Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Carbon-Fiber Stealth Ship Runs NT

tiled_rainbows writes "The Guardian has an article today about the Swedish navy's new stealth warship, which they claim is the largest carbon-fiber vessel ever built. Slashdotters will be interested to learn that the ship runs Windows NT. The article says 'While the point-and-click system is popular with conscripts, the ship was fitted with a wooden ship's wheel at the insistence of senior officers. If Windows goes down, they will still be able to steer.' Which raises the question: where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer?"

44 of 526 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by trp642 · · Score: 5, Funny

    US Navy develops new Sasser Torpedo to protect us from Swedish terrorists. Bush feels they are hiding WMD's. Swedish Chef is quoted as saying "We no heeden dur Weaponden den Massen destructnueden. bork! bork! bork!".

  2. I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize you were being cutesy, but making a USB ships wheel sounds about like a one-weekend take-it-apart-and-put-it-together project, starting with a shaft-encoded driving-game controller.

    The hardest part would surely be building the binnacle.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, the sensor doesn't need to support the wheel :-)

      Skipping the driving controller, you might do better to dismantle a $2.99 optomechanical USB mouse for its optical sensor and USB interface.

    2. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by fsck! · · Score: 4, Informative

      And then there's the issue that NT doesn't even support USB.

    3. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope it works better than that single dial thingy that BMW has.

      "I said thirty degrees port, not turn on the music!"

  3. USB? Hazza! by Ckwop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer

    I doubt it's USB since NT4 doesn't support USB.. :P Probably PS2 or a Serial connector :)

    Simon

    1. Re:USB? Hazza! by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      Reminds me of the old Winston Churchill quote:
      "Traditions! What traditions? Rum, sodomy and the lash!"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:USB? Hazza! by Throtex · · Score: 5, Funny

      All Winston Churchill quotes are 'old'. I'd surely be impressed if he were making any new ones.

    3. Re:USB? Hazza! by fizban · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or as they're saying today:
      "Traditions! What traditions? Rumsfeld, sodomy and the lash"

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  4. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    THe bluescreen sunk my battleship!

  5. Movie idea by BorgDrone · · Score: 5, Funny

    This gives me a great idea for a movie: "Speed 3: Dead in the water".

    1. Re:Movie idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You joke, but the USS Yorktown didn't think it was so funny. :-P

    2. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They must have divided by 0 in kernel space to bomb the OS.

      NT get chosen for stuff like this because it's easier for them to support special hardware by writing and maintaining drivers, not a particular monolithic kernel that slashbots would recommend.

      Frankly, who cares. This would be a story about some really cool tech (an enormous, "invisible" boat) but instead its an OS flamewar.

      Bah, slashdot isn't a "news for nerds" or a "geek" site anymore, it's just a soapbox for OSS philosophy.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  6. The stealth effect is kind of ruined by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    The stealth effect is kind of ruined, however, when this Swedish ship tries to sneak through the fog at night, but the cook is happily cooking tomorrow's pastries exclaiming "Bork Bork Bork!", which echoes over the waves.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  7. Sinking squared by SilverGiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who knew--a ship that could crash twice.

  8. BSOD by PhuckH34D · · Score: 5, Funny
    well... blue is an excellent camouflage color on the water...

    --
    You're old school? I beta tested the motherf***ing abacus!
  9. Support ? by Alcoyotl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIRC, Microsoft was bound to stop support on windows NT 4. Are there any kind of provisions for systems such as this, which is going to be in service for quite some time? Or will the Swedish Navy be on its own if some glitch appears ?
    I know that using an old an proven operation system is better because all major bugs have been either wiped out or referenced, still I'm not sure that using a closed source unsupported OS is the smartest way. But maybe they know better ?

    1. Re:Support ? by lseltzer · · Score: 4, Informative
      See Retiring Windows NT Server 4.0: Changes in Product Availability and Support:
      • January 1, 2004 - Beginning on this date, non-security hotfixes are no longer available.


      • January 1, 2005 - Beginning on this date, Pay-per-incident and Premier support will no longer be available. This includes security hotfixes.

        January 1, 2005
        (or later) - Online support will no longer be available
  10. Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a materials scientist, but I would imagine that carbon fibre can burn. A huge advantage of steel is that it may weaken under heat stress, but it will never contribute to a fire, which is one of the gravest threats to a warship in combat.

    The British learned this lesson the hard way in the Falklands. In that case the new building material was aluminum, which can actually burn when it gets hot enough. This contributed to the loss of several ships which suffered massive fires after being hit by Argentinian aircraft. As a result, not only in the UK but in navies around the world, new naval ships are built entirely out of steel.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by madpoet_one · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone who worked in a carbon fiber development lab in the eighties, I will agree that carbon fiber can burn.

      But as the MSDS for carbon fiber points out:

      Flammability classification: Not classified.
      Flash Point/Method: Not known, but very high!
      Auto-Ignition Temperature: Not determined
      Flammable Limits: Lower: Not applicable
      Upper: Not applicable

      Carbon Fiber MSDS link

      --
      Remain lost in hidden worlds where I reign. Head engine and caboose in my toy train...
    2. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

      WWII demonstrated the obsolescence of your old behemoths. Take the British and German fleets from the battle of Jutland: classic dreadnoughts, immense steel battleships with incredible armour and gigantic guns. Put them on one side. Take the HMS Ark Royal, a small aircraft carrier from the modern Royal Navy. Put that on the other side. Which side wins?

      If you said anything other than Ark Royal you lose. Our good friends the Japanese demonstrated in 1941 what happens to traditional battleships when someone in an aeroplane has a go at them.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

      That's because they don't need to go in for close combat. Firing massive shells is a relic of the days when naval wars were fought with cannons. These days a carrier would strike your battleship from over 100 miles out and sink her without a single useful shot fired by the battleship. Not to mention that armor is relatively ineffective against many modern weapons that are designed to pierce armor. Thus naval warfare focuses on a different set of abilities:

      1. Ability to launch a strike from great distances.
      2. Speed to quickly enter and exit a theater of operations (U.S.S Enterprise [CVN-65] did 32 knots, non-stop, around the world!)
      3. Stealth to sneak up on a ship without getting blasted from a hundred miles away. (Subs still rule this area.)
      4. Screening ships and weapons to shoot down incoming planes.
      5. Survivability via ability to float despite massive internal damage.
      6. G.I. proofing so that no one accidentally blows up the ship from the inside. (Don't laugh, this happened several times in WWII.)

      The truth however, is that any major conflict would probably see a total loss of all seagoing vessels. They'd simply start lobbing nukes at one another until they are all destroyed or capsized.

    4. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by phayes · · Score: 4, Informative
      Building major combattants out of carbon fiber & epoxy may well expose these ships to fire hasards (however this will be more related to the epoxy that binds the fibers than the carbon fibers themselves. Carbon fibers burn relatively cleanly, epoxies, on the other hand put out fumes that will incapacitate & blind crewmembers that are trying to control the damage). Having carbon structural members burn through & fail is of little import if everyone is already dead due to the smoke.

      Your example of HMS Sheffield is in any case incorrect and is covered in the sci.military.navy FAQ:

      There are many misconceptions and incorrect stories regarding the use of aluminum in warship construction.

      One common story is that HMS Sheffield, a destroyer sunk during the 1982 Falkland War, was lost because her alleged aluminum superstructure made her more vulnerable to damage. This story is completely untrue, because Sheffield's superstructure was not aluminum. Like all ships of her class, her hull and superstructure were entirely steel. Aluminum played no role in her loss.

      Two Royal Navy warships lost during the Falklands War did have aluminum superstructures, and their loss is incorrectly attributed to this feature. Ardent was hit by seven 500- and 1000-pound bombs, plus at least two more bombs which failed to detonate, and sank some six hours after the attack. Any warship of her size, regardless of aluminum or steel construction, would likely be sunk by this many bombs, so aluminum cannot be blamed here. Antelope, another aluminum-superstructure ship, was struck by two bombs, which lodged in the ship but failed to explode. Later, while one of the bombs was being defused, it exploded, blowing a major hole in the hull and starting a large fire. The fire eventually reached the magazines, causing these to explode. Again, an aluminum superstructure appears to have little connection to the ship's loss, which was caused by the explosion of the bomb and the magazines.

      A related story claims the US Navy and Royal Navy abanonded aluminum superstructures, in favor of steel, as a result of the Falklands war. Since aluminum superstructures played little or no role in the Falkands losses, this story is obviously untrue. The Royal Navy's switch to steel appears to be a result of a 1977 fire in the frigate Amazon. In the US Navy, the switch from aluminum to steel superstructures was a result of the 1975 collision between the carrier John F. Kennedy and the cruiser Belknap. The collision caused major fires aboard the cruiser, and her aluminum superstructure essentially melted; she was reduced to a badly burnt hulk. This incident lead to a decision to adopt steel superstructures in the next new warship class, the Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) class destroyers. This decision had been made prior to the Falkands War.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  11. Seafoam blue by SilverGiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Captain, everything is in order; the heads-up display shows nothing but blue seas ahead."

  12. Pretty pictures ala Google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  13. Re:Corvette by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    You missed the other definition: A $60,000 fiberglass and aluminium penis extension that gets 8 miles to the gallon.

  14. Not Surprisingly by smartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shortly after they installed nt, all the rats on the ship disappeared.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  15. Pictures of Visby by bjornhi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The boat is named Visby and pics of it can be found here and here /Björn

  16. Hope they do better than the US Navy did with NT by bingbong · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in May 1997, the US fitted the USS YORKTOWN (http://www.yorktown.navy.mil/ ) with NT and it had disastrous results (http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/july13/cov2. htm ) . The ship went DIW (dead in the water) for a few hours. This is the worst case scenario for any ship's captain (and their career)...

    Guess it took this long to work out the bugs... Not bad - only 7 years!

    --
    "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
  17. I can See it Now by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Excuse my lack of Nautical Terms, but you get the idea.

    Navigator: Captain, radar is picking up an iceberg 2 Nautical miles ahead, just off the port bow.

    Captain: No problem, that's plenty of time to steer clear.

    Captain clicks the navigation display on NT

    Clippy: It seems you are trying to steer, what would you like to do?

    • Steer Port
    • Steer Starboard

    Navigator: Captain, Icberg 1 mile ahead

    Captain: (showing frustration) clicks Steer Starboard

    Captain: This should handle it!

    Clippy: How many degrees starboard would you liek to steer?

    • 5
    • 10
    • 15

    Captain uttering swedish curse words, clicks 10 degrees

    Navigator Captain, Iceberg at 400 meters

    Clippy: You clicked Turn Starboard and 15 degrees, it seems you are trying to evade an Iceberg. Windows NE (Nautical Edition) has several new features, just for this.

    Clippy: Would you like to enable the "Evade Iceburg" Wizard?

    Captain: $^@#$#%*, runs up to the wooden ships wheel

    Captain: See, this is why the tried and true method works! turns the wheel

    Windows NE has detected a new device and is unable to find a driver for it.

    Captain: Aha! my son warned me about this, I have the driver right here!

    Windows NE: Windows NE has finished installing drivers for the device "Ships Wheel", in order to use this device you must restart windows. Click here to restart, or if you wish to restart later click cancel.

    Sharks: Break out the hotsauce fellas, here comes dinner

  18. Vulnerability? by !Freeky2BGeeky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, all jokes aside on the operating system that runs this thing, I'd like to know what happens in a real battle when this thing gets hit with ordinance?

    The article states that they had to create new techniques for cutting the material during construction, but if this gets hit with a mine/torpedo/exocet, will it shatter? If not, how would they fix the leaks w/o being able to weld a new piece of steel over the hole(s) to keep it afloat until it makes it back to the shipyard?

    --

    Visualize Whirled Peas

  19. Fire Control by codepunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Captain: Fire control, engage hostile target 1004 range 2000 yds with 5 inch main battery.

    Fire Control: Sir, unable to engage target 1004 the system has encountered a VB runtime error 91 object variable not set.

    Captain: Engine room ahead all full make turns for
    30 knots.

    Engine Room: Sir we keep getting a RPC failure in the gas turbine controller.

    Captain: All hands abandon ship!

    --


    Got Code?
  20. Instructions for using the forward cannon by iPaul · · Score: 4, Funny
    10.1.3Initializing the Cannon for Rapid Fire

    During combat it becomes necessary to increase your rate of fire to ensure the destruction of enemy vessels. Microsoft does not endorse the use of this software on fishing boats, pleasure craft, or walruses.

    From the Control Panel select "Forward Cannon." Right click on the cannon and select "Properties." From the "Firing Rate" tab make sure the "Fire at will" option, and click the apply button. If the ship does not begin firing type "Regedit" at the command prompt. Under "HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE" search for "Fire Control" and make sure the is a "Fire Control" entry in the registry. If necessary, load the Forward Cannon 1.3 install CD and double click the fcannon.reg file.

    Once the cannon is installed, you may choose to test-fire a round. You will be prompted with a dialog asking if the target was hit. Clicking on No will take you to a web page with possible reasons (non of which will actually apply) as to why the target was missed. Some targets are not compatible with Windows and cannot be hit with the forward Gun.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
  21. Weighs twice as much by kahei · · Score: 4, Funny


    From the article:


    And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette.


    In other words, its great weight makes it _more_ likely to avoid attacks -- perhaps by escaping downhill.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  22. The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The good: A lightweight, stealth ship. I'd love to have one. I have no need for one, but it would be cool. (I'd rather have a lightweight, stealth car, esp. if it came with a retractable 57mm cannon!) Do we have any idea how well CF will really hold up in this case, though? Both in long term maneuvers and under attack by enemy aircraft? What about barnacles? OK, the good we don't know for sure.

    The bad: Let's see, didn't the US Navy already experience a problem with an NT4-based ship being dead in the water? And a dead ship can't maneuver. If there are other ships around, that's not a good time to be invisible. (Captain of aircraft carrier: "What was that crunchy sound?")

    The ugly (editing): "And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette." Presumably they meant half as heavy!

  23. obvious question by ajrs · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it have minesweeper?

  24. Re:It Can't be steel by dustmote · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a mine sweeper. I'm sure there's a joke here somewhere..


    I know I'm going to karma hell for this joke, but....

    In Soviet Russia(socialist Sweden?), Minesweeper runs Windows!

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
  25. I doubt it will be NT for long. by -cman- · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to what little info is avialable from Janes The ship is one of two which were initially ordered in 1995. Military procurement being what it is, no matter where you go, the ships were probably designed with NT in mind, circa '95. However, I doubt NT will last longer than the first refit or post-sea trials.

    The US and UK navies are both experimenting with a number of computer-control options ranging from MS solutions, to various *nixen. Of course there is the now aporcyphal story of the NT crash that put the USS Yorktown dead in the water. Short answer, it may have been built on the NT platform, but lots of replacement systems exist now and I doubt NT will survive long enough for the ship to enter the active list.

    --
    "Being Irish, he possessed an abiding sense of tragedy which sustained him through brief episodes of joy." -W. B.
  26. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know it's a joke, so yes, except Sweden doesn't have "nukes".

    Actually (I'm Swedish) we don't have much of an army, airforce, or navy, at all anymore..

    Not that I personally agree to spending the kind of money you do in the US, but the military situation is pretty pathetic in Sweden (although it's been a few hundred years since we were a military power by any standard).

    We can't defend our borders at all, and we probably can't wage an effective (defensive/guerilla) war on Swedish soil either (no militia to speak of, laws against owning weapons other than for hunting, etc.).

    The cuts in the military budget has been brutal, to the point I was kind of amazed that they've been able to develop this stealth vessel at all (with what money - the entire navy budget?!?).

    Without much debate, politicians have been working overtime to convert (reduce) our own military to a few special units (like this stealth corvette thing) - perhaps to be used in some large EU military force.. (Not that I know enough about it to say whether 'tis a 'Good Thing', but I've always considered self-reliance to be important, so.. I guess I think it sucks bigtime.)

    --
    668.5
  27. Re:IMO Hardly News by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember getting an interesting tech support call back in 1998. A naval officer was attempting to get Windows NT Server running and was wondering if we could help. (We were business support and her husband worked for our business.) Apparently all of her regular outlets for support were shut down for the weekend (or maybe it was a holiday, I don't remember) and she needed to get the computers running on time for the deadline. We didn't support NT Server, so I really couldn't help her.

    When I passed the story on to coworkers, they didn't entirely believe me. After all, why would the Military use NT computers for mission critical applications? Then about a month later, the story of the USS Blueridge hit the presses. I was vindicated! :-) Too bad the Blueridge didn't fail. It might have given the Admirals the idea that NT computers were a bad idea for naval warfare. Instead they had to go and refit an entire ship (the Yorktown) that later had to be towed back to port.

    With any luck, they've learned enough that the USS Ronald Regan won't be suffering systems failures anytime soon.

  28. Re:Corvette by dubious9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah I was expecting something bigger ("biggest fibreglass boat!"), but I guess they don't need anything too huge.

    Anybody who wants to see a another good article about the ship, with lots of pictures, try, here.

    --
    Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
  29. Re:building materials by drexelmike · · Score: 5, Informative

    Emergency repair isn't an impossible situation to handle. There are plenty of epoxy resin systems that have short (15min) cure times. While I can't imagine that they'd have time to properly vacuum bag it in an emergency, it's not the end of the world if a patch is a bit resin-rich. A simpler and more likly alternative is the use of a room temprature curing pre-preg patch. While it would require refrigerated storage, it's a simple peel and stick solution. These are commonly used in auto racing marketed under the "RhinoPatch" brand name. they gel in 30 seconds and cure in under a minute.

  30. Booze cruise... by isaac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stealth is a waste of money for the Swedish Navy anyhow; it seems this ship's mission, like all other seagoing Swedish vessels, is to sail back and forth between Stockholm and Helsinki in order to give Swedish people a place to buy cheaper booze than System Bolaget.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.