Slashdot Mirror


Novell To Release Ximian Connector Under GPL

ashmodai9 writes "According to this article on LinuxToday.com as well as this press release directly from their site, Novell announced that its "Connector for MS Exchange Server would be integrated into Evolution 2.0 and made available as open source, beginning today with the current Connector 1.4." Apparently, downloads will be available for the current version of Evolution starting May 14th." Thanks to reader crafterm, a snippet from Novell's Connector website: "With the Connector for Microsoft Exchange installed, Evolution functions as an Exchange client, enabling users to become full participants in company-wide group scheduling and other collaborative tasks. Linux and Solaris users can access public folders, Global Address Lists, email, calendar, task lists, and group scheduling information." Update: 05/11 17:58 GMT by T : In related news, ChiralSoftware writes "Codeweavers' long-awaited sequel to Crossover 2.1 is here. Just like the old version, the new version lets you install MS Office on Linux desktops. The new version adds support for Outlook XP, Lotus Notes and Microsoft Project."

130 of 497 comments (clear)

  1. Apache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But what does this have to do with Apache?

    1. Re:Apache? by rowanxmas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why doesn't /. have a Linux section? It has an Apple section so why not a Linux one.

      It does, it is just mislabled as "main".

    2. Re:Apache? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...how come this is filed under "apache"?

      It's either an honest mis-click of the mouse, or Timothy wanted to remind everyone of just how GOD-AWFUL UGLY the Apache section color scheme is.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Apache? by rgigger · · Score: 2, Funny

      For the same reason that there is no "White Entertainment Network"

  2. Don't wait until the 14th. by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Download the source now!

    1. Re:Don't wait until the 14th. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, download it now, because you KNOW Microsoft is going to be pissed.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:Don't wait until the 14th. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I posted this elsewhere: You need an Exchange CAL and a Windows CAL to legally use this thing. MS has no reason to be pissed.

    3. Re:Don't wait until the 14th. by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily true. You might need a client access license but you don't need to purchase a copy of Windows. Additionally, depending on how you have your server configured, multiple people can share a CAL, just not at the same time (per server vice per seat licensing.) MS is still getting a slice of the pie, but their slice is a whole lot smaller.

      The biggest thing that MS won't like about this, however, isn't the loss of a few seat licenses but that it opens up an avenue for migrating to Linux. You can convert piecemeal rather than having to switch everything at once.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    4. Re:Don't wait until the 14th. by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I looked it up, $31.32 for Server 2000 CAL (bought as part of a 5 pack for $156.60 at Provantage) and $75.34 for an Exchange CAL (once again, bought in a group of 5 for $376.72 at Provantage) Net cost : $106.66 per seat.

      I stand by my original statement - I have a real hard time believing that the Linux crew is going line up to fill out Purchase Orders to send Microsoft a hundred bucks a seat for each of the Linux installs they have across organization running Ximian email clients. Good luck convincing me otherwise. For the record, I really like Microsoft - this isn't about what I like / dislike, it is totally about envisioning the Linux users (the kind of Linux users that would be eager early adopters of this Exchange adapter) getting this to work and remembering 'oh yea, maybe I need to send MS a nice Benjamin Franklin plus change because ... that's the rule.' Not.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    5. Re:Don't wait until the 14th. by Dalcius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      About 50% of the developers for my company (software company/Linux shop) run Linux as their primary desktop, a handful of others run it secondary, and all our new back-end stuff is Linux. We're actually in the process of moving to Exchange as we speak, and this is very welcome news as it makes things just that much easier.

      We're just one company in a sea of others, but I'm sure we're not an isolated incident.

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  3. Excellent news for the FOSS community! by biglig2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another reason for not switching - the need to access an Exchange server - bites the dust.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    1. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Furthermore, this creates a OSS project that now directly challeges Outlook, which will exempt users from most of Outlook's exploit issues...

    2. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by javcrapa · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I tried using linux at government organizations, a big stipper was the exchange acces, now we have one less barrier! Thank ou Novell!

    3. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by bhmit1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This day is getting better by the minute. I've been getting sick and tired of connecting to exchange via webmail in firefox (or whatever it's called now). They turn off half of the features (spell check, alarms, etc) if you aren't using IE. My company doesn't allow me to setup a rule to forward all my mail off site, so I've been pretty grumpy about company email for a long while.

      On an aside, I'm interested in finding a good imap server for evolution that lets me store calendar and address entries on the server. Is that even possible? If not, what other options are there?

    4. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by Frymaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      this creates a OSS project that now directly challeges Outlook

      exactly. ms has made itself powerful in part by adopting the "embrace and extend" method of squishing competitors. glad to see the evolution people doing a little table-turning. the advantages that evolution will offer over outlook will be:

      1. free
      2. less virus prone
      and that ought to be enough to put a dent in the ms market share.
    5. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Furthermore, this creates a OSS project that now directly challeges Outlook, which will exempt users from most of Outlook's exploit issues...

      Sorry, but no. First, this 'exchange connector' depends on Outlook web access, so it is not TRULY an Exchange connector. It is more an exchange translator. Second by requiring Outlook web they will cause more sites (not less) to run Iis (internet information server) The only thing worse than a site running exchange (as an MCSE I know) is a site running exchange with Outlook Web enabled. They get all the power of exchange viruses coupled with the ease of IIS viruses for an optimal user experience Sarcasm I hope that they are pursuing a true Exchange connector.

    6. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an MCSE you should also know that Exchange 2000/2003 requires IIS before it will even install. Some dependance on the NNTP service......

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
    7. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but wher the hell is the OSS project to replace exchange?

      that is what is needed. this is a great stop-gap. we need an OSS exchange server.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Furthermore, this creates a OSS project that now directly challeges Outlook

      Not directly.

      It needs to run under win32 to complete a transition pathway. Viz.,

      1. web browser: Mozilla Firefox in place of IE on win32. check.
      2. Word editor: OpenOffice.org in place of Word on win32. check.
      3. email client: Evolution in place of Outlook on ...uhhh...oops.

      In many instances users can experiment with free alternatives on Windows and later, the underlying OS can be traded out for whatever works best as a "hardware manager and process handler" be it Win2K, WinXP, Linux, FreeBSD, OS X, etc.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    9. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by Bull999999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Give him a break. He did admit to being an MCSE after all...

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    10. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by Lennie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think it uses the WebDAV-part (which I wouldn't call Outlook WebAccess, that's a bit silly).

      I hope that they are pursuing a true Exchange connector., this is one big messed up protocol, I really do hope no wants to do that, it's scary (probably a waste of time).

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    11. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by Lennie · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    12. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 3, Informative

      No it isn't, because Evolution also works with OpenGroupware etc... so no reinforcement there.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    13. Re:Excellent news for the FOSS community! by denlin · · Score: 3, Funny

      sorry, it's near the end of my day & i was catching up on some news (read wasting some time). assuming bill's net worth of say $30 billion & to live next to him, your worth was say 1000th made completely from the $0.05 each 'As an MCSE I know', & you're 40 years old, that means you've heard 'As an MCSE I know' once every 2 seconds from the moment you were born! ouch, i'm very very sorry.

      --
      Yes, I have RTFA. Yes, I have a girlfriend. Yes, I'm new here. And no, I don't want a free iPod.
  4. Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is great news! I put in a request a couple of months ago to have this purchased, and I just cancelled that request. It's nice to have one fewer barrier to acceptance.

    Now I just have to convince our NT admin staff to turn on Outlook Web Access...

  5. Obligatory Monty Python..... by finse · · Score: 3, Funny

    And there was much rejoicing!!!!

    --
    Paranoid tinfoil hat crowd say Y here, everyone else say N.
    1. Re:Obligatory Monty Python..... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      And there was much rejoicing!!!!

      Yay.

  6. custom contacts form and categories? by ironhide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always wondered if custom contacts forms would work.
    And what about categories? In Windows you have to add them to the registry - there is no such thing in Linux.

  7. Novell owns Evolution?? by RedOregon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did I miss something somewhere?

    "Evolution is Novell's award-winning e-mail and workgroup client for Linux systems..."

    When did Novell pick up ownership of Evolution??

    --
    Skivvy Niner? Email me!
    HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    1. Re:Novell owns Evolution?? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been, what, a year now since Novell bought Ximian? Anyway, that's how it belongs to Novell now.

    2. Re:Novell owns Evolution?? by arkhan_jg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Novell bought Ximian in August last year; Ximian wrote evolution, and the exchange connector plugin.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    3. Re:Novell owns Evolution?? by chabotc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhhh yea i think you did miss a few things..

      Novell Buys Ximian
      And later Novell buys SuSe

      So obviously, since Evolution is a product by ximian, it is now owned by Novell

  8. hehe by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Safest spot in the war, is closest to your enemy... or so they say... MS... watch yourself

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
  9. I wonder what MS will think of this by existential+goo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now that Connector is open-source, it should be interesting to see what MS thinks of this as it will undoubtedly eat into their ability to sell Office as well as they do now.

    I also wonder how long it will be before we see some kind of open-source version of Exchange Server itself, replacing MS across the board for Exchange!

    1. Re:I wonder what MS will think of this by cube_slave · · Score: 3, Informative

      OpenGroupWare.org is a great open source project tackling this effort.

    2. Re:I wonder what MS will think of this by baudilus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      none of them are integrated as nicely as Exchange.
      read: "none of them is so easily infected by virii as Exchange"
    3. Re:I wonder what MS will think of this by 13Echo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not only that, but there may be something else to consider.

      1) OpenOffice.org is available for several platforms.
      2) Ximian is working on putting Evolution integration into OpenOffice.org.
      3) Ximian is porting Evolution 2.0 to Windows.
      4) ???
      4) I think that "Profit!" fits in here somewhere.

      Nevertheless, it may be a very good strategy to begin to pull away the strict dependance upon MS Office and Outlook/Exchange. Microsoft still charges Exchange server "seat licenses", but this is just one small step that may very well make a significant impact, especially when MS Office itself is taken out of the equation, and can be replaced with OO.o and Evolution.

      Novell is getting to be pretty crafty. Maybe we need to give them a bit more credit? ;)

  10. Great News by SmilingBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's great news - and for those wondering why Novell would release this open source, whereas they could sell it for cash before: Remember, Novell is not primarily selling software but services. They hope to sell more services by freeing the Connector.

  11. Macs. by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now only there were some way to access full Exchange compatibility from OS X...

    --saint

    1. Re:Macs. by chetohevia · · Score: 3, Informative

      Before this, Evolution was already available on OS X in the past (Install X11, then use Fink to get Evolution).

      To complete it, just build yourself a Connector package.

      It's been tested internally at Ximian and Novell in the past, although it was determined it wouldn't be worthwhile to release it as a product. But now that it's free, you can do it.

      a.

    2. Re:Macs. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could use evolution in fink. It's only in CVS at the moment, but I'm sure that evolution 2 will be supported officially in fink eventually. Alternatively, it looks like you could compile it yourself, when it's released: unofficial ximian guide to evolution on osx

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  12. Wonderful News by cube_slave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is great. A couple developers here at work are trying to get Linux for their workstations. Hooking into Exchange was always a set back. IT did not want to pay for the connector, since it already paid for Outlook.

    This is just one less hurdle to overcome. I aplaud Novel's decision.

  13. Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server... by The+Breeze · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Compatibility with Exchange is wonderful, seriously.

    The promise of exchange - integrated email & calendaring, locks a lot of companies in to MS software.

    Say what you will, the ability for a clueless end-user to click "accept" on an email and automatically schedule themselves for a meeting is a Big Deal(tm).

    Now, if only we had something affordable that could do that on the Linux server side, with clients on Linux, Windows and Mac platforms...and no, webmail doesn't cut it...

    Is there anyone working on this?

    -Steve

  14. Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, you have your connector for MS Exchange right there in the main app now. NOW what's stopping you from seriously considering OSS as a possibility? And, I'm not talking about the 1.2% of the population that needs some bizarre, esoteric feature in Outlook or Word or whatever that 98.8% of the rest of the population didn't even know exists.

    Seriously, folks. Linux ain't ready for the home desktop market, but it's high time more people start considering its viability for the desktop in the workplace, especially as lightweight replacements for Wintops that don't do all that much more than word processing and scheduling.

    Take most of that money you've been blowing on MCSEs and A/V software, and pay a few competent *nix admins to come in and properly set up the systems, and you just may well alleviate some, or most, of that downtime. How much TCO did YOUR company have to add to Windows from Sasser, anyway?

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by macemoneta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about one of the major features of Outlook that has been missing for three and a half years now? The notes/memos feature? I, and many other use it extensively, but no matter how many times it has been requested (or who requests it; check the submitter on the listed bug), it has never made it into Evolution.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    2. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by baudilus · · Score: 2

      This may be modded off-topic, but find me a company that "blows" money on MCSE's? I remember when MCSE certification actually meant something, way back when. No offense to MCSE's here, but they are now a dime a dozen - everyone wants MCSE certification, and IMHO it doesn't carry as much weight as it did. I know MCSE's who didn't know how to 'ping' an IP or even start a command prompt.

      "Blowing" money on MCSEs is right; a good (really good) *nix admin commands at least three times the salary of a good MCSE.

      Besides, despite what everyone is saying: "now what's the reason for not switching" - I don't think the reason has ever been lack of support or application compatibilty. The reason is the receptionist, the administrative assistant, the actual person that has to USE this desktop. What receptionist do you know that wouldn't ask for more money if they had to learn Linux in order to do her job? At the very least, I see the IT dept and those types migrating, but the rest of the office staying with good ol' windows. Even if it is free, it may not be worth the cost.

    3. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's ridiculous, if you don't mind my saying so. If you're in the typical corporate structure, you'll either put up with whatever the company tells you to put up with, or you'll quit. If you quit over the operating system on your box, and you're the typical pencil-pusher type, then you're just an idiot.

      It certainly does NOT have to hit both targets at once, and if it did, there'd have certainly been no Windows NT on corporate systems while Windows 95 was on the majority of home desktops. There were superficial usage differences between those two systems that were no worse and no better than the superficial usage differences between WinXP and Linux w/ X. The biggest hurdles to overcome would be getting people used to the fact that they can't just install whatever arbitrary crapware they want, and they should be putting everything in thier Home directory.

      Besides, I'd like to know what "problems" exist in a properly administered Linux desktop box for work that don't exist in Windows?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    4. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh. So fire the receptionist and hire a competent one? It's called internal training. You should have a budget for it. There's no reason your receptionist needs to "learn Linux". You give her the apps, you give her the introduction, and you give her some time to settle into it, and that's that.

      I'm sick of hearing that people need to "learn Linux" to migrate in the workspace. Hello? I'm surrounded by 350 co-workers and I think maybe 2 of them, not counting our meager IT staff, actually "knows Windows" but they still manage to do their jobs. The nice thing about "knowing Linux", however, is that if you're a competent admin you can make sure that the people who don't "know Linux" can't shoot their own toes off, or, at least, can't shoot anyone else. See, with Windows, not only can you shoot your own toes off if you don't "know Windows", but you can shoot everyone else in the general vicinity, and, on occasion, it just arbitrarily decides to shoot you even if you didn't do anything wrong.

      I don't want to hear any crap about migration costs. Proof. Give me proof. Give me case studies. I'm tired of excuses. Maybe they're true, but they're always just excuses. It's just people afraid of a new thing and nothing more.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, the problem with Linux is that your company is too cheap to hire a competent receptionist who can learn the basics of very similar software packages in-house in a reasonable amount of time? For your general word processing and spreadsheeting applications, Open Office isn't really that much different. If she can learn to blindly click buttons on Office, there's no reason she can't learn to do it on Open Office. If that were really true, we'd all still be using WordPerfect.

      You can even train a mouse to do rudimentary, repetitive tasks. Just how much dumber are your receptionists?

      On top of that, I can't imagine that the cost difference of hiring new receptionists, especially from a temp agency, are going to offset productivity gains and cost savings for the rest of the company if Linux is a viable consideration otherwise. If it does, maybe you need to consider firing your HR group and getting people who don't just knee-jerk hire every receptionist that walks in the door...

      You're just making exuses. You must be a manager.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    6. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2

      ...porting it to a less capable backend like mysql would be too much right now.

      My experience is from a programming perspective, not administrative. However, in that experience, I've learned that MSSQL (one of the few MS tools I don't find myself absolutely loathing) databases can be migrated to PostgreSQL very easily. NOTHING can be migrated to MySQL because, well, this is just my personal opinion (not a troll, dumbasses, just an unsupported opinion.. but go ahead and mod me down because you're a MySQL fanatic who realizes I'm right), but it's pretty much shitware as far as mid and large scale relational databases go.

      In addition, most of the SQL, if you've done it properly in the code, is very portable between the two. Also, if you need to move up a step, PostgreSQL has some nifty features that MSSQL doesn't (conversely, MSSQL does actually have some things, mostly data types and functions, that pgsql doesn't).

      Just my two cents, but moving between MSSQL and PostgreSQL usually isn't that painful.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    7. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...as IT Director my excuse is my perogative.

      If this really is your reasoning, and if you really do manage on that kind of an attitude, I'd like to speak for your employees for a moment. If you don't really believe this, or it's not really your attitude, then disregard the comment. However, if I was an employee under someone like this, I'd think you were a complete idiot, I'd think you were totally full of shit, and I'd react accordingly every time you told me to do something. Just something to think about if you really are under the impression that your excuse is your perogative and that's a good enough explanation.

      ...downtime of a single office worker can be major.

      Our 1900 workers were down for the entire workday one day last week because some idiot brought and infected Windows laptop in and plugged it into the network (against policy - this was an exec, of course) while the patch was undergoing regression tests. How much do you think that sudden, unscheduled downtime costs compared to controlled, scheduled downtime? We send people to train all the time. We survive. That's just a lame excuse for an inability to manage your people's time effectively.

      Proper management of any OS is going to get less trouble.

      Undoubtedly. A badly mismanaged *nix system is a timebomb waiting on the network. Of course, a well managed Windows box can ALSO still be a timebomb waiting on the network. On top of that, *nix systems, if properly setup in the first place, don't require you to constantly pick through them with a fine tooth comb all the time. They don't require nonstop patching (don't give me shit about the number of patches that come out for "Linux" [since so many people seem to think every app that runs on Linux is a part of it] - if you're putting sendmail on desktop boxes, you deserve to get toasted). There's no forced upgrades. If you stick a box in running kernel 2.0, and it still does its job just fine, good for you! Too bad Microsoft is going to come around and start choking you off so you "upgrade" (upgrade means: introduce a whole new slew of bugs and security issues) when they release their next product.

      There are legitimate reasons not to move to Linux. You don't seem to have given me any. You're just making excuses.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    8. Re:Cue Irrelevant Feature Complaints In.... by mindfucker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Linux will be ready for the workplace desktop when it's ready for the home desktop.
      I think you have it backwards. Linux is actually easier to use than windows if you have a geek set it up correctly for you. That's why it will take off in the corporate sector first, and with home lusers last. I thought this was common knowledge, but then again, I'm new here.
  15. Paging Steve Jobs! by toupsie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stevie-baby, here is your chance to get Mac OS X into the Enterprise! One of the major problems with integrating Macs in most large scale companies is the Exchange Mail Systems in use. In the past, most Mac OS X users had to load up classic to use the G-d awful Outlook client. The new Office 2004 Entourage client is still not as cool as Stickies, Mail, iCal and Address Book working as a team and the best part, those are built into the OS -- as the connector should be.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Paging Steve Jobs! by outZider · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, Mail.app already has Exchange support. You can download an exchange connector for Address Book -- since Address Book already uses LDAP, you can just configure it to query the Active Directory server. It should be tied together better, but the pieces are in place.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    2. Re:Paging Steve Jobs! by jdwest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't Mail.app's Exhange support closer to glorified IMAP? Ability to schedule? I don't think that part's there ... And, there are issues with iSync for AddressBook and Exchange.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    3. Re:Paging Steve Jobs! by cocotoni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, they would have to hurry up with the integration of Evolution before MicroSoft releases Entourage 2004 that will probably integrate better with Exchange.

  16. Re:That's great news! by SmilingBoy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Novell Evolution 2.0 coming in the third quarter with native GroupWise support
  17. Re:That's great news! by Flashbck · · Score: 2, Informative
    Even though I know that this is /. I am talking about....Did you even read the article?!?!?!?

    In addition to support for Microsoft Exchange, Evolution 2.0 features integrated support for the newly available Novell GroupWise® 6.5 for Linux
  18. Awesome by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Exchange is probably MS' best and most important product that has no Open Source equivalent. I am aware of Kolab and some other works-in-progress, but none of these are even close to Exchange yet. Exchange has more than its fair share of security problems, but what it does, it does well. Now with Connector being released GPL, that will have two consequences: The free downloadable version of Evolution will be able to use Exchange's features, and hopefully other OS tools like Koffice/Kmail will pick up those abilities, too. Also, having an open source client side might help them in getting an open source server side move faster. Now I just wish that Evolution would be properly integrated with KDE. They are doing it with OOo...

    I'm a full-time desktop Linux user, and not just for coding, but for every aspect of business, so all this stuff matters to me. This week is going to be a great week in Desktop Linux: Suse 9.1 and Crossover 3 are both coming out at about the same time, and both are huge improvements over what came before.

    -------
    WAP news

  19. Re:Based on stolen code? by haydenth · · Score: 2

    What are you talking about? The connection was out LOOONG before the Microsoft code leak. Besides, it wasn't the entire operating system that was leaked, just parts.

    --
    - tom -
  20. Good for KDE folks, too by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I use KDE, so Kontact integrates better with the rest of my desktop than does Evolution. However, this is bound to be good for me, too, since the KDE folks can presumably use this to improve KMail's Exchange support. Oh, to be able to view the company calendar without booting into XP. That would be very, very nice.

    Novell, you seriously rock. I know you're doing this for business reasons, but you just bought a lood of goodwill from a bunch of folks in IT departments. Thank you!

    OT harp: Now, if KMail would just add IMAP filtering... ;-)

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Good for KDE folks, too by Per+Wigren · · Score: 5, Informative
      Now, if KMail would just add IMAP filtering... ;-)

      From the KDE 3.3 Release Plan:

      Redesign filters to use Sieve internally. Allow editing of Sieve scripts on IMAP servers to get rid of the bug reports a la "KMail doesn't support IMAP folders for fitering"

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  21. Cached Mode? by Mantrid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well we ended up with an Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 solution here...an expensive solution, but once they spent the money - well It's actually been quite good! Active Directory seems to be a bit of a headache ;) But Exchange/Outlook really is running well! Two things stand out (well having different mail views in OL2K3 is awesome - for example having a view of "follow up" items, or "unread" items separate from the folders they are in):

    One is cached mode - no more online/offline dicking around - it really works *well*. I have not had any screwy problems as of yet. (Basically Outlook caches your email - a seamless synchronization of your folders and it automatically detects a connected state)

    The other thing is the RPC over HTTP - so I can get full exchange functionality over the internet, just as if I was using IMAP or POP standards, but with the full exchange server deal: contacts, calendars etc. It's really been handy - no opening VPN connections or using webmail to check my work mail on my laptop.

    Are these two features available with Novell's solution? Even if they aren't I'm sure they will be. And having the option is great for the future even though, we are on the MS road for the time being. But for now, Exchange 2003 has worked very well, certainly better than our Linux pilot (Debian/FetchMail/Exim etc. with Thunderbird) - but our Linux pilot was kneecapped by having to operate in a mixed environment (which these new connectors would fix), and obviously going with Exchange cost us a whole lot more money! (Like $20K or thereabouts instead of free - consulting and hardware fees would've been required in both cases - and the Linux consulting was a lot cheaper believe it or not)

    1. Re:Cached Mode? by cascadefx · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But Exchange/Outlook really is running well! Two things stand out (well having different mail views in OL2K3 is awesome - for example having a view of "follow up" items, or "unread" items separate from the folders they are in):

      Virtual folders have been in Evolution forever. I have the same thing set up in Evolution and was shocked when I installed Outlook 2003 and they had it too. I think the interface is BUSY though. I hate the bars that break stuff out by date... it is distracting. The other stuff is interesting (but I have it in Evolution).

      I don't know everything that the connector adds, but I am glad to get it... hopefully soon.

      This isn't to say that Evolution doesn't have its rough edges. It DOES... but it is amazing for how relatively young it is. I have been using Outlook for years and it only recently got to be very usable. Evolution is a lot further in a shorter amount of time (love the RSS feed aggregator that is built in).

  22. Silliness by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Novell has in public beta a GroupWise client for Linux and Mac OS X...and then they give away a connector to make a free client talk to the enemy's mail/calendaring system?

    Makes me glad I don't have Novell stock. GroupWise earns them money. This does what?

    1. Re:Silliness by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this gives companies who use exchange (The enemy) to start using Evolution (The ally) which can also use Novell's (presumably) better cheaper product (The Goal).

    2. Re:Silliness by www+www+www · · Score: 3, Insightful
      GroupWise earns them money. This does what?

      I can imagine that Novell want the parts of the FOSS/OSS community that uses the Evolution Connector to help in taking care of this code while Novell redirects its Ximian hackers to work on better integration of Evolution with GroupWise. The Connector was a big deal for Ximian but not a huge source of money for Novell, and they rather use the excellent hackers of Ximian to something that is better for the future of Novell.

      Besides, the more corporation PC's that Evolution appears on, the more chance for the Novell sales-team to convince these corporations to switch to GroupWise.

      --

      bring it on! --- JFK

    3. Re:Silliness by thelexx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This earns them goodwill and helps build a reputation for playing well with others, which means that people who care about such things will be more likely to consider purchasing other Novell products in the future.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    4. Re:Silliness by Graymalkin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By allowing Connector to be distributed without encumbrance in other Linux distros they can increase the popularity of Evolution in Windows oriented corporate settings. Increasing Evolution's popularity increases Novell's mindshare in corporate settings. With every copy of Evolution installed on a corporate machine that is one less copy of Outlook sold. With a reduced demand for Outlook Novell is probably hoping the demand for Office will drop as well. Once Office's demand drops it stands to reason that the demand for Windows server products will drop as well.

      The goal of Novell, Sun, IBM, and others is to make alternatives to Microsoft viable in corporate settings. Some companies might want to replace Windows on their PCs with Linux or maybe buy a bunch of eMacs. If they're stuck with Windows and Outlook for e-mail and calendaring they might not be able to. If Novell gives that company and out from under Microsoft - via Ximian Connector - they'll be remembered for it when it comes time to replace an Exchange server. By backing open source projects to replace Microsoft they can take advantage of tons of man-hours invested into the projects and the inherent cross-platform capability of the software. Where before a company might have only had the prospect of upgrading to new Windows PCs there's increasing propects of being able yo buy any PC they want running any OS that fits their needs.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  23. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by LNX+Flocki · · Score: 3, Informative

    Groupwise does the trick. I might not fall in your definition of affordable though...

  24. Thank you, Novell by JediTrainer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd just like to throw that in. I've been waiting for ages and now it's actually possible.

    I can actually use my Linux box at work, without relying on my Windows box.

    In my particular company, we use Exchange. While I *have* been able to get IE working with Wine, I haven't had any luck with Outlook at all - I need it for its calendar, which everyone else uses. With Evolution plus the connector, I can now throw away my old dusty NT box for good!

    We've needed this for a long time, and I am very grateful for this.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  25. Re:Novell is really serious by dmoore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Evolution 2.0 is released, it will have native support to connect to Novell GroupWise servers. Most likely, Novell plans to use Evolution as a vehicle for corporate adoption of GroupWise. Furthermore, since Connector is now free, corporations who currently run Outlook have an easy migration path to GroupWise because they can now install both servers, and access them freely with the same client. Once the bugs are worked out, they can discard Outlook and stick with GroupWise.

  26. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by LNX+Flocki · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also this might be of interest

  27. Re:Motives? by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Novell is trying to set itself up to be the premire Linux distributer. The $60 dollars may mean something to Ximian, but it's peanuts to Novell compared to how much money they stand to make if Linux really starts taking off. Novell's thinking seems to be "What's good for Linux is good for Novell", hence the GPL'ing of YaST and Ximian-Connector.

  28. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by miguel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could write the server-side of the protocol this client expects for instance. That should not be too hard.

    Specially if you use something like Mono (plug, plug, plug, plug).

    Love,
    Miguel

  29. Indeed: havoc in redmond by SlashDread · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow.

    This is THE single big reason to NOT switch away from Windows in Office Automation. THE. Wow.

    I cannot believe, there are not 10.000 alarm bells ringing in redmond right now.

    Notice the tarball already avail in source?

    Notice how SOON it will be officially? This looks like a planned hit and run to me.

    Prediction: Either MS treatens them and they pull it. But the source is out so -pbbbt-. Or expect the next big free software suit to arrive. And it will be pulled, but the source is out so -pbbbt-

    If, on the other hand, MS plays nice about this, well, hell just froze over again.

    "/Dread"

    1. Re:Indeed: havoc in redmond by existential+goo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, since I was just postulating they might have a little more stress about it, you can relax now and realize nobody thinks that MS's world is going to end if an OSS Exchange Server clone were created.

      However, Office is, from what I understand, MS's biggest source of revenue, so threatening that in any way likely isn't taken lightly or ignored in Redmond.

      However, my personal bet is that they'll just quietly (at first) either:

      1 - Prepare to pull some patent crud and hinder Connector and its derivatives (kmail, anyone?) as much as possible when the timing is right
      2 - Change protocols a bit and periodically in an attempt to keep the OSS community behind just enough to hinder them and keep MS on top

      There might be other things they'd try, but I sincerely hope that they aren't able to touch Connector or any groups working on OSS Exchange-compatible servers.

    2. Re:Indeed: havoc in redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      cannot believe, there are not 10.000 alarm bells ringing in redmond right now.

      Ximian Connector has been listed on Microsoft's website for a long time as a partner product, so they have no reason be suprised. Connector uses APIs which MS built in for the explicit purpose of interoperatbility.

      Be clear on one thing (bolded for emphisis): In order to use Ximian Connector, you need to buy an Exchange CAL and a Windows CAL.

      MS gets paid whether you are using Outlook or not -- in fact they get paid more because Unix cilents aren't using a free IMAP server or something.

    3. Re:Indeed: havoc in redmond by mlrtime · · Score: 3, Informative


      AFAIK Mozilla only works with Exchange Server via IMAP. Many companies turn off IMAP/POP3 on their servers. The only way to grab your mail is to use outlook or a connector.

      Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'll load up mozilla now and try it.

    4. Re:Indeed: havoc in redmond by jdavidb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What grounds would MS have to threaten them? In this country, you still can't threaten someone simply for competing with your business, even if you're a monopoly. I don't read anywhere where they need MS's approval to keep this source available.

    5. Re:Indeed: havoc in redmond by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need a server CAL for EVERY desktop that connects to your server, no matter who it is. You need an Exchange CAL specifically for Exchange clients, IMAP/POP3 included, AFAIK.

      You just don't have to pay the outlook tax, or the windows desktop tax.

  30. Not for Exchange 5/5.5... by Spoing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've admined 5.5 over the past few years...and can't get management to switch over to OSS or even newer versions of Exchange that Connector supports. Very annoying...though I do use Evolution to read mail.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  31. Great news by killmister · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really great news ! I decided to migrate to SUSE 9.1 and was very close as regards bying the Connector. Now I will wait till Novel will relese their desktop. THis is really a huge step towards interoperability in large corporations where people use MS server applications.

    --
    MySQL Error 1040: Can't return sig, Too many connections!
  32. Open SUSE and the new Distro scenario by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Is it me ? I have the feeling that if Novell keeps opening up (as in GPL) the core of SUSE, then the (perhaps) most polished distro (according to reviews from people I respect) will become extremely popular.

    The big picture for commercial distros a couple years back was:

    • RedHat, open but not very user friendly.
    • Mandrake, even more open (in its development cycle), more polished and user friendly, not as stable.
    • SuSE, polished, stable, professional, user friendly, but with closed source bits preventing widespread use.

    With RedHat going Fedora (and resigning its mindshare), it wasn't clear what the new scenario sould be. Mandrake was in my mind the great candidate to be the king of the overall distro (from freelading and home users through enterprise solutions), assuming they released more stable corporate versions.

    Mandrake did its homework, and they announced a new development strategy with a community release and a later, more stable official release. They probably should add a slower (once a year) corporate option

    But now Novell buys SUSE, opens it up and kicks the hell out of the Chess board. RedHat backs up and announces their (late) return to the desktop. Things are getting hot my friends :-)

    1. Re:Open SUSE and the new Distro scenario by jdavidb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you have missed some things. RedHat did not abandon the desktop, nor did they resign their mindshare. Their mindshare was reassigned to Fedora, and most of it stayed there. Fedora == RedHat. Yes, there's some differences, but Fedora is still what the old plain vanilla RedHat Linux was. The only difference is average joe user can no longer buy a support contract for it, which is no difference, because average joe user bought his RedHat CDs from LinuxCentral instead, without a support contract. (I know, because I did.)

      So, RedHat didn't abandon the desktop. Meanwhile the RedHat Enterprise Linux product continues as before, and RedHat announces the new Desktop product for corporate users. Meanwhile Fedora continues to occupy the same niche as the old RedHat Linux.

      I keep seeing these misconceptions repeated, so, one more time, everyone, all together: "Fedora == RedHat Linux."

  33. One more step, a Win32 port of Evolution by Erik_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now, they only need to release a Windows port of Evolution and even more people will be able to enjoy this awesome program.

    1. Re:One more step, a Win32 port of Evolution by sgarrity · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to this interview with Miguel de Icaza at OSNews, "Ximian is working on a native port of Evolution 2.0 to Windows using the WIMP engine to make the application look XP-native."

      I imaging the reference to WIMP is the WIMP-GTK theme for GTK-on-Windows that mirrors the look of Windows.

      This is how Gaim handles their Windows "port" (thought I don't think "port" is really the rigtht word.

  34. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Say what you will, the ability for a clueless end-user to click "accept" on an email and automatically schedule themselves for a meeting is a Big Deal(tm).

    I don't consider myself clueless and it's a Big Deal(tm) for me.

    I don't get paid for managing my calendar and I don't want to waste my time managing my calendar. If someone or something will do it for me or make my life easier, then all the better.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  35. Check Out OpenGroupWare by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like the was the missing piece that kept Evolution from connecting to OpenGroupWare. Now that looks to be solved. OGW provides Contacts and Calandar services (an can be integrated with a mail server like Cyrus to provide mail)

  36. Re:Motives? by johnnyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a feeling that a lot of the companies that have been kicked around by Microsoft in the past are using open-source as a tool just to piss off Microsoft. Witness Sun and Novell.

  37. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could write the server-side of the protocol this client expects for instance. That should not be too hard.

    Sounds doable. I'm a developer on the Citadel project, which has an open source groupware server. Now that the Connector is open source, we might give some serious consideration towards implementing the required WebDAV API in our web service.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  38. Want to thank Novell? BUY from them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, if you really want to support Novell becuase of its very positive actions of late, here's the way:

    BUY something from SuSE, Ximian or Novell!

  39. Exchange Server alternatives or better options? by xeno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, this is fantastic news. I'll be taking my work laptop and switching over to linux as my primary OS by the end of the week. (And yes, I realize I'm lucky to have an IT dept that will still support me after I do such a thing.) I'm not a zealot about such things; imho Outlook and IE genuinely suck on their own functional/security merits. The only thing I'll miss from a windows client perspective is Visio (yeah, I think MS does make/maintain some good products), but then there's always VMware.

    BUT here's the obvious question: When will there be a viable challenger to Exchange Server? Am I missing something big? Last time I looked, most of the messaging solutions were missing a decent calendaring/schedule solution. Oracle's Collaboration Server is so involved/overkill (9cds for a basic install, iirc) that it's out of reach for most small/med orgs, and makes Notes look svelte. Groupwise was pretty obtuse & closed when I last looked. Open Groupware looks interesting (especially with the knoppix-ogo distro), but feels like Openoffice build 635... i.e. not fully baked.

    When is a project going to come up with messaging, calendaring (via ical, mapi, etc etc), a repository that isn't as horrid as exchange public folders (maybe something modeled after/improving upon Opentext's Livelink), flexible event notifications (maybe simple stuff like alerts via email/SMS???). I have hopes for IBM's recent office tools announcement, but we'll see. A turnaround for Groupwise? Maybe? Options, I want options, dammit!

    -Jon

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:Exchange Server alternatives or better options? by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When the Calendar Access Protocol gets finished. Of course, now their talking about having to modify iCal and such to deal with inconsistencies caused by the CAP draft. The CAP draft itself is on draft 12 which is 6 years of development.

      If you want a server, see if you can help get CAP out the door: IETF Calendaring & Scheduling group

      From what research I've done, everyone seems to think this will be the final draft, sets up a new project. Although, I am hopeful that the UW project will be successful, although I have no clue how tough to integrate with Cyrus or Postfix it will be.

      --
      Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    2. Re:Exchange Server alternatives or better options? by bagboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>> The only thing I'll miss from a windows client perspective is Visio

      CrossOver 3.0 Supports Visio XP.... I know.. I'm running it..

  40. Yast open sourced and now Ximian Connector? by plazman30 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is Novell turning out to be a good open source neighbor, or what? I think there is finally a large commercial corporation that "gets it!"

    About time.

    How long till they open source NetWare and eDirectory?

    1. Re:Yast open sourced and now Ximian Connector? by ralf1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cross platform Groupwise client is in Open Beta right now. http://beta.novell.com/public.jsp (free reg required) "I don't exactly see a Groupwise client for Linux (or a free one on the Windows side)."

      --
      "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  41. Re:Lack of feature? by tiger99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, the objective should be to get rid of Outlook on the desktop, to get rid of the worm threat. It looks as if that will be the next phase of either Novell's plan, or a culmination of other bits and pieces that are in development.

    It seems to me that all the functionality of Outlook could be provided in a browser interface with a bit of clever stuff on the server. If that browser is not IE, then many of the problems simply go away. I don't see that anything Outlook provides can't be done in a better way.

    I am looking forward to the next phase of development, a few major breakthroughs on FOSS look like co-inciding with Longhorn being late......

  42. Bynari Insight Server by OmniGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.bynari.net
    This product (not free, but cheaper than Exchange) which, by an odd coincidence, I'm evaluating for purchase in an upcoming IT changeover, replaces an Exchange server and supports both standard and Outlook/Exchange clients with all the calendaring bullhockey PHBs can't seem to do without. They have a separate for-cost Webmail product as well, about which I know little.

    Insight Server *looks* very good, and the independent info I've seen also likes it. (If anyone has direct experience good or bad, I'm interested in hearing of it.) I'm looking forward with glee to a MS-free server room...

    Also, once upon a time, Bynari was making a free Exchange client, but something happened to that plan and they don't mention it on their site any more.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:Bynari Insight Server by KodaK · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using it. I'm pretty happy with it. I got it because my boss wanted Exchange like features to not use.

      We use some of the features, but not all of them. I've got no complaints. Remember, what you're really buying is the connector component which translates the Outlook info into "regular" mail that can be stored in Cyrus IMAP -- everything else is open source.

      Their version-in-the-works will integrate Spamassassin and ClamAV too. Hopefully they'll have the hooks for other AV products as well.

      --
      --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
  43. CrossOver Office 3.0 now supports Notes 6.5.1 by Erik_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another good news for Linux in the Enterprise came from CodeWeaver's CrossOver Office 3.0. It now supports Lotus Notes 6.5.1 on Linux.

    CodeWeaver is happy to announce that today we have shipped version 3.0 of CrossOver Office.

    We've added new, official, support for Outlook XP, Microsoft Project, and Notes 6.5.1. Unofficially, we're excited by users comments that far more applications are working now. These include programs like Framemaker and Microsoft Money. You can see the full list of changes here:

    http://www.codeweavers.com/site/products/cxoffice/ change_log/

    Further, this version marks some fairly ubstantial changes in our CrossOver Product line. First, we have merged the CrossOver Plugin product into the CrossOver Office product offering, so now all non server versions of CrossOver automatically provide
    the Plugin functionality.

  44. No excuses for IT now? by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Interesting


    For a basic office computer, there is now no excuse for IT to not use Linux, unless there is a specific Windows-only app that is needed.

    Linux has any terminal you ever needed, OO.org, and now is fully Exchange-server compatable?

    And it's all free?

    The only thing that could possibly make your Linux TCO high now is perhaps re-training your tech staff who have undoubtedly been brought up on MS Windows if they went to college in the US, and that's not terribly expensive in the long run...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  45. Why won't you support Linux companies? by dennisr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see quite a few comments about "Now I am going to switch to Linux" or "I have been waiting for this for so long" and I got to thinking. What stopped you from using prior to this? It was available for download for ~30 dollars. I purchased it not only for its functionality but to support a Linux company.

    1. Re:Why won't you support Linux companies? by y2dt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I never bought it because it wasn't absolutely necessary. Our exchange server here provided IMAP and POP3 inboxes that I could use in any standard mail client.

  46. Re:Keep adding things to Apache... by wjwlsn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Too late, Emacs has already passed becoming an OS. It is now on its way towards becoming sentient.

    --
    Getting tired of Slashdot... moving to Usenet comp.misc for a while.
  47. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What would be the advantages of writing the server-side in Mono over Java? Not a flame, I'm sincerely curious.

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
  48. thunderbird? by twelvemonkeys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if thunderbird will be able to integrate the connector into their code?

    Some of us are still forced to use windows at the workplace for other reasons (Visio a big one), but would love to have an open win32 email client that can connect to exchange for calendaring reasons.

    1. Re:thunderbird? by mactari · · Score: 2, Informative

      Completely integrate; fraid not. Afaik, Thunderbird still uses the MPL (Mozilla Public License) which basically is a convoluted BSD license as far as my IANAL self can figure. That's what allowed Netscape to use Mozilla as its core and still close it up and sell it.

      Now can Thunderbird provide a hook so that you could personally set up some module someone else writes to integrate with Exchange? There I have to think it's an easy yes. As long as Thunderbird doesn't incorporate GPL code and just provides standardized hooks, you could add a GPL module that does the trick. Alternately, someone could write an "Exchange to POP3 converter" like Hotmail Popper and other similar projects.

      And certainly there's nothing keeping you from forking Thunderbird into a GPL project that I know of, but I don't think your fork, Exchange or not, would be the dominate one.

      --

      It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  49. Now if Sun would get a clue by amblin · · Score: 2

    Exchange connector for Evolution, now free.
    SunOne Calendar connector for Outlook, free.
    SunOne Calendar connector for Evolution, NOT free.

  50. Coming soon from Microsoft... by Mannerism · · Score: 4, Troll

    ...a new Exchange license designed to make this unattractive.

  51. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by slagdogg · · Score: 2, Informative

    What would be the advantages of writing the server-side in Mono over Java? Not a flame, I'm sincerely curious.

    They would both be nice choices -- Miguel is largely responsible for Mono, however. So, you might say he is biased :)

    Miguel on Mono

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  52. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by 4minus0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now, if only we had something affordable that could do that on the Linux server side, with clients on Linux, Windows and Mac platforms...and no, webmail doesn't cut it...

    I'm not so sure webmail doesn't cut it. I recently rolled out a web based groupware server based on qmail/vpopmail/phpgroupware and the users couldn't be happier. They do everything they used to do on Exchange and I freed up a sizable chunk of IT's budget by no longer needing Win2k/2k3 Server license, Exchange license, and CALs. That adds up.

    I installed Mozilla Firebird on the Ghost build host and have the browser start with all the pages they need in tabs. Aside from some Oracle and AS/400 users, most never have to leave the browser to do their work.

    Web applications are great in an enterprise environment, they free up a bunch of my time so I can do useful things like post on slashdot ;)

    --
    You've got an easy breezy wind at your back...most of the time.
  53. You should still purchase it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you work for a company that would actually spend money on it, DO IT! We should financially support F/OSS companies when we are able to.

    Also, remember you'll likely be buying some support which is cheaper than going it alone.

  54. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by dwinship · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You could write the server-side of the protocol this client expects for instance.

    Er, no, don't do that unless you want to keep tracking our ever-expanding knowledge of exactly how Exchange works. OpenGroupware made their server work against Connector 1.2, and then it just failed against Connector 1.4.

    Admittedly, if they had had the source, they could have figured out why, and fixed things, but the point is that Connector doesn't really have a real, official, documented "protocol". It just does whatever works best for us at the time, and we're always figuring out new things.

    If you're going to try to hack in to one of the Evolution backends, it would be better to use the GroupWise SOAP interface, since that does have well-defined semantics. (Although that API will also be changing over time.)

    The best would be to get CAP or CalDAV finalized and out the door so Evolution can support those.

  55. Re:Motives? by The+Conductor · · Score: 2

    How about this? Building a reputation of releasing formerly commercial products as GPL makes your current commercial products more future-proof. MS has always appeared future-proof because they are the One-That-Won't-Go-Outta-Business (the Highlander effect: there can only be one). Not much consolation to those who want to continue using Win9x, OE, etc., though. But if a company builds a history of GPL'ing stuff, that lowers barriers to adoption even while products are still closed-source commercial.

  56. Great -- but not fantastic -- news by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Novell/Ximian Connector goes a long way towards integrating Linux into a Windows-heavy business environment. However, it doesn't go as far as many here seem to think. Just because you have Connector does not mean that you will be able to use Evolution with Exchange at work... at least, not in all cases.

    Specifically, Connector only works if Outlook Web Access is enabled on Exchange. There are a few problems with this approach in the real world.

    First, OWA isn't enabled by default in Exchange. That is because, secondly, OWA costs extra for each user. Third, as a result, all places I've worked that used Exchange either disallowed using OWA at all or severly limited its use.

    For instance, at my current company, OWA is enabled but only has a few client licenses and is therefore blocked from all internal IPs. It's intended use is for people that are traveling that want to access their email via a web browser.

    So, yeah, Connector is very slick and very useful... just not as slick and as useful as the euphoric posts here seem to indicate!

    1. Re:Great -- but not fantastic -- news by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wouldn't getting a "per user" license solve the problem of having to get additional licenses for each user? As far as I know, there isn't a special "OWA" license for Exchange servers.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    2. Re:Great -- but not fantastic -- news by IceCat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Been awhile since you've worked on an Exchange box? First, in Exchange 2000 it is enabled by default. Second, the user CAL will satisfy the user access for OWA.

      Care to point out an MS article that dictates otherwise?

  57. Yes, enter Kolab! by pointwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Kolab Project is a project that was sponsored by the German "Federal Agency of IT-Security". The Kolab server is based upon several open source software pieces: OpenLDAP, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, Apache and more. Kontact (combines the following KDE apps: KMail, KOrganizer, KAddressbook and KNotes) will soon be ready for use as a Kolab client too. There are other clients too.

  58. Re:Wonderful, wonderful - alll we need is a server by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this a joke/troll? Miguel de Icaza?

    Eh, anyway, why would you try to build a new server technology based on a hack of an old one? I mean, if you're going to spend the time an resources to build a server-end-software, why not develop a new open protocol, or extend IMAP? Why would you try to emulate the bass-ackwards way of accessing an Exchange server that Ximian uses, when you could probably develop a server with something superior to Exchange's unknown front-end access and add that protocol to Evolution?

  59. Buildling from source by O · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, I'm running gentoo and just built this from source. A couple of things:

    Be sure to specify the proper --prefix= to ./configure (probably should be the same one with which Evolution was built).

    A few things failed to link. This was solved by adding "-lresolve -lldap" to the proper _LIBS= line in the Makefiles. I only had to do that a couple times.

    So, I have it installed and Evolution finds it. It seems to be hung up right now trying to connect to the Exchange server, but at least I got it installed.

    --

    1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
  60. Re:That's great news! by Glamdrlng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to wonder what Novell's long term strategy is here. This is either A, a clever grab for better karma, or B, a move to provide a gradual upgrade path from Windows/Office/Exchange to Suse/Evolution/Groupwise.

    I actually don't expect Microsoft to get too bitchy about this. It seems to me like they're putting their money on virtual office integration. While Novell has a product in this space too, Microsoft's product will probably end up being more polished, easier for the average end-user to use, less secure, but effectively less expensive for clients with enterprise license agreements.

    --

    Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
  61. Re:No Open Source equivalent? by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Informative

    All because Exchange can't be accessed via HTTP internally (here, at any rate), and won't "finger" me.

    Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the Evolution connector uses WebDAV (i.e. HTTP) to connect through Outlook Web Access. It doesn't speak the MAPI protocol that Outlook itself uses to connect to Exchange. If you can't use the webmail internally, the connector won't work either...

  62. OpenGroupware is now an Exchange killer! by rednox · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is great news for OpenGroupware. It's a full featured calendar, email and groupware server.

    Previously, the only end to end open source solution you could set up with OpenGroupware was using Mozilla Calendar, another iCalendar app, or by using the built in web client. The Mozilla/iCalendar support is good, but "provides little "groupware" functionality and the support for it is to be consider experimental".

    There are plugins for Outlook and Evolution, but they were both not open source. It was actually pretty funny, an open source server, an open source client (evolution), and a closed source, very expensive connector to get the two to talk to each other! Look for "Ximian Connector" in their FAQ:
    http://www.opengroupware.org/en/users/faq

    OpenGroupware will not be able to use this Evolution connector directly, but since it is open source, it will be adapted for this purpose. Helge Hess the main developer for OpenGroupware has said as much.

  63. Opposite Problem by awarlaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But I Currently have the opposite problem and have yet to find a solution.

    I am looking to replace an exchange5.5 with something a little more controllable. Cost is an issue and I have around 50 clients. webmail a must. Currently, we are evaluating and will probably go with SUSE Openexchange.

    But, here's the problem:

    We also want to replace the outlook clients and I would love to switch to evolution. But, I cannot switch the clients off win2000 because of some propriatary programs that need to run.

    The goal here is to be MS free within the next year. And, with the exception of some programs we are currently porting, If I can get the users off outlook I can switch them from 2000 to Linux or BSD and very few would notice the difference.

    It took us 3 months to ween the users from MSOffice to Oo with very little complaints/training.

    Any thoughts?

    --
    TIME is the Aether...
    1. Re:Opposite Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Sun's Messaging and Calendar server.. It's cheaper than OpenExchange, runs on Windows, HP-UX, AIX, Solaris, Linux, and integrates nicely with both evolution and outlook. WebMail, WebCalendar is also part of the package.

      You may also try the java desktop system with crossover or wine to run the propriatary programs...

  64. Any news for Mozilla by standing_still · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will Mozilla be integrating the connector?

  65. Don't underestimate the windows bridge by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For a lot of pieces of software, Windows versions are very important.

    Some people may disagree, on the "well, if it's there on Linux, people won't switch".

    There are, however, 2 good reasons for building Windows versions. Firstly, people will choose the OSS project instead of a Microsoft one. That's less money for MS to spend on developing lockin, paying lawyers etc.

    Secondly, if people have Evolution (to go with Apache, PHP, MySQL, GIMP, Open Office and Mozilla), they can get used to it on Windows. Then, they can pull the plug and continue to use what they've got elsewhere.

  66. This is great news by Cable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you have Linux and want to connect to the firm's Exchange server.

    The next step would be to port Evolution to Windows to help ease the migration to Linux. Evolution needs to integrate with OpenOffice.org so that it can take advantage of a word processor to edit messages better and do a spell check.

  67. Re:What's the difference? by rmm4pi8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the latter only works if exchange has IMAP turned on, which apparently most corporations turn off, and it doesnt support CAL integration. the ximian connector uses the OWA instead of IMAP, and fully supports CALs as long as you have the server license.

    --
    U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.