Slashdot Mirror


MSFTs "iPod Killer" Readied for Europe

rocketjam writes "Reuters reports that the first hardware to run Microsoft's "iPod Killer" software will be available in Europe in the second half of 2004. MS has been working with several manufacturers, and is expected to introduce a device which will play movies and songs as well as store digital photos through Microsoft's yet-to-be-unveiled Portable Media Center software. A spokesman said 'We think this is going to be one of the hot devices for Christmas 2004,' The players are expected to sell for between about $700 to $800. They will play MP3s as well as audio and video recorded in Microsoft's digital format. The player will be significantly larger than the iPod in order to accomodate a video screen. A Jupiter Research analyst, Mark Milligan said 'By definition, (the devices) just don't have widespread appeal', and he doubts the devices would change the consumer electronics landscape in any way."

82 of 580 comments (clear)

  1. Nice but not quite "innovative" by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Apple Computer: (n) A primary source of ideas for Microsoft's research & development groups. See also: Muse

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's called an iBook. It's priced at 20-ish precent more than the quoted device price for this new Microsoft offering.

      It also has a bigger screen ;-)

    2. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by ptomblin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see anybody clamouring for a portable device that plays "video AND audio in WMP format".

      Look at the huge sales of the ridiculously overpriced iPod Mini - the market wants smaller and sleeker and good looking, not huge, bulky and with too many features.

      The only "iPod killer" is going to be something that looks as cool as an iPod, holds as much, but is smaller and cheaper.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    3. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      and probably better battery life....

    4. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Must... not... feed... troll..

      Argh!

      They got it a long time ago--that's why their OS natively supports clicks from three mouse buttons + a scroll wheel and can be programmed for more by people who make mice with more buttons. Safari even supports the middle-click as opening a new tab and Expose can be connected to any of the mouse buttons from the control panel.

      If you don't like the single button mouse then buy your own. I have a kensington studio mouse and have been very happy with it.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    5. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by saden1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At 700/800 dollars how can it possibly kill the iPod? Come on, they aren't even the same market segment. I know this and I'm not even a "Licensing Engineer." I think they should be targeting the same crowd that buys portable DVD players and such because your average Joe will expect their "iPod Killer" to STAFT for 700/800 dollars. Honestly, where do they get off? If they are smart they would be going after auto manufactures.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    6. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by MoneyT · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a new driver called SideTrack which allows you to program a soft button into your trackpad. That is, you can set the physical button to either a click or right click and set a tap on teh trackpad to the opposite. It also adds scroll zones to the sides.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by ultramk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look at the huge sales of the ridiculously overpriced iPod Mini - the market wants smaller and sleeker and good looking, not huge, bulky and with too many features.

      Don't forget the best part of the iPod: the interface. It's a work of minimal art. 4 buttons. wheel. I've never had to show anyone how to use it when they want to look at it. it's intuitive. how much new technology can we say that about?

      Also, I just don't understand how someone can call something overpriced that is so popular that it's nearly impossible to get ahold of one. (trust me, I've been trying to order one for my brother-in-law's graduation) If there were selling it for $150, they would be making $100 less profit on each and every one, and since they are selling as many as they can make, that would be millions of dollars just *gone*. For Apple's shareholders, it's priced *just right*.

      This also means that they can drop the price by $50 this fall after the people willing to pay $250 are satisfied, and capture another whole market segment. or keep the price point and increase the capabilities.

      Marketing 101: If you can sell it for $10, what is to be gained by selling it for $5?

      Of course, if by "overpriced", you mean, "costs more than I am willing to pay for what it is", that's different. Of course, that's a subjective thing.

      It'll have to be more than cheaper and smaller and cooler looking to kill the iPod: it would have to work better, and be easier to use. No one has managed that, and I for one would be very surprised if Apple wasn't able to keep up.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    8. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by Spellbinder · · Score: 3, Informative

      linux runs on a ipod!!!
      so why????

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    9. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WHY?

      For $700 to $800, you could get a FUCKING AWESOME device that was a similar size but had better processor speed, better input options, better everything. I mean, there are SONY laptops that are about this size, with keyboards. This is about what you'd pay for a sweet 802.11b palmtop and a big CF hard disk to go with it. Things with which you could ACTUALLY USE WITHOUT A LOT OF HASSLES, installing Linux or not.

      But instead, you'd prefer to buy a multimedia device, REMOVE the multimedia subsystem, and try and write your own?

      That's nuts man. I love working on cars, and I like that I can customize my communter sedan if I want to, but I wouldn't go buy a new car with the intent of ripping out the engine and building my own engine from scratch. Seems to me you'd be better off buying an OLDER (read: cheaper) car and doing your restorations on that. Or buying the NEWER device, and just using it as is without putting in several hundred hours of work to get back to where you started from.

      I just don't understand it. Oh no -- maybe I'm not a nerd anymore! What'll I do with all these ThinkGeek T-shirts?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    10. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by nehril · · Score: 4, Insightful

      content will be an issue for these video devices. with music, you have folks with large cd collections with a rip-time of a few minutes per cd. apple added the itunes music service so theres more ways to get stuff to put on the iPod. And most people *like* listening to their favorite songs multiple times, and you can do that while doing something else.

      but what will you put on your "video pod" ? ripping a dvd takes a lot of time and disk space, and there's no movie I like so much that I want to carry it around with me all the time and watch it over and over again. You could trawl the net for tv episodes, but there's really no legal way to get them, they're encoded in a bazillion different codec combos and most importantly, how many times will anybody watch the same Seinfeld episode?

      I guess the new wave of tv season->dvds is a potential source, but whereas you can listen to music at work or walking down the street or whenever, watching TV is not as workable.

      I'm sure there'll be a few thousand folks who will buy a bigger, heavier, expensive unslick brick with crap battery life for the sake of showing their friends movie trailers... over and over again.

      now, when you get the Itunes Video Service going, and I can easily download a set of seinfeld episodes quickly, cheaply and reliably encoded, then... well then still maybe not. there are some hurdles to cross before anything like this "kills" the ipod, or even challenges mp3 players as a whole.

    11. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by ultramk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Marketing 201: Sometimes you can make more profit by selling more units at a lower price.

      Not when they are selling as many as they can make. That's the point.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    12. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by nojomofo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      t wont' be until these devices become as small as ipods that they could really be considered "Ipod killers"

      I don't think that anybody wants a video device as small as an ipod. What, a 1" screen or something? These will always be entirely different segments.

    13. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by javaxman · · Score: 4, Informative
      Portable DVD players cost half as much. Even ones which have 'extra' features like the ability to play MP3 and audio CDs.

      Just one example

      So why would I buy this $700 thing? So I can spend time uploading video and audio to it to remove the inconvenience of carrying around a folder of disks?

      I just don't get it... and neither does M$ or any hardware company that thinks this Media Player thingie is in even remotely the same category as the iPod Mini.

    14. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by JamieF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >"99 cent" stores struggle.

      No, they struggle because everything they have sucks. Haven't you even been in one? It's not a matter of merchandise that lacks famous logos... it's just crap.

    15. Re:Nice but not quite "innovative" by JamieF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and then when you actually try to use it you'll find that ripping DVDs to 3" size takes a half hour per movie, and that the reason the portable movie player only costs $50 more is that it maxes out at 8 fps because it has the same embedded CPU as the audio-only player, and that the battery only lasts 15 minutes because the audio player could power down the drive during songs but the video player can't, plus the color LCD takes lots more power than than the B/W one.

      In reality, that $50 more color AV player with crappy battery life would never be put on the market, and instead it would cost $300 more and have a much better CPU and battery and would also be a PDA (since that costs almost nothing extra once you have all that hardware), and it's already for sale today from PalmOne and Sony and HPaq and Dell etc. etc.

  2. Different Market by druske · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure with that high of a price (about $670-$810 US) and the additional size (3X as thick, twice as long!) that this thing qualifies as an "iPod killer" in any real sense; they're playing for an entirely different market segment. It seems like a very small niche to me.

    Give 'em a couple of versions, maybe they'll get it right and the market will materialize. I wouldn't bet on it though. "More TV, more often" isn't a big hole in my life, anyway...

    1. Re:Different Market by jeblucas · · Score: 5, Funny

      They mean "iPod Killer" in that if you took one of these and whacked an iPod with it, the iPod would die.

      --
      blarg.
    2. Re:Different Market by d'fim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For that price, one could get a low-end laptop.

      --
      Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
    3. Re:Different Market by I+am+Kobayashi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. Isn't this just taking the concept of "bloatware" to the digital media player hardware market?

      There is a reason why iPods are so popular: they are relatively inexpensive, they are small and portable, and they do what the user wants them to do well: play music.

      I am with the Jupitar analyst, I just don't see a market for this (especially against the iPod) unless the price goes down to iPod levels....

      --
      --Kobayashi--
    4. Re:Different Market by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Funny
      They mean "iPod Killer" in that if you took one of these and whacked an iPod with it, the iPod would die.

      Hell, my money would be on the iPod...

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    5. Re:Different Market by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
      they're playing for an entirely different market segment.

      my question is "what market segment would that be?" people who want to pay almost as much as the cost of a laptop for significantly less functionality and a marginally smaller size? people who want to watch movies while jogging?

      this beast reminds me of the newton. lots of features but too damn big and clunky. of course newton had the saving grace of being the first to market...

    6. Re:Different Market by forrestt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess. You've used Microsoft products in the past?

    7. Re:Different Market by EndlessNameless · · Score: 4, Funny

      ::: For that price, one could get a low-end laptop.:::

      Which also comes nicely packaged with a set of CTRL + ALT + DELETE keys.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    8. Re:Different Market by Simon+Carr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh, I suggest a perfectly working, but used 12" iBook[1].

      Actually I'm starting to "not get" this thing, even if it is aimed at a totally different market. I mean they've got to know the size of the prototype is prohibitive to coolness. They shouldn't have even shown it. Where are people going to carry this thing around in this day and age when most electronics are the size of a deck of cards at a maximum? I'd almost be embarrased pulling out that prototype to show photos or video. Imagine being in an airport or something with that. I can pull out the Clie[1] anywhere no sweat, I couldn't say the same with this cinderblock.

      And all that needs to happen to rip this thing a new one is a PalmOS device with one of those new super-micro HDs. They can already do everything advertised by this, all they need is storage. Hell WinCE devices can do this, and are smaller. Ahh! What's the deal with this thing? Now it's like some sort of unsolvable riddle that I don't want the solution to...

      [1]: Yes, I'm both an Apple and Sony Clie fanboy.

      --
      -- The unsig...
    9. Re:Different Market by sfraggle · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are some photos of Microsoft's new offering here :)

      --
      were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    10. Re:Different Market by Mondoz · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's the Palm OS / WinCE battle all over again.

      The users want a PDA, so they pack in every feature they can think of and bump the price through the roof...

      If the iPod is a good product as just an MP3 player, then if we jam in a video player, word processor, fishing tackle box, and dog whistle, then it's got to be a better product...

      Such Deja Vu from the PDA wars...

      --
      /sig
    11. Re:Different Market by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Insightful

      really?

      299 for an iPod...the bottom of the market is 250 for HDD players...that is not expensive at all, for the market.....

      now, you might think that all HDD players are expensive for what they do, but that is the market price point, so live with it.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    12. Re:Different Market by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, the problem with your assessment is this:

      Back when WinCE devices were substantially larger and more expensive than Palm Devices, Palm outsold them.

      But now that Pocket PCs are comparably priced and sized, they outsell the PalmOS stuff. Because you can do a lot more with the Pocket PC.

      PalmOS is trying to catch up, feature wise, but since PocketPC has had things like multimedia and wireless for a lot longer, they work better than they do on the PalmOS. They don't seem as clunky. And therefore PalmOS is in a tight spot, playing catch up.

      The demand was always there. MS pushed their devices out before they were cost effective, and by doing so, a lot of really great software was written.

      It could be they're doing the same in this market. On the other hand, they could also be making another AutoPC...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:Different Market by laird · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "now that Pocket PCs are comparably priced and sized, they outsell the PalmOS stuff"

      Actually, according to Gartner data comparing 2Q02 and 2Q03 (http://www3.gartner.com/5_about/press_releases/pr 15aug2003b.jsp) it looks like Palm's worldwide market share is growing (30.5% to 38%), as is Sony's (10.3% to 11%), while the WinCE licensees' market shares dropped, HP from 15.9% to 15.3%, and 'others' (including Dell) from 41.2% to 30.4%. RIM also grew from 2.1% to 5.3%.

      In the US, Palm is more dominant, growing from 40.5% to 46.7%, while Sony shrank slightly, from 13.1% to 12.1%. RIM went from 3.1% to 7.3%, leaving all of the WinCE licensees dropping from43.3% to 33.9%.

      So while Palm is doing very well so far, it's always possible that the next version of WinCE turns out to be easy to use, reliable and efficient. But since MS is still stuck with the "Windows everywhere" approach instead of the "sell the best possible product for the market" approach, I think they'll be stuck in second place for a while yet.

  3. Sloppy editing... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Funny
    Reuters reports that the first hardware to run Microsoft's "iPod Killer" software will be available in Europe in the second half of 2004...The players are expected to sell for between about $700 to $800. They will play MP3s as well as audio and video recorded in Microsoft's digital format. The player will be significantly larger than the iPod in order to accomodate a video screen.

    There's a typo in the article. "N-Gage Killer" is misspelled.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Sloppy editing... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Funny

      N-Gage killer? You mean it isn't dead yet?

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:Sloppy editing... by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought the official N-Gage killer was N-Gage...

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  4. not an ipod killer by mlong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think the ipod needs to worry about any competition from this. People buying an ipod aren't going to pay a lot more for a device that is alot heavier, bigger, and plays movies in microsoft's proprietary format. Not to mention I have yet to see microsoft come out with anything that is elegant and easy to use.

    --
    //m
    1. Re:not an ipod killer by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I bought an iPod, and I probably would buy this, if I wasn't saving up for a laptop. Microsoft's Media Center version of Windows XP is easy to use, and it does look pretty good. If the portable Media Center is anything like the Media Center version of XP then I would buy it.

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    2. Re:not an ipod killer by Total_Wimp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      People buying an ipod aren't going to pay a lot more for a device that is alot heavier, bigger, and plays movies in microsoft's proprietary format...
      This is actually a great opportunity for Apple. Now they can come up with something smaller and lighter that uses their own proprietary format (plus a few others) and they can clean up.

      TW

      Think about it: the iPod wasn't new, it was just smaller and better. Now Bill is giving Apple the exact playing field they need in order to show up the competition. Bravo.
  5. idiots by prockcore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    an ipod killer would have to be cheaper than an ipod.

    It seems that MS is using the same tactics that failed for all the gameboy competitors. Try and add a billion features, and price yourself right out of the market.

    1. Re:idiots by Kenja · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "an ipod killer would have to be cheaper than an ipod."

      No, it just has to offer better value. For me my USB pen MP3 player is an iPod killer since it offers more of what I want for a better price. I dont WANT to carry around more music then I can listen to. I also dont want a player with moving parts.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  6. iPod Killer my arse! by jwthompson2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like my iPod because it packs a lot of storage in a small package and I don't want to watch video on a stinkin' handheld, that is why I tote my powerbook around. This idea seems plain old dumb to me, but I guess if it is competition it is good for consumers but just strikes me as a dumb idea that I'm not going to consider buying, especially at twice the price of an iPod.

    --
    Even if I knew that tomorrow the world would go to pieces, I would still plant my apple tree. -Martin Luther
  7. Christmas gift??? by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who gives a $700-$800 Christmas gift? I know a few people might get their spouse or children somethign like that, but the vast majority give gifts far smaller than that.

    And besides, for that price you could get a laptop.

    1. Re:Christmas gift??? by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


      Who gives a $700-$800 Christmas gift?

      Martha Stewart to her cellmate "Bertha"?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Christmas gift??? by PhoenixOne · · Score: 3, Funny
      High level Microsoft employees? ;)

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  8. iPod killer by eXtro · · Score: 5, Funny

    At 2X the price and 6X the volume the only way it'll be an iPod killer is if you use it like a brick to smash an iPod. This sounds like the Saturday Night Live skit where the hipper you were the bigger your cellphone was.

  9. archos av320 by Cheeze · · Score: 5, Informative

    it's already been done in a smaller package. the Archos av320 is already available and works pretty well.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  10. no thanks... by revmoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They will play MP3s as well as audio and video recorded in Microsoft's digital format.

    What Microsoft apparently doesn't realize is that customers aren't going to spend $7-800 on a device only to have to convert every divx and xvid movie they have over to microsoft's proprietary format. Time really is money in this case, and it's just not worth it to have to spend days/weeks converting movie files.

    --
    I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
  11. Not quite a skiller by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not quite in the same target market, as it plays movies, stores photos, and most importantly it is FATTER than iPod (roughly three times as thick as an iPod and roughly twice as long ).

    It's like callling an elephant a pet killer because it can carry luggages, push start your car etc, which your normal domestic pets like dogs, cats cannot do.

  12. Ipod Killer? by medscaper · · Score: 4, Funny
    Don't believe the hype.

    The "Ipod Killer" is just a Microsoft employee named Ted who steals people Ipods.

    Then stomps on them.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  13. Has anyone seen teh leaked pics of this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know a guy who knows a guy, and I managed to get one leaked photo.

  14. My questions by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea itself isn't a totally bad one - at a lower price, I could consider getting one for my kids for long drives or some such. (Then again, by the time they're old enough for me to do that, an iBook at nearly the same price will have the same effect.)

    But my questions are these:

    1. It plays movies in WMV and audio in WMA. So where am I going to get the WMV movies? WIll I be able to stick a DVD into my computer (assuming I want to get a Windows box, of course) and have it ripped to a format that the device can use? Or am I relying on having some other system (like a Tivo) to record TV shows and let me get that video on my device that way?

    And if I have to rip the movies myself with an unofficial DVD, will I still go to jail/get fined?

    2. Battery power? I'm seeing 3 hours - seriously? iPod killer with 3 hours of battery power? That's like the Sega handheld devices that were going to kill the Gameboy with 3 hours battery power.

    3. TV out? Suppose I do pick it up and put movies on it so when I'm at a friend's house we can watch something. Can I have a TV-out so we don't have to scrunch around a tiny little screen?

    Just a few thoughts. I'm sure there are more. Again, I'm not saying this is a bad idea, but I have serious reservations before spending $500 - $800 of my cash. I already spent $300 on an iPod....

  15. Two words: on crack by sootman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd like to have a portable video-playing thingie as much as the next guy, but they are trying to squeeze into an incredibly small niche here: people who are willing to spend $800 on something larger than an iPod, but who don't want to spend the same amount of money on a DVD-playing laptop. Any larger than an iPod and you're quickly getting out of the fits-in-the-pocket category. What are they aiming for, the fits-in-a-glovebox market?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  16. iPod Killer... by nickgrieve · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ha ha, yeah, right. Just like how IE was going to be "the Netscape Killer"... feh...

  17. Explain to me again... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why would I spend $700 for something that is bigger and heavier than my $300 Sony Clie?? It plays MP3s and videos. (I love showing people Golem accepting the MTV award.)

    I can get several CDs on an 128MB memory stick and play them in my car using an RF adapter. The MS product does provides more disk space for video, but with the recent advances in micro drives, it's only a matter of time until they start becoming more common in PDAs.

    I thought MS was supposed to be better at creating loss leaders <cough> XBox </cough >

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  18. Why not buy a laptop? by Nacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the price of this thing, why not spend a little extra money and buy a laptop with a Centrino or equivilant processor??

    It's not like the "iPod Killer" will fit nicely in your pocket anyway, so why not splurge and have all the features of a ultra-mobile laptop.

    My 2 cents

    1. Re:Why not buy a laptop? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i agree... for $800 and something bigger than an ipod why not jump to a subnotebook......?
      like i really want to watch Kill Bill on a 4" LCD on the subway... or browse pictures of my trip to Las Vegas...... no thanks.
      running around with your own audio is like having a personal soundtrack to your activities. watching a mini screen is an activity of its own. i'm not saying this device has NO market, but it's not the same as an audio device (iPod or any other). why do people think audio is the poorman's video? someone needs to escape the cube sometime and live life.

  19. iPod Killer? Don't make me laugh! by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The players are expected to sell for between about $700 to $800. They will play MP3s as well as audio and video recorded in Microsoft's digital format. The player will be significantly larger than the iPod in order to accomodate a video screen.

    These things appeal to a different market (entirely!). Apple decided to make the iPod mini to take aim at the market that wanted a player even smaller than the iPod. They want an mp3 player--not something that will slice bread. This thing is huge and expensive when compared to other mp3 players--which is the only market that the iPod attempts to compete in.

    Call this a "portable movie player" that's "aiming to repeat the iPod's success in a different market," but calling it an "iPod Killer" is a horrible misnomer. I seriously doubt that anyone would consider one of these things in lieu of an iPod.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  20. no push news please, bernie by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Microsoft's Bernard envisaged a scenario where the owner of a Portable Media Center gadget would be able to store hours of their favorite music and movies on the device. They could then download from a news-oriented Web site a round-up of the day's news to watch on the train.

    When will these guys get it through their thick skulls that people don't want to watch pre-recorded news programs on TV. They have to stop trying to get it to be a "TV newspaper".

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  21. Yeah, right! by iiioxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only iPod killer the boys from Redmond could come up with would be a Microsoft-branded claw hammer (retailing for $149.95 most likely).

  22. Re:Yet another story ripped from Yahoo! by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdot is more a point-of-view than a news gathering organization. This story originated at Reuters, which is a news gathering organization.

    Slashdot is more like your local newspaper: it takes stories from a variety of locations (often wire services) which are relevant to you (determined by geography in the case of your local newspaper, or technical interest in the case of Slashdot). Yahoo does the same, but it's pretty catholic in its tastes. Slashdot gets its stories from a variety of sources: wire reports (often via other media), journals, blogs, press releases, and sometimes just people finding out interesting web sites (though that hardly counts as nes most of the time)

    In all likelihood, the story originated as a press release from Microsoft, rewritten by Reuters into a news article, and then rewritten again as a Slashdot story. Slashdot adds very little: a bit of commentary, and sub-categorizations (Microsoft, Music, Business, Media).

    The commentary is biased, but you wanted it biased: you came here for the Slashdot-esque view of things. You could read the Reuters feed yourself, but you'll probably read a lot of stuff you don't care about. You could even subscribe to get the press releases directly, but you'd really hate that.

  23. My review by mst76 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No wireless. Larger and more expensive than an ipod. Lame.

  24. Re:Ipod Killer? by DjMd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good news is Apple is working on a "Ted Killer".
    It's a big guy named Steve who stops Ted.

    Seriously MS is smoking something when they call their new bomb an Ipod killer.
    It won't have firewire, it will have excessive DRM lockdowns and won't handle Ogg.
    Oh and it costs more. great.

    --
    DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
  25. Yeah, that'll sell! by El · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, it only costs twice as much as the Archos players that are already out and that already have the same capabilities! I can't wait!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  26. ipdod is dying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple Computer : "Proudly going out of business for twenty-seven years"!

  27. In fairness by Nakito · · Score: 3, Informative

    In fairness, I see nothing in the article to indicate that Microsoft itself is the source of the term "iPod Killer." Yes, the phrase appears in quotation marks, but only in the reporter's text. It does not appear in the verbatim quotes from the Microsoft representative. The term may be be the reporter's own invention. Microsoft's marketing department is usually more sophisticated than this, since the term obviously sets them up for a fall.

  28. iPod killer? Honestly... by Xaroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not at $700-$800. I can buy a smallish laptop that does the same thing for less. Heck - I could go hit eBay for a Toshiba Libretto and probably fare better than that.

    While the economics probably aren't in their favor on this, if they wanted to make it an "iPod killer", the price would have to be significantly less than the iPod just to make up the difference from Apple's name recognition, and the size of this beast.

    Sell the exact same piece of hardware for $150, and we'll talk about iPod slaying.

  29. Re:welll, yes, a laptop-but by El · · Score: 4, Informative

    For $778, you could have gotten a Dell notebook with a 40GB drive ($699 for 20GB).

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  30. Ooops... Apple will have it first by barthrh2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to an Apple Insider article, Apple is already ahead of this game. They will deliver sooner, at a lower cost, and very likely a better product. Guesses (aren't they always with Apple?) include an intro around April 28 for the first anniversary of the iTMS.

    Sources: Apple readying 4th-generation iPod

    (snip) While sources could not pin-point a specific day or month of introduction, they said the soon to be released player would boast a 50GB hard disk capable of holding 12,500 songs and carry an approximate cost of $499.

    Unlike the recent capacity-centric revisions to the iPod line, the 4th-generation iPod will host a number of architectural advancements and new features. Most apparent, sources say, is the presence of a 2-inch color screen for displaying photos stored on the pod, from the palm of your hand.

    The player will reportedly also adopt a video output jack that will allow users to connect their iPods to television sets, sources said. Meanwhile, no mention was made in regards to an output jack capable of relaying audio to a home entertainment center. (/snip)

    1. Re:Ooops... Apple will have it first by pknoll · · Score: 3, Funny
      The player will reportedly also adopt a video output jack that will allow users to connect their iPods to television sets, sources said. Meanwhile, no mention was made in regards to an output jack capable of relaying audio to a home entertainment center.

      *cough* Headphone jack?

      =)

  31. What movies? by bluesangria · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Forgive my ignorance, but how are you supposed to copy video onto this device if all DVD's have copy protections anyways? And if it's not a commercial movie you want to download onto it, why would you want to download, say, your home movies which would interest no one except yourself? And if your home movies DO interest other people (maybe you are the porn star next door), how exactly do you go about adding Microsoft DRM so you can play them on your "iPod Killer". Methinks Microsoft spends alot of time talking up lip service to a new device under the assumption that ANY press is better than NO press. Tablet PC anyone?

    blue

  32. Apple seems to want this too by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If AppleInsider is anything to go by, then Apple also seems to be developing an iPod with these sort of features. See story: Apple readying 4th-generation iPod. Apple already learnt their lesson, circa 1990, whereby standing proud, simply give the competition time to catch up - in that case it was MS catching up, and bypassing, with MS-Windows. If Apple is smart, they will keep one step ahead of the game.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  33. Re:Ipod Killer? by ericdano · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Get over the OGG thing. It's not going to get adapted. It's like BETA and VHS. It might be a little better, but people don't care.

    I personally use 160bit AACs for most everything.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  34. Re:Ipod Killer? by joemc79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it will have excessive DRM lockdowns and won't handle Ogg. Oh and it costs more.

    Just like the ipod?

    40GB iPod = $500
    DRM
    No Ogg support

  35. $800? I don't think so by ThousandStars · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think Microsoft is ignoring a cardinal rule of consumer gadgets: a few things that do one thing well are better than one device that does a few things poorly. In this case, they're trying to position themselves between the expensive portable DVD players that I've seen on planes / the iPod, and laptops. For $800, someone can get a laptop. For $1000, someone can get a pretty nice laptop.

    I think it flops.

    There are so many things wrong with this device I can't name them all. Sorry, it's not an iPod killer.

  36. The Microsoft myPod, with "Clippy" innovation by cpu_fusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clippy, "Hi, it looks like you are trying to carry this device. Do you want to 1. lift some weights, 2. buy a backpack, or 3. sell this thing on ebay?"

  37. My decision to buy is made by CdBee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For some months now I have been contemplating purchasing either a Creative Labs MuVO or an Apple iPod

    I've now decided, definitely the iPod. I don't want to contribute to yet another Microsoft monopoly. I can't imagine the horror of being forced to use WMP to access my mobile device and being locked to a single platform.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  38. Re:Ipod Killer? by Beatbyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's bald and jumps around screaming "iPODS!!! iPODS!!! iPODS!!! iPODS!!!" with sweat stains in his arm pits right?

  39. Microsoft Pr0nMaster! by mveloso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Redmond, WA - Microsoft's new Pr0nMaster gives you pr0n on demand. Bring your pr0n with you - on the train, on the bus, at 12.000 meters - everwhere. It's large capacity drive means you won't have to explain what you're doing with "all those DVDs" when you pass through customs. The big screen means you won't have to squint while you watch. And it's small enough for you to bring it to the restroom or other enclosed space so you can "do your business."

    The Pr0nMaster also comes in a sport enclosure, because "accidents happen" when things get exciting on-screen! Plus its handy video out lets you plug into the A/V equipment at your destination - so you can share the wealth!

    The Microsoft Pr0nMaster - a peepshow in your pocket!

  40. Re:Ipod Killer? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    A music player that doesn't handle OGG is like an automobile that doesn't make toast.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  41. Re:Ipod Killer? by Durandal64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The iPod has no built-in DRM. Or didn't you know that you can play m4p's from iTMS on any iPod you want?

  42. Re:Ipod Killer? by McNally · · Score: 5, Funny
    A music player that doesn't handle OGG is like an automobile that doesn't make toast.

    This is Slashdot. Without knowing whether you're an emacs user or not we can't tell whether you think it would actually be appropriate for an automobile to also make toast..
  43. Re:Ipod Killer? by Q2Serpent · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the iPod *does* have DRM.

    The m4p files are still encrypted on the iPod, they are just encrypted with the iPod's key instead of the PC's key. Yes, you can copy files to any iPod from anyone's iTunes collection (so long as that song is registered with that copy if iTunes), but have you tried to get such an m4p file back off the iPod again? Even if you could just copy the m4p back off, it'd be encrypted with the iPod key instead of the PC key.

    -Serp

  44. Not the iPod killer by Unregistered · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the iPod killer won't be softwarre, but hardware. Specifically, i think it will be a windows update that "accidently" makes ipods no longer work on that system. This update will also be bundled with all the security updates so you have to chose between secure and iPod.

  45. The REAL iPod Killer by TheXRayStyle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's a story about the REAL ipod killer