Slashdot Mirror
The Confusion
The Confusion is the second volume of Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle (preceded by last year's Quicksilver , to be concluded later this year with The System of the World). Quicksilver tells two stories: the political and scientific development of Europe at the beginning of the Enlightenment, through the person of Daniel Waterhouse, and the adventures of "Half-cocked" Jack Shaftoe, a vagabond tramping around France and Germany, as he rescues a young woman named Eliza and does his best to win her. As the story develops, Eliza leaves the life of adventure and enters the world of politics, acquiring for herself along the way the title of Countess in France and Duchess in England; Jack falls so deeply to adventure that he disappears completely from the final third of the novel. We leave him to a certain death, an oar-slave aboard a pirate ship, half-insane with syphilis.
As The Confusion begins, Jack, in the first of dozens of reversals of fortune, wakes cleansed of syphilis by a boiling fever, rowing for a much less brutal master than expected, and somehow a member of a cabal with (I suppose by definition) a Plan. Eliza finds herself relieved of a staggering fortune and held, for practical purposes, under house arrest.
This volume follows the largely-separate stories of these two characters over the course of fourteen years, interweaving them chapter-by-chapter, as they move toward some ultimate climax that, of course, we will not have reached by this volume's conclusion. Stephenson labels each of these, though they are non-contiguous, as a book of The Baroque Cycle. Jack's story is book four, "Bonanza"; Eliza's, "Juncto", is book five.
Lazy critics will certainly remark that The Confusion has an appropriate title. Those who read at least two-thirds of it may notice that Stephenson presents a definition of "con-fused" (solids melted and then allowed to run together and mix) that bears a certain resemblance to the structure of this novel. But I read the title more as a reference to a period of time, at the cusp of the Enlightenment, in which all of Europe seems taken aback (another term for which Stephenson provides the origin, which he positively revels in doing). The world is in the midst of a deep depression, and the great confusion then is, what exactly is money?
Indeed, one gets the impression that The Baroque Cycle could just as well have been titled "How Money Got To Be That Way." Late in this novel, when Stephenson compares foundries to heartbeats, it becomes very clear that what we've been witnessing throughout The Confusion is the path through the gushing arteries and trickling capillaries driven by that heart. I recall now that in Cryptonomicon Stephenson spent an uncomfortable amount of dialog on the financial inner-workings of corporations. At the time I dismissed it as the ramblings of a particularly pedantic character; now I'm beginning to wonder if, inside Stephenson's hacker/geek-novelist facade, there isn't an accountant just screaming to get out.
Yet I make it sound dry, and Stephenson is anything but: in The Diamond Age he made Turing machines seem exciting, in Cryptonomicon it was cryptography and computer programming and mathematics in general--and he did so without the cheating we've been forced to accept these days, especially in film. And here, in the ebb and flow of silver, Stevenson constructs revenge plays, alchemical conspiracies, and an engrossing picture of the Way Things Work. There is a slow and deep pleasure in learning, in understanding; his talent is to impart this with all the visceral immediacy of swordplay.
That is not to say that he is above actual swordplay. Or conspiracies of piracy and murder and torture. In the world of Jack Shaftoe we have adventure packed so thickly that Stephenson finds he can't quite fit it all in: We follow Jack through each daring escape, each execution of an intricate plot that doesn't quite go according to plan--then we cut to the next chapter, months or years later, in which Jack has somehow found himself again destitute and in great peril. We spend half the chapter trying to figure out exactly what he's gotten himself into, and how, and what precisely happened to all of his co-conspirators, and the other half (once they've coincidentally reunited) watching them plot once more.
The worst of these is about half-way through The Confusion: After Jack and his cabal leave us successful in carrying out a particular plan, we return to Jack to find he's been working in an animal hospital in Hindoostan, hung in mid-air so that all the blood-sucking patients, from mosquitoes to ticks to giant centipedes, can feed. As he is displacing native workers I can only assume this is an elaborate pun on the word "scab." (His jokes, when they misfire, are horrendous. Example: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo.") We find his companions have been scattered by a pirate ship (filled exclusively with female pirates) and Jack has been waiting patiently three years for the narrative to return to him. This was the point I nearly put the book away.
I can accept the cyclic reversals of fortune; I can accept the method of storytelling that begins in the middle and fills in back-story as it moves forward; I can accept a very long middle volume of a trilogy, which by nature has no real beginning or end. Together though, these do exhaust my patience and at times my attention. The Confusion would be a much better novel written completely at 1000 pages than it is part-summarized at 800.
Now I fear I'm being too negative. The novel dips at the center, but it shines in every chapter concerning Eliza, and toward the end it even shines for Jack. Eliza's talent lies mainly in manipulation, and so much of her story involves cryptic political moves, hints being dropped, and relationships being exploited. As the novel begins she is still young, and her motivation is mainly revenge. She is a the Stephenson heroine: Sharply intelligent, beautiful in a fierce sort of way, sexually uninhibited, and though morally centered, vicious when wronged. (He understands his audience--geeks, male, young--and he has a pretty good idea of what they want.) As she grows older, she softens, or at the very least she becomes to some degree satisfied.
There is maturity here, for Stephenson's characters and for Stephenson himself. Moreso than anything he's so far written. He allows his characters the room, the experience, the years it takes to fundamentally grow. There is more to it than that, though: there is the classical resonance, Jack's journey with The Odyssey, the reluctant Esphahnian revenge play with Hamlet, the general Shakespearean method of History, melding the reality of Kings and Dukes with the artistic truth of fiction. Stephenson has in The Baroque Cycle given himself a canvas broad enough that he can truly develop.
About the ending: though Stephenson need not really bother to end this book, as it is incomplete until the third volume is published, he does make an effort. What it suggests about the further story is intriguing, but it suffers from the same deficiencies, as an ending, as plagues his other novels: It is tied together clumsily and it doesn't really make all that much sense. It is painfully abrupt. I think, though, that I have come to understand why Stephenson ends his books this way: his characters are so vivid, so capricious, that they drive his stories anywhere but the ending he had in mind. He closes a book not in completion so much as surrender.
Disregarding Snow Crash, which is of another class completely, this is the best book Stephenson has so far written. I score it an eight, but I do so on a scale broader than the nine Slashdot previously gave Quicksilver: The Confusion is the superior novel.
You can purchase the The Confusion from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
It's cool how with the Shaftoe family he shows successful geeks through history. It's nice a nice change to see geeks portrayed in a positive light.
Hey buddy, dumb it down a little for the guys that just read manuals and code all day long.
that his works are pure fantasy, don't you?
Kinda makes you stop and think, doesn't it? Well, it should.
The earlier books in the series were full of events, but that is a thing of the past: an inordinant amount of pages in the recent books are devoted finding a magic cereal bowl that stops global warming.
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
One of the, if not major, then most enigmatic characters in both the books of the Baroque Cycle and Cryptonomicon is Enoch Root. A person(?) with an unnaturally(?) long lifetime. The tiny bits of information that Stephenson dishes out throughout Cryptonomicon and now in both Quicksilver and The Confusion are enough to drive anyone mad :). The Confusion has at least one, uncharacteristically lucid explanation that is worth reading. There has grown up a sizeable following, online, of other readers who are trying to piece together the puzzle of Enoch Root. Here are some links for those who are interested.
LINKS MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS
What's up with Enoch Root
Neal Stephenson Wiki
I liked Confusion too - at least better than Quicksilver. But I missed the Waterhouse/Newton business - very little of that in the new book. Stephenson seems to be trying for a pretty tightly woven trilogy - a bit like LOTR - hard to know how to judge it before we've really seen the whole thing. Both Quicksilver and Confusion ended somewhat strangely...
Energy: time to change the picture.
No, he just has a nematoad for an editor.
Origin : When the wind changes direction the sails of a sailing ship sometimes blow back against the mast, i.e. they are taken aback.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
The Confusion is a better read, if you can get through Quicksilver. And the complaint I've heard most often is that people couldn't get through Quicksilver. If you do make it through, you are in for a real treat. The Confusion was a page-turner in the way that Stephenson's best writing has been.
My fear is that, if this is Empire, we end up getting Ewoks in Book 3.
sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
I've been using this particular method of ensuring cleanliness amongst new employees for the past few years. As long as you are willing to put up with about 7% "breakage" and a few months of beet red survivors, it's quite effective and much less invasive then injecting them with ...wait, now that I think about it, injections would probably be much more humane/effective. Boy, I wish I'd thought this through years ago. Oh, well. Live and learn (for those that survived).
About the ending: though Stephenson need not really bother to end this book, as it is incomplete until the third volume is published, he does make an effort.
Knowing Neil Stephenson, I don't expect anything different by the end of the third volume.
Peace and love, y'all
GAHHHHHHH MY EYES! Why is there no:
-1 Spoiler mod?
..who is going to bother with this drivel after the insufferable first volume?
technically, it's "on teh spoke"
but yeah, I'd like a definition too. google searches only turn up slashdot where it gets used. anyone? bueller? bueller?
Thanks for taking the time to write this thoughtful review. Can't say whether I agree with you or not, as The Confusion is waiting for me to finish Broken Angels. However, I liked Quicksilver and had some of the same feelings about it that you use to describe this work. I agree with your statement that Stephenson is maturing as a writer. His writing is getting more complex, and that can result in it being less easily read by many. Snow Crash and Cryptonomicon had the obvious geek hooks that suck in the /.er, but in these last two the geek factor is less obvious.
From reading Quicksilver, I agree with your statement that this could be a history of how money came to be what it is today. It also seems to be about the development or maturation of empiricism and how it came to be the dominant force in society. This is certainly relevant today with the rise of the neoluddite, anti-science faction on the American right. The Confusion is next in the pile, and I am looking forward to reading it.
Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
sucks.
It sounds like the guy hated the book. All his points show aspects he doesn't like, and then relieves it with fun aspects of another Stephenson book. I get the impression that he is a fan of Stephenson because he likes some of his other books, and Stephenson has become trendy.
But...thanks for the review anyway, I'm happy to hear about this book.
I'm sorry, but I didn't get that from the review. What's the opinion again?
It would be great for a geeks - thumbs up or thumbs down - in the beginning. Yes?
I have to read extremely long and boring papers all day. It would be nice to see in the first sentence of a review - it sucks for geeks! or It's great for geeks!
Sorry, I'm in a crunch, and I don't have patience for long ... writings.
I didn't know Slashdot was available on gopher. NEAT!
write, then proceed to share his meandering thoughts in a somewhat effective manner. Apart from the fact that I think the review is at least mildly opposed to placing etymology in an understandable and vivid context, he tells me nothing of value, nothing that I couldn't get from a few moments chatting with anyone who's read the book. How about using reviews that read at least as well (or as poorly) as the text they're reviewing? It may mean fewer posts, but it could certainly add to the content. In the present case, anyone who finds entertainment or value in the review should switch to reading L.Ron Hubbard, and get a personality test to boot.
You have to boil them if you want them clean enough.
A very fitting title to this book.
To review sci-fi without making it sound utterly stupid?
I'm sure the book is fabulous, but is there any way to summarize the plot of a sci-fi novel without making it sound like a 6 year olds daydream?
"Ok so theres this guy and he can fly an go through space but then these bugs go in his ears and eat his brain! The make him quit his job and become a tabledancer on a space ship to pluto! And then this giant talking half-bear thing comes and wants to beat him up but he has a ray gun so thats the end of that!"
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
... did not start with this book, rather Stephenson has been interested in the process on moeny and worth for a long time now. Check out his short story (yes, he occationally can write short stories) The Great Simoleon Caper which you will easily find on the net.
From the start of this review, it looks like nothing's changed. You'd think he was getting paid by the word!
If his new stuff turns YOUR crank, that's great, but I'll have to be satisfied with my old copies of his classics.
Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
Am I the only person who read Quicksilver and was yelling at the book "GET TO THE POINT!"
Personally I loved Cryptonomicon, but Quicksilver dragged so much that I doubt I'll bother to continue reading the series.
you're a piece of shit
next time you see the person you love most, imagine that happening to them, and see how funny you think it is. if you truly pass this video off as being in any way funny, please take a look inside yourself and realize what you've become
there's trolling (posting links to goat.cx and what not) and then there's being a disgusting human being
Casual Games/Downloads
it's a variable of "Off the hook"
Yes, the Shaftoes' are not really Black Adders. They really are more akin to very muscular Baldricks.
it's a variable of "Off the hook"
So it means "awesome"?
Urban Dictionary for Off The Hook
How do you get from "off the hook" to "on the spoke"?
That's my complaint as well, a pretty major spoiler for Quicksilver I'm trying hard to suppress before I read the book.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
No such problem with Confusion, but I guess my brain's adjusted.
Just wondering if anyone else noticed that.
-- ac at work (20% through Confusion).
Lazy critics will certainly remark that The Confusion has an appropriate title.
And critics who want to say the same thing but are too pompous to do so will criticize the `lazy' critics.
-Colin
is this part of some "obfuscating posts" competition?
"There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
There, I said it. I guess I'm not a geek anymore.
Anyone able to produce such excellent works as Snowcrash and Cryptonomicon definitely has my respect...I'll keep buying Stephenson's books until...wait, I still gotta run out and get Quicksilver....
The reviewer says "Snow Crash" is of "another class completely", implying that it's really good or something. I thought "Snow Crash" sucked. It was just silly, and the writing wasn't very good. That book sees so much undeserved hype, and I can't figure out why. "Cryptonomicon" was much better, although let's face it, that's pretty faint praise.
So if the reviewer is a fan of "Snow Crash" and enjoyed this novel too, then maybe I'll give it a pass. And first I have to finish William Golding's "Pincher Martin". Now there's another class completely...
...the reluctant Esphahnian revenge play with Hamlet...
Erm. Anyone care to tell me what "Esphahnian" means? Google won't.
was it in Harry Potter?
My god people can be awful to each other. (I didn't see the video, the still from the NY times was enough) It makes me very ill to think about this crap. Hey, humanity, can we not have anymore wars, ok? Can we try that? That means you guys in Sudan too.
Sig removed because it was obnoxious
"Esphahnian" is the name of a character in the book.
See this for a brief explanation; follow the links there for more detail.
I have seen the endings of his books as much more ambiguous. There is apparently no "happily ever after" or "the butler did it" in Stephenson's story's. Instead I always get the feeling he is trying to say that this part of the story is over and now life goes on.
i know it is entertainment, and everyone expects a beginning, middle and end. But, until you die, is your life like that?
If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
Anyhow - since reading Cryptonomicon, and now Quicksilver - and what I am hearing about Confusion - I steadfastly believe that Neal is trying to tell us (geeks? maybe) something, that he is trying to impart on us some form of wisdom that most men have lost.
Now, I know that is a grand bit of hubris to suppose this - who knows what Neal is really thinking or trying to do, and to surmise that this is what he is doing seems to be rather arrogant (and I am someone thinking this!)...
I think he is showing us not only what and how "money" came into being - but how it can be done again - but this time in a fashion that is free from government meddling (ie, taxes, tariffs, fees, etc), among other ills which affects current monetary systems. He started delving into this with Cryptonomicon - but it dealt more with the "bank", less with money - how to store your "money", in other words, so that governments have no say about it. The Baroque Cycle is showing how to "make" money - that is, create a currency of exchange, because that is all that money is - a substitution for barter, because it is hard to carry around pigs and chickens for trade with you everwhere. It is showing it in a quasi-historical account. We, as geeks, should be following up the leads, where they are "true", and finding out the historical truth behind them - to learn how money works, where it came from, and most importantly, how governments function with (and without) it. I think that is the direction Neal is attempting to lead us, if only we would look and follow.
We need to wake up - fully - and recognize that we live in a corrupt world society, and that we have the power to change it, because we control the means of communication of this planet. We can either sit back, and wait for the chains of enslavement to be shackled upon us (if we don't get killed or worse by our fellow "civilized" men), or stand up and make the difference to free the world from this corruption.
Reason is the Path to God - Anon
Thanks for the review. It was well written, and mostly how I thought about the two books. I cannot but expect my impression to change, though, when System comes out this fall. This is not 3 separate books, it's one really big one, and I expect that we are going to see some major ties to Cryptonomicon in 3.
Since the major theme of Crypto was the development of a secure form of electronic currency, and the machinations that went into it, I expect to have some more great ties to the idea of credit and soft currency and trade drawn in System.
Is is only me or did some of the themes in the book, a la the Royal Society's rise and fall based on political support, patronage, etc., ring alarm bells to those of us in the F/OSS community? Is there a parallel to the beginnings of modern science and commerse to be found in the study of the Scientific Revolution? If so, technology is going to get cool in 50 years.
Developing Retail Point-of-Sale Software
Those readers who are still paying close attention towards the end of the book, and enjoyed Cryptonomicon, may catch the "foreshadowing" for some people and place names in Cryptonomicon. (The Cabal's Mr. Foot, Queen Kottakkal, etc.) If you need more help, check out the section in Cryptonomicon where Randy flies to the island the crypt will be on, and note names of the island, the hotel, the sultan, the grand wazir, etc. Allow for spelling changes over the years.
Wait, you want it longer? Please, Jesus, don't encourage him to write even longer.
-c
"If you are an idealist it doesn't matter what you do or what goes on around you, because it isn't real anyway."-R.P.W.
He could have been stripped naked and had some ugly white trash chick point at his dick.
I liked Snow Crash too, like many other people, and I'm not a native English reader/speaker/writer. With his down to earth style of writing, Stephen is able to skip right onwards to the more interesting bits of a story where heroic characters are in all sorts of precarious situations and problems. On the other hand, he is able to fill loads of sections with total and utter rambles that you wonder if you should really read on. But you usually do read on. And it usually is worth it, too.
I remember SnowCrash going religious about half way through, rambling on and on about the meta configuration of religions. But the metafors start piling up near the end, and the hystorical background somwhat enriches your understanding of the real message he's bringing. Stephenson is trying to make the book itself resemble the Metaverse, which is why some of it sounds a bit chaotic and wired. But that's mainly why I like the book, to be able to find out what this Stephenson character is trying to say, not having all the answers spooned up immediately.
Then of course, the cool settings, fast paced timing, sexy character traits, a malfunctioning society and intense situations are extremely sci-fi and thus interesting to any techno fanatic. Who would not want to try out the virtual worlds of SnowCrash, to walk with Hiro, and riding boards with Y.T., harpooning vehicles..
With great power comes great electricity bills.
The novel dips at the center, but it shines in every chapter concerning Eliza, and toward the end it even shines for Jack.
Well, it dips only if you don't enjoy "things baroque" only for the sake of themselves. I have to confess i'm a sucker for this kind of super-intricate plot that sprouts gratuitous detail at every step and branches off endlessly in subplots.
The Baroque Cycle has a great second book in The Confusion. Highly recommended.
But a "letter of credit" from a bank is very portable, and keeps its value as long as the bank continues to exist. (I.e., so long as their banca isn't rotta.) Letters of credit, bank drafts, bank notes and so forth are, I suspect, the real beginning of modern currency.
Stephenson talks about this stuff? Dang. Maybe I should buy the books after all! --Though, come to think of it, why doesn't he just write essays?
Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
of the symbolically named Phillippine Shaftoes of the last quarter of the twentieth century. Nothing really Baldrick-like about them. But Jack and Bobby definitely play Baldrick to E.R.'s Blackadder. If you were thinking of contrasting them with the Waterhouses, I think that clan might be better identified with Hugh Laurie's character. (With Stephen Fry as the Comstocks?) :-)
* And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
Oh, what would I give for an "Edit Post" feature. One that can only be used for good.
* And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
You almost had me going until you listed Robinson. And who's Hamilton? (Rhetorical, I'll find out myself).
You think this book is tough? Have you read "Crime and Punishment"? This book also has at least 3 names for each person. One thing that makes it tough is that all the names are Russian (nothing against Russian names. I think everybody would agree it would be harder to read a book with names that are different than your own culture.). What is really the hardest is each character is called by a different name by each person. Example: Your sister my call you Bill, your mom William, your cousin Billy, your wife Willy, your friend Slick Willy, your uncle Silly Willy, your co-worker Big Bossman, and your garbageman Jeeves.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
One of the things that I've always found curious about this current cycle of books, is that it seems to be a series of books written with a purpose -- to give people a firm understanding of the fundamental principles underlying economics, value, and money
Cryptonomicon covers in excruciating detail, but with a story interested enough to keep you reading, the principles behind cryptography, which would be needed for a cryptographically sound currency, but it also covers modern ideas of value in corporations (various incarnations of Epiphyte) as well as the changing economic nature of gold.
Hg and Confusion also cover in detail what the ideas of money and value in their respective periods, and the level of detail can only be described as exacting.
So, I think that irrespective of what you might think of them as novels -- I happen to quite like them but opinion seems to vary -- they're definitely the most fascinating economic history textbooks in the history of the world.
As economics history textbooks, they're extremely well written as they keep you engaged as a textbook might not. A lot of people just assume that Stephenson is just an unspeakable pedant, but I assume he's a man with a mission. I also assume that this mission is that he thinks it is important that a lot of people understand the actual basis behind the modern economy and the modern economy's development.
Therefore instead of viewing it simply as a book, view it as a 'A Citizen's Illustrated Primer'[1] that will entertain and inform in equal measure about the things that NS thinks are important. Personally, I can't wait.
--Corprew
[1] a reference to the instructional book in NS's book 'The Diamond Age.'
What's your point, and why is this modded up Insightful?
He doesn't really think it's confusing (more at con-fused, see review).
It's his REVIEW that's definitely confusing, and it needs revision.
But you managed to make a witty observation/play on words. How cute. Here's a cookie.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
I knew there was something about her name. And it wasn't in any encylopedias/historic references that I could find. Now I gotta dig up my paperback copy of Cryptonomicon for a once-over.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
Is it just me or does anyone else think that Cryptonomicon was derivative of Gravity's Rainbow ?
"Nothing is impossible for the man who refuses to listen to reason"
Snowcrash was unbelievably immature and completely implausible on an endless number of counts. The Ultra-Cool central idea, (a programming virus for Humans transmissible simply by looking), was half-baked and under-developed. What a shame. The only thing which kept that book floating was Neal's fun and punchy style of prose. (Sounds like the charismatic wise-ass in the class who knows more raw facts than the teacher, knows how to deliver them, but who still flounders like a dying fish when asked about the Meaning of Life.) Still, when read with the understanding that the whole book was (meant?) to be a pulp joke on the same level as, Kill Bill, I found it to be almost entertaining. Until the ending. Neal needs a good smacking for that ending. And his editors need to be fired.
Whatever.
More interesting was his internet-distributed essay he wrote after discovering Linux and ditching his Mac. Though the ending was also ill-focused and confusing. Pattern?
So the long and short is this. .
NO WAY am I going to torture myself with 1200 pages of his latest series just to know what the buzz is. And since the review doesn't cover what I want to know, I'll ask it here. .
Does Stephenson's expose of economic 'reality' take into account forces like the Masons, Knights-Templar, Rothschildes, the Jews and all that good stuff, or is it just another attempt to fill people with a self-satisfied belief that they know more than they really do?
Is Neal Serving or Harming?
Thank you.
-FL
The rotten fish eater, although I can't remember his name right now, was clearly a bad guy, while Enoch Root is more of a mysterious/good/Gandalf character.
This review is fantastic: it thoughtfully discusses the major characters, themes, and structures of the book, and places those discussions in the context of the author's other works and the trilogy as a whole. I think that the people who have complained that the review is too long and too complicated just haven't read enough real book reviews. Try reading the New York Times Book Review; that's the way literary criticism is done. And as others have said -- if the review is too long and complicated for you, you probably won't like the book. And while yes, there were spoilers, I don't think they would hurt your enjoyment of the book much at all. Fiction this complicated deserves multiple reads. It's a different book each time. Like Cryptonomicon and David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest, these stories unfurl in the reader's mind. The real story is something that can't be represented on paper.
There seemed to be some sort of countdown process earlier in the series. Earlier, he seemed to be killing off one or two of the Forsaken (= nazgul-copies) per book. There were about a dozen of them, and it looked like that once the forsaken were killed off, it would be time to battle the Dark Lord Saur.. er Shaitan.
However, a couple of books ago, he started to add in new Forsaken to replace the ones who have been killed.
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
There's more to the intarweb than Google:
WILDCAT IS ON TEH SPOKE
I didn't see "The Confusion" as a particularly hard read, far less heavy going than Part1. A lot of it is a Shaftoe-led seafaring yarn. While still expressing some serious ideas, Stephenson still has a lot of laugh out loud funny moments in te same way as Cryptonomicon. But if you didn't like that, run the other direction...