Slashdot Mirror


Andromeda And Mutant X Cancelled

dmehus writes "Science fiction fans may be dismayed to learn that "Mutant X" and "Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda" have been cancelled, despite the fact "Andromeda" had been cleared for a final season beginning in the fall. That prospect seems highly unlikely as the show's producer, Fireworks Entertainment, is shutting its doors for good and owner CanWest Global Communications (which also owns canada.com, the National Post, Global Television, and a bunch of other media assets) announced it will take a $159 million writedown on Fireworks. The news means "Mutant X" has a series total of three seasons and 66 episodes, while "Andromeda" will have a series total of 88 episodes in four seasons. Slashdot has previously covered 'Andromeda'."

85 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. 88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In TV-land, 100 is a magic number for a weekly series. When you hit 100 episodes, you have enough episodes to go 5-a-week and last 20 weeks without a repeat. That's good enough to survive on cable or syndication with a nearly infinite life. Lesser series have done it, but you've gotta be really deep to not risk burn-out.

    So, Andromida stopping at 88 is kinda an ugly number to get caught at. Sci-Fi might have an interest in funding a series-ending run of about 13 episodes to run as an exclusive event, and therefore give the show some life in daily reruns. 88 with an abrupt-stop ending just isn't that valuable for reruns in comparision.

    Of course, that depends on Sci-Fi being able to see the value in rerun rights. If the library of Fireworks assets including the 88 existing episodes get sold to a party that's not interested in letting Sci-Fi have the show on a 5-a-week daytime basis at a reasonable price... then there's no point in doing the deal.

    The Sci-Fi saves the show thread is a longshot, but it could happen so it can't be ignored. The show's not dead yet, but it's taken a usually-fatal blow.

    1. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by Chalybeous · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Shows have survived in syndication with less. There were, if I remember right, 79 episodes of Star Trek (plus the original pilot, which remained unaired til the mid-1990s, although it was released on video around 1984-85) when it went into syndication.
      That said - the original Star Trek was a good series. I've seen some Andromeda, and while it looked okay and had the occasional interesting moment (not to mention some impressive visuals and sets - I remember seeing a giant observation deck with a diplomatic function going on), it never hooked me. Probably part of it was that I can't stand Kevin Sorbo - although DeepWater Black's Gordon Michael Wolvett was a welcome addition to the cast, and Lexa Doig is reasonably easy on the eye.

      No offence to those who like Andromeda, but I think it's about time people stopped cashing in on Gene Roddenberry's name just to get ratings. (modern Trek's high point was DS9 - since then, it's just been flogging a dead franchise!)

      DISCLAIMER: The above views of TV shows are just my opinion. Yours may vary. Remember, opinions are like assholes - kindly stop shoving yours in my face ;-)

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    2. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by TastyWords · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to Episodes Guide (an address worth memorizing - you won't need need a bookmark for it), there were seventy-nine articles not including the pilot. The pilot is labelled "UNAIRED".

    3. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Actually, 100 is the magic number for "big money" syndication. There are many (many) TV shows in perpetual rerun land nowadays because there are so many channels with relatively little content. Given the number of awful movies that Sci-Fi Channel trots out on a regular basis, they'll probably have Andromeda in reruns for the duration.

      Finally, I would note that the idea of Sci-Fi funding enough episodes just to round out to 100 is just silly. After all, they're the only network that's likely to be interested in rerunning Andromeda ANYWAY, so why would they want to make the property more valuable (and thus more costly) unless they truly think that making new episodes is a profitable proposition (as they did with SG-1)?

    4. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

      No offence to those who like Andromeda, but I think it's about time people stopped cashing in on Gene Roddenberry's name just to get ratings.

      Actually, Andromeda did have a basis in Roddenberry's work -- at least more so than Earth:Final Conflict did (unless I missed something). The original idea was a show called "Genesis II" about a man named Dylan Hunt who was put in some kind of suspension for an experiment, and found by a group called Pax something like 150 years later, after Earth had been through bad events and balkanized. He and the Pax teams would use subshuttles to get to all the different city-states that had grown up after a technological and civil collapse. The intent was to give the characters access to many different cultures, like the Enterprise had in Trek, and let us watch as Pax and Dylan rebuilt society. There was another pilot, very similar, called "Earth II" (I think), that, again, had Dylan Hunt sleep for a long time (this time on a space station), before returning to a balkanized Earth to help rebuild civilization.

    5. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pilot is labelled "UNAIRED".


      They need to change the "unaired" as the Pilot was aired about ten - fifteen years ago on live TV during one of the anniversaries.

      technically - parts of the pilot were used in a rare two part episode of star trek where the pilot profided background for Spocks defence trial - Also - Captain Pike - the pilot commander was given a homage in Futurama as well.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    6. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by Chalybeous · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a lot of stuff in Roddenberry's notes, and I acknowledge that Andromeda was drawn from there. But basically, the Andromeda we have now was made from those notes and updated by other people, and Gene's name was only used as a crowd-puller (i.e. brand recognition for Trekkies).

      All I'm saying is, Gene's been dead for over a decade. Isn't it about time TV stopped making shows from his thirty year-old rough drafts? Strikes me as a combination of authorised plagarism (his widow and son are involved in it) and grave robbery...

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    7. Re:88 and rough end is tough fate in TV biz... by Chalybeous · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know about its air status in the US, but "The Cage" was aired at least once on BBC2 in the early-to-mid-1990s (I have a feeling it was either 1991 or 1996, for the 25th or 30th anniversaries, but I could be wrong). I just chose not to say anything before you chimed in, in case someone decided to mod me "-1, Smartass" ;-)

      For the uninitiated (and there probably aren't many on /.), Star Trek's second pilot (at the time, an unprecedented feat in TV) was called "Where No Man Has Gone Before" and aired as the third episode of the first season. This is why the uniforms, consoles and equipment (and some of the sets) don't match up - although the sets went through a near-constant process of upgrading, so there's a clear but gradual change between "The Man Trap" (the first regular episode) and, say, "Balance of Terror".

      OK, I just earned myself 2D10+5 geek points for that little FYI...

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

  2. One could say ... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny

    -- They're dead, Jim.

    1. Re:One could say ... by mphase · · Score: 4, Funny

      And so the Bad Shows were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins.

    2. Re:One could say ... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Funny

      And so the Bad Shows were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins.

      Hey, at least the 88 episodes aren't being sent to a far away planet where a young energy beam can become the only surviving fan other than somebody frozen for 1000 years.

    3. Re:One could say ... by mphase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot, the only place you can make a Futurama reference and then have it expounded upon.

    4. Re:One could say ... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slashdot, the only place you can make a Futurama reference and then have it expounded upon.

      Futurama lasted only 72 episodes, yet is still doing perfectly well in 5-a-week infinite reruns on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim. It is possible to survive with less than 100 episodes... but the show has to be detail-filed and good in general.

    5. Re:One could say ... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, and, at least in Andromeda's case, it's a good thing (tm). I liked Andromeda when it first came out, but when they canned the lead writer because, as Sorbo put it, he created plots that were too subtle for most people to understand, I knew it was headed for trouble.

      Then, then next season, the credits started with a line like "The universe can be a dangerous place." I almost shut it off right there, but wanted to give it a chance. I thought that season opener (where they rescue Becca and Tyr) was weak, but John DeLancie was on the next one, so I watched it. They took a character (DeLancie's), who had been defined as definitely evil and suddenly tried to make him only unpredictable. I've never watched another episode since.

      That one jumped the shark long ago.

    6. Re:One could say ... by tbannist · · Score: 2, Informative

      That one jumped the shark long ago.

      The exact episode was Ouroborus. They fired the head writer, dropped the character "Rev Bem", (actor Brent Stait chose to leave), threw out the character bible for Trance Gemini and didn't both to replace it with anything. Every episode after that one was pretty bad, it was often glaringly obvious that episodes that had originally been written to star another cast member had been rewritten to expand Sorbo's role.

      Gordon Michael Woolvett and Laura Bertram were the highlights of the show and with what seems to be a dramatically reduced role in the series after Ouroborus and all touches of intelligence rooted out so Sorbo wouldn't feel dumb, there was no reason to continue watching the show.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  3. on the other hand... by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Science fiction fans may be dismayed to learn that "Mutant X" and "Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda" have been cancelled


    Though fans of quality television will rejoice. Mutant X? It has to be one of the worst TV shows I've seen more than 5 minutes of in the last 10 years.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:on the other hand... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Action/Sci-Fi is a very expensive form of TV show due to the need for special effects. To do it cheap always results in looking bad...

      Maybe CanWest is doing a good thing by putting FireWorks out of its misery rather than delivering sub-standard final seasons.

    2. Re:on the other hand... by ericdano · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hence why a lot of good ANIME scifi is out there. Sol Bianca, Lost Universe, Captain Tyler, Macross, etc, etc.

      It's sad, but Enterprise just blows. Andromeda was way better I thought.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:on the other hand... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Mutant X" has a series total of three seasons and 66 episodes

      That's 67 episodes (I'm fining them an extra one...) too many as far as I'm concerned. Andromeda was just barely watchable and only because I of Keith Hamilton Cobb's (Tyr Anasazi) overacting while he was still there. I tuned in to see just how much he would ham it up this week.

      Mutant X on the other hand was unexcusably horrible on all levels.

      Sci-Fi Channel must be kicking themselves in the ass. The passed on Firefly to get a show whose studio goes belly-up before they even air an original episode.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:on the other hand... by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Action/Sci-Fi doesn't always need special effects. Sci-Fi isn't just laser guns and spaceships and giant sand worms and 3D holographic simulations. The trouble is, everybody wants to be Star Trek these days.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    5. Re:on the other hand... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually rip-off is the wrong word, considering it started as a contract with Marvel comics.
      My understanding is that some company involved in the first X-Man movie got a contract to do a tv series based on the x-man 'concept', and thinking they were going to get to do X-Men the tv series they got another company to buy in and help out. Well aparently the first contract (with Marvel) was such that that the first company got told by marvel they couldn't actually use the x-men or any specific marvel characters, just the basic concept and to use x and mutant in the title. well the third company was a bit disapointed to find out they weren't getting into what they thought and it only got worse till they decided to drop out and sue the company in the middle for misleading them, afaik thier suing Marvel as well. Fireworks is one of the companies, but I can't recall wich.
      So in short it may be pathetic, but it's Official pathetic and not a rip off per se. (though I'm shure many viewers feel riped off)
      The sad thing is this is likely to kill Andromeda off. I've only seen about 15 or so episodes, but thier at least average for tv. Frankly the only other decent s.f. type series on broadcast tv is SG1 which, while well done, has only minimal continuity and character developement from episode to episode. Whereas Andromeda seems to have a story arc to it.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    6. Re:on the other hand... by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I own the first three comics of Marvel's Mutant X series and I think this TV series has single-handedly killed their value :^(

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  4. "Dismayed" is a bit strong. by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Science fiction fans may have be dismayed when they learnt that Firefly was being cancelled, but I buy the DVDs of Andromeda here in Australia and I'm far from dismayed. Not saying I know when it jumped the shark, but I almost stopped buying it at DVD 4.6.

    1. Re:"Dismayed" is a bit strong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm my sentiments exactly. I got into Andromeda first, liked the first season dvd's immensely, then got introduced to firefly and now Andromeda just seems... tired, or tiresome.

      In anycase I've bought all the Andromeda dvd's.
      The most recent one that came out was 3.4 though, so how do you get access to season 4 dvds??

    2. Re:"Dismayed" is a bit strong. by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hmm my sentiments exactly. I got into Andromeda first, liked the first season dvd's immensely, then got introduced to firefly and now Andromeda just seems... tired, or tiresome.
      Snap. I'm almost ashamed to have the Firefly box set in the same media tower as Andromeda.
      In anycase I've bought all the Andromeda dvd's. The most recent one that came out was 3.4 though, so how do you get access to season 4 dvds??
      Apparently Australia has been getting DVDs the fastest. Might have something to do with the fact that no free-to-air station will touch it. I think cable hasn't even started showing season four here.
    3. Re:"Dismayed" is a bit strong. by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not saying I know when it jumped the shark

      One good (bad) thing I can say about Andromeda is that it excelled at shark jumping. Too many characters for one thing. While some shows can make that work (Firefly) Andromeda didn't seem to have the budget (or the writing talent) to have all the characvters in each episode. Also whats the point of having a ship staffed by thousands if 6 and an AI can do the job just as well. I could go on and on, but I'd rather go to bed...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re: "Dismayed" is a bit strong. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative


      > WTF is "jumping the shark"?

      Originally it meant a show doing something outrageous and irrelevant in order to boost sagging ratings, e.g. Fonzie jumping over sharks on waterskis.

      Now the term seems to be generalized to a couple of broader meanings by a lot of people, such as (a) making changes that take it away from its original conception, or even (b) simply going down the tubes.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:"Dismayed" is a bit strong. by vjmurphy · · Score: 2, Funny

      " I almost stopped buying it at DVD 4.6"

      Unfortunately, Andromeda is not a show that you can refer to by episode numbers and have it make any sense: perhaps in 10-20 years, when there have been multiple conventions, a balding Kevin Sorbo can do a skit on some lesser comedy show and when DVD 4.6 is brought up, he can say "Get a Life." THEN you can start refering to Season X, Episode Y.

      But that time has not yet come.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
  5. And yet... by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Enterprise gets picked up for another season.

    Isn't it obvious? GOOD SF doesn't sell. Cheap commercialized tripe does.

    1. Re:And yet... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Enterprise keeps getting renewed because UPN needs something, anything, with the Star Trek brand in order to hold the network together. UPN is a constant sixth who sometimes risks falling to seventh behind Spanish-language Univision. It's main problem is any time Paramount has a good show, sister network CBS grabs it. Having to eat CBS's leftovers, and then having its backbone major-city affiliates also being treated as CBS's little sister just is no way to run a network.

    2. Re:And yet... by Zenithal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alright, I'd be the first to say that Enterprise, compaired to TNG is crap. But Enterprise compaired to much of the much WORSE crap out there is pretty darn stellar. We should be at least somewhat happy it's still around.

      There's a lot of TV hours out there per-week. One of Enterprise isn't a plague on humanity, and it beats the living crap out of yet another our of reality TV.

      --


      Aaron
      AaronCameron.net
    3. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as they don't cancel StarGate SG 1. It is the only *good* Scifi on the air right now. Not that this means anything to cancel-bots who will cheerfully favor horrid garbage -- as long as it is cheap to make.

    4. Re:And yet... by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Enterprise gets picked up for another season.

      Isn't it obvious? GOOD SF doesn't sell. Cheap commercialized tripe does.


      Did you just call Andromeda and Mutant X good sci-fi?

      Andromeda has spaceships making race car noises, and Mutant X had its Xavier-wannabe use communication satellites to download the DNA needed to stop an epidemic in mutants!

      Not that I'm defending Enterprise, I think Rick Berman should be stoned to death, but Andromeda? Mutant X? Good riddance!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  6. Yet another quality Slashdot communitycancellation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    First goatse.cx gets shutdown, now Andromeda.

    Is nothing sacred anymore?

    What's next - Lucasfilm is cancelling Episode III!!?!?

  7. 88? by kahei · · Score: 4, Funny


    *88* episodes? The fact that someone kept Andromeda going for 88 episodes is deeply disturbing. I always assumed there were only about 4, and they got repeated a lot.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:88? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're thinking of the space battles. There were only about 4 space battles that were rendered and the rest a remixes with the same 3D graphics. There were some "girl of the week" episodes that hardly had any space battles. But it is a worry that a show only as tenth as good as DS9 could go on for half as long.

  8. Not really by laiquendi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Science fiction fans may be dismayed to learn that "Mutant X" and "Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda" have been cancelled

    Heh, more likely they won't. Save your pity for Firefly.

  9. Mutant X by thisfred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't seen much Andromeda, but I can't say I'm surprised to see Mutant X cancelled. All it was, really, was a very cheap ripoff of the X-Men (Scientist provides place for young and confused mutants and together they fight crime.), and it didn't even seem to want to hide that fact. Good riddance.

    --
    "I Just Want You To Hurt Like I Do" - Randy Newman
  10. No Offense Intended by mphase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry to say that I haven't been able to watch either show because they are just so bad. I've never been able to stomach Mutant X but I liked Andromeda at first, but now to watch episodes I originally liked I stand stand it. I believe the reason for this is fantastic shows like Farscape and Firefly which just make these shows look like steaming piles. Okay I've got to admit I little offense is actually intended. How do people whatch that dren?

    1. Re:No Offense Intended by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do people whatch that dren?

      Simple, the majority of people are idiots, and TV networks look to attract as many viewers as possible. If its a well written show with many plot twists and great dialogue, its bound to confuse a significant portion of TV viewers, who find it uncomfortable. The key is to find an acceptable level of mediocrity. If people weren't getting dumber and less literate, there would be no motivation to reduce the reading level of news magazines.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re: No Offense Intended by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > uncomfortable. The key is to find an acceptable level of mediocrity. If people weren't getting dumber and less literate, there would be no motivation to reduce the reading level of news magazines.

      Would you mind explaining that again, without using so many big words?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  11. Obligatory… by RadRafe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blame Canada.com!

  12. Good riddance to bad crap by JoeShmoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean...seriously...these shows are unwatchable. Completely. Why in God's name would anyone mourn these shows being cancelled?

    There's no science. Please, someone find me the gene that lets a guy turn into some kind of Lava monster. That's a more amazing evolutionary feat than the bombadier beetle. It's like the worst parts of the worst episodes of X-Files all jammed into an solid 40 minutes, with an entire rip on the whole X-Men concept to boot.

    And Andromeda...starts out with this gimmick of a holographic hot chick representing the ship (sort of a video version of Star Trek's talking female ship voice). Then they drop all pretense and somehow she becomes a walking talking hologram. And then later, I'm not sure, but did she end up turning into a real girl somehow? And those stupid names. God, who the hell green lights crap like "Rev Blem" or "Trance Gemini"...oooo! So alien! So spacey future sounding!

    Forget it. Other shows, like Farscape or whatever, hey...I'm not a fan, but I can be appropriately sad to hear another Sci-Fi show bites the dust. But Mutant X? No. Andromeda? Quit beating the dead Roddenbery. These shows should die...every dollar not wasted on them is perhaps another dollar that can maybe somehow through a miracle end up going towards new Firefly episodes.

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Good riddance to bad crap by Kris_J · · Score: 5, Interesting
      And Andromeda...starts out with this gimmick of a holographic hot chick representing the ship (sort of a video version of Star Trek's talking female ship voice). Then they drop all pretense and somehow she becomes a walking talking hologram. And then later, I'm not sure, but did she end up turning into a real girl somehow?
      There are three distinct versions. A screen-only, all-business personality. A cynical hologram. And a modified "we robots don't have emotions and sometimes that makes me really sad" robot. It is to Lexa Doig's credit that she unflinchingly maintained these three distinct versions of the same character through all the bad scripts and questionable editing.
    2. Re:Good riddance to bad crap by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thank you for clearing that up...not that it really matters but...I really question the direction and general quality of a show when major plot points are subject to such huge revisions. Case in point...

      Enterprise was sold on the principle of a "simpler, earlier Trek". Remember the exolinguist Hoshi? Remember the struggle to communicate? Wasn't that supposed to be a major theme of the series? It took precisely five episodes for the show to go from "omg omg omg the computer will take six hours to translate this so we know if this alien is hostile" to "I'm Captain Archer onboard an alien prison ship but apparently everyone speaks English or the Universal Translator is now small enough to fit invisibly in my ear". Enterprise has pretty much thrown out everything it was based on, giving us episodes involving time plots and DeathStars more complicated that anything from the other so-called advanced series.

      Back to Andromeda...I gave it a try or two for the first half season or so then promptly forgot about it. A couple years later when I revisited it during a bout of insomnia, I remember thinking that absolutely nothing was the same. The angry fend for himself bounty hunter was somehoe like the chief ship security officer, the pacifist preacher was doing some kind of ninja kung fu, and the hologram of the ship was somehow walking around and trying to get laid. Or something like that. Anyway, I got the sense that the series had probably been through two or three shark jumps and flipped back to Cheers reruns for the 10000th time.

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    3. Re:Good riddance to bad crap by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Meet the twins, Vreeeeeeeeeet and Bob" - K from Men in Black.

      Seriously, names all mean something. So, if you were an alien, wouldn't your name be translated too? You'd have aliens with Indian sounding names like "Son of the stars".

      It always bugged me on Star Trek (really any Scifi) show when they just sprinkle alien words (or even worse...subtitles) throughout the otherwise English dialog. How exactly does the translator know when to let a word slip through untranslated? The fact that the aliens would then explain the meaning of the alien word was another irritation. How does the alien even know the word isn't being translated? Aren't they supposed to be speaking their own language?

      I don't mean to be unreasonable, I'm willing to put up with a little suspension of belief but it would be nice for script writers to pay attention once and a while and think about it. I mean, we all rag on any SciFi show that doesn't display perfect 100% physics rules ("you can't see lasers!" "there are no booms in space") so why don't we get equally uppity about things like obvious language paradoxes?

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    4. Re:Good riddance to bad crap by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Seriously, names all mean something. So, if you were an alien, wouldn't your name be translated too? You'd have aliens with Indian sounding names like "Son of the stars".

      The rest of what you say is perfectly valid, but the above would actually be a usefull function to add to a translator. It would be much more usefull for it to know to leave "Joe Smith" alone. That way when the aliens say "Joe Smith," he'll know they're talking about him. And given the odd results you can get by translating a phrase back and forth between langauges, it could also save some of the confusion that might result when they said his "name" and it came back as "The Lord Added a Man Who Hammers Metal."

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    5. Re:Good riddance to bad crap by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I got the sense that the series had probably been through two or three shark jumps...

      Yes. The show was never great television, but really, the first season had more promise than I think people like to give it credit for. The show's head writer (and the real creator, despite the Roddenberry name), Robert Hewitt Wolfe, was floundering toward a long story arc with a dark, complex background. The first season had perhaps too much of a penchant for visiting old Trek tropes, but it frequently found rather clever, interesting takes on them -- no tractor beams, but Buckytube tow cables; no transporter technology, and an episode with the engineer trying to invent it, blowing up watermelons as he tried to send them from one side of the room to the other. The writing was uneven but when it was good, it was, well, good. The universe got more complex the more we saw of it, and it was clear Wolfe had a direction he wanted to go in, an epic story he wanted to tell over several seasons.

      Then, halfway through the second season, the producers -- notably Sorbo himself -- decided that Wolfe was asking viewers to think too much. Really. IIRC, I'm not paraphrasing by very much. Wolfe got the boot and the show just veered right off into the twilight zone. I watched about ten minutes of a new episode a month ago, and it clearly wasn't even a related show to the first season.

      It may have always been cheese, but in the beginning it had aspirations to be Blue Stilton. It ended up as day-old nacho sauce.

  13. Conversely... by ScriptGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Science fans may be excited to learn that "Mutant X" has been cancelled.

    --
    Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
  14. Re:Yet another quality Slashdot communitycancellat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's next - Lucasfilm is cancelling Episode III!!?!?

    We can only hope...

  15. He's dead, Jim. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the name above the title was dead years before the show started... you're running a show based on an idea that wasn't good enough to go forward when he was alive. That's the first sign you're in trouble.

  16. Too bad by noewun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Andromeda's best point, imo, was that it didn't take itself seriously. It never pretended to be anything other than a cheesy science fiction show, and had a lot of fun with some of the sillier conventions of sci fi. To me, it was the perfect antidote to shows like DS9, which seemed to be so concerned with being "serious" sci fi they forgot about things like character, dialog or plot.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    1. Re:Too bad by phoxix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it was the perfect antidote to shows like DS9, which seemed to be so concerned with being "serious" sci fi they forgot about things like character, dialog or plot.

      I disagree

      Unlike all the other Star Trek series, DS9 had the interesting "Advantage" of being situated in a space station. Which essentially was a non-moving set/location. So while all the other Star Treks were about mindless exploration (and meeting new species in each episode), DS9 was all about building what was there because it was all what they had.

      The story/plot of DS9 got quite involved, you had the Federation, Cardassians, Bajorans, the Dominion, and even the Klingons all in a developing plot. On one side you had the Federation and their shaky alliance with the Klingons, on the other you had the Cardassians and the Dominion. WIth the poor, defenseless Bajorans and their worm-hole in the center of it all.

      Seems like quite a setup if you ask me

      Sunny Dubey

    2. Re:Too bad by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hey, a space station with a lot of politics, double-dealing and a solid arc plot, cool!

      "Welcome to Babylon 5. The last, best hope for a quick buck. Oh, this is demeaning! We're not some deep space franchise. This station is about something!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Too bad by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Funny

      "So while all the other Star Treks were about mindless exploration"

      Kinda missed the point of the franchise there, didntcha?

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
  17. Cherry flavoured hope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We can only hope..."

    Will that be the "Classic Hope", or "New Hope"?

  18. Holy cow! by natet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must be the only person on the face of the planet who actually liked both of these shows. I watched them, not to learn some profound truth, or for their rigid adherance to sound scientific principles, but because they entertained me. Don't get me wrong, neither were my favorite shows, I wouldn't go out of my way to watch them, but if they were on, and I wasn't watching something else, I would watch them.

    Even if I hated both of these shows, I would still be sad to see them go. The main reason is... With the trend of sci-fi shows being cancelled, eventually all we will be left with are the vapid teeny-bopper soap operas (Smallville anyone?) that seem to be so prevalent lately.

    --
    IANAL... But I play one on /.
    1. Re:Holy cow! by lightspawn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't get me wrong, neither were my favorite shows, I wouldn't go out of my way to watch them, but if they were on, and I wasn't watching something else, I would watch them.

      You, sir, showcase the alarming arbitrariness of the TiVoless.

  19. Re:Fireworks did put out some decent genre TV by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a list of everything produced by Fireworks.

  20. make that 3.5 by The+Rizz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stargate is pretty much guaranteed to run its whole plot out without getting cancelled (since there's only 1 season left, and production is already a good deal underway). Unfortunately, the later seasons' plotlines aren't as good as the earler ones... but at least it's another to add to the list.

    Also, there is ReBoot ... well, sorta. They finished off the story started in season 2 when they were picked up (nearly 5 years later) for season 3. Then a few years later they got the greenlight to do new episodes and started a new major plot ... just in time to get cancelled mid-plotline yet again!
    However, it is animated so it may not count in this list, anyway.

  21. Re:Lets be honest.. by radja · · Score: 2, Funny

    >And MutantX? Seriously, who even watched an entire episode?

    that would be me. I was smoking drugs at the time...

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  22. As close to the horses mouth as I can find: by Hungus · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is pulled directly from the official andromeda bboards:
    From: JeremyTII Apr-21 7:51 pm
    To: Rayhana (27 of 56)
    11360.27 in reply to 11360.26

    While I cannot answer every question everyone has about the issues discussed in this thread, I believe I can offer some encouraging information.

    From speaking with TPTB, I can tell you this: Mutant X and Andromeda have not been written off; Tribune very much wants to produce another season (meaning S4 and S5, respectively) of both shows.

    Beyond that, I really don't know many details.  Bottom line: You, the viewers, want the shows to come back.  Tribune is trying very hard to make sure that happens, I assure you.

    On another note, Marta is no longer with Tribune.  In the interest of preventing future rumor-mongering, I will say that she was not fired or laid off; she left voluntarily, and on good terms. She may log in here again sometime, but that's up to her.

    Hang in there, folks; we're tryin' our hardest.
       Jeremy D. Horowitz
       Website Producer/Moderator
       Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda
    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
  23. Its still running? by OriginalChops · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know that momnet in time where you switch the TV on and it shows you something on the channel you left it, just before you decide to change channels?

    Well, thats probably all the entertainment i got out of Andromida after the first episode. The quote "Did you see the size of him? He looks like some ancient Greek God or something!" did it for me...

    Did any of you manage to see "John Doe"? Now that I was sad to see canseled. And canselation of Firefly should be considered an act of treason, any an all people involved in that decision should be procecuted to the full extent of the law in all countries Firefly was shown.

    1. Re:Its still running? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, thats probably all the entertainment i got out of Andromida after the first episode. The quote "Did you see the size of him? He looks like some ancient Greek God or something!" did it

      Wish I'd seen that one, I might have actually watched the show. Nothing wrong with a show that's willing to make fun of itself from time to time....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Its still running? by ecs05norway · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the best line of the entire series was where Sorbo proves his character is not Picard... Tyr: "I say we kill them all." Hunt: "Sounds like a good idea to me."

  24. Pure science fiction will never sell. by master_p · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's why lots of excellent true fictionary science books have never been touched for televised media. Average Joe does not really understand science, and he/she does not want to be bothered with operating their brain.

    Throw a little soap opera in there, and you may have a winner.

    1. Re:Pure science fiction will never sell. by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of people (myself included, for a long time) were put off by the perceived arrogance of its hardcore fans, and statements like that, i.e. if a guy like that watches that show, then I probably wouldn't be interested... it had nothing to do with not really understanding science. One of the reasons I can't stand Star Wars is because the rabid fans have just completely ruined any enjoyment I got out of the films by almost making a religion out of it (Matrix was another one.)

      A lot of people perceive sci-fi as the domain of nerds and weirdos that dress up like characters from the movie/tv show/whatever, and in enough cases they're right. If it had the appearance of even being more accessible to the average viewer, I'm sure it would get higher ratings.

      I think the fact that my TV gets about six different Discovery channels, two History channels and a Biography channel proves that there is a large portion of the population that is, in fact, interested in science. (Again, myself included, though I'm less interested in speculative science... a.k.a. sci-fi, because of the "fi" part.)

      I really don't like the attitude I see more and more towards the "average joe" on this site, as if to imply some kind of moral superiority. Everyone has different interests and just because something doesn't appeal to the majority of the population, doesn't mean it's stupid or they're afraid of it or don't understand it. It just means they don't like it. Same as art, same as music, same as everything else.

      --
      My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
  25. To hell with em, Dr. Who is returning! by mrshowtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really, Mutant X was beyond horrid and Andromeda had some good moments, but both were shitty in just about every aspect. But, this brings up an interesting topic; what is left to watch that is "Sci-Fi?" Stargate? Enterprise? What else? I am so beyond glad that the best Sci-fi show EVER is coming back, Dr. Who of course!

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  26. Of course science does not sell... by tizzyD · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Really, even look at CSI. It's not a show about the science of forensic analysis, how they can use DNA to determine a 1 in a billion chance of who did it, or how lasers help them solve crimes. It's about the story. It's always been about the story.

    Consider the oldest stories, like the Indian epic the Mahabharata or the Greek's Iliad. It's not about the wars or conflicts. It's about the interplay between people. It's always been about the context of the people. We as people want to see other people experiencing things.

    Now, look at the lastest successful sci-fi, IMHO Babylon 5. Sure, they made space fighting a lot more realistic. But it was the story of the Shadows vs. the Vorlons, Sheridan's heroic sacrifice on Z'ha'dum, and the betrayal of Garibaldi. Really, look at this summary about the conflict:

    The Shadows, awakened years earlier from a millenium-long slumber on their ancestral home of Z'ha'dum, gradually made their presence known, and their purpose became clear: weeding out the weak and defenseless among the younger races to promote rapid evolution. Moving largely behind the scenes, they set the younger races upon one another, causing wars and inciting genocide. The Shadows are the embodiment of the question, "What do you want?" They seek not military victory, but philosophical dominance, a universe in which younger races scramble madly to attain their goals without regard for the consequences. Such an environment demands chaos, and it's chaos the Shadows have so effectively brought upon the major races.

    When the other First Ones departed for reasons of their own, the Vorlons were left behind to oppose the Shadow philosophy. If the Shadows represent chaos, the Vorlons are lords of order: they seek the same outcome, the advancement of younger races, but on their terms, whether their charges like it or not. The Vorlons prefer to ask the question, "Who are you?" It is a question that leads to introspection and spiritual growth, but not to expansion or scientific advancement.

    Unfortunately, the struggle between the two philosophies is played out not among the ancients, but among the younger races, unwitting pawns in a game few yet realize is being played.

    Little here talks about science, the reality of evolution, or the underlying science. It's about philosophy, life, and the questions we all encounter along our own life. That's the story, and that's what made it more interesting than any show about cool tools. It's never been about the tools. They just get us to start watching. It's always been about the relationships, whether we want to admit it or not.
    --
    ...tizzyd
  27. Re:If all today's sci-fi is so bad by gonzoxl5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lexx was cancelled a few years ago, the first two seasons were the best but the others were also worth watching (even the worst of Lexx was far better than Andromeda or Mutant X at their best).

    Stargate has some dodgy moments these days (especially those involving a heavy 'Sam Carter' or 'Jonas Quinn' presence) but generally holds together due to the strength of the other characters - I'm hoping that the Stargate Atlantis spin-off will pick up the baton and start with an early sprint.

    ST - Enterprise has some good times and bad times, some good characters and plotlines let down by a lousy captain and a 'soft porn' happy scriptwriter or two, and what is the 'god squad' theme song all about then ?

    There are a couple of things I'm really looking forward to :

    The Firefly Movie - the series was by far the best sci-fi in recent years, if there is any justice then the movie should result in the commissioning of a new series.

    Battlestar Galactica Series - Sci-Fi comissioned a full series of this after the pilot was successful, theres a lot of scope boh in the case and with the writers to do some great stuff with this, certainly theres an opportunity for something that grows on the 'dark' elements of the original without re-creating the 'ham & cheese' that accompanied it first time around.

    Farscape mini-series - Announced earlier this month by sci-fi channel, a four hour mini-series that I believe is to be titled 'Peacekeeper War'

    but so much good sci-fi has been canned in recent years, the aforementioned Firefly, Lexx and Farscape chief amongst the unjust victims, also gone but not forgotten are Now and Again, Dark Skies, G Vs E, Brimstone and a whole host of other shows that were far more deserving of funding than Andromedaft and Mutant Wrecks!

  28. Scifi? by Mukaikubo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The SciFi channel is in a "Oh my God, you want us to SPEND MONEY on PRODUCTION!?" phase. They kinda forgot the spending money part of "You have to spend money to make money" proposition... Witness, Farscape, and only funding a measly 4 extra episodes after the biggest fan backlash in history against them, and every company that advertises with them.

    1. Re:Scifi? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The SciFi channel is in a "Oh my God, you want us to SPEND MONEY on PRODUCTION!?" phase.

      Try the entire TV industry. Unless it's cheap to make and extremely sucessful (Ie: Friends) they are "gambling".

      In the old 13 channel universe, they could get with having so-so shows that developed into great shows over 1-2 season period. viewers had no choice to watch filler sometimes. The rating system was primitive so that bad shows may not show as such for months.

      In a our 500 channel universe, however, filler shows do not last more than 4 shows, never mind even 1/2 a season! The rating system delivers real-time numbers. The only thing they are willing to "Gamble" on is BS-reality shows because they know that viewers do not have attachments to these types of shows.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  29. Two things we should think about. by Yo+Grark · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Mutant X was not a cheesy ripoff of X-men, it was sanctioned by Marvel in a struggling time and helped keep Marvel going even in a small capacity. Besides it was filmed in Canada, most in Toronto, how much quality can you REALLY get? :P

    2. Andromeda WAS good with good story arcs till Sorbo decided that his "fans" couldn't handle anything more than 1 story long and became "episode adventures" after he fired a true writing guru...

    "Robert Hewitt Wolfe has parted company with the last bastion of scifi for people with half a brain - Andromeda. Wolfe said: "Basically, they want the show to be more action driven, more Dylan-centric, and more episodic. They also want more aliens, more space battles, and less internal conflict among the principal characters. Also, they want a lot less continuity so as not to confuse the casual or new viewer with too much backstory."

    Well congrats Sorbo, your simple plan worked perfectly. Maybe they'll invite you back on a Young Hercules episode. Wait...that was cancelled too you say? HA!

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  30. That's sad... by NateKid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Andromeda could have been a great show. The Nietzscheans were a terrific race, I'd hazard to say a bizarre melding of the Vulcans, Klingons and Borg. I thought the acting was great and the whole show had a happy-go-lucky campiness about it.

    I stopped watching it, though, because it pissed me off constantly. I never saw a show fall so far short of its potential.

    Interesting note - some writer said the Nietzscheans were going to be called the Dawkinites (or something similar) initially, because they strongly echoed parts of Dawkins' thought, but that was abandoned because it didn't have enough of a ring to it. But I loved the Nietzschean attitudes, they seemed like one of the all-time best misreadings of Nietzsche...and once again, it makes me sad to think what the show could have been if the writing staff worked a little harder...

  31. Re:on the other hand... Mutant eXcruciating. by FauxReal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was like a grown up 90210 with only pretty people allowed. But it is nice to see that a secret superhero crew can find the time to get the latest in high maintenace hairstyles. Not to mention it had 70s style special effects made with 21st century technology.

    Mutant X was so bad it made my teeth hurt.

  32. Re:Number of SF series completing their run? by JackJudge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wouldn't include B5 in that list, the original 5 year arc was truncated to 4 then at the last minute got it's fifth and final year, when JMS had so obviously run out of steam.
    Even though there wasn't much of an overall arc I guess TNG went through it's natural lifespan, likewise DS9.
    Buffy and to a degree Angel both got to live out their natural lives, but I agree, investing your time and commitment to an SF show these days seems to be doomed to failure these days. Even now I still have trouble getting my head around Farscape's cancellation, Firefly I could sort of understand from the studio's POV, though losing the Serenity crew was, surprisingly, a worse shock to the system.

  33. Finally by Snaller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now perhaps we'll get to see Lexa Doig (Rommie) on Stargate SG1, she's married to Michael Shanks who plays Dr. Jackson on that show - (damn him) - he's done a guest show on Andromeda, so there was talk about her doing the opposite.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  34. What about Jeremiah? by The_Whole_Fn_Show · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off, I refuse to call Mutant X "sci fi", b/c that's insulting to all of the great sci fi shows that exist(ed). Andromeda was more like VIP, if I didn't feel like thinking (at all) for an hour, I could handle it, but you were never going to see anything worth mentioning.

    I've never seen Firefly, as watching 2 minutes of Dark Angel had me convinced that the big four networks were incapable of putting out any good sci fi. If it's as good as everyone says, I may have to check it out.

    B5 was pretty good, and I'm already sad over the impending end of SG-1 (especially if they screw up Atlantis, which I have a feeling they will), but I was rather suprised to see the end of Jeremiah.

    Granted, they covered in one season what I thought should have been at least a 3 season arc, and then kind of lost their way, but it was a far superior show to either Mutant X or Andromeda. It was a rather dark show w/ interesting characters. I thought that Perry and Warner were very good, especially considering the cheezy crap that they've worked on previously. And almost every episode has at least one cool moment (Perry laying on the gas filling the semi trailer w/ exhaust to try to kill some punks, Astin talking a guy into grenading himself and his thugs, etc.). The only entertaining moment from Mutant X was from an early episode when Vicky Pratt was fighting w/ someone. They zoomed in on a kick she threw, but only showed a close up of her ass. I laughed about that for quite some time.

    I wish they'd bring back shows like Jeremiah, Family Guy, Futurama, Farscape (though I didn't get into it until nearly the end) for starters. Shows like Andromeda or Mutant X should go the way of Odyssey 5, dead and stay that way.

  35. Re:DS9...Huh? by Chalybeous · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, I'm calling it the high point of modern (post-1987, non-theatrical) Trek. Sure, like any show, it had trash and treasure - but it also had some well-made, thoughtful episodes, a reasonably good Dominion War arc, and the lovingly produced 30th anniversary special, "Trials and Tribbleations". Remember, even TOS had "Spock's Brain" - and weighing it up on my favourite episodes, it outshines TNG, Voyager and Enterprise. Of course, DS9 will never be as good as classic Trek...

    It's not the best TV scifi ever made, but it beats the pants off Voyager!
    (The best recent scifi are the three Fs - Farscape, Firefly and Futurama!)

    --

    "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

  36. Re:And yet... Earth: Final Conflict by boy_afraid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For a while I tried to get into Earth: Final Conflict, but I couldn't stand the bad costumes or get the whole Plot. I gave up on it and then just recently as it's been on Sci-Fi channel in the mornings while I get dressed, I'm hooked now.

    I still don't like the cheesy plots or bad costumes, but I like the underlying struggle and Sci-Fi technology. I love a mystery.

    I say good riddance to Andromeda and Mutant X. Who needs to be addicted to more TV? Let's bring some live action ROBOTECH!!

  37. Re:Bah! by Glytch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like you're talking about Lexx. What a great show. Cheesy as hell CGI, but I love a show that can out-weird anything else on TV.

  38. Ripoff... yes... by Raptor+CK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In fact, it was such a ripoff that they even had Marvel slap their name on it!

    As I recall, the reasoning behind Mutant X was that Marvel has some agreement with Fox regarding any X-Men TV series, but they weren't getting anywhere, so they scrambled to get *some* mutant-related show on the air with any other network.

    Mutant X is basically just X-Men tweaked to the point where isn't legally X-Men, and can therefore be aired on UPN. Of course it's crap, but I doubt it can be called a ripoff when it's done by the same people. Unoriginal, sure. Derivative, certainly. Ripoff? Not so much.

    --
    Raptor
    "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
  39. Re:And yet... Earth: Final Conflict by Alyred · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Let's bring some live action ROBOTECH!!

    God No!

    Can you imagine how horrible it would be if they tried? Imagine Starship Troopers on a TV budget! Cheap cockpit views made of poorly-constructed plywood, and cheap CGI animations of robots. They'd just spoil the whole damn series in the memory of the fans, or worse, make it into another power rangers clone.

    No matter what they did, though, they'd have to make it similar to what they recently did to the Transformers: Ruin it to appeal to the Short-Attention-Span, "reality-tv" watching Pokemon generation. I'm coming to the conclusion that's the only way to get something new onto television these days, and make it so that the TV Executives will buy off on it. Look at what happened to the live-action version of The Tick. That series was brilliant, and the acting superb, but it was too cerebral and off-beat for the TV execs to give it time to catch the attention of the consumer.

    All for the love of Profit!

    -113 grams, 10 milliliters... He's lead, Jim.

  40. Re:And yet... Earth: Final Conflict by Creepy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree on Robotech - too much action for network TV and probably even cable TV (outside companies willing to risk big $$ like HBO, but that doesn't really fit their core audience). The biggest obstacle to good sci-fi on network TV, though, is that the networks are moving almost completely to sitcoms and reality TV to cut expense. I wouldn't be surprised if that eventually backfires and they lose share to cable, but I haven't seen any slowdown in popularity yet. Even cable is jumping on that bandwagon... maybe in 10 years, the ONLY things to watch will be reality, sitcom, crime drama, or sports. I imagine I'd throw my TV out around then.

    The other thing I hate about network TV is their consistent unbelievable science in sci-fi and characters that are basically untouchable. Dark Angel jumping through a pane of inch-thick glass, falling 4 stories and running away uninjured, for instance. Genetically engineered or not, she's gonna get sliced up and probably break her legs in that fall. Then there's dodging pretty much every bullet... *groan*
    Execs should watch Alias to know how to create this kind of character right. She's not invincible, but is superhuman in some ways (and this is explained in a realistic way - a cold war CIA project designed to create superspies), has flaws, shows fear, and yet still succeeds in most (but not all) missions. Missions that fail? That's so refreshing to see in any show. I was also happy to see a Cold Case show that didn't produce enough evidence to pin the murderer as well. Maybe networks are waking up to reality - we don't always win every battle.

    My biggest peeve with sci-fi, though is the 20th century medicine in shows like Star Trek and even the new Battlestar Galactica, though. If you can build a spaceship that big, you probably have the med-tech to cure cancer and revive the dead for several minutes - heck, they probably could convert entire body structures. Hmm... today, I think I'll be a Trellian...

    To be honest, I actually didn't think the Tick worked well in either live action or cartoon form, probably because it didn't fit the genre. Both had funny moments, but not the laugh-until-you-wet-your-pants moments from the comic book. The live action shows biggest fault was that it was paced too slow. The cartoon had to make sacrifices for its audience and took away too much of the adult humor.

    I thought TMNT (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) worked much better in both comic and live action, and I'm not really a fan of that series (aside from the first couple of gore-fest comic books). It's probably because it meets people's expectations (superhero=action heavy) and was already dumbed down in the comic book when the writers found they were getting more pre-teen fans/interest than adult spoof audience fans/interest.

  41. Worst work yet? by perlfu_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could have seen this coming a mile away. Not only is kevin sorbo quite possibly the worst actor known to human kind, andromeda is uninsightful, and not really up to the standard set by some of gene's other great works. I'm sure neither of these shows will be missed.