Slashdot Mirror


VIA/Apex Game Console Details Leaked

DammiTT writes "It seems that Apex are releasing a new PC-based 'console', using VIA components, later this year. It'll be announced during CES on January 8th." However, HardOCP already has some initial pictures and details up on its site, for this "ApeXtreme Personal Gaming Console and DVD Player", or PGC. According to this early, unconfirmed report, it's running a 1.4Ghz VIA chipset, the CN400, and "will be powered by a near-instant-on version of WinXP (embedded) with Windows Media Player, and... will have removable media in the form of DVD/CD." It comes with "a 40GB IDE hard drive... you can play DVD movies, audio and video CDs... [and] the price points will be at US$299 and US$399."

241 comments

  1. Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Steve+'Rim'+Jobs · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If I'm reading the article right, there seems to be little difference between this "console" (if you can even call it that what with all the features) and a fully-blown PC, except for one thing - the OS, which will be embedded Windows XP. If a fully-featured Linux distro could be gotten to run on this animal - and I'm sure it wouldn't be that hard - it would make a great workstation, much better than the Xbox turned out to be for this sort of thing. The only potential problem I see is if it comes with some sort of DRM that makes loading alternative OS's difficult. Unfortunately this is more than likely, but we shall see. In any case, I'll probably be getting one simply because I enjoy tinkering with the latest tech toys. But who doesn't? 8)

    1. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by aflat362 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason it has an embedded version of Windows XP is so you can play PC games on it. This is a game console. I see no benefit of Linux on this system. If you want a cheap workstation build a cheap workstation. You could probably do it chaper and better than this box anyway.

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    2. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, linux must be installed on it! Everything is obviously better with linux... even if the device is designed for the purpose of running windows based games...

    3. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by NightSpots · · Score: 1

      Chances are the boxes will be relatively easy to modify, based on the 'not locked down' comments.

      On the other hand, this sounds an awful lot like the Phantom, an XP based PC game console coming in different configurations ... at least it seems these will eventually make it to market.

      (Of course, I see no way for the companies involved to make money on these things. If MS loses money on the X-Box, how does a fourth party expect to sell enough units to make a profit?)

    4. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Boot to Knoppix (need a hardware mod) with maybe a little something extra and us it to put a full distro on the HD and overwrite DRM.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    5. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 1

      Mmmm... maybe if you want a cheap Linux workstation you should go build a cheap Linux workstation? This is clearly for games, a market Windows still excels over Linux in. Tinkering is great, but with the openness of the architecture, where's the fun in tinkering?

      --
      End of Line.
    6. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      There is no DRM. RTFA.
      We are told the OS will not be "locked down", certainly inviting many modifications by the end user.

    7. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There will be no DRM. RTFA.
      We are told the OS will not be "locked down", certainly inviting many modifications by the end user.

    8. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wouldn't worry about the Linux issues, or hardcore DRM for that matter. Both companies, VIA and Apex are not exactly know for their dogged pursuit of DRM and like technologies. Apex in particular has been slapped down abunch of times for violating DVD 'standards', anyone rememeber the region free DVDs sold everywhere?

      There are a bunch of interesting things this console will bring. First is that VIA is really hot for it. They made sure to pester people to be at the press conference, something they are usually more laid back about. They are going to push this thing, trust me.

      THe next thing is that I expect it more to be a 'digital convergence' box than a game console. It won't threaten the PS2 or XBox, that is for certain. If you look at the specs of the chip, it is packs a rather modest amount of horsepower, especially in the areas where 3D games need it most, FP. The GPU isn't exactly anything to make people forget about the NV40/R420 either.

      What it will do is play DVDs well, most likely PVR functions, and play a lot of slightly modefied PC games more than adequately. If you take a TVs rez into acount, it should more than do the job. Overall, a lot of functionality for the money, but precious little bleeding edge.

      I have two hopes for this box, first is reasonably priced games. Second, and more importantly is that VIA makes this a reference design, and Apex is the first of many to come out with a box. Others will follow, some with bigger HDs, other with better video out etc etc.

      One thing for sure is that I will be at the press conference. VIA has always done some good things, and if you look at the stuff they showed me at Comdex, there are some really really cool geek toys there. They are all based on the EPIA platform which is small, fanless, and cheap, but more than powerfull enough to do most everything.

      http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12853

      All the people at VIAs show (they were next door to comdex) had really innovative things. If you are into neat devices, I recommend you keep an eye on VIA, the platforms that they spent years creating are just starting to take off. Also, FWIW, I plan to do a full write up as soon as I can after the press conference.

      -Charlie

    9. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      At $300 to $400 it is in the same price range as the 2.4Ghz, 256meg, 40GB, DVD+CD-RW compaq I am writing this on. With micronPC selling white box systems for as low as $200, it's a shame I can't get a decent price on something as small as a shuttle.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    10. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there seems to be little difference between this "console" (if you can even call it that what with all the features) and a fully-blown PC

      Sounds like an Xbox...

    11. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a fuck? It's got Windows XP - it will already be a great workstation.

    12. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      With micronPC selling white box systems for as low as $200, it's a shame I can't get a decent price on something as small as a shuttle.

      On the other hand, some of us will pay a premium for a small, very quiet, PC. I recently built a machine using the mini-ITX board with the Via Nehemiah 1GHz chip on an EPIA motherboard and it rocks. It's not fast at all, but perfect for a MythTV frontend box for the living room and it fits in a tiny case. Now all I need to do is build a homebrew IR receiver and I can get the big desktop-sized coolermaster case out of my living room (even though it's nearly silent as well.. takes up too much space and the Athlon XP 2400+ generates too much heat).

    13. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      It's a computer which fits in your normal stereo rack. Why wouldn't linux be good for it. Video, music, emu, photos and whatever. Why would I want a clumsy desktop computer when this thing actully looks quite good. It's as good bet as the MSI one.

      MSI mega pc

    14. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by aonaran · · Score: 1

      If you bothered to read the article it says that the OS will NOT be locked down and the 40 GB harddrive is not a proprietary format (like TIVO's was)

      It is a Via Eden PC with XP embedded preloaded.
      If it had a PCI slot it'd be just what I needed to make a nice MythTV box. (still could be a frontend box if they bother with a NIC in it)

    15. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by hey! · · Score: 1

      You could probably do it chaper and better than this box anyway.

      Cheaper, yes. Better? Depends on your requirements.

      For example, the cheap boxes I've put together are noisy, big, ugly, and don't have much in terms of multimedia capabilities, which is fine with me for what I want the boxes for. This thing is built from the ground up to be part of a home entertainment system. Of course you could put together somethign that was as quiet, had the video output and DVD capabilities, and maybe even looked as nice, but by the time you got through with it it could hardly be much cheaper even counting your time as free.

      I can see this box as a basis for people building Linux based PVRs or MP3 jukeboxes.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by ramzey5150 · · Score: 1

      Not a cheape Linux workstation, you could save some money and buy other similar boxes (save the component and s-video out) that do more or less the same thing. This thing could be a huge winner for Apex if they'd just do two things: 1. Include software to make this thing a Tivo like device (DVR/PVR) 2. Include a DVD burner to and make it so you can burn the recorded TV content to DVD. If it did those things I'd probably pay $500 for it, it would be worth it for people with HDTVs

    17. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could just buy a Tivo box for less, and even with the lifetime subscription, probably end up cheaper once you are all said and done, and still be running linux.

    18. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 0

      Does TiVo play XviD, DivX, Windows Media Video (through mplayer), DVDs, CDs, MP3s, and Ogg Vorbis? Can I use TiVo to fetch pictures off my digital camera? Can TiVo play innovative Linux games like Frozen Bubble? Can you choose the Linux distribution that your TiVo uses?

      I'm proud that you've chosen such a limited, featureless TV box. Congratulations.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      TiVo Advocate

      --
      I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
    19. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Of course, you could just buy a Tivo box for less, and even with the lifetime subscription, probably end up cheaper once you are all said and done, and still be running linux.

      Cost is not a big deal for me and I find the Tivos to be frustratingly limited. The system I will be replacing had dual tuners w/software encoding to DivX and 400GB of space and I've outgrown it. The new system will include a seperate back end file server w/600GB RAID-5 file system for show storage and dual Hauppauge PVR-250 tuners for encoding to mpeg-2. That will allow me to take advantage of the EPIA's built in hardware mpeg-2 decoding support (although the 1GHz Nehemiah is more than adequate for decoding my DivX recordings using software). I'd prefer to switch to mpeg-2 to make archiving to DVD-R's easier so I don't have to transcode from DivX (mpeg-4) to mpeg-2 before I burn a DVD of the shows.

      Anyway, as you can see, my needs are a little outside the scope of a normal Tivo box with a single tuner since they don't allow you to offload shows to a file server or burn them to DVD-R without hacks. Don't even get me started on the DirecTivo toys with 35 hours of recording time and no ethernet! :-/ The ONLY one that caught my eye was the Pioneer unit that had a built in DVD-R burner, but even then it doesn't let you create a skiplist to cut out commercials before archiving to DVD and it only has a single tuner. Dual tuners is an absolute necessity in my house since we have a bunch of shows on different channels that are all on at the same time slot.

    20. Re:Mmm.. Cheap Linux workstation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, wait, Frozen Bubble is innovative? Never mind the fact that it's obviously an almost direct copy of bubble bobble, bubble puzzle or whatever the hell the original neogeo one was called.

  2. Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    When My graphic card alone cost that much.

    I'm starting to think I'm getting ripped off from Nvidia and ATI here.

    1. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You you want cutting edge technology, you pay a cutting edge price. All that R&D has to be payed off somehow.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by NightSpots · · Score: 1

      Your graphics card probably has as much memory as that box...

      Thanks for buying those high-end cards, though. You make the rest of them affordable for those of us who buy whole computers for less than a grand.

    3. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Gherald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > $300.. my graphic card alone cost that much.. getting ripped off from Nvidia and ATI here.

      Who modded this insightful? It is obviously a troll.... if you are paying $300 for a graphics card, you are getting a premium product, at a premium price.

      Why should this be surprising?

      $300 NV/ATI offerings are years ahead of anything S3 has to offer. Here is a massive benchmark that includes (presumably) the best S3 has to offer.

      If you want something superior to that S3, look at NV/ATI's offerings in the $100-200 range. There's pleny of options for any need.

      If you want a recommendation, based on current market prices, I would go with either a 9200 (for casual gaming/video) or a 9600 pro (for moderate gaming).

      9800 would be a step up if you have a need for it, but really only necessary if you want to do 1600x resolution with the latest games.

    4. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Whole computers for less than a grand? Thats hardly significant or impressive these days. I can build one for $400 for common office tasks. Or for $600 for an average family that wants to play a few good games. Or for $800 for an intermediate guy that wants something more serious.

      For $1000 I can get you a 9800 pro, Athlon64 3000, 1gb ram, a 120gb sata drive, and a suitable mid-range motherboard, along with a decent looking case and reliable PSU. Thats a high-end computer IMO. Anything beyond is more like "ultra" and is a waste of money for the needs of 99% of the population.

    5. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      High end gaming cards are good for running high resolutions on a computer monitor like 1024x768 and higher. They're a total waste at 640x480 on a TV. Any budget 3D chip can play games well enough at that resolution. If the reviews are correct, the S3 Deltachrome chip in this thing is competitive with midrange cards from Nvidia and ATI.

    7. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Whats your point? I prefer www.froogle.com and just plain www.newegg.com

      Pricewatch used to be great, but froogle is better now for my purposes.

    8. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously a troll? Who modded this insightful?

      This retard thinks that everyone who doesnt believe what he believes is a blantant troll.

      Some people found it insightful, especially since great fucking games were put out on systems that cost alot less.

      Graphical capability? Why the hell would that matter when you can buy a game system that plays games (prince of persia, Soul caliber) for 99 dollars, but want equivalent offerings on the computer, you have to spend 200 dollars just for the graphics card, not to mention make sure you have enough ram.

      If you dont think you are getting ripped off by the graphics card makers, then you either have too much money, or not enough common sense.

    9. Re:Whats with the 300 dollar price point... by Gherald · · Score: 1

      It does not take a lot of rendering power to do 640x TV resolutions.

      These days the default for computer games is usually 1024x. Factor in FSAA and things of that sort, and there really is no comparison.

      PC hardware has allways been years ahead of consoles.

      As for those "great fucking games", that is another debate for another time. We are discussing video hardware, not the quality of availeable games.

  3. "The OS will not be locked down" by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    So it will boot Linux.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:"The OS will not be locked down" by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Only if you can make the CD/DVD drive first in boot priority-certainly possible with a hardware mod, but probably difficult to do. One way VIA could make this boot faster is to hard-wire the BIOS with preset values, no customization.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:"The OS will not be locked down" by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I imagine cd/dvd will be first in priority. The old Apex dvd players supported this so you could update the bios via a cd with a new binary image of the bios burned onto it. That's how I unlocked my AD1200.

      The reason they do this is to make manufacturing simple. Every single box coming down the line has identical parts in it. Once a completed unit is ready to be boxed, they send it to the nationalization part of the assembly line. Depending on what country it's going to, it gets flashed (probably via a cd) with the proper bios and country code. This is also part of the Q&A process so they know if they can fire one up and flash it, it'll probably work.

      At the end of the line you end up with mechanically and electronically identical units, each supporting various country codes. This makes manufacturing cheap, simple, and quick.

  4. Go Apex! by pb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if you could use this for a PVR too; Apex also makes one of those now.

    Just get me one of these with a larger hard drive, and I'd be set...

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:Go Apex! by Yhippa · · Score: 1

      That would be kinda nice, if they could somehow get Windows XP Media Edition on there, I wouldn't mind that either.

    2. Re:Go Apex! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      The only difference with XP Media Center Edition is the program guide, PVR and a full screen interface with big fonts that look good on a low-res TV screen. It's only sold to OEMs who install it in prebuilt PCs bundled with TV-style remote controls and a TV tuner card. Nothing you can't cobble together yourself from 3rd party software like MyHTPC or MythTV, but it has the advantage of being tested by OEMs as a package and working out of the box.
      I would guess that if this is being marketed to consumers rather than hobbyists, it'll have some kind of easy to use, full screen interface. A TV tuner and PVR might be an option, but you'd have a hard time adding it on yourself without a PCI slot.

    3. Re:Go Apex! by Yhippa · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll have to check those out. My big beef was lack of readability. For some resolution, my screen resolution will not go below 800 x 600.

  5. Lemme at it. by ActionPlant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always been a fan of Apex, and this looks fun. Competition for the Xbox with configurable, customizable components? And support for PC games? I'm all for it. It's about time we see something that isn't proprietary.

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
  6. Did somebody just... by inode_buddha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    see a marketplace where modded X-boxes used to be? Makes me wonder....

    --
    C|N>K
  7. Okay! Hate to be a cynic, but... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dumb question. Couldn't you pick up a full PC for that price by the time this thing comes out? Wouldn't that also give you a wider library of games?

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  8. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there enough shelfspace for one more 'platform'?
    What happened to industry consolidation?
    They should instead make an 'el cheap-o' game qonsole for subtropical regions with vast amounts of potential customers (ie, india [250 mill + middle class] China, LatAm, etc.
    I would predict they will be splattered by the top dogs sometime soon.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo's got ya covered.

      iQue

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I wonder... Will it have games where the characters sing, dance and pretend to kiss after some half-arsed carchase that ends in the middle of the street or park with all the involved jumping into immediate song and pretend kissing?
      is so -yea!

  9. X this X that by munch0wnsy0u · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One has to wonder when the completely overused and tired X will be phased out. I for one would be happier if the marketing people would find something just a tad more innovative. X is so overused - bleh!

    1. Re:X this X that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excuse me, but that is an extreme example of an exhilic exhortation. explication is expected. upon further examination; the letter deserves proper exaltation. it shall exact the proper amount of remuneration from your exchequer for such exaggeration whereas it exceeds the excellence expected it. the letter shall not go into exile due to your execrable exhortation . we see no exigency but exiguous explanation for your request. we expect expiation.

    2. Re:X this X that by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they should give it an unpronouncable symbol, a bit like "the artist formerly known as Prince"

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    3. Re:X this X that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xcuse me, but that is an Xtreme Xample of an Xhilic Xhortation. Xplication is Xpected. upon further Xamination; the letter deserves proper Xaltation. it shall Xact the proper amount of remuneration from your Xchequer for such Xaggeration whereas it Xceeds the Xcellence Xpected it. the letter shall not go into Xile due to your Xecrable Xhortation . we see no Xigency but Xiguous Xplanation for your request. we Xpect Xpiation.

    4. Re:X this X that by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      been reading too much Piers Anthony?

    5. Re:X this X that by leinerj · · Score: 1

      At least its not called the iBox or I this or I that :p

    6. Re:X this X that by cfuse · · Score: 1

      What about LinuX?

  10. VIA chipset is unstable by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VIA has a tendency to make the most unstable chipset.

    I have owned 3 abit motherboards, 1 tyan and 1 ecs, all based on a VIA chipset. Only 1 out of 5 board could remain stable for more than a year. Yes, yes I installed the VIA-4-in-1 drivers and more or less the same OS.

    If you do the math, that's 20% stability in my experience.

    1. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by awing0 · · Score: 1

      I can relate, I worked in local PC shops for a few years and worked some more in network consulting. The early via chipsets were a nightmare, and most of the times the 4-in-1 drivers would break more things than they fixed. Windows 2000 support was especially bad. I worked in the AMD K6 to Athlon 2.0GHz timeline, I don't know if things have got better since.

      Via didn't make great chipsets for Intel CPUs either, same problems with those. The Intel CPU/Chipset combo always gave the least problems/most stability. The AMD made (limited production) chipsets were decent, better than Via at least.

      --
      Cthulhu Saves.
    2. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      The VIA record with the EPIA platform is rock-solid. VIA's record with Intel and AMD CPU platforms, on the other hand, leaves much to be desired. This new Entertainment Center computer is based on next-gen EPIA. This is going to rock. Hard.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats what you get trying to buy the cheapest mainboard, really not trying to flame here, i had 5+ mainboards with via chipsets too, and problems from agp/ide/usb to just random freezes, but these days i avoid 'm, i prefer a good and stable chipset, even if they are more expensive..

    4. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know if things have got better since.
      I'm pretty sure they have. I don't have any hard numbers to prove it, but I've built a lot of computers for family and friends, and the KT266A and later boards are less flaky than their predecessors. I still prefer nForce 2 boards for the bells and whistles, but VIA chipsets are a far less masochistic choice nowadays.

      That said, the 4-in-1s are still a mess, so if you're not having any problems with the built-in Windows drivers, don't install the 4-in-1s. IIRC it was just a couple of months ago that VIA released a 4-in-1 set that caused massive IDE corruption if you had more than 1 GB of memory. The more things change, the more they stay the same . . .

    5. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      I've owned about 8-10 Gigabyte motherboards with VIA chipsets and have never had a problem.

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
    6. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the Via chipset is slow as crap. I really don't know what kind of job AMD's chipset does these days, but for all my machines, Make Mine Intel.

      --
      End of Line.
    7. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by awing0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Via is the reason I still use Intel. I've always thought AMD made good CPUs, but were held down by bad motherboard chipsets. The funny thing is, a lot of the issues weren't common between boards. I'd have identical machines that had different issues. It always scared me away. I used to call it "Playing the Via lottery."

      --
      Cthulhu Saves.
    8. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 0
      Agreed. I am typing at a KT266A-based computer (Jetway mobo).

      Cheap, simple to build, and it never, ever, gives me problems.

    9. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 1

      I have an Asus A7V8X which is based (I think) on the VIA KT400. I'm comming up on my year anniversary, and I havent had any problems, and it has spent most of that time overclocked.

    10. Re:VIA chipset is unstable by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with VIA.

      Now ECS makes crap boards, so I wouldn't blame Via for that one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Suspend Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    I noticed that the unit has a Suspend Button instead of a Power Button....

    Gotta wonder what the uptime record is for Windows Empbeded....;-)

  12. What will it play with? by 9Nails · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...normally around a launch, the console boys start to talk about which companies have signed on to make games. And how many games will be available at launch. So, the static with the games has me wondering, is this a slimmed down PC that will play PC titles?! Or is this a console that will play proprietary console games? Or somewhere in-between?

    1. Re:What will it play with? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the article. It comes with slimmed-down XP and can play PC games straight off the Best Buy shelf: "Obviously, you can play DVD movies, audio and video CDs, and PC games on the box." This means you get at least the entire Intellivision, NES, Game Boy, Game Gear, Sega Genesis, Super NES, N64, PS1, and GBA libraries in emulation, along with hundreds of emulated arcade games.

    2. Re:What will it play with? by jesse.k · · Score: 1

      and i can already do this with my modded xbox. which costs less than half of an APExtrem

    3. Re:What will it play with? by Exiler · · Score: 1

      How many hours did you spend modding your XBox, and what's minimum wage where you live?

      --
      Banaaaana!
    4. Re:What will it play with? by jesse.k · · Score: 1

      I spent about 30 minutes using the software hack, most if it was just backing up the old hard drive and installing the hacked files over it. Then I had a sweet $150 networkable media player and emulation machine.

      Next time trolling someone else, dumbass.

  13. The first question everyone asks.... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

    can it run Linux? How about is the platform any good or what is the quality of graphics?

    (Just wanted to know if anyone can help me here. Can this machine run Linux?)

  14. Planet of the APEs? by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Couldn't they have picked a better name?
    APE extreme? Makes me think of gorillas.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Planet of the APEs? by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      >>APE extreme? Makes me think of gorillas.
      Shouldn't that be you and me? :-)

    2. Re:Planet of the APEs? by Otter · · Score: 1

      Yup, "ApeXtreme" immediately brought up an image of the gorilla boxing matches on Futurama. "Now this is the high life! Watching apes mangle each other near celebrities!"

    3. Re:Planet of the APEs? by Speare · · Score: 1

      APE extreme? Makes me think of gorillas.

      And it runs Windows CE.

      Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  15. X-Box Killer? by lynxuser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds like it has the ability to become the X-Box killer, for gamign systems that run like PCs.
    Upgradable, running an OS (instead of a agaming OS), ability to put Linux on it. Yum. I can't wait for this to outshine PS2, GCN and Xbox.

    --
    I read Slashdot in Lynx, I am a real geek.
    1. Re:X-Box Killer? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      XBox killer? This thing hasn't got a snowball's chance in Hell of being an XBox kill. Hell, I'd be willing to wager that a Dreamcast can kick this thing's ass on the gaming horsepower front.

      No. This isn't an XBox killer. It's a completely different machine. This is a DVD/PVR that can also play games. Not a game console that can also play DVDs.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  16. Re:another xbox by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

    So uhh give me Xbox live games for the PC and I'll be happy. Oh and Dead or Alive 3. Make them all run on progressive, have dolby digital. Oh, and I want them all on my hard drive where it just lists them and I pick what I want to play. Then I'll be glad to get rid of my xbox's.

  17. Looks slightly familiar .... by LoP_XTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else think that this system looks a little like one of the 3DO systems that came out in the early/mid 90's?

    Not the first gen 3DO, but one of the later ones ... I remember when I was in Japan then, there was like 3 or 4 different models of the 3DO from different companies.

    Aaron

    --
    "Curiouser and Curiouser...." -Alice
    1. Re:Looks slightly familiar .... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Well, at a possible $399 usd it's priced much like the 3d0, so you may be right. And we all know how successful that venture was :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  18. Say it ten times fast: by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Competition for the Xbox with configurable, customizable components?

    Configurable, customizable components cause console crashes.

    Consoles "just work" because the games know the exact quirks of the fixed hardware they run on. Console games don't have the incompatibilities with video cards, incompatibilities with CPU models, and even incompatibilities with optical drives that PC games tend to have.

    1. Re:Say it ten times fast: by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      Good point. I think that's why [it looks like] Apex is talking with developers:

      We were also told that versions of games are being developed that you do not have to "load". Simply put the CD in and play, much like is used on other consoles.

      Sounds like they've got their bases covered.

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    2. Re:Say it ten times fast: by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, my friends X-Box crashes quite frequently, and I've heard that this quite common. For a console, this is completely unacceptable, but for some reason, people keep buying X-Boxes.

    3. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've heard, we've heard, they've heard.

      My friend says Slashbots believe everything they hear.

      I believe him.

    4. Re:Say it ten times fast: by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      Common or not, mine's crashed occassionally; this can be very frustrating after an hour of intense RPG gameplay. You're about to save, wait for the cutscene, and the box crashes trying to load it. That IS unacceptable.

      And yes, I know. It's a Microsoft product. I'm the idiot for not saving.

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    5. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 1

      Strange... I have one, and so do most of my friends. I've never seen one crash. Maybe your friend is trying to strip the DRM and do things to it that it wasn't designed to have done to it?

      --
      End of Line.
    6. Re:Say it ten times fast: by ActionPlant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe it's a generational thing? When did you and your friends all get yours?

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    7. Re:Say it ten times fast: by numpins · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about consoles or Macs? (:

    8. Re:Say it ten times fast: by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      They need a good Marketing group.. They could achive what MS tried to do with the Xbox and come out ahead of the game... Everything you mentioned eg "incompatibilities with video cards, incompatibilities with CPU models, and even incompatibilities with optical drives that PC games tend to have" Could be fixed in this "console platform" so all those issues are resolved.

      That could be a boost for the linux gaming community... Someone just needs to build a gaming based distro with great libs that make it look inviting to Gaming manufatures and suddenly we could see a good growth spurt in that market as the code base for the games will be out there for linux.. Just getting it to work with your hardware is the only thing left.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    9. Re:Say it ten times fast: by X-Rayden · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why do evrybody still buying XboX? because Microsoft made ppl think the XboX is better, even if its not! lol they buy opinion from thoses who talked videogame on tv and radio, so they talked a lot of the XboX forgetting the 2 other/better console.. the only credit that i can give to the xbox is online play... HardDrive aint gonna make me wet... what's the hot in that? smooth save? hey! before trying to do smooth save... why not make SMOOTH LOAD! Nintendo were trying to do just that with their mini-cd format! and by the way... 733 Mhz of a 32 Bit proc on a windows based system is like having a 200 Mhz on a propriatary system, Nintendo and PS2 got better CPU... Graphics are better on XboX? yes... but in what way... ? game are less fun! tke a good concept est exploit it... do not give him good graphic and think ppl will love this... if your a 3D Digger... go to Imax and check out Pixar... they are good at it! good and fun game do not NEED good graphics... if it come with, great, that make a great game candy eying!

    10. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Digital+Dharma · · Score: 1

      That's certainly a possibility. I received mine for christmas of 02, as did most of my friends. I know of 3 who had gotten theirs long before that though as I clearly remember making fun of them for still having the rathar large pads. I know they run hot on occasions, but even so, I've left mine on all weekend at the root menu of a DVD movie while the wife and I were out of town and even though it was quite hot when we returned it never crashed.

      --
      End of Line.
    11. Re:Say it ten times fast: by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      that must be partly to try and take advantage of all the oddball features their S3 card is capable of though, they'll want to compete with the graphics of the XBox, and can't do so unless they get developers on board to make native customised optimised ports.

      it's great competition though, they've got the geek market covered, every techy/semi-techy user will want one, never again will anyone with a slashdot account go for an Xbox! i'm all for it, even if it does run windows and use WMP by default...

      i suspect this just about dooms the XBox WinCE project though.

    12. Re:Say it ten times fast: by incom · · Score: 1

      Funny, I just got an xbox at christmas, and it just crashed for the first time today. Still better than desktop XP, but I hope this is a rare occurance. Just because it's standardised hardware, doesn't make it crash proof.

      (game was espn hockey 2k4, and it was caused by near as I can tell, excessive input from 2 controllers while loading a faceoff, but it could have been just random)

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    13. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      Well done old chap.

      Quite an impressive troll boy, I very much will look forward to your future endevours.

      au revoir for now.

    14. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine had his xbox crash while playing morrowind. I had a couple of friends over to play some system link mp Halo. It was the first time I ever saw an xbox crash, noone else I know has had their xbox crash on them.

      Also, he had a dvd dongle plugged in at the time so maybe that's the culprit.

    15. Re:Say it ten times fast: by ActionPlant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why thank you good sir. Believe it or not, I wasn't even trying.

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    16. Re:Say it ten times fast: by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      Actually, that could well be so. I've always had the dvd sensor plugged in. Crashing isn't common for me, but it has happened on a number of different games and a few dvds.

      Now you've got me thinking. I'll be unplugging the dvd sensor tomorrow for my GF's Morrowind marathon.

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    17. Re:Say it ten times fast: by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Mine crashes...and is unmodified.

      It doesn't crash often enough to say it's a bad product - there's nothing to say it's not poor quality games. But the fact remains that I've had more XBox crashes in the year I've had it, than I've ever had on my launch day PS2.

      I've had maybe 10 crashes on the XBox (In Hunter: The Reckoning, Whacked, Baldurs Gate: Dark Alliance and Morrowind), and 2 or 3 on the PS2 (Summoner which was full of bugs anyway).

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    18. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      The only crashes I've had have been during Morrowind. I can't say whether this is Xbox or software since Bethesda won't recognize it. Or at least the didn't last time I checked. It's a widespread problem though. As far as other crashes, I don't know. One cause seems to be heat issues.

      I haven't played Morrowind GotY to much yet so I don't know if it's a problem in that edition or not.

    19. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about your "non-standard" hardware, but 8 of my linux workstations haven't crashed in 3 years, running debian just fine (with few tweaks).

      and hardware that I have is the cheapest, I play games only on one of the boxes but not a lot, mostly do work...

      my p1 box crashed once (64 mb swap due to small hdd) due to swap filling up and no ram left, but this is not really a matter of stability, it simply ran out of ram/swap.

    20. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      My XBOX is a few months old, and every game that I have bought for it has crashed. This is on a new unmodded XBOX!

      What is funny is that I modded my XBOX with a software mod, and none of the XPort classic console emulators have crashed. So hacked/modded software works better than Microsoft's blessed software.

      Pathetic... but for $170 it makes a great MPEG4 and classic game player.

    21. Re:Say it ten times fast: by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Before I modded my XBOX, it had crashed multiple times with EVERY game I got for it:

      1. GTA3 Double Pack (both GTA3 and VC crashed)
      2. DX: Invisible War
      3. Prince of Persia (not a crash, but a corrupted save game where the girl got stuck levitating above a bottomless pit effectively halting game progress)

      I since became fed up with the crappy official software, and I tried a save-game XBOX hack, which lets me play MPEG4 movies and classic console and arcade games on my XBOX. While the media player has crashed, it is still in beta, but the classic console gaming system emulators have not crashed... so I have literally thousands of great games that don't crash!

      So in the end, my XBOX was worth the $170, but the official XBOX games aren't worth their price tag. You are better off hacking your XBOX and not buying official games.

    22. Re:Say it ten times fast: by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      So far we've had no problems with GotY, but it's really tough to tell...crashes don't happen everyday, only when you least expect them and it's the most inconvenient time.

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
  19. Advantages of a fixed system by tepples · · Score: 1

    Would the $300 "full PC" come with TV out? (A 27" VGA display sold in the United States costs much more than a 27" S-video display.) And would it come with a set of fixed hardware for which game developers can optimize rather heavily?

    1. Re:Advantages of a fixed system by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

      Would the $300 "full PC" come with TV out? (A 27" VGA display sold in the United States costs much more than a 27" S-video display.)

      The upward bound on that price range is $400. Not THAT much bigger, but when you're dealing with low-middle end machines (which is what this will be by the time it's released), that's a big jump in capability. And there are low-cost GeForce cards with TV outs on them. Are they any good? Probably not by today's standard, but right now they work better than vapour.

      And would it come with a set of fixed hardware for which game developers can optimize rather heavily?

      My brand of calculator comes with a set of fixed hardware for which game developers can optimize rather heavily. Doesn't mean they're gonna.

      --

      --------
      Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    2. Re:Advantages of a fixed system by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      You can get cheap video cards with S-Video out. You could probably buy a GeForce 2 with S-Video out for less than $50. So I'm sure the newer cards can have them easily. Of course, I'm not sure if the S-Video out is any good. I have tried in with a few cards a few years ago (Nvidia, Matrox) and couldn't really tell the difference. But then again, I wasn't using it much. S-Video really isn't a big deal anymore (I think you can get them for $40 to $50 on any card these days).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    3. Re:Advantages of a fixed system by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any TV-out is generally pretty crummy with a regular TV, but supposedly this will have component video output (better than S-video) capable of HDTV, which would look much nicer. Also, hopefully this thing will be capable of playing MPEG4 (including Xvid and all of the DivX codecs) - though they didn't mention it.

    4. Re:Advantages of a fixed system by forgoil · · Score: 2, Informative

      DVI should by all means be the best of the supplied connections. I am just sad that they didn't include HDMI (including sound) which would have been the absolutley easiest and best.

      Let's be honest, a cheap "do everything" product is not going to have high quality D/A converters for picture nor sound. Then it is much better to make use of D/A converters further down the line. This is why cheap DVD players can't compete with expensive ones when it comes to picture quality, although you do need a good display to see it (14" TV nope, good Panasonic 32", could think so, 50" plasma, jupp, 200" expensive projector, you bet).

      I'd be happy to see old horrible legacy connectors die. It is bad enough to get par, ser, PS/2, ISA Bios, PATA, PCI, VGA, gamepad, etc on computers when USB2, Firewire 800, DVI, PCI-express, SATA, etc isn't just a whole lot better, but also cheaper (to make) and easier to use.

  20. This is cool... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    DVD movies...

    Bringing the APEX style price of region free DVD players to region free DVD capable computers for the masses :)

  21. "Emachines" all over again! by mrshowtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if this new "game" system is a good idea, at least not from APEX. Yes, APEX has always been hacker friendly, but APEX has a pretty bad track record in the DVD player market; I had to swap out APEX DVD players four times before I got one that worked. Coupled this with the unreliability of the VIA chipset= "Emachines" 3 years ago, i.e. crap. Ironically, now Emachines has a really good quality and good value, for about the same price as this APEX game system. Even if they bundled this new game machine with a Radeon 9800 chip built in, I would be wary of it.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  22. You know what this means? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MAME CONSOLE BITCH!

    Seriously, I don't think it will take very long at all before some enterprising individual or group of individuals starts homebrewing their own Mame32 CD for this baby. Think about it. It has a special version of WinXP, that means access to the Win32 API. It will also mean standardized hardware.

    Something like that will make the system marketable to grandparents and uncles. People who have no interest in Max Payne or GTA VC just might want to play Burger Time or Space Invaders.

    Now, we just need for the owners of the copyrights to those old games to come to the table to negotiate licensing. Even if they don't I'm sure that something like this will sping up eventually anyway.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:You know what this means? by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This has already been done on Xbox: http://mameox.sourceforge.net/

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    2. Re:You know what this means? by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is this "copyright" you speak of?

      --
      *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
    3. Re:You know what this means? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Good. That and more projects like it are exactly what we need. Enough of this kind of thing will make people stand up and take notice. If 2 or 3 million people show interest in this software that will make people think. "We've made $0.00 on our rights to "Burger Time" since 1984. If we can make 20 cents per copy of the rom sold in this emulator thingie that we don't have to contribute any work for, that might be a good thing."

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:You know what this means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe we can all just enjoy very old games for free and they can profit off of new ventures? Why are you looking to charge yourself for a product the creators dont even care about anymore?

    5. Re:You know what this means? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Or maybe we can all just enjoy very old games for free and they can profit off of new ventures? Why are you looking to charge yourself for a product the creators dont even care about anymore?

      Two things that I refuse to pay for are Porno and old video games, but this is what it'll take to bring classing gaming to the masses. When I fired up Mame32 for my GF's children the looks on their faces were classic. They got a taste of the games that I played when I was their age.

      It was those games that helped to make me into the kid ass kicking machine that I am today. Can't beat me at Fuzion Frenzy? Maybe that's because I used to play Tron like it was the law!

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:You know what this means? by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People who have no interest in Max Payne or GTA VC just might want to play Burger Time or Space Invaders.

      Hate to burst the fun bubble, but if you just want to play Burger Time or Space Invaders, you can run MAME on a PSX, PS2, Dreamcast, Xbox, or hell, even a GBA. You don't need a 1.4 ghz anything unless you're trying to play some (relatively) recent games in MAME.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    7. Re:You know what this means? by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes but with all of those examples it means hacking the shit out of things (not to mention the expense). And God help you if you use a hacked ROM on Xbox, leave it activated and then go on Xbox Live. They kick your ass!

      Also, look at it this way; with a standardized and relatively open platform it might mean that a multitasking processor is finally good for something in a console.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    8. Re:You know what this means? by antic · · Score: 1


      I have a modded xbox that I can FTP to, running media players, picture viewers, snes emulators, the MAME gear with hundreds of arcade games, and a 120gig harddrive with about 30 games on it. I really don't know why anyone buys a PS2 or gamecube.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    9. Re:You know what this means? by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      please explain the ass-kicking.

    10. Re:You know what this means? by iainl · · Score: 1

      "Yes but with all of those examples it means hacking the shit out of things"

      Not with the Dreamcast, it doesn't. I've not done anything to the insides of mine except clean them once or twice, and yet it plays Spectrum, NES, Master System and MAME stuff just fine from nothing more expensive than a CDR or two. There are Genesis and SNES emulators as well, but they aren't full speed on a lot of games.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    11. Re:You know what this means? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      If you log on to XBox Live with your mod chip enabled with a hacked bios, Microsoft can/will detect it and ban that XBox for life from XBox Live. Not exactly an ass-kicking...but does prevent illegal copies of the game from being played on XBox Live.

    12. Re:You know what this means? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      GCN: Metroid, Zelda, Animal Crossing, Pikmin

      PS2: GTA [pre XBox release], Madden 2004 [online play], SOCOM.

      I mean honestly, do you really want to get into a console flame war? It's fine if you don't understand why anyone would buy a Gamecube or a PS2 but why try to incite an argument in the manner you have? Obviously you believe that no one should buy a Gamecube or a PS2 [ignoring anyone who bought a PS2 before the XBox was released and anyone who bought a PS2 or Gamecube before the XBox had been modded and software was written for it], and it doesn't appear that your opinion is going to change at any point. Why be so trollish?

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    13. Re:You know what this means? by robson · · Score: 1

      I mean honestly, do you really want to get into a console flame war?

      I'm so conflicted. I support your console-loving agenda, but reject your liberal-hating agenda. Quick, someone tell me what to think!

    14. Re:You know what this means? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Think about it. It has a special version of WinXP, that means access to the Win32 API.

      Do you really think they would put the entire Win32 API in an embedded version of XP? All a gaming/entertainment console needs is the basics, plus DirectX.

      Also, this product is clearly designed to compete with the Xbox, and thus Microsoft has more incentive to see it fail than to see it succeed. Putting Embedded XP on this console is/will be a huge mistake.

    15. Re:You know what this means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic video gaming has already been brought to the masses. Years ago. That's part of the reason they're classics. Cuz they're not only really good, but also really old.

      You can run mame on tons of things now, I rather see no need to give game companies the idea to start cracking down on the free distribution of Remarkable Old Games. If people want to play them, right now, they can. On mame. For free.

      To the masses? Everything is already accessible to the masses. If they are willing to put forth a modicum of effort.

    16. Re:You know what this means? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Classic video gaming has already been brought to the masses. Years ago. That's part of the reason they're classics. Cuz they're not only really good, but also really old.

      I'll say that most people in the US who are over 25 and under 50 have played Pac Man. How many of them have played Pac-Gal? Or how about Crazy Kong? Mame has given me the ability to play games that were not available to me 20 years ago because no arcades in my area had them.

      Everything is already accessible to the masses. If they are willing to put forth a modicum of effort.

      In a word. Bullshit. It took me countless hours to amass my collection of ROMs.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    17. Re:You know what this means? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Do you really think they would put the entire Win32 API in an embedded version of XP? All a gaming/entertainment console needs is the basics, plus DirectX.

      Well, YEAH!

      Also, this product is clearly designed to compete with the Xbox, and thus Microsoft has more incentive to see it fail than to see it succeed.

      Money is money. If they make it on the Xbox or if they make it on licensing embedded XP, it's still money in MS's pocket.

      Putting Embedded XP on this console is/will be a huge mistake.

      Why? If it falls flat, MS loses nothing. If it takes off, MS gets to claim another victory for their "XP Technology".

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:You know what this means? by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1
      I would be all for buying these roms if they were bundled up at a reasonable price. A real good example would be The Blue Sky Rangers ( http://www.intellivisionlives.com/ ). I gladly paid for their Intellivision emulator/rom bundle. These guys are an old group of the original Intellivision developers that do this as a labor of love more than for profit.

      Unfortunately the "Intellivision Lives" CD probably has such a small audience and therefore small profit margin that the commercial heavies aren't interested in creating such an animal. Go take a look on the various console video game review sites, the commercial versions of "arcade classic" games are almost always terribly low due to being compared to modern games in the graphics and sound department and they definitely appeal to a far smaller consumer base than the latest and greatest rehash of the same old beat-em-up or skating game.

      What I'm trying to say is that the commercial developers wouldn't be interested in releasing these types of things mainly because of the lack of profits involved. It's just too small of a consumer base to please at the expense of the development costs. I would be more than happy to buy (yes, I know...evil word) these classic games given the opportunity at a REASONABLE price point; especially considering that the bulk of the profit for these games was made way back in the 70's and 80's and any additional profits would be pure gravy.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

  23. I Stopped reading the article by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    ... As soon as I got this far.

    "It will be powered by a near-instant-on version of WinXP (embedded) with Windows Media Player.."

    Basically its a bog standard "Via Eden" PC with DRM and a shit name "ApeXtreme PCG" how naff! It'll probably be about as successful as the ill fated Ndrema.

    Might be fun to hack, but aside from that, its nothing special.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:I Stopped reading the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah , you dont just knock something like this together and expect it to take off! Why choose XP anyhow ? It would be far more interesting if it didnt ship with an OS at all and had something a lot simpler like a core kernel and some IO functions.

      And as for a "DivX" Jukebox .. 40gb... yo can already do this with several of the Kiss DVD players, and they have a much more appropriate price tag.

    2. Re:I Stopped reading the article by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      "yo can already do this with several of the Kiss DVD players..."

      Sure you can, as long as you use specific codecs. What if you'd like to use Xvid instead? Or .OGG for audio? Having a relatively open machine like this will mean that all codecs can finally have support in a decent form factor, at a decent cost.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  24. Typical TiVo Troll comment by Fubar411 · · Score: 1

    Not very harsh, but that's the typical response. For everyone who's thought they could do better, even at an inflated price, go ahead and try. I've watched with somewhat bated breath the Freevo and MythTV projects, but they always come in more expensive and with zero WAF (wife acceptance factor). I've had several people use my TiVo with no guidance by just mashing a few logiclly positioned buttons and figuring it out on their own. The wife loves TiVo (stand alone) to the point where we're considering the DirectTivo upgrade. TiVo is more than the sum of its parts, ie cheap motherboad + 40/60GB HD + that linux operating system. And if this media hub or pvr referenced in the parent are anything like other Apex products, then forget about a good user interface. The wifes, unfortunately, sometimes have a say in the tech gear purchases.

    1. Re:Typical TiVo Troll comment by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been thinking of building a freevo box for awhile, but until I go through my next upgrade cycle sometime later this year, it'll be expensive.

      Re-using your own legacy hardware for a pvr is what makes it cheap. Rolling your own with new parts is where the high price comes in. TiVO is always cheaper than what you can build NEW, but if you're recycling your 'old' p3 1ghz or so, then it can be more cost effective.

    2. Re:Typical TiVo Troll comment by Trelane · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed.

      I'm working on recycling my PII-400MHz [512MB RAM; 30GB disk] into a MythTV box. It by itself isn't very beefy, but I've dropped an extra $80 (on top of the regular $100 for a midrange tv tuner card) to buy a WinTV PVR 350, so that the encoding and decoding can be moved off to a dedicated processor, freeing the main cpu and keeping me from having to upgrade. At least, that's the theory; we'll see how reality goes. :)

      Eventually, I'll get a mini-ITX board that I can put in a cute container my SO will accept; for now, she's fine with hiding my huge tower behind the sofa. ;) When I do that, I'll see if I can myabe get another, cheaper card; the hardware encoding on the 350 will still be a boon then; I'll be able to easily do 2 streams at once. [so she can watch HGTV and I can record Sci-Fi. :]

      That's the other good thing about rolling your own--it may be about equal to the cost of a tivo+subscription, but you simply cannot say that the freedom the MythTV box gives you compares to the highly locked-down nature of the TiVo and such; I can add and remove parts; add more hard drives or external drives; stream it across the 'net so I can watch TV or recordings in my study or at school, etc. I see this as being a big reason for a school to work on such a system--they'd have an extremely flexible system for doing audio and video in the classroom; they need only have enough bandwidth and a client in the room; they could have a big beefy server in the back office storing all the clips for the school, all nicely indexed.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    3. Re:Typical TiVo Troll comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Eventually, I'll get a mini-ITX board that I can put in a cute container my SO will accept; for now, she's fine with hiding my huge tower behind the sofa. ;)
      My SO hides my huge tower somewhere else ;)
  25. Yes but will it run Linux? by __aailob1448 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Considering that:

    1- The Xbox, with all its "mighty" Microsoft DRM was made to run linux.

    2- It's a PC that, according to the article, geatures a non-proprietary formatting, standard USB ports, ethernet ports and whatnot.

    3- comes from a manufacturer that allows you to disable region-coding on its DVD players just by hitting a couple buttons on the remote.

    4- does not have any real hopes of signing up the big game developers (especially not japaneese behemoths like SquareEnix, Capcom or Konami)

    I think they definitely want their units to be hacked to death. And if they don't, they are blind, ignorant fools. I mean, this is obviously the ultimate set top box. Wireless gamepads? Please! More like wireless remotes...

    You could stream media from your computer, install mythTV and record your favorite tv shows, back them up to the computer over ethernet, emulate old arcade/console games. Basically everything the Xbox can do, only more and better thanks to the increased amount of ram and cpu speed. The possibilities are too many to list.

    It would be funny if I got it all wrong and this becomes the next ps2...

    1. Re:Yes but will it run Linux? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe there just trying to sneak region free players under the nose of the MPAA?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. put down the crack pipe by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    I guess you'd blame everything on the Xbox if you had the chance. Apparently you seem to ignore that EA was doing cross-platform for years...point your finger in that direction for a more realistic argument.

  27. Name Branding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ApeXtreme?

    With a name like that, their only hope is getting the licencsing rights for a Donkey Kong port from Nintendo/Rare?

  28. What's the video? by irritating+environme · · Score: 1

    Consoles are all about polygon power, more than processor. I didn't see any mention of NVidia vs. ATI vs. the rest.

    --


    Hey, I'm just your average shit and piss factory.
    1. Re:What's the video? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      S3 DeltaChrome, apparently it is quite a good graphics chip, doesn't rival the latest offerings from nvidia or ATI but is still quite powerful.

  29. Gorillas by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    APE extreme? Makes me think of gorillas.

    Yes, you'll be able to emulate Donkey Kong Country or Ape Escape on this machine, as well as watch the Planet of the Apes DVD.

  30. Too much for too little by be-fan · · Score: 1

    C'mon, a VIA processor? A SIS graphics chip? They are going to release a very underperforming system very late in the game, for very high price. Are they stupid???

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Too much for too little by SignificantBit · · Score: 1

      we know this sistem is clearly low-end... but, remember when you use TV as display you dont' need go higher than 640x480.

    2. Re:Too much for too little by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That's true, but this S3 chipset is only moderately faster than the GeForce3-class GPU in the XBox, and its probably a wash when you consider that nobody is going to spend much time optimizing for it compared to the XBox.

      The XBox costs $200. So this machine won't really be any faster, and cost 50-100% more money.

      Not only that, but by the time it comes out, people will be making noise about the XBox2 and the PS3. The XBox2 will have an ATI R500-based GPU! It'll be easily five times faster than this thing.

      If you want a cheap gaming PC, $400 will buy you a much faster Dell system, and $100 will buy you a very good Radeon 9600.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Too much for too little by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1
      That's true, but this S3 chipset is only moderately faster than the GeForce3-class GPU in the XBox

      This is the latest one from S3 (Deltachrome), which with alpha drivers scores somewhere between ATI's 9500 and 9600. A little more than just "moderately faster" - your $300 system is coming with the equivalent of a $150 graphics card.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

  31. Re:another xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The X-Box division has started turning a profit.

    You have permission to kill yourself now.

  32. Wife/Mom Acceptance Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what percentage of /.ers have to worry about parents rather than spouses in their tech purchases?

    1. Re:Wife/Mom Acceptance Factor by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Is that a trick question? Because the answer is ZERO. True geeks wouldn't worry about anyone else except themselves ;) ...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  33. Windows Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will I run Windows Update on this machine? Does the console/DVD player need to be activated with Microsoft or Apex when I buy it?

  34. Doomed to failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Full disclosure: I work for one of the Big Three console manufacturers. Still, I think the points I'm about to make stand by themselves just fine.

    1. The spec is not that great. Developments in graphics and CPU are mostly driven by the games industry (do you really need a Radeon 9600 to run Word?), and from what I've heard, all future consoles from the Big Three will have specs that make 1.4GHz look a little lame. Hell, 1.4GHz is only twice as fast as the Xbox processor. The minimum spec for next-gen consoles is an order of magnitude higher than their current ones. At 1.4GHz, it wouldn't be able to run many of today's PC games, let alone the ones to come 5 years hence (the length of the usual console lifecycle).
    2. "The OS will not be locked down." A critical key to the success of any console is publisher support, and publishers will not support a console that does not have reasonable copy-protection. If the OS is not locked down, then copy-protection goes out the window.

      An open OS also screws up the business model of all console manufacturers, which is to get royalties from licensed publishers. Why would publishers bother to get a license if anyone can write software for it?

    3. Who? Via may be famous for their PC hardware, but that is not the same thing as knowing how to run a games console company. They'll have to work very hard to convince publishers that they're a credible competitor for the Big Three. You could argue that Microsoft (and indeed Sony) were in the same position when they started, but I think they had enough money to throw at that problem.
    As the HardOCP article suggests, this could be a kick-ass DivX box, for watching all your media on a big TV. Well, I sure hope so, because you won't be playing many games on it.
    1. Re:Doomed to failure by etymxris · · Score: 1

      1. Yes, this is underpowered. However, developers are able to squeeze much more out of a single system such as a console than they are out of a diverse system such as a PC. That's why current games work at all on PS2 and XBox.

      2. You asked, "Why would publishers bother to get a license if anyone can write software for it?" Indeed, why would they? Maybe Apex and VIA are *gasp* planning to make money on the console itself, and not game licenses. Does Apex get money for every DVD that plays on their DVD players? No, but they still manage to make money.

      3. They don't have to convince anyone that they are a "credible competitor". If there is no cost for the license (XBox), and no funky hardware (PS2), then game publishers would be stupid to NOT support it. That is, game publishers that have already decided to publish to the PC can easily re-QA a game to function on this console. It's not trivial, but even a marketshare of 100,000 would more than justify the required effort.

      Again, this is assuming that the publisher has already decided to release for the PC. Pirating software for this console will certainly not be more difficult than for the PC, no matter how open it is.

    2. Re:Doomed to failure by lsd · · Score: 1

      If the CPU on this thing is a Nehemiah-core C3 chip (which it most likely is) then you can forget about being twice as fast as the Xbox. C3s are enough for a good many things, but they're very slow compared to Intel/AMD chips - the PIII-derivative in the Xbox should beat it by a significant margin. Hell, the 485Mhz G3-derivative in the GameCube will probably beat it too.

    3. Re:Doomed to failure by ewhac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The minimum spec for next-gen consoles is an order of magnitude higher than their current ones.

      7 GHz!?!? I have serious difficulty believing that.

      "The OS will not be locked down." A critical key to the success of any console is publisher support, and publishers will not support a console that does not have reasonable copy-protection. If the OS is not locked down, then copy-protection goes out the window.

      Here's an experiment for you to try some time: When your next-gen console comes out, claim it has anti-copying technology in it, but don't actually put any in (just stick in a delay loop for checkDiskIsValid()). See if anyone notices.

      I'm betting they won't. Because the fact of the matter is, whatever effect anti-copying support has on sales, those effects are completely swamped out by larger issues, such as sales and marketing efforts, distribution deals, "network effects," and the vagaries of the buying public. If you have a successful platform, no one will much care that discs can be copied. And if you have a crap platform, copy protection won't save anyone's ass.

      Get the fsck over it.

      An open OS also screws up the business model of all console manufacturers, which is to get royalties from licensed publishers. Why would publishers bother to get a license if anyone can write software for it?

      Because the tech support is better? Because they can get a turnkey development system rather than have to locate and pay for expertise to cobble one together? Because they can get co-marketing support? Because "outsourcing" is still a buzzword among executive circles?

      I can download a complete GNU-based development environment for the GameBoy Advance. But the documentation is uneven and incomplete. And I also don't get access to Nintendo's subroutine library (a valuable thing if you've ever tried to get the bloody network link to work). "Free as in beer," doesn't always win. There are tradeoffs.

      Schwab

    4. Re:Doomed to failure by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Hell, 1.4GHz is only twice as fast as the Xbox processor. The minimum spec for next-gen consoles is an order of magnitude higher than their current ones.

      I call bullshit, troll, or somewhere in between.

      You're telling me the next gen consoles are all planning on a 7ghz CPU? They better not be planning on releasing until 2007 or so, if that's the case, and they want to keep their consoles under $300.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Doomed to failure by -tji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're thinking in terms of the current console makers - selling the console for a loss, locking it down, and raping the consumer on the games.

      At $300 to $400, Apex/VIA are not losing money on the hardware. These are two companies with a lot of experience in dirt cheap manufacturing.

      They can make a healthy profit on getting the hardware out there. Maybe they can also get some game licensing revenue, or maybe they avoid that altogether and see if the PC game makers will do a trivial port to this platform and keep a bigger slice of the pie for themselves.

      VIA has had good results with the Mini-ITX community. This could be just an extension of that effort. Put a cool reference platform out there & let people hack the hell out of it.

    6. Re:Doomed to failure by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      with features like divx jukebox this looks more oriented towards the home theatre enthusiast more than anything.

    7. Re:Doomed to failure by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
      7 GHz!?!? I have serious difficulty believing that.

      The next generation consoles aren't due until Christmas season 2005. 7+ ghz will be a reality then, unless you doubt Moore's Law will continue (and I have yet to meet a serious computer engineer working in the field who doesn't think it will hold up for at least the next few years).

      The consoles of that period will probably use a lesser part for price reasons (7 ghz will cost approximately $400 at that time, given current trends), but the original poster's estimate is close enough that I don't understand where your disbelief comes from. The next generation consoles will probably push at least 5 ghz for the main CPU. In any case, they'll be a hell of a lot faster than the 1.4 ghz machine, which IS, in fact, destined to failure just like the 'Phantom'.

    8. Re:Doomed to failure by iainl · · Score: 1

      "You're telling me the next gen consoles are all planning on a 7ghz CPU? They better not be planning on releasing until 2007 or so, if that's the case, and they want to keep their consoles under $300."

      To be fair to the guy, the XBox came out late 2001 in the US, 2002 everywhere else. So that would only be roughly the standard 5 year wait to 2007.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    9. Re:Doomed to failure by millette · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Doubling processing power every 18 months, it grows rather fast. Five years means 10 times the power according to Moore's law.

    10. Re:Doomed to failure by Troed · · Score: 1

      You're thinking in terms of the current console makers - selling the console for a loss, locking it down, and raping the consumer on the games.

      Congratulations, you've fallen for a myth. Consoles aren't usually sold at a loss - the only ones ever to have done that are SEGA with Saturn and Dreamcast, and Microsoft with the Xbox.

    11. Re:Doomed to failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although there will be a lot of ignorant responses to your post, calling you evil for not supporting an "open" console system, I 100% agree with you. I read the responses and saw lots of mentions about how great the 1.4ghz CPU will be, and how it will "beat" the xbox, gamecube, and ps2. I have bad news for people: A Via C3 is not at all an intel p4, and the video card in this console is barely adequate to display text, much less hardware accelerated 3d graphics.

      This box will be nothing about a hobbyist box for people who can't figure out that they can build this box from parts themselves for less than ordering it put together. It has absolutely no future as a legitimate game console, at all.

    12. Re:Doomed to failure by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The minimum spec for next-gen consoles is an order of magnitude higher than their current ones.

      7 GHz!?!? I have serious difficulty believing that.


      No, an order of magnitude overall. The PS2, for example, has many bottlenecks. Inadequate RAM for one, and tortured processor scheduling... Not to mention that terribly slow DVD drive. The PS2 was released in Japan in the beginning of '00. If Moore's law holds up, that means a system released in the second half of 2004 should be 8 times as powerful.

      Here's an experiment for you to try some time: When your next-gen console comes out, claim it has anti-copying technology in it, but don't actually put any in (just stick in a delay loop for checkDiskIsValid()). See if anyone notices.

      I'm betting they won't. Because the fact of the matter is, whatever effect anti-copying support has on sales, those effects are completely swamped out by larger issues, such as sales and marketing efforts, distribution deals, "network effects," and the vagaries of the buying public. If you have a successful platform, no one will much care that discs can be copied. And if you have a crap platform, copy protection won't save anyone's ass.


      Developers were right ticked about the rampant piracy with the PS1. I've heard very reasonable estimates of a 10% sales loss due to piracy on that platform, and piracy there required soldering. While that 10% wouldn't have saved 3DO, it will keep a studio running for a long time if the game looks like it is doing well, because that money is entirely cream. 10% of sales of a successful game is another entire game that you can develop. Any executive that doesn't sweat those lost sales shouldn't be heading your team.And once again, that level of piracy was in spite of an actively modified protection scheme.

      With the current relative rarity of DVD burners, piracy on the PS2 has been much less of an issue. But with burners just hitting the 100 dollar mark, if someone releases a platform without any copy protection at all, you can bet your tail it won't draw many developers. In fact, please do that. Bet your own tail. Don't advise other people to bet theirs, because they're going to lose it.

      Why would publishers bother to get a license if anyone can write software for it?

      Because the tech support is better? Because they can get a turnkey development system rather than have to locate and pay for expertise to cobble one together? Because they can get co-marketing support? Because "outsourcing" is still a buzzword among executive circles?


      But Activision is large enough to take over all responsibilities in-house. Electronic Arts will probably create a consulting service better than what the console makers offers, and for less money. Truly terrible games will make it to market (worse than today), and half-assed unfinished ones will be pushed out the door without quality assurance. The IBM PC platform is arguably the creation of IBM, but do the millions of programmers out there flock to big blue when they're writing software?

      Face it, without lock-in no XBox developer would be paying Microsoft's exhorbitant console developer fees... they would buy a copy of Visual C++ and put in the effort to change some function calls. Co-marketing only happens to a select few big boys, "outsourcing" is still fought against by notoriously protective game developers, and development systems for new consoles are pretty cobbled together as is. As for tech support?

      You're talking about re-doing all of the mistakes that the industry made in the 2600 era. Somehow I don't think that is a good way to run a business. Many consoles fail for many reasons other than unmitigated access to the hardware for all developers and users. But no console has succeeded under such circumstances.

      As a game player, I want a platform that everyone can develop for, can extend, and over which I have full rights. It's called a PC, and it set me back a grand. As a game developer, I want a target platform with known parameters, whose players purchase games instead of pirating them, and which has an extensive user base. That's a console, and they hit the sweet spot somewhere between 200 and 250 dollars.

      Get the fsck over yourself.

    13. Re:Doomed to failure by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      The next generation consoles will probably push at least 5 ghz for the main CPU.

      I think that is a little high, the CPU isn't as important to a console as it is to pc (in fact you could argue it's not that important to pc's anymore). The ps2 main cpu runs at around 300 mhz whilst the GC runs at around 400 mhz, the difference between these machines and the 700 mhz X-Box is that the memory, graphics chip and CPU are practically built into each and data bus's are all high bandwidth. The X-Box is the most powerful console but it's lead isn't as great as the numbers suggest.

      My point is that raw CPU speed won't guarantee you a great games playing machine, I really can't see MS shelling out for expensive top of the range CPU's when most of their power would be wasted.

    14. Re:Doomed to failure by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      The minimum spec for next-gen consoles is an order of magnitude higher than their current ones.

      7 GHz!?!? I have serious difficulty believing that.

      Sony has actually stated they want Playstation 3 to be TWO or THREE orders of magnitude more powerful than Playstation 2. How?? Grid computing. If you've been reading slashdot at all the last year or so, you've probably seen numerous articles about the Sony/IBM "Cell" processor, a small processor designed to be used in massive numbers. They want to put one (or more) in every Sony product, so for every Sony component you have, your system gains more multiprocessing power.

      It's pretty brilliant, and also pretty brilliantly evil. They already have patents on the design.

      Also, just for shits and giggles, put a N64 next to a SNES, or a SNES next to a NES, or a PS2 next to a PS1. And tell me you don't see an order of magnitude difference in the power. It doesn't just come from the CPU.

    15. Re:Doomed to failure by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      from what I've heard, all future consoles from the Big Three will have specs that make 1.4GHz look a little lame

      And from what I've heard, we will all be driving flying cars powered by hydrogen fuel cells in 2010.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    16. Re:Doomed to failure by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Developers were right ticked about the rampant piracy with the PS1. I've heard very reasonable estimates of a 10% sales loss due to piracy on that platform, and piracy there required soldering.

      Yeah, and that unsanctioned copying completely destroyed the platform. I can't walk into a GameStop without seeing thousands of unsanctioned PS1 discs piled in great heaping bins selling for $5/pound... Oh, wait, that isn't actually true. In fact, titles are still profitably published for the PS1, and all I've ever been able to find are sanctioned copies.

      Any executive that doesn't sweat those lost sales shouldn't be heading your team.

      Incorrect.

      Any executive wasting valuable company time worrying about unsanctioned copying should be fired immediately and replaced with someone who can keep their attention focused on factors they can control.

      Unsanctioned copying is like the weather; it is going to happen whether you want it to or not. If the weather forecast predicts ten inches of rain for the year, but only nine actually fell, launching into histrionics about how someone must have "stolen" the other inch merely makes you look foolish. Likewise, it is the fundamental nature of computers to copy data. If you're an executive in this industry, you really ought to have figured that out by now. Stop bitching about the weather and focus instead on strategies to help your company survive the occasional slightly dry season.

      But Activision is large enough to take over all responsibilities in-house.

      And that's a problem because...?

      Electronic Arts will probably create a consulting service better than what the console makers offers, and for less money.

      BWAH-HA-HA-HA-HAHAHAHAHAHAAA!

      Forgive my <strong> reaction, but I've been a recurrent victim of EA's "support" in the past, first with the Amiga (absolute crap IFF parser code; Stu Ferguson and I eventually released a replacement that beat the tar out of it), and second with the 3DO (3DODebug didn't, and 3DO Animator was the most preposterously pathetic excuse for a paint program it has ever been my misfortune to encounter). Indeed, it's in EA's interests to screw other developers so they can enjoy a market advantage.

      So, yeah, let EA try. It'd be a hell of a laugh to see who falls for it.

      Now RedHat/Cygnus, on the other hand...

      The IBM PC platform is arguably the creation of IBM, but do the millions of programmers out there flock to big blue when they're writing software?

      You neglect to consider a couple of things:

      1. IBM was the entity to approach when IBM was still doing platform development (from original PC to PC-AT to PS/2). Even for the justly-maligned PC Jr., IBM was where you went for development tools and support. When IBM stopped innovating on the platform, they lost their place of prominence.
      2. IBM had outsourced software development to a college drop-out, which gave him the opportunity to leverage that expertise for his own company. Maybe you've heard of it...

      Face it, without lock-in no XBox developer would be paying Microsoft's exhorbitant console developer fees... they would buy a copy of Visual C++ and put in the effort to change some function calls.

      Well, make up your mind: Would people go to Microsoft for tools and support, or wouldn't they?

      I think you've made my point for me. Visual Studio is cacophany of half-assed ideas and a lame editor, all bolted together so you can't easily tease out the important and/or usable bits and junk the rest. Yet people still drop over $1000/copy for the damn thing. Why, when you can get the Proton compiler from Intel, or the MetroWerks package, or even get DJGPP or Cygwin for free? B

    17. Re:Doomed to failure by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.

      Any executive wasting valuable company time worrying about unsanctioned copying should be fired immediately and replaced with someone who can keep their attention focused on factors they can control.

      Unsanctioned copying is like the weather; it is going to happen whether you want it to or not. If the weather forecast predicts ten inches of rain for the year, but only nine actually fell, launching into histrionics about how someone must have "stolen" the other inch merely makes you look foolish. Likewise, it is the fundamental nature of computers to copy data. If you're an executive in this industry, you really ought to have figured that out by now. Stop bitching about the weather and focus instead on strategies to help your company survive the occasional slightly dry season.


      Weather happens. If the person building your house neglects to build a roof, that person is negligent. If your real estate agent tells you to buy a house with no roof, that person is negligent. If your console company builds a platform with absolutely zero copy deterrent, your console company is negligent.

      I'm not saying that PS1 copying was the end of the world, but I am saying that having not even token copy protection is a very bad move.

      It's all about changing the economic balance for people, so that the hurdle of bypassing protection plus the risk if caught plus the intrinsic moral shame is more compelling than 50 dollars. For most people copying games from their friends copies, the risk is zero. And morals are dirt cheap these days.

      Let me restate this. If the producer on a major project allowed a game to be released without any protection at all (even safedisk), they are going to have cost that company sales. Not as much as the RIAA (or BSA) might lead you to believe, but certainly some of the people who pirate are interested in you game enough to buy it.

      As for store shelves: That's so Chinatown. People burn their own downloaded disks. No store would be caught selling gold disks to people... That problem is largely contained. But people burn their own all of the time. Copyprotection doesn't stop professional duplicators, because they have sufficient financial incentive to crack anything you throw at them. You do and did stop them through legal means. Individuals, on the other hand, need a form of dissuasion a little less invasive than an FBI raid.

      The Electronic Arts comment was intended to be ironic, as I was already referencing IBM, and seemed like the most likely to setup an absolutely terrible service. Acclaim might possibly do worse, but I doubt they will survive for very much longer (I've been saying that for years, though).

      Personally, I don't think that having developed hardware X will give company Y enough outsourcing pull to be able to outperform company Z, company Z being the upstart group of MIT and Harvard grads who have looked at the internals and who also want to sell consulting.

      It seems that we're mostly in agreement, except for the fine line of whether or not a company can draw enough consulting services selling consoles without any additional technological encumberment (Yes, Sony, selling an obfuscated piece of hardware counts as an encumberment). While the optimist in my would love to see that happen, the pessimist is just not buying it.

  35. Re:another xbox by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    I Agree with the Original poster the X-Box hardware is wasted on the crappy PC architecture and the fact that its games are to a certain extent "generic" PC/Win32/DirectX Code.

    I would have had a lot more respect for Microsoft's console if they had completely redesigned the machine from scratch instead of butchering the existing PC architecture. The PC, or more precisely Windows has suffered and become the heap of shit that it is today because Microsoft have never wiped the slate clean and started afresh. Apple have done this several times both in their operating system and in their hardware architecture. And the result is a cleaner system. OSX is the best thing Apple ever did!

    We dont need the console market being saturated with X-Box clones with varying architectures, it'll result in an inconsistent gaming experience for everyone, and cause headaches for the game developers alike. The beauty of consoles is a fixed hardware spec to work with.

    Go Ahead get an X-Box... buy a second hand one, mod it, and pirate all the software. Thats my advice. Help microsoft to lose even more money on the thing!

    I use gentoo for my PC needs and a PS2 for games. I like it that way and Im not mad keen on FPS's

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  36. Re:another xbox by LentoMan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if only this xbox emulator would be further in development:
    http://www.caustik.com/cxbx/

    Some screenshots:
    http://www.caustik.com/kingofc/
    htt p://www.caustik.com/cxbx/screenshots.htm

  37. Xbox killer? Nah. by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

    People have talked abou things like this for ages, now Apex is actually following through. If this were marketed as an Xbox killer, they would have done it differently. We would have had screens of usage, a pic of the controller, a little bit more name brand than VIA (ew...). I think the article had it right. Yeah, you could play games on it (and it'll be easy) and I think that if this has a strong enough place in the market, game developers will have to make it compatible if they want to sell games. But there's more to it than that. This could indeed be a killer DIVX jukebox. Just as people often buy those MP3 boxes for their stereo, this could be the same thing, plus whatever the hell other features you want without it being an actual computer, because nobody's going to keep their computer sitting above the TV. That's why it says DVD player on it, guys. It's not trying to compete with the video gaming monsters I think anybody who's putting serious money into a gaming console right now realizes that you have to put SERIOUS money in. The system wars are pretty much closed to new competitors. Just look at the little thing, it's not even menacing. It looks like a designer DVD player

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
    1. Re:Xbox killer? Nah. by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

      sorry about the format, I need to hit that preview button a little more

      --
      Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  38. Not an X-Box killer by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With Microsoft supplying the OS, this is most definately going to fail as a console system. If it ever got popular, Microsoft would kill it off.

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  39. Not submitting, I'm buying in!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone will be branded with a neon green X. Resistance is futile.

  40. An unanswered Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What game maker would divest their IP in a console so open and free for copying?

    I'll tell you:
    No serious game producers. It's too risky a gamble. We'll see $10-$20 games max on these things, but nothing too system stressing.

  41. Screw games, give me a DiVX player by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

    The suggestion that this could be used to play divx encoded video is very tantalizing. $300 for something that could replace my gamecube, DVD player, and the cabling/SVCDs I make would be very well worth it.

    1. Re:Screw games, give me a DiVX player by Troed · · Score: 1

      A modded Xbox has been able to play DivX movies for a long time now. It will never replace the Gamecube however, can't play Gamecube games ... :)

  42. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's funny dude

  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Okay who's going to offer 1000 to Run Linux on it? by Bruha · · Score: 1

    I dont see the Lindows CEO stepping up on this one though hehe...

    But if you could run Linux on it you would be able to run all ALL your games on it.. From the Atari to the Xbox..

    I'm definately interested..

    Would be nice if companies worked to create a console standard (Powerful and simple) and then made profits selling games.

  45. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article states "The video processor behind the box will be VIA's S3 DeltaChrome graphics processor." Try reading the article next time, and if you don't at least don't use your karma bonus when you're going to ask a question which might be answered by the article.

  46. At least it's not a Phantom by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    So, whatever happened to the great vapour game machine?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  47. Say Hello To An XBox Subsidy by blueZhift · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I read about this and some of the comments, the thought suddenly came to mind that if this sells at all, Microsoft is a big winner. Why? Because you know MS is not giving the embedded Windows XP away for free and since they aren't making this thing, every sale is money in the bank for them. And the embedded XP is probably similar to what they use in the XBox, so they get a little more return on that investment.

    As for VIA, this doesn't make much sense as a games console. Usually a console maker takes a loss on the console hardware itself (at least at first) and makes up the losses on game royalties. PC games don't sell anywhere near the number that console games do, plus a PC game publisher pays no royalties to anyone. As it is unlikely that the market will support another proprietary format, games are not likely going to make VIA any money.

    Since VIA is in business to make money, one can only conclude that they plan to make a profit on the hardware itself. Being able to play some PC games and do PC-like things then becomes just another marketing bullet point. This is also support by the fact that the thing looks like a more or less standard DVD player. This strategy can work if they keep the manufacturing costs down and do a good job of marketing. My final guess is that this will be marketed primarily in Asia where PC penetration is low which would make a device with some PC functionality more attractive. And the you can bet that games like Starcraft and other titles wildly popular in places like South Korea and China will run on the system without a hitch.

  48. More Pictures by Scrambled · · Score: 0
  49. Apex has a way of making cheap stuff... by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apex has had a history of making cheap electronics that aren't of that poor quality. Beginning with their DVD players, which were packed with features and under the $100 mark (this was in 2001, BTW), and later televisions that looked to be a far better value than any other brand.

    How do they do it? All their products are made in China.

    1. Re:Apex has a way of making cheap stuff... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      My first DVD player was an Apex, and it was decidedly poor quality. It would overheat, for christ's sake! I had to install a FAN in my DVD PLAYER! It also had terrible video on every output, a dumb interface, a remote that had the wrong company's name on it and half the time didn't even control the TV.

      I have since upgraded to a Pioneer DV-C36, which is probably more than my TV can handle. It is a very nice DVD player with accurate color and great sound...but you geeks wouldn't want one, because it doesn't do MP3 like the Apex did (poorly).

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  50. pc tv out by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    just get a pc with tv out and a wireless keyboard,mouse and u get pretty much the same thing.

    1. Re:pc tv out by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Been there. Done that. Was not imoressed. The problem with a PC with TV out is that the TV out usually sucks. Mine is completely non-adjustable so I can't really use it in Windows for shit. Either the screen is shrunk due to running in underscan mode, or stretched outside the edges of the screen by running in overscan mode.

      If I had a nice, big, easy to read interface like my ReplayTV then my system would make a good livingroom computer, but, alas, I do not.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  51. It must be the shoes! by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering that Xbox and PS? Will be shooting it out for the top tier market, and Nintendo will pretty much retain their core market from their various franchises; their could very well be a place for the Apex.

    Cost of developing for any of the big three consoles is pretty much through the roof, enough to where any of the smaller publishing houses would never have a chance to develop for the current console market. This has translated into stale games overall... I own over 50 PS1 games. I own less than 10 PS2.

    Given that Apex could never hope to compete with Sony head to head, they might be able to carve a niche market by having a more diverse creative pool, lower priced games, less cost of development, and being able to take more risks as far new games are concerned.

    You wouldn't need tremendous hardware to do that, and since Apex already has positive cash flow from their other ventures; they can ride out building a user base.

    All they need is one killer game that is unique to their system. All the other things it can do would just be icing on the cake.

    This could very well be a giant killer.

  52. My Gamecube crashed... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ... Not once but several times playing Rogue Squadron II. There is a known bug in the 'Hoth' scene that, if you happen to hit it, will lock the machine up solid.

    That said, I've never seen it crash on any other game - ever.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:My Gamecube crashed... by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      You could get the original Super Mario Bros on the Nintendo Entertainment System to crash by getting more than 99 lives. Of course, it is one of those bugs that you have to go out of your way to trigger... but even old console games can crash.

    2. Re:My Gamecube crashed... by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

      Sonic the Hedgehog for Gamecube (the first one), was awful. I got a blue screen of death at least twice on it (Well, not a Windows BSOD, but a blue screen and the machine locked up)... I blame the game though, there were some other weird quirks while playing it too. I can't remember much more as I've banished the game from my memory. (and I think this was 2 years ago).

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    3. Re:My Gamecube crashed... by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. I expect you mean Sonic Battle Adventure, and i've played that game numerous hours and finished it a number of times on the GCN, and never had any problems. Are you sure it wasn't just a damaged disk?

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    4. Re:My Gamecube crashed... by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

      It's possible... the disk looked fine, but it may have been defective.

      I took it back to EB but went for a different game instead of just getting it replaced.... it's the only time I've ever had that kind of trouble and it just sort of turned me off.

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  53. How stupid is via? by sterno · · Score: 1

    Okay, let's think about this for a moment. You are going to try to compete in a market in which the 800 pound gorilla is competing. Do you really want to paying for that gorilla's bananas? Which is to say, it is damn foolish of them to use Windows as their OS because MS can sink their boat at a moments notice if it behooves them.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:How stupid is via? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Via arn't competing with Microsoft, they're competing with nVidia and they've been doing that for the past few years anyway. Apex are the ones competing with Microsoft, and that's upto them. Looking at the specs & the price point they don't stand to loose much if Microsoft steam-rollers them.

      ..MS can sink their boat at a moments notice if it behooves them.

      No they can't. Microsoft are convicted monopolists and are operating under conditions which limit what they can and cannot do. Any under-hand tactics which may be aimed at stopping Apex from competitng in the same market as the XBox would certainly not go un-noticed. Anyway, I seriously doubt Microsoft is too concerned about this machine; the PS3 v's the XBox2 is the one they're worrying about at the moment.

  54. There are good reasons! by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Informative

    Okay, simple:

    1) This baby not only has Composite and S-Video, but also COMPONENT Out!

    2) Portability and suitability for the case design.

    3) Pre-assembled and parts guaranteed to work with each other.

    4) A single platform that can safely be written for. Because it is wide open, you could well see significant Linux development (PVR, games, etc.) without the usual PC worries over sound, gfx, or chipset drivers.

    Think of all the time a company like Valve has had to spend making sure that their games work on 'X' brand's gfx card. Then there are differing generations within that company's platform!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  55. My Kindom for some new Capcom Fighters by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    USB jacks in front for joysticks, maybe now we can finally get Capcom to port something newer than Street Fighter Alpha 2 to the PC. Or how about a local release of the 640x480 Guilty Gear X port. Still, who in their right mind would cough up $300 for a PC in a box without Microsoft buying up developers left and right to ensure some good games?

    I'm sure 'porting' games to it won't be too tough, at least until Microsoft starts changing APIs around to muck things up for them. Seriously, the only thing more nutsoid than releasing a console into a market where Nintendo is floundering is going up against Microsoft while relying on their software fer chris'sake. Apex, it was nice knowing you. Say hi to Novel for me.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  56. Re:great way to flush $300+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will respond to your anonymous troll anonymously!

    Please stop trolling. I've had an apex machine for the better part of 2 1/2years, it's even survived a couple moves and it still runs as good as the day I brought it home.

  57. Ape Xtreme? by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    ape ( P ) Pronunciation Key (p)
    n.

    Any of various large, tailless Old World primates of the family Pongidae, including the chimpanzee, gorilla, gibbon, and orangutan.
    A monkey.
    A mimic or imitator.
    Informal. A clumsy or boorish person.

    extreme ( P ) Pronunciation Key (k-strm)
    adj.
    Most remote in any direction; outermost or farthest: the extreme edge of the field.
    Being in or attaining the greatest or highest degree; very intense: extreme pleasure; extreme pain.
    Extending far beyond the norm: an extreme conservative. See Synonyms at excessive.
    Of the greatest severity; drastic: took extreme measures to conserve fuel.
    Sports.
    Very dangerous or difficult: extreme rafting.
    Participating or tending to participate in a very dangerous or difficult sport: an extreme skier.
    Archaic. Final; last.

  58. Re:another xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares what hardware is inside if it runs things better then any other console on the market? Or who it's made by as long as it's fun? PS2 and Gamecube have absolutely NOTHING on Xbox Live.

    I already own 3 Xbox's I don't think I need another.

    Although I am not surprised that someone brought out how 'good' apple is on an Xbox topic....

  59. oh, that's easy... by keeboo · · Score: 0

    press the 'suspend' button...

    small circuitry makes
    CPU pin N (HALT): high

    press again...
    CPU pin N (HALT): low

    so if you keep it in 'suspend' mode, Windows can survive for years!

  60. Does it include other XP features? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1
    will be powered by a near-instant-on version of WinXP


    will it also include a near-instant-on BSOD?

  61. instant-on WinXP means.... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    "instant-on WinXP means it'll also crash faster than normal XP. No more need to wait annoyingly for crashes. All for an amazingly low price of 4 payments of 34.99. But call now and we will pay one payment for you. That's right, you can go from 0 to crash in less time than ever for just 3 payments of 34.99!"

    They should've went with Knoppix. Hell, there's even a version of Knoppix that is made for xmame-ing.

  62. Re:This got modded up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why did this get modded up? The author is obviously stuck thinking in their own little box.

    1. So what. It will be released before the next crop of consoles from the major manufacturers. It beats current models without much effort. The C3 may not be the fastest processor in the world, but has dedicated hardware for accelerating encryption (which can be retasked for similar math operations, somewhat similiar to MMX, etc) and the graphics hardware has MPEG2 in hardware.

    It is still faster than PS2, xbox and gamecube. And it will be available quite some time before the next generation of consoles arrive.

    "At 1.4GHz, it wouldn't be able to run many of today's PC games"

    Care to name any that won't run at the typical 800x600 max used on TV screens when using current 3D hardware?

    Besides can PS2 (PSX released outside Japan yet?), xbox, gamecube do PVR functions?

    2. Really? Is that why there is so many games on the PC platform? Copy restriction technologies can be seperate from the OS, and indeed this allows a publisher choice and the ability to move to newer ( fixed ) forms, when they are eventually cracked (modchips anyone). I would have thought that publishers would prefer this option?

    2b business model. Yes platform licensing is the only possible way to make money from a console.

    Did it ever occur to you that this is a hardware company, and that they might want to use a hardware sale business model. Which is why they will likely encourage the use of these boxes in alternative applications. (It is amazing how cheap something can be made for, if the volumes are right)

    Besides technological lockin isn't the only way to enforce platform licensing. Trademark law is quite sufficent in most cases. However I would be surprised if the console games didn't use some form of public cryptography to sign the licensed games though. (Don't forget there is hardware acccelerated cryptography support on C3 1Ghz+ chips)

    3. It isn't a Via console. In the same way xbox isn't a nvidia console. Apex is experienced in consumer entertainment devices, and that is all they need if they are planning on not following the traditional console business model.

    4. Besides it seems that the game playing ability is being marketed as one feature of many.

    However as it is PC based, with a windows OS, and therefore likely to be Direct X based. The effort required to port games from xbox or PC titles should be minimal, so if it gets a reasonable install base for PVR features, and the platform licensing, if any, is reasonable. I wouldn't be surprised to see at least a few publishers trying the platform out.

  63. near instant on?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It will be powered by a near-instant-on version of WinXP (embedded) with Windows Media Player.."

    hey im stuck with windows (im too much of a dumbass to understand linux) and why can't I buy (rip-off) a near instant on windows? the closest i can get to that is windows 3.1

    hehehe apeXtreme.... they'd better have donkey kong on it

  64. moot point by etymxris · · Score: 1

    1.4 C3 is roughly equivalent to a 700Mhz PIII. Five times that is a 3.5 Ghz, which is practically available already. The original poster was unlikely talking out of his ass, but I still think his reasoning is flawed as regards the viability of the proposed Apex/VIA console.

  65. PlayStation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I bought heart of darkness (2nd hand) on playstation and that slowed down and crashed after an hour or so. I saw a bit of a scratch on the disc.

    See, Nintendo was right with the N64 - if you want your games to last you need cartridges. 2nd hand NES and SNES games still work, but playstation stuff is caveat emptor.

  66. Infinitum Labs, eat your heart out! by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Wow, Apex seems to have beaten the Phantom to the punch.

    But I guess thats like saying Quake 3 beat Duke Nukem Forever to the punch.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  67. Nuon version 2 by derrickh · · Score: 1

    Looks like they're trying to bring back the Nuon. The Nuon played DVD's, CD, and games. An SDK was released and a few homebrew apps have been released for it, too. Maybe this has a better chance of survival than the Nuon did, but it'll be an uphill battle. The guys at VMLabs learned the hard way that consumers and developers both hate machines that aren't quite PCs and aren't quite consoles.

    D

  68. Assured of Success by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

    This is a great product idea. It is desirable whether or not it ever gets outside publisher support.

    1. Its not priced as a loss leader, so VIA/Apex can make $ off the hardware.

    2. It doesn't bondage the consumer with restrictive wrappings, so you can run linux, mame, internet communication tools, custom media players, and PC games.

    3. The processor/graphics chip is actually good enough to run most existing games (low rez), and is even suited to run dx9 games better than existing low end ATI/nvidia cards (on paper anyway). I'd imagine the marketing format will be to offer dual PC/Apex games in one box. Maybe there might not even be any license fees to make games for it! Or publishers would pay a small fee to have a standard "Works with Apex" sticker on their PC game's packaging.

    The only weak link is that most PC and console games are suited to highly contrasting controllers.

  69. Cheap DivX player and Emulation machine by Xian97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my household, I see this being used more for a cheap media jukebox for playing DivX, MP3, OGG, or XviD than anything else. The other main use I would have for it would be as an emulation machine - MAME, Atari800Win, Stella, JNES, WinUAE, STeem, WinSTon, and VisualBoy Advance to name a few. You can find most of those for a modified XBox, but it is a hassle since they would have been created with an XBox Developers Kit and so couldn't be distibuted except through unofficial means. For the latest and greatest FPS a pc would be the logical choice, but for emulation and older games that do not require a fast 3D video card this box would be a good alternative. I could build a similar spec PC for about the same cost of this or less but I like the small form factor and the fact I don't have to spend my time building it.

  70. Rabid Reflex Post Rebuttal by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can disagree and not be disagreeable, but apparently that's not your... Uh. Style.

    I'm not going to call your post 'dumb', but we certainly have a difference of perspective and opinion.

    We'll have to wait and see about the video quality won't we? Last I checked, Apex has never used Via components before (unless you know otherwise). Via's Epia quality is excellent. I should know - I've installed at least 6 of the Nehemiah-based Epia's here where I work. Simply beautiful design. Perhaps this is the very reason why both companies decided to work together on this project.

    As to the physical design, my point was that it is designed as an entertainment component rather than your average beige box. Sure, you can get a small form factor machine but the cases alone are very expensive for what you get IMHO.

    I'm *not* assuming about the "wide open" part. If you read the article you would have noticed that this is being marketed as being hackable.

    Where Valve is concerned, well EVERY video game manufacturer deals with card/gfx manufacturer issues. When you're as big as Valve you can expect companies to design their chips and drivers around your game - to an extent. But what about the old cards still floating around? Only a small percentage of people out there are going to actually run out and buy a new gfx card just to play a certain game.

    Example: Valve spent months trying to get decent framerates on GeForce FX hardware because of their poor pixel shader implemementation. Gee, why'd they do that? Why didn't they just 'let it go' at 20 FPS? Because they knew quite a few customers out there have this series of cards.

    And what's with this assertion that DeltaChrome is 'shitty'? For what purpose? I've seen the test results, and it's certainly no Radeon 9800XT, but consider that you'll be dealing with lower resolutions on TV. Even on 480i HDTV. So then, the difference becomes running Quake III at 400+ FPS on some top of the line card or around 80-100 FPS on the S3. Wow. Funny, I didn't notice the difference either.

    How about thinking things through before YOU post next time?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  71. competing with xbox will get you buried by Bobartig · · Score: 1

    Microsoft started their project knowing that they were going to lose money on each console sale, and only make it back on games. Their own model didn't have them making a profit for 3-4 years, and that was with much better sales than they've been realizing. They had billions of dollars of cash they were willing to sink into it, just to get a foothold in the console market. They spent like $450 million on advertising the first year alone. How exactly is apex and via supposed to compete with that, particularly if lots of their customers buy the box as a HW project? They're basically trying to build some soupped up version of the xbox (PC hardware in a nice box with really small WinXP type OS). Does anyone really think they can beat M$ at their own game? (i.e. a game that 1) microsoft made up in the first place, and 2) can't even win themselves?)

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    1. Re:competing with xbox will get you buried by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      We're forgetting one thing: we'll buy this thing. There is positive geek stigma surrounding it that Microsoft couldn't attain with years of apologizing and giving good, free sourcecode.

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
  72. The little hobbits would love that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first spotted "Apex" and "console" in the same line at GameTab, I knew I was in for something hilarious. Oh, man... I wouldn't buy this contraption if my life depended on it. My pal and I have already had plenty of awful experiences with Apex DVD players.

    Ok, so I let my best friend borrow LotR: Fellowship way back in the day. He had just received a fresh Apex DVD player from his mother, and he wanted to try it out. I thought, hey, that's all fine and dandy and such. So he puts it in, and damn.. the device certainly became the lord of the rings. It created five or six of them on the bottom of the damn disc. Needless to say, I never let him borrow any DVDs again; at least, not until he got a PS2.

    One thing I will credit Apex for, though, is that their DVD players are fit for hammering/axing/burning. Ah, good times.

  73. Here's a piccy by Lord+Graga · · Score: 0

    It's obviosly fake, but what the hell: here

  74. Re: As much as I like GTA... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

    Even better - get a PSX to USB adapter, buy a pair of Dual Shocks, and play on your PC. Good controller for SNES emulation, obviously the best for PSX emulation, and comparable to the "fit" of the Xbox controller for everything else.

    --
    -insert a witty something-
  75. My Apex 1500 was crap. by log0n · · Score: 1

    Died 8 months after I bought it ( http://www.nerd-out.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2828 4 ). The picture quality was crap, the construction was cheap and crappy. I bought an Apex something-or-other for my brother for Xmas last year, and it's now dead (got him a LiteOn LVD-2001 for this christmas). 2/2. I've got 0 interest in buying another Apex product.

  76. Windows XP on slot machines also by flowerp · · Score: 1

    Next time you go to Las Vegas, mind that a lot of modern slot machines run Windows XP these days.

    http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/commun it y/experto/aug2002/bally.asp

    I also believe these are networked.

    Happy hacking! ;)

    --
    --- Eat my sig.
  77. You know by geekoid · · Score: 1

    in the 80's I had an opportunity by into 'X' at about a buck a share. INstead I went with 'Q', what was I thinking?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. Not another computer/console by marcomarrero · · Score: 1

    A game console? It's an almost off-the-shelf, less than a PC, More than a DVR, Media Player. It's like the Nokia nGage, it's a Nokia phone with only propietary MMC's. Computer to consoles failures: - Commodore 64GS (Commodore 64) - Amiga CD32 (Amiga 500 + CD) - Apple/Bandai Pippin (PowerMac 66) - Atari XE Game System (Atari 8 bit) Successful computer to console: - Let's say that the Atari 5200 is an Atari 400 with some slight modifications... (I got a lot of info from darkwatcher.psxfanatics.com )

  79. Ha! We had it a day earlier :) by writertype · · Score: 1

    Although Kyle did a good job, there's also some more details on ExtremeTech, and on the Ziff-Davis CES report site here.