Slashdot Mirror


Google's Early Hardware

revjonnylove writes "Ever wonder what Google's early hardware looked like? Well, wonder no more. Thanks to Archive.org's Way Back Machine, we can all bask in the glory of Google's home made HDD cases, constructed partially of Lego, as well as other neat-o toys. Is that a PowerPC logo I see on one of their servers?"

223 comments

  1. Not bad! by CptChipJew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are 9 9Gdrives between the two machines...The left box has 3 9G drives, and there are 6 4G drives on the right...This IBMdisk expansion box has another 8 9G drives...This is our homemade disk box which contains 10 9G SCSI drives

    294 GB? That's a pretty damn nice mostly donated setup for 1997. This was '97 right?

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Not bad! by BJH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looking at the Wayback Machine link, it appears to be a snapshot from 1999. Of course, Google could have obtained this hardware well before then.

    2. Re:Not bad! by duck_oil · · Score: 0

      That does sound big. I didn't even know Google was around in '97. I certainly didn't hear about them until at least '00 I'd guess. Did they get their hardware setup before their search engine and web site was complete?

    3. Re:Not bad! by CptChipJew · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems it was started as a project at Stanford, and took off from there, here's a link to an archive of the old site.

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    4. Re:Not bad! by sedrules · · Score: 1

      Best search engine ive used. A lot better than the mess that yahoo went to. I dont even mind the new page change, it seems to load faster. Also everything they used then could still run nicely today for a lower volume site.

    5. Re:Not bad! by pholower · · Score: 2, Interesting
      everything they used then could still run nicely today for a lower volume site.

      How many site online now do you know of that have as much volume as Google? Wouldn't just about every site out there be a lower volume site?

      I agree though. I wouldn't mind having that setup for my own site. It would probably run faster than the crap I have it on now.

      --
      -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
    6. Re:Not bad! by Fr4ncis · · Score: 0
      294 GB? That's a pretty damn nice mostly donated setup for 1997. This was '97 right?
      I think it was late 97 but more probably early 1998 instead. Pentium II was released in mid-1997, but IIRC just in 233 and 266 versions. 300 came along after a while.
    7. Re:Not bad! by CptChipJew · · Score: 1

      I think Yahoo uses Inktomi's search technology. Whether it was good or not, it earned that guy a lot of money. I saw his BMW Z8 in Berkeley once, with the license plate INKTOMI.

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    8. Re:Not bad! by linebackn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yikes! And there are even older versions of that page on file check out the logo on this one: http://web.archive.org/web/19980502040303/http://g oogle.stanford.edu/

    9. Re:Not bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then why is the copy right 97-98?

    10. Re:Not bad! by MadBiologist · · Score: 1

      Best quote there...

      When no documents match your query, the system will return 20000 random web pages

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    11. Re:Not bad! by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      It seems it was started as a project at Stanford, and took off from there, here's a link to an archive of the old site.

      Whoa... searching with it works!

    12. Re:Not bad! by ElliotLee · · Score: 1
      404 Not Found The requested URL /search/cgi-bin/qsearch.py was not found on this server.
    13. Re:Not bad! by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

      If it helps narrow this down any, I bought my P-II 350 in July 1998.

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
    14. Re:Not bad! by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      Not that far before then.

      I built myself a "firebreathing" 300Mhz PII (woohooo) in 1998. At the time, the 300's were the fastest chips that you could readily get your hands on. Yeah, the 333's had just come on the market but they were hard to get and cost about 40% more for 11% more speed. Running the 300 at a 72Mhz FSB was a little more economical for 'lil ol' self-employed programmer person :)

    15. Re:Not bad! by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a nice Dual P-II 350 back in 1999. It was hella fast for it's time. I really hated to see it go.

      I've been using Google for about 4 or 5 years now; I think it's amazing how fast everyone has come to know and use it. I never had any doubt.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    16. Re:Not bad! by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      404 Not Found The requested URL /search/cgi-bin/qsearch.py was not found on this server.

      Did you use the link in the grand-grandparent post? It still works for me. The form tag used there is:

      <FORM method=GET action="http://www.google.com/search">

      which is current.

  2. Gmail by gid13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1GB per person. Servers made of Lego. No April Fools.

    1. Re:Gmail by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      I built my a computer made out of legos why can't google. http://home.comcast.net/~sessions9/lego.html

    2. Re:Gmail by NeoThermic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Repeat after me: Its Lego, not Legos. Lego is shortend from Leg Godt, which is Danish, and means Play Good. The amazing thing is, its plural and singular at the same time, so you don't need the S.

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    3. Re:Gmail by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      That's the ugliest lego computer I've ever seen. It's also the first.

    4. Re:Gmail by rokzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      >The amazing thing is, its plural and singular at the same time...

      amazing? got sheep?

    5. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Repeat after me: It's "it's," not "its." Its does not mean "it is."

    6. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Legoes"/"legos" are acceptable English forms of the word. We are not speaking Danish, and language evolves and is defined through usage.

      See etymological fallacy for more helpful information.

    7. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Lego anyway, those are Duplo.

    8. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it look more like Duplo to me.

    9. Re:Gmail by catbutt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not singular and plural at the same time, it's like the words "water" and "stuff", which are neither. If you want to refer to an individual piece, you should say something like "a lego block".

      BTW, since I have mod points today, I almost modded you down for saying "repeat after me", but decided to reply instead.

    10. Re:Gmail by kEnder242 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Finally! I agree, just didn't know how to say it. The link says it all.

      The issue isn't about Legos, its that the English language (or any language) is constantly changing.
      Any language that doesn't is dead (e.g. Latin).

      --
      my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
    11. Re:Gmail by chgros · · Score: 1

      It's not Lego anyway, those are Duplo.
      Actually, IIRC, it's not even that, it's fake Lego (after all, Duplo ARE Lego).
      BTW, the thing is on display in the basement of the CS building of Stanford University.

    12. Re:Gmail by lga · · Score: 2, Informative

      Surely it should be "Lego" (singular) or "Lego bricks" (plural.)

    13. Re:Gmail by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No it's not acceptable.

      To equate this to an evolution of language shows your retardation in general communication.

    14. Re:Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, sir, are a tight-assed, friendless loser.

    15. Re:Gmail by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      1 of 3. I do have a nice tight ass. Do you have a loose ass?

  3. Its amazing... by sailor420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its amazing to think that search engine used to run on just that.

    Id be interested to see what their current hardware is like.

    1. Re:Its amazing... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 0
      Id be interested to see what their current hardware is like.

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of search engine nodes.

      (hmm, this is probably the one time a Beowulf post isn't a lame cliche).

    2. Re:Its amazing... by Ghost_MH · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, imagine a Beowulf cluster of pigeons.

    3. Re:Its amazing... by iwein · · Score: 5, Informative

      here, i googled for you

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:Its amazing... by RazorX90 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now, to techs that seems hilarious...but you know for every 10 of us, there is a housewife telling all her friends Google operates on birdfeed.

    5. Re:Its amazing... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      quote "here, i googled for you"

      Useless.... that has no pictures ;[

  4. It give us hope by thammoud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    us pee ons that we can still create something very special with almost nothing but scrapped together hardware. Who said that we need millions to implement great ideas ?

    1. Re:It give us hope by Achoi77 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A lot of those boxes seemed to be donated by IBM. Hrm, I wonder what they did to get so many 'donations,' and where can I get some of these so called 'donated boxes by IBM.' =)

      Seriously, did they go up to IBM and pitch their vision or something?

    2. Re:It give us hope by PacoTaco · · Score: 5, Funny
      us pee ons

      How often does this happen to you?

    3. Re:It give us hope by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They were at college. They probably called up the guy at IBM that handles giving shit out and said "Hey, IBM Giving Shit Out Dude, give some shit to us." Or something to that effect. If you're doing some kind of research I'm sure IBM and most other companies would be willing to cut you a deal or donate hardware to your project.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    4. Re:It give us hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They probably have an entire "Giving Shit Out" department.

    5. Re:It give us hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we can still create something very special with almost nothing but scrapped together hardware.

      That hardware would cost a small fortune even today, let alone 5 years ago. Maybe not millions, but definitely not something peons can afford without donations from Intel and IBM or research grants.

    6. Re:It give us hope by dattaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the electronics industry, its called "engineering samples." Have an idea? Call their sales department and ask for samples to prototype your idea. Much like a test drive of a new car, except you get to keep the car and they come over to help you modify the hell out of it.

    7. Re:It give us hope by rixstep · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who said that we need millions to implement great ideas ?

      The military.

    8. Re:It give us hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close... except for the great ideas part.

    9. Re:It give us hope by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! We started our website with a hodge-podge of hardware leftover from the dot-com bust of our company. It was enough to survive for 6 months. Once we brought in some income, we bought better servers. This is how the US has succeeded so well - we do best with what we have.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  5. Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With a hard drive case made of LEGOs and under a dozen computers google managed to become the world's most powerful search tool.

    1. Re:Amazing! by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      Just imagine how much more quickly they would have become the world's most powerful search engine if they had used the Technic line instead of just run of the mill Lego!

    2. Re:Amazing! by KegDude · · Score: 1
      With a hard drive case made of LEGOs and under a dozen computers google managed to become the world's most powerful search tool.

      That, and funding from the NSF, NASA & DARPA, which I imagine helps a bit.

      (From About Google, according to Archive's cache of google.stanford.edu)

      No matter, their technology is damn impressive, and they seem to always keep improving. Google!

    3. Re:Amazing! by davidl9999 · · Score: 1

      LEGOs... LEGI... kinda like octopusses...

      --
      (Yes, it's my Yahoo id) :P
  6. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    We all had to start somewhere right?

    1. Re:Hey by BJH · · Score: 1

      Oh good, is this going to be a hardware bragging rights thread?

      Firewall: PentiumMMX 233MHz, 64MB RAM, 4.3GB FastSCSI HDD
      Fileserver 1: PentiumIII 1.13GHz, 256MB RAM, 36GB Ultra160 SCSI HDD x 6, PERC3/DLC RAID card
      Fileserver 2: PentiumIII 750MHz x 2, 768MB RAM, 36GB Ultra160 SCSI HDD x 3, Software RAID
      Fileserver 3: PentiumIII 866MHz, 640MB RAM, 18GB Ultra160 SCSI HDD x 2, Compaq SMART2 RAID card
      Workstation 1: Celeron 1GHz, 512MB RAM, 80GB Ultra100 IDE HDD
      Workstation 2: PentiumIII 800MHz, 256MB RAM, 80GB Ultra66 IDE HDD
      Workstation 3: Alpha 21164 600MHz, 384MB RAM, 18GB UltraWide SCSI HDD
      Workstation 4: UltraSparcII 296MHz x 2, 768MB RAM, 18GB UltraWide SCSI HDD x 3, Software RAID
      Workstation 5: Alpha 21064 266MHz, 96MB RAM, 9GB UltraSCSI HDD
      Diskless PC 1: PentiumIII 800MHz, 256MB RAM, boots from Fileserver 2
      Diskless PC 2: AMD K6-III 450MHz, 128MB RAM, boots from Fileserver 2
      Laptop 1: Celeron 700MHz, 160MB RAM, 40GB Ultra66 IDE HDD
      Laptop 2: PentiumMMX 233MHz, 64MB RAM, 4.3GB IDE HDD

      I've left out the stuff that's not normally running (e.g. the other two Alpha boxes, the dual PII that's currently in pieces, a Quadra700, a PowerMac 7100/80, three IBM PC110 handhelds...).

      Who needs central heating?

    2. Re:Hey by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Who needs central heating?

      Heh, I did the same thing for a couple years. I heated my den and office with the servers.

      Then I got wise. It's too loud and takes up too much room. Not to mention the fire hazard (even quality components go bad; having all that stuff just increases the risk). You can replace most of those weak machines with one single newer, faster, and cheap machine. The same goes for all those power sucking drives. The only reason I have multiple machines now is for the multiple architectures.

      I got my main PC (high powered laptop)
      A single server (also a MythTV box)
      An Apple box (OS X)
      A Sun box (Sparc Solaris)

      Quiet and simple. I make heavy use of VMware.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    3. Re:Hey by bonaldi · · Score: 1

      Hey, BJH - any interest in selling one of those PC110s? I'm looking for one, and they're hard to find.

      (Would've emailed, but your address isn't public)

    4. Re:Hey by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pffff...
      in my 10x10 dorm room, I have the following
      1 20" monitor
      2 17" monitors
      3 computer towers
      3 laptops
      1 12 port Bay Networks Switch
      1 48 port 10mb hub
      1 10 port 10mb hub
      1 4 port wireless 802.11B switch
      2 phones
      2.1 Klipsch Speakers
      2 Jensen Speakers
      1 32" TV
      1 old ass half working VCR
      1 giant rubbermaid thing full of spair parts

      And the campus network people looked at me funny when I asked for a second mac address identity when I brought down my second computer. They got scared when I brought the third, and after that I just stuck everything behind a router so they wouldn't bitch.

      It gets 90* or so in here if I don't open the window or run the AC full blast.

    5. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1 12 port Bay Networks Switch

      1 48 port 10mb hub

      1 10 port 10mb hub

      1 4 port wireless 802.11B switch

      All in a dorm room?

    6. Re:Hey by wizard992 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just wonder about the last time a girl was in that room...

      Nahhhhh..

    7. Re:Hey by BJH · · Score: 1

      I bought them all at the same time - one for use, two for spare parts - but the one I use hasn't broken yet, so the other two are still sitting intact in their boxes.

      Let me think about it for a couple of days; I'll let you know. Be warned that I'm in Japan, so the postage will be quite stiff.

    8. Re:Hey by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

      girl?
      Theres no room, sorry ;-)

  7. Re:Blarg by ms_drives_me_mad · · Score: 1

    how come they got these free lunches from ibm etc. at the start itself. I wanna know!

  8. PPC by boarder8925 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Is that a PowerPC logo I see on one of their servers?
    Looks that way.
    1. Re:PPC by Spacelord · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes it is an IBM RS/6000 F50 which does indeed have a powerpc processor, and usually runs IBM's own version of Unix, namely AIX. I've configured plenty of those back in 98/99.

      I do wonder what OS runs (or used to run) on that machine though, AIX or (Yellowdog?) Linux?

    2. Re:PPC by bru_master · · Score: 1

      AIX would run on them, in fact motorola used to manufacture powerpc boxes to compete with the RS6000's (Phoenix AZ). The high end boxes would look similer to the IBM 43P and the F50..... but the lower end goodies looked like a mac powerpc there marketing name was the Motorola PowerStack. Here is a link but I have never seen one run on NT. (I dont often see much run on NT) http://www.winnetmag.com/Windows/Article/ArticleID /2391/2391.html

    3. Re:PPC by niks42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually I do have a copy of Win NT version 3.51 and the ARC boot diskette for PPC (but only boots on PREP machines, and the F50 above is not a PREP machine ;-) ) .. It does boot, it kind of works OK and its fine as an OS goes , but things that run in that environment are scarce. I think IBM dropped NT in a deal with Microsoft when M$ dropped NT support for MIPS.

    4. Re:PPC by rixstep · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that's 'Powe rPC', a form of IPC (interprocess communication) invented by Franklin Douglas Powe.

      He also invented the 'r4' SMP cluster environment.

    5. Re:PPC by rs6krox · · Score: 1

      That's a F50, I still have one in the computer room. Even back in 1999, these weren't high-end. They were originally designed to be workgroup servers. They made good file servers, test boxes for larger applications, or even production boxes for smaller apps or fewer users. They were higher up the food chain than the 43P, which is a desktop "server", IBM sold a lot of firewalls on 43Ps. The disk expansion unit looks like a 7133. They carry up to 16 SSA disks. They rocked back then. I still have one in production. Faster than SCSI, with real concurrent bi-directional transfers, all one a dinky little 4 wire cable. And they're hot-swappable, hardware RAID support, and can have multiple paths to one machine.

    6. Re:PPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does look that way, doesn't it?

      It's amazing how some people like the story submitter have no fucking clue how useful non-intel cpus are in the server market.

  9. I remember those 9Gig drives when new by shoppa · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I remember when those 9 Gig drives were new. Street price was $4000 or $5000 each.

    Last time I checked, those same model drives were listing for $5 on E-bay but not selling... it'd cost way more to ship them.

    1. Re:I remember those 9Gig drives when new by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Yeah its great.
      I'm gonna build a compact centrino, or maybe duron box with at leat 512 ddr, and latest high end nVidia, it'll all cost me > $1000, and then I'll sell it next year for a tenner!

    2. Re:I remember those 9Gig drives when new by adolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      $4000? In 1997?

      You're on crack.

      Though I hasten to admit that I didn't buy any 9 gig SCSI drives in 1997, per se, I did buy two 9-gigabyte IBM 9ES ultrawides in 1998 for something less than $500 each (Non-anecdotal evidence here).

      (Oh, and yes. They're still working justfine, thanks.)

    3. Re:I remember those 9Gig drives when new by manifest37 · · Score: 1

      not if you buy them straight from ibm. they were that much.

    4. Re:I remember those 9Gig drives when new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they were not. Please, get real.

    5. Re:I remember those 9Gig drives when new by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      Not really, because while the relative speed of computers is still increasing quickly, the absolute speed has reached a point where they don't become obsolete so quickly. Back when 500MB hard drives were first introduced, they had a huge capacity compared to previous drives, but the absolute size was small, you can't store much video or even audio on a 500MB drive. Compared to this, a 500GB drive is huge, but also absolutely speaking. Even when 500TB drives will be around, the 500GB drive will still be large enough to store at least your audio collection. If your home theater PC can store and play back 300 hours of video and 5000 hours of music, then that has a lot of usefulness, and I'd say it wouldn't need upgrading until something much better comes along, possibly decades from now. You could in fact liken it to an appliance like a VCR, which you wouldn't replace until it breaks or something much better is available (DVD/digital video).

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  10. Where are these hardwares today? by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are they in a museum or Google's vault? ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Where are these hardwares today? by joelil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Hardwares are Being recycled. All the equipment that is in those pictures is either in our wearhouse or has been recycled. HMMMMMMM. Maybe I could build one of those too. I have all the equipment. Recycling

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.
    2. Re:Where are these hardwares today? by chrisfez · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ironically enough, some of Google's first setup (possibly the one pictured) is sitting in a display case in the basement of the Gates Computer Science building at Stanford

    3. Re:Where are these hardwares today? by BrianCarlstrom · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ironically enough, some of Google's first setup (possibly the one pictured) is sitting in a display case in the basement of the Gates Computer Science building at Stanford

      Pictures of "The Original GOOGLE Computer Storage" from the basement of Gates.

  11. That's not lego by Moth7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's duplo you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:That's not lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit, you're right. i had to go back and check there.

    2. Re:That's not lego by sbaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not even Duplo - it's some kind of cheesey clone.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    3. Re:That's not lego by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Looks like Duplo to me...to my knowledge no one ever tried to rip off that particular Lego theme. Which doesn't come as much of a suprise.

    4. Re:That's not lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then your knowledge sucks, ever hear of mega blocks?

  12. standard by Cheeze · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think those types of setups are familiar to just about anyone that was in the computer arena in the early to mid-nineties. Having random machine without cases, 10 keyboards that may or may not be plugged in, and horrible wiring is probably how many of the top technological companies started. I am sure now it's all properly racked up with labeled cables and a KVM switch, but before the funding, I bet most companies run on old workstations. I thought the lego disk array was appropriate. I wonder what a fire marshal would have to say about their setup.

    I think the worst setup I have seen was a previous company I worked for. They had a satellite office that just contained hardware. Well, no one ever went there, and for good reason. It housed quite a bit of old dialup gear, analog dialup gear, complete with external serial 28.8 modems. they were just stacked up all over the place. good thing they thought ahead and got modems with volume knobs, or you would be able to hear each person dialing in. The plastic racks all of the gear was sitting on was so old, it had started cracking and was a hazard to be around. It all worked somehow though. ahh...the good old days.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    1. Re:standard by G27+Radio · · Score: 0

      good thing they thought ahead and got modems with volume knobs, or you would be able to hear each person dialing in.

      ATM0 is your friend.

    2. Re:standard by BJH · · Score: 1

      Heh... exactly what I was thinking. The kids these days, they don't know their Hayes commands from their bellybuttons.

    3. Re:standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My computer room still looks like that.

  13. Google hardware by TrentL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh. I thought you were going to talk about this.

    1. Re:Google hardware by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Their software must suck, if you need 8 servers to index 40 GB worth of data.

  14. Compensation by erbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm no psychologist but I'm pretty sure the simplicity of Google's site design could be an attempt to balance the chaos of their hardware and wiring setup

    1. Re:Compensation by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it isn't, it's because the marketing drones who think up cluttered sites like MSN would have declined jobs at a company with such deeply uncool hardware.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  15. Re:Blarg by HidingMyName · · Score: 1

    That is interesting, now that you pointed that out. Perhaps they got stuff for performance evaluation?

  16. Any recent photos? by lyberth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How does it look today?
    how do they manage the wirering to all those servers today?

    --

    There isn't much like the scent of a fresh harddisk
    1. Re:Any recent photos? by taped2thedesk · · Score: 1
      How does it look today?
      how do they manage the wirering to all those servers today?

      Probably looks something like this.

  17. Slashdot.... back in 1997 by billygr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How about the /. ? http://web.archive.org/web/19971221012817/http://s lashdot.org/

    1. Re:Slashdot.... back in 1997 by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Can you find my old log-in? I have no idea what it was or what email it was, so it shouldn't take you too long. I want my ID in the 30000 range.

    2. Re:Slashdot.... back in 1997 by Bake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sad part is that this particular copy of the slashdot front page links to an article where the W3C recommends HTML 4.0. And now 7 years later, slashdot is STILL using the much-outdated HTML 3.2.

    3. Re:Slashdot.... back in 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is that sad? You can read this page can't you? It works doesn't it? No need to update. Simply no need.

      Please /. don't come up with some god-awful CSS nerd-style site!

      Thanks.

    4. Re:Slashdot.... back in 1997 by bogie · · Score: 1

      Tell you what. If I can ever find my original /. id you can have my current one. ;)

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    5. Re:Slashdot.... back in 1997 by Bake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As others have pointed out before me, there is quite a lot of bandwidth to be saved for Slashdot to switch over to a CSS based web. The content will be MORE ACCESSIBLE TO OTHER DEVICES. It'll actually have a better chance of getting validated as anything. Right now it doesn't even rank good enough to validate as HTML 3.2*.

      Why do you consider CSS "god-awful" as you put it? Is it because you can't grok it, or are you the type that would prefer a compiler that assumes when statements end and puts in its own end-of-statement marker instead of doing the right thing and bitch about it in the compiler output?

      *It would appear that the powers that be here on Slashdot aren't too happy with people trying to validate the site as the W3c validator received a HTTP 403, Denied from slashdot.org

    6. Re:Slashdot.... back in 1997 by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Sure thing. What number are you?

  18. I love Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love Google and want to have like a million of its babies. I want to print out Google's front page and rub it against my naked body. Actually, I've done it once already, got some nasty paper cuts. But it was worth it.

    I LOVE GOOGLE

    1. Re:I love Google by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...print out Google's front page and rub it against my naked body."

      OI! Wash that before you give it back!

    2. Re:I love Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont't ever try that with slashdot. All you'll get will be bad karma.

  19. In the Early Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can find tons of info and reading by googling 'site:stanford.edu backrub' should yeild some of the first papers and some great pictures.

  20. Orignal "About Google" Page by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Orignal "About Google" Page by 1Oman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From that page:
      Current Development: Sergey Brin, Larry Page, and Craig Silverstein

      I wonder what happend to this Craig Silverstein fellow.
      Sergey And Larry were like "we're gonna start a serach engine company" and he was like "theres no money in that, I'm going into banner ads".

    2. Re:Orignal "About Google" Page by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny in its irony! Heh, reminds of a prof that i have. He and a few buddies decided to start a company after they graduated back in the day. Times got rough and he figured "screw this, i'm getting a real job".

      Turns out, his buddies - they made a fucking mint a few years later. He tells each class this story....i've heard it a few times b/c of taking several of his classes.

      But hey, he's a tenured prof now and just traded his wife in on a newer model 1/2 the age of the wife!

    3. Re:Orignal "About Google" Page by Jeff+Lightfoot · · Score: 1

      Or...even more original from 1998

  21. storage, then and now by dankelley · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Less than a decade later, this sort of storage sits in an ipod. A decade before, we stored 'big' datasets on 20Meg disks.

    It's amazing, how hardware changes.

    But human-scale things remain the same. It still takes the same time to write a /. comment, or to sigh.

    1. Re:storage, then and now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1/4 terrabyte in an iPod?

      What kinda 2.5" drive ya got there buddy?

    2. Re:storage, then and now by cruff · · Score: 1

      I remember buying a 20 MB hard drive 17 years ago for my Mac Plus. At work we were using 200 MB SMD drives on our low end Unix systems, and arrays of similar 200 MB disks (probaby CDC then) on the Crays. A decade ago at work we were using 500MB disks on our low end Suns, if my failing memory serves me correctly.

    3. Re:storage, then and now by ajna · · Score: 1

      Your point about 250 GB not being available in iPod-sized packages is true, but there's an important error: iPods use 1.8" hard drives. iPod mini's use even smaller drives (1"). 2.5" is the notebook size and drives of that size are capacious in cheap in comparison to 1.8" and 1" beasties.

      Reference: news.com.com article (that extra .com is really annoying.)

  22. Re:Blarg by pmjordan · · Score: 1

    IBM may have sensed that google was going to make it big, so they sent them stuff, hoping to get a massive paid deal later on.

    Or, it was just a dotcom thing to do - "Hey, I have an idea!" - "OK, I don't care what it is, but have this server!"

    phil

  23. I thought they used a bunch of pidgeons? by Mudcathi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fowl hardware: pidgeons

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    1. Re:I thought they used a bunch of pidgeons? by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      ghghghgh. it has no "d".

      I'm someone who really works with pigeons doing visual cognition tasks. =) Everyone thinks that's hilarious =)

      http://pigeon.psy.tufts.edu

  24. The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by Mercury2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who are wondering, I happen to own two of the very same machines in the top two pictures lol! They are Dell Poweredge 4200 machines with the logo plates removed! The specs are roughly this:

    Dual CPU capable (max 333mhz)
    Max RAM 512MB Bios Limit (66mhz EDO SDRAM)
    6x80pin SCA drive bays
    Dual 700 watt hot swap power supplies
    Built in VGA (ATI Mach64 VT 1MB)

    For the record, they typically ship with AMI Megaraid 428 (or higher) hardware raid cards. But the onboard SCSI2 is Adaptec AIC-7860 & 7880. Also worth mentioning, they are clusterable using Windows NT. I grabbed these machines off machine and local computer store and have been very stable work horses running Debian! (www.emaildesktop.com).
    Just glad to see that these machines were useful in their days!

    1. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by spamnix · · Score: 1
      Funny, the system I'm on is pretty similar to that dual PII, minus the hotswap supplies and SCSI drives. 'Cept this is home assembled.
      ECS P6LX2-A motherboard
      2xIntel PII 333MHz
      4x66MHz DIMM slots (max 128MB each, 512 max total, 512 PC100/133 installed and used as low-latency 66)
      1xAIC-7880 built in (ultra+wide capable but unused)
      2x3DFX Voodoo Banshee 16MB cards (1 AGP, 1 PCI)
      1xMaxtor 30GB 5400RPM IDE HDD
      2xgeneric CD-ROM drives (8x, 40x)
      1xHomemade dual channel PWM fan speed controller
      2xTurbine-style fans <b>tie-wrapped to CPUs</b> (30CFM each!)
      1xAntec 250W ATX PSU
      ... Running Gentoo Linux of course. Win2K actually doesn't run on it! Win2K b0rks with 333MHz CPUs insalled, on a pair of mismatched 233&266 CPUs it's fine. It put me back $26 to assemble, using (mostly new) parts I had 8-) Works for me as my main linux desktop, dual head on 24" SiliconGraphics and 17" NEC monitors.
      --
      I have a BS in BS.
    2. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by TerryMathews · · Score: 1

      Your 333 CPUs must be of different stepping. The older CPU needs to be in the first slot.

      --
      -- Terry
    3. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running Gentoo Linux of course.

      Yeah, that's smart... Run a source based distro on slower hardware. So how long does GNOME and KDE take to build? What? Not finished yet... OK, get back to us when you know (that is, if Slashdot is still here). Debian is your friend.

      My Win2k box works fine with dual 333's... Meh. PEBKAC

    4. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by coldnight · · Score: 1

      The PE 4100 has the same chasis and was a dual Pentium Pro 200 (or 180). You are correct that those are 4200's though, being P2 machines. Wouldn't want someone to get the wrong thing at the swap meet! :)

    5. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by spamnix · · Score: 1
      Your 333 CPUs must be of different stepping. The older CPU needs to be in the first slot.


      Nope. They're identical. They work find in Linux either way, and either way Win2K doesn't like 'em.

      I had a long talk with M$ and they couldn't figure it out. The mobo manufacturer didn't reply to me.
      --
      I have a BS in BS.
    6. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's smart... Run a source based distro on slower hardware.
      Does he compile every time he runs something?
      I thought that was the big point of Gentoo - optimized binaries for your exact platform so that when you do run it, it runs faster than Debbie or whomever would run on that slow platform, or am I missing something?

      I don't run gentoo because I won't run any software that doesn't have an Open Space License *Python*

      Any other creative source based distro out there besides gentoo and rubyx?

    7. Re:The first two are Dell Poweredge 4200's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he compile every time he runs something?

      No, but have you ever compiled KDE on a 300 Mhz machine? It takes literally days. And you have to do this every time you want to upgrade to a new version. Like maybe to fix a critical security hole. Are you just gonna leave the machine vunerable while waiting for crap to compile?

      I thought that was the big point of Gentoo - optimized binaries for your exact platform so that when you do run it, it runs faster than Debbie or whomever would run on that slow platform, or am I missing something?

      Yeah, have you ever benchmarked the differences? I have. Hardly any difference at all, and if you use an i686 compiled distro then there is no difference at all.

      Any other creative source based distro out there besides gentoo and rubyx?

      CRUX Linux

  25. More pictures... by midimonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you're having a hard time loading the images from the story, you can find some other images here.

  26. wayback search much more interesting... by mlush · · Score: 1

    Hmmm pictures of old computers mildly interesting

    Archive.org full text search very very interesting, having to know the URL in advance was a real limitation on the service!

  27. How many servers now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Last I heard Google has a serverfarm of 8000 machines but how many do they have today?

    Just to lighten up a little, check out a little story by Verity Stob on Life in the Google Farm.

    1. Re:How many servers now? by Meowing · · Score: 2, Informative
      Last I heard Google has a serverfarm of 8000 machines but how many do they have today?
      Maybe you could try looking on Google or something.
  28. Hey by trs998 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    My room is starting to look like that.
    Ive got:
    firewall (P133)
    file/web/dns/mp3 server (pIII 700)
    Qube 2 (MIPS 250Mhz, 256Mb RAM)
    xbox (soon, going to be a webserver, moving to DSL line)
    modem (urrrrgh)
    16-port old switched 100mbit hub (donated)
    dual-monitor desktop (not always on)
    laptop (always with me)

    No pictures though. You arn't a true geek unless youve at some point abandoned the idea of screwing everything into a case, screwing the case up and running it neatly.
    My firewall spent 1 year in a drawer, the server's got hard drives attached to every ide channel (3 hd's and a writer) with hd's laying in the bottom of the case.

  29. Re:Today's Google hardware? by unknown_host · · Score: 0

    dunno, try searching on this site

  30. Geeeeeeeek alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i smell geek!!!!!

  31. video of a lecture about google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you have broadband and a spare hour, have a look at this lecture about google by Urs Holzle. Its reasonably light on hard-core specifics, but he covers some interesting things like determining the relevance of a page, hosting problems due to very high power density, failure rates of hardware etc etc.

    Interesting stuff.

  32. Imagine by iLEZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of.. nah..

    --
    You cant fight in here, its a war room!
  33. let's get some info on the current setup by iwein · · Score: 5, Interesting

    getting some info of google's current hardware in here seems a good idea. here goes.

    here is a nice article. The company estimates that a server running Google applications all day is the equivalent of 40 years of use in a regular context. Approximately 82 of these servers die every day, but not completely; Google employs maintenance people who walk around with carts of hard disks, for example, and replace them in malfunctioning servers or UPSes.

    now for some pics... damn. can't find them with google :). i'll post them if i have them.
    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  34. The Brits on the board will be with me when I say by IainMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    if only the Glastonbury ticket service was on such a powerful set up.

    Dual Pentium IIs?

    Luxury.

  35. Re:Blarg by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that Google started as a research project at Stanford probably didn't hurt.

  36. google 1 GB Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    wonder how many lego blocks would they need to put together a cabinet to fit all those new hard disks they must be buying.

  37. Night? by antdude · · Score: 1

    You call 7:22 AM a night? :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Night? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I don't stop drinking 'till 0800, no matter what anyone says.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  38. rumor has it that.. by eshefer · · Score: 1

    Gmail's servers also have powerpc logos on them..

    (It's probably a april fools joke from macslash, though..)

    1. Re:rumor has it that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old Google machines were RS6000 systems, donated by IBM, think AIX or Linux for PPC and not MacOS.

  39. Re:The Brits on the board will be with me when I s by pldms · · Score: 1

    It's too soon to joke about that farce :-(

    I was in the pub last night and I swear people were unconsciously whistling that bloody 'engaged' tone. Beep...beep...beep...beep...<redial>.... (repeat for 24 hours or until crazy)

    --
    Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
    me a number based on the order in which I joined
  40. ROFL! by BReflection · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone else see this picture of Sergey in a speed-o? Here is another one of him IN DRAG. I kid you not!

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:ROFL! by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I bet somebody has put in some specific code to stop Googlebot finding those ;-)

    2. Re:ROFL! by BReflection · · Score: 1

      well, if he knew about it he could simply ask archive.org to remove it and they would oblige. :) (i backed it up for good measure)

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  41. Dell PowerEdge 4100s! by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1

    Those white servers in the first pic are Dell PowerEdge 4100s if I'm not mistaken. Funny how the square Dell logo was removed and it says they were donated by Intel.

  42. ancient hardware by m00by · · Score: 1

    hrm... some of the same hardware that lives in my datacenter. but I don't get to take care of the beast. ahh.. IBM F50... =D

  43. Legos? Duplos! by stick_figure_of_doom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those are not legos! I remember those things from way back when, they're Duplos. They're way bigger than Legos, and they don't cut your foot when you step on them. They're designed so that little kids can't hurt themselves. I never thought I'd see those again.

    --
    If someone drops a fort on Will, he makes a reflex save.
    1. Re:Legos? Duplos! by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      duplos mostly suck because they won't hold together very well. my kids have a couple of sets and they got pretty frustrated when things fall apart in the middle of a build.

      I think the idea is that they will come apart easily for small hands (in some cases I swear lego have become bonded at the molecular level because of the difficulty in separating two bricks).

      What you say about stepping on them is true. I have let out some loud curses in the middle of the night while heading for the bathroom and stepping on one of those little 2x2 bricks. OUCH, DAMMIT!!!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Legos? Duplos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, your bunny would look a lot cuter with a tail!

      (\(\
      (^.^)
      o(")")

    3. Re:Legos? Duplos! by Fishstick · · Score: 1


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      o(")")

      hmm, it doesn't line up for me - are you using hidden characters to make it work?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Legos? Duplos! by Skidge · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, we could always tell which of our lego bricks were the worst offenders for not coming apart. They were the ones with teeth marks on them.

  44. Googleisney by dangerz · · Score: 1

    Let us never forget that it was all started by a case made of lego's

    --
    The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
    - Albert Einstein
  45. Re:Blarg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's all sorts of donated crap lying around here at Stanford for people to use. Even today.

  46. Note the last line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The whole thing. Now which keyboard do I use?"

    IBM Model "M".

    http://www.dansdata.com/ibmkeyboard.htm

    1. Re:Note the last line... by acalford · · Score: 1

      All praise the keyboard!

      --typed on an IBM Model M, which they will bury with me when I am dead...

  47. OT: Tradeim by maroberts · · Score: 1

    But hey, he's a tenured prof now and just traded his wife in on a newer model 1/2 the age of the wife!

    I knew teaching had some benefits. Regular yearly influx of fresh 'talent' makes up for the relatively poor pay.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  48. I am an idiot! by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There was a database class offered at Stanford that was advertised as being about "things you could do with our db of 1/3rd of the internet's text, including links."

    This sounded interesting, but I hated the prof so I didn't take it. This class turned out to be related to the Google project of course and many of the people who took it ended up at the company.

    My other brush with Google greatness was being designated driver for Larry (friend of a friend). This was before anyone knew about Google.

  49. Google Hardware by rent · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  50. What Really Happened to Craig Silverstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  51. Duplo blocks, not Legos by puetzc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless those are the worlds smallest servers, I think those look like Duplo blocks, not Legos. I have boxes of both. Duplos are simpler, and about twice the size - although Duplos and Legos can be mixed. The thick Duplo baseplates make a much better case cover, as they would be stiffer than Legos. I especially like the operators' faces as a part of the case.

    1. Re:Duplo blocks, not Legos by suchire · · Score: 1

      They are Duplos; when Craig Silverstein came to Harvard to speak about Google, he told us that they used the Duplos because they were more cost-effective than the Legos, since they were bigger for cheaper.

      --
      Such irE
  52. You know you're a computer nut when... by spamnix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know you're a computer nut when: 1) your bedroom has more computers in it than Google's early setup, and is much less organized. I have 15 in here now. 12x10' room. I pity the power wiring in here. One Pentium II is running in a case built entirely of STANDARD lego (not duplo). Deja vu all over again. Incedentally, I use DistCC, and can muster the CPU power equivalent to an 8GHz P4...

    --
    I have a BS in BS.
    1. Re:You know you're a computer nut when... by Audiostar · · Score: 1

      I've got a recording studio control room for my home studio that I used to use for graphic design. It currently has probably 8 six plug power strips all filled up, five computers constantly running, and two large racks filled with both audio and computer gear. In addition to how difficult it is to find which keyboard/mouse combo is for which computer, (KVM switches are for the lazy) I'm pretty sure the whole thing could go up in flames at any moment. Thank god for smoke detectors.

  53. Impressive... by mrscott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At my previous job, I was responsible for the web services for a financial services company. We hosted our stuff at a data center in Herndon, VA. Some of Google's hardware happened to be in a wire cage that I walked by every day and it was pretty damn impressive. 42U racks, with either 42 or 84 (back to back, 42U high) servers in each one and about 6-8 racks per cage. I will admit that my "technical ego" was bruised a little since I wanted it for myself... :-)

  54. Hey IBM, Intel? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, um, I'm starting a search engine too. Send me lots of kick-ass hardware for free.

  55. Peon by mrscott · · Score: 1

    Peon is actually the word I think you were looking for... while the phrase "pee on" would probably accurately reflect the way that some workers are treated, it summons to mind some things that many of us would rather not think about.

  56. Useless Attachment to Old Junk by NotWallaceStevens · · Score: 1

    It's a strange quirk of human nature that we form nostalgic attachments to old junk. Somehow the fond memories of an old car get converted into reluctance to part with a trembling rust bucket that leaves pools of oil in your driveway. Through some fault of thinking I have several old, useless 486 PCs taking up space in storage. What matters with google is not the hardware they got for free, or waxing nostalgic about data centers cluttered with 28K modems and piles of keyboards and monitors with 1-1 relationships to systems, but rather, the vision and hard work that hardware supported, and the thought, the beautiful algorithmic jazz, expressed in code and data on those old loud slow hunks of silicon and steel. Waxing nostalgic over pictures of old junk ought to be replaced by waxing creative over a close reading of the PageRank algorithm. That would be a more useful expenditure of your time on a saturday morning.

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Re:The Brits on the board will be with me when I s by ratpack91 · · Score: 1
    yeah i was hammering the website for seven hours yesterday and more on thursday. At 17:45 i said screw this and gave up leaving 3 browser tabs on their last attempts.

    half an hour later i come back and what do ya know - "Thank You for booking online with Aloud.com for your Glastonbury 2004 tickets..." Awesome baby! And a nice conformation email was waiting for me in Thunderbird. Yes i was crazy but happy, although last time I went it only cost a tenner for me to get in.

  59. And I wasted money on racks... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...when the answer was FLOOR MOUNTED servers the whole time! Next thing you know, we'll find out you can skip the expensive UPS and plug things straight into the wall...nah, that's crazy!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  60. Museum Pieces by Horsey+Fiddler · · Score: 1

    For interested history buffs, the Duplo drive bay can be seen in a display case in the basement of Stanford's CS building.

  61. Re:Just for the record (and yes, quite offtopic) by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    Um... it was an april fool's joke...

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. Colour Scheme. by AlecC · · Score: 1

    Well you can see where Goolge got the colour scheme for their logo. It is just the colours of the Lego bricks.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  64. Bad judgement by CCRancor · · Score: 1

    I bet that Sergey Brin regrets ever putting this photo online.

    --
    Open source is the art of letting other people write your bad code.
    1. Re:Bad judgement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than:

      Copy Detection Mechanisms for Digital Documents
      by Sergey Brin, James Davis, and Hector Garcia-Molina.
      We develop and study a system for detecting copies of documents in large collections which is useful for finding copyright violations.


      or working in the Gates building?

  65. Re:Google hardware--only 20 GB search per server by blastedtokyo · · Score: 1

    I was shocked to see that their lowest end search server is limited to a maximum of 20 GB. And it sounds like their highest end server maxes out at 200 GB. Either they haven't updated their web pages in ages or they only serve companies with tiny intranets or small libraries of content. Imagine if one GMail server could only handle 20 users (I know, nobody's to use all 1 gig)...that'd be enough servers to cause another california blackout.

  66. Re:Where are these hardwares today? Partial Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lego box is in the basement of the William
    Gates Building on Stanford campus. It is inside
    a little display made of wood and plastic.
    I haven't looked carefully to see if the hard drives are actually still inside.

    I pass this display almost daily on the way to class.

    The irony of the building name has not been lost on me.

  67. Looks like the early days to me... by speby · · Score: 2, Interesting
  68. See the "lego machine" for yourself by Animats · · Score: 1

    The "lego machine" is in the basement corridor of the William Gates Computer Science Building (really!) at Stanford. The basement corridor seems to have the less-interesting historic hardware. There's also a large glass case of old networking hardware ("Wow! A DELNI!"), all unlabeled.

  69. Lego = Construct verb in Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://latin.realdictionary.com/Latin/lego.asp

    lego - appoint, select.

    lego - to gather, choose, collect, pass through,
    read.

    The word LEGO(R) is formed from the Danish word Leg Godt (play well). It was discovered later that the word in Latin means "I study, I put together".

  70. It's LEGO DAM IT, not LEGOs!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry, but I'm a LEGO NAZI...

    LEGO has no need for an "s" on the end, even if there is 230 Ga-Billion blocks! (Ga-Billion is infinity +1 in case you were wondering)

    1. Re:It's LEGO DAM IT, not LEGOs!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, and it's "damn it."

    2. Re:It's LEGO DAM IT, not LEGOs!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps gazillion not gabillion?

    3. Re:It's LEGO DAM IT, not LEGOs!!!!! by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lego can both be used as a mass noun, or to refer to the individual bricks. I like the sound of Lego as a mass noun, because I like mass nouns in general, but the usage as Lego as Lego Brick is a generally accepted part of Engilsh.

      But yes, there is no need for the 's'. And I really think that when you spell it LEGO you must be refering to the mass noun version, because LEGO is only spelt that way when bowing to the wishes of the trademark holder, and the trademark holder also wishes that people use it exclusively as a mass noun. So if you are going to say LEGOs, you should spell it legos.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  71. Oh yah? by Lysol · · Score: 1

    Well I got 4 rubbermaid things full of spare parts!

    Plus, NO TV, NO phone (yes DSL tho), 6 speakers, 2 turntables & MANY microphones!

    Where it's at!

  72. PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is that a PowerPC logo I see on one of their servers?"

    God, even this "nerd" site is ruled by the Wintel Ignorances.

    Wake up and go learn something other than what Wal-Mart/Microsoft shove up your ass/throat.

    1. Re:PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake up and go learn something other than what Wal-Mart/Microsoft shove up your ass/throat.

      Which one of those shoves things UP your throat? This I'd like to see. Does that mean they start it up the former?

  73. Re:Just for the record (and yes, quite offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee whiz, it's so weird how it says "Happy Birthday April" at the bottom, linked to by "sign in"! What a cool feature!

  74. an even better photo by kguilber · · Score: 0

    but have you seen this one of Sergey Brin (co-founder)?

  75. You are wrong by meehawl · · Score: 1

    it was an april fool's joke

    You are wrong.

    --

    Da Blog
  76. Was I the only one... by sircle_72 · · Score: 1

    ... or did anyone else check out slashdot's archives just as soon as they got done looking at google? takes me back to the days of innocence - when I was playing football in high school and had no fucking clue as to what slashdot was, nor how much time i'd end up spending (wasting?) on it...

    I think it's great to see how so many sites we regard as the high standard for information and entertainment now all got their starts - as small, underappreciated dreams of a few people that they kept alive through hard work, dilligence (and a healthy dose of luck along the way).

    --
    Sure Bill Gates' hair is fugly, but give his barber some credit! At least he managed to cover the horns on his forehead.
  77. Re:It's DAMN IT, not DAM IT!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  78. Great Minds Think Alike? by JoelW · · Score: 1

    One on my own computers has a disk rack made of legos as well, but I used plexiglass scraps instead of foam rubber for the walls and there's some duct tape and velco in mine as well.

  79. More Pictures of the Duplo Case at Stanford by BrianCarlstrom · · Score: 2, Informative

    More pictures of "The Original GOOGLE Computer Storage" from Stanford CS Department's Computer History Exhibits Photo Tour.

    You can physically see this display in the basement of the Stanford Gates Building.

  80. Lego Servers by rune2 · · Score: 1

    I bet that now their lego servers look like this ;-)

  81. Sergey Brin's dad: poetry for son's 25th birthday by j.leidner · · Score: 2, Funny
    Here's part of a poem mentioning written by Sergey Brin's father Michael Brin (he's a mathematician at U Maryland) on the occasion of his son's 25th birthday:

    ...
    You are tough, you mine data,
    You surf first and think later,
    And your crawler fast as light
    Wanders madly in the night.
    ...

    Surf first, think later, huh? Not sure I can agree with that... ;-)

  82. "Back in the Day" we had some Intel "Katmai" boxes by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

    They sent us these boxes - beta Pentium IIIs - to write our software to SSE2. anyway, yeah - the chip packaging was still P II style.

    Oh, and Intel's cases - THE WORST EVAR!

  83. Google database software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know what kind of database software google uses ?
    From their job postings it seems as if they might actually use mySQL, but I am not sure what for.
    Where and how do they store their large indexed data ?

  84. Re:Google hardware--only 20 GB search per server by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1
    I seriously doubt that it's harddrive space limiting the capacity of their server offerings. I don't know the details of how Google's search algorithms work, but I can tell you that they don't run in constant time, and that the requirements probably ramp up pretty quickly as you add data. Remember that Pagerank works on the connections between nodes in a network, which means with each node added to the network there may be many connections to analyze.

    Also, 20GB of space is a lot in many applications, and search is one of them. These servers are designed to search through mostly text data (including HTML), and even large text files aren't usually more than a few hundred k, or a meg or two at most. If we assume that the average file to be searched is 500k, that's 40,000 searchable files on one low-end server. That's more than enough for a midsize company's support database, for example. These servers seem designed to search small to midsize intranets and midsize to large databases of specific information. If you need more than that for your specific application, you probably have enough resources to contact Google directly and work out a custom solution, as I'm sure many companies have done.

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  85. Watch Google Fellow Urs Holzle by Maxwell309 · · Score: 1

    From UWTV.org and the 2002 University of Washington Computer Science and Engineering Colloquia:

    Google Linux Cluster, The
    Google's Linux cluster currently processes over 150 million queries a day, searching a multi-terabyte web index for every query with an average response time of less than a quarter of a second, with near-100% uptime. In this discussion, Google Fellow Urs Holzle will describe the software and hardware infrastructure that makes this performance possible, as well as provide an overview of the main problems facing a web search, software architecture, servers and compact rack hardware designs. For more information about this program, please see the CSE web site.

    Watch here using Windows Media Player or compatible:

    Modem

    DSL (250k)

    Cable (1300k)

    The video is also available in streaming mpeg2 using IBM VideoCharger. If you are on the UW lan and want to use the VideoCharger link it can be found on the UWTV site.

    --
    "DRM is like violence: if it doesn't work, use more."
  86. LEGO is an adjective, not a noun! by goldfndr · · Score: 1
    Company names are used as adjectives, not nouns. You wouldn't say you have several Microsofts, right? LEGO bricks, LEGO sets, LEGO kits, LEGO elements...

    I really wanted to use some moderator points in this thread but NOBODY got it right!

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
  87. But, what's with the floor? by Noginbump · · Score: 1

    What's with the giant floor tiles anyway?

    I could never work in a place that sterile looking. I gots to have my extra short loop-pile carpet.

    Then again, you could probably get a few raquetball games going in a place like that...

    --
    He who questions training, only trains himself at asking questions. -- The Sphinx, Mystery Men
  88. Use OpenMosix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you'll have an 8GHz P4 even when you're not compiling! (useful unless you run Gentoo - distcc runs all the time then)

  89. So? by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

    Where is all this hardware now? Some display case at Google HQ?

  90. Re:Just for the record (and yes, quite offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think i read something of it being posted one day early to be the april fool's joke, and they had another one (opening up an office on the moon or something)

  91. Re:Its amazing...and funny by robbot · · Score: 1

    How long will that page last through an IPO?

  92. Re:Just for the record (and yes, quite offtopic) by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    Hm... let's e-mail them and ask.

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  93. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion