Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Mail Worms Gang War?
cuzality writes "The media is now beginning to suggest that this recent onslaught of new viruses (with new versions of major-impact viruses being found daily) the result of a virus gang turf war, kinda like the India/Pakistan virus conflict, in which official Pakistani sites were savaged by such infamous groups as Indian Snakes and Indian Hackers Club. The gangs are shooting fast and loose: variations of the big ones are being discovered daily (as of March 4, we are up to MyDoom.H, Netsky.F, and Beagle.K), and in the space of three hours on Wednesday morning, five variants of these three were first discovered. Typically these viruses (or more correctly, worms) do little damage to the infected computer, intent mostly on spreading far and wide, and sometimes inflicting DoS on some poor evil empire."
Since Microsoft is in Seattle, this could be a real West Side Story.
Where's the question?
Make even shorter URLs - 8LN.org
MyDoom.F does destroy word, excel, access, jpg, and other files.
SARC
This was a major headache for me the past few weeks. Backup tapes suck. Worms suck harder.
Bored? Why not join a decent mess
"Plenty of letters left in the alphabet" - J. L. Picard
"Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
It was bound to happen, given that more and more worms are written for criminal spammers. And since spammers AND criminals are stupid, they will fight each others.
I mean, seriously, how hard is it to write malicious code if you can get the person to run any program. Heck, here's my virus:
This is NOT hacking... it's taking advantage of stupid people...
Jay | http://oldos.org
Actually, the evil empire isn't all that poor; it's got several billion dollard in cash. And the poor wannabe empire isn't poor either; apparently it got a $86 million cash injection, thanks to the evil empire.
I'm getting some forged emails lately, badly forged at that, which look like they're coming from my ISP, "warning viruses being sent from your account", "warning immenent suspension", etc. They have a pif file atteched (which I never open) and have been coming from .lt or .gr servers (my ISP would not likely be using these.) Looks to me like another brand of worm on the rounds and there's a morbid sense of humor behind it.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
From the article:
...
Most of the comments tucked inside the latest bugs are brief, unprintable and poorly spelled. "Bagle -- you are a looser!!!" opined the author of the sixth version of Netsky.
Hmmm, where have I seen that misspelling before? Let me think
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
since some of these viruses involve opening back doors, it's a turf war in the sense of who owns more zombie computers, I guess.
What's interesting/annoying is that the latest variants of the Bagle/Beagle virus use password protected encrtypted zip attachments which has caught quite a few mail gateways and virus companies off guard. Our mail gateway (mailscanner/f-prot/spamassassin) was unable to deal with the encrypted zip attachments and passed them on through.
The virus companies better hurry the heck up and come up with a solution. (Looks like ClamAV and Sophos have already done so.)
In the late 1800's in the American west there was a boom in illegal activities (Billy the Kid, Butch and Sundance, etc.). The citizenry had enough and banded together (i.e., paid taxes) to fight back (i.e., hired police). Cyberspace is in the equivalent of the late 1800's in terms of working out who controls what. Now we, the citizenry, must decide if we want to hire the Pinkertons or establish a proper police force. Just remember, the Pinkertons were often as dirty-dealing as the crooks they were after, and the Sheriff was usually a former badguy with a badge.
If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
The only reason anyone writes a virus these days is to do it. Even when there's an added payload (like a DDOS to www.sco.com), the virus is out there solely to be out there. The fact that it's due to rivaling gangs makes perfect sense.
If someone were to write a truly destructive virus (you open it, it sends itself to everyone in your inbox, then promptly writes random data over your hard drive) then we'd really see people start to take viruses seriously.
Even the most "destructive" viruses in recent history have wimped out in some way -- just consider Michelangelo, which was hard-coded to become destructive at a much later date, long after it would be discovered and patches written.
Cretin - a powerful and flexible CD reencoder
...kinda like the India/Pakistan virus conflict, in which official Pakistani sites were savaged by such infamous groups as Indian Snakes and Indian Hackers Club...
Seems like virus writers also got oursourced to India!!
With that in mind, those programmer comments being reported now, although they do seem to show a gang war, may just be more misdirection and once again the media fell for it. If it really is the spammers behind it all, and criminal elements doing it (yeah, I know, "spammers" and "criminal elements" are redundant), this gang war idea may just be more cover.
Meanwhile there are millions of zombie Windows boxes around the world with clueless owners not realizing they are 0wn3d. That's the real story the media should be following up on.
Of Neal Stephenson's thing about how in the future when you go outside you'll have to breathe through a hankerchief, a la 19th-century london, because the air will be filled with millions of malicious nanobots, and millions of helpful nanobots neatly neutralizing the malicious ones, and millions of meta-malicious nanobots that only exist to disable the neutralizers... just one big no-net-effect hacker arms race.
I wonder how long it will be and how much futher adoption of windows server operating systems we'll have to see before internet traffic starts to look like that.
If being the victim of a Microsoft worm is like being caught in the crossfire of a gang war, there's a simple solution: stay out of the line of fire. If you had a choice between one house in a safe neighborhood, and another house of roughly the same price in a neighborhood where bullets from the local crack dealers were coming through your walls at three in the morning, where would you choose to live?
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
Are these really viruses? Only two are actually mass-mailing worms that don't rely on Outlook's address book to send themselves. All of them rely on the user to open and run the malware program. Some of the MyDoom variants I'm seeing don't even make a feeble attempt at social engeering. Apparently most users are just downloading and executing attachments without even thinking. This despite all the warnings and hype surrounding e-mail containing "viruses".
Imagine if e-mail was just plain old ASCII text with no attachment support. *sigh*
Fred
"A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
-RMS
Wouldn't this much virus activity raise the chances of being caught? Pride has been the downfall of a great many "1337 d00dz" who can't seem to avoid bragging about their 5|i77z. Then again, if you did stage such acts, it does nothing for your ego unless people know you did so.
These are not your stealth haxorz, these are the works of script kiddies. But of course everyone here already knew that.
Can anyone recommend a good server-side tool to block viruses and worms? I'm using procmail now with a bunch of handwritten rules, and they work well on a bunch of older viruses, but there are so many new variations now that I can't keep up! On the client side, Bayesian filters (in Mozilla Mail and Apple Mail.app, for example) work reasonably well with spam, but they have a harder time with viruses and worms. It's also more annoying because viruses and worms are so large (30k or 100k, typically) and my local mail client has to download the entire message before filtering it out.
Note that I don't want to just block all messages containing attachments with certain extensions. There are many legitimate reasons for someone to send me a zip file as an attachment.
That's where I think this is all ultimately headed. The spammers are in bed with the virus writers, who have taken the penis enlargement pills as commission. :P
Why don't these "hackers" use their skills to do something productive. With the time and effort they're putting into this programming, they probably could have written some utility software that would have earned them bags of money. But where's the fun in that.
TechTV's The Screen Savers last night suggested that one of the motivations of competitive virus writers is because the anti-virus companies put out rank-order lists such as the one shown on SARC's homepage. Maybe those lists should be discontinued to at least knock down some of the motivation?
Did Microsoft create them? No.
Do they exploit any vulnerability that Microsoft is responsible for creating? No. (They spread by tricking users into running the attached executables.)
I know it's fun to pretend that everything bad is Microsoft's fault (and I'm no fan of Microsoft myself), but come on... how does it make any sense to prefix something with "Microsoft" when Microsoft had absolutely nothing to do with it? What's next? "Microsoft OpenSSL vulnerability discovered"? "Microsoft recording industry sues 12-year-old kid"? "Microsoft PATRIOT act renewed"? "Hacker charged with violating the Microsoft DMCA"?
Allow PDF, GIF, and JPEG at the firewall and in the mail client. That's it.
Microsoft needs to turn off the "feature" that clicking on a mail attachment runs it. It should just be "viewed", with a dumb viewer. It should be impossible to launch programs from mail attachments. Users should have to explictly save to a file and run to do that.
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:03:48 -0800
From: support@xxx.edu
To: me@cc.xxx.edu
Subject: Warning about your e-mail account.
Parts/Attachments:
1 Shown 10 lines Text
2 12 KB Application
Dear user of "xxx.edu" mailing system,
We warn you about some attacks on your e-mail account. Your computer may
contain viruses, in order to keep your computer and e-mail account safe,
please, follow the instructions.
For more information see the attached file.
Cheers,
The xxx.edu team http://www.xxx.edu
[ Part 2, Application/OCTET-STREAM (Name: "Information.pif") 16KB. ]
[ Cannot display this part. Press "V" then "S" to save in a file. ]
------
Pretty *good* social engineering, if you ask me. The other earlier worms did not send customized messages according to the domain. I had to stop a couple of family/friends from giving in and opening the attachment.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
This is only a Microsoft worm/virus/trojan in the sense that it runs a Windows exe. This is NOT a failing with Outlook or Outlook Express. This code can be run from ANY client that allows attachments
[paraphrased email text below]
"Hi, I'm the admin from [YourEmailServer]. We've been getting complaints about your account, and we think you have a virus. Please open the attachment, and run the file. Password is 12345
Cheers, [YourEmailServer]
Haven't we been asking the ISP's to get on top of the virus problem? Well...here comes an email, supposedly doing just that!
"We think you have a problem, and here's how to fix it"
This exact same thing could have been targeted to the OSX environment, or a *nix script.
"Hi, due to the traffic we've noticed, we think your Mac/Linux box has been compromised. Please run this script to identify and fix the problem."
Now...most *nix users are a bit more clueful and suspicious. But, more than a few would be caught out.
(and if you, the writer(s) of these things are out there reading this...this is NOT a compliment. You are not cute, nor are you inventive. You are merely a fool. And one that will be caught. Hopefully for you, by the authorities. They will be much easier on you than we will be...we won't be using vaseline)
A question, what is it?
It's an interrogative statement used to test knowledge, but that's not important right now.
Seriously guys, who moderated this up? The latest round of worms take advantage of exactly 0 security exploits in Windows or assorted applications; they're all social engineering. Even if Microsoft is loaded with cash, you can't seriously expect them to pay out for what is fundamentally a problem with the users. Your second idea(go after the users) makes sense, but you can't sue someone just because their users are morons, it makes no sense.
Yeah most are not too damaging, but here's my story.
Symantec's corporate antivirus software only allows for once daily automatic downloading of new virus signatures.
- Last week our AV server downloaded updates at 8am as usual.
- At 11am Symantec released new signature for MyDoom.F.
- At 1pm stupid_corporate_user_04 opens and unleashes MyDoom.F on the network. MyDoom.F blows away all MS Office and image files on stupid_corporate_user_04's machine, then begins the same task on all network shares this person had access to.
- At 8pm automatic backups kick off
- At 11pm backups complete, having successfully backed up ruined shares.
- At 8am the next morning, AV server picks up signature for MyDoom.F. At same time, users begin to notice their files are gone. Alarms go off everywhere.
- At 11pm that second day, all corrupted/trashed files have been removed, all viruses eradicated, all data restored from 2 day old backups.
Summary: 1.5 to 2 days of work time lost by 60 employees, plus 12 hours @110$/hr for support consultant to help clean up the mess.
Needless to say, I wouldn't categorize the virii as doing little damage, whether they actually delete local files or not. Even had we not lost files, we still would have had a big cleanup job, and it still would have impacted our users.
Here's a big Fuck You to the person who wrote that variant, and to all the other virus writers out there.
.sigs are for post^Hers.
No. He meant redundant. A redundant question is one that doesn't need to be asked, a rhetorical question is one that doesn't need to be answered. Big difference.