Slashdot Mirror


PowerBooks & iBooks Get Speed Bumped

Currawong writes "Apple has, as rumors predicted, speed bumped its line of portables. The PowerBooks now come in 1.33 and 1.5Ghz G4 versions, including either NVidia 5200's or Radeon 9700 video hardware. The iBooks can now be had at 1 or 1.2Ghz with Radeon 9200 video included. All can be purchased at the Apple Store. This complements nicely the recent speed and feature increases on the eMac range."

41 of 751 comments (clear)

  1. Good news! by protonman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good news, I've been looking at getting a notebook for some time now and my little research indicated a superior battery life on Apple notebooks.

    The prohibitive price is still a bottleneck for me though.

    --
    The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends.
    1. Re:Good news! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dell: 533 MHz FSB
      Mac: 800 MHz FSB

      Dell: ATA/100
      Mac: SATA

      Dell: 100 Mbps Ethernet
      Mac: Gigabit Ethernet

      Also lacking in the Dell: ports for 802.11g and Bluetooth, FireWire 400 or 800, optical audio I/O ports, AGP 8X, and a capacity of 4 GB of RAM.

      You proved the poster's point: yes, you can build a PC that has fewer features and costs less than a Mac. But you can't find a PC that is feature-comparable to a Mac and yet costs significantly less.

      (The 1.6 GHz G5 is kind of a waste of money, anyway. It only has room for 4 GB of RAM as opposed to 8 GB in the other G5's, and it doesn't have PCI-X. The 1.8 GHz is a better value.)

      Your response here, based on the normal Slashdot way of doing things, should be something along the lines of, "Nobody needs FireWire anyway, 'cause USB is faster." Or something like that.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      there are number of distributors out there

      one with outstanding reputation http://www.powernotebooks.com/

      ok, i did cheat. add $500 for XPpro and a 3yr warranty.

      and you don't get any cool i-apps.

      but if we're talking strictly hardware, centrino w/radeon 9700(128mb version), dvd writer, 1024mb ram, 7200rpm drive...hovering just above $2k rocks.

      that said, i have a dell m60 already, so i'm eyeballing the 12" powerbook for portability.

    3. Re:Good news! by juiceCake · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Mac users (me in particular) don't admit we're paying a huge premium for the Mac brand name because, in fact, we're not."

      That's great and of course not. The valuation of what one purchases is very much subjective to the party involved. To you, it's not a huge premium, to others it is. There is no right or wrong in this case.

      "Anyone who believes a bottom of the line Dull is comparable to a Mac workstation deserves exactly what they get when buying said Dull."

      A spectacularly impressive argumentative tactic, taking the name of the particular company being argued against and turning it into name calling. This gives about as much credibility to your presentation as someone referring to Apple as Crapple or the Macintosh as the Crapintosh. Just wonderful.

      "You're comparing Apples with oranges (or better yet, Apples with crap)."

      I've worked with "crappy" Dells and Apples and great ones. It's true!

      "add in a OS to compare with OS/X (oops - there aren't any)"

      Wonderful. Continue the absurdity by stating that nothing compares to OS/X. Statements like this make a constructive, sensible debate impossible. You sir, are a wall.

      "and the other standard software packages (iTunes, iMovie, iDVD, etc., etc.)."

      It is wonderful that you like these and see value in them. That said, others do not. Like me for example. Don't care for any of them, particularly iTunes. But that is just my opinion, and in no way is a statement that you to must see it as I do.

      "Why can't PC bigots get over the fact that today's Macs are price competitive with PC's?"

      What is a PC bigot exactly? A person who sees things differently is a bigot? Here in Canada, Macs are, in my humble opinion, very much competitive with PCs in the laptop area and yet bigot that I am, I still prefer the PC and one of the factors is price, and the other is features. Having said that, other opinions are welcome and not judged, unless of course they offered in oh you unholy unwashed masses sense. Let's take a look at an example or two shall we?

      The 17" Powerbook is $3,699.

      The 17" Toshiba Satellite P20 is $3499.

      Features vary, such a RAM, Firewire ports, etc. but its all down to which one you like better. What's your name for Toshiba? Toshita?

      Now as for desktops, I recently upgraded to a P4 2.8Ghz with a Gig of RAM, 800MHz FSB, 36 GIG SATA, Pioneer 107 DVD-R+R, ATI 9600, 120 GIG ATA second drive, new case, external drive enclosure for the CD-ROM, external drive enclosure for a third Hard-Drive (ATA - 80 gig) for $1800.

      I can pick up a PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz (I know, the speed varies across platforms and OS's) for a mere $2499! I find the PC in this case to be a far better deal in this case. Does this make me a PC bigot? Does recommending the new eMac to a client who personally finds using Macs easier make me a bigot as well? My god, just the other day I was praising InDesign and talking about its advantages over Quark (I didn't say Quirk however). I must be an Adobe bigot! Oh the humanity. When will this rampant platformism ever stop?

      Very peculiar. Do people actually see other people as defined by their computer system? Are there millions of PC people out there? What sort of clothes do they where? What strange foods do they eat?

    4. Re:Good news! by The+Unabageler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend got a dell and started boasting about his 7 hour battery life.

      later on he mentioned that it's only with the second battery plugged in. lame.

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    5. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On OS X, 3D acceleration is used for the 2D display as a part of Quartz Extreme. This means that 3D acceleration might be of zero utility to a PC user but its used at the system level on a Mac. Besides, what AGP video card are you going to buy that doesn't feature 3D acceleration?

      As for low weight and no optical drive, afaik every 17" notebook you buy will have an optical drive. Only the tiny sub-notebooks are CD/DVD-less.

      IMHO, the biggest difference is what OS you intend to run. I would NEVER consider a PC notebook because they don't run OS X.

    6. Re:Good news! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must be some new kind of bigot! You're bigoted against rampant platformism!

      Seriously though it's never going to end. It's not just an argument or a debate to these people who can't see the merits of both systems. It's a holy war.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Good news! by MrChuck · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Um, usb2 and firewire are both well faster than any 7200 RPM drive will put out (around 7MB/s in real use. dd does not count as "real use".)

      So it becomes moot.

      However when Apple introduced the iMac with USB and firewire, but no SCSI or ADB - meaning those of us who had spent money with Apple and their partners for parts were SOL. Apple has a long habit of burning loyal users.

      Cracks in the case? Cosmetic, not covered underwarrantee (lemme tell you how good that laptop looks with epoxy holding the crack that extended from going further).

      From the start of the mac, they've done this (which was odd given that they committed to open at the start and that Apple ][ cards worked in ][+ and ][e and even /// machines - they even were a big cause of IBM (of all companies) "inventing" the personal computer and using non-IBM parts - and being fairly Open such that all those machines you have are derived from PC clones)). With mac they went closed and proprietary.

      Got a trackball for your Mac 512? Maybe a less painful keyboard? Sorry, we have ADB now.
      Mac SE cards? Sorry, the new SE uses a different buss.
      I'll just touch on iPod schemes for charging them and talking to them. The Firewire cable is simple and worked. Now I have (another) proprietary dock cable thingy to deal with. Nice "improvment."
      Own a SCSI scanner, drive, tape? Yeah, we're using Firewire. No transistion machines. Sorry.

      The day that Apple introduced the iMac, I was down the street earlier that day looking at a Compaq PC. It had USB and Firewire and IDE and PS/2 connectors and serial ports. I could run a USB keyboard and a legacy trackball. With the iMac, I could run their crap keyboard and hope drivers for other things might be available. Transition is useful (surprisingly, firewire-2 works with old firewire. That's a break from their habit).

      Feature for feature matching is only useful if you want those features.

      Is GigE really necessary for most of us? It's cool, but my servers have GigE and use it, my desktops and laptops don't. So knock that off the comparison chart.

      64bit? Hate to break it, but OS 10.3 isn't 64 bit. So the G5's only fully used by, er, Linux.

      Look, if the choice is a machine running Windows or a machine running MacOS then, if you can get the apps you want, the mac is cheaper. You're not spending forever screwing around supporting and restoring the machine. My mom got a mac because I won't help her with Windows (it's like AlAnon).

      OTOH, if the choice is an x86 box running *nix vs. a Mac, then the PC is cheaper by a chunk. An older 266MHz pentium with 128MB of RAM running fvwm SMOKES the G4 Tibook with 768MB of RAM. THe Terminal App leaves a huge memory footprint. Aqua is sluggish and fat. Making X11 look not-fat is a feat! Sure, at several typical end user things it's a much better machine. But really, I read mail, browse, and user terminals 90% of the time.

      At work, there's a Mac and a WIndows box. The Windows box is used only for Notes and a trouble ticket system for which I have no choice. The Mac is a Lombard with 2 heads (LCD and a monitor) for everything else.

      Bizarrely, I find myself using Windows for OpenOffice - because the 400MHz Mac with 256MB of RAM running firefox and terminal starts swapping (1GB of swap in use!) when I start up XWindows. Forget mail.app (I'm happy with mutt and IMAP) or iChat, terminal + X + browser kills a Mac.

      so when you price compare
      double the ram in the Mac, leave the PC alone for Unix and compare $2400 to $800 for a laptop configured to run your stuff. Linux runs GREAT on an $800 laptop. And on a $300 desktop system.

      What's Apple's < $1000 desktop system? Oh, an eMac with a built in monitor. Gimme that for $500 without the damn monitor (17" monitors are free and there are plenty around to be had) and we can talk.

      Oh, you'd better buy Office, because

    8. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's complete BS. I can still sell my 600Mhz on Ebay for $7-850. He'll even the old powerbook (500Mhz) still go for almost a thousand dollars!

  2. Instead of a speed increase at the same price... by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead? I would love a 700mhz Powerbook for $600 or so (no thanks, refurbed units).

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  3. Converted by beeglebug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can someone refresh my memory? How fast is a 1.5ghz Apple processor when converted into Intel ghz?

    1. Re:Converted by LEgregius · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From what I can tell, for integer-only code (i.e. no altivec) a G4 is a little slower than a Pentium 3 (not 4) or Pentium-M (which is a modded P3) running at the same clock speed. In fact, my 1.25GHz G4 runs C/C++ code in OSX at about 2/3 the speed of the same code on my 1.7GHz Pentium-M running linux (both using gcc 3.3 and pretty standard optimizations). Since a 1.7GHz Pentium-M is about the same speed as a 2.2 or 2.4 GHz Pentium 4, that makes the G4 reasonable faster than a P4 at the same clock speed. Both of my machines have 1GB of RAM, btw.

      Altivec code, on the other hand, seems to be very different. Code that heavily uses the altivec, like MP3/AAC encoding, graphics work, Folding@Home, and the OS X UI seems to be much faster at the same clock speed. For doing Folding@home, for example, my 1.25GHz G4 is quite a bit faster than my 1.7GHz Pentium-M. A few years ago, I had a 667 G4 and a 1.2GHz athlon. The G4 was nearly twice as fast as the athlon when doing Distributed.NET type stuff (rc5-64 at the time, I think).

      For those of you doing Java, a G4 seems to run Java code of any sort, including the compiler, the same speed as an Athlon XP or Pentium-M at a 50% greater clock speed, or 80% higher for a P4. I did tests compiling the same code in the same IDE, doing code refactoring, etc. The disks drives, btw, were approximately the same speed and the ram was the same for all these tests.

      I know I haven't done really official tests, I'm just stating my experience.

    2. Re:Converted by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's true that OS X has far superior multi-tasking relative to Windows. When I do a processor intensive task on my Windows boxes, I have to walk away and let it finish. I'm not sure why more people don't bring this issue up. Being able to perform other tasks and have the system and other apps remain responsive while encoding video in the background is huge productivity enhancer.

      I recently configured a low-end Dell for my sister. I figured the 2.4 GHz Celeron would easily smoke my old 800 MHz G4 TiBook. And I have no doubt that on a single-application benchmark, it would. But in practice, I was cursing at the thing because it seemed so damned slow. My laptop just feels faster. And that perception seems to be because virtually nothing bogs it down, so I've gotten in the habit of multitasking. Start an application installation or system update, and then check my email while it is in process. Start three applications at the same time and browse the web while they load. Start a graphics program rendering a big tiff, then switch to Word and work on a document. I was expecting to do the same thing on the Dell, but often one application will bog down the entire system. But for the way I've gotten in the habit of working, it feels pokey.

  4. powerbook improvement by millahtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a year old powerbook and the new ones for the same deal I got have halk gigahertz speed improvement, 20 gig bigger hard drive, over twice the speed of dvd burn, faster wireless, faster firewire bluetooth and more. And it's the same price. That's quite an increase for a year. It's so cool to see yet so depressing at the same time.

  5. G5 Laptops by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any news available about if or when there are going to be G5 based laptops released?

    I'm looking to get an Apple notebook in about 6 months but I don't want to have a big jump like the G4 to G5 be released a few months later when I could've gone without it for a little longer and then got the G5.

  6. Benchmarks by SkiddyRowe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone have any benchmark comparisons (3rd party comparisons, none of this "Apple-funded / Intel-funded" stuff) I'm a bit skeptical considering I bought a Dell laptop with 1.6Ghtz about 1.5 years ago.

    This isn't considered to be a troll, I'm just wondering about the performance difference.

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead? I would love a 700mhz Powerbook for $600 or so (no thanks, refurbed units).

    The answer is simple really. Apple would like to maintain their products as objects of desire. Sexy bits of computer art that both inspire lust and allow us to accomplish our work easier and/or faster than ever before, making a difference. To lower the prices would reduce Apple computers to commodity items much like the rest of the Wintel world.

    How many Dell, HP, Compaq, graybox etc.... hardware rollouts are greeted with the same kind of fervor that Apple computer hardware announcements inspire?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  9. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead?

    They do, at the same time discontinuing it. Go to an Apple Store this week and you'll surely find some new, unopened last-generation powerbooks and ibooks on sale price.

  10. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by mac+os+ken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Part of the reason you cant directly compare is because of the processor achitecture. PowerPCs and x86 based processors have differing binaries/commands/structures/etcetera. Photoshop is one of the few products on both the Mac and Windows platform that is almost identical in code and function. You'll notice in comparison between the two platforms Photoshop is a common program used.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  11. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by Morgahastu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because a benchmark of a modern FPS game is a terrible way to benchmark the processor since most of the work is dependant on video cards.

    Here's is something from a post I made somewhere above concerning speed compairisons:

    --------

    I have the previous version of the 12" PowerBook running at 1ghz and it's noticably faster than my p4 1.5ghz. I'd rate it as feeling about the same as a 2.0ghz p4.

    So I'd say the 1.5 would be about a 2.8 or 3.0ghz pentium.

    While we're on this topic I'd like to point out that Macs feel much faster than they actually are because of the superb multi tasking and UI response under heavy load.

    When I am encoding a video on my Windows machine I can't do anything else on my computer, if I try to click something it takes about 30 seconds for the menu to popup.

    On the other hand, my Mac can have 20 apps running and encoding a video at the same time and the UI still responds beautifully.

    This is why using a Mac is a great experience, you so rarely get frustrated at it because it just works.

    ----

    FYI it has the same NVidia FX5200 the new ones have and it plays all the current games very well (Except the super high end FPS games like Ut2004...playable but not that enjoyable). Anyway, anyone who intends to do serious gaming on a laptop is a damn fool, even more so on a Mac laptop.

  12. Re:Temperature woes by kakapo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is true of the first generation 12'' PookBooks, but is much less of a problem is the second generation models (and the newly released ones are the third generation).

    There are two 12'' 1GHz models in my household, and they never get uncomfortably hot -- neither is used for gaming, but I do a good deal of development and numerical computation on mine, which means the CPU can be pegged at 100% for lengthy periods. The fan does kick in fairly regularly though.

  13. Why doesn't BMW sell the 2002 3 series anymore? by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I surely wish BMW would sell me a 2002 3-series instead of the improved 2005. I don't want to buy a used one, I just want to buy a new old one. I mean, surely they keep all those old parts around.

    Dude, warehousing old graphics cards, HDs, etc costs money and would actually increase Apple's Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). If they then dropped prices, they would have slimmer margins in both directions (lower revenues, higher COGS).

    I got my dad to buy a Apple refurb iBook and save $300. It works great, has no physicial defect and as far as I can tell, is identical to a new one with three $100 bills stuck in the DVD/CDR combo drive.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  14. New iBook memory config by gabe824 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The iBooks have had their memory limit raised to 1.25GB. Better still the soldered in chip is now 256MB instead of 128MB, this gives all the default configurations a free slot to upgrade with. This resolves what was for me, my biggest gripe about my G4 ibook.

  15. Re:5200's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That this is a video card for a low-end consumer laptop, not a 1337 game system, maybe?

    Hold on a minute there. One moment people here claim that all Apple hardware should be compared to medium or top-range PC stuff, and that this makes them reasonably good value for money. And then, when people do exactly that, it is suddenly unfair because the Apple is really a low-end system?

    You cannot both have your cake and eat it. Either the 12" model is quite overpriced as a "low-end consumer" machine at $1600-$1800, or it's got a really shitty graphics card for a medium/high range machine.

  16. What about screen resolution. by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use an IBM Thinkpad that's got a 14" screen with 1400x1050 resolution. That's more pixels than the 17" Powerbook on the same screen that Apple's only fitting 1280x854 (Powerbook) or 1024x768 (iBook) on.

    I'd happily take a G4/500 with a Radeon 7500 if I could get decent resolution with it. I'm sure Sonnet will have a CPU upgrade for me when I need it, but it's a lot harder to upgrade the screen.

    The crummy screens on Apple's current low-end lineup is why I'm upgrading my almost 10 year old Beige Powermac (upgraded to G4/466 and 768M RAM) instead of getting an eMac (17" screen, but it's a really ugly last-century shadow mask) or iMac (15", 1024x768) or a notebook. I don't need a red hot machine and I can't imagine giving up my 1280x1028 (up to 1600x1200, if I wanted) aperture grill display (a nice Trinitron clone by CTX, under $200) for the eMac or iBook...

  17. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My (highly subjective) experience is quite similar, but I'd like to point out two things:
    1. AltiVec. A lot of Mac code is AltiVec optimised. This means making explicit use of the vector libs, rather than just hoping the compiler will auto-vectorise for you). Much less code on x86 is optimised like this, since you have to support MMX, SSE, SSE2, 3DNow!, 3DNow2! etc, so most code either uses MMX as a lowest common denominator, or doesn't use the vector unit at all. This means that such code will run 2-4 times faster than on an equivalent x86 machine. The QuickTime MP3 and AAC encoders are examples of this.
    2. Memory. OS X likes memory. Most of the time you don't quite applications in OS X, you just leave them running with no windows open. If you do close them, then OS X will try to leave the application binary in the disk cache for as long as possible so that you can reload it quickly. The disk cache is quite aggressive. I was browsing through a load of PDFs on a CD the other day, and part way through, the CD span down. It had cached the entire CD (or at least all of the PDFs I looked at after it had spun down). Adding more RAM will have a huge effect on your perceived speed.
    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  18. iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The previous generation iBook 12" was slow (800MHz G4) and had a low RAM ceiling (640MB) with 256k L2 cache on-chip.

    The iBook G4 12" announced today is no speed demon, but at 1GHz, it's fast enough for its target user (students/education professionals), and the 512k L2 cache certainly helps. With up to 1.25GB DDR RAM, the machine is basically identical to the previous generation 12" PowerBook.

    Add an Airport Extreme card and upgrade the disk to a reasonable size (60GB), and you can get the machine for $1273. The 12" PowerBook, meanwhile, costs $1600 in more or less the same configuration.

    Is there a really compelling reason to buy the 12" PowerBook if you're Joe Student? Doesn't seem like it. Graphics are nominally better, but the nVidia 5200 isn't so hot, is it? There's a 333MHz speed bump, which nobody will notice during normal use. Bluetooth is included, but you can add it to the iBook for $50 if you need it.

    So I wonder if the current iBook rev. will take a bite out of PowerBook sales. There are few (if any) "must have" features on the PowerBook 12", and the current iBook speed and RAM capacity are finally on par with other modern machines.

    My money would be on the iBook, I think.

    1. Re:iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget that the iBook also has longer battery life (6 hrs vs. 5 hrs, more like 5:30 vs 4:30 in practice).

      Also you can get an iBook with SuperDrive for $1499 (14"). That may be the real killer for some users since the cheapest SuperDrive powerbook costs $1799 (12") and isn't much faster.

    2. Re:iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a college student who will be buying either a 12" iBook or a 12" PowerBook as soon as I get a chance to try them both out in person. (I'm only referring to the 12" models in this post.) Before this update, I was very much leaning towards getting an iBook rather than a PowerBook. The iBooks used to be much better than the PowerBooks in terms of bang for your buck. However, having seen these new models, I'm almost assuredly going to get a PowerBook.

      With my education discount, I can get the PowerBook for $1399 and the iBook for $1155. The PowerBook is the stock 12" without the Superdrive, and the iBook is the base 12" with a combo drive, Airport Extreme, and a 60 GB HD. (The Airport and bigger HD are BTO options to put it on par with the PowerBook. So now I'm looking at a $250 difference, or ~20% if I look at it that way. For this 20% more in cost, I get a 1.33 GHz G4 vs a 1 GHz G4 (33% improvement), a 167 MHz system bus vs a 133 MHz system bus (25% improvement), a nicer video card (double the VRAM), and other random PowerBook niceties like the ability to do monitor spanning without OpenFirmware hacks. Not to mention the PowerBook is lighter and smaller in all 3 dimensions. The only real advantage I see in the iBook is the greater battery life, but the 5 and 6 hour quotes are to be believed, the difference is all but negligible.

      While the iBook is still an excellent option, I just feel I'm getting more bang for my buck with the PowerBook. This is a laptop that's going to last me a long time, so I think the extra money spent will be well worth it in the long run.

  19. I Love Apple! by ThisGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ordered a PowerBook 1.25ghz 15" SuperDrive on Friday. I awoke this morning to see that my order had been cancled, but re added. I was pretty confused until I saw this post on slashdot, and I checked some emails, and bam! They switched my order for me! Why do I think this wouldn't have happened with a company whose name begins with M and ends with -onopoly.

  20. Apple Loan = Tool of the devil by Del+Vach · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since I'm in complete agreement with the opposing viewpoints that...
    • If we knew what was being released in six months, we could hold off on current purchases to get a better value
    • The only reason Mac users bring this up is because we follow Apple's lineup so closely some of us feel they OWE us this
    • It must suck trying to sell what you've got on the shelf when half your potential consumers want the next model regardless of what the current one is
    ... I'll just pipe in and bash MBNA. Yes, they may advertise a 6.99 APR with no interest for 6 months (think those were the current terms), but:
    • When you're approved for an Apple/MBNA loan, they make a point of not mentioning what APR you actually GET- think 24%
    • They don't send the paperwork on this loan for close to two months, so if you want to get on the ball and start making payments during the initial 6 mo. period- too bad!
    All that being said, I actually order a 1GHz 15" PB when they were first released, then cancelled the order based on rumors of a redesign, and ended up ordering the 17" I'm on now. Just had to pay off the sleazy MBNA loan with a credit card (sigh).
  21. Re:Lose Airport Extreme, add PCMCIA by cbiffle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ahrm.

    So why is it you need PCMCIA? Is the current Cardbus slot not sufficient? It's like PCMCIA, only much faster and with a wider bus.

    Oh, and it's backwards compatible.

    Let me guess -- didn't read the specs? I understand.

  22. Re:Temperature woes by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mercifully (in a way), a semi-recent update changed the fan kick-in temperature to a lower threshold, meaning less built-up heat but a lower battery life. Expect the batteries on the new PowerBooks to not quite last as long as they're listed as, though they'd probably last long enough as is. For a college student like me, just having them last through class so that I can go back to my dorm and plug in for the evening's homework is fine.

    Should you ever want to change the fan-temperature back (meaning more battery life and less fan noise), you can install Silent Night using Pacifist (Silent Night's installer doesn't always work right).

    I for one couldn't stand the fan being on all the time, but then, I use my PowerBook on a desk most of the time, and I found the heat kind of plesant during the winter. YMMV.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  23. Re:desktop update next week? by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... but I don't see G5s there until fall.

    SJ at the release of the G5 stated clearly that they "IBM and Apple are today announcing that within 12 months we'll be at 3GHz". You can hear/see this yourself in the WWDC 2003 video at timecode 1:52:00

    Unless things continue to go horribly wrong at IBM, that means the G5 will hit that mark in June.

    Note that Steve stated they would be at that speed, not announcing that speed. I would expect, based on that statement, that such systems should be shipping by July at the latest.

    At this point, I suspect that Apple will forgo any interim speed bump or upgrades for the PowerMac and is simply stockpiling the 3GHz processors in anticipation of a major buying spree once the new systems are released.
    I recall speculation after the WWDC last year that Steve's statement might mean there would be no major updates until a year later. That speculation seemed to be dismissed quickly by most.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  24. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The 1.25 GHz eMac is a steal at 749$

    Sure, or you could get an Athlon XP 3200 512K 2.2GHz 400 MHz FSB w/dvd-rw, 80gb 7200rpm drive, 512m, gigabit ethernet, bluetooth, 802.11g, a radeon 9200 and a 20" CRT for $100 less.

    Link?

  25. screens? by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't suppose the screens on the 12" model have been updated? I remember hearing that the screen model used on the 12" Powerbook and the 12"/14" iBooks was a much lower quality screen than the 15"/17" powerbooks.

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  26. Wireless add-ons now standard by amichalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (WARNING: this post has nothing to do with wanting a G5 Powerbook or complaining how a year and a half ago I bought a Powerbook and now Apple has upgraded them *again* and I am so mad. Thus, most people will want to skip this post.)

    What do you think about the standard Airport Extreme (80211.g) and Bluetooth in the Powerbooks?

    I think this is the most overlooked "new" item. Just as USB and Firewire were first standards on the Mac, is Apple again ushering in a new era of wireless connectivity by making these items standard?

    When Intel released the Centreno and those wireless ads that went with them, I never heard it having much response. Is there a high demand for these wireless standards?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  27. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is no tech support for underwear. Every call from a customer cost you money. The cheaper the computer the stupider the questions.

  28. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gaming is now bigger than movies.

    Is that why I'm buying a Powerbook in a few moths to use at college (for communications, as in radio/tv/film. As in video.)?

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  29. I should clarify... by danielsfca2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I should really clarify here. I'm not knocking Celeron machines and older Pentium/clones like yours for uses like that...I found a discarded Compaq Celeron-500-based machine in a "toaster" formfactor in my basement...and it is an awesome server!

    Right now I'm looking into getting an old, old laptop with AC adapter for use as a server because they're quiet and i can hide it in the bottom drawer of my dresser and have a mailserver without leaving on that wind-tunnel of a PC (my Athlon box) all night, etc.

    I think everything can be put to use, as you clearly appreciate too.