Slashdot Mirror


A Wireless Network for a 4-Story Apt. Building?

zzzreyes asks: "I live in a 4 storey building, and pretty much everyone in this building is into gaming and computers. I have just received, through the death of a great aunt, about $7,000. I want to know how and what I should buy, to provide wireless access through out the whole building, so we can all share one connection. There are 6 double-room apartments on each side, and we only have four floors. I'll hopefully have access to the elevator shaft, in case I need it. Will $7,000 be enough?" How cheaply could you do something like this, assuming you had access to much of the building? What would be the best way to set up the access points to guarantee the best coverage for the whole building?

39 of 578 comments (clear)

  1. Pay off debt or buy a house by tntguy · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Seriously.

    1. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by schatten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      agreed. this will benefit you far greater than a wireless connection.

    2. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by GreenPickles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Investing that sort of money into a house, or into something that will appreciate with time is a smart idea.. Especially when you have a nice chunk of change like that. The real estate market is looking really good right now. See if you rent all the time you are pumping money into something you will never own. If you buy, then you will own something, and be able to sell it after sometime. Basically renting makes someone money. The objective in the "financal game of life" is to have more money streams comming towards you rather than away from you.

      There are lots of good books that talk about this concept.. and having $7k is a nice way to start sometihng like that.

    3. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by Sacarino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really don't think this is offtopic at all. The poster wants to know if $7k is enough to do this project.

      The reply here obviously is "yes, but don't waste your money." How is that offtopic...?

      These people are not going to pay your bills for you. Don't offer to pay theirs. They want broadband, they need to shell out their cash.

      Just because a great aunt was kind enough to bestow money on you doesn't mean that you are expected to share.

      Life can be harsh, don't make it harder in the long run by giving away money now.

      --
      -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    4. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by shark72 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "These people are not going to pay your bills for you. Don't offer to pay theirs. They want broadband, they need to shell out their cash."

      I don't believe it was stated in the question that he was making this up-to-$7K investment out of pure kindness and that he was asking for nothing in return. Somebody, please correct me if I'm wrong.

      By my math, there are up to 48 tenants in the apartment building. If he charges each $20 a month for access to his wireless network, that's $11.5K, or a return of about 150%, in the first year alone.

      Unless he's lucky, buying property is unlikely to have that rate of return.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    5. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by binarybum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the hell? Since when did this become "news for middleaged businessmen that remind everyone of their fathers?"

      This guy is embracing the spirit of nerdom by doing something that non-nerds would consider a waste of time and money.

      Today his apartment complex, tommorrow his city!
      A lot of great people in the tech world get their education and ideas from what may have started as seemingly wasteful iconoclastic exploits.

      --
      ôó
    6. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by Technically+Inept · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The real estate market is looking really good right now.

      And the stock market was looking really good around 1999.

      A lot of people talk about rent as if it is "wasted money." That's not at all true, most of the time. Buying a house is an investment, and investments are inherently risky.

      If you have $10,000 to make a downpayment on a house (assuming you live in Gary, Indiana or something), then you have the choice whether to invest that $10,000 in a house or in some other investment. Choosing to continue to pay rent allows you to invest it somewhere else if you feel the return will be greater or the risk is reduced. Much of the time, your rent will be cheaper than what you pay on a mortgage, and most of that mortgage payment is going towards interest at first. Calculate the "expected return" on each investment (including the tax implications)and you can figure out whether buying a home is a good (financial) use of your available capital.

      How can you tell whether home prices are likely to keep rising? One way is to look at the ratio of home prices to rents. Over time, rents and home prices should keep roughly the same ratio. One reason that ratio can get out of whack is when people are buying a home not because of its value compared to rent, but because they expect to sell it for more later. When home prices rise without a proportional rise in rents, that can be indicative of a bubble. And that ratio is at historic highs right now in the U.S.A.

      Of course, low interest rates can also push home prices higher, but it's not nearly as simple as people usually make it out to be. A home will become part of your investment portfolio, and your entire investment portfolio should be considered carefully.

      --
      Now watch me hit this drive.
    7. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by gagy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is off topic, but more insightful than most of the comments here. Mortgage is a good idea only when your rent is really high, or more specifically, if your rent is more than The interest payment portion of your mortgage. For Example: You mortgage a $200,000 house for 25 years, assuming about 5% interest, your payments for the first five years are $1185 a month. In the first five years you've paid 60*1185 = $71,145, but oh so sad for you, $54,343 of that was in interest. Now then, say your rent is $500 a month (say you live with a room mate) and (this is the key) you put away the difference that you'd pay for the monthly mortgage, ($1185 - 500 = $685). Now do that for five years while renting, and you've saved $41,100 towards your house. So mortgage is NOT always the best way to go.

      --
      -I DDoSed your mom.
    8. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And they're going to subscribe for what, exactly? Internet access?

      Most ISP AUPs don't allow you to resell internet access -- you can share it for free (most of the time), but when you start reselling their services, they'll want a cut, and if you don't give it to them, they'll have quite a nicely sized legal lever to pry it out of you.

      Add to that the fact that 48 tenants times twenty dollars per month per tenant equals about the cost of a T1, and you're not looking at much of a profit. One to three hundred dollars a month, at most, giving him a three year time to realize his original investment.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    9. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he's going to be giving these people internet access, he's going to need to buy a pretty fast internet connection---I'd say "Business" DSL at least. Don't forget overhead. It might come out to quite a bit less than $11.5k.

    10. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh my god. Where are the social engineers on this one? Think about it. Dead aunt... tee hee.... exactly $7000 dollars. Sounds to me like someone wants to get a 36 office building done for $7000 or less and they are fishing for clues. Nobody in their right mind would donate that amount of money to their apartment building. What is more plausible is that someone got a $7000 bid to do their office building and they want to see what its really worth to get it done or at least have some negotiating advantage. IMHO its worth paying the 7Gs if you want it done correctly. You can get it done pretty cheap if you are willing to make compromises, but 18 (assume 50% usage) people sharing one or even two DSL lines for games kinda blows. Those types of compromises domt create the type of network you might want to depend on for a business however. Spend the $7Gs if this is for biz.

    11. Re:Pay off debt or buy a house by DRue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of people talk about rent as if it is "wasted money." That's not at all true, most of the time. Buying a house is an investment, and investments are inherently risky.

      This is horrible advise. Owning a home is always a better investment than renting - renting you are GUARANTEED to lose 100% of your 'investment'. Owning a home you could, but it is very likely that you will see a nice appreciation on your home. Also, the gov't (in the US) will pay you back a third of your interest paid on your mortgage (see: tax deductable), and with interest rates what they are right now it is the best investment you can make. Rent is only a 'better' option if you are looking to live somewhere short term, or if there is a serious differential between the monthly expenses (which there isn't with today's interest rates and such).

  2. all for one one for all by kayen_telva · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if everybody shares the same connection, online gaming will suck, unless you have an OC3

  3. Invest it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Buy stock in Ask Jeeves, man!

    No.. seriously.. put it somewhere and save it. If you want, you could buy a Linksys WAP and a Linksys signal booster and a big antenna and that might work and might run you a couple hundred bucks.

  4. Ethernet by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With so few and so fixed appartments I recommend you set up ethernet connections to a common box. Less than 1K total cost. Then set that box to whatever external connectio you like (if you like to).

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  5. One word of warning ... by lambent · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I applaud your noble effort. However, I must warn you. Once you take responsibility for setting up this network, everytime something goes wrong, you will be the first person the tenants come to for help. Even though it sounds like your neighbours are computer oriented, I guarantee you will be swamped with more problems than you bargained for.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:One word of warning ... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better put a lawyer on retainer with that plan, because guaranteed that you'll be the one left holding the bag should the cops come knocking about kiddie porn, warez, cracker attacks, etc.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  6. Why the wireless obsession? by phr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you really can get to all the apartments, why not put an ethernet drop into each one? Let people install their own wifi points if they want them.

  7. It's none of my business, but I'd love to know... by fejikso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are you subsidising the whole cost of the installation?

    If all the people in your building want to get wireless, they should chip in, shouldn't they?

    On the techical part, I don't know, but I think $7000 should be MORE than enough to get the whole thing running in all the building.

    Again, it's none of my business, but it is my personal suggestion not to be so eager in spending so much money like that. Unless you REALLy want to play with those guys. Who's going to pay for the fixed internet connection fees later?

  8. Don't be a bloody idiot by ttys00 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't waste this gift on crap. Your great aunt left it to you, not your apartment building. Buy a car, pay off some debt, invest it in a managed fund - do something useful with it rather than waste it on people who won't even say thank you.

  9. Re:Equipment cheap. Labor NOT by fnord123 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Forgot to add: Most ISPs do not allow you to share bandwidth like this, so expect to have to pay extra $$/month for a business plan.

    All in all I agree with the other posters. Save your $$ and let your neighbors buy their own access!

  10. Owning or renting? by Tripster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, you say apartment so I'm assuming rental to begin with, don't bother! Take your $7,000 and use it for a downpayment for a house of your own, interest rates are low right now and you are much better off paying a mortgage of your own rather than someone elses for them.

    Now, if it's a condo, check the D-Link DWL-900AP+ access points out, they will run in repeater mode so you could share probably get away with doing it with 2-4 units spread around the top floors.

    The big question will be your gateway, with a dozen apartments you could all share a T1 line easy enough but there are monthly costs and likely be the same or more than cable/dsl alternatives and really that's only if all apartments sign up and keep paying.

    If you are renting, let the landlord build this type of "service" rather than wasting your own money, put it to better use, just buy 1 AP and whomever can see it can link up.

  11. Re:don't do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Totally.

    Go to a dumpster at some IT company, get a load of cable, buy some cheap router/hub boxes for $20 - put the cables under the carpets - bish bosh jobs a good'n , and you have $6900 odd left to invest in
    something really positive.

    I did what I describe above in my apartment block back in 98. It worked fine, we all had a great time gaming until everyone started fighting over who fragged who with what cheat.
    I was pissed off that it cost me about fuck all for the routers and caused so much trouble, imagine how you will feel if you blow 7K.

  12. As A Former Landlord, I Say Don't... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to work as a property manager for a number of different properties spread out through the city, with a number of different owners.

    From that point of view, DON'T DO IT!

    Consider:

    1) You have to get permission to do any wiring and you'll be running wires of some type (power or CAT5) through the building, which will require the owner's permission.
    2) You can spend all that and have a great time, but the landlord can decide to sell the building at any time, and you may suddenly find out you have to leave either at the end of your lease term or with as little as 30 or 60 days notice.
    3) How do you know, after doing all that work, that you'll get to take the equipment with you when you leave?
    4) Why are you investing in a building you are only renting? (You have no way of knowing that, right or wrong, you'll be able to take the equipment with you when you leave!)

    Basically, you don't know how much longer you'll be living there and a number of things could result in an early termination of the lease, or other problem. While the equipment is yours, there are a number of ways the owner can keep you from taking it. Hell, the owner could even sue you for putting it in.

    As a property manager, my job was 1) Protect the property owner from any harm or damage (not just physical) (that includes the property itself), and AFTER THAT, 2) Protect the tenant from harm (also not only physical), but this comes under #1 because anything that hurts the tenant could result in a suit or other harm to the owner, including inappropriate or illegal actions of the owner that hurt the tenant.

    In such a role, I can tell you that I, and almost every property owner I have either known through networking, or worked with, would not want a tenant, no matter what they know about computers, crawling through a building and installing equipment the OWNER doesn't fully understand. And if an owner allowed it, you have no way to be sure they'll let you keep it later, or even allow it to continue to operate.

    The owner also has to consider what could happen if a building inspector came through and you had violated a law you weren't aware of.

    Maybe your landlord allows this. That doesn't mean you'll stay there long enough to make it worth while, or that you can keep the equipment later. It's like digging for gold in someone else's mine when, at any minute, they can walk in and say, "I've changed my mind. You can't keep the gold. It's all mine." Would you do that? Most likely not. Doing this is the same thing.

    Be wise. Invest in something you'll have for a long time or that is yours, like a car, or a house downpayment, or even a cruise to an exotic location.

    Oh, and I live in the US, so I don't know laws in other countries, but you've still got to face the fact that what you do may benefit you for only a short term and could benefit the owner for years.

    (Oh, your lease is solid, you say? Check. I saw buildings bought and sold all the time -- sometimes tenants had till the end of the lease to move out, sometimes only 60 days. There are too many variables to be sure you will stay for years in an apartment.)

    1. Re:As A Former Landlord, I Say Don't... by D.A.+Zollinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The parent poster is saying some very smart things - listen. If you are absolutely certain this is the direction you want to go, consider possibly an ad-hoc network of wireless cards in everyone's computer. This will allow all of you to network with each other without installing anything permanent. I would purchase your own wireless card, and encourage the other tennants to purchase their own wireless cards that they can take with them when they leave. If not that many bite, you can perhaps offer to subsidize their purchase - but be patient with your friends before blurting out, "I'll buy your card for ya!" If it is important to play with you, they will find a way.

      Beyond that, you have way too much money to throw away. I would find more intelligent uses for it. Consider the parent post. Unless you own the building, and want to provide something nice for all your tennants, I wouldn't invest in much outside of your appartment. Encourage others to join you in going wireless to play together, but don't run wires all over a building that you don't own.

      --
      I haven't lost my mind!
      It is backed up on disk...somewhere...
  13. Don't blow your money.. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I live in a 4 storey building, and pretty much everyone in this building is into gaming and computers. I have just received, through the death of a great aunt, about $7,000."

    I would suggest putting that $7k towards your retirement. Invest it in a solid fund or IRA. This would be much wiser than blowing it on a technology that will be outdated in a couple of years.

  14. like everyone else says by Indy1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    wire it. Wireless doesnt handle a pile of users very well, espcially bandwidth suckers like gamers and what not. 100 meg ethernet is cheap, extremely reliable, and has a lot more bandwidth to boot .

    Keep in mind that wireless is x mbps SHARED, like the old ethernet hubs were, as compared to standard switched ethernet, which gives each port (and user) dedicated bandwidth.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  15. Re:It's none of my business, but I'd love to know. by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, let everyone pay for it, unless you want to be declared the first geek-saint. I lived in an appartment I I convinced the owner to put UTP in every room. I put a hub in the basement and provided internet access to my 7 neighbours for 5 Euros per month. Since my cable ISP had no download limit, only a 80kb/sec bandwith limitation (I prefer that over a 500kb/sec with 10GB dowload/month), I had no worries. Only a few people overloaded the network but I wrote a script called ditchthebitch.sh to take care of that.

    Anyway, UTP is preferred over WiFi because of security reasons (tapping ito a cable is quite harder). Also, I have wireless and watching a movie over an NFS mount is impossible, with UTP at 10mbps it is no problem. So I guess for gaming wireless would be too laggy, too.

    The only problem I had was nobody wanted to play against me. I played Quake against my neighbour once and I won with 30/-1. So I advice you to let the others win the first time..

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  16. Be careful about your own liability by joelparker · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you build the wireless network,
    be sure you understand your liability.

    Like if a neighbor downloads too much,
    or uploads to Kazaa, or hosts a game server,
    does your service provider cut you off?

    Good luck... sounds like a useful project!

    Cheers, Joel

  17. Re:Equipment cheap. Labor NOT by ptbarnett · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Forgot to add: Most ISPs do not allow you to share bandwidth like this, so expect to have to pay extra $$/month for a business plan.

    Speakeasy will allow you to share your bandwidth. However, you remain responsible for it.

    Save your $$ and let your neighbors buy their own access!

    Or you can become an administrator in Speakeasy's NetShare program. Everyone pays the price you specify to Speakeasy (minimum $20/month), Speakeasy provides email and newsgroup access, and credits half of their monthly fee to your account.

    You can now get 3.0 Mbit downstream, 768 Kbit upstream with 4 static IPs from Speakeasy for $110/month. At $20/participant, it will only require 11-12 additional subscribers to reduce your net cost to zero (after taxes).

  18. Re:Fascist moderators prove their hypocracy AGAIN! by glk572 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    do you have any idea of how moderation works, read about it before you complain too much. and if you don't like how people moderate meta moderate.

    I have moderated several times and concider myself proof that you don't need great carma to get to moderate. just keep it at neutral or higher, and actually read slashdot and you'll probbly get to moderate a few times a year.

    just know that when you complain about "the moderators" that you are talking about nearley every slashdot reader.

    as for the wireless project it should be easy to do for about 300-400$ if you need great coverage.

    my wap saturates about half of my building witch is about twice the size of your's.

    Just pick out points for your wap's then run wire there, hook em all together and plug them into your cable modem. 2 acess points should do it just fine, and a hundred feet or so of cat 5 and there you go. if your coverage isin't as good as you'd like just add another point.

    I woulden't even screw around with high gain antennas, most that I've seen that work well are directional, and the omni's that I've seen are way to expensive for one's that work.

    if you're really serious about wireless you should get your fcc technition class lisence, it allows you to run your way at up to 1500 watts, or something rediclus, way better than screwing around with fancy antennas for just a hundred miliwatts or so.

    --
    Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  19. Re:It's none of my business, but I'd love to know. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I really have to agree here.. 48 appartments comes to about $20. each for the wiring and APs another $10/month each would cover a decent high speed hookup to the building. If you want to cover any spare change above that, then go ahead. If it's a condo building, take the idea to the strata council. If it's rental suggest it to the landlord... I'm guessing that it'll make the apartments that much more salable.

    Given that you had to ask the question, I'd guess that you could probably use some help.

    If you're not used to running and terminating CAT5 cable, then I suggest that you find someone to work with you who is.. as somebody else pointed out, the expensive part would be paying someone to do that part commercially. It's not really that hard, but having someone who knows what they're doing (and perhaps even has their own tester) would really help.
    You should also take a look at what it'll take to secure the wires properly to the shaft wall. If they come loose, the elevator won't even notice as it's shredding your cat[56] to kingdom come.

    To find out if you can get away with one AP per one or 2 floors, set up an access point near the elevator, and then beg access to some corner suites on that floor and the floors above and below. Even if you can (theoretically) get away with it, I wouldn't suggest less than 1 AP per 2 floors.... otherwise you'll run into bandwidth saturation problems (presuming you're not trying to service the entire building with a 1 Mbit DSL connection).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  20. YES IT IS by narftrek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look the guy asked a simple question. He didn't post "hey guys give a philosphical debate over whether I'm wrong for wasting my money when there's starving kids in Africa." He asked "I have 7G's. Can I make a kickass LAN?" He didn't need to mention it was an inheritance, cause you guys would have answered his question. Instead he gives a little TMI and you guys feel the need to grind his morality into the ground. Like he needs that at a time in his life like this. Look I'll try to answer his question for you guys:

    I'm not sure. I try to use actual cable for security purposes (still paranoid of the wardrivers) BUT in your case wireless is the perfect way to go. Not like you can go drilling holes and laying cable. From observations I've had, One wireless router (get the switched type so you can WIRE your cables in at the router and put yourself in a different domain to protect your computers), and probably 2 AP's at most. If some need arises, you can put some into different IP blocks and filter only thier content. Setups like that are nearly endless. You're on the right track. Just look up the prices for some common affordable routers like the Linksys models. I've had one of thier non-wireless routers for years and it works great. They now have a 802.11G version of the same router available today. Choose AP's in a similar fashion. If you'd like to test the waters, I'd suggest getting something off ebay at a low cost to get any bugs out and THEN drop the phat cash on some topshelf equipment when you know you won't be dissappointed. Worst thing to do is to drop a load of cash on some equip and then find out it sucks & or doesn't work like you'd planned. Good execution here is key. You wouldn't want to make a memorial that was broken.

  21. Re:Equipment cheap. Labor NOT by jbplou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A nat device, all he needs is a Netgear/Linksys router and a 4 or 5 repeaters. The main problem will be getting enough Bandwidth from his ISP for all the users, since a DSL or Cable connection won't be enough speed for all those users.

  22. Or just let him spend his money... by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know what, when somebody has money, has a project in mind, and wants advice on a project... comments like this are really a pain. Do you really think that most people wouldn't consider alternate uses for the money? Do people always have to have a personal gain in mind raither than a personal "project."

    There's nothing wrong with setting up a WAPnet for the neighbours (so long as it doesn't interfere with other people's WAP's etc). There's nothing wrong with doing with one's one money what one sees fit.

    You know, if I came across and extra $7000 and wanted to spend it buying a few computers for a school etc, I would much rather have advice on that topic for slashdot than a bunch of "WTF - giving money away - invest it!" BS comments. In this case, the guy is donating to his apartment community instead of a school etc, but it's the same concept.

    Oh, and p.s., $7000 is tons for WAP. Why not come down and check out my apartment building when you're done yours </joking>

  23. The the RIAA by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    comes in and sues him for downloading songs off of whatever P2P network is there, the FBI knocks on his door about certain threats that originated at his IP, Comcast cancells him for selling internet 'service' without a buisness contract, and finally the IRS audits his complete accounts for 'income recieved' without the appropriate W2's.

    Now, yes, WAP for 7K is easy. Buy a bunch of US Robotics, 1 for every 2 floors, and a bunch of wireless cards. Run Cat5 up and down the inside of the fireescape (drill) and stuff the holes with firebreak.

    It's not terribly difficult, but you MUST CHECK OUT CODES before doing any sort of permanent installation- why waste bandwidth by using wireless to move 'up' the building.

  24. Re:It's none of my business, but I'd love to know. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think that you'll still need to get the maintenence handled... Unless you intend to handle the entire apartment building on a $75/month DSL line, (which will spend most of it's time saturated) the money you have left over will get eaten up on bandwidth charges pretty quick.

    You may want to seed the first couple of month's worth of usage just to get your neighbours 'hooked' on the idea, but sooner or later you'll need to have them pitching in on the ongoing charges.

    For anybody doing any amount of gaming, $10/month to get a 10meg line into the building, with all of the capital costs covered would be one hot steal. If you're really lucky one of them may even offer to hand engrave a plaque thanking your aunt for her bequest.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  25. Roth IRA by krs-one · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few people have replied saying invest your money, which is a much wiser investment (rather than buying a wireless network).

    Invest in a Roth IRA. Investing $7,000 for 45 years at 10% interest (the average return rate, it takes ~7.2 for your money to double). Investing so, and not adding a single penny more, will accumulate to $510,233, a pretty hefty sum.

    Don't believe me? Go to this Roth IRA calculator, enter in 7,000 for the current IRA balance, 10% for the interest rate, and years until retirement as 45 years. Don't worry about the tax bracket as that doesn't involve Roth IRA's.

    Let your money work for you, not the other way around.
    -Vic

  26. NAT administration is going to be heavy by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful


    NAT is thrown around here like it's no big deal. And it won't be for simple web surfing and so forth. But when all these goofs want to use their p2p apps that require inbound ports to be forwarded to specific IP addresses... Oh my!

    The ONLY way to do it is assign static IPs to everyone. Then give everyone a range of ports and set the NAT to forward each range of port numbers to the appropriate IP. Oh, and if some of these people have multiple computers...

    Now you have a network admin job when you get home from work! Let's see them send that one to India