Slashdot Mirror


Need a Job? Move to India

WhoDaresWins writes "As U.S. jobs move abroad, more Americans are willing to work overseas like in India as per a CNN.com story. The story talks about many Americans and also Indians who are American citizens moving to India for work. This story should be an eye opener to people who feel Americans cannot work in India. With a booming economy there is a need for skilled professionals with years of experience in a western enconomy and industry. Best of all, job listings are available online." Thomas Friedman has a piece called The secret to India's success.

92 of 1,078 comments (clear)

  1. Good luck getting a visa... by crovira · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its not that simple to get a visa to India. Without a visa you can't get hired.

    Its not a viable option.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by b-baggins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No wonder you're whining about losing jobs when your first response to something that's hard to do is: It's not a viable option.

      Remind me never to hire your sorry a$$ for anything.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    2. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its not a viable option.

      Jeeze, you give up easily don't you?

      As someone who has travelled a bit and worked in a number of different countries, I expect it isn't that difficult to get a working visa for India. Getting a tourist visa takes a few hours if you visit the embassy. There's probably a bit more paperwork for a job visa, but I doubt it's that difficult.

    3. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by dalutong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's simple. Some U.S. company hires you, sends a letter to the embassy saying that you are a skilled worker that is skilled enough that the company can't find someone of your qualifications here, and then you get your visa. It is not the h1b visa holders fault. Get mad at your own companies.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    4. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's always important to keep in mind that there are billions who have it worse.

      This always sounds good on paper but does little good in reality. I spent a lot of my life in some pretty shitty situations (life is pretty good now thank you) I used to say this to myself all the time. Did nothing to help me feel better though. Mostly I've found it useless to think about those who have it better or worse than you do. Just keep your mind on improving your own situation and survive.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    5. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is better - job stays in the USA but is done by a foreigner who pays taxes, or company is prevented from hiring a well qualified foreigner to work in the USA, and so outsources the job to a country where the person does not pay US taxes. Unless you are considering making non-US citizens not living in the USA pay US taxes, in which case they might say "No taxation without representation!"

    6. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is, it should be illegal. There is no skill that a foreigner would have that an American doesn't already possess.

      Yet it's completely possible that no American applied for the position, and therefore they can state quite correctly that they can't find someone qualified for the position here.

      The only reason to hire foreigners is because the company is looking for cheap labor.

      If a company is looking for cheap labor, they don't bring someone in on an H1B visa. It is more expensive for companies to hire people this way. If you want to do things in a cheap manner, you open an office in a foreign country and employ as many people as you need. If the labor is cheap enough, you make up the costs of operating the office. Alternatively, you farm it out to a company that is already setup in the foreign country and more or less charges you labor + overhead, and then you hope they don't have a habit of using your data against you.

      When Kerry gets elected this kind of crap will be put to an end. Stop exporting American jobs to India!!! Vote Kerry and get Bush the hell out of office!

      Something tells me that Kerry can't do any more about this than Bush can. Then again, I'm sure if we look around a bit, we can find evidence that Kerry has been on both sides of this issue, too. After all, it's not the first time jobs have been exported from America, nor will it be the last time.

      While I'm sure there are 500,000 Americans out there looking for work (actually, about 15x that, but since there are only about 500,000 people in India working for US companies...), I'm not sure how many of them are willing to be AOL and AT&T phone support reps working for $5-10/hour. On the other hand, there are 150,000,000 Americans going to work every day with little reason to worry that their jobs are going to be shipped overseas.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, to a degree. I think it's the way we're wired through evolution. People can think about how small the world is, but they see a picture with an tiny white spec supposed to be earth and it gives them new perspective. People can talk about poor people in India, but until they see pictures, they can't really imagine it. People talk about breast cancer being a serious issue, but until they lose a loved one, they don't think it's important. Unless terrorist attacks affect them personally, some don't realize the gravity of the issue.

      I would like to think that I am not limited (to the same degree) that most humans are and can empathize and take lessons to heart. That I won't have to suffer more to learn from it. The more I think and consider the many ways in which I am fortunate, that I not only understand but feel and appreciate how fortunate I am. I just go through a mental list (not the same thing every time) and visualize both how I'm lucky and how others are unlucky and each item on the list is uplifting.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    8. Re:Good luck getting a visa... by Lobsang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he was arrested, kept in night for a jail and deported. Now that's barbaric(...)

      Countries tend to be very picky about people entering their borders. I think there's some kind of macho-ego culture or something at work in the immigration department. I felt it less when entering Europe, but it's definitely strong when entering Israel or the US.

      If you think this is barbaric, take a look at this. This, yes, is horrific.

  2. So this means.. by bob670 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can go to India, apply for my old job and do the same work for less pay? Well that seems like the very definition of "fair trade".

    1. Re:So this means.. by sdjunky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I figure you meant it as a joke... but I gotta comment anyway :)

      The cost of living in India is far below that in the US. You may be making less money but end up better off or the same as you are now.

      Of course, that's until India loses all of their work to China.

    2. Re:So this means.. by KingJoshi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget that costs of living and standards of living is also drastically different. For that lower wage, you'll still be able to afford servents and other things you probably couldn't here.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    3. Re:So this means.. by dave420 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Middle America thinks free trade is fair when America's gaining from it, but as soon as America's deal isn't so sweet, fair trade is something to be condemned.

      To America, it seems, it's ok for Indians to be poor and begging on the streets of mumbai. As soon as those same Indians out-price the US, they should be stopped. Double-standards all the way :)

    4. Re:So this means.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not "fair".

      It is, however, free trade.

      Suck on it.

    5. Re:So this means.. by Tassach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. If it's so great in India, why do so many Indians try and come to the USA? Maybe it's because of the fact that, despite all of our problems (and we do have a lot), the USA is still one of the best places in the world to live.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    6. Re:So this means.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, and this is somehow different than any other group of people in any part of the world? Please. Everyone's for something when it benefits them and against it when it doesn't. We're just good at making sure things benefit us. Deal.

    7. Re:So this means.. by philbert26 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Middle America thinks free trade is fair when America's gaining from it, but as soon as America's deal isn't so sweet, fair trade is something to be condemned.

      I think you mean "Middle ${western_country} thinks free trade is fair when ${western_country}'s gaining from it, but as soon as ${western_country}'s deal isn't so sweet, fair trade is something to be condemned."

      The US is not the only country in the world practising protectionism while preaching free trade. Trade unions in the UK are also complaining about jobs going to India. And farmers all over Europe are heavily subsisided while Africans are finding it hard to sell their crops.

    8. Re:So this means.. by dalutong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As true as you might think that is, I don't believe it.

      That's like saying you are only religous until you want to do something that isn't allowed. That's not how it works. You don't do something because you don't think it is right and because it is not allowed. And if you are tempted to do something that isn't allowed, you fight that temptation.

      So Free Trade is like a religion. You have to fight the desire to break out of it when it isn't as easy.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    9. Re:So this means.. by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The US has the highest population growth of all of the 1st world nations. The lower paying jobs are being taken from Americans by immigrants and illegals (which aren't really illegal anymore thanks to Bush). The middle paying jobs are getting farmed out overseas. The difference between the earnings of the CEO's and the workers keeps getting larger. These are not good signs.

      The changes in the US economy are making it look more like a 3rd world nation's, where there is no middle class, there are the few filthy rich at the top, and most everyone else is grobbling for work. I'm not a bible thumper by any means, but the saying "The love of money is the root of all evil" is true, and we are witnessing it.

    10. Re:So this means.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Its called money. Do not kid yourself that the US is soemhow better, the people are culturally more enlightened/uplifted and that there is a better work climate here as compared to every other place in the world. The almighty buck calls.

    11. Re:So this means.. by rcs1000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is:

      Companies are owned by their shareholders. Directors have a fiduciary duty to their owners: they must manage the business in their interest. They aren't there to manage "expectations", or to drive their stock price. The job of a company is to make money for its owners, plain and simple.

      (This is what Regis at Adelphia, Ken Lay at Enron, everybody at Worldcom etc. forgot)

      What companies DO NOT exist for is to provide jobs for Americans, Indians or anyone else.

      If you want Amercan companies to be run for the benefit of the - abstractly - American economy, or American workers, then that's fine. But you must expect in turn that foreign countries will impose tariffs on American goods, and you must accept that companies will make a lot less money. You must accept that VC money (and other sources of finance) will flow to places where the business environment is nicer. And you must expect that entreupreners will - instead of coming to America - will leave to go to more free market countries.

      If you still think that's good for America, that's fine. But you cannot abstractly tell companies how to manage their business.

      If you want to discourage outsourcing to India, then there is a way to do it (also known as the South Korean way ;-)). Vote with your dollars. Don't buy from companies that outsource; start a consumer advocacy group (like the ones that pressured businesses not to invest in South Africa).

      But don't pass laws.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    12. Re:So this means.. by itbwtcl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to agree with you, concerning stupidly-inflated market values in the US.
      However, the problem is almost impossible to solve at this point.
      If the US froze all wages and costs, and waited for inflation to catch up,
      they would still have to wait 10 or 15 years for inflation to even it all out.
      This would only work if the rest of the world played along... right.

      Another thing. I think the reason so many Americans are cranky
      about the labor flow overseas is their perception that they are being bled dry.
      I'm not sure I could argue with them. They have spent generations building
      an industrial infrastructure the rest of the world envies. They have been called upon
      for monetary, material, and military assistance by almost every other nation
      on earth. There have been years when those in power were of questionable
      moral character. But on the whole, the Americans have always had the
      reputation as the people you could go to for help when you really needed it.
      Deservedly so, I think.

      Many Americans are coming to the conclusion that they will never be able
      to count on such good will, as they have shown, being reciprocated.
      Many Americans are also coming to the conclusion that their government
      is out of their control, and in the process of betraying them.

    13. Re:So this means.. by theghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with you, but i'll offer another reason as well.

      A lot of foreign workers come here and take a job for less money than their American counterparts would, live much more frugally than their American counterparts would, and send a large portion of their income back to their relatives.

      They are living a decent life (although perhaps not a luxurious one) and they're allowing their extended family to do the same.

      To put it in more concrete terms, a single person making $30k can live on $15k, send $10k home, and pay their taxes with the remainder. That $10k is worth a lot more in places like India. Remember from the interview that "Many Indian workers live on between $35 and $100 per month."

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    14. Re:So this means.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you just expect us all to pack up and move to fucking india? You really are a piece of shit.

    15. Re:So this means.. by kcbrown · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What companies DO NOT exist for is to provide jobs for Americans, Indians or anyone else.

      If American corporations don't exist in order to provide jobs for Americans and to benefit the American economy, then those corporations should not reap the benefits of American laws (and, by inference, American law enforcement), American infrastructure, the American military, etc.

      You people who believe that businesses should be able to run in a vacuum are forgetting one very important thing: corporations exist to serve society, NOT VICE VERSA. This is why corporations are given charters by the government. It used to be that these corporations would have their charters yanked if they were shown to harm society, but that sadly has not been the case for a very long time.

      Until people such as yourself figure out that the individual is a first class citizen and the corporation should not be, we will continue to see greater and greater abuses of the people by corporations.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    16. Re:So this means.. by Daytona955i · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vote with your dollars. Don't buy from companies that outsource; start a consumer advocacy group (like the ones that pressured businesses not to invest in South Africa).

      That doesn't really work. I'll take the example of walmart. It's a big chain that comes in and ruins most of the small towns it goes into. What happens is they sell cheap (both in price and quality) goods at "low low prices." On the surface, providing low cost goods sounds great... However, they drive out the smaller stores and then when it's not profitable they pack up and leave. What's left? Not much... walmart destroys these towns and people let it happen. I often ask people why they shop at walmart and they say "because it's cheap." I start to explain about how bad walmart is but they say I know but they have cheap stuff.

      The bottom line has become the most important thing. This leads to a huge increase in initial income but what happens in a few years? If you don't care about your town or what country you live in then by all means outsource or by from walmart. However, most americans have become complacent. They think that the rights they have in the US are basic human rights that everyone should have. They don't realize what they have and therefore really don't care anymore.

      I for one care about my country and I don't like seeing it's economy being hurt by things like outsourcing. You can no longer buy anything that is american made because everything comes from somewhere.

      Trade is not bad... trade at the expense of your own economy is. All so a manager (who should really take a paycut if they want to save the company money) can save a few bucks.

    17. Re:So this means.. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Companies are owned by their shareholders. Directors have a fiduciary duty to their owners: they must manage the business in their interest. They aren't there to manage "expectations", or to drive their stock price. The job of a company is to make money for its owners, plain and simple.

      I can see the Director, his expression firm with resolve: "I'm only here to ensure our investors see a return. If that means laying off our workforce and then giving myself a big bonus followed by cashing out my now more valuable stock options, then so be it."

      Sorry, but I don't buy that at all. That's what stinks about globalization -- no matter the harm or benefit to us or India, you can guarantee that the CEOs, the Directors, the VPs will all be seeing nice, healthy benefits to themselves.

      So they get rich, screw their workers, and tell us they were "just doing their job". They shake their heads sadly and say "I greatly regret having to do this..." before they swing the axe. Oh yeah, I can see them crying all the way to the bank.

      Look at HP: struggling in many ways, huge layoffs, morale is low -- then the execs go off and buy themselves a nice fleet of corporate jets so they can cruise about the country making their deals in style. "Fiduciary duty" my ass.

      If you want Amercan companies to be run for the benefit of the - abstractly - American economy, or American workers, then that's fine.

      Stop making things abstract, so it sounds impossible or unreasonable. There is nothing abstract at all about a CEO axing a US job, hiring an Indian worker, and pocketing the difference in salary (or generously sharing it with the stockholders, one of the major ones of course being themself).

      There is no reason a company can't be run for the benefit of its own employees. I guarantee you I have more invested in my company than any of the VCs or fund managers that have purchased our stock. So why must my company be run in a way where they are encouraged to screw me and help the VCs?

      The corporation, despite unfortunate 14th Ammendment interpretations, is nothing more than a legal construct. The rules governing this construct are arbitrary, not a law of nature. Acting like the complete lack of responsibility to anyone but stock holders is an inevitable and inescapable feature of the corporation is a self-serving lie the beneficiaries of the lie enjoy telling far too much.

      Me, I'm not eating that bullshit any more.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    18. Re:So this means.. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Companies are owned by their shareholders. Directors have a fiduciary duty to their owners: they must manage the business in their interest. They aren't there to manage "expectations", or to drive their stock price. The job of a company is to make money for its owners, plain and simple.

      First, companies may be there to produce money for their investors. But those investors are also given liability protection by the state and, as such, have some obligation jointly to said state. Some investors believe that payment of taxes and provision of jobs is enough of an obligation. But today, companies are ducking both through offshoring. Should the state continure to grant boons to the corporations if they provide neither jobs nor revenue to the state?

      Second, companies definitely have a fiduciary obligation to their investors. But the temporality of that fiducuiary responsibility is not specified nor agreed upon. In many ways, this trend towards offshoring trades short-term profits for potentially disasterous long-term results. If everyone is offshoring, clearly there is no long-term sustainable advantage from doing it. You are also provding multitudes of new entrepeneurs with the funding and knowledge to compete with your business in a legal environment suspicious of and relatively immune to IP or non-competition protections for you. And, since moving a job to another country gets rid of one potential customer in your largest market, given that other countries' markets are not expanding so quickly, you are giving up certainty in your ability to market.

      No, I don't believe that the current offshoring trends have as much to do with fiduciary responsibility as much as they have to do with the fact that it's an easy way for a lazy CEO to get a quick pop in the balance sheet and the inbreeding and herd mentality that pervades upper managements.

      --
      That is all.
  3. sad day by pvt_medic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    its a sad day when the american dream is to movie to India.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
    1. Re:sad day by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What does this mean?

      I think it mainly means that the construction industry has made great progress in creating low-cost building materials. For example, a good portion of my house, including some large support beams, is basically made out of glue and sawdust. Much of the rest is made out of extruded plastic, refined dirt (gypsum) and paper. Computers have undoubtedly helped the construction companies streamline their inventory, scheduling and manpower to significantly lower the cost of building a house relative to the average wage.

      This new ability to crank out more and bigger houses for less money makes it possible for a lot of people to buy houses, but it doesn't say that much about economic policy in general.

    2. Re:sad day by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, I've been on a mortgage for the last few years, I own a teentsy tiny itty bitty percentage of my home... sure people calling it "owning", but its more like being 0wn3d. 80% of people are PAYING ON A MORTAGE.. I would bet that only 5% of those people actually OWN their home outright. The only reason for this is that rental rates are actually about the same as mortgage rates, and the interest rates on motgages fell to almost nothing. Using credit to live a certain lifestyle doesn't mean you ARE living that lifestyle, you're just borrowing it.

      --
      meh
  4. Seems obvious to me.. by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


    In this new "Global Economy" it only makes sense that people would be willing to move to where the work is. I was ready to move to the US for a geek-gig a few years ago. It's only "news" because the tide of immigration is shifting.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. No thanks by onyxruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No thanks, America is worth fighting for.

    1. Re:No thanks by onyxruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      New, nope, not new at all. If you wont fight for what you have, you don't deserve it. Now fight doesn't mean violence, fight means taking action. People fought for my rights and job opportunities before me, why should I get a free ride off their work?

      Future generations are going to need jobs more so than our own, and what are they supposed to do? Even Lou Dobbs (conservative and pro business) has realized this and started trying to fight it.

      Why not defend America? People run ramshod over it all the time, should I stand by and do nothing while it's trampled? Stand up for what you believe in, and don't allow a small vocal minority to represent themselves as the majority that they aren't.

  6. America is Doomed by KrackHouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We don't edukate our kids. I'm going to move pretty soon, probably to Bangalore to start a business because only 10% of the people in San Diego can afford to buy a house now.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:America is Doomed by DamnRogue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which, if true, means that either there is an imminent crash in the San Diego housing market or no one will sell any more houses. Supply and demand are your friends.

  7. Please. by Ryosen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This story should be an eye opener to people who feel Americans cannot work in India.

    Yeah, let me just pack up my family, sell my house and all of my belongings, kiss off my friends, and break every tie that I have by deserting my country so I can go work for $12 an hour.

    Thanks for opening my eyes. I'll take my chances here in the US.

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    1. Re:Please. by KrackHouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The median home price in San Diego is > $400,000. If that same home was $50,000 in India then the $12*8 = $96 / Hour. Not too shabby.

      --
      What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
      http://houndwire.com
    2. Re:Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mean like people in the whole world have been doing to move to America for years? Why is it that Americans think they are so above everyone else? People throughout history have moved to where the jobs were. If it weren't for the influx of Chinese immigrants looking for work, how many of our railroads would have been built? Throw the idea that Americans somehow "deserve" high-paying jobs out the fscking door.

    3. Re:Please. by dalutong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two Points:

      1) That's exactly what the Indians do when they come here.

      2) If you were willing to work for 12 dollars domestically then you wouldn't have to go to India at all. You could probably get away with 20. That's the real solution. Lower the cost of living, and live a less luxurious lifestyle. That's competative capitalism for you. Whether you choose to be competative is your business.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    4. Re:Please. by Patik · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's exactly what the Indians do when they come here.

      No, it is not the same thing. The Indians can move here for a better life and better pay; when Americans move to India, they take a pay cut and move to an overcrowded nation with far less to offer for much crappier pay, all just to keep from being homeless.

  8. 1800's Flashback by auburnate · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Back in the 1800's, millions flocked to America as the land of opportunity and a place to start over and make something out of yourself.

    Are we seeing a mini-exodus that signals that India is now the forerunner for the place of opportunity and a chance for success?

    I think at some point the outsourcing needs to be regulated or even curbed back. I think also there should be a public list of companies that have outsourced to any foreign land and how many American jobs were lost because of it. I understand these are highly opinionated, but come on, we are cannabalizing ourselves.

    1. Re:1800's Flashback by DrDoombender · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Outsourcing is by far the bane of the american dream. As one Indian exec put it to me: The Americans' self-image that this tech thing was their private preserve is over. This is a "wake-up call" for U.S. workers to redouble their efforts at education and research. If they do that, he said, it will spur "a whole new cycle of innovation, and we'll both win. If we each pull down our shutters, we will both lose."

      My basest impression of this comment is that it is a big load of crap. I know well educated people who can't find a job or who were layed off. Thank goodness that most employers allow you to find new departments to work in. Even still, I don't think more education and research are part of the solution. My impression of tech jobs, is that you usually have to go to school your whole life to keep current.

      Also, I never once believed that this "tech thing" was America's private preserve. However, how many EU countries are outsourcing to India? No, America's private preserve seems to be outsourcing to lower wage countries, while the news often puts a positive spin on it. The question that pops back into my mind is the one that every laid off/fired employee has, "Who's going to pay for all their products if nobody can afford them, and how am I going to live off of a highly reduced salary?"

      as for that last part of the statement about a whole new cycle of innovation...and we'll both win. Yeah, I think that's a load....by both win, he means, India will win because they can undercut american salaries by far.

      I think at some point the outsourcing needs to be regulated or even curbed back. I think also there should be a public list of companies that have outsourced to any foreign land and how many American jobs were lost because of it.

      I agree, outsourcing should be regulated. It not only hurts the American economy, but it hurts many foreign countries as well. Nike, comes to my mind first. Mainly because they are notorious for their phillipines, slave labor like conditions. I think the first stipulation would be that any US business has to pay the US minimum wage to overseas employees. Plus, they have to have livable working conditions, complete with breaks. Bush is supposed to be working on new jobs for the unemployed, but I think most of those are going to be minimum wage jobs, and you know how those with a tech degree from college want to work at register. Nevermind the fact that we worked hard, sleepless nights to get away from that thing.

    2. Re:1800's Flashback by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I know well educated people who can't find a job or who were layed off."

      So start your own innovative IT business where you're worth a good salary doing something that can't readily be exported (or become a plumber and get rich). You'll always be one pay-cheque from disaster while you expect employers to give you jobs.

      Seriously, most of our ancestors never had jobs in the modern sense and they survived, why shouldn't we learn to live without them too? Jobs are a invention of the industrial era, and the industrial era is coming to an end.

  9. To all Americans by 4b696e67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Offshoring will never stop if you support the companies that do it. These companies would NOT want to give up the American consumer market for any reason. So if you want them to stop offshoring, stop buying products from companies that offshore. If the government won't do anything to help the American worker. Then the American public needs to do it themselves.

    I'm not an economist, but that seems logical to me.

    1. Re:To all Americans by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These companies would NOT want to give up the American consumer market for any reason. So if you want them to stop offshoring, stop buying products from companies that offshore

      Many people do not have that option. They have to make their meager wages last enough to live on. Why do you think WalMart does so well?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  10. Meh by IAmTheDave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Troll me, but fucked if I'm going to leave the good ol USA for India, when so many people from India (half of our IT staff here) are coming to the US because opportunity and life is better in general in the US. If I can't work in IT, I can work in construction, sales, anything. I can work. If I love to code that much, I can do it after work at home as a hobby.

    I see no benefit to uprooting my entire life to go to India so I can write code for so little money, when I can get a temp job here that will pay the rent while I'm submitting resumes and waiting to land a job in IT in the US.

    But that's just me.

    --
    Excuse my speling.
    Making The Bar Project
  11. We need to start taxing companies who do this. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was listening to talk radio the other night, and I'm not sure whose show it was (I was just skimming through), but they were saying that one presidential candidates was proposing a tax to these big companies for outsourcing work to make up for unemployment.

    I personally think (in my opinion) that's a wonderful idea. Maybe companies would think twice and start giving jobs back to those unemployed.

    After all, you could pay someone from India $5 less an hour to do it, but.. you'll end up paying that back in taxes, so you won't really save much.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:We need to start taxing companies who do this. by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was listening to talk radio the other night, and I'm not sure whose show it was (I was just skimming through), but they were saying that one presidential candidates was proposing a tax to these big companies for outsourcing work to make up for unemployment.

      Chances are, that candidate is John Kerry. His wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, is the owner of (or one of the owners of) the Heinz Ketchup company... which has 57 factories, out of 79 total, overseas. Ironic, really, that the Heinz 57 Ketchup company has 57 varieties of outsourcing. Here's my link for an article that says so.

      I personally think (in my opinion) that's a wonderful idea. Maybe companies would think twice and start giving jobs back to those unemployed.

      Perhaps you should elaborate a bit and say those companies should give those jobs to the unemployed people in the United States. It's rather difficult to give a job to someone that's already employed.

      After all, you could pay someone from India $5 less an hour to do it, but.. you'll end up paying that back in taxes, so you won't really save much.

      Great idea! That way, when the company has to spend $10 million more per year, they'll really understand the value of American labor! Then, when you have to pay $50 for an optical computer mouse, or $1000 extra for a middle-of-the-line new computer, you'll understand why the company decided that maybe it should save some money to begin with.

      If you want to destroy the economy, a great way to start is by concentrating on the 10,000 workers that got paid more than they're worth, rather than concentrating on the 170,000,000 people in the country that already have other jobs. I'm sorry if this seems cruel, but if you ever start a business, you'll understand. As the article above quotes Adam Smith (the founder of Modern Economics), "It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family never to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy."

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    2. Re:We need to start taxing companies who do this. by duslow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget that this cuts both ways. Remember that the US also exports alot of other products besides just tech jobs to these foreign companies as well. So if we start taxing them for the people we export, they will in turn tax their companies that buy U.S. products or hire foreign tech workers. The end result being, you won't have a job here, nor will you have a job there.

      So when politicians get up and make blanket statements like that, the are simply appealing to your emotions, not your head. We are in a global economy. Just adjust and get over whining about losing the jobs you probably don't even want to do anyway.

      Afterall, when was the last time you ever made tennis shoes? Tech jobs have become the new white collar job of our time. If you don't like it, you are free to pursue other occupations. You might think about that the next time you go buy your shiny new pair of Nikes. You are supporting the very thing you are complaining about.

    3. Re:We need to start taxing companies who do this. by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chances are, that candidate is John Kerry. His wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, is the owner of (or one of the owners of) the Heinz Ketchup company... which has 57 factories, out of 79 total, overseas. Ironic, really, that the Heinz 57 Ketchup company has 57 varieties of outsourcing. Here's my link for an article that says so.

      This isn't irony and none of these jobs are offshored. Heinz is a global company with global markets. These foreign companies serve their local markets.

    4. Re:We need to start taxing companies who do this. by bshroyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Welcome to the 21st century. Please note that it is no longer 1950. The tactics you suggest MAY have worked last millenium, but won't in this one.

      It's easy now to take advantage of the cheaper Indian labor - there's almost no cost, and considerable savings, in outsourcing. If the savings are eliminated through taxation, companies will take more drastic measures to realize the savings. Implementing a tax on outsourced jobs will only lead to movement of the entire company to where the labor is cheaper. It'll see the formation of subsidiaries/partnerships in India, employing only Indians, and then "selling" R&D or finished product back to the American parent.

      If you're considering a war between the US congress, writing tax code, and American free enterprise, finding ways around it, I think we both know which one will be both more creative and quicker to act.

      The smarter move on your (and all of our) part is to VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET. Don't like outsourcing? Don't buy products or services from companies that use foreign labor. You'll pay more in the end, but it won't be any more (or any less) than you'd pay if the "outsourcing tax" were applied.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    5. Re:We need to start taxing companies who do this. by Matrix272 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This isn't irony and none of these jobs are offshored. Heinz is a global company with global markets. These foreign companies serve their local markets.

      Then maybe you could give me an example of a non-global company that is sending jobs to India?

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
  12. Outsourcing by Mullen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Outsourcing is just another sign that America and the West in general needs to get its collective shit together. For too long we have ignored Education and Research. Outsourcing is just another fire under the ass of the West that it has to take these things seriously.
    We are going to loose some jobs no matter what. That is a fact, but if we stop bitching about jobs moving over seas and actually took seriously and invested in Education and Research, would not have to worry so much about it. As America's we have gotten lazy and we think we are entitled to high paying tech jobs. Well, break the news to you, we're not and 550 Million Indians under the age 25 are also saying the same thing.
    Forget election year protectionism speeches. Just make the average American worker more skilled and educated and less jobs will flow over seas.

    That's what it is all about. You heard it here first.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:Outsourcing by gminks · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Are you telling me that people with 30 years of IT experience need more education?
      Are you telling me people with Masters degrees in CS and EE need to be trained?
      Do you mean to tell me that the workers who have had to train their replacements in order to receive severance pay were not skilled?

      No one who is in high tech thinks that they are "entitled" to their job. We know that a requirement of the job is keeping up with new software, hardware, protocols, etc.
      It is immoral to bring foreigner in any country to replace native workers. I find it disturbing that the companies then turn around and blame education, and basically ask for subsidies to do something with all the workers that they have displaced.

      We are trained. We are experienced. We are tired of the excuses for "loosing" (talk about needing to be retrained!) our jobs to foreigners on our soil and in other countries. The problem is not lack of education or skills, the problem is that American high tech workers are not being allowed to compete for these jobs.

      Let us compete. Force American companies to play by the rules when it comes to H-1B and L-1 visas. Level the playing field, and then less jobs will flow overseas. ginaminks.com/blog

  13. Some Thoughts.... by zungu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    American's look down upon the third world as a shitty place. American's think that when they militarily conqured Japan they became masters of it. When Japanese progressed to challenge American industrial might, the American just pooped in their pants and used muscle techniques with the Japanese. This is nothing new to those of us living in places like India. The Britishers had the same arrogance and even racial superiority written all over (Just read any Raj era literature). When third-world opposed American businesses selling sugar water as cola and repatriating millions of dollars that is a trade barrier. And we are then given lessons in the greatness of free-trade. American's bring is huge industrial production capabilities that disturb the local employment structure. When third world complains it is said the progress is inevitable and productivity is more important than living wages for workers. When Indians create world-class (CMM Level 5) software delivery systems benefiting the American business they are accused of stealing jobs. Why is improved cost-benefit not a good thing? If a minuscle number of Americans prefer to go to grad schools how are Indians at fault for this? This is just the beginning pals, more is yet to come.

  14. Another solution? by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't find the article, but I read a good piece about an IT Manager in Boston was forced to outsource to save money by the CEO of their company.

    Instead, he looked at what they would pay an Indian contractor including costs of working with him overseas ($42,000) and hired people locally, like college graduates, to do the work instead. So granted, some poor programmer making $65,000 is out of a job, but at least that job stayed in the USA and went to some college graduate.

    Hopefully this will be the trend, I don't like the fact that everyone in IT is going to be looking at a pay cut, but it's better than losing all our jobs/productivity to India.

    $.02

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
  15. Overblown Hysteria by USAPatriot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As U.S. jobs move abroad, more Americans are willing to work overseas like in India as per a CNN.com story.

    Right off the bat, this is wrong. The number of jobs being currently outsourced is fairly miniscule in comparison to the total number of jobs in the US. Somehwere less than a million jobs have gone overseas in a workforce of 130 million.

    It's weird how slashdot is so pro-freedom, yet so against free markets and free trade when it can potentially affect them negatively. In the end, this outsourcing will only make the US a more efficient workforce and benefit all consumers.

    --

    Slashdot Moderation: From positive to terrible in 2 "insightful" posts.

    1. Re:Overblown Hysteria by bricriu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, we'll all be efficiently flipping burgers.

      Your point about jobs being outsourced is ill-informed at best, asinine at worst. When we count unemployment "leaps" in tenths of a percent, losing almost a full percentage point (1m/130m = .77%) overseas is HUGE.

      Who benefits from moving jobs overseas? Those who own the companies. Before you start in with the tired "well, buy stock, and then you'll get rich too," (a) do you have ANY idea how much stock you have to own in order to live off the dividends? (b) burger-flipping doesn't exactly leave lots of spare cash around with which to invest.

      --

      AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
      - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

    2. Re:Overblown Hysteria by liquidsin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at it in percentages like that is misleading. It may only be .75% of the workforce, but it's still nearly a million people in the country who were previously employed, and now aren't. Economists get a hard-on when they can say "hey, unemployment is down to 13.3% this year from last year's 13.4%". This is a HUGE chunk of the population. When an entire industry starts outsourcing, how do those who lost their jobs find new ones? They move to another industry. And since most of these people spent years in universities to get those jobs, they aren't really trained for much more than that particular sector. So they end up looking for jobs in retail. Are there really enough jobs for all of them? Do all those jobs pay as well, or will they all have to sell their homes? Who will buy those homes? Do you know a million middle to upper-middle class families looking for houses?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  16. Re:Blown out of proportion. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    he runs a website devoted to american jobs, what the hell do you think he'd say on national TV? that there really aren't any, so nobody should pay for his service?

  17. Re:Robert Cringely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Robert,

    India is still a developing country, as compared to the US. The true difference here is that developing countries do not have the same existing protocols and laws to support something similar to what goes on in the US. Expecting India to have the same standards as the US is unreal and smacks of ignorance. As someone who has lived in India for 21 years and in the US for 3 years, I have come to know that there are laws for almost everything here in the US. Not true in India...

    Of course, the Indian immigration policies are more restrictive, we have an unemployment rate of close to 12%, do you think any country with that high an unemployment rate would ever want foreigners to come and take away their jobs? Besides, the immigration policies in India are in place to keep away poor people from Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh.

    However, I strongly believe that Americans going to India for work can be a productive experience for all involved..

  18. Re:And never return... by b-baggins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's true. Our crime is very disorganized. Why, we haven't had a good Hindu-Muslim bloodbath over here in the US, why, um, ever. The Indians have one every few months. We really need to get with it.

    And our povery here is shameful. We aren't even anywhere near to having a million people living in the streets of our national capital. And our train system? Pathetic. Why, we don't even let cows on the trains or pack hundreds of people on top of the cars.

    And, finally, we don't even have a nuclear power on our southern border sending troops into disputed territories and claiming that parts of our country belongs to them. How can we even have the kind of excitement India does when we don't have our own Pakistan?

    You're right. Life in America is so much worse. Sign me up for the Indian utopia right away!

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  19. You Thought Globalisation Was For You? by Numen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you did think the benefits of globalisation were aimed at you, you've been mugged. When politicians and business leaders talk about globalisation they mean for *them*. They told you it would reduce costs and mean cheper products, but they didn't tell you that the reduced costs where as a result of sending your job overseas.

    And if you think it's bad now, you aint seen nothing yet.

    You did, and are voting for the chaps that aren't just allowing this to happen but are actively working toward it. You want it to stop? Start questioning your candidates as to their position on out-sourcing. Ask them what their position is on what amounts to selling off the IT industry in persuit of short-term gain. Ask them what they intend to do once the process of shipping your IT industry over-seas is complete and any competative edge you once had is lost.

    But, but, but the Indian deserves to work too! Absolutely they do. The European and the North American also deserve to yield return on the industries nurtured in those societies. The IT industry did not pop out of the ether, and it was not forged solely on the back of private enterprise, it was built from a wide variety of national as well as private resource.

    You are responsible for allowing this to happen when you allow your political leaders to persue their own business interests unchecked.

  20. Your Going About it All Wrong. by MoronBob · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You should have come in Illeagally from the southern border. Then you would automatically get amnasty from mr bush. Not to mention free health care and a free college degree(if Orin Hatch has his way). Following immigration law is so Passay. Its no longer polically correct to follow laws if you find them distastefull or unconstitutional.

    --
    Telecommuting! What about socialization?
    1. Re:Your Going About it All Wrong. by MoronBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately I do know how right I am. I would like to see some serious reform to the US immigration policy. However I would never blame anyone for taking full advantage of any loophole they can find in their efforts to make a better life for them and their family. Our country is mostly made up of people that share the same dream of freedom and prosperity for all. I am American Indian, Irish, and Dutch and my Wife is Korean. That makes our children all of the above. Immigration is good for our county as long as we don't take in too many criminals and not enough workers which the current policies seem to be slanting towards. I would like to see us close our borders and increase the number of legal immigrants coming into the US. Its just becoming a free for all that encourages dishonesty and law breaking.

      --
      Telecommuting! What about socialization?
  21. LISTEN UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I pointed this out a few days back... Outsourcing. Whine. Moan. Impossible for us in the USA...blah blah. Now, go and read the last thread on Tech Support humour. Look how many people spent the time insulting (l)users. Now, pick up the phone, dial a tech support number you know to be routed through to India. Compare and contrast. The American will be unable to help you and will most likely be rude. The Indian will be knowledgable, attentive and polite. Compare, contrast and get a clue.

  22. Yes, *tiny* problem by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only way you'll have a standard of living that's above what we'd consider the poverty line here (structurally sound accomodation, clean water, decent food, minimal health care) is if you get a managerial role. Indian programmers simply aren't paid that well, even relative to Indian living costs. They don't live in nice houses, they don't drive cars, they don't aspire to buying boats and retiring early. They basically aspire to not leaving debts for their children. That's why you see so many of them over here.

    Now, if you're quick, you will be able to land one of those management/consulting roles. Now, next question: how long are you going to be able to keep it? Are you really skilled enough to keep ahead of a bunch of talented, enthusiastic - and, not insignificantly - native Indians?

    Bonus point question: during any job reshuffle, will you be the last to go, or the first to go?

    Extra credit question: when you get tired of chasing jobs that pay well enough to pay for health cover and want to move back to the US, will your period of low wages negatively impact your ability to buy your way back into the US property and financing markets? Think carefully about your answer.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  23. Live like a king by tstoneman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have several co-workers that are Indian. They say that the starting wage for someone out of college in India, in those high-wage markets is like 10,000 rupees a month. This is about $2000 US a month.

    However, for 1000 rupees a month, you can get yourself a butler/servant. As well, rent is like 1000 rupees a month, meaning you have several thousand rupees left to do what you want.

    If you have more experience, I would think 20,000 rupees a month is more reasonable, which means that you could easily save $3000 US dollars a month and still live like a king, which is not bad at all. Even assuming 0% interest except inflation and no raises, after 10 years you could come back with almost $400,000 US. Not too bad...

    However, hell would freeze over before I moved to India... I'd rather just take my chances here in the US.

  24. Drop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Slashdot needs to drop the pro India stance. Every article I read has been how wonderful India is and how outsourcing our jobs is a great thing. Drop it! Outsourcing to India is not a great thing, India is not a wonderful place to live. It is almost impossible for a forgien worker to get a job there.

    Indian work is not up to the same standard as American work is. For every "successful" indian outsource story there are 100 of stories that tell just the opposite. The tell of how shotty indian work is. How cost overruns drive the costout of control. We see stories of how indian workers routinly leak private information, steal IP. Why don't we see those stories here too.

    Slashdot has the pro indian glasses on and all they see is how rosie it is.

  25. Re:Robert Cringely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Love Cringley and all that but I think he is confused and misinformed. You need a job first to get a H-1B and so is the case in moving to India. Find a job and the visa is yours to take.

  26. Suck it up, Princess! by pjkundert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, not to be a butt-head, but...

    I cannot believe that there are still people that think a programmer or sysadmin type has some divine right to earn USD$80,000!

    We live in a global economy. Deal with it. Every heard of that new-fangled thingy called the "In-Ter-Net?" Guess what? It reduces the effect of the "distance" variable to nearly zero in some equations!

    If your only redeeming quality, to your employter, is that fact that you are "near", and some other person is "far", guess what -- maybe you can get a job as Grover on Sesame Street, after your boss cans your a**.

    If you have chosen a lifestyle that demands a high income for commodity work, then get prepared to walk away from your house and car. The days of Trade Unions dicatating, and IT people demaning, high wages is almost over.

    --
    -- -pjk Perry Kundert perry@kundert.ca http://kundert.2y.net
  27. Well done by kahei · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I don't know if I agree (in my experience, most outsourcers in poorer countries are in a far better position than American labor of the early 20th century) but that was a well-put argument.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  28. Re:Outsourcing - Crank up the Spin machine by blyons3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...Okay fair enough.

    "We've ignored education and Research..."

    But, one can't help but see the commoditization of high tech skills that has gone on over the past 2 years all over the world. (even pre-9/11).

    Dr. Norman Matloff's 1999 study on immigration and high tech work is finally resonating with the average Joe. But the cheapening of the work force, both foreign and domestic continues. Just check out the March 11, 2004CNN Lou Dobbs transcripts from last night's program on increasing the H1-B quota (again), and later on in the program a chat with a Republican congressman about the rosy future in high tech and the coming job shortages (chuckle). How many more fake high tech developer "shortages" do we need to endure?

  29. Can't stop globalization by bshroyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Go ahead and try. Convice your congresscritters to pass the "No Jobs Overseas" bill, and you'll find that American products and services are suddenly higher than similar products and services available for import from Asia, Europe, or India.

    Used to be, the cost of information flow was expensive. If you manufactured doohickeys in Dallas, you had your customer support staff located in Dallas. With cheap communications, you can locate your CSR's anywhere, or everywhere -- to save a few pennies on every doohickey you make, which allows you to stay competitive against all the other (foreign and domestic) doohickey makers.

    The free market is now global. Can't stop globalization in a free market. Don't want a free market? Try Cuba.

    --
    The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    1. Re:Can't stop globalization by bshroyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hadn't thought of that -- it is ironic, I guess, that the sucess America has had in innovation leads directly into outsourcing American jobs to further that innovation.

      The solution? How about we keep innovating, staying one step ahead of the curve? Might work. We certainly can't go back to where we used to be.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
  30. Re:Getting your head around Free Trade by theghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Man, you do not understand this. People in India earn less AND PAY LESS. They are not abused, well, not programmers anyway.

    Why do they pay less? Because the goods and services that those well-paid programmers consume are made by a poverty-stricken people who are abused.

    There's no denying that this is good for India, but let's keep looking at the bigger picture.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  31. the 'secret' to India's success by dmh20002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the only reason IT jobs are outsourced to india is cost. English language and good education make it feasbile, but its all about the $$$. If the labor rates were anywhere near the same there wouldn't be any outsourcing there. It wouldn't matter if everyone in India had a PhD and a Nobel Prize.

    All this blather obout how much smarter the Indians are is like the Japanese guy in 'Black Rain' telling Michael Douglas that 'we will own America in 10 years'. Its just bragging based on a temporary bubble. Just after that movie the Japanese economy collapsed and hasn't really recovered completely in over 15 years.

    All that said, the only answer for Americans is to do what we did in the 80's/early 90's against Japan. Become more competitive. Unions, tariffs, sanctions will just kill the American IT industry and make everything more expensive in the US. We have to get off our butts and figure out how to compete.

    1. Re:the 'secret' to India's success by easter1916 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All true, but India has a much larger pool of potentially-educated and low-wage people to draw from than Japan ever had. Also, Japan purchased on the basis of a massive property bubble and dodgy bank loans, and when that bubble popped the repercussions drove them away. Neither thing has or is happening in India. Fear India -- it is doing things the "right" way, slowly, steadily, with so much catching up to do and with a pool of some 1 billion people all desperate to achieve a standard of living that you have been used to for decades.

  32. a=a by HarryLeBlanc · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "...many Americans and also Indians who are American citizens..."

    Ahem. Indians who are American citizens are Americans.

    Just thought I'd point out the (probably unconscious) racism that underpins the framing of this issue.

  33. Mods on crack by theghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Normally, i detest whiners who complain about moderation, but this is a truly exceptional case.

    How is it that a post that starts off with a "cleverly" disguised racial epithet (Translation for the clue impaired: "Fuh Q Raghead" = Fuck you raghead.) has anything other than flamebait mods?

    The rest of the argument is entirely redundant when taken in context with the rest of the posts on this article, so what's the excuse?

    Note to the cretin who wrote the original post: "raghead" is most often applied to Arabs, not Indians. If you're going to be a bigotted asshole you should at least do it right!

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  34. What an excellent deal! by beforewisdom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - get fired from your job

    - give up your home

    - move away from your friends

    - move away from your extended family

    - move your family away from their family and
    their friends

    - move to a foriegn culture in the 3rd world

    - accept a lower standard of living

    - take a cut in pay

    All so billionaires and millionaires can have a tiny bit more money

    What a special deal!

    Steve

  35. Several Reasons for Staying in the United States by $criptah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I moved to the U.S. at the age of fifteen and now, almost ten years later, I cannot imagine living elsewhere. You might think that I have become a spoiled young brat with a nice BMW in his garage because I say these things, and you're wrong. I am just an average American dude who works as a sys. admin and pays his taxes. Why would I maintain my average status in the United States if I could get a better life in India? Here are my reasons.

    The beauty of the United States is its lack of a mainstream culture, an official religion and strong traditions. That is enough to keep me in this county because I can be whatever I want to be and theoretically I am protected under the Constitution.

    I can choose my religion and whether I want to celebrate certain holidays. I am going to marry a girl of my choice and nobody will stop me from doing it. When I have kids, my daughter and my son will have equal opportunities and when they grow up, they will be allowed to date and live with their partners (regrdless of their partner's gender) before they get married. That is the beauty of the United States and this is priceless. I have visited many countries and I have met a lot of people; my experiences suggest that although the United States is not the perfect country, it is a good place to live and would like to stick with it.

    Please do not get me wrong: I am not trying to put India down. I am sure that it is a great country that has a log of great people. However, if I had to choose between Boston and Bombay, I would stick with the former simply because my views are closer to Western culture and because I value personal freedoms that exist in the United States.

  36. Re:Can't stop globalization-Freedom slide. by bshroyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with your point in its entirety. See my response here.

    People forget that the economy isn't something external - it's something we're all a part of. Free markets can and will be changed by people voting with their dollars, pounds, and rupees.

    Free markets will never be effectively changed through legislation - there's no point in trying.

    --
    The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
  37. Re:Several Reasons for Staying in the United State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    The beauty of the United States is its lack of a mainstream culture, an official religion and strong traditions. That is enough to keep me in this county because I can be whatever I want to be and theoretically I am protected under the Constitution.



    However, if I had to choose between Boston and Bombay, I would stick with the former simply because my views are closer to Western culture and ....


    The former contradicts the later, dont you think? There is a mainstream culture in US. Its the McD's culture. Every small town is virtually indistinguishable from every other small town, except when you encounter minorities - amish, mormons or Red Indian tribes or mexicans/blacks and like.

    Your assumptions that people outside your country dont have the same rights as you is ridiculous. Some of the European contries have more freedoms than what you got. Just like in the US, if u fuck with the administration,u wud get screwed elsewhere too.

    Its laughable to suggest that India has a mainstream culture. India is the most diverse place in the world. There are 18 official languages, if I am correct. I see people in US crying fowl when there are instructions written in Spanish - just a 2nd language spoken around here. Its a standard practise to write it in 3 languages atleast in India. India has more religious cults than US.. both wacko and non-wacko. There are certain religions that survived only because they chose to live in India - like the Zorastrians aka Parsis - originally from Persia, all but wiped out due to the advent of Islam. They have been around for 1000 years in India. FYI - India even has MORMONS and some stone age negroid tribes who are, well, living in stone age still.

    And yea - Hindus dont believe that all non-hindus are evil and go to hell.

    US is a good country for an average guy because of the number of opportunities available. US is a great country for the really smart too. In India life has been tough for past 300 yrs. Only the best shine there.. Its not a country I would recommend for the mediocre americans.

  38. Whoa!!! Hold on there little one... by cOdEgUru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now now.. lets not issue blanket statements shall we..

    From those last two lines, you come off as someone who absolutely has no understanding nor knowledge of India, its culture and its people.

    Sure, I agree that women are abused in various parts of this country, but women arent obviously hated!! Remember, we had a woman as our Prime Minister when the rest of the world was still letting their women run around in Bikinis and swinging to pop culture :) (Yes, that is a blanket statement).

    The biggest problem in India is that there are still an immensely large population that has no education, has no healthcare, has no idea how to stand up for their rights. Corrupt politicians are not delegated to the Western world, we have them as well.

    The Hindu Religion (Despite being a Christian myself, I have immense respect for Hinduism and for other religions as well), does not look down upon the women, the so called "holy" individuals who wanted to bend their religion to their needs and wishes, decreed that women were inferior. As a religion and among its scriptures and texts, Hinduism has utmost regard for Woman as a Mother, Wife, Sister, Friend and an Equal. And believe me, this religion and the indian culture has existed for thousand more years than the Western Civilization and Christianity (heck, Christianity came to India way before it reached the Western world, in 52B.C when St. Thomas reached the southern tip of India). So yes, this is a Land which is steeped in culture, which has treated women with utmost respect in all corners of it, and yet has been vandalized and abused by people in power, by religious nuts, who had their own agendas.

    And when United States (formerly known as Land of the Free) shudders at the thought of letting immigrants who werent born here, having a shot at being President, India has no qualms in letting the Wife of a Former Prime Minister who was born and raised in Italy, get a swipe at becoming the nation's Prime Minister. Also, voting rights for Women, We didnt had to think twice about that either.

    Oh one more thing when you are still trying to comprehend.. Gay Marriage is Legal in India (we just dont let them fornicate, now thats another story!) :)

    So please crawl back to your trailer and show not your face and your intellect to the rest of us (That if you didnt know was surely a blanket statement, but meant solely for you)

    1. Re:Whoa!!! Hold on there little one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Christianity came to India way before it reached the Western world, in 52B.C when St. Thomas reached the southern tip of India
      Whoa! Christianity got to India before Christ? India is very spiritually advanced, I must move there ;-)
  39. Say nothing more.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I already addressed this "cruelty to women" in the same thread elsewhere, so heres the link. Agree or not, its up to you.

    Now, you speak volumes about how we abuse and devalue our women.. (Devalue is such a perfect word!). Would you care to switch on your TV?? Hmm.. how about you look at the print media, the Ads, the Sports. Everywhere you see nothing but SKIN!. Now after what America and its people has done to degrade and devalue the image of women, I am not sure there is anything left for us poor Indians to do! :)

    Seriously dude, climb out of your hole and visit India for once. You will find it not much different than any other place you been to. Dont take what you read/watch on TV, at face value. Dont you want to find out for yourself???

    You really need to stop believing what others tell you and get a job in India.

  40. Re:"India" as the buzzword of the day by soundcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So in other words, corporatons are rigging the labor markets. I think as Amercians we need to put a stop to this. Amercians need to FORCE the government to pass laws requiring Amercians to hire Amercians before they hire imported guest workers in Amercia. That, and not "jobs going overseas" is the real problem.

  41. Re:Further evidence Friedman smokes the good stuff by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Friedman is full of crap if he thinks a few well-off geeks will change life for the heaving masses that populate the sub-continent.

    This is correct. In fact, offshoring often simply exacerbates divisions between rich and poor in the "host countries" and can actually lead to global instability. See Amy Chua's "World On Fire" for an alternate (and, IMHO, much more accurate) viewpoint.

    --
    That is all.
  42. Capitalism & Free Trade by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I am about to say applies to capitalism in general (so don't assume it's just the computer industry; what I say should equally apply to, say, farming).

    You are wrong

    I think your understanding of capitalism is completely wrong. There is NO SUCH thing as CONSERVATION under capitalism. This is why capitalism can increase the wealth (eg. GDP) of a country. In fact, trade can increase the wealth of all countries that engage in it*. If your assertion were correct, this wouldn't happen (the total wealth in the world will be constant). Your conservation principle is automatically violated by the growth in wealth.

    Why some don't support the present

    There are many reasons people are against what is happening. Clearly some people are racist and don't want to see "other kind" get jobs. Some people on this message board have already shown that. Then there are others who are clueless when it comes to economics and somehow think that they "own" the jobs (whatever that means). I'm not any of these. I'll tell you why I'm against so-called "free trade" and the most popular form of capitalism today, neo-liberal economics.

    I'm not a capitalist, and I'm not a nationalist either. I could care less about countries (I can't wait until all countries dissapear). The problem with so-called free trade is the following. We know for sure that trade benefits countries. However, the benefits can be shared in many different ways. One country can benefit completely, or the other, or in a mixture of some sort. *I* claim that what is happening is that the benefits of trade accrues to the shareholders and their corporations (what Marxists would call capitalists). I further claim that what passes for "free trade" these days is nothing more than an attempt by capitalists to undermine worker rights and environmental regulations, among others. Capitalists have always been angry for the success of the socialist policies enacted in defense of the workers (eg. minimum wage, inability to fire without cause, mandatory paid holidays, etc). You just need to read popular press or economist opinions over the last 50 years to see what I mean. What is happening now is simply removing the regulations placed by socialists in the past. When you move to a poor country, all these regulations dissapear IN THE LONG TERM.

    The worker, either in India or in USA, do not benefit--although some may or may not benefit in the short term. The American worker loses because their wages are driven down (close to zero). The Indian worker loses because their job is temporary** and nothing more than a transit job. Overall, workers are worse off. A job which provided good working conditions all of a sudden doesn't have these worker benefits. I am a socialist and to me, it seems like everything we*** fought for and won won is slowly being eroded. For instance, a country like USA or Canada mandates the number of hours you work or the number of vacation days you get. The poorer countries either don't have as strong of a regulation or don't enforce it. When a job moves from USA to say Mexico, you automatically lose the worker benefits.

    So that's why I am against what passes for free trade these days. Make no mistake about it: I'm in favour of trade. But the type of trade I like is called fair trade (a concept foreign to capitalists).

    Capitalist defense

    Finally, I'll mention what the capitalists are saying about all this. A lot of capitalists like their country so it's not as if the American capitalists are out to destroy their country. The capitalist argument was mentioned by Thomas Friedman in one of his previous articles that was mentioned on Slashdot. Basically, it says that countries benefit from trade (true) and USA, in this case, will create superior jobs to replace those lost through innovation (questionable). Of course, capitalists like Friedman don't mention that the shareholders and their corporations are the ones that benefit in the end.

    My Prediction

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  43. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A minor problem is that Friedman is full of shit, but who needs facts when you've got a newspaper to sell?

    --
    [o]_O