Slashdot Mirror


Thermoacoustic Cooler Means Green-Friendly Icecream

MuddyRiverDoc writes "National Public Radio aired a story describing ice cream manufacturer Ben & Jerry's sponsored development of a thermoacoustic refrigeration technology, which uses helium gas subjected to ultra-loud 173 db sound to chill an ice cream cooler. The NPR interview and pictures of the Penn State researchers who did the development is available. There is also a brief description of the technique at the Penn State Live site and at the BBC, and an over-cute Ben & Jerry's broadband presentation, Sounds Cool!, that does however provide a useful diagram. Thermoacoustic refrigeration has been a focus of research for more than a decade at Purdue and elsewhere, and has reportedly flown on the Space Shuttle, but this prototype is reportedly the first that demonstrates the size, efficiency, and quiet operation that promises successful commercial introduction. Cool Sound Industries, Inc. is reportedly exclusively licensed for this thermoacoustic technology."

38 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Parties by Mikkeles · · Score: 4, Funny

    So does this mean that noisy, drunken parties will be cooler than quiet, staid cocktail parties?

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  2. This stuff works by toast0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ever see people driving down the street with their radio so loud their car buzzes. They're pretty cool right?

    1. Re:This stuff works by Brento · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ever see people driving down the street with their radio so loud their car buzzes. They're pretty cool right?

      It also explains why I yell at those morons to "Chill out!", they just turn the volume up even louder.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
  3. Microwave Fridge by tindur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really miss a microwave fridge in my kitchen

    1. Re:Microwave Fridge by kaos.geo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some 8 years ago, I suggested a "microwave fridge"
      to a friend, he dismissed it as impossible... but his mother who happened to be there (and also happens to be a major Physics major) liked the idea and after some years of occassional debate between her and her college professor-type friends, they phoned me to tell me that sound waves would do the trick... :P
      At least now I know I wasnt so crazy after all! :P

    2. Re:Microwave Fridge by mangu · · Score: 3, Informative
      The difference between heating and cooling is that one can send energy, in the form of electromagnetic waves, into the food, where it's converted to thermal energy. The frequency used in microwave ovens is 2.45 GHz, which is absorbed by water and converted to heat.


      OTOH, one can't convert thermal energy back into microwaves, so the heat must get out of the food by thermal conduction, which isn't very quick in the usual food substances.

    3. Re:Microwave Fridge by mangu · · Score: 3, Informative
      Thermoacoustic cooling does not convert heat into any other form of energy. It works as a heat pump, where the gas absorbs heat at one end and carries it to the other end. Sound waves are used to move the gas from one end to the other.


      Unfortunately, there's absolutely no way to move heat from anywhere to a warmer place. When one wants to cool something to a temperature that's lower than the ambient we are in, one must first raise the temperature of the medium we want to cool. In both "classical" refirgerators, where a compressor is used, and in these new thermoacoustic chillers, the means used to raise the temperature is by compressing a gas. The compressed gas becomes warmer than the ambient and radiates heat away, through a heat exchanger. When the gas is expanded its temperature drops. Since we let it radiate heat when it was compressed, this expansion will make it drop its temperature to a point that's lower than the ambient temperature.

  4. Great by osullish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can buy that new kick-ass sound system without worrying about that new fridge my wife has been hounding me about and not feel guilty!

    --
    It's hard enough to remember my opinions, never mind the reasons for them..
  5. Same Energy as Freon Systems by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I heard this interview on the radio. Apparently the process doesn't save any energy. It doesn't use ozone depleting chemicals though. Unless it ends up being much less expensive to manufacture I doubt it will go anywhere.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Same Energy as Freon Systems by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nowadays "Green Friendly" means something that you can print on a flyer to drive sales, not something that has anything to do with the enviroment. We've already done away with freon.

      I like watching the recent phenomenon of both wood and plastic products being promoted as "Green Friendly," One, because it's, like, natural, organic, renewable and shit, and the other because, like, it's a recycled resource and doesn't require cutting down any huggable trees and shit ( and I can only surmise the latter have never been to the Newark area. Well known for cracking plants. Very few trees.)

      Every product is "Green Friendly," if you know how to write the brochure to make it that way.

      KFG

    2. Re:Same Energy as Freon Systems by Fian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is another disadvantage - Helium is a finite resource (excluding fusion). A lot of our current supply of helium is collected almost as a by-product of natural gas mining. When the supply runs out, which is anticipated to happen with a few decades, there won't be any liquid helium for super cooling or *gasp* for your party balloons - let alone to chill your groceries

    3. Re:Same Energy as Freon Systems by the0ther · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just so long as my supply of nitrous oxide doesn't deplete, the impending helium shortage is copacetic.

  6. Peltier cooler? by beldraen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Out of curiosity, is there a reason why peltier coolers haven't been more main stream? I even have a small cooler that uses one, but it seems the idea of making it into larger appliances is something not which of thought.

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    1. Re:Peltier cooler? by Geiger581 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Peltier coolers are very inefficient in terms of heat shift. Right now, the best known materials aren't much more than ~10% of Carnot (thermodynamically limited) efficiency. This means that they produce a lot of heat to move just a little. This is why your Peltier block will get pretty chilly on one side but scalding hot on the other and why CPU Peltier rigs virtually require a water block to operate. Standard phase-change coolers are much better, and these new devices (haven't read the article yet) may be even better.

    2. Re:Peltier cooler? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

      They opperate at 5% efficiency, while top end refrigeration is at 45%. Instead, these guy should be looking at cool chips, which opperate at 55% efficiency.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Peltier cooler? by mangu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Besides the low efficiency mentioned above, there are two other problems with Peltier chips. One is cost. The second problem is that, being made of lead telluride, they aren't very environment-friendly. Lead compounds are rather toxic and do not degrade in nature.

  7. I'm amazed B&J's still operates semi-autonomou by Kuad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When Unilever bought them out, most of us (shareholders, that is) assumed B&J's would get folded into the corporate machine and lose some of its identity. It's good to see that they've sort of remained a seperate entity that just happens to be owned by a corporate giant.

  8. Re:noisy by br0ck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, here's yet another link that says..

    But from the outside, it's no noisier than your typical icebox. The noise generated by the Penn State fridge can only be reached when the gas is under tremendous amounts of pressure -- 10 atmospheres worth. If the gas escapes, the pressure dissipates and the sound dies down.

  9. Summary please! by moxruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm too lazy to RTFA and the writeup was full of links but short on information.
    Can someone tell me what this is all about? Is there a chance I can get indignant and rant about something I have neither the time nor patience to understand?

  10. What if Master P really was the Ice Cream Man? by ProppaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Yo B, turn that sh*t down..."

    "Naw man, it's cool...just makin' ice cream"

    "Word"

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  11. Oh no by Woogiemonger · · Score: 4, Funny

    So they've taken "We all scream for ice cream!" literally?

  12. Not at all... by cnelzie · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...the system works with the 'woofer' producing the single note within a sealed container. From what I heard on NPR, the sound is no more loud then walking into a large server room and hearing the fans run. It's just a bit deeper of a sound.

    Inside the canister there's 198 Decibels going on... That would shatter your ear drums and make your eyes bleed (possibly) pretty quick I understand...

    Outside the container all your hear is a regular humming noise at one frequency...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  13. Question by (ana!)a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi, I live in Canada and I've always wondered why we didn't have a fridge that would take advantage of the outside temperature ? I mean, when it gets down to -20s celcius and you spend a lot of energy heating your house to +20 celcius, then you spend some more energy to cool down the fridge inside the house (although it actually participates in heating up your house), it sounds kind of ridiculous, don't you think ? Is there a particular reason for this ? Maybe it wouldn't be of much use for anyone but canadians, russians, norvegian and the like, but still... I've always known there was a link between noise and temperature... After all, my fridge sure is noisy !

    --
    IANWYTIA (I Am Not Who You Think I Am)
    1. Re:Question by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've lived in Iowa, and wondered that too. You could, I suppose, attach your fridge directly to the wall, and then simply connect a duct to the outside temperature. Here's some thoughts why that wouldn't work:
      • It would break in the summer, and it might be cheaper to cool in the winter using the traditional method than cool in the summer with the inefficiency of the duct;
      • it could get too cold--you don't want to keep you milk stored at -20F, you want it at +40F--so you would actually have to heat it up. But why not do this for a freezer?
      • The temperature change typical throughout the day might not guarantee that the food stays cold, which could lead to inconsistency and lawsuits over food poisoning.
      • Every time you open the door, heat would escape from the room to the outside--and it might be more efficient to keep food cold using the traditional method than to warm up the room again.

      It does seem like each of these issues are surmountable with clever tech. Of course, there isn't anything stopping you from keeping your freezer on the porch and turning it off during the winter.
      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  14. and that explains.. by cabazorro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Barry White.. cool
    Cindy Lauper.. not cool.

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  15. "Quiet operation"? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 4, Funny

    173dB is quiet? Was your previous job in the PR department of a CPU fan manufacturer?

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  16. Whohooo...! by Tore+S+B · · Score: 3, Funny

    This may be the first technology where yelling at a piece of broken equipment really loud makes it work?

    --
    toresbe
  17. "quiet operation"? by roseblood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "thermoacoustic refrigeration technology, which uses helium gas subjected to ultra-loud 173 db sound."

    I know...RTFA, but...I did read the FA. Problem is I must have read the wrong one (so many links here.)

    Whatever they use to keep the 173db sound locked inside the box, I want. I'll use it to line my appartment walls, as I'm tired of hearing the latest crap..err...latest top 40 hit being blasted by my neighbor's juvenile deliq..err...teenager.

    --
    There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  18. I heard that by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A class I was taking last semester was being taught by a retired NASA program manager who mentioned the helium scarcity. Most of the world's helium is "mined" in Texas, so if this were handled correctly it could lead to quite the litte technology monopoly. OTOH, if helium were to become more scarce on earth I pretty sure someone would find an alternative source.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  19. Refrigeration efficiencies compared by Geiger581 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reported maximums (research-only included) in terms of Carnot efficiency:
    Stirling-cycle (phase-change): ~50%
    Peltier junction (solid state): ~10%
    Thermoacoustics (standing wave in gas): ~40%

    Using a 'speaker fridge' now would be quite wasteful in terms of efficiency, although researchers believe that they can surpass the old CFC-type compressors soon.

    The question that comes to my mind, though, is why the focus on the cooling itself. For a non-emissive object like ice cream, better energy conservation may be more easily achieved through better insulation. How about investing in cheaper silica aerogel, hippies? This stuff is virtually as light as air, essentially made of sand, almost as insulative as pure vacuum, and fairly strong. Having a cooling engine without any ozone-depleting chemicals is great, but it's kind of silly if your freezers still have interior styrofoam lining.

  20. Heard this on NPR yesterday by Lebo · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, the 190db figure is the sound level INSIDE the unit. Acording to the reporter, the sound level outside the unit was no louder then a standard cooling unit.
    From the description of given, the tech sounds interesting. They use a powerfull speaker to create areas of high and low preassure in the chamber. In the areas of low preassure they place tubes which run to the cold case. In the areas of high pressure they place tubes which run to an external heat exchanger to vent the waste heat.
    I can definately see this technology comeing into widespread use in the future, as stricter enviromental controls continue to restrict conventional refirgerants. I also wonder how well it would work in an automotive setting, where the high level of vibration makes coolant loss more of an issue.

  21. Three Observations by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny

    - How eco-friendly is the helium extraction process? Off the top of my head I believe it's fine, but are there any hidden eco-hostile effects in its production? Probably still far better than the method it replaces.

    - Have they experimented with different sound sources for the 173dB? Playing Barry White could produce seriousness smoothness...

    - Will they equip the Refrigerator Gnome that controls the internal light with OSHA-approved protective headphones, or will a generation of the little critters be doomed to deafness? (Don't laugh, I saw one of them in my 'fridge once after a Dead concert.)

  22. The Hilsch Vortex Tube by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always liked these - not too hard to make, but also not as effecient as other methodes. Apply compressed air, tube gets hot on one end and cold on the other.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  23. Ice cream plants are already enviromentally safe by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This technology may be great for retail coolers and the like but virtually all ice cream plants already use an environmentally safe refrigerant. Anhydrous ammonia is the refrigerant of choice for industrial applications.
    • It causes no ozone depletion
    • It does not contribute to global warming
    • It has heat transfer characteristics 1.6 to 4 times that of HFCs and CFCs
    • It requires 1.22 HP per ton of refrigeration (versus 1.27 for R134a and 1.25 for R22 this can be important when you have 10,000 HP engine rooms)
    • It cost $0.25/lb (versus $3.40 to $25.00 for HFCs and CFCs) Important when you have hundreds of thousands of pounds of charge.
    • It is lighter than air (unlike HFCs and CFCs) so releases typically float away
    • It has a narrow window of explosive concentration that is difficult to achive LEL:16% UEL:25%(its is hard to make it go boom)
    • It is a naturally occuring chemical. Your body make ammonia.
    • Its pungent odor is 'self-alarming'. You will leave an atmosphere of ammonia long before concentration levels reach dangerous limits.

    The reason you don't have ammonia in your car and home is that exposure to the chemical in concentrations above 300ppm poses health risk. 30 minutes of exposure above 1720ppm can cause death and 5,000ppm is rapidly fatal. It should never be used in a run-to-failure, zero maintenance system like your kitchen fridge or AC unit.

    --


    Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
  24. Re:Ice cream plants are already enviromentally saf by jafiwam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Themoacoustic coolers can probably be produced with a much higher mean time between failure as well. Fewer moving parts. I assume they could make a long-life speaker cone and make it replacable with a "slide out, slide in, recharge gas" type fix.

    The end result is fewer fridges go to landfills beause they broke.

    Even if the average lifetime of the fridge can be raised by a few percent, that's significant reduction in appliance-garbage.

  25. Helium and Argon by dpilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    The key difference between helium and argon is density. Helium is (obviously) lighter than air, and when released, floats to the top of the atmosphere. Presumably some evaporates into interplanetary space, given the energetic environment, there. Argon is denser than air, so it will tend to stay in the lower atmosphere.

    Both are fossils of creation, but helium is also generated by alpha decay of radioactives inside the Earth. (Alpha decay particle steals two electrons from an unsuspecting nearby atom and presto, helium.)

    If there were enough desire for helium, it might be possible to scoop it from the upper atmosphere. There has been talk of space planes running an oxygen liqufaction cycle for an 'air-breathing rocket'. If we can actually do that, we're halfway to mining helium. Helium would be part of the stuff that *didn't* liquify on the first part of the cycle.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  26. Space shuttle by mrogers · · Score: 3, Funny
    Thermoacoustic refrigeration has been a focus of research for more than a decade at Purdue and elsewhere, and has reportedly flown on the Space Shuttle...

    Apparently thermoacoustic refrigeration works better in orbit because in space, no-one can hear ice cream.

  27. Re:thermal energy back into microwaves in 6 steps by jgalun · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I know you're making a valid point about the science of this here, but could we lay off the "invading Iraq to steal oil" meme?

    1: invade Iraq.
    2: Steal the Oil


    The US did not invade Iraq to steal oil, for a number of very obvious reasons:
    1. Invading Iraq caused oil production from Iraq to dip below pre-war levels, as everyone predicted it would
    2. Invading Iraq has already cost $200 billion - the equivalent of purchasing 6 billion barrels of oil. Since Iraq produces 2.5 million barrels per day, we'd have to steal about 6 years worth of production to break even. Of course, the US would actually have to steal more than 6 years to break even, because to continue stealing the oil it would have to keep paying to keep its army in Iraq.
    3. If the US wanted cheaper oil generally and access to Iraqi oil for US companies specifically, the easiest way to do it would have been to drop sanctions in return for Saddam Hussein selling a lot more oil and giving contracts to American companies. Hussein wanted to sell more oil and get rid of sanctions anyway, and would have been happy to throw some contracts to the Americans to get that.


    Please...It's getting ridiculous that so many people still believe that this is a war for oil when the numbers didn't add up before the war and still don't add up after the war...