Slashdot Mirror


Google Offers Personalized Search

Ryan Barrett writes " Google is just overflowing with news today. Along with the recently announced UI redesign, they've launched a personalized search engine on Google Labs. It's still beta, but it looks pretty cool. (Note that it probably uses technology acquired when they bought Kaltix last year.) Other announcements include Web Alerts, a 'numrange' command, and image search built into Google News."

87 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. This looks cool, however.... by adamgreenfield · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think I'll stick with traditional Google. I like the non-cluttered look of the main page and the lack of Yahoo-ism (read: 50,000 things under the search box). But hey, to each his own and options are great things, as long as you stick with resonable defaults and you can always turn them off.

    Google Labs come out with some awsome other things as well like the Google Deskbar and my personal favorite Google Voice Search (Also noteworty is Google Sets, however I can't find many uses for it yet).

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
    1. Re:This looks cool, however.... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obviously you haven't even seen the google personalized search thingie. It's as clean as the traditional google search, with a link that allows you to set your search options.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:This looks cool, however.... by keep_it_simple_stupi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed. More options are good - but this search seems significantly slower than the normal Google - I really don't think that Google can get /.'ed can it?

      As a side note, selecting computers as your interests doesn't skew any results for the search term "bass" towards computers - I still get bass fishing. The FAQ is wrong man!

    3. Re:This looks cool, however.... by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When I heard "personal search", I thought they meant I'd be running my own crawler/engine/etc.

      That would be cool. I set up my crawler to crawl stuff as frequently as I want - i.e. the PR pages of companies who'se stocks I own, every hour, others, who cares.

      One step cooler is if my "own" serch engine could share search databases in a kazaa-like-manner with other people I select, so people with similar interests can share the load.

      P2P would be awesome for special-interest search.

    4. Re:This looks cool, however.... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It's beta software, what do you expect?

      So, I ran two side-by-side tabs, one which contains the "normal" Google search and the other contains the "personalized" search, with the slider set at "max". It seems to do a fairly good job. I set a couple of preferences, and now it seems to rank stuff which mentions Linux higher.

      Or move the slider around and watch the search results rearrange themselves on the page!

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    5. Re:This looks cool, however.... by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've actually written such a thing - minus the p2p part - can tell it a set of "seed" pages, how "deep" to go, and how frequently to go there.

      If people think this'd be a cool open-source project I wouldn't mind throwing out the sources (just ugly nests of perl scripts with a postgresql backend) and seeing what people do with them. Not documented yet. If people are interested, feel free to email me at srchengine-interest@cheapcomplexdevices.com , and if more than a few people ask, I'll put something up and let people know when I wrote enough of a doc to use it.

    6. Re:This looks cool, however.... by cptgrudge · · Score: 4, Informative
      (Also noteworty is Google Sets, however I can't find many uses for it yet).

      Just as an example, I put redhat, debian, and mandrake into the Google Sets. It returned a bunch of alternate Linux distros. This could be useful for finding targeted information on a subject that one isn't familiar with except for a few starting elements. Not groundbreaking by any means, but it could have interesting uses, even if it's only reducing search time to find relevant information on a topic.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    7. Re:This looks cool, however.... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, this could turn into Google's answer to avoid "link spam" to unrelated sites. By asking the user in advance what categories their query is going to be about, it's a way of being able to declare all offtopic sites offtopic and therefore disqualified from the results.

      The ideal web search shouldn't produce 30 million hits... it should do the work of determining the one hit you really wanted to see, with a small handful of few runner ups to confirm the info on the first site.

    8. Re:This looks cool, however.... by br0ck · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I've heard the beta versions run on smaller single servers and don't harness the full power of Google's server farms. Note the disclaimer on labs.google.com that says: Please note: These technologies are still in the beginning stages of development, so they may disappear without warning or perform erratically. If something's not working on this page, please come back and try it again later.

    9. Re:This looks cool, however.... by xNoLaNx · · Score: 4, Informative

      You realize the slider bar at the top personalizes it in incriments deafulting to around 0, so at first it will show fish, then as you slide it to the right it will show bass related to computers. Note the special icon next to personalized items.

    10. Re:This looks cool, however.... by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      its also a way for them to help target marketing

      --
      I ate my sig.
    11. Re:This looks cool, however.... by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Note the disclaimer on labs.google.com that says......they may disappear without warning or perform erratically.

      In other words, "we're about to get slashdotted".

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    12. Re:This looks cool, however.... by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
      (Also noteworty is Google Sets [google.com], however I can't find many uses for it yet).

      OK, this may not be a terribly practical use, but it's interesting: I just put in my first name and the first names of my two sisters, wondering if (against all odds) it would complete the set with my parents' names. Instead Google returned a set of four items: the three names I'd given it, plus a fourth name... which happens to be a name my parents considered giving to my little sister, and would have been on the short list if they'd had another child. It's probably just picking up on name preferences of the 1960's in my parents' culture, but in a sense it "predicted" what my baby sister would have been named.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    13. Re:This looks cool, however.... by David+Hume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Choices are great


      Except when choices aren't great. :)

    14. Re:This looks cool, however.... by Dynedain · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other words, "we're about to get slashdotted".

      Anyone have the link to the google cache?

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  2. No Safari by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Sorry, Google Personalized does not currently support Safari.

    oh well...

    1. Re:No Safari by millahtime · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Sorry, Google Personalized does not currently support Safari."

      Check your cookies and see if they are enabled. I don't see why it wouldn't work in safari. Probubally a security setting.

    2. Re:No Safari by a.ameri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interestingly it is working perfectly well with Konqueror. I wonder what Konqueror has, that safari is lacking, that has forced them not to support Safari right now. Google Personalized seems to be using heavy use of JavaScript, and as far as I know, Konqueror and Safari both use KJS for as a JavaScript interpreter. So...

      On a side note, I think I actualy like the idea of this personalized search. Someone up here mentioned that s/he prefers the traditional search engine, cause it is uncluttered. Well, I can't see how google's personalized pages are any more cluttered than the traditional search page. They look completely the same, just in the personalized page a scroll bar is added to the search result page.

      I think this actually opens a new horizon in google. You can have the traditional original search, by just moving the scroll bar to the left, or you can get a specific seacrh on a specific topic that interests you.

      They might seem totaly unrelated, but given the current technologies that are comming out of Google Labs, am I the only one who is being reminded of the golden ages of Bell Labs? If the Google guys really continue to push their innovation engine with this speed, I don't see how even a monopoly should be able to crush them.

      I know, I sound like a fanboy, but who isn't a fan of google? really...

      --
      -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    3. Re:No Safari by Roogna · · Score: 3, Informative

      Specifically, if you load Safari with the Debug menu enabled, and change the user-agent. Then search. You'll see why they don't support Safari yet. The javascript they've got going for the slider doesn't work quite right under Safari.

      I'd bet that Safari support will come soon enough, either from Apple fixing whatever their handling of this paticular javascript is, or google simply getting it to work.

    4. Re:No Safari by Drakonian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Where do you see this? I'm on Safari and the Personalized Search seems to load up fine for me, and searches seem to work. I didn't see Safari mentioned in the FAQ. What am I missing?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    5. Re:No Safari by nicky_d · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, it kinda supports Safari - if you enable Safari's debug menu and use the Debug menu to set your user agent to, say, MSIE 6, you get the slider. I can move in in crude and fairly arbitrary steps by clicking either side of it, but when I try to drag the slider, Safari just starts dragging the slider image - either the position marker or the background bar - just like it drags all other images.

      So it's not really usable, but you can see how it works and get a taste of the results.

    6. Re:No Safari by Lord+Grey · · Score: 2, Informative

      The searches work, but you can't personalize them dynamically with a slider. Instead of the slider, which should be above the hit list, you see the error message.

      --
      // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    7. Re:No Safari by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 4, Informative

      At the top of the search results, it will say "Sorry, Google Personalized does not currently support Safari." (right next to the link that says 'Edit Profile'). If you change your User Agent, the page will reload and in that spot where the error message was will be a gauge you can click on for "Min" and "Max" personalization.

      It says: Tip: Drag the slider (above) to the right to personalize results. Personalized results are marked by [little google balls here]

      It sort of works in Safari, but it isn't draggable, you have to click - and it misjudges where you clicked relative to the gauge. It does seem to change the results though. This is what the "personalized" searching is really doing - if you are in Safari and you can't use the gauge, all you get is slightly different results from a regular Google search. There's not much "personalized" about it. Hope that clarifies what people are seeing here...

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
  3. I only have one wish,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish Google would fix their searching of mailing lists. I would love to see duplicates filtered, messages ordered by date, and indexing by subject.

    1. Re:I only have one wish,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      duplicates filtered, messages ordered by date, and indexing by subject.

      That's three wishes.

    2. Re:I only have one wish,,, by Coneasfast · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wish Google would fix their searching of mailing lists. I would love to see duplicates filtered, messages ordered by date, and indexing by subject.

      what they need is a new section 'google mailing lists', which functions similarly to google groups, you can search newsgroup items, view the whole thread in a nested format, etc

      although they would probably need to archive the mailing lists from various sources, could take quite a bit of work

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    3. Re:I only have one wish,,, by hoist2k · · Score: 2, Funny
      I wish Google would fix their searching of mailing lists. I would love to see duplicates filtered, messages ordered by date, and indexing by subject.

      and a pony, of course.

      --
      Turns out that cute girl's A|X t-shirt didn't mean AIX. Who would've thought?!
    4. Re:I only have one wish,,, by heim913 · · Score: 2, Funny

      duplicates filtered

      Maybe slashdot could license this technology?

  4. Personalized Google News by glinden · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're curious what a personalized version of Google News might look like, take a look at Findory News. Findory learns from the news you read, searches thousands of sources, and finds articles that match your interests.

    1. Re:Personalized Google News by rjstanford · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmm. Uncool, for me at least. I get more than enough personalized coverage from other sources - I already know where to go. What I rely on Google News for is a good snapshot of stuff that I haven't already heard about before. Now, if they would integrate it so that one of the boxes on the standard news site was "Personal" and one was "Local" (to balance out, L-R), that would be cool... but I think that the focus on just showing the viewer what they want to see is out of place for a news portal. Just my two cents, of course.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  5. 3 Google stories in one day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, and the day isn't even over yet. When's Slashdot ever going to get a Google icon?

    1. Re:3 Google stories in one day? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Redundant

      "Wow, and the day isn't even over yet. When's Slashdot ever going to get a Google icon?"

      There are too many to chose from. :(

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:3 Google stories in one day? by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's not a troll. that's actually IS the second search result, and he DID mark it as not safe for work.

    3. Re:3 Google stories in one day? by Tokerat · · Score: 3, Informative


      What for? There is pretty much already a Google section. ;-)

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  6. Google web page by joeware · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use the Google toolbar and never really go to the Google webpage. Will the Google toolbar be able to access the personalized profiles for personalized searches? I haven't spotted the answer yet. I'll try the personalized searches, but don't plan on using anything but the Google toolbar for 95% of my searches.

  7. Interesting concept by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I might have to fire up Mozilla or IE, since it doesn't support Safari just yet.

    But I could see where this could be useful to me. Right now, my only problem with Google is that it returns too many results. By letting it know I'm not interesting (usually) about sports, religion, and other issues, I can start to specify what I want. And if I need more general, that's what the slider is for.

    Nice idea. Be interesting to see how they handle things (like can I make an "account"), and then there's the privacy issue. I don't mind Google sells the data in a generic sense, as in "people interested in Clark also research political books" or some such, as long as they don't say "John Hummel has a fetish for Swedish schoolgirls with giganticly think eyebrows".

    'Cause if that information got out, man would my face be red.

    1. Re:Interesting concept by AaronStJ · · Score: 2, Funny
      "John Hummel has a fetish for Swedish schoolgirls with giganticly think eyebrows".

      'Cause if that information got out, man would my face be red.

      Don't worry. I don't think anyone wants to know about that.

      I feel dirty now.
      --
      Stupid like a fox!
  8. Google updated by SKPhoton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Google is of course known for its simple interface and accurate results. Now they're expanding into becoming more of a portal by providing more services. It's nice to see they don't make their pages clunky and overloaded.

    Also, interestingly enough, Google has released their new web API. It will be interesting to see how this develops.

  9. Is this a good thing? by Potor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not certain this is a good thing. Obviously, setting up filters in a search by search manner is helpful. But pre-filtering all web searches based on a menu of categories seems to me to be a great way to skewer, not filter, your results.

  10. No registration! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the coolest things about Google, IMO is the amount of customization they can offer storing content locally using cookies without needing any kind of registration. Nothing more annoying than having to fill out a huge form on every other website you visit, especially given that most of them ask for WAY more information than is really needed.

    Google groups, where they do need registration has a form that asks for:
    E-mail
    Password
    Password confirmation

    Google rocks!

    1. Re:No registration! by MushMouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't need a registration, they know who you are already. Probably more about you than you would feel comfortable with. One question. Is there any way for me the user to erase my user trails on google?

    2. Re:No registration! by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, not needing registration has the bad side of not being able to get your preferences if you happen to use another machine. Or change browsers. Or need to reset your profile (and cookies) for some other reason.

      I wouldn't mind ggroups type very small registration form if it allowed to get settings everywhere, especially now as something like this has something bit more tedious to repeat than the simple things they've have had before. Especially if it would be parallel to the current system instead of replacing it.

  11. Can't personalize to the degree I want! by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, so the categories are:

    Arts/Cinema
    Business/Industries
    Computers
    Health
    Home
    Kids/Teens
    Music
    News
    Recreation
    Science
    Society
    Sports
    Regions

    There should be a subcategory of "Porn" under each and every one of those.

    1. Re:Can't personalize to the degree I want! by wanchai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      in the regoin category: > Africa > Asia > Caribbean > Central America > Europe > Middle East > Oceania > Polar Regions > South America > United States so where's Canada?

    2. Re:Can't personalize to the degree I want! by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kids/Teens

      There should be a subcategory of "Porn" under each and every one of those.

      You are a sick, sick man.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:Can't personalize to the degree I want! by finkployd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kids/Teens

      There should be a subcategory of "Porn" under each and every one of those.

      Pete Townsend? Is that you?

    4. Re:Can't personalize to the degree I want! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Enjoy your free pr0n via Google.

    5. Re:Can't personalize to the degree I want! by Krojack · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're anticipating for when the USA invades and takes over Canada =)

  12. Google Sets by Nos. · · Score: 4, Interesting
    At my last job I had with a webhost, we were naming our servers after console game players (atari, nes, etc). sets came in very handy when we started running out of ideas.

    (Please ignore (or mod down) the same post further down, this is where it was meant to be)

  13. My Preference Not listed by ralf1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Place hard core lesbian porn at top of search" really should be an option.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
    1. Re:My Preference Not listed by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, in the context of your post, your sig takes on entirely new worlds of meaning!

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  14. 466453 = Google by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google seems to registered has registered 466453.com for Google Number Service on cell phones. The idea is that users just send the numbers on a phone keypad for their serarch query, with Google doing the magic of figuring out what you meant. The number 466453 was selected because it's the number you get if you type out "Google" that way.

    1. Re:466453 = Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm... I wonder if some 1337 H4X0R already took 600613...

  15. What makes Google so different by alphakappa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    inspite of adding so many features over the years, is that none of these features clutter the front page. Google.com is still just as simple as it was when they first came out - yes, they do have different categories such as images/newsgroups etc, but the interface is still almost the same and the extra stuff never cries for attention.
    Even the local search feature and other features like the Google calculator etc kick in only when you make a search by making intelligent (almost) guesses - so it will be interesting to see how Google implements the personalized search when it finally goes out of beta.
    More power to you Google!

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  16. Re:Numrange + Froogle = useful product search? by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you can use numrange to search for a certain price range in Froogle, that would make Froogle much more useful, which presently does not even have the ability to sort by price.

    Perhaps its new, but I was just using froogle this morning, and saw that it had the ability to sort by price, as well as filter with min / max price settings.

  17. Region Search - No Canada! by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Under Regions:

    Africa
    Asia
    Caribbean
    Central America
    Europe
    Middle East
    Oceania
    Polar Regions
    South America
    United States - (Points to individual States)

    OK. So how do I choose Canada?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Region Search - No Canada! by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 2, Funny

      "OK. So how do I choose Canada?"

      "Polar regions"

    2. Re:Region Search - No Canada! by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      You sure its not listed as one of the states? ;-)

    3. Re:Region Search - No Canada! by akiaki007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's probably under the individual states of United States. I'm guessing right before Puerto Rico. :-P

      --
      "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
  18. Wish: Google Groups -- Where # of Posts n by dasunt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wish that google would add an ability to limit their usenet archive searches by # of messages in a thread.

    Many times, I only find one solitary question (1 message) posted, without any answers. :(

  19. Re:Make Safari not support Google by Unregistered · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chill dude. Google is in a tough position to fight page rank spammers since they are the only search engine worth optimizing for these days. And personalized is still in pretty early beta so it prolly will support safari when it goes gold.

  20. missing from google by molo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's only one feature missing from Google that I would really like: use of the HTML tag with relations of "prev" and "next" for the search results page. That would enable easy navigation via the Mozilla or Opera site navigation bar.

    Maybe next time.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  21. Only positives? What about negatives! by broothal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is a great idea, although I'd like to be able to check boxes of stuff I don't like to see. Imagine being able to tick off commercial sites as a negative. Then, when I'm searching for info on my new digital camera I won't have to wade through dozens of commercial sites offering it for sale.

  22. Needs more constraints by polyp2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm ... There are no options to remove SCO or Microsoft from the results :(

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  23. The new look of Google by alphakappa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google has changed its looks drastically. Methinks this is due to the following reason:

    1. Every search engine copies the original google look - i.e., tabbed sections for images/groups etc

    2. Every search engine also copies the sponsored results look, i.e, Adwords in blue/green boxes on the right and ad results on the top.

    So Google has gone ahead and implemented a distinct look by removing the tabbed sections (dunno if this is good or bad) and removing the boxes from the Adword results, and instead just separating them by a thin blue line (looks good in my opinion).

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  24. Wildcard searching by startup.cmd · · Score: 4, Informative
    Another useful Google feature is search globbing. It works just like command line wildcards. Use the * operator inside of quoted phrases when searching, and Google will substitute any word in its place. Here's an example:
    "* processor"
  25. Guess I am Alone in this? by Merlinium · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one that seems to have seen a rather disturbing trend of late with Google searches? Seems like every time I do a search nowadays, I end up with the first few pages (sometimes every page) of websites that are only interested in selling me the Item I was trying to find more information about, to me this is annoying as hell, as all I wanted was some specs on the product, I don't need to be shown 50 different websites that sell the damn thing and have the same Stupid General Info sheet.

    Maybe its the way I am doing my searches, but I seem to recall last year about this time doing some similar Research on New items and Was getting Manufacturers, Forums about, Tech info Sites about, Reviews, etc. Not anymore though, now I get Buy it here, or we have lower prices, or Best price on the Net, etc. I have just about given up using Google for any kind of serious research searching. I shall give this Personalized Search engine a Try, and maybe I could stop getting tons of sites trying to Sell me some product that I am only interested in trying to figure out if it will work for me.

    Signed, One Pissed Off Searcher.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire and crime fighters fight crime, what do Freedom fighters fight?
    1. Re:Guess I am Alone in this? by KeeperS · · Score: 3, Informative
      This probably has more to do with the terms you're giving Google than Google itself. The more generic of a term you give Google, the less it has to work with. If you give Google a really generic term, you're going to get broad results.

      For example, say I'm looking for information on a printer. If I put in something like Printer I get a bunch of generic sites on printers. Putting in a specific printer, such as HP PSC 1350, helps, but I get a bunch of people trying to sell me that printer. Since I'm looking for reviews and not a place to buy it, a search for HP PSC 1350 review -buy gets me even better results. There might be better searches still, but you get the idea: the more specific your search terms, the better your search will be. Google is good, but it can't read your mind.

    2. Re:Guess I am Alone in this? by norkakn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Companies try to figure out how google ranks pages and then they try to get themselves ranked more highly

      So, I don't really blame google for it, especially since I think that they are trying to help the problem and penalize people who try the tricks

  26. Personalized search is inevitable by glinden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Search engines currently use one highly optimized relevance rank for all users. The relevance rank functions have improved tremendously, but it is increasingly difficult to make further gains with a single relevance rank function because not everyone agrees on how relevant a particular page is to a particular search.

    To get further improvements, you will need many relevance ranks. With enough different relevance ranks, search results effectively will be customized to each person's definition of what is relevant. At that point, you have personalized search.

  27. Re:Make Safari not support Google by cptgrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm finding google less and less useful thanks to Google not being the slightest bit successful at fighting the companies tweaking their ranks...

    That's right, blame the companies actually innovating new technology and leave the scum that take advantage out of it. That'll teach them to come up with new things. Any search engine will have tweaking problems once it reaches sufficient popularity as Google has.

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  28. Dangereous developments by wondercool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mmm, I am a bit surprised that everbody is so enthusiastic about Google and all what the company does.

    1) The de facto monopoly in the search market makes us all very vulnerable. Just like /. moderatio points, internet user will often overlook interesting links or think that if Google can't find it, it does not exist.

    2) Google already knows a lot about what each IP address is interested in. With personalized items, it is going to be even more knowledgeable.
    Could mean less diversity in the eco-internet advertising and information world.

    Personally, I like to be surprised by some search results I did not anticipate (where are the they days of internet *surfing*?)

    Tip from me, disable cookies on domain google.com For a bit of assureance...

    1. Re:Dangereous developments by KeeperS · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Google might be the big dog in the search market, but I'm not especially worried. Unlike certain other monopolies, if you have a problem with Google, there's absolutely no cost to switching. I hear there's plenty of other search engines out there. Privacy is an issue, but if you're not going to trust Google, I'm not sure why you would trust another search engine.

      As for finding results you didn't anticipate, are you saying that you'd rather have less accurate results?

    2. Re:Dangereous developments by KD5YPT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm gonna have to counter that. "Selling out their soul?" How do you think Google can pay for their operation cost and make money if they're not going to have ad? They actually made it their point not to include flashy graphic ads already! How much more do you want? Persoanlly, I don't mind about those text ad. Speaking of selling out soul (I don't want to start a flame... but here goes), how about Slashdot? We have big flashy ads, but I don't hear people complaining. As for pagerank and advertisers trying to beat it. For one, blogs bomb it by accident sometimes, but that could be easily remedied in the future (create a "gray list" of blog sites, and user get to say whether they want blog result or not). As for advertiser, I don't think they're quite successful at Google bombing Google (they just make the webpage they're google bombing with on the black list... BANG, no more lousy advertisers, remember SearchKing.com lawsuit?).
      As for your argument how other search engine got neglected, how about Google when they start out? They got where they are now through their reputation alone, doesn't that count for something?

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  29. Re:Very Strange by nomso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just tried the same. I tried User agent: Windows MSIE 6.0 and Mac MSIE 5.22

    Drag the slider (above) to the right to personalize results. Personalized results are marked by (symbol)

    What I found was that the slider thing doesn't work perfectly: it seems that there is a misalignment on the position of the slider.
    If I however use the Mozilla user agent, it works perfectly.
    Funny that. They are probably compensating for a poop in the MSIE code.

    Debug info: Mac OS 10.2.8, Safari 1.0.2 (v85.7)

    --
    there is no spoon
  30. Searching Mailing Lists by jaaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what they need is a new section 'google mailing lists'

    You mean like The Mail Archive or MARC?

    Or if you like a newsgroup view of mailing lists there is always Gmane

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  31. This does not bode well... by ajutla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like Google precisely because it doesn't have creeping featuritis like Yahoo or portal sites. I go to google.com, I type something into the box there, bam, I find what I'm looking for. I don't need a personalized search! I don't need to search for images within Google news; I don't need five billion options on the main page telling me I can "personalize" Google. I just want simplicity.

  32. Re:I may not know art, but... by BigDumbSpaceApe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not really, just trying to making better choices about what you mean when you use words. Like i entered the word "Cocoa" in the search engine. Since it knows i'm interested in programming and politics, it downplays stuff about the foodstuff cocoa (unless about the politics of cocoa trade) and focuses on the math and programming interpretations of the word. Wierd thing is, when i entered it, i meant the programming topic, but the page about the politics of cocoa trade looks pretty interesting.

    My first impressions are pretty good. The links that im not interested in on the first page drop pretty fast when i use the slider. But i hope the extra time its taking to do the searches are just a beta thing.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFM.
  33. Is this filtered? by jonhuang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Search for 'Naked', search for 'sex' -- even with preferences set to minimum, porn doesn't turn up. That's actually an excellent feature.. but a little surprising. Actually, the first 10 results have a very "yahoo" hand reviewed look to them.

    1. Re:Is this filtered? by st0rmshadow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, all I got from that sentence was hand reviewed naked porn sex.

  34. Needs more languages, but looks good by Zarhan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is going to be a real killer app for me, as soon as they add more languages besides english.

    Lot of my searches are in my own language, that is Finnish. Naturally, they cannot really guess what pages are related to computers or astronomy (my interests) when they are not in english.

    For example, when I search for "Austin" I get (depending on the slider) either the city page for Austin, TX or the local astronomy society. For my hometown of Tampere, Finland I get either the town page or Tampere University of Technology (because it has pages in english). My local club is not listed.

    Hope that they will add more languages soon.

  35. Kaltix by Nalez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (Note that it probably uses technology acquired when they bought Kaltix last year)

    The google image name is google_kaltix_results.gif so thats a good hint that it is from the Kaltix technology

  36. Google's Directory / dmoz is dead by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm reposting this here because it's important:

    Dmoz is dead. I myself was rejected about 5 times in the last 4 years. But the really important point is
    - quality went down, way down
    - the way dmoz works is against changing stuff quickly
    - there is no peer review. Once you're an editor, you can pretty much do what you like. There is a master-subordinate system at work though so your category's parent's editor can control you, but this is wrong on so many levels:
    a) those people are often lazy
    b) those people can't look after everything
    c) the system makes people eager to climb the ladder as fast as possible instead of working on things
    d) leads to building of factions that work for each other.

    In short, the basic rules of dmoz automatically lead to the mess we've got now.

    But the biggest problem is: there is nothing better at hand, so Google and dozens of other website use its still the best thing around yet really bad.

    I'd suggest to build something new along these lines:
    - wiki-style editing to ensure fast updates
    - slashdot-style modding to ensure good + fair quality
    - meta-discussion forums to argue wheter any entry/mod/move/category-creation is correct with polls to decide otherwise
    - Various anti-spammer/anti-troll methods, like relying on metamod-karma to ensure a safe and fair operation
    - A final editorial team that gets out of the way in 99,99% of all cases, but tries hard to keep stop spammer from taking over the platform by constantly reworking the platform (like Slashdot, too).

    Sounds interesting? Any work in this direction already on track? Somebody interested in starting it?

    (old message here, posted earlier today 3 hours after topic went live and nobody commented on it - but we all know that on slashdot 3-hours-old topics old are old news :-/)

  37. Package Tracking! by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm suprised nobody posted about some of googles other new features, like package tracking, which has been a godsend. With hotmail (i only use it for shopping online) screwing up links like it does, the tracking links in the confirmation almost never work, but i can just c&p the tracking number into the google bar in opera now and have my summary in 2 clicks.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  38. Google's Logo! by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    And yet the logo is still a *GIF*. Ignoring the very nice possibility of making the shadows alpha transparent and doing away with the solid white background color (which looks out of place when I am using a brightness-inversion bookmarklet), there is still the much lamented patented nature of GIFs, as well as a size penalty. What are they thinking?

  39. But you'll have to re-enter the preferences... by ajdecon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every time you try to use this on a different computer, you'll have to re-enter your preferences: with no login or registration, your preferences are no more than a cookie.

    Not implying this is a huge problem, but it does have a downside.

    --
    "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." -Richard Feynman
  40. Hey - what happened to Craig Silverstein? by sushi5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He's not on the list of execs anymore!

    Did Brin and Page fire their first employee?