Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Fairness, Radioactivity, Recovery

Slashback tonight brings you an easy way to let the U.S. Congress know how you feel about fair use, an update to the legend of Elena's Chernobyl motorcycle trip, a twofold resolution to the Freenet Project's PayPal snafu, and more. Read on for the details. A bell to reach your slavish public servants. Cory Doctorow (not just a writer, he's also the EFF's European Affairs Coordinator) writes with a followup to a recent Slashdot story on Boucher's reintroduction of the DMCRA. "I thought I'd mention that EFF has an 'action center' item that lets Slashdot readers (and others) write to their Congresscritter with one click, urging them to support the bill."

Ha, ha, puny earthlings! TinoMNYY24 writes "The Independent broke the story of SpaceShipOne leaving the Earth's atmosphere. The headline of the story is "'SpaceShipOne' becomes first privately funded vehicle to break through earth's atmosphere." One more step towards the X-Prize."

A data recovery success story - please send more. bigdog1 writes "I also had the IBM 75GXP data loss problem reported on slashdot. Like the guy in this article, I was not able to pay someone to do my data recovery. However, I eventually was able to get almost all of my data back using a free program, NTFS Reader. The only problem was that the file names were not in the long format. From now on I am buying an extra hard drive, but has anyone else had success stories recovering their data? Long file names?"

Too little, too late. An anonymous reader writes "I recently e-mailed paypals's public relations department and urged them to restore Freenet's paypal account. Their reply indicates that they have reexamined Freenet's account and decided not to terminate it after all. No news on the freenet project page, but here's paypal's reply:

'I apologize that your concerns were not addressed in the previous email. Our Compliance Department has reviewed The Freenet Project account in question and the service has been fully restored. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us again.

Sincerely,
Andrew
PayPal Account Manager'"

ultranova writes "Because PayPal has offered no explanation or apology, the project does not intend to continue advocating its usage, and has migrated to Amazon Honor System."

'Adventure Capitalist' is a much better motorcycle story anyhow. malign writes "Mary Mycio notes that the 'Ghost town' photo essay is probably faked, and notes her reasons. There go my fantasies! :(" Rumors and grumblings to this effect have been around for quite a while, but this seems the most straightforward debunking I've seen of the trip a Ukrainian woman named Elena claimed to have taken through the Chernobyl area.

(We posted two stories about the alleged trip in March.)

Corporate machinations meet the mounties. los furtive writes "The CBC is reporting that HP has agreed to pay back the Canadian Government $146 million that had been defrauded from the Department of National Defense (previously mentioned here). HP claims it was the victim of 'a complex scheme designed to exploit both parties through contracts inherited through HP's merger with Compaq Computer Corp.' In the end they decided it was more appropriate to take action against those responsible and not engage in protracted litigation with the government."

181 comments

  1. One click? arrrgh! by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 5, Funny

    lets Slashdot readers (and others) write to their Congresscritter with one click,

    In other news: Amazon sues the EFF

  2. Chernobyl by bendelo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shame to hear that the Chernobyl story is probably fake, even more so that Elena has a husband!

    Website was featured in The Mail on Sunday - so much for background research.

    1. Re:Chernobyl by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At least that explains her stories about all the people who "stayed after the evacuation". There's been a careful, ongoing international study done on the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster. Her claims just didn't fit the facts of that study.

      Of course, the inconsistencies didn't tip me off either. I just thought that she was stretching things a bit. *shrug*

    2. Re:Chernobyl by Volmarias · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is interesting that most of the responses aren't "Egads! The story is a fake!" but rather "Egads! She's married!"

      You're all a bunch of hornballs...

    3. Re:Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, you read the story?

      You must be new here.

    4. Re:Chernobyl by tburke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So if she just carried along a helmet, how did the motorcycle get into some of the pictures? Some other random abandoned Soviet highway? I have no idea if the site is a hoax, but Mycio's post gives me no reasons to think it is. "Motorcycles are forbidden", right, and Russian officials don't take bribes either.

    5. Re:Chernobyl by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      I don't have an answer to that, but that leads to another question - Who took the pictures with her in them?

      --
      I'm a minister!
    6. Re:Chernobyl by antic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your joke aside, and this is no judgement on your comment in particular, but how about people judge this person for their contribution (fake or otherwise) and not on their looks alone?

      In the forum thread about "exposing the fake", 3 out of 9 comments reference the husband or "shagging" the woman in question.

      Keep it in your pants!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    7. Re:Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story is far from fake. Maybe she isn't a scientist. Maybe she went their on a tourist trip in a car... does it matter? The point is, she has some cool ass Chernobyl pictures and wanted to post them to the web.

      Is it such a big deal if she spices it up a bit? A regular tourist excursion isn't very exciting, so why not say she rides her bike around there. Big deal. You guys are all just jealous that you never got to go to a radioactive wasteland.

    8. Re:Chernobyl by bstone · · Score: 3, Funny

      I love how the forum at www.uer.ca responds to a slashdotting though. Their page begins with:

      Welcome Slashdot readers!
      Just so's y'all know, you folks are setting serious records for the number of individual users on the server at once (peaking around 1000 right now instead of the typical 80 or 100). Now, on to what you're probably looking for:

    9. Re:Chernobyl by refactored · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So some official, representative of the goverment that created the mess in the first place says she didn't. So suddenly you disbelieve her.

      I mean when these "Authorities" were "Communists", you all knew they were congenital liars. Now the same "authorities" are no longer "communists", but something a lot closer to Robber barons, you suddenly believe them!?! They the same bastards.

      We talking about a country where everybody has a amply well founded fear of authority. So an authority goes and asks her, "Did you ride you bike alone through Chernobyl?" Answer: "No, no, of course not."

    10. Re:Chernobyl by birukun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She did make reference at one point in her story of a girlfriend that went riding with her - or may be I dreamt of her with another woman? :-)

      Seriously, she did mention it, I have not gone back to see if it is still there, but some shots I think are hard to fake, and if they were, who would spend THAT MUCH TIME to doctor some photos for any purpose.

      BTW, has any questioned anything from the LA or NY Times lately? ;-)

      --
      Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
    11. Re:Chernobyl by flyneye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      looking back over the photos,I can clearly see the motorcycle in many of the photos that certainly appear to be delapidated chernobyl.
      Perhaps the detractor didnt actually look the site over before spewing jealous allegations.Perhaps it has something to do with the husband thing.lol

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    12. Re:Chernobyl by refactored · · Score: 1
      That report you point to is from a "Radiation is Good For You" NGO made up of nuke industry supporters.

      Try... Health: Long-term effects - Overview

      Basically lots and lots of money is involved so everyone is lying fit to bust while the poor sods in between die.

    13. Re:Chernobyl by Dmala · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somehow I think a lot of Slashdotters would still believe, even when presented with physical evidence and sworn statements to the contrary. The image is just too romantic: a attractive young woman, blasting like a bat out of hell on a motorcycle, through a desolate, radioactive wasteland. It's an image straight out of the movies.

    14. Re:Chernobyl by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who took the pictures with her in them?

      In Soviet Russia, the pictures take you.

      No, really, think about it... there's this little invention called a timer. They tend to put them on even fairly low-end cameras now. If she can afford a Ninja, she can probably afford a camera with a timer. My guess is that even in Russia, the clock and the camera might have gotten together one night, and with the help of a few shots of stoli, a little camera+timer might have been born.

    15. Re:Chernobyl by [ella] · · Score: 0

      Well,
      just shows that (male?) Slashdot readers are just a bunch of shallow guys, making sure that their brain is not always in control. And we are proud of that ;-)

      One should give it's brain a little rest !

      --
      Mike
    16. Re:Chernobyl by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      if she just carried along a helmet, how did the motorcycle get into some of the pictures

      That picture, in Chapter 4, is the last one that shows the bike, and is below a heading "entering Chernobyl area". It looks like that's just outside the restricted area.

    17. Re:Chernobyl by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      looking back over the photos,I can clearly see the motorcycle in many of the photos

      Which photos? I just ran through the lot at kiddofspeed.com and didn't see any of the bike in the actual town.

    18. Re:Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jealousy? Fantasies? WTF? How does riding a motorbike about Russia invoke jealousy or fantasy in the readers?

      I'm completely baffled by people's reaction to his story. It's mildly interesting in the same way all travelogues are interesting but the attraction of this particular piece escapes me.

      Can someone explain it to me?

    19. Re:Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when did we start trusting a page that begins "I am writing a book..."? We weren't so quick to accept a Linux bashing story that started the same way!

    20. Re:Chernobyl by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Parent makes sense:

      Debunker states that they took a motorcycle helmet with them on an offical car trip. Theres no sign of any helmet in the photos,. Thers 1 pic of motorbike at a recognisable location.

      There are problems with the original photos, though, her jacket changes from green motorcycling jacket to a black fashion one, and the weather appears to change. I guess the first few pics are of a real motorcycle trip.

      The 'feel' I get from this is that the trip did happen, it involved staying with researchers at chernobyl, the authorities were notified but only get involved when 'incidents' happen. Several details were left out either for narrative or personal reasons.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    21. Re:Chernobyl by sinisam · · Score: 1

      Please read more closely at the rebukal arguments.

      Main argument is that it is prohibited by law
      there.

      For a country where corruption is a way of life, this is a rather weak argument !!!!

  3. Possible precedent against "corporate immunity"? by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The HP/Compaq story seems to be implying that they are actually taking action against individual employees of the corporation who were responsible for doing such-and-such, as opposed to HP/Compaq itself.

    This could set a GREAT precedent! As things stand currently, people within corporations can pretty much do whatever they want, while acting in the interest of the corporation, and they'll never see a personal fine or the inside of a jail cell. (Case in point: Bill Gates was never fined or jailed for all the things he did. MS just got a slap on the wrist, but nothing happened to Gates himself.) Maybe now, we'll see some accountability, as people won't simply be able to hide behind their involvement with $BIG_CORPORATION to avoid criminal charges...

  4. It can't be fake! by wicka_wicka · · Score: 1

    Man, that just ruined my whole day...not really, the pics were still cool. Why would anyone really care that someone thousands of miles away from them kinda lied?

    --
    hi
    1. Re:It can't be fake! by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, that just ruined my whole day...not really, the pics were still cool. Why would anyone really care that someone thousands of miles away from them kinda lied?

      We cared more that Slashdot presented it as fact when it really was fiction.

      Slashdot: Fiction for nerds, stuff that doesn't matter... just doesn't have the same ring to it.

    2. Re:It can't be fake! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Slashdot just point to what others are saying. It's not CNN for crying out loud.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:It can't be fake! by alberk · · Score: 1

      who says it was fiction? Elena has more facts in her story then Mary does in her jibe against Elena. Elena obviously wasn't alone since someone had to have taken the pictures OF HER in some of those photos, and I doubt a Russian agency is ever 100% reliable on anything including trying to protect their own rear ends in crunch time. What I wanna know is, why'd she say she rode through alone? She obviously didn't.

    4. Re:It can't be fake! by The+Cornishman · · Score: 1

      I read her whole site carefully the first time Slashdot referred to it, and have just revisited. Clearly the pictures did not come from a single visit; in one Elena is wearing green kawasaki leathers and in another a black jacket.
      On the lone/accompanied front, she explicitly says she went to the ghost town, where the most poignant pictures come from, with someone else, and consistently talks about where "we" went.
      If the impact of the pictures has been enhanced with some artistic licence, that's fine by me. Call 'fake' if you like, but those pictures aren't PovRay and they aren't PhotoShopped up from snaps of rural Pennsylvania, either. Volunteers for a perfectly fact-checked dry-as-dust photographic reconnaisance, one pace forward!
      Hmm. Thought not. Dismiss.

  5. I Don't Think So by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    lets Slashdot readers (and others) write to their Congresscritter with one click,

    In other news: Amazon sues the EFF

    I don't think so. As far as I know the Amazon patent covers only buying with one click, not writing. But iANAL.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:I Don't Think So by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Right, so moving the proper way to contact your congressman to one click, One Click Campaign Contributions, is only something Amazon can do.

    2. Re:I Don't Think So by BobaFett · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, as long as we don't use the EFF one-click interface to send campain contributions, we're ok?
      Otherwise, it's buying congressmen with one click and we're back to "Amazon sues the EFF".

    3. Re:I Don't Think So by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think so. As far as I know the Amazon patent covers only buying with one click

      So if I tried to corrupt a congressman with this system, then I guess Bezos could sue the EFF.

    4. Re:I Don't Think So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew, my system allows purchasing with one click, so I should be safe from Bezos and his Krazy Mad Patent Avengers.

    5. Re:I Don't Think So by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Are one-click kickbacks covered by that?

    6. Re:I Don't Think So by pegr · · Score: 2, Funny

      lets Slashdot readers (and others) write to their Congresscritter with one click,

      In other news: Amazon sues the EFF

      I don't think so. As far as I know the Amazon patent covers only buying with one click, not writing. But iANAL


      Er, I take it you're not familiar with how one influences a congressman...

    7. Re:I Don't Think So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was a joke

      *duh*

    8. Re:I Don't Think So by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fact is stranger than fiction: Amazon Presidential Candidates page

    9. Re:I Don't Think So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love anal too! We should get together sometime.

  6. Too little, too late... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    PayPal's restoration of Freenet doesn't help at all. It's hard to unring that bell, and Freenet now doesn't want to deal with them anyway.

    PayPal wanted to break their association with Freenet, and they just got what they wanted.

    1. Re:Too little, too late... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "PayPal's restoration of Freenet doesn't help at all. It's hard to unring that bell, and Freenet now doesn't want to deal with them anyway."

      Err hold on, you need to think about the bigger picture. Paypal's restoration helps at least some. I mean, didn't you consider never ever using Paypal again over it? I did. Restoring service made me feel a bit better about it, but offering no explanation still bothers me.

      However, there is something to think about: Slashdot's involvement in it. I have a feeling the negative press they got (on a massive scale, mind you) changed their minds in the first place. But now they've restored it, any reason they gave would either be real boneheaded/unfair, or they would say that Freenet did something wrong, in which case most people who'd be active in a discussion here would blindly run to Freenet's defense. No win scenario for Paypal.

      So the only real choice I can make right now is "Something happened, and it's really a private matter that I have no right to know about." It still makes me wary, though.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Too little, too late... by e-gold · · Score: 4, Informative

      EFF's solution has been to quietly accept e-gold since 1999. Freenet takes e-gold, too.
      http://102948-USD10.e-gold.com would give a gram to EFF (they had it working before, and now they've somehow managed to bust it! Sigh...).

      http://767764-USD20.e-gold.com
      donates $20 worth to Freenet (or you can use their page at donate )

      We may not have the hype or marketing-budget of other systems, but we've been around since 1996 (and, frankly, Slashdot should have taken e-gold since at least a year ago, it's not like sci.e-gold.com is all that hard to use!). (And yes, I'll still click anyone from Slashdot a bit of e-gold to play with if you send me an account number!)
      JMR

      Speaking ONLY for Jim Ray, the Barbarous Relic of the e-gold system!

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    3. Re:Too little, too late... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      isn't trading in large amounts of gold illegal in the US? I know it's illegal to back loans with it, as well as other types of trades. The feds like to show up and take it away.

      It will be shut down, large banks do not like economies that doesn't include them.

      If I have an acount, and you have an acount, and we do business, how is it taxed?Assuming same state transation.

      What about market fluctuations? what keeps people from manipulating it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Too little, too late... by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

      ok, click me some gold ;)
      1377420 ....

    5. Re:Too little, too late... by e-gold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hi. I'm not a lawyer, and (despite the handle) I don't speak for e-gold Ltd. either, but here goes...

      1. Gold is not only legal to use as money, it and silver are, if you actually read the constitution once in a while (which apparently rules-out all US politicians besides Dr. Ron Paul) you might find there are more problems with using green paper as money. I agree that the feds have a history of taking stuff away, that might be why e-gold Ltd. is a Nevis company instead of a USA one. I had no idea it was illegal to back loans with gold (might be news to some central banks!).

      2. If "it will be shut down" how come e-gold has been chuggin' along since 1996? (2A. But why haven't I heard of you?? Because the news media were either too-clueless, or too busy covering "beenz" & "Flooz," -- both RIP -- which both spent LOTS of money on ads instead of concentrating on hiring smart geeks & doing money better than the Federal Reserve!) I'd agree that some individuals (especially at large banks) don't like thinking about an honest, weight denominated currency, but that's tough luck for them, I guess. BTW, not many folks seem to know this, but the Federal Reserve is (supposedly...) a private corporation -- insert Jefferson-quote about banks!

      3. I pay my taxes, and (I guess?) you pay your taxes. e-gold is a currency denominated by weight, it's not a government (a good thing if you want honesty in money, IMO) or a tax-collector or a tax-evasion-mechanism. It's just Better Money(tm) and even though people tend to think in political terms about EVERYTHING these days, e-gold is IMO very apolitical (but I'll admit, it tended to appeal to libertarians like me in the past).

      4. Markets fluctuate, it's a fact of life. The price of green paper in grams has gone from a bit over $8 to a bit under $13 per gram since I started working here, but gold's buying-power tends to be stable over time compared to fiat currencies like the paper dollar. And NOTHING keeps people from manipulating the price of gold except (we hope!) the marketplace! (As it is, there are constantly accusations of manipulation in the metal markets -- see www.gata.org or just google around for them!) That's why e-gold prefers LBMA "allocated, good delivery bars" instead of paper promises that you might be storing some "pooled" gold.
      JMR

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    6. Re:Too little, too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e-gold is a currency denominated by weight, it's not a government (a good thing if you want honesty in money, IMO) or a tax-collector or a tax-evasion-mechanism.

      at first, i couldn't help but be compelled to note the hypocricy of this statement - first, the Federal Reserve isn't allowed to be a (supposedly...) corporation, but then being a non-government entity is the best way to maintain honest in money ...

      but then, i thought about it, and if you guys at e-gold are really taking on the Federal Reserve and competing with them in a market for money, then great. those bastards need the competition!

      ')

    7. Re:Too little, too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I believe the Federal Reserve actually IS -- despite the governmental sounding name -- a private corporation. I can tell you that issuing paper money without having to keep expensive heavy yellow bars around.

      "If the American people ever allow private
      banks to control the issue of their money,
      first by inflation and then by deflation,
      the banks and corporations that will grow
      up around them (around the banks),
      will deprive the people of their property
      until their children will wake up homeless
      on the continent their fathers conquered."

      -- Thomas Jefferson

    8. Re:Too little, too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the CIA was behind this. You know, they're in the news quite negatively the last months and there must be more. The CIA wants to know every transaction done to a terrorist organisation, so they contacted eBay (aka Paypal).

    9. Re:Too little, too late... by glitchvern · · Score: 1

      I know possession of non-jewlery gold in the United States use to be illegal until a few years ago. Not sure about what is legal/illegal to do with gold now. Large banks do not like Credit Unions either, but they have not managed to shut them down yet, although they have limited their expansion somewhat. I imagine it is taxed the same way as everything else on the internet.

    10. Re:Too little, too late... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
      ...all US politicians besides Dr. Ron Paul

      Thanks. I needed a laugh today. Dr. Ron Paul really needs to stress that title because borderline nutjobs like him need something to remind us that even borderline nutjobs can have titles in front of their names.

      Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying you shouldn't listen to the guy. He's smart and he's done a good job of thinking some things through. But, criminy, I'll never forgetting sitting at a party with one of his aides twenty years ago in Houston and being told, in hushed and fervent tones, how Paul had called together his inner circle for a critical briefing and given them the inside story on the giant conspiracy at the highest levels of government to change the money from green to red and yellow; how the new money was going to be issued in a surprise move in less than three months; how everyone would be forced to use the new scrip because greenbacks would be declared worthless a few days later; how it was all a multinational/Illuminati/Jewish/whatever plot to drive all hidden assets into the open to make it easy for our coming communist overlords to redistribute wealth.

      The guy's not stupid, but he's out there. And he associates with people who are stupid and are WAY out there.

    11. Re:Too little, too late... by e-gold · · Score: 1

      I said "Dr." because, frankly, he IS one (nobody calls Howard Dean "Mr." and gets away with it, so I don't really see your "point" all that well here!). Dr. Ron Paul is a real, went & passed med-school, Doctor just like Dr. Howard Dean is. I don't know if you've complained about Dr. Dean being constantly-called "Dr." before, but I seriously-doubt it! If you go through 6+ years of that hell, you get to call yourself that no matter where you fall on the political spectrum, so it might be best for you to simply "deal with it."

      As for the association-with-nutjobs issue, if THAT's somehow a disqualifier for politicians, I don't even have time for the mixed Planter's Can of those on the tax-and-spend left.

      What Dr. (there, I said it again, just to annoy everyone!) Paul stresses is an occasional reading of the Constitution, and it shows in his votes and in the bills he occasionally-sponsors. ESPECIALLY regarding the spending-issue and monetary stuff, more politicians should emulate Ron Paul. (And you should probably emulate me, and turn-off the ol' Karma bonus when posting off-topic IMO!)
      JMR

      Speaking ONLY for myself (chances are Dr. (heh heh! I just did it again!) Paul might even disagree with some of what I've said above!)!!

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    12. Re:Too little, too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ron Paul is a real, went & passed med-school, Doctor

      So, I might look him up if I want to know an obscure Latin term for a part of the body most people don't know exists.

      But the medical schools I'm aware of don't spend much time teaching economics or fiscal policy.

      Emphasising an irrelevant degree in the hopes of appearing authoritative in this case is deceptive.

    13. Re:Too little, too late... by e-gold · · Score: 1

      Or in the case of Dr. Dean??? My point is, at least in part, the double standard you and/or the other person seem blind to, but obviously it's there. Dr. Dean and Dr. Paul are US politicians. They both went through a hellish med-school system and managed to survive it, so we don't call 'em "Mr." anymore. Either one. Deal with it!!! (Sheesh, all lefties CAN'T be this idiotic, right??!!)
      JMR

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  7. Wait, that's $146 million CANADIAN... by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I have that much in my couch cushions ;) (Just kidding!)

    1. Re:Wait, that's $146 million CANADIAN... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Can I have some of it?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  8. DATA RECOVERY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got MOST of my data back. Here is a step by step that I posted:

    b[RESTORE YOUR LOST DATA]b - If your Deskstar drive is doing a click-click-pause, you can get your data back!

    I have 2 IBM Deskstar 60GB drives, about 1.5 years old. A month ago, I was backing up data from one of them, and it froze. I rebooted, and WinXP took 10mins too boot, and the drive in question never showed up. So I ripped the case off, and to my gut renching surpise, the drive was giving me the r[click of death]r . So I spent the next few weeks trying to find a solution, as I am not going to RMA a drive with all my data on it. I *NEED* that data. So after trying just about every method I could find, I finally found a combination that worked.

    Things to note:

    - Freezing the drive had no effect, but try to keep the drive cool throughout the restore process. I had a fan blowing over the drive in question constantly

    - Putting the drive in different positions (i.e. on it's side, end, etc) had no effect. Lay it flat.

    - From what I can tell, the data is not lost. The drive seems to make sectors as 'bad' in certain sections of the drive, and thus 'can't read them'.

    What you will need:

    - 2 Drives of equal or greater size that are working
    - A copy of "Media Tools Professional" [FULL] http://www.atl-datarecovery.com/mtl.htm (I had version 3.3)
    - A copy of "Ontrack EasyRecovery Professional 6" [FULL] http://www.ontrack.com/easyrecoveryprofessional/
    - A floppy diskette

    [For these instructions, the BAD drive will be called Drive-B, and the good drive will be Drive-A. Drive-C is where the data will be restored (This CAN be an FTP site)]

    1 - Hook up Drive-B and Drive-A onto your mainboards IDE controller (NOT any onboard HPT, RAID, etc)

    2 - Boot off the floppy containing Media Tools Pro

    3 - Select the Drive-B and choose Clone, Drive-to-Drive

    4 - Select the Drive-A as the destination, and press Ctrl-S to bring up the options screen

    5 - Change the rety attepts to '1', and click off the 'disable error control codes on last attempt'

    6 - Choose to 'Invert' the clone (the last check box on the options screen)

    7 - Start this process and wait for days (my 60GB drive took 49 hours) You will hear ALOT of clicking and it will the remaining time will bounce around from 200,000 hours down to 2 seconds. This is normal, but be prepared for a LONG wait.

    --After clone is done--

    8 - Reboot into WindowsXP, with Drive-A connected (disconnect Drive-B)

    9 - Open up Ontrack EasyRecovery Pro 6 and do an advanced recovery

    10 - Choose Drive-A and select the Advanced Options

    11 - Choose Advanced scan, and 'Disable MFT'

    12 - Start the scan (this took 1.2 hours). Then it will present you with a file list of what it files it found.

    13 - Select the files/directories you want to restore and then select Drive-C as your destination

    14 - As it starts to restore, it will prompt you to 'Overwrite' files. DO NOT OVERWRITE ANYTHING. Most of the files are cross-linked, and you will end up with garbage. You need to either 'RENAME' each one, OR, wait for it prompt you to rename, then in an explorer window, delete the files that it restored, and then click overwrite. Here is an example:

    - You have selected the dir 'mp3'
    - It starts restoring by putting all your *.mp3 files in there (ex: e:\mp3\*.mp3)
    - After it restores all the files in that dir, it will restore the same files, with different data.
    - At this point, it will ask you if you want to overwrite or rename
    - Open Explorer, and delete all the files in e:\mp3\
    - Then click 'Rename' in the dialogue box
    - It will then write out the GOOD data

    AND THANKS TO THE GRACE OF GOD, YOUR DATA IS BACK! I got %99 of my data restored, using this workflow.

    The ONLY thing I didn't mention was that I updated the drives BIOS before I did this. I have NO clue if that made any d

    1. Re:DATA RECOVERY by koniosis · · Score: 1

      My bad, didn't mean to moderate this offtopic, was meant to be interesting! Soz, good story! Hence this post to remove the moderation.

      --
      I spent ages trying to think of sig, but never did :(
    2. Re:DATA RECOVERY by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      You can also use a boot floppy or CD with a suitable rescue distro of Linux and use dd_rescue to do the dirty job of copying the disk. Used it successfully with multiple old drives displaying various degrees of damage. (Their images are now stored on DVDs, mounted as loop devices when I need to access some of the ancient data. In addition, I have a log of the bad sectors from the disks, which together with the images of the filesystems could allow making a list of what files are affected by the damage.)

  9. Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The question I have is why did she fake it? I mean, the story says she went in the standard Chernobyl tourist ride with a helmet, in order to fake photos, so it was a deliberate, planned deception.

    So why did she take the pain to do all this? I doubt it's the money, since she didn't sell her story AFAIK, and I doubt she wants to promote some form of radioactive tourism. So, unless she's completely mythomaniac and/or she really really wanted to delude herself that she had made the trip for real, I just don't get it...

    1. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by demonbug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe she just wanted to write a good story - which she succeeded in doing. Sure, she should have said something to that effect on the website, but it was still a good story.
      A lonely motorcycle ride through Chernobyl sure makes a better story than "a standard Chernobyl tourist ride".

    2. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think an english dictionary, thesaurus and a basic understanding of english grammar would have been more useful for a good story.

    3. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then again, maybe the person questioning Elena's story is the one making up porkers, and not Elena?

    4. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by MasterMnd · · Score: 1

      It does looks like Elena is wearing different jackets in different pictures. So would she have gone as far as to bring 2 leather jackets, or did she actually go twice? Of course she could've taken the bus trip twice as well.

      I suspect the real truth is somewhere in the middle.

      Good story, and very good photos either way.

    5. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by techstar25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So let me get this straight...nothing actually happened at this Chernobyl place? It's just a town in the middle of nowhere that everyone decided to leave all at once without warning?
      No. Most of what she wrote is true except the motorcycle part. I don't give two shits how she got in there. I thought the photos were cool, and she ditn't fake those.

    6. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      So why did she take the pain to do all this?

      She's a writer and used the trip to gain attention.

      My business was to show people Chernobyl as I saw it and now it is time to get busy with another chapter, which will not be a Chernobyl relative and I will make online version of it.

      I expect there will also be a book offering. Nothing really wrong with what she did (slight misrepresentation), it's just marketing, right?

    7. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      Here's what I think;
      Her Daddy got her some special priviledges to go and ride around Chernobyl, but once it got out that it happened, that rules were being bent, and people in charge of the area, possibly getting in trouble for allowing it, the story had to be changed to protect those involved.
      Just a conjecture.

    8. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Maybe she didn't fake it, as other posters have pointed out, but her story has had to change, as a consequence of all the attention she has gotten, official and otherwise, in order to protect some of the people whose jobs may well be on the line for having let her do what she did ...

      Either way, I honestly personally do not think that photo-essay was 'faked' any more than any other average 'web site you read on the internet', and the impact it had on my personal reality of the Chernobyl disaster, anyway, was sufficiently supportive of my own personal sensibilities enought that, fact or fiction, that was one good read on a Sunday afternoon. It made me really consider the consequences of our scientific and technological actions, and her essay also provided a great deal of hope for cultural understanding in the future.

      I mean, apart from the odd "TV's Most Scariest Holocaust" re-run, when was the last time whitey thought about the consequences of Chernobyl? If you ask me, April 25 ought to be a World Holiday, and if thats a problem we should get rid of a few of those extra "Queens Birthdays" and "Costco Sellout" holidays, and folks ought to remember nuclear disasters, yearly, together as a united group for one day, lest another one happens for similar reason...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard psychopaths hard understanding to.

    10. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by fader · · Score: 1

      The problem is, it would quickly lose its meaning and become just another holiday. 20 years from now, we'd see ads like "Come to Wal-Mart for our Chernobyl-day BLOWOUT!! Save like there's no tomorrow! Our prices are melting down!" etc. I'd rather avoid that, personally.

      --
      - fader
    11. Re:Fake Chernobyl motorcycle trip by swb · · Score: 1

      It does looks like Elena is wearing different jackets in different pictures. So would she have gone as far as to bring 2 leather jackets, or did she actually go twice?

      I forget the details of her jackets, but speaking as a motorcyclist I've frequently worn or brought two jackets when going on long rides, especially in 'border' seasons where the temperature might fluctuate between cool and cold.

      As far as I'm concerned, the fact that she went there at all and shot the pictures was pretty amazing. That she did it on a bike doesn't mean much, although it does add a certain flair.

  10. What about the pictures? by aarku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So maybe she didn't motorcycle through... but the pictures aren't fake, are they? Are they ripped off from somewhere?

    1. Re:What about the pictures? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you should have RTFA. It explains that she and her husband (sorry guys) took the standard "tourist" tour through in a car.

    2. Re:What about the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no proof that she got close at all - just the outskirts, like many tourists have.

    3. Re:What about the pictures? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No they are technically not fake in that at least some, if not all that do not include a motorcycle, are indeed from that area. But, her husband probably took them since she is *in* most of them herself.

      So, the lesson to be learned from this is that hot single science chicks with motorcycles and coolness to bike through radioactive deadzones on their own don't really exist except in the dreams of the slashdot collective mind.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:What about the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry, but you should have RTFA. It explains that she and her husband (sorry guys) took the standard "tourist" tour through in a car.

      And you should RHFWS. She has many photos of the motorcycle in front of landmarks. The post you were responding to was clearly wondering if those photos are faked. Simply saying she took the standard tour in a car does nothing to explain how the motorcycle appeared in the photos. Did she sneak it in? Are the photos faked (remarkably, exceptionally well)? Are the photos stolen from someone else who really did have a motorcycle there? It's a legitimate question.

    5. Re:What about the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but you should have RTFA. It explains that she and her husband (sorry guys) took the standard "tourist" tour through in a car.

      s/explains/claims/. If this whole thing teaches us anything, it's that you can't just take one person's word for it. So why are you so quick to take Mycio's word over Elena's?

    6. Re:What about the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooooo, it SAYS they took a car via a travel agency....no proof, nuh uh, nothing, zip, a few statements that are not backed up..."explained" is being a bit generous

  11. one click email/fax by zors · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm on a couple of these "fax your representative and senators" alert systems now. I have two feelings on them, either they've opened a new avenue (or rather mass transport for an older one" for communicating with our public servants, or they will just further immunize our representatives from individual opinions.

    1. Re:one click email/fax by wizard992 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm on a couple of these "fax your representative and senators" alert systems now. I have two feelings on them, either they've opened a new avenue (or rather mass transport for an older one" for communicating with our public servants, or they will just further immunize our representatives from individual opinions.

      Of course the Senators and Congressmen (or thier staffers) are simply adding rules or filters to thier email to shuffle all messages from a "One-Click-Email" system into a folder they never read. Or possibly /dev/null.

      Kudos on the Izzard quote :)

    2. Re:one click email/fax by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about all congressmen and representatives but my rep The Honorable Sherrod Brown seems to listen to the faxes I have sent through the EFF's website. Of course I have never sent just the form letter. Since he sits on the Houses Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet he is a little more tuned into the issues that concern me regarding technology. I have recieved a response every time I have written him including two hand written letters. I also had a talk with him at a public appearance and he recognized my name and remembered the issues I cared about, I am not a contributor to his campaign but I AM an active and concerned citizen who has spoken up for what I believe in and I feel that my voice HAS been heard. The thing about American politics is that the cast majority of the populace is so apathetic that a small vocal minority can have a vastly oversized impact on issues that concern them.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:one click email/fax by ryanmfw · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait, what is this *opinion* thing I keep hearing about?

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
    4. Re:one click email/fax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The handwritten way gets you way way way MORE noticed than just a quick email. It tells them that you were actually concerned enough to write a letter and not just 'fire something off'.

      Form letters tend to hold less weight. As it is a group just sending the same message over and over. 'Mr senator you got 3000 of this' and the clerk hands over 1 copy of the letter. But 'Mr senator 3000 people sent in letters about this issue' and the clerk hands over several letters.

      Also even IF you dont like the person who is representing you, even if you didnt vote for them. Remember they are representing *YOU*. You can still talk to them... It is after all why they get the big bucks...

    5. Re:one click email/fax by 8tim8 · · Score: 1

      Of course the Senators and Congressmen (or thier staffers) are simply adding rules or filters to thier email to shuffle all messages from a "One-Click-Email" system into a folder they never read. Or possibly /dev/null.

      I read somewhere that congresspeople have certain formulas they use to figure out how many people care about an issue they get comments on. It was something like a handwritten letter equals ten people care (but only one writes), a form letter means five people care, an e-mail means one person cares, etc. It seems to go on how much effort it takes to produce the document instead of a flat number of responses.

    6. Re:one click email/fax by zors · · Score: 1

      Huh. The best i ever got was a form e-mail from Senator Kerry. Shows how little it takes to impress "the little people" eh? Though i was very impressed with my state senator who was in fact an intelligent man who understood the issues AND the basics of our 3 branch government system! Or am i being a bit cynical?

  12. A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...weeks ago that the site was a fake. The story in Swedish is here.

    1. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's in bloody swedish!

      "I dag är det exakt 18 år sedan reaktor 4 i Tjernobyl exploderade. Det ledde till den största ekologiska katastrof människan har åstadkommit - hittills."

      What the hell is that???

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That part:
      Today, it's exactly 18 years since reactor 4 in Chernobyl exploded. It lead to the greatest ecological disaster man has ever accomplished - so far.

    3. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by mijok · · Score: 4, Informative

      A very brief summary in English:

      - it's been 18 years since reactor 4 exploded and that lead to the greatest ecological disaster man has accomplished - so far
      - the reason for the disaster was human error
      - some irrelevant stuff about what opinions Swedish politicians have about prolonging the use of atomic energy in this country (not stated in the article: a decision has been made to eventually dismantle it)
      - a quite respectable (not stated in the article, but that's the opinion of most people here), Swedish newspaper, Dagens Nyheter, has published the images from Elena's site
      - the story is fantastic but a hoax
      - Elena's father is not a nuclear scientist and she doesn't drive around in the dead zone
      - she and her husband, Igor, have taken the pictures during one visit with the supervision of the zone administration
      - the page has had millions of visitors
      - an Ukrainian friend of the reporter tells from Kiev that the zone administration has gotten many inquiries from motorcyclists interested in riding in the dead zone so in that sense the page is a commercial grip on the disaster

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    4. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by hpa · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They also state that the cause of the accident had nothing to do with the state of Soviet technology "because the reactor was brand new."

      That is such total bullshit that it's not even funny (and the political comments in the article makes it pretty likely the author isn't the kind of peg flaws on the Soviet system, if you know what I mean.)

      It's not that the Soviets couldn't have built a safe reactor, it's because they chose not to do so. The reactor was most definitely technologically faulty - it failed some of the most basic safety requirements. It was a human error only in that the Soviet authorities ever allowed this reactor design to be built and fuelled.

      So what was this technological flaw? The graphite-moderated reactor has a so-called positive void coefficient, which means that a overheating reactor will speed up the reaction in the core. Western - and some Soviet - reactors have a negative void coefficient, in which an overheating reactor will slow itself down and reach equilibrium.

      That difference, combined with a solid containment, was the chief difference between the Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl accidents. Both were major disasters, but the former was confined to the plant and had economic consequences; the latter spread radioactivity over large parts of Europe and had yet-untold consequences in terms of both human life and environmental destruction.

      A nuclear reactor should not depend on humans doing the right thing for its safe operation, and in the event of a disaster, its safe shutdown. Any reactor that does so is dangerously flawed and technically unfit for operation.

      Unfortunately there is in Sweden a sizable group who has as their political agenda to close down domestic nuclear power, whereas what probably would make more sense is to take the money that would cost and pay for the Russians and Lithuanians to built new plants and shut down the currently operating RBMK (Chernobyl-type) reactors on the Baltic coast.

    5. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by Cecil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That difference, combined with a solid containment, was the chief difference between the Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl accidents.

      While I mostly agree with your post, I don't think that particular comment is exactly true. While there's no arguing that the positive void coefficient was a prerequisite for the chernobyl disaster, Three Mile Island was something quite different. The TMI disaster happened with the control rods fully in. The reactor core was basically idling, and the failure was mainly poor design and monitoring of the cooling system, which spent a good long time spraying radioactive coolant out of a pressure release valve. With all the control rods in, very little of the energy is being produced by nuclear chain reactions, so positive void coefficient does not play a significant role.

      Then again, I am not a nuclear physicist or technician, so I may very well be full of shit.

    6. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by mijok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They also state that the cause of the accident had nothing to do with the state of Soviet technology "because the reactor was brand new."
      I agree, a while ago I saw an interesting documentary (or reconstruction) about the disaster on the Discovery Channel. In addition to the numerous mistakes made in the control room (since the most senior engineer ignored the concerns of the others - and they all had incentive to carry on with the experiment) the very construction was filled with errors. The project manager was only concerned about meeting the deadline (since he got a bonus that way) and didn't care much about the materials used. The roof should've been fire-proof but because the material wasn't available they used some combustible material instead. Furthermore, the design had some fundamental flaws and the engineers in the control room weren't fully informed about the functioning of the reactor.
      I left out the bias from my summary but assuming that you're Swedish you probably noticed the final sentence in the article: "Allt medan Barsebäck reser sin stolta siluett mot Köpenhamn och folkpartiet vill få oss att glömma allt om Tjernobyl." So he most definitely states an opinion as well but I assume that the facts are correct and I think that those are of greater interest to Slashdot readers than Swedish politics... (To those who are, the sentence means: "All of this whilst Barsebäck [A Swedish nuclear plant close to Denmark] raises its proud siluette towards Copenhagen and Folkpartiet [a center-right political party] wants to make us forget all about Chernobyl").

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    7. Re:A Swedish tabloid, Aftonbladet, reported... by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It was a human error only in that the Soviet authorities ever allowed this reactor design to be built and fuelled.

      It was not an error, it was a conscious decision. If I remember correctly, RBMK reactors have design that allows exchange of fuel rods without shutting down the reactor. Weapon-grade plutonium is almost-pure isotope 239, isotope 240 (which is what 239 turns into when staying in the reactor for too long) doesn't produce neutrons during fission, so the resulting bombushka has less boom for the same bucks. Shutdown of the reactor is easy to see even from the space (eg. drop in the temperature of the cooling towers) and shutdown intervals of the plants are carefully monitored. Reactor that doesn't require observable shutdown to refuel, and thus allows unmonitored shortening of the refueling intervals, is a big military advantage; as another advantage, the RBMK construction was fairly simple and easy to build.

      Then the day D came, a snafu escalated to a fubar, and the rest is a well-known story.

  13. LOLOLOL @ all the horny geek suxx0rs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It seems that all the outrage over the faked Chernobyl excursion is focused on the also-revealed fact that the chick is married.

  14. Bugger. by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1, Funny
    Quoth the article:

    Elena [of the Chernobyl rides] and her husband


    Fuck. There goes a few million /.ers fantasies.
    1. Re:Bugger. by eclectro · · Score: 1

      There goes a few million /.ers fantasies

      Not only that, but I feel *violated*.

      Next, we will find out that she really doesn't own a motorcycle, or it's brand is "schwinn".

      I wonder if it was her husband Igor's idea to perpetrate "the mortorcycle trip that takes YOU!"

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  15. In other news.... by stoutstreet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....MOON LANDING FAKED.
    Also,
    CHERNOBYL RIDE IS A TRUE STORY
    I have provided the same amount of evidence for my point of view as that forum post.

    1. Re:In other news.... by thryllkill · · Score: 2, Funny

      As far as the Chernobyl ride goes, I don't know. But I can vouch for the moon landing being fake. I mean myth tells us the moon is made of cheese, and not rocks and dust. Take that Armstong!

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:In other news.... by damgx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Was just thinking the same.

      With all the newspeak comming from the President of the US, and the stories now running around the world about what really goes on in a war. One would think evidence was the first think you ask for, when someone say. "Thats not true." "This is how it is."

      So the story around the pictures may be fake, lots of pictures are 'fabricated' big deal.

      People still read (ha ha) playboy, but know the photos are constructed. The pictures are still pretty though right?

      --
      I only read slash. for the articles...
  16. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by demonbug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. Now, instead of the whole company being held responsible for the actions of employees, the company will instead be able to throw a couple of those employees to the lions and go on with what they were doing. How much do you want to bet it will never be high-level management that takes the fall for this kind of thing? Personally, I think I kind of prefer it when the whole company takes a hit - at least it hits the managers (the ones ultimately responsible) in the pocketbook, if nowhere else.
    I guess employees just better become a lot more careful - get all directives in writing, and ignore anything your boss tells you to do that they don't write down. Employees are going to be held responsible for what they have most likely been directed to do, or at least have done with full knowledge of their bosses, so they better learn to protect themselves.

    Basically, my point is (if I actually have one), while it is great that "those responsible" are being held responsible, somehow I doubt they are the ones that are really responsible.

  17. Re:BREAKING NEWS YOU MUST READ THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I hate to break it to ya. But both men and women are whores. So the next time you look at your son or daughter, take a good hard look. They may not be yours. Muahahhaha

  18. say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elena, please !!!
    Say it ain't so!

    will the a/c

  19. Well, just becuase you're all incredibly lazy by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 3, Informative

    $146 million CDN =

    $107 million US
    or
    89 million Euros
    or
    60 million UK Pounds

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  20. slashback by Sn_wC_t · · Score: 5, Funny

    wouldn't a slash back be /..(slashdotdot)?

    1. Re:slashback by iosmart · · Score: 2, Funny

      nah, ../ dotdotslash

  21. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As things stand currently, people within corporations can pretty much do whatever they want, while acting in the interest of the corporation, and they'll never see a personal fine or the inside of a jail cell.

    Are you serious? Look at the Tyco case...Dennis ain't exactly scott free, even if he did have a mistrial.

    DAs are more than happy and able to go after individuals if they have the evidence to do so.

  22. Except... by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...that it's *not* a private matter. Freenet, as the account holder, has all the say in what's private. If they say that their account is frozen, and they want an explination, then paypal can't say it's private matter.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  23. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by Stile+65 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Corporate "immunity" has more to do with the shareholders than the employees or management. It simply means that people who bought stock in the corporation and don't oversee/participate in day-to-day functions of the corporation, meaning they had no say in the wrongdoings of people within and on behalf of the corporation, can't be sued for misconduct that they weren't part of. It also means that, should the corporation go into horrible debt, etc. the shareholders can't lose more than they put into the company - their stock value can go no lower than 0.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  24. So Elena is fake...try this... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a tour of an abandoned missile silo. Pretty kool. Don't try this at home (well unless your home IS a missile silo).

    1. Re:So Elena is fake...try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also
      www.infiltration.org
      is quite a good read on the subject of abondoned places.

  25. Acctually... by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Since we are backing up from where we are now, I think it would be more like ./..

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  26. Freeze it by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1, Redundant
    It doesn't look like anyone has mentioned it yet, but you can freeze a dead HD and in some cases you will be able to boot it up like normal with enough time to get critical files.

    Just remember to put it in a sealed plastic bag. Many many people have said it worked, although I've never had to do it myself.

    1. Re:Freeze it by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      To add to the statistics; I have tried this method.... It did not work.

      --
      I'm a minister!
    2. Re:Freeze it by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Condensation problems, maybe?

    3. Re:Freeze it by Surak_Prime · · Score: 1

      I'm a retail PC tech, and I have done this many, many times, with about a 50% success rate.

      Wrap the drive in a handtowel, then put in a freezer bag. Freeze for two hours, and you'll have at least 45 minutes, IF it worked. Do NOT reinstall the drive inside the machine - leave it hanging by its cable outside, because condensation of water vapor will begin in short order, and you don't want the water dripping on other, presumably good, components.

      --
      :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
  27. more about us Swedes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some Swedish idiot has put up a verbatim copy of the story without mentioning the original source at all - actually funny, because then he states that he was just a little girl when the pictures were taken. In case somebody is curious: Jerka!=jerk in Swedish (I think it's his nick name because the name of the site is Jerka's Market).

  28. Too bad about Chernobyl by drgonzo59 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still don't get the point why would she bother to make a story like that. Back when I read it the first time it did seem odd that anyone would let her into the zone by herself. What if she fell and broke her leg or something, or had an accident. But I guess the risk made the fantasy so much more thrilling. I suspect she might have wanted to try to either publish a photo album, or was expecting that someone from the West would pay her to go back and shoot some more, or maybe invite her on Oprah. I grew up and lived in those parts and I know that as nice and hospitable as Ukranians (and Russians for that matter) are, they can also be liars and manipulators (learned from papa lenin himself). I think the young couple wanted to somehow make money off of it, which if true, would be very sad.

    1. Re:Too bad about Chernobyl by MoggyMania · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I grew up and lived in those parts and I know that as nice and hospitable as Ukranians (and Russians for that matter) are, they can also be liars and manipulators (learned from papa lenin himself)."

      That's true of any nationality, unfortunately.

    2. Re:Too bad about Chernobyl by Rower · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is still the former soviet union, enough cash in the right hands and I'll bet the ride could be had. Of course you would get the attention of (if your not already dealing with with)the mafia,the police and military. A real adventure if you have the stomach (and cash and connections) for it.

      --
      Hooo Son! This'uns a Hawg!
  29. Edge of space? by LMariachi · · Score: 4, Informative
    I see elsewhere that the boundary of space is pegged at 62 miles, which would make this the first privately-funded (albeit unmanned) rocket to pass it (by 15 miles!)

    (But I'm biased, since I was lucky enough to be present at that launch.)

    What body decides what marks the boundary of space? I see all sorts of references to "officially defined" but no one says by whom.

    1. Re:Edge of space? by hpa · · Score: 1

      Well, depending on who you ask, it's either 50, 100 or 200 km (31, 62 or 124 miles.)

      I suspect the 100 km figure is the point at which the concept of national airspace cease to apply, kind of like the 12 nm limit at sea.

    2. Re:Edge of space? by Fortran+IV · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't recall my source but what I read in the 1970's was that the "official" 100km boundary was set by treaty between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. in the 1960's.

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    3. Re:Edge of space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      " the boundary of space is pegged at 62 miles"

      The universe is a spheroid region, 705 meters in diameter.

      Everyone knows that! ;) :D

  30. Elena's website by amembleton · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Elena's website by fearlessfreddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What really sucks is that Mary Mycio's article debunking the Chernobyl photos has so little
      verifiable information.

      "They traveled in a Chornobyl car that picked them up in Kyiv." I'm sorry, who picked them up? What was their name? Or was this an untraceable Chornobyl ghost car?

      "They organized their trip through a Kyiv travel agency", but what was the name of the agency? Can we get a quote from someone at the agency?

      "Zone Administration personnel were in an uproar", but what were their names and what positions of authority do they hold? Why no direct quotes?

      If we have become savvy enough not take take the Chernobyl diary at face value, then why should we believe the undocumented assertions in Mycio's article?

    2. Re:Elena's website by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Great, now we can nuke her website, and turn that into a ghost server.

      I am waiting for someone to put a bittorrent of a .tar.bz2 of her website

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:Elena's website by refactored · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Zone Administration personnel were in an uproar" because somebody is going to get their ass kicked in for letting her through.

      Her story has changed, no suprised, because some ugly bugger in authority is out to get the poor sod who let her through. No doubt she is shocked by the interest the whole thing created, and now is trying to protect that person.

      Elena is a _very_ brave lady to go biking through hell, and even braver to take on the mindless butt covering bureaucrats that created hell.

    4. Re:Elena's website by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Soon to go the way of Chernobyl.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Elena's website by amembleton · · Score: 1

      Her site has been on the front page of Slashdot twice now and hasn't gone down. Some people made mirrors of it and some zipped it up.

      I don't think there is any need to use P2P to distribute this site it seems pretty solid. Anyway a quick search on eMule has brought up this link: Recopilacion_fotos_y_videos_Elena_Anaya_y_Paz_Vega _por_Kool.rar. So that might be the one.

  31. Here's your motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    The story on this website will become a chapter named "Ghost Town" in a book I am working on. It will be a travelogue.

    "Thank you suckers, I'll laugh at you all the way to the bank."

  32. Give Elena the Trophy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I bought it. This has to be one of the best trolls in recent times. Snookering a bunch of so called-technophiles and a bunch of news outlets calls for at least a beer or something.

    And yeah, damned husband.

  33. Hook, line, and sinker by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    Boy, she got me good. Elana got me hook line and sinker! She really moved me.

    Still the points she made were good and she told a good story.

  34. Freenet crybabies by fname · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, Freenet had their Paypal account shut down. It seems that from the get-go, Freenet (and its community) decided this was politically motivated and shouted to the world about it; y'know, instead of trying to work it out with Paypal. So now that PayPal has reversed their decision, Freenet is unhappy because PayPal didn't show the proper respect & apologize? Gimme a break.

    Not a troll or a flame, just think its a pity that the Freenet leaders can't exhibit a little diplomacy in order to advance their cause.

    1. Re:Freenet crybabies by Gramie2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or maybe it just brought home the arbitrary and capricious way in which PayPal can freeze the account of anyone they feel like.

      Maybe FreeNet just decided that they wanted to go with an organization that showed a little more responsiveness and responsibility.

      I don't think the point is that PayPal has frozen or unfrozen the account; the point is that they could do so again at any time, without giving any reason.

  35. Just a scary thought by njchick · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the reactor building in Three Mile Island wasn't strong enough to sustain the hydrogen explosion, the ghost town could have been Harrisburg rather that Chernobyl. I could have made a site similar to Elena's. The only difference is that nobody would take it seriously.

    1. Re:Just a scary thought by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hydrogen explosion? What hydrogen explosion? There was no hydrogen explosion at TMI. There was a release of hydrogen gas due to the hot zirconium fuel rod cladding reacting with the water, but it was noticed, understood, contained, and dealt with. It didn't explode.

    2. Re:Just a scary thought by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen explosion? What hydrogen explosion?

      Hydrogen burns invisibly, that's why it wasn't noticed.

      I think you got trolled by the parent.

    3. Re:Just a scary thought by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      It's hard to tell, given the blatant and bald-faced misinformation that shows up on radiation-related /. threads.

    4. Re:Just a scary thought by njchick · · Score: 1
      I cannot find the site where I read it initially, but Google found this:
      At 12:45 PM, the Pennsylvania State Police closed PA 441 to traffic near Three Mile Island at the request of the commonwealth's Bureau of Radiation Protection. An hour later, the US Department of Energy team began its first helicopter flight to monitor radiation levels. At 1:50 PM, a noise penetrated the TMI-2 control room. The sound was that of a hydrogen explosion inside the containment building. The noise at the time was dismissed at the time as a slamming of a ventilation damper.
      I also remember reading that the reactor core was just 500 degrees (not sure Celsius of Fahrenheit) below the meltdown temperature.
    5. Re:Just a scary thought by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm afraid I'm gonna have to go with the NRC's official report rather than a local soft news magazine.

      From a summary:

      Within a short time, the presence of a large hydrogen bubble in the dome of the pressure vessel, the container that holds the reactor core, stirred new worries. The concern was that the hydrogen bubble might burn or even explode and rupture the pressure vessel. In that event, the core would fall into the containment building and perhaps cause a breach of containment. The hydrogen bubble was a source of intense scrutiny and great anxiety, both among government authorities and the population, throughout the day on Saturday, March 31. The crisis ended when experts determined on Sunday, April 1, that the bubble could not burn or explode because of the absence of oxygen in the pressure vessel. Further, by that time, the utility had succeeded in greatly reducing the size of the bubble.


      I also remember reading that the reactor core was just 500 degrees (not sure Celsius of Fahrenheit) below the meltdown temperature.

      Incorrect. If that were the case, 60% of the core would not have melted.
    6. Re:Just a scary thought by Danious · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hmmm, so you would rather go with the official / corporate line of "no big deal, we had it under control all along, we did everythng right, there was no risk, nothing to see here, move along please" because they wouldn't have any reason to spin to us now would they????

  36. e-gold by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    blast it all, I was hoping to mention e-gold first.

    But such is life. e-gold is very much the way to go if at all possible.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  37. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by ghc71 · · Score: 2, Informative
    RTFA.
    "[HP] said it was the victim of a scheme run by an employee of Defence and others.

    One employee of Defence was fired and is now living in the Turks and Caicos.

    ...HP said there was no evidence that its employees derived any benefit from the scheme."

    The article and its predecessor state that HP claims that it was acting as the programme manager for a number of subcontractors, one or more of whom allegedly colluded with a civil servant to submit fraudulent invoices, which HP then passed on to the Ottawa government.

    HP is not going after its own employees, as it claims that none of them profited from the scam.

    Corporate immunity is something of a given, BTW. If a corporate officer is sued for their actions in their corporate capacity, the corporation tends to foot the bill through its liability insurance - you won't get a penny from the individual themselves.

    --
    - Sig files: contemptibly familiar the second time around.
  38. Paypal can suck it. by karmatic · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, I gave PayPal a call - I have cancelled all of my accounts. I currently run over $10,000 per year through there, totalling somewhere around $500 in fees (the occasional uncovered chargeback, and lots of small transactions).

    I let them know I would not do business with them(I know several people personally who have had problems with them as well), and I am in the process of switching to YowCow.

    Slight recommendation: don't use SolarPay. I ended up buying a re-branded version of their software, and it is backdoored. No, I won't tell you the backdoor - there are a number of sites still using it.

    1. Re:Paypal can suck it. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Lots of claims, with no evidence to back them up.

      Plus a high UID that makes you even less trust-worthy.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Paypal can suck it. by karmatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The high UID is because I got tired of posting at -1 (too many troll/flamebait mods). As you can see, I'm rather blunt.

      Anyhow, I really don't _care_ if you trust me or not. I could give you the email of my old paypal account - what good would it do?

      Let's see - friend and client FastModz (sells modchips, http://www.fastmodz.com/us/) - lost nearly $5000, because apparently Mod Chips violate the ToS. Legal, or not, PayPal should not have just pocketed the money.

      http://www.lowcostfurnishings.com/ of my other IDs, if it would make you feel better.

      Really want to get to know me? Google is your friend. Yes, every single search resultis about me.

      So, screw you. Who needs karma anyway?

  39. Save Our National Igloo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $146 million? We'll finally be able to save our National Igloo!!

  40. My data recovery story by localhost00 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I have a 200GB drive that was more than halfway full. I had it in a USB enclosure, hooked up to my XP system. Four times, my partition was corrupted! First time it was all FAT32, then I decided to go NTFS. When the NTFS was corrupted, I (along with banging my head on a brick wall) tried GetDataBack and I was able to recover all the data, full names in tact. As for the FAT32 partitions, WinME was all that was needed. It is important you pick out a TRUSTED USB enclosure. I finally put the drive on a RAID controller and haven't had a problem since.

    But for NTFS recovery, use GetDataBack.

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    1. Re:My data recovery story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a Fat version too can't vouch for it though, Tried the NTFS one once it works but I still always use Ontrack Easy Recovery. Also WinHex is supposedly the best tool you can get for recovery but buggered if I can work out how to do it, I'm just an MCP, if it's not wizard based I can't do it!

  41. IBM clickers : how I did by denpo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might sounds stupid, but I managed to get access to a unreachable IBM click'o'death disk in a very simple way : The drive was installed horizontaly in my PC case, well, tried to run it in a vertical position. Believe me or not, it worked, the disk started fine. I didn't investiguate how long it could still run this way. 15 minutes was all it took me to make a complete disk copy, then it got dumped.

    --
    //TODO: put sig here
  42. Re:Paypal can suck it. (Fixed HTML) by karmatic · · Score: 1

    The high UID is because I got tired of posting at -1 (too many troll/flamebait mods). As you can see, I'm rather blunt.

    Anyhow, I really don't _care_ if you trust me or not. I could give you the email of my old paypal account - what good would it do?

    Let's see - friend and client FastModz (sells modchips, http://www.fastmodz.com/us/) - lost nearly $5000, because apparently Mod Chips violate the ToS. Legal, or not, PayPal should not have just pocketed the money.

    http://www.lowcostfurnishings.com/ - Lost hundreds of dollars because a client discovered a piece of furniture was too wide, and disputed it. PayPal reversed the funds, hit her with a chargeback (she finally managed to get it off), and she had to pay out of pocket to get the furniture shipped back. This was all part of PayPal's "protection" policy.

    Perhaps, if it will make you feel better, I should use one of my other IDs, if it would make you feel better.

    Really want to get to know me? Google is your friend. Yes, every single search resul tis about me.

    So, screw you. Who needs karma anyway?

  43. hard to say... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am of the opinion that it was probably fakes, but the link does not in anyway disprove her claims.

    In the former soviet union, we fake...unhem..excuse me, almost slipped.

    In Russia(both before and after the fall) Anything can be had for money. I know someone who paid to have there military records marked them as deceased.

    Now the link says:
    " Zone Administration personnel were in an uproar over who approved a motorcycle trip in the zone."

    of course, that doesn't mean she didn't give 100 bucks to the gate keeper. Or that they new about it, and became alarmed because of the media attention.

    "Elena and her husband have changed the Web site and the story considerably in the last few days. Earlier versions of the narrative lied more blatantly about Elena taking lone motorcycle trips in the zone. That has been changed to merely suggest that she does so, which is still misleading."

    That's called covering your ass, and in no way is proof of a fake.

    I wonder what would be good proof that she did it?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:hard to say... by mercurialfool · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has no one noticed the picture with her motorcycle in foreground and the Chernobyl sign in the background?

      Are we to assume its photoshopped?

      I personally don't think it is.

      Just to be clear, gettting the "standard" chernobyl tour-van to haul a bike seems less likely than occasional bribery.

      That doesn't mean she hasn't lied some, just that I think there is room for some truth in her story.

  44. Data Recovery by phasm42 · · Score: 1

    A recent data recovery operation I did on a Windows XP system: My friend had installed VMWare, and I think he somehow managed to set VMWare to use his physical primary drive as the drive the VM would use. He then installed Windows 95a (FAT16) onto his 40GB drive (which he thought was a virtual drive) which surprisingly worked until he tried to exit the VM and it wouldn't let him. After he rebooted, his machine booted into Windows 95a -- it had overwritten his NTFS drive! He was horrified at all the data he had lost, so I told him I'd try to recover it, although I didn't have much confidence in the situation. Rebuilding the MBR was straightforward -- I just used an MBR from another Win2K machine and modified the partition table to match his drive size (this is something I have a lot of experience with). The boot sector was also straightforward -- NTFS keeps a backup copy of the boot sector at the end of the partition. My main concern was the MFT. The mirror at the center of the drive would be intact (the FAT16 partition used by Win95a was 2GB and wouldn't reach 20GB into the drive), but I didn't think that the MFT mirror was a complete mirror. However, after reading the location of the MFT in the boot sector, it turned out that his MFT was located 3GB into the drive! This surprised me quite a bit. I later checked into this and found that a friend's XP machine had the MFT at about the same spot. My Win2k machine at work had the MFT about 200-400mb into the drive, and my machine at home had the MFT less than 1MB into the drive. Anyway, after a reboot (into an alternate installation of WinXP) and a scan, he was able to recover most of his data, which was a great relief. Some day though, I'll have to try out the MFT mirror thing and see if it would have been enough to recover an NTFS partition...

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  45. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by jreiser · · Score: 1

    In the US, there is an important exception. If the alleged bad activity involves pollution, then the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA": USC 42, chapter 82) applies. It says that a coporate officer will go to jail if the corporation is convicted. Congress had some sense back then.

  46. Bad Thermal recalabration by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    I've dealt with many of these 60GB IBM drives. Turns out, the problem is overheating. I think the cause it a faulty temp sensor and thus cannot thermal recalibrate correctly based on servo data on one of the platters. To get around this, I would power down the PC and let the drive cool down. Next, I would place a powerful (yet small) table fan right up against the hard drive to keep it cool. I recommend the Honeywell Enviracair HT-800. Now your drive should work trouble free and thus would be a good time to back up your data.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  47. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT FOO!

    Mod parent up plz.

  48. How about a Missile Silo Museum? by CritterNYC · · Score: 1

    It's a tour of an abandoned missile silo. Pretty kool. Don't try this at home (well unless your home IS a missile silo).

    If you'd like to see a silo without the health (and legal) risks... and learn a bit, check out the Titan Missile Museum in Tucson, Arizona (Museum Photo Tour.) Quite impressive. I went last year. Even got to press the button, which was a bit unsettling.

  49. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by Parandor · · Score: 1

    The HP/Compaq story seems to be implying that they are actually taking action against individual employees of the corporation who were responsible for doing such-and-such, as opposed to HP/Compaq itself.

    This could set a GREAT precedent!...


    I disagree. The Canadian governement sued HP over a breach of contract. HP took responsability and paid. No precedent here.

    Then HP made an inquiry into what happened and found out that some of its own employees were responsible of fraud against themselve and their customers. They are looking into suing theirs employees for fraud, breach of contract ( employment contrats ) and misrepresentation. Once again, nothing is precedent.

    Finally, they are looking for breach of contract with their subcontractors who failed to deliver. Still no precedent.

    What does create a precedent is the fact that subcontracting ended up costing them a lot more money than they would have saved using it. It may make several corporation re-evaluate subcontrating. This is good for you and me.

  50. "you've got gold." by e-gold · · Score: 1

    e-metal® payment confirmation: Batch 36278290
    Paid To: 1377420 (Joshua Wise)
    Amount: .59 grams of Gold
    Memo: Play around with sci.e-gold.com !

    From:
    101961 (e-gold promotional account)
    Actual payment weight = 0.018969 oz. (0.590000 grams)
    Applicable Conversion factors:
    1 oz. troy = 31.1034768 grams
    Gold exchange rate = 381.70USD/oz.

    The e-metal payment was successful.
    Your batch number for confirmation is 36278290
    Thank you for using e-gold.

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  51. What's Your Point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    =
    $153,058,477.20 Aust. Dollars
    or
    173,497,877.39 Bulgarian Leva
    or
    279,994.170 Gold Ounces
    or
    133,091.283 Platinum Ounces
    or
    172,212,351,743.92 Italian Lira
    or
    3,093,234,971.99 Russian Rubles
    or
    106,685,949.95 Cuban Pesos

    Just because I don't care, doesn't make me lazy, HP must pay $147m Canadian it makes no diffence how much that is in USD or Euros

  52. EEEEW ugly site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That site has the worst background and hardest text to read I've seen all week. I do not reccommend.

  53. in irrelevant terms by vkapadia · · Score: 2, Funny

    $107 million US =

    14,267 Indian programmers (for 1 year)

    http://www.computerworld.com/careertopics/career s/ story/0,10801,91916,00.html?from=story_kc

  54. Don't Freeze it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's overkill leave it overnight underneath a reverse cycle air conditioner, 21 degrees celcius is sufficient. Obviously more people have freezers than reverse cycle air-conditioners but I have tried this and it does work!

  55. Regarding data loss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when my dad's 40GB hard disk (with Window$ 2K on it) which was also an IBM DeskStar, corrupted, I put it into my Linux box and ironically it worked 100%.

    Then configured an FTP server pointing to that drive and my dad recovered all his data again.

    Weird!

  56. What about breeder reactors? by Dog's_Breakfast · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to interest Slashdot in a story about breeder reactors. I still think it's the best way to build a nuke. It doesn't create plutonium waste, it burns it up. If we built breeders, we wouldn't have a nuke waste problem. Some stories... One of the most fascinating things I've read on this topic is how a Boy Scout working on a science merit badge managed to build a working breeder reactor in his backyard, and got into considerable trouble for doing so. The whole story is here: http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1111/n1782_v297/ 21281407/print.jhtml This essay (http://www.argee.net/DefenseWatch/Nuclear Waste and Breeder Reactors.htm) strongly argues the pro-breeder position. A basic explanation of how LMFBRs work can be found here (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene /fasbre.html). The USA built an Experimental Breeder Reactor at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. It no longer functions, but it's open to public visitors: http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:9sr2-vf-QQsJ: www.inel.gov/publicdocuments/factsheet/ebr1-fsheet .pdf+%2Bbreeder+%2Breactor&hl=en&start=7&ie=UT F-8 India is the latest country to build a breeder reactor, and this article sums up the current situation well: http://www.thehindu.com/2003/09/17/stories/2003091 703770800.htm

  57. Re:Possible precedent against "corporate immunity" by torpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, instead of the whole company being held responsible for the actions of employees, the company will instead be able to throw a couple of those employees to the lions and go on with what they were doing.

    Just tell me why is it either/or?

    What if the precedent for this gets set, then a) individuals can be targeted by law if they break the law, and b) corporations who have been proven to allow/permit/encourage such law-breaking by its constituent members also can be targeted by the law ... if they break the law?

    Why does it have to be A vs. B all the freakin' time? Life is not dialectic unless you make it so!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  58. dear sir by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    as a Freenet-crybaby I can only say one thing:

    "Whéééééééééééééééééé&#23 3;"

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  59. Abu Ghraib has shown this to already be true by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    Great. Now, instead of the whole company being held responsible for the actions of employees, the company will instead be able to throw a couple of those employees to the lions and go on with what they were doing. How much do you want to bet it will never be high-level management that takes the fall for this kind of thing

    Well, if the Abu Ghraib prison scandal is any indication, that is already the norm in government circles. As the west has largely degenerated into a corporatist state (this includes the EU ... just look at the history of software patents in Europe if there was any doubt ... but the decay is significantly further along in the US), it is reasonable to expect the same from corporate criminals as well.

    Until the public rises up and demands accountability from brazen criminals like Bill Gates, GW Bush, and Rumsfeld, they will continue to brazen it out while their pawns take the fall. As long as we as a people quietly acquiesce to such nonsense, it will not only continue, it will continue to get significantly worse.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  60. Chernobyl "Kidd of Speed" by Go_Ask_Alex · · Score: 1

    Has anyone considered that Elena (and maybe her husband) are probably laughing their butts off at all of the discussion of her web sight? Someone may be thinking "priceless," and she doesn't even have an ad banner.

  61. The Chernobyl girl's English seems to have improve by BillX · · Score: 1

    The Chernobyl girl's English seems to have improved dramatically. From the revised page:

    "I have never had problems with the dosimeter guys, who man the checkpoints. They are experts, and if they find radiation on you vehicle, they give it a chemical shower. I don't count those couple of times when "experts" tried to invent an excuse to give me a shower, because those had a lot more to do with physical biology than biological physics."

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  62. Re:Paypal can suck it. (Fixed HTML) by evilviper · · Score: 1
    The high UID is because I got tired of posting at -1 (too many troll/flamebait mods).

    Which is one of many reasons I don't put much trust in high UID logins.

    Legal, or not, PayPal should not have just pocketed the money.

    What would you expect them to do? They should certainly not be delivering the money, since it is presumably illegial. What do you think they should do with it?

    Really want to get to know me?

    No, no. My high-UID remark was just me pointing out that there is no reason to trust you, since you've provided no proof. I put a small bit more faith in users with a low UID and a history of accurate comments, but that's just an aside. Knowing all about you (especially knowing that you regularly troll/flame) isn't going to make me trust what you have to say.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  63. Re:Paypal can suck it. (Fixed HTML) by karmatic · · Score: 1

    What would you expect them to do? They should certainly not be delivering the money, since it is presumably illegial. What do you think they should do with it?

    How about refund it? If it's illegal, they shouldn't have it anyway. Besides, it's not illegal - it's just against their ToS. If they aren't allowed to transfer the money to the recipient, why should they be allowed to just pocket it? Presumably, there is something of value being exchanged - if the item was shipped, the seller is out the money. If it wasn't, the buyer is out the money.

    Either way, PayPal benefits, and someone else loses. Their ToS are subject to change, and frequently do. Why should they be able to go "well, we now don't like X, so we will freeze the account of anyone we know to do it, and take the money?" Isn't that a little too much power?

    Banks, at least, have no incentive to do this. If there is a question of legality, they don't get to keep the money - it gives them little incentive to act without proof of wrongdoing.