Slashdot Mirror


Meteorite Crashes Through New Zealand Roof

freitasm writes "The New Zealand Herald and Stuff are reporting on a 1.3kg, four billion-year-old rock that fell through the roof of a house in suburban Auckland, New Zealand. Their insurance company will pay for the hole in the roof and couch and two holes in the ceiling. The meteorite itself, a chunk of an asteroid, could have been basketball-sized when it impacted Earth's atmosphere at 15km a second. By the time it hit the house, its velocity had probably slowed to 100-200m a second."

69 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. rawr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now thats what I call a smashing entry!

    1. Re:rawr by daveashcroft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Finally we know what happened to beagle.....

  2. Why was this posted? by dotslashconfig · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, that's right... this is the biggest news in New Zealand since the Lord of the Rings crew packed up and left.

    1. Re:Why was this posted? by azzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      New Zealand beat England in rugby, and got two early wickets against England in the cricket (though don't look like winning). There's some more NZ news for you.

    2. Re:Why was this posted? by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's big news because the insurance company actually paid for the damage!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. Um, ouch. by Talonius · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet their insurance company cancels them after they pay for all the repairs, too. :) It was preventable, if New Zealand had invested more heavily in SWMDT (Star Wars Meterorite Defense Technology). Of course with the license fees the Reagan administration was charging...

    That would truly suck. To be sitting there watching "When Meteorites Attack, True Stories of Meteorites and Their Victims" and WHAM, there's a smoking hole in your television set, sparks flying everywhere, and the father figure of the family is screaming for his teenage son, wondering if he had been busy building nuclear reactors again.

    --
    My reality check bounced.
    1. Re:Um, ouch. by Ixany · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gosh no. Just think about the probability of this happening twice to that same house. Although statistically, it isn't any smaller than the probability of a meteorite hitting it the first time, one mustn't spoil the obligatory Garp reference:

      "Honey, the chances of another plane hitting this house are astronomical. See? It's been pre-disastered. We're going to be safe here."

      Great stuff, that.

    2. Re:Um, ouch. by alex_ware · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be better if they didn't claim, they could sell the meterite for more than the damage. But the insurance premium would go up.

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    3. Re:Um, ouch. by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone slacked off of the "Missile Command" budget and one little city of 5 got destroyed.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  4. A Natural Disaster? by awacs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or another Open Source project gone wrong?

  5. why claim the insurance? by drg55 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Meteorites are quite pricey, just put it on ebay.
    Put the house on ebay too.

    1. Re:why claim the insurance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It must be one of the safest houses in the world - what are the odds of it being hit by two meteorites?

    2. Re:why claim the insurance? by MerlTurkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the U.S. if it lands on YOUR land it's yours. Laws differ from Country to country however. I saw a price quoted in one report of over $6,000 for that meteorite, they can (and probably will) get MUCH, MUCH more than that. "Merl"

    3. Re:why claim the insurance? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Informative

      As another reader pointed out, the odds of it being hit by a second meteorite, is exactly the same is it being hit by the first... which is slim, but another meteor isn't going to avoid the house next time because a meteor crashed there beforehand.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    4. Re:why claim the insurance? by sonicattack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of the story about the statistician who calculated the odds of there being a bomb on the airplane he was travelling on, and found out that the odds were too high for him to feel safe. He then calculated the odds of there being two, independent bombs on the same plane, and noticed that the possibility was remote to the extreme, compared to the first calculation.

      So, now, he always brings a bomb with him when he's flying.

    5. Re:why claim the insurance? by rollingcalf · · Score: 4, Informative

      The probability of both hitting, given that A already hit, is just the probablity that B will hit.

      Other posters were implicitly referring to the fact that the first one already hit, while your statement is referring to a time when none has hit yet.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    6. Re:why claim the insurance? by quantaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      As another reader pointed out, the odds of it being hit by a second meteorite, is exactly the same is it being hit by the first... which is slim, but another meteor isn't going to avoid the house next time because a meteor crashed there beforehand.

      As another reader pointed out, the odds of you getting the first joke, is exactly the same as you being hit by a meteor... which is slim, but this joke isn't going to avoid you next time because you ruined the first joke before hand.

      (seriously I would hope that the /. crowd doesn't need the Gambler's fallacy explained to it :)

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:why claim the insurance? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Funny

      you mean if you sell it to a fellow countryman youll only get arrested 'a little bit'

  6. Could be a good thing? by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now at first, you'd think having a meteorite crashing through your roof was bad.

    On the other hand, does this mean that these people now own the meteorite? and if so, does anyone have any idea how valuable it might be? Just courious :)

    --
    Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    1. Re:Could be a good thing? by Tranzig · · Score: 4, Informative

      The estimated value is over 10000 NZD, that's about 6000 USD or 5000 EUR. It's in the article.

    2. Re:Could be a good thing? by MrRTFM · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, you could make a fortune renting out your house to visiting dignitaries as a 'highly secure meteor resistant location' (based on the lightning never strikes twice principle).

      Of course, they'd need to fix the holes in the roof and get the carpet shampooed first.

      --
      You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    3. Re:Could be a good thing? by keraneuology · · Score: 2, Informative

      In 1954 Ann Hodges was asleep on her couch when a meteorite came through the roof and hit her, leaving a nasty bruise. The landlady of the house won ownership in court. (Sylacauga, Alabama)

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    4. Re:Could be a good thing? by Tjebbe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Money? Can you imagine what kind of superpowers they must have got from the meteorite?

    5. Re:Could be a good thing? by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      TV news tonight said they could expect around $10,000 (Australian - I'm in .au) if they wanted to sell it.

      As an aside, apparently the lady of the house and her child only left the room in question a few minutes before the event.

      --
      Janie took my gun...
  7. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they should check the 'meteorite' for peanuts...

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
  8. I'm pretty surprised by the loss in speed. by James+A.+S.+Joyce · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know that the Earth's atmosphere is approximately 100 kilometres in thickness, but the idea of an object dissipating so much kinetic energy as heat is still amazing. Nonetheless, at that speed it's going at about the same speed as a bullet from a gun so I guess it's a good thing no one was there. Luckily, though, since kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity, it's a good thing it lost all but literally 0.2% of its speed.

    1. Re:I'm pretty surprised by the loss in speed. by mog007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not that amazing. A large portion of the meteorite is boiled off from the heat, so not only is the atmosphere making a cushion, but it's also removing mass, thus decreasing the KE even more.

  9. Insurance? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Their insurance company will pay for the hole in the roof and couch and two holes in the ceiling.

    What insurance policy covers meteor impacts? If there's anything in the world that might happen that could be called an Act of God, surely 'smiting with flaming rocks from the heavens' qualifies?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:Insurance? by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 4, Informative

      You would be surprised what is and is not covered under some insurance policies.

      Besides, Acts of God can also sometimes be covered under insurance - after all, what's the point of wasting all that damn money on insurance if they can just turn on you and say, "Nope, that tree falling on your house last night during the freak ice storm was an Act of God" ?

      So, for those too lazy to click the link above, meteors are covered the same as airplanes under home insurance, "objects falling from the sky." Now, the reason this is covered is precisely because it doesn't happen very often. Just as people on the coast pay extra for hurricane damage insurance and folks in the midwest pay extra for tornado insurance, if there were an area where meteors were common, there'd be extra clauses for meteor damage.

      Insurance is, largely, a racket.

      --
      sig not found
    2. Re:Insurance? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What insurance policy covers meteor impacts? If there's anything in the world that might happen that could be called an Act of God, surely 'smiting with flaming rocks from the heavens' qualifies?

      I'm sure the insurance company could have... but that would have created some very bad publicity. Can you imagine the homeowners saying - we have been paying them premiums for the last ten years and the rats claimed it was an "act of god". With no fatalities, light damage, and global coverage paying was the correct corporate maneuver. That kind of favorable branding is hard to get.

    3. Re:Insurance? by MinotaurUK · · Score: 3, Interesting
      IANAL, but I did do a course in contract law a few years ago. As I remember from the lectures on insurance contracts, "Act of God" doesn't mean things like meteors, storm damage, etc. at all. It's usually described as "unexplained natural phenomena", at least as far as insurance contracts go on this side of the pond.

      Unusual though a meteor coming through the roof is, I'm not sure it counts as "unexplained".

    4. Re:Insurance? by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Insurance process:
      • Meteorite hits house
      • Owner of house contacts insurance company
      • Insurance company sends 120-page claim form
      • Owner returns claim form
      • Insurance company claims Force Majeur, All Bets Are Off
      • Owner complains to insurance trade body
      • Insurance company asks for proof that meteorite is from outer space
      • Owner engages in frank discussion with insurance company
      • Insurance company grudgingly pays half of cost of damage
      • Owner finds insurance premium has doubled
    5. Re:Insurance? by cd_serek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "...meteors are covered the same as airplanes under home insurance..."

      Well, I have to disagree with you here. Here in Australia, there is a piece of legislation called Damage by Aircraft Act 1999 [http://scaleplus.law.gov.au]. What this statute entails is that whereby any damage caused by an aircraft, the airline will automatically be liable for the damage (no questions asked), and the the damages would be sought by the insurance company on the behalf of the insured (the person being insured). However, this piece of legislation does not extend to cover non-aircraft-parts related damages. So, where there is damage to a premise caused by meteors, if the Insurer (insurance company) choses to hide behind the insurance clause of "Act of God", then the poor unlucky house-owner can't do anything about it. And will have to pay for the damages him/herself.

      Now, similarly, over in New Zealand, there was this very interesting case back around '97, where a piece of scrap metal from a commercial airliner did fall onto the roof of a suburban home just after takeoff. As a result, few roof-tiles were damaged, and the New Zealand Court of Appeal held that the airline was automatically liable for any damage caused by one of its aircrafts.

      So, if in the present circumstance, a piece of meteor fell out of the sky and damaged a home, who would the insurer sue on the behalf of the insured? There is no airlines involved. God? As if! In such scenario, the insured can only pray that the insurer would "out of the kindness of their hearts" allow compensation to be awarded.

  10. That house! by Fullmetal+Edward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all lies! That house was area 51! Get your tin foil hats and ten foot thick steel bunkers because aliens have fired the first shot in the intergalatic war of 2004!

    --
    --- [Insert intresting Sig here]
  11. Re:Why can't... by eyeye · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes it would really rock.

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  12. The house owner is not selling ... by Mr+Very+Angry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The house owner said that she didn't think anyone would want to buy the rock and wanted it to stay in New Zealand / Auckland anyway. I don't think she knows how much she could get for it.

  13. "What we've got here is..." by Elroy+Jetson · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What we've got here is what we call a "Boeing Bomb". See the peanut? Dead giveaway."

    "Nuh-uh... thats a 'Space Peanut.'"

  14. In a most-likely unrelated story, by Vengeance · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anomalous plant growth has been noted in the vicinity of the meteorite strike, with nearly complete coverage of the immediate vicinity with lush, dense foliage. The homeowners could not be reached for comment.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  15. 4 Billion yo? by wynterx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, the two articles contradict a bit in this area, but if the experts don't yet know where it is from (as the NZ news article says), how do they know how old it is?

    I'm far from expert in this area, but if they haven't yet done the work to figure out exactly (or even roughly) where it is from, surely they couldn't have done the work to figure out its age... Or are some assumptions being made here?

    ...OK, I'll 'fess up, just to make this look less like the flamebait that it is...

    I am a young earth-creationist and my conspiracy theory says that assumptions are definitely being made. The Stuff article says it is an asteroid-derived meteorite... Asteroids are said to have formed c. 4bya therefore metorite is 4 billion years old. No tests required.

    1. Re:4 Billion yo? by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      How does the meteorite coming through the roof of a suburban home add to its value?

      Instant skylight.

    2. Re:4 Billion yo? by stef49 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are even more reasons for not using Carbon dating:

      (1) Carbon dating only works if you know the initial proportion of C13/C14 at the time of 'death' (or creation). The current assumption is that this proportion is quite constant on Earth. However, this proportion is likely to be very different in space (and on other planets of course) so you cannot date anything from out of space with Carbon dating even if it organic.

      (2) Carbon decays quite rapidely so it cannot ve used to date millions of years and even less billions.

  16. Money money money by Paul+Townend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmmm....should the insurance company really have to pay, considering the net result of the impact is that the householders will probably be able to sell it for at least $10,000? Admittedly, I have no idea how much the repairs cost, but.... well... it just seems a bit odd to pay out for an event that will actually monetarily improve the policy-holder....

  17. Re:Absolutely Crowned! by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the stuff article, the meteorite could be worth $10,000. That would be one expensive conversation piece. I'd sell it if I had an offer like that, without hesitation.

    --
    Mod parent up!
  18. Clearly by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

    they asked the rock. Don't need extensive research to ask something. But I think the rock may be female, in which case it's been 4 billion years old for the past 3 billion years.

  19. Re:Absolutely Crowned! by brassman · · Score: 2, Funny
    Heh...can you imagine the conversation in the emergency room?

    Yeah, but I don't think it would go the way you had it.

    Doctor: Ewww! What happened to, uh, him?

    Constable: He got hit by a meteorite...

    Doctor: *choke* Good Lord!

    --
    "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
  20. What happen? by boffy_b · · Score: 2, Funny

    In AD 2004, war was beginn...oh, never mind.

    --
    Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
  21. This could have been prevented! by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    All we needed to do was send Bruce Willis up there with a team of roughnecks.

  22. The US Defense Department has just announced... by IrishMist · · Score: 3, Funny

    that it hat reliable information that Osama bin Laden was in the house at the time.

  23. War! by Trailwalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a response to the attack on New Zealand, President Bush announced today that United States Army and Marine units would be stationed on Mars and other planets as a deterrent to further terrorism by unknown aliens. He will send a request for a further $900,000,000,000 to congress to fund the development of transport and supply systems for our brave patriotic troops. Haliburtion corp. has patriotically volunteered to undertake the conract for a mere 25% markup.

    Attorney General John Ashcroft declared that the aliens have obvious ties with Al Queda. Only alien mind control could have changed the joyous happy reception that should have been give to US liberators by the oppressed Arab world. He will ask Congress to amend the Patriot act to allow preventive detention of the entire population of the United States and 24 hour observation of everyone else.

    Affable non-entity and Homeland Security fill-in Tom Ridge announced newer, more vibrant colors for ever more heightened security levels. He is asking Congress to redefine illegal alien to include beings from other planets/solar systems.

  24. I disagree. by duffel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    MOD PARENT DOWN, repost information
    The parent is a known troll saving up karma for posting gnaa shit in some story to come.
    Actually, kunundo (parent), I'm quite offended by your remark.

    First off, you attack the person rather than their statement. This is called an Argumentum ad hominum. It's a logical fallacy and carries no weight. Personally, I think James (parent's parent) raises quite a good point. The loss in energy is quite impressive.

    *scribbles on back of envelope*
    The heat it deposited in the atmosphere is enough to vaporize more than 200 liters of water previously at room temperature. (In a really really rough calculation). For what's essentially a piece of rock, I thought that's quite cool.

    So, to me, the comment was interesting. So, whatever the motives, the comment is a good one and should be rewarded as such

    Also, moderators have mod points for a reason: They're good active members of the slashdot community. Don't tell them what to do, let them make up their own mind. That's what they're there for.
  25. what to do with it... by EricKoh · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd find a blacksmith and craft an astral shield+4

  26. Skeptics by Veteran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the things which we fail to do is mock skeptics when they are wrong. The idea of rocks falling from the sky was rejected by all scientists at one time - despite the eye witness testimony of those who had seen it happen. The people who had seen it happen were dismissed as liars, as hoaxers, and as hallucinogenic; they were not gifted great thinkers like all skeptics are known to be.

    An example of current skeptical thought: the idea of an elephant startling at the sight of a mouse is 'scientifically' ridiculous. I have never seen an elephant startle at a mouse, however I have seen a full grown African elephant startle and flinch back at the sight of a common gray squirrel. This occurred at the Houston Zoo in the early 1980's. That behavior is not unreasonable if it is viewed from the elephant's perspective; elephants have poor eyesight, and the serpentine movement of a running rodent when seen by an elephant could easily be mistaken for the movement of a poisonous snake - which is one creature that might cause an elephant to startle.

    I know for a fact that the idea of an elephant flinching at the sight of a small rodent is a reasonable idea since I have personally seen it happen, and that the skeptics are dead wrong in this respect. Since skeptics never apologize when they are wrong I would like take this opportunity to say to all of the skeptics of the world most formally: "You are of my own personal knowledge completely full of shit".

    Skepticism is very important in science; it keeps people from being gullible. Skepticism is healthy scientific behavior up to a point, when it goes beyond that point it is wrong and destructive. An example may clarify what that point is: saying "Your experiment show evidence of 'X' but it could also be explained by 'Y' or 'Z'" is an example of proper skepticism. However to mock someone and in general act like a turd is going beyond the point of healthy skepticism and into a destructive unscientific area.

    The original Viking lander experiments on Mars all sent back evidence of life existing on Mars. Healthy skepticism would have been to say: "The results are inconclusive because they could have also been caused by certain rare chemical compounds, further testing to rule out those rare compounds is required". Instead we are told there is "no evidence of life", the people who designed the experiments are ridiculed publicly, and the test data is ignored as 'poor science'. As a result of skepticism gone wild no follow up experiments have been performed, and everyone 'knows' that there is no life on Mars.

    Flaming rocks DO fall from the sky, Elephants DO startle at small rodents, the Viking experiments DO need to be followed up, and 'skeptical' scientists who use mockery need to be publicly humiliated by being forced to wear Dunces caps with the words "Rocks don't fall from the sky!" stenciled on them.

    1. Re:Skeptics by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't seem to know very much about skepticism at all.

      Skeptics are convinced by the evidence. Anyone who is unpersuaded by uncompelling evidence is not a skeptic, period.

      Therefore your rant about skeptics, flogging, and the supposed ejaculation that you will acheive from such behavior is meaningless.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  27. It's not just you. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Interesting
    is it just me, or have there been a lot of reports lately of 'large explosions' and 'bangs in the sky', and 'loud flashes of light in the distance', and pretty much they've all been meteorites?

    There have been an increasing number of strikes over the past couple of years. Some, like this one, a half dozen instances back, are pretty darned significant. (Though, those ones suffer from a near total media black-out policy, while the smaller ones tend to get the typical, "Funny news, one in a billion, what WILL the insurance companies do, har har har! Go back to sleep, citizen" treatment). Those in power, however, are more or less aware and are preparing in their own ways. One theory suggests that the real reason behind the current world-wide military lock-down is not the 'Terrorism' bugaboo, but rather is to secure the population (and planet resources) for when things get really hairy. Look up Alternative '3' to get an idea. (Rather a cartoony distillation of the concept, but close enough to the real deal to be a relatively good primer on How Things Are.)

    There appears to be a definite time-scale thingy going on here. Watch and listen. Almost everything of any significance going on in the world today is directly related to the sky falling tomorrow, so to speak. And most of it is reactionary, religion-based stupidity. We wouldn't have troops in Iraq, and Israel wouldn't be on a genocidal free-for-all if it wasn't for the 'Good' book. Ah, religion! Crack of the Masses.

    Favorite news-bite of the week:
    Madsen, a Washington-based writer and columnist, who often writes for Counterpunch, says that people close to the pope claim that amid these concerns, the pontiff wishes he was younger and in better health to confront the possibility that Bush may represent the person prophesized in Revelations."

    Though, don't fret. The big rocks aren't due to start whacking us for a little while yet. We'll probably get all the Harry Potter books out before. And thank goodness for that! (sic)


    -FL

  28. Shrek by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 4, Funny

    The last big story from New Zealand was Shrek the Marino sheep that was on the lam for seven years.

  29. Re:lots of meteorite activity lately? by kidgenius · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's not the act of flushing that causes those to come out. There is a valve on the plane that allows for a hose to be hooked up to the plane to remove all of that "matter". Well, when one of these 2 valves goes bad, the stuff starts to leak out of the hatch on the plane. As it sits on the outside of the plane, it freezes, then will break free. I heard that one time there was a piece a little smaller than a basketball that broke free, and the engine ingested it. Needless to say, the plane was forced to land b/c the engine was severly damaged.

    Also, let me say that you do not want to be the guy hooking up the hose when one of those valves is bad. You end up having to reach your arm up the hatch of the plane, and manually open the valve, and hope to god you can get yourself out of the way, and the hose in place before the "matter" starts flowing. As you can imagine, it is a pretty difficult thing to do.

  30. Yahooooooooo-ooooo! by HisMother · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they had checked the newspapers, they would have had time to shop on Yahoo for a boatload of throw pillows and their trailer would have been saved!

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
  31. Ping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    The rock hit her leather couch and bounced back up to the ceiling before rolling under the computer.


    This demonstrates that the Martians have Internet. They have sent a ping :)

  32. Tin foil hats? Ha, just wait! by Teun · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article says Base Ball size, just wait for that extra-terestrial to come off the field and starts looking for his ball!

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  33. Fortunately we're safe in the USA by hugesmile · · Score: 4, Funny
    As long as meteorites are measured in kg's (weight), and meters per second (speed), we should be safe here in the USA.

    Our heavy traveling stuff weighs pounds or tons, and only travels in miles per hour.

    1. Re:Fortunately we're safe in the USA by 1hurcoman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you got that wrong. Volume is measured in Volkswagons. Distance is measured in football fields. Weights are measured in bowling balls. Speed can be measured in NASCAR or something.

  34. ObNitPick by The+Monster · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hate it when the media gets scientific terminology wrong. It would be incorrect to say the house was hit by a 'meteorite' (definitions taken from dictionary.com): meteorite n : stony or metallic object that is the remains of a meteoroid that has reached the earth's surface unless it's been shown that it bounced off the surface of the earth prior to punching holes in the house. I believe it would me more accurate to say that it was hit by a 'meteor': meteor n : a meteoroid that has entered the earth's atmosphere [syn: shooting star] Then, after the meteor punched the holes in the roof and couch, and came to rest, it could be accurately described as a meteorite.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:ObNitPick by blue+trane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well to me, a house is on the earth's surface. Its roof is an insignificant elevation above the surface, when compared with the height of the earth's atmosphere. So a meteor that hits a house's roof is a meteorite, in my usage.

    2. Re:ObNitPick by Long-EZ · · Score: 3, Informative
      Meteoroid - in space or the atmosphere
      Meteor - the ionized gas we see as it streaks through the atmosphere
      Meteorite - once it reaches the earth's surface

      We can't see a meteoroid, we see the meteor, aka "shooting star".

      It doesn't need to strike dirt to be a meteorite. It became a meteorite the instant it hit the roof.

      I hate it when the media gets scientific terminology wrong, but I hate it even more when the media gets it right and geeks get it wrong.

      --
      >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
    3. Re:ObNitPick by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe he's saying that the meteor hit the roof, and upon hitting the roof (and thus the surface of the earth) became a meteorite. I agree. If a kid then picked it up (big kid), and threw it, it would be a meteorite. But the first impact from space will always be a meteor hit, as it it not a meteorite until it hits.

      --
      Evan "Pedantics are us"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  35. act of god? by deft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    im suprised that term hasnt been attacked yet.

    if an insurance company told me something wasnt covered because it was an act of GOD, id kindly request they prove this "GOD" existed from which this meteor was cast down...

    heck, i might even sue for slander, for them implying that GOD wanted to kill me.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  36. Earth Rover by DonalGraeme · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhere else in the universe an alien species is trying to figure out what happened to their Earth Rover.

  37. More pictures by akeyes · · Score: 2, Informative

    can be found here http://www.local6.com/slideshow/news/3413231/detai l.html?qs=1&s=1&dm=ss&p=news including some of the hole caused by the meteorite

  38. Re:lots of meteorite activity lately? by DieByWire · · Score: 2, Informative
    Needless to say, the plane was forced to land b/c the engine was severly damaged.

    If you're referring to the Northwest 727 in Florida in the latter 1980's, the right engine actually separated from the aircraft after the blue ice went through it.

    Brings new meaning to 'losing an engine.'

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.