Slashdot Mirror


PCLinuxOS 2K4: Mandrake Meets The Live CD

NoahsLinuxArk2K3 writes "For those of you who may not be familiar with PCLinuxOS, it's a Linux distro derived from Mandrake Linux 9.2, developed by none other than Texstar from PCLinuxOnline (best known for his RPM work for the same distro). The new distro is primarily a Live CD, but can also be installed to the hard drive. It is still in preview release, but at 306 hits per day, it's already #8 on the DistroWatch charts. This review is the first of its kind to surface and it is looking very promising." Update: 12/30 03:18 GMT by T : A semi-anonymous reader writes "For those who dont have a high speed connection, PCLinuxOS 2K4 Preview 4 is available from OSDisc.com for a few bucks." Probably soon it will be at cheapbytes, too.

182 comments

  1. Quite Amazing by Rodrin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's very rare to have a new linux distrobution hit the top 10 on distrowatch ever. Count this distro in your books as a record breaker. But why does it have to be based on Mandrake? Boo-hoo. =)

    1. Re:Quite Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not quite true. Unusual yes, not that rare though. Yoper was in the #1 spot less than two weeks after addition to Distrwatch and stayed there for a while. Knoppix skyrocketed and settled in a 3d, I don't remember how high it got though. Sorceror linux followed the same pattern. There are probably others but since Distrowatch is /. ed I can't look at the distro list to refresh my memory.

    2. Re:Quite Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i remember about a year or longer ago when Yoper came out it made #1 for a while and i could not see what all the fuss was about as it was just another dumbed down distro (bastard child of Debian only dumbed down)

      now Yoper is barely keeping current

    3. Re:Quite Amazing by bogie · · Score: 1

      Yea because distrowatch is such an accurate measure... As its previously been pointed out, some distro called Yoper was #1 on distrowatch the week it came out.

      Some bored linux users will do anything to push their "distro of the week". Distrowatch isn't in on it and they were nice when asked about their rankings, but anyone with half a brain knows those results are far from accurate. So no, I won't be counting this distro as any sort of record breaker, at least not any type of record that matters.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    4. Re:Quite Amazing by ladislavb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Things have improved since those days. Firstly, between 2 - 5 new distributions are added to DistroWatch every week, so it is getting increasingly hard for any of them to get to the top 100, never mind to the top 10. Secondly, the number of visitors on DistroWatch has trippled since "Yoper times" (now at over 20,000 visits per day) and it's becoming harder for one person to manipulate the page hit ranking. And thirdly, PCLinuxOS is created by somebody who is well-known in the Mandrake user community and who has a record of providing reliable enhancements for vanilla Mandrake releases.

      Yes, the DistroWatch ranking is nothing but a light-hearted popularity contest created for fun (and to laugh at those who take it seriously). In contrast, PCLinuxOS is a serious and promising distro worth watching, especially if you are a Mandrake fan.

  2. Re:more like Cockdrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there were enough moderators in this world to get rid of such postings.

  3. Holy shit! by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny
    developed by none other than Texstar from PCLinuxOnline
    Holy crap! Not Texstar from PCLinuxOnline!!!

    This is a great day for us all.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Holy shit! by oddfox · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well most anyone's that used Mandrake Linux and third-party packages will have heard of Texstar sometime during their package-seeking. Texstar is one of the biggest names in the Mandrake community, and his packages are usually of pretty high caliber. I think he may have even done packages for some other popular distros, as well.

      I'm pretty glad, myself, that if anyone was going to be making a Mandrake-based distro, it's Texstar. He seems to know his way around a Mandrake system or two.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:Holy shit! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Well most anyone's that used Mandrake Linux and third-party packages will have heard of Texstar sometime during their package-seeking.

      I've been running Mandrake on my server for around three years now, and I've never heard of him.

      Mind you, I don't have any cause to use any packages that don't come with the distro, so perhaps that's why? Or perhaps it's because -- even when I have sought out packages in the past (for RedHat), as a non-coder I don't recall ever paying any attention to the author/packager's name.

      But hey, if you say the guy's a star, I'm happy to take your word for it.

    3. Re:Holy shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not true. Texstar packages suck 99% of the time. Look at his specs, they are *ugly* and sometimes full of bugs. But I'll grant you that he is good at quick and dirty packaging funny programs that newbies want.

    4. Re:Holy shit! by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      How many packages have you contributed to the community? I've used his packages to upgrade all of KDE, add things like kmplayer and k3b so I could burn dvd's. How are these funny little programs? I've rarely ever had a problem with texstars stuff, again where are your packages?

    5. Re:Holy shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try to get hired my ms with the FUD you dish out.

    6. Re:Holy shit! by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Well, you instantly isolate yourself from Texstar's target audience when you mention "server", lol.

      I myself don't usually pay much attention to a packager's name most of the time (Although you have to admit, it's very comforting to know it's a trusted source), but in the short time that I used Mandrake (I started out w/Linux when 8.2 was hot stuff), I installed Texstar's packages quite often to upgrade software, and also get new programs.

      Sorry for the late reply, heh.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
  4. Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even better.. by Qweezle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mandrake has always been my favorite distro for it's useability, while still maintaining the features that a Linux guru(not myself) would love, it's truly a distro for everyone.

    But a Live CD is just awesome, think of all the new users who can try Linux for the first time, not as Knoppix, which is translated from German, but Mandrake! What a great way to learn about and be introduced to Linux!

  5. LiveCD installers by AMystery · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why aren't there more LiveCD installers? I used Knoppix as my debian installer and it was such a good experience that given the choice I would never go back to anything else. Text based installers are powerful, but for the pure user experience, being able to boot into a full OS and surf the web and listen to music while the OS installs in the background seems like the best way. So why aren't there more such discs? Also related, is this something other geeks would want? I can see the elitism of loving debian's old isntaller, but how much worse is a LiveCD version? Is the only problem hardware support? Its easier to have a simple installer that works on everything than try to get a LiveCD to boot? Appeal to the lowest common denominator?

    1. Re:LiveCD installers by bfree · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taking Debian as an example, it may be worthwhile looking at having a liveCD net-installer image, so you can boot up into a full-system and choose to kick off a net install at any time. But on a regular installation cd, you do not want a liveCD, why? Well the point of having a cd is so you don't have to download so many packages (if any), and if you use up space on the cd with the liveCD then you will likely send more people hitting the mirrors.

      I recently had to install a system as a basic desktop. I did both types of knoppix-installer runs (debian and knoppix) and either way I felt I had a slightly mish-mashed system which I didn't really want to keep working with. So I got the latest daily image of the net-inst cd for debian-installer, experienced one minor problem (had to hand prod the network up) and had a system up under my control in no time. The old debian installer is just that, old! The new debian installer is looking great (providing the ports can come together) and while it may still be in development, asking why liveCD when compared to the old installer is a waste of time. Why liveCD Vs the new installer ... well I think it's a matter of horses for courses. If you want a quick means to a certain setup, liveCDs should be great, but if you want to setup a system with what you want, it's probably never going to happen from a liveCD except where the liveCD is simply a glorified front-end to the regular installer and then your liveCD has the decreased space for packages that got me started!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    2. Re:LiveCD installers by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      Specifically speaking to Debian I see no reason to have a LiveCD installer. With the current XFS install disc I have Debian installed in less than 10 minutes. I don't want to extend that to 15 or 20 to surf the web for 10 minutes (which I can easily do with my other machine anyways, heh). Now for something like Gentoo I always use knoppix to install it (don't like the Gentoo LiveCD much).

    3. Re:LiveCD installers by AMystery · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Your point is valid but you miss the audience. As a computer expert you are probably comfortable with the simpler installers that just do what they need, install the OS. but for those who have just one computer and aren't really comfortable with it, having a nice friendly fully functional OS that lets them try things out, search for help online and generally be up and running in 30 seconds is a boon.

      It takes me roughly 1 hour to install any OS, windows or linux. Since I just have the one system and its getting rather old, that is at minimum of one hour when I cannot be productive computer wise. If I use a LiveCD then as soon as the CD boots I can keep going while the system installs in the background.

      Your point about space is good and I would like to see a LiveCD based Net install. That would work great for new computer users. The CD has the LiveCD image, whatever other files fit and it downloads anything else. However, the CD boots and runs and there is very little wasted space there. You copy the CD to the HDD and its good.

      a LiveCD based install just seems like the future of computer installs. Friends of mine who install windows for a living often bemoan how the installer is silent, like it would be better to have some kind of background music while it runs. That's the kind of thing that non-geek people see as progress. Also it just makes me happier, less down time, more powerful visual interface.

  6. Re:more like Cockdrake by sk8_feet · · Score: 1

    Now I know for sure that Kindergarten is out for Christmas break. BTW: I kind of like Mandrake, I recommend it to lot's of WinTel users ...

  7. poor penguin by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Funny

    this poor pengiun should have listened to Linus when he told him CDs aren't fish.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:poor penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch. That's just wrooong!

  8. Why Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the Harry Potter lore, if you've been petrified, the best thing you could do is take mandrake. Thus for all you BSODed Windows users out there who still freeze up, mandrake is your cure.

    For those who don't freeze up, the livecd version is for you -- you can try it out and STILL have the exclusive potential to wait for that highly coveted Windows system lockup.

    1. Re:Why Mandrake? by cfuse · · Score: 3, Funny
      According to the Harry Potter lore, if you've been petrified, the best thing you could do is take mandrake.

      If one is petrified, how does one take anything other than what is given?

      Nurse, pass me my gloves and lubricant, and that huge turnip shaped mandrake root ...

  9. Great for demoing by xybe · · Score: 1

    This is truly a great chance to let users of other OSs take linux for a ride, especially since Mandrake is quite user-friendly. If a user decides to install Linux on the HD, mandrake is quite newbie-friendly, pity that the current version seems to have quirky HD installer.

  10. #1 with a Bullet by mesach · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is still in preview release, but at 306 hits per day, it's already #8 on the DistroWatch charts.

    Way to shoot it directly to #1 with a bullet and a slashdotting!!!

    --
    moo.
    1. Re:#1 with a Bullet by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      quick someone post another fedora or gentoo story.
      HURRY!!!!

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  11. Re:more like Cockdrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratz asshole. I stop reading at -1 from now on. Good bye wonderful freedom of speech you trolls supposedly fight for.

  12. God dammit! by 77Punker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is it just me, or are the trolls getting worse?

    1. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just you.

    2. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      most likely /. discussing threads will be modded down, but her goes it anyway.
      it's the holidays, when those lamers have nothing to do but spam /., a couple of weeks and it'll be over.
      I wonder if CmdrTaco can implement some filter for ASCII art, or goatse links, both shouldn't be that hard at all, and in both cases, the post's score is -1 automatically.

    3. Re:God dammit! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And by "worse" I wouldn't even mean "more frequent". Just plainly MUCH worse quality. Little stupid scoundrels that struggle for attention, just because they are too stupid to post anything that would earn them a single +1.

      Now mod me +1 Flamebait ;)

      Ah, so it wasn't that I'm offtopic - somebody tell me, is that new LiveCD better than knoppix? And if so, how?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's possible to implement such filters but only is useful IF it counts as a down moderation when the post starts automatically at -1. The reason it's so important is after enough negative moderations, the IPs of the wankers are banned. It probably doesn't matter that much, though, since they have proxy lists.

      There actually are lameness filters to prevent a lot of the ASCII art.

      What's unfortunate, is more restrictions will probably be placed on posting which will likely prevent some legitimate posts from getting through.

    5. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They're mostly not trolls, they're just crapflooding. Crapflooding takes nearly no skill, unlike trolling. I tend not to troll (intentionally, anyway), but I have some measure of respect for a good troll. Being a crapflooder is about as impressive as being a script-kiddie. No, actually, it's about as impressive as wanting to be a script kiddie, but being too dumb to work out how to download stuff.

    6. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being a crapflooder is about as impressive as being a script-kiddie. No, actually, it's about as impressive as wanting to be a script kiddie, but being too dumb to work out how to download stuff.
      Um, most crapflooding is done with scripts.
    7. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two groups of trolls (no idea whether they're actual groups or individual calling themselves groups) got in to a pissing contest just recently, which is why we see a dozen skull ascii arts up there. They usually get bored of this before long.

      There is a filter for ASCII art, but the trolls have found ways around it. And if they try to ban goatse links everyone will just use redirects.

    8. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      less complaints about trolling, more complaints about bush plz kthx

    9. Re:God dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, there are sites running these scripts so the wannabe troll (crapflooder) just has to open a web site to do their flooding.

  13. BitTorrent? by MyHair · · Score: 1

    Okay, sounds cool, I wanna try it, but I expect this 33k download rate won't last. Anyone have a bittorrent link?

  14. Get linuxed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first got linuxed with Slackware (ouch!), but when I tried Mandrake, i seen the light, and the the elegent gears with K's engraved on them. Mandrake is a good distro, even power users will like it. Try mandrake cooker edition, its like Unstable Debian, but without the gritty bits of
    Linux.

    I have linuxed several people with Mandrake, Windows 98/ME refugees who don't want XP like it the most! So what are you waiting for, get linuxed today!

  15. FP 04 Happy n3w yar! Wo0t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should all compete for the first FP of the new year 04.

    1. Re:FP 04 Happy n3w yar! Wo0t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the best idea ever. It's official: Whoever gets the first FP after 12:00 am Jan 1 2004 gets a bucket of hot grits and fucks the other groups like little girls. So you trolls better be checking slashdot on new years eve instead of having fun or something lame like that.

    2. Re:FP 04 Happy n3w yar! Wo0t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      12:00 am Jan 1 2004

      yeah but what time zone?

  16. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by cavebear42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mandrake with its superior driver support is the way to go for a live CD. I'm excited to hear that there is interest in pursuing this type of OS. My challenge with the live CD distro is that, as I understand it, its a "take it the way we make it" distro. No matter how much you like the way they made it, it just feels wrong. You should be able to build your own cd out of the Mandrake you configured. In any case, I still await the day Linux comes in a distro Grandma can use.

  17. Mandrake est francais ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ne faites jamais confiance aux Francais. Ils sont fromage mangeant, singes de reddition. Ne regardez jamais eux, eux des mots de pronouce correctement, la subsistance mettant le que a la fin des mots et plus mauvais de tous, ils prennent l'urine de chat et la vendent en tant que "vin". Oui, c'est un troll, et oui, j'ai employe les poissons de Babel mais qui s'inquiete quand le trollkore est sur le perdre.

    1. Re:Mandrake est francais ! by roomisigloomis · · Score: 1

      Shut the fuck up, you Pepe LePew-hating, no-girlfriend, monkey-spanking, thumb up ass, no job, panty-peeping, live in your mother's basement, no Ma I'm not smoking anything, panty-stealing, hamper-diving, big Mac eating, left-cheek-sneak silent-but-deadly farting, skidmark wearing motherfucker. Learn how to speak French rather than using that Babelfish crap. (How's this for a native French speaker?)

      --
      "We are accountable for not only what we do, but also that which we don't do." -- Moliere
    2. Re:Mandrake est francais ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ribbit

  18. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. You always get americans going "when will linux be ready for The Desktop (tm)". Hint: It's READY RIGHT NOW. Mandrake rocks.

  19. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by SharpFang · · Score: 0

    D0h. I appreciate a good troll. But this is junk, shit! When they post a homosexual story, an ethnic joke with Slashdot management substituted for characters, when they make vague references to usablity of new feature in pr0n business, when they forge the Nigerian Scam or BSD is Dead to suit a story, the classic Beowulf, Russia and Profit, that are all really good trolls! But this?
    Pathetic.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  20. Ohohohoho! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarde! Nous sommes francais! Nous nous rendons! Oh la la!!!

  21. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by cavebear42 · · Score: 1

    Fix your filters. You woln't have to see the crap. dave

  22. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Latest netcraft survey reveals: innovative trolling is dying. ( The cat thing was a pretty cool twist on an old theme though. )

    YLFI
  23. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Just did that. But now I might be missing a lot of valuable trolls :)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  24. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by KeyserDK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mandrake Has just relaesed a LiveCD called MandrakeMOVE. One version for use with an USB Key or one for use with no USB key.

    Another thing is that Textar is mainly releasing an bugfix/update of mandrake. Nice, but 99% of the work is done by mandrakesoft. The world of GPL.

    --
    still reading?
  25. Re:THE KING IS ALIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's gotta be painful to run through spellcheck.

  26. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knoppix, which is translated from German, but Mandrake!
    I thought Mandrakesoft is a company in France. No?

  27. Blah... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    Who cares how a no-name site like distrowatch ranks linux distros? I'm more interested in where Casey Kasem and Rick Dee's weekly Top 40 distro rankings puts them.

    1. Re:Blah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true middle-schooler!!

  28. Distrowatch Rankings by 42sd · · Score: 0

    Heres the google cache of the rankings.
    It's from the 12th of December. PCLinuxOS is 11th in the last 3 months column.

  29. "Out of the box" gratis commercial software? by Plug · · Score: 1

    Everyone says that Linux can't be easy to use while people have to go out and manualy get graphics drivers, Java, Flash etc, loosely ignoring the fact you do the exact same thing on Windows.

    Why is this distribution any different? The legal powers-that-be in all the other distros say that they can't ship with Java/Flash/whatever. I don't ask from a "how have they done wrong" perspective; I'm hoping that there has been some background research done that could mean other distributions can start shipping with the NVIDIA/ATI drivers and useful gratis commercial applications out of the box.

    1. Re:"Out of the box" gratis commercial software? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You would have to get permission to include any third party software. Permission to download isn't the same as permission to redistribute. Since they're free downloads anyways, it would be hard for the software creators to show that they were seriously harmed by your redistribution, but it's still copyright infringement.

      On the other hand, if you created a script to FTP the latest version from their own websites, and then set them up, it might pass the legal sniff test.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:"Out of the box" gratis commercial software? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      According to Texstar the distro is legitimate and it's ok to redistribute the Nvidia drivers in a free-as-in-beer distro. Mandrake didn't include it or flash in the download edition of their distro because they want the download edition to be 100% free gpl stuff.

    3. Re:"Out of the box" gratis commercial software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nvidia:

      2.1.2 Linux Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of Section 2.1.1,
      SOFTWARE designed exclusively for use on the Linux operating system may be
      copied and redistributed, provided that the binary files thereof are not
      modified in any way (except for unzipping of compressed files).

      Source: http://www.nvidia.com/object/nv_swlicense.html

    4. Re:"Out of the box" gratis commercial software? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      not really. with alot of the freely downloadable software, you have to click through some soft of agreement. i have no idea what they say in there, as i just want to install what i'm after. sun does this with thier java/jdk. wouldn't sun benefit from allowing distros from including the sun jdk as oppose to that blackdown (similar, but not)? heck, sun even has a click through to download their netbeans platform in binary format. i suspect their cvs servers are public, but then you're on your own.

      what other commercial products did you have in mind that exist for linux that could be installed? i can think if yahoo messenger, and there's no click thorough. debian and gentoo have it easy wrt to these types of software. just apt-get or emerge them and they're there.

  30. Looking for a PowerPC version by Thaidog · · Score: 1

    The knoppix powerpc version sucked... but the idea is great for a rescue disk... I use knoppix for both x86 and PowerPC for this reason. Anybody seen anything ready for powerpc?

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

    1. Re:Looking for a PowerPC version by nofx911 · · Score: 1

      Gentoo has a PPC Gnome/KDE LiveCD. You can purchase it here:
      http://store.gentoo.org/index.php?item=23&action=v iewitem for $10.

      Here is the link for the Gentoo Press Release:
      http://www.gentoo.org/news/20030603-ppclivecd.xml

  31. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1
    But a Live CD is just awesome, think of all the new users who can try Linux for the first time, not as Knoppix, which is translated from German, but Mandrake! What a great way to learn about and be introduced to Linux!


    Yeah, but Mandrake beat them to the punch with MandrakeMove. I find it very much similar in function and feel to a Knoppix/Drake bastard child, although it lacked a bit of the applications that I'm used to with Mandrake. It was much like Mandrake Light.
  32. Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to see an uncompressed Live-DVD with twice as much stuff on it as on a Live-CD. Anbody working on one of those yet?

    But in the meantime, anybody got a bit torrent for PCLinuxOS up?

    -Rick

    1. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by sofakingl · · Score: 1

      The basic idea behind sticking with CD is that more computers have CD-ROM drives than DVD-ROM drives; thus, more people can use the distro if it is on CD. But you are still right, though; even with less people able to use it, it would still be nice to have a LiveDVD distro so that those with the proper drives can have better Live distros.

    2. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by MyHair · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try a Google search for Knoppix DVD. I'd provide a link, but I'm not sure which one to give you. It seems to be more of a grass roots effort than an official release, though. And there was a comment by Klaus in German that, with the help of babel fish, sounds like there's an issue with cloop files over 4GB in cloop versions 0.68 and earlier. So it sounds like he has in mind DVD with compression, but some of the Knoppix fans think like you and want an uncompressed DVD.

    3. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Informative

      LiveDVD's aren't necessary yet. From what I've heard from developers, you can fit around 2 gigs of uncompressed data onto a 700mb CD before you compress it and use cloop to decompress on the fly once the cd is running. Kernel 2.6 has newer cloop-style stuff in it and is supposed to smash things even smaller. Believe it or not, the PCLinuxOS is very full featured and has lots of bells and whistles on the disk.

    4. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd like to see an uncompressed Live-DVD with twice as much stuff on it as on a Live-CD.

      I agree, and what I'd really LOVE to see is packet writing enabled, so those with DVD-RW burners could have their home directories and system settings stored on the DVD between uses.

    5. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is DVD bootable? I mean, does it have anything like CD's eltorrito?

    6. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by jred · · Score: 1

      Does Knoppix do that w/ cd-rw? That would rock. I've used it a few times, and it sucks to reconfigure your mail client every time you boot. It's just about the only thing I consistently changed every time. Thank goodness for IMAP :) I'm sure there's a way to "permanently" change that before you burn the ISO, but I'm lazy & want it done automagically.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    7. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by nacks1 · · Score: 1

      yep... a torrent for this sure would be nice.

    8. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by elgaard · · Score: 1

      And especially more computeres have CD-burners than DVD burners. Most knoppixes are downloaded and burned by users.

      But if Mandrake plans to sell these a DVD might work better for them.

    9. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1

      If you use a USB pen/thumb drive as your home directory, you don't have to keep doing that.

    10. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      I'm not sure if Mandrake has solved this problem, but their web page says something about using a 'USB key' to save settings.

    11. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Yes. In fact I've successfully made a bootable DVD using a standard Knoppix ISO. YMMV.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    12. Re:Isn't it about time for a Live-DVD? by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Most of the live distros support these. a "USB Key" is basically a USB flash drive. I picked one (128MB) up from Best Buy for $40-- plug it in and you've suddenly got an extra drive. Mine has saved my ass more than a few times at work so far-- I had a system die recently where it hadn't been on the tape backup but all of the data I had been working with had been copied onto my memstick.

      They have some really nice uses once you actually think about how you could use one-- keep a mixture of important windows and linux tools on it so you've got the tools you need to actually get work done no matter which OS you're sitting in front of, for instance.

  33. A Download Link by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 1

    If you want to download the latest version right now, you can:

    Download PCLinuxOS

    (Hopefully, we'll have a hard time slashdotting Ibiblio.org)

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  34. More Direct Link by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're really impatient, you can Download the English preview-4 ISO here

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  35. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    1)Imagine a Beowulf cluster of trolls in soviet russia 2)???? 3)Profit /compound troll

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  36. Babelfish Translation by Shriek · · Score: 0

    Never make confidence with the French. They are eating cheese, monkeys of rendering. Never look at them, them words of pronouce correctly, the subsistence putting it that has the end of the words and worse of all, they take the urine of cat and sell it as "a wine". Yes, it is a troll, and yes, I have employe the fish of Babel but which inquiete when the trollkore is on losing it.

  37. YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOOKORE 0WNZ J00

    1. Re:YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I'm talking about!! I replied to the post above about how this troll stuff at -1 is really funny, and this is exactly what I'm talking about... This guy just responded to like the 50th posting of this Trollkore troll under this article. You'd have to read all the way down at -1 to even find it. It's great.

    2. Re:YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      YOU

      SO

      FAIL

      IT

      so, you suck. ahhhhahahahhahhahaaaaahahahh

  38. Since most of the other posts at +2 by MrHanky · · Score: 5, Informative

    are replies to trolls, I think I should try to make a serious post. But in the christmas spirit, I have to admit that I'm very drunk at the moment, so most spelling mistakes are the results of being non-English and very drunk. And having just seen a friend run off with the only good-looking woman in the pub, and she wasn't that good looking anyway. But I'm not complaining, so this should be worth at least +2 informative anyways (at least, I'm not going to say that *BSD is dead). Alright, here goes:

    I tried PCLinuxOS a couple of weeks go. It's a live CD a la Knoppix, but based on Mandrake instead of Debian. What I liked about the distro was that it found all the hardware, like Knoppix. I also liked the fact that it was really simple to find various apps in the menues, but that's not very unlike Knoppix, is it? I use Debian ayway, so Knoppix feels quite all right to me. PCLinuxOS is good in most of the ways that Knoppix are.

    However, PCLinux were (at the time I used it, in the beginning of December) not very well localized. I'm used to Norwegian keyboard lay-out, and when I can't find the '|' and '@' symbols, I'm pretty much fucked (especially the latter. Try connecting to an email-address or a Jabber-account without '@'!). What I'm trying to say, is that it's not quite as well localized as Knoppix is. Most programmers (who use US lay-out anyway) or Americans wouldn't notice, but persoally, I get confused. In Knoppix, I just choose my keyboard lay-out by right-clicking on the flag in the system tray, and I type '@' by pressing '@'. PCLinuxOS just doesn't have that option, so it's obviously a very American product, although based on the French Mandrake. That's one point in favour of Knoppix. Oh, and when you exit Knoppix, it will eject the CD and ask you to hit ENTER before the computer turns off, as if by magic (but by ACPI/APM).

    So, personally, I don't see any reason to use PCLinuxOS instead of Knoppix, but if you use Mandrake or Red Hat, it's probably the rescue CD you want. Or if you use American keyboard layout. No matter what, PCLinuxOS has very good hardware detection, so if you can't be bothered to make your own rescue CD, you might just as well use that as anything else. It's good. Submit bug reports. I know I should have.

    And it has many of the apps you want to demonstrate to most wannabee nerds.

    1. Re:Since most of the other posts at +2 by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative
      I also might recommend trying MEPIS Linux out as a great bootable CD as well as general use distro. I just discovered it recently, and I have to give it immense credit for working out of the box with all the NVidia hardware (evil-tainted driver detection and all). MEPIS gets the fact that people want easy to use and easy to install, not ideological purity. Mind you, I still use Mandrake when I'm using Linux, but if you don't have the time or patience to make Mandrake not look and feel sucky, or to make it work with your hardware, MEPIS is a great alternative (and can let you experiment with a Debian-based alternative that's very easy to test out).


      I am sure PCLinuxOS probably does as good a job, knowing the quality of all the old Texstar RPMs. I predict we'll all be hearing a lot more from these upstarts, and see them presenting a serious challenge to the most popular distros, especially with the major PR fuckup that RedHat has brought upon itself with Fedora (sorry, it had to be said) and with the middling quality of the Mandrake 9.2 release (as with the last several Mandrake releases, unfortunately - always _almost_ great).

    2. Re:Since most of the other posts at +2 by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      Wow, good job spelling for being drunk! Does slashdot have a spellchecker now??

      Also, I must commend you for not cock-blocking your friend. Nobody likes a cockblocker, unless it's an incredibly funny story and involves a fat chick.

      --
      Berto
    3. Re:Since most of the other posts at +2 by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Thanks. It's always nice to wake up with a mild hangover, read slashdot and discover I've posted a comment that isn't just some insane drivel about Guinnes or whisky, but somewhat comprehensible, and even rated '5, informative'. I'd impress myself, if I didn't know that I write slowly and proof-read a bit before I submit.

      BTW, my friend claims he later rejected the woman for political reasons, so he's obviously got his own built-in cock-blocker.

    4. Re:Since most of the other posts at +2 by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      2 things never to discuss with a woman (at least on the first few encounters): religion and politics.

      Shame on your friend. He could have had his fun and then dropped her later!

      --
      Berto
  39. Time to clarify. by Bilange · · Score: 1

    I dont get the "Beowulf clusters" and the "in Soviet Russia" sentences. Can someone explain?

    Maybe the BSD is dead too, if theres some kind of inside joke about BSD...

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
    1. Re:Time to clarify. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. You should get at least the Beowulf ones.
      Beowulf is a clustering system or something about that, that allows to conduct massive paralell computing - you get 500 boxes with P4 2GHZ 1G RAM s in one room, network them together, install beowulf and launch some program and it runs like on one computer with something like 450GHZ clock and 450G RAM. (50 eaten due to clustering overhead). Clear?

      Now imagine an iPod.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine a HP calculator.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine a webserver in RJ45 plug.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine a 4-store building filled with a lamp-based computer from IIWW.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine a classroom of kids solving a math problem together.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine a box in shop filled with soda cans, all with RFID tags, that are small CPUs.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine a digicam with a DSP inside.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      Imagine an original ancient greek abacus.
      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

      You get the idea?

  40. Mandrake is the best! Always will be! by RouterSlayer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've always liked Mandrake better than any, well, since Slackware went to v7. up to v4 slackware was best, after that... ugh.

    Mandrake has ALWAYS had the best hardware detection, especially for notebooks! my god it's easy to setup, and use too! and ALL the tools are there!

    what the hell is yer problem?!?
    It's got apt-get too yknow! and rpm! and mandrake package management... and everything.

    sheesh.

    BTW KDE kicks Gnome's ass all over the place. the new one, KDE v3.2, omg it's hot!

    so stop spouting BS about Mandrake, it's the only stable, well-supported, fully open-source distro left. RedCrap is gone (always has been CRAP!) and SUSE is now going to be gone (thanks Novell). What else? Slackware which isn't so great any more?

    Or debian? bah! debian sucks rocks, always has. The old Slackware could kick its butt into next week!

    There's a Mandrake LIVE (boot from CD) version too out now, I think it's called Mandrake-Move. It's very cool!

    So get off yer holier than thou bullshit. and btw - BSD Sucks! nice stable platform, LOUSY hardware support, write me when it gets out of the freaking darkages! Sun 2.4 left that kind of disk partition management in the dust eons ago!

    it's (almost) 2004 people, this aint the freaking 70s!

    And BTW I still prefer VMS (command-line!) v5.2 all the way baby, no gui's for me. and please! no bullshit about NT being VMS, it ain't, so kiss my ass.. ;)

    1. Re:Mandrake is the best! Always will be! by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Whoa, if you aren't a flaming fanboy I don't know what you are.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:Mandrake is the best! Always will be! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yer just a flaming idiot.
      emphasis on flaming. fame boy.

      Must be a debian luddite. couldnt admin a box if yer life depended on it.

    3. Re:Mandrake is the best! Always will be! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Binary distro's are for incompetant idiots and soccermoms.

    4. Re:Mandrake is the best! Always will be! by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Lol, thanks for the laugh, it's been pretty boring today.

      P.S. -- For the record, Slackware and Gentoo are the only Linux distros I run anymore.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    5. Re:Mandrake is the best! Always will be! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Ah, the good old Volvo-driving soccermoms. *coughMILFcough*

      http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/everclear/volvodr iv ingsoccermom.html

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  41. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and steaming hot grits poured down Natalie Portman's pants. you can't forget about the grits.

  42. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You CAN build your own live mandrake CD.

    http://www.linuxminicd.org/mklivecd/

  43. Solution? by 1000101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't trust "e"-voting. Why? Because it has been proven to be unsafe. That being said, I still like the idea of electronic voting and think a reliable system can be developed. I'm just curious as to why a dependable and safe methodology hasn't been implemented yet. I'm not convinced the reason is because it is not open source though. That would certainly make it better though given the implications of the results. But I could probably pick ten or twenty developers off /., make it closed source, and come up with a safe voting scheme. So why is it that things have gone so badly? Why do I constantly read about flaws in the system? Are the people working for these companies so incompentent that they can't write good code? I think the jury is still out on this subject and there is plenty of work to do, so I'm hoping that things will only get better.

  44. HD install by daserver · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems the author of the review did not read the README, which clearly states that installing to HD i experimental. Snooping around on the mailinglist one can see that some work has been done in this area and that a new preview is on it's way.

  45. Re:holy shit the trolls are taking over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, this is hilarious... I love reading at -1. I don't understand how people can read all these articles without being at -1... There's some genuinely funny stuff there, if you at least have some skin.
    I guess one reason would be worrying about what's getting picked up at the firewall at work... I worry about that myself sometimes.

  46. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, having run Linux since before there was a Win32, and having upgraded a running Slackware system from a.out to ELF binary format and BSD init to SysV by hand (lets you know a bit more about what's under the hood) I'd have to say that Mandrake is built pretty well, considering it's based on Redhat and its oddities.

    Yes, the /usr/include/linux thing is strange, but that's not the kernel source per se - that's the headers which are kept around so that the compilers have headers if you don't install the kernel source separately. If it really bugs you, symlink it to /usr/src/linux/include/linux (and do the asm directory while you're at it) like it was supposed to be done. Fixed quite quickly, and nary a wasted minute.

    If someone's actually a guru, as I suspect you're not since you sound quite frustrated, they're not going to have problems with something like this. They'll be smart enough to put a new compiler and compatible binutils in their own separate directory, and they'll realize that they should test the compiler with some sample code in a few languages before they start depending on it. Hell, they'll probably even compile their own kernel before they even get to that point. They'll get by without the tested and patch-labeled kernels provided by the distributor.

    The point is, if you're a Linux guru, the distro isn't likely to stop you from doing anything. You'll be able to make it do what you want regardless, and for those who don't want to waste hours, Mandrake saves a lot of tweaking when getting to a usable desktop. It's the average user who is going to have issues like these, and that's what Mandrake will have to keep working on if they're going to actually make it to Joe Blow's new computer. They've certainly got a lot of work to do before it's ready for you.

    Looks like you picked the wrong week to stop drinking... err sniffing glue... err snorting cocaine...

  47. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, as you said 99% of the work is done by Mandrakesoft. This has been the case with every one of their recent releases. I have been a Mandrake fan for some time (I remember installing the first or second release of Mandrake when it was really just a patched, bugfixed RedHat). I still use Mandrake regularly, but what ticks me off about the recent releases is that they all seem to be about 99% of the way there, or maybe more like 95% of the way there.


    Texstar did an absolutely admirable job of packaging fabulous RPMs to fix some of the atrociousness that came with out-of-the-box Mandrake back in 9.0/9.1 (and 8.2 if I remember properly). Check out the default font configuration on 9.1 to see an example of what I'm talking about - I couldn't look at the desktop, it pained my eyes. Between Texstar's RPMs and the PLF RPMs, you can actually make Mandrake 9.1 into a usable system.


    If Texstar is going to build on Mandrake and take a 95% distro and make it into a 100% distro out of the box rather than distribute piecemeal patches fixing the things Mandrakesoft screwed up, then by all means, more power to him. That's fully in the spirit of the GPL and of Linux in general. And I should again point out that Mandrake got its start as basically a bugfixed/patched up version of RedHat - anybody else remember their first releases when it looked like they had just done a Find/Replace on "RedHat" and typed in "Linux Mandrake"?

  48. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually no, Texstar's livecds were out a good month before mandrake released their move. Maybe longer. And mandrakemove can not compare to the completeness and beauty that is PCLinuxOS.

  49. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Holy shit.. he's comin' right at us!!! (jumps out of window)

  50. Canadians with dialup, I'll save you a few bucks. by aonaran · · Score: 2, Informative

    OSDisc.com is a bit pricey if you have to pay the $4.75US international shipping rate.

    See my site for CDs at $5 Canadian/distro shipping included.
    I'm not running a real business, just trying to provide a source for cheap media for those who don't have highspeed.

    This is my way of contributing back. $5 pays for the CDs, a padded envelope and shipping by whatever method I can afford with the remaining money.

  51. Re:Would you trust anything from Houston? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Texstar has proven himself to be more than honest and trustworthy time and time again. From his selfless help in the newsgroups and forums, from endless hours compiling applications for users for no more than a thank you, to now providing a viable alternative to any linux distro and still hasn't charged anything for it. I just wonder how many hours he's spent making rpms and now on this livecd for the community. So, yes, I would trust Texstar to the ends of the earth. What does it matter where he's living?

  52. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

    Please mod this up!

    In addition, almost all of what you're referring to can be configured by .rc/.conf files in the user's home directory -- which can be stored on a USB key, along with your favorite text editor. (They should be stored on a USB key in this manner -- so you can use the same home directory key across different live CD distributions ;) )

  53. Re:THE KING IS ALIVE by hdparm · · Score: 1

    WTF?

  54. Re:hey jews this post is for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dead Hitler fucks your mother!

    Bitch.

  55. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not at all, check your facts right. As texstar honestly mentioned it, he used the mklivecd script that was added in the development branch (cooker). He just had to use it and tweak some things. But most of the work would not exist without Mandrake team and other contributors.

  56. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by KeyserDK · · Score: 1

    I see, i probably did the (font) work myself then ;). Geeky me.

    --
    still reading?
  57. livecd script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    sorry to crack this one open but it only takes 10 min to make a mandrake livecd . It here :
    http://livecd.berlios.de/

    The hard work is tuning it. cloop makes u for nice compression but getting mysql and apache in there is a bit harder. I've made one too ..
    So if you have time to spend , maybe spend it on a home-brew live-cd ?
    The steps:

    * install mandrake
    * install busybox and cloop
    * get the script
    * run it with some additional flags
    * burn the iso

    It's also wurth to do for pursonal use. Like, config a clean mdk9.2 with all your preferrences, like mozilla links and mail config and whatever. then burn the iso you freshly made and you can do all your stuff at work on any pc without filding with the settings eatch boot.

    sorry to say this anonymous .. but it's NOT mandrakesoft that does 99% of the work on this one.

  58. Re:Mandrake is great anyway, live CD is even bette by Jerry · · Score: 1

    If you want a LIVE-CD of Mandrake then go to their website and download MandrakeMove. They just released it. Two things: it is built around the USB Key and it is available through MandrakeClub.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  59. MandrakeMove didn't work for me by gvc · · Score: 1
    Several comments have suggested MandrakeMove as an alternative. It failed for me in an annoying way.

    On my P2-300 with an ATI Mach-somethingorother, it booted up, X11 failed to start, and then it quit! The message as to why it failed scrolled off the screen, and it didn't leave me in command-line mode or anything useful.

    OK, so maybe it can't figure out my video card but why can't it come up in VGA, or at least command-line, mode?

    I'm still dowloading PC Linux on my laptop. I'll let you know this afternoon: (a) if PC Linux works on my P2 and (b) if MandrakeMove works on my laptop.

  60. Re:Canadians with dialup, I'll save you a few buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airmail is available for Canada and Mexico for $2.75. Its not listed on our "shipping info" page (it seems to kill our other international sales), but it is listed on the second page of the checkout form.

    Still cheaper to pay your $5 though :)

  61. Mandrake vs Suse by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

    "Mandrake is for the WinTel crowd"
    I wish we could stop parroting this old canard. It's a smear of all who run Mandrake, without any thought behind it.

    Dude, I for one run Mandrake on my machines, because, after struggling with Suse's bugs for 4 years, I'd wasted enough time on bit-twiddling. Not to mention that Suse9 is simply busted.

    Time is an important factor these days. I don't run Linux, just to spend endless hours fiddling with scripts and researching stupid mistakes. I need to get actual work done. Most things in Mandrake work, without troubleshooting; and I can tell you that is refreshing.

    --
    Campaign finance reform is national security.
  62. I agree MEPIS is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using it as the first distro that completely replaced Windows. I was given help from the forums for silly problems and there were only two of those. The box worked faster then I can imagine. I will be using debian for a long time. URPMI is no APT-GET.

  63. Got this yesterday... by dcuny · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm glad I beat the rush.

    I'm a Mandrake user, and regularly use Knoppix to access my email (in fact, I'm using it right now since I'd forgotten my Slashdot password).

    I'd taken a look at MandrakeMove, and was very unimpressed - it's basically stripped of anything useful except for a few office tools, and doesn't come with enough codecs to handle multimedia in a useful manner. In contrast, I've already burned several copies of PCLinuxOS for my coworkers - it's quite good.

    Knoppix still seems to have better hardware detection. For example, on my home machine PCLinuxOS didn't seem to properly initialize the sound card, or find my second CD ROM - both of which Knoppix does properly. And it doesn't seem to have as many developer tools, although I didn't get a chance to fully explore it. For a "normal" user, the selection seems complete, though.

    I also didn't see any way of setting up a permanent data store (like Knoppix's Persistant Home Directory). But this is a preview release, and I may have simply missed it.

    PCLinuxOS is basically everything that MandrakeMove should have been, but wasn't. Where MandrakeMove feels like crippleware, PCLinuxOS feels like a full version of Mandrake on CD - with all the eyecandy. The look and feel is awesome. I'm looking forward to the full release.

    1. Re:Got this yesterday... by dcuny · · Score: 1
      Correction - the audio detection does work on my machine, it just was set to a volume level of zero. KPPP works, but I had to tweak some of the settings to get it to work (it connected, but none of the applictions initially "saw" the connection).

      In contrast, Knoppix "just works" out of the box. It just doesn't look as slick.

    2. Re:Got this yesterday... by powder_web · · Score: 1


      From madadmin's review on Mad Penguin (http://madpenguin.org/Article757.html):

      "A feature that is being implemented (but not quite ready) is the ability to use a USB mass storage device such as a pen drive as your /home partition. This option is specified at the lilo prompt by typing:

      livecd home=usb

      When I used this option, I booted the machine and logged in as the 'demo' user with KDE.
      Immediately I received a DCOP error: "Could not read network connection list. /home/demo/.DCOPserver_localhost_0. Please check that the dcopserver program is running". Logging in as root works fine, as the system mounts /home onto the USB drive, not /root. When I logged in I checked the contents of the device and it had the demo directory in it that appeared to have all the right permissions... AND was full of profile-related files. The drive had plenty of free space as well, so I am not so sure what was going on here. To test even further, I attempted to log into GNOME too, but that proved futile. It would hang at the '2.4' splash screen. I left it alone, scratching my head.

      When all of the bugs are worked out, this will be an awesome feature for those of us who have important files that may need to accompany us in our travels. I am curious if anyone else has implemented such a feature with other live Linux CDs. If not, they need to start immediately. Texstar has a great idea here."

  64. Very Impressed by bryhhh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've just donwloaded the ISO and booted my wifes Toshiba Satelite A30 laptop from the CD, and it correctly detected the graphics, sound, network card and USB mouse. The distro does everything that Windows XP does, and more besides.

    You can tell that the creators of this distro have put a lot of work into the user interface. Just about everything is configurable through the configuration tools, allowing 'users' to fully configure their system without having to understand where the operating system keeps it's configuration files.

    This distro looks like a real Windows beater on a home desktop system, and my wifes laptop will almost certainly be running this distro in the very near future.

  65. Because Mandrake rocks, and so does Texstar (-: by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    why does it have to be based on Mandrake?

    Posted from the world's only 2.6-ready-OOtB Linux distribution: Mandrake 9.2. Running 2.6.0-1mdk as I type. Also running XFree86 4.4 recompiled (rpm -bb) from Cooker with no issues: if I was any more leading-edge, people would be throwing chunks of frozen foam at me. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  66. No, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    YOU FAIL IT!

    BWhaHAHhahaahAHHAAHhahahaah

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING

    1. Re:No, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU FAIL IT COCKSUCKER

      I AM TEH WINZ!

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  67. from the and-it's-not-knoppix dept. by dolson · · Score: 1

    Should read "from the I-cant-believe-it's-not-knoppix dept."

  68. Yea (Mod parent up) by Bilange · · Score: 1

    I got it; i guess i was not familiar with the term itself, but I know what are you talking about.

    Thanks!

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
  69. For those with KM266 chipset by WoTG · · Score: 1

    OK, this post is a little old. I ended up d/l'ing this live CD. It worked GREAT on my KM266 (integrated everything) based system - Knoppix doesn't get the video (fbdev works though) or sound properly. PCLinuxOS 2K4 picks it all up. Very nice. (This probably applies to other recent Via integrated chipsets too)

  70. Re:To the GNAA.. by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

    how sweet