Slashdot Mirror


AMD Announces New Low-End Processor Line

beaverbrother points out these articles at CoolTechZone and PC Magazine, writing "AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) is slated to launch a new Sempron line of processors this summer, to compete with Intel's Celeron line. The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing, and more advanced tasks, like playing video, with ease."

100 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. Sempron... by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Funny
    The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing, and more advanced tasks, like playing video, with ease."
    So... all tasks, with ease?
    1. Re:Sempron... by Rodrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, notice how they carefully left p0rn out.

    2. Re:Sempron... by psyco484 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All tasks not requiring screaming fast processors. This is not for servers or gamers, it's for the other 75% of the PC market.

    3. Re:Sempron... by ExTycho · · Score: 3, Funny

      or you could just use a old duron 1.3ghz and save yourself 100, for those extremely processor intensive word documents!

    4. Re:Sempron... by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it seems that consumers are only able to keep track of one or two processor family names per manufacturer. Intel: Pentium/Celeron, Apple/Motorola: G4/G5, AMD: Athlon/Duron. Though the marketing people try hard, the Centrinos and Semperons are destined to become forgotten, no matter what their architectural/price advantages.

    5. Re:Sempron... by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure they left pr0n out of the semPRON?

    6. Re:Sempron... by mrjb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Absolutely sure -- semPron is Portuguese/Spanish -- 'sem' means 'without'

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    7. Re:Sempron... by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Modded as funny but I have two computers with 1.4 Durons from Walmart ($199 a piece) and they work great. Mandrake and W2K. Both play full screen dixv and xvid videos with no problems and the gaming is not too bad (thats what the consoles and MY computer are for).

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    8. Re:Sempron... by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it seems that consumers are only able to keep track of one or two processor family names per manufacturer.

      I suspect most consumers really don't have a clue about processor names, and will just go for whatever a salesperson points in their direction. Any ideas as to performance probably comes more from noticing the general naffness of a name than any actual understanding. Really, which would you rather have in the absence of any other knowledge, an Athlon or a Sempron? That, of course, is precisely why low end processors get names like this :)

      BTW, I'm under the impression Centrino is just a name for a mobile Celeron and on-board Intel WiFi NIC -- not quite a "processor family name".
    9. Re:Sempron... by NetGyver · · Score: 3, Funny

      It wouldn't be so damn bad if the new chip name had a ring to it.

      Take "Athlon" for example: The "Ath" part of the name reminds me of Athens, Greece. You know, home of the Roman empire, which was a powerful force in it's day. The "ion" part of it reminds me of the word "marathon" which says to me it can keep going and going. Kind of a powerful runner if you will...

      Now take "Duron", the "Dur" part reminds me of "endurance" whicn means it's not running for speed, it's an endurance runner. The "on" part still reminds me of marathons.

      These to me, seem like very fitting names. However, I'm not sure what to think of Sempron. Excluding the obvious porn reference, it does remind me of the Sampo Virus.though.

      --
      A Penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!
    10. Re:Sempron... by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you mean "other 95%"? While I don't have any statistics, one out of four PCs being for serving or gaming sounds awfully high. That is unless you consider sharing folders to be serving, and fiddling with solitaire to be gaming. The vast majority of "PCs" are going to be workstations and desktops in business, which won't be servers and game boxes.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    11. Re:Sempron... by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the Roman Empire was from Athens, why did they name it after Rome?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Sempron... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You're right... but by most people's standards, these will be screaming fast processors! My Athlon 2500 is almost a year old and still feels screaming fast to me. It is fast compared to any of the other computers I am around.

      I think it's weird that when a budget processor comes out, people write it off as something that's OK if all you do is email and surf the net. Those very same snobs would be slobbering to have that processor just 18 months earlier. Have their needs really changed that much in those 18 months? Do they resign themselves only to email and web surfing once their computer is 18 months old?

      My point is that this thing will be cheap and screaming fast, and do everything effortlessly except for playing games that don't yet exist. Yet I'm sure that slimy salesmen at CompUSA will say that you shouldn't buy one unless what you do is just email and internet. Bah! I bet you when this comes out, it will be faster than what 90% of CompUSA employees run at home!

    13. Re:Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In my family we have 8 computers. 7 are used for looking up recipes on the internet.. and 1 is for the man of the house to play quake

    14. Re:Sempron... by pknoll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Very true, but consider - the CPU spec depends on what your servers are doing. I have one that runs my firewall; it's a K6 266. Another runs DNS/DHCP and et cetera for my local LAN; it's a P-III 500, and that's likely overkill in both cases.

      Not all servers need screaming fast processors, either. So, AMD's market could be even larger than just -gamer.

    15. Re:Sempron... by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Duron is being phased out, to be replaced by Sempron. AMD will thus still only have two consumer CPU names, Athlon64/Sempron.

    16. Re:Sempron... by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Informative

      Likely overkill?
      Unless you have a gigabit pipe thats a lot of overkill.
      Both tasks could easily be done by a single 486.
      I have a 200Mhz pentium at my house doing the same and act as a fileserver too. The only reason its that fast is that I didn't have anything slower with an usb port (for the wlan interface)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    17. Re:Sempron... by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Do they resign themselves only to email and web surfing once their computer is 18 months old?"

      Absolutely not. We buy a new CPU and graphics card long before those 18 months have passed.

      Now if only ATI would get off their asses and actually bring the X800 XT Platinum Edition to the market, I wouldn't have to make do with this 7 month old 9800 XT. Lemme tell you, this thing _crawls_ in 1600x1200x32 with 6x FSAA and 16x Aniso in some games. Not "games which don't even exxist", but actual games available here and now. It sometimes even dips lower than 60 fps ;)

      And don't even get me started on AMD's 939 pin socket. They've been talking and talking about it for months. Why can't I buy a 939 pin CPU and mobo already? I already have the paired Crucial RAM and Zalman copper heatsink for it. Geesh, I mean, this socket 754 AMD 64 3200+ is, what? Almost 8 months old ;)

      Well, sort of "ha ha, only serious." I _will_ buy a new A64 and an X800 XT, but I'm not really _that_ angry and impatient as the above paragraphs sound. I can wait another month, if needed :)

      Does it make economic sense? Absolutely not. Is it what 90% of the PC market is all about? Absolutely not. Is it stupid? Absolutely.

      But, hey, it doesn't make it any less real.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    18. Re:Sempron... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoever convinced people that being a "server" meant that it needed to be big, fast, and expensive was a marketing genius. In reality though, most servers don't need to be big, fast, or expensive. Sure, there are people with multi-terabyte databases with thousands of users, or file servers for 10,000 employee companies, but for every one of those there are 100 machines that serve a low traffic website, or handle e-mail for less than 1000 people. Why run an 80 watt $600 processor at 90% idle for those tasks? If you ask me, these low end processors are *perfect* for that kind of stuff.

      I just finished swapping out 3 dual P3 Xeon machines that were running 4 websites and e-mail for 6 domains with an Athlon XP-M (yes, the mobile version) 2400+ with a PowerNow compliant chipset. Not only is it sufficient, but since it's still not under heavy load it spends most of the time at 800mhz, and total power usage is down from 620 watts to 130 watts. The whole system was less than $500 (not including the SCSI adapter and DLT drive I scavenged from the other servers).

      I'm the sysadmin for one company that is running their corporate network (file, mail and web servers) off a pair of Duron 700s. Their 100Mb network and 1.5Mb net connection are more of a bottleneck than the CPUs.

      Low end processors exceeded the performance requirements for the majority of servers years ago. It's really unfortunate that the prevailing attitude that servers need to be powerful causes people to waste money on the latest and greatest CPUs when it could be better spent on faster storage, or something else entirely.

  2. Yes but... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will they overhead and melt down like the Celeron processors? Without this feature I doubt they will be able to effectively compete with the Celeron.

    1. Re:Yes but... by Professor+S.+Brown · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you meant over[b]heat[/b], then In a word, yes. I tried some last week, and they were absolutely abominable. All of mine were put to use integrating a Dirac pulse that was picked up by my satellite dish. Almost immediately they overheated, all the capacitors exploded and a diode changed direction and everything.

      --
      Shitram Brown, PhD
      Professor of Mathematics
    2. Re:Yes but... by MoronGames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Standard Socket A boards (Athlon, Athlon XP, Duron) are also able to halt the system or produce an error noise once a certain temperature is reached. This applies to all nForce 2 chipsets, and KTxxx chipsets. I am unsure about others.

      --
      hey!
    3. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "...or produce an error noise..."

      Is that a sort of pop noise followed by crackling?

    4. Re:Yes but... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's typically a BIOS setting whether the system halts or just buzzes. Sometimes you can set one threshold for alarms, and another for shutoff.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Yes but... by mog007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actully the new line of Athlon 64's have a built in protection mechanism for just this sort of calamity. AMD learns from the past.

    6. Re:Yes but... by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, that's your Rice Krispies . . . but you forgot the snap ;)

    7. Re:Yes but... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Well, system halting is good, but or produce error noice? If the heatsink has fallen completely off you've hardly started to hear that error beep when the CPU core has already permanently damaged.

      It'd be really interesting to know, what option applies in which case."

      I improperly installed the CPU cooler in a Shuttle SFF Athlon system (with an NForce2 chipset), and it refused to boot and blinked the "CPU" LED on the motherboard. No damage was done to the CPU, after removing the (defective) shim the CPU worked fine.

      The whole "thermal death" issue was really a farse. Since Athlon XP, there has been a thermal diode in the CPU. Implementing the $.25 circuit which monitors the diode and cuts the power was left to the motherboard manufacturer. Unfortunately, most manufacturers left the circuit off to save money. Fortunately, every modern board has thermal protection.

      Not to mention the fact that, with a properly installed heatsink (remember, 95% of the people with Athlon systems got them professionally assembled and tested by an OEM), the Athlon should *never* have such a problem. Trust me, it takes a lot more than a sudden shock to unseat the heatsink.

    8. Re:Yes but... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Given that, unlike AMD processors, Intel CPUs have a thermal regulator in them, I dont get the joke. I've seen Athlon chips barf their guts out across a motherboard when the heatsink fell off (plastic clip broke off in a tower), but a Celeron should just crash in that case or a P4 will just reduce its clock speed. In fact even the newer 64 bit AMD chips lack a thermal cut out on the chip, but at least (at LONG last) they have it on the motherboard."

      Sorry, you're wrong.

      All AMD CPUs since the Palomino (Athlon XP) have had a thermal diode *embedded in the CPU*. This includes the Athlon 64.

      Early Athlon XP boards lacked the functionality to cut power.

      "I just wish that AMD would spend more time on things like this and clock locking rather then pushing for higher speeds."

      Why? ALL modern AMD boards have the proper functionality and will shut down when the thermal solution fails. Why should they focus on fixing something which hasn't been broken since 2002?

    9. Re:Yes but... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hey, update your FUD. The last Athlon that had the burn-up problem you describe was the 1400MHz... that's right, way back when they actually used the freqency as the model number. Now they just shut down.

      Since then, the Pentium4's have also been running considerably hotter than Athlons.

    10. Re:Yes but... by Merovign · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Both platforms are "fast enough" for now."

      No matter how many times I read it, I don't get it.

  3. are these really cheaper to produce? by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or are they just filling in a perceived niche? id buy these for sure if they are really cheaper than older durons are (really cheap)...

  4. Duron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So it's like a Duron, but with an even sillier name?

    1. Re:Duron? by Josh+Booth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sempron sounds rather hard for English (myself included) speakers to pronounce. They'll probably say "semperon" instead, which seems more reasonable anyway since semper is Latin for always. Or they could just be blunt and call it "AllwaysOnium"

    2. Re:Duron? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, in an effort for to promote "brand identity", and after the great success they had with their T-bird line, they're going to name it "Firefox".

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  5. soundalike by 7Ghent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, the marketing strategy is that the new chip name sounds so similar that people will get confused and buy a Sempron when they meant to buy a Celeron?

    Well, at least it sounds less like vegetable.

    1. Re:soundalike by jlp2097 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No.
      "semper" is latin for "always", "everytime", "ever".
      "durus" means "enduring", "hard".

      So the name suggests this being the successor of the Duron.

    2. Re:soundalike by 7Ghent · · Score: 3, Funny

      So then wouldn't "Sempron" make a better name for a Viagra-like drug?

  6. so... by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Big numbers on box with little actual performance, for people who want big numbers but don't really need a powerful computer(or have a clue, of course, if you're without a clue you don't really need a powerful computer so..)...

    if it's a celeron competitor that is..

    hopefully it'll be at least very affordable..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Whats with the -ron? by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Celeron, Duron, and now Sempron Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Whats with the -ron? by erucsbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hidden performance problems that surface later - like Enron?, or is it just that when the heavy calculations need to be done, the high end chips will say "see you later on" while these low end ones stagger on.

    2. Re:Whats with the -ron? by flamelord · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sauron would work well.

      I want a Sauron processor.

    3. Re:Whats with the -ron? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      New from K-Tel! The Dadooron cpu.

      Brought it home on Monday and my heart stood still.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.
      Loaded up this OS from a guy named Bill.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.
      Whoa, my heart stood still.
      Yeah, an OS from Bill.
      And then I booted up my,
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.

      They knew what they were doin' when they caught my eye.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.
      A really nifty box and lots of pie in the sky.
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron
      Yeah, they caught my eye,
      With all that pie in the sky.
      And when I booted up my,
      Dadooron ron ron, Dadooron ron.

      But wait! Don't order yet. Call before midnight tonight and get a Moron XML4000 Ultra Plus with bluing for extra whiteness at no extra cost!

      KFG

    4. Re:Whats with the -ron? by VistaBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if you translated Athlon from English to Japanese to English, you might get Athron...

  8. Bad name by ebcdic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel sure this will immediately be spelt "sempr0n".

    1. Re:Bad name by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact it already *has* been spelled sempr0n. Allow me to link you.

  9. Sempron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hm.Sempr0n.

    Sounds like something having to do with Marine porn.

  10. Whats up with these names?? by jamesdood · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean Sempron? Opteron, Xeon, maybe I would by a new processor when they come out with the Orgasmatron!

    --
    *narf!*
    1. Re:Whats up with these names?? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Funny
    2. Re:Whats up with these names?? by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was bored, so I Googled.... and apparently, it's already copyrighted.

    3. Re:Whats up with these names?? by fembots · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should have introduced Megatron in '90s, if Transformers allows AMD to use that name; and eventually have Gigatron when they broke the GHz barrier.

    4. Re:Whats up with these names?? by jamesdood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually if I remember correctly, this is from a pretty funny Woody Allen movie, Sleeper

      --
      *narf!*
    5. Re:Whats up with these names?? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I mean Sempron? Opteron, Xeon, maybe I would by a new processor when they come out with the Orgasmatron!"

      I'm waiting for the Megatron myself.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  11. I think what it implies is: by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they're getting at is that its designed for basic functionality like your word-process and your basic video decoding.

    What this processor is probably not aimed at is high end video encoding/transcoding - 3D (openGL or DirectX) gaming or high-load server processing.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:I think what it implies is: by vivek7006 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do video encoding using Duron 1.3 Ghz. I can rip and encode a whole DVD movie in about 4-6 Hrs. These new processors will be definetely faster than a Duron 1.3Ghz, which IMHO is fast enuf.

  12. You've gotta admit by slycer9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That as much as we like to rip on 'choked' CPU's, Joe 6Pack doesn't NEED 1/2 the processing power that most of US use in our routers!

    Jesus Christ, my router/firewall alone is a 333PII, which, for the average luser is WAY more than enough.

    That said, I'm all for a new low-end CPU from AMD, let's me keep my overhead low and profits high. Good stuff, have some.

    --
    Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    1. Re:You've gotta admit by RobinH · · Score: 4, Funny

      my router/firewall alone is a 333PII, which, for the average luser is WAY more than enough.

      Well, a 333 P2 would choke on just half of the spyware that's installed on Joe 6 Pack's computer, so I doubt he'd be happy with the performance.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    2. Re:You've gotta admit by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The average "luser", as you like to refer to the overwhelming majority of PC users, wants to run an OS that they are familiar with and that's current. I'd like to see you run something more powerful/recent than, say, Windows 98 on a 333MHz Pentium II and see how much time you'd waste just looking at the hourglass.

      Oh, and newsflash for you: Joe Sixpack wants to do more on his PC nowadays than just word process and play solitaire.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:You've gotta admit by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm running XP Home on a K6-300 with - are you ready for this? 96 MB of ram. Yeah. I hate my life.

  13. Why this new line? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article says it's a 32-bit replacemnent for Duron to compete with Intel's Celeron at around 2.8GHz.

    So why don't they just lower Athlon's price enough to compete with Celeron? Or is this Sempron simply a rebranded Athlon, while Duron is a crippled Ahtlon?

    At first I thought AMD is introducing a dumped down 64-bit Athlon, that might be something, as the price of Athlon64 is still too expensive.

    1. Re:Why this new line? by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Athlon XP is already competing with Celeron. In the UK, a 2.8 GHz Celery will cost me 86. An Athlon 2800 XP (which as most of you will know will kick the Celery's arse until the cows come home) will cost you... 67!

      Both prices taken from aria.co.uk, there may be slight differences elsewhere. But as you can see, the superior Athlon is already undercuttnig the crappy Celeron. The point of the Sempron is to (hugely) undercut the Athlon in order to provide a chip that's cheap as... er... chips.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  14. I don't get this by batkid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Athlon XP line is actually very competitively priced against the celeron. For example the XP2500+ is $125.00 Canadian compared to the Celeron 2.6Ghz which is $120.00 Canadian. The only difference between the XP and the Celeron is that the XP is WAY faster in many areas (e.g. gaming). So is this new budget line going to decrease performance in order to "compete" with the celeron?

    1. Re:I don't get this by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Looks like frys is selling an xp2500+ with motherboard for $65 US (If you happen to live in the Dallas area which I don't). Is there a market for processors cheaper than that?

      -jim

    2. Re:I don't get this by Caesar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The general idea isn't so much to compete with Intel in the North American market as much as it is to undercut them massively in Asia and Latin America. You may recall that AMD killed the Duron line in 2002 only to bring it back later for sales in China (sales that they consider to be strong, and also great for branding).

    3. Re:I don't get this by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not the "real" price, it's one of those limited quantity specials to get people in the door. The regular asking price of the XP 2500+ was, I believe, close to $90 for the retail version when I was there this weekend.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  15. A processor optimized for downloading music ! by sufehmi · · Score: 4, Funny


    From PC Magazine's article :

    Basic computing is no longer just about e-mail, Web browsing or word processing. Today, it's also about downloading and playing music, as well as sending pictures to family and friends


    Yes !! Finally, they've created a processor optimized to downloading music. With Sempron, you can download MP3s 10x faster than using Celeron!

    Intel, eat my pants.

    Now I remember why I cancelled my subscription to PC Magazine years ago....

    1. Re:A processor optimized for downloading music ! by heckpart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This statement does not come from the PC Magazine. It is the original statement which you can also find in the press release from AMD...

      In fact you can simply find the real aim of AMD. They do not want to bring a new highend processor but an well performing "everybody" or "always computing" CPU.

      And finally... It is clear, that AMD offers its low cost users much more performance than intel does with its silly celeron line...

  16. Ob. Monty Python... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Funny

    AMD annnounced today the new line of Semprini proc...

    (sounds of announcer being taken away...)

    Those responsible for this announcement have been sacked.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  17. Duron changed to the semperon by Grout58 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why did they change the name? People just getting sick of duron? Celeron never changed its name for as long as its been around.

  18. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I purchased a boxed XP 2500 w/ motherboard from Fry's this weekend for $69.00. The Athlons are already a better deal than the Celerons.

  19. Don't forget their next processor line... by Dr+Cool · · Score: 5, Funny

    And for the energy and utility markets, they're making a new line of processors called the Enron. But I hear their beta version had problems with the floating-point unit... it kept inflating numbers by 20% to 50%.

  20. Marketing geniuses... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Funny

    They wanted to emphasize that this was "more" than just a celeron, and of course, they had to keep the -on suffix.

    Introducing the AMD Moron....

  21. Great for Thin Clients by privaria · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These will probably work fine in thin clients connected to a server running a stable, multitasking, multi-user OS. Actually, they may even be overkill for that.

    Imagine a tiny motherboard using one of these with a basic amount of soldered-in RAM, on-board video and NIC, and an on-board boot flash containing LTSP. Voila, a compact, cheap license-free, diskless, plug-and-play, workstation! How's that for putting Linux on the desktop?

    An open hardware project, anyone?

  22. Semper... by hpa · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first thing the name "Sempron" reminded of was the fact that Semper is a Swedish brand of baby formula.

  23. Re:Where do they get these names? by sploo22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe I should RTFA...

    NOOOO! Don't do it! Just imagine the chaos if EVERYBODY clicked that link at the same time. We might even crash the server!

    *shudders at the thought*

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  24. Not lower, Higher!!! by elasticwings · · Score: 3, Funny

    Argh, stop making lower processors!!! Make new higher ones. I don't want to be able to afford a new cpu. I want to dream about new fast ones that cost more than I have. :P

  25. AMD what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    AMD Spermon?
    AMD Sempr0n?

    I'd like to applaud the marketing people at AMD for showing that even though you are severely retarded, you can still come up with a name for a a discount CPU.

    And cheers to AMD for having such enlightened hiring practices! Most companies reserve the mentally deficient for IT jobs.

    1. Re:AMD what? by Merovign · · Score: 2, Funny

      On-topic: What is it with the stupid names! Always with the stupid names! Sempron! Opteron! VW Touareg! An economy station wagon called Matrix! Nasal CROM! Semprini! I know it's hard to find names, but criminy!

      Off-topic: If there were a real-life meeting of Kuro5hin.org posters, I would want to know so I could be somewhere else. In comparison, /. is a bastion of fraternal love and kindness. Even on bad days.

  26. Duron = 32bit, Semperon = 64bit? by Unit3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, I believe that the Duron name refers to the lower-end 32-bit chips, whereas Semperon will be lower-end 64-bit chips.

    Feel free to correct me, though.

    --
    -- sudo.ca
  27. And what about the Moron processor? by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  28. Re:Simpron by Spad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whereas by misreading the name of the processor, you're just begging for abuse...

  29. The BBC would like to apologize by XanC · · Score: 2, Funny

    These are the words that are not to be used again on this programme:

    B*M
    B*TTY
    P*X
    KN*CKERS
    KN*CKERS
    W**-W**

  30. Not necessarily.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you take online multiplayer games as an example the GPU is probably only 50% of the equation.

    All the prettiness is handled by the GPU but the CPU is still responsible for generating the OpenGL/DX stream and handling player (and other player) location, physics etc. A good example of this is UT2004 Onslaught which requires as much CPU as GPU power.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  31. look elsewhere by GunFodder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Via already makes a line of small integrated motherboards with most of those requirements, called EPIA. They use their own Eden processor. It's pretty gutless, but it would make a fine file server or I/O device.

  32. Simperon? by Bodhammer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    simper

    \Sim"per\, v. i. [imp. & p. p. Simpered; p. pr. & vb. n. Simpering.] [Cf. Norw. semper fine, smart, dial. Dan. semper, simper, affected, coy, prudish, OSw. semper one who affectedly refrains from eating, Sw. sipp finical, prim, LG. sipp.] 1. To smile in a silly, affected, or conceited manner.

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  33. No computers. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Low end processors, old processors, crap processors ... the problem is that people still have full-blown computers on their desks. Maybe if you're Joe Seven-Pak (you know, Joe Six-Pak's poweruser cousin) and you edit your home videos on your PC, it makes sense to have the latest and greatest. But I find it completely stupid -- actually, I find it downright obscene -- that businesses with bloody acres full of cubicle dwellers, have not embraced network computing solutions like LTSP or even Citrix. If it weren't for the damned status quo being continously hammered into people's minds by Intel and Microsoft, maybe people would realize that keeping power off the desktop and centralized behind the glass is the best way to lower the TCO of a multiuser environment.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  34. Combine a Duron with Centrino by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to me that AMD is trying to cash in on the buzz surrounding the Centrino marketing push that Intel is making.

    I can't say I blame them. It's a good idea. AMD has always been a good "budget" performer. Intel may be king of the hill in raw processing power, but in the price/performance battle it's AMD all the way.

    Some might label me as an AMD fanboy because I haven't bought an Intel chip since the P2-300 and because I have sworn off Intel because of the P3's processor ID fiasco. That's fine with me.

    Spend more on Intel than I do on AMD and you'll get a 10% performance bonus at the cost of a 25% price premium.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  35. Re:fuck! by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I still use a 433MHz and a 466Mhz Mendocino Celeron. Not in one box, of course. But the two machines are still in working order. Hell, I have a ThinkPad 600E 400MHz PIIm that is still kicking ass under both Linux and Windows 2K. Don't count the old machines out.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  36. Simpleton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    AMD announces the Simpleton processor line. Designed to be a replacment for the older Moron line, the Simpleton features 4 more letters in its name. The new line is designed to compete with the current Intel Cheaparon line.

  37. Re:Centrino correction by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Centrino is any system that uses the following: 1. An Intel Pentium-M processor, which is NOT a Celeron and has NO releation to the Pentium 4. The new "Dothan" Pentium-M, overclocked to 2.4Ghz in a recent review competed with the Athlon 64 3400+ in many tests and defeated the 3.4Ghz P4EE in SuperPi. This chip may be where Intel goes next, as it uses only 21 watts yet is faster than the Prescott and can clock high with hardly any cooling. 2. An Intel 850 motherboard (I'm pretty sure about this, can't guarantee it though). 3. And that board has to have integrated wireless. If the notebook has the above three, its a Centrino. Just a fancy name for a Pentium-M high-battery-life machine with wireless.

  38. Ok, yeah by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The processors are designed to perform basic tasks, such as word processing...

    That's officially the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  39. name.... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the first thing i saw in the name was Sem pron , so is it optomized for jpeg, and movie decoding or something?

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  40. after a quick search... by Nyder · · Score: 3, Funny

    after a quick search I realised the 2 most stupid things that usally gets asked didn't.

    "Can it run linux?"

    "Can you imagine a beowolf cluster of these?"

    thanks

    um, hey, look, the only reason I post stupid stuff like these is because I can't find a job.
    So check my blog if you'd like to help...

    http://nyder.blogspot.com

    --
    Be seeing you...
  41. Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile design. by Glasswire · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the "Pentium M" processor in Centrino is not a Celeron or any other Pentium 4 Willamette or Northwood or Prescott core derivative.

    It was designed from the ground up to perform well at lower clock speeds to lower power consumption and increase battery life.

  42. Re:Sempron... = TAMPAX competitor by mdrejhon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I first heard about Sempron, I immediately thought it was a new brand of tampons.

    A CPU called a Sempron? No wonder we're running out of trademark namespace!

  43. Re:How Less = More by aka1nas · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do realize that the sempron will be a regular athlon64 with features disabled? I.E. some of the L2 cache or the "64-bitness".

  44. Running Server 2003... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

    on a 533 MHz celeron and 128MB of RAM, and a laptop hard drive.

    The scary thing is, it's the one of the most responsive windows machine I have.

    Just goes to show you: Server 2003, it's XP, except it doesn't suck!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  45. Ding ding ding! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are our new Slashdot champion. Lets' break down your +5 score:

    +1 for mentioning Linux.
    +1 for introducing it in a clever, offhand way (a link to kernel.org which will associate the linking phrase in google, YOU SLY DOG YOU!)
    +1 for advocating a return to client/server computing in some form
    +1 for using "open" and "hardware" in the same sentence.

    Good job! I'd shake your hand if I could reach it.
    Now for the bad news:

    You don't know what the FUCK are you talking about.
    The Sempron is going to be 100% like the Duron. Is the Duron in ANY way more suited then any other processor for thin client computing? AMD's new server line of Opterons with lower voltage cores might be a starting point. The Pentium-M might be a starting point. The Sempron is NOT a starting point.

    Oh wait, AMD already sells an embedded x86-compatible processor Am5x86! And, WHAT'S THIS?!?! It even sells a miniature integrated platform, called Elan.

    Well tie me up and violate me with a spoon. Do you enjoy being such a karma whore or are you just that ignorant?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  46. Re:Wrong. Centrino core is a whole new mobile desi by dcam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at this article

    Basically a P3, with more cache and some of the features of a P4 (improved branch sheduler) and none of the crud (long pipelines).

    --
    meh
  47. Re:Its the name ... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's just me

    Yep, you're a crackhead.

    It's hard to pump Sempron.

    I pump my sempron every day! Now I get to put my sempron in my computer. My wife's gonna get jealous at last. :(

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  48. You're wrong. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Playing games that don't exist is not the only problem for a budget system. In addition to these processors being slated as "budget", the manufacturers will add junk to either use outdated, or unreliable, or undated and unreliable for video (I still remember the awe when I saw brand new top of the line P4's with that cheap stuff). Put that together with a standard 48x cdrw and you have a system that is totally void of anything worthwhile.

    This is not to diss AMD, I'm sure the Sempron will kill the celeron, and likely compete with the p4 on an even clock speed, but the big manufacturers will treat it like a Cyrix (They see: P4, Athlon, Celeron, then Sempron). I cannot feel strongly enough about my friends who go out and buy a "cheap" celeron for $500. Just imagine all the people who would sell them their 3 year old gaming system, a system to totally blow away the modern "Screaming fast" PC.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14