Slashdot Mirror


Inside Microsoft's New Digital Photo Project

robyn217 writes "While Microsoft Research plays 'Big Brother' to a young hiker's trip across North America, it breaks new ground in digital photography by combining metadata, like location via GPS, with the image. Its online presence looks impressive as it displays digital photo albums on a map of the world, but it's slow and unwieldy for the most part and may not be better than a standard travelogue site. This week, I took a closer look at the project currently named the World-Wide Media eXchange (WWMX)."

153 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. Where do you want to go today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just point at the picture you'd like to go to, and Microsoft will tell you exactly where it is.

    1. Re:Where do you want to go today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wouldn't mind telling Microsoft where to go.

    2. Re:Where do you want to go today? by JonTurner · · Score: 1, Insightful
      >>Just point at the picture you'd like to go to, and Microsoft will tell you exactly where it is.
      I think somebody on the implementation team needs to go back to the drawing board. Or out to the woodshed...

      From the web page: "our small server is unable to keep up with requests, and access to the WWMX itself maybe even slower than it usually is." [emphasis mine] Hmmm. Not exactly what I'd call a ringing endorsement of their server technology.

      A little examination of the header info tells us what we need to know...
      <title>World-Wide Media eXchange: WWMX</title>
      <meta content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1" name="GENERATOR">
      <meta content="C#" name="CODE_LANGUAGE">
      Yep, I think that just about sums up the problem. It's a Win box, running IIS and .Net framework.

      "What can you do with a gazillion photos on a single database indexed by their location?"
      On a MSFT/IIS/.Net server? I dunno... pray that no more than a dozen people try to hit your web site at the same time?

      I know they meant the site to be a showcase of MSFT technology. Funny thing is that it is a showcase, just not in the way they intended.
  2. 'plays Big Brother'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are the freaking sponsor! You make it sound like some grand conspiracy.

    1. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      I suppose that also applies to the other 4 sponsors as well:
      Golite,
      Montrail,
      Defeet,
      Northernlites.
      When you start painting with a broad brush, you should be careful. (or were you just pandering to an audience for web site hits?)

    2. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by DocDendrite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You screwed up. You are part of the problem with /.not the solution.

      Dropping such a false and out-of-place jab in the story contributes to Slashdot's notoriety for biased reporting. We could blame the editors for approving your rediculous write-up but you deserve admonishment too.

      If you had just refrained and simply described the project in an objective way the comments section would no doubt be full of thanks and kudos for the relevant, interesting story.

      Way to go! pffffft.

    3. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by DocDendrite · · Score: 1

      You did. Enough to take time out of your day to even reply. That requires thought and consideration!

      So think of how many others are reading my comment and considering it. In fact its only been 15 minutes and I've already been moderated +1.

      Its been SO worth it.

    4. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Wrong!!

      Think Big Brother, the television show!

      Atleast, that's what I thought of immediately, and that's how it was intended.

    5. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Word. I don't see how this is any worse than, i dunno, OWNING a cell phone. In fact, I trust Microsoft more than I trust Verizon. Microsoft might have locked me indefinitely into an upgrade path, but they did it through enticing features and a massive application pool, not a mandatory contract. And Microsoft isn't allowed to charge me $175 to switch providers...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. So how do I mod the story as a troll?

      --
      True story.
    7. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by robyn217 · · Score: 1

      You should try reading the actual article I wrote on the project before you make that call...

    8. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by phiwum · · Score: 1

      You screwed up. You are part of the problem with /.not the solution.

      Dropping such a false and out-of-place jab in the story contributes to Slashdot's notoriety for biased reporting. We could blame the editors for approving your rediculous write-up but you deserve admonishment too.


      And what about Slashdot's reputation for arrogant and haughty respondents with silly hairs up their asses? Who's to blame for that reputation?

      The "Big Brother" comment was just a throwaway line. No one took seriously any implication that Microsoft was spying or otherwise invading the privacy of the hiker.

      As far as Slashdot's reputation for biased journalism: It's well deserved, but it is a feature of the site and not a failing, near as I can figure. Slashdot is not a paragon of the traditional American view of journalists who dispassionately report the news as if they had no compelling interest one way or the other. It is a geek site, written by geeks and for geeks and it doesn't bother me a bit that the contributors' opinions are easy to see in their writing -- just so long as the story also contains suitable references to other sources of information, including (where relevant) traditional sources of journalism.

      Silly, overbearing and self-important freak.

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    9. Re:'plays Big Brother'? by DocDendrite · · Score: 1

      And what about Slashdot's reputation for arrogant and haughty respondents with silly hairs up their asses? Who's to blame for that reputation?

      You and I. But our comments aren't on the frontpage are they? Most users only read the stories and not the replies to the replies of the comments of the stories. These postings are inconsequential.

      ...contributors' opinions are easy to see in their writing
      opinions??? They are assinine conspiracy theories and pot shots. And they don't contain suitable references at all. It IS a failing of the site.

      (Also, a correction on the insults you hurled: remove the prefix "self" - I actually am important. Oh, the other descriptors are fine.)

  3. I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by DR+SoB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm glad microsoft is getting into this kind of thing. National Geographic has been doing a dismal job over the past few months, and there really are not enough players in the game. It's funny, in my experience most geeks really do like the great outdoors, so it seems a proper marriage to me!

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
    1. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean you.... erm.... welcome our new photo/GPS overlords?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just don't take any photos/GPS of $cientology near Riverside California. That's an "interfering with a religion" crime according to the kangaroo court there. (And leave the Tom Cruise missles at home.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by infochuck · · Score: 5, Informative

      National Geographic has been doing a dismal job over the past few months, and there really are not enough players in the game. It's funny, in my experience most geeks really do like the great outdoors, so it seems a proper marriage to me!

      I'm one of those outdoor geeks (backpacking, kayaking), and I have to disagree with your assesment of National Geographic's performace. I'm not certain exactly to what you are referring, but if it's basic mapping software, I *love* their NatGeo Topo State series. The maps are the latest USGS topoquads (many other campanies' prducts, like Delorme, use maps that are many years old and lacking in many newer trails), and are beautifully reproduced. GPS support has been wonderful, and I can do exactly what the above blurb was talking about - take photos, record their positions in my GPS, and, when I get back home, upload my route, along with waypoints indicating, among other things, where I took what photos. The photos then have to be manually associated with each waypoint, but it works so well, I'm not about to start complaining.

    4. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
      It's funny, in my experience most geeks really do like the great outdoors

      Were not talking about the Outdoor simulation on 3DMark here. -Ba da bum.

    5. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by ajs · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not getting into it.

      It is very important to remember that Microsoft (maker of Windows(tm) operating system) is a very different beast from Microsoft Research. MSR is a true research organization, and assuming that work done there will in any way translate into Microssoft products is a long-shot at best. Probably the most likely outcome of this kind of work is that some of the technology will be fed back into parts of various MS products.

    6. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      This is very true, but there content is more what I was speaking of. I would like to see other players, that's all, competition is normally a good thing..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    7. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by brianosaurus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude, I'll complain for you...

      Are you trying to suggest that manually associating a waypoint with an image is a good solution? The first time, yeah. For 10 images, maybe. For 100 images, no way. For 1000 images, you've got to be kidding me. Even in smaller daily batches, it would get tedious. And computers excel at tedious jobs.

      Kodak had a camera a while back that ran Java. You could plug a GPS into its serial port and it would automatically stamp the images. That was a pretty cool solution, but it required tethering your (bulky) camera to a (bulky) GPS unit.

      With microsoft getting into the action, hopefully Delorme and others will jump on board, too. Maybe even iPhoto will have some way to correlate the timestamps from photos with a GPS track log. It should be fairly straightforward, once you have the data.

      I need a bluetooth GPS. Badly.

      --
      blog
    8. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1
      National Geographic has been doing a dismal job over the past few months, and there really are not enough players in the game. It's funny, in my experience most geeks really do like the great outdoors, so it seems a proper marriage to me!
      I'm one of those outdoor geeks (backpacking, kayaking), and I have to disagree with your assesment of National Geographic's performace

      Man, I read that to be total sarcasm. No matter what, you both can't be +5.

    9. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      The Nikon D2H digital SLR has a wireless capability; it can FTP images as soon as they are taken to a local server. Just keep a small laptop nearby connected to a GPS and update the EXIF info as the pictures appear on the server. Parsing the GPS NMEA data is easy; you could probably do the whole thing in less than ten lines of shell script.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
    10. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by infochuck · · Score: 1

      Just keep a small laptop nearby connected to a GPS and update the EXIF info as the pictures appear on the server.

      Uh... I think you missed my point. I'm an outdoor geek. I am a geek and I like the outdoors. This doesn't mean I geek out *in* the outdoors. Sure, I bring a GPS and digi cam, but a laptop? There goes my 13 lb base pack-weight.

    11. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by infochuck · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to suggest that manually associating a waypoint with an image is a good solution? The first time, yeah. For 10 images, maybe. For 100 images, no way. For 1000 images, you've got to be kidding me. Even in smaller daily batches, it would get tedious. And computers excel at tedious jobs.

      Are *you* trying to suggest that there are products out there that don't require I buy a bunch of specialized hardware (ie, non-std GPS and digi cam) and can just tell, magically, that I took pictures 4-15 on my external memory card at waypoint x, picture 16 (external) at y, and picture 3 on the internal card at z? Cuz if this is what this new MS technology does, then sign me up. But I somehow doubt it's that simple.

      Certainly, now that I think about it, as long as I'm careful in naming waypoints and associated them with numbered images on my cam, I could glue together some scripts and keyboard macros to do this for me automatically.

      Timestamps, eh? Doh! Why didn't I think of that? Wonder if my GPS keeps 'em...

      Too bad my camera doesn't.

      So, anyway, NatGeo's system may be manual for associating things with coordinates, but, with my existing hardware (of which I am very fond), any other solution on the market would be, too. So I'll stick with NG for now.

    12. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by infochuck · · Score: 1

      OP:National Geographic has been doing a dismal job over the past few months, and there really are not enough players in the game. It's funny, in my experience most geeks really do like the great outdoors, so it seems a proper marriage to me!

      IC:I'm one of those outdoor geeks (backpacking, kayaking), and I have to disagree with your assesment of National Geographic's performace.

      RZ:Man, I read that to be total sarcasm. No matter what, you both can't be +5.

      Read which of the two posters' snippets as total sarcasm? His or mine? Why? Why can't we both be +5? We were expressing opinions. Are our opinions wrong? He expressed two primary sentiments in his post: firstly, he didn't care for NatGeo. Secondly, the field needed more competition. I disagreed with the former sentiment, and agreed with the latter - more competition is rarely a bad thing. I'd say we're both right. Nat Geo, as has been pointed out, could use some improvement - though I maintain it's much better than any of the alternatives I've explored, especially for a $99 package that works without intrusive 'theft-protection' measures, works with a broad range of hardware, is visually very stunning, easy to use, and *has the latest maps*. I'm a cheap bastard when it comes to software - I write it myself ot use open source/freeware, when possible, but that hundred bucks was teh best I've spent on software, save maybe Civilization and MOO.

    13. Re:I for one, am glad ms is getting into this by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      You could always use a Psion or iPaq type thing with serial connection to GPS and wifi for the D2H camera... but I understand the weight issue.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
  4. Thought this was call TIFF by lostpuppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They have been using embeded data in TIFFs for years in nav. programs that overlayed a map image with altitude and lat/long.

    1. Re:Thought this was call TIFF by DocGonzo · · Score: 1

      It is called TIFF. For JPEGs it's EXIF. Breaking new ground my ass.

    2. Re:Thought this was call TIFF by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're talking about GeoTIFF, it's not the same thing. GeoTIFF adds real georeferencing metadata to raster data. This just adds coordinates to a photo. I think the point of this is to then present the photos in a geographical context. They hint that it'll be a feature of Longhorn's media-management capabilities.

      Cute idea. Still, it's not all that revolutionary. If Apple added a geo-coordinate metadata field and simple mapping capability to iPhoto, they could probably beat MS to the punch well before Longhorn ships. But I don't know why they would.

      Like much of the MS research stuff I've seen, it's a neat idea but what's the point? Solution, where's your problem? Might be a nice addition to ophoto.com or something but nobody is screaming for it that I can tell.

  5. I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if a Linux-based solution was doing exactly the same thing terminology like 'big brother' would be nowhere to be found. I find your write-up to be double plus biased.

    1. Re:I bet... by sakshale · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree 100%

      I am not a fan of MicroSoft, but I am a fan of being truthful. The phrasing used in the announcement would have been flagged -1 TROLL or -1 FLAMEBAIT if I was moderating.

      MicroSoft's sponsoring of something like this is not something that we should condemn or flame. Sounds like it is the people at /. who operate the 'Ministry of Truth'.

      --
      For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.
    2. Re:I bet... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      I gave up modding on this "article" for just that reason (trust me there are some posts in serious need of modding; I chose to post instead).
      Why can't we mod the submitters write-up?

    3. Re:I bet... by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 2, Informative

      Take a deep breath and relax - what makes you assume that the "Big Brother" is an Orwellian reference, vs. a reference to the idiotic reality-tv show of the same name (thus the capitalization, perhaps)? RTFA and decide for yourself if this doesn't ring true.

      --
      o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
    4. Re:I bet... by ajagci · · Score: 1

      Yes, but against that unjustified negative bias, you have to put the unjustified positive bias, namely that this is something "ground breaking". Altogether, this is a non-story about some nerd at Microsoft doing what other nerds elsewhere have done before. It's neither particularly amazing nor particularly scary.

    5. Re:I bet... by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      how do we know? because this is slashdot. and either meaning would have a negative bias towards MS.

    6. Re:I bet... by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 1
      Yeah, to a point I can see what you mean. But evaluate it in light of the things that various M$ folk over the years have said to the press. Think about all the various "big Brotherish" projects that M$ has supported over the years.

      I don't think it is necessarily unfair to apply that label to M$, after all their actions make a pretty good case for hanging it on them.

      I agree with you in that I fail to see how the phrase is applicable to this particular project of M$'s, but they got a lot of bad history to live down before I think you can justifiably moderate as Flamebait or Troll a post because "Big Brother" was applied.

      --
      "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
      "Talk minus action equals /." -
    7. Re:I bet... by Digypro · · Score: 1

      But wait........

      Isn't the title of the idiotic reality-tv show an Orwellian reference!

      Ouch! Brain Freeze!

    8. Re:I bet... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's like a known child molester trying to get involved in a volunteer project with schoolkids, and someone making a comment that this is dangerous. Sorry, but when you've made a very bad reputation for yourself, you have to live with it, and people have every right to judge you by your past actions, and also to treat you differently because of them.

  6. Cobine with TerraServer by plilja · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once there is a large enough dataset of pictures (and that really is the key to making more then a travelog), I like the idea of combining something like this with a satalite imaging service so you can feel like you are really zooming in.

    To me it has the potential to help provide context to the places that you here about on the news or that students are assigned to research. Plus, it's just plain neat!

    1. Re:Cobine with TerraServer by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Once there is a large enough dataset of pictures (and that really is the key to making more then a travelog), I like the idea of combining something like this with a satalite imaging service so you can feel like you are really zooming in.

      USGS DOQs (the kind used on Terraserver & the probably best a civilian will get) are 1m resolution aerial photos. You're not really going to be able to "zoom in" on photos taken from the ground. There probably are satellites with better resolution but you're not likely to see the images made publicly available for a long time.

      To me it has the potential to help provide context to the places that you here about on the news or that students are assigned to research.

      You can do this today! Go to the library and ask for an "atlas." Also, look in the photography section for whole books of photos of different places.

      Plus, it's just plain neat!

      Yes, I suppose it is at that.

  7. Correlating Images and GPS data. by bogamo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I currently run a website, TrailRegistry that does exactly this. Actually it does a whole lot more. The general tilt of my site is hiking related, so the pictures are generally of views, shelters, mountains, etc... What I think is more important is sharing of trip data collected by GPS. So for instance, if you hiked an unmarked trail in your area, you could upload the GPS track log to TrailRegistry, and TrailRegistry will create a Topo map (On the fly) for other users to use.

    Please check it out, You might find it usefull. Also,I allways love feedback on what I could do better..

    --
    Check out TrailRegistry.com, my hiking site, Maps, altitude pr
    1. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by loserbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot your close bracket:

      [/shameless-plug]

    2. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by spikev · · Score: 3, Funny

      It appears that you just /.ed yourself.

    3. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      "Formal capactity testing? Screw that. Let's build a site and try to get it listed on slashdot. Just watch the sucker for a couple minutes and when it dies, go back and read the log to see how ya did!"

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    4. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by mikeboone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It would be nice to see your maps plotted on Digital Raster Graphic (DRG) maps. Though you'd probably need more horsepower to serve them up. And despite being public domain U.S. government data, they are pretty difficult to get for free. :(

      I have found free DRG data and plotted GPS routes on them for trip reports on my website. I haven't found any tools for doing this that will let me make up these maps and publish the result with no strings attached, so I've settled for overlaying my GPS track onto the map with Photoshop.

      http://boonedocks.net/travel/

      If anyone knows of a free/cheap tool where I can feed it my GPS track data and a public-domain DRG TIFF file, and plot the result, let me know.

      Storing GPS data in each photo seems like overkill to me. If the subject is distant, like a mountain, the lat/lon won't really convey what you want. And maybe I don't want someone to know the GPS coordinates of my house if I take a picture of my dog on the couch. :)

    5. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by bogamo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A good portion of the data on the site comes from DLG (Digital Line Graphs) from the USGS and National Park Service.

      --
      Check out TrailRegistry.com, my hiking site, Maps, altitude pr
    6. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Storing GPS data in each photo seems like overkill to me. If the subject is distant, like a mountain, the lat/lon won't really convey what you want.

      Or add in a simple compass to the camera to record the approximate direction that you were facing when you took the picture. +/- 10 degree accuracy would be plenty.

      Actually I like the idea that a photo would be automatically tagged with GPS data along with the date/time/direction facing. I envision a news / historical service where the public can submit images that they choose. With the GPS / time information, it would be easy to pull up related images.

      I also wonder if it could be used as some sort of digital signature system where you would have proof that you did indeed take that exact photo at that time and that it hasn't been altered.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    7. Re:Correlating Images and GPS data. by Jordy · · Score: 1

      A while back a buddy and I were talking about taking this to the extreme. If you could have the GPS coordinates, the focal length, distance to subject, time, the direction the camera was facing, pitch and roll, you could actually throw together different images from multiple sources into a weird sort of virtual tour of an area over time and do a walkthrough (not smoothly, but well enough).

      Now that would be spiffy. Useless, but spiffy.

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
  8. Big Brother?! by bdigit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hardly.... They sponsored this guy and I think it's great that they are doing so. This is a wonderful project but since it's sponsored by Microsoft it's automatically evil?

    1. Re:Big Brother?! by Erick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about everyone else, but I interpreted it as "Big Brother the TV show" where the contestants are watched for the benefit of the viewers. This is Slashdot though, so I can see why everyone is freaking at the term. :P

      --

      DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE

      ok
    2. Re:Big Brother?! by mingot · · Score: 1

      Should we classify this as 'False Anology' or 'Appeal to Emotion'? I never was good at the taxonomy of logical fallacies, but I can smell shit from a fair distance.

    3. Re:Big Brother?! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's not a false analogy, just an extreme comparison. The point is, when someone's earned a very bad reputation, people have every right to continue to treat them badly because of it. As far as I'm concerned, a convicted child molester should be shunned for life, even after he's gotten out of prison. If someone wants to take pity on him, fine, but no one should ever feel bad for avoiding him and keeping their kids away from him until he dies. That's just something you can't ever live down.

      Similarly, when a company has acted as poorly as Microsoft, there's no forgiveness deserved. Especially when they've done nothing at all to earn it. Obviously, their actions aren't quite like molesting children, but the principle is the same. They've earned a bad reputation, and no one should be surprised that people will forever treat them badly because of this. I for one want nothing to do with their products. I don't care how great a product they come up with; because of the way they've acted in the past, I'll never forgive them and will never do business with them. When I go to a restaurant and have a really bad experience, I never go back. Even if my friends want to go there, I refuse, because I don't want to support a business I don't like. This happened at a restaurant near where I live here. Now it's out of business. Good riddance.

    4. Re:Big Brother?! by mingot · · Score: 1

      It's not a false analogy, just an extreme comparison.

      No, it's still a false analogy. You spend a lot more copy building up the appeal to emotion this time, though.

  9. "Server too busy" by Dracolytch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, lets link to a website that has nothing but photos and thumbnails! Ooh wait, better yet! Let's find one that organizes them dynamically with non-trivial algorithms!!

    Are we going for a new slashdotting record or something?

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  10. They forgot the'.' by mynameis+(mother+... · · Score: 5, Funny
    But still!

    While trying to view the microsoft link above I got the following error message:

    Server Error in '/' Application.

    Still amazingly honest for Microsoft!/p

    1. Re:They forgot the'.' by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      they forgot the '-ed', too. As in, "this page has been /.-ed"

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  11. WWMX by mobby_6kl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course they couldn't call it WWME - World-Wide Media Exchange

  12. I know it's in my sig... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... but I just can't resist plugging hostip.info which attempts to geolocate IP addresses to a latitude / longitude map (and give a nice zoom-in if you're located or (if you're unknown) once you have put in your details...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:I know it's in my sig... by Knacklappen · · Score: 1

      ... but I just can't resist plugging hostip.info which attempts to geolocate IP addresses to a latitude / longitude map (and give a nice zoom-in if you're located or (if you're unknown) once you have put in your details...

      Yeah right, exactly what we need: A service that can map your IP to a physical/geological address. And you guys cry about spam, RFID tags, [insert your least favorite type of invasion of privacy here] .

      --


      Excellence: Moderate (mostly affected by comments on your karma)
  13. It can't be much good by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    because it's written in .NET (probably C#). Oh yeah, and at Slashdot, we don't like either .NET or Microsoft.

    Even when they do "impressive" stuff.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:It can't be much good by maharg · · Score: 1

      yeah, I'm impressed.

      This is a technical forum, my friend. If you're gonna show us your kung-fu, it had better be good..

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    2. Re:It can't be much good by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

      What have my martial arts skills got to do with this being a tecchie forum?

      And what's it got to do with the wwmx project?

      Is that you Uncle Bubba? Have you been drinking ralgex again?

      --
      "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    3. Re:It can't be much good by maharg · · Score: 1

      is your real name Bill Gates ?

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  14. That easy... by fluch · · Score: 1

    Is it that easy to /. a M$ .NET server?

    1. Re:That easy... by loserbert · · Score: 1

      You tard, even after you posted that I can still hit their site.

    2. Re:That easy... by bonch · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, the "M$" website was running just fine.

      P.S. Should we call this place "$lashdot" from now on, since a corporation owns them and they put banner ads everywhere unless you subscribe?

  15. That was my idea! by smclean · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Weird, I was just writing up plans the other day for php software which would be able to deal with relating images to GPS coordinates and compass headings, and make a nice interface. They stole my idea!

    I have a lot of good ideas for the software, and have already written out a lot of db schema and logic, but I am having a hard time finding high resolution maps which I may use legally, and this was discouraging. Most of the big satellite image companies want an arm and a leg for the right to display their images on your site. Anyone know of a place where I can get at least semi-high resolution satellite maps, like 5m or better, that I'll have the rights to display on my website?

    I assume that I would release the software under the GPL without any maps included, but its no fun writing software which nobody can really use unless they purchase satellite imagery!

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    1. Re:That was my idea! by smclean · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to expand on my idea, why not, I was going to first make a map manager that could take any map image, and let the user define the upper and lower / left and right latitude / longitude of the map. Then the user could import and tag all their images with GPS data, via either manual entry of latitude and longitude per-image, maybe some kinda EXIF data (are there cameras that do this), or let them just point-and-click on a defined map and calculate the lat/lon that way. Images could also be assigned a 'trip' and 'trip sequence number', so when the maps are rendered, an entire hike could be represented by the lon/lat of the images as waypoints (maybe even make it able to import GPS tracks from GPS devices and have waypoints with or without imagery). Images should probably have a time stamp too so hikes could be represented accurately. With this data, so many great interfaces could be created, like nice two-paned views, with a map on the left with click-able waypoints, and a image viewer on the right that shows the image taken at the given spot on the map. And with multiple maps, you could zoom out and see all the hikes in a specific region, or select a more detailed map to represent a specific hike. Have maps automatically scale to the users preference and display all the maps, regardless of their size, in the same display. The programming is so easy, I have been dying to write this stuff! All I need is MAPS! ARGH!

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    2. Re:That was my idea! by smclean · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I was not thinking of using my software on the same scale as Microsoft "envisions" but merely as a catalogue of hiking trails in a region.

      It is certainly interesting to think of how this might be developed on a very large scale, though. Perhaps every copy of the software people run for personal sites could be configured to connect amongst each other in a peer-to-peer like configuration and 'trade' their knowledge with one another, allowing each site to have a massive amount of data. *Thats* the kinda stuff you'd think would grow into a true internet-representation of the 'real world'.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    3. Re:That was my idea! by maharg · · Score: 1

      Crack on with it - their copyright ran out:

      Copyright (C) 2002-2003 by Microsoft Corporation

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    4. Re:That was my idea! by smclean · · Score: 1

      ...got a link? :)

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    5. Re:That was my idea! by SufferingSimian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's "your" idea " http://www.geospatialexperts.com/

    6. Re:That was my idea! by seekr_hidr · · Score: 1

      They did not steal your idea! Get a clue! Their site is already up and running as opposed yours which is only at the planning stage. That said, they probably started planning for this thing a while ago even before you thought about it...

    7. Re:That was my idea! by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      How about a [mythical] camera that records location of each photo along with compass direction and elevation of the view. Then, combined with digital terrain elevation data (probably available free from the government) one could map the image to the planet's surface. Eventually, as the world gets photographed, we could gradually collect high-resolution images of the earth's surface without expensive spy satellites.

      The only hard part would be the implementation.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    8. Re:That was my idea! by smclean · · Score: 1
      Just to clarify, I was not under the impression that my idea was literally stolen.

      My story was more, dang, I had that idea way back when, but I couldn't get any free satellite imagery.. anyone know where to get some?

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    9. Re:That was my idea! by peggus · · Score: 1

      Yes I also had "your" idea a while ago. I think it's a logical consequence of combining hyperlinking, digital photography, GPS and the internet. I'm sure many many people have had the idea, only a few implemented it though. My idea was slightly different though, I was playing around with 360 degree panoramas when I though it would be cool to be able to click on a location in one picture and get transported there. Quicktime VR already supports this but each location has to be linked by hand. Using GPS coordinates and compass data would make it easier to create massive databases that people can walk around in. -Peggus

  16. Actually not a bad idea by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few years ago an old Jeep buddy of mine mentioned an idea for a web site like this - people could drive around Utah, take pictures, and record the GPS coordinates of where the picture was taken so that others could find the same place for camping/etc.

    This just seems to do something of what iPhoto does - attaches some meta-data (in this case, GPS coordinates, time&date, etc) to the file.

    I'd say this could be pretty cool, though of course I'd like to see an open standard used and the ability to turn it off. I don't think I mind all cell phones by 2005 having GPS (the ability to save lives could be huge for 9-1-1 services), but I want the capacity to shut the damn thing off so Psycho Boy Jones can't jump me because he didn't like my recipe for spicy sweet mashed potatos.

    Side note for those worried about privacy: there was a story I was reading about a service for cell phones in Japan. Suppose your spouse calls and wants a picture of where you are, and instead of working late at the office (like you said you were), you were out at the bar with your friends. This service will forward a picture of your office to them instead of your current location.

    With GPS being mandatory in cell phones by 2005 (at least according to the article), you wonder how other people will tap into it? Is this a 9-1-1 services only thing, or is this "add to my GPS" list so people in other phones have your coordinates at all time? (Something that might be a new level of parental control when your teenager goes out with friends for the night....)

  17. Thank you Microsoft... by mattkime · · Score: 1

    for capturing someone's cross country adventure and turning it into a slow loading web page adventure.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  18. can I get MS to pay for my fantasy trip? by mpost4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how can we get MS to pay for other fantasy trips, I would love to get a boat and live on the sea and go diving every day. I would let them take all the pics they want, hell I would even let them test out the new MS scuba computer with me(as long as I get analog backups)

    1. Re:can I get MS to pay for my fantasy trip? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      While documenting the great outdoors is good, the city cores should also be done. I'm willing to do Toronto night spots for expenses. It would be tough bar-crawl^w^w research, but someone has to do it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  19. Re:slashdoted... by madman101 · · Score: 1

    So is the one mentioned above running .JSP - but no comment about that?

  20. Slashdotted by Stranger4U · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or did we just slashdot Microsoft?
    So much for stable serving abilities.

    1. Re:Slashdotted by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It was really MyDoom.B that submitted the story. That virus was trickier than they thought.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Slashdotted by jpr1nd · · Score: 1

      nope.

      www.wwme.com (216.168.224.63)
      www.microsoft.com (207.46.156.220, 207.46.156.188, 207.46.250.252, ...)

    3. Re:Slashdotted by jpr1nd · · Score: 1

      oops, i realize now that its not actually wwme.com, but rather .org (which is 131.107.151.179)

      in any event its not the same host

    4. Re:Slashdotted by twoslice · · Score: 1
      Just you. Everyone else clicked on the link to here.

      Say,

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    5. Re:Slashdotted by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1

      Yes, we're more effective than MyDoom.B!

      --
      CT

  21. Nice. by Niacin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe someday this could be put to use on something like mapquest. Do a search, pop up with a picture of your location, this sure as hell beats any map, when the user can SEE where they are going.

    I cant remember how many times i have been stuck guessing which building i have to walk into.

  22. Locating places... by thewiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Over the years I've seen many pictures of places I'd like to visit (as I'm sure the rest of you have as well). IMHO, including GPS and other location metadata in a picture is a great idea! Now we'll know exactly where that beautiful water fall we want to visit is rather than just knowing that it's somewhere in Ecuador.

    The downside of this is that every tourist with a GPS can find places that are virtually unspoiled by man and end up spoiling them.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Locating places... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      The limitation of these sort of things is usually how hard it is to get to the place. If it's easy to get to, then everyone already knows about it. I don't think knowing the exact location is going to affect things all that much.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  23. It's cool....but it's been done by deanj · · Score: 1
    Combining GPS info with images is very cool, but NOT new. A quick google finds:


    information on how it's already being done.

  24. Interesting how so many people know it's no good by toopc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yet the site isn't actually working. Maybe it does suck, maybe it's nothing new, but since it's not actually accessible at the moment, isn't it kind of hard to tell?

    It's a Microsoft Research site and obviously they weren't expecting it to be get much traffic. If you doubt Microsoft can set up a site that can handle high volume, everybody click this now:

    Microsoft.com

  25. Re:slashdoted... by loserbert · · Score: 1

    It's not even .net you tard, its just asp...

    .net pages use the file extension .aspx

  26. Re:Slow??? From Microsoft? You must be joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually, that isn't the case for Microsoft Research at all. While the company itself may not use all of the contributions of MS Research, generally the group does some pretty innovative things. Most of the time. Unfortunately, very rarely does their work make it into their products, but when it does (like ClearType), it's usually pretty damn good.

  27. GPS data in EXIF image tags by Speare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is at least one professional camera which can embed GPS coordinates in the image data itself, in the form of an additional line in the EXIF tag. It has limitations when you're indoors, I would imagine, but great for most hiking or driving conditions.

    This would be immensely popular for real estate agents who need to correlate pictures to addresses all the time.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:GPS data in EXIF image tags by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      Sounds pretty cool (d'you know which camera/s [links]? Does it have an internal GPS, or do you have to thumb it in?).

      On the same page: does anyone know - or have any ideas - on how you (efficiently) could get geolocation data into the EXIF tags et al. (while in the field), if you don't have such a nifty camera?

      Hm.. Perhaps compass & map + pen & paper would be as good as any other way that isn't automagic(?)

      But still, a solution envolving e.g. a Zaurus with GPRS/Wifi, GPS card/device, and some GPL'ed Linux software, would feel more ...appropriate. ;)

      --
      668.5
    2. Re:GPS data in EXIF image tags by xixax · · Score: 1

      1. Make sure your camera & GPS agree on date and time

      2. Set your GPS to log your tracks

      3. Load GPS logs and images onto a PC

      4. Loop through images and use location from the nearest (in time) GPS point to amend the image's EXIF.

      Xix.

      --
      "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  28. Re:Slow??? From Microsoft? You must be joking... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Probably slow because it's microsoft funding a non-profit initiative (looky, its an .org site), and its probably a matter of more server power needed.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  29. directions online by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind having a photo directory of all the exits on the major interstates. I am more visual than map oriented, and this would be fantastically helpful. I miss exits all the time. If I knew what I was looking for, I don't think I would miss them.

    If they are looking for a commercial application, thats something they could consider.

  30. Re:slashdoted... by winse · · Score: 1

    then what was the tag at the bottom : "
    Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.573; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.573 " all about ? I've never used asp | .net so I really don't know

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  31. Backgrounder by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bill Gates has a private project (Corbis, not affiliated with MS) growing to amass a large collection of photographs. It already does a good business of finding and licensing photos for almost any use. They could be trying to get more for the collection, or to join up in an IP pipeline to benefit both companies.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Backgrounder by NurseMaximum · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard of this, but what is it with this guy and EULAs?
      The Use of this site from the front page:

      --
      Who meta-moderates the meta-moderators?
  32. GPS in cameras please by metamatic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't wait until GPS technology is small enough and cheap enough to put inside the camera. It'd be great for looking at holiday photos...

    "Where the hell was that?"

    "Lemme check the map... Oh, that was St Jude's Cathedral."

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:GPS in cameras please by mcguirez · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good news!

      It's already there and been available for years. Well, in Japan anyway.

      I wrote an open source EXIF metadata library for Delphi. Sometime in summer 2001, I had someone from Japan write and inquire about adding the GPS EXIF tags. I did so and tested it with some sample photos that were sent along. The interesting thing is that evidentally software shipped with the camera that plotted your path on a map and put links to each photo that you took. Of additional interest is that the GPS tags include an entry for "direction" that GPS normally doesn't return (that is: "Which direction is the camera pointing?"). So I don't know if the camera also had an embedded compass or not.

      Lets see (sound of shuffling back throug old files...) that was a Kashmir model KASHMI.

      Cheers!

      --
      When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras
  33. Well, why not improve on the idea even further? by bennomatic · · Score: 1
    See if you can get a system to include even more information such as the direction the camera was pointing, lens size and zoom settings, etc. Then combine the whole thing together so that as more and more images come in, you can do matrix-esque bullet-time renderings of scenery, buildings and more.

    And you could build in error-correcting routines so that once you have multiple image sources for a particular location, it'll learn to throw away non-static elements such as vehicles and people. Imagine being able to do a fully-rendered fly-through of New York City. Wouldn't that be awesome?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  34. I forgot... by Trillan · · Score: 1

    t breaks new ground in digital photography by combining metadata, like location via GPS, with the image

    Oh, that's right. I forgot Microsoft invented metadata. Giggle.

    (Am I the only one who heard about this being done by other companies years ago? I distinctly remember finding stuff about something similiar when looking for a Palm GPS module.)

    1. Re:I forgot... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

      as far as applying GPS location via metadata.

      a little used application named iPhoto also stores this information; provided you have a GPS enabled camera (I don't) I was looking at exposure information from my EOS 300D and low and behold I saw an unpopulated field for lat/long/gps. If I had my GPS with me at the time of the photo I guess I could have entered this data by hand. But certainly Microsoft will claim this 'innovation' was theirs, much like Gore invented the internet.

      I would be curious to know if anyone with a 911 enhanced cell phone with a camera has checked to see if they are recording their location? Big brother indeed.

      --
      Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  35. Re:Slow??? From Microsoft? You must be joking... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    The site loaded just fine 2 minutes ago. Just as quickly as Slashdot.

  36. Re:slashdoted... by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

    And of course no website running on say, Apache, has ever been slashdotted.

    Sheesh.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  37. Re:OK, I'm impressed.. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

    What makes you think that sponsoring == hosting? What was the last time you saw microsoft.com "slashdotted"? And the other site seems to be running JSP. No witty report about it? I'll leave it to you to see what your DNS server tells you about wwmx.org - I'll be impressed then.

  38. Why do I smell a patent or copyright looming? by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    We won't be able to publish our own photos online because it will infringe on some patent.

    1. Re:Why do I smell a patent or copyright looming? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Shhhh... They'll hear you...

  39. Article Text by sirReal.83. · · Score: 3, Funny

    Server Error in '/' Application.

    ***** Server Too Busy *****
    Description:An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

    Exception Details:System.Web.HttpException: Server Too Busy

    Source Error:

    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.

    Stack Trace:

    [HttpException (0x80004005): Server Too Busy] System.Web.HttpRuntime.RejectRequestInternal(HttpW orkerRequest wr) +147

    Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.573; ASP.NET
    Version:1.1.4322.573

    1. Re:Article Text by ralf1 · · Score: 1

      Wow - that .Net framework really scales. Pitiful.

      --
      "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  40. Do it Your Self Map Server by SufferingSimian · · Score: 4, Informative

    Screw M$. If you have a GPS and a digital camera, you can make your own site using GPS Photo Link.gpsphotolink I've used it on numerous ocassions and it works like a charm. It uses the time stamp on your digital photos to relate to the nearest waypoint or position in your GPS tracklog to generate GIS data for your photo points. It then creates HTML that links your photos to map graphics of your location.
    Check out the sample sites at SAMPLES

  41. Nikon D1 Supports GPS in EXIF by DesignPsychology · · Score: 1

    Nikon D1 adds GPS information to the EXIF header. See a review. "RS232C port for connection to GPS units, GPS location is recorded in image header"

  42. GPS and Photo site... by DerKomisar · · Score: 1
    This site seems to have a good thing going with logging photos and GPS coordinates together.

    http://www.geosnapper.com/index.php

  43. All togather now... by billimad · · Score: 1

    omgod we're slashdotting microsoft. where mydoom failed we rule.

  44. Re:OK, I'm impressed.. by Gabriele+Capone · · Score: 1

    $ host wwmx.org
    wwmx.org has address 131.107.151.179
    $ whois 131.107.151.179
    [Querying whois.arin.net]
    [whois.arin.net]

    OrgName:&nbsp ; Microsoft Corp
    OrgID: MSFT
    Address: One Microsoft Way
    City: Redmond
    StateProv: WA
    PostalCode: 98052
    Country: US

    NetRange: 131.107.0.0 - 131.107.255.255
    CIDR: 131.107.0.0/16
    NetName: MICROSOFT
    NetHandle: NET-131-107-0-0-1
    Parent: NET-131-0-0-0-0
    NetType: Direct Assignment
    NameServer: DNS1.CP.MSFT.NET
    NameServer: DNS2.CP.MSFT.NET
    NameServer: DNS1.TK.MSFT.NET
    NameServer: DNS1.DC.MSFT.NET
    NameServer: DNS1.SJ.MSFT.NET
    Comment:
    RegDate: 1988-11-11
    Updated: 2002-12-05

    TechHandle: ZM39-ARIN
    TechName: Microsoft
    TechPhone: +1-425-936-4200
    TechEmail: noc@microsoft.com

    OrgAbuseHandle: HOTMA-ARIN
    OrgAbuseName: Hotmail Abuse
    OrgAbusePhone: +1-425-882-8080
    OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@hotmail.com

    OrgAbuseHandle: MSNAB-ARIN
    OrgAbuseName: MSN ABUSE
    OrgAbusePhone: +1-425-882-8080
    OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@msn.com

    OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE231-ARIN
    OrgAbuseName: Abuse
    OrgAbusePhone: +1-425-882-8080
    OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@microsoft.com

    OrgNOCHandle: ZM23-ARIN
    OrgNOCName: Microsoft Corporation
    OrgNOCPhone: +1-425-882-8080
    OrgNOCEmail: noc@microsoft.com

    OrgTechHandle: MSFTP-ARIN
    OrgTechName: MSFT-POC
    OrgTechPhone: +1-425-882-8080
    OrgTechEmail: iprrms@microsoft.com

    # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2004-02-05 19:15
    # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

  45. ka-boom by gregoryb · · Score: 2, Funny
    but it's slow and unwieldy for the most part

    if it wasn't before, it sure as heck is now!! yah slashdot!

  46. Re:OK, I'm impressed.. by kelzer · · Score: 1

    What makes you think that sponsoring == hosting?

    This? Specifically, the part where it indicates the Netblock Owner is Microsoft.

    And the other site seems to be running JSP.

    Which site is that? The only other links I saw went to sites that were either static HTML or ASP.

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  47. The show by bonch · · Score: 1

    I think it was more in reference to the ever-watchful nature of the television show. Hence the quotes.

  48. use Bluetooth by ajagci · · Score: 1

    Putting the GPS inside the camera may be neither necessary nor desirable right now. You are probably better off getting a Bluetooth GPS and putting Bluetooth into the camera. That way, you can keep the GPS in your backpack, give it its own big battery, and you can share it with your PDA and mapping software as well. Of course, eventually, GPS becomes small enough that it really doesn't matter.

    Note that some cameras already have "built-in GPS", or rather, they have a PCMCIA slot plus the software to drive a GPS that you put into it.

  49. Damn, there goes my "Documented World" idea. by SparkyUK · · Score: 1

    For a long time I've thought it would be cool to equip digital cameras with GPS (including facing information) and Packet Radio transmitters. Every photo could be invisibly stamped (via metadata) with the time and location of the shot and users could choose whether or not to "upload" the photo to a central server via the radio/cell/communications service.

    Yes, a lot of shots would be useless but the central server could build up a massive "montage" to document what the world looks like at ground-level. I think this would also be very useful for providing data to create virtual tours of places.

    Of course, I'm also harbouring the hope that the data could be used to create a truly detailed virtual world that I'll be able to live in once this meat-body packs up and I go completely digital....

  50. Don't mind Slashdot... by bonch · · Score: 1

    They're too busy reporting that Microsoft is "violating human rights in China" because bad people use Windows. Disregard Red Flag Linux for now.

  51. Re:Slow??? From Microsoft? You must be joking... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    I have no love for Redmond's imprint on the computer business since about 1984 either.

    But with so much money and so many intelligent employees, it's nice that somebody plays around with new technologies and publishes them for the world to see.

    And if recent history of executives leaving MS is any guide, you could well see new technologies and ideas blossoming outside the confines of the Borg.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  52. Re:OK, I'm impressed.. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    indicates the Netblock Owner is Microsoft

    And does it also indicate that the IP is hosted out of the same boxes that serve microsoft.com and their other high-traffic domains?

    For all practical purposes this might be a crappy little PIII under a desk at MS Research.

    Or to put it another way, when the last time you noticed microsoft.com was down due to a front-page link posted here, which happens every other day?

  53. Re:OK, I'm impressed.. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

    Wow, thanks.

  54. Re:OK, I'm impressed.. by Gabriele+Capone · · Score: 1

    You were just saying that they weren't the ones hosting it.

    What makes you think that sponsoring == hosting?

  55. Re:Slow??? From Microsoft? You must be joking... by multi+io · · Score: 1
    ClearType

    Sub-pixel rendering was (probably) first implemented by Apple in the 70s. Which didn't keep M$ from trying to patent it 20 years later...

  56. True, but... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    keep in mind that Microsoft doesn't have a stellar track record for information privacy.
    Hence the big brother comment remark.

  57. Re:Proves one thing by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    Not even Microsoft can make .NET scalable enough to sustain a good ol /.'ing.

    It's only scalable if you plan it that way. The site seems to be working fine now (did you click on the correct link?) and if you had visited it you'd see:

    It's an experimental research project run by the Interactive Visual Media Group at Microsoft Research

    You expect a research project to be primed for loads of traffic? Of course, we all know that no Apache server has ever been slashdotted...oh wait, this just in from fedoranews.org

    NOTICE 2004-02-05 11:00 AM
    Sorry, we've been slashdotted. The KDE 3.2 articles will ben turn off for next few days.


    From netcraft:

    The site fedoranews.org is running Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.12 OpenSSL/0.9.6b DAV/1.0.3 PHP/4.1.2 mod_perl/1.26 on Linux.

    Hopefully fedoranews.org "will ben" turn on the articles soon. In the meantime, wwmx.org remains available for browsing.

  58. ClearType? From Microsoft??? by Fuzzy+Bo · · Score: 1
    Well, the *name* might be theirs, but the technology wasn't original!

    Microsoft's November 1998 Comdex announcement of it's "breakthrough" new display technology, dubbed 'ClearType' was regarded by many as the most important event of the show. (snip) But Microsoft was apparently unaware that twenty-two years ago AppleII programmers were using these techniques -- rooted in Apple technology patents -- to improve the effective resolution of their video displays.
    Steve Gibson.(c) 2003 Gibson Research Corporation.
    http://grc.com/ctwho.htm
    1. Re:ClearType? From Microsoft??? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Well, the *name* might be theirs, but the technology wasn't original!

      Actually, the technology is original. Apple was using subpixel rendering on the ][gs to give the finder 640x200 instead of 320x200. However apple wasn't using this to anti-alias fonts, which is what cleartype does. It's like saying that anti-aliasing was invented at the same time grayscale was invented.

      In fact, Apple didn't use anything like cleartype until Jaguar, well after the introduction of cleartype. (Even after FreeType had it)

  59. New??? You must be joking by Barbarian · · Score: 1

    Attaching GIS data to photos is nothing new.

  60. But could it be extended to video production... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    It seems a good idea. But it would be really interesting if you could extend it to film and video production. One topic that interests me is the concept of automatically identifying the location of individual frames or scenes in adverts and movies. Some locations are fairly easy (downtown LA, Eiffel Tower, Tower of London), but sometimes things are a bit harder eg. looking for a streetname, telephone number on a vehicle).

    Many of the old series, have helicopter fly overs in downtown cores. I always wonder how the view differs from now to back then, if a film camera were to follow the exact same path (eg. In the title sequence of ChiPs, are those large squares of green space still there in downtown LA?).

    If a camera could store the pan, tilt, zoom and rotation along with the GPS coordinates, this could be possible.

  61. About Facial Recog by ShallowThroat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was just at a microsoft presentation at my university this week, and the guy was cool enough to demo the lastest build of longhorn. one of the things he showed off was the photo viewer/editor that had facial recognition. it could scan a picture, find peoples faces, let you click and name them, then tell the app to find all other pictures with that person in them. i have been a "mac zealot" for years, and even i must say that it was pretty cool. the guy made a good point that "shouldnt we all be expecting computers to be able to do this kinda stuff by now anyways?" and it's true.

    --
    The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
    1. Re:About Facial Recog by ShallowThroat · · Score: 1

      because they have had a fuckload of cash and have been hiring the best people for well over a decade, and havent come up with anything good yet

      --
      The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
  62. EXIF? by delus10n0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't the EXIF specification already allow for information such as GPS location to be saved in the tag?

    http://www.exif.org/

    There also appears to be a propposal for LocationIFD, to further enhance/add to this functionality.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  63. Re:apples and oranges by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    As you say, apples and oranges. Apache serves HTML pages and images, and nothing more, while ASP.NET serves all sorts of dynamic content.

    Of course, you can use Apache to serve dynamic content with mod_perl, etc, but I've lost count of the number of times I've seen sites like that go down, and not because of bandwidth (k5, anyone?). Conversely, I've not seen a static IIS site go down, other than for lack of bandwidth.

  64. Re:Locating places... ruin places by wiremind · · Score: 1

    I doubt this will do that at all, people who go out into the wilderness to see those kinds of places are the kind of people who apreciate its beauty.

    Knowing the EXACT location of some beautiful waterfall wont change who goes looking for it.
    it will just change the methods used to find it.

    kyle

  65. Re:Interesting how so many people know it's no goo by Woy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Haha you can't get me you hacker! Everybody knows (i read it at that very website) we're not supposed to click links...

    --
    "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
  66. Patent by Microsofts+slave · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long till this is patented: Patent for associating geographic data with images.

    Boy, wouldnt that blow. All of a sudden this interesting field being monopolized by microsoft. While it is an interesting concept, i cant see myself using it if it was a patented process... unless i hacked together a solution myself. It wouldnt be that hard with the textual comments in the JPEG headers.

    --

    Tragek

  67. Yeah Right by ianr44 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a young (19,) long distance hiker (Hiked the entire Appalachian Trail last year) I'm going to be pretty suprised if he can stick anywhere near that schedule. He's planning on going from Pinkham notch to Caratunk in 6 days, which is ~167 miles. That area is on par with the hardest sections of the trail, most thruhikers would be very impressed at averaging 20miles/day through there, yet he's intending to average 28!? In October no less, when there's could easily be a fair amount of snow on the ground. This hike has a lot common with M$, at least as far as big talk goes.

  68. Prior Art: FITS by Bloody+Peasant · · Score: 2, Informative

    breaks new ground in digital photography by combining metadata, like location via GPS, with the image.

    Wait a minute. "Breaking new ground by... combining metadata with an image"????

    Sigh. Astronomers have been doing this since at least 1981 with the FITS Format. See over here for the full story on this venerable and still very much in production format.

    I sure hope M$ doesn't try something silly like a patent on this; it seems to me that FITS and the other formats used by the Medical and Geophysical Sciences would provide a wealth of prior art...

    --
    -- This .sig intentionally left meaningless.
  69. Heaps of OSS tools by xixax · · Score: 1

    What is shown in the article is not very difficult at all. As long as you have location attached to the image *somehow*, just build an indexed database of localities, and link it to some form of web mapping tool (such as Mapserver, http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu)

    The tricky bits will be: Building something that can handle large volumes of image data (places like Deviant Art seem to handle it OK, but it'd cost), and; (IMHO, the useful bit), some way of deciding which one of a million pictures of the Grand Canyon is worth seeing. In regards to the latter, some sort of ranking systeem ala Slashdot, and the ability to make queries on other metadata, such as time, azimuth and elevation, "Show me the most recent winter picture looking ouyt across the valley".

    For your last trick, link images to Live Journal, so you can read all about how gothically depressed people were when they discovered the pictures were under-exposed.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  70. Re:looks like geo-experts 4 a buncha microserfs:-P by SufferingSimian · · Score: 1

    Works in Firebird 0.7

  71. My camera should be able to fly a small airplane by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

    It would be great to have a whole INS inside the camera so it really knows where it is, where it's pointed (x,y,z+yaw,pitch,roll) , and how fast it's moving (well that one may not be as useful, but give us the data and the applications will come). A rangefinder would also be useful in finding out what the camera was really pointed at- you want to browse by image not by vantage point. Of course, right now that type of capability in a camera would cost $100K and be the size of a loaf of bread, but just wait...

    And I forgot that it needs longrange wireless comm to immediately upload the pictures to a searchable server as they are taken.

    I imagine google image search will have advanced search functions for location or other metadata soon enough and make the need for a centralized site like the one linked in the story unnecessary. Also google needs to add some facial recognition, so I can upload a picture of someone and it will return results with all other searchable pictures of that same person (and their location according to the GPS data on the most recent photo). Bad for stalkees, I suppose, but interesting tech.

    Google Boogle Broother? I dunno, probably a better name than 'Froogle' was for their product search.

  72. Slashdot Causes Interstate Incident by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    The load on the server also caused the hiker to have to wait for two hours at the Michigan border for his GPS-signed Microsoft Passport to be processed. He was then able to enter Michigan without having to go through Customs.

  73. I have a similar system available as open source by Diomidis+Spinellis · · Score: 2, Informative
    My GTWeb system demonstrates how trip diaries can be created and presented by exploiting the synergies of integrating a GPS, a digital camera, and publicly accessible databases. A GTWeb site consists of a trip overview, timelines, maps, and annotated photographs. The site is created by processesing a user's GPS track log and digital camera pictures, linking them with a gazetteer database, topography, and coastline data. The (research prototype quality) software I developed can be freely downloaded (GPLed Perl and C source).

    An article that appeared earlied this year in IEEE Pervasive Computing describes the principles of operation.

    Diomidis Spinellis - #include "/dev/tty"

  74. Re:Damn, there goes my "Documented World" idea. by Grail · · Score: 1

    And don't forget the historical importance of such a site - people could (for example) search the archive for information about what advertisements were *really* being displayed in Times Square at the time that Spider-Man was released ;)

  75. An independent project by Slur · · Score: 1

    Check out The Degree Confluence Project for a more independent and manual approach. It's surprising how widely this project has covered already.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media