Slashdot Mirror


Beastie Boys' New Album Silently Installs DRM Code

nfsilkey writes "After more than five years, the Beastie Boys have released a new album. It seems that the retail disc is bundled with a copy protection autoinstaller which silently silently puts itself onto the listener's computer. Many listeners are up in arms and some are venting their frustrations on the band's website."

51 of 1,035 comments (clear)

  1. Heh by teknokracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not my version of the album....

    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh. Not on my tux-wearing platform. ;)

    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Nor on my Macintosh..."

      Are you sure? According to the blurb, it "installs 'helpful' copy protection software on MacOS and Windows as soon as you insert the CD into default systems."

      Looks like maybe the days of "it's okay, nothing will ever infect my machine, since nobody bothers to write things like this for macs" are coming to an end.

      Here comes the death of "security-through-smugness"

    3. Re:Heh by DJTodd242 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Looks like maybe the days of "it's okay, nothing will ever infect my machine, since nobody bothers to write things like this for macs" are coming to an end.

      ...and you can thank your iPod for that one.

    4. Re:Heh by Beek · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've bought two albums with EMI's copy protection... I couldn't tell the difference from a normal CD. I played normally, and was able to rip all the tracks into iTunes.

      If it did install something, it was done in some extremely sneaky fashion. I didn't notice it installing anything, and it would have somehow got around the fact that I was an unprivileged user.

    5. Re:Heh by Build6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's a little ironic that it's being done with a Beastie Boys album. Historically the primary "copyright", or "theft" issue with songs is sampling.

      They were hit in the past for sampling from AC/DC's song "Back in Black" for their 1985 single "Rock Hard", which was supposed to appear in their "best of" anthology release, but couldn't because AC/DC refused them permission to sample. It seems a little incongruous for them to be shipping out DRM also.

    6. Re:Heh by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 5, Interesting

      According to North American Law (Canada and US), aren't viruses against the law? And don't virus writers go to jail (or at least get heavy fines) for writing thier viruses?

      Asside from the Windows bashing, the parent post has a good point (and btw, this "virus" isn't windows only...) it is a virus... If I don't know it's installing, and it disables some sort of functionality of my computer (even if that functionality can potentially be used for wrongful doings), then it is a virus, and should be dealt with as such...

      I havn't hit the record store yet to pick up my copy, but, does it have a BIG ass warning on the back? If so, then, that will be thier leagal loophole. And if that is the case, are music disks (not actually a CD because of the error bits tossed in here and there) going to start coming with EULA's that you have to "agree to" by breaking the seal? Heck, why not encrypt the cd, have it access a server on the net where you put in your geographical location, favorite color, age, job position, mothers maden name, and your address, and they send you a floppy disk that has a program that checks for the original cd, then sets an "ok" flag in some directory, that will allow you to access the second digital key (each time you want to play the cd) from the internet, makes you take two steps backwards, turn clockwise twice, then hold the left mouse button, the - on the keypad, F2 and F10 all at the same time in order to listen to it.....or just buy your copy, support the artist, then fire up any P2P software, download the files, and burn them onto a cd that you can listen to whenever, and wherever you are.

      Let's keep this rant going...

      The more complex the copy protection they put on to "deterr" piracy, the more of a one-upmanship contest it becomes, and the bigger the contest, the more people that play...and the more that try to crack it, the better the odds are that someone else will think the same way the software writer did when they wrote that specific copy protection routine.

      Now, I'm not getting on any "high and mighty" bandwagon here...I don't buy all the music I listen to, I do download quite a bit to check out new bands, or to preview how an average band had decided to go with their next album, but if I do like the band (or album to be more specific) I will definately shell out my hard earned cash to buy the original. I've got some cd's that I've never actually put into a cd player (because I already had a downloaded copy) but I still bought the cd.

      One last thought I have that you can mull over if you are so inclined is... People say that CD prices should have dropped by now...and to some extent, I agree, but that's my opinion, but there is also a flip side that I realize...SOME of the additional cash that I pay for a cd is going to research new copy protection schemes so that POSSIBLY someone won't be able to rip it and distribute it for free. Sure, I like the sounds of that, but I would prefer if they did more work on these skemes before putting it into production on a retail product. And even if they did manage to get the perfect scheme working that was transparant to everyone (with the exception of the warning that they can use as thier loophole), and would work on any device, and allow me to port to an iPod, backup cd, whatever, then what's going to stop the pirate from hooking the line out of a diskman to the line in on a soundcard and recording the cd and putting it up on a P2P network?

      Mod me up, Mod me down, Makes no difference to me at this point, because you've already read what I had to say.

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
    7. Re:Heh by atrizzah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What people don't also realize is that song swapping is an old tradition, which helps keep old groups alive and helps new groups become more popular through word of mouth. I would say that literally the majority of the classic rock and underground songs that I listen to, I would never have known about if it wasn't for the fact that I could give a group a try by downloading MP3's. Then provided that I KNOW that I'm getting more than a couple good tracks, I buy the CD to support the group

  2. Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was under the impression that installing software on the user's computer without asking is illegal?

    1. Re:Illegal? by teknokracy · · Score: 5, Informative

      When one goes in-depth into the "end user license agreement" that we all say "I agree" to, it becomes apparent that you actually do warrant them to install such an application. I'd imagine it would be part of the liner notes, interactive software related agreement, or perhaps even just a simple "look on this site to see the license agreement" blurb.

    2. Re:Illegal? by DarkMantle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Two words...

      Spy-Ware

      That said, if it's a stardard EXE I don't see how it would run on linux. :D And since Linux doesn't have an autorun annoyance... I mean feature, we'd have to consciously install it.

      Once again, the solution is... Don't use M$ Windows. (Sorry Mac people, I have had no recent experience with a Mac to make a comment on it.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    3. Re:Illegal? by aka-ed · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm $orry it'$ ju$t that my keyboard i$ broken.

      anyway, who is Ian $ez? Tell Ian that part of the whole point i$ that it doe$n't matter how the arti$t feel$ about copy protection. The label$ have been in the court$ and in front of the pre$$, repeatedly talking about the right$ of the arti$t; how well doe$ that rhetoric $tand up when we learn that the arti$t has no right to avoid $uch protection?

      Where i$ the recording indu$trie$' re$pect for arti$t$' right$ in $uch a ca$e?

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    4. Re:Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      can we call them MICROS~1 ? ;)

    5. Re:Illegal? by Epistax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really do hope the courts do something about this passive signing away of your rights. I call it passive because the agreements define for themselves what agreeing to them means, so they are by nature fraudulent. So buying a product is a legal signature? So is opening a CD case, or installing software? They can put all the "Read the EULA"'s they want, but I don't see how any specific number of warnings suddenly merits compliance by law.

      By reading this you acknowledge my right to use your computer to research how better to write future comments. Oh yeah you have to give me your stuff too if you break our agreement. By reading this sentence you have broken our agreement. The next bag of potato chips you open signifies your compliance to turn over all properties that can be used to drink out of.

    6. Re:Illegal? by madmancarman · · Score: 5, Informative
      anyway, who is Ian $ez? Tell Ian that part of the whole point i$ that it doe$n't matter how the arti$t feel$ about copy protection. The label$ have been in the court$ and in front of the pre$$, repeatedly talking about the right$ of the arti$t; how well doe$ that rhetoric $tand up when we learn that the arti$t has no right to avoid $uch protection?

      It's probably Ian Rogers, the webmaster for the Beastie Boys' web site for a very long time - starting in 1994. I worked with Ian a bit when I was running the original Foo Fighters site, he's actually a really nice guy (Foo Fighters and Beastie Boys used to share the same management, Gold Mountain Entertainment, now GAS or something like that).

      With how the industry works, I'm sure he had absolutely nothing to do with this, but instead it was label decision as has already been pointed out. It's another perfect example of how disconnected the music industry is from its fans (at least those in non-english speaking countries - the software doesn't exist on the US or UK releases).

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    7. Re:Illegal? by JPriest · · Score: 5, Funny

      With Linux it won't install the DRM, but it won't make any difference because because your sound card does not work with Linux anyway.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  3. My name's Mike D. and I want respect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your freedom and your privacy are what I expect!

    1. Re:My name's Mike D. and I want respect... by Mattintosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      They did it like this...
      They did it like that...
      They did it with the wiffle ball bat...

  4. Control by Ms.XingTianCai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's hard to believe that a band that has prided itself on pushing the envelope and being controversial would do something like this. These people obviousle cared enough to buy the CD, why would the record industry need to protect themselves from them? It's just another way for them to control what we can and cannot do, thereby infringing on my rights. When I can't even listen to my music without worrying about what programs may be being installed on my computer, we've let them go too far.

    --
    As a computer, I am amused by the faith you have in technology.
    1. Re:Control by bersl2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think this would be the artists' call to put copy protection on the CD.

    2. Re:Control by mriker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe, but the artists have a choice in who distributes their music.

  5. DRM for what? by Hello+Spaceman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought "To The 5 Boroughs" (cause I'm representin' Manhattan), and ripped all the tracks to my iPod with no problems. Just what does the DRM code do?

    I'm on a Mac, is this another case where I'm missing out on the DRM fun because of platform neglect? (There IS a Mac partition on the disc, but all it seems to have on it is a Macromedia presentation with a QuickTime movie.)

  6. Obligatory Futurama Quote: by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo Bender wanna make some noise
    Get your harddrive scratched by the Beastie Boys!

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  7. Calm yourself... by chronicon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure the RIAA said it was OK. Get over it. Besides, I sure if you gave the Hon. Senator Orrin Hatch a call he would help clarify the importance of the issue. You'd just have to get past the "Beastie who??" questions first...

  8. Re:DRM is worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    They even have it in their new lyrics:
    Check-ch-check-check-check-ch-check it out
    What-wha-what-what-what DRM is all about
    Work-wa-work-work-work-wa-work it out
    Let's turn this motherfuckin' operating system out

    subtle, but effective.
  9. Does the band know or care..? by lovecult · · Score: 5, Informative

    To quote from
    http://www.boingboing.net/2004/06/11/new_beasties_ disc_ha.html

    Update: Ian sez, "Hi, I'm not sure who posted re: Beastie Boys copy protection, but I just spoke with Mike D and their management and they wanted me to pass along that a) This is all territories except the US and UK -- US and UK discs do not have this protection on them; b) All EMI CDs are treated this way, theirs isn't receiving special treatment; c) They would have preferred not to have the copy protection, but weren't allowed to differ from EMI policy."
  10. You gotta fight... by neonstz · · Score: 5, Funny

    You gotta fight for your right to copy!

    1. Re:You gotta fight... by miracle69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You bought a new CD - man you don't wanna know
      You go to your PC it says "no go"
      Loaded DRM - your machine won't work
      But the Beasties don't tell you like you're some kind of jerk.

      You gotta fight for your right to copy

      The Boys caught your sampling and they said "No Way"
      Those hypocrites - use samples every day.
      Man, del-ing this is such a drag
      Now your idols tossed all their cred in the bag.

      You gotta fight for your right to copy!

      Don't you buy our CD if you expect to have a hear.
      Cause our DRM won't let you play it through the air.
      Your PC busted and you said "Where's my noise?"
      Aw, man, it won't play cause it's the Beastie Boys.

      --
      Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  11. Isn't this easily circumvented? by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wasn't there an article many months (years?) ago about how to circumvent this kind of thing by holding "shift" as you insert the disc? Yes, that's a Windows-only solution, but I don't see this kind of problem affecting Macs or Linux machines.

    Wait, is mentioning that little workaround considered a DMCA violation?

  12. This is Illegal in Minnesota by Kope · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I personally hope that a CD I buy installs something on my computer. Really. 'Cuase I'm walking into the DA's office and demanding prosecution under 609.88 the next day. And as a highly paid professional, I know I can bill my time that any 10 second problem will turn into the maximum allowable penalty pretty darn quick...

    609.88 Computer damage.

    Subdivision 1. Acts. Whoever does any of the following is guilty of computer damage and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 2:

    (b) intentionally and without authorization or with intent to injure or defraud alters any computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or any other property specifically defined in section 609.87, subdivision 6;

    Subd. 2. Penalty. Whoever commits computer damage may be sentenced as follows:

    (a) To imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $50,000, or both, if the damage, destruction or alteration results in a loss in excess of $2,500, to the owner, or the owner's agent, or lessee;

    (b) To imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the damage, destruction or alteration results in a loss of more than $500, but not more than $2,500 to the owner, or the owner's agent or lessee; or

    (c) In all other cases to imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $700, or both.

  13. Re:Fuck them. by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agreed. And to show my disgust, I'm going to NOT buy their album. Twice.

    We'll see who's laughing then!

  14. Not going to check this out by dvduval · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think I'll ch-ch-ch-check...check it out! Cause DRM's what it's all about!

  15. Shows why Linux is not ready for the desktop by cetialphav · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just another example of why Linux is not ready for the desktop. I should be able to buy this CD and put it in my Linux box and NOT be able to rip it just like on Windows. Until Linux can run all of my important software (DRM controls, Kazaa, Gator, Sobig virus, and various spyware), I'll just stick with windows.

    Seriously, this is just stupid. I would guess that most pirated MP3s that are being shared out there have been downloaded from someone else, not ripped from the original CD. So it really only takes a few people with either a linux box or enough sense to turn of autorun on their CD drive to be able to spread pirated MP3s all over the world. This can't possibly stop anything and will likely piss off the people that are supposed to be customers.

  16. Prosecute them for writing a Virus/Trojan horse by BigDish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lately people have been prosecuted for writing a virus, well, whoever wrote this needs to be prosecuted the same way.
    1. It is malicious (prevents you from copying the CD as you noramlly would be able to.
    2. It silently installs itself, masquarading as a
    standard Audio CD (I'm sorry, 5" music disc)

    How is that different than any other trojan horse?

  17. Re:Beasties by E_elven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Record exec: We decided to give your music away for free, guys. We'll still pay you $50 million, though.
    Beasties: Hell no, dude. We DEMAND you put some evil copy protection on the album!
    Record exec: Isn't that horribly unfair towards the customers, guys? Come on, have a heart.
    Beasties: Oh yeah? Well fuck you, fat Record Exec. We've got the right to party! *BLAWW* *BLAWW* *BLAWW*
    Record exec: *Aaaargh* Oooooverrr my deaaaad boddyyyyyy... custooooemmueua *AAAARGH* cstmrrrrs muuust beee pa... pah.... pahmpppered.. *groan*
    Beasties: *Urinate on the dead Record Exec and offer a sacrifice to Satan*

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  18. Oh, except on music CD's by Jadecristal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From Microsoft's description:

    Turns off the Autoplay feature.

    Autoplay begins reading from a drive as soon as you insert media in the drive. As a result, the setup file of programs and the music on audio media start immediately.

    By default, Autoplay is disabled on removable drives, such as the floppy disk drive (but not the CD-ROM drive), and on network drives.

    If you enable this setting, you can also disable Autoplay on CD-ROM drives or disable Autoplay on all drives.

    This setting disables Autoplay on additional types of drives. You cannot use this setting to enable Autoplay on drives on which it is disabled by default.

    Note: This setting appears in both the Computer Configuration and User Configuration folders. If the settings conflict, the setting in Computer Configuration takes precedence over the setting in User Configuration.

    Note: This setting does not prevent Autoplay for music CDs.

  19. Strange by vandan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tripple J ( youth national radio network in Australia ) reviewed the CD recently and said that many of their songs had political statements against the bullshit greed and right-wing idiology running rampant through the current US government.

    Strange that they are critical of their government yet side with the record companies on this issue. Maybe they don't mean what they say? Or purphaps the record company pulled this one of them without telling them?

    I certainly won't be buying it anyway. I'll add it to the not-worth-buying-but-good-download-potential list.

  20. Arrogance by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Installing anything on a person's computer, without authorization, is just plain old arrogance. "But it was in the fine print of the EULA..." Fuck the EULA. There needs to be a big dialog box: "DRM to be installed. Yes/No?"

    And if they say no, the goddamned thing doesn't play, they take it back to the store and get a refund.

    What this evil corporation is saying, is: "Fuck you. We own you. We own your computer. You'll take it and like it, because protecting our digital rights trump fucking up your piece of shit from Dell, you fucking Joe Sixpack sheeple. If you don't like it call your Congresscritter. Oops, we own it, too."

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  21. beastieboys.com Offline by Barryke · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Beastie Boys site seems to be down.. since half an hour ago actualy...

    Maybe some hackers acualy buyed the cd. and got mad.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  22. 5 bucks says the shift key circumvents this.... by anakin357 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    http://www.fsckin.com/
    1. Re:5 bucks says the shift key circumvents this.... by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 5, Insightful
      To find out if this is true, borrow the disc from some sucker who actually bought it, and can't use it. By all means do not buy it yourself.

      In the 1980s. The software industry tried all this copy control nonsense with Commodore 64 software. Many companies did not survive the backlash. The record labels will not learn until everyone stops buying. Any business that alienates their customers deserves to fail. Vote with your pocket books. Stop feeding the hand that bites you.

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    2. Re:5 bucks says the shift key circumvents this.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      How do you think a cd is supposed to run a program after being inserted without using autorun?

      "Autorun" is one of the most irritating features of Windows. It's easily disabled, but at the cost of losing "notification" when you insert or remove a CD, which means you have to manually prompt for a refresh sometimes. But it's better than some installer taking over every time you insert a program disk to refer to something or copy some files. Trusting to "pressing the shift key" to defeat it on each insertion is about as reliable as using the withdrawal method of birth control; pretty soon your PC is going to get knocked up.

  23. see, this is why people use windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    You have to use the group policies manager to disable it. Goto start --> run --> "gpedit.msc" (thanks to the other replier, I forget what it was called) --> Local Computer Policy --> Administrative Templates --> System (click it) --> on the right pane find "Turn off Autoplay" in the list --> right-click --> properties --> select the "enable" radio button.

    Ease of use has always been Windows' strong point. In linux you'd have to open up a file and change something; that's unexceptable for the casual user.

  24. It doesn't bother all that much to me ... by anubi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That they did this.

    What bothers the hell out of me, though, is that it can be done.

    How in the world can I trust *anything* that willy-nilly follows whatever orders someone else tells *my* machine to do, leaving me powerless to override? The most surprising thing to me is that business is taking this. Do they really think only "good guys" know where the unlocked back doors to the operating system are?

    Stuff like this just convinces me further that anyone even thinking of using this kind of system in a business environment needs to have his salary and standing in his organization re-evaluated.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  25. it's a Mac OS 9 vulnerability by dmoen · · Score: 5, Informative
    The vulnerability doesn't exist in MacOS X, unless you are running the Classic subsystem. To protect yourself, start up Classic, run the Classic QuickTime control panel, and disable "AutoStart". Now your Mac will not automatically run malware on inserted CDs.

    So that's why most MacOS X users will not have their machines infected--they aren't running Classic at the time they insert the CD.

    Doug Moen.

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:it's a Mac OS 9 vulnerability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes. And to clarify, you CAN NOT turn on autorun in Mac OSX at all. It's not even available.

  26. Re:Virus by c0dedude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The CD is the vector. Give it to a friend, it perpetuates. Direct-copy it, it probably perpetuates. Remember, worms perpetuate without user action. Viruses perpetuate with user action.

    Seriously: How does someone so blatantly shortsighted manage to breathe?

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  27. Re:Silently installing DRM eh? by SamNmaX · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Technically, if your product silently installs software without the users knowledge, wouldn't that put it in the same league as spyware, as defined by some of the more recent bills passing through Congress?

    Even though this may be technically spyware, it could also be technically illegal to remove due the DMCA. So basically, you put a cd with this type of crap on it, and since it's goal is copy-protection, anything that could get around it, including say, the ability to remove it if it attempts to stick on your system like a virus, could very well be considerred 'circumvension'. I'd be curious to see how such an argument would hold up in court.

  28. Sabotaged! by Rai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sabotaged

    You can't stand it, you know I planned it
    I'm gonna set it straight, this fair use debate
    You can't copy shit when I'm in here
    Because my new CD will stop all your file shares
    So while you sit back and wonder why
    Copy protection is installed inside
    That's not a real CD, it's a mirage
    I'm tellin' y'all you've been sabotaged

    So listen up 'cause you can't copy nothin'
    I'll shut you down unless you use the shift button
    But I'm in and your MP3s are gone
    You'll never rip another one of my songs
    'Cause what you hear you might not get
    And we got legal threats so don't you pirate yet
    You're copying a thing that's a mirage
    I'm trying to tell you now you've been sabotaged

    You can't stand it, you know i planned it
    I'm gonna set it straight, the consumer rights fate
    You can't copy shit when my CD's in place
    And now you feel disgrace because I'm in your disc space
    But make no mistakes, I'll shutdown your scandal
    I'm Hilary Rosen when I fly off the handle
    No more fair use, it was all a mirage
    I'm scheming on your rights; you're sabotaged!

  29. Well, there's a very clear and simple message here by X86Daddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the message I get from this is:

    Do not buy this album. If I want to hear it, download it instead.

    Their instruction is just crystal clear. Yes; it sucks that Windows auto-installs crap off CDs, and yes, there's easy ways around that. But to arrive at that is to miss the point. The point is that if you don't want their DRM, don't buy the product... you can get the music for a nice $0.00, without rewarding their vile practice.

    If people in the biz are reading this, please take note: DRM offends and insults and disrespects those who you're trying to sell to. You're only getting sales from the ignorant, and I'm working to reduce their numbers by telling as many friends / family members as I can to stop buying big label music. Flat out stop. Download, buy used, or go with small, respectable labels. (I do still buy, generally direct from small artists; the rest... fuck 'em. Not a dime to the RIAA from me.)

    If you agree, you can help... simply assist as many people as you can to find alternatives to buying big label music. If people really want the latest Beastie / other-pop album, there's torrents, k-lite, etc... and the price is better. Is it wrong? Is killing in a war wrong? I'm working to destroy my enemy or change their stance here; that is the nature of war. You gotta fight... It may be company policy, but you're still sell-out bitches, Beastie Boys (and I love some of your work... oh, well).

  30. The Liner Notes by cammoblammo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Given the EULA that these things will attempt to pass off on us, I wonder if they can (pseudo-legally, at least) get around *nix type security arrangements?

    Hey! Buy this great CD! It rocks! It jives! It's phat. It's good, and reeeaaalll bad! Stick it up the establishment, throw down your oppressors and ROCK!!!!

    .
    .
    .
    4. A II 3 e vii) THE USER AGREES, IN THE EVENT OF SECURITY SYSTEMS ON MUSIC SYSTEM BLOCKING THE INSTALLATION OF SAID MUSIC PROTECTION SOFTWARE, TO SUPPLY AS NEEDED ALL PASSWORDS, ENCRYPTION/ DECRYPTION KEYS, USER NAMES, OPERATING SYSTEM DETAILS, CREDIT CARDS NUMBERS AND ALL OTHER INFORMATION NECESSARY TO INSTALL AFOREMENTIONED ON THE AFOREMENTIONED MACHINE OF AFOREMENTIONED USER, HERETOFORE AFOREMENTIONED.
    4. A II 3 e viii) IN THE SITUATION THE SAID MUSIC PROTECTION SOFTWARE IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE OPERATING SYSTEM, APIS, REGISTRATION DEVICES, OR OTHER SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE FEATURES OF THE COMPUTER ON WHICH THE SOFTWARE IS TO BE INSTALLED THE USER AGREES TO REMOVE ALL SOFTWARE FROM THE COMPUTER, INCLUDING OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND AGREES TO INSTALL THE PRESCRIBED OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE WHICH CAN BE PURCHASED VIA WWW.MICROSOFT.COM. ANY NECESSARY SOFTWARE PURCHASES, SYSTEM UPGRADES, OR OTHER CHANGES IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USER. THE PUBLISHER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ASSOCIATED COST.

    .
    .
    .

    Yeah! Rock on!

    I'd like to thank my girl, my wife, my manager, and most of all God who made all this possible.

    --

    Cogito, ergo sig.