Slashdot Mirror


Apartment Lit Solely by LEDs

(eternal_software) writes "A company called Vos Solutions created what they call 'a blueprint for future living' named The Vos Pad. The Vos Pad is the world's first apartment solely lit by LEDs. There are some images of the place up on their website."

124 of 529 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 5, Funny

    I looked at this and said cool... My wife looked at it and said YUCK!!!

    Just goes to show, Not for everybody.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    1. Re:Well... by Metal_Demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems like a cool concept to me. Problem is they used not so cool colors. One of the best things would be the options in colored lighting, which is not great with conventional lighting. Shouldn't be terribly expensive either.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    2. Re:Well... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just thinking about how cool it would be to bring a chick home to a place like this. She'd probably be really impressed at first, but then if she became your girlfriend and moved in, she would make you change it.

    3. Re:Well... by l810c · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear I've seen a porno shot in that apartment.

    4. Re:Well... by foxfyre · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a woman and I like these lights. There is a certain romantic atmosphere to the lighting. It's too bad the ugly sofa pattern destroys it.

      --
      -- Not a /. dude.
    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both of my girlfriends looked at it and said: WOW!!! I also think it looks awesome - if the price comes down we'd love to illuminate your place with it.

    6. Re:Well... by splurdge · · Score: 5, Informative

      The N.Y. Times article that I read said the installation of the system cost $50,000 (according to the designer's approximation). So much for not too expensive. The article is here.

    7. Re:Well... by QHacksCumGuzzlinWife · · Score: 5, Funny

      My wife has bookmarked my slashdot account and reads this stuff.

      Don't worry about me, honey, I created my own account.

    8. Re:Well... by Deslack · · Score: 3, Funny
      Both of my girlfriends
      I don't think you belong here. This is Slashdot, News for Nerds, Stuff that matters?
      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
    9. Re:Well... by PishiGorbeh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Loved the LCD Tv over the stove.. Does anyone there cook? Grease and heat, Yuk.

    10. Re:Well... by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if youre in it for the long haul or you install it on large enough of a scale, with the energy you save over incandescent, it will pay for itself.

    11. Re:Well... by canajin56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I dunno about the large scale bit, it depends on the deal you can get. As for "long haul": If I left every light in my 2 bedroom apartment on 24/7, the portion of my electricity bill corresponding to the cost of the lights would only reach $50,000 by 2138. So if I make it to 150, I could rest easy knowing that I saved myself some money...except that utilities are included in my rent. I imagine if one lived in California, they payoff time would be shorter.

      On the other hand, compact fluorescent bulbs are 35 times cheaper, and 50%+ more efficient than LED bulbs (Even using coloured LEDs. Using white LEDs, fluorescents are 3 times more efficient) Some company has said that by 2005 it will be producing white LEDs that are as efficient as compact fluorescents...

      Until then, however, compact flurescents are the way to go for saving power OR money.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    12. Re:Well... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmmm.... "Female Eye for the Nerd Guy"

      OK, LEDs add a nice atmosphere to this place, but the Spiderman poster and the life-size cardboard Xena cutout have to go. And I don't believe there's such a thing as "load-bearing pizza box", so get shovelling.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    13. Re:Well... by AstroSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      After 20-odd years in front of multiple CRTs, the room is soley lit by me.

  2. what? by awing0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure there are tons of slashdotters whose apartments are already soley lit by LEDs.

    --
    Cthulhu Saves.
    1. Re:what? by iabervon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I doubt there are many slashdotters with apartments that aren't in part lit by either CRTs or halogens (such as LCD backlights).

    2. Re:what? by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, just what we need now is to tell everyone in the neighbourhood -

      Warning! Geek Crossing! Nerd Ahead! LEDs Lit!

      Would do wonders to my social life. No thanks! :-p

    3. Re:what? by Metal_Demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are giving a bad name to geeks everywhere. Most of us aren't ashamed pussies.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    4. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, yes. Although not at the moment. A few years ago I was playing with LEDs a lot while working on data aquisition stuff. I thought it would be cool to use only rehargable LED lamps to light my place. I rather dislike cords. It worked quite well actually, and I intend to fit my next boat out the same way.

      Mind you I didn't use them as a replacment for normal lighting as we know it. I used them more like a high tech oil lamp or candle so most people might have found the system lacking.

      Japanese style lanterns make particularly lovely LED lamps. Quick, cheap and easy to make if you just want a little mood lighting without the fire risk of the real thing. Or try the old punch some holes in a coffee can trick.

      Soon the lure of the light switch called though and I returned to using conventional electric lamps and conventional oil lamps. It was an interesting experiment though. I still keep a couple of LED paper lanterns on poles about the place for fun.

      If I were going to build off the grid (like that boat or the cabin in Montana) I wouldn't have any hesitation about lighting it with a combination of LEDs and oil (never put your eggs all in one basket).

      KFG

    5. Re:what? by sofakingl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure there are tons of slashdotters whose apartments are already soley lit by LEDs.

      You misspelled "parent's basements".

    6. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You seem to know a lot about this off the grid stuff. I read many of your posts and come off as this geeky woodsman how-stuff-works kind of guy.

      Thank you. Thank you very much.

      You saved money. Good for you. Most people in your position live a bit above their means and end up with all sorts of payments they can't make when the job goes away. You're ahead of the game already and show evidence of the sort of thinking that might make it off the grid.

      An Adobe hut in Mexico is a lovely way to live. I spent a few months in a couple back in the late 60s. $20,000 should last you about 20 years if you live a bit American. You can live off the interest damn near forever if you aculturate. Yes, it really is that cheap to live there. Adobde is absolutely delightful to live in in the appropriate enviroment (desert}. Hell itself in the wrong one (rainforest). I've tried both. I enjoy it for a time, the desert is lovely, but I'm from the northeast mountains and start longing for trees and meadows after awhile. A bit of ocean doesn't hurt either.

      Books. Lessee. There really aren't too many good ones. Most of them are written by "back to nature" types. There's a difference between back to nature and off the grid. One is a philosophy (generally propounded by city folk), the other is just living. Just living, on the whole, works better as a philosophy of living than a "philosophy of living" does. The trick is to adopt the proper mindset and adapt yourself to the life, rather than trying to force the way of life into some preconcieved notion of "the way things should be."

      On the whole "nature" doesn't give a shit about "the way things should be" and just goes about her business as usual. If you get squashed along the way, well, that's natural.

      The people who actually live like this don't normally write books about it. It's just normal life to them, why write about it?

      But there are some exceptions and a handful of books not overtly intended for off the grid living that can be invaluable.

      First off there's Walden of course, if only for inspiration, but there's a fair amount of very practical advice on living in there. Remember, the whole point was an experiment in living. Throw in Life Without Principle. If you read this and say "Yes! That's what life is all about" you'll probably have a shot at living off the grid. Anybody contemplating any sort of nonconventional living ought to read these. They're both available on the web.

      One of the most valuable books you can possibly own if you're going to build any sort of shelter, from a shed to a mansion on the edge of town is Rex Robert's "Your Engineered House." If you've read my posts much you've heard me mention this one before. It's a must. Written in a conversational style that you can read like a novel and illustrated with his own crude pen drawings this book is a marvel. He covers everything in this book and will leave you wiser about home building than an entire library shelf full of other books.

      ***BUY THIS BOOK***

      Did I make myself clear? :)

      It's out of print. You'll pay at least triple it's original cover price to acquire it used (I'm not the only one who reveres this book. Last time I looked there were copies available on Amazon), maybe double that if you want a really clean copy with dustjacket. Pay whatever you have to. Diamonds aren't cheap.

      Square Foot Gardening. How to grow the most food, the easiest. Forget everything you know about farming. Conventional farming is medieval ideas about how to grow food en mass for the masses. You want modern ideas about how to just grow food for you. This one will get you started. Supplement with any book about container gardening that catches your eye.

      I'm afraid I've never seen a single book beyond the technique of growing food off the grid that was worth a crap though. Honestly, they're all pretty much garbage. You can cherry pick them for bits of info though

    7. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've thought of it. It would take a few volumes. :) Just the idea of living off the grid is a full book. Witness Walden.

      Well, lessee again. Dirty never killed anyone you know. Unsanitary will kill you, unpleasantly at that, but it's a modern city myth that dirty and unsanitary are the same thing. In any case, what makes you think you'll suddenly forget how to wash? Going off the grid doesn't mean suddenly forgetting everything you know about living. Get some water. Use it. In one of the adobe huts I lived in, the shabbiest one of the bunch, I had to clamber down a nearly sheer embankment 1/4 mile to a spring for water. I didn't go dirty. I just hauled water.

      I remember reading a piece on the web about some guy who lost his job and decided to live in a tent. He was in your position. He had money. He didn't "have" to, but the idea of living cheaply, "close to nature" and off the grid appealed. So he left his apartment, got a tent, found some woods and moved in. (Come to think of it one of my physics classmates as an undergrad lived on campus in a tent for two years before they made him stop. He prefered it. Us physicists are weird you know). Then he got another job, but continued to live in the tent for awhile. He didn't last. He hated doing things like having to walk too far every morning to jump in an ice cold stream to wash.

      Well, he obviously never bothered to think very much about what he was doing. Why did he suddenly forget you can go to K-Mart and pick up a collapsible 5 gallon water jug with a spigot on it? Did he do something daft like not buy a good camp stove? And if he did, why did he suddenly forget that he could use it to heat bath water? For that mattter why didn't he bother to acquire an army surplus collasible bath? (There's an entire episode of M*A*S*H that revolves around one of these for goodness sake). Or he could have obtained a five gallon paint bucket on trash day, some old hose to go with it and made himself a gravity fed shower, which, in fact, could also double as a complete gravity fed plumbing system (even cities still have gravity fed water tanks. You shouldn't have to be from the woods to think of this). Fresh water is a dear commodity when blue water sailing. You can't waste it on showers. Running out can be fatal. But no one need go dirty. You take an old fashioned tea kettle. Fill it with salt water. Put it up to boil. Fresh steam comes out the spout. You catch it on a sponge and have a nice, toasty warm sponge bath.

      So you're afraid of being dirty. So don't be dirty. Wash. There's a couple dozen perfectly nifty ways to accomplish this if you don't get locked into thinking that "wash" means "upstairs bathroom."

      Bored. Books are cheap. You go to a library sale on the last half day and walk away with shopping bags of books at a couple dollars a bag. A lot of O'Reilly books are showing up at these these days. All the "dime" novels you can choke down. Complete encyclopedias for next to nothing. Even lots of books directly relevant to living off the grid like gardening books. Our ancestors read a lot.

      They played a lot of music too. Get ahold of a fiddle or something.

      But on the whole I've never found being bored to be an issue except when leading a fairly conventional life. Living off the grid is active and interesting as all hell. You have do things, make things, invent things and think about things. The greatest thing about it is there's very little distinction between labor and leisure. The concepts lose most meaning when you don't have a boss. Work is leisure. leisure is your work. There's no "job." It's just living. Living can be fun.

      Ok. Family issues. I'll add a book. J. Krishnamurti; Think on These Things. Chapter 11. Conformity and Revolt. It might give you something to, ummmm, think on. The rest of the book isn't too bad either.

      RV squatting in the woods. Actually, there's a small, very loosely knit community that's doing exactly that right now

    8. Re:what? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeesh. Walden isn't "back to nature"?

      That scares me as to what you've run into that *is* "back to nature". I get a vague image of PETA meets the Amish or something.

    9. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, off the grid really only means just that. Not dependant on the grid. The grand infrastructure of corporate supplied services. It doesn't necessarily imply self sufficient; and there are whole off the grid communities scattered about.

      Of course in Mexico I lived in villages that were off the grid and yet otherwise perfectly normal villages, largely self sufficient, but only as a village. The buddy system has some real advantages. That's one of the advantages of going off grid in a camper or boat, even if you're solo. When you need a buddy you can find one and they take care of each other.

      But yeah, if you're out in the middle of the Atlantic on a 20' boat you'd damned well better be able to take care of yourself, and if you can that's probably the best place to be if things go all to hell. :)

      I can't say I recommend self dentistry as anything but an emergency measure though.

      Let's say that off the grid means not dependant on services and implies the ability to be self sufficient when and where the need arises. You have a certain security that way.

      Right now I'm obviously not off the grid (Ok, I could be actually. I've powered a compter by pedal generator, but I'm not). In fact I'm city dwelling.

      But when all the lights went out last summer most of mine didn't. People couldn't buy food because all the stores are computerized these days. I had plenty of dried stores on hand and fresh produce in the yard. None of it went bad in the fridge because I don't rely on refrigeration. My toilet didn't flush, but that's because my toilet doesn't flush.

      I passed a powerless night almost exactly as I always do. Entertaining the neighbors for a bit with my guitar, then reading a physics journal and working on my greek for a bit by the warm glow of my oil lamps. (No Slashdot though).

      And if push came to shove I know how to make my own oil to fuel them. Petroleum isn't exactly the only source of hydrocarbons in the world.

      So at the moment I'm quite the little urban urchin. No one should get the idea that I'm Grizzly Adams or anything. Nor am I a Luddite. My shelves aren't lined with anti tech survivalist tomes, unless you consider O'Reilly manuals, Halliday & Resnick, the CRC manual and The Theory of Rotating Stars survivalist tomes. Yes, my light is an oil lamp, but the cabinet it sits on is stuffed with electronic componants and test gear.

      I just play the game by different rules and values and with a skill set appropriate to those rules and values.

      On the other hand, yeah, I'm perfectly capable of wandering off into the state park and flat out disappearing in the woods and remaining there in comfort, by my own standards, for as long as I like, and can get to those woods in a day, with all my gear, without recourse to a motor vehicle. I can get by with little more than a sturdy knife and box of matches (just to make it easy the first few days) if I have to and occasionally do just that. I part it's my technical background that allows me to do it. Physics, astronomy, chemistry, engineering, biology and the history of those are all very valuable things to know out in the woods alone. The average survivalist can survive like that. I can live.

      And oddly enough I'm not sure exactly how I came by those skills, per se. I mean obviously I learned them over time, and I've read a great deal, and "practiced," but I didn't take courses or anything. They don't cover roots and berries in Diffy Calc. It's just the way I've always lived, since I was a child, I like to do things on my own and I picked things up as a went along, even most of my science; and invented three quarters of it simply by paying attention and thinking about things.

      It's just life.

      KFG

    10. Re:what? by jerde · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gosh I hope you don't mean "in parallel" -- you'd want that resistor in series, or all it's doing is wasting power!

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    11. Re:what? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's not really. While he lived in his cabin in the woods (only a mile out of town mind you) he also kept his commercial schoolroom, lectured, made few of his out of state tourist journies, sold his produce commercially and continued to be an active member of the transcendentalist literary movement.

      It was, as he stated, an experiment in minimalist living, and the form it took was that of a gentleman farmer and scholar reduced to the barest essentials. He also happened to love nature.

      No, I've never met a "back to nature" person who PETA would want to have much to do with. PETA isn't much for slaughtering livingstock and keeping milk cows and hunting. PETA are the very antithesis of the back to nature folk and can only exist in cities. The Amish are religious Luddites, not back to nature people, perfectly civilized and like it that way and very effective capitalists. They tend to think of the back to nature folk as city loons, and they're right.

      The back to nature folk are sort of a cross between hippies, survivalists and new agers.

      They're not only anticapitalist, they're antimoney and often antitrade. They have some vague romantic notions about "being one" with nature and try live totally and completely self sufficiently, by farming mostly, with some hunting and gathering thrown in, and making absolutely everything themselves, eschewing everything they perceive as technology (without any apparent realization that farming itself is a technology, as is a house and a candle and a steel hoe). They can't quite make up their minds about whether they want to be hermits or communists. They virtually all come from cities (country folk think of them as city loons, and they're right) and they virtually all fail.

      You can do mountain man/hermit just fine if you want. A good knife and you're set. A gun is really, really nice to have though, and matches make life easier. Every one I've known also has some product to sell now and again, even if it's only racoon hides. But then a good knife is actually pretty high technology. A gun is even higher. You're not going make your own of either out in the woods or on your little farm thingy. You have to buy them.

      The only back to nature folk I've ever met who "made it" were the ones that eventually realized that the way you make a living from a farm was by being a farmer. You grow crops in excess of your needs. You sell them and then you spend the money on things you need. Things that other people make in excess while you're farming. Things like oil lamps, plough blades, maybe a radio, or a knife, or an electric generator, or, gasp, modern medicine ( 'cause those natural herbs just didn't seem to do the job after all on little Johnny's appendicitis).

      Because farming is a technology of civilization. Go figure.

      Thoreau sold crops and taught school. For money. To buy things with. Things he couldn't make himself. Like flour (remember I said don't grow grain?) paper and ink. His family owned a factory in town that made pencils.

      I only know of one way to go completely back to nature that works. Full blown late stone age living. It can be done. There are certainly at least a few people living like that right now, although fewer every year (The knife and the T-shirt seem to have made it nearly everywhere now). I've tried it as an experiment (just because it's the sort of thing I do sometimes for fun. Really). I can do it. Others less suited for it than I have managed with a little extra to work with. Selkirk, for instance. It isn't what most people would call "fun." Oh yeah, don't get sick.

      City person. In the woods. Naked.

      Riiiiiiiight.

      They don't even know how to make a proper pointy stick.

      KFG

  3. Please use google cache, already slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    A link to a page full of images on slashdot... This website will die.

    Please use this:
    Google cache for the pictures

    And this:
    Google cache for the website

    1. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, but the pics themselves weren't cached on google, only the html content so the pics can't load from a site that's so abysmally slashdotted that I'd be suprised if it's still up and running in 2 hours.

    2. Re:Please use google cache, already slow... by dozing · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course google doesn't cache images. So how about a different website that displays some images of the same pad: http://www.litelogic.com/client/vos.htm

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
  4. Nightclubbing by BWJones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, its funny but iTunes spun up Nightclubbing by Iggy Pop as soon as I clicked on the link to the sight, because that is exactly what this looks like to me. If I were single and 18-23 again perhaps I might think this was cool, but come on now. I was really hoping that by clicking on the link I was going to see real LED lights (perhaps spectrally tuned to the wavelength of sunlight) that could really light a house. I don't think we are that far away from other applications like automobile headlights and real replacement sources for household lighting, but this is not quite there. This to me is more like mood lighting or decorative lighting rather than household lighting.

    Also, it appears that the apartment is not lit entirely by LEDs as ACDC lighting systems are providing cold cathode lighting as well.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Nightclubbing by BWJones · · Score: 2, Funny

      as soon as I clicked on the link to the sight

      Aaarrgh! For those spelling/grammar nazis out there, I've been writing vision research grants all day, so sight should be site. Forgive me.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Nightclubbing by venicebeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, apparently in the future, all of our houses will look like the inside of a nightclub with purplish bluish hues.

      I agree with you -- they clearly were more interested in making it look cool than having a functional lighting system. I would have a hard time reading in there. Is this a matter of intent or technological limitations? I mean is it possible to get a room nice and bright and white using only LED lighting?

  5. News? by JamesD_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Already have one, sorry.

  6. Big deal... by odie_q · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I turn off my monitors, my apartment is also lit solely by LEDs.

    --
    ...ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  7. PURPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OH GAWD make it stop..... I would turn insane after living in a place like that, with hardly any direct light, and everything purple or green. Did they do that on purpose? I know even the white LEDs are a little thin in their output spectrum, but damn, they aren't purple!

    Hint to lighting designers: the human body has evolved over millions of years to expect sunlight. Lighting should either look like direct or diffused sunlight.

  8. Costume by MSBob · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are you required to wear a shiny white uniform when you are in the apartment? It looks like a set for a B rate sci fi flick from the fifties...

    Perhaps it's just that my interior decorating tastes aren't up to date :-)

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  9. Any ideas? by ir0b0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any ideas on why led lights for the home are not more widely available? The technology is not new.

    The site reports that that led lights are up to 10,000% longer lasting and can produce up to 10 times more light than incandescent bulbs.

    The site also states that led's use less power and are less expensive.

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
    1. Re:Any ideas? by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Any ideas on why led lights for the home are not more widely available? The technology is not new.

      I believe an LED the size and lummen output of a 100watt bulb for example would be a fair bit costly in contrast to a typical 100watt bulb.

      I have no site to back this up, don't know where to buy a big ass LED, but let's look at radioshack

      http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog%5F na me=CTLG&category%5Fname=CTLG%5F011%5F006%5F002%5F0 00&product%5Fid=276%2D320
      5mm White LED $4.99
      3.6V 20ma

      http://handyman.everything-warehouse.com/PID-3EE z3 ZEY3yaPG/GE-Mazda-100W-Edison-Screw-Lightbulb-Glas s-Pearl-Pastel-Whites-pk-2/
      GE Mazda 100W Edison Screw LightBulb 9004100198514
      1000hours $0.99
      120v .8A

      Now, I don't know how many 5mm white LEDs = the lumen output of one 100watt bulb... but at $5.00 a pop, in the short term the traditional 100W bulb costs less.

      So you can either replace your bulbs at 99cents a pop, or construct a led solution that would likely cost $5.00 per unit, multi units to equal the light level of that one bulb.

      I'm sure the LED would save you money, but people are lazy.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:Any ideas? by radixvir · · Score: 2, Informative

      the reason they arent prevelant yet is because of price. over the next few years it should come down alot though. the best way to get started with led lights would to buy drop in replacement bulbs (edison type sockets). check out this site

    3. Re:Any ideas? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Radio Shack gives you the shaft on components. It's really not valid to compare them there.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    4. Re:Any ideas? by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those arent the LEDs you should looking at.
      http://www.lumiled.com/luxeon/products/luxeon III_i ndex.html

      This are the babys for serious room illumination. http://www.lumiled.com/luxeon/products/luxeonIII_i ndex.html
      3.xV, 1000mA. And around 3-5 times the lumen efficency of your traditional bulb. And its only 30$ or so (if i remember correctly). So this is around 15 times more power/money than your example.

      Sure, more expensive in the beginning, but in situations where broken bulb does not only mean 1$ for a new bulb, but working time to replace it, or simply a room being dark that SHOUDNT be dark, the 100.000 hour lifetime should be quite a bonus.

      Especially considering that LEDS dont "break", but fade. If not electrocuted, they become slowly dimmer. The 100.000h usually means the time where they are only at 50% or so output. So even a long time after that, it would still produce light, even if its not a lot.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Any ideas? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      hah, you DON'T want to price electronic components at Radio Shack. They're so insanely expensive you might as well burn your money for light instead.

    6. Re:Any ideas? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Radio Shack gives you the shaft on components. It's really not valid to compare them there.

      I used Radio Shack as a reference as it indeed is a place where one can go out and buy something, rather then a mailorder website. It's fair to compare with something you can buy NOW.

      But since you objected...

      http://www.lc-led.com/View.jsp?idProduct=141
      10 mm Big Super White (30 Deg.) 3.3V
      30-99 pcs : $1.42 USD
      100-199 pcs : $1.04 USD

      Assuming you can use a rectifier and a set of 36 of these in series, and assuming you bought in the 100 unit class...

      $37.44 per 36 in LEDs alone
      + rectifier, wire, solder, etc..

      vs .99cents for a damn bumb (I pay much less, but hey)

      Assuming you burn 24/7. and it burns out after 720 hours or os... about $12 yearly per bulb...

      I don't know how many LEDs = 1 damn bulb, but assuming we stick to the 36 per bulb... which is reasonable in america... it would take you 3 years to see benifit on your pocketbook. Assuming that you'd need 3 to = one 100watt bulb (again no facts, but according to http://www.theledlight.com/120-VAC-LEDbulbs.html their 36 diode unit provides equal to 30watt bulb). we're talking $108 for the damb bulb. Not likely to see a benifit on your pocketbook for 9 years. If it lasts 30 years... victory!

      [note i'm not taking power consumption into account]

      Excuse me please, i'm going out to buy a traditional lamp and a damn 99cent bulb. I'm lazy!

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:Any ideas? by javaaddikt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Radio Shack's pricing is outrageously high. Their electronics packaging and pricing is structured to provide electronics hobbiests a common part they need at 11pm.

      Because most electronics catalogs have minimum orders, shipping costs, and shipping delays, you'd end up paying probably $15. Therefore, rat shack can rape you with $5 capacitors, or 5 resistors for $2.

      Those LED's would be more like $0.70 in high quantities.

    8. Re:Any ideas? by jldrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those arent the LEDs you should looking at.

      Wait just a second,... is this some sort of Jedi mind trick?

  10. Cost? by jimmer63 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What does it cost to have this done? What are the monthly saving each month?

  11. LCD TV above the stove? by phatsharpie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't imagine placing a LCD TV above the stove is a good idea. Not only would heat from the stove damage it, but what about oil splatter from cooking?

    -B

    1. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by awing0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you insinuating that they would feast off the light emitted from the diodes like some sort of freakish plant monster?

      --
      Cthulhu Saves.
    2. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, that's the problem with "demo" homes like this. They always have neat looking, and completely doofy shit in them.

      You're supposed to go "OOooooooo! Ahhhhhhhh!"

      But mostly you end up saying "Well, That's kinda dumb. What kind of clueless moron thought that up?"

      In the end what really sells a new technology is showing how it can mold into your existing conventional home completely unubtrusively.

      What would really be impressive is a picture of a 1920's farm house kitchen with a caption:

      "This home is completely lit by LEDs -- and you can't even tell!

      KFG

    3. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on where you're from I guess. I've lived in three. They all had original art deco electric lighting fixures in them. One still had the original wiring (shudder).

      Remember that in the 1920s rural farmhouse didn't necessarily mean out in the boonies. More often than not it meant being situated right about where your suburb is now since they hauled fresh produce into the city, often on a daily basis. They didn't fly the stuff in from Argentina and a farm had to be proximate to the city.

      This sort of farmhouse generally got electric lighting about WWI in my neck of the woods (upstate NY, proximate to General Electric).

      KFG

    4. Re:LCD TV above the stove? by mantera · · Score: 2, Informative

      argh i forgot the link... http://www.tefal.co.uk/tefal/products/product/inde x.asp?category%5Fid=200&dept%5Fid=220&sku=U00024&m scssid=C7QHD2W4BPNV9NCS1WRLUPE9G4386TT1

  12. Bah by paul248 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This "electric light" thing will never catch on.
    /lights a candle.

  13. This just in by mrpuffypants · · Score: 3, Funny

    Company just released their second product: First NOC lit by flaming server. Footage at 11...

  14. too bad it's inefficient by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Compact Flouresent is much higher in efficiency per watt of electricity used.

    plus it's a bitch to find a LED area lamp.

    LED's are ok for small point task lighting, they completely suck at area lighting that is typically used in a home in both electricity used and lumens of light output.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:too bad it's inefficient by crazyphilman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently got a full complement of fluroescent bulbs for my apartment; they replaced all of my regular light bulbs with dramatic energy savings: for example, I replaced my 60-Watt bulbs with equivalent fluroescent bulbs that provide just as much light but only use 14 watts each. My only remaining "normal" light bulbs are in the bathroom, where I have some of those fancy globe-type lights over the sink.

      My electric bill dropped under 30 bucks as a result. Not bad, eh? And, that's keeping a couple of lights on at all times.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    2. Re:too bad it's inefficient by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Flourescents, compact or otherwise suck as a human-useful light source. They're the ultimate expression of the concept of making something cheap and barely able to do the task in question. Wonder why a lot of offices are starting to tear them out? The long term effects of looking at a computer monitor that is running at a different refresh rate than the flourescents causes eyestrain and headaches. Definitely not ideal. The only place flourescents are all right are some industrial / woodshop-ish applications, where you're not reading stuff off a monitor, or looking at fine detail all day. And flourescents still burn out a lot more often than LEDs do. One of my kitchen flourescent lights just blew a ballast, so I'll have to go get that replaced as well....
      Besides, it's all relative. If cost efficiency was the defining goal behind everything, we'd all be eating no-name brand macaroni and Ramen for food, riding bikes to the office, and wearing sweats and t-shirts...

    3. Re:too bad it's inefficient by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Besides, it's all relative. If cost efficiency was the defining goal behind everything, we'd all be eating no-name brand macaroni and Ramen for food, riding bikes to the office, and wearing sweats and t-shirts...

      I was just thinking "Now what kind of dumbass would do all that just to save a buck?" as I ate the last bit of my store brand macaroni while sitting here in sweatpants.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    4. Re:too bad it's inefficient by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only place flourescents are all right are some industrial / woodshop-ish applications, where you're not reading stuff off a monitor, or looking at fine detail all day

      (incidental fact)
      In many woodshops, you are definately looking at fine detail, frequently measuring to 1/64 of an inch or so. The reason why woodshops like flourescent lights is because with wide area lights like that, the shadows are reduced. It's much easier to work in three dimensions without strong shadows that might confuse perception.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  15. FPS by 3lb4rt0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The photos make it look like an FPS game. Do you need a geforce 4 to live there??

  16. I just don't see what's so special about this by kaltkalt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When this was posted on Fark yesterday, several people sent me the link... and I couldn't figure out why. I kept reading the page, thinking I was skipping over something that stated something newsworthy or truly interesting about the "Vospad" ... like how this is the inside of George W's Texas ranch or how some new, amazing type of LED is at work here... but nothing was to be found. A house lit by LEDs... looks cheap and tacky to me. So, I asked the people who sent me the link why they sent it to me.... same answer "cuz it's cool." No, sorry, it's really not.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  17. Costs vs Bennies by Fringe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The site is /.'ed so I can't be sure it's the same but there was an article throughout the newsrags (NYTimes, LA Times, etc) this past week on a guy who lit his entire apartment soley by LEDs. The hardware cost him $50K. Too much really. To spend that kind of dough, there's gotta be some additional win. But you'll get a lot farther with a woman, for example, by spending that same amount on a nice car you pick her up in and a few nice dinners than on unfamiliar lighting she finds intimidating.

    Off topic, but I gave a bunch of these really cool LED flashlights for Christmas: http://www.techass.com The Elite is really nice and very bright.

    1. Re:Costs vs Bennies by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cost seems too much. Sure that there isnt a 500% designer increase on the price tag?

      For usage like room illumination, only the lumiled luxon star leds would be well suited. They are not cheap, but not too expensive compared with halogens either (especially because they can be switched infinitly and not overdriven they should last for many years). You can get 100W equivalent in luxon stars for arond 100-200$. 10 of these should be enough for a normal sized appartment (60-70 m^2). You have to consider that the smaller granularity of the light sources (one luxon star has around 3-10W equivalent) you can have much more effective illumination, reducing waste in "brightspots" near the light sources.
      So even with installation (comparable effort to 12V halogen) it shoudnt cost more than 5-10 K$ to fullfill even the most fancy demands in led room illumination. 50K seems WAY too much.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Costs vs Bennies by thesolo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because, as we all know, life is all about impressing women.

      What, didn't you get that memo?

  18. LED lighting is the future....Not now by patdabiker · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a good concept, but LED's don't output enough light to live comfortably. Maybe it'd be cool to flip a switch and have your apartment be purple...but that as the only option? Doesn't work for me. The main benefit I see is that LEDs use a ton less power than conventional lighting. Unfortunately, they don't offer the brightness or color of good ole' conventional light bulbs.

    1. Re:LED lighting is the future....Not now by MrUnknown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Even in the pictures the rooms look too dark to live in. pricing is also a problem... you can go here and buy a 30watt equal for... $180.50! Has 36 LEDs.

      I think LEDs will more than likely gain share in accent lighting to provide the "cool" effects like those in the pictures because there great for that and direct lighting (under cabnets?)

  19. Their server room is certainly lit by LEDs now... by John_Booty · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the lights on their router are surely blinking like mad! Hopefully it won't catch fire, which is certainly a more dangerous (albeit more aesthetically pleasing) method of lighting. :-)

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  20. As there is no way by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
    that I'll be able to get to the videos - is this static lighting, or is controlled by computer or something?

    I think that having that many lights strobing would have a great effect, when I invite the door to door Mormons in and convince them I gave them LSD.

    Otherwise - I'd like to see a little more white light; I'm not Prince, so I don't need that much purple.

  21. Kenny Roger's Chicken by qedigital · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of the Seinfeld where Jerry has trouble sleeping because of the red glow of the neon sign from the Kenny Roger's Chicken across the street.

    Your colour vision would go all out of whack as you move from room to room with the different colour schemes never mind what will happen when you go outside for some sunlight (that rat fur hat might even look good).

    --

    Rapidly approaching the Zener knee...

    1. Re:Kenny Roger's Chicken by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Your colour vision would go all out of whack as you move from room to room"

      I have this problem at home with the bathroom and hallway, both of which are lit with GE's "Pure White Light" bulbs. They're not actually white, more of a freakishly bright blue-ish, purple-ish color that hurts my eyes but I'm not the one that makes the household decor decisions. When I go to any other room, the normal incandecsent lighting makes the rooms look all yellow.

  22. During the day? by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why are all the pictures taken during the day? What does it look like at night?

  23. Read it all ready by czion3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    NYTimes had an article about this company on thursday here is the
    Google link.

  24. Sweet by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Low electric use, the ability to change colors on command and lights that last for many years. Get the cost down to say $50 per light fixture and type A / Edison socket incandescent bulbs will go they way of the gas light fixture. Please make it happen soon. I already have plans for these lights. Imagine walking into a room and have a lights slightly change color to notify you of a pressing issue (like bad weather on the way or new porn posted to your favorite USENET group).

    So the question is when will prices really come down? Isn't the big problem making blue LEDs [cheaply]? When will the masses wake up and upgrade?

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  25. Tagline by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Lit by LEDs, inhabited by virgins."

  26. Disappointing by Powercntrl · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was expecting something showcasing technology like the 5 watt Luxeon Star LEDs, instead, it just looks like Lucky the Leprechaun shat all over the place.

    Despite the bad example (and color scheme, ugh.) this site shows, LEDs really are coming into their own for uses in lighting and will be a very interesting technology to watch in the coming years. The LED Museum has a great listing and reviews of LED based lighting products, from flashlights to Xmas lights.

    I do believe LEDs can be effectively used for lighting. I was given a 1 watt Luxeon Star-based flashlight this Christmas and after using it in instead of an incandescent flashlight, I have to say I am very impressed. The Luxeon puts out a pure white light (very similar to HID headlights) which makes objects being illuminated appear more clearly and it projects an even beam with no dark shadowy spots. If for nothing else, this article should be a reason to check out what's available in LED lighting - you might be pleasantly surprised.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  27. solely lit by LEDs, really? by azzy · · Score: 2, Funny

    > The Vos Pad is the world's first apartment solely lit by LEDs

    No natural lighting at all? Sounds grim. Wanting to get away from Windows is one thing, but this is a bit extreme.

  28. slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder if my box will survive, but anyway, here's what I captured.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by va3atc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder if my box will survive, but anyway, here's what I captured.

      I dare you to host those four video files ;)

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    2. Re:slashdot my BOX, now ;) by Siergen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bleh. The designer *really* likes up-lighting. I agree it's a nice contrast from standard down-lighting, but a little goes a long way, and almost every room has lots of it...

  29. In the New York Times by DeepRedux · · Score: 3, Informative
    There is a recent article in the NYT about this: Let There Be L.E.D.'s.

    The article noted that the apartment's lighting system cost an estimated $50,000. That probably accounts for the lack of popularity of LEDs for home lighting.

    An alternative to LEDs are Organic LEDs, a much cheaper, plastic-based technology. Unfortunately, they are not yet ready for prime time.

  30. I wonder what the power use is by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    all LED lighting....must bee inexpensive to power those I bet.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  31. Shelves? by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like there's no books in the home of the future.

    That's unfortunate.

    --saint

  32. informative ?!? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Funny

    if you have a link to a halogen lcd backlight, please post...
    (meaning: there arent any)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:informative ?!? by Trejkaz · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:informative ?!? by iabervon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was actually distracted by the fact that most of my house is lit with halogen lamps or fixtures at this point, and I don't actually have a recent LCD. But I was going for "funny", not "informative". The moderators are clearly confused today, if you got funny and I got informative.

  33. *Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by reignbow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once again, designers make a laughing stock out of themselves by refusing to use common sense. As a result, their "prototype" has obviously never been lived in for even a few hours. Three glaring points:

    1. LCD TV. Above the stove. So it can catch the oil crackling in the pan, the smell when something gets burned, as has occasionally been known to happen and the condensation when cooking something in boiling water. Yeah, right! No way anyone's going to hang an expensive LCD there.
    2. The bed. In the middle of an open square, so it takes maximum space. This is a bit so-so as they might have thought of a couple. The whole room gives off a rich-bachelor feeling to me, though. Most bachelors I know have the bed pushed up against one wall to conserve space.
    3. The sinks in the bathroom. They're round bowls with no shelf space in sight. Where do you put toothbrush, toothpaste, hair gel, combs, shaver, soap? Well, I'm sure the tooth fairy will be ready to hold them for a while.
    As you can see, I don't think that what is shown in the pictures has anything to do with an apartment, which is made up of connected rooms where and this is important! people need to live, and need to want to live.
    --
    Divide et impera!
    1. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would second all of the points parent made, but also add that I would be totally sick of living in a purple / pink / funky coloured house in about, oooooh a week.

      Looks like a nasty place to live - if I spilled bong water on the couch, THEY'D KILL ME!

      And all those sleek surfaces made of plastic? Looks like a lot of dusting to me...

      But I do like the LED light idea - now if they could get 'em in softwhite with about as many lumens as a 100 wat bulb, that screw into a standard fixture, I'd buy 'em by the dozen.

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    2. Re:*Sigh* Designers w/o common sense - again by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like the ideal place to shoot a porn movie.

      If you ask me the designers got it spot on.

      --
      siggy played guitar
  34. I'm not sure it's American by Cybertect · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check the phone number for their PR contact - it's central London number (England, not anywhere else)

  35. Re:LED lit by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A standard fluorescent bulb flickers at 60 Hz.

    With 4 diodes (at a few cents each) you can build a full wave rectifier that will let you connect an LED to AC power without flicker.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  36. Slashdotted! Mirrors collected below! :D by rohan_leader · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience that this may cause."

    Mirrors that were grabbed from the slashdot thread: Consider using these mirrors.

    mirror 1
    mirror 2
    Karma whoring at its finest :D

  37. Cloud City by danidude · · Score: 3, Funny
    isn't that the interior of the Cloud City? Geez, I wouldn't be surprise if I see Lando in there somewhere :)

    --
    - no sig.
  38. Look past the colors by edo-01 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think it's a very cool idea, but the colors and general decor of this example are pretty terrible. The Vos Pad looks to me to be entirely without human appeal. It works as a technology demo, as an almost abstract rendering of a "futuristic" apartment but it just reeks of designer-wank. I'm sure there's a lot of self congratulatory backslapping going on in coffee shops amongst the design-mavens who lap this stuff up, but the apartment itself looks to be as appealing to live in as a chip manufacturer's clean room. The faux zebra-skin couches, the overwhelming use of purple and the overall sterility of the space are very offputting ofter the initial wow of seeing the images.

    That said however, I've ordered a bunch of of Luxeon LEDs in various colors - mostly the "warm whites" - to play around with. I think if you did this in a decent house or apartment with colors that didn't induce vomiting you could end up with something pretty special.

  39. I guess the Vos Pad is now lit by,,, by NoData · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the crackling embers of a slashdotted server.

  40. Re:LED lit by shepd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >With 4 diodes (at a few cents each) you can build a full wave rectifier that will let you connect an LED to AC power without flicker.

    It'll still flicker at 120 Hz without a filter capacitor!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  41. Previous /. discussion by rockwood · · Score: 2, Informative
    We touch on this previously in this article Though previously concerning three other companies

    Kopin Corp
    Color Kinetics
    Luminus Devices

    The biggest issue was the overhead of the LED for the residential aspects, whereas larger corporations may be better equipped financially to handle the current cost.

    To quote this article directly

    "The problem is cost. Like early computer chips, today's LEDs are still too expensive to spark mass adoption. "You could replace a 100-watt light bulb with a 60-watt LED, and get the same brightness," says John Fan, chairman and founder of Kopin Corp., a Taunton company that makes LEDs. "You'd save 40 percent on power, but it would cost about $100. We need to bring that price down.""

    Personally that is far outside of my price range. At that rate I'd be replacing one household bulb each year... hmmm.. I should have my entire house finsihed when I'm about 87 years old. And by that time I'll be blind and won't need lights anyway.

    --
    Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
  42. Designed by the decorator from Beetlejuice by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2, Funny
    The place looks like it was designed by Otho, the Interior Decorator from Beetlejuice.

    One thing I noticed was the LCD display over the range. At first I thought it was stupid because why would you want a tv there. Then I though well maybe you could use it as a internet appliance recipe book. But then I realized that having electronics hanging above steaming pots really is a bad idea after all. It should be moved to counter space where you would be doing cutting and mixing. You also need better task lighting in a kitchen unless you want to slice your finger off.

    Having the sconces with their beams of super bright light reflecting off the wall and providing indirect lighting is very cool and is like a fusion of 21st century modern with 19th century retro since it is similar to gas lamps or candleholders. I couldn't help but be reminded of all those dungeons my 24th level Magic-user had traipsed through. However, it appears the sconces are below eye level. It doesn't take an 18 intelligence to know that is a bad idea.

    The LEDs in the floor of the kitchen look like the emergency lighting in the aisles in a passenger jet. It might be useful if your apartment ever crash lands and you need to crawl to the exit through thick smoke. And I won't even go into the colors because so many people have already commented about it that it would just be redundant.

  43. Well.. where does he live? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'cause it'll save him all kinds of money on his cooling bill!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  44. How are you supposed to read? by bobbv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it looks like it would be OK to walk around it, but it's missing some basic things, such as directional lighting for reading. LED's provide narrow directional light, which is fine for washes of light (when diffused with lenses or diffusers) or small pin-spots, but the designers don't appear to have tried to create light at the scale needed for common things like sitting on the couch and reading or cooking.

    Btw, I've had my apartment stairway lit with white LED replacement bulbs from LEDTronics for 5 years (continuously! Never turned off because it's too dark to find the switches, which is why I installed the bulbs in the first place.). It's worked great, except that they've now faded to the point they no longer provide enough light to walk up the stairs with, but it's taught me that the technology isn't ready to replace all the bulbs in the house. Here's their full line of replacement bulbs:

    http://www.led.net/datasheets/25mm_medbase_index /2 5mm_med_index.htm

  45. Here's what I get... It's not slashdotted at all. by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because of the absolutely phenomenal number of requests for this
    site (due to its being listed on Slashdot), we have had to take
    the unusual step of temporarily disabling the content of the
    site until things calm down :-) We apologise for any inconvenience
    that this may cause.

  46. Re:LED lit by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wihtout a rectifier it is off 50% of the time.

    With a full wave recrifier, it will be off for tiny amount of time between pulses; almost certainly faster than the LED can turn off, and it will be on fully twice as much. Also, the human eye can't detect a 120Hz flicker, the limit is around 48Hz.

    If it bothers you, spend the 10 cents to add a filter cap :).

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  47. I know someone with a LED basement by OYAHHH · · Score: 5, Informative

    I

    Know someone who has an LED basement.

    She has an extreme case of porphyria and she can only tolerate light in the 585+ NM wavelengths.

    BTW, 585 is exactly the wavelength of those ugly yellow street lamps you occasionally see. I think those lamps are some type of sodium vapor lamp and they are ultra efficient also.

    Since incandescants, etc. were literally cooking her from the inside out I built her an LED lamp.

    Her lamp has 50 LEDS connnected in 10 parallel circuits. I also slapped on ten switches with one master on/off switch.

    Thus, she could turn on as little as 5 or as many as 50 bulbs simultaneously.

    It works great for her. She's still very sick, but at least she has some light she can tolerate.

    LED's emit a very narrow wavelength of light. You can get them in small bulk packages at the following address:

    www.TheLEDLight.com

    That store also has a whole bunch of Super Cool LED flashlights etc.

    Also, my friend's porphyria is a really rare and strange disease which means she is akin to a vampire. She has the EP variety. Only approximately 300 more like her in the US.

    She has been stuck in her mom's basement now for two years, at the age of 34. Such a tragedy!

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:I know someone with a LED basement by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, my friend's porphyria is a really rare and strange disease which means she is akin to a vampire. She has the EP variety. Only approximately 300 more like her in the US.

      Is this different than Xeroderma Pigmentosum? That's the condition I am more familiar with. (The children in The Others are afflicted with Xeroderma Pigmentosum. There was also a very touching story on NPR several years ago about a night-camp for children with Xeroderma Pigmentosum, since they couldn't go to daycamp. That was the only time I have ever heard an NPR reporter actually break down in tears.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  48. A MIRROR (with the images) by blixel · · Score: 5, Informative
  49. Re:LED lit by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >With a full wave recrifier, it will be off for tiny amount of time between pulses; almost certainly faster than the LED can turn off

    Considering LEDs are used in TOSLINK circuits (and heck, gigabit fibre circuit), I really hope that isn't true!

    An LED should shut off nearly instantly. I mean, how can one expect it to stay on but the rectifier diodes to turn off? :-)

    >Also, the human eye can't detect a 120Hz flicker, the limit is around 48Hz

    Directly, yes. Indirectly, the debate is still out there.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  50. Excellent... by LoganTeamX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, just to find a way to integrate this into my apartment without the landlord having a seizure (literally!)... hmm. There isn't much heat in our bedroom, but with a decently overclocked Barton and a stock Palomino in custom cases, we don't get cold toes ;) I wonder if the boss will let me convert from fluorescent at work...

    --
    One of the 187.
  51. Re:LED lit by VCAGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's not quite true. Some fluorescent bulbs do indeed flicker at 60 or 120Hz--these use the old magnetic ballasts. However, most newer fluorescent (and also HID) lamps use electronic ballasts that are very similar to switching power supplies--they "flicker" at 20,000Hz.

    --
    Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
    A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  52. Re:LED lit by Ioldanach · · Score: 2, Informative
    A standard fluorescent bulb flickers at 60 Hz.

    But an electronic ballasted compact flourescent that screws into a standard lamp base flickers at 25-40kHz. The compact flourescent technology causes no visible flicker, is smaller than the old magnetic ballast (which operated at the frequency of house wiring, 60Hz), and improved efficiency overall, losing less energy to heat in the ballast.

    One reference

    Another reference.

  53. Re:LED lit by Ioldanach · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oops, the first sentence was copied from a previous poster, but I did the blockquote tag wrong and didn't notice it on preview. Sorry.

    Also, when purchasing a compact flourescent bulb, be sure it is electronically ballasted. It'll last longer, turn on quicker, provide no noticable flicker, and work in colder temperatures.

  54. another site killed by /. by MrLint · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We all know full well that the /. effect can kill all but the most well supported sites. Perhaps something radically different is in order. Perhaps an akamai like p2p fallback system.

    before a small site gets listed on /. and get obliterated into ether the maintainer could allow the site to be mirrored and then sent out to some temporary storage sites for.. oh say a few days, and then when the referrer is /. then the content can be served up by one of the ac hoc distributed mirrors?

  55. Those are NOT feasable! Use flourescent. by Pejorian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those lights are really dim, so you'd still need a lot of them to light a room.

    To give you an idea, the average 60w light bulb gives off 860 lumens. Those LEDs you linked to only give off 80! You'd need 10 of them just to get close to a 60w bulb! If each of those LEDs are $30 as you say (there are no prices on the website), that's $300 per 60w bulb!!!

    Those 15w mini-twister flourescent bulbs give off 900 lumens. They also last for 6000 hours. Seems to be the reasonable way to go for now...

    --
    - Murphy's Corollary: - It is impossible to make things foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
  56. One more try... by davmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it will probably fall on deaf ears like it has every other time I've posted a comment like this.

    This story, the resulting Slashdotting of their site, followed closely by the need to take the site down, is yet another indication that the powers that be at Slashdot need to learn the simple courtesy of *ASKING* the people behind websites like that if they want a story about them on Slashdot. Or at least allow them time to prepare for the devestation their servers are about to undergo.

    When stories about spammers and such ilk are posted, we show our feelings by Slashdotting their site, thereby either costing them tons in bandwidth charges or crashing their server.

    When stories about things we like are posted on Slashdot, we show our approval by doing the same damned thing.

    Quite frankly, I'm surprised that in this day and age of litigation-while-you-wait no one has sued Slashdot for getting their server hammered.

    I'll stop now so that the moderators among you can show your ignorance by moderating this post as "off topic" or "flame bait".

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:One more try... by volkris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it IS offtopic and arguably flame bait.

      But in the end these people have already agreed to have lots of people access their site by simply posting a public web site. They've already agreed to play the game; there's no reason to re-ask.

  57. LED light is cool but the Vos Pad is silly by kobotronic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    LED lights will eventually replace fluorescents, incandescents and other traditional forms of interior illumination. There's all kinds of reasons :

    The colors are bright and pure when you want them to be, and significant progress has been made towards (simulated) full-spectrum light. The lights are cool and run on low voltage, are much more efficient than fluorescents and have very long lifetimes.

    Cost is coming down (slowly) and eventually LEDs will be reasonable replacements for ordinary lightbulbs, with similar light characteristics except for added features such as optional color control and the like.

    The Vos Pad is silly because like so many posters have pointed out, it's as uninhabitable as the star trek apartment that other guy built. Plus, it looks incredibly gay with those colors. Just an immensely complex concept piece demonstrating how not to use LED light fixtures. The Vos Pad appears dark and spooky, a movie set rather than a home. And the light beams coming from the floor will be incredibly annoying. But all this don't mean the technology itself is invalid.

    LED lit homes can conveivably be every bit as practical as ordinary types. LEDs can be fitted into whole new kinds of fixtures that wouldn't be possible to make with conventional technologies. The LEDs are so versatile they can be built into anything and arranged in any pattern or configuration imaginable. Thin panels or stripes of light could be fitted under shelves or hidden in the ceiling so as to provide advanced discrete lighting without the hassle of bulb replacement.

    As a test project a little while I ago I drew up a fancy model for a dream bathroom in a 3D program, accurately picturing discreet LED illumination with color accents and proper work surface brightness and no nasty point lightsources burning out retinas.

    The render engine used was precise enough using photon maps, global illumination and caustics, that you could get a reasonable estimate of the number of LEDs on any given spec you need to light a room properly. You can pretty much go in with a virtual light meter and measure how much light hits any given simulated surface point and add more lights until you have the desired brightness. (As a photographer I have a nice digital spot lightmeter, and was able to calibrate the model using a handful of Nichia superbright white LEDs for reference.)

    Turns out you need hundreds of LEDs to get an equivalent brightness to just a few 25 watt halogens. But if I had the cash to splash I'd definitely consider it for my new apartment!

    When in Tokyo, visit Roppongi Hills and witness the glorious displays of LED illumination in and around the plaza at the base of the skyscraper complex. There's even LED illumination in the stairways and sometimes in the trees around the plaza too.

  58. LED retrofits by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    A while ago I stumbled across LEDtronics...they have a wide variety of LED products, but what makes them really interesting is that they have retrofits for just about every kind of incandescent bulb out there, with ordinary threaded bases that operate on anything from 12VDC to 240VAC, and bulbs for automotive applications. They also have a cross reference that converts incandescent bulb number, bulb type, or bulb base to an LED product.

  59. Re:LED lit by shawb · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason that the light does not flicker is that there is a phosphorescent coating on the inside of the glass, which gives the light a die down time. Sorta like glow in the dark objects, but a much shorter time frame. So in essence, there is a flicker, just less noticeable to the eye (assuming the bulb is in good repair.)

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  60. Oh great, I hope this show never goes on the air by Beek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Geek Eye for the Normal Guy

    But really, it's kind of cool. But I think I'd shoot myself if I had to live there.

  61. Re:LED lit by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also, the human eye can't detect a 120Hz flicker, the limit is around 48Hz.

    I beg to differ. A 60hz flicker is highly irritating to my eyes. If someone's CRT monitor is set to 60hz, my eyes tear up and get red and sore after just a few minutes.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  62. LEDs aren't all that efficient by Gumber · · Score: 2, Informative

    Contrary to popular understanding, LED's aren't particularly efficient when compaired to incandecent lights.

    A high-efficiency white LED puts out something like 15-20 lumens/watt. A good halogen bulb puts out ~15 lumens/watt.

    LED's seem impressively bright because they throw all their light in a fairly narrow beam.

    I believe that florescent lights are more efficient that LEDs, though that will likely change. Appearantly their will be white LEDs in production with effiencies reaching 60 lumens/watt by 2005.

  63. It's my contrary nature again... by KC7GR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speaking as someone who suffers from minor Seasonal Affective Disorder, I have to wonder what the value would be, outside of saving power, in lighting an entire room or home with LEDs.

    The material I've read on SAD, and my own direct experience, have shown me that both broad-spectrum (approximating daylight) and high intensity (again, approximating daylight) are important in combating the condition. We live far enough north (Puget Sound region) where the short days and extended periods of cloud cover during the winter do indeed have a noticeable affect on my moods.

    Considering that I grew up in California, which averages 328 sunny days per year, this came as no great surprise.

    What I ended up doing for our home was installing full-spectrum flourescent tubes in the flourescent fixtures, and bright halogens in my work area. Both have done wonders for my mood in the winter months.

    Unless someone has come up with a full-spectrum LED, I don't think this kind of lighting is going to see wide adoption outside of perpetually sun-drenched areas, and then only as a "Gee Whiz" item because of the high cost.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  64. Looks like Miami Vice by serutan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or any number of other tv shows featuring unrealistic and impractical lighting in pastel colors that real people would almost never want in their home/workplace. Bleah.

  65. They must draw LOTS of power by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because there wasn't any juice left for their server ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  66. Re:LED lit by shepd · · Score: 4, Informative

    >Good point, but then why do the LEDs in TFT notebook displays have such horrible lag?

    Because they're not LEDs, they're LCDs. ;-)

    LCDs are a totally different technology. They lag because, well, jeez, I explained this once before but it slips my mind (It's early here! Give me credit! Please!). Basically, it has to do with the fact you're asking a material (crystals) to twist and bend when power is applied; then you take the power off them (or reverse it) to try to force them back to their original position. This takes time.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  67. Good idea, lousy concept... by teddlesruss · · Score: 3, Insightful
    LEDs are good. The apartment is a step in the right direction, and we should congratulate the company for pioneering that. But. What a. Frightening. Unnatural. Implementation.

    I asked my other half, she wouldn't use the bathroom for all the rice in China. Point-blank no way. "How could I work out my makeup in that light?" was her first question.

    I am thinking about the kitchen. How do I get a meal looking right in those ghastly hues? How can I enjoy a steak when it will look like a Quake gib under that light?

    So while this is a noteworthy effort, it may have set the cause of LED lighting back by years... (kidding, okay? I'm pretty sure other architects and designers will see the advantages and adopt them pretty quickly...)

    Which is sad because the idea of using LEDs to light a living space (or indeed a workspace) is sorely needed in view of the air pollution that our thirst for light and convenience creates.

    I read somewhere that a 100W consumed for a year produces a cupful and a half of pollutants in that year. (I.e. collect all the pollutants and scrunch 'em together, bingo, 1 1/2 cups of waste...)

    That means that for every 100W lightbulb in your place, which stays on for an average of a quarter of a day or so, over a quarter of a cup of crap per year... The average home has seven lightbulbs, that's over two cups of pollution per house per year.

    If you could reduce the amount of power required to produce the same amount of light to around a fifth or less, you'd reduce that contribution to pollution due to light from two cups to a quarter cup.

    That has to be worth going for...

    --
    -- ted russ http://www.arach.net.au/~ted/mydynes/ http://www.arach.net.au/~ted/myblogs/
  68. If you want this yourself by slightly_kooky · · Score: 2, Informative

    The VOS pad was kitted out using the Aurora and Genius fittings from ACDC Lighting.