Slashdot Mirror


No Call List Bypassed Using Call Centers in India?

lollipop17 asks: "My husband and I recently bought a house, and so our three months on the do not call list before we can file complaints is not quite over. We only have one business thus far that has called soliciting anything, but here's the catch: it's always a recording, and when I finally got through on the number they provided, 800-513-4524, the reps that answer are in India and have no idea what's going on other than they have a contract with an American company to take sales orders. The girl on the recording mumbles the business name, which seems to be 'All Digital Satellite,' which I could not locate via Google as it's so generic. Given the recent story about spam faxes, and solicitations overseas, do you think this is the future of telemarketing (the offshore location anyway)? Has anyone successfully filed a complaint with the FTC for violation of the do not call registry (for I am sure they will call again after our three months is over, they call at least twice a week)? Does anyone have ideas for tracking them down (i.e. local phone number or stateside address)? The message even seems fraudulent, but I cannot file a complaint with the better business bureau without local phone or address. Any ideas?"

94 comments

  1. Phone spam by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    That sounds like phone spam.. Illegal, arrives in garbled format, and from some shady scam outfit that does not want to identify itself.

    Reminds of the few times I have received spam advertising products that took the "cover up" aspect too far: the return address was fake, the name of the product was not in the e-mail, and there was no link or phone # or any way for me to contact them if hell had frozen over and I actually did want to buy their product.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Phone spam by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are the "telezapper" products that may help, but they are kinda lame. I use a linux-based asterisk phone system. If your caller ID is not on the (mysql based) white list, you need to navigate the menu. Numbers I dial are automatically added to the white list, and I also have a web-based management tool for it.

      There is also a Telemarketer Torture script for asterisk someone came up with... :-)

    2. Re:Phone spam by jo42 · · Score: 1

      I get phone spam on my Canadian cell phone from a company in the US trying to sell me US-based services/products. Idijts!

  2. Robert Kirkpatrick by Jane_the_Great · · Score: 4, Informative

    I found this PDF press release that mentions a Robert Kirkpatrick at All Digital Satellite. Perhaps you can contact those responsible for this site to clue you in as to how you can get in touch with Mr. Kirkpatrick. Here's a link to the actual PDF file at the Winegard company's website.

    --
    THIS ACCOUNT IS OFFICIALLY RETIRED/RETARDED.
    1. Re:Robert Kirkpatrick by nocomment · · Score: 1

      I found this list of expired names as of Mar 10 2004 (it appears from the URL. Perhaps this company is folding or didn't want the name? Or it could be completely unrelated.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  3. This means .... war! by Leffe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Couldn't you consider this an attack on America and use it as an excuse to invade India :)?

    1. Re:This means .... war! by WarPresident · · Score: 5, Funny

      Couldn't you consider this an attack on America and use it as an excuse to invade India :)?

      Never pick a fight with a country that believes in reincarnation and has nuclear weapons.

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    2. Re:This means .... war! by addaon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If everyone left off the last eight words of that comment (or perhaps the last eleven), the world would be a better place.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    3. Re:This means .... war! by Saiai+Hakutyoutani · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Are you sure the fatalities in Iraq are only 750? I've been led to believe it was closed to 10 000.

    4. Re:This means .... war! by papercut2a · · Score: 0

      Cool, maybe I can get my job back afterwards.

      Naahhhh, it'll probably just move to Hungary.

      :-(
    5. Re:This means .... war! by papercut2a · · Score: 0
      More than 750 dead, thousands maimed or wounded.

      There are years in which more people die at soccer matches than did during the Iraq invasion.

      http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/africa/05/09/soccer. chronology/

      http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/stadium.deaths/

    6. Re:This means .... war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? Only American deaths have merit. At least to Americans. Besides, the real dead/injured count wouldn't fit in the space available.

    7. Re:This means .... war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over 10 times more people are killed in car accidents every year than died in the WTC. Where is the preemptive strike against GM/Ford/Honda/Toyota/etc? The true Axis of Evil!

    8. Re:This means .... war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      truly, they have Axes of Evil ...

    9. Re:This means .... war! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      YOu know what, there are people murdered all over the world every day, just random acts of violence, DO YOU CARE??? how about those pages of Obituaries?? DO YOU CARE???

      Unless they are your friends or relatives, you likely don't. Ditto for deaths in Iraq. 5000 or 50000, the average American or Brit or Pole or Turk doesn't care unless they are Americans or Brits or Poles or Turks.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    10. Re:This means .... war! by papercut2a · · Score: 0

      truly, they have Axes of Evil ...

      You mean Axles of Evil.

  4. phone bills by rooskie · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd imagine if you kept them on the line long enough the overseas phone bill would add up on their end.

    1. Re:phone bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason they ship this stuff to India in the first place is that overseas phone rates have plummeted. Tying up their phone reps is minimally expensive, and it would require vast participation in this scheme to even make a dent.

      If you really want to fuck up their finances, order whatever they're selling, then cancel it when it fails to meet your expectations. If they don't refund your money, reverse the charges. After just a few of those, their merchant account will get revoked.

  5. They can use VOIP by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "I'd imagine if you kept them on the line long enough the overseas phone bill would add up on their end"

    I thought of this too, but these scammers could probably use some sort of VOIP thing to get their voices from India into the US phone system without long distance charges.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:They can use VOIP by jmt9581 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I thought of this too, but these scammers could probably use some sort of VOIP thing to get their voices from India into the US phone system without long distance charges.

      That's a good point, but you're not just tying up the phone lines: you're tying up the telemarketer as well. Say something like "Hold on a second while I go get my wallet." Then put the phone down and walk away for half an hour or so.

      --

      My blog

    2. Re:They can use VOIP by GeekyGurkha · · Score: 1

      But surely if they're using VOIP to get the call into the US; then the call, once on the telephone system, has to be originating in the US (putting it onto the telephone system anywhere else would defeat the object of trying to avoid international call charges), and would come under the US do-not-call list?

      --
      Hey! What pretty widgets?
  6. Wonder if it's the same people who've called me by Kraken137 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been on my state's do-not-call list for 2 years now, and I'm on the federal one as well now, but I've had 3 recordings left on my answering machine. They're all offers for satellite TV hookups, go on for quite some time, and only leave a number.

    "Again, I can hook up all the TVs in your house with satellite for $XX a month."

  7. Any idea if they are using VoIP? by xmas2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    While it seems the cost of using "classic" analog phone lines would make doing this type of soliciting cost prohibitive, I wonder if they are using VoIP to make the call, and therefore dramatically reducing their costs, thereby making it cost effective and also being outside the US/FCC control ... mostly.

    I agree with another poster that ultimatelly these guys want to sell you something, and it is that company that should (also!) get busted big-time. These guys are in the same sewer as Email spammers - too bad we can't just have the Hulk drop on 'em! ;-)

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Any idea if they are using VoIP? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are only outside US control if:
      a) The company located outside the US
      b) The call center is outside the US
      and
      c) The company's bank is outside the US

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Any idea if they are using VoIP? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      And the company has no operations in the USA. I know of a company here in Israel that is a call center for the USA (customer service for long distance). Its a seperate company from the parent company. But they still have some sort of US presence.

      Actually my flat-mate and a number of other folks I know work there.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  8. When I recieve these calls by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

    They usually mispronounce my name (for those of you who know me well, you'll be able to descramble it) and I can usually say with complete honesty that there is no Chiodoor Sadder at this location.

    But it's definately a get-around of the do not call list- which I've been on since July 2003 (three months *before* the law went into effect). The only other telemarketing calls I recieve are political campaigns and charitable "surveys".

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  9. more power to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they keep calling you too. Marxism, like nazism, is an ugly and inhuman ideology that always results in horrific atrocities when implemented.

    1. Re:more power to them by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

      Not neccessarily- depends on if you follow the decentralized model or the centralized model. Centralized models of just about anything are ugly and inhuman and result in horrific atrocities- just look at the Corporatist atrocities being commited by the United States in Iraq over the last year. That's what centralization of power will get you.

      Obligatory slogan: Democracy without socialism is oppression- socialism without democracy is SLAVERY.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:more power to them by E_elven · · Score: 0

      Good stuff. I must say, though, that while seminal, marxism is hopelessly outdated, mainly in its support for modern governmental issues and global economy. I support a fully labour-trade based economy.

      It's astounding how often people relate marxism (or communism) with dictatorship. Marxism is not exactly a form of government, in the same way capitalism isn't, but both are tied tightly to and provide parts of the governing process. A working marxist model /requires/ democracy in order to function. This of course also means that marxism cannot be forced on a people, because this is likely to cause abuse of the system. This sort of an economy/government needs to be willed by the people.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    3. Re:more power to them by papercut2a · · Score: 0
      depends on if you follow the decentralized model or the centralized model. Centralized models of just about anything are ugly and inhuman and result in horrific atrocities

      And a decentralized model in which people are forced to work in order to support someone else is some sort of significant improvement? At least the "centralized" models of socialism don't use a a veneer of public relations to hide what they do to people.

      Democracy without socialism is oppression

      Socialism in any form is oppression.

      Obligatory slogan: Socialism sucks.

    4. Re:more power to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a decentralized model in which people are forced to work in order to support someone else is some sort of significant improvement?


      Try running a decentralized chain gang/gulag... let me know how it works out with no guards except those selected by the prisoners. I'm sure there are implications for network security.

      Lastly, if you don't like Socialism, I hope you have some nice wilderness area bought up already, because it seems most world powers are heading toward the role of nanny state.

    5. Re:more power to them by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And a decentralized model in which people are forced to work in order to support someone else is some sort of significant improvement?

      That would be no improvement at all over the current centralized systems. After all, under capitalism, the majority of your work is to support your boss's salary, and his boss, up to the stockholders, who do nothing to earn their way.

      At least the "centralized" models of socialism don't use a a veneer of public relations to hide what they do to people.

      You mean like Enron and Worldcom did?

      Socialism in any form is oppression

      Except in the form where WORK and SURVIVAL are completely unrelated (see Robotic Freedom for details of a form of socialism that would actually turbocharge capitalism- and allow for maximum human potential while shedding mindless jobs better done by non-humans).

      Socialism failed in the 1920s (and it did actually fail in the 1920s- it just took another 50-75 years before governments figured out that it DID fail) because human labor back then was scarce. Heck, there were only 2 billion human beings on the planet back then- as compared to 6 billion now. NOTHING was automated to any great extent- and the majority of people working in factories back then were little more than cogs in the great machine that is an industrial age factory.

      As the current "Jobless Recovery" is proving, we can do that work for less; cheap labor overseas (read slavery) or robotic automation here (productivity) or cheap skilled labor brought in from overseas (exploitation) can all do the job FAR cheaper than paying an American $40,000/year can. Thus, we shouldn't be paying Americans that much money to do work better done by others. Instead, we should tax the excessive profits (who needs more than $1.3 million a year to do ANYTHING THEY WANT?!?!? And that's only 1000x minimum wage) and provide an "American Fund" just like the "Alaska Residents Fund" to give poor people more money to spend- thus creating a consumer class that can be used by the rich to earn money from, which allows more people to hit that magical maximum wage, which allows us to put more people into the consumer class, and reduce the number of people working to survive to begin with!

      That's the kind of socialism I'm for- freeing up the creative to be creative instead of chaining them down to a job just to put food on the table.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  10. I don't know about the Federal List by foidulus · · Score: 1

    but in my state(PA) you have to put down a somewhat sizable deposit in order to call anyone(in addition they cannot be on the DNC list) if you do call someone on the DNC list, the state seizes their deposit, and they cannot call anyone in the state ever again.
    However, things like "satellite" services are probably scams to hook up illegal services and the like, so I doubt that they registered with anyone(very few scammers like having the government have info on them, wonder why). Thus being scams they probably leave very little evidence, even the places you would pay them are probably a front. Your best option would be to call the police, but honestly I doubt that for something like this the police would even bother with the case, probably just cover you with red tape till you give up.

  11. Contact your phone company by alienw · · Score: 5, Informative

    Recorded sales pitches are illegal in most states, and this constitutes harassment. Contact your phone company about tracing the calls. They have the capability to do this.

    Also, the BBB will be completely useless here. You need to contact the Federal Trade Commission and the FCC. The former regulates various consumer-related things, and the latter enforces many phone regulations.

    1. Re:Contact your phone company by SenatorTreason · · Score: 4, Informative
      Good call on this one.

      If you live in Georgia, see this page.
      "Unsolicited telemarketing calls placed by computer or delivering a recorded message are illegal under Georgia law."
      I get a recorded message everyday saying that someone had entered my name into a contest for a free month of satellite television....grrrrrrr.....it's *soooooo* bogus.
    2. Re:Contact your phone company by lewp · · Score: 1

      Wow, I didn't know this. I live in Georgia and I get stupid recorded telemarketing messages all the time. Next time I get one I might actually look into having something done about it.

      Thanks!

      --
      Game... blouses.
    3. Re:Contact your phone company by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Just remember that you need to ask for a "Terminating Number Search" - If you don't get this exactly right, the telephone company will have no idea how to help you even if you're a cop investigating bomb threats to a school.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    4. Re:Contact your phone company by papercut2a · · Score: 0

      Get on the state no-call list! It works well--since signing up for it, my telemarketer-scum calls have dropped to nearly nothing. I think I've gotten three buyourstuffthatyouotherwisewouldn'twant calls since signing up over a year ago, and I sent a complaint in for each one. One guy called twice within a few weeks, but nothing since.

      (Well, OK, the state of Georgia now says to sign up for the "free(paidforwithhighertaxes)" federalbigbrother list and you'll get put on the state list automagically.

      Go ahead, big brother already knows who and where you are. ;-)

    5. Re:Contact your phone company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per the FTC, telemarketing companies are required to play an automated message if there isn't a live body able to speak to you after you pick up the phone (i.e. to avoid "dead air"). Most legitimate companies simply provide a phone number to call in case you want to be placed on the DNC list or if you want any information on the product.

      Using a hook (i.e. satellite tv) definitely sounds shady and you might want to think about reporting it if it gets completely out-of-hand.

    6. Re:Contact your phone company by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      I get that exact same message... "You or your family or a friend probably entered you into this contest, and you won!", not a direct quote, just a paraphrase. Makes me wonder how many senior citizens get ripped off down here in Florida, thinking that some relative they don't even remember entered them in a contest (retired people are notorious suckers for contests)...

    7. Re:Contact your phone company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a recorded message everyday saying that someone had entered my name into a contest for a free month of satellite television....grrrrrrr.....it's *soooooo* bogus.

      So why don't you pretend to sign up? When the installer comes by, torture him till gives up the names of his employers. No jury would covict you for attacking telemarketers! :)

    8. Re:Contact your phone company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this story is already pretty old, but I'll throw a question out there anyway. I've always wondered about this whole "call tracing" thing. I mean, every call you make goes through a computer that knows exactly what numbers were involved and is I'm sure connected to another computer that has a database of who pays for what numbers, so isn't tracing a number as simple as checking that computers logs and bringing up the info? I mean I do that for my web server and it's trivial as getting some food out of the fridge. I think it's time we kill the myth of "tracing a phone call".

    9. Re:Contact your phone company by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      These days, tracing a call is indeed trivial, in most cases. There are some situations where it's more difficult, like international calls, but it's still pretty easy.

      The whole "tracing a call being difficult and taking a long time" thing comes from the days of mechanical switches. Back then, when a call was routed, all the connections were made mechanically. Only long distance calls were recorded for billing purposes, and even then it was done on a paper tape which was meant to be fed into a billing system, not hand-searched to trace calls.

      The only way to trace a call back then was to go to each switch on the call path and find the mechanical connection that tells you what the next switch is. This required the cooperation of employees at each central office involved in the call, and it all had to be done before the call was terminated. Upon hangup, the entire mechanically connected circuit is torn down and all trace of it is lost forever.

      That's where the concept of "tracing a call" comes from. It wasn't always automatic and fast as it is today.

  12. "Be right Bach!" by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    " Then put the phone down and walk away for half an hour or so."

    And since this is over IP, they might be incurring bandwidth and transmission charges. So, when you put the phone down, turn on a nearby tape player playing some J.S. Bach tocatta with some ridicolously high note resolution (32nd notes, etc) into the phone. Just to maximize the data going over their lines. You'll be on your way in no-time to actually succeeding in slashdotting a telemarketer.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:"Be right Bach!" by Segway+Ninja · · Score: 1

      You know, slashdotting telemarketers and spammers doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. Surely, we could pull it off...

    2. Re:"Be right Bach!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since this is over IP, they might be incurring bandwidth and transmission charges. So, when you put the phone down, turn on a nearby tape player playing some J.S. Bach tocatta with some ridicolously high note resolution (32nd notes, etc) into the phone. Just to maximize the data going over their lines. You'll be on your way in no-time to actually succeeding in slashdotting a telemarketer.

      That doesn't make technical sense.

      Codecs are fixed, and regardless of the sound you are trying to encode, you are going to put out XX Kb/sec (depending on the codec). As such, "high not resolution" will not do anything different than enough back noise to get over their Voice Activity Detection algorithm.

    3. Re:"Be right Bach!" by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, it is a variable bitrate codec. Such as those used in situations where bandwidth efficiency is important. Like VOIP.

    4. Re:"Be right Bach!" by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose the slash and the dot could be seen as an ASCII representation of a baseball bat and a brick, respectively...

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  13. Ask the phone co. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be able to find out from the phone company who owns that 800 number.

  14. You don't need to wait by sribe · · Score: 3, Informative

    My husband and I recently bought a house, and so our three months on the do not call list before we can file complaints is not quite over. We only have one business thus far that has called soliciting anything, but here's the catch: it's always a recording...

    You don't need to wait 3 months. Using automated recordings for commercial phone calls was illegal, to any phone number, long before the do-not-call registry was in place. For what it's worth, every time I've gotten one of these it's from a local small business--some schmuck who doesn't know better and gets sold on the neat idea by an unethical firm who knows that use of its software will leave the user liable for bankruptcy-inducing fines...

  15. Get Their Billing Address by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ask the next caller for their address. Tell them you're a telemarketing consultant, and you'll be glad to listen to their pitch and rate it at your normal consultancy rate. If they give you an address, listen to their pitch, hang up, write them a letter telling them what you think of their pitch, and send it to them along with an invoice. If they don't pay, submit it to a collection agency. The resulting credit rating problems will make them notice.

    I've never gotten past explaining what I needed the address for, and I've never gotten a return call from the same place. If I ever do get an address, they'll get my best effort to rate their pitch, and a bill for US$200.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  16. Ask and Ye Shall Receive by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hoovers.com allows you to search for businesses, including the assumed name a company may be operating under. If the company pays taxes you can get informatin on them, although if you haven't paid money for the service they will ask you either to buy a subscription or a report. Still, the Information you'll find if you search their site should give you enough leads to track down the business and let the FTC know who to go after.

  17. Yes!!! by gottabeme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That sounds like the same calls that I keep getting! Recorded message, wanting to sell satellite service, same voice every time, same sales pitch, saying things like "I was given your name by a friend as someone who might be interested in this." Yeah, right. We already have Dish Network and have no desire to change to any other service. I finally called the stupid 800 number and the first option on the menu was the one to remove your phone number from their list. That just shows how many people they are ticking off. In two or three months they called around ten times. It's like e-mail spam: they figure if they spam you enough you'll eventually buy something. Argh!

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  18. Googling by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    for "All Digital Satellite, Inc." comes up with somebody in O'Fallon.

  19. they called me too. by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 1

    but they seem to have stopped. my problem now is all sorts of companies calling for whoever previoisly had our phone number. as I understand it this is legal because the previous person had given them written permission to call but our number is on the donotcall list and has been for over 3 months.

    per donotcall.gov this may be legal since they're not calling for us, but even after being told it's a wrong number they proceed to try and solicit us.

    1. Re:they called me too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to take you off of their "whitelist" if you request it, since the person who authorized them to call is no longer an authorized user of that number.

      Tell them to put you on their do not call list.

  20. interesting phone recording by kootch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I received a phone call a few days ago in the middle of the day that when I picked the phone up it just said "we're sorry, this phone message was intended only for your answering machine" and then it hung up.

    Very strange.

    1. Re:interesting phone recording by kootch · · Score: 1

      that wasn't supposed to be funny! it really did happen!

  21. The real problem... by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is that the legal system is regional with the concept of jurisdiction, whereas communication technology is global.

    It is simply a logical progression for phone / fax spamming companies to use this method of bypassing the law.

    Now what I REALLY want to see, is a filtering system for telephone calls. For example, I want to have the ability to be able to block ALL calls using a white/blacklist, or perhaps automatically reject all calls from a certain area / country. I also want to be able to filter SMS text messages.

    1. Re:The real problem... by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The original story does not say what number is shown for Caller-ID. I'd be interested to know if this call shows up as originating from India, or Out-Of-Area, or Unavailable, or what?
      Now what I REALLY want to see, is a filtering system for telephone calls. For example, I want to have the ability to be able to block ALL calls using a white/blacklist, or perhaps automatically reject all calls from a certain area / country. I also want to be able to filter SMS text messages.
      For GSM cellular on the Treo 600, the CallFilter application can filter both calls and SMS messages.

      Of course, just switching to a cell phone instead of a landline pretty much solves the telemarketing call problem -- in the US it is a violation of federal law to make an unsolicited sales call to a mobile phone or any other recipient-pays telephone (ship to shore, etc).

    2. Re:The real problem... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes - whitelists. The absolutely surefire way, that the chick who asked for your phone number will NOT be asking you out for a second date.

      What? Put HER on a white list? Yeah - like she'll give you her real number. Why do you think she asked for yours in the first place?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    3. Re:The real problem... by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      She asks for the guy's number so she knows it's him who's calling in case she accidentally anwers and has to speak to him.

    4. Re:The real problem... by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Check out Asterisk. You can do many things with it, including caller ID based whitelists, menus, etc.

      FOSS, too.

  22. They've only just begun to use the loopholes... by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'd been predicting it since the DNC list was announced and recently, I got my first loophole call!

    Here's the loophole:

    1.Non-profits are exempt from the DNC.

    2.Non-profit needs funds.

    3.Company pays NPO to make calls on their behalf.

    Mine began,

    Caller: "Hello, may I speak to (me)?"

    Me: "Uh, speaking."

    Caller: "Hi, I am calling from the (city) (religious organization) Community Center. Could you take a moment to answer a few questions?"

    Me: (not wanting to go to Hell this week) "Uh, sure"

    Caller: "Great! Are you (religion)?"

    Me: "No."

    Caller: "Is anyone in your house (of the XYZ religion)?"

    Me: "No."

    Caller: "Okay, that's all for that part of the questions, just a few more."

    Me: "Great."

    Caller: "How many telephones do you have at this number?"

    Me: "What?"

    Caller: "How many telephones do you have at the address for this phone?"

    Me: "Why do you want to know how many phones I have?"

    Caller: "Oh, we just want to ask about your long distance carriers"

    Me: "What does this have to do with (religious organization)?"

    Caller: (click)

  23. This is who owns that 800# by jaredcat · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is who owns 800-513-4524

    UniPoint Services / 512 735 1200

    1. Re:This is who owns that 800# by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 1

      >This is who owns 800-513-4524
      >UniPoint Services / 512 735 1200

      Now what would be really nice is if you could teach us how to find that information ourselves, for any 8xx number.

    2. Re:This is who owns that 800# by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Actually I think PointOne (d/b/a UniPoint?) ownes the number. PointOne is just a VoIP telecommunications provider. It would be like listing a hosting company as the main contact for a website. It maybe a start to get you going in the right direction, but it's not the answer ultimately.

  24. Claim of randomness... by JGski · · Score: 1

    Been on DNC since before it's introduction. I still get calls. One tele-droid actually claimed that since my number was chosen at random, it was somehow OK to for them to call and try to sell me something even though I was on DNC! LOL

  25. Use Visa to screw them over by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Buy whatever they're selling, put it on your Visa (not MC or Amex... well ok, maybe Amex). Buy as many of them as you can fit on your credit, wait a few days then file a fraud complaint about the transaction.

    No, better, buy them all in seperate orders, then have them all charged back. When the spammer has racked up a good chunk of chargebacks and complaints, they will either quit (unlikely) or eventually their merchant account will be revoked and they will be SOL.

    As a bonus it causes the evil Visa to spend their ass-dollars on support clerks and fraud investigations, rather than investing in the total monopolisation of online billing.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  26. No money? No war. Sorry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. The U.S. government only invades countries in which Cheney can make money. (They want to put an oil pipeline through Afghanistan. They want Iraq's oil.)

    Dictators are bad only if there is money in invading.

    1. Re:No money? No war. Sorry. by papercut2a · · Score: 0

      If Cheney wants Iraq's oil, then why are we going to an awful lot of trouble to rebuild Iraq's oil industry and giving it back to Iraq ??? Besides, Cheney doesn't make any money from any of this, other than his salary.

    2. Re:No money? No war. Sorry. by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Believe we will give it back to them when it actually happens, not before. All I've seen is a lot of mumbling and foot shuffling whenever the subject of what will actually happen June 30 comes up... which makes me think a cute little puppet government is more likely than anything with actual autonomy/sovereignty. What, you think we went to war with Iraq just to let them do what they wanted? That defeats the whole point of going to war, lol.

    3. Re:No money? No war. Sorry. by papercut2a · · Score: 0

      you think we went to war with Iraq just to let them do what they wanted? Um, well, yes. That's what the idea of a setting up a democratic government over there is all about. Compare this to the previous dictatorship in which they could NOT do what they wanted. I'm simply amazed at people who think that the after-war stuff is as easy and quick as instant grits. This is not a "just add water type of thing. It took us over four years to reestablish government in Germany after WWII. Had you been alive then, would you have been complaining as strongly that it was taking too long? Or would you rather we take the time to do it right instead of fast?

  27. O'Fallon, Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illinois? Missouri?

    1. Re:O'Fallon, Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a public service to those who do not yet have access to Google, seaching for that name yields http://www.ofallon-mo.com/businessdirectory.htm which has the entry:

      All Digital Satellite, Inc. 4 Turtle Dove Ct. O'Fallon 63366 379-9992

      That looks like a residental address to me, and I have no clue if this entry actually has anything to do with the company in question.

  28. Iraq Body Count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iraq Body Count. This is civilians only.

  29. stupid telemarketers by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

    Every month or so I get a voicemail (on my cell even, no landline) with a message that starts with "This is not a business call. Please call back at 800-814-xxxx between ." I googled for the number, hit verizon's phone listings and yahoo's number lookup, but I couldn't find it. It's rather annoying that they don't even bother to leave a business name.

    Telemarketers need to die.

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    1. Re:stupid telemarketers by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      Got the number, the douchebags just called again. This must be coming from outside the US, the guy's accent was so bad I had to listen to the message 4 times to get the number, I couldn't understand the business name.

      1-800-477-1827

      I need to find a payphone to bitch at these guys from. No way am I using my cell minutes on telemarketing scum.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    2. Re:stupid telemarketers by wiggles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bill collectors are known to use these tactics. They'll try to call you, then if they can't get you, they'll just tell you to call them without leaving a name, only a number.

      Are you paid up on your Beowulf cluster of Imacs?

    3. Re:stupid telemarketers by Shurhaian · · Score: 1

      Telemarketers need better jobs. The people who pay them to telemarket need painful executions.

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
    4. Re:stupid telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I get calls from bill collectors looking for someone with the same last name. It is pretty funny because they aren't allowed to say that "Joe Smith" owes them money unless they are talking to "Joe", but I won't tell them anything about "Joe" until I know why they are calling.

    5. Re:stupid telemarketers by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      I've never, ever had a late payment in my life. To do so would mean a lack of self-responsibility, and therefore I would have to kill myself. It's the one thing I blindly believe in (my own religion!) It amounts to theft, and there's only one thing I hate more than thieves, religious extremists. Of course, they're nothing but thieves anyway, stealing people's thoughts. Now I'm way OT. Thanks! :)

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    6. Re:stupid telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've probably already thought of this, but just to be safe you should check your credit reports to make sure something wasn't misreported.

      Or they might be calling to get info on someone related to you. One of my uncles has issues with credit and my parents get a call every couple of months from collection agencies wanting to know if we know his latest phone number.

    7. Re:stupid telemarketers by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Because it's illegal for them to discuss anything with someone other then the person on the account or otherwise authorized on the account. Collection agencies can't say "This is Acme Collections calling for Soandso." They can just say "Please have Soandso call 555-1212" Same way with Doctor's offices and medical privacy. In both cases, they have no way of assuring that you and only you get the message.

  30. DNC List... by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I refused to sign up for these, since this gives people access to a database of phone numbers to dial if they are not bounc by it. I considered the politicians, "charities," etc. but didn't even consider overseas locations that could get the list easily and legally violate it (More cheaply than telemarketers in the states, as well).

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  31. ... or for someone else in your house by JohnQPublic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From The Maineiac Site of Jokes and Games:

    Is the Coast Clear?

    A married couple were asleep when the phone rang at 2 in the morning.

    The wife, undoubtedly blonde, picked up the phone, listened a moment and said, "How should I know, that's 200 miles from here," and hung up.

    The husband said "Who was that?"

    The wife said "I don't know, some lady wanting to know if the coast is clear."

  32. Google says ... by JohnQPublic · · Score: 1

    ... it's Equifax Collections, a bill collector. Admittedly, it's not via reverse-lookup but instead from somebody's web page.

    1. Re:Google says ... by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      That page is wrong, I called them back a few minutes ago. They had my number listed for 3 different people in 3 different states, none of which were me. The company is
      First Management Alternatives, not Equifax.

      To verify I had no collections problems, I ordered a 3in1 credit report from Equifax, and I was right, no problems. D'oh! It cost $40 :(

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  33. How to find them. by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
    Does anyone have ideas for tracking them down (i.e. local phone number or stateside address)? The message even seems fraudulent, but I cannot file a complaint with the better business bureau without local phone or address. Any ideas?

    So, call the number, tell them "Yes, I'm interested in your service", etc. Pretend to be interested. They want to sell you something, so if you pretend to be a potential customer, they *will* contact you, tell you who they are, etc.

    And at that point, you can file on them.

  34. Complaints by enforcer999 · · Score: 1

    It is probably this Arlington Texas guy . Complain to your state Attorney General. www.naag.org

  35. Representative from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey all, this is a representative working in "ALL DIGITAL SATELLITE". I know these people here. they have partnered with a innocent *****n company here in india. U can mail me in this email id tsasksk@yahoo.co.in for further communications

  36. instead contact me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hi, this is a representative working in "ALL DIGITAL SATELLITE". I know these people here. they have partnered with a innocent *****n company here in india. U can mail me in this email id tsasksk@yahoo.co.in for further communications