Slashdot Mirror


SlashNET Forum with Marcel Gagne

weebl writes "SlashNET is pleased to announce an upcoming forum with Marcel Gagne. He writes the 'Cooking with Linux' column every month for Linux Journal magazine. His first book was the acclaimed Linux System Administration: A User's Guide. Recently he wrote a book called Moving to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye!, which is intended for consumer desktop users who are curious about Linux and want to give it a test run. The forum will be held on Monday February 23, 2004 at 8PM US Eastern Standard Time (-0500). As usual, the forum will be held in #forum. You will be able to submit questions both before and during the forum which will be used to guide the discussion."

149 comments

  1. Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by jetkust · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Say Hello to the Installation Screen of Torture.

    1. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by Jotaigna · · Score: 1, Interesting

      and to his close friend, the "compiling a module for the xxxx hardware" README file.

      Seriously, i tried to install a linux distribution just to get a glimpse on the state of the art on desktop usability. In my uninformed decision i downloaded Fedora and instantly missed the multimedia support.
      Eyecandy and the like, and ready to use software are needed for the (painful if ur not a geek) transition to a Linux Destop.

      --
      "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    2. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by October_30th · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm going to install Gentoo on my dual Opteron tonight. So, I guess the next time you see me, I've become one of those annoying Gentoo fanatics.

      Maybe I should start practising already. "Emerge!". How's that?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    3. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fedora is a bleeding edge development distro.

      Give a try to Mandrake, you'll find that it generally installs on out of the box boxen, quicker, easier and with less intelligent input than Windows.

      And of course there's always Knoppix for those who are curious, but want to take minimal risks with either their system or intellignce.

      KFG

    4. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      hmmmmm, shit, it seems to be contagious eh. I installed it a year ago and never turned back. Never had a more stable Linux box. Now its all Gentoo or nothing for me.

    5. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right then. So I guess we won't get to see you for about the next three weeks....

    6. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuckers should say 'kiss the blue screen goodbye and welcome the mono OOPSy one'. Ans yes I know, Linux is ready for the desktop, is secure as a multi-user system yada yada...

    7. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by stratjakt · · Score: 0

      Less intelligent input?

      As in the input it requires is less intelligent than Windows, as in Windows asks for the local time zone, and Mandrake asks if you smell your own farts?

      Or, the input is intelligent, there's just less of it?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      KFG

    9. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by UnassumingLocalGuy · · Score: 1

      ...And goodbye to the 60 megabytes of Windows Updates you need to install before you get infected with the Blaster worm.

      --
      "Hu, ho, ho-ah-oh-oh-oh. Hu, ho ho-ah-oh-oh-oh. Mario Paint! Whoaaa!"
    10. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by Steel+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      I'm running Mandrake 9.2, and I'll grant you that I've never had a "Blue screen of death" and the install was a breeze compared to M$ Windoze. Instead of a blue screen, Mandrake doesn't even seem to know about it when it freezes. I can't even salute my way out of it. In the last month, Drake 9.2 has frozen on me 4 times while using basic programs like mozilla. Then I must push the button on the box. If there's a better way, please let me know CTRL_ALT _BS is a joke. So much for not rebooting Linux. Where it obviously excells beyond measure to me is that I don't have to reboot it just because it's been running for 3 days and is therefor out of memory. I thought when I went to 512 MB I'd be beyond that. Windoze literally has an infinite appetite for memory. It's a good thing for dozers that dimms and simms keep getting cheaper.

    11. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by gentoo_is_hyped · · Score: 1

      " Fedora is a bleeding edge development distro. Give a try to Mandrake, you'll find that it generally installs on out of the box boxen, quicker, easier and with less intelligent input than Windows." Uninformed FUD. Mandrake is generally buggier than either Fedora or SuSE. Get your facts straight.

      --
      [Gentoo is hyped. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion]
    12. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by t0ny · · Score: 0
      Recently he wrote a book called Moving to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye!, which is intended for consumer desktop users who are curious about Linux and want to give it a test run.

      Does he cover moving to Windows 2000, XP, or 2003? I have yet to see a BSoD on any of them.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    13. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by slateX · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I just decided to try Linux again this week. (I was a dos guru back in the day and gave linux spins on and off around 1997). I heard things were great nowadays. Frankly, I think they're worse.

      I tried installing Mandrake and Redhat 9, in that order. The Mandrake installer didn't like my standard MS USB wheel mouse. It would work until I got to the part where I tell it that I had a wheel mouse, then it froze. Eventually, I chose the magic option (gotta choose Explorer Mouse instead of Wheel Mouse), then the program didn't freeze, the mouse just stopped working for the rest of the installation. That was fun, especially since all the help for the installer options required mousing over them! Wasn't fond of Mandrake, moved to Redhat.

      Okay, so I want to get twinview to work some day. I install the new NVidia drivers. To do that I need A)root B)get outside of xwindows.

      I just love root. Wow, I love having to type in a password every time I want to open the equivalent of a windows control panel item. Makes me feel all fuzzy and protected

      Okay, so there is no obvious way to get outside of Xwindows in redhat 9. I looked it up online, and I got 4 people with twice as many options, and they didn't agree with each other. Some methods involve changing your inittab or something.

      All of this to get out of windows! Why is this not a default option in GRUB? I had to add an argument to the kernel in the end.

      Now I'm going to edit XF86Config. But there is no pico installed (perhaps because I didn't install pine). So I have to try to use "vi", a wonderful tool where ctrl-S is a shortcut for "lock up my system" instead of save, and :sav results in "error, not enough arguments" or something to that effect.

      At the moment I am trying to de-bloat my original Redhat install with the Add/Remove Applications application. Only, when I, say, uncheck "cdda2wav" audio application, I get a warning saying that the cdda2wav package can not be found, and that it is required by some other arcane piece of software. However, this is not very clear at all. At first glance, it seems as though the package I am trying to remove can not be found. That dialog needs to be reworked big time. After that, the program cancels back to the part where I can check or uncheck applications. So if I really want to get rid of the 100k cdda2wav program, I'd better get searchin' through the dozens of other application categories to I can find that one other program that depends on it! No way that could happen automatically, eh?

      All said, I am very disappointed in Linux. I've been reading Slashdot for ages, and I was very optimistic coming into this, but it seems that the way things are now, some major overhauling has to happen. Perhaps it is a form of blindness, from spending so much time in Linux the developers and Linux lovers are overlooking these huge flaws. I'm hoping that the experiences of a newbie can open some eyes.

      I'd better submit this before my mouse freezes up again. Ugh, I need therapy.

    14. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by loginx · · Score: 1

      Dude... he said "dual opteron"
      The install will likely take him all of 35 minutes...

    15. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen plenty of them. Perhaps you should stop using it just to download porn.

    16. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yupp, linux are still for the computer literate. Sadly, you are not one of them.

    17. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by slateX · · Score: 1

      By "computer literate," you must mean "someone who has been haxoring at linux for years." I am quite computer literate. I built computer systems as a hobby in grade school. I am now in charge of fixing everyone's win32 system where I work (which is a research center full of other "computer illiterate" engineers and scientists).

      Okay, instead of trying to insult me, how about answering some of my complaints. Why is it so hard to get out of Xwindows? It is 2004 and a standard USB mouse freezes up randomly in linux. How about my complaints about the way red hat handles dependencies in its packaging system? Do you enjoy typing in a password when you want to change your screen resolution?

    18. Re:Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goobye... by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Ah...you see, I thought he was installing it by letting it download itself, not from a LiveCD like he replied. It's about the only reason I haven't tried Gentoo yet. But now I'll have to look around for the LiveCD. Thanks...

  2. oui oui! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you bring the bottle of wine, I'll bring the bag of...

  3. At least you get a screen. by bad+enema · · Score: 0, Troll

    I tried getting Linux to work and I ran out of intelligence.

    1. Re:At least you get a screen. by kfg · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you at least have the wisdom to admit it, even if in jest, suggesting that there's still hope for you.

      KFG

  4. BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can imagine the shit in the pants of a neophyte who sees "kernel panic" on their screen.

    1. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Better "kernel panic" than "printer on fire".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got one of those printer on fire messages before. I think it was because the printer cable wasn't pushed on all the way. Anyways, I was glad to have the kernel source handy to figure out why might have caused the error. With Windows, it'd just print out garbage characters on the paper or something.

    3. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't plug in a printer cable all the way, what the fuck are you doing (seriously) with the kernal source? You seem too stupid to live.

    4. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

      Yeah what the hell is Kernal Panic anyway that freaks me out. Makes me Panic.

    5. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by gentoo_is_hyped · · Score: 1

      " I can imagine the shit in the pants of a neophyte who sees "kernel panic" on their screen. " Uninformed FUD. I have not seen a kernel panic on a Linux PC in many years. More often than not used to be caused by immature reverse engineered hardware drivers but has much improved now.

      --
      [Gentoo is hyped. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion]
    6. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      And when is the last time you saw a BSOD on XP? Calling references to kernel panics FUD is as ridiculous as keeping up the BSOD jokes with recent versions of Windows.

    7. Re:BSOD isn't *that* unfriendly... by gentoo_is_hyped · · Score: 1

      " And when is the last time you saw a BSOD on XP? " Just prior to replacing it with Linux actualy... six months ago. Despite Monopol$oft'sclaims I have personally found XP to be far more fragile than Linux. I choose Redhat/Fedora Linux on my PC & Yellowdog Linux on my old clamshell iBook.

      --
      [Gentoo is hyped. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion]
  5. Distributions by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm fairly new to regular Linux use, and as such am probably one of those readers for whom his work is intended.

    Lately, I've been trying to get moved over to Linux (from WinXP). But damn near every distribution I've tried to install gives me problems. From SuSE to Knoppix (installed, not live) I cannot get it working. One of the attractions is that it doesn't cost me anything to try out.

    How do you handle the recurring debates over distributions? What would you recommend to someone who wants to try moving to Linux but can't afford to spend countless hours getting it to install - installing Windows XP only takes me 30 minutes and everything works.

    Perhaps some other ./ers could offer their suggestions as well. Sorry if this isn't quite on topic.

    1. Re:Distributions by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      What? You must be doing something wrong. Just see an example of how good Linux installs are here: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=97912&cid=8364 504

      Plus that comment is modded +5 Informative so it must be true!

    2. Re:Distributions by mumkin · · Score: 4, Informative

      How do you handle the recurring debates over distributions? What would you recommend to someone who wants to try moving to Linux but can't afford to spend countless hours getting it to install - installing Windows XP only takes me 30 minutes and everything works.

      I would recommend that you drop into the #forum channel of irc.slashnet.org around 8pm EST this evening and ask Marcel Gagne. :)

    3. Re:Distributions by adamshelley · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Windows XP only takes 30 minutes to install if you never plan on connecting it to a network. Try two-three hours after patching, installing AV, office, firewall etc.

      Typically, when you install a linux distribution, given a typical desktop installtion, you've installed your os, all your apps you need and you can be securely connected to the internet - assuming u've used the latest release of your favorite distribution. This should take an hour roughguesstimate?

      As for your problems getting linux working, what hardware are you using? I can see ye' olde hardware being tough to get going but linux pretty much works out of the box now-a-days. Maybe you need to find a 2.6 distro?

    4. Re:Distributions by chazwurth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Without knowing what kind of problems you're experiencing, the best advice I can offer is that you should find someone in your area who knows what they're doing. If you're even somewhat close to a medium-sized city, there is probably a local Linux user group; try googling for them, they may have a web page. If you have any friends who use Linux, ask them for help I've found that many Linux users are happy to help someone else who's just starting out.

      If that doesn't work out for you, try the IRC channel for whichever distribution you're trying to install and having problems with.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    5. Re:Distributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If everything works with XP, why are you switching?

    6. Re:Distributions by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sorry, but its damned near impossible to have both ease of installation and flexibility. That said Linux has come a long way. Just to get linux to boot I have to add mmap=640k mmap = 512m mmap = 1023 mmap = 2047

      That just gets me booted, then I have to add more kernel load options to get the network cards to use tcp/ip properly

      Granted my situation is unique, the machine is a quad processor proliant but the situations are real and the person isn't necessarily doing anything wrong. One of the strengths of the linux kernel is that you can pretty well run it on everything. Windows particularly XP has the luxary of being able to install on the latest machines or at least machines that that were made in the last six years. Its really hard to beat the installer for it simply because it does all the hard work for you.

      I've had times when I had to configure every little detail (Gentoo custom compiled goodness) I've also had times where I installed and everything just worked. (Mandrake 8.2 RH 6.0 to 9.0) Linux is far from being easy to install but then again, if you are installing an OS you would do well to know the OS you are installing.

      From a usability standpoint KDE and Gnome desktops are quite easy to use, mark Firefox icon Internet and most people can get on to check their email or read slashdot just fine.
    7. Re:Distributions by rsklnkv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "...installing Windows XP only takes me 30 minutes and everything works..."
      EVERYTHING? You mean all of notepad and sound recorder and the other three apps that come packaged with XP?

      On a serious note, I haven't had a linux install take me countless hours in years. That's not to say there is no post-install tweaking to be performed, but even windows needs that after an install (new latest-and-greatest drivers, codecs, etc).
      I just installed the latest Suse and had no serious problems. In fact, I was quite surprised to see a little network icon on the desktop with my workgroup autodetected. Pretty sweet. Also pulled up my USB thumdrive, and digital camera without a hitch. I've been using linux for eight years or so, and I think this is the first time I've had every bit of my hardware show up with zero probs, even an external usb hd...

      --
      _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
    8. Re:Distributions by kfg · · Score: 1

      If everything works with XP, why are you switching?

      An innate preference for the Open Source philosophy and/or a geekly curiosity?

      KFG

    9. Re:Distributions by mm0mm · · Score: 1
      - installing Windows XP only takes me 30 minutes and everything works.
      You must be a very lucky guy. Wait and see what happens when you upgrade your PC with a bran'-spankin-new devices for which XP doesn't have driver available. If you don't have a driver disk and are not connected to the web, you are out of luck.

      Quite honestly, I don't find Windows (any version) installation any easier than popular Linux distro installation. This is already a redundant topic on /. To me it takes more than 30 minutes and after installing OS, I have to install all the applications that I would use, and meantime I also have to solve version conflicts, if any. Not to mention, er, how many reboots do I need to do??? Windows installation is a pure pain in the ass.

      From SuSE to Knoppix (installed, not live) I cannot get it working.
      SuSE's FTP installation takes a while. If you enter FTP domain name instead of IP address, it won't work. Though I use SuSE and I love it, you might want to try Mand---e (formerly known as Mandrake) first. If it still doesn't work, go check out Installfest held by Linux user groups in your country.
    10. Re:Distributions by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Most debates about distributions don't amount to much anyway, so they are handled quite nicely. You're doing the right thing by trying out a few different ones, but you can save some time by avoiding any of the ones that sound too "exotic".

      Using one distribution versus another won't have a day or night impact on your use of Linux until you get into the portions where the various flavors differ. On excellent example of this is in administration. The average user usually does very little administration, but it often becomes more important over time, and Linux is no exception. Learning one distrobution's administration often will leave you in the dark about another's. If you dig deep enough it often will become the same, but when you dig that deep, you're probably not using your distrobutions administration packages anymore anyway.

      When in doubt, remember that the larger and more active distrobutions often have more people in your exact situation who may advertise thier soultion to a similiar problem on the internet.

    11. Re:Distributions by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      KFG: A little of both. Plus, XP isn't working perfectly (on any machine I've tried). I've switched to OpenOffice.org, Thunderbird and have tried GIMP. I like the philosophy, the price and the fact that sometimes I can screw around with the code myself to get it to do stuff I want (without having to wait for MS to do it for me).

      This weekend I tried SuSE - installing using a "newbie install guide" I found posted on Slashdot. Plenty of instructions for installing via FTP network install. Wait! It doesn't recognize my network card. So I try to activate those modules. What parameters - not a clue. My card isn't listed so I use the closest one. Not working. Tried EVERY network card they have listed, but none worked. I will look further tonight, but I spent almost two hours trying to install it Saturday and was getting pretty frustrated.

      On my home network, XP installs in 30 minutes and the default network settings are correct for my setup (inside a Linksys 802.11b router).

      Mostly, I want to find a decent distro that is free, reliable and has support for my existing hardware. If SuSE isn't for me (and it doesn't sound like it is) then I'm willing to try others.

      My main complaint is about the vast number of distributions that are obviously just different flavors of the same thing. There aren't enough differences to justify a whole new distribution (I looked through several hundred on a couple of different sites before picking a mainstream one).

    12. Re:Distributions by kfg · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd be among those that claim that XP doesn't work as designed, i.e. when it's working perfectly it isn't working by my definition of "working."

      That doesn't mean I don't use Windows, just that I have declined to upgrade and don't intend to do so except under some form of compulsion, which I feel free to resent.

      As per my other post I'd recommend Mandrake, and I'm sure you'll find that dozens of other like recommendations appear under this article.

      My experience is that it installs fast, clean and with networking up, running and configured on almost anything and it's what I always use these days when I'm introducing Linux to someone.

      I don't have personal experience with installing it with Linksys wireless gear, but it certainly goes without a hitch on my Linksys NIC and ethernet router.

      KFG

    13. Re:Distributions by NtroP · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Although I use RedHat/Fedora almost exclusively my primary desktop OS at work (as a Systems Administrator of a large Windows/Linux/Mac network), I'd recommend ARK Linux for drop-dead simple installation and good beginner experience. I have to admit, the one-click install is pretty impressive. As you get more familiar with Linux you will probably look forward to "tweaking" the install and compiling your own kernels, etc. and may want to look at some of the "better known"/"mature" distros, but the pollished install and interface of Ark Linux is something I'd feel comfortable recommending to my Mom.

      This is the most solid "Alpha" version of any OS I've seen. As always, YMMV depending on the type of hardware you run, but I've seen it install flawlessly on both Dells (Optiplex) and IBMs (300pls, etc). If you are installing it on a laptop you may run into some problems, as laptop hardware can be a bit odd at the best of times and finding Linux drivers for newer laptop hardware can be a challenge with ANY distro.

      The debate over which flavor or distro to use depends heavily on what you're used to IMO. Although there are sure to be plenty of people out there who will point out specific instances where "Dist A is better because FOO", I've rarely seen one distibution NOT be able to do something another can with a little tweaking and perhaps some re-compiling. People tend to stick with what they know and will argue vehemently for it, to the exclusion of all else. I "know" RedHat Linux and as such, if I'm going to set up a workstation or server to do something I've already done, I'll tend use and recommend it. That doesn't mean that Mandrake, SuSe, Debian, or even OS X can't do it just as well. Each has their strengths and weaknesses based on many factors including choice of installer software, package manager, default driver-selection, default desktop/window-manager, etc. but just because the choices for the default install may be best for a given situation doesn't mean that another distro can't be made to work just as well.

      Unfortunately, at this point in the game, running Linux as a primary desktop entails some extra learning and frustration. However, as someone who has moved completely off Windows, I can say that the discomfort is well worth it in the long run and the knowledge gained in the process will serve you well.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    14. Re:Distributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you enter FTP domain name instead of IP address, it won't work.

      How come it works flawlessly when I enter a domain name then? (even decently fast on a 10 Mbit/s connection)
      ... ah well, you probably won't listen to me anyway as I'm too lazy to create an account and thus posts as AC.

    15. Re:Distributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I just spent the weekend installing XP on my laptop, 2 days of installing, crash, uncompleted installation due to not recognizing the usb cd-rom drive in mid-installation and reinstalling. Then came the "security update, reboot, goto security update" time, followd by the "install updated drivers, reboot, goto install updated driver" ... still have to install all the aps.

      Next was Linux, up and running in 2h, with all the aps and updates, and with only 2 reboot. I usually spend more time installing Windows than Linux, maybe it's just me...

    16. Re:Distributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... ah well, you probably won't listen to me anyway as I'm too lazy to create an account and thus posts as AC.

      Here, AC... I'll listen to you... You cute little furry... Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!! You BIT me!

      You jerk AC, you drew blood, too! Fuck you! Hope no one EVER listens to you! Fucker!

    17. Re:Distributions by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      If you try to install some new hardware and XP doesnt have the driver, you are in the same position as you are with Linux. Except with XP you are pretty much garunteed the driver actually exists. Furthermore I reinstalled XP about a week ago, and it took a total of two reboots. Once to install the OS, once after I ran windows update. Here's a hint, just because an installer tells you to reboot doesnt generally mean you have to. I had a fully functional, secure, updated system in under 2 hours. Including DL time for updates. Most of that is in custom configuring various parts of the install. At school I've done default XP reinstalls in under 15 minutes (copying the cd to the hard drive in advance helps). Linux has a lot going for it, but modern versions of Windows has installing pretty much down.

    18. Re:Distributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, with Windows 2003 my Dell PC's onboard sound card isn't supported :( It's a Dell Dimension 4550.

      Works fine in Linux.

    19. Re:Distributions by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

      I am a Windows user myself but I recently installed Debian and have been doing alright with it. I have tried Mandrake it worked alright. And I tried older versions fo Redhat so far I have to say that Debain is by far my favorite.

    20. Re:Distributions by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      I'm intrigued, because in my experience, network card support is pretty good. (It's harder to sell network cards without Linux support than it is to sell, say, Winmodems.) Please reply, or email if you prefer, everything you know about your network card. Maybe I can make sense of it.

    21. Re:Distributions by gentoo_is_hyped · · Score: 1

      Try Fedora - lots of thrid part supprt in english. Better yet grab Mepis - run it as a CD based live distro or install to HDD in minutes. Both good choices. Before going Linux check your Hardware compatibility. (It is still the case that hardware vendors lazily only support Monopol$oft in the majority of cases but is steadily improving)

      --
      [Gentoo is hyped. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion]
    22. Re:Distributions by Lew+Pitcher · · Score: 1

      Well, Marcel has his favourite distros, but "KTBSODG" uses a variant of Knoppix. For the most part, the book stays away from distro-specific requirements, and concentrates on a specific GUI (KDE).

      --

      "values of beta will give rise to dom!"

    23. Re:Distributions by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1


      Did you check to see if this network card is on SuSE's supported hardware list? Most major distros publish a list of hardware they support out of the box.

    24. Re:Distributions by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the offer, but I'm downloading Mandrake ISOs. I'm sure I would have had no problem with SuSE once it was installed, but I couldn't get my network card running and thus the network install was not possible.

      I hate being a newbie again.

  6. installation screen of torture? by freerecords · · Score: 5, Insightful

    no... you obviously haven't had a go at installing any of the "user friendly" distros anytime in the last oooo ummm 4 years? Redhat/Fedora has a great installer which is so easy to use.. but by far the winner has to be Mandrake whose isntallation makes Windows look like Slackware 4.0.. Linux is ready for the desktop - the desktop just isn't ready for linux.

    --
    tim
    1. Re:installation screen of torture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the gratuitous dig at Slackware? Many users prefer its simplicity to Mandrake's hand holding.

    2. Re:installation screen of torture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mandrake whose isntallation makes Windows look like Slackware 4.0.

      You insensitive clod! I still run Slackware 2.1! (Actually it's a light install that's fine for 486s with small HDs that are kept far from the Internet.)

    3. Re:installation screen of torture? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      While I agree that installing linux has gotten a lot easier with Mandrake (or even Redhat), it's still far from being as simple as a Windows install. Non linux users don't know what window manager they should pick, what packages they really do need (nothing has a simple name... it's like reading a novel when doing an install), or what sizes their partitions need to be. Granted they have default settings, but I think someone needs to come out with a distro that takes it all down to the basics: 1 window manager, 1 partition setup, and 1 set of common apps. If people need more, give them an easy way of installing new packages... one with a nice GUI that doesn't require additional configuration (see Add/Remove Windows Components for a good example). Windows still has an edge on linux for installation... hopefully linux can continue to get better.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    4. Re:installation screen of torture? by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you haven't installed Windows in the last ooooo ummmm 4 years? Its been almost six years now since I've had to stick a Windows cd in and actually type anything to get an install. Granted if I want to customize it even further then I would not do an unattended install but these are options that pretty much every OS has in the last ten years.

      Plus, does it really matter about the installer? I mean if you are installing an OS should you not know how to configured and operate the OS already? If that's the case then a hard installer is no problem like in my opinion the Gentoo installers.

      If you are going to mention Linux and a desktop in the same sentence leave out the installation details as they don't matter. Instead concentrate on KDE and Gnome and the long way they've come towards making it a really user friendly experience despite the often buggy components its built on.
    5. Re:installation screen of torture? by Lussarn · · Score: 1


      see Add/Remove Windows Components for a good example


      You can only install a few MS apps there (Of which most just add/remove an icon). Not a very good example.

  7. I like by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 1

    His wine choices at the beginning if his articles!

    --

    --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
  8. The Blue Screen of Death by FreakOfTheWeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I honestly don't remember the last time that I or anyone I know had a blue screen of death with windows 2000 or windows XP. It's time to stop complaining about the stability of windows.

    There are plenty of other things to focus on (for example: security, closed standards, cost, etc.)

    I am not saying that the current windows operating systems are the pinnacle of stability, but for most purposes, they are definitely good enough.

    1. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by papadiablo · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't remember the last time that I or anyone I know had a blue screen of death with windows 2000 or windows XP. It's time to stop complaining about the stability of windows.

      I can remember, though i must say it does happen much less often than in Windows 98. Windows 98 was terrible, you couldn't use it for more than a day without it blue screening on you. XP and 2000 it happens more like once a month, if that often. But it does happen.

    2. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by curtisk · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have seen some recently on winXP pro and they actually were due to hardware issues, so yeah they still exist, but nothing like their glory days of the win9x series. Beating the "BSOD" joke to death is old hat and really not current for a current book.

      OTOH, my new book "Saying goodbye to Exception Errors and emm386 by moving to Linux" should be on bookshelves soon.

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    3. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      the blue screen has been replaced with a much friendlier technology. spontanius reboot. no blue screen, no newbie wondering which keys to press, no hassle, just a machine doing a reboot and will be finished booting in a few minutes to let you get back to work.

    4. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a link to back it up with.

      http://www.activewin.com/winxp/tips/basic/20.sht ml

    5. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by westlake · · Score: 1
      I honestly don't remember the last time that I or anyone I know had a blue screen of death with windows 2000 or windows XP.

      It's been a year for me.
      Microsoft's crash analysis diagnosing the problem quickly and correctly as a USB driver, in language you didn't need to be a techno geek to understand.

    6. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you BSOD on 2000/XP, you either have fauly drivers/hardware, or you are a complete moron.

      I never had a BSOD in 4 years, using W2K. My wife's laptop BSODed all the time using XP because the motherboard was faulty (it would always be HOT to the touch after 5 minutes) the manufacturer replaced the laptop, no more BSOD.

      Disclaimer: I use OpenBSD on any machines exposed to the Internet, FreeBSD on servers and 2000/XP/FreeBSD on desktops.

    7. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      just a machine doing a reboot and will be finished booting in a few minutes

      more like blink an eye and you will be back in business

    8. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly don't remember the last time that I or anyone I know had a blue screen of death with windows 2000 or windows XP. It's time to stop complaining about the stability of windows.

      on XP, no, me neither. I haven't seen BSoD for a while. But I still have to use Ctrl+Alt+Del key to kill the apps that halted, leaving a white (blank) window in the screen. From my experience I still have to use Ctrl+Alt+Del as often as with Win9x. I am not saying this is a WIndows' issue, but more of application issues, but it's annoying to see Windows media player halting in the middle of playing a movie. I mean, I thought MediaPlayer is from Microsoft, isn't it?
    9. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have about 600 w2k servers in our data center, and we still have problems now and then. Naturally most of the problems are traced to hardware, but we did have one particularly difficult exception. We had a corrupt NTFS partition which would crash ntfs.sys. chkdsk fixed it, but we had to install w2k on a FAT partition and rename ntfs.sys before we could get a machine to boot with the corrupted drive attached.

      You're right that things are much better, but the fundamental opacity of Windows (ha ha) is still one of its biggest problems.

    10. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by weakethics · · Score: 1

      We see Blue Screens on Win2K daily, related to the Netware client. You can blame Novell, but a poorly written app shouldn't be able to hose your system.

      --
      "I like to play with things a while... before annihilation!" Ming the Merciless
    11. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by SteelX · · Score: 1
      more like blink an eye and you will be back in business

      ...after losing that critical report which you were writing at 4am in the morning.

    12. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But I still have to use Ctrl+Alt+Del key to kill the apps that halted, leaving a white (blank) window in the screen.

      Task manager's kill is not satisfactory to me. If you have kill.exe (MS's command-line process killer), use that instead. A simple kill -f "Window title" should cleanly stop a process. If you don't have the program (WinXP Home doesn't) it comes standard with the Debugging tools package.

    13. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Windows no longer gives BSOD. It will reboot if it encounters a critical error. While I haven't seen a BSOD in forever, I have "clicked my way into the bios" a few times. Albeit, mostly when playing a game.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    14. Re:The Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...after losing that critical report which you were writing at 4am in the morning.

      MS Word makes periodic backups while in use. Look for the filename ending with ~

  9. Book is good... by neiffer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Linux System Administration: A User's Guide" was one of my first Linux books. It was fairly informative and very easy to read. Now, mind you, I'm still addicted to Windows, but I thought that he had a very realistic slant on the strengths and weaknesses of various Linux options.

  10. Linux Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    His first book was the acclaimed Linux System Administration: A User's Guide.
    "Linux Users: A System Administrator's Guide" would be more acclaimed.
  11. Have you tried Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Mandrake is absolutely THE easiest to install, and works on almost all platforms (Laptop compatibility rocks!). Give it a roll!

  12. Please! by msimm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make him stop using the CORNY FRENCH shtick. It make interesting articles unbearable. French is a beautiful language, but Marcel's French waiter doesn't belong in my firewall configuration article.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Please! by TheTomcat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      French is a beautiful language

      I see you've never been to Quebec... or the Acadian areas of New Brunswick.

      (-:

      S

    2. Re:Please! by dbc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed!! That stuff drives me nuts. At first, I tried to slog through his crap to find out what he was trying to say, but that French chef schtick just got in the way. Pretty quickly, I just started completely ignoring his columns. Then I dropped the magazine. It was an easy decision... which of two Linux magazines do I want to continue paying for? Easy: shit-can the FRENCH CHEF magazine.

      Hrumph.

    3. Re:Please! by msimm · · Score: 1

      Its too bad too, LJ is a really good journal and his articles are informative. But I can't read more then two lines myself before I become angry and lose patience. If I where reading comedy, maybe...but I like to keep my technical reading clear and comprehensible.

      Good to know I'm not alone on this (my wife thought I was nuts grumbling under my breath..lol)!

      --
      Quack, quack.
    4. Re:Please! by AbraCadaver · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with parent on this - I've gotten some pretty damn usefull information from his articles, but crap, throwing french phrases in the article willy-nilly is just annoying. You don't know how many times I wish I could do a search-and-replace on paper just so I could place all the french sillyness with " "!

    5. Re:Please! by jregel · · Score: 1

      What had the potential to be the most interesting column (for me) actually had the reverse effect because the irritating French comments just made me fume.

      It made me stop subscribing to the Linux Journal.

    6. Re:Please! by Lew+Pitcher · · Score: 1

      You might not have noticed, but Marcel Gagne is a Canadian of French descent (i.e. French Canadian). The brand of franglais that Marcel writes in his articles is both humourous and representative of the sort of English language you might find in English-speaking Quebec, French-speaking New Brunswick, and French-speaking northern Ontario.

      I, for one, appreciate Marcel's humour and language. I told him so when I reviewed his first book for Addison-Wesley Longman.

      --

      "values of beta will give rise to dom!"

    7. Re:Please! by msimm · · Score: 1

      If this was a humor column I would have just written it off as not my style and moved on. The trouble is this is a technical column. *shrug*

      I guess he would have his admirers but I'd appreciate his articles a whole lot more without the cutesy. For me it shoots straight past painful into new, uncharted territory.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    8. Re:Please! by loginx · · Score: 1

      That's also his style.

      It may not be very compatible with everyone but it's pretty easy to disregard the comments and focus on the point of the article...

      Also, you make it sound in your previous comment as if everyone should unsubscribe from LJ because of those articles, though it had been voted the best column by LJ subscribers over 2 years in a row IIRC...

      That aside, the comments don't bother me at all but I can see how someone could get annoyed with them.

    9. Re:Please! by msimm · · Score: 1

      Also, you make it sound in your previous comment as if everyone should unsubscribe from LJ because of those articles

      Your probably refering to one of the other comments attached to mine. I read LJ myself, I also have a lot of respect for the editor Don Marti and although I do find it dissapointing because I can not 'disregard the comments and focus on the point of the article' I would not let that stop me from enjoying the rest of the magazine.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  13. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was spammed about this on Orkut. That, in itself, has put me off it.

  14. Not just for the desktop anymore... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently upgraded some servers to Win Server 2003 and it's very quick, but I'm pretty sure it flashes the BSoD every other time I reboot. I'm going to hook it up to a VCR to check it out, because it's too short to notice anything but the color of the screen and writing. It's just eery...

    1. Re:Not just for the desktop anymore... by Brando_Calrisean · · Score: 1

      You know, you can change that behavior. I can't tell you where, but there's an option to disable the reboot that occurs on a BSOD. It also logs that text somewhere. Sorry I can't offer more precise instructions; I use Linux.

      --
      Don't call me a cowboy, and don't tell me to slow down!
    2. Re:Not just for the desktop anymore... by prator · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Win2003, but, in Win2k, this is under System->Advanced->Startup and Recovery. Turn off Automatic Rebooting.

      -prator

    3. Re:Not just for the desktop anymore... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      a VCR?!?! YIKES! That's not a typical piece of troubleshooting instrumentation.

      What you want to do is prevent Windows from rebooting immediately after your bluescreen. Do this: Go into the control panel, and click System Properties. Click the ADVANCED tab, then click the SETTINGS button for STARTUP AND RECOVERY. There you will see a checkbox that is probably checked that says "Automatically Restart". Uncheck it.

      Not that we all wouldn't like to see a video of your server crashing...

    4. Re:Not just for the desktop anymore... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's during the boot, the screen flashes up and there's no crash or anything input into the event log. The behavior is simply baffling.

      The video would just be for entertainment purposes, because other than that screen, the server's fine.

  15. What people should say to interested users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Of windows is that with linux, you actually can figure out what went wrong, when something goes wrong. You have extensive logs, all the configs are right there in front of you.

    I hate windows now, after using linux. Windows is like the stereotypical woman. You never know what's really wrong with it, and you have to keep on trying different fiddling games. Then suddenly, it will start working fine again.

    I do NOT want something that is as mystical and mysterious as windows when I need to get something done. Thank god I've got linux, which just works (And if it doesn't, I can figure out why it doesn't...)

    All metaphors aside, I still think the registry and drivers system of windows (especially XP) is one of the most mysterious and confusing arrangements I've ever seen.

    1. Re:What people should say to interested users... by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Troll

      How do you figure that?

      Whoopty damn doo, the source is available to me.

      However, any documentation I'm lucky enough to find is years out of date. The CUPS manual is basically a longwinded treatise about reading the manual, for instance. Absolutely no information in there to help you get your printer working.

      Do I really want to pore through millions of lines of source code to figure out why I can't get a particular machine to join a SAMBA controlled domain? Or start debugging ghostscript to figure out why everything I print heads to the printer with no margins (and thusly always crops a half inch out all the way around?)

      There's plenty of stuff on any OSS/linux/gnu/whatever box I've seen that just plain doesn't work. And there are many folks with real jobs for whom "here's the sourcecode, figure it out yer own fucking self!" just doesn't cut it.

      That said, how is the windows registry any more confusing than the tangled mess of bullshit in your average /etc folder, complete with cryptic names, inetd.conf? what the fuck is an inetd.conf for?

      And I also much prefer user-installable drivers than having to compile all hardware support into the monolithic kernel.

      The impetus behind linux is an ideological/philosophical one, not a technical one. It's a screaming pain in the ass to use day to day.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:What people should say to interested users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Windows is the stereotypical woman, then linux is the stereotypical nigger.

      It's worthless and I can't get it to do any fucking work.

    3. Re:What people should say to interested users... by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      My guess is that you really have a hard time understanding women then since there are always signs that say what is wrong.

      Surprise surprise this is just like Windows except you never learned to get such information. You have logs that are just as extensive in Windows if you choose both to activate them and read them. In Windows I can dump all tcp/ip traffic to a text file or database just like I can with Linux, Netware, or BeOS. Its all about knowing what tools are available to you rather than just assuming they don't exist because people don't have the complete source code. The fact is there are plenty of API's that allow for most any task to be performed.

      When it comes to the registry you must be smoking something. Its hierarchical! Categorized nicely, most any experienced Windows Admin can mull through the registry and change whatever they need when they need to, then they can push the change out to all their Windows boxes if it is necessary.

      Seriously, if you want to bash Windows do it on merit like security, there are valid arguments there.

    4. Re:What people should say to interested users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, you don't have to. People like me like to know these things. Then I'll post a step-by-step guide for everyone else.

  16. The logs will be at slashnet.org by chmod_localhost · · Score: 5, Informative

    For some reason, nobody ever bothers to mention where the logs of the Slashdot IRC forums get posted. After the IRC interview with CmdrTaco and Hemos a few months ago, it took me some digging to figure out where the log wound up.

    For those who can't make the chat, the log will eventually be at http://www.slashnet.org/forums/

    Editors: After the chat is over, any chance of having the log URL linked to the story text as an update?

  17. This is OT.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    Linux is ready for the desktop - the desktop just isn't ready for linux.

    I've got 2 Linux boxes at home (no Windows partitions). I'd have to disagree though. Until Windows users know what emacs is or why some application binaries go under /usr/bin versus some /usr/local/bin or that documentation will be found under /usr/share/doc (or /usr/local/share/doc) and how to correct symbolic links pointing to outdate lib files I don't think its ready.

    The way I'm seeing it now is Linux is two distict operating systems: desktop user system and POSIX *nix server. To truely be ready for the desktop we are going to have to cut out some of the cruft (at least for default) and thats going to REALLY piss some people off.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:This is OT.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      or why some application binaries go under /usr/bin versus some /usr/local/bin

      Explain.

    2. Re:This is OT.. by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      This is a fine point about Linux. Since its inception its been trying to be both a desktop and a server and ironically this is a big complaint the Linux community has with Windows!

      I agree there needs to be seperation. An administrator is quite capable of running man woman while the average user needs to be able to just click an icon and get exactly what he or she wants. I've seen this done with BeOS, Windows, and Lycoris. All three are great desktop OS's in my opinion. Cut out the stuff you don't need and add the stuff to make it more usable.

      It appears at though Red Hat has begun to take this approach since Fedora split and now you have Advanced Server and Fedora for OS's from them. Great step in the right direction I think.
    3. Re:This is OT.. by msimm · · Score: 1

      System binaries go into /usr/bin and user installed binaries go into /usr/local/*. The idea being that if you need to back up your system you can back up /usr/local/* and get any extra software you installed, leaving the system software (which can be reinstalled with the system disk) in /usr/bin. Its good for servers (but not necessarily a good ease of use versus usefulness trade off).

      --
      Quack, quack.
  18. lose the faux frency accent, marcel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quit reading his LJ article because of his annoying Quebequa (I think he's Candian) phrases like 'mon ami'. Either write in French or English, please... I beg you.

    1. Re:lose the faux frency accent, marcel by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      Funnnily enough I quit reading LJ because of the annoying americanisms :-)

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
  19. True enough. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I was joking around, but I got modded troll - twice.

    And when I'm being serious I get modded 5-Funny.

    There was a point in my original post, not one that hasn't been repeated a million times over, but I find that the only people who enjoy Linux are the ones who like a challenge getting stuff to work. Personally I'll stick with my BSoD, at least there is the "restart" button.

  20. Mon ennemi by g1zmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is he going to keep up the annoying French persona, having his stuffed penguin fetch obscure bottles of wine for the readers? It's a failed bit, in my opinion.

    --
    I have found there are just two ways to go.
    It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
    -REK, Jr.
    1. Re:Mon ennemi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amen, g1zmo. Mod me -1 Redundant

      The fake French chef bit was humorous the first time I read Linux Journal, but after 12 issues, it's too much of the same bad joke. Get a new schtick Marcel!

    2. Re:Mon ennemi by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      They might be obscure to Jolt Cola swigging weenies, but to those of us who appreciate the finer things in life Marcel keeps a very good cellar. I just wish he would serve some cheese with it some time. You know real stuff like Reblochon, Ponte l'Avec or my favourite Coeur de Neufchatel :-)

      BTW I think that being french-canadian he's sort of stuck with his "french persona"

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    3. Re:Mon ennemi by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Ah, the spirit of Slashdot. I'm glad you judged me to be a "Jolt-swigging weenie" who has no idea of the "finer things" of life, with absolutely no basis for such a characterization. But you're absolutely right. I've no idea what the difference is between the wines (I assume those are wines) that you listed. That's just not my bag. I'm sure I have knowledge of things that you know nothing about, and don't really care about, but I wouldn't ever try to imply that you're second-class because you don't appreciate the same things I do. Diff'rent strokes and all...

      And I'm Texan, but I don't mosey around, annoying people with an exaggerated fake John Wayne impersonation, calling women "little lady" and shouting out "yeehaw". If I did, you would be just as beaten down as I am when I read Gagne's column.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  21. Slackware by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Contrary to popular belief slackware is quite simple to install and get working as long as you don't mind using text-mode menus to install. However, with Linux, you only install once. If yo know what a disk partition is, then that's about as technical as you need to get these days to install Slackware. It's also comprehensive without being bloated, very unfussy about hardware, very up-to-date and un-"dumbed down" unlike Fedora (previously Red Hat).

    I am biased. I've been using Slackware since 1995. I've tried Debian, SuSE, Red Hat and certain commercial UNIXes. When it comes to my own personal machine, Slackware is never beaten.

    1. Re:Slackware by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

      Slack kicks ass. Check out the benchmarking I did (link in .sig). No comparison that it's arguably the best distribution of Linux available--if you're willing to be patient a bit. Gentoo isn't bad either, but I got tired of taking a week to configure each install.

    2. Re:Slackware by gentoo_is_hyped · · Score: 1

      Telling a newbie to start with slack is just plain sadistic.

      --
      [Gentoo is hyped. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion]
    3. Re:Slackware by turgid · · Score: 1

      I was a newbie when I started with Slackware back in 1995.

  22. Will the new book INCLUDE a distribution? by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see some commentary about the difficulty of installing Linux. If this book is for the average Windows user, then it needs to include some Linux distro that is practically guaranteed to install with no hassle (or at least no hassles not described in the book!).
    If THAT can be accomplished, then Microsoft can start kissing itself goodbye.

    1. Re:Will the new book INCLUDE a distribution? by Broken_Windows · · Score: 1

      It includes a slightly modified version of knoppix on cd.

  23. Cooking With Linux? by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought they already had toasters that run linux. Or is he talking about high-end machines, like ovens?

  24. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That comment deserves at least a 3 score.

  25. In the immortal words of ESPN's SportsCenter... by numbski · · Score: 0

    Quick! What words rhymes with Gagne!?!?!?

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  26. Linux needs more Marcels by embill · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my opinion, Marcel provides an intelligent, readable, and most importantly FUN introduction to Linux. A first line of support for many Linux newbie's is their local LUG mailing list where more often than not (but not always) they're berated by the local alphageeks for asking a question that's been answered 100 times previously on the list or in scads of documentation. Unfortunately, newbies just want things to work, they don't want to know how it works. These types of responses usually result in their retreat back to the safety of Windows. Whether we like it or not, the latter situation is only going to increase, as more and more users migrate to Linux. Marcel's book stands as an excellent resource for anyone newbie's who don't mind doing a little reading. And for those who don't, Marcel offers both a mailing list and an IRC channel (#wftl on server: www.marcelgagne.com) for painless, alphageek free help.

    1. Re:Linux needs more Marcels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux needs more Marcel Marceaus.

      A lot of you assholes just need to shut the fuck up.

  27. I don't think so.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    then it needs to include some Linux distro that is practically guaranteed to install with no hassle (or at least no hassles not described in the book!). If THAT can be accomplished, then Microsoft can start kissing itself goodbye.

    There is a hell of a lot more to a good distro then the install process. Linux has excelled well beyond Windows in this regard already. Take my personal favorite: Mandrake. Not only does it look good installing, but it will configure and install most of your drivers in less then 10 minutes. But that doesn't make it time to kiss Microsoft goodbye. There are a lot of areas that still need work (configuration suites/desktop integration/filesystem layout/rational system application naming/menus).

    Not to rain on anyone's parade, but we need to look at this pragmatically if we would like this to succeed.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  28. French waiter by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

    Somebody had to say it - thank you. That shit's NOT FUNNY! It's annoying as hell! And it's pissing off the French! Just tell me about compiling the kernel module for my toaster, or whataver the article is supposed to be about that week. If I want uninspired ethnic humor I'll go down to the bar.

  29. Bon Jour! by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 1

    Je m'appelle Marcel. Stop zee Weendows from eenvading your computer, just like we (oui?) wanted zee Americans to not eenvade Iraq. Bah, we (oui?) French no notheeng of, how do you say..."warfare." I weel help you zees time. But if you eenvade another countree (Mon Dieux, not France AGAIN), I weel veeto your Leenux installation, just like we (oui?) veetoed your UN rezolution.

    Puns intended!

    --
    Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
    1. Re:Bon Jour! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very clever, fucktard

    2. Re:Bon Jour! by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      I don't recall Canada vetoing any UN resolution on Iraq. Enlighten us please

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
  30. That's pretty cool and all... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    ...but I want to know when we get a forum with anime fanfic writer Stephen Gagne. :)

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  31. Mandrake has live cd too! by Azureflare · · Score: 1

    Not just knoppix. So if you're concerned about mandrake compatibility with your system, download the MandrakeMove cd (bittorrent or the download page) and try it out on your machine!

  32. Re:Distributions for the Clueless by The-Dalai-LLama · · Score: 1

    I gather that, given enough time, most /.ers could write working binaries with nothing but a pencil, some paper, and a case of Jolt cola, but I guess this is the place for my first post: an old thread where my almost-complete ignorance works in my favor. Mod me redundant, but if there are any other newbies reading this, let me second NtroP's recommendation of Arklinux.

    Other than Knoppix, ARKlinux is the only distro I've ever tried*. It has installed smoothly on both of my machines (a Compaq laptop and a home-baked system built around a 1.2G Athlon), using an interface that makes installation easy for newbs. It can either be installed by itself (be careful - this option overwrites your drives), or it can be installed parallel to an existing OS using unpartitioned disk space (it co-exists with Win98 nicely on my machine) or space that it clears for itself (if I'm understanding correctly, and I'm really not a reliable source). It's still in Alpha stages, so I wouldn't recommend trying to put it on the machine that has the only existing copy of your almost-finished doctoral thesis, but it's easy enough and stable enough that I've switched to it completely as my home OS.

    If you're a newb looking to get your feet wet, have the obligatory one-night stand with Knoppix and then give Ark a try. YMMV, but I have nothing but good things to say about it (and I am a reliable source by virtue of my cluelessness).

    The Dalai Llama

    * Ok, there was that time I tried to use BasicLinux on a 286 laptop and learned the hard way that, unlike Windows, anything saved in the "temp" directory goes away when you cut the power. That doesn't count.

  33. I KISS YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. About 3 hours by October_30th · · Score: 1
    It was my first Gentoo installation ever and it took a bit over 3 hours - including the half an hour I spent trying to figure out why the Gentoo LiveCD kernel panicked upon boot. If anyone else is wondering about the same, just switch off the autoprobe and load the necessary modules manually. After that the installation was a breeze.

    The machine is a dual Opteron 240, 2 GB of DDR333 and two 15K SCSI-drives controlled by the on-board 133 MHz PCI-X U320 controller.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  35. Speak for yourself. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I find tres dificile the technical stuff, so I get real joy de vivre every time I read Monsieur Gagne's articles in le magazin.

    But there are some people around here that take life tres seriouse and would jump to the Seine from the Eiffel Tower beacuse a fly flies close by.

    Ces't la vie I suppose.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.