Slashdot Mirror


OQO Ultra-Portable Impresses At CES

carpoolio writes "One of the most-talked about gadgets at CES last week was the OQO ultra personal computer (uPC). TechTV gave it a Best Mobile Device award, and deservedly so. It's a fully functional PC that fits in your pocket. Running on a 1 GHz Transmeta Crusoe processor, the uPC packs a 20 GB hard drive, 256 MB of RAM, and has a color screen that slides up to reveal the keyboard. The price? Sub-$2,000. Photos available on OQO's Web site. Similar devices have come and gone in recent years, but this one really looks nice." OQO seems to be slowly migrating from vaporware to a release date - a CNET News article notes that "OQO said Thursday that it will begin selling the device in the second half of 2004."

268 comments

  1. Hmm... by inertia187 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We must have skipped vPC (very personal computer) and hPC (hyper personal computer). I'd still be interested in a sPC (semi-personal computer). Just don't show me the aPC (anti-personal computer).

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Hmm... by dustmote · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better than an anti-personnel computer. "Destroy all humans! Destroy all humans!" :)

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    2. Re:Hmm... by elmegil · · Score: 3, Funny
      nononono.

      Ex-Term-In-Ate!!!

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Hmm... by dustmote · · Score: 1

      Of course! I lose nerd points with myself for not making an immediate Dr. Who reference here. Tsk, tsk, Isaac....

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    4. Re:Hmm... by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, you're supposed to promote Linux.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    5. Re:Hmm... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      No no no no no, Hyper Personal Computer is the one where ryu can throw a fireball in mid-air.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, where is the is it good or is it whack guy?

    7. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no!!!

      Ste-ri-lize!!!

    8. Re:Hmm... by GreeboNZ · · Score: 1

      If it takes eight seconds to open my Xterm, then it certainly is an anti-personal computer!

    9. Re:Hmm... by kinnell · · Score: 1
      We must have skipped vPC (very personal computer) and hPC (hyper personal computer).

      Personally, I'm going to wait for the tPC (Tremendously Personal Computer)

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    10. Re:Hmm... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Would X-Terminating humans mean sending them to an X-Terminal? That's not sooo bad....

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    11. Re:Hmm... by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      Macs are quickly becoming anti-person computers. As it is, you have to feel intimidated sitting in front of an Imac, with its neck-like monitor stalk and condescending 17" display staring down at you. How long before Macs are simply too cool and artsy-fartsy to associate with the cool logic and stiff 9 to 5 work demands of a user? The pain associated with allowing yourself to be 'used' by the average human will become too much for them to bear. Be very afraid....

    12. Re:Hmm... by nedwidek · · Score: 1

      Of course you want to see it and here it is aPC

      --
      Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
  2. But..... by SeanMac · · Score: 0

    Can I run my distrubted processing responsibilities for the Walled City on it, and will it tell me when Kombinat hackers are investigating about my wherabouts?

    1. Re:But..... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      It is sleek looking, but still no Sandbender.

    2. Re:But..... by SeanMac · · Score: 0

      Pah. The best part's the software man... A virtual UQO inside your UQO... MADNESS I SAY

  3. The website is slashdotted... by subk · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...And only two or three replies. This has got to be some kind of record.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    1. Re:The website is slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...And only two or three replies. This has got to be some kind of record.


      You must be new here.
    2. Re:The website is slashdotted... by subk · · Score: 1

      Notice that I said "two or three" because I am _not_ new here..

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    3. Re:The website is slashdotted... by mrwonton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the real problem is you're too old. Thanks to the wonderful (semi)-new subscription system, pages can be slashdotted by the priveledged "few" before we the peasants have our turn.

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    4. Re:The website is slashdotted... by subk · · Score: 1

      I'm 20 years old and I'm not paying for my news, damnit!

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    5. Re:The website is slashdotted... by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      You don't have to pay for it, just look at all the intelligent commentary you get on each topic for free!

      I for one welcome our new pay-to-be-the-first-to-slashdot overloards!

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    6. Re:The website is slashdotted... by tealwarrior · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can still get pictures of it from google image search.

      --
      In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.
    7. Re:The website is slashdotted... by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      People should just start posting the google image cache link by default. We all know the average slashdotter just wants to look at pretty pictures anyway.

  4. Is that an OQO in your pocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, yes, it is. Nevermind.

  5. That's weird by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that an RS-232 port I see on the side? If it is, why? Is there something wrong with just providing a few USB ports?

    1. Re:That's weird by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      RS-232 is an extremely useful interface. If I had to choose a port to jettison from PC laptops, the parallel port would be my first preference. I don't understand why this huge and useless connector is still included on most PC laptops.

    2. Re:That's weird by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > Is that an RS-232 port I see on the side? If it is, why? Is there something wrong with just providing a few USB ports?

      Data acquisition and sensing is one of the Really Cool Applications for an ultraportable. It's a hell of a lot easier for Joe Labgeek to h4x0r something together that talks RS-232 than USB. I'm glad there's at least one "legacy" port.

    3. Re:That's weird by kruczkowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GPS and Routers/switches.

      Go on groupstudy.com and see how people complain about the new laptops that don't have a serial port.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    4. Re:That's weird by JVert · · Score: 1

      its not 232, usb doesnt do vga out very well, so i'll give you one more guess of what it might be.

    5. Re:That's weird by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      GPS and Routers/switches.

      Go on groupstudy.com and see how people complain about the new laptops that don't have a serial port.


      When they instead should be complaining that GPS and router manufacturers continue to be too lazy to support modern interfaces. I'm lucky to have access to a friend's PC to update my GPS -- my own machine is legacy-free, and the Garmin GPS I have is one of the few boat-anchors holding me back from no longer needing a serial port.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:That's weird by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      No, it's too wide to be a VGA out. I think the VGA out is the port next to it. (If you look at Photo 5, you'll see a long bar connector and then a short stubby connector.) Unfortunately, the site is well Slashdotted, so I can't check out the specs.

    7. Re:That's weird by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 1

      I would LOVE to have one of these that I could carry in my pocket into data centers and hook to console ports (aka serial ports) on machines in my racks.

      Yes, serial is useful... thought there's no reason not to do it with a dongle like Apple does with lots of their larger ports (likve video) on laptops.

    8. Re:That's weird by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Okay, I managed to grab a Google Cache of the specs. No mention of RS232, but lots of mention of FireWire. Still, I have FireWire on my Mac and the port looks all wrong. It's too bad that photo is so low-res or I might actually be able to make it out.

    9. Re:That's weird by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why this huge and useless connector is still included on most PC laptops.

      I also prefer RS232, as it is more universal than parallel port. But I can confirm that PLIP (max 50kb/sec on my 75Mhz laptop) is faster than SLIP (max 10 kb/sec). Maybe they want to allow us faster network connection? ;->

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    10. Re:That's weird by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I don't understand why this huge and useless connector is still included on most PC laptops."

      There are lots of printers and dongles still out there. You just know the one guy who can't run his old copy of 3D Studio MAX is going to be a whiner.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:That's weird by jrstewart · · Score: 1

      it's probably the docking connector.

    12. Re:That's weird by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm thinking too. The more I look at it, the more it reminds me of those old SCSI connectors. Given that the device probably doesn't have SCSI. the only reason for a custom port would be a docking port.

    13. Re:That's weird by JVert · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, maybe Serialized PCI? I got a product sheet at home with a diagram of each component, I'll find out for sure tonight.

    14. Re:That's weird by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I really don't see what's wrong with a serial port. People act like it's "holding them back." It's a very simple interface, easy to code for, and easy to implement. I'd wager a USB port would raise the price of many GPS units. Also, I believe serial is somewhat of a standard on GPS devices (set forth by the NOAA or some such?).

      Exactly what hurts you about having a serial port?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    15. Re:That's weird by Chilles · · Score: 1

      there is 6-pin firewire and 4-pin (mini) firewire. This one has 4-pin which is sort of rectangular with a dent in the middle of one long side) and I think mac's have 6-pin (which is sort of rectangular with one arrow-ish short side)

    16. Re:That's weird by Raffaello · · Score: 1

      There are, of course, cables that go from 6-pin to 4-pin (that's how you connect DV cameras to a Mac, for example) so the two are compatible.

    17. Re:That's weird by steveha · · Score: 1
      According to the specs in the Google cache (thanks AKAImBatman, there is a docking cable. I quote:


      OQO docking cable includes

      * 3D accelerated 1280 x 1024 video output (VGA and LVDS)
      * Serialized PCI
      * Additional USB
      * Additional FireWire (IEEE1394)
      * Ethernet
      * DC power
      * Audio out


      So my guess is that the weird port is the port for the docking cable.

      "Serialized PCI". Cool. You could make a docking port with PCI cards in it!

      steveha
      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    18. Re:That's weird by Lanboy · · Score: 1

      Router console ports are designed so that terminal servers can get into the router when the network is down.

      You can buy a usb serial cable and pci serial cables ,though they are a little crufty. I personally want a recessed serial port with an adaptor. You can get 9 pins small enough.

    19. Re:That's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Just as an offtopic aside, I love whoever designed the FW400 'arrow' connector. Nice, easy, visual cue for my users as to how to plug the thing in, unlike USB which tends to have a 50% chance of being upside down if you're not paying attention. I think the FW800 plug is a reversion to a symmetrical design ( oval-ish? ) - if so, boooo.

      FW400 guy, if you're reading this, I salute you.

      Back, semi-on topic, this photo seems to be packing ( l-r ) a docking connector, USB and FW400??

      YLFI
    20. Re:That's weird by BigDish · · Score: 4, Informative

      No it's not an RS232 port. It's a propritary port. The unit comes with a cable that's about 3 feet long that breaks it out into other ports such as Ethernet, USB, VGA (and some others, I don't remember the details)
      This thing is AWSOME! I saw it at CES and I'm seriously thinking of getting one when they come out. It is truely amazing. The only thing I'm not sure of is the screen seemed prone to getting damaged. They also claimed they had it running off the same battery at CES all day and it was still running (so several hour battery life)
      Not sure if the pictures on this site show it (it's slashdotted) as none of the other pictures I've seen show this, but the screen slides up about 1/2 way to reveal a little QWERTY keyboard.

    21. Re:That's weird by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      And furthermore, you can buy USB->Serial adapters that work without a hitch. Beat that bizatch.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    22. Re:That's weird by millette · · Score: 1

      I've always prefered the parallel port when it comes to attaching various leds and relays to a computer. If course, opto-couplers help too if you don't want to fry your motherboard...

    23. Re:That's weird by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      Lowest common denominator. A serial port I can plug a laptop into (with a serial USB thingy, anyway), a dumb terminal, a printer, and it doesn't take any brains at all to slam a modem onto it and get some decent out-of-band management.

      Oh, and I'd like to add to the list of devices just about every piece of storage-area-network equipment, from Network Appliance to EMC. Yup, my EMC box has a four fibre channel ports, two network ports and a serial port. My NetApp has serial, network and fibre-over-copper.

    24. Re:That's weird by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

      That's what dongle cracks are for.

    25. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should be ditching ALL the legacy PC ports, and just putting USB on it. You can get many combinations of parallel, serial, PS/2 mouse and PS/2 keyboard which will connect to USB, including all of them in a single dongle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The serial port is connected to the ISA bus. The ISA bus is connected to the PCI bus. The PCI bus is connected to the hip bone...

      You could do away with the ISA bus entirely if you just did away with those legacy ports. Yes you could make new chips to connect them to the PCI bus, but that's expensive and no one wants to do that, so they keep hooking them up to ISA.

      If you ditch all the legacy crap, the machine gets cheaper, and simpler. USB host controllers are on the PCI bus. If the machine gets cheaper, you can afford to buy a USB to RS-232 adapter to plug in your serial device. The system is going to have USB whether it has the legacy connections and buses or not. The only reason you need the ISA bus in most PCs any more is the legacy ports.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:That's weird by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I understand your point, but I'm not sure that it would make as bit a difference price-wise as you think. If it's cheaper to have ISA/Serial than it would to put Serial on PCI... Then how expensive is the ISA bus? Also, aren't there sensors and such on the ISA bus too?

      I really don't think it's That Big A Deal(TM). *shrug*

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    28. Re:That's weird by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      2 prong RS-232?
      Nope. That's the power port on the left in the side view shot.

    29. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's true that the sensors are generally hanging on the ISA bus, except for the CPU temperature sensor, which is now generally built into the CPU, as it is on my Athlon XP. On my mainboard it is built into the ITE 8712 SuperI/O chip, which provides all legacy I/O on my system. There are of course PCI SuperI/O chips out there. (The linked chip, the Nominal Semidestructor PC87393, has 16 general purpose I/O pins, which could be used for monitoring.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:That's weird by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Wrong side. Look at the fifth photo. You'll see a long bar with screw holes. Looks a lot like a 232 or parallel port. The concensus is that it's a docking port.

    31. Re:That's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you find this universal to USB dongle for cheap (less than $20 or so)?

    32. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've seen them in assorted stores in the San Jose area for $30 or so, such as Software and Stuff. And of course, if more legacy-free PCs were made, the demand would go up, and prices would come down, as per the universal law of supply and demand.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:That's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I'll check those out.

      You do have to admit that $30 is a lot more than the few bucks it takes a manufacturer to include the ports themselves.

    34. Re:That's weird by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Transmeta might be set to make a killing if it's as nice as you say it is. What is their stock sitting at, hmmm?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    35. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's true, they are currently pretty expensive, simply because people already have those legacy ports all over their machines, so they're not motivated to buy such devices. Eliminating cumbersome interfaces with large ports will do us all good, though; It can make computers simpler, and motherboards smaller. These are good things(tm).

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:That's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well until our supplier can get their USB connector to their equipment working we are stuck using the slooow parallel port.

    37. Re:That's weird by iantri · · Score: 1
      Simpler? I fail to see how eliminating something like say, PS/2 ports and replacing everything with USB mice/keyboards makes things simpler.

      USB is a much more complex protocol than PS/2.. PS/2 is specialized for only one purpose and is natively supported by EVERYTHING.

      If your computer breaks and need to boot with a rescue disk, USB complicates things far more than necessary.

      Also, (and this is a real life scenario), RS-232 and parellel ports make GREAT simple interfaces.

      A Computer Engineering class, for example, can built a simple device and interface it to the serial/parallel port. Since there is no raw access to the USB port, this would be impossible.

    38. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the complexity of the hardware. Operating systems already support USB, so using USB peripherals does not significantly increase the overall complexity of the OS; the drivers are already there. It DOES, however, reduce the complexity of the hardware of a system with USB if you remove the ISA bus and all the stuff hanging off it; Similarly, if you remove all the Legacy I/O ports. The only people who will be sorry are people in Operating Systems design classes, and it's not like those machines are going to dissappear overnight, nor will single board computers go away.

      Rescue disks have become increasing useless. There are now many solutions for booting from CD (or USB pen drive, or other mass storage device) which work with modern computers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:That's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RS-232 ports are stupid.

      You can buy a tiny little USB to RS-232 dongle. Makes MUCh more sense.

  6. aPC... by nweaver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't that called Windows XP?

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:aPC... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Isn't that called Windows XP?"

      If you had said Windows 98, modern Windows users would have found that amusing as well as the uninformed Linux zealots.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:aPC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, I'm sitting here on a Win98 box because I consider the MS EULAs pretty damned hostile.

      Of course, with them sneaking in all sorts of random updates even in the security patches these days, I'm going to eventually have to purge any non-OS friendly hardware and go 100% OS... Debian or something.

      I'm not exactly on friendly terms with the BSA, and my copy of Windows is legit...

    3. Re:aPC... by missing000 · · Score: 1

      However, if he had said Windows ME he would have had an even better point!

    4. Re:aPC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's called Linux.

  7. Sexy... by ActionPlant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yeah. I'd definitely hit it.

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
    1. Re:Sexy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, based on its size, I think you'd be more likely to felch it.

  8. Upgrade. by Humba · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is sooo much better than my OQO 1.0
    OQO 1.0



    The only real change I noticed from the original spec was a 20Gb HD, vs 10Gb in the first.

    --H

    1. Re:Upgrade. by smr2x · · Score: 0

      I'm always up for new toys..

      Blinking lights and little screens just turn me right on!

      --
      .
    2. Re:Upgrade. by wyluli · · Score: 1

      How much was it in 2002??? It looks to me that they just waited 2 years for the parts to make it under $2000

    3. Re:Upgrade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I saw the OQO in the headline, I thought, "aw dammit, OQO have paid the slashdot ad-cum-story fees again". When will slashdot stop reporting this vaporware device? (See slashdot archives for all the paid OQO stories).

    4. Re:Upgrade. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Your OQO 1.0, huh?
      Does it get as good gas mileage as my flying car?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:Upgrade. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1


      It has a keyboard now as well as a bunch of other features. They've really done a lot of amazing work to miniaturize the internal components.
      This is one device that your really can't knock until you actually use and then you won't want to.
      It was worth the wait.

    6. Re:Upgrade. by sympatico · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The only real change I noticed from the
      > original spec was a 20Gb HD, vs 10Gb in the first.

      maybe that is all *you* noticed but i noticed that that new one is *thinner* than the original. *wider* than the original. has a *higher resolution screen* than the original. and, more important, has a keyboard under the screen. version 1.0 had *no* keyboard.

    7. Re:Upgrade. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      My point is that there never was a production OQO 1.0 as far as I ever heard, and I've been trying to get info on the product ever since I first heard of it about a year or two ago. Saying that this one's an upgrade over the one you have is like saying that you're a world-reknowned Duke Nukem Forever champ.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    8. Re:Upgrade. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I am certain that none of the first design went into production.
      I think the parent was referring to the info posted on their web site prior to CES which had quite a different design.

  9. Not Much Impressed by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    It shifted its target from lightweight users to enterprise users. It's friggin more expensive than cheapo PDA but has not enough juice in it.

  10. Nice but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..The keyboard looks awkward. With the device set up the way it is, there doesn't seem to be muc provision for placing it on a desk to enter data quickly (well, more quick than dual thumb tapping)

    1. Re:Nice but.. by Wuss912 · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats what the docking station is for

    2. Re:Nice but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you connect an external keyboard, mouse and monitor.

  11. Sorry, you missed the boat. by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 0, Troll

    I remember hearing about OQO a long time ago; I was even invited to an early meeting where the prototype was shown. (It looked just like the "machine" they keep trotting out for press photos.)

    If they introduced this three years ago, it might have sold. Now, there's the Cappuccino PC, which has been through several revisions since its introduction. Likewise, I can build a Mini-ITX PC for a fraction of the price of this new OQO. Furthermore, I can run any OS I want; this OQO can only run Windows XP. Yuck.

    I'm afraid that I can't endorse the OQO. Sorry, guys. Next time don't produce so much vapour.

    Sincerely,
    Seth Finklestein
    Miniature Computer Expert

    --
    I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
    1. Re:Sorry, you missed the boat. by klausner · · Score: 1

      You are comparing the Oqo to boxes 2-10 times its size. If you want a mini-ITX, fine, but it won't fit in your pocket, or even your briefcase. See http://www6.tomshardware.com/business/20020417/win hec11-11.html for a size reference on the Oqo.

  12. Windows Only? by ThisIsAnExampleAccou · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the C|Net article:

    The machines run Microsoft's Windows XP operating system and all the software that goes with it

    I know this is pretty much a /. cliche, but I think that it is actually warranted in this case - can you run Linux on it?

    I can think of several functional uses that a PC of this size could fulfil running Linux.

    1. Re:Windows Only? by smr2x · · Score: 0

      Is it a barebones XP version? I sure hope so...

      --
      .
    2. Re:Windows Only? by tommck · · Score: 1
      If you can get it to boot off a CD, you could always try Knoppix :)

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    3. Re:Windows Only? by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, you cannot run Linux on it. There is all sorts of dedicated hardware inside the OQO that is not available to the general public (e.g. you). It would take months if not years to reverse-engineer all the hardware; and then you would get sued under the DCMA.

      I'd recommend a nice Mini-ITX PC. You get to build it yourself, and you can run whatever you want with it.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Pundit

      --
      I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
    4. Re:Windows Only? by elmegil · · Score: 1

      'cos you know, a mini-itx fits in your pocket. Makes a GREAT substitute.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:Windows Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...I can think of several functional uses that a PC of this size could fulfil running Linux."
      Er, what would those be, exactly? I see usefulness of a small PC for embedding, but what's accomplished by the small display and keyboard? For the same money one could buy a good laptop with better capability and far greater usability, and it certainly doesn't fit the bill (in either size or cost) for a PDA. So what apps fall in that middle ground? Not trolling, I just really don't see the usefulness of this thing...
    6. Re:Windows Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you can run Linux on it, but the question is: can you buy it without having to pay the Microsoft tax?

    7. Re:Windows Only? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      I'll take the bait. If drivers, etc weren't an issue (big if) then:

      1. Entertainment pc - video's, music, etc that also has email, web and a few games. The Linux versions of these apps sure look a lot more customizable to the small form factor than most of the Windows versions.

      2. Take it with you PC - Dupe your full-size Linux environment on the mini computer and borrow the keyboard, video and mouse when you get to your client site. Why lug a laptop bag?

      3. Presentation PC - you can do it with XP, why not with Linux?

      4. Development PC - Long commute? Want to code on the metro? No Problem.

      In short, most anything you'd want to do on this thing with XP you might also want to do with Linux. You might as well have asked, why bother with XP?

      The thing that makes this form factor so appealing is the same thing that makes the iPaq so appealing, but the iPaq had too many compromises as far as storage, speed and OS. This box dispenses with most of those compromises in a nice, pocketable form factor. The desire for Linux is just a desire to dispence with the last of those compromises.

      TW

    8. Re:Windows Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you forgotten who has a hand in this device? Linus - the man himself. It is almost a given that linux will run on it.

      Years to reverse engineer? What do you think those guys developing linux for PDA's do? (www.handhelds.org).

      Hmm... I see linux in the near future.

    9. Re:Windows Only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.saintsong.com.tw also makes quite small PCs, but they lack the screen and keyboard... but fully customizible!!

    10. Re:Windows Only? by sympatico · · Score: 1

      i say we throw all those shrink wraped CD's into the boston harbor! no more taxation without representation!

      i have heard first hand that linux runs without a hitch on the device. the only complication seems to be the odd screen size for X11. but it does run in VGA mode. i am sure that is not too complicated to fix. the person i talked to said they had more trouble installing linux on a dell server than the OQO device.

    11. Re:Windows Only? by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

      It's highly doubtful this company, created some totally customized chips, when there are already chips out there for the Cursoe, so more than likely you will be able to run linux on it.

      --
      Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
  13. Um... by dewie · · Score: 2, Funny

    I didn't get to see all the photos before it got slashdotted, but I don't think it accepts that kind of input...

    --
    Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On A Technicality --theonion.com
    1. Re:Um... by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      You're right. I didn't mean to objectify it. This is a computer, and deserves the same respect that is the right of every computer regardless of speed, platform or form factor.

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    2. Re:Um... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I didn't get to see all the photos before it got slashdotted, but I don't think it accepts that kind of input..."

      In his case, it might.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I didn't get to see all the photos before it got slashdotted, but I don't think it accepts that kind of input...

      Just as with women, sometimes you have to make your own holes.

      i'm gonna burn.

  14. Not a Good Server... by johnalex · · Score: 1

    Apparently. The site's already /.'ed. Anyone get a mirror?

    --
    JA
    http://www.johnalex.org/
    1. Re:Not a Good Server... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Funny

      the server must be on an OQO :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  15. Is this the ex-Microsoft dude's device? by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

    A while ago (I have no idea) there was some story about some ex-Microsoft founder (don't know which) who was going to make a device just like this.

    I couldn't get to the site to see who runs the company.

    Is this that device?

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
    1. Re:Is this the ex-Microsoft dude's device? by bmarklein · · Score: 1

      No, that's the Mini-PC from Vulcan Ventures, run by Paul Allen (MS cofounder & third-richest man in the world).

      Here's an article describing OQO, Mini-PC and other ultra-portables, all of which are yet to come to market.

  16. should use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some kind of a Beowulf cluster of those things to run their website stead a single one :-)

  17. RE: Major problem. by fshalor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The darn thing runs windows!. Oh.. Nm. All the other specs sound like my ibook. Needs more ram though.

    I don't think this'll be fun to type on, though I'd say it would be much better than the PDA's of today. Looks well constructed from the pictures.

    I'll wait for the solid state CF 2.0 GB internal drive. I've had it with HD's in portable devices. I love my iPod, but I've had so many HD's fail on me that I'm sick of replacing them.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  18. Obviously by Quixadhal · · Score: 2, Funny

    their web site is running on one of these things... probably in someone's pocket (ow!).

    1. Re:Obviously by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      slashdotting someones pocket? too many request to get in their pants? are those some open ports in your pocket or are you just...

      /em gives up and goes home.
    2. Re:Obviously by Theolojin · · Score: 1

      their web site is running on one of these things... probably in someone's pocket(ow!).

      actually, it is running on a beowolf cluster of these...

      ba-dum ching.

      --
      Life is short; think quickly.
    3. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were here in Philly, the Slashdotting may have turned it into a half-decent hand warmer.

  19. How big was the Newton? by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    Let's see, 4.9 inches wide, 3.4 high, 0.9 deep, weighing 13 ounces... how does this compare in size with the Newton?

    I don't know about putting it in your pocket... maybe if you're wearing a suit or jacket you could load up an outer pocket with one.

    1. Re:How big was the Newton? by douglips · · Score: 1

      The newton was quite a bit bigger.
      See here:

      8.3 x 4.7 x 1.1 inches - 1.4 pounds

  20. CES by Kjeks · · Score: 1

    CES. What is it all about... is it good, or is it whack?

    --

    --
    Will work for bandwidth.
    1. Re:CES by GuyZero · · Score: 1

      Damn, no mod points... I'm all up with the Ali G references.

  21. Imagine a.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Beowolf cluster of these could fit in a pair of painter's pants or bib overalls.

  22. uPC at PocketThings by romper · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is another site which shows the uPC -- with pics.

    Soon to be Slashdotted too, I'm sure. :)

    --
    Right is wrong when left is right.
  23. nah... by ed.han · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's just user-hostile.

    ed

  24. Server is running on one of these... by ironwill96 · · Score: 1

    Due to the ultra small size, they probably werent able to include enough cooling to stop spontaneous combustion from high-res pictures loading on thousands of /. user's computers.

    --
    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
  25. Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's vaporware. Oqo has announced previous versions of this product several times, none have ever made it to market. I'd love to have one of them, and many people have been waiting for it, but at this point I'm not holding my breath. I'll believe it when I see it.

    It made /. in 2002 for best vaporware:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/ 12/22/022821 7&mode=thread&tid=126

    Slashdot should not be promoting hype from any vendor that has a history like OQO until it's actually released.

    1. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That explains the OQO Duke Nukem: Forever bundle.

    2. Re:Vaporware by howlatthemoon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. In a previous thread in last year's vaporware awards Nominations for 2003 Vaporware Awards I suggested OQO for 2003, before finding that they won for 2002. They even cited that 2002 award as part of their press package. While I was seriously interested at the $1K price point, 2K is getting a little steep, and that is making the big assumption they ever release one, I am not getting my hopes up and will stick with my clie NX70v

    3. Re:Vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely, not only that but the closest competitor, antelopetech actually _made_ it to market with basically a very similar device (the design/concept licensed from IBM originally). Anteloptech's offerings aren't cheap though, and I doubt oqo will be if ever released. If they were in the sub-$1000 range for the core & then tack on dough for the extras it might be more appealing, otherwise these are excessively spendy for the massive drop in speed you get for them compared to a standard mini laptop.

    4. Re:Vaporware by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Shameless plug.

    5. Re:Vaporware by sympatico · · Score: 1

      > Oqo has announced previous versions of this
      > product several times, none have ever made
      > it to market.

      didn't OQO just announce it *once* before? at WinHEC 2002? this does not seem unusual to me. also, it seems to me that the design has changed for the better. there is now a keyboard, hidden by an upgraded screen -- 5", rather than the old 4", and 800x480, rather than the old 640x480.

      i think OQO is pushing the technical limit here with this device. i look forward to a new paradigm in computing. no more distinctions between portable and desk tops. whether it is OQO or another company this is the future. it seems to me that OQO is ahead of the game.

      could they fit a cell phone in there as well? how about voip over the builtin 802.11b?

  26. beowulf cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine a beowulf cluster of these.
    OR
    In Soviet Russia we make computer better by largeness.
    OR
    SCO filed paperwork to stop production because they own the rights.
    OR
    Apple Powerbook engineers? It will be too expensive and too slow.
    OR /. already? Is their web site running on one of these boxes?

    1. Re:beowulf cluster by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia we make computer better by largeness.

      This n00b has obviously not yet mastered the art of the "In Soviet Russia" joke.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  27. Didn't win Best of show by mallocme · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually this didn't win best of show from techtv. The Denon/Mediabolic networked PVR won that award, this won in its category (mobile computing) http://www.techtv.com/news/ces2004/story/0,24195,3 591383,00.html ------ Got Wang? http://www.battlewang.com

    1. Re:Didn't win Best of show by mallocme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a direct link:
      Link to TechTV

  28. I checked this out a couple days ago... by BFedRec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It does look sleek and sexy, but not the most practical. It fills in where a power user needs a PDA, and it seems to have the function built in to become a desktop. But the problem is that it's filling a pretty small niche of people who want more than a PDA but less than a laptop. It's not practical to use this as you primary work travel PC as the keyboard is a thumb-board and isn't good for quick entry. It is an ultimate PDA... but you've got to be a pretty high-roller to spend two grand on your glorified PDA.
    Sadly it's probably a niche market item. I hope they find a way to make those innovations really work with a practical product, but I fear they'll be innovating in the field but not financially leading it. I'd love to try one out but don't see it as a practical addition to my tech tool belt.

    CharlesP

    1. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been to the web site for the new pics, but originally these were to be used with all kinds of docking stations: laptop dock, desktop dock, pda dock, etc. Is this still the case?
      It wasn't meant to be an over-powered PDA, it was meant to fit something new. Think of carrying this home instead of a full laptop. All you need is a small dock at work and at home. Plus, you can use it on the go to boot!

    2. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess I am a niche buyer. But this is exactly what I'm looking for. Laptops are too big, PDAs don't have enough power (and also can't run x86 code).

      I'd take one and two docking stations (one for home and one for work), but it has to run Linux.

    3. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      after you "checked it out", did you even think about it? the input isn't a problem; you connect external input devices. put a full sized keyboard and mouse on your desk at work. if you want a portable full sized keyboard, get one of the foldout ones for use with pdas. the external monitor is helpful too.

      this device would be ideal if it came to market. it's not a "niche" device as you've kindly told everyone. it's perfect. most people don't need anywhere near the power that their midtower machines offer, just enough for mail+web+docu. just unplug this thing, put it in your pocket and go home/out/travel.

      i guess the same was said about pdas, but this device is a real "server"; i.e. usb controller (not client), firewiree controller, video, enet, etc., etc.. it's the pda that's the niche product. most people want a computer, not a pda. they _settle_ for a pda.

    4. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by CliffH · · Score: 1

      I think the niche is entirely denpdant on industry or area. At the right price point, I could sell these things like hotcakes (ok, maybe not hotcakes, I remember that Letterman show) because most people over here are hesitant of buying a PDA because it will NOT do what a laptop will do for them. If they have something PDA'ish in size that for all intent and purposes is a full standard system, people will buy them up like crazy. Now, if they try to push this off at ~$2000, they'll sell a few to people that must absolutely have the latest greatest gadget around, but they won't get too many more. They have to push it to the medium sized market, take the price hit to sell more units, bring down manufacturing costs, etc. IANAMBA (I am not an MBA), but this sounds like pretty basic stuff. Put it at between $350-$500 less then that ~$2000 mark, and they will sell quite a few pretty quickly I would imagine.

      --
      sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
    5. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Check this out.
      Good enough for posting to slashdot from the backseat of a car (over GSM)!

    6. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but it has to run Linux.

      It will eventually, but not at launch. There is so much custom hardware in there, that they had to write most of their own drivers for everything. Their focus has been on getting the device to launch. Unless some major flaw is exposed which requires their focus, Linux support will be a high priority. The company is full of hardware geeks who would prefer to not use Windows either.

      BTW...my answer is simply paraphrasing the answer of a friend of my who works there (when I asked him the same question about a month ago)

    7. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by BigDish · · Score: 2, Informative

      I asked the rep about Linux on this and he told me that all their engineers run Linux and they actually had Linux running on it before Windows. That said, they won't officially support Linux, BUT they will provide any necessary drivers to run Linux on it.

    8. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I am going to buy one of these, too. I'm in the market for a new laptop and I'll happily wait the 6+ months it may take for the OQO to hit the market.

    9. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by lmfr · · Score: 1
      I use my former laptop's harddisk, in a usb-2 case, and a bootable cd.

      So wherever there's a pc, I can use my own system. And I've still to find a pc unable to boot linux.

      Regards.

    10. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      That is so not what I want. Again, I want something with the power of a laptop (that includes CPU, RAM, and harddisk), with an x86 CPU. Something that can be docked to use a real keyboard, mouse, and monitor when I'm at home or work.

      I don't want to post to /. from the backseat of a car. I want to code, compile, debug. Not just jot down notes of what I should try when I get back in front of a real computer.

      I want to be able to boot into a full Linux install, to use all my day-to-day applications. Not just fill in a bit of information that will be synced with my applications when I get back to a desktop.

      And I want this magical device to fit in my pocket. (I do wear baggy jeans, with big pockets.)

    11. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Well, it deals with compiling and debugging just well for its size. Unless you're talking Mozilla...

      Ofcourse it would be nice if the device had a 3.0GHZ P4 instead of the 0.4GHZ XScale CPU.
      Also I'd prefer 1GB ram over the 64MB that's included. But the fact alone that you can stick a small,
      yet full featured (real keyboard!) linux box into your pocket (baggy) makes it attractive, doesn't it?
      I really hardly ever do any coding-work when on the road. And if I wanted to I think the main limiting factor would still be the form factor (small screen) long before RAM/CPU become an issue...

      You must see it to appreciate how small it really is...

      I know I sound like an ad.
      Disclaimer: not affiliated with anyone

    12. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I'm mistaken my Zaurus runs x86 code. Anyway, I think I would prefer something about the size of a paper book, this should give you a lager screen, a bigger (longer life) battery, and perhapse would be cheaper because it wouldn't have to be quite so miniturized. Does anyone remeber the Dauphin Brick? Something like that but updated with todays tech.

    13. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by horza · · Score: 1

      An additional plus is that if it's always on you then it won't get stolen (useful if you are a student, or have offices that aren't particularly secure).

      Phillip.

    14. Re:I checked this out a couple days ago... by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > Unless I'm mistaken my Zaurus runs x86 code.

      Heh! Zaurus runs ARM code. x86 is a different instruction set architecture. However, It's almost pathetically easy to port programs from x86 Linux to ARM linux, especially if the programs are Qt-based. Most of the games I've written pretty much cleanly compile for the Zaurus, as well as x86 Linux and Win32. Of course, setting up the cross compiler in the first place was a bitch and a half....

      --
      -JC
      coder
      http://www.jc-news.com/parse.cgi?coding/main

  29. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it play ogg? Shouldn't something called oqo play ogg? Seems natural to me.

  30. Picture links and slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste of time! 5 posts and slashdotted already....

  31. Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  32. How to destroy your webserver by Undaar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here are some simple steps to destroy your webserver:

    1. Decide on an electronics device (computer, camera, etc)
    2. Make device chosen in step 1 *really* small, but just as powerful as full sized device.
    3. Put info about device on webserver you wish to destroy.
    4. Post link to info on Slashdot.
    5. ...
    6. Profit! No! Slashdot!

    --
    ~ "When I'm of that age I'm just going to live up a tree."
  33. Whoopee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The machines run Microsoft's Windows XP operating system and all the software that goes with it

    Sweet! I can run notepad! Paint! IE! Windows Media Player! What a steal~! I'm going to go out and buy one right now!! </sarcasm>

    Maybe they meant "software that runs on Windows XP" but honestly, there isn't a whole lot that comes with Windows XP.

    1. Re:Whoopee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The machines run Microsoft's Windows XP operating system and all the software that goes with it Sweet! I can run notepad! Paint! IE! Windows Media Player! What a steal~! I'm going to go out and buy one right now!! Maybe they meant "software that runs on Windows XP" but honestly, there isn't a whole lot that comes with Windows XP."

      I think the parent doesn't know whether he's coming or going.

  34. Its nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used this at CES and all I can say is wow! The keyboard was suprisingly very easy to use with just thumbs. If they can bring the price down a little this will sell very well. M$ is pushing it hard (it was at their booth). I can think of a thousand uses. The dock and cord options make this a great portable.

  35. customized nano-itx? by keot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the specification seems similar to a nano-itx board, although the dimensions (145 x 86 x 23 mm) seem a tad too small. instead of modding a mini-server into a cdrom drive, you could mod one of these boards into a floppy drive. add a microdrive and the ports you'd need and you'd be well on your way.

  36. Is that an OQO in your pocket? by Stradenko · · Score: 1

    Or does a good slashdotting just get you off...

  37. iPod killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No need for an iPod when you can carry around a whole computer.

    1. Re:iPod killer by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the iPod killer. For pretty much the same price, it plays mp3s and it also plays divx, xvid, and it has its own screen to play it on. And it's only twice the thickness. (Did I mention it was almost the same price as a 20 gig ipod?)

      ARchos

  38. Just image... by nadamsieee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just image a large warehouse filled with racks upon racks of these things running as an OpenMosix cluster... Super (space efficient) computing at its best. ;)

  39. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

    1. Re:No, I'm New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOULD YOU STUPID COCKSUCKERS STOP MODDING THIS GUY UP. EVERY ONE OF HIS FUCKING COMMENTS ARE THE SAME, EAT SHIT YOU STUPID FUCKING SHITEATING WHORES.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    2. Re:No, I'm New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we be modding up ACs that post the FAQ at us over and over again instead?

  40. CPU by MarcoPon · · Score: 1

    TM Efficeon a little bit too late to be in this one? Bye!

    --

    SeqBox
  41. here: lots of pictures by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

    In case you forget aboout google images, here you can see pictures of OQO ;)

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  42. So tired of waiting. by Hexydes · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The said this thing would be out in late 2002, early 2003, late 2003, early 2004, and now late 2004. Who cares? They said the price was going to be $800. Then $1,000. Now $2,000. Who cares?

    Neat idea, but the company really sucks at delivering. At least update your webpage. They are only 3 months away from not updating it in 2 years. That's just pathetic. They need to invest in some more resources and a PR team.

    1. Re:So tired of waiting. by ecloud · · Score: 1

      Well they just need to finish with it and find ways to produce it cheaply. By fall 2004 a 1 GHz processor is going to be pretty underpowered (especially running XP); it won't be a laptop replacement anymore, it'll just be a souped-up PDA, and should be priced accordingly, like whatever is the hot new Zaurus by then, or a tad more. $800 might be OK.

    2. Re:So tired of waiting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell, that reminds me of the AMD 64 version of XP!!!

  43. But can it run Linux, does it support Ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Please, please tell me all..

  44. Toshiba e805 + presentation pack by Fubar411 · · Score: 1

    Add a 1GB CF card and you have all that plus a few hundred dollars to buy a bag of chips.

  45. Damn you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now you've slashdotted archive.org!!

  46. Uses? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Really, what are the uses of these kinds of tiny devices? Heck, for PDAs as well. They're nice toys but they lack power, easy of use and most importantly, a good use. I've only encountered a FEW situations that made me think "Yes, a PDA would be a good tool for this job." and that mostly involves truck drivers and route planners. For the rest I can't seem to find a use for these things. And I'm supposed to seel em for crying out loud.

    As I see it, TINY computers ( PDAs and these toys alike ) are like solutions waiting for a problem.

    1. Re:Uses? by lordvdr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, I use my PDA many many times a day. For the basics, ya know, address book, calendar. I don't use it for much beyond that, other than games, a convenient subnet calculator, etc. But saying that PDAs are a solution waiting for a problem is obviously someone who has never really had one. I'd love an easy to use method to get phone numbers into my phone so I only had to put them one place (NOT going to get a PDA/phone, no way), but other than that, could not LIVE without my PDA.
      -lv

      --
      If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Uses? by Rostin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ?? I use my PDA all the time, as do many people. I tell it when my meetings are, and it alarms a few minutes before to remind me. I put in all my phone numbers, addresses, etc, and then they are at my fingertips, wherever I go. And, no, I don't have a cell phone that I could put that stuff in. I even have a street map program that gives me directions and lets me search for addresses. Finally, I use it pretty often as a calculator. Could I carry around a "little black book," a bunch of street maps, a scientific calculator, and tie a bunch of strings around my fingers? Yeah, I guess so, and if I did, I wouldn't have any use for the PDA. But I'm pretty happy with having all that functionality in a box that's the size of a deck of cards.

    3. Re:Uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's not a PDA.

      why isn't anyone reading the specs for the device? just because you can't think of any uses for it, doesn't mean that other people can't. (especially those of us who have READ about it.)

    4. Re:Uses? by KingJoshi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think these are cool, but not worth 10 times the price of a PDA. And PDAs are useful (but different people have different needs).

      I use mine for the basics (keep track of appointments, tasks, contacts). I also have wireless so I get email. I have my shopping list on there. I track the calories of what I eat. I keep track of my expeneses. I have a dictionary I occasionally use. I have a street map that also has points of interest, which has been useful. I have a graphing calculator. I can voice record or jot down any ideas I have. I also play mp3s on my PDA (the 256MB card still holds 3 hours of songs even with all the other software on it). And also, it can play games when I'm waiting. I've also used it to read ebooks. There are other things a PDA can do. Different people have different needs or some are creative and find other uses. It's a personal digital assistant. It assists me. It may have no use for you, but you have to be pretty blind or stupid to not see how it can be useful for solving many other people's problems. It may not be the only or even best solution. But for me, it solves many and it's easier to carry then a lot of other things combined.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    5. Re:Uses? by CarrionBird · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I use mine a good bit. Basic text entry and word processing, emails, light web browsing, and the traditional PDA functions.

      Plus it doubles as an mp3 player and voice recorder. Basiclly I use it when and where I don't want to lug around all the stuff that goes with my laptop. I can fit the unit and keyboard in a large coat pocket, along with my cell if I need net access. Look at the Dana, basically a palm os based laptop. For some people, that would do everything they need a laptop for. For many others, it would be woefully inadequate.

      It all really depends on what you would do in a mobile setting and if you can tolerate the smaller screens.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    6. Re:Uses? by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, here goes:

      I have an Ipaq 3970 running Pocket Windows 2002 and fitted with a dual CF jacket housing a Wifi card and a 256MB CF card. The unit has bluetooth and I also have a bluetooth-enabled phone.

      Software on the PDA includes:
      PocketVNC,
      PockeTTY (a ssh client),
      XSForms (create forms on a PC, fill them in on the PDA and then upload the data in XML format back at base,
      Pocket Informant (diary/organiser).

      In my role as a 'roving' techy, consultant and trainer, I am often away from my main office, where I am one of the support guys. I can use the Ipaq to do remote diags on our servers and desktops (Win2K, XP and Linux) pretty much anywhere through my phone or a wi-fi point, and I also use the forms software for customer questionnaires/surveys - all this saves me lugging my laptop everywhere and also means I can go out even when 'on call' (Last week I checked out and rebooted a Win2K server via PocketVNC while a passenger in a car zooming along the M4 motorway (UK)! I can also check/send mail. It's not the answer to everything but it's damn handy!

      The next add-on will be a CF adaptor with a vga/video out lead and an IR remote control so I can use the PDA to show full-size/res Powerpoint presentations-sure beats lugging around the laptop again and looks real smart-ass!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    7. Re:Uses? by Babbster · · Score: 1
      It seems inevitable and I'm in a mood:

      Pr0table pr0n.

    8. Re:Uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      PDA's aren't really for everyone.... yet. I use mine quite often though, and for reasons that I think a lot of people would want them as well if they were slightly more accessible. One of the major things I like to use it for is watching video. I can re-encode one of my DVD's down to 320x240 resolution so that it will fit easily onto a 256 meg SD card and then watch it quite clearly wherever I want. Add to that the standard PDA functions like calendars and contact lists, the ability to quickly check my email at a wifi access point, the ability to read ebooks, listen to mp3s, view maps and play simple games all in a form factor that can fit easily into my pocket. I know I was looking for something that could do all of these things for a while until someone introduced me to the modern PDA, now I find that at least for me its pretty indispensible.

    9. Re:Uses? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      with two sets of full size monitor/keyboard/mouse at home and work, you can always pick up where you left off.. + a full computer for use in the field... hmm.. it's like having three perfectly computers all perfectly synchronized....

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    10. Re:Uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your PDA have a speaker? If so, there is probably software for it that takes a phone number and plays the dialing tones. Just hold it up to the reciever. I have seen single purpose devices that do this, so it should be no problem for a PDA.

      Of course, you could just bring the number up on the screen and dial it manually.

    11. Re:Uses? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      are like solutions waiting for a problem.

      Apparently some people have a use for them. I necessarily wouldn't knock a product that I have no need for, because sometimes they really are needed by people that aren't me outside of my circles of perception that have different needs than myself.

      I would think that Microsoft wouldn't have gone through five major revisions on their CE product if it were this way, same with Palm. If it were an unnecessary and worthless product, neither version would have gotten off the ground.

      I use PDAs routinely. I keep my shopping list and jot notes all the time, and they are routinely backed up and I have a track record. Keeping the address book is nice, but I suppose not needed for on the road, cell phones track phone numbers.

      I really don't know what power is needed for, but some Palms can play full motion video.

    12. Re:Uses? by Lproven · · Score: 1

      Just because you haven't found a need doesn't mean there ISN'T a need.

      I've been using a PDA many times daily since a few days after I bought my first one - a Psion Organizer II LZ64 - in 1989. Since then, I've had a Psion Series 3, 3a, 5, 5mx. In between those I've owned or used a Newton MessagePad, Newton 2100, Palm III and iPaq, and evaluated and reviewed HP 95LX, 100LX, OmniGo 700, Nokia Communicator 9000 and others. None comes close to the power and flexibility of a Psion, and still today, nothing does.

      They are indispensable business and personal tools to me.

      If you can't see the use, it's YOU.

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
  47. How big is this thing? by telstar · · Score: 1

    I need a picture with a quarter in it so I can tell how small this thing is.

    1. Re:How big is this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, can't help you. I can say that it is roughly 1/2,400ths the size of a VW or 1/569,097,878th the size of Rhode Island*. *Statistics not to scale.

    2. Re:How big is this thing? by mac+os+ken · · Score: 1, Funny
      When buying consumer electronics I use the International Wang Standard.

      "Does the size, cost, and functionality of this unit make my wang look big or small?"

      --
      .deviatefromtheabsolute.
    3. Re:How big is this thing? by klausner · · Score: 1

      Try http://www6.tomshardware.com/business/20020417/win hec11-11.html.

  48. In other news, Hell freezes over... by avgjoe62 · · Score: 3, Funny

    One of these actually made it to Real Life? And Doom3 is in pre-order? My God, can DukeNuk'm Forever be far behind?

    --

    How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    1. Re:In other news, Hell freezes over... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      My God, can DukeNuk'm Forever be far behind?

      Yes.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  49. Not mini ITX - Try this by Daath · · Score: 1

    Via's Eden-N platform - 12x12 cm mainboard - 15x15mm CPU - How's that for small! :)

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  50. profit!!! by 74nova · · Score: 2, Informative

    i think the lameness filter should now catch this "1. 2. 3.profit!!" bidness

    and to stay on topic, i would really like one of these, but sub $2k isnt sub-enough for me. might even be worth it, but thats hefty for a college student. oh well, pdas get bigger/better, and laptops get better/cheaper. someday ill have the $ to get some neat tech toys...

    --
    use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  51. Re: Major problem. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    what the hell are you doing to your iPod that the hard drives fail? throwing it at the wall as it loads the music into the buffer?

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  52. OQO's site must be running on one of these things. by CliffH · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ok, enough being silly. :) Personally, I've been waiting on any kind of info for these as both a probable customer and reseller. It's a hell of a thing to want to tell your customers what's on the horizon only to have to bite your lip at every friggin turn due to said product being vapourware. I'm hoping against hope that they actually do get this out the door the second half of 2004 because I will buy one for myself (business expense, of course) and hopefully start selling them over here to the gadget lovers or the people that truly need something reasonably small that is a full blown PC. Now, if they can confirm that (insert distro here) runs on this thing with no problems, you have one hell of a nice little network analyzer and right about the same price as what Fluke offers (from memory), and it can be used for many other things (as opposed to what Fluke offers). Ruggedize the thing (there are people over here in NZ that specialize in that) and it would be a great tool on construction sites for conveying new building plans, emails, etc. Ok, enough rambling. I just want to see a beow... :)

    --
    sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
  53. I've found a crusoe roadmap... by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

    it's not only about OQO, but about crusoe too - photos of presentation. (warning, it is translated from russian using worldLingo)

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  54. a tad late? by Chilles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The specs are still all right, I guess..for the size... but when they announced it almost two years ago it had specs I'd die for, right now it's just a too low spec too small expensive laptop, or a too high spec, too short battery life, too heavy pda.
    If it had the size of an average contemporary PDA with these specs it'd be ultra, or with the performance of a P4 2.5GHz with a 120 GB HD and 1024 MB of RAM (a contemporary PC) then it'd be ultra too. Right now it's just a bit smaller, a bit lower performance, a bit more expensive... just a different compromise. Windows XP and Office XP on this hardware? Nothing ultra about that.

    They're still speaking in terms of: "it will be available in QX of 200Y" though, so maybe they're just waiting for the year ipaq's have these specs and HP is willing to produce them OEM style so they can slap their by then hype-laden brand-name on...

  55. OT but amusing by galacticdruid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry to be OT, but this is too amusing to not comment on. Here at /. people very anti M$, but then on the home page there's an ad for visual studio. Is that ironic or what!?!?

    --
    we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively - bill hicks
  56. Competing device from Antelope Technologies by crush · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Was also unveiled. It is based around an iPod-like module which uses the same Toshiba harddrive as the iPod and a Transmeta chip.

    1. Re:Competing device from Antelope Technologies by Sir_Dill · · Score: 1

      The Antelope product is actually a licensed/rebranded IBM product called MCC(Mobile Computing Core)

      There have been a few slashdot stories about it in the past and google search on IBM MMC turns up a couple thousand hits for it. Glad to see this finally "made it" :-)

  57. Transmeta's Advance by munch0wnsy0u · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone and their dog seems to think that Transmeta will never make it in terms of their ultra low heat and ultra portable processors. These things, especially seeing as this one could get off the gound, will be Transmeta's saving grace. They have realized that GHz is no longer the barometer by which users in the know guage performance but it is power consumption and consequently battery life that becomes important as our society moves towards portability bundled with performance. Transmeta has found their niche and, through products like these, will finally realize their potential.

  58. Press Eyes to Screen for Cheap Laser Surgery by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Hey sexy mama, wanna kill all humans?

    1. Re:Press Eyes to Screen for Cheap Laser Surgery by pfunkmallone · · Score: 1

      I just spewed a mouthful of cofee on my screen. Classic Futurama reference!

    2. Re:Press Eyes to Screen for Cheap Laser Surgery by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Classic Fry response. :)

  59. Imagine a cluster of these!! by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    No, really!! Wait - don't mod me -1 Troll just yet.

    The dimensions of this device make it smaller than a typical "blade" server, so you would have a much higher processor density than your typical rack full of blades. In addition, the Crusoe processor runs very cool and uses very little power, so you could probably fill a rack with these things and not require any extravagant cooling.

    Just a thought.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  60. More Vapor from OQO by olivercromwell · · Score: 1

    I recall reading about this device almost two years ago. I was pumped when I read it, and was looking forward to seeing it hit the shelves. Now, here we are, another preview of a prototype at CES, and the sheep in the mainstream IT press are cooing over it, and giving it awards! This thing has been vapor since it's original announcement. They had nice mock ups on their web page from day one. But still, no product. I will believe it when I can HOLD it in my own hand.

  61. what about a portable... by jvagner · · Score: 1

    ..stable session and development environment. everything runs off the OQO and you can connect from any, and i mean any, client.

    that'd be nice. looks too expensive though.

  62. not vaporware by urbaneassault · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw this device Thursday and drooled the rest of the day. While the rest of the show seemed to be a contest in who could put the most flatscreens in their exhibit, OQO drew a huge croud around their tiny booth in the gargantuan Microsoft display. Having held it and played with it, i can assure you that it's not vaporware. And if it is indeed vaporware, then they've managed to pull the wool over the eyes of many exhibitors who all got to play with this very chic device. While form factor is great, the best feature, i think, is the power dongle, which extends the device well past a simple "not a laptop but not a pda" category that is growing. It has vga, rj45, usb, and firewire all of the same dongle, with usb and audio on the device itself....oh yeah, and it does just fine playing back dvd's...Quite the gadget.

    1. Re:not vaporware by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

      At the Transmeta booth, they also had a stand, and the people there were talking tech, not shiny happy MS PR speak. If you were nice, or you happened to have a press badge, they would go into great detail for you. I was one of the two :)

      -Charlie

  63. Uhm... Sony PCG-U1, PCG-U3, PCG-101??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why not use one of these instead? The pricing on the OQO doesn't make it that much less of a bargain...

    http://www.dynamism.com/u101/full/compare.jpg (Side by side U101 with older U1/U3 model)
    http://www.dynamism.com/u101/full/dress.jp g
    (In some lady's hand)

    1. Re:Uhm... Sony PCG-U1, PCG-U3, PCG-101??? by klausner · · Score: 1

      Because the Sonys shown are huge by comparison. The Oqo is 3"x5"!

  64. reinvent the hp 100lx and atari portfolio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems to reinvent the hp 100lx and atari portfolio with colour.

  65. Re: Major problem. by Babbster · · Score: 1

    More likely thrown by other people who demo his unit only to find the hard drive filled with Britney Spears and Poison.

  66. No they didn't by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I played with one at CES, and I must say you are dead wrong here. Try building a mini-ITX box with the size that this thing has, not to mention the sheer slickness of the device. Oh yeah, there is that 5 hour battery life also.

    Look at the size of the thing:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13578
    I spent a lot of time talking to the OQO guys, this is done right. I have not played with the cappuccino, so I can't comment there, but OQO is slick as shit.

    -Charlie

  67. same here! by simpl3x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so, i bought a fujitsu tablet which weighs in under three pounds. on the road, i access email via a cdma modem, and hunt and peck my way through the emails. at home or at the office, i use a keyboard. the weight was my primary issue. i was really tired of lugging around a full laptop, when the uses for a pc on the road are primarily information gathering and communication.

    my questions about the oqo are: will it use tablet edition of xp, and isn't a 1gz transmeta a bit backwards for 9 months from now? i like the profile/size, but i think people underestimate the power requirements for a pc you want to use in different settings, particularly graphics processors.

  68. Mirror of image by glrotate · · Score: 1
  69. OQO Site Very Slow by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

    In other news, OQO will be serving its website entirely off of a single uPC

    --
    SPAM
  70. telephone! by simpl3x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i would love to see a pc card slot so that i could use a cdma cell phone/modem in it. talk about a full featured phone! skip the p900...

    but, in terms of the market you describe, communications are key. and, there is not a slot. What good could it be in that market? oqo needs to be a bit more focused on the market for this product. fujitsu has been doing this for years, and some of the palmtop pc profiles are downright strange, yet driven by customer needs... barcode readers, technician equipment...

    my wishlist would be: tablet pc driven, higher capacity hard disk, pc card slot for a cell phone, and a decent graphics card. battery capacity can be added by battery packs when needed. most people don't need the processor speed, but want to drive a decent monitor, though a 1ghz transmeta is so 2 years ago, not nine months from now.

  71. No one mentioned the cable by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    One of the slickest things about the OQO is the cable. There is a thick cable on it that you can barely see in my pic:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13578
    I t is wrapped around the guys neck like a bandolier. It has a bump every 8 inches or so, and each bump is a port. One is for a pop-up ethernet plug, another USB, etc etc. You get all the ports in a beautifully efficient way, no clunky dock or block. I should have put it in the article, maybe for a followup. One thing for sure, transmeta had a ton of cool stuff at the show.

    -Charlie

  72. Re: Major problem. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I posted about this on usenet once, the response I got was that you'll find out very fast about CF's million read/write cycle when you are using it for a harddrive and part of that is a swapfile...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  73. Maybe an example will help the n00b: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, the lame old joke fucks YOU up!

  74. Ultra portables by rfinnvik · · Score: 1

    When the first wave of ultra portables came out, we bought about 15 Toshiba Librettos for some of our sales staff.

    About a year later, all of them had been thrown away in favour of laptops with a keyboard you actually can type on... These machines were also hampered by a LOT of technical issues, and I'd be a bit sceptical to a new wave of these things before they've proven to be reliable.

    Basically, these things seemed like a good idea at the time, but technical - and useability issues made them more a novelty than anything you could use to get work done...

    That being said, I salvaged a 110CT, installed Linux on it and I use it for running ethereal and other network troubleshooting stuff... :)

  75. The skinny by tooz · · Score: 5, Informative
    OK, first of all, it might be later than expected, but it's not vapor. I've held it in my hands and played with it; it's a pretty damned sweet piece of hardware.

    Second of all, it runs linux just fine. The designers have tested it with Red Hat 9 with no problems. They haven't tested BSD, but don't see any reason why that wouldn't work as well; there's some discussion of testing Darwin on it.

    Third, I just asked one of the designers about ports. The reponse:
    "We've got USB, FW (4 pin), Audio (stereo with "extra" feature lines), 2 docking ports, external 802.11 antenna port and Power. USB is 1.1, FW is 400Mb. On the docking connector, we've got: VGA, LVDS (for digital interface to LCD), Serial PCI (for external PCI chassis/devices), same FW, 2 USB lines, Audio, Power. On the docking cable, we've got a USB -> Ethernet converter with RJ-45 plug, male and female VGA connectors (for flexibility of plugging into devices without additional cables), and so on." There is no serial port on the device.

    Fourth, the theory behind the device is to have a box that will convert from a PDA to a desktop machine and back again. You use it in the office, undock it, use it on the train, and redock it to use it again once you get home. No syncing required. It's not really meant just be a turbo-charged PDA.

    1. Re:The skinny by tooz · · Score: 1

      Updated Info:
      In addition to Red Hat, the oQo crew tested Gentoo Linux 1.4 and FreeBSD 5.2, all of which worked fine, with the exception of some difficulties getting X to deal with the funky screen ratio.

  76. You want water? by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Can't we just nuke the ice caps and save ourselves a few billion in water detecting probes?

    Yes. that IS a joke.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  77. Looks like there server is an OQO too.... by pineapples10 · · Score: 1

    Server's down already....perhaps they are serving their site from an OQO??

  78. I agree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Needs a Pentium-M, USB2, Cardbus slot and a much larger hard drive. Add 802.11 a/g while you're at it. Looks like they spec'ed it long ago.

  79. Ya need pretty big pockets by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    Deep ones too? Nah, not too bad, but it's not a tiny device. According to the flyer from the show, it's 4.9" x 3.4" x 0l9" and 14 ounces. Metric? What's Metric?

    Lots bigger than an iPaq or Palm, altho certainly smaller than a Newton.

    But it's much too big for a shirt pocket, and probably too fragile for a pants pocket. Probably destined for a holster or coat.

    Other details:
    Bluetooth, 802.11b, FireWire, 5" VGA screen w/ digitizer, TrackStik w/2 buttons on the keyboard left edge, microphone/speaker, bettery fuel gauge (3 lights), dock, external antenna jack, thumbwheel, USB 1.1, headphone jack.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  80. 1st thing I'll do with mine... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    Install XP Tablet Edition so I can use the tablet features and hook it to my Wacom Cintiq as a dock.
    Same pen works with both.

  81. They're probably running the web site on the OQO. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Guess it doesn't cut the mustard, eh?

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  82. There's plenty of USB-Serial adapters by xswl0931 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Subject says it all. I would rather not have the RS-232 port.

    1. Re:There's plenty of USB-Serial adapters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet drivers stillll need to be written to utilize that.

      rs232 solves a lot of easy problems, USB DOESNT

    2. Re:There's plenty of USB-Serial adapters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have yet to find one that didn't hiccup every so often. Belkin especially has problems on this front. Not to mention they take up more space and are yet another newfangled whizhicky to spend money on and get lost and tangle the cable and for what? To save one square inch on the side of a device.

  83. You'd attach a keyboard for that purpose by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    You're not supposed to be able to touch-type a thumb pad

  84. Re: Major problem. by fshalor · · Score: 1

    Hocky!!

    I'm the general use computer fixit peroson for a lot of people I know. (and an amazingly high number of people I don't know.) I also manage about 40 systems and have about 5 in the house. HD failures happen. And the're happening more frequently recently.

    I didn't type clearly enough. The iPod has been 100% trouble free (except for me stupidly forgetting to empty the recycling bin once after deleting about 5 gigs of data off it on one mac and then.. er, well, nevermind.)

    I'm litterally to the point where I'm seriously contemplating just replacing them about once every 1.5 years. (Useing working old drive as a backup.)

    Although, I've got a quartet of 9 gig scsi drives that have been on (except for 3 moves and power outages) since 1995. Those I trust. :)

    Thankfully, ipod HD's are now pseudo user changable. Wonder about this little OOA gizmo?

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  85. Usefulness? by gidds · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, the spec may be quite impressive for its size, but for actual usability and usefulness, it doesn't look like a match for my outdated but much-loved and vital Psion 5mx...

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    1. Re:Usefulness? by kcelery · · Score: 1

      The matrix style keyboard is for 2-finger typists, not too useful if you really want to type up something. And again, the price tag makes it a vapourware.

  86. Re: Major problem. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    If only you knew that "fshalor" knows more classical music than most of the DJs of classical radio stations. :^)

  87. Easteregg on their website by lhaeh · · Score: 1

    I went to 'page source' in mozilla and found this....

    oqo: hardware: video

    1. Re:Easteregg on their website by lhaeh · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow....

      oqo: hardware: video

  88. Does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it runs Linux, they might be hearing from a few litigious bastards before too long. Better watch out!

  89. Wrong. ex-apple people by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    Many of the people who designed this did the design for the ti power book.
    Vulcan is something else all together (doesn't have a Tablet for one).
    When Bill Gates saw the Vulcan he said "That's great but where's the tablet?"

  90. ugly brute. by xot · · Score: 1

    Has to be one of the ugliest computers I have seen.no? They could do with a lil color.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  91. Who edited that movie? by Excarnate · · Score: 1


    A spastic, brain-damaged monkey.





    No offense to our primate cousins.

    --
    .signature: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Who edited that movie? by Excarnate · · Score: 1


      Sorry, here is the link to download the spastic, brain-damaged edit job: monkeyOQO.mov

      --
      .signature: No such file or directory
  92. Or as Bender would say by Vaystrem · · Score: 1

    "Hey sexy Mamma, wanna kill all [the] humans?"

  93. Oof... by arothmanmusic · · Score: 1

    For poop's sake... who wants to read or type on something that small? I don't know which I'd lose first... the whole unit itself because it's so small, my eyesight from looking at that screen, or my mind from typing on those little keys!

  94. Re: Major problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never seen a post so full of sentence fragments and random unconnected thoughts.

  95. Out of curiosity... by goldfndr · · Score: 1

    Is the default font used on it bigger than the 10px used on their website?

    (Sorry, just venting... my cell phone and Tungsten T use bigger fonts...)

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
  96. iPod killer? Not yet! by lo_fye · · Score: 1

    If iPods were still 15GB, *maybe* it would kill the iPod. But really, a 20GB harddrive? :P Boooo. It should have a 60. Still, I want one. Form factor is pretty sexy, a la Palm Tungstens. Shit, running MS OneNote on this would rock. So phat it makes the tablet pc look fat, and redundant.

    --
    geeks are cats who dig a certain kind of cool
  97. No weight listed in specs by risacher · · Score: 1

    Anyone know how heavy the device is expected to be? They don't list the weight in the specs. I really loathe it when companies release "specifications" for things without including what seem to me to be obvious metrics, like dimensions, weight, power consumption, heat output, etc.

    --

    "The simplest solution is to ignore your dead children."

  98. But ... by k3vmo · · Score: 1

    It's not upgradeable! .... wait.. sorry.. thought we were talking about the Cube..

  99. Re: Major problem. by iantri · · Score: 1
    It's an interesting world we live in when people believe they need more than 2,560,000 bytes of RAM for most purposes.

    What for, exactly? It's an ultra-portable computer; you are not rendering 3D graphics on it. At best you are running some sort of embedded application, whose memory requirements (IMHO) should be FAR under 64mb.

  100. Music sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, it's too expensive, but other than that, I have the ideal application.

    Think about it. It's got storage, a sound card, general-purpose programability, and wireless. If it were cheap enough to be a mass-market item, you could write a little app that shares music over peer-to-peer wireless. Since it's a general-purpose device, it would be hard to make a lawsuit stick against oqo, and since you're not using the internet it would be rather difficult for the RIAA to deal with.

  101. If..... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    A) It can run hi-power analytical stuff like Nastran, etc.
    .
    B) I can hook up my ergo-keyboard and trackball to it.
    .
    C) It'll output to virtual image display goggles so I can work while travelling by air without people looking over my shoulder.
    .
    . ....I'd be really interested

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  102. Re: Major problem. by fshalor · · Score: 1

    INteresting, yes.. I really only need nano, emacs for serious stuff, and a light weight X11 for Lyx, dia, xmgrace and gnumeric. And about 500 MB of storage. I wasn't implying the need for 2 GB of ram, I was implying the need for a non-converntional storage media.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::