they have with their distributors. I would assume that these contracts limit or ban the sale of these movies into the U.S.

      The remedy for Miramax would be to terminate business with the foreign company.

      If I'm wrong and Miramax can arbitrarily control U.S. imports, then we're all in much more trouble than you realize.

    4. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by infolib · · Score: 1

      Since when is it illegal to import a legal copy of a video from another country?

      In Denmark, since december 2002. An EU directive forced through that giving or selling copyrighted works imported into the EU is illegal without the consent of the "rights holder". Several small countries including Denmark had voted against it - the danish minister claimed that it had been forced through by english publishers. Several other EU countries have implemented the directive as well. (They should have done it by Dec 2002)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    5. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by FunkyChild · · Score: 2

      Essentially, if someone owns the copyright for a product in this country, they can restrict the importation of any copies of that product from abroad, even if that product was purchased legally (and for which they already received payment).

      Except for the fact that Miramax would not own the copyright, they would have licensed distribution rights. There is a world of difference, and although I don't live in the US, I can't see why buying the DVD from overseas would be illegal at all.

    6. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that Miramax would not own the copyright, they would have licensed distribution rights.

      In this case, they amount to the same thing.

      I can't see why buying the DVD from overseas would be illegal at all.

      That's because you're thinking like a consumer, and I heartily agree with you. It shouldn't be illegal. However, local copyright owners (or licensees) disagree, because for them it's not about whether or not the original copyright holder gets paid, it's about whether or not they make a profit at the end of the quarter. So it's in their best interests to deny imports of material over which they hold exclusive rights.

      Is it legal? Yes (as far as I know). Is it right? Hell no. Can we fight it? Probably not, at least not until it starts to affect stuff people care about, and by the time it reaches that stage, there will be enough local (US) market that the US distributors will have released it already, rendering the point moot.

      I think the biggest mainstream example of this in recent memory was the aforementioned Beanie Babie Import Fiasco. And if elderly ladies getting detained at the airport and having their half-dozen legally purchased beanie babies confiscated didn't create enough of an uproar to get congress to change these ridiculous laws, then I'm not sure what will.

    7. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to call you a liar but I am going to need a link for your assertion. Maybe you are just mistaken but you seem pretty sure of your self.

    8. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      The relevant laws are 17 USC 106 (the right to distribute), 109 (first sale), and 602 (importation).

      The relevant case is Quality King v. Lanza Research, 523 US 135 (1998).

      "[The prohibition] encompasses copies that are not subject to the first sale doctrine-e.g., copies that are lawfully made under the law of another country...."

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    9. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Since always, actually. It's quite annoying."

      Not since always. Entertainment industries won this legislation relatively recently, at th end of the vinyl era if I recall. When they did the supply of import vinyl dried up or doubled in price. Free-market competition my ass.

    10. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by Dahan · · Score: 1
      Uh, seems to me that Quality King v. L'anza Research says that importation is allowed.

      A district court ruled in favor of L'anza, saying that the importation violated L'anza's exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute:

      L'anza filed suit, alleging that petitioner's actions violated L'anza's exclusive rights under the Copyright Act of 1976 (Act), 17 U.S.C. 106 501, and 602, to reproduce and distribute the copyrighted material in the United States. The District Court rejected petitioner's "first sale" defense under 109(a) and entered summary judgment for L'anza.
      However, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed that decision. "In sum, we are not persuaded by either L'anza's or the Solicitor General's textual arguments."
    11. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      Your google-fu is much stronger than mine.

      Either that or you're already better versed in this than I. Either way, thanks for the cite. :)

      However, I think I'm confused. It appears that this supreme court decision reverses my prior understanding -- that is, it seems like they upheld "First Sale" even for items sold overseas, and so allowed people to purchase cheaper goods elsewhere and re-sell them in the US, even at odds to local "exclusive distribution rights" owners.

      Or is my legal-fu as bad as my google-fu?

    12. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that was importation of products that had been made in the US by the US rightsholder, exported abroad, then reimported back into the US again.

      It wasn't a win for importation generally.

      IIRC there's a concurrence that makes this a little more clear.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    13. Re:Exclusive rights to movies? by Dahan · · Score: 1
      IIRC there's a concurrence that makes this a little more clear.

      Ah, good point... Justice Ginsburg's concurrence:

      This case involves a "round trip" journey, travel of the copies in question from the United States to places abroad, then back again. I join the Court's opinion recognizing that we do not today resolve cases in which the allegedly infringing imports were manufactured abroad.
      The opinion refers to K mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 486 U.S. 281 (1988), which might be more relevant to this situation, but I haven't had a chance to read it yet.
  21. Lager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    a lager group? hooray!

    1. Re:Lager? by paazin · · Score: 1

      I prefer a good stout, myself.

    2. Re:Lager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody should take a poll

    3. Re:Lager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody should take a poll

      Cowboyneal!

  22. Obligatory Family Guy quote by zonix · · Score: 1
    Fearing Miramax (and thus Disney) and their army of lawyers, [...]

    Remember the Michael Eisner (CEO, Disney) sketch on Family Guy?

    Eisner: (cheerful) "See you at Disneyland!"
    [gets into his car]
    Eisner: (angry) "Bring money!"
    [speeds off]
    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Obligatory Family Guy quote by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      Family Guy is DA MAN!!

  23. is it miramax or Eisner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems like mirster I'm a f-ing idiot Eisner is up to his idiot behavior again. Since disney has totally forgotten how to make movies, they decide to butcher Hong Kong films in the hopes of making a buck. Miramax used to make good films, but lately they haven't done much. Atleast everything disney tries to change ends up being dog crap. it's only when disney takes their hands off, that movies come out decent and make a profit.

  24. WTF... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever happened to the concept of a free market economy? Shouldn't people be able to purchase this film, and tell others where to do the same, without fear of being sued for it? What law(s) would this even violate?

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:WTF... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to the concept of a free market economy?

      Silly consumer, the global "free" market is only for companies looking to get cheap labor elsewhere! Mere humans are not permitted to participate in this so called "global economy".

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  25. But he wasn't even advertising the film Hero! by iainl · · Score: 1

    These links are to buy films from Hong Kong that happen to merely share a similiar title (give or take translation) and much of the same footage. Since Miramax will not be releasing the film you can buy in the rest of the world to US cinemas, but rather a total re-edit, why should they care?

    Far more damaging than simply getting things late is Miramax's technique of utterly mangling these films beyond all recognition. I wouldn't mind half as much about the wait if I knew I was going to get the actual film at the end of it, rather than some hack job. What is next? Getting in trouble for pointing out where to buy Total Recall, as some people might buy it rather than go see Paycheck?

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:But he wasn't even advertising the film Hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting in trouble for pointing out where to buy Total Recall, as some people might buy it rather than go see Paycheck?

      What?!? You act as if they are the same movie. Paycheck is about a guy who has his memories altered and has to figure out what happened before some maniac takes over the world. Total Recall is about a guy who has his memories altered and has to figure out what happened before some maniac takes over the world...ON MARS!!! Big difference there...

  26. But doesn't it hurt profits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "MiraMax think they can easily get away with stopping release of movies in certain regions. All part of the greater scheme of sucking as much"

    But doesn't it hurt sales and profits to say "We never will make it available for your country" ?

  27. A US Movie Company C & Ds a US based movie com by matchlight · · Score: 2, Informative

    A whois of kungfucinema.com shows it's registered to a person in Seattle Washington. I think that's how they can bully the guy. I'm sure if there was a HK based movie selling site, there wouldn't be much that Miramax could do, unless they also owned the HK rights to the movie as well.

    This is a classic example where even when a big corp. is wrong, making them do the right thing would cost too much time and money with almost no return.

  28. In other words ar alla poliser haschare by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    "No, sorry, officer, I can't point you to the nearest drug dealer because we have a free-speech-limiting law in place that prohibits me to do so. You and you're fellow police officers will have to look elsewhere for your dope. Have a nice day."

  29. Jerks by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

    I just don't get it.
    Can't they work in a positive manner?
    Ask the guy to link to thier site for the movie.
    Give him a small clip or something to post.
    Free publicity.

    1. Re:Jerks by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Publicity and stuff usually goes to press..
      He's "just" a review site, it seems.
      Anyway, I should link to stuff like that. I'm in canada. (cough cough)

      That's a nice 5-10-12-10-5, btw.
      Kudos.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  30. Hero : Miramax version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Hero!
    with DMX (Voice) & Ice Cube (Voice) ..and a slamming soundtrack.

    now all we need is to get ILM to add some cars to it..

    1. Re:Hero : Miramax version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What movie was that? I remember seeing Jet Li with a very deep voice and heavy background rap music. It was totally out of character. It was shocking to hear that voice coming from Jet. It was a terrible dub.

  31. Wordage of C & D by kensai · · Score: 1

    Was this a threating or a non-threating C & D letter? If it was a non-threating one, then maybe Miramax is in negotations to buy the movie and this information may have undercut their offer.

  32. You should lose your exclusive distribution rights by mocm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you delay distribution for more than 1 year. Some companies seem to buy up exclusive distribution rights for asian movies just to prevent them from competing with their own products. Like Disney did with Studio Gibli and Miramax with Hero, Shaolin Soccer or others. (Just try to get a DVD of Drunken Master 2).
    These tactics are in total contrast to the purpose of granting distribution or copyrights. Which should promote the arts and encourage artists to publish their work.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
  33. Don't Buy Our Products! by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

    By removing these links, he's making it more difficult for people to purchase these films, thereby allowing us to protect our interest in these properties. -- Matthew Hiltzik

    Uhhh... what? Sooooo... it's in my best interest to... uh... NOT let people buy my products? Umm... I think I must've missed that econ class.

    Direct translation from bullshit PR spin-ese:

    By removing these links, he's making it easier for our people to rape consumers when it comes to purchasing our films, thereby allowing us to extort as much money as possible from innocent buyers by locking away legally purchased media. We do all of this under the guise of "protecting our rights" because we, big shitheaded corporate assholes, think that the only right consumers have is the right to give us money.

    Bye bye Miramax! I hardly ever go to see movies or buy DVDs now because 1) movies in theatres are way too expensive and 2) I hate fucking around with CSS protectionist bullshit. I'm happy to report that in the rare event that I do plan to buy / go to a movie, I will make sure ahead of time it's not got anything to do with Miramax (and yes, I keep a list of these things).

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  34. Oh... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, am I breaking the law by linking to places where you can buy this DVD??

    Please C&D this post.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  35. Of course he did something wrong! by palad1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    He did the movie a disservice by writing something about it.

    All we need to know about Shaolin Soccer and Hero can be accessed using AOL keywords SHAOLIN SOCCER and HERO.

    Move along citizen, the computer is your friend.

    1. Re:Of course he did something wrong! by stuph · · Score: 1

      WTF is an AOL keyword!?!? I'm confused now...

      --
      --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    2. Re:Of course he did something wrong! by palad1 · · Score: 1

      Darn Compuserve users, straying from the one true path!

    3. Re:Of course he did something wrong! by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      When you are consuming that cotton candy masquerading as content, try to remember that Revolution is not an AOL Keyword.

      Whatever happened to the word "citizen"? Everywhere I look today, I see only consumers. Even my local--state run--driver's license office refers to me as a consumer, and hopes I enjoy their product. It's sickening, and scary.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    4. Re:Of course he did something wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compuserve? Bah! Prodigy till hell freezes over!

  36. Just another example by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    When are people finally going to realize that situations like this, caused by strong copyright law are an inhibitor to the free market and not something that helps it. In this situation, even the copyright crazy who believe it's an artist's god given right to control the dispersion of their ideas should be able to see the problem with it. The "artists" (film-makers, actors etc.) released this movie abroad and are getting paid for it, these people were simply importing it.

  37. that's funny by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    a quick search on ebay reveals: link! so will they attack ebay? or what about: link again! It seems pretty obvious it's a pointless endeavour. There are tons of sites out there where you can get original, uncut hong kong, chinese, japanese etc movies. The funny thing is, I prefer getting the movies when they come out on dvd, not waiting 2 or 3 YEARS to see them when some distributor in the US picks them up and decides to sell them. So, does google.com have to remove all instances of HERO from their system? I think not. Just because Miramax got the rights to the film, does not mean they can stop someone from distributing a version that was previously released. If they cared that much, they should have funded the production as far as I'm concerned.

    1. Re:that's funny by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Just because Miramax got the rights to the film

      No...Miramax has the North American distribution rights. They don't own the film, and they can't sell it anywhere else other then North America. Or at least that's as far as I can tell. The only thing Miramax is protecting is the profits from when they decide to release their hacked-up version. And you can't do that when the real fans are finding better versions of it elsewhere...

  38. No by IshanCaspian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The trick is, if we allow consumers to decide what they want for themselves, they will find and come to expect GOOD movies, which are much more difficult to make than "Gili". It's easier to ensure that you have a good return on your investment in a movie when you can totally control what it's competing with. Additionally, it's easier to milk each region for what it's worth, rather than having one price.

    In short, they don't care about hypothetical sales for "hero." They want kung fu fans to shut up, get out there, and start paying up for whatever they have decided is the kung fu movie for december 2003 is. Stop telling them what you want. The movie / music industries will tell you what you want, and when you can have it.

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
  39. Just go to Chinatown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought the Chinese edition DVD for 12 bucks in Chinatown the other day...

    Pretty good movie.

  40. Similar to Anime Fansubs by starbuck8968 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This reminds me of anime fansubs you can get from newsgroups or bit torrent. While the anime isn't licensed in the US all is good and download all you want. But as soon as its licensed, the links go down (for torrent at least) and you're out of luck if you didn't get all the episodes.

    1. Re:Similar to Anime Fansubs by MooCows · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, not really
      The most important point here is that anime fansubs are technically illegal
      (you're downloading something somebody worked hard for for free, some lawyer proved this is illegal, although I can see the point)

      While if you buy a DVD from another region, you're actually spending money that goes to the producers.
      In this case you have actually bought a product

      Why should this be illegal just because you live somewhere else? It's ridiculous!
      If you aren't satisfied with the products offered in your country/region you should be allowed to purchase it somewhere else.

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
  41. just so you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie Hero isn't from HK its from the mainland.

  42. OMG by redcaboodle · · Score: 1

    needed sometime to remember. I saw that movie at least 3 times earlier this year.
    Complety forgot about it. If I ever see the DVD in a shop I will probably not even remember it.
    Way to go - thats how you gain customers. Make the movies available so late that everyone has forgotten about it. I suppose it works with LOTR, but Hero was not that good... and I dont read the book a couple of times a year.

    --
    -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
  43. What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought if there is any place on earth where they've got all the movies ASAP, then that must be america.

    Here in Europe both movies are already out of the cinemas and available on DVD in every fucking store.

    Hero is great. I have seen that movie twice. Once in a THX enabled cinema with all the BOOOM stuff and once in a little program cinema with subtitles :).

    Shaolin Soccer is furious! Probably the most insane movie about soccer ever made.

  44. Globalism rant by swb · · Score: 1

    By now it should be clear that globalism and multinationalism is something for the benefit of corporations -- cheaper labor, differential market pricing. It's not for consumer benefit at all.

    1. Re:Globalism rant by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      You nailled it! Capital can travel freely, and large corporations can be immune from governmental authority, while labor is locked into specific geograpgic locations, and consumers are ruled by governmental authority acting on belaf of those same corporations.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  45. Shaolin Soccer by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Informative
    Shaolin Soccer was playing ever-so-briefly my local cinema here in the US, so I dont know what they mean by "not released". After seeing the beyond-bad previews, there was no need to see the film.

    On a side note, there is a "Shaolin Martial Arts Studio" that I often pass by, and I can't help but think of that movie and laugh (and picture kids kicking flaming soccer balls) whenever I see that sign.

    1. Re:Shaolin Soccer by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

      I saw Shaolin Soccer (a dub of the hong-kong flick), its freakin' funny.

      Its a parody of martial arts movies, there is no way an american corporation can do it justice, they can only butcher it.

      However I do support cutting out the part where they sing in a restaurant...that was lame, and might have made sense to chineese viewers, but was mostly weird for me.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Shaolin Soccer by malducin · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not released because Miramax, which own distribution rights in the US hasn't officially released. What you probably saw was a theatre getting/importing a reel and showing it, or maybe as part of a film festival.

  46. Re:A US Movie Company C & Ds a US based movie by Syberghost · · Score: 1

    Amazon's got it, from a guy in New York. Interesting that Miramax doesn't tackle them.

  47. Appeasement is wrong too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now let me get this straight: he's afraid of their lawyers, so he backs down? Just once, I'd like to see someone who doesn't collapse like a spineless coward at a letter (gasp!) from a lawyer (gasp!). It doesn't matter how much money and how many lawyers they have if they simly have no case.

    It's unlikely that they would really sue; they're *counting* on the fact that spineless cowards like this guy will give in without a fight. If he actually called their bluff, they'd probably do nothing. And if they did, he could (and should) countersue for millions! If people who are threatened starting countersuing in greater numbers, you can bet the big corporations would start thinking twice about making such threats.

  48. Another reason the MPAA may be a dinosaur? by abb3w · · Score: 1

    The world has gotten a lot smaller since Nelly Bly's 1889-90 trip around the world. Goods and services travel around the globe readily; some are now all but universal. Various organizations act to strengthen "free trade" between countries. But the DVD region codes are a method for not only protecting copyright, but limiting who you can sell your initial copy to, unless they have a region-free DVD player.

    With the routine shipping of items around the globe (I've ordered obscure computer hardware from Australian PC dealers a couple times), this attempt to control the release of movies at different times in different countries seems doomed in a not overlong timeframe.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:Another reason the MPAA may be a dinosaur? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Hold on there, citizen! The benefits of free trade are not for you!

      If the WTO was actually interested in promoting free trade rather than exploitation of labor, you would be able to bring suit against Miramax (and Harmony Gold, for you Macross fans out there) for restraining free trade of perfectly legitimate goods.

      But it's not. So you can't. Sucks to be an Earthling.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  49. stupid by kraut · · Score: 1

    "he's making it more difficult for people to purchase these films, thereby allowing us to protect our interest in these properties"

    Surely the distributor of a movie should make it EASIER for people to BUY it? I hope the original owner of the movie has some words with them....

    --
    no taxation without representation!
  50. Free trade, my ass, Disney's face by Demona · · Score: 2
    I already knew Disney and Hollywood were protectionist thugs who, like all thugs, believe in one set of rules for them and another for the proles. But I didn't realize it's gotten even worse since the last time I ranted about this same subject.

    Fuck the Mouse that Whined. Nobody has the right to interfere with free trade of lawfully obtained property between consenting adults.

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
  51. I got to see both of those movies a long time ago! by dido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Man, this is absolutely incredible. There was a theatrical release for both movies (which both TOTALLY ROCK!... I can only hope that Miramax & Co. don't butcher them!) here in my country a long time ago! Hero was released here late last year, and Shaolin Soccer not long after if I recall correctly. Now, Shaolin Soccer, and maybe even Hero, have actually even been popping up on the Chinese cable channels (with English subtitles, thank goodness) occasionally. Does a whole lot of good for them to be closing the barn door after the horse has already run around more than half the world for about a year ongoing, don't ya think?

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  52. Mirimax - Disney Conspiracy by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Miramax buys up the rights to major martial arts movies, then butchers them for their release to the US. Disney buys up great animated movies from Japan (Princess Mononoke/ Spirited Away),dubs them in "American", then releases the movie to only a a handful of theaters, with a very limited marketing budget to 'prove' that there's no real market for the movies in the US (and to cutdown on the competition with their inhouse animated products.) If people can buy the original version of their 'products' overseas, shouldn't that a benefit of Globalization? Someone needs to challenge the Mouse in court and take them down a peg or two. I think a countersuit for attempting to violate the site owner's Free Speech Rights is in order.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  53. I've seen Hero by Goner · · Score: 1

    That movie is so good. Probably the best Chinese cinema since Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and in some ways better. Totally amazing that it was the director's first action movie. He also directed 'happy times' which was a story set in the modern day urban China which is similar only in its bright colors. Basically Hero is worth buying on the black market, but I can't wait to see it on the big screen. It sends chills down my spine just thinking about it. I wonder if they'll keep the one line translated as "How swift thy sword." Great last words.

    1. Re:I've seen Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, Crouching Tiger sucks. No offense, but its really an awful movie.

  54. Miramax's "rights" by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Please be aware that Miramax Film Corp. is the exclusive licensee of the right to distribute Hero on all home video formats, as well as through other forms of exploitation in, among other territories, the United States and Canada. Your actions in this regard are completely unauthorized and violate valuable rights held by Miramax."
    What Miramax is talking about here, is purely a private deal between Miramax and the makers of the film. It is not in any way related to copyright law or the social contract to which all citizens are bound. You are not a party to this contract and not in the slightest bit bound by it.

    It is 100% legal for a US Citizen to purchase the film from an importer (or by importing it themselves) without going through Miramax. If Miramax doesn't like the fact that they don't really have exclusive control of the market, then they should sue the makers of the film for selling copies in the far east without somehow guaranteeing that none of those copies will get to America. This is ridiculously impossible to do, of course, but that's the just the nature of how impractical an exclusive distribution contract is. There's no such thing as geographical exclusive control anymore; this is a global economy.

    Miramax's argument is deception, and the person to whom they wrote the C&D, was not violating their rights.

    It's disappointing that this dude caved in. I can understand it; I might cave into bullies too, instead of paying a lot of money for defense. But there's no way he would have lost, had it gone to court.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Miramax's "rights" by FunkyChild · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This case has nothing to do with copyright, and everything to do with bullying. It's a shame the guy just bent over and believed them, rather than finding out that clearly they had no legal right to force him to do anything like that.

  55. Simple answer. by Koatdus · · Score: 1

    Don't buy anything from Disney.

    I don't.

    Ever!

    At one time Disney may have been about making good, fun, wholesome movies but these days they are just about greed.

    They don't even make very good movies anymore. They all pretty much have the same lame plot.

    1) Young "person" disobeys parents/teacher/tribe/king because adults are stupid.
    2) He or she has big adventure.
    3) At the place where they should start suffering the consequences, someone bails them out.
    4) They return home as a hero.
    5) They were right, adults really are stupid because it all turned out ok in the end. (Notice that no mention is ever made, or even thanks offered, that those "stupid adults" may have risked everything including life, limb, and eternal suffering to accomplish number three.)

    --
    Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    1. Re:Simple answer. by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      But those Pixar movies are so *cute*! Maybe Jobs will take Pixar out on its own and leave the shadow of the Mouse.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    2. Re:Simple answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if anyone doenst believe this about disney...

      just go watch "haunted mansion"

      Oh crap that was bad. horrible bad.
      If this is the quality we are going to see from disney then they need to close their doors.

    3. Re:Simple answer. by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean McDonald's Haunted Mansion?

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
  56. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by Kevitt · · Score: 1

    There's a Drunken Master 2??

    I didn't know... but now I'm gonna see it one way or another!

  57. Compliance Matters? Only in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Interesting. On reading this I Headed to hkflix.com where I usually get my asian dvds from as I had wanted a copy of Shaolin Soccer. I found the following text on the page.

    URGENT NOTE: According to Disney*, who claims exclusive North American distribution rights to this film, it is a violation of United States law for any North America-based company to sell this title. Any such competitors of ours selling this title are doing so in violation of U.S. law. We are as unhappy about this as you, and we thank you in advance for your continued support of HKFlix.com. If you'd like to express your opinions about this issue to Disney, we strongly encourage you to visit THIS WEB SITE and sign the online petition they've prepared. We also encourage you to call Disney at 1-800-72-DISNEY, and email them at disneyinfo@disneyhelp.com to politely voice your concerns. Let them know you'd like to see these important Asian films released in their original language, in their original widescreen format, with their original title, with their original soundtrack, and uncut. * We loosely use the term "Disney" to refer to the entire Buena Vista family of studios, including Miramax, Dimension, Disney, Touchstone, etc.

    I think the important text is the North-American based part. Everyone else can sell this legally.

    P.S I dont believe in online petitions so im not replicating the links here but they are on the original page.

  58. mirmax funded production of hero by Datasage · · Score: 1

    Mirmax funded the production of hero, instead of later purchasing the rights. So i would assume that the are already made some money on it. Unless their contract only allows them to make money off the US release.

    I for one already got my copy of both Hero and Shoalin Soccer. Both of them are avaialable at sensasian.com.

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
  59. He should do what google does by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    and post the text of the C&D, which contains the link.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  60. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by kagejishin · · Score: 1

    Actually, it shouldn't be hard at all to buy a copy of Drunken Master 2. It was released here in the US as "The Legend of Drunken Master." Good luck finding a copy of Drunken Master 1...though to be honest, DM2/LoDM is a better flick.

  61. Instant review of "Hero"... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which I saw last night, since I still live in the Free World (aka Oceania).

    The movie is a telling of an old Chinese story. If you ever read Chinese mythology, you will know that they are mixed from generous helpings of love, drama, treason, duty, battle, beauty and tragedy, set in landscapes of stunning mountains and gorges, and generally featuring the epic plotlines Tolkien was inspired by when he wrote LoTR and the Hobbit.

    Hero is no different. The movie is visually stunning, a tapestry of color and force. It paints an overlapping series of stories, and the five main characters get more and more complex as the film progresses through intense red, blue, white, and green.

    The Kung Fu scenes are dreamlike and truly beautiful. Only the slightest sense of repetition spoils a few of the scenes, but it is easily compensated for by the sensuality of the filming. Yes, it is ridiculous to see people running on water or across tree tops, but this is the story of a person recounting his version o a myth. Some poetry is in order, and Hero delivers.

    The ending - which I won't divulge - is downbeat and not what I would have proposed, but this is true to the style of ancient Chinese stories, which do not - like many Western myths - celebrate the survival of the individual in the face of adversity. Rather, they tell stories of how intense personal tragedy and suffering can be placed into a greater context. A few dramatic deaths serve to highlight the lesson.

    Don't go to Hero expecting to see amazing fight scenes. It's a movie to relax with, a film to see twice, one to take your girlfriend to and to hold her when the lovers die, in true Romeo and Juliet fashion, alone on a mountain top.

    What I liked most about this film - apart from the visuals, the sound, the scenery, and the subtle plot - was its ability to portray all the characters as sympathetic, from the tyranical king, alone in his citadel of a palace, to the assassins and killers, each shown at the end to be Heroes. There are no villains in this film.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Instant review of "Hero"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ending - which I won't divulge... ...the lovers die, in true Romeo and Juliet fashion, alone on a mountain top.

      Whoops.

    2. Re:Instant review of "Hero"... by lehyeong · · Score: 1

      "Hero" moved me-- to tears. Funded by the Bejing government, it is a 2 1/2 hour long apology for totalitarianism. But what would you expect from a director who was once one of the bravest social critics in Chinese cinema, but has since sold out for a position in the Cultural Ministry. (Zhang Yimou)?

      Donnie Yen, Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung are tragically wasted, while Jet Li captures all the emotion of a wooden dummy which comes as a surprise to no one.

      The uninspired fight scenes are far too formalized and drag on interminably, with none of the visceral impact of "Fist of Legend", "Fong Sai Yuk" or even "Crouching Tiger".

      Sure it looks pretty, but "Hero" doesn't have many brains and not a hint of soul.

      Hong Kong kung fu films were once dominated with stories of rebels (Fong Sai Yuk, Wong Fei Hung) sticking up for the little guy against opressive governments, but the message in "Hero" is that as long as you've got the best intentions it's OK to crush dissent. What a shame.

    3. Re:Instant review of "Hero"... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      But this is the beauty ofthe movie. It sets up the audience to sympathize with the main characters, and then eliminates them all, one by one, in the name of the "greater good".

      It is too well done to be without intentional irony. The imperial palace is huge, dark, forbidding, the imperial troops are faceless and without character, and we feel nothing for them at all. Only the King tries to justify his motives and he is like a lonely Macbeth in his castle, his statements are so insincere that although he is speaking the "party line", it's obvious he does not believe it for a second. He is a bloodthirsty tyrant, through and through, and all the talk about "greater good" is just a facade, a way to buy time before he brings down his fist.

      That the movie manages to convey all this ambiguity, and do it while being funded by Beijing, is quite an achievement. Without the little voiceover at the end ("and the great kind unified China, built the wall, and kept the northern hordes out"), we'd be left with a very dark movie indeed.

      It is a far more potent message than any simplistic story of rebellion.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
  62. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's brilliant. You should write that up at halfbakery.com.

  63. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by jtnishi · · Score: 1
    1 Year seems a hair arbitrary, though. In all honesty, I have compassion for some companies who can't get a product out within a year. Anime companies are typically known for taking the better part of 9 months to get releases out, because it does take time.

    However, it probably would make sense to be putting "distribute by" clauses inside the contract. Maybe not 12 months, but maybe by 18 months, or almost certainly 24 months. If the companies start taking longer than that, then I think the offering company should have the right to revoke w/o penalty and choose a different distributor, if they wish.

    In any case, it's obviously a contract issue, and not anything that should be legislated like that.

  64. i have hero sitting on my hard drive by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    from two video cds brought to my place from a female friend from chongqing

    i like hero, it's pretty good, very visual, great subtle cgi... sort of like crouching tiger hidden dragon on steroids... it concerns an ancient emperor of china who united the empire, and the assassins in his care/ against him

    there is this one scene where the two female lead characters are fighting in a forest full of yellow leaves... one uses the sun and the leaves to swirl and block the other's pov, causing her to impale herself on her sword... when she dies, all of the yellow leaves turn red... awesome!

    and the guys fighting across the surface of the lake without causing a ripple? tre cool

    you are so screwed, old guard of the traditional distribution channels

    the internet is going to eat your lunch

    sucks some of us have to get caught up in their death throes

    you should have learned when fox news tried to sue al franken for using the term "fair and balanced" on his book cover: sales of his book skyrocketed

    you should have learned when giuliani tried to outlaw that dung-covered madonna portrait: interest skyrocketed

    so go ahead and fight: first rule of public relations: there is no such things as bad exposure... all exposure of a sublject matter is good

    you are so screwed stupid lawyers

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  65. Seriously, why did Miramax risk the bad publicity by jtnishi · · Score: 1
    They must've known that doing something like that would eventually get them reported somewhere. Granted, slashdot readers do not constitute the public en masse, but sometimes with smaller films (especially sometimes with films like Shaolin Soccer, which isn't likely to become any sort of Hollywood-class blockbuster in the theatres), the best publicity one can get is with word-of-mouth. But word-of-mouth has to start somewhere, and the best place tends to be the fans of the movie in the first place.

    So in essence, they've now ticked off some of the fans by looking like they want to control the exclusive rights to distribution of the movie in their region, going so far as to stop imports. To a certain extent, region coding was supposed to enforce that. Obviously, however, Miramax took it into their own hands to go a step further. They aren't the first to do so, actually (I had an auction cancelled on eBay for an import DVD that I was bidding on because a company was going to release the DVD domestically - I'll spare the company by not naming them or the title here). But seriously, anime companies don't try to stop imports from Japan of their titles, and would be foolish to do so. They know better. Miramax apparently doesn't, and it might just come back to haunt them, though in all likelihood, it'll mean little.

  66. The True Case Against Copyright by LuYu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a good example of the censorship that copyright produces. Copyright was created to increase the amount of information available to everyone. Instead, it is being used to keep people from accessing information that they would legitimately pay for.

    The movies studios want to coerce fans into seeing the movie when and where the studios choose. Rather than allowing true fans to appreciate these movies when and where the fans, the customers, might want, they block their distribution. The movie studios do this whether or not the expect to release this movie in a given market. In the end, this leaves a minority of fans who have the interest and the financial means to see a movie locked out of it.

    Whether or not the copyright holders of these movies believe they can make money in a given market, they will refuse to let people watch it. If they cannot make money, there is no incentive. If the information is not distributed, the incentive is not working for society and should not be granted to the rights holders. Either way, the movie studios are blatantly misusing their legal rights. Their legal rights exist to give enough incentive to get information to be disseminated, not to stand as a barrier to the dissemination of that information.

    An individual should be able to purchase any movie from any market that person might desire to purchase from. Just because the majority of people in one area like some given thing does not mean everybody has to. Even if the movie is released in the US market, and most Asian movies are not, it still forces the US version on people, which in many cases has parts cut out of it and may be dubbed. An individual may want to watch the movie with subtitles or in its original language or in its original state.

    The practice of restricting people by region is racist. Regionalizing is saying that because you live in such and such a country, you will pay such and such a price or watch movies in such and such a language. Because you live in such and such a country, you will know such information. What is the difference between this and bathrooms marked Colored and White? I guess Jack Valenti is more of a good-'ol-boy than we thought.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:The True Case Against Copyright by Kpau · · Score: 1

      The problem a lot of you are missing is that until Mirimax *purchased* distribution rights to Shaolin Soccer, it was perfectly legal to buy it. My son bought a copy last summer. Morally speaking, I see Miramax's behavior as no different than Mafia-style manipulation of supply and demand. It strikes me as hypocritical that we're screaming for free world trade yet we allow our entertainment industry to continue their region-restricting ways. Write your congress-critters and complain about the double-standard.

    2. Re:The True Case Against Copyright by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Bravo!

      At last, someone who understands how the copyright laws work to keep people divided.

      I like to see films from all over the world, but unless they are in English, French or German, I need subtitles - not some inferior dubbed and cut version hacked about by a bunch of incompetents in a cheap sound studio in the US (or in Britain, for that matter).

      Films should be kept intact, as the director intended them to be released, and for some fat suit to think they have the right to restrict the purchase of the genuine product so that they can force their butchered version on us is deeply insulting.

      Thanks for making the point so concisely.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  67. Great movies by magic · · Score: 1
    ... despite the movie company going way beyond their bounds on this one, I'd like to mention that these are both great films.


    Shaolin Soccer is hysterical (in a Hong-Kong is insane kind of way). It's about a bunch of losers who use magic powers to win local soccer matches. They also break into song and dance periodically for reasons unknown, despite the fact that it isn't a musical.


    If you liked Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, you'll love Hero. It is sad and beautiful, with amazing battle scenes. In fact, the entire movie consists solely of amazing battle scenes, which serve to carry the interestingly twisted plot.


    -m

    1. Re:Great movies by omega9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm.. I just screened my copy of Shaolin Soccer for a bunch of friends at a party this weekend. It must have played at least 4 times in a row. I invite you to ask anyone that was there exactly how many times they "break into song and dance periodically for reasons unknown". One of the lead characters sings a brief serenade, which would only classify this movie as "musical-like" as much as any other movie that has anyone singing for longer then 3 seconds. Also, it's not "about a bunch of losers who use magic powers to win local soccer matches". It's a group of brothers who studied kung-fu as children and now live in modern society, one brother having the dream of finding an effective way to teach other the wonders of kung-fu. Did you pay attention when you watched this movie? You sound like a highschool jock describing opera.

      Hero is perhaps visually similar to Crouching Tiger becuase they share the same producer, Bill Kong. Tony Ching Siu Tung even directed the action, the same action director from Shaolin Soccer. And saying "the entire movie consists solely of amazing battle scenes" is crap. The action is incredible, but it stands second to the communication of personal relationships between the characters. It's a shame you weren't able to emotionaly relate to the characters at all, else it would have been an even better experience.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    2. Re:Great movies by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      IIRC there was at least one entire song and dance number in the street in the first half of the film, is that what you were referring too?

      I agree with you about Hero, its a near perfect combination of fighting and drama, I mean, the characters relate to each other through their fights with each other and thier enemies. Its all loyalty, love, and anger.

      If I had to sum up Hero in a sentance, I'd say that its like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, except that its got a gripping story behind it and is actually good (unlike CTHD).

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  68. Sue Miramax for False Advertising by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

    I learned about Shaolin Soccer from a trailer in a theater at least a year ago, and have been eagerly awaiting the release. The preview said "Coming Soon" as did the posters that were displayed in the googleplex lobby way back when. So isn't Miramax falsely advertising this movie by saying "Coming Soon" and then not delivering?

    1. Re:Sue Miramax for False Advertising by NessusRed · · Score: 0

      You are so stupid it is not even funny. Please don't breed for the good of man kind. YOU IDIOT YOUARE TEH = SUCK!!!!

  69. The True Case Against Copyright-Race card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The practice of restricting people by region is racist. Regionalizing is saying that because you live in such and such a country, you will pay such and such a price or watch movies in such and such a language. Because you live in such and such a country, you will know such information. What is the difference between this and bathrooms marked Colored and White? I guess Jack Valenti is more of a good-'ol-boy than we thought."

    What a fool thing to say. I suggest you look up race. Look at a region map, and yes there's only so much room on a disk, so a language has to be picked. Does it upset you mightly if all the actors aren't a generic gray, and we all don't speak a universal language? Your post is an insult to all the people who truely suffered and died (of all races) bringing equality to the world, just so you can fulfil your personal vendeta against an individual. You should be ashamed of yourself.

    1. Re:The True Case Against Copyright-Race card. by LuYu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look at a region map, and yes there's only so much room on a disk, so a language has to be picked.
      I just have been looking at a region map, actually. Language could not be the only factor in choosing regions. Australia is in the same region as Latin America. Japan is in the same region as Europe. The DVD consortium was definitely choosing the Asians it liked better.

      If, on the other hand, that statement was meant to refer to languages on a disk, you are also wrong. Most DVDs can carry as many as five soundtracks in addition to subtitles for ten countries. In Region3: Southeast Asia, DVDs typcially have an English and two Chinese soundtracks and subtitles in Thai, Bahasa Indonesia, Tagalog, Korean (North and South Korea use the same writing system even though they are in two different regions -- maybe Region5 is the Communist region), Chinese Traditional, Chinese Simplified, Malay, Vietnamese, and of course English. Sometimes these disks have other features like extra soundtracks. Really, though, the subtitles can be considered unlimited. Text storage for subtitles will never be a significant portion of 4.7GB even if they included Ancient Mayan. So, if that was your question, no, they do not have to choose a language.

      There is only so much space on a disk for what? Segregation? There should not be any space on a disk for such a thing. People should be able to buy DVDs anywhere in the world and watch them anywhere else. When you buy something it is your possession. You own it (and before anyone considers it, I do not even want to hear the licensing argument -- it is pure BS). You should be able to access the information on it until you break it, throw it away, or sell it. No one should have the right to tell you what to do with your movie that you purchased.

      Does it upset you mightly if all the actors aren't a generic gray, and we all don't speak a universal language?
      Perhaps you missed my point. I am precisely against this. I want access to all DVDs in the world. I should be able to buy movies from India over the Internet if I like and watch them on a DVD player in Europe or on the freaking moon. My intellectual explorations should not be restricted by some fat, cigar smoking, Harvard graduated executive who thinks he is my father and knows whats best for me. I am spending my money, and I will not be told what to spend it on.

      Your post is an insult to all the people who truely suffered and died (of all races) bringing equality to the world, just so you can fulfil your personal vendeta against an individual.
      Nice flamebait. This is not a "personal vendeta against an individual". Far from it. I am against all that would restrict my freedom to learn and think. As far as freedom goes, those are the two most fundamental freedoms of all. Jack Valenti is merely one of those who is working actively to keep the people of the US, if not the people of the world, ignorant for his own profit. I am not personally against him. If you had said I had a vendetta against copyright, you might have had a halfway reasonable argument.

      You should be ashamed of yourself.
      Quite the contrary, actually. Your post has proved to me how right I actually am.
      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  70. And they killed Radio AAHS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio AAHS - intelligent, educational radio stations for children. Radio Disney - blather marketing the latest Disney products (i.e. pop stars). One violation of contract later and AAHS is bankrupt and Disney is every major market in the country. They took Radio AAHS' experience with children's radio and bent it to their evil will!!

    That said, The Emperor's New Grove is the funniest animated movie ever. "It's what we like to call a cruel irony, Cronk. Much like my dependence on you!" I feel so dirty...

    1. Re:And they killed Radio AAHS! by Koatdus · · Score: 1
      They took Radio AAHS' experience with children's radio and bent it to their evil will!!

      I couldn't agree with you more. For an eye opener try listening closely to to lyrics of the songs they play on friday night. It's NOT stuff I want my seven year old listening to.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
  71. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Theres also a III, but it doesn't star Jackie Chan.

    Drunken Master 1 - horrible 1970s kung-fu flick except for the fighting techniques, which are brilliant.

    DM II - The USian Legend of Drunken Master. Note if you get an Asian release of this film you will also get the end scene which was cut from the US release.

    --
    Needle Nardle Noo
  72. Or is just Miramax and Asian movies? by hcduvall · · Score: 1

    I honestly haven't heard of cuts being enforced onto other Miramax foreign buys. They own the rights and release far too many good films for me to ignore and boycott. They might not get entirely even coverage, but Amelie, City of God (yeah, it got shafter overall, that one), and non-asian movies seem to get released eventually- w/o cuts.

    Hell, Iron Monkey got cuts. Who the hell were they thinking was going to see Iron Monkey!?
    I believe that Zhang Yimou (the director of Hero) has also come out to say that Miramax forced it to be shorter than he wanted.

    May'be the Weinsteins' are still upset over losing Crouching Tiger, but I haven't heard of this kind of delay, and this constant cutting to their other purchases. Things they produce themselves is something else.

    I believe they own the rights to Infernal Affairs too, a good, tight, cop thriller that's the best HK smart gangster film in a long time. The sequel is already out, there's an american remake in the works (they should beef up the women's roles)- but you won't see it in America...

  73. remember that Revolution is not an AOL Keyword. by palad1 · · Score: 1

    I will. In the meantime, why not moving over to Europe? Here, when someone claims he's a citizen, he's usually a right-wing hardliner... Well, in France that is.

  74. Fuzzy legality by nkuzmik · · Score: 1

    Lemme see if I'm tracking all this correctly.
    Kung Fu Cinema had a link to a site where you can purchase a copyof this Jet Li movie. I'm guessing that this copy is in the original language.
    If I were to go to that site, and buy this movie, I would be paying full price, plus shipping for a movie.
    My high school economics teacher defined "buying" as Party A giving Party B some form of currency and in return Party B then gives Party A some form of goods and/or serviced.
    Now assuming that you all agree with that definition, on what grounds does Mirimax order this C&D? I am giving Party B money, and they are giving me goods, which I assume the acquired in a legal fashion. Because this is a foreign film, I don't see where Mirimax has a juristiction over the original version. They would have all kinds of rights over the English version but not the original.
    Can anybody explain this too me?

  75. That doesn't add up by faust2097 · · Score: 1

    Pollard criticized the studio for not permitting the original version of such films to hit the states, saying "If they own the rights to this film, then this film is not available to U.S. consumers -- period."
    Funny, I bought both Shaolin Soccer and Hero as gifts for people for under $10 each in Chinatown last week. And these aren't bootlegs, are uncut [which is a HUGE problem I have with Miramax], are excellent transfers and have perfect sound. SHaolin Soccer is actually made funnier by the Engrish subtitles as well.

    Remind me why I should purchase edited, dubbed, region-locked versions of these movies for $20+ each again?

  76. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by RickHunter · · Score: 1

    With Studio Ghibli and Disney, its a long story... Basically, Ghibli was really pissed about the hack-job the first American distributor for Nausicaa pulled. So much so that they now refuse to acknowledge that the release even happened. Disney (technically Buena Vista, but Disney for all intents and purposes) was, IIRC, the only one that would agree to a clause that said they could make no edits or changes other than dubbing. In return (again, IIRC) they got exclusive rights for all DVD distribution outside of Japan.

    Unfortunately, then anime started taking off in North America, and Ghibli started producing "children's" movies that showed just how bad the stuff Disney offered really was. So Disney started sitting on releases, either those that competed with their own offerings (Spirited Away, which was in theaters for a whole day, even in a lot of big cities) or they felt were too far outside the target market. (Whisper of the Heart)

  77. Re:Instant review of "Hero"... possible SPOILERS.. by hcduvall · · Score: 1

    Ummm...you're kidding right?

    Yes, this is one gorgeous movie. The colors, and views are amazing (expect no less from Christopher Doyle). The acting is decent to good- except Zhang Ziyi, I admit to not liking her, and it seems to me the cuts that the film (even your free world version) underwent under studio orders happened in her portion mostly, but she was bad...

    But this movie is a subtle as a rock or 700 Club parable about the bible. Eeegad, its a hard task to compare oneself to Kurosawa, but the format immediately recalls Rashomon. It consists of several retellings of portions of the story, from alternate points of view. In this case, color-coded, but likewise heavyhanded.

    Each portion is beautiful, but so stylized (and detail changes so drastic) that I wouldn't call it subtle. Everyone is arguably a collection of tics with vague motivations. The character with the most time to explain his thoughts is the future first emperor- a divisive person in history to put it lightly. May'be its just cynicism on my part, but I can't help but attribute a bit of propaganda to a movie so heavily supported by the Chinese gov't, that ends with the a inspiring (or tragic) view of the great wall, and basically pushes a nationalist, right or right, view at the end.

    Heck, may'be I think unity was better than smaller kingdoms at war, may'be I even agree. But Hero wasn't trying to explore anything. It doesn't have a villain- when it should. Ambiquity isn't turning everyone strictly into heroes- ambiquity must show complexity and doubt- and Hero doesnt.

    Oh, yeah, its worth seeing.

  78. Region encoding software hacks by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    If I am in Region 1 and want one of the many Region 2 DVD's (that will never come out in Region 1), I have to get a hacked DVD player, or get a pirated/cracked version of the CD.

    Actually, there are lists of software hacks that you can find on the internet to help with that. Of course, this doesn't really help most grandmas who expect something to work without punching in the first 6 digits of pi into their remote control keypad.

    Oddly enough I had to use one of these hacks recently to view a Region 1 DVD on my Region 1 DVD player. When I tried to play the disk I got some kind of screen telling me that I needed a Region 1 player. I've never had that happen before. I tried inserting and removing the disk and even turning off the machine but got the same error each time. Finally I resorted to the software hack on that webpage for my machine and was able to watch the movie I rented. Boy would I have been upset if I had to go back to the videostore in the rain and exchange the disk.

    However, seeing as how the disk was 'XXX' (with Vin Diesel) I probably would have been better off if I hadn't been able to watch it :)

    GMD

    1. Re:Region encoding software hacks by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are lists of software hacks that you can find on the internet to help with that.

      Yeah, too bad most of them don't work. :-)

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  79. Re: remember that Revolution is not an AOL Keyword by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

    1. Nobody has offered my a job in Europe.
    2. If I did move to Europe, I would no longer be a citizen in the country in which I live.

    Honestly, I'd love a chance to live and work in Europe. At least for a few years.

    --
    No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  80. Brave America, by imbaczek · · Score: 1

    Where's your courage? Right next to your wallet?

    I mean, the guy should have at least asked if he should wipe his ass with a copy of the constitution, and delete the links only if he got a positive answer. Oh, and he should wipe his ass with the now worthless piece of paper afterwards.

    Don't hestitate. Mod me down.

  81. I just ordered the movie by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    I went from the link on the webpage (it's still there) to the company selling the DVD, then I ordered it. Just to support the site. Up yours Disney. BTW, the DVD is only $11.95!!! Apparently it's mono, though, which sucks.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    1. Re:I just ordered the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apparently it's mono, though, which sucks.

      I hope that isn't the case.

      -cmh

  82. Kung Fu Dispute by radd0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, now everybody is Kung Fu Fighting.

    -r
  83. Ebay should really be in trouble then by usurper_ii · · Score: 1

    because you can order all the films in question off of it. I ordered Shaolin Soccer about four or five months ago and paid about 10.00 for it, and that includes shipping.

    I assume that even if an individual purchased one of these movies, they would have the right to resell it? Or would Miramax get its army of lawyers to write a nasty letter to you?

    If it is legal, some of these import companies would be on more legal ground to just sell them on Ebay as individuals instead of under a company name.

    I kind of understand Miramax's point of view, but I have a hard time understanding how my viewing Shaolin Soccer before they release it in the US hurts anyone. The way I feel is that the actors earned money, as the DVD I purchased was a legit DVD. As long as the actors got paid, I don't care about putting any extra money in Miramax's pocket. The US release of Shaolin Soccer on DVD will probably be 15 - 20.00. I paid 10.00 and got to see it uncut but had to read subtitles.

    Usurper_ii

  84. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by rjkm · · Score: 1

    There is no Drunken Master 2 release available in Europe. I do not want the changed US version. HkFlix seems to sell a good Asian version but for a rather steep price (+ transport + import tax). And maybe HKFlix will not be able to sell it much longer now?
    A German importer offered it a few months ago but when I ordered it he said his Asian distributor suddenly no longer had it?!?!

    Btw, there is a great Drunken Master release availabe in Europe from www.hongkonglegends.co.uk.

  85. cutting by cybercyph · · Score: 1

    Hero was phenominal. I'm curious, though--i can't read mandirin, but i watched it with someone who can. At the very end of the film (no spoilers here), a screen with words and a picture of the Great Wall come up. according to my mandirin-reading friend, it basically invalidated the message of the film. He said it felt tacked on, and he thought it was there just to please the government; the message of Hero is fairly anti-government, as it is. I'm anxious to see if that scene hit the cutting room floor in the American release. Do films in China often add in things like this, to keep the government off their backs?

    1. Re:cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a couple places with the text.

      http://www.kanai.net/weblog/archives/001410.html
      http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&t hr eadid=277628

      There's one link where they discuss the message in their blog.

      I dunno, I thought the message was conveyed through Nameless's decision/action.

      Certainly the decision he had to make is worth discussion. How much are you willing to sacrifice for stability? Answering "your life" is trival when compared to what the characters gave up.

      -cmh

  86. Miramax does not have that right. by Animats · · Score: 1
    Parallel imports are legal in the US. See Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. Lanza Research Int, a unanimous Supreme Court decision. Once the product has been sold by the copyright holder, the first sale doctrine permits further transfers, internationally or otherwise.

    There are legislative attempts to change this, but Wal-Mart is opposed, so it's not likely to sneak through.

    If you want either of those movies (in Mandarin), they're advertised on eBay for $7.99.

  87. imports for personal use explicitly permitted by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since when is it illegal to import a legal copy of a video from another country?

    Since always, actually. It's quite annoying.

    Shipping in single copies of copyrighted works from abroad for personal use is permitted. So is carrying them back in your luggage when you travel. See 17 USC 602 (a) (2), the text of which follows:

    Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501. This subsection does not apply to

    [...]

    importation, for the private use of the importer and not for distribution, by any person with respect to no more than one copy or phonorecord of any one work at any one time, or by any person arriving from outside the United States with respect to copies or phonorecords forming part of such person's personal baggage; or...

    There's also exemptions for government use, scholarly, religion, and educational purposes, and for libraries. You should read all of 17 USC 602 (a) before jumping to conclusions about whether it's illegal to import videos.

    1. Re:imports for personal use explicitly permitted by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      You should read all of 17 USC 602 (a) before jumping to conclusions about whether it's illegal to import videos.

      If I'd been able to find the exact location of the appropriate sections of code, I would have. But I'm busy and have been having a bad google day, so I went from memory of past "import CD" problems.

      I'm glad to hear of the statuatory exemption of one copy for personal use -- but I'm not sure that matters, ultimately, when someone like Mirimax can send out C&D letters and it ends up costing someone like a movie-review site $1000 in legal fees to clear up the mess.

  88. A really tough choice by superbeerchan · · Score: 1

    Ok guys.....

    I hate Miramax.

    I love Quentin Tarantino.

    What the *Hell* am I supposed to do when Kill Bill Volume II is released?

    (whimpers)

  89. Miramax by Akuinnen · · Score: 1

    Maybe if Miramax didn't chop up HK films there wouldn't be such a problem. I bought "Fist of Legend" on DVD after seeing the Chinese version. After watching it and seeing it wasn't the original movie I began a search. Finally I found the original for sale on E-Bay and bought it. If Miramax hadn't made changes to the orignal film I wouldn't have even bothered.

  90. what about the first sale doctrine? by hey! · · Score: 1

    Exactly what would be the constitutional fig leaf that would empower the restriction of legally made copies?

    The beanie baby example is bad because they were knockoffs whose very existance is illegal.. Overseas distributors cannot import legal copies because it violates their agreement with the copyright holder (which consumers aren't party to). However they can sell to consumers in their own countries, and accordinng to US law they lose any right in a copy after it is sold (but not new copies made from that copy IIRC).

    Which is the genesis of all that region encoding nonsense: it prevents people from buying container loads of DVDs in 3rd world countries where they can only be sold for cheap, importing them to the US and selling them at a profit.

    Holy crap, have I just figured out a socially useful purpose for region encoding? This allows studios to sell DVDs in third world countries near the marginal costs rather than the higher average costs.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  91. Parallel Importing ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am curious, in New Zealand we have a law that explicitly makes it illegal to sell/buy the exclusive import rights to a product. Is there anything similar to that in the US? I believe Australia is similar.

    Examples are: any can import macs and sell them. Anyone can import DVD's and sell them. Anyone can import Levi's jeans and sell them. It is for this reason that multi region mods are legal in New Zealand - it is illegal for software distributors to force consumers to use the 'authorised' importer.

    1. Re:Parallel Importing ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some links:
      http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/77/wal mart.htm l
      http://www.oligopolywatch.com/

  92. Re:what about the first sale doctrine? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

    The beanie baby example is bad because they were knockoffs whose very existance is illegal.

    Actually, most of the instances I'd heard were not knockoffs, but were legal licensed products from overseas. Which just made it all the more galling.

  93. Perhaps I missed something, but why is this news? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    It has been widely known that most lawyers for entertainment business has their heads perpetually stuck up the part of their body where sun don't shine...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  94. Scarecrow Video by cens0r · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this affects someone like scarecrow video? They have all the imported movies from hong kong. They have both hero and shaolin soccer for rent. You could rent 28 days later before it hit theaters, if you had a region free pal DVD player.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  95. Todays market economy by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    Because of the internet, it is easier to purchase items abroad then ever before. The companies need to learn this. Otherwise, You know what happens when companies "crack down" on legal overseas media products....you download them instead! There, now no one gets money, not billy working at the shipping depot or bobo packaging the dvds at some factory in china, and not the banking firms handling transactions...etc.etc...the point is it should not be legal for companies to do this anyway, it just hurts the economy!

  96. Sad State of Affairs by Eric+Savage · · Score: 1

    It's just plain sad that despite never sending or receiving one, I instantly knew what C&D meant. They are so common these days.

    --

    This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
  97. "made under this title" (17 USC 109) by tepples · · Score: 1

    Exactly what would be the constitutional fig leaf that would empower the restriction of legally made copies?

    Other than the fact that they were not "made under this title" (17 USC 109)? Imported copies are usually made under another country's copyright law. And the Constitutional justification for this and most of the rest of Title 17 is the Copyright Clause.

  98. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by tepples · · Score: 1

    it shouldn't be hard at all to buy a copy of Drunken Master 2. It was released here in the US as "The Legend of Drunken Master."

    I thought "The legend of" was supposed to be the third installment: "Max 300" on DDRMAX, "Maxx Unlimited" on DDRMAX2, "The legend of Max" on DDR Extreme.

    Or am I missing something?

  99. I saw a Chinese version of this movie by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    Apart from a translation of the title and the DVD logo, there was no English on the box. Worse, the DVD navigation menus were all in Chinese, and none of us speak a word! We had a hell of a time turning on the English subtitles for the movie itself. We just systematically went through every menu and sub-menu until we found it.

    They must have either released it with no region encoding, or with US region encoding, I guess, because I had no problems.

    Anyway, the movie's not bad. The tone is a bit too earnest for me. And the kung-fu is of the supernatural variety (a bit like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, which I absolutely loved) which turns off some people. But overall I enjoyed it. Not nearly as much as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, though.

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  100. Copyright owner dictates terms by tepples · · Score: 1

    In any case, it's obviously a contract issue

    Unless all the copyright owners refuse entirely to allow such distribute-by clauses in distribution contracts.

    and not anything that should be legislated like that.

    There are plenty of limitations on what a contract can do, precisely because legislatures have found that a given party has way too much leverage in dictating the terms of a contract. For example, many jurisdictions do not allow complete disclaimers of warranty and liability on new goods.

  101. The true criminals are Miramax's editors by Black+Art · · Score: 1

    Miramax has a reputation for destroying good films.

    A prime example of this is "The Black Mask". The edit was terrible. More insulting was the replacement of the soundtrack with a black hiphop one that had nothing to do with the film. (Asian is non-white and so is hip-hop, so it must be OK.) The original cut was MUCH better.

    I have Hero and Shaolin Soccer. I much prefer Shaolin Soccer. The message of "Hero" is that people must preserve the state, even if it kills them.

    Shaolin Soccer is just FUNNY. (Stephen Chao is a genius! "God of Cookery" is another of his films. Imagine a martial arts version of the "Iron Chef".)

    I have seen previews from Miramax of Shaolin Soccer. I had a hard time believing it was the same film. They tried to make it serious. (Yes, they are that clueless!)

    Miramax may be legally right, but they are far from morally right.

    If there is a god of film, Harvey Weinstien will burn in his hell.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  102. I had forgotten by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Thats right, I forgot about that. Seems like years ago. That should be reversed. Maybe instead of a lager party, we need to organize a keger party.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  103. BOYCOTT NOW IN PROGRESS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine Miramax, we'll just boycott you!

    Consider yourself boycotted...

    Please review that whole 1st Amendment thing...

    If he wasn't breaking any laws,
    how can he get slammed with a C&D Order?

  104. Re:You should lose your exclusive distribution rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your brain

  105. The basic problem here by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Is that the american film companies like Miramax and Disney dont want all the great asian films getting to america untouched because they show up just how bad similar american films are (for example, from what I have heard, there are anime films from japan that "out disney" some of the recent disney releases, although I personally havent seen said films)

    Therefore, they bring them in and edit them to hell so that people dont see how good they realy are. Or they bring them in and have just enough screenings (with no promotion) so that they can satisfy the licence requirements and then bury it for good never to be seen again.

    So, basicly, its about the american movie industry not wanting better quality foreign product to get to america since it will show up how crap the similar american stuff is.

  106. kakak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kakak

  107. How can they stop linking. by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    This is the internet. you know, that big GLOBAL information network.
    In my country (Australia) parallel importation is legal, so his link would not be in violation of our copyright laws.
    In fact, region encoding in this country is seen as anti-competitive and trade restrictive (which it is).
    It is up to the individual to decide if what they are doing is legal in their particular country. I thing the Hong Kong distributor should sue Mirimax for restraint of trade!!! :-)

    Funny how the U.S wants free trade when it suits them, but when it comes to IP rights... sheesh...

    --
    Burma?
  108. Regions economic, not racist by moncyb · · Score: 1

    I also don't understand why you said region coding was "racist" though I also think the AC was off base. I would say region coding seems to be more about price fixing and economic control than any racism. If you look at a region coding map, you'll see it isn't drawn in racial areas.

    If it were racial, US/Canada, all of Europe, Russia and Austraila would be in one group. All of Asia would be in one group. Central and South America would be in their own individual group. Yet these groups are all mixed up.

    If you look at it, they seem to be divided among more economic lines.

    Region 1: US/Canada - both wealthy nations
    Region 2: Western Europe, Japan, the Middle East, and others - all wealthy (perhaps regions 1&2 should have been joined, but I suppose the US based organization who made the standard decided they wanted more control over their area)
    Region 3: various countries - I suppose they are well off, but not as rich as 1 & 2.
    Region 4: Central/South America & the Pacific - Most of these countries can be considered poor, but not the worse. I don't know why they put the Aussies in there though. Maybe they don't care about that market?
    Region 5: various countries - many of these countries can be considered "third world" in the respect they are generally the poorest of all. I'm not sure if Eastern Europe and Russia would be lumped in here today (maybe region 4), but at the time DVD was created, those countries weren't doing well.
    Region 6: China - They are their own beast, the government probably asked to be in their own region so they can control what can be played.