Slashdot Mirror


Listen To The Universe On Your iPod

ptorrone writes "The New York Times had a great story about Dr. Mark Whittle, a professor of astronomy at the University of Virginia who has taken the cosmic background radiation of the universe and made a series of sounds. The folks over at Engadget made the sounds available in MP3s so you can listen to them on your computer, iPod or whatever. Also, If you'd like to read more about Dr. Mark Whittle's work visit his site, there are a lot of presentations and information regarding Big Bang Acoustics."

227 comments

  1. high-school? by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it coincidental that the MP3s sound an awful lot like a bomb fuse burning and then a toilet flushing?

    The Universe was created by the big bang in the high-school men's bathroom!

    1. Re:high-school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I knew I shouldn't have eaten that burrito." -God

    2. Re:high-school? by Saxton · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought he just stole all the sounds from the Atari 2600 "Missile Command" game cartridge.

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    3. Re:high-school? by maxbang · · Score: 5, Funny

      This only confirms my theory that the Big Bang originated somewhere in the near vicinity of Uranus. Not only was it ridiculously loud, but it also stank to high heaven.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    4. Re:high-school? by mog007 · · Score: 1

      The Universe is a pretty big place, how did they manage to compress it into an MP3 that can fit on the average computer?

    5. Re:high-school? by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I can't download a copy at this time. I get a service not available. :-(

    6. Re:high-school? by maxbang · · Score: 3, Funny

      Simple - similar to the Fraunhofer pscho-acoustic encoding algorithms, they just deleted the frequencies that the human ear doesn't perceive. Seeing how the human ear didn't exist fourteen billion years ago, most of the sound didn't make it and left us with the sounds of a street preacher screaming that the world's beginning is nigh.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    7. Re:high-school? by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Somehow it seems right that god and atari are related. To create such joy from such meagre resources. God created 'ALL THIS' from ... well... from fuck all!

      But Atari created the single most entertaining game of all time from a half-hertz cpu and 3 bytes of ram! now THATS an achievement.

      (the game in question, if your wondering, was COMBAT on the 2600 - games have all been downhill since then)

    8. Re:high-school? by Mignon · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. The original brown noise.

  2. Listen to gravitational waves by beeplet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People have also turned gravitational wave simulations into sound files. Gravitational radiation can be a hard concept to explain to people, but make it into a sound file and it helps people (non-physicists) grasp the idea. Here's a page with a set of audio files for inspiral into Kerr Black holes.

    A few years ago I made an audio file out of the gravitational wave background in our galaxy (from white-dwarf binary stars). It sounded rather like listening to the ocean... I wish I had kept a copy.

    1. Re:Listen to gravitational waves by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      lots of sound files there. could you point the one, most interesting?

      maybe there is something that sounds like your ocean you mentioned?

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    2. Re:Listen to gravitational waves by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Too weird. Earlier today, for the first time in years I was listening to Fiorella Terenzi's Music from the Galaxies, audio transformed from radio observations of UGC 6697.

      She has been doing this sort of thing for years. More info at http://www.fiorella.com/.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Listen to gravitational waves by beeplet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think these are all files for individual orbits, while the ocean sound I generated came from the addition of thousands of individual binaries. But of the ones given on that page, I think the eccentric orbits are the most interesting (i.e., they generate the most complicated and varied waveforms).

      The ones I like best are called (humorously) zoom-whirl orbits, because the inspiraling mass makes one or two large orbits [low-frequency]followed by a series of very fast, close orbits [high-frequency] - the result is a kind of funny popping sound superimposed on the more-slowly varying sound. There are more details in this paper by Scott Hughes. (See page 37 for a graph of a zoom-whirl orbit.)

      Unfortunately I don't have sound on this computer to double-check which of the sound files on his page are the ones I'm thinking of, but try the ones under "Generic Kerr Inspirals, Kludgy Results" with e=0.95 or 0.7 for starters.

    4. Re:Listen to gravitational waves by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Ah, Fiorella!

      Major babe, she!

      Got three pictures of her up on my wall.

      The only astrophysicist and radio astronomer who looks like an Italian porn star.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Radiation - Music? by BlindSpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What method did the professor use to turn the radiation into music?

    --
    Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
    1. Re:Radiation - Music? by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that not many of you will get to listen to these fine MP3s but let me tell you they are certainly nothing even close to music and certainly not something I would put on my iPod to listen to.

      In fact, there was no reason to mentio the iPod at all.

    2. Re:Radiation - Music? by BlindSpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just wondering what program/algorithm the prof used to inturpret the radiation into "music" or something listenable?

      --
      Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
    3. Re:Radiation - Music? by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps he used this program to covert GIFs into WAV files (it makes a picture in the spectrogram that you can see w/a program like Audacity).

    4. Re:Radiation - Music? by BlindSpy · · Score: 1

      Thats a good find but anyone could have taken any random picture and done that. I think the reason this is news is that the prof came up with a good way to represent the radiation as sound.

      --
      Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
    5. Re:Radiation - Music? by garcia · · Score: 1

      What's to say that isn't exactly what he did? How the hell would we know that this is what the radiation of the universe sounds like?

      I can't be anything but skeptical with a blatant iPod plug in the days when "research" is presented about topics that directly correlated with up-in-coming movie releases.

    6. Re:Radiation - Music? by LS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm very surprised your post didn't get modded down heavily. Every mention, even implied, of Slashdot being in bed with Apple is met by swift punishment, lest the truth of inline marketing be known to the Slashbots. Watch me as I get moderated into oblivion!! I'll die with my boots on!!! :)

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    7. Re:Radiation - Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we can see, you are safe. Using phrases like "Watch me as I get moderated into oblivion!!" protect you from negative moderation.

    8. Re:Radiation - Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the layman, it's called reverse hypnosis.

    9. Re:Radiation - Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the rest of us, it's called reverse psychology.

  5. Come Over to My Place Tonight... by bcolflesh · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if you want to hear the sounds of the Big Bang!

    1. Re:Come Over to My Place Tonight... by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Funny

      So your mom is back in town, I gather?

      --
      The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    2. Re:Come Over to My Place Tonight... by bcolflesh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'd have a retort for this, except I'm white and my cable package doesn't include UPN or BET - sorry!

    3. Re:Come Over to My Place Tonight... by randomaxe · · Score: 1

      ...if you want to hear the sounds of the Big Bang!

      Fajitas night again, is it?

  6. Way Cool... by dukeluke · · Score: 1

    Totally straight out of a sci-fi classic....felt like I was streaming through space at light speed.

    Interesting concept on how he altered the waves to be audible for humans - and sped them up so we could actually listen to them in this lifetime.

  7. So what I'm hearing is... by Lester67 · · Score: 1

    You can Whittle while you work?

    (sorry.)

  8. what you meant to say is by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "listen to the universo on your computer"
    or

    "listen to the universo on your MP3-player"

    There is nothing in this story that requires mentioning an iPod. And frankly all the plugs on slashdot are getting a bit tiring.

    1. Re:what you meant to say is by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I see your point but it IS by far the most popular player. I've noticed at my university that "ipod" is becoming generic slang for any mp3 player (like how walkman came to mean any portable radio)

      Finkployd

    2. Re:what you meant to say is by Nexum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Frankly your whining is tiring. The original article carries an almost identical headline.

      --

      This sig has been deprecated.
    3. Re:what you meant to say is by BlindSpy · · Score: 1

      I agree to this: putting 'iPod' in the subject just looks like he's trying to gather attention.

      --
      Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
    4. Re:what you meant to say is by dtio · · Score: 1

      > There is nothing in this story that requires mentioning an iPod.

      Right. I first thought by reading just the headline that it was about a new cool hack that enables your iPod to listen to some E.T. radio station or something..

    5. Re:what you meant to say is by Jonsey · · Score: 1

      They'll also get you mugged.

      And still look like crap. Just one man's opinion, but I'm a man with style : )

      --
      I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
    6. Re:what you meant to say is by finkployd · · Score: 1

      True, fortunately this is a REALLY low crime campus.

      Finkployd

    7. Re:what you meant to say is by BlindSpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly what I thought - where's the iPod stuff?

      --
      Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
    8. Re:what you meant to say is by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      This kind of thing is in fact older than ipods OR mp3(Wow! Pre 2.0 kernel). You can listen to the sounds of many of the earths electro-magnetic field phenomena here . In REAL TIME!!! OMG!!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:what you meant to say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, your use of the word "Frankly" is tiring, I think...that... *yawn* zzz
      snoooooooore

    10. Re:what you meant to say is by phoxix · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in this story that requires mentioning an iPod. And frankly all the plugs on slashdot are getting a bit tiring.

      I wish the slashdot editors in general didn't sell out to Apple. But its pretty hard to mention anything remotely anti-apple being that all the pro Apple folks will jump on you ASAP.

      Sunny Dubey

    11. Re:what you meant to say is by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that more people listen to mp3s on their computer than on iPods. I don't have numbers to back that up or anything but I'd bet on it. It was a shameless plug that made everyone think that the article might have had even the tinyest bit to do with iPods... which it doesn't.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    12. Re:what you meant to say is by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Caaaareful... That almost sounded like you didn't worship at the Shrine of Apple. That's dangerous thinking there, lad.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    13. Re:what you meant to say is by Gropo · · Score: 1
      Oh.. if only I could motivate myself to lift the mouse cursor all the way to the link... I'd see that the article itself claims that one can listen to the Universe on their iPod. With a big juicy picture of an iPod.

      iPOD iPOD iPOD iPOD...

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    14. Re:what you meant to say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, you guys did go to the linked engadget site before posting didn't you?

      The title of THEIR article is:

      "Listen to the sound of the Universe on your iPod"

      and there's even a picture of an iPod there.

      Now everyone just take a deep breath, Slashdot and Apple are not out to get you.

    15. Re:what you meant to say is by phoxix · · Score: 1

      I don't worship Crapple.

      Far from it

      Sunny Dubey

    16. Re:what you meant to say is by TVC15 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >cool hack that enables your iPod to listen to some E.T. radio station or something

      perhaps they only wanted to emphasize that these were not .ogg files? ;-)

    17. Re:what you meant to say is by theNeophile · · Score: 1

      And don't call me frank!

    18. Re:what you meant to say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there's a lot of people who wouldn't look like crap after getting mugged.

    19. Re:what you meant to say is by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Hmm...

      *clicks link to NYT article* Ctrl-F "iPod" -- no results.
      *clicks link to lead Ph.D's site* Ctrl-F "iPod" -- no results.
      *clicks link to cheesy gadget site* -- no crap? All kinds of iPod stuff there. At a gadget and portable audio site? Wow... I'm now incredibly enlightened.

      This news item is covering some cheesy site's WAV->mp3 conversion as much as the research. Just because some pro-iPod dumbarse gadget site feels the need to plug iPods (look at that, correct place and time) doesn't mean Slashdot has to repeat their drivel. And what's at these other links? Dr. Whittle himself released pdfs, and wavs, and ppts, and htmls... forget that crap... some cheeseball converted the wavs to play on an iPod (or any other mp3 player); now that's a F'n headline! Slashdot isn't supposed to follow the stupids... at least not in a science category article.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    20. Re:what you meant to say is by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      That just goes to show that lousy editing can be found at both web sites. Shocking really.

      Of course, I never expected a headline saying "Listen to the universe on WMP!"

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    21. Re:what you meant to say is by merdark · · Score: 1

      Just because some pro-iPod dumbarse gadget site feels the need to plug iPods (look at that, correct place and time) doesn't mean Slashdot has to repeat their drivel.

      Funny, I feel exactly the same way about slashdot and Linux. Linux this Linux that. Things get mentioned only because they use Linux, not because they present some 'other' cool idea that just happens to use Linux, but could easily use any other OS.

      So I guess we should censor shameless Linux plugs too. Man, that would require a lot of censoring.

    22. Re:what you meant to say is by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Agreed... anyone spouting off about Linux in an unrelated story should be flogged. It'd be like some wanker claiming 'Listen to the Universe in MPlayer'. Equally pointless and mis-representative.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    23. Re:what you meant to say is by metalligoth · · Score: 1, Insightful

      iPods are about to surpass the Sony Discman in sales volume. If Slashdot were a BBS and this was 1989, would you yell at someone for making the title "Listen to the Universe on your Walkman" instead of just saying "stereo" or "record"? Like Kleenex = Tissue and Xerox = Copies, iPod will soon = Portable Music Player, just like Walkman/Discman once did.

    24. Re:what you meant to say is by hmccabe · · Score: 1

      What you meant to say is "I get all butt hurt over insignificant shit." Seriously, do you insist on saying photocopy whenever somebody uses the word xerox as a verb. The same thing has happened with the iPod. It wasn't the first mp3 player, and I assume you'll tell me why it isn't the best, but it's still the name that comes to peoples mind when they think of hard disk based portable digital music players. And since I'm just in the mood to be an asshole, I'll mention I think you meant to say "universe", although I'm sure the "universo" sounds nice too.

    25. Re:what you meant to say is by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Actually I think what they meant to say was "Listen to the universe on your iPod."

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  9. How long... by Jareeedo · · Score: 4, Funny

    before this turns up sampled in a hip-hop song?

    1. Re:How long... by justkarl · · Score: 1

      I can do it before the evening's done.

    2. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      before the Universe subsequently sues for unlicensed sampling?

    3. Re:How long... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      You could put Bubb Rubb over it.

    4. Re:How long... by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1
      before this turns up sampled in a hip-hop song?
      Too late.

      Bling bling, bitches.
      --
      [o]_O
    5. Re:How long... by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      How long before this turns up sampled in a hip-hop song?
      Too late! Advanced physics and gangsta rap have already collided.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  10. Macroscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm reminded of Macroscope by Piers Anthony...

    I don't think this has the same implications, I'm just reminded.

    Thanks for your time. :-)

  11. Big bang accoustics? by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Do we need THX do really appreciate the sound of "BOOM"?

    Let me konw when someone makes a techno tune out of it, and adds the lyrics "Let there be light!"

  12. iPod? WTF is the relevance? by bombom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fucking A, for the love of free beer, would you stop pimping Apple?

    I think the /. editors add/allow such flamebait in the articles just to enjoy the flame fests. And like a retard I just complied....

    Damnit, knew I shouldn't have left the tinfoil hat at home today.

    --
    IOException - Can't Speak
    1. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by falcon5768 · · Score: 0
      :-P....

      Actually (even though apparently Im on the Apple Fanboy List wooo hooo) I was going to say the same thing. Its a mp3, you can listen to it on any device not just a iPod... is it a sign of the iPods cultural dominance when saying listening to it on your iPod has the same significance to some people as listening to it on your walkman..... Walkman is a Sony thing, but we dont say cassette player, we say walkman.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by Nexum · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original article carries an almost identical headline, the /. editors have just taken it from there. RTFA? Try RTF Headline.

      --

      This sig has been deprecated.
    3. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by wibs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No kidding. I have an iPod, I have a Mac, I love them both... but this has NOTHING AT ALL to do with Apple or the iPod! The mere fact that some noises are available in mp3 does no more to tie this story to the iPod than it does to any one of forty bazillion other mp3 players.

      I can see it now... "Listen to the universe on your Rio Cali 128, Rio Cali 256, Rio Chiba 128, Rio Chiba 256, Rio Nitrus 128..."

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    4. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by bombom · · Score: 1

      I agree with the point you make but with all due respect (to all apple fanboys) I don't think the iPod has quite reached the ubiquity of Walkman, Kleenex or Xerox.

      THe simple reason is that they are too frigging expensive. I was in the market for a mp3 payer and I ended up buying a 20 gig Creative Xen for less than 200 bucks as opposed to 300 bucks for an iPod.
      If design and coolness factor were deciding factors (rather than ubiquity) we would stop saying my car and say something like my BMW (insert your personal Jap/German maker here).

      --
      IOException - Can't Speak
    5. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by bombom · · Score: 1

      And the editors exist to do what exactly?
      This looks like another case of the editor not having RTFA.

      --
      IOException - Can't Speak
    6. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by finkployd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try clicking the friendly links in the submission. The headline on the linked story is the same (well, almost)

      Finkployd

    7. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Quiet you.

      As I said before, Keep up the good work. All of this pimping of apple has made my apple stock rise from 19 to 29.

      Keep pimping apple. You are making me a happy camper.

      --

      no .sig
    8. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 1

      Are you saying I didn't have to download the mp3, import it into iTunes, export it to my iPod, and then put on my headphones to hear it? I could have just double clicked? But the article said iPod...

    9. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      Ahhh but if you remeber sony diskman and walkmen where frigging expensive too when they both came out... a diskman was like 200 bucks and is shit compaired to the 30 dollar ones you can buy now. I know my family didnt own one till they where around 145. And then it was one for the entire family (which btw still is working even after 15 years)

      Likewise it was the people around town that ended up calling tape decks walkmen, it was the media, which is ALSO calling MP3 players iPods.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    10. Re:iPod? WTF is the relevance? by bombom · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      Now take your logic and go away, I was having a much better day without all your fancy shamncy logic :)

      --
      IOException - Can't Speak
  13. Slashdotted already! by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    Downloading @ 0.5 k/s.. sheesh..

  14. Bittorrent by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If someone can get a bittorrent started, I'll leave it hosted all day at work here. At the moment, I can't even download the file though.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Bittorrent by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Yagh! I've got it downloaded, but I've never started a bittorrent before. Can anybody post a quick how-to? :D

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:Bittorrent by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      You just leave the download window open.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Bittorrent by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I meant... to start the bittorrent. I d/led it finally the "regular" way, and have it now, and want to share it

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  15. What it sounds like in Western New York by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    When listening to background radition, we here in Western New York can only hear the cryptic cosmic phrase, MY TEE TAH KOH MY TEE TAH KOH.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  16. Boy, that oughta drive the RIAA nuts by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 5, Funny
    Teenager 1: So what'd you download today?

    Teenager 2: The universe, man, the universe.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  17. Vonnegut story by micromoog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of a Kurt Vonnegut short story called "The Euphio Question". Someone discovers accidentally that if certain deep-space signals are amplified from a radio telescope and broadcast, it causes ultimate euphoria in the listener. A good read (like all of his work).

    1. Re:Vonnegut story by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 3, Informative
      That story resides in the book "Welcome to the Monkey House" for anyone interested.

      The entire book is excellent, and I can't recommend it strongly enough.

    2. Re:Vonnegut story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then why bother?

    3. Re:Vonnegut story by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      sometimes I really have no faint hint from where all those (insert a handful of appropriate adjectives) anonymous posts came from.

      that's kinda.. strange.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
  18. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the story isn't great either. pretty boring.

  19. These are always cool by JLSigman · · Score: 1

    A few years ago CNN posted a link to a recording someone had made of a comet passing by... some hissing, then a minor whistle. Very spooky. I think I still use it at home as my minimize sound.

    --
    -jls
    Techno-pagan
    1. Re:These are always cool by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! One of the coolest things about looking at data in ways that we haven't before, is that sometimes new patterns emerge that lead to a greater understanding of the universe. And it opens the doors of science a little wider too, because who knows, a musically trained person might see the pattern that a physicist or astronomer by training might miss.

  20. Been doing for quite some time by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny
    taken the cosmic background radiation of the universe and made a series of sounds.

    Just what I need to spend 300 bucks or more on an electronic device to hear the universe.

    I have been doing this with a Sea Shell for decades

  21. Torrent by SenFo · · Score: 1

    Assuming it wont be a copyright infringement to do so, does anybody want to set up a torrent?

    1. Re:Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the Universe is going to sue you for copyright infringement.

      YOU STOLE MAH RADIATION.

    2. Re:Torrent by Talking+Toaster · · Score: 1

      I think it's safe to say this has been in the public domain for a few billion years.

      --
      Howdy Doodly Doo!
      Anybody want some Toast?
  22. Some massaging by adulttoys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some massaging of the data was needed...Dr. Whittle shifted the sounds to the human audible range, producing a chord like the sound of a jet engine. He used computer models to generate the cosmic chords from creation for the first million years and condensed them to five seconds.

    I don't know much about sound, but this seems odd to me...if he's editing it this much, at what point is the guy just making his own music?

    --

    ---
    Adult Toys
    1. Re:Some massaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point at which he stops using a fixed (whether algorithmic, or what have you) scale to match each sound wavelength to a radiation wavelength.

  23. Hey, I hear it! by cflorio · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me know if you hear sounds in prime number intervals.

    1. Re:Hey, I hear it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny this is on here on Slashdot; they are playing the movie Contact on television right now.

  24. I'm going to wait for the video iPod... by diesel66 · · Score: 3, Funny

    so I can *see* the universe.

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
    1. Re:I'm going to wait for the video iPod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. if you play it in Media PLayer.. those fancy graphics almost make it seem like its the video :)

    2. Re:I'm going to wait for the video iPod... by raddan · · Score: 1
      so I can *see* the universe.

      I recommend mushrooms.

    3. Re:I'm going to wait for the video iPod... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Dropping some acid will get you there alot cheaper than a new iPod device

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  25. What the by vurg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just hear some cosmic fart...oh wait my microphone is on.

  26. the cars that go BOOM by geekpuppySEA · · Score: 1
    never thought I'd paraphrase the band Le Tigre on slashdot, but:

    We like the universes, the universes that go BOOM

    --
    Intelligent Design: because MATH is HARD.
  27. Better download it now... by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

    before Puff Daddy remixes it.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  28. You can see remnants of the big bang by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Turn your tv to an unused channel
    2. Turn the brightness all the way up
    3. Turn the contrast all the way down
    4. ????
    5. 1% of the dots are energy left over from the big bang. (PROFIT!)

  29. Big Bang Acoustics by anticypher · · Score: 2, Funny

    To experience the original sound of the big bang in all its glory, turn your volume gain up 11 billion deciBels. Amplifiers that only go to +10 GdB gain just wont cut it for true audiophools.

    the AC

    Some slight hearing loss may occur. Don't try this at home, go to a friends house.

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:Big Bang Acoustics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't measure billions of dB in dB - what you're actually asking for is a gain of 1.1 GB, gigabels. The "deci" in "decibel" is the metric prefix for "tenth".

    2. Re:Big Bang Acoustics by anticypher · · Score: 1

      Doh! I know this. You are completely correct.

      I blame the beer.

      the AC
      I even got the joke backwards. It should have been "Crank your gain to 10 billion Bels. Even better if your amp goes all the way to 11 billion Bels.

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  30. those Star Trek laws look pretty dumb NOW, huh by geekpuppySEA · · Score: 1
    Guess this invalidates at least one of those Star Trek laws we read about earlier today...

    nyah, nyah, nyah!

    --
    Intelligent Design: because MATH is HARD.
  31. Only MP3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about ogg?

  32. Sounds of Jupiter by squidfrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are some other good soundclips on the Sounds of Jupiter site as well; e.g., Jupiter's lightning and the "bow shock."

    1. Re:Sounds of Jupiter by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I remember listening to a clip that was the sound of wind on Io or some such; it was freaky. That's the best way I can describe it; freaky.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  33. Re:Review Of The Universe by MikeXpop · · Score: 3, Funny

    Personally I would have thought Space Invaders, but I really can't argue with the universe can I?

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  34. Scientific Progress goes Whoosh Bleep Fzoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, this has virtually nothing to do with science.

  35. I don't get it. by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have some experience in astronomy. I understand gravity and the cosmic microwave background and have gone through the calculations for a handful of Big Bang parameterizations.

    That being said, I don't understand the purpose of this. Doing the acoustic analysis is fine and informative. Making an audible sound out of it is nonsense. It's almost entirely arbitrary, as the sound is not audible. It's the acoustic equivalent of a false color image. It really tells you nothing you didn't already know, it's just a pretty picture. Hardly worthy of all the press it is getting.

    I don't believe that it improves people's understanding of fundamental phenomena. In fact, I'd say that, if anything, it gives them the impression that they understand more than they really do. And that's usually a bad situation.

    The public just likes to have shiny objects dangled in front of them, they rarely (bother to) understand the significance of said objects.

    --


    Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    1. Re:I don't get it. by hopethishelps · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I understand gravity

      No, you don't. Nobody does. The best theory of gravity we have is Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, which most physicists who understand it believe to be incorrect.
      But you're right about conversion of gravity waves to sound waves being useless as an aid to comprehension.

    2. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just another artificial way of presenting data, like graphs, pictures, or even numbers for that matter. You just a h8ter.

    3. Re:I don't get it. by beeplet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's the acoustic equivalent of a false color image.

      Yes, exactly. And false-color images are used in astronomy all the time for a very good reason: they take information measured in wavelengths beyond the visual range and present it in a way that can be quickly understood by a human. It's not just about making pretty pictures (although I would say that's a bonus in some cases) - it's about presenting information in a human-understandable form. Of course you could process your IR or X-Ray astronomy pictures in a way that never involves making a visual representation of them, but then you miss out on the insight that comes from processing the image visually, which our brains are designed to do.

      Likewise with gravitational waves: we have no biological way of experiencing them directly. We can measure them with sophisticated intstruments like LIGO and LISA (or at least we hope to soon). Any representation of a waveform is artificial, whether it be a plot, a datafile, or and audio file. And each format can be used to emphasize a different aspect of the data. In the case of gravitational waves, some of the frequency bands overlap with the sound frequencies the human ear is sensitive to - no need for artificially tweaking the frequencies to make it audible.

      So I would strongly disagree that such representations interfere with understanding. As long as you are not misrepresenting the process you use to make a sound file or false-colour image, I would say they can only enhance our experience and understanding - for scientists as well as the general public.

    4. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always rely on the New York Times... to print crap.

      I wouldn't wipe my butt with it.

    5. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your actually described the effects of the theory. the orginal question was what is gravity? Not what does Gravity do. What mechanisms drive gravity, how can you reproduce gravity in a labrtory, what speed does gravity travel (S hawkings says instantious), does gravity last forever, more(?)...

    6. Re:I don't get it. by rbgaynor · · Score: 1
      einstein's theory of relativity dealt with energy and mass. it hadn't anything to do with gravity.

      You're thinking of special relativity, Einstein's theory of General Relativity has everything to do with gravity

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    7. Re:I don't get it. by maxbang · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nobody understands women, either. So that must mean that gravity=women, which makes sense as
      1) both get "heavier" as you approach the center,
      2)Though their effects can be weak, the effect itself is pervasive anywhere in the universe,
      3) Both tie you down,
      4) Both are disobeyed only in fantastical tales of science fiction, and
      5) Black holes (the most extreme form of gravity) are the same thing as a woman's memory nothing _ever_ escapes.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    8. Re:I don't get it. by Cruciform · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      5) Black holes (the most extreme form of gravity) are the same thing as a woman's memory nothing _ever_ escapes.

      I've never heard of a selective black hole before. Ever notice that a woman's memory suddenly fails her when you point out a past mistake? :)

    9. Re:I don't get it. by beeplet · · Score: 1

      The fundamental principle of General Relativity is the idea that an accelerated reference frame is indistinguishable from a reference frame in a gravitational field. We can equally well interpret the effects of a gravitational field as the curvature of spacetime. In addition, Einstein postulated that the curvature is related to not simply mass, but the mass-energy-momentum tensor, which is where the E=mc^2 comes in.

      So I would say Einstein's theory of relativity had everything to do with gravity...

    10. Re:I don't get it. by beeplet · · Score: 1

      5) Black holes (the most extreme form of gravity) are the same thing as a woman's memory nothing _ever_ escapes.

      Hmm... Posting bad jokes about women in my thread? I won't forget this, Mr. Maxbang! : P

    11. Re:I don't get it. by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Making an audible sound out of it is nonsense. It's almost entirely arbitrary, as the sound is not audible.

      The same could be said about numbers. They are arbitrarily scaled and spaced, arbitrary names, arbitrary symbols.

      What they are is a model of what is being observed or described. Same with false color images or sounds of the cosmos.

      What does 2kg mean? What does the evenly spaced clunk, clunk, clunk of a pulsar mean?

      Granted, numbers and math work better for proper scientific understanding, but sounds and false colors can convey meaning to someone who doesn't know the math and physics.

      Or do you read Word documents in hex?

    12. Re:I don't get it. by node+3 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, exactly. And false-color images are used in astronomy all the time for a very good reason: they take information measured in wavelengths beyond the visual range and present it in a way that can be quickly understood by a human.

      I'm sure the original poster views all his IR astronomy images in their most accurate respresentation.

      Due to limitations of slashdot, I'm unable to present such an image here, but I can show you the negative of such a photo:

      --begin--

      --end--

    13. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nice troll. I guess the whole gravitation / curved space thing was some other Einstein's theory of relativity. . .

    14. Re:I don't get it. by pkcyll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not nonsense. (And for the record, this is not insightful but "full of it".) Science is obtuse to 99.9% of the population. To get funding, scientists need to explain to the common folks what their work is in terms they can understand, or, in this case, hear. So what if people have the impression they understand more than what they really do? Isn't this good for science? If science remains obtuse to common folks, what is gained? Are scientists really that full of themselves that they want to sneer on people who think they have an understanding? Now, that is nonsense.

    15. Re:I don't get it. by SB9876 · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the whole false-color picture stuff in your comment which has already been sufficiently jumped-on, I'd like to note that this isn't such a bad idea. Your ears are one of your most sensitive sense organs, especially for noticing small discrepancies. I remember reading an article at least 10 years ago that described a company that had converted the readout for their durg teating machines from a graphical to an auditory readout. The overall accuracy of the people monitoring the machines to catch drug-positive samples went way up for the auditory readout.

    16. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, you'd get ink everywhere!

  36. RIAA? by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

    This professor is going to get a subpoena from the RIAA soon. "You have unauthorized mp3's available your server. We are suing you for $5,000,000,000."

  37. Since when does mp3 MEAN iPod... by tevenson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't understand why the headline had to read iPod instead of mp3. Why not just say you can listen to the mp3? I think more people listen to mp3's from other players (be it computer or a Creative product, etc...) than the iPod.

    Perhaps I'm just silly, but I don't think of the iPod as soon as I find an mp3 or a new sound.

    1. Re:Since when does mp3 MEAN iPod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I could have spared an Insightful mod for you, but what can I do I am tempted to post a reply to the article (as nonAC)

      This is /. and you need to crap Microsoft or praise their competitors
      Do you need any stronger reason??

      Let me be the first to say this

      You must be new here

  38. Oggs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these sounds available in Ogg Vorbis? If these guys were truly interested in furthering science, they would have released these sounds in a free (as in speech!) format.

    1. Re:Oggs? by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 1

      I came into this thread, not because I cared, but just to see if some slashdotter would raise the Ogg flag.

      Thank you for not disappointing me, and yet, disappointing me all at the same time.

    2. Re:Oggs? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      shut up; no one wants to hear it.

  39. same thing with radio... by wooby · · Score: 1

    "Listen to atmospheric noise (and extraterrestrial radiaton!) on any AM or FM radio! Just tune to static and start dancing." "See extraterrestrial radiation! Stare at the sky!"

  40. The way the site is being slashdotted... by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I'll probably listen to the Big Crunch before the Big Bang.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  41. WTF? by sinserve · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It is an mp3 file, DON'T tell me how to listen to it. MP3 is a portable format and the majority of us use software players. What is next? "Linux kernel released, use WinZip version X" or whatever.

    Am I the only fucking one seeing this? I am offended.

    1. Re:WTF? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Am I the only fucking one seeing this?

      No. There seems to be more than just you noticing this. Infact, I was also going to post a rant on this issue as well.

      It's popular culture that helps create the wrong terminology for technology and science. People are going to run with this whole "I-Pod" thing until MP3 becomes a geek phrase again. The masses will soon start refering to the music they download/rip so often that it will be "I have The White Album as an I-Pod file" instead of MP3.

      Perhaps it's being a bit anal but, as someone else once said, wisdom begins with calling things by their propper names. How many of us fly into a rage when a user calls a PC a modem or a hard drive? Why? Because it makes communication that much harder. Confussion eventually makes it's presence know because people don't take the time to learn what something is. or worse yet, are too lazy to call something by it's propper name.

      Please call it MP3. Not an Archos file, not a Napster file and certainly not an I-Pod file. MP3!!!!

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  42. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'The new your times' is singular. You are the one who needs english lessons.

  43. Sounds alot like Ummagumma by sparkywonderchicken · · Score: 0

    Is it just "Set the controls to the heart of the sun" being answered?

  44. noPod by GAMMAH_DJ · · Score: 1

    I don't need the mp3s for listening to in my portable HD audio player, as it already supports wavs.

    noPods are nice looking, but I find others to be more convenient. I like being able to drag/drop or "mount /iriver; cp mp3s/* /iriver/mp3s" on my win or nix machines respectively.

  45. Redundant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Am I the only fucking one seeing this? I am offended."

    Try reading the two or three previous comments with the exact same complaint. And the replies to them which indicate you should definitely have been able to notice these comments before posting this redundant crap.

  46. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'The new your times' is singular. You are the one who needs english lessons.

    YHBT. FOAD.

    Regards,

    The Have-Has Troll

  47. DRM anyone? by kipple · · Score: 1

    so NOW I'd like to see who's complaining that the internet is used to share music without paying royalities.

    On the other hand (seriously now) this reminds me of the Silmarillion, a book of J.R.R.Tolkien that describes the beginning of the Universe as a Music... cool.

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    1. Re:DRM anyone? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except in the Silmarillion, the creation was likened to an extremely complex symphony, whereas this is just white noise.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:DRM anyone? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Except in the Silmarillion, the creation was likened to an extremely complex symphony, whereas this is just white noise.

      That's just the difference between theory and observation. Tolkien believed in intelligent design, and so imagined a symphony. On the other hand, we've actually gone and done it - decoded the remnants of the big bang into white noise - so we know the truth.

      The Universe was created by Dom Delillo.

    3. Re:DRM anyone? by kipple · · Score: 1

      ...but in the Silmarillion it is also said that the Men didn't fully understand the music (of the water), but were moved by it.
      Perhaps we should ask some elf.

      Any Noldor lying around here?

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  48. If you play it backwards and speed it up... by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Funny

    You hear Carl Sagan saying "billlllions and billllions"...

  49. Whats next? by justice7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    First the Universe, the next thing we'll be listening to is bit-by-bit samples of old *nix binaries.

  50. Dirk Gently Strikes by obdurate · · Score: 1

    Isn't this what Richard MacDuff was working on?

    --

    Nuclear war would certainly set back cable--Ted Turner
  51. Uh, Fiorella Terenzi did this YEARS ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    This is really old news, folks. Fiorella Terenzi has been making sounds out of "cosmic noise" for years.

    www.fiorella.com

    -- Space Ghost

  52. very interesting. by RegalBegal · · Score: 0

    but i'm sure it only sounds good in .ogg or .flac and i'd rather listen not on my iPod but on a rio karma.

    waka waka waka.

    --
    "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
  53. GOOD GOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those beeps... those are... prime numbers!
    oh wait... 1 3 5 7 8... never mind, carry on.

  54. iPod??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was so ready to tear into my brothers iPod (just to piss him off) when I read the next blurb and see it has ABSOLUTLY nothing to do with an iPod. Would you please stop accepting money under the table from apple? Seriously, this isn't just an oversight.

  55. NASA has something similiar by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Informative

    A set of CDs called "Symphonies of the Planets" which are recordings of magnetic flux in deep space as recorded by voyager probes. I had the fortune to pick up one of the cds on a whim at a Tower Records in about 1992. The one I have is *EXTREMELY* cool and my favorite thing to listen to if I am having trouble sleeping.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:NASA has something similiar by JLSigman · · Score: 1

      For any others who might be interested, I found the box set on Amazon.com, but it's only available used.

      --
      -jls
      Techno-pagan
    2. Re:NASA has something similiar by drayzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you could just download it here from eMule here...

      NASA - Symphonies Of The Planets 1 (@320kbps).rar
      NASA - Symphonies Of The Planets 2 (@320kbps).rar
      NASA - Symphonies Of The Planets 3 (@320kbps).rar
      NASA - Symphonies Of The Planets 4 (@320kbps).rar
      NASA - Symphonies Of The Planets 5 (@320kbps).rar

      PLEASE, if you like the music support the artist and buy a CD or a concert ticket... Sure Solaris is star, but even with the recent publicity Mars and the smaller planets just don't pull much wieght in the universe, and poor Pluto keeps hearing rumors of being kicked out of the band!
      ~Z

  56. On your TV too. by suso · · Score: 1

    There is also a way to view cosmic background radiation on your television as well. It might only work on older TVs though. It has something to do with switching to a "snow" channel on UHF, turning down the brightness, turning up the contrast and maybe one other setting. Maybe someone here will know. It was on some documentary back in the 80s or 90s.

  57. slashdot (not affiliated with Apple) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A great excuse to tie in some iPod product placement.. well done.

  58. Stop Whining Already by saddino · · Score: 3, Interesting
    JFC, I can't believe how many people are actuallly offended by the title. Would you also complain about:

    Strap This Portable GPS Onto Your Backpack

    "WTF, doods? I use a satchel. Don't TELL ME what to use to carry my books!"

    Watch The Star Wars Holiday Special On Your TV

    "DVD = TV???? I've got a PLASMA you bitches. What is it with the analog bias on Slashdot these days, huh????"

    New NASA-developed Lens Cleaner Keeps Glasses Dry In Rain

    "Why couldn't you have titled this Eyewear???? I think most people use contacts these days anyway."


    My guess is: probably not. Something about the iPod just drives these people nuts.

    1. Re:Stop Whining Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Case in point:
      iPod is a brand name and a specific product, not a general category of device, and the comparison you're making here (with iPod compared to "backpack" or TV instead of "Jansport" or "Sony") illustrates just how far out of hand the brand-hype confusion has gotten. No-one (er, fewer people) would have complained if it said "Listen to the universe on your mp3 player." Of course, it could've just said "Listen to the universe," but that would've been too simple now wouldn't it...

      Nothing about the iPod bothers me personally. What DOES bother me is media content (even emergent media like /.!) which is needlessly stuffed with advertising.

    2. Re:Stop Whining Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My guess is: probably not. Something about the iPod just drives these people nuts.

      Yeah, they don't have one.

    3. Re:Stop Whining Already by Xaleth+Nuada · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Backpack.
      TV
      Glasses

      These are all common items that can describe a variety of specifically branded things. Like a Jansport Backpack, Ralph Lauren Glasses, Panasonic Television. What everyone is bitching about is the use of the specific brand named item. As posted above by someone else, if the blurb read "play in your MP3 player" there would be nothing to complain about. The issue arises in the specific product placement.

      Unless we are moving along to a trend where "iPod" becomes a generic term such as "Xerox", or "Hoover", or "Google" that although refers to a specific brand (or product/service) it is equated with all items/services that perform the same function (i.e. Copy machine, Vacuum cleaner, Search Engine). It's all off topic really but the use of the brand name to describe a generic item is what Lindows/Linspire is fighting with Microsoft about. Even Google is fighting the use of their name generically.

      Remember...

      Specific branding leads to Trademarks.
      Trademarks lead to control.
      Control leads to Profit.

      --

      I read Slashdot for the .sigs
    4. Re:Stop Whining Already by d474 · · Score: 1

      Well, your examples use generic terms. That's different. iPod is a brand name my friend.

      To make it a more accurate analogy, your examples should go more like this:

      Strap This Portable GPS Onto Your Jansport
      Watch The Star Wars Holiday Special On Your Panasonic TH-42PHD5UY
      New NASA-developed Lens Cleaner Keeps Jean Paul Gaultier Glasses Dry In Rain

      Now can you see why using iPod in the article seems like a shameless plug/endorsment?

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    5. Re:Stop Whining Already by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I can't believe this got modded up. Children, of the four (4) choices below, choose the one that does NOT belong.

      1)Backpack
      2)TV
      3)Glasses
      4)iPod

      If you guessed iPod you would be correct, because that is the only brand name in the list. Until it becomes legally generic, such as Xerox and Kleenex (and coke I believe, but not sure), it is considered a product plug and should be revealed as such. Blatant PR moves like this are a disturbing thing and I for one will be sure to speak up whenever I garbage like this.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:Stop Whining Already by saddino · · Score: 1

      First, to you (and all those who noticed that my examples lacked specificity of brand): you're right, there is a difference between using the brand name and I see how the iPod compares thusly.

      However (and perhaps more importantly): No, I do not see why using the iPod bothers you or anyone else. Your modifcations of my examples (using Jansport, Panasonic, etc.) don't bother me in the least. And honestly, that was the actual point I was trying to make.

  59. Just when I thought I can listen to the Universe.. by flyingace · · Score: 1

    Just when I thought I can listen to the Universe... you go and slashdot it...
    grrr...



  60. Listen to my ass on your iPod!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty similar...
    Ass MP3

  61. MP3s!?!! by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    Audible range compression is for the mortals.

    What would I do with my big huge ears!?

    Give me my uncompressed music



    (Have you paid $0.75 for your mp3 decoder!?!?)

  62. OMG! We Slashdotted sound of the unvierse! by CoolCat · · Score: 1

    Are we doomed to ethernal silence?

    seriously.. mirror anyone?

    1. Re:OMG! We Slashdotted sound of the unvierse! by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      Kind of makes you wonder what a slashdotting would sound like.

      Chorus:
      aaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiie, 200 bytes/sec! Yeah!!

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
  63. Wow... by Red+Dane · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to waste space on my mp3 player with a bunch of farts and rubbing noises from outer space!

    On the upside, I'm sure it's neat to listen to that stuff once.. and that is it.

  64. mirror? by eaglebtc · · Score: 1

    is there ANY possibility someone got a copy of these before they took the files offline?

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  65. For those who have not d/l-ed it.. Don't bother.. by the_rajah · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't know what I expected, but it was basically just short clips of varying pink noise, (as opposed to white noise). I'm with the other commentators.. WTF does this have to do with an iPOD?? Into the bit bucket with the files and mod the article down..

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  66. Music of the Spheres by mbowles · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pythagoras didn't need an iPod...

  67. I listened to the MP3s... by bonch · · Score: 1

    They were an Apple commercial.

    "You're listening to this on an iPod!"

  68. er by GeekyGurkha · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person having difficulty extracting the mp3 file?

    Perhaps it's really an old spice-girls number and my computer is cleverly stopping me from accessing it,

    --
    Hey! What pretty widgets?
  69. Re:mirror? (but harvesting with wget is better =) by i621148 · · Score: 1

    try this:
    wget -r -l2 --no-parent -A.wav,.mov -R.html,.gif http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~dmw8f/sounds/cdromf iles/index.html

  70. Freaky... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do these clips sound eerily like the fake songs the RIAA is putting out?

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  71. Flawed Examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your examples are flawed. The main compaint people are having is not that they have been told to listen to this on an mp3 player, it's the mention of the iPod. To use your examples:

    "Strap This Portable GPS Onto Your Backpack"
    Becomes:
    Strap This Portable GPS Onto Your Northface Backpack

    "Watch The Star Wars Holiday Special On Your TV"
    Becomes:
    Watch The Star Wars Holiday Special On Your Sony TV

    "New NASA-developed Lens Cleaner Keeps Glasses Dry In Rain"
    Becomes:
    New NASA-developed Lens Cleaner Keeps Ray-Bans Dry In Rain

    Do you see the difference?

  72. Damn! by Savatte · · Score: 1

    I knew I should have waited for one of those 60gb models!

  73. mod parent up by sbma44 · · Score: 1

    Glad somebody mentioned this. I guess the prof mentioned in the story put the red shift radiation through some signal processing, but that just makes it prettier. We've all heard the universe before: it sounds like someone tripped on a cable.

  74. iPod? by sulli · · Score: 1

    No man, the future is ringtones!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  75. Most Hubble Telescope images are FALSE COLOR too! by mdrejhon · · Score: 1

    You got it right. In fact, most of the beautiful Hubble Telescope photos take advantage of falsecolor, at least for one component, such as infrared light combined with visible light. Obviously, a color has to be assigned to the infrared light or any other wavelength not in visible range. For Hubble, the falsecolor images often end up having far more useful science than the realcolor images.

    There is definitely science in turning non-acoustical phenomena into sound, and it does a hell of a good job introducing science to the masses, just like Hubble Telescope photos. Zero/One-dimensional phenomena (time) can most easily be converted to sound frequency ranges, since you only have a single sample point for a given moment. Background noise is one example since certain types are fairly uniform in all directions of the universe. Thus, there is, indeed, a certain amount of legitimate science in converting this to sound, just like hubble falsecolor (most of 'em!) is legitimate science. Just bear in mind that human hearing is very narrow slice of all the frequencies in the universe, just like the human eye eye is another very narrow slice of (much higher) frequencies in the universe. Sound equivalents for things like black holes, pulsars (beep...beep...beep), etc, have been done, and have proved very useful science in the past.

    Obviously, it shouldn't be your only science (just like you have to do things like graphs, charts, mathematics, write proper papers, comparative analysis, etc.)

    I am no scientist, but I know enough to tell you that falsecolor is useful science.

  76. Let me guess... by fgb · · Score: 1

    It's all silence with a brief

    "What the f*ck do you think you're doing!"

    at the beginning.

  77. ouch by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

    I don't have an iPod, you insensitive clod!

    --
    free online diet tracking.
  78. Dr. Fiorella Terenzi by djaxl · · Score: 1

    Fiorella Terenzi released music based on telescope readings as far back as 1991.

    And she's "a cross between Carl Sagan and Madonna"!!

  79. The problem is... by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 1, Interesting

    False color is good for looking at geometric data. If you want to know where objects lie in an image, you can overlay and false color some intensity maps at a few different wavelengths. That is very useful. A lot of the time, it's done just to impress the peasants, of course.

    With this data, the temporality of it renders it pretty much worthless to the human ear. Anything you can detect by ear will very easily be seen in a simple Fourier transform or similar technique. A Fourier transform and a plot against logarithmic time is probably the best (most efficient and informative) way to visualize it.

    Image processing is still not very good at identifying features, unless those features are very well stereotyped. This happens to be a part of my current work, albeit with time-series acquired microscopic images (EM, laser scanning, etc). The human eye/brain will pick up on visual cues that the best algorithms will miss. The algorithms themselves are generally designed/trained based on analysis conducted by eye.

    Picking out 2/3D phenomena is where false color images can be useful. Simple grayscale intensity images are often just as good or better (I worked for a professor that insisted on keeping color channels separate during viewing). Listening to 1D data, you won't learn anything new that the computer couldn't have told you.

    I know this was done just for the sake of doing something neat. And, I don't fault it for that. What does bother me, however, is that now you'll have some NYT-reading, liberal artsy, pseudo-intellectual douchebags running around thinking that the Universe plays an audible tone. In the end, they only get half the facts down and make up the rest, then go on to propogate that misinformation.

    I'm always torn about trying to explain science to the masses, since they're clearly too dumb/uninterested to ever truly understand. Is it worth it to only give them half the facts? Don't forget, it's legislators who only understand half the facts that cause most of the problems that /.ers complain about.

    --


    Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    1. Re:The problem is... by beeplet · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm not going to get into a debate about the acceptable uses of various ways of representing data (which I think is more subjective than you make it out to be), but I want to respond to your last paragraph:

      I'm always torn about trying to explain science to the masses, since they're clearly too dumb/uninterested to ever truly understand.

      Have you ever considered that few people would want to listen to someone who starts out with that attitude about them?

      I work with a project that places cosmic ray detectors in schools. The goals are both scientific and educational. I have had school security people drop by after their shift to talk and learn more about what we're doing. This - making science accessible and interesting to people - is one of the most rewarding parts of my work. You might be surprised how much "the average joe" can grasp, given the opportunity and the right resources.

      Is it worth it to only give them half the facts?

      No one is dishing out half-truths. All the relevant information is there. In the original article it clearly states:

      The cosmic sound waves stretched 20,000 light-years, moved at half the speed of light, and were about 50 octaves below what people can hear. Dr. Whittle shifted the sounds to the human audible range...


      I have never seen a similar presentation that didn't include some explanation of how it was done and what the relationship to the original data is.

      It seems to me like you are asking, "Is it worth trying to disseminate interesting science even though it might be only partially understood?" To that my answer is that getting some of the information across is enough to make science outreach a worthwhile excercise.

      I think it is more important to find creative and interesting ways of engaging people in science than making sure they've got all the facts straight right away. After all, if they you can get someone's interest, they will be motivated to learn more, and then any original misconceptions can be disspelled. If you start out expecting people to learn science by picking up the nearest Astrophysical Journal, it just won't happen.

      Don't forget, it's legislators who only understand half the facts that cause most of the problems that /.ers complain about.

      Again - more information, not less, is the answer. There's nothing wrong with presenting data any way you feel like it, as long as you explain what you did. If more scientists were working to publicize their research like this guy is, maybe everyone, politicians included, would realize that science is not something which is the exclusive domain of the specialists in ivory towers. When science is accessible, I think people are more likely to feel that it is of true value, and hence more willing to fund it with their tax dollars.
    2. Re:The problem is... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      > I'm always torn about trying to explain science to the masses, since they're clearly too dumb/uninterested to ever truly understand.

      The only way to guarantee that this is true, is to never try to explain it.

      Also, never, ever confuse ignorance with stupidity.
      Someone can have no knowledge, or interest in something without being stupid, and assuming their lack of interest is due to stupidity only makes you look bad.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  80. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been listening to the universe my whole life.

  81. Nothing New by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I have a CD of space recordings dated back to 1992. Granted it's out of print these days, but, there is still some info to be found on them.

    From the liner notes:
    These recordings are the most unique approach to deep level relaxation... hmmm.. let me type the better ones...

    These recordings come from a variety of different sound environments:
    1)From the intersection of the solar-wind with the planet's magneto-sphere (...)
    2. From the magneto-sphere itself.
    3. From the trapped radio waves bouncing between the planet and the inner surface of it's atmosphere.
    4. Electromagnetic field noise within space itself.
    5. From charged particle interactions of the planet, its moons, and the solar wind.
    6. From charged particle emissions from the rings of certain planets.


    OK, I guess that gets the point across. This stuff dated back a number of years.

    FYI, for anyone that knows most of Brian Eno's recodings, this won't sound any different...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  82. I don't need iPod by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    ...to listen to the universe. I do it pretty much all the time.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  83. You can't just slap on a header by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Generally when one turns binary information into audio they just slap a WAV header (or MIDI) on the file and the compress it to an MP3. The result is just static or a mess of notes.

    A Better way to do it, is to read in the file as tones. DeCSS.mp3 actually has a deep base beat and repeating melody that's able to be listened to. I ran two versions of DeCSS C code through it and it's very easy to recognize when it gets to the key.

    The way it works is that the forumla for piano key frequencies is used and only every other key is used. The result is always harmonies. In the INI file you can specify the number of simultanious tones that make up the chords and the delay between them. If you have say 8 tones, the first 8 bytes will make up a chord. If in the next 8 bytes one of the values is repeated the note is "held." This results in a more fluid "composition."

    It's a slightly older version of MathSound. The newest revision will be posted probably this weekend.

    It allows for MiddleC to be defined (currently it's 440Hz which is actually A) and what byte value represents it. Currently zero is middle C. It also allows you to limit the number of keys so you don't get too high pitched or too deep.

    Ben

  84. Check the mail by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 2, Funny
    I wonder if God's lawyers have sent a cease-and-desist yet to prevent unauthorized distribution of His work.

    Then again, it's not as though God would find a music industry lawyer in heaven, right?

  85. Woops... by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    They should have released this file as a torrent, its going at like 1.5 k/s!

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  86. Space Sounds by InvaderXimian · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of SpaceSounds.com

  87. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem confused. They are not praising Apple.

  88. It was Kraftwerk's biggest hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Muuuuusik - nonstop.
    Fuse burning - nonstop.
    Hear Universe flushing - nonstop.

  89. that's because you forgot who funds your research by efuseekay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a PR stunt, to get people interested in cosmology and to give back to the people who actually pay taxes to fund experiments like WMAP and stuff.

    I am perfectly happy with hanging shiny objects to the public. If they are interested, they'll ask more questions, and who knows, the younger ones might get excited enough to want to find out more (and pursue a career in science). If they don't bother to find out more, then fine with me, someone got to keep things like the water supply running.

    So, all the power to those people who spend time doing such things.

    --
    Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
  90. Actually it was Denfender.... by hajihill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Definitely sounds like the old defender video game... or else the aliens really do sound like that and Atari managed to hit the nail on the head.... Either way, I'm scared.

    --
    Of blankness, I know nothing.
  91. Outer Limits Episode and sounds from space by gregorymc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just this morning saw an Outer Limits episode where teenagers who listened to a certain recording of noise from outer space become zombies and began to turn into aliens. I had to go to work so I didn't catch the twist (not that the Outer Limits really has Twilight Zone quality twists), but it seems a bit strange to me that MP3 records of sound from space would now be made available after I just watched that show this morning. Or maybe I'm just not getting enough sleep.

    1. Re:Outer Limits Episode and sounds from space by glyneth · · Score: 1

      I saw the end, if you want to know what was going on, let me know.

      And yeah, there was a twist.

      I knew I should have checked the second page before I posted my own post (a few down).

  92. I hate how the word iPod is synonymous with mp3 by deviun · · Score: 1

    boo

  93. I've never done this before by JakeD409 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, universe listens to you!

  94. What does the color green sound like? by CA_Jim · · Score: 1

    This is about as scientifically useful as "What do colors sound like?" or assigning sounds to coefficient of friction. But won't you get as much science from maryjuana? False color imaging helps people see details since our brains are wired for visual input. But mapping to arbitrary audio would be like mapping the alphabet to a musical scale then playing a book on the piano. I'm not sure you would get anything useful out of it.

  95. Done, done and done by nfotxn · · Score: 1

    Oh man I've totally been listening to the universe with my ipod already. I just get real comfy on my beanbag chair, grab some munchies and tune in some floyd. Oh man I am so hungry right now. I love chips. Corn chips, kettle chips, barbeque chips. They are soooo good.

    --

    _nfotxn

  96. Stardroppers by virtual+void · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone but me read the book The Stardroppers by John Brunner? In this book, "stardropping" is the latest hype. Using portable receivers, people listen to cosmic background radiation. What they hear is not only noise and static...

    Sounds like Brunner's story from 1972 has become reality :-)

    (And yes, I know, we don't carry receivers, but the resemblance with the plot is still striking :-)

    --
    /virtual void
  97. Or... by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    Just tune your (older) TV between channels. The snow is partly caused by the cosmic background radiation. Newer TV's just show a blue screen when there's no signal (there's gotta be a Windows joke in there somewhere...)

  98. Is anyone else reminded... by SoulSkorpion · · Score: 1

    ...of Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency?

  99. Outer Limits? by glyneth · · Score: 1

    Man, I just saw an Outer Limits episode like this. Pacey (Joshua Jackson) took some sounds and then Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst) and her friends started listening to it, and they all mutated.

    It was "Music of the Spheres," Episode #3.14, and SciFi just reran it during their marathon.

    Don't listen to it! You'll all turn iridescent gold!

  100. links to "radio astronomy" and pulsar sounds by dgen_network · · Score: 1
    If you liked this, you may also like

    Radio Astronomy, in the literal sense
    http://www.radio-astronomy.net/

    And pulsar sounds
    http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/research/pulsar/

  101. Nitrous Oxide by paulpas · · Score: 1

    Is it me or does track 9 sound exactly like doing a whippit?
    Perhaps Nitrous Oxide is one of the secrets of the Universe. :)

    --
    -PMP-
  102. My poor server... by hbp4c · · Score: 1

    Gah, so this is what happened to my server and network on the 9th!

    (Looks to corner, sees ashes of machine still smoking...)

    Sigh...