Slashdot Mirror


Flash Mob Supercomputer?

dan of the north writes "The NY Times (free reg yyy bbb) is running an article on flash mob computing. More info on the first event in SF on April 3, 2004. The goal is to run Linpack and "build a home-brew computer powerful enough to be added to a list of the world's 500 fastest computers." Minimum requirements are 1.3 GHZ Pentium III/AMD equivalent or better with 256MB of RAM, a 100 Base-T network connection and a CD-ROM - laptops preferred. "After taking a shot at a speed record, the computer will be reorganized to serve as the host of a giant multiplayer video game tournament." Cool... a 2fer!"

259 comments

  1. Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these babies!

    1. Re:Obvious... by The+Gravedigger · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Comedy gold indeed.

    2. Re:Obvious... by turgid · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't come anywhere near my BIOS...

    3. Re:Obvious... by flash_in_the_pan · · Score: 1

      > As long as they don't come anywhere near my BIOS...

      So long as you can boot from CD, this KNOPPIX distro won't touch anything.

      We've got a few LAN boxes we're trying this on, and the only BIOS change we made was to allow booting without a keyboard 'cause we're too lazy to cart a keyboard/mouse around.

  2. Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Won't be long before sporting events and rock concerts will be able to host such supercomputers, too ...

    Imagine, iPod2 has WLAN ... good enough node spec for me! ;)

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Wicked. by illuminata · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Singer: Let me see your nodes!

      Crowd: *yells*

      Singer (to promoter): What the hell is a node anyways?

      Promoter: Don't worry about it, just go with it!

      Singer (to crowd again): I said let me see those fuckin' nodes!

      Crowd: *yells louder*

      Singer: Fuck right. That's what I fuckin' like to hear. Now, for our next motherfuckin' song, I want to see the most massive, the most fuckin' atrocious motherfuckin' pit on this motherfuckin' planet.

      Yeah, that scenario was implausible. Thus, I don't see supercomputers in concerts anytime soon.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    2. Re:Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You walk into the concert arena, your iPod2 uses zeroconf (rendezvous) to identify itself to the concert host system.

      anyone whos' got the 'share my compute cycles' checkbox set on their ipod2 automatically shares their ipod2's cpu cycles, again announced by rendezvous, with the rest of the system.

      for the duration of that gig, the machines are all bound together, beowulf-style, to distribute the live recording of the event that is being produced for prosperity during the concert. some 'secrets and surprises' are thrown into the tracks too, just for grins.

      at the end of the gig, everyone walks away with their own digital recording of the event, custom, unique, 'branded to the event'.

      the whole thing was included in the price of admission, and open to anyone who walks into the concert arena with their boxes turned on ...

      I can totally see this happening. In fact, if I had the resources, I'd start a company that does just this service for concerts and gigs and such ... now would be round about the right time to get into this market, since its infancy-stages ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:Wicked. by kinnell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...except, the promoters normally don't want you walking out with a high quality digital recording of the event. If you did, you would be less inclined to buy music from them.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    4. Re:Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 1

      listen, you freakin' moron, its *THE PROMOTERS WHO ARE SELLING YOU THE TRACK*.

      look, just forget it. go back into your box.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Wicked. by kinnell · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      If you can't accept criticism, maybe you should leave business ideas to the grownups.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    6. Re:Wicked. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I thought paying for a ticket was buying music from them.

      Of course, a concert promoter would say you're paying only for admittance. If concert promoters had their way, they'd charge you for the air you breathe while at the concert venue.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:Wicked. by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Expect just think about how many cycles your iPod has.

      Reminder, its a walkman.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    8. Re:Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you can't see the -obvious business opportunity- for promoters then you're an idiot!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 1

      For p2p distribution of files over a period of one or two hours - duration of the gig - I'd say that any theoretical iPod2 would have plenty of CPU cycles for the job...

      Remember, it hasn't been invented yet.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    10. Re:Wicked. by kinnell · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Will it encourage more people to go to concerts? No. Will they be able to charge people more? No, because the vast majority of concert goers won't have wifi enabled ipods with them, and will resent paying for a service they can't use. Will they be able to bill ipod owners seperately? No, the logistics involved will make it unfeasible. And what if the system doesn't work as advertised? Will they lose the opportunity to sell a live CD later? Yes.

      This is an old idea - it's called bootlegging, and with a few notable exceptions, almost all record labels oppose it. Think about it - this idea would be much cheaper and easier to implement if they just offered to send you a CD later and took $5 and a postal address at the T-shirt stall. Plus, they would get revenue from all the non-ipod owners as well, and could fix the parts where the vocalist sings out of tune.

      So who's the idiot?

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    11. Re:Wicked. by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Missed that.

      Even still, why would you? I'm having trouble coming up with a scenario that would need distributed computing to record anything.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    12. Re:Wicked. by loserMcloser · · Score: 1

      the live recording of the event that is being produced for prosperity

      of course the concert is for prosperity -- prosperity of the band and promoters...

      I think you meant posterity.

    13. Re:Wicked. by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a half decent pickpocket could make a mint thieving all those expensive iPod2's out of the concert-goers pockets too... I wouldn't take a ten year old Walkman to a gig, for fear of losing it in the throes of the pit, or having it nicked, leave along half a grand's worth of iPod.

    14. Re:Wicked. by El · · Score: 1

      Uh, The Grateful Dead and Bill Graham used to condone taping of concerts. But then, where are they now?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    15. Re:Wicked. by illuminata · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, don't take it the wrong way. I'm not really arguing with you one way or another.

      People are probably just listening to my sig.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    16. Re:Wicked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be able to bill ipod owners seperately? No,

      Sure they can bill IPod user seperately... They'll just have to all pod's embedded w/ RFID tags! :)

      What? Why is everybody looking at me like that?

    17. Re:Wicked. by ttyp0 · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a company already providing high quality live concerts. They pull up in a semi truck and patch in to the soundboard. They then burn discs of the show and even put a nice little label on it. If I remember, it's the price of a normal CD and you prepay at the beginning of the show.

    18. Re:Wicked. by mlambie · · Score: 1

      Exactly this happened at a Pearl Jam concert my friend went to in Perth, Western Australia. I'm sure it happens all over the place. Scary - I nearly typed "Perl Jam" ;)

    19. Re:Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Will it encourage more people to go to concerts? No.

      Umm... why not? If I was going to get a good-quality, professionally packaged tarball of a gig, I'd definitely go to the gig, and I'd be happy to throw in an extra $10 to my price of admission.

      I don't see your counter-argument... you're just saying it 'wont happen' without any plausible argument...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    20. Re:Wicked. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Not to record, to distribute. Distributed computing to distribute... the iPod2 would be running a p2p client for sharing ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  3. licenses by SHEENmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure the first thing on the minds of the people building this is whether they should buy client or server licenses from SCO.

    (It's 4:20am and I don't have any coffee; I'm sure of a lot of things at the moment.)

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:licenses by baneblackblade · · Score: 3, Funny

      nah, they'll probably use the supercomputer to DOS sco.com again as the kicker for their gaming competition.

    2. Re:licenses by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure the first thing on the minds of the people building this is whether they should buy client or server licenses from SCO

      No, the first thing on their minds is the question "why aren't there any girls here?"

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:licenses by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because the girls know they can't compete for attention when there an Unreal Tournament server running on a super-computer.... so they give up and go elsewhere.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    4. Re:licenses by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      This is why I think there should be two additional moderation choices, namely "+1, Intoxicated" and "-1, Shitfaced". :)

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    5. Re:licenses by lewp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Geek delusion #42:
      The only reason girls avoid me is because they're jealous of my supercomputer.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    6. Re:licenses by marksie531 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have given me an idea... How cool would it be to have a massive war (e.g. 500+ people). There hardware is there, all we need is a game which could handle this sort of scale.

    7. Re:licenses by rotciv86 · · Score: 0

      What about +5 stoned, -5 crackhead?

      --


      My ghEtt0 webpage.
    8. Re:licenses by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      And a network that could handle the amount of traffic involved...

    9. Re:licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's feasible, but the client computers would need some awesome specs, too, unless most of that would be handled by the supercomputer.

      Trouble is... the game :(

    10. Re:licenses by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Because they're too busy kicking our asses at games!

    11. Re:licenses by Unoti · · Score: 1

      Shadowbane and Dark Age of Camelot do this, although it gets pretty bad over, say, 200 people.

  4. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hey, Gang, Let's Make Our Own Supercomputer
    By JOHN MARKOFF

    Published: February 23, 2004

    SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 22 ? Some class science projects get out of hand.

    That is certainly the case with Patrick Miller's graduate course in do-it-yourself supercomputing at the University of San Francisco. On April 3, his students plan to assemble the first "flash mob supercomputer" in the school gym.

    While brainstorming about how to build a home-brew computer powerful enough to be added to a list of the world's 500 fastest computers, Mr. Miller and his students, along with Gregory D. Benson, an associate professor of computer science, came up with the idea of an electronic barn-raising. They decided to build on the concept of flash mobs, the sudden Internet-organized gatherings with no particular purpose that became an unlikely fad last summer.

    Last week, the class put out a call for about 1,200 volunteers to bring their computers to the Koret Gym here for a day and plug them into a shared high-speed network.

    "This is what happens when crazy ideas catch fire and people say, `Wait, there is nothing to stop this,' " said Mr. Miller, who is a lecturer at the university and a computer scientist at the Center for Applied Scientific Computing at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

    There are already many Internet-connected virtual supercomputers, like the SETI@home project, which uses the spare computing cycles on the personal computers of volunteers to hunt for signs of alien civilizations. Several universities have shown that it is possible to hook hundreds of off-the-shelf personal computers together to create supercomputers. But until now no one has tried to build an instant supercomputer in one place.

    "It struck me as being something of a 60's idea," said Dennis Allison, a founder of Dr. Dobbs, a Silicon Valley magazine for computer programmers. "This could easily be an idea from one of William Gibson's science-fiction novels, where everyone gathers in Grand Central station to save the world by plugging their machines into the Net."

    Before stumbling onto the idea of the volunteer project, the class considered a variety of ways to make a cheap supercomputer, including buying many Microsoft Xbox game machines. However, the students would have needed to install the free Linux operating system on the machines to tie them together, and Microsoft has recently made that more difficult.

    John Witchel, the graduate student who had the original idea of building a volunteer supercomputer, says he thinks flash mob computing will make it possible for high school students and community groups to harness computer power now available only to large corporations or government laboratories.

    "We're trying to democratize supercomputing," Mr. Witchel said.

    The group has high hopes for its gym machine. It plans to run a speed benchmark program known as Linpack. The group estimates that to make the next Top 500 list, scheduled to be released in June, the machine will need to reach a speed of about 550 gigaflops, or billions of mathematical operations per second. The No. 1 spot on the list is held by the Earth Simulator in Japan, which can run at more than 35 teraflops, or 35,000 gigaflops.

    Jack Dongarra, a University of Tennessee computer scientist who helps maintain the Top 500 list, says the students have a shot at making the list, but it will not be easy.

    "It could be that electrical power will be an issue," he said, adding that the slowest computer will limit the speed of the entire supercomputer. To make certain that they have enough speed, the students are asking that volunteers bring only computers with at least a 1.3-gigahertz Pentium or AMD processor and 256 megabytes of memory, requirements that most recent home machines will meet. Laptops are preferred because they use less power than desktop computers.

    When all the machines are plugged together via donated high-speed networking switches, the students will be able to tack

    1. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "It coluld be that electrical power will be an issue"

      Perhaps people should bring a good UPS along. I don't know how long the machines have to be up, but it may be possible to run enough machines on UPS long enough to achieve their goals.

    2. Re:Article Text by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They said preferably laptops, which have internal batteries. A 1.7GHz Centrino laptop has PLENTY of power, and damn good battery life to boot.

    3. Re:Article Text by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      They said preferably laptops, which have internal batteries. A 1.7GHz Centrino laptop has PLENTY of power, and damn good battery life to boot.

      Someone just used the word "power" to describe "Centrino." Obviously, this poor man is stuck in the 1980's.

    4. Re:Article Text by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Plenty for the requirements of the flash mob supercomputer:

      Minimum requirements are 1.3 GHZ Pentium III/AMD equivalent or better with 256MB of RAM, a 100 Base-T network connection and a CD-ROM - laptops preferred.

  5. At last something that qualifies by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Funny

    At last, something that qualifies for the appelation "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters".

    Twice over, even.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    1. Re:At last something that qualifies by DrMrLordX · · Score: 2, Informative

      2fer usually means "two for one". At least, that's how I interpret it.

      as in, two birds with one stone, etc.

    2. Re:At last something that qualifies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're on slashdot when praise for an interesting article gets moderated as -1 Troll.

  6. Rock on! by lord_nightrose · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can provide two - a 1.5gHz P4 with 640MB of RAM and a 1.83gHz Athlon XP 2500+ with 512.

    Of course, that would require me to turn them off, first... and I'm not sure if a massive multiplayer game is incentive enough for that.

    Perhaps if they provide free drinks...

    --
    This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
    1. Re:Rock on! by lord_nightrose · · Score: 0

      Ah... Slashdot moderation, what a fickle mistress ye be. It starts at "Score: 4, Interesting", and within but a day becomes "Score: 5, Funny". To think that it was all just because I wanted some booze... *sigh*

      --
      This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
  7. Printer friendly flash-free link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Printer friendly flash-free link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the trick to making a no-reg link? I've tried just appending ?partner=GOOGLE, but that doesn't seem to be enough.

    2. Re:Printer friendly flash-free link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the New York Times website. When you see a story you'd like to read, copy the title to the clipboard. Then go to Google News, enter a search with the story title, and a no-reg link to it will appear.

  8. I'm there! by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so, I'm going, obviously, but my big question is, beyond benchmarking, are we going to actually COMPUTE anything?

    --
    -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    1. Re:I'm there! by illuminata · · Score: 3, Funny

      so, I'm going, obviously, but my big question is, beyond benchmarking, are we going to actually COMPUTE anything?

      I can't say for sure. Let's hope for their sake that somebody brings a keyboard with a pi button on it, otherwise the whole damn thing will be a waste.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    2. Re:I'm there! by FisterBelvedere · · Score: 5, Funny

      The article clearly notes that the this will be used to estimate the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow. If there's enough time the organizers said they would try for both the African and European Swallow.

      --

      FisterBelvedere -- Putting a whole new meaning to "streaks on the china" since 1996.

    3. Re:I'm there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This event is more about community-building and fun than about science. Most of the people attending probably aren't billing by the hour, but still: Who's going to leave their computer unattended? Is the computational power of a single CPU worth binding its owner's time for the duration of the event? A bare-bones system which meets the requirements can be built for less than $200 (ATX-case, board, AthlonXP, 512MB, no CD, no HD, PXE boot). How many flashmob supercomputers are you going to join before it occurs to you that you could have contributed that kind of node to a community-controlled permanent supercomputer instead? More cycles, less investment.

    4. Re:I'm there! by EuropeanSwallow · · Score: 1

      I'm here too, ready to take my share of coconut... ;)

    5. Re:I'm there! by Humm · · Score: 1

      Too late, that question has already been answered.

    6. Re:I'm there! by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      beyond benchmarking, are we going to actually COMPUTE anything?

      You've either never been to a significantly large LAN party or are incredibly lucky. Getting x,000 randomly selected laptops to even all communicate together properly for the benchmark will be a major undertaking, nevermind doing any useful work in the amount of time allotted. The planners give the impression of being quite organized with their pre-made Knoppix disks but I assure you there will be something to gum up the works. This leads to a whole new discussion of why can't PC's be plug-n-go appliances after 20+ years, but nevermind that now...

    7. Re:I'm there! by dingbatdr · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely that such a cobbled-together supercomputer would be able to scale well on a real incompressible flow calculation. Such calculations require way too much global communication because of elliptic solves. Most of the demos for breaking benchmarks that I have seen run purely hyperbolic problems. So if the unladen swallow is going Mach 1.0 or greater, we have ourselves a test problem.

      --
      The truth is an offense, but not a sin.------R. N. Marley
  9. Reg. Free Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Same article, different place, thank you Google.

    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/161702_fl as hmob23.html

    I'd make it clickable but the submission mechanism is being funky right now...

    - Neil Wehneman

    1. Re:Reg. Free Link by OverlordQ · · Score: 1
      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Reg. Free Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably using IE to post to Slashdot. I've noticed MS's browser sometimes has hiccups when making POSTs.

  10. Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by baneblackblade · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This doesn't sound like such a bad idea. seems like a lot of things could be done this way much faster and more efficiently. if this works we should look into other applications for the Flash Mob, like a rocket-building day for the X-Prize, or a random code-swap where a bunch of us get together and hand eachother a blank disc with the source code to something nifty on it to play with.

    1. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by rholliday · · Score: 1

      That'd be cool. But what do you figure the percentage of viruses/trojans/worms that would be handed around, instead of cool homegrown apps?

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    2. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      If you're swapping blank discs, the only thing changing hands is fingerprints.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    3. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by zangdesign · · Score: 1, Funny

      a random code-swap where a bunch of us get together and hand eachother a blank disc with the source code to something nifty on it to play with.

      I was pretty much right alongside the whole idea until you typed that last bit. Having heard that, I'm thinking you might want to reexamine your plan a bit.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    4. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by kinnell · · Score: 3, Funny
      we should look into other applications for the Flash Mob, like a rocket-building day for the X-Prize

      Great idea! If everyone were to turn up with a model rocket, we could strap them all to a chair, and blast someone into orbit. It's bound to work.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    5. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      0% since the discs would be blank ;)

    6. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      I have a patent on fingerprints, and if you go swapping them like that, I'm going to have to sue you for giving away my IP.

      Dammit.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    7. Re:Other Practical Uses are Bound to Surface... by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      random code-swap where a bunch of us get together and hand eachother a blank disc with the source code to something nifty on it to play with.

      Brilliant idea. It's called the internet.

  11. Laptops preferred? by Brainix · · Score: 4, Funny

    But these are so much cooler!

    --
    Raj Against the Machine! http://social-butterfly.appspot.com/
  12. Watch out for those basketball players... by xoran99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously, I'm worried that the very smallest mishap will bring this crashing down. If this works, it'd be the greatest thing ever, but if it doesn't, what a spectacular failure. It'd be interesting to count how many power cords are tripped over in the process.

    What's amusing is that people are encouraged to bring laptops, and are then expected to play games that way...

    --

    Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

    1. Re:Watch out for those basketball players... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 4, Informative
      What's amusing is that people are encouraged to bring laptops, and are then expected to play games that way...
      Maybe you're trolling, but laptops can be perfectly serviceable game machines. They may not be able to match an absolute top-of-the-line desktop, but with DDR3200, 7200 RPM HD's, and 128MB graphics cards, they can be pretty competitive.

      On a related note, I've never seen anyone on /. mention iBuyPower. Their prices are $1000 less than Alienware, and probably a few hundred less than a Sager or Clevo. They really are in a (price) class of their own.

      Check out one of their laptops compared to an equivalent Alienware.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
    2. Re:Watch out for those basketball players... by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      My cousin has a stupidly powerful, huge laptop which I wouldn't say no to playing games on. It's got a 17" screen and it weighs a ton, because it has a full on Pentium 4 in it. Not a Centrino or whatever they called the mobile processors... I'm talking a proper Pentium 4. You should hear the noise it makes with a proper fan in there. Mental. Not sure about the graphics, but some mobile graphics chips are fairly respectable.

      The laptop was bought for him by the company he works for - it's for sound/light engineering for gigs. The lighting stuff it can do looks pretty impressive, so I wouldn't be surprised if it could transfer that power to game rendering.

      The only thing I'd be concerned about would be hooking a mouse up - after that it'd rock. Not all laptops suck for these things!

    3. Re:Watch out for those basketball players... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      A comparable powerbook would be better, more reliable, run a real os, and have guarenteed support, and would have a well known large community for help, etc, etc, etc.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
  13. SkyNet is coming!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The next thing you know, SkyNet will be born from this cluster! Especially considering this would take place on the Governator's state. ;)
    Better get those EMPs ready though, I'm expecting robots from both Terminator and Matrix to come to life after a few days. ;)

    1. Re:SkyNet is coming!!! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1, Funny

      If Skynet emerges from this project, expect it to do nothing more than camp spawns, wallhack, and bitch and moan about anyone who knows how to use a rocket launcher really well.

    2. Re:SkyNet is coming!!! by vanillacoke · · Score: 1

      Theres no skill in rocket launchers, sniper rifles OTOH.....

      --
      The secret to getting modded up is to allways say i've got karma to burn in your sig..
    3. Re:SkyNet is coming!!! by ultrasound · · Score: 1
      SkyNet is already Here....

      UK backs PFI military satellite Skynet 5 is a huge 15-year project...

      Be afraid. Be very afraid.

  14. GO USF/DONS by Zero_K · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a USF Student, I will be there with my laptop...All I have to say is GO DONS... The computer science department already has a cluster called the "keck cluster". Basically 64 nodes of dual P3 at 1GHz, with 1 Gig ECC Ram. There is talk about throwing the keck cluster into the flash mob cluster, but the biggest hurdle is appearntly laying the lines. Harney Science center is about 200 hundred yards from the gym where this is going to happen. And just FYI, they wanted it to be done on the 1st of april, but that didn't work out for some reason.

    1. Re:GO USF/DONS by killmeplease · · Score: 1

      I used to be in charge of all of teh woring at USF and helped lay most of the Cat5+ Cable that was layed in the 90's. I can tell you that they could link Harney 5th floor to the 2nd floor BDF near the elevator & entrance. There is a cable that runs from the BDF to the switch room. In the switch room, there is a line that goes out to the basement of the gym, where the fitness department is. From the basement, running cables upstairs shouldn't be too hard. You could feasably run 1-10 100BaseT switched links direct to the gynasium through the system I have described, if things haven't changed all that much since I graduated in 2000.

      --
      - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
    2. Re:GO USF/DONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about asking ITS? its 2004 guys, we have fiber from gym to harney.

  15. Whats the CD for? by eadz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cluster Knoppix of course!

    1. Re:Whats the CD for? by Raztus · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. I can see the threat of a released virus being stomped out by using Knoppix, but what about when the gaming begins? Are they just going to play what is available on the CD?

    2. Re:Whats the CD for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always the RTCW:ET live CD. Just a reboot away.

    3. Re:Whats the CD for? by patmiller · · Score: 1

      No... When the LAN party starts, you're on your own for virus protection.

  16. The first time ... NOT by kb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe somebody should point out that is not the first time somebody has done such a thing... back in 1998 there was a quite similar event at the University of Paderborn where 512 normal home PCs brought by people were connected for one night (the event was even broadcasted live on German TV). I have to admit that the "flash mob" element here is more predominant (back then people knew about this two weeks in advance), but it's definitely not the first attempt to create a spontaneous supercomputer with home machines. The cluster even made it into the Top250 IIRC. :)

    More info...

    1. Re:The first time ... NOT by Threni · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Maybe somebody should point out that is not the first time somebody has done such
      > a thing.

      Yeah, but now the media has invented a stupid name for it. But yes, it is a little late 1990s, isn't it.

    2. Re:The first time ... NOT by cei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This time we only know about it 6 weeks in advance... oh wait. Why is that "flash"???

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    3. Re:The first time ... NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not certain about this but...
      People usually plan a get-together over a week or more so when it happens in a 30 mins its called flash.

      Super Computing normally is planed over the course of years... I think (realitive) 6 weeks can be called flash?

  17. Why not combine it with wardriving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Add a few thousand temporarily owned computers and the odds go up quite a bit towards getting on the top 500 unclassified supercomputers.

    1. Re:Why not combine it with wardriving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Key difference between cluster computing and grid computing: connection between the nodes. Grid computing works best with relatively low amounts of data on which much individual computation has to be performed. Clusters can handle bigger data and more interrelated computation.

    2. Re:Why not combine it with wardriving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that 802.11a can handle up to 54Mbit streams? That puts it fast enough for cluster computing.

    3. Re:Why not combine it with wardriving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half duplex, and that's just the raw bitrate. Protocol overhead eats about half of it, leaving you with about 2 MByte/s one-way or 1 MByte/s both ways, which is almost exactly what you get on a 10 MBit full-duplex ethernet.

  18. The next step at scientific conferences by HermesHuang · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Next thing you know they'll have a room at science conferences where people leave their laptops when they're not presenting so that protein folding or whatnot gets worked out on-the-spot.

    1. Re:The next step at scientific conferences by El · · Score: 1

      Why leave them in a room? Run 802.11g and use all the laptops while they are sitting on their owner's laps!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  19. Then we're gonna... by wan-fu · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the FlashMob FAQ:
    "How do I setup my own flashmob supercomputer? First and foremost, if you can come to FlashMob I -- there's no substitute for first hand experience. Otherwise, start here and get some experience running a one node flashmob. Then run two. Then run ten. Then take over the world."

    We're gonna to do it on your computer, then two computers, then ten computers, then your neighborhood. And then we're gonna do it at USF, then California, and then we'll take over the world! YEEEEEEAAARRRRGGHHH!!!

    1. Re:Then we're gonna... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      I already know what the answer will turn out to be though - 42.

    2. Re:Then we're gonna... by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      Then run two.
      Then run ten.
      Then take over the world.

      Then Profit !

  20. Welcome by DustinB · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well I for one welcome our new home-brewed PC overlord.

  21. been there done this ... by thehosh · · Score: 5, Informative

    guys from the CLOWN '98 [http://www.tlachmann.de/linux-cluster/] already tried this (even it was not the main goal). it was a temporary cluster for only one night, but to get into top500 you have to build a durable cluster.

    1. Re:been there done this ... by //rhi · · Score: 1

      see http://clown.gt.owl.de and http://cluster.gt.owl.de The thing that was fun doing was the "non-destructive install" - this was long before knoppix ;-) enjoy //rhi

      --
      //rhi /.15411./
    2. Re:been there done this ... by kb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If "non-destructive" excludes the buggy 2.0.36 Adaptec SCSI drivers which fried a handful of AHA2940 controllers... yep :)

    3. Re:been there done this ... by flash_in_the_pan · · Score: 1

      Yea... With only 64Meg RAM, there wasn't room for a big RAM-drive, so it had to go on a drive. It's interesting that it was a Debian install like the KNOPPIX core though

    4. Re:been there done this ... by flash_in_the_pan · · Score: 1

      CLOWN looked like a cool hackfest, but it isn't really isn't easily recreatable. The "flash" in FlashMob is in its ability to make one whenever you want.

  22. OK, here is the deal by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have an idea as how to make Wifi hotspots economical. Imagine the Matrix meets Slashdot - in our wifi hotspot, imagine a network that sucks the living cycles from a beowulf cluster of you!

    Here is the deal... to use a hotspot you have to download a package that connects your computer to the local "grid". In exchange for network access the grid gets your spare CPU cycles. The best hotspots could leverage the power of hundreds of notebooks, and then resell this on the market as a computing resource commodity, for multiplayer games, data crunching, whatever.

    Though... I'm running a high fever and this is perhaps the fruit of a deranged mind.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:OK, here is the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It will never work. Clusters are bad enough bandwidth wise. Wifi will get destroyed. Processing power is relatively cheap and easy these days, but to really get a top50 you need to have a bandwidth solution (such as myrinet, or host of other proprietary things). Gigabit ethernet isn't even fast enough for a lot of applications.

    2. Re:OK, here is the deal by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For notebooks, 100% cpu usage has a definite impact. Seriously reduces battery life.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    3. Re:OK, here is the deal by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      There would be no need to install software. Just run all http traffic through a proxy server. Have the proxy server insert a Java or Javascript applet into every web page. So, while I read slashdot, a little 1 pixel by 1 pixel "web bug style" applet is busily doing some ray tracing, or some other readily paralleliseable app. The applet tells the proxy what it figured out when the user clicks to the next link, and so on. Now, how feasable is this? Assume that Java runs at 100% of native speed on whatever code you are running. Assume everybody has Java turned on. Assume everybody has a 1 GHz PIII laptop, and you average 10 people connected at a time.

      A Quad opteron would probably be faster than the distributed computing setup running in the coffee shop, but it'd cost more. You can run your proxy server off a throwaway PII.

      Now, who in fuck's sake are you going to sell 10 GHz worth of aggregate cycles to? The technical issue is minimal. Where is the business case? You have a fast, but high latency cluster. Bad for things like game servers. Commercial rendering services are few and far between, and you would need to take on clients who don't care that their scene files are being rendered on Joe Coffe Drinker's laptop, which ain't high security.

      For anything like a game server, you really do need to have installed client software, and latency still isn't going to be what you would like. Plus, you need to pay somebody to be a tech support monkey. Thngs need to JUST WORK in order for people to keep coming back. Where is this commodity cycle market? Is it on NASDAQ?

  23. Home Brew? by pseudonaja · · Score: 1

    Did someone say Home Brew? gimme a few kegs of that!

  24. Dorm Clusters by HFShadow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The next logical step I think would be for a university to provide free internet in dorm rooms, as long as you leave your system on and run a distributed computing client for them. The student saves $$ without any noticable problems on their side, the university gets free computing time, seems like a win win situation.

    1. Re:Dorm Clusters by joib · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think it will work. Reliability, bandwidth and latency tend to be the biggest problems with purpose built clusters. I imagine a setup like the one which you describe is going to be much worse in these aspects. Not to mention that most simulation software is written for homogeneous clusters, i.e. all the computers in the clusters should have an identical software environment, and the slowest node limits the speed of the entire calculation.

      A similar but slightly less pie-in-the-sky thing would be to use the lab computers for batch processing during the night. Lab computers tend to be centrally administered and perhaps identical computers could be grouped together so that CPU cycles aren't wasted to the extent that they would be in a homogeneous environment.

    2. Re:Dorm Clusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at the two universities where I've studied (Lulea University of Technology, Sweden and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore) we had free internet access (10 mb) without having to run anything for the uni... And power was included in the (pretty cheap) rent to, so having my three computers on 24h was not a problem :)

      Only had a laptop while in .sg though...

    3. Re:Dorm Clusters by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      A similar but slightly less pie-in-the-sky thing would be to use the lab computers for batch processing during the night.

      The Virginia Tech cluster having been in the news so much lately, I thought of another time at VT that we've had quite a cluster accidentially. Or, rather not accidentially. rdickert is a guy who was on the VT distributed.net RC5-64 team. His stats are here. At some point, he had installed the d.net client on almost all of the computers in the math emporium, and I think some in the CS labs. For those not familiar, the math emporium is an off-campus location owned by the university where people can come to use computers for various things. The computers there always have mathematica and matlab on them, among various other things. Anyway, when he was using them (~1998, scroll down on his stats), they were I think somewhere around 300 Mhz G-3's, and there were about 500 of them.

      Yep. Eventually they figured it out, and shut it down, but wha'eva.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:Dorm Clusters by dave420-2 · · Score: 1
      I think he's talking about distributed computing, not clustering. With distributed computing, the bandwidth isn't an issue (as packets of work are sent to each computer for processing, as opposed to participating in a problem in real-time).

      It'd work a treat, I'm sure. Thing is, who'd pay for it? (serious question - I'm interested in knowing)

    5. Re:Dorm Clusters by FSWKU · · Score: 3, Informative

      If only that could assure a decent connection. Where I'm at, the connection isn't even worth being a freebie. It's slower than dialup in a lot of cases, and completely unreliable (it went down at least 10 times just this past weekend). Then there's the fact that the support office is a complete joke. A friend of mine took their computer over there because the network adapter was being a pain in the ass. They didn't know what to do with it. The sad thing is, it's an adapter my friend bought at the campus bookstore. Why, then, do they not know how to fix something they presumeably told the bookstore to stock?

      Add to this horrific mix of hardware and wetware problems the fact that not one single person in the help office speaks easily intelligible English, then you have one hell of a mess on your hands. I'm not against people from other countries, but damnit if you want to work in tech support for a college where 99% of the students are born on this side of the pond, shouldn't you be able to at least speak English well enough to be easily understood?

      And just so I'm not modded COMPLETELY off-topic here, what the fsck is up with this "flash mob supercomputer" crap anyway? Normal flash mobs were retarded enough to begin with, and I could have sworn that annoying little fad was over with. This is just completely insane. The idea behind the supercomputer thing is a novel one, but for the love of all that's holy, give it another name. Attaching "flash mob" to anything automatically earns it the stigma of being something cooked up by complete nutcases just trying to get in the news for their attempt at the "next big/cool/outlandish thing".

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  25. Whatever happened to proof reading? by terremoto · · Score: 3, Funny

    They could perhaps put together a super spelling/grammar checker. From the web site...

    >your computers' firepower

    >Plus they'll be prizes

    >the first of it's kind

    >least one students thesis

    >By in large

    >software for it's problem set

    >information on Flash Mob Computing computing

    >couldn't finish it's job

    >better at solving certain types of problems then grid computers

    1. Re:Whatever happened to proof reading? by mek2600 · · Score: 1, Funny

      The spellchecker will be the first thing they run on that cluster. You'd need a badass powerful system to sort through all those errors.

    2. Re:Whatever happened to proof reading? by Vic · · Score: 1

      They could perhaps put together a super spelling/grammar checker. From the web site...

      >your computers' firepower


      There is nothing wrong with the first one you mentioned. I would suggest finding another proofreader. ;)

  26. Robot Genitals Burning Your Retinas by jms258 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Supercomputer mob flashes YOU!!

  27. When you get home by Illserve · · Score: 2, Funny

    Take that hard drive out and scrub it with a brillo pad.

    A better name for this project might be Flash Petri Dish.

    1. Re:When you get home by PowerBert · · Score: 1, Funny

      That has a ring to it.

      Flash Petri Dish. Instant Culture.
      It could hit the charts somewhere between SARS and Chicken Flu.

  28. Tough one to call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really think 1200 is overkill for this. Take a look at the Top500 list and see how badly all the Gigabit Ethernet systems scale: most of them have worse than 50% efficiency and that's with only 1/4 the number of nodes. Now cut the interconnect bandwidth by a factor of TEN, cause Apple is pretty much the only company putting Gig-E standard in their (pro) computers, and it seems to me that hundreds of people are going to be sent packing because adding them to the cluster would actually make it SLOWER.

    1. Re:Tough one to call... by unixbob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dell have been shipping their poweredge servers with gigabit ethernet as standard for nearly 18 months now

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    2. Re:Tough one to call... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Intel has a 10GigE controller and it has begun sampling the industry's first 10 Gigabit Ethernet adapter that fits in a standard PCI-X slot. Model # is 82597EX if you want to look it up :)

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Tough one to call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I bet we'll be seeing quite a few of those at flashmob supercomputing events...

    4. Re:Tough one to call... by ldspartan · · Score: 2, Informative

      New Thinkpads (at least my T40) also are shipping GigE. I'm fortunate to have both a poweredge at my desk and a T40 to wander about with... if only I could do something with those GigE interfaces other than enjoy their very fun autodetection (no crossover cables, ever!)

      --
      lds

    5. Re:Tough one to call... by unixbob · · Score: 1

      Well seeing as the " minimum requirements are 1.3 GHZ Pentium III/AMD equivalent or better with 256MB of RAM" I don't think the macs will be of much use.

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    6. Re:Tough one to call... by sinergy · · Score: 1

      Dell has Gigabit ethernet on all their laptops now.

      --
      ...
    7. Re:Tough one to call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the point. Think about it. Apples are pretty much the only computers which are in consumers' hands and of which a significant percentage is equipped with gigabit ethernet interfaces. Since Apples don't meet the requirements and servers are not the typical bring-along computer, there won't be many gigabit ethernet capable computers.

    8. Re:Tough one to call... by Obasan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having done a fair bit of linpack benchmarking on 'real' clusters I have to say I think their chances are very slim. The interconnect makes a huge difference particularly when you have so little RAM per node. I doubt they will have a nonblocking switch architecture which makes a significant difference in Linpack (even setting aside it not being gigabit.) Also, MPI applications (Linpack included) often run into bottlenecks with wait conditions, some of the slower nodes will probably end up choking the entire cluster. A few problem laptops with bad RAM modules, and they can spend more time than they have pulling their hair out troubleshooting.

      That being said, it doesn't seem like all that serious an enterprise. Good luck to them, and if they have fun, hey all the better. :)

    9. Re:Tough one to call... by ePhil_One · · Score: 1

      Didn't Intel basically include a high performance GigE NIC in all their 865/875 chipset for all those who opted for it? Granted, they aren't laptops, bt there's a ton of these machines out there, the big problem is building a GigE network of sufficient scale.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    10. Re:Tough one to call... by wezelboy · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. If linpack were an embarrassingly parallel distributed computing problem, the top 500 might look completely different and they might have a shot getting on the list. As it is, the interconnect is going to get them if the power doesn't.

    11. Re:Tough one to call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell has Gigabit ethernet on all their laptops now.

      Uhhh, not even close to true. Spot the missing checkbox.

      But really, it doesn't matter what Dell (which isn't exactly dominant in laptops for education) includes in their newest machines, or what Intel included in their chipsets (Dell certainly is dominant in desktops, yet Gigabit is an optional add-on that few users will bother to get).

      What matters is that they only specified in their requirements that users bring 100base-T. And since 100base-T is still far more common, that is exactly what most people will be bringing, and what the organisers will have to settle for.

    12. Re:Tough one to call... by sinergy · · Score: 1

      Inspiron's don't count.

      --
      ...
  29. Depending on what the verb 'to flash' means. by drosselmeyer · · Score: 1

    Depending on the meaning of the word 'to flash', I think this could well be arranged. :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia... RUSSIANS comment on YOU.
  30. YEAH, It's a Jesuit College smart guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted this above but nobody will read it unless it's in the subject line!

  31. It will never work? by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the comment proposes distributed computing, not clustering. This is pretty reasonable wrt network consumption. (seti@home is not known for slowing down your net connection!)

    It could actually work.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  32. So many geeks, so few outlets... by Cerberus9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how many extension cords they'll populate before they flip the circuit breaker.

  33. 1200 laptops could be a big problem by ca1v1n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given how long this will take to set up, battery power isn't a viable option. Still, using a laptop is a pretty good idea. If you compare a laptop drawing 65 watts to a desktop drawing 300 at full CPU utilization, with a knoppix CD spinning at full speed, plus monitor power, you see that they gain nearly an order of magnitude in energy efficiency, though this is probably offset a bit by the lower clock speed on the laptop processors.

    Now, let's generously assume that each laptop is drawing half an amp at 110 volts. At 1200 laptops, that's 600 amps. The circuit breakers in my house trip at 15 amps, but I'll generously assume this facility has 50 amp wall circuits. That would still require 12 entire circuits, plus a safety factor, nevermind all my generous back-of-envelope assumptions.

    Okay, so assuming they've got a lot of extension cords, now we just have to deal with space. Let's assume, again, generously, that each person + computer + associated infrastructure needs only one square meter of floor space. This makes the space requirement equivalent to a 30m x 40m area, or about two World Cup soccer fields. I hope they've got one hell of a big gym.

    Heat is, by comparison, a relatively minor issue. If the facility can handle a crowd that large, adding their low-power laptops is minor. People tend to dissipate about 100 watts anyway, so the laptops won't be the most significant source of difficulty.

    It sounds like a very daunting task they have ahead of them. I hope they've already gotten these problems figured out, because this project sounds really cool.

    1. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix CD won't keep spinning once the pages are cached (probably a few dozen seconds).

    2. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know what the maximum power draw of a fast notebook at 100% CPU is, but I do know that a desktop is nothing like 300W. More like 90-120W -- sans monitor of course, since a cluster would never have one monitor per node. And that's a real full-power CPU, not the throttled down "mobile" version. You simply cannot put a 70W CPU in a notebook, it would melt. So notebook CPUs have to be slower even on AC power than standard CPUs. Notebooks are not going to give a very big computron/watt advantage, if any.

      30x40 meters doesn't sound like an unusually large gym. (Soccer fields are quite a bit larger than 30x40.) University gymnasiums can generally hold more than 1200 spectators, not even including the playing areas.

      I'd be very surprised if they hadn't considered power requirements. Part of the experiment might be to see how long the "supercomputer" can run on its own batteries, though for logistical ("cat-herding") reasons that's likely to fail -- half the nodes will be out of juice before the other half are ready to start. Most likely they really do have 600 amps available in the facility.

    3. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I thought of a couple more problems...

      1. Heat: If they expect to have 1200 people sitting in the bleachers with 1300+ MHz laptops running at 100% for the duration of a real benchmark, they'll have to expect a lot of burned laps.

      2. Theft: If they have a designated hookup area for the computers (much more logistically feasible, ethernet-wise at least) they'll have a hard time getting all 1200 computers successfully reunited with 1200 owners. It'd be very easy to grab the wrong one "accidentally". Given that this is San Francisco I'd expect vultures looking for any opportunity in such a huge computer thief buffet.

    4. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Seahawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hehe - this made me laugh a bit! ;D

      a 30x40m soccer field? :)

      But hey - since you called it soccer, I suppose you are US, so you are excused.

      And for info - a standard soccerfield is between 90 and 120m long and 45 and 90m wide for national danish soccer matches.

      For international mathces, the dimensions are: 100-110 x 64-75m :)

      Or that would be a little longer than a football field, and quite a bit wider(I believe a football field is 53 yards wide)

    5. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by ImWithBrilliant · · Score: 1

      They might have been thinking of notebooks in terms of using batteries rather than power cords. However, a minimum 4.4 hour LINPACK on battery at 100% CPU...

      They're gonna need to resolve those power issues.

      --

      Is it a rule, that there's an exception to every rule?

    6. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power is definitely something which needs to be planned for, but it isn't that difficult to provide it either. The Gathering and other computer parties regularly concentrate more (and more power hungry!) computers than what is planned for this event. If necessary, they could power up one third of the machines, then turn off the monitors when everything works, turn the next third on, and so on. But I doubt that's necessary if they have talked to someone who has experience with medium scale LAN parties.

    7. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now, let's generously assume that each laptop is drawing half an amp at 110 volts. At 1200 laptops, that's 600 amps. The circuit breakers in my house trip at 15 amps, but I'll generously assume this facility has 50 amp wall circuits. That would still require 12 entire circuits, plus a safety factor, nevermind all my generous back-of-envelope assumptions.

      600 amps is nothing for a place like this. I can get an 800 amp feed to my house, according to the nice folks at my local power company (and I'll be upgrading to that as part of my rewiring plan). 12 circuits is no big deal either. Think of the power requirements for holding concerts or any type of show, or just for lighting the place.

      A place like that also probably has a house electrician on staff who knows the boards and how to get x amps from point A to point B. I doubt power is going to be the main issue holding them back on this.

      Dan

    8. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the saddest part is, I play soccer myself. I was posting after not sleeping for a a very long time, and for some reason decided to make the meters-feet conversion, even though I was already thinking in terms of meters (70m x 110m). Thanks for the catch.

    9. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

      You're right about the soccer field. I was on crack, and was thinking of a 70' x 110' soccer field, rather than 70m x 110m. I blame this on the united states failure to use SI despite officially adopting it a century and a half ago.

    10. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by ca1v1n · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 300W is more than just the CPU. There's a lot of other stuff that draws power in a computer, like the power supply, the memory, the disk, etc. The nice thing about underclocking is that power draw is proportional to the cube of the clock frequency (this becomes more of a quadratic relationship as you get away from the peak performance of the chip), so you get huge power savings from modest underclocking. You also get a better cpu/memory clock ratio, so the pain is still less.

    11. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      I've measured the actual power drawn, at the AC power plug, by many PCs. It's never anywhere near 300W, that's just the power supply's rating. 60-120W is typical, with a real monster machine (dual CPUs, SCSI RAID, etc) pulling maybe 200W.

    12. Re:1200 laptops could be a big problem by patmiller · · Score: 1

      Its actually smaller because you aren't spinning any disks (KNOPPIX loads off the CD and then is pretty much out of the way). Basically everything runs as a large processor array with CPU/Memory/100baseT and nothing else. Actual draw is going to be pretty big 1200 * anything = numbers that make plant engineering cringe

  34. Can't wait by mstefanus · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can't wait for the next Slashdot headline on this. I'm imagining...
    "Flash Mob: 13 people turned up. No GigaFLOPS, just a flop"
  35. SETI@HOME is #1 at 63 TeraFLOPS by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    SETI@HOME isn't on the Top500 list, because it's not running Linpack, but according to its stats page, it's been running at about 63 TeraFLOPS today, which is comfortably #1 on the list. So this should be fun...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  36. Powerbill ? by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Erm... who pays the powerbill ?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Powerbill ? by electrichamster · · Score: 1

      Most students in university halls leave their computers on 24/7 anyway...electricity is paid for by the uni.

  37. HA! I can already do this without leaving home... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called the internet. D'oh!

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  38. New York Times Random Login Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    All Slashdot postings linking to NYTimes articles should always also link to this url:

    http://www.majcher.com/nytview.html

    A javascriptlet there will allow you to generate a totally random login for viewing the article. Every Slashdotter which accesses the article should create a new random login in turn, filling their database with useless random login id's that are only used once and then forgotten about.

    1. Re:New York Times Random Login Generator by subk · · Score: 0

      It's b0rked.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    2. Re:New York Times Random Login Generator by orangepeel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...and thus forcing the New York Times to implement a "pay per view" system for each article.

      Thank you! That's some great thinking on your part!

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    3. Re:New York Times Random Login Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I hope they do. That is just consequential. If they really wanted you to read their pages, they wouldn't put the registration between you and the article. They are trying to accustom people to non-free web content. Instituting pay-per-view now would make more people object to their strategy, so they're taking it slow.

    4. Re:New York Times Random Login Generator by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't someone just register a generic Slashdot account? Like username: slashdot and password: slashdot. Over at bluesnews someone registered a generic bluesnews account in that kind of way so that everyone could just log in using that to read the articles.

    5. Re:New York Times Random Login Generator by Jemm · · Score: 0
      "Why doesn't someone just register a generic Slashdot account? Like username: slashdot and password: slashdot. Over at bluesnews someone registered a generic bluesnews account in that kind of way so that everyone could just log in using that to read the articles."
      Someone did just that. It lasted all of 1 day before that account stopped working.
  39. Erm, well good luck....you'll need it... by grahamlee · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The goal is to run Linpack and "build a home-brew computer powerful enough to be added to a list of the world's 500 fastest computers."

    Yes, but you require a minimum of a 100 Base-T connection. You want to create one of the world's top 100 supercomputers using Ethernet? Good luck in beating that latency, guys....next time, see if you can get a flash mob of infiniband vendors to come along for the ride.

    1. Re:Erm, well good luck....you'll need it... by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly, speaking as someone who has run CFD code on smallish clusters, 100MB ethernet falls flat on it's face at about 20 machines, and those were dual 500MHz machines - it will be worse with faster ones! (to preempt some silly comments, CFD code and linpack have a LOT in common)

      And that was using specially tuned low latency ethernet drivers and TCP stack under linux.
      These guys have very very little chance of doing anything useful at all - which is a bit of a pity, but perhaps if they did just a little research first..

      I wonder if they even have network switches that will efficiently route 1200 nodes.. let alone a decent plan to interconnect them.

      The first step would be to use 1Gbit or faster concentration to some very smart switches to at least cut down the network blockage a little.. It won't help with the terrible latency, but will give them a little headroom at some vector lengths.

      They will also suffer terribly from the differing speeds of nodes - I've yet to see a solution for linpack that distributes efficiently over a wide speed range of machines.

      Of course, I bet in the end they just come up with a great SETI score, or something similar - something that would actually scale at all on a cluster like this.

      Oh well, I wish them luck anyway.

    2. Re:Erm, well good luck....you'll need it... by grahamlee · · Score: 1
      Of course, I bet in the end they just come up with a great SETI score, or something similar - something that would actually scale at all on a cluster like this.

      i.e. something that doesn't actually use the network particularly heavily. Yes, I concur.

  40. What, no macs? by morganjharvey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Minimum requirements are 1.3 GHZ Pentium III/AMD equivalent or better with 256MB of RAM
    Perhaps I'm missing some fundamental requirement of cluster comptuing, but why wouldn't macs work? I'm sure a 1.25 ghz G4 could hold its own with the above mentioned. It can also run linux. College campuses seem to be a hotbed of mac users, so it seems that they would want to tap this. Does clustering require that all nodes be of the same architecture?

    1. Re:What, no macs? by the3mcsand1dj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      blink...

      I'm not sure the SOFTWARE aspect of this "Super Computer" but, uh... maybe the programmers are coding this in a Microsoft language...

      Mentioned before is SETI@home (software distributed amongst many clients) and another (I'm too lazy to scroll back up and read). This "Psuedo-Supercomputer" aspect is mearly a distributed software application which shares data over a network. All hosts must run a program to "Link" them together in such a manner that they distribute the computing. Therefore, the platform of which this client is programmed for would be the limiting factor in the sucessfull implementation of this "SuperComputer". (eventually they may write clients for other platforms... but it sounds like they have settled on the PC for now).

      Plus, they are Macs... heh. (what I mean by this is that I have an underlying contempt for something I can't rip open and reassemble the guts of, and Macs are much too "User Friendly" to properly "fix" in this manner.)

      Hopefully this is coming off as humerous and not offensive, both of which I am capable of in a somewhat unpredictable manner, but in all actuality, it's probably just me rambling...

      --
      I started out with nothing, and still have most of it left.
    2. Re:What, no macs? by the3mcsand1dj · · Score: 2, Informative

      apparently I had no idea what I was talking about... it appears that they are booting from a linux cd that will be provided... so to answer your question... macs would probably work providing they are new enough to run linux...

      --
      I started out with nothing, and still have most of it left.
    3. Re:What, no macs? by BenBenBen · · Score: 1
      macs would probably work providing they are new enough to run linux...
      So they have to have a 68K or later processor then?
      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    4. Re:What, no macs? by yess · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well. The Knoppix linux distro, which is to be used, is prepared for x86 architecture. Sorry, guys. Maybe it's time to start thinking about porting this distro to Mac CPUs? It shouldn't be that hard...

    5. Re:What, no macs? by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      If you can't rip open and reassemble the guts of a mac, you have problems. I've worked extensively with both platforms, and with the exceptions of the iMacs, the Macs tend to be much easier to take apart and work on. Pc's have made great strides with the advent of the modder community (and finally some decent PC cases) but the consumer stuff is still garbage. That said, you can't build your own mac from scratch, but that's not their objective.

    6. Re:What, no macs? by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll agree with you that the iMacs are a pain in the ass to even just open, but given how easy all the other models are to open, it kinda makes up for it.

      As for making your own mac from scratch, this is possible, just not mainstream. You can order all sorts of various sundry parts, including the motherboard, etc., from different places online. I know it's not quite the same, but last time I looked (about a year ago) the parts available would have allowed one to save about $400-500 on a normal mac. It could be argued that this allows a little more flexibility than ordering one preassembled, but, as you say, that's not their objective. And plus, most people who buy macs don't really look at the price. Like me. I just look at the price afterwards. It's real easy to blow $5000 at the apple store in one sitting. :p

    7. Re:What, no macs? by mcstoufer · · Score: 1

      Actually, With g77 installed from Fink, you can then compile the LINPACK 3.0 test suite, natively. I'm tempted to just show up and let them have the ol' Apple what-for.

  41. Origins of "flash mob" by archilocus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting term "flash mob". The first time I encountered it was in the writing of sci-fi author, Larry Niven. In some of his series personal teleportation becomes ubiquitous giving rise to the 'flash mob'.

    When a news broadcast reports a certain kind of story (riot, fire, etc) people start to teleport into watch the fun. The news reports the growing mob and before long it reaches critical mass and turns into a real riot as people take advantage by teleporting in and doing a quick bit of looting.

    I'm not sure if Larry originated the term though ? Anyone know an ealier source ? Is it a 'real' phenomenon ?

    --

    Don't look back the lemmings are gaining on you

    1. Re:Origins of "flash mob" by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes and no.

      Flash Mobs DO exist these days, but generally aren't disaster tourists. Yet, anyways. Modern Flash Mobs consist of large numbers of peoples gathering somewhere, doing something silly for about 5 minutes and then leaving again, just as quick. An example I heard of some time ago was at a Toys R Us store ages ago with a huge mock-up dinosaur. A Flash Mob gathered before the dinosaur and worshipped it for 5 minutes. And I'm not talking about quiet, solemn worship, here. After 5 minutes the crowd was gone as quickly as it has arrived.

      Just found a link to a site regarding the particular Flash Mob. Includes some pictures for your viewing pleasure. :)

    2. Re:Origins of "flash mob" by cei · · Score: 1

      Sure, but this computer gathering isn't until April. Where's the spontaneity or "flash" with this project?

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
  42. Re:HA! I can already do this without leaving home. by torpor · · Score: 1

    yeah, boring. i'd rather be at the beach.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  43. Strikes me odd by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
    Sig: "Who sponsors your feelings?"

    That's just what I was wondering.

  44. Electrical power could be an issue... by TitanBL · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bullshit, eveyone just bring a powerstrip and 'daisy chain' those bad boys....

    1. Re:Electrical power could be an issue... by the3mcsand1dj · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the aspect of amperage... Yes, powerstrips are magical, but even powerstrips will not increase the amount of amperage available through a circuit breaker.

      Have you ever seen an electrical wire smoke because the current running through it began to melt and burn the insulation? I have... and that's why we have circuit breakers to stop that from happening inside your walls and along gym floors full of hundreds of students with their computers strewn about in concentric circles from one outlet in the middle of the gym floor...

      So, yea... bring your gasoline powered generators instead.

      --
      I started out with nothing, and still have most of it left.
    2. Re:Electrical power could be an issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are missing the aspect that he is joking. :) He's obviously making fun of the idea that you can just plug together an unlimited number of power strips to provide outlets for all your computing equipment... a fallacy which a number of less-saavy consumers seem to fall into.

  45. Re:SETI@HOME is #1 at 63 TeraFLOPS by October_30th · · Score: 1
    Such a waste of good computer power...

    Good marketing but still shoddy science.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  46. WHAT? THEY STOLE THAT FROM ME! by the3mcsand1dj · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, not exactly... but kinda.

    Since I was a small boy, I have been facinated with computers... I researched paralell processor computers (by this I mean that I asked my Computer Engineer uncle about them) and quickly thought about alternate interfaces for "linking" processors, other than building custom mother boards capable of distributing computing power amongst multiple processors... and was quickly discouraged by the lack of comunication speed inherent in the options available at the time (namely: Serial, Paralell, ISA ... etc.).

    And then, what's interesting... is that I was JUST thinking about this the other day .. and told my friend Kevin about my idea that I had when I was a kid... and said "I want to design a software or maybe a type of "add-on" card that would allow you to connect multiple computers together to form a type of super-computer".

    Then I log in today, and see this headline! Blink a few times and read it again, then read the article and don't quite understand it and then realize that, although neat, it's not that cool the way they are doing it...

    First, even 10/100 LAN is a bit slow to properly transfer data at rates that would be condusive to properly handling large amounts of data. I would liken this method to a Muliti-Processor Xeon motherboad with a 66mhz front side bus. Yes, the processors are super-fast, but what's the point if you can't send them the data or receive it fast enough to use them?

    Second, if all they are doing is connecting computers, what do they plan to acheive? From the article I see no plans for organizing the computers into "Pre-Processing", "Processing" and "Clean-up" groups in the true form of a Parallel Processor computer...

    And Third, I thought of it first... haha

    Anyway, I still wish I could be there to see what happens and how it goes... I hope the benchmark tests will be properly designed to include both small and large datasets and sufficiently complex procedures...

    --
    I started out with nothing, and still have most of it left.
    1. Re:WHAT? THEY STOLE THAT FROM ME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Third, I thought of it first... haha
      You're probably right. Nobody else in the world thought of it before this story broke. You are a genius.

      You and I are kindred spirits, because when I was a boy, I came up with the idea of "the fastest computer of all time." Shortly afterwards, computer makers caught up with my advanced thinking and made faster computers than had ever been made before.
  47. Fly in the Ointment? by sithkhan · · Score: 3, Funny

    My first thought was "Neat." My second thought was "Who in their right mind would connect their computer to a network FULL of strangers? What sort of viruses and trojans would they pick up?" Then I remembered that I am connected to the internet as well as everyone reading this ...

    --

    is it that bad seein a hot chick again? if i see a hot chick walkin down the hall i dont say "repost"
    1. Re:Fly in the Ointment? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well not only that, but they will be booting off a provided Linux CD, which will enable them to join the cluster.

      If you are so worried just remove the HDD from the machine you take, and you won't have any problems? :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Fly in the Ointment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not convinced that many flash mob attendees will know how to take out their hardrive. And just because they are booting ClusterKnoppix doesn't mean everyone connecting will be. 1000 people is a lot to hide in. Wouldn't catch me hooking up.

      Then again.... interesting take on a honeypot. 1,000 is a lot of people - enough to hide amongst under normal circumstances but not so many that it can't be narrowed down to a few shady characters after the event. I'd make damn sure I got faces on film if I was anywhere close to the project.

  48. NYT slashdotted? I think not. by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    like the NYT is going to be slashdotted?

  49. UGLY! by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Those are the nastiest computers I have ever seen. Whatever happened to the plain old gray cases? Or whoever has seen the customer wooden computer cabinets some guy made?

  50. When i saw the title... by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...i thought this was about mobs of people bringing their computers to times square for 10 minutes setting up a quick LAN and ten disappear again!

  51. But isn't "... a 2fer!" = 24 Beer by Graemee · · Score: 1

    In these parts a 2fer or 2-4 is a case of beer. So do they pay you with beer to participate?

  52. Usefullness? by BigFootApe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure it's a cool stunt, but aside from running the Linpack benchmark, what will this pile 'o' pcs do? It will, of course, do nothing, for it will only exist about a day.

    I've seen this sort of thing happen before: people devoting energy and money to what amounts to a technical fetish. The end state is a world where people like Robert G. Brown build themselves home beowulf clusters with no discernible purpose. (RGB: you're a nice guy and all, but I find it hard to believe that you need all that horsepower for personal use).

    I'd rather see an article about broadband users organising themselves into a GLOBUS grid. For that matter, I'd like to see a comprehensive system for bug tracking MPICH (I've seen some weird bugs there). There's lots of things I'd like to see written about or developed. Tomorrows 'infinity + 1' Supercluster ain't it.

    1. Re:Usefullness? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      Sure it's a cool stunt, but aside from running the Linpack benchmark, what will this pile 'o' pcs do? It will, of course, do nothing, for it will only exist about a day.

      So what usefulness is there in going and watching a movie? I'm sure the people that participate will do it because they consider it 'fun'.

      I'd rather see an article about broadband users organising themselves into a GLOBUS grid. For that matter, I'd like to see a comprehensive system for bug tracking MPICH (I've seen some weird bugs there). There's lots of things I'd like to see written about or developed. Tomorrows 'infinity + 1' Supercluster ain't it.

      So if you don't click on the article, you won't have to read or post a comment about it. If you'd REALLY like to see a bunch of broadband users organising themselves into a globus grid, then start organizing! I'm sure you'll find a bunch of other people that would be interested too...

  53. pentium or amd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hm a p3 1.3 ghz amd equiv = 600mhz athlon?

  54. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From flashmobcomputing.org: "Today, supercomputing is controlled largely by governmental organizations, academic research institutions, animation studios, and recently human genome companies. This means that the problems that get solved by supercomputers are narrow in scope and tightly controlled. We want to change that."



    This is so stupid.

    • "supercomputing is controlled" - what does that mean? Nothing!
    • "narrow in scope" - What possible problem can one want to solve on Beowulf-type cluster? The only ones I can think of are academic, military, research and such - the exact list of those who have such clusters
    • "We want to change that" - Why? An average home user has enough computing power. If he doesn't then he's a researcher which means he has access to a cluster at his place of work. It doesn't make sense to run Word on Beowulf cluster.


    Besides, I don't think with 100Mbps interconnect their cluster will scale beyond performance of 32 P4 nodes with Myrinet...

    1. Re:Stupid by flash_in_the_pan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps its stupid only because you don't need a supercomputer, but 10 years ago it was stupid for you to own any computer because there was nothing you could do with it.

      In a classic chicken and egg, as enough "stupid" people bought computers suddenly there was a market to write programs which made more people want to buy which created a bigger market, etc...

      In any case, if you are a researcher who can't get supercomputer time -- you won't write codes that need them because they are useless. If you can get time, then you may choose to write some to support your research. So, if there is a way to get a cheap (even if it is sorta crappy) computer with lots of memory (even if it has poor scaling and efficiency), then that researcher can do things she couldn't do before. That, friend, is the point.

      I think there are a lot of people who could do more science if they had a good cluster. But, how can you justify the expense (considerable for space, machinery, sysadm) without having applications that require it. How can you have applications that require a cluster if you don't have one? Again, its chicken and egg. FlashMob gives you a chance to build something to break the dependency chain and work up to a real supercomputer.

  55. Can you provide...... by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you provide us with a small, used nuclear power-station please (Gigawatt range only please).

    Need not have transmission voltages, IEC leads will suffice.....

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Can you provide...... by lord_nightrose · · Score: 0

      I've got one, but it's a bit runny... probably more runny than you'd like. Let me go check on it...

      Oh...... the cat's just eaten it. Sorry about that.

      --
      This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
  56. Hackers paradise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Against the background of this orgy of networking, what are the security implications?

    Seems to me that it's probably not a great idea to be hooking your laptop up for the day to 1,000+ other laptops without a very clear idea of the level of risk involved and who everyone is. When the flash mob fad started in London, it was mainly young professional (media and advertising) types who turned up. They strike me as the kind of people who are issued with good hardware because it looks good for the company but but haven't much of an idea how it works. All it takes is a busy little coder to work out how and there's nice way to get yourself onto a lot of laptops and potentially the systems they sync into. Anyone thought about this?

  57. Some Distributed Supercomputers... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

    ...that you don't hear about: Large collections of ping zombies, and large collections of SMTP spam relays under hostile control (I can't think of a better term than 'hostile'). Come on, how many distributed supercomputers out there have tens of thousands to millions of nodes?

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  58. "keck cluster" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now they're working on the "geek cluster".

  59. Re:But isn't "... a 2fer!" = 24 Beer by loserMcloser · · Score: 1

    in this case it means 2-for-1.

  60. It's all about the latency... by Richard+Mills · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds like a fun event, but I'd be very surprised if they can make this work. Sure, if you get enough computers together, the "theoretical peak" (basically the aggregate FLOP rate of all the computers) can be really high, but for a problem with dependencies like the LINPACK benchmark, communication latency is what is going to limit the runtime when you try to hook a thousand or so laptop computers together using only fast ethernet. I think that even Gigabit ethernet would scale poorly in such a setting (decent bandwidth, but startup time for a communication is slow compared to something like Myrinet or Infiniband).

    Maybe it's possible, but I think it would require a pretty creative network topology and some pretty clever re-structuring of the linpack benchmark (which is allowed by the Top 500 list rules, BTW).

  61. Diamond Age Misread by robkill · · Score: 1

    At first I thought it was "Flesh Mob Supercomputing" and thought of the "Drummers" from "The Diamond Age". Power consumption wouldn't be an issue, but the heat dissapation issues would have a whole other set of consequences.

    --
    DMCA - Chilling free speech since 1998.
  62. Jambands still do it by cosmol · · Score: 1

    The dead are still touring and still allowing concert recordings. There are many bands that still condone audience recordings. Almost all are "jambands" of one kind or another. Check out furthurnet.net and db.etree.org.

    1. Re:Jambands still do it by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Dead have toured since Jerry Garcia Died about 8 years ago.

    2. Re:Jambands still do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be naive.
      The Grateful Dead may be no more, but "The Dead" is till touring.

    3. Re:Jambands still do it by El · · Score: 1

      My point was that the Grateful Dead managed to be the most profitable band in the world one year while still permitting their music to be freely recorded and traded. My joke was that Jerry Garcia and Bill Graham are dead now. (I once ushered a Dead concert at Shoreline Amphitheater and committed the cardinal sin -- I demanded that Bill Graham show me his ticket! He just said "I work here" and pushed past me...)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    4. Re:Jambands still do it by cosmol · · Score: 1
      Yeah I got your point. It's one that I love to point out myself. There are many bands that don't give a damn about prohibiting music sharing because it can actually help them (assuming their music is good in the first place.) Most people don't know that the grateful dead allowed recordings, or that many bands still do.

      Not that It makes a difference replying to a story that has dropped off of the front page, but I enjoyed your anectdote about Bill Graham :)

  63. mispelled link by cosmol · · Score: 1

    FurthUr.net Oops, should have previewed

  64. /. (Blaw, blaw, blaw) by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    Isn't "flash mob computing" called "slashdotting"?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  65. how is this a flash mob? by happystink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this a flash mob if it's advertised weeks ahead and isn't going to just show up and then disperse quickly? This is just a planned event with no RSVP list, that doesn't make it a flash mob, they're just jumping on that currently-hip (not for long let's hope) name to get attention and feel cool. I'm surprised they didn't actually say "it's a flash mob of metrosexuals!" to really get attention from lazy people who love idiotic hip slang.

    --

    sig:
    See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  66. Old idea, suggested in 1964-65 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading a Russian SF story in the sixties (1964 or 1965). The organizers of a computer science meeting gathered all attendands on a stadium and, for a few hours, connected their BRAINS in a supercomputer.

    I dont remember the title of the story or the author. I think the author might have been a well known Russian SF writer, like Efremov, but I am not sure.

    Has anybody read this story and remember the title and the author?

  67. Wireless? by pherris · · Score: 1
    Why leave them in a room? Run 802.11g and use all the laptops while they are sitting on their owner's laps!

    Here's a few issues I can think of:

    Power cables. It's safer and much easier to design a temporary power grid [to power the laptops] around a small area instead of extention cords everywhere. Tripping is also an issue (I mean falling and not the other San Fran tripping).

    Security. If they have a locking cage setup for single laptops one could simply could power, boot, store, lock and return where the event is over.

    Networking Cost. Enough said.

    Network conficts. It's only a guess but wouldn't 500 or 1000 802.11g hosts create so much noise that getting everyone connection in such a small area would be impossible?

    I guess if was limited to a hundred or so wireless users with the bridges spread way out it could work but IMO not recommended.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Wireless? by El · · Score: 1

      You can run different channels spaced far enough apart that they don't interfere, but yes, under clustering all the channels would saturate long before you reached 1000 laptops. You might be able to get away with something non-network intensive like SETI@home.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Wireless? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget burned penises! Could make for a nasty lawsuit. It's better to forbid lap-top use of laptops at the event.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  68. What will the Government think? by Polymath+Crowbane · · Score: 1
    I wonder how long it will be before Homeland Security decides this technology is too terrorist-friendly. After all, imagine a gym full of terrorists networking their laptops to engineer a deadly pathogen or a nuclear device? The horror!

    This may sound like a joke (and I'm writing it as one), but I expect to see this kind of response from our current administration shortly after this experiment succeeds.

  69. Re:SETI@HOME is #1 at 63 TeraFLOPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't going to get anything like 63 terraflops. It won't get close to the performance of the Big Mac G5 cluster. I'd be surprised if it gets in the top 100 let alone the top 5. SETI clustered computing is TOTALLY different from is going to be going on here. For a start there is no continuous inter-node data dependency ... at all. I'll give it 5Tflops max.

  70. Re:SETI@HOME is #1 at 63 TeraFLOPS by Lebofsky · · Score: 1
    See:

    http://boinc.berkeley.edu

    - Lebofsky

  71. Why not make it a 3fer? by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    Being a grad student, he could help out his fellow 'mates by calling for proposals of possible computations. I'm sure there are plenty of other grad students who would love to find answers to certain problems that require a supercomputer -- that could be answered in a few minutes to hours.

  72. Don't generalize by brucmack · · Score: 1

    It's not always like that. My university has free hookups in all the dorm rooms, with true 10mbit connections to the internet. Only gets bogged down during the busiest times of day, and dorm connections are lowest priority, but it's still always fast.

    1. Re:Don't generalize by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      I'm not really generalizing. Several friends of mine go to college 2 hours north of me, and have outstanding connections. Unfortunately, that seems to be the exception in my region. Here, we have a single 45mbit pipe servicing the dorms, the academic buildings, and all the public buildings (student center, health center offices, etc) on campus, as well as the local community college. That's approx. 15,000 to 20,000 computers sharing 45mbit of bandwidth. The dorm network is 100mbit locally, but good luck even seeing 16kbit to the outside world. It's fast SOMETIMES on the weekends, and IF it decides it wants to work properly. But not only is the outbound pipe inadequate, the network configuration is completely slipshod. The pipes for my dorm and about 3 others are routed through the one across the street (even tho mine is closer to the NOC). Beginning of last year, part of that dorm floods. Kills EVERYTHING. Network is down for a couple WEEKS while they rush order parts from Dell. What boxes do I finally see? A crapload of 24 port UNMANAGED switches. I really don't understand. They know what wires in the closets go to what rooms, so if they really wanted to know what room was causing trouble, a managed switch could tell them what port, they could match that with the port map and instantly know even know what side of the room was causing hell. But no, they go with unmanaged switches and resort to some lame MAC address registration system linked to your email that you have to redo every semester and it seldom works right on the first try. Anyway, I'll shutup before the off-topic moderations murder what little positive karma I have.

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  73. Maybe they could contribute something ... by carlmenezes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...like a KNOPPIX ISO image that is specifically meant for setting up a distributed computer on a local LAN. How about it? I can think of a lot of places that could use the power of distributed computing that don't necessarily have all the knowhow of how to set it up - let's take the most obvious : public schools. Something like a Flash Mob Computing KNOPPIX ISO downloadable would be like a gift from God.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:Maybe they could contribute something ... by Dave114 · · Score: 1

      Sort of like this?

  74. WDR Computernacht by daybyter · · Score: 1

    Anyone remembers the WDR Computernacht (I think it was in 1998) when you could bring your PC and they created a Linux cluster to make it in the Guinness book?

  75. been there, done that by OnsightFlash · · Score: 1

    get a bunch of G5 macs. use os x.add ethernet. turn it on . it works. ask virginia tech.

  76. The church by Unoti · · Score: 1

    Among the groups who could use a supercomputer they listed churches. I wonder what a church would want to do with a supercomputer for a day or a weekend?

  77. Re:Motly Crew alowed no professional vidio taping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It helped solve a debate as to wether one of the hot female dancers was actually showing here tits or not

    She wasn't

  78. Oops! by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

    I hope that people don't mistake it for one of the mass gay marriages taking place in San Fran these days! After all, you don't find that many guys huddling at a single place, on any normal day.

    --
    My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
  79. april fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuttin'but a hoax!!!

  80. Why not? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of 1.3 GHz P3 equiv Macs out there! (of course they aren't laptops... but on the other hand, the Mac laptops will have higher interconnects, so the bottleneck will probably be CPU over bandwidth)

    Or are you talking about 256mb?

    Are you talking about Linux?

    Or are you talking about the fact that the organizers won't know what to do with Macs?

    1. Re:Why not? by unixbob · · Score: 1

      Well because if they're trying to make a supercomputer from a bunch of networked PC's then they're gonna all need to be running the same platform / software (e.g. Beowulf). Last time I checked you couldn't do this accross multiple different OS's

      --
      The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
  81. Already exists by Jman314 · · Score: 1

    Apparently they're using Cluster Knoppix. So the tools for this already exist, it's merely a matter of getting enough machines to play together well.

  82. Re:been there? Virg Tech: $5.2 mil vs. USF $10k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Significant cost reduction and time to market seem to be an key fundamental in the computing world, wouldnt you agree?

    USF $10k built in a day vs. Virg Tech $5.2m in six months seems like an advancement, otherwise you can say that the $40m supercomputers in existence make VTech's just another "been there, done that" supercomputer.

    "...before planning, financing and building the Big Mac in about six months for just $5.2 million. Most other machines of its class cost upward of $40 million and take years to assemble.."

    Source: Mac Supercomputer Just Got Faster
    October 30, 2003 Wired News
    http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,61005,0 0.html

  83. Re:The first time ... NOT (oh wait! YES) by flash_in_the_pan · · Score: 1

    First off... Go look at this site http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/E/1999/01/010/ By look at, I mean read it... in part it says "After some adaptations, the necessary Linpack- Benchmark ran on an Alpha subcluster with 48 nodes." Note also that 60 of the machines were (then) top-of-the-line DEC Alphas (I guess they only had a 48 port top switch). This is not "512 normal home PCs," unless Frau Blucher happens to own an Alpha Server farm :-) It also says, "Many computers and the complete infrastructure (switches and so on) came from sponsors." Like: 50 Alpha's from Samsung, 5 4-way SMP Xeon servers, a lowly 2-way SMP Xeon server, etc.. 128 PIII from SEH GmbH, etc... So, well over half their machine was corporate servers and not quite as heterogenous as "kb" would have you think. They also had to install Debian 2.0(!) on the hardrives. So, that wasn't a "spontaneous supercomputer with home machines." It was a bunch of sysadmins in a hackfest. The FlashMob boots off CD (no install to a hard drive). Its plug and go. Reboot and you can have your old Windoze box back. That's spontaneous.

  84. Rrturn of Communism? by MiniMarx · · Score: 1

    What do you think, does this trend marks the return of communism? people volunteering their times and computers for the public good? what next - we volunteer labour? money? maybe it's the end of private property as we know it?

    1. Re:Rrturn of Communism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course something is happening. Look at file sharing. Think of basic flashmobbing. I think this marks the return of the good of the community big time.