Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Carbon-Fiber Stealth Ship Runs NT

tiled_rainbows writes "The Guardian has an article today about the Swedish navy's new stealth warship, which they claim is the largest carbon-fiber vessel ever built. Slashdotters will be interested to learn that the ship runs Windows NT. The article says 'While the point-and-click system is popular with conscripts, the ship was fitted with a wooden ship's wheel at the insistence of senior officers. If Windows goes down, they will still be able to steer.' Which raises the question: where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer?"

126 of 526 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by trp642 · · Score: 5, Funny

    US Navy develops new Sasser Torpedo to protect us from Swedish terrorists. Bush feels they are hiding WMD's. Swedish Chef is quoted as saying "We no heeden dur Weaponden den Massen destructnueden. bork! bork! bork!".

    1. Re:In other news... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only if they've got wifi receivers.

      Any known way of externally communicating with that box is a risk, though. Otherwise it's like an isolated network staffed with trusted personell.

    2. Re:In other news... by MrTaz65 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh come on, that was beautiful swedish chef and you know it. You're just jealous.

  2. I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize you were being cutesy, but making a USB ships wheel sounds about like a one-weekend take-it-apart-and-put-it-together project, starting with a shaft-encoded driving-game controller.

    The hardest part would surely be building the binnacle.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Dav3K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like hell, you say. Show me one shaft-encoded driving game controller that comes anywhere near the size or strength this would have to be to support the wheel. I agree with you in that the technical principles would be identical, but the scale here would require things to be built on a much larger (read: heavy duty) scale and out of much stronger materials. (substitute plastic with metals)

    2. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, the sensor doesn't need to support the wheel :-)

      Skipping the driving controller, you might do better to dismantle a $2.99 optomechanical USB mouse for its optical sensor and USB interface.

    3. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by YankeeInExile · · Score: 2

      who ever said anything about supporting the wheel on the shaft encoder? The idea I had, upon first reading the article was something like this: Picture of wheel

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    4. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by fsck! · · Score: 4, Informative

      And then there's the issue that NT doesn't even support USB.

    5. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope it works better than that single dial thingy that BMW has.

      "I said thirty degrees port, not turn on the music!"

    6. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by AnyoneEB · · Score: 2, Funny

      It doesn't? I'm running Windows NT v5.1.2600 and it supports my USB devices fine, as does Windows NT v5.0. I've never used a machine running Windows NT v4 or lower, so I do not know anything about its USB support.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    7. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by fsck! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't "NT 5.1.x" more commonly known as Windows XP? I know that "ver" under Windows 2000 reports 5.00.2195. When people talk about what "NT" supports, they usually mean "NT 4.0" or in rare occasions, "NT 3.51."

  3. USB? Hazza! by Ckwop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer

    I doubt it's USB since NT4 doesn't support USB.. :P Probably PS2 or a Serial connector :)

    Simon

    1. Re:USB? Hazza! by krymsin01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really doubt it's anything like that, since they wanted it to be able to steer in case windows went down. As for where you could get something like that, I'm sure you could put some sort of tracking pattern on the axle of the wheel, then mount a USB optical mouse in a fixed position to track it. Viola.

      --
      stuff
    2. Re:USB? Hazza! by jwhyche · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tradition. If anything navy's love is tradition. I'm willing to be that had a lot to do with the decition to use a wooden wheel.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:USB? Hazza! by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      Reminds me of the old Winston Churchill quote:
      "Traditions! What traditions? Rum, sodomy and the lash!"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:USB? Hazza! by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More likely the wheel is physically linked the steering gear train. The operation would be kind of like the player pianos with moving keys. If someone chose to revert to manual there would not be a reliance on the computer for steering.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    5. Re:USB? Hazza! by Throtex · · Score: 5, Funny

      All Winston Churchill quotes are 'old'. I'd surely be impressed if he were making any new ones.

    6. Re:USB? Hazza! by fizban · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or as they're saying today:
      "Traditions! What traditions? Rumsfeld, sodomy and the lash"

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    7. Re:USB? Hazza! by calags · · Score: 2, Funny

      And no cannibalism.

      "There is no cannibalism in the British Navy, absolutely none, and when I say none, I mean there is a certain amount."

      --
      Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
  4. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    THe bluescreen sunk my battleship!

    1. Re:BSOD by JHawk24821 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ships are gray because they are meant to blend in with the skyline, not the water's surface (in response to the post above, saying blue was a good color). Subs using periscopes would spot a blue boat against a grayish sky in a second.

  5. Stealth? NT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not very stealthy.. all those loud bleeps every time they reboot each hour.

  6. Movie idea by BorgDrone · · Score: 5, Funny

    This gives me a great idea for a movie: "Speed 3: Dead in the water".

    1. Re:Movie idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You joke, but the USS Yorktown didn't think it was so funny. :-P

    2. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      But the Yorktown went down due to expirimental software they were screwing with, ie; it was the userland stuff that THEY WROTE that crashed. They were testing some new code, and it didnt work. Read your own link, as biased as Wired is they can't hide that fact.

      "The Smart Ship program is still in development, and officials said glitches are to be expected, but in this case the problem appeared to be more political than technical. Using Microsoft's Windows NT operating system in such a critical environment, some engineers said, was a bad move."

      See, shit like that is stretching to blame someone else, common practice in government contracts. But MSFT didn't write the "Smart Ship" program. Who are the "some engineers"? I bet "some other engineers" said it probably didn't matter what OS was running.

      The rest of the article tries to go into the awesomeness of unix, as though it would have made everything magically OK, but the problem is clearly defined here:

      "They rushed this stuff on the ship, there was no real prototype, and then they tried to make things work as they went along"

      Thats a simple recipe for disaster no matter what OS you choose.

      Of course, this is slashdot so its got to be MSFT's fault.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Movie idea by larkost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The issue was that they divided by 0, and the resultant crash bubbled up and crashed the os on a network controller, in turn taking a whole group of systems down with it. While the proprietary systems triggered the crash, it should not have gone so far, so the OS does bear some responsibility.

      This should never have been run on a non-real-time operating system. So not NT, not Linux, not MacOS, etc...

    4. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They must have divided by 0 in kernel space to bomb the OS.

      NT get chosen for stuff like this because it's easier for them to support special hardware by writing and maintaining drivers, not a particular monolithic kernel that slashbots would recommend.

      Frankly, who cares. This would be a story about some really cool tech (an enormous, "invisible" boat) but instead its an OS flamewar.

      Bah, slashdot isn't a "news for nerds" or a "geek" site anymore, it's just a soapbox for OSS philosophy.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Movie idea by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ask the CSX Railroad company how smart they think they are for using Windows for their signal system? Yes, the same signal system that was off-line for 1/2 a day because a MS virus/worm took the MS Windows-based system down.

      I've not read the full details of the big blackout in the NE a year or two ago but so far, I've not seen anything that says that the MSBlast worm did not bring it's LAN to it's knees and cause this. They do say that the monitoring systems message queues were backing up and caused that software to crash. That looks secondary to me since they've not said why it's messaging queues were backing up...

      Microsoft is a marketing company first and foremost and so their OS design is forced to follow that line of thinking. Use of their OS's in mission critical situations is the dumbest thing anybody can do IMHO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    6. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 2

      no, I'm old here.

      Once upon a time this article would have been about stealth technology on the high seas, going into tangents about the Philidelphia project and stuff.

      Now it's "who cares about the tech, MS is teh gheyer than aidz olllolol!"

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  7. Wooden Steering Handle Protocol Mismatch by Colourspace · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you'll find that the next M$ version of the wooden ship steering wheel will actually require FireWire bandwidth to run...

  8. The stealth effect is kind of ruined by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    The stealth effect is kind of ruined, however, when this Swedish ship tries to sneak through the fog at night, but the cook is happily cooking tomorrow's pastries exclaiming "Bork Bork Bork!", which echoes over the waves.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  9. Sinking squared by SilverGiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who knew--a ship that could crash twice.

    1. Re:Sinking squared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The question is, do the rats get back on board once it has been rebooted?

    2. Re:Sinking squared by pottymouth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless they try to print to a network printer that's not available. That very thing caused my currently patched XP Pro box to blue screen in a repeatable way (which is supposed to be impossible). I've had a similar problem printing a PDF (on an available network printer) with Windows 2000.

      Not exactly the type of thing that we want taking a war ship down....

      Besides, Penguins and water go together!!

    3. Re:Sinking squared by Foolhardy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you so sure it is Windows's fault, and not some crappy printer drivers? Which printer are you using?

  10. DaVinci Virus by z0ink · · Score: 2, Funny

    We require 20 million dollars or we will sink a series of oil ships .....

    --
    Steal This Sig
  11. Corvette by thedillybar · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to http://www.theta.com/csla/glossary.html:

    Corvette: A small, fast warship with light armament often used for anti-submarine warfare.

    1. Re:Corvette by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed the other definition: A $60,000 fiberglass and aluminium penis extension that gets 8 miles to the gallon.

    2. Re:Corvette by op00to · · Score: 2, Informative

      $60k? Try $44k, corvettes aren't that expensive. Even fully decked out, you're only talking $53k or so.

    3. Re:Corvette by dubious9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah I was expecting something bigger ("biggest fibreglass boat!"), but I guess they don't need anything too huge.

      Anybody who wants to see a another good article about the ship, with lots of pictures, try, here.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    4. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      someone woke up with their mullet in a twist this morning...

    5. Re:Corvette by orcrist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article also said this corvette would be used for anti-submarine warfare - last I checked, subs use sonar, and are very rarely on the surface in a position to use radar.

      Well I have to admit I didn't read this article so I don't know if the article talks about what kind of stealth technology the ship has, but I did serve as a Sub Sonar Tech in the U.S. Navy in the early 90's so I can answer the part about what good it might do.

      As you said, subs use almost exclusively sonar to find and track other ships, surface or otherwise. However what they use is passive sonar meaning there are 2 methods for being stealthy.

      1. The best way is not to be heard, usually by being very very quiet, though this is combined with tactical use of so-called 'layers' where there are sharp differences in the speed of sound caused by temperature and pressure differences. This will refract (bend) the sound waves and if the difference is extreme enough it will even reflect them (this is similar to the effect that causes a windows to reflect some of the light). That's what subs attempt to do, and it's not really an option for surface ships since the aforementioned layers tend to bend sound downwards such that it favors the subs:

      Your typical graph of speed of sound (SoS) vs. depth looks something like this:

      /
      /
      /
      /
      /
      \
      \

      Sound (or any wave for that matter) will bend 'towards' the slower speed (Sonar Techs say 'sound is lazy'). Initially the temperature gradient causes the SoS to follow a corresponding gradient (colder is slower, IIRC 1.8 feet/sec. per 1 degree F difference), and at some point (depending on the temperature conditions) the temperature gradient levels off and pressure becomes the deciding factor (higher pressure is faster). This can even cause the sound to be 'funneled' over great distances as if it were in a tube.
      The other factor favoring subs here is that propeller noise (through cavitation) is much easier to prevent in higher pressure water, i.e. deep water.

      2. The second method is to disguise your sound, for example by making the sound coming from the ship sound more like a rain squall. There are many many sounds in the ocean, and rain is a pretty easy sound to emulate. We once almost got run over by a friendly ship because of this. They couldn't hear us and and we thought it was rain!!

      Hmmm.... I spent a bit too long on this post, gotta get back to work :-( Hope it helped.

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  12. BSOD by PhuckH34D · · Score: 5, Funny
    well... blue is an excellent camouflage color on the water...

    --
    You're old school? I beta tested the motherf***ing abacus!
  13. Support ? by Alcoyotl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIRC, Microsoft was bound to stop support on windows NT 4. Are there any kind of provisions for systems such as this, which is going to be in service for quite some time? Or will the Swedish Navy be on its own if some glitch appears ?
    I know that using an old an proven operation system is better because all major bugs have been either wiped out or referenced, still I'm not sure that using a closed source unsupported OS is the smartest way. But maybe they know better ?

    1. Re:Support ? by lseltzer · · Score: 4, Informative
      See Retiring Windows NT Server 4.0: Changes in Product Availability and Support:
      • January 1, 2004 - Beginning on this date, non-security hotfixes are no longer available.


      • January 1, 2005 - Beginning on this date, Pay-per-incident and Premier support will no longer be available. This includes security hotfixes.

        January 1, 2005
        (or later) - Online support will no longer be available
    2. Re:Support ? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd imagine that if yo wave enough money at the right person at Microsoft, you'd buy yourself as much support for whatever product of theirs as you liked.

      I can't think of a single company that wouldn't keep a dedicated team employed if paid to do so. All you have to do is cover the costs plus some profit - I can't think of a reason not to.

    3. Re:Support ? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why would an NT box that doesn't have an internet connection require security patches? a computer not connected to the internet is infinitly safer than any PC that is (including linux)

  14. Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about USB-controlled torpedo/missile tubes?

    That'll _really_ make a WinNuke.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know it's a joke, so yes, except Sweden doesn't have "nukes".

      Actually (I'm Swedish) we don't have much of an army, airforce, or navy, at all anymore..

      Not that I personally agree to spending the kind of money you do in the US, but the military situation is pretty pathetic in Sweden (although it's been a few hundred years since we were a military power by any standard).

      We can't defend our borders at all, and we probably can't wage an effective (defensive/guerilla) war on Swedish soil either (no militia to speak of, laws against owning weapons other than for hunting, etc.).

      The cuts in the military budget has been brutal, to the point I was kind of amazed that they've been able to develop this stealth vessel at all (with what money - the entire navy budget?!?).

      Without much debate, politicians have been working overtime to convert (reduce) our own military to a few special units (like this stealth corvette thing) - perhaps to be used in some large EU military force.. (Not that I know enough about it to say whether 'tis a 'Good Thing', but I've always considered self-reliance to be important, so.. I guess I think it sucks bigtime.)

      --
      668.5
    2. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Informative

      Part of it is the relative quiet in that part of the world. It's one of the reasons that, since 1991, there has been political pressure in the US to move forces from Germany to somewhere else where they'd be more useful. Any power there willing to try to build up forces for offensive operations would likely be unable to hide significant portions of it, and would thus provide time and reason for surrounding nations to match a buildup. Everyone knows it, and Europe is mostly united in its desire to aquire more money instead of more bullets, so there's little reason for anyone to go on the offensive.

      Barring a revival of the Russian bear, there's really not a lot to worry about, and besides, you've got the Finns there to sacrifice themselves for your safety (as has happened on several occasions in the past, IIRC). :)

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by lalleglad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I've always considered self-reliance to be important"

      So you think still staying out of NATO is good, too? Joining the group, kicking and screaming?

      The concept of a country is >100years too old and self reliance is a myth, ask the finns when fighting the russians (my grandfather took part there and frooze his butt off, but anyway thanks for trying), the Danish Jews when escaping the nazis and the Norwegians when receving the same guys going through Sweden from Denmark. So it isn't so simple.

      Actually, Swedish military hasn't been worth just about anything since Wasa sank.

      There is no such thing as selv reliance, and you are probably right that Sweden wouldn't be able to defend yourselves even on your own soil, but then who would want to try? Between Stockholm and Kiruna there isn't much but agriculture and some fishing, except perhaps for a good hockey team in Oernskjoeldsvik/Husum that also has a lot of forrestation (now owned by some Finns ;-)

    4. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by GoCal92 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wasn't it Eisenhower who said we really only needed one American soldier in Germany? The only real purpose of the forces in Germany was to die in the initial assault from the Soviets. They might be able to slow them down a bit, but those forces only really existed as a "trip wire" to bring the U.S. into the conflict.

      The same is true of the American forces in South Korea. There isn't nearly enough to stop the million plus army of North Korea - really, they're there to slow down the assault and die. Their deaths would require the U.S. to enter the conflict.

      If Europe is serious about maintaining a force that can ensure the sovereignty of EU nations, what they really need is heavy lift capability. Being able to get the constituent forces large enough to repel an invasion to the battlefield requires them to have an infrastructure and vehicles to move massive amounts of soldiers and equipment. He who gets there first with the most usually wins.

      NATO understands this. The major contribution from the U.S. will be heavy lift capability. I remember reading a story of how the allied commanders met with the German commanders after WWII to discuss the various battles and campaigns they were involved with. The Americans looked at the battle plan for Barbarossa, and their first question was, "Where are the trucks?" The American commanders were amazed that the Germans would plan such an attack using horse-drawn carts as a means of moving men and material.

      As it is, Europe depends mainly on the U.S. as a guarantor of their sovereignty. (I don't think the Poles will depend on the French as guarantors of their sovereignty ever again!) Aside from the use of nuclear weapons, I don't think any EU nation aside from Great Britain has sufficient armed forces on its own to ensure their own sovereignty. As has been mentioned, the need for this "guarantee" is considerably less nowadays with the dismantling of the Soviet threat.

  15. Steering by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was probably to be done by a wheel anyway. That it's made out of wood at the request of the officers is probably a nod to tradition.

  16. Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a materials scientist, but I would imagine that carbon fibre can burn. A huge advantage of steel is that it may weaken under heat stress, but it will never contribute to a fire, which is one of the gravest threats to a warship in combat.

    The British learned this lesson the hard way in the Falklands. In that case the new building material was aluminum, which can actually burn when it gets hot enough. This contributed to the loss of several ships which suffered massive fires after being hit by Argentinian aircraft. As a result, not only in the UK but in navies around the world, new naval ships are built entirely out of steel.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not actually the carbon fibres that burn it's usually the stuff that holds it together. Have if you aply enough current to a piece of carbon you can make a cool ark.

    2. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by madpoet_one · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone who worked in a carbon fiber development lab in the eighties, I will agree that carbon fiber can burn.

      But as the MSDS for carbon fiber points out:

      Flammability classification: Not classified.
      Flash Point/Method: Not known, but very high!
      Auto-Ignition Temperature: Not determined
      Flammable Limits: Lower: Not applicable
      Upper: Not applicable

      Carbon Fiber MSDS link

      --
      Remain lost in hidden worlds where I reign. Head engine and caboose in my toy train...
    3. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

      WWII demonstrated the obsolescence of your old behemoths. Take the British and German fleets from the battle of Jutland: classic dreadnoughts, immense steel battleships with incredible armour and gigantic guns. Put them on one side. Take the HMS Ark Royal, a small aircraft carrier from the modern Royal Navy. Put that on the other side. Which side wins?

      If you said anything other than Ark Royal you lose. Our good friends the Japanese demonstrated in 1941 what happens to traditional battleships when someone in an aeroplane has a go at them.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

      That's because they don't need to go in for close combat. Firing massive shells is a relic of the days when naval wars were fought with cannons. These days a carrier would strike your battleship from over 100 miles out and sink her without a single useful shot fired by the battleship. Not to mention that armor is relatively ineffective against many modern weapons that are designed to pierce armor. Thus naval warfare focuses on a different set of abilities:

      1. Ability to launch a strike from great distances.
      2. Speed to quickly enter and exit a theater of operations (U.S.S Enterprise [CVN-65] did 32 knots, non-stop, around the world!)
      3. Stealth to sneak up on a ship without getting blasted from a hundred miles away. (Subs still rule this area.)
      4. Screening ships and weapons to shoot down incoming planes.
      5. Survivability via ability to float despite massive internal damage.
      6. G.I. proofing so that no one accidentally blows up the ship from the inside. (Don't laugh, this happened several times in WWII.)

      The truth however, is that any major conflict would probably see a total loss of all seagoing vessels. They'd simply start lobbing nukes at one another until they are all destroyed or capsized.

    5. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by larkost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even better, replace that aircraft carrier with a missile cruiser and some good satellite coverage.

    6. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by HBI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your theory fails to take into account surface to air missiles.

      I'd like to see your airplanes vs. an AEGIS cruiser.

      (splash)

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    7. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by phayes · · Score: 4, Informative
      Building major combattants out of carbon fiber & epoxy may well expose these ships to fire hasards (however this will be more related to the epoxy that binds the fibers than the carbon fibers themselves. Carbon fibers burn relatively cleanly, epoxies, on the other hand put out fumes that will incapacitate & blind crewmembers that are trying to control the damage). Having carbon structural members burn through & fail is of little import if everyone is already dead due to the smoke.

      Your example of HMS Sheffield is in any case incorrect and is covered in the sci.military.navy FAQ:

      There are many misconceptions and incorrect stories regarding the use of aluminum in warship construction.

      One common story is that HMS Sheffield, a destroyer sunk during the 1982 Falkland War, was lost because her alleged aluminum superstructure made her more vulnerable to damage. This story is completely untrue, because Sheffield's superstructure was not aluminum. Like all ships of her class, her hull and superstructure were entirely steel. Aluminum played no role in her loss.

      Two Royal Navy warships lost during the Falklands War did have aluminum superstructures, and their loss is incorrectly attributed to this feature. Ardent was hit by seven 500- and 1000-pound bombs, plus at least two more bombs which failed to detonate, and sank some six hours after the attack. Any warship of her size, regardless of aluminum or steel construction, would likely be sunk by this many bombs, so aluminum cannot be blamed here. Antelope, another aluminum-superstructure ship, was struck by two bombs, which lodged in the ship but failed to explode. Later, while one of the bombs was being defused, it exploded, blowing a major hole in the hull and starting a large fire. The fire eventually reached the magazines, causing these to explode. Again, an aluminum superstructure appears to have little connection to the ship's loss, which was caused by the explosion of the bomb and the magazines.

      A related story claims the US Navy and Royal Navy abanonded aluminum superstructures, in favor of steel, as a result of the Falklands war. Since aluminum superstructures played little or no role in the Falkands losses, this story is obviously untrue. The Royal Navy's switch to steel appears to be a result of a 1977 fire in the frigate Amazon. In the US Navy, the switch from aluminum to steel superstructures was a result of the 1975 collision between the carrier John F. Kennedy and the cruiser Belknap. The collision caused major fires aboard the cruiser, and her aluminum superstructure essentially melted; she was reduced to a badly burnt hulk. This incident lead to a decision to adopt steel superstructures in the next new warship class, the Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) class destroyers. This decision had been made prior to the Falkands War.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  17. Seafoam blue by SilverGiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Captain, everything is in order; the heads-up display shows nothing but blue seas ahead."

  18. BSD by QEDog · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is something very appropiate about a Blue Screen of Death as the possible cause of the death of sailors.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  19. Cockpits stand back...... by MrIrwin · · Score: 2, Funny
    I have seen home made racing car cockpits used with racing games, and home made airplane cockpits with flight simulators.

    Next up, homemade bridge for seafaring game, complete with a computer controlled salt water sprayer. I can't wait.......

    --

    And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

    1. Re:Cockpits stand back...... by dastrike · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      while true; do eject; eject -t; done
    2. Re:Cockpits stand back...... by C_nemo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Sea Shaddow design is not the most used stealth ship hull design. The Sea Shaddow is a ship designed for stealth in every way, not only radar as the Visby class. The design of the Sea Shaddow aims to lower its signature for both radar, wake and heat.

      Norway has also designed a stealth missile torpedo boat Skjold

      This is a surface effect ship, and you will have no problems spotting it on IR or seeing its wake. But you will have a *very* hard time seeing it on radar at all.

      As for submarine sims, Silent hunter II aws released 2-3 years ago. You can play it in multiplayer with Destroyer Command. Play the hunter or the hunted.

  20. I want one by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first thing I'd do is wipe it and install Linux.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Dammit, we need supplies! Shore is only 5 minutes away, so let's go!"

      "For some reason, it's not recognizing the control panel hardware!"

      "WTF? Well, fix it!"

      "Ok, just lemme write a patch and recompile the kernel!" ...1 week later

      "Good lord... we're lost at sea in our own waters!"

      "I'll have it up and running within 5 more hours, this time I mean it!"

  21. Re:Even better... by David+Horn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nope, it'll be bluetooth. Which means it won't work, and people will be able to steal its address book entries... ;-)

    "Ah'm sorry, Cap'n, for some reason the ship's wheel has paired itself with my mobile phone instead of the ship."

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  22. Pretty pictures ala Google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  23. They'll be easy to find by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just look for the ship running in circles in the middle of the North Sea. "Ensign Chef, I said CTRL-ALT-DELETE, now!" "Bork bork bork!"

  24. Amazing. by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amazing that a country would trust their armed forces to a piece of software made in another country.

    Of course I don't know the last time Sweden went to war but still.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  25. History by makkverk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of another swedish warship which was said to be "a floating work of art and a weapon of war". It was called Vasa. Quoting the article: "...The Vasa sank within one nautical mile of the start of her maiden voyage in 1628 before she even left the Stockholm archipelago..."

  26. Not Surprisingly by smartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shortly after they installed nt, all the rats on the ship disappeared.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  27. Fiber Dust by Giant+Panda · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that any hit is good, but imagine what will happen when this thing takes a hit of any kind or has a fire. Carbon fiber dust floats around like grain dust and the body likes it about as much as asbestos. When I was doing Fire Fighting for the US Air Force, occasionally, we would have the opportunity to cut into / chop up an F-16 that had made a "critical navigational error" and it was always respirator only work because of fiber dust.

  28. Pictures and more info by Metatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can be found here.

  29. Stealth ship, my ass by leomekenkamp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stealth ship, my ass. I'll believe it when I see it.

    Oh, wait...

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  30. Pictures of Visby by bjornhi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The boat is named Visby and pics of it can be found here and here /Björn

  31. Hope they do better than the US Navy did with NT by bingbong · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in May 1997, the US fitted the USS YORKTOWN (http://www.yorktown.navy.mil/ ) with NT and it had disastrous results (http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/july13/cov2. htm ) . The ship went DIW (dead in the water) for a few hours. This is the worst case scenario for any ship's captain (and their career)...

    Guess it took this long to work out the bugs... Not bad - only 7 years!

    --
    "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
  32. I can See it Now by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Excuse my lack of Nautical Terms, but you get the idea.

    Navigator: Captain, radar is picking up an iceberg 2 Nautical miles ahead, just off the port bow.

    Captain: No problem, that's plenty of time to steer clear.

    Captain clicks the navigation display on NT

    Clippy: It seems you are trying to steer, what would you like to do?

    • Steer Port
    • Steer Starboard

    Navigator: Captain, Icberg 1 mile ahead

    Captain: (showing frustration) clicks Steer Starboard

    Captain: This should handle it!

    Clippy: How many degrees starboard would you liek to steer?

    • 5
    • 10
    • 15

    Captain uttering swedish curse words, clicks 10 degrees

    Navigator Captain, Iceberg at 400 meters

    Clippy: You clicked Turn Starboard and 15 degrees, it seems you are trying to evade an Iceberg. Windows NE (Nautical Edition) has several new features, just for this.

    Clippy: Would you like to enable the "Evade Iceburg" Wizard?

    Captain: $^@#$#%*, runs up to the wooden ships wheel

    Captain: See, this is why the tried and true method works! turns the wheel

    Windows NE has detected a new device and is unable to find a driver for it.

    Captain: Aha! my son warned me about this, I have the driver right here!

    Windows NE: Windows NE has finished installing drivers for the device "Ships Wheel", in order to use this device you must restart windows. Click here to restart, or if you wish to restart later click cancel.

    Sharks: Break out the hotsauce fellas, here comes dinner

  33. Plastic is the right choice by Woogiemonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the Visby really does turn out to be more cost-efficient than a steel ship, some maritime analysts believe that it could be a matter of time before merchant vessels begin to be made from tough plastics.

    I've had a little yellow plastic duck toy that has been chewed into fervently by my pet dog for years and years, and the thing STILL stays afloat no problem. I think the Swedes are on the right track here.

  34. Problem!! by trompete · · Score: 2, Funny

    The problem with stealth ships on the sea is that they leave a blank spot on the radar where there should be echos for the waves.

  35. Structural Integrity by cexshun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd worry less about it running NT and more about it's structural integrity. They'll soon learn what many automotive enthusiates have learned. Although Carbon Fiber has it's advantages(light weight, looks cool, non-metal, etc), it also has several disadvantages. Carbon fiber tends to be very tempermental to temperature changes, and will crack easily with severe cold/heat. Also, although carbon fiber is fairly flexable, it's still brittle. It's doesn't crack when impacted, it shatters.

  36. Where did they get NT for a new install? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NT isn't a current product, how did they get a copy of it. Instead of 2003, or XP.. ?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  37. Vulnerability? by !Freeky2BGeeky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, all jokes aside on the operating system that runs this thing, I'd like to know what happens in a real battle when this thing gets hit with ordinance?

    The article states that they had to create new techniques for cutting the material during construction, but if this gets hit with a mine/torpedo/exocet, will it shatter? If not, how would they fix the leaks w/o being able to weld a new piece of steel over the hole(s) to keep it afloat until it makes it back to the shipyard?

    --

    Visualize Whirled Peas

    1. Re:Vulnerability? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 2, Funny


      Just imagine a group of very nervous looking sailors waiting while one of them is mixing up a large batch of 5-minute epoxy.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  38. Fire Control by codepunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Captain: Fire control, engage hostile target 1004 range 2000 yds with 5 inch main battery.

    Fire Control: Sir, unable to engage target 1004 the system has encountered a VB runtime error 91 object variable not set.

    Captain: Engine room ahead all full make turns for
    30 knots.

    Engine Room: Sir we keep getting a RPC failure in the gas turbine controller.

    Captain: All hands abandon ship!

    --


    Got Code?
  39. Instructions for using the forward cannon by iPaul · · Score: 4, Funny
    10.1.3Initializing the Cannon for Rapid Fire

    During combat it becomes necessary to increase your rate of fire to ensure the destruction of enemy vessels. Microsoft does not endorse the use of this software on fishing boats, pleasure craft, or walruses.

    From the Control Panel select "Forward Cannon." Right click on the cannon and select "Properties." From the "Firing Rate" tab make sure the "Fire at will" option, and click the apply button. If the ship does not begin firing type "Regedit" at the command prompt. Under "HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE" search for "Fire Control" and make sure the is a "Fire Control" entry in the registry. If necessary, load the Forward Cannon 1.3 install CD and double click the fcannon.reg file.

    Once the cannon is installed, you may choose to test-fire a round. You will be prompted with a dialog asking if the target was hit. Clicking on No will take you to a web page with possible reasons (non of which will actually apply) as to why the target was missed. Some targets are not compatible with Windows and cannot be hit with the forward Gun.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
  40. Weighs twice as much by kahei · · Score: 4, Funny


    From the article:


    And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette.


    In other words, its great weight makes it _more_ likely to avoid attacks -- perhaps by escaping downhill.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  41. The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The good: A lightweight, stealth ship. I'd love to have one. I have no need for one, but it would be cool. (I'd rather have a lightweight, stealth car, esp. if it came with a retractable 57mm cannon!) Do we have any idea how well CF will really hold up in this case, though? Both in long term maneuvers and under attack by enemy aircraft? What about barnacles? OK, the good we don't know for sure.

    The bad: Let's see, didn't the US Navy already experience a problem with an NT4-based ship being dead in the water? And a dead ship can't maneuver. If there are other ships around, that's not a good time to be invisible. (Captain of aircraft carrier: "What was that crunchy sound?")

    The ugly (editing): "And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette." Presumably they meant half as heavy!

  42. the French have already got a stealth one by dario_moreno · · Score: 2, Funny

    It might be the one pointed out by the Guinness book cited in the article, hence the various James Bond jokes as well as the Taiwan interest ; indeed, the french stealth frigate appears at the beginning of the last (or before-last) 007 movie, and it was sold to Taiwan by Thomoson , giving rise to a huge financial crisis. The frigate is however not made of carbon.

    I hope the frigate has a lower radar signature than a 1970s Volvo...

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  43. building materials by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People have been building boats from fibreglass for a long time. There is no difference between working with CF and working with fibreglass - it's just that CF is stronger and more expensive (and thus more difficult to cut).

    Also, if you use the technique the Sweedes used (sandwich expandable foam between two CF layers), the hull is alot more buoyant than a steel hull - which means you can change the shape (within reason) to a more stealthy version.

    Modification would be a bitch though! If you want to weld a new bracket to a steel hull it takes 5min from the inside or a few hours to do externally. If you try the same thing on a CF hull, it takes a few hours (12?) for the CF resin to go off. Forget trying to modify the exterior hull without a drydock. Also, in the event of wartime damage repairs you can weld a new plate over the hull and have it watertight and you are good to go. No chance with CF - it needs a completely dry environment (assuming you even have enough raw CF & resin in the first place - you can't just reuse old sections)

    1. Re:building materials by drexelmike · · Score: 5, Informative

      Emergency repair isn't an impossible situation to handle. There are plenty of epoxy resin systems that have short (15min) cure times. While I can't imagine that they'd have time to properly vacuum bag it in an emergency, it's not the end of the world if a patch is a bit resin-rich. A simpler and more likly alternative is the use of a room temprature curing pre-preg patch. While it would require refrigerated storage, it's a simple peel and stick solution. These are commonly used in auto racing marketed under the "RhinoPatch" brand name. they gel in 30 seconds and cure in under a minute.

  44. this is good planning by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Funny

    since they know NT will crash, they have already planned ahead. good job. now, send us your bikini team.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  45. obvious question by ajrs · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it have minesweeper?

  46. Re:It Can't be steel by dustmote · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a mine sweeper. I'm sure there's a joke here somewhere..


    I know I'm going to karma hell for this joke, but....

    In Soviet Russia(socialist Sweden?), Minesweeper runs Windows!

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
  47. No one has asked this so i will... by kzeddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why do the swedes need a stealthy warship?
    I think they will make a play for their empire

  48. question by Johnny5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know anything about this, which is why I ask...

    I RTFA and it mentions being less visible to radar, infrared, etc but says nothing about sonar detection. Isn't sonar a big way of tracking warships? Is this still going to be vulnerable to that?

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  49. I doubt it will be NT for long. by -cman- · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to what little info is avialable from Janes The ship is one of two which were initially ordered in 1995. Military procurement being what it is, no matter where you go, the ships were probably designed with NT in mind, circa '95. However, I doubt NT will last longer than the first refit or post-sea trials.

    The US and UK navies are both experimenting with a number of computer-control options ranging from MS solutions, to various *nixen. Of course there is the now aporcyphal story of the NT crash that put the USS Yorktown dead in the water. Short answer, it may have been built on the NT platform, but lots of replacement systems exist now and I doubt NT will survive long enough for the ship to enter the active list.

    --
    "Being Irish, he possessed an abiding sense of tragedy which sustained him through brief episodes of joy." -W. B.
  50. And of course, Clippy is included! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, I noticed you're attempting to open fire. Would you like to:

    A: Declare war!
    B: Send a bouquet of flowers?
    C: Trigger the ship's self destruct?
    D: Open the e-mail attachment titled "HotPix.pif"?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  51. Sigh... English.... by Quixote · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article:
    And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette.

    So.... is it twice as heavy as a conventional corvette?

  52. New meaning for old phrases... by aminorex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Military use of Windows NT will likely bring new meaning to the old phrase "blue screen of death".

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  53. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by science_gone_bad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a signature that I used for a while for this very ship:

    In days long gone, the captain used to go down with his ship. Now that Windows NT is running Navy warships, the ships go down all by themselves.

    --
    "I never get lost because everybody tells me where to go"
  54. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in May 1997, the US fitted the USS YORKTOWN (http://www.yorktown.navy.mil/ ) with NT and it had disastrous results (http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/july13/cov2. htm ) . The ship went DIW (dead in the water) for a few hours. This is the worst case scenario for any ship's captain (and their career)...

    Funnily enough, both the commanding office and the officer in charge of that project went on the record to state that the problem was not with NT.

    How many OS crashes do you know which can be fixed by - and I quote - "replacing the value in one of the fields with something other than zero"?

    If the OS had crashed, you would not be able to replace the value in the field.

    God you slashdot guys are sheep. Don't you ever check the veracity of the crap that you spread?

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  55. Re:IMO Hardly News by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember getting an interesting tech support call back in 1998. A naval officer was attempting to get Windows NT Server running and was wondering if we could help. (We were business support and her husband worked for our business.) Apparently all of her regular outlets for support were shut down for the weekend (or maybe it was a holiday, I don't remember) and she needed to get the computers running on time for the deadline. We didn't support NT Server, so I really couldn't help her.

    When I passed the story on to coworkers, they didn't entirely believe me. After all, why would the Military use NT computers for mission critical applications? Then about a month later, the story of the USS Blueridge hit the presses. I was vindicated! :-) Too bad the Blueridge didn't fail. It might have given the Admirals the idea that NT computers were a bad idea for naval warfare. Instead they had to go and refit an entire ship (the Yorktown) that later had to be towed back to port.

    With any luck, they've learned enough that the USS Ronald Regan won't be suffering systems failures anytime soon.

  56. Re:Viola? Celllooo. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Voilà!

    --
    Here we go again!
  57. True stealth... by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...by stench.

    If you really want to keep people away from it, run NT 3.51.

  58. Drop out. by Stumbles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apparently the Swedes did not learn from the US Navy's experience of using NT to run the ship. Not a good thing to be dead in the water because a computer crashed. IIRC, in Microsoft's EULA it specifically says not for use in critical systems.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  59. Booze cruise... by isaac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stealth is a waste of money for the Swedish Navy anyhow; it seems this ship's mission, like all other seagoing Swedish vessels, is to sail back and forth between Stockholm and Helsinki in order to give Swedish people a place to buy cheaper booze than System Bolaget.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    1. Re:Booze cruise... by Mictian · · Score: 2, Informative

      While the comment is funny, it doesn't have much to do with reality. The reason there are so many passenger ferries sailing between Stockholm and Helsinki is the tax-free shopping. You get the cheap booze from the ship, not from ashore.

      Helsinki actually has (and has traditionally had in the past) higher alcohol prices than Stockholm. Very few people in their right minds would travel from Stockholm to Helsinki to buy booze from Helsinki, instead they buy it tax-free from the ship.

      The whole tax-free status of the ferries will be removed within 5 years (or sooner, I can't recall the specifics) due to EU regulations, unless I'm mistaken. And that is why the ferries currently do a very brief visit at the Åland island (to sustain the status until the transition period expires).

      Another relating matter is the recent lowering of the alcohol tax and thus prices in Finland. Which was (and had to be) done because Estonia joined the European Union at the beginning of May.

      Estonia's capital Tallinn offers alcohol at a fraction compared to the prices in Helsinki, and with a lot of boats and ferries going between the cities daily (there must be one leaving about every 15 minutes), "alcohol turism" would have skyrocketed unless they had cut alcohol taxes. It'll still probably increase substantially, it's just too early to get actual statistics yet..

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure of the former" - Albert Einstein
  60. Re:IMO Hardly News by wayward_son · · Score: 2, Funny
    With any luck, they've learned enough that the USS Ronald Regan won't be suffering systems failures anytime soon.


    It should be fine, as long as the memory stays good.

  61. Which side wins? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Put them on one side. Take the HMS Ark Royal, a small aircraft carrier from the modern Royal Navy. Put that on the other side. Which side wins?

    The German in the Type XXI submarine packing active and passive SONAR, accoustic and wireguided torpedoes with power assisted loading, a truely effective whisper mode that defeats allied passive sonar and accoustic torpedoes and the capability to remain submerged for days on end? The Royal Navy got a very rude shock when they finally got their hands on one of them. Thankfully these boats came to late but they are the early ancestors of modern subs.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  62. 9LVMK3E - id est the NT4 box in the ship by priich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The combat managment system here,9LV Mark3E from celsiustech/saabtech, is already in common use. I think they have sold some 50 systems to like 8 or 9 countries and i haven't heard of bluescreen issues yet. Here's a link (in english) to the product. 9LVMK3E

  63. Not a real-time OS by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It makes me sick to see how often fools, imbeciles and idiots attempt to use an OS which has no real-time capability whatsoever to do real-time work.

    NT is known for freezing for periods of up to 10 seconds (maybe more?) at random intervals, quite probably while it defrags the mess it has got its memory into. The same problem happens with Win2000 and I have also seen longish freezes in XP. Controlling a ship, or anything lese for that matter, needs hard real time.

    Not only that, in most countries, evidently not Sweden, the software would have to be capable of validation and verification to a suitable standard, that can of course only be accomplished if you have source. The currently fashionable standard assigns criticality levels Sil1 to SIL4, now NT can't even meet SIL1 (SIL4 is the highest, mandatory in life-threatening situations). Previously, lots of people followed the aircraft industry in assigning levels 1,2,3,4 or A,B,C and D (in these cases 1 or A was required in potentially life-threatening cases). An extra level, Z, was introduced, guess why?

    I once upon a time thought that the Swedes were generally competent, however with the JAS39 Grippen, and now this, I think that their defence industry has become a complete joke. I could tell you about their SAAB civil aircraft, fortunately they are out of production now.....

  64. how is it possible by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

    how is it possible for something that broadcasts NBT all of the place to be considered "stealth"? :P

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  65. God help us all... by Honkytonkwomen · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....if this ever becomes a remotely controlled "spam zombie".

  66. Another group that didn't read the EULA by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    7. note on java support. the software product may contain support for programs written in java. java technology is not fault tolerant and is not designed, manufactured, or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, such
    as in the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control, direct life support machines, or weapons systems, in which the failure of java technology could lead directly to death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage.

    Interesting that they pawn this all off on Java and not anything having to do with Microsoft.

  67. Re:IMO Hardly News by four12 · · Score: 2, Funny
    anyone can call MS 24x7 and speak to a support engineer

    MS: Microsoft Technical Support, how may I help you?

    Navy: This is the USS Ronald Reagan, we've had a critical malfunction in our navigation systems. It says something about "0X0000A000AB" or something... we need help!

    MS: OK, we'll need a PO or credit card to charge the call to.

    Navy: Umm. It's after hours and there's nobody who can cut a PO?

    MS: Can you use a credit card?

    Navy: Mine are maxed out, and the OOD just finished filing for banruptcy after a nasty divorce, so his credit is screwed.

    MS: Thanks for calling Microsoft, have a good day! [click]

  68. Let's hope it never goes into combat ... by dougmc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Carbon fiber is indeed really really strong, but it's a serious bitch to repair. A shell that hit the ship would make a nice big hole (carbon fiber is pretty brittle -- I wonder if they've got a kevlar shell outside of it, or would that mess with the radar signature?) of splintery mess.

    I guess rather than welding it they'd be using epoxy to repair? At least that's what we do with R/C planes that use carbon fiber (well, usually you replace the carbon fiber completely when it breaks -- not an option for a ship made of it.)

    1. Re:Let's hope it never goes into combat ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess rather than welding it they'd be using epoxy to repair? At least that's what we do with R/C planes that use carbon fiber (well, usually you replace the carbon fiber completely when it breaks -- not an option for a ship made of it.)

      Maybe they use individual plates that can be replaced one at a time.

      Emergency repairs would be a bitch, though.

  69. Good Trade by Wasuremon0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Sweden,

    After a lot of careful consideration, we, the people of the United States of America have decided to propose a collaboration of sorts.
    For every swedish woman we are sent in good health and of legal age we will send one well-trained High School computer dork to assist with your new warfare projects. Our computer nerds are by far the most experienced in dealing with BSODs and downloading new drivers for your ships. They are also content with being paid in meatballs, as it is rumored that yours are of top quality. Send all inquiries as to where to send women to Wasuremon0.

    We look forward to making the world a better place with you,
    -The USA

  70. ip address by r4d1x · · Score: 2, Funny

    i gotta find the ip to this thing. wonder if they have AV installed or if i could slip BO2K or netbus in. that would be 1 hell of a remote control boat.

  71. OK, enough jabs at NT by lgordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NT is one of the only operating systems the FDA approves for class 2 (and higher, I think) medical devices. It's funny to say Windows NT bombs out all the time, but that's mostly because of driver issues. The fact remains that for embedded/turnkey applications, NT is about as stable an OS as you can get. It got that job by replacing OS/2 (in ATM software, etc) not by replacing a UNIX platform.

    Mod me down if you want, but you know it'd be abusive, and this is totally on-topic.

  72. Re:IMO Hardly News by g-san · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the topic of tech support calls, I got a call from a ship in the IT-21 project. While we were going through the standard, "what's the IP address of ..." I got a reply I didn't expect:

    Me: Ok, now whats the loopback IP address on the other end?
    Navy Dude: Uh, that's classified.

    There was one guy in our group that had the proper security clearances to work in both the classified and non classifed networks. I know of at least two multi-week trips he got to take on an aircraft carrier. Talk about actually wanting to go on-site for a change!

    And I doubt that the wooden ship wheel is USB, NT doesn't support USB.

  73. It can't be that stealthy ... by muck1969 · · Score: 2, Funny

    with Windows NT's swap file usage.

    And another thing, does that mean they now require admin rights to access advanced features of the ship ... or do they just use it in safe mode all the time?

    --
    m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif