Slashdot Mirror


Russia, China World's Biggest Spammers

An anonymous reader writes "According to this ZDNet article, The Spamhaus Project has warned that organised cirminal gangs in Russia are supplying U.S.-based spammers with details of compromised PCs that can be manipulated to send junk mail. According to Spamhaus director Steve Linford, the Russian gangs aren't constrained by any anti-spam or cybercrime laws in their home country and have no respect for legislation implemented in other countries. Also, apparently 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits who in turn have hosting arrangements with Chinese ISPs."

97 of 435 comments (clear)

  1. What is the best way to stop this? by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Maybe not completely relevant to the specific subject, but what is the best way to stop this?

    User end filters are a necessity these days, and even then, I still spend at least 15 min each day dealing with the spam. My personal box - No One else knows the address, it is for my own internal network purposes, is chock full of the stuff.

    What do other slashdot'ers do? What can we hope to see in the near future?

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe not completely relevant to the specific subject, but what is the best way to stop this?

      Due to the global nature of the internet, the only way is to wait until the governments of China and Russia change due to public, internal pressure. Note that this may take some time.

      In the meantime, SpamBayes might help.

    2. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by chimpo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Going after the money would be more effective. Sure, we can't go into China and Russia, but we can make life HELL for USA spammers. If we make it unprofitable here and send more of them to jail, that'll stop most of the jerks. Even if it's just Scott Richter that goes to jail, that'll put a major dent in the action.

    3. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by halowolf · · Score: 5, Insightful
      While end user filters are a necessity, they should be the last line of defense, because by the time the SPAM has reached you, it has stolen the bandwidth, CPU cycles and disk space to get there.

      I currently sit in the "email itself must change" camp to fix the problem of SPAM. Of course its an impractical camp to sit in at the moment, but things are moving along slowly.

      I can't see that addressing the problem of SPAM on an international law basis is going to yield any results in the near and not so near future.

      Just random opinions on my part...

    4. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by zangdesign · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The other method is to go after the advertisers who hire the spammers in the first place. Spammers are bottom-feeders, for sure, but if you cut off their customers, then you cut off their income.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    5. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way is to make sure this way of advertisement of your services is illegal in the USA, and actively go after those that still do it.

      90% or more of all SPAM advertises a product or service in the USA. While it may be difficult to track the spammer, it should be simple for law enforcement agencies to track down the actual advertiser.
      I cannot imagine one would not be able to find the guy who offers you a low-interest mortgage, for example. Make him go out of business. Then his competitors will no longer spam.
      Same for the sale of unlicensed health products.

    6. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aren't you missing one important fact here? That most of the spam are promoting american products? This is a big like fighting drugs by throwing the addicts to jail and hitting small time street pushers. The only way to deal with this is to his the ones that profit big time - which are the ones trying to sell their products using these questionable means.

      Fact is if I look at my inbox - something like 95 % of all Spam promote questionable american products, 2-3 % is in russian so I don't even know what it promotes - and I have yet to see ONE spam mail that actually try to sell a Chinese product.

    7. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lucky You.

      I get spam all the time, though not in great quantity. Maybe 5 a day, tops. But here's the kicker: They're all Chinese and Japanese.[/p][p]I have no clue what the chinese ones say, but they're encoded in the chinese character set. From what I can make out of the ones in Japanese, along with having a friend who can bumble her way through the language, I've gotten about 40 Emails over the past year from a Japanese Home Loan Company.[/p][p]I don't own a home.[/p]

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    8. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even if you never publish your address, people you send to may do so inadvertantly by way of forwarding. Also, we have seen an agressive amount of username probing at our mail server, people cultivating valid email addresses dictionary style. If your email name prefix is common enough, then its not too suprising you get spam.

      As a solution at my workplace, we deployed dspam at the mail server about 7 weeks ago. At first I was discouraged at the results so much that I thought I had made a worthless call. Gradually I saw improvment and now it is running at about %99.7 accuracy. I get something over 200 spam a day into my account. I now see about one spam in my in box every three or four days, the rest go into my spam folder. Our other users found the system to be far better than I did, faster learning even. One user reported near pefection in about a week, he gets 10 spam a day. Except for one user (but there is one in every croud), it has nearly fixed the spam problem at our orginization.
      I expect this to be a more realistic and permanent solution far beyond what legislation will ever do to inhibit spam from using my time.
      I mean, other than right now.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    9. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by RT+Alec · · Score: 4, Informative

      1. ISPs (and any other business that gives a workstation a "real" IP address) need to block egress port 25. Comcast is going to be doing this soon, others should soon follow suit. This plugs the zombies.
      2. IP addresses that continue to send spam will be blacklisted. With the zombies effectively out of the loop this will become easier (albeit never quite perfect).
      3. SPF and other authentication schemes need to be adopted to prevent "spoofing" and so called "Joe jobs".
      4. E-mail providers (including small companies) need to deploy mature e-mail systems for their users. In 1995 it was fine to accept e-mail from anyone on port 25, with no authentication and no encryption. In 2004, remote clients need to have an SSL connection available (both for sending mail and accessing inboxes), and must require authentication before accepting initial mail submission (SMTP+TLS+AUTH). Not only is this more secure, but it also addresses the issues always raised by blocking egress port 25 and deploying SPF.
      Once these techniques and practices be come commonplace, it won't matter if spam originates from lawless areas of the world. Existing laws against fraud (and other illegal business practices) will cover the extreme efforts that will be necessary to continue spamming.

      Appendix:
      SMTP+TLS+AUTH is not that tough, no whining. All modern mail clients support it, on all platforms. There is a little bit of work to do on the server end, but that's what you pay your ISP (or IT department) for:

    10. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by dfeist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "ISPs (and any other business that gives a workstation a "real" IP address) need to block egress port 25. Comcast is going to be doing this soon, others should soon follow suit. This plugs the zombies."

      I hate it when people like you try to split the internet in to parts, "clients" and "servers". The great thing is that everyone can be both client and server! Let's not change this!

      Additionally, this measure achieves virtually nothing. Port numbers can be changed; and opening a connection to port 25 is still the normal way to send e-mail.

      --
      Unix makes easy tasks hard and hard tasks possible. Windows makes easy tasks easy and hard tasks $29.95.
    11. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most appear not to have read even the summary here, let alone the article. Let me draw your attention to: "organised cirminal gangs in Russia are supplying U.S.- based spammers with details of compromised PCs"> Aside from the atrocious spelling, note that the spam relays are "compromised PCs", probably mostly in the US. So geographical blocks aren't going to stop them. One part of the problem that could and should be fixed is to prevent the "compromises". I suppose these are email "click me and see a movie star's tits" trojans, or maybe more devious direct probes into Windows. In both cases there are simple solutions. Though we'd like to say "DON'T USE WINDOWS YOU MORONS", it will take a while for that to come to pass. But otherwise, a basic firewall and anti-virus, both available free, will prevent almost all these attacks, regardless of patching the OS, and thus reduce the number of zombies.

    12. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Blocking port 25 is not the solution, it's an extremely bad action that infringes on my rights as broadband client to use mail directly to my server. This approach will only end up:

      • Blocking my ability to use point to point mail with encryption
      • Sending and receiving mail quickly and reliably by not using the providers mail servers
      • Allowing me to install my own anti-spam policies by having mail come to my server first

      Blocking port 25 is a very short sighted approach by the people that cry for this. Just because these people don't want to run their own legitimate mail server shouldn't mean that others are denied the right.

      The point of having the right to control one's own privacy policy on mail seems to go right over the heads of people who cry port blocking as a solution.

    13. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by TiggsPanther · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The best way is to make sure this way of advertisement of your services is illegal in the USA, and actively go after those that still do it.

      This idea seems so obvious, and so potentially effective. So why won't the governments (or whoever else has the authority to do so) do this?

      What I'm guessing contributes to it is two simple facts.

      1. Companies pay taxes.
      2. Knowing where to draw the line between what is Spam and what is legitimate advertising.

      The first I'm guessing in itself is only a very small factor. But when a billion-selling company pays its taxes, then you want to be very sure they're not legit before pulling the plug or slapping them with hefty fines.

      The main problem is the second. A great deal of mail is easily flagged as Spam. A great deal of mail (including some advertising) is definitely legit. The difficulty is that there is also mail all across the scale.
      Too relaxed and you don't block enough Spam, people still complain, and there's enough leeway for the Spammers to adjust tactics to stay in the "grey areas".
      Too restrictive and you run the risk of arresting/fining/whatever people who were sending mail that in that case was totally legit. And in the current knee-jerk sue-em mentality, that could be a bad move to make.

      You could make it illegal to advertise certain product types over the internet, but again this could easily meet corporate resistance.

      Now banning advertising would be cool. But that's only in my personal opinion, and highly unlikely to ever happen. Besides, even I understand that sometimes advertising revenue is important - even though I perosnally hate seeing adverts anywhere I go.

      I guess that the Follow the Money idea is one that although would be the msot effective, is also the one with the biggest legal minefield.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    14. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by marsu_k · · Score: 2, Funny
      Heh, your analogue about the war on drugs (which, in my opinion, is being fought just as you described, by harassing addicts and small time pushers) just awoke the conspiracy theorist in me.

      <tin foil mode>
      It's a known fact (among a certain crowd) that the CIA, contrary to common belief, is working right along with the Columbian cartels to get extra funding, ditto for Afghanistan (sans the cartels, and heroine instead of cocaine).

      Now I've just come to realize it must be the same with spammers. So instead of trying to get to them, they just taxing them, ever so slightly. Plus I heard the male agents have much larger genitalia nowadays. Coincidence? I think not.
      </tin foil mode>

    15. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative
      Blocking outbound port 25 also undermines SPF. SPF advocates argue that roaming will still be possible if ISPs allow non-local connections to their SMTP servers with one of the new SMTP authentication schemes used to verify that the connection is valid instead of simple IP addressing. However, if outgoing port 25 isn't accessable, contacting the SMTP server you're supposed to use to send email under the profile you want to use simply will not be possible.

      Not that this means I necessarily think SPF is a great idea either, but...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    16. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The other method is to go after the advertisers who hire the spammers in the first place. Spammers are bottom-feeders, for sure, but if you cut off their customers, then you cut off their income.

      I'm doing this with one spammer's customer right now. Since they are a legitimate company in my town, I have collected evidence that the spammers they do business with are using dictionary attacks, web page harvesting, and zombies. I've explained to them that all this is illegal and if any of my 20 email domains receives another spam from their business, all the evidence is going to the FTC for prosecution via CAN-SPAM. The law is far from perfect, but at least legit companies can be punished for breaking it. They are listening and reconsidering unsolicited commercial bulk email as an advertising route.

      I know, many people would say fsck it and just turn them in. I figure I'd be nice first. I've explained the consequences and I've convinced them I will follow through. If others out there live in the same city (not necessary, but it IS easier) as a legit business that is spamming, be professional and courteous, but make them wish they never spammed you.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    17. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by ironfrost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's sad but true that a lot of the legitimate businesses that use spammers don't even realise that they're doing something wrong. When they're after business, the spammers don't tell them that they're using dictionary attacks and harvesting addresses from web pages. They'll pull the same "opt in" crap that they do to everyone else, and say that everyone on their mailing list of 5 million customers has agreed to receive advertising.

      A lot of the people that hire "bulk e-mail advertisers" to market their business have no idea that they're spamming until people start to complain.

    18. Re:What is the best way to stop this? by maximilln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because my $9.95 dialup connection did?

      Since when is the difference between residential service and business service defined by which TCP ports we use? Spreading FUD about port 25 and outright lies about how it will reduce spam is leaning towards this sort of model.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  2. 70% from US? by westendgirl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If 70% 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits, wouldn't that make the US the biggest spammer?

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

    1. Re:70% from US? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If 70% 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits, wouldn't that make the US the biggest spammer? "

      Perhaps. But the solution is still in Russia and/or China.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:70% from US? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the solution isn't just in Russia and/or China, it's in the US too. Cut off the demand (by, say, making the use of unsolicited spam by businesses illegal) and you've solved the problem.

      Saying that the solution to spam is only in Russia and/or China is like saying that the solution to the war on drugs (as stupid as that is) is only in Colombia, etc.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:70% from US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly, this is a completely misleading title.

      Not only that, what about the organised cirminal gangs in Russia

      followed by: the Russian gangs aren't constrained by any anti-spam or cybercrime laws in their home country

      So what makes them criminals exactly, if what they do is legal? Just because it's illegal in the US, you can't start calling people in other countries criminals. I mean, they are probably right, but just based on the information provided is plain crazy.

      And then this and have no respect for legislation implemented in other countries

      Why the fuck should they?! Like the US respects every freaking legislation in the world. I can tell you one thing, there's plenty of US legislation that I don't respect.

      Spam does not come from Russia or China. It comes from the sleazebags in the US that pay these people to distribute it.

      I don't know how often it must be said: follow the freaking money. It's US companies/people paying for it, and it's largely US people buying this shit, which keeps it profitable.

    4. Re:70% from US? by Tristandh · · Score: 2, Funny

      If 70% 70 percent of spam is sent from China

      Brought to you by the Department of Reduncancy department.

    5. Re:70% from US? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But the solution is still in Russia and/or China."

      If the second worst spammer in the world can appear on a chat-show to talk about their activities, then the US isn't exactly a hostile environment for such people...

    6. Re:70% from US? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How do you track which business authorised the spamming then? For example, what if Ford wanted to up it's web presence in order to sell more of it's new car aimed at geeks - it pays an advertising firm who take out banners for this car on Slashdot and setup a mailing list on the Ford website. The advertising firm outsources list management for all clients to India, the Indian outsourcing center then mails every address they have with Ford Geekmobile information rather than just sending it to the people on the Ford-optin list.

      Who gets the fine there? If you say Ford since they're the ones who benefit, what's to stop them spamming adverts for other car companies and getting them fined? The ad agency didn't actually spam anybody, so they don't deserve any fine. The Indians aren't bound by US law so they don't have to pay.

  3. Why does this remind me of illegal drugs? by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's the damned Columbians making all that cocaine! The friggin' Afghans are selling opium again!

    Evil Russian spammers! Chinese spammers want to take down America!

    And yet, in both cases there is plenty of demand from within the States. If it ain't rich kids experimenting, it's poor kids escaping with drugs from South America or Asia. If it's not a "bulk emailer" in California, it's a "clever marketer" in Florida sending millions of unsolicited email via servers in Russia or China.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Why does this remind me of illegal drugs? by capoccia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >And yet, in both cases there is plenty of demand from within the States.

      In my case, only 1/4 of my spam was in English. I know a few hundred foreign words, but none in Russian or any Asian language. It seems pretty far-fetched that Americans could be creating demand for this type of spam.

      Also interesting is that reporting spam did not decrease the quantity of foreign-language spam.

  4. its great... by drfrog · · Score: 5, Funny

    to see them embrace captialism so readily

    we should be proud!

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
  5. Well, technically by dedazo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The US is the largest spammer in the world. Russia and China would be the largest spam relays.

    That title is wrong.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:Well, technically by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The US is the largest spammer in the world. Russia and China would be the largest spam relays.

      If Americans thought the same way about guns, they'd ban them. But they say "guns don't kill, people kill". Spam relays don't spam, people (most of them Americans) spam.

  6. so lets see... by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Funny

    Russia for mafia controlled zombies
    China for high quality spam warez
    Africa for business relations about that recently deceased relative.

    GOT IT!
    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  7. Bullshit by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Headline should read, US Spammers using services of Chinese ISPs, Russian mob. The Spam originates here, and ends up here. The vast majority of Spam is in English, and targeting an American audience.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Bullshit by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More correctly, the vast majority of spam you recieve in the US is in English, and targeting an American audience.

      At my last job, I adminned machines in Seoul. 95% or more of the spam was pure Korean, targeting Koreans.

      The spammers know their audiences, and target accordingly. The other-language spam you get is errors.

  8. Start Bombing by rstidman · · Score: 5, Funny

    President Bush just outlawed China forever. We start bombing in five minutes.

    1. Re:Start Bombing by sirdude · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Oh well, atleast we have equal rights...so nobody will read your email either.

      hehe - well put :)

      I definitely don't understand what kinda clout these 'marketing' companies have in DC/wherever, that they are able to block any 'definitive' legislation against spam - something the majority of the populace will welcome with open arms.. Someone should make it a prime election issue :P

      It's not as if it's the call-center industry where thousands of jobs are bound to be affected..

      I don't get it. I don't believe Politicians were in mind when the term 'common-sense' was coined :S
  9. Steve Linford's corrections by alanw · · Score: 4, Informative
    in this posting to news.admin.net-abuse.email, Steve makes a couple of corrections to the article:
    > Linford also told the conference that some 70 percent of spam is sent
    > from China by American spam outfits who are hosting their servers with
    > Chinese ISPs.

    That should say: "70% of spam advertises URLs hosted in China" (not "is
    sent from").

    ...

    > Unless things change drastically, we predict that 80 percent of
    > email will be spam by December this year, and it's very likely to go
    > to 90 percent by this summer," Linford warned.

    That should of course say "next summer".
  10. Surprise, surprise... by ImpTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems like every day we have a story about such-and-such is the biggest cause of spam. In fact, I bet we've accounted for at least 400% of spam with all these stories combined.

    If these trends continue, I'm afraid that one day soon I'll check slashdot and find out that 97% of all spam is coming from my IP.

    1. Re:Surprise, surprise... by serutan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I wonder what percent of the Russians and Chinese who generate 70% of spam are using the Windows zombie machines that distribute 80% of spam?

    2. Re:Surprise, surprise... by spacefrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      If 97% of the 400% of spam comes from your IP, then you are only responsible for 24% of the total spam.

      And, likewise, if there is only 400% spam quantity, and you are responsible for 24% of it, that is only 6% of the total spam.

      Continue extrapolating, and you will quickly see that you are not responsible for any spam whatsoever.

  11. That old bone song.. by TidyKiller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's interesting how the Russian Mafia is helping American Marketers take advantage of Chinese Equipment. My question is: How involved are the actual Chinese people? Are they all victims of circumstance, or are they helping in some way?

  12. Conflicting stories by IAmMaxHarris · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Also, apparently 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits who in turn have hosting arrangements with Chinese ISPs."

    Really? That contradicts this story posted just two days ago:

    The Register is reporting a study by Sandvine.com that blames Microsoft Zombies for 80% of all spam.

    So which is it, then?

    1. Re:Conflicting stories by aixou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So which is it, then?

      Who says it can't be both?

    2. Re:Conflicting stories by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't contradict at all - apparantly the Chinese are controlling the zombies

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Conflicting stories by twistedcubic · · Score: 5, Funny


      So which is it, then?

      It's both. They use non-Euclidean statistics.

  13. Give users the power to block countries... by Dzimas · · Score: 2

    A simple solution to offshore spam would be to give users the ability to filter the originating mail server by allowed countries. The vast majority of my messages come from Canada and the USA, followed by a small number from Europe and South America. If I could tell my mail server to reject all but mail from my "usual" countries, I could avoid the Chinese mail bombs and bizarro unicode virus messages. The biggest prob I can see with this is offshoring - I recently started to get mail from an offshored IT unit belonging to Shell in Malaysia. That one I would have probably blocked accidentally.

    1. Re:Give users the power to block countries... by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      f I could tell my mail server to reject all but mail from my "usual" countries, I could avoid the Chinese mail bombs

      Thanks. It's people like you that block my mail (I live in Hong Kong) and make me have to use devious inconvenient methods just to send a normal message.

    2. Re:Give users the power to block countries... by AtomicBomb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As many around here have pointed out, the bulk (80%) of the spam are sent by compromised cable/DSL machines. In other words, even if you can find the IP the email is originated from, it offers no solution to you.

      The "70%" figure mentioned earlir on refers to the percentage of url embedded in the spam (e.g. the store for the V1a4Ga) that uses an IP from China... If you manage to instruct your spam filter to read inside the email main body, you may have a solution.

      On the other hand, I don't think it will be a long lasting solution.... If spammers can send spam thru compromised machine, they should be able to web host their site thru a compromised machine...

    3. Re:Give users the power to block countries... by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They already do. If you try to trace the websites in "cheap oem software offers" you will notice that they are in fact compromised machines on DSL and cable spread around the globe. The last sample I followed was in US, UK, France, China and portugal and a name server doing load balancing in the US. Registered by a russian company. This about says it all...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Sir,

    It is common known that Russia and China are the source for White and Chinese mail-order brides. However their population has not the African type to satisfy your cravings. Therefore I and my colleagues who have the contact you for V aig r a already have prepared a business venture in which you can test your new supply. For only a small investment we will connect you to the premium provider of African mail-order operating out of our Locations in Congo, Liberia, and Somalia. Please reply post haste with your reply.

    Sincerely yours,
    DOCTOR M. BOKUZUWANDI

  15. Wasn't it Windows PCs...? by osobear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was just an article on how it was infected windows PCs.... and I remember everyone assuming that it was PCs here, so are we talking about Windows in China, now? How do you plan on education in that case?

  16. Outsourcing SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If 70% 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits, wouldn't that make the US the biggest spammer?

    That's exactly what it is, only we in the U.S. like to outsource everything we possibly can--tech support, call centers, software development--and that now includes everyone's favorite e-mail marketing substance, SPAM.

    Outsource! It's the trendy thing to do!

  17. Re:Solution? by theguywhosaid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    or 1. people could just stop being assholes.
    or 2. people could just stop reading it and buying the junk.

    i would rather my first solution happens, because as a side effect there wouldnt be any more assholes. number two wont happen, because sometimes you just want to see if it really will make your junk bigger. your idea is GREAT, but... i dont really know what the new paradigm would be.

  18. X% of Spam is caused by This by SJrX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know in the past month I have seen that 80% of Spam is caused by infected PC's in Windows. That 80% of Spam comes from China. That 70% come from Russia and China. That the US accounts for 60% of Spam. That Eastern Europe Accounts for 60% of Spam. So from this I know that there is 80+80+70+60+60= 350% Spam. This also tells me that Russia accounts for Negative 10% of Spam. Don't believe me, take this The Reg Story, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/04/trojan_spa m_study/, This one, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/25/spam_delug e/ and thats just El Reg. The only conclusive thing I have been able to determine is that these stories are worse than spam, not only are they useless, but we actually read these stories.

  19. another... by abscondment · · Score: 2, Interesting

    another possible explanation of this is illegal copies of Windows.

    I was recently talking with a friend from hong kong; he mentioned that virtually no one buys legitimate copies of software because it's more expensive and less readily available.

    he also said that users and companies using pirated software don't update it for fear of legal action--hence the huge number of zombies.

  20. New laws by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The USA is quite obviously the source of the spam. It is up to the USA to legislate in some way to stop the flood of spam that is hurting people all over the world. The real question is: how do you stop the spam when it is being sent from countries like China where the USA has no power to arrest spammers?

    Well I think I have a possible solution and it can be illustrated by a case study. In Australia we had an international Paedophilia problem, Paedophiles were travelling to countries like Thailand where sex with children was not illegal and thus were not getting arrested. The solution that was eventually found was new laws whereby anyone who broke Australia's anti-paedophile laws could be arrested no matter where the offence was enacted. Offenders were met at the airport by police and arrested for crimes in other countries and the problem of "paedophile sex tourism" was solved.

    My Solution to spam is similar. The USA needs to pass laws allowing them to track down the companies and individuals that are using the Chinese spam services and arrest them. Make the law such that sending spam is illegal no matter which country it is sent from. The spammers might get so scared they will stop Spamming

    --
    99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    1. Re:New laws by humankind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why moderate the above comment down? Makes no sense

      With all due respect, it would make sense to you if you had sense.

      We have a ton of spam laws already. Passing more laws doesn't change a damn thing. Almost all spammers are already breaking numerous laws, criminal felonies involving computer tampering are just the start. In fact, the USA Patriot act could even be employed to consider the activities of most spammers to be terrorism and thus subject spammers to capital punishment. What more do you need? The problem isn't more laws. The problem is.... say it with me.....

      E N F O R C E M E N T

      Our law enforcement branches are more interested in going after people downloading Metallica or Martha Stewart's stock dealings than they are enforcing the plethora of violations done by spammers. Passing more laws has not proved effective.

  21. The Russian mafia by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is the other (electronic) Russian Mafia. Unlike the dumb Italian teamstears who beat people with baseball bats, some of these guys are very skilled and intelligent. The counterparts of many American geeks in Russia couldn't find a well paying job, have plenty of time, and nowadays on the Internet, they have access to all the technical information they need on any subject. They will use the best asset they have, their brain, to make money or build recognition for themselves. And the way the laws are shady there they think they can get away with anything as long as its online. If spam will make a couple of hundred rubles - they'll get into spam, if they can extort money from banks by compromising their webservers, they will do that. How do I know all this? I grew up in those part and still visit friends and family once in a while...

    1. Re:The Russian mafia by 21mhz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The counterparts of many American geeks in Russia couldn't find a well paying job
      Yeah, cry me a river. At least in major sities, this is not the case. The definition of "well paying" may vary, but we're talking about Russian standards here. It's more like the employers can't find adequate geeks to man the jobs.
      In small shitholes, it can be tougher (what country has it the other way?). But nothing really prevents people from moving anymore.
      The bottom line is: these people have deliberately chosen to be scumbags.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    2. Re:The Russian mafia by drgonzo59 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I will have to disagree with you. It is not always true that in even in the major cities you can find computer related jobs. Sure you can clean the street or even work as a waiter, but I was talking about computer jobs, anything hardware or software. There are some very good software firms in Russia and ex-Soviet republics but computers are still not as pervasive as they are in US or Western Europe. That is another reason why so many of them leave and I am one of them. And as far as nothing preventing people from moving, you forgot, we are talking about Eastern Europe here, you can't just pack your bags and move to America or Europe, you gotta go through a lot to get a visa and be allowed to come in those other countries.

  22. Spamassassin 3.0 and URIBL_SBL by alanw · · Score: 4, Informative
    The soon-to-be-released Spamassassin 3.0 will have the URIBL_SBL test. This will test the IP address of domains referenced in the body of the spam against lists of known spammer hosts. This will reliably trap all of the 70% of spam that advertises web sites hosted in China.

    http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/howtouse.html
    http://www.spamassassin.org/full/3.0.x/dist/rules/ 25_uribl.cf

    1. Re:Spamassassin 3.0 and URIBL_SBL by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The soon-to-be-released Spamassassin 3.0 will have the URIBL_SBL test.

      It's due out around the end June, assuming no major glitches in the code, etc. I've been testing the URIBL_SBL rules with the current version, and after a little messing around to get it working have found that it works very well indeed. It's definitely worth looking at the upgrade if you are currently running a vanilla version of SpamAssassin. IIRC, version 3.0 will also be adding support for Spamhaus' XBL list, which lists the hosts that the article is about; those that have been demonstrably compromised by a worm or trojan.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  23. Re:I asked this around and didn't get an answer by hacker · · Score: 2, Informative
    russia.blackholes.us, of course:
    # DNS based IP address spam list russia.blackholes.us
    R$* $: $&{client_addr}
    R$-.$-.$-.$- $: <?> $(dnsbl $4.$3.$2.$1.russia.blackholes.us. $: OK $)
    R<?>OK $: OKSOFAR
    R<?>$+<TMP> $: TMPOK
    R<?>$+ $#error $@ 5.7.1 $: Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected by russia.blackholes.us
  24. Re:Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Problem gone? Not by a longshot.

    You only got 8,398 messages in one year?

    I more than that in ONE WEEK. Each day, I average 1,650 email messages; with about ten of those being legitimate. With your recommended software, even with its "amazing" accuracy, I'd still be getting more spam passed through than legitimate messages.

    (This is an old email address, used for well over fifteen years. It has been out in the public forever--used on things like domain registrations and Usenet--well before email addresses needed to be guarded, because spam simply didn't exist back then).

    No, classification and filtering is not a reasaonble solution. You got 66 classification errors; how am I supposed to look through over 1,500 messages a day to pick out the one or two that actually were legitimate but got filtered as spam? It's insane, and I'm not going to do it.

    We need a BETTER solution than filtering--because if this trend continues, within a couple of years EVERYONE is going to getting thousands of emails a day.

  25. NEXT! by humankind · · Score: 4, Funny

    The USA is quite obviously the source of the spam. It is up to the USA to legislate in some way to stop the flood of spam that is hurting people all over the world. The real question is: how do you stop the spam when it is being sent from countries like China where the USA has no power to arrest spammers?

    Hey, what a brilliant idea. We currently have only a hundred or more anti-spam laws across the world, most in the US. Let's pass a few more. I am certain that when we pass the 500 anti-spam law mark, spammers will suddenly start to cower in their boots and realize that 500 anti-spam laws that aren't being enforced or have no legal/civil/criminal teeth are a formidible obstacle to overcome!

    1. Re:NEXT! by humankind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      do any of the current anti-spam laws allow prosecution even when the spam is sent from another country? Because that is what I think is needed. I assume that it is currently sent from china because you can get arrested for sending if from the USA, make sending spam from anywhere an arrestable offence.

      The source of the spam is ultimately in the United States. Using a foreign network to route spam serves to make the spammers harder to track and catch, but not impossible. The truth is, most of the largest spammers are easily trackable and can likely be proven guilty of numerous laws, whether they use foreign servers or not. The problem is it's a very low priority for law enforcement authorities unless, for example, the spammers mailbomb The GAP or Macdonald's company headquarters... then there'd be hell to pay.

      Another problem is District Attorneys in most states in the United States have no interest in prosecuting spammers. Either they are ignorant or apathetic, but numerous spammer criminal cases have been presented to authorities for prosecution only to have them turned down.

    2. Re:NEXT! by aXis100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely the easier solution is to charge the companies who are advertising their products via spam, not the elusive spammers themselves. Two good reasons are:

      1) The spam obviously has to have a link back to the vendor in order to make sales.
      2) If there is no demand for it, spam will stop.

  26. Oh no! by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 4, Funny

    "According to Spamhaus director Steve Linford, the Russian gangs aren't constrained by any anti-spam or cybercrime laws in their home country and have no respect for legislation implemented in other countries."

    Criminals with no respect for the law! This world is surely going to the dogs!

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  27. Spam by Sinful_Shirts · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have gotten quite a bit of spam that is actually written in Chinese. I don't think I have gotten any spam in Russian. I actually got a piece of junk mail that I thought was funny once. The subject was "Hard times ahead!" and I thought it would be about saving money, but it was for viagra or something.

    1. Re:Spam by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't think I have gotten any spam in Russian.

      I have, although it's more obvious when reading it with Mail.app on my Mac at work than with Mutt on my machine at home - it shows up in the Cyrillic alphabet in Mail.app but not in Mutt in my boring old ISO 8859-1 xterm.

      Messages in various Chinese/Japanese/Korean encodings look, when viewed by software assuming ISO 8859-1 encoding, like a different form of noise than messages in Cyrillic script, so you might be able to reconize Russian spam that way as well.

      I actually got a piece of junk mail that I thought was funny once. The subject was "Hard times ahead!" and I thought it would be about saving money, but it was for viagra or something.

      One of the funniest spams I saw was one posted to alt.sex.nfs (which I was reading at the time as I was working on NFS at Network Appliance) - it had the subject "Men needed for lesbian lust", which is somewhat of a Special Extra Bonus Unclear On The Concept subject line....

  28. My new spam fighting techniques. by ffsnjb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I implemented some new spam fighting techniques last night. The most effective one from logs since implementation was making HELO checks mandatory in Postfix. If the sending client doesn't submit an EHLO response, Postfix rejects the client. Since this happens before message transmission, it seems that not nearly as much bandwidth is being used (haven't verified that yet.) I'm surprised this isn't on by default in Postfix, but it sure is funny to see all these hosts rejected. None of them even resolve, there's no way that it's legitimate mail. If it is, too damn bad.

    --
    "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    1. Re:My new spam fighting techniques. by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm not too sure what the original poster is doing from the description, but I reject some connections based on HELO/EHLO too, so I can tell you how what I do works. But firstly, since you say that you don't know the details of SMTP, let's clarify what HELO/EHLO do:

      When host connects to an SMTP server in order to send it an email, it will receive a banner back which may include the string "ESMTP". If it does then the remote SMTP server supports an enhanced version of SMTP with additional features, "ESMTP". If the host also understands ESMTP, then it should respond with an "EHLO" command. If the host does not understand ESMTP, or the string is not present in the banner, then the host will respond with the "HELO" command defined in the original SMTP RFC to use the simpler set of SMTP commands.

      In either case, "HELO" or "EHLO", the host should also tell the server its host name, viz:

      EHLO host.company.com
      Ideally, "host.company.com" will also have a valid reverse DNS record which will match the IP connecting to the SMTP server. However, the SMTP RFCs do not actually *require* that this is the case, nor for that matter that the hostname is provided at all. Frequently the hostname will be given, but will not be a valid fully qualified domain name on the Internet. So, depending on how draconian you want to be, there are a number of options for rejecting the connection before any data is sent:
      • No hostname after HELO/EHLO
      • Hostname given is just a host, not an FQDN
      • Host domain name given does not appear to exist in DNS
      • FQDN given does not have RDNS record
      • FQDN given has RDNS record, but it does not match the IP connected
      Using any or all of those will certainly reduce your spam intake, but may also cause legitimate email to be rejected, as usual YMMV as to how much. One thing to watch for if considering this though is that a *lot* of legitimate Windows boxes, including some operated by ISPs, seem to have been configured so that they provide their NetBIOS name when they HELO/EHLO, all but the first check listed above would refuse the conection from such a server.
      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:My new spam fighting techniques. by TiggsPanther · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firstly, thanks for the info. Helps a lot. Also gives me a few ideas. (Though probably not anything that hasn't already been considered before)

      Maybe the next round of SMTP RFCs should require at require at least something to be given in the HELO/EHLO command. Depending on how strict the RFC requirements were you could then easily block on the criteria you supplied above.
      Certainly if you reject at the level of RFC requirements then any corporation or individual complaining that their legitimate mail got rejected can then be told that their server breaks the published standards. (Yes, I know that RFCs are more suggestions than had requirements, but they are the closest we have to de facto standards for the various protocols)

      Also if it was part of the RFC, then there would be more pressure for software-houses and ISPs to have the Windows-based servers set up to respond properly.

      What would help (and would be nice) was if ISPs would allows RDNS records for those that request them for no extra charge. So then you could easily reject on the fourth (or fifth) item in the list. Especially if it was opt-in only, then anyone sending directly from their machine legitimate would have a valid RDNS entry.
      People sending directly from machines without RDNS entries are more likely to be either compromised boxes or people trying not to get caught. And if it was free to get your IP address an RDNS entry from your ISP then it would reduce the legitimate reasons for people not wanting to get one.

      It wouldn't catch everything, but it'd at least make it harder to send anything unofficially. And provide a way of directly identifying any server that sent you stuff you didn't want.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  29. Wrong headline by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The headline is "Russia, China World's Biggest Spammers". The text says "organised cirminal gangs in Russia are supplying U.S.- based spammers with details...". The SPAMMERS ARE AMERICAN. The spam is mostly from Americans, to Americans. The solution is in America. Don't fuck up the whole world's Internet because you can't work out how to stop the 100 guys in Boca Raton who send most of the spam.

    PS "cirminal": Jesus, Timothy, you're actually paid to edit this?

  30. High Volume E-mail Deployers by CHaN_316 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone see that awesome interview with Scott Richter (spammer overlord) on the Daily Show? It was so hilarious. He calls himself a high volume e-mail deployers that send useful services to people.

    The best is when they posted Scott's e-mail address on national TV, which is: scottrichter442@yahoo.com

    This site here has the video available of that Daily Show clip. Please try not to slashdot the site, maybe someone setup a mirror or something.

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
    1. Re:High Volume E-mail Deployers by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw that too. What a turkey.

      "Is it ok if we show your email address on screen?"
      "I'd rather you didn't." (as scottrichter442@yahoo.com flashes several times...:)

      A couple of weeks ago, the Aunty Spam blog did an interview with Scottie. Very evasive answers. I had a little back and forth dialog with him in there. (scroll about 1/2way down)
      Very enlightening as to his mindset.

  31. spam stats by humankind · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some analysis of my rejected mail logs over the last 24 hours revealed this:

    Total rejected spam: 16235 (and 8178 accepted messages)
    Confirmed Chinese spams: 1229
    Confirmed Korean spam: 1414
    Confirmed Canadian spam: 264
    Confirmed Polish spam: 342
    Confirmed US/comcast spam: 1363
    Confirmed French spam: 181
    Confirmed Southwest Bell spam: 382
    Confirmed Italian spam: 114
    Confirmed Spanish spam: 167 (TDE must have finally gotten their act together)
    Confirmed German spam: 967
    Confirmed Netherlands spam: 452
    Confirmed Brazillian spam: 864

    This is by no means a scientific analysis - it's based on hard-coded IP-based blacklists that are caught before standard blacklists are checked.

    Spamcop RBL rejects: 5460
    Spamhaus RBL rejects: 1509
    Njabl RBL rejects: 1807
    Homebrew RBL rejects: 6382

    The big three spam sources have traditionally been Korea, China and Brazil. Comcast has been the big US spammer. France (wanadoo) has also been a major contributor though it doesn't seem to be reflected in this days' logs.

  32. There is a fundamental problem with email by Daedius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People want an open public form of communication, but are unwilling to accept email from people they don't want to hear. I think its interesting that people expect others (i.e. government) to go after these individuals in the hopes that it will put an end to all unwanted email (especially when the individuals are in other countries). If you sat down in the middle of times square, do you think its fair to expect people to stop yelling, the cars to stop honking, cellphones to stop beeping, or the people to stop shuffling past you? The truth is, you will always get unwanted email if you aren't going to actively manage what email gets to you. Do you ever get SPAM from IM? No. The reason why is because you have actually personally networked who you want to talk to and eliminated all others. I believe the future of email communication will be based around a networked process of individual/group permissions. Till that day, people are going to be lazy, unhappy, and wishing for something impossible -- that SPAM will end if they do nothing.

    1. Re:There is a fundamental problem with email by radja · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's not about individuals we dont want to hear. it's about artificial entities we dont want to hear. people merely want what they also have in the offline world: commercial messages should be regulated. ads on tv are regulated. ads in newspapers are regulated. bulk snailmail is regulated.

      be aware that commercial messages by companies do not fall under freedom of speech (or at least not in my country. freedom of speech is only for people.)

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  33. Reply to your business proposal. by Dimensio · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Dr. Bokuzuwandi,

    Your prosal intrigues me, as I am always seeking to expand my business to new countries whenever possible. You must understand, however, that I cannot simply blindly enter into deals with people who I have never met. As such, I will require a sign of TRUST from you, in the form of photograph identification. Please understand that I will not be able to accept normal government ID cards or an international passport for this endeavour, as such things are easily forged. Instead,I shall give to you a password phrase, and you must have a photograph of yourself holding up a large and clear sign that displays this password phrase. Scan this photograph in and email it to me as an attachment. When I have received it, I will be 100% ready to trust you with your business proposal.

    I do apologize, but until I receive this form of identification from you, I will not be able to provide you with any further information about myself.

    The password phrase is "I LOVE ARSE FORKING"

    Yours Very Truly,
    Pastor Phil McCracken

    (Hey, it worked before!)

    Now if only I could find a way to similarly humiliate the spammers who advertise pirated software or penis pills...

  34. "click here" domains by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I filter based on those.

    Current List of Domains

    At the time of this posting it's at 2209 domains. In a day or so it should go up several dozen when I do an update.

    It's the only thing in a spam that can't be obfuscated or it simply won't work. At best they can do one to one character codes. Occasionally a spammer will try to be clever and request the user copy and paste the link into their browser. I tend to catch those when I examine what got through but the pay off from those is probably so low that the spammer goes back to links. It's hard enough to get someone to click.

    The other advantages of blocking based on click-me domains is that the header is irrelavent (it doesn't matter where it came from) and that it's the only thing that costs the spammer real money. And it's the only thing guarenteed not to be in a legitimate e-mail ever.

    I've gotten several occuraces of dictionary words inbetween the same obvious spam domain entry. It's quite simple to see which are the filler to fool fully automated anti-spam systems and which are the real links.

    The long and shot of it is that if you can use it, so can spammers. Charging thousands for a .mail domain is just dense and turns e-mail into a commodity controlled by big business instead of what is basically seen as something for everyone.

    You have to deal with spam within the rules that spammers set. You can't invent rules and then pretend spammers are going to follow them. After an update it takes a few days for the spam to pick up again. If major players would stop worrying about where spam was coming from and start dealing with where it's pointing to, this problem would be a lot more managable.

    I've started sending my hotmail spam off to my mail server to help build the filter. It'd be nice if other people were building reliable lists so that I could premptively filter more domains. Nobody really takes it seriously though. They'd rather blacklist countries since it's "easy."

    Ben

  35. Oh get off it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is simply presenting more of the story. SPAM is an international enterprise. Most of the instigators are here in the US, as are most of the compramised computers. However it sounds like from this and other articles is that much of the hacking work is being done by criminal syndicates (huge shock there) and that most of the websites the spammers are setting up are in China.

    This does NOT mean that the domestic spammers are being ignored. One has already been convicted, Microsoft and Time Warner are suing a bunch more, and the justice department says it is prepping 50 criminal cases under teh new SPAM law. This was all announced on /., if you bothered to read it.

    Quit with the anti-American bullshit. Yep, the problem is here. We know, we finally have a law for it, though not as strong as we'd like, and the wheels are in motion. Doesn't mean that the US is solely responsible. I do not at all think it is unreasonable that Chinese hosts should show the same standards demanded of US hosts in not hosting SPAM sites.

  36. Re:eh? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, if they don't show some common 'net deceancy, it may be the only answer. This applies to ANY ISP

    But people are banning entire countries, not ISPs. That leaves those who live there no reason to choose a "good" ISP over a spam haven; all are discriminated against. If you're going to be punished for living in the same country as spammers you might a well get the benefit from using a service subsidised by them.

  37. When will they learn? by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Spamhaus Project has warned that organised cirminal gangs in Russia

    When will they learn... Cirm doesn't pay...

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  38. ok.. by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since it seems that foreign ISP's are in league with organized crime, then i'd say that this is a threat to national security. Therefore, I recommend that all TLD providers remove all references of the suspect ISPs from their databases, including blocklisting their POPs and SMTPs.

    It'll be a double-edged sword, I know, but in this matter, it'l hurt them more than the rest of the world. Boycott and Blacklist all *.ru and *.cn servers until this matter has been settled.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  39. Shitty Russian mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dmitri: So Vladimir, whatever area do you specialize in these days?
    Vladimir: Smuggling, my friend. Vodka, narcotics, humans... If it can be smuggled, chances are I smuggled it some time...
    Dmitri: Sounds good, how about you, Ivan?
    Ivan: Weapons trade, of course. Got a few good high-up friends in the Red Army that are willing to relinquish some surplus material to me at a good price, which I sell in Africa and the Middle East.
    Dmitri: Good to hear you two are making a nice profit.
    Vladimir: How about yourself?
    Dmitri: I rent out hundreds of cracked computers to US based companies.
    Ivan: ...
    Vladimir: Dmitri, you suck.

  40. Re:eh? by bani · · Score: 2, Insightful

    banning entire countries has become a last resort. some countries have a rather cavalier attitude toward abuse, like china. the chinese state operated national networks had an official autoresponder which responded to _all_ abuse complaints with the lie:

    "In your SPAM eMail,I can't find the IP or the IP is not by my control.Please give me the correct IP.Thank you."

    it's no wonder china is one of the most regularly firewalled networks. besides them being a spam haven, their _official policy_ regarding abuse is to do nothing at all, and lie about it!

    so really, in china there really aren't any "good networks". they are _all_ bad.

    as for banning korea etc. well, i have absolutely zero reason to receive email from anyone in korea nor do i read korean. so into the bin goes *.kr. how exactly does that hurt any koreans?

    answer: it doesn't.

  41. A simple Question... by Lord_Pain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are we not punishing the fools who hire these spamming bastages to promote their business?

    After all if the source of the spammers income dwindles then they wither. Perhaps I'm being overly simplistic.

    --
    -- What's this '-r *' file doing here? -- Oh well, a simple 'rm' should do the trick.
  42. ..and speaking of headlines by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The text says "organised cirminal gangs in Russia are supplying U.S.- based spammers with details..."

    I know I'm repeating myself, but, we have to make sure that headline appears in the "mainstream" media, not just in places that only us geeks look.

    Joe 6 pack needs to be routinely reminded that "spammers=criminals", and "buying from spammers=giving money to the Russian Maffia".

    I think those of us who are familliar with the problem, need to take the initiative to contact our local media and help them understand what's going on. Lay it out for them: virusses -> zombie PCs -> mail relays -> spam -> criminal gangs.
    And then repeat to make sure they get it: "Aunt matilda's computer is being used to make Big Money for the russian maffia.", and "buying from spammers finances the creation of more virusses".


    The fewer people who buy from spammers, the less spammers can afford to stay in business. Shout it from the rooftops.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  43. I completely disagree by Ummagumma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just installed an anti-spam appliance yesterday. So far, over 80% of the Spam that is blocked has come from DSL and Cable lines, presumably from compromised machines.

    --
    "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
  44. Why I Am Not Surprised by $criptah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As somebody who lived on the territory of the former USSR, I am not surprised that the majority of spam arrives from Russia and that kiddie pr0n sex rings are linked to companies in Belarus. Why does that happen? Well, compared to the United States those countries have virtually zero law enforcement and high levels of corruption.

    Even with Vladimir Putin, Russia still lags behind in terms of law enforcement when it comes to protecting human rights, technology, women, children, etc. When I traveled across the republicts of the former USSR I was surprised by the amount of counter-theft goods that one could get through local flea markets. You can get CDs full of the latest software, like 3D Studio Max, for $2-3USD. If you get a several CDs, you get a discount. When you pop one of those puppies in your drive and read the instructions, they'll say "Please run a program called crack.exe in order to activate the product." Activation my ass. The same applies to DVDs, and brand-name products.

    According to my friend who travelled to China, that country is pretty much in the same spot. Yes, they are good at banning people from accessing forbidden sites. Yet at the same time you can to to a street market and purchase a fake "NorthFace" jacket for $20USD or less; In the states you'd pay up to ten times as much. Then there are corrupt politicians and cops who can close their eyes provided that you pay them a certain amount of money. With that in mind, it is not a surprise that China and Russia lead in spam.

    There is a lack of sync between technology and the laws that govern it in the countries that are not, well, *that developed* yet.

  45. ISPs are a major part of the problem by Skapare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ISPs are a major part of the problem. They either know, or can know, that they have spammers and other criminals on board. Yet many do nothing about this because they would rather have the money spammers pay them. We need to stop peering with bad ISPs in every way we can.

    Those who whine about their mail not getting through because they are using one of these bad ISPs are also part of the problem. They need to stop encouraging their ISP to continue, and force the ISP to decide between good and evil. If there's another ISP, switch. If there's only one and it's because the government gives them a monopoly, then the government is the problem and they need to fix that. If there's only one and it's not a monopoly, then they need to start their own ISP (and not allow spammers, lest they also be cast into the deep pink cyber oblivion).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  46. Re:Columbian cartels by marsu_k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't sure about the spelling and didn't bother to look it up. Thanks. This is, after all, the place where spelling does indeed matter and is always perfect. (not to mention that English isn't my mother tongue, voimme jatkaa tätä keskustelua suomeksikin jos tuntuu paremmalta :P)

  47. The solution is simple by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not hard at all to block these cable/DSL/dialup hosts from sending you mail. Here's what I use:

    1) A filter that looks for hostname patterns that look like consumer internet connections (DSL/cable/dialup):

    [note: these are in Exim lookup-table syntax]

    \N^(dsl|cable|adsl|dialup|docsis|pool|ppp|client |c lient2).*$\N
    \N^.*\d{1,3}-\d{1,3}-\d{1,3}-\d{1,3} .*$\N
    \N^c\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\..*$ \N
    \N^[sShH]\d{3,}.*\.[a-z][a-z]\.shawcable.net$\ N
    \N^.*\d+\.charter-stl.*$\N

    2) Next, you block known spam-source countries. Some may take offense to this but the company I work for only sells products to people in the US, so these filters aren't a problem. To accomplish this, I set up djb's rbldns server on one of my machines. Currently, I'm blocking netblocks from Brazil, China, Korea, Malaysia, Nigeria, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey. These netblocks come courtesy of blackholes.us.

    3) Anything that is not caught by those first two local options is run against the DNSBL list at SORBS. We choose to use their combined blackhole list but you could just as easily go with their anti-dialup/dsl/cable IP list.


    If an e-mail makes it through all of that, it gets run through SpamAssassin and blackholed if the score is >= 7.0 and marked if the score is >= 4.0.
    We're also doing a bit of tarpitting. Every time we get a connection from a blacklisted IP, we tarpit them for two minutes before spitting out a 550 error code.

    Despite this, we still get some spam and dictionary attacks. The spam gets filtered by the client and the dictionary guesses are blackholed by the local delivery server, which is configured not to send bounces.

    Chris

  48. There will always be spam by moofdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spam is an inevitable by product of having a virtually free message delivery system.

    As far as I can tell, this is the first time in the history of the world that a company, legit or not, could advertise their products and services for free. Every other method costs a hell of a lot more money and doesn't reach nearly the same audience. Be it paid tv advertising, direct mail, etc.

    As long as email is free to send, boxes will always be full of spam. Spam will be the end of email, the problem is only getting worse, with no real hope in sight.

    --
    Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
  49. Why does it say "china and russia" by jfdawes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is the article titled "China and Russia 'behind current spam deluge' when they are just the ISPs? It's Americans paying for it, so they are behind it.

    Of course, the lack of respect for US spam policy does not help the situation - but this is not surprising, given that the unstated rule of almost all American policy is "If you have enough money you can get away with whatever you like". (Note that this isn't "If you give me enough ..." you just have to have it)

    Selling junk to idiots, America's number one industry.

  50. A simple idea to curtail *LOTS* of spam.... by iamcf13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For outgoing SMTP connections to send email:

    1) POP-BEFORE-SMTP and/or
    2) Route ALL port 25 traffic through the ISP's mailserver.

    For incoming SMTP connections to receive email:

    ONLY ACCEPT CONNECTIONS FROM FELLOW DNS-IP-VERIFIED SMTP SERVERS. NO EXCEPTIONS!

    Alas, as long as hosts continue use 'hidden mailservers' that are not officially on file with a DNS lookup, spam will continue to plague the Internet.

    In a perfect world, directly delivering email to the recipient's mailserver should only be done by a fellow mailserver offically on file with the DNS system. When a 'non-mailserver' IP does this, the practice screams spam....