Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla 1.7 Released

kashif-khan writes "Right at the verge of Firefox 0.9 and Thunderbird 0.7 being released comes the official release of Mozilla 1.7. Updates include smaller size, increased speed and faster start up times. Be sure to read the release notes for the complete list of features and download it from mozilla.org."

56 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by Hi_2k · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thunderbird isn't a browser, it's an email client. And a danm good one at that. I regularly switch l users to Thunderbird from Outlook, and they never want to go back.

    --
    When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
    Sluggy Freelance.
  2. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by Steveftoth · · Score: 5, Informative

    The biggest reason to switch for me is that the web development tools for IE suck compared to mozilla/firefox. DOM inspector, JS debugger, etc. all are awesome tools compared to IE.

    The fact that IE lets websites install software on your computer doesn't exactly make my day either. I really hate that.

  3. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I find I need both Firefox and Thunderbird. It might be because one is a browser and the other is an e-mail client, but I haven't figured out the trick to make either accomplish both tasks.

  4. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firefox is a browser, Thunderbird is an email client. The suite is still good if you need a web page editor or if you like everything in one package. Personally, I use IE only when I have to. I use Firefox the rest of the time, I occasionally startup the suite for page editing (usually I just use vim), and I always use Thunderbird for mail.

  5. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by Joff_NZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Firefox == Web Browser
    Thunderbird == Email Client
    Mozilla == Web Browser and Email Client in one Application.

    And the biggest reason to switch? Well, there are several main ones - but saftey from all the spyware, malware, etc that exploits IE is the biggest one for me. That and pop-up blocking and Tabbed browsing.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
  6. Right at the verge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Right at the verge of Firefox 0.9 and Thunderbird 0.7 being released comes the official release of Mozilla 1.7.
    That should be this:
    Right on the heels of Firefox 0.9's and Thunderbird 0.7's releases comes the official release of Mozilla 1.7.
    1. Re:Right at the verge? by PitaBred · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought that too, but I went to Merriam Webster's online dictionary and apparently verge is just the edge of something, doesn't matter whether it's fore or aft. It does sound funny using it like that in the article though.

    2. Re:Right at the verge? by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Right on the heels ... comes the ... release" isn't passive voice either. I'd say it's a wash whether the inverted sentence structure or the regular variety is better--both have their pros and cons. Damn that copyediting apprenticeship. :-P

  7. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by qvek · · Score: 3, Informative

    Firefox is the browser. Thunderbird is the e-mail client. Mozilla is the suite containing these two products, a new version of which has been released because the two components above have been updated. Hope this helps!

  8. Is the Copy/Paste bug fixed? by JasonUCF · · Score: 4, Informative

    I see no updates on Bugzilla for any of the trees -- for the life of pete, that "intermittent" copy paste bug is awful. Every now and then copy/paste funtionality will just disappear. You can't copy anything.

    I can stand misrendered pages, I can stand missing URL's, I can stand a memory leak that might force me to restart the system every now and then -- but yee gods, if you mysteriously take my copy/paste away from me at inopportune moments.. madness! URL's hand typed! Monkeys flying out you know what comes next!

    I love the 'zillas to death and I am typing this on Firefox now. I'm not saying the bug forces me to abandon it.. it's just.. so... painful! Help me obi-developers, you're my only hope!

    (can I get a witness? holla!)

    1. Re:Is the Copy/Paste bug fixed? by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've noticed it in some older releases, too. Normally switching to another window and doing some typing or something would clear it up for me, IIRC. It hasn't happened for a while. It actually seemed to just lose focusing abilities, not just copy and paste.

  9. Re:Awesome! by Pyrion · · Score: 2, Informative

    I only had that problem when I applied the UI tweak that forces the browser to redraw more often than it's defaulted to.

    Forgot which one it is though since I lost all that to a reformat.

    --
    "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
  10. MODERATOR ABUSE-NOT A TROLL by setzman · · Score: 3, Informative
    Does this release actually render slashdot correctly? Not a troll, but theres nothing more sad than to read about people forced into using IE because of banking sites, yet i have to refresh 5 times just to keep the article text from bleeding into the left column. :(

    This is a real issue with Mozilla and FireFox (based on Mozilla obviously), thus the parent has a legitimate concern as opposed to being a troll.

    --
    C:\>
    1. Re:MODERATOR ABUSE-NOT A TROLL by ron_ivi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Even better (IMHO), is the CSS Zen Garden - Slashdot look&feel.

      While not a 100% clone, it's cool because ALL the layout&look&feel is done in CSS. It's the exact same html as this, this, and even this wireless-device-friendly look

      If slashcode adopted this approach, we could all use whatever look we wanted for whatever device we were using; just by having a user-specified style sheet!

  11. Fedora Core 2 by hypermike · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the Article:

    Users of Fedora Core 2 may experience unusually long delays in resolving hostnames. This results from the fact that IPv6 is enabled by default in Fedora Core 2. If you do not need IPv6 support (which is most likely the case), then it is advised that you disable it in the kernel. To do this run the following command as root: echo "alias net-pf-10 off" >> /etc/modprobe.conf You will need to reboot to have this take effect (or simply unload the ipv6 kernel module).

    An FYI if anyone is having trouble on Fedora.

    --
  12. acroread bug? by slurpburp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has the acroread bug been fixed, or is that just a Gentoo thing? Anyone know?

    1. Re:acroread bug? by miknight · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah I use Gentoo with Moz 1.7 and the acroread plugin now works well.

  13. Will there be an official build of GTK2+XFT? by bconway · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm currently stuck in that I'm still finding FireFox too buggy for everday use (broken -remote, crashing with some plugins, etc.), however I often find myself using it because GTK2 and XFT in the default Linux build is outweighing the ugliness of GTK1 and the non-XFT fonts in the latest Mozilla build. Will there ever be an official build of Mozilla 1.7+ with GTK2 and XFT? I've searched Google, and there were a few people building it regularly, but they seem to have discontinued doing so.

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    1. Re:Will there be an official build of GTK2+XFT? by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny...Mozilla has a GTK1/no-XFT build, and you want a GTK2+XFT one. Firefox has a GTK2+XFT build, and I want a non-XFT one. Funny how our opinions are complete opposites here (well, not entirely opposite--I do like GTK2, but only because it works with the Qt-Engine and GTK1 doesn't).

      Anyway, why would you want XFT? It generates nauseating, headache-inducing fonts. Thankfully, the mozilla-firefox-bin in Portage seems to not use XFT, but the ebuild is a tad buggy.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    2. Re:Will there be an official build of GTK2+XFT? by Vireo · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've searched Google, and there were a few people building it regularly, but they seem to have discontinued doing so.


      I use the builds from this page; it has XFT builds for Mozilla 1.4 trough 1.7 RC3, so I guess 1.7 final will be there soon.
  14. BitTorrent by typhoonius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fairly neat: it seems that Mozilla has setup an official torrent tracker for this release.

  15. Re:Why is it still in development? by taped2thedesk · · Score: 4, Informative
    From a 1.6 release announcement:
    We're moving forward and shifting our development attention to Firebird and Thunderbird, (but) we're not going to abandon the suite," Decrem said.

    In fact, Mozilla has found that many enterprises and larger organizations considering Mozilla want a full application suite, Decrem said.

  16. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by trisweb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Woah woah woah...

    You're right about the first part, but on the second part-- Mozilla is a separate application suite that contains both a Browser and a Mail Client, but they are not Firefox/Thunderbird, they are completely different (mostly). So the updates to Firefox/Thunderbird have little to do with this.

    Details, details...

    --
    "!"
  17. NOT A TROLL!!! by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had similar problems. Most web designers design their web pages with IE in mind. My online banking doesn't render correctly in Mozilla 1.6 or Firefox. It is a shame. I have contacted this bank, which will remain unnamed, and they said, "Our online banking system is best supported by Internet Explorer."

    As far as Slashdot goes, I do sometimes have problems rendering the page, especially the user login.

    These small problems mean nothing in the big picture. I love Mozilla.

    The parent is not a troll.

  18. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by Pedersen · · Score: 5, Informative
    • Firefox = Browser
    • Thunderbird = E-Mail & News
    • Mozilla = Browser, Email, News, Calendar, Composer, Palm Sync, Address Book, and even the kitchen sink

    Personally, I go with Mozilla, but then again, I like having all that extra functionality in one place.

    --

    GPL made simple: What was my stuff is now our stuff. If you improve our stuff, please keep it our stuff.
  19. Re:Awesome! by 222 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, its a real problem.

  20. WOW by shao · · Score: 2, Informative

    7% faster at startup, is 8% faster to open a window, has 9% faster page loading, and is 5% smaller

    1. Re:WOW by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats a pretty big improvement for a mature piece of software such as mozilla.

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
  21. Re:Awesome! by hattig · · Score: 4, Informative

    When Slashdot fucks up:

    1) Click Back Button
    2) Click Forward Button

    Always renders correctly after clicking the forward button.

  22. Re:Awesome! by obotics · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those interested in tracking this bug, it is Bug 217527 in Bugzilla (copy link and paste into another window ^_^). I have seen this problem many times; usually one or two refreshes will fix the problem. Note that the status on the bug says "Fixed." However the fix was pulled back out due to a problem with the patch.

  23. Re:Awesome! by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just do a CTRL-mousewheel (or whatever you have your font size change bound to).

    That will force a re-render and clean things up.

    The bugzilla number is 217527 (the Mozilla team do not want direct links from Slashdot to Bugzilla - if you cannot figure out how to get from here to there without a link you probably shouldn't be going there anyway.)

  24. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by trisweb · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't have any Slashdot Cool Points, so I'll take some of yours and try to help you out. ;-)

    In a nutshell, Mozilla started off as the open-sourced version of Netscape 6, which turned into the Mozilla suite, and included the browser, and an e-mail client and some other things and even more things. Mozilla was big, slow, and clunky by many people's views, but it had a great rendering engine called "Gecko," and some other cool stuff. So some people decided to take the rendering engine and other cool stuff, and make a browser that was smaller, lighter, faster, and was really good at one task -- web browsing. They called it Pheonix, then Firebird, then Firefox (legal issues...). At the same time (well, a little later, after people saw how cool it was) some people decided to make an e-mail client on the same idea -- they called it Thunderbird (No legal issues).

    So, Firefox and Thunderbird are very similar on the inside, but with obvious differences. Mozilla is pretty different, as it's a direct derivative (albeit with a full rewrite) of the Netscape application. The Mozilla suite is also significantly slower (but hopefully better with this release) than Firefox and Thunderbird, and has a bigger memory footprint.

    Read this for a more thourough explanation of Firefox's goals, and also check out the Wikipedia article.

    --
    "!"
  25. Re:Agreed... by Kelerain · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have had this problem as well. It seems to be a bug in the engine, because increasing and then decreasing the text size fixes the problem. Its a pretty simple work around, but I hope they fix the bug for 1.0

  26. Re:popup blocking problem by wwahammy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Usually if you click on the link a second time, you can get the window to pop up. If it still doesn't work, just exempt that url or site from the pop-up blocker.

  27. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by Nugget · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not as pretty, but it's ten times more functional. Just load up "about:config" from the Location bar in Firefox. This will give you access to every tunable feature that exists in the program, including and far exceeding those which are exposed in Mozilla's preferences.

  28. Re:Why is it still in development? by puck01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Correction:

    I meant firefox 0.9!

  29. MODERATOR ABUSE: parent is not "off topic" by ky11x · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good lord. Mods, have you missed his joke or forgotten history?

    The parent post is making a reference to the history of Mozilla and Netscape. Netscape got bought by AOL, who fired a bunch of Netscape developers, and then the Moz got an injection of development effort as former Netscape developers helped out on Moz.

    It's not such a bad joke. I think it's funny and insightful -- he's pointing out the irony of what AOL did and is doing (now that AOL is using Moz code to help with Netscape).

    If you don't know the history and thus didn't get the joke, please don't assume that someone is "off topic" or "inflammatory." He may just be too subtle for you and you could learn something from him.

  30. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by Lshmael · · Score: 3, Informative
    from http://texturizer.net/firefox/faq.html#q1.3:
    What's the difference between Firefox and Mozilla?

    Mozilla (Application Suite, also known as SeaMonkey) is a complete suite of web related applications, such as a browser, a mail/news client, a chat client and much more. Firefox is just a browser, which makes it a better choice if you already have a mail client for example. Also, since Firefox is smaller than the whole Mozilla suite, it's faster and easier to use. Note, though, that Firefox is not just the standalone Mozilla browser. The user interface in Firefox differs from Mozilla in many ways. For example, Firefox has customizable toolbars.
    Similarly, Thunderbird is a standalone mail client. For most people, Firefox and Thunderbird will fit just as well as (if not better than!) Mozilla; if you want a IRC client and a HTML editor, then I would suggest you use Mozilla.
  31. Re:And it's better than ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Check the posting history. He's a troll.

  32. Re:Awesome! - Slashdot's bad HTML by Synistar · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is the combination of a bug in Gecko and Slashdot's horrible, invalid HTML output.

    To quote a previous post of mine:

    Fixing Slashcode's HTML has been discussed to death before but the Slashcode devels have not put any effort into fixing it yet.

    Take a look at these articles for more info on how this can be fixed.

    Note: That last link is about a Slashcode user who has already tackled some of the major issues with fixing Slash to output valid XHTML and CSS

  33. Re:Agreed... by zvar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, I "think" I have it narrowed now to at least why it is happening.

    I have Firefox on three computers, two with adblock blocking http://ads.osdn.com/* and it happens all the time on those two. On the one computer I don't block the ads on I have never had the issue.

    Just my two cents on a possible cause.

  34. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by rendler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check this extension for Firefox out. It gives the tabs in Firefox more options and features that you could poke a stick at. And also has just very recently been updated to work with 0.9 properly.

    --

    *shrug*
  35. Re:Obviously they don't need a CALENDAR by generic-man · · Score: 5, Informative

    Evolution is the only open-source e-mail client I've seen that can open and respond to Outlook invitations perfectly. It's been like that since version 1.0, which was bundled with Red Hat 7.3.

    Mozilla plans to add Outlook invitation support as part of the integration step. I don't know if any of the Evolution invitation-accepting code can be converted over, or whether that constitutes a violation of all 48 licenses that Open Source considers valid, but it is possible to accept Outlook invites using open-source software.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  36. Simple fix: by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 5, Informative
    put the following code in a bookmarklet on your bookmarks toolbar, when it messes up just click and it'll fix it right up. It also works on other sites where tables/columns don't render properly.

    "javascript:document.getElementsByTagName(%22body% 22)[0].style.display='none';document.getElementsBy TagName(%22body%22)[0].style.display='block';void( 0);"

    You'll also have to remove the spaces slashcode puts in there.

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

  37. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In fact, Camino (another Mozilla program) was recently updated as a result of the Mozilla 1.7 updates to the Gecko rendering engine. (I'm not entirely sure if this holds true for Firefox/Thunderbird.)

  38. Re:99% Issue by ticktockticktock · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here is what the developer of a bittorrent client named BitTornado says about this:

    "Try disconnecting your router and connecting your computer straight to your uplink." on his forum.

    If that works, here is the explanation as to why: "Some routers have been implicated in consistently corrupting data inside TCP packets, either when running in game mode or simply due to lousy firmware coding. They'll replace any instance of the external IP to the internal one for incoming data, and vice-versa for outgoing."

  39. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The current Mozilla suite probably contains little to none of the original Netscape Communicator 5.0 source code which Netscape released. The original Mozilla (Netscape 5.0) was trashbinned and they started over (after wasting quite a bit of time on 5.0).

    Netscape 6 (horrible) was based off a *near* 1.0 Mozilla codebase IIRC. Netscape 6+ are derivatives of Mozilla not the other way around.

  40. Re:Seriously, I'm not trying to be an ass... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 2, Informative

    GNUWin. For all your Win32 OSS needs.

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  41. Re:Firefox + Thunderbird = Mozilla? by ImpTech · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I checked, about:config works just fine in the standard Mozilla suite as well. For that matter, it works in Epiphany. I'm pretty sure its just part of Gecko.

  42. Re:Someone please explain this to me. by moondo · · Score: 3, Informative
    The simple enough reason for a normal person to switch to firefox from IE... is because (a) firefox allows much faster and efficient browsing with the tabs (just have to middle click any link), (b) will stop popups w/o making you have to install some weird "tool bar", (c) will avoid spyware and other suspicious things from mysteriously getting into the unaware user's computer, (d) seems to be faster than IE, and (e) will get a kind and nice explanation of how to use the browser's features by someone (I'd never teach them how to use IE).

    I made 2 girls change to firefox just by showing them the tabbed browsing and by telling them "... it's much better, yo!". Checked on them a few weeks later and they were still using it. That's all they wanted... a hassle-free, simple to use, understandable, non-deceiving internet program.

    Just my humble opinion.

  43. Re:Mozilla 1.7 RC-3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  44. Re:IE is a strong alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I hate the way IE decides to crop printed pages so that you only get _most_ of each line of text.

    Mozilla's "resize to fit" print feature is absolutely fantastic. It's a killer feature which doesn't get the attention it deserves.

  45. Re:URL autocomplete feature in Firefox by chuonthis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Type about:config in the address bar. Search for the pref browser.urlbar.autoFill and set it to true. If it doesn't exist, right click > New > Boolean and enter browser.urlbar.autoFill and true.

  46. Re:Stupid question- How to upgrade??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    mozilla will just use your old profile.

    you could back it up (and if you use firefox you probably should, since on occasion it has been known to wipe out profiles while upgrading).

    if you're moving from mozilla to firefox0.9 (or newer, i suppose), it can (and may default to...) import your mozilla profile.

    there are sites that describe how to backup mozilla profiles, http://gemal.dk/mozilla probably has an explanation somewhere.

  47. Re:Mozilla 1.7 RC-3 by rsax · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was using 1.7 RC3 and I just upgraded to the final release an hour ago. I can tell you that the first thing I noticed was an unbelievable speed increase. From initially double clicking the Mozilla icon it takes literally less than 2 or 3 seconds to start up. I'm guessing this is because all the debug options were removed for the final release.

  48. using tabs by lemody · · Score: 2, Informative

    mozilla tabs have one very stupid problem. if i click a new tab with middle mouse, and then start to fill up some form on the page i still am (another is loading in another tab) focus is suddenly moved to another form on another tab (when the other page has finished loading) and all the text i am writing goes there, i don't like at all.

    --


    class he-man extends man!