Slashdot Mirror


Mars Express Confirms Water on Mars

jki writes "So, finally: Through the initial mapping of the South polar cap on 18 January, OMEGA, the combined camera and infrared spectrometer, has already revealed the presence of water ice and carbon dioxide ice. This information was confirmed by the PFS, a new high-resolution spectrometer of unprecedented accuracy. The first PFS data also show that the carbon oxide distribution is different in the northern and southern hemispheres of Mars. The MaRS instrument, a sophisticated radio transmitter and receiver, emitted a first signal successfully on 21 January that was received on Earth through a 70- metre antenna in Australia after it was reflected and scattered from the surface of Mars. This new measurement technique allows the detection of the chemical composition of the Mars atmosphere, ionosphere and surface." On another note, NASA has gotten some sort of signal from Spirit, but it's still not fully functional.

100 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let the terraforming begin!

    1. Re:heh by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Terraforming?! Do you know what this means? It means that we now have rocket fuel, air, and drinkable water all for the taking! The primary equipment necessary is one nuclear power plant! That just leaves the problem of rockets that are still in one piece by the time they make it to Mars.

      Segway into GCNR rockets. They can be used for space travel, and landing and taking off. We could even build CO2 breathing "flyers" for easy transport from orbit to the surface and back. If NASA can, they should start work on the proper engines immediately! WhooHoo!!!

    2. Re:heh by forand · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But why? In all seriousness what reason do we have to go to Mars? The moon is a much better astronomy platform since it has no atmosphere and lower gravity, plus it is much easier to get to.

      So what purpose does going to Mars serve? I am a physicist btw, working on GLAST for what is is worth.

    3. Re:heh by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      In all seriousness what reason do we have to go to Mars?

      That is a difficult question, isn't it? The most common (and vague) answer would be Hillary's, "Because it's there." While that may not seem like a very good reason on the surface, it's really just an attempt to explain a strong pioneering spirit that is pervasive in many cultures.

      To actually look at the benefits of space travel however, you need to look at it from an economic standpoint instead of a scientific one. Opening up space to colonization would trigger a new economy. Those who take the step toward space will need various raw materials. Those raw materials are plentiful on asteroids, moons, and planetoids. Thus space based businesses could make a mint by mining and selling raw materials. Those raw materials could then be processed by space smelters and factories. Those factories could then produce a variety of products, including space craft such as cruise ships or colonization ships. Various institutions could then form colonization efforts where the cost is split among the settlers. (Similar to the settlers of the Americas; the Mayflower being a common example.)

      But what does this have to do with Mars? Well, space is a pretty vast place. If we assume for a moment that companies become interested in mining asteroids in the belt just past Mars, then we have to ask the question of how they're going to be supported. Sending ships from Earth would be problematic at best, very slow with catastrophic results in case of failure at worst. However, if Mars were used as a staging point for mining support and materials processing, trips back and forth could be substantially shortened.

      Of course, all of this requires the development of high thust AND high Isp engines. Of all the options available, only nuclear engines meet the necessary criteria. GCNR (Gas Core Nuclear Rocket) engines can throw the same mass as chemical engines, but have a much higher Isp (3000-5000). These would work well as a launch solution, space plane solution (since they could potentially "breath" atmospheric gases), and as a initial solution for interplanetary travel. However, even GCNR engines have a low Isp when you take into account how much space is out there. Thus the next step would be the development of pure space drives such as Orion or Nuclear Salt Rockets. Both of these would provide an excellent solution for non-landing craft with high thrust, high Isp, and excellent fuel and mass capacity. They'd have so much power, that they could easily carry GCNR space plane crafts as landing shuttles. (The largest Orion design calls for 8 million tons of ship mass.)

      More info on propulsion methods on Wikipedia.

      Does that help explain it?

    4. Re:heh by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 2, Funny
      Segway? Have they started making rockets now? They must be the self stabilizing ones huh?
      :)

      <sotto-voice>I think you meant seque </sotto-voice>

    5. Re:heh by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, it is the government's responsibility to encourage new economic growth. Capitalism is great (at least I like it), but it requires that the government help it along every once in awhile. Since space is not a "safe" investment, no company is going to invest in it. Not to mention that Nuclear technologies are still carefully controlled. Thus the government is going to have to develop the initial technology, prove it, then give it away to companies who wish to make a profit on it.

    6. Re:heh by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BTW, I was reading up on GLAST and came across this:

      GLAST is a next generation high-energy gamma-ray observatory designed for making observations of celestial gamma-ray sources in the energy band extending from 10 MeV to more than 100 GeV.

      Just out of curiosity, what would be able to hit the craft with 100 Giga-electron Volts of Gamma radiation? I could see getting hit with that much energy close to the Sun, but over interstellar distances?

      Or perhaps I'm just overestimating how much energy 100 GeV is?

    7. Re:heh by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not an astrophysicist, but based on things I've read, I wouldn't expect 100GeV stuff coming from the sun. But there are other things in the universe (black holes, magnetars) that can make photons and other stuff with that kind of energy, and much higher (I've seen some articles about cosmic rays with energies of ~10^21 eV, although nobody knows for sure where they come from).

      As far as distance from the source goes, photons only get scattered if they interact with something . As long as there's not much between 'there' and 'here,' they can get through, even if it does take a while.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    8. Re:heh by sgage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Hillary's, "Because it's there."

      But Hillary did not ask for (at least) tens of billions of tax dollars to accomplish his explorations.

      - Steve

    9. Re:heh by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that you are a capitalist and that everything should be driven by profits in your world. But the fact of the matter is that the vast majority of scientific research generates ZERO profits--at least in the short term. With your attitude, should we eliminate all theoretical physics (eg. studying the origin of universe, black holes, etc), social science (hardly any money to be made here), biology (why waste time studying animals?), history (who cares), etc.

      Knowledge is not a profit-generating instrument. Capitalists have a hard time understanding this. Unfortunately, I have a feeling you just never will realize it...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  2. That explains the mute Spirit Rover by addie · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's just sitting there sulking.

    1. Re:That explains the mute Spirit Rover by woodhouse · · Score: 5, Funny

      Brain the size of a planet, and they have me looking at stones.

  3. Europe by Tirel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Europe can be proud of this mission: Mars Express is an enormous success for the European Space Programme.

    1. Re:Europe by gerardlt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I believe the NASA discovery was at the North pole, though I agree that this news is not very groundbreaking.

      BTW, does anyone know how they identified the North/South poles? Was a compass sent there in a previous mission, or was it an arbitrary decision?

      --
      /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
    2. Re:Europe by Phekko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmph, this is so obvious. Even a child knows, that north is the one that is upwards in your map. Just look at any map of Mars and... Oh, never mind

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    3. Re:Europe by ahillen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why does every press release have to mention how they are doing it "better" than we Americans are...

      The press release doesn't even mention the USA or NASA...

    4. Re:Europe by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and now you're just as aggressively generalizing and attacking Europe. *sigh* Try to show some class and not yourself fall down to the levels of those you're attacking (or your impression of them).

      All I can see is that they're very excited, happy and proud by the results, as they should be. These feelings are all positive ones and a sign that they're dedicated to the work they do. I seem to recall NASA engineers crying in joy when the Spirit sent back its first signals. I understand them, and I understand why ESA is very relieved by these achievements. They need all the success and publicity they can get, just like NASA, since space organizations like these are constantly fighting to not have their fundings lowered.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Europe by mikerich · · Score: 4, Informative
      BTW, does anyone know how they identified the North/South poles? Was a compass sent there in a previous mission, or was it an arbitrary decision?

      Mars' magnetic field is only a tiny fraction of that of Earth's and is actually dominated by regional poles rather than the strong magnetic poles on Earth. Mars does not appear to have a dynamic Core so its magnetic field is actually the one frozen into the planet when its hot interior solidified.

      So a compass wouldn't be much help.

      The answer is that the North Martian Pole is the one pointing in much the same way as the Earth's North Pole.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    6. Re:Europe by TheCaptain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hrm...perhaps the moderators confused "insightful" and "inciteful" again.

      Slashdot has seemingly always had a problem in that department, IMHO.

    7. Re:Europe by canthusus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's not like the press release didn't rub everyone's faces in the fact it's European.

      Why does every press release have to mention how they are doing it "better" than we Americans are.

      Err, the only mention of Europe in the press release was the very last paragraph.. "Mrs Edelgard Bulmahn, German Minister for Research and Education, who is also chair of the ESA Council at ministerial level, said at the press conference: "Europe can be proud of this mission: Mars Express is an enormous success for the European space programme."

      We are looking at the same press release, right? Because that quote doesn't seem to justify your assertion that ESA has a serious case of American Wang Envy

      There is a place for Europe and the US and [insert name of country here] in space exploration. And justification in each country being proud of its successes, and congratulating the others on their successes.

      If Mrs Bulmahn's comments offended you that much, then I apologise on her behalf, and on the behalf of The whole damn socialist European Union

    8. Re:Europe by gunnk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, you can have two kinds of poles: geographic and magnetic.

      Magnetic is the way your compass points. Planets do not have to have an appreciable magnetic field, so it is possible to have a planet without a magnetic north.

      Geographic is based on the direction of a planet's spin. Here's one way to choose geographic north: the right-hand rule.

      Stick out your right-hand like you are going to shake hands, but with your thumb pointing upwards. Now curl your fingers in towards your palm. If the curling of your fingers occurs in the same direction as the planet is spinning then north is in the direction of your thumb. If your fingers are curling opposite to the direction of the spin then your thumb is pointing south.

      The right-hand rule is used a great deal in the world of physics.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    9. Re:Europe by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why does every press release have to mention how they are doing it "better" than we Americans are...

      The press release doesn't even mention the USA or NASA...

      You must've not read all the way to the end. I quote the last paragraph:

      Mrs Edelgard Bulmahn, German Minister for Research and Education, who is also chair of the ESA Council at Ministerial level, said at the press conference: "Europe can be proud of this mission: Mars Express is an enormous success for the European Space Programme. We rule! In your FACE, NASA! Your rover SUCKS! Who's laughing NOW!"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:Europe by woodhouse · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's probably not the most efficient way to obtain pretty wallpaper for my 2048x1024 desktop, but it's appreciated none the less.

    11. Re:Europe by brinch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is very sad to see, that the results of the current space exploration are always met by childish discussions of which space agency is better and more succesful.

      I am quite sure that the the Mars Express team was very aware of the existing discoveries when they designed the instruments and that they by no means intend to steal the credit for the achievements of others.

      However, when it comes to please the politicians who pays for the party, it can be necessary to wrap the results in glittering paper. Just try to watch CNN tomorrow night...

    12. Re:Europe by Haeleth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't seen anyone note yet that in 2002 NASA discovered the exact same.

      No, they didn't. They demonstrated that it was very likely that water was present; the press at the time obviously played that up as "we've found water", but it was not proven. As recently as two or three months ago I remember reading articles about how what they found might not actually be water at all.

      What the European mission has now done is proven beyond reasonable doubt that the hydrogen Nasa found is, as we thought, contained in water.

      This is not pointless duplication of effort - it's a perfect example of two space agencies producing complementary work and building on each others' successes to further human knowledge.

      And it's a crying shame that idiots in America and Europe alike - I'm speaking in general terms, not at you specifically - feel compelled to put down the other side's efforts and hype up their own.

      This is science, not sport - everyone's on the same side here.

    13. Re:Europe by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously though, it's a pity that Beagle seems to have been lost for good. Mars Express may have proved the existance of water but Beagle would have been able to prove the existance of life.

      Let's keep our finger's crossed that it eventually is found safe and sound and is still able to carry out its mission.


      I think frankly we're going to have to give up on Beagle. It's a pity, but at least it's not a terribly expensive loss. It would be a greater setback if something turns out to be seriously wrong with Spirit as well, or if Opportunity doesn't land safely; I hope I speak for the majority of Europeans when I say I hope the American landers are both able to carry out their missions successfully.

  4. Landers by Ilex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any chance it can confirm the location of our missing landers?

    1. Re:Landers by MellowTigger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think the parent question was intended to be funny. I think it's a serious question. I will rephrase:

      These new probe imagers have impressive resolution. Any chance that they can be used to identify lost landers and determine what happened to them? It might be useful to somebody to know if a lander ended up in one big piece or thousands of smaller pieces.

    2. Re:Landers by Ilex · · Score: 2

      Actually it was intended to be funny. It's just my sceptical sense of humour.

  5. Free Shrimp!! by SwissCheese · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet, so when do I get my free shrimp?!?

    1. Re:Free Shrimp!! by jea6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't. The promo is only if the Mars Exploration Rover finds it. And it's pretty far away from the martian south pole.

      Long John Silver's announced today that it will give America free Giant Shrimp if NASA's Mars Exploration Rover project finds conclusive evidence of an ocean on Mars by February 29, 2004. The out-of-this-world offer from the world's most popular seafood chain celebrates NASA's efforts to find traces of ocean water - and possibly, evidence of life - on Mars.

      Besides, this is one of those times you should seriously consider just saying no.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  6. Crap by l0wland · · Score: 3, Funny

    So Spirit tripped and drowned in a puddle of mud?

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
  7. But of course... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...we're all still waiting for confirmation of bacteria and/or bacteria fossils. I certainly hope that NASA can establish good contact with Spirit again soon, and that Opportunity lands safely tomorrow!

  8. Is this really news? by loconet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct me if im wrong but didnt we already know there was frozen Water in mars? Isn't what we're looking for liquid water or the indication that there was once liquid water? Is this frozen water in a melted state somewhere else in the planet ..that would be interesting?

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Is this really news? by Troed · · Score: 5, Informative

      It has been confirmed on the north pole before, but not the south. That's why it's news.

    2. Re:Is this really news? by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Informative

      no, we knew that there was frozen carbon dioxide on mars (dry ice), but not water ice. we've believed there has been water on the planet at some point due to certain geographical and geological reasons (the way some of the rocks are pointing the same direction, the "canals", etc, etc), but we don't know for sure that there actually was water on the planet.

    3. Re:Is this really news? by dsoltesz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Odyssey have found water ice near the southern polar cap, I'll have to check on the ice situation regarding the northern cap. I'm not sure what specific thing the Mars Express orbiter folks are looking for, but one of the goals of the MER rovers is evidence that there was liquid water.

  9. WWater on Mars w00t! by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I only need to ship out hop plants to set up my Martian Brewery!

    --
    Worst .sig ever!
  10. Lowell said that 120 years ago by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    When he saw the water channels on Mars, later confirmed by the orbiters.

    1. Re:Lowell said that 120 years ago by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
      He also said that he saw spokes on Venus (There is a theory that he was seeing the blood vessels at the back of his own eye.)

      Of course, it was probably the Venusian railway network where Elron Hubbard claimed he was almost hit by a train...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  11. 750 bytes by geschild · · Score: 4, Funny

    10 minutes at 10 bits/s, I wonder what was important enough to spent those bytes on...

    If Nasa-geeks are anything like other geeks, it must've been either martian porn or nethack I guess. The former being more likely. ;-)

    --
    Karma? What's that again?
    1. Re:750 bytes by cperciva · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given that this response came after they uploaded new code to help them track down the problems, I'm guessing that the data received back included the string "HELLO WORLD".

      Which is unusually appropriate in this case, actually...

    2. Re:750 bytes by amabbi · · Score: 3, Informative

      according to the latest on NASA's marsrover webpage, an additional communication session of ~20 minutes occurred with transmission at 120 bits/sec... hopefully this information will help determine what happened to the Spirit rover 2 days ago...

  12. Interesting, so .... by ozric99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... how are they going to get the bottling plant up there?

  13. Scientific point of view by MountainMan101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a scientist, although I find it very interesting that they have "discovered" water on Mars, I do no think it is the ground breaking discovery that it has been played up as.

    From the geological appearance water was always expected, Hydrogen and Oxygen are both abundant enough (in the early history of Mars - not in the atmosphere at the moment). H2O is the thermodynamic result.

    Although the absence of water would almost certainly have procluded the existance of "life" on Mars, the existance of water is not, in itself, that startling a discovery.

    It is important that scientific funding goes towards real science and not satisfying the public demand for fantastic revelations!

    Finally, well done ESA for building a spectrometer that accurate, and getting it there :-)

    1. Re:Scientific point of view by tobe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd actually argue that as long as 5-10% of science funding goes towards feeding the public fantastic 'revelations' then the absolute size of the other 90% is far more likely to become and stay large.

      Giving the public something to capture their imaginations is a far lesser crime than allowing the majority of science resource in this day and age (admittedly not public money) to be frittered away on 'curing' dandruff, limp hair and stubborn stains.

      Centralised, organised world research council. NOW !!

  14. Discovery may indicate life... by gerardlt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists confirm that what they've found is mostly water. They were quite surprised to see that the water was held in bags. Quite ugly bags.

    They continue to speculate what the discovery might mean, and whether life may be possible in this environment...

    --
    /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
  15. JPL has an update: 20min data session rcat 0830EST by TheOldCrow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like some telemetry was just received from Spirit:

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2004/30.cfm

  16. hmmm... by rogabean · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know as of late it seems to me that NASA is just feeding us every little finding in morsel form. It feels like we are being baited with a carrot. This whole "we found water" thing is no exception. We go from hearing next to nothing to now hearing something "new" just about everyday. I understand they are grasping to get the American public "excited" once more about space exploration, but still. Water does not excite me.

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  17. More recent "successful" attempt...... by nbehary · · Score: 2, Informative
  18. Is Spirit Waterproof? by stuffduff · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wonder if there is enough vapor to form condensation and potential short circuts where dust might accumulate in microscopically damp areas. Other concerns include areas of unusually high magnetic activity where magnetized iron bearing minerals might form accidential circuts. Or the possibility of static discharges, like mini lightening.

    Does anyone have a comprehensive list of what the rovers are designed to deal with?

    It may be time to return to a soft landing strategy.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  19. I'm curious... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting
    We've seen several photos now of the vicinity of the nasa lander, but I've been wondering... what does the area reallya look like at night? Do its moons reflect enough light for detail in nearby objects to be discernable, or is everything just cast in shadow?

    Moderation: -0.66 Mildly Off-Topic

    1. Re:I'm curious... by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do its moons reflect enough light for detail in nearby objects to be discernable, or is everything just cast in shadow?

      Unlikely. Phobos and Deimos are tiny, and orbit very fast, very close to the surface of Mars. They can't even be seen from all points of the Martian surface. I'm guessing that in the Martian night-time, if they pass overhead they're entirely in Mars's shadow and thus cast no light. I think they're only visible at dawn and at dusk, under certain lucky conditions.

      What I'd love to see it some photos of the night sky. I've always wanted to see the same constellations from a planet other than Earth. Dunno why, just seems significant to me.

      --
      These sigs are more interesting tha
    2. Re:I'm curious... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've always wanted to see the same constellations from a planet other than Earth. Dunno why, just seems significant to me.

      For fun, you could always take a trip to the opposite latitude (north/south) on Earth. The Moon will be the right angle in the sky, but upside-down and going backwards. Most of the constellations will be different and the ones that aren't will be upside-down.

      I don't know about you, but I'd hold on to something solid before looking up.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:I'm curious... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, I can see my house from up here!

    4. Re:I'm curious... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you're wrong in a couple places, here.

      1) "I've tried snapping the sky from here with a 3 megapixel camera and it's a waste of time, even with very long exposures"

      This would seem to disprove your theory.

      2) "the resolution of the cameras they've got up there sucks even more so"

      This is quite wrong. Spirit's camera has a 1 megapixel CCD, which may seem small. But it's a 1 megapixel *B&W* CCD, meaning no filters. By contrast, the 4 megapixel CCD on your average camera has filters which are used to detect red, green, and blue (plus one extra green filter, I think). These four inputs are then combined to form the final output pixel. As a result, a 4 megapixel colour CCD (as they are produced today) has an effective resolution equivalent to a 1 megapixel B&W CCD. Moreover, most B&W CCDs have a much lower signal-to-noise ratio, meaning it can be kept open for longer exposures.

      The combination of these factors is the reason why virtually all astrophotography-specific CCDs produced these days are 1) B&W, and 2) relatively small (comparatively speaking).

    5. Re:I'm curious... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Informative
      The constellations would be essentially identical to what they are like on Earth. The only discernable difference would be in how the visible planets move past them over time.

      All those stars are *REALLY* far away, after all, and the short hop from Earth to Mars is insignigicant in comparison.

  20. Mars Rover Communicating at 10 bits per second! by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow.. That's a little more than one ascii character per second... I can see the bits coming down now: A...L...I...E...N...A...T...T...A...C...K
    NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Mars Rover Communicating at 10 bits per second! by danidude · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or...
      A..L..L..L.. ...
      Y..o..U..R.. ..
      B..A..S..

      --
      - no sig.
    2. Re:Mars Rover Communicating at 10 bits per second! by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Funny

      s...l...a...s...h...d...o...t...t...e...d

  21. better news by spurious+cowherd · · Score: 2, Informative
    The latest update seems to indicate that they may be on track to getting back working
    They just need to stay away from the STOP+A keys

    --

    Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.

  22. Contact w/ Spirit by Ateryx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good News for NASA, Bad news for Brits. NASA had 20 minutes of connection at 120b/s with spirit.

    --
    "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    1. Re:Contact w/ Spirit by tobe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it bad news for the brits.. it's good news for everyone. Science is not a competitive pursuit.. it's a collaborative one.

  23. NO NO.. Spirit found water! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last communications between NASA and Spirit....

    NASA: MOVE FORWARD 10

    SPIRIT: 10? Ok 10 METERS [whir.. Trundle]

    NASA: NO NO. 10 FEET!

    SPIRIT: OOPS..

    NASA: WHAT HAPPENED?!?!?! REQUEST STATUS REPORT!

    SPIRIT: LOCATION - OLD RIVERBED
    GOOD NEWS - FOUND WATER
    BETTER NEWS - LOTS OF WATER
    BAD NEWS - NOT WATERPROO...#%$&#..... Bzzzzzzzzzzzt

    NASA: DAMN!!!!!!!

    --
    Have a nice day!
    1. Re:NO NO.. Spirit found water! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      NASA: Go North

      SPIRIT: THERE IS NO WAY THROUGH IN THAT DIRECTION

      NASA: Go West

      SPIRIT: I AM IN AN OLD RIVERBED. THERE IS A TROLL HERE. HE LOOKS UNFRIENDLY.

      NASA: Kill Troll

      SPIRIT: WITH WHAT SHOULD I ATTEMPT TO KILL TROLL?

      NASA: Kill Troll with Tinderbox

      SPIRIT: I AM IN AN OLD RIVERBED. THERE IS A DEAD TROLL HERE.

    2. Re:NO NO.. Spirit found water! by line.at.infinity · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about:

      NASA: REPEAT 1000 [ FORWARD 20 RIGHT 160 ]

      Ahh, the good old LOGO days... ;)

  24. Don't know 10 bps by Zorgoth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in the oilfield operating a 2 tons monstrosity called an MWD. These things are used to transmit data from up to a 10 km deep hole and on the basis of this data the decision of which way to drill a well are made (oil wells are usually not vertical affairs these days). Multi-million dollar decisions are regularly made on a data from a transfer rate of less than 10 bps, 6 bps is excellent and transmission rates are often in the range of 0.5-3 bits per second. You would be surprised at how much system information can be crammed into that bandwidth if the programmers are clever. Incidentally, my tools use a modulation/demodulation scheme similar to that used on the Voyager probes, we just have to transmit through viscous mud with pressure instead of light across the solar system.

    --
    -------------------------------END--COMMUNICATION- --------------------------
    1. Re:Don't know 10 bps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Multi-million dollar decisions are regularly made on a data from a transfer rate of less than 10 bps, 6 bps is excellent and transmission rates are often in the range of 0.5-3 bits per second.

      Sounds like a correct description of the thought-process normally executed by my boss...
    2. Re:Don't know 10 bps by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've got MWDs and oil????

      Don't tell Bush!

      (MWD must mean mass weapons of destruction... scary to think that not only has your company developed nuclear technology, but also developed antimatter)

      This only applies if you don't work for Halliburton.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  25. Sparkling Mineral water to be exact. by J1bber · · Score: 2, Informative

    This stuff's mixed with frozen C02

  26. Mars Express Confirms Rocks on Mars by fuzzybunny · · Score: 3, Funny

    In breaking news today, NASA's Spirit probe transmitted data confirming the existence of rocks on the red planet. "We're very excited" said Aloisious Smythe Ponsonby-Jones, project manager of the Mars mission's rock-finding department. "Right on this picture, you can see a little redd-ish one, and here another. This one's shaped like an egg, and the second one, if you look carefully, has a little face shape on it."

    The mission's dust-detection sub-project, as well as its quest to determine whether Mars is, indeed, reddish-brown colored, are still awaiting further data.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  27. Hoorraayyy by savagedome · · Score: 2, Informative

    Spirit Rover is back on track again.

  28. Sinkhole!!! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

    check out the Mars Express photo featured at the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3422841. stm

    looks like there's a sinkhole... and where there are sinkholes, there are....? CAVERNS!

    1. Re:Sinkhole!!! by cxvx · · Score: 2, Funny
      check out the Mars Express photo featured at the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3422841. stm
      looks like there's a sinkhole... and where there are sinkholes, there are....? CAVERNS!

      Caverns? Maybe that's why Bush is so eager to go to Mars. You never know Osama may be hiding in one of them there. He sure can't find him on this planet :)

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  29. You joke but terraforming is a good idea by JumperCable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let the terraforming begin!

    You may be joking but I think it's a good idea. I think the odds of finding life on mars is slim to nil. Right now they are fruitlessly running around hoping to find past traces of life.

    Terraforming will be a long long process. I say we jump start it by tossing out some extremophile microbes and see what takes root. Scatter them around the water laden edges of the poles. Anything that produces organic compounds has got to be better than what Mars has now.

    At this point we have some clue as to what kind of compounds and weather conditions exist on Mars. Let's set up some test beds here, genetically reengineer existing extremophiles and see if we can get something that grows.

    1. Re:You joke but terraforming is a good idea by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      With not natural cycle for water and little amounts do we really want to waste it on microbes? I am with the poser above put some kind a big power supply there (nuclear, or microwave orbital) and start putting people there...

      Note: I am not a Bio major so maybe putting large colonies of microbes would not reduce the amount of water...

      --
    2. Re:You joke but terraforming is a good idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am with the poser above

      Thanks a lump. :-/

      As for the microbes, I'm not sure that limited water is the issue. The real issue is if we really want to be deploying microbes when there's no one there to keep an eye on them? If we build a small dome city near a (relatively) closed area like a canyon, we will have the perfect staging point for deploying microbes. Inside the canyon, Oxygen levels would (hopefully) rise quickly forming a bubble of livable atmosphere.

      That's the theory anyway. Whether it's workable or not remains to be seen. Since O2 is much lighter than its CO2 counterpart, it's possible that all the O2 will simply float away and disperse.

    3. Re:You joke but terraforming is a good idea by sniggly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most astronomists nowadays believe most water on mars has evaporated off planet - there might not be enough to go around for terraforming. Maybe if spirit's got its little wheels spinning in some kind of icy mud there might be enough, but so far NASA hasn't stuck its detectors into the ground as they perhaps should have done right away.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  30. what sort of commands get sent? by Raleel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i mean...I know they got limited bandwidth and all, but what sort of protocol do they use?

    good lord, this is an incredibly geeky question, but I'm serious, i wanna know.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:what sort of commands get sent? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Probably some offshoot of Kermit. You can sent data over tin cans and a string without loss with that beast.

      In contrast, Beagle seems to have used YModem-G and "&Q0". Kiddies.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  31. All these technogeeks all this hostility by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's kind of sad really all these nerds who pretty much owe their lives, livelihoods and amusement to advanced technology constantly pooh poohing this great science going on.

    Ah well - the confluence of indifference, stupidity and radical Libertarian 'prices of everything'.

    See If NASA promised that Mars science would guarantee the slashnerds could share illegal music for free forever I'm pretty sure those damn Trekkie buffoons could get behind it.

    Live long and eat Cheetos, fat goofy weird comicbook store guy.

  32. Astronaut Dean says... by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Funny

    With this water we can go to Mars. Then were gonna take Deimos, then we're gonna go take Phobos, then we're going over to Mercury to take back the SUN!!!!! Yeaaaaahhhhh!

    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  33. The fine print by addie · · Score: 4, Funny

    For purposes of Long John Silver's offer, an ocean is defined as a single body of water, the surface area of which equals or exceeds five million square kilometers.

    Er... I'm pretty sure they're safe on this one.

  34. Maybe not so by Mr+Europe · · Score: 4, Informative

    You must be from Japan ?
    If the rover is the size of compact car, it is very compact !
    Here are both the current rover and the previous one in the same picture:
    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/s pacecraft/ tworovers_br.html
    One seat could barely fit.

  35. Re: How would it react to wind? by thedillybar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I wouldn't worry about it flipping.

    That's why you're not an engineer for NASA. You worry about the little things or you stand on the sideline and watch.

  36. Re: How would it react to wind? by mikerich · · Score: 5, Informative
    Look at photos of the Spirit, what with it's flat platform on top..... They landed this thing in an area known to have alot of wind (and in their words, has alot of "dust devils" and little twisters).

    Easy, Martian atmosphere pressure is only 1% that of Earth's. So whilst the winds on Mars can reach enormous speeds, they actually exert very little force.

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  37. Just out of curiousity... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would the recent solar eruption have anything to do with Spirit's shutdown? No matter the data speed involved in the transmission, a solar flare and multiple sunspots would generate quite a bit of noise. Especially when you take into account that Mars doesn't have much of, if any magnetosphere to deflect ionizing particles.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  38. The signal reads: by minator · · Score: 2, Funny

    w3 T3h M4rTi4N H4k3r5 h@VE 0wN3r3D Y0uR 5loW R0V3R. W3 WIll 0vErcLOcK 1T anD m4Ke i+ f45tEr. W3 4Re L33+. J00 4R3 L4m3.

    NASA can't make any sence of it...

  39. Re:JPL has an update: 20min data session rcat 0830 by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's more good news then. :-)

    Let's just hope the good news in it transmitting telemetry data doesn't mean bad news in what the telemetry data shows. :-/

    Regardless what, I'm starting to get ready for the Opportunity landing party to be held at #maestro on irc.freenode.net :-D

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  40. Clickable link and text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    JPL has an update

    Updated Mars Exploration Rover Mission Status January 23, 2004

    The flight team for NASA's Spirit received data from the rover in a communication session that began at 13:26 Universal Time (5:26 a.m. PST) and lasted 20 minutes at a data rate of 120 bits per second.

    "The spacecraft sent limted data in a proper response to a ground command, and we're planning for commanding further communication sessions later today," said Mars Exploration Rover Project Manager Pete Theisinger at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

    The flight team at JPL had sent a command to Spirit at 13:02 Universal Time (5:02 PST) via the NASA Deep Space Network antenna complex near Madrid, Spain, telling Spirit to begin transmitting.

  41. Re:Water by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    close enough.

    water would boil on mars given the pressure and daily temperatures.

  42. More news by MouseR · · Score: 4, Informative

    By increasing the digit at then of of this http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2004/30.cfm, you can get more news.

    This one above is somewhat upbeat. The data rate from this last communication went from 10 minutes at 10 bits per second to 20 minutes at 120 bits per second.

    Not quite live streaming, but not yet slashdoted either.

  43. Re: How would it react to wind? by uberdave · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rover dimensions: 1.5 meter (4.9 feet) high by 2.3 meters (7.5 feet) wide by 1.6 meter (5.2 feet) long ( MERfacts

    It's closer to the size of a riding lawn mower. It's only the camera mast that makes it tall.

  44. Re: How would it react to wind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mars Express has ground-penetrating radar that can read down to 3 miles, so it should see the ice lenses of the cryosphere. We found so much water just from the epithermal neutron counter on Odyssy.

  45. Spacecraft Commands by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is a generic answer, as I am not familiar with the command and data handling systems on Spirit.

    Most spacecraft commands are sent as fixed or variable length frames of synchronous data. A frame usually begins with a sync pattern, some header information, the actual command, and a trailer containing a checksum or CRC. There is no protocol, in the sense that most people use. Think of the commands as UDP datagrams. The engineers in the control center monitor the telemetry downlink to verify that the commands sent were received and decode properly. The spacecraft command decoder has parameters in the telemetry downlink such as "# of good commands received" , "# of commands rejected", and "last command received". For simple commands, like "heater #5 ON", you can check the downlink telemetry for the status of heater #5 and verify that it is in the correct state. For complicated operations, like uploading software or large data tables, the spacecraft can be commanded to do a memory dump to the downlink telemetry, allowing the upload to be verified.

    As a general rule, spacecraft command processing is kept as simple as possible. You want the command decoder to be extremely reliable, so that even if half the hardware on the spacecraft is broken, you can still send it commands and have them executed. Rather than rely on an automatic protocol, it is usually better to take advantage of the cleverness of the engineers and computers on the ground. Since there is a human in the loop, take advantage of it. The human knows things that a protocol doesn't, like the spacecraft is about to go "over the hill" due to the motion of the Earth and the spacecraft. The engineer may also want to do things like uplink a sequence of commands into temporary storage, verify them with a dump, and execute them only after he is sure that all of the commands were successfully received and decoded. Some commands are designed to require multiple actions before they do something dangerous and/or irreversible to the spacecraft. For example, "arm pyro #36" and "fire pyro #36", which might deploy a solar panel.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  46. update on Spirit signal by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    After analyzing the data, they found Spirit had been infected with the Nachi virus and was sending out spam from Mars. There were also ARP requests mixed in the data stream looking for windowsupdate.com. :-)

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  47. Dude by KnightStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Evidence for water activity on Mars comes (I think) mainly from pictures of geological formations: eroded hillsides, gravel bars, river canyons, etc. This is different: evidence of water ice currently in a particular location. Then again I thought that the presence of water ice on Mars was already pretty well established, but what do I know :-)

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  48. Why go? To guarantee our survival, some say. by hpulley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some say we should worry more about incoming asteroids wiping out all life on earth which would mean we should establish human colonies on the Moon, Mars and elsewhere to hedge our bets against such an occurance (could return to repopulate the planet after a time). Others say earth is heading for environmental disaster and the solution might be to leave it for lifeless places and artificial environments where we can do no harm. Others yet want us to think about overpopulation which could be solved by spreading out to other planets and while others say that sociopolitical causes are the main of hunger today, there is a limit to the number of people that can live here.

    Why did people come to the New World, not just in Columbus' time but earlier from Asia? Why did they send their canoes to Pacific islands? The time will come that our reasons will match theirs. Today the reasons are not yet there and the will is only shared by a few but the reasons will likely become more apparent and the population more willing with time.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  49. Only one Shrimp by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    but it's a GIANT shrimp.

  50. Re:The more important fine print by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, you can go in multiple times and wear a different mustache each time.