Slashdot Mirror


Wearable Cell Phones Are Here

An anonymous reader writes "BusinessWeek Online just ran an article on wearable cell phones. A cell phone in a powder case? In a wrist watch? Inside your earring? Sure, why not. And these phones could make it into the U.S. in the next year."

69 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. The last place I'd want it... by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is in my ear. I hate telemarketers enough as-is, but to have them that close to me 24/7? I'll stick with my normal phone, thank you.

    1. Re:The last place I'd want it... by zoloto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or on my wrist for that matter. It's one thing to get a phone call in the middle of a date and ignore it because it's on vibrate, but if it's on my wrist in my watch it's a little harder to ignore if I'm trying to make a move. Then again, that can't be all bad actually... ... nevermind, carry on.

    2. Re:The last place I'd want it... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's one thing to get a phone call in the middle of a date...

      This is unlikely to be a problem for most of the readers here....

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    3. Re:The last place I'd want it... by cliffa3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This would disrupt a movie even more...just imagine, you're sitting there and the guy down from you falls out in the aisle looking like he's having a seizure. Then again, maybe the vibrate functionality will be taken out for the ones you wear in your ear.

  2. Tin foil hat... by cbrocious · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You gotta wonder if these will be small enough to be able to be given to people as presents to spy on them. "Wow, these are beautiful earrings! Thank You!" "No, thank YOU!"

    Perhaps a privacy concern for the future.

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    1. Re:Tin foil hat... by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 5, Funny

      To spy on them it'd take a lot of anytime minutes. Better have it set to spy on Nights and Weekends only.

      --

      --
      Are you a Chipotle Fan?
    2. Re:Tin foil hat... by cbrocious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now... "Can you hear me now? Damn."

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    3. Re:Tin foil hat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, how about a privacy concern for right now? It's not like there haven't been bugs available for years that can do this.

  3. Yeah by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Cellular Thong is already on pre-order.

    --

    --
    Are you a Chipotle Fan?
    1. Re:Yeah by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm, bet that'll get people to switch the ringer from loud ring tones to vibrate.

    2. Re:Yeah by karzan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn Aussies ... I did find it confusing when my rugby-playing Aussie housemate said for the first time 'let me just go get my thongs' ...

    3. Re:Yeah by keefey · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had the same when I arrived in Sydney. Someone asked "brought your thongs?", and all I could say back was "what, my leatherette g-string and leopard skin pouch?"

    4. Re:Yeah by antic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Makes you wonder about "ring" tones...

      That's one ring that shouldn't have a tone. Keep it silent and odourless kids...

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    5. Re:Yeah by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do us all a favour then: Don't get the camera model. :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. From the article by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 5, Funny

    That could change soon. NTT DoCoMo, a pioneer in wireless services, is developing a technology called FingerWhisper that uses a hand's bone structure to make a wrist watch phone easier to manage and operate. Here's how it works: When a call arrives, the phone sends vibrations through the bones in the index finger. When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice. The technology also would allow users to dial phone numbers or send text messages by tapping their palms in certain ways. And the technology doesn't seem to pose any health risks, says a DoCoMo spokesperson.

    And you thought the taco-shaped side-talking N-Gage was embarassing...

    1. Re:From the article by Punto · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice.

      This is actually one of the coolest designs for cell phones I've ever seen, and the worst thing is that they've been reporting this for years now (the oldest mention of it I can remember is from before 2000), and still no sign of it on this side of the pacific (or at least not on this side of the ecuador).

      I can't wait for them to arrive here, so I can finally have an excuse to get a cell phone, and join in on the annoyance.

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    2. Re:From the article by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I'm Japanese (born and raised) and my parents taught me to use those beveled wooden sticks to clean my ears. I don't know whether it's safe, but it feels really good. Almost as good as sex.

      Of course, my people are also known for their other weirdnesses, such as a religion that believes the spirits of our dead ancestors haunt the streets picking up the shit of the living and eating it. I am not kidding.

    3. Re:From the article by kcorporation · · Score: 5, Funny
      When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice
      I think I speak for all of us when I say, "Go, go, Gadget Phone!"
    4. Re:From the article by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Yes, Bob is here, but no, I won't pass the phone to him."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  5. Star Trek by Entropy248 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aw shit... Here come those damned communicator pins. On the show, they seemed really cool. In an age with cellphones with speaker phone (or even worse, the dreaded BLEEP walkie talkies), they now seem like the rudest invention of all time. I've always thought the best compromise was an in-ear implant, but I suspect we're years away from those. Plus the three tone error message would officially hurt like hell. (We're sorry, the number you have reached has been disconnected. But, you won't hear this message because you're now deaf.)

    1. Re:Star Trek by gunnk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know -- they could be a real improvement.

      The rudest thing about cellphone conversations currently is that the conversation intrudes upon you, but you are excluded from participating because you only hear half the conversation.

      At least with communicator pins you hear both sides and can "contribute" with your own comments...

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
  6. Now I get it by k_killmore · · Score: 5, Funny

    All those guys on the subway talking to themselves weren't crazy, they were beta testers.

  7. Great!!! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, how about some decent service? I mean, having a phone in an earring is great, but it would be nice if the damn thing worked half the time. Maybe if they spent some money on the damned plans and cell towers, instead of on the latest new candy coated pice of crap phone id be impressed.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Great!!! by WhiteDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, I just bought this new cellphone that's only the size of a button and clips to your lapel... and look they give you this free screen/keyboard thingy so you can operate it... and I pooh-pooh'ed this bluetooth thing...

      This might be OT, but how many people out there have access to both a GSM and CDMA phone network?
      In Australia, we now have most metro areas with both networks, but for the last few years all new installations are CDMA only.

      For several years I used a couple of different GSM mobiles - a cheap NEC Fido, then a top-of-the-line nokia 9110 - and on only one occasion did I ever get a call go straight to message bank when the phone should have rung.

      After my 9110 connected with hard surfaces one too many times, I got a cheap CDMA phone as it offered coverage in a town where I spend a fair bit of time (one of those damn CDMA only areas).

      Since then, it often goes to message bank when it should ring - most noticable when you are only a few hundred metres from the tower, or on one occassion sitting about 1.5km from a higher powered tower with a constant good signal for an hour - after which I got a phone call starting "oh, so you're answering your phone now - you weren't 5 minutes ago".

      Everyone I speak to has noticed similar behaviour, and they have many different makes/models of Crappy Dodgy Mobile Access phones.

      Other things - like getting the same SMS as I come into coverage for 3 days, SMS's being delivered days late, not being able to configure divert on no answer separatly to divert on out of range (that's a missing network feature btw), were also reported by the other CDMA users I spoke to.

      Last week I lost the cheap CDMA, and took the opportunity to go back to GSM (we had to tell the telco this was REALLY what we wanted to do several times before they accepted we had it right)

      Personally, I'm MUCH happier knowing which half of the time my mobile works now.
      Does this kind of thing apply to CDMA in the rest of the world?

  8. Beam Me Up Scotty by keefey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There were reports on The Register, concerning wearable media: Motorola Showcases Watch Phone and Unix on a wristwatch. How important is functionality on your arm to the general public? Note, on your arm it becomes useable with only one hand. How much info could realistically be displayed, and how functional would a phone in a watch actually be?

    All those sci-fi shows show people talking at them in the style of a video - where is the privacy? It's all well and good when you're on Omnicron-8, but on the train, heading towards Slough, it's going to be a bit of a piss-take.

    Gimme the 6600 any day, I don't care if it is a brick, I can get my fist-like fingers to press the buttons!

    1. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by isorox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      where is the privacy?

      HELLO! I'M ON A TRAIN! I'LL BE HOME AT EIGHT!

      Yeah, plenty of privacy nowadays.

      How important is functionality on your arm to the general public? Note, on your arm it becomes useable with only one hand.

      What functionality do you need in a phone. I rarely use my actual phone, my bluetooth earpiece has one button that answers when it rings, hangs up when I'm talking, or activates voice dial when I'm not talking. Say the name of someone and the call connects. One finger to initiate the call, one finger to end the call, just as much privacy as a normal cell phone.

      A phone built into a watch would simply replace the current time with the calling name. Bluetooth means you can program it from your PDA or laptop, or some credit-card-sized keypad you can keep in your wallet.

      Really, what does a phone do? The only major function I use aside from phone calls is SMS, which I'd rather do through my PDA anyway (full keyboard for starters)

    2. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by keefey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, but doesn't it just smack of those 80's calculator watches that everybody seemed to have simply because they could? It seems to be the opposite direction of the way the current trends are going anyway - basically phones are having more and more functionality added (Symbian for a start), whereas this wearing lark seems to be stripping it out. I'm not complaining, it's nice to see some diversity in the market.

    3. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a smartphone. My PDA is my phone. My web browser is my phone. My camera is my phone. My MP3 player is my phone. One 266MHz device, one battery, all that functionality.

      Remember, the gist of the actual article has little to do with wrist phones per sei, rather that these devices are now small enough to be used in such a way, or in wearable clothing, purely to make them more convenient so you don't have to lug as many gadgets around with you.

      Of course if you use a PDA and a cellphone for sending SMS's, you probably fit into the 80% of people who are going to keep carrying a lot of baggage and a lot of different batteries for every gadget you have. So basically in order to have the same level of functionality you get from a single handset, you're carrying your handset, a bluetooth headset and a PDA?

      Which is fine of course, each to his own, but I'm very happy with the way convergence lets me carry all that functionality in one device.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    4. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by isorox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a phoen sucks as a PDA. Aside from the tiny screen, there is no decent way of inputting anything. Compare to a PDA with a built in keyoard (quite small admitably) and handwriting recognition that fits in your shirt pocket.

      One battery is great, but I'd rather know my phone will last 3 days then have a PDA-cum-phone-cum-mp3 player that lasts 12 hours.

      I typically carry 3 gadgets with me at any one time, phone (with built in camera, calander etc, none of which I use - I used the camera 4 times when I first got it but its a waste of time), mp3 player/flash stick (I lose it in my pocket its so small), and PDA in my jacket or shirt pocket (depending what I'm wearing).

      I dont know anyone (geek or non-geek) that uses their phone for anything more then phone calls and SMS (or PDA - GPRS connection). Actually, thats not entirely true, I use mine as an alarm clock sometimes too.

    5. Re:Beam Me Up Scotty by utlemming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although some functionality is nice, these watches seem geared towards people who just use cells to talk. I have played with SMS, but personally I find it annoying and an invasion of my privacy. In the last two weeks I have got Porn and "Find out dirty secrets about your Friends" text messages. I bought a phone so that I could get a hold of people when I wanted to. And the thing has proved its value. But at the same time I haven't used my "vision enabled" crap. No need to. The thing that I have wanted for a long time is a phone which I could wear on my wrist. Then I wouldn't beat the thing to death. However, one thing that I think would be great would be to have cell phones with 4 megapixel cameras in them. That would kick some serious ace.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  9. Great. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thieves may now start ripping off peoples' earrings hoping to nab a cellphone.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  10. Re:Repost? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it was only in the future queue which is viewable by subscribers...

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  11. Wearable Cellphones? by Law1620 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now only if they could make wearable clothes...

  12. In a suppository? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just wondering, because I've seen bumper stickers like this:

    "Would you drive any better if i shoved that cell phone up your ass?"

  13. Can I... by Myrmi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Can I borrow your phone? I need to make a really important call!"
    "Sure!"
    *Removes phone from ear*
    "Uh.... never mind..."

    --
    "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
    1. Re:Can I... by dhalgren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or perhaps worse, for the bone-conduction model:

      "Can I borrow your phone? I need to make a really important call!"
      "Sure!"
      *Sticks finger in ear*
      "Uh.... never mind..."

  14. Aww great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just what I need, more people making those stupid thumb in the ear "I'll call you" signs.

  15. Voice recognition buttons by CraigGraham · · Score: 2, Interesting
    An alternative to these Star Trek-like technologies is voice recognition. Motorola has developed something it calls the SmartButton. The user pins the device onto a lapel, then taps on it and, using voice commands, dials a number and holds a conversation.


    The author has evidently little knowledge of Star Trek!
  16. Big on the inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article..."A phone stitched into clothing or wrapped around a wrist could allow women to forego a purse."

    That must be some damn good phone for a woman not to need her purse...I guess it also holds tampons, 5 lipsticks, lube, etc.

    1. Re:Big on the inside by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      You ain't lived until you've asked a woman for her driver's license in order to accept her check and she pulls a bottle of Chianti and a one pound jar of Vaseline out of her purse while she's looking for it.

      KFG

  17. Just what we need... by penginkun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like we don't have enough moving hazards out there on the streets as it is. Now we're going to have women putting on makeup AND talking on the phone at the same time? Lord have mercy on us all.

  18. Uh... by SinaSa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't this strike anyone else as pretty, well..useless?

    Cellphone in a wrist-watch? How do I dial a number when I want to make a call? Or did someone suddenly decide the caclulator digital watch was a good model to follow?

    Or is there some attachable keypad you use to dial the number? Wait. You mean like a current phone and some handsfree earpieces, a speakerphone, or even a bluetooth headset?

    Inside ear-rings? Sorry, but I've seen the photos of that corporate executive lady who spent three or four hours on her cell every day. Nice cancerous ring around the ear section of the skull.

    --
    --
    The last digit of pi is four.
  19. A Powder Case Is Wearable? by Jameth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the subject line is kinda all I had to say.

  20. *taps chest* - "One to beam aboard" by the_seal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Other wearable technologies coming soon: *Thigh mounted popcorn popper *Foldable stomach mounted TFT screen for my ass mounted, slim line nix box. *Bicep Juicer

  21. probably won't happen... by Geak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... because the F*cking Communications Commission would have to approve it. We all know it takes forever for that to happen. I can already hear them screaming - NO YOU CAN'T!!! YOU'LL BE CLOGGING UP THE EARWAVES!!!

  22. That boring "vision thing" by ites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else bored with designers trying to sell us their "visions"? What happened to asking people what they want and then making that cheaply and well?

    (I guess this would eliminate 75% of the mobile phone industry at a stroke, no more 3G, WAP, MMS, UMTS,... just free SMS and cheap voice)

    Mobile phones...? OK, here is what _I_ would like to see:

    1. Cheap, cheap, cheap. The damn things get lost and stolen too easily. If they cost $25 that'd be OK.

    2. Pretty in pink. Make them colored, even better, make it possible to print phone sheaths on an inkjet. Why the boring grey?

    3. Standardised: one single battery standard for all phones. One single micro plug for all phones. One single power supply for all phones. One single range of car kits, etc. Let's see Nokia and Sony-Ericsson and Siemens define a new standard "base" that frees us from having to keep separate chargers for each and every phone we buy. (Nokia has done this for its own phones, but that's not enough)

    4. Extensible rather than overpackaged. If I want a digital camera, MP3 player, PDA, let me add this to the phone. It'd be a lot easier if mobile phones had standard connections and some kind of docking system.

    Let me propose a new, radical design for mobile phones. First replace SIM cards with "core" modules that are the size of a phone battery pack. These cores conform to an industry standard and have the SIM card embedded in them, along with the bulk of the GSM electronics.

    The core can then be "sheathed" with anything from a $2.50 cover that provides just a keypad and headset jack, to a $2500 cover covered with diamonds.

    The development of a standard core will allow the cost to come way down and spawn an entire industry of add-on manufacturers, which is where the mobuile phone industry will make money again.

    Now if I, a simple Slashdotter, can come up with a plan to revolutionize the mobile phone industry, either I'm a genius, or the experts reviewed in this article are bumbling idiots, or both.

    Now I need another coffee. Make way!

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:That boring "vision thing" by dago · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. Well, cheapest phones cost around 50$ new here, unsubsidized.

      2. Done, Nokia 3200 has that, you can print your own cover.

      4. Done, look at all the various accessories for nokia/ericsson. They even have RC Cars

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    2. Re:That boring "vision thing" by mt-biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Europe, at least, most of your wishes seem to be coming true.

      1. Cheap, cheap, cheap. The damn things get lost and stolen too easily. If they cost $25 that'd be OK.

      Yes, but only as long as you don't want MMS, UMTS, Bluetooth, etc. See below.

      2. Pretty in pink. Make them colored, even better, make it possible to print phone sheaths on an inkjet. Why the boring grey?

      Most phones can be bought in a range of colors and/or have interchangeable skins.

      3. Standardised: one single battery standard for all phones. One single micro plug for all phones. One single power supply for all phones.

      OK, chargers aren't there yet, and perhaps differences in battery technology make this difficult, but at least the data connections are becoming standardised thanks to Bluetooth. New BMWs just need the phone to be authenticated with the on-board computer and the car can then use the phone regardless of whether the phone is lying in the cradle or in your pocket.

      4. Extensible rather than overpackaged. If I want a digital camera, MP3 player, PDA, let me add this to the phone. It'd be a lot easier if mobile phones had standard connections and some kind of docking system.

      My Siemens S55 has a snap-on camera module with flash. I hate the thing, but that's just because the quality of the thing is crap and the connector is really dodgy. Again, Bluetooth could be the answer.

      Let me propose a new, radical design for mobile phones. First replace SIM cards with "core" modules that are the size of a phone battery pack. These cores conform to an industry standard and have the SIM card embedded in them, along with the bulk of the GSM electronics.

      The core can then be "sheathed" with anything from a $2.50 cover that provides just a keypad and headset jack, to a $2500 cover covered with diamonds.


      I think your core modules are going to be too inflexible. How about we modularise things a bit more - a small standardised storage device which we can attach to various phone electronics (to allow upgrades of the electronics, or a choice between folding, compact, and larger models with more features). Battery technology is becoming flexible with regard to shape and umm... flexibility, so let's keep that free-form too, since we want users to be able to choose between tiny devices and larger devices with a longer battery life. Best would be to allow the battery to clip on the to the electronic module.

      Now the people who would like a shiny, colored phone can buy the electronic module which allows the shells to be exchanged, whereas business users who don't care can go with boring grey where the integrated shell will be cheaper to manufacture.

      Oh, wait... that's sounding a lot like the status quo.

      Now if I, a simple Slashdotter, can come up with a plan to revolutionize the mobile phone industry, either I'm a genius, or the experts reviewed in this article are bumbling idiots, or both.

      I can think of another alternative. :)

      I suspect the mobile-phone market is one of the more market-driven industries out there, judging by the amount of competition and innovations we're seeing.

      Personally, I've just set up my first WLAN at home and find the freedom of being able to surf/work anywhere in the house just great (but what's with the chalk marks outside my front-door? ;). For me the next step would be to access my home network from my laptop _wherever_ I am. A Bluetooth/UMTS gateway over my cellphone could be just what I need, if the price was right...

  23. Seems like a good idea by Dizzle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idea of putting a finger in your ear would improve audio quality, would it not? I mean, when you plug your ear with your finger, it blocks out everything but low frequency sounds for the most part. Couldn't that make conversations, even in loud places, quite feasible?

    Just a little sidenote: what answer is that stupid guy expecting to his question? "Nope, can't hear you now." That's like saying "Whoever's not here, raise your hand." or "Are you asleep?"

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  24. Prior Art? by wonton_mein · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think somebody already has prior art:

    Wearable cell phone

  25. A New Age of Etiquette by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all of these tiny cell phones and people broadcasting their lives to the world as they talk, I'll have to wear my iPod all of the time just to be polite and respect their privacy! Oh well, at least I won't be able to hear the panhandlers...

  26. Free and Competitive Markets by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It doesn't matter how cool or technically advanced a cell phone is, the wireless carriers in the United States have a chokehold on the market. They want to force their subscribers to buy their phones only from the carrier's limited list of "approved" phones. This gives the carrier's marketing drones vast power over what phones and features are available. You don't buy a phone with the features that you want, you buy a phone that may have been crippled so that it fits in with the carrier's marketing strategy.

    The FCC needs to require all cellular carriers to activate any phone that meets the technical standards for their network.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  27. *fap* *fap* *fap* by Suchetha · · Score: 4, Funny
    The technology also would allow users to dial phone numbers or send text messages by tapping their palms in certain ways.

    oh.. *pant* *pant* *pant* sorry.. *pant*pant* wrong number... *click*

    Suchetha
    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  28. Part way there already by panurge · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have artilleryman's ear, and I use an in-ear hearing aid. I use a neck microphone (under my shirt) on my cell phone with an inductive loop, so phone speech comes directly into my ear. Unlike a Bluetooth unit, the battery life is weeks. Because the hearing aid is music grade, the sound quality is vastly better than you get with the tiny speakers on cell phones. The result is that I can answer the phone and talk with no visible phone at all. I still derive minor pleasure from the shock of some people watching this madman talking to himself, but the fact is, it works extremely well. The microphone is shielded and has good noise rejection, and on the T setting I can block out external sounds and hear perfectly in very noisy environments. The one thing I would really like is an external keypad I could velcro to a jacket, or a better voice dialing system than the (frankly crappy) Nokia 6310 the company provides.

    There are few benefits of middle aged deafness, but this is one of them.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  29. Evil Phones!! by iR-Corp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a MAJOR problem with privacy, these things are so small you could slip them into a handbag or wallet even and record an entire conversation, and if they have the SUPA COOL video FONE then the Ped's will go ballistic. Screw small phones, i lose mine enough as is. Respec.

  30. Re:Erm by watzinaneihm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a picture of a watch phone being sold in India, Ugly if you ask me

    --
    .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
  31. fashion disaster by RocketRainbow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    when will you tech boys learn? I have dozens of pairs of earrings! Now supposing I switch to the earring phone: this means I have to buy dozens of phones! And they'll still be dodgy looking if current phone design is anything to go by. So when I go out, I wear my ordinary earrings, and now I have to carry a phone anyway. More phones! Any wearable technology suffers from this limitation: I have 3 watches, 7 handbags and even a couple of wallets. Oddly enough, since I practically live in my Mary Janes, perhaps a shoe phone is in order...? "Hello.. Chief?"

    --
    *#*#*#*#*#******* I love peanut butter sandwiches!
  32. Touchdown!! by slumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe now I won't feel so weird about using my Sports Illustrated shoe phone.

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  33. Re:I missed them by g3n0m · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should check out Xelibri

  34. India's First Camera Watch Phone by sanspeak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reliance Infocomm a CDMA cellular provider from India has introduced one such wearable CDMA based mobile phone Telson TWC 1150. This mobile is also supported by Supports unique RUIM Card that can be used in a GSM handset for International Roaming.

  35. Maxwell Smart was ahead of his time by cervo · · Score: 2

    He had a shoe phone all those years ago and people could always tell him as "the agent with the shoe phone". Well now everyone has shoe phones so all the agents will have them. It just took all these years to catch on, he was a man ahead of his time :)

    So all of you go watch reruns of Get Smart again keeping in mind that you too can have a shoe phone just like Agent 86. I don't think it was a cell phone though, but it was the first wearable phone I ever saw and it was pretty cool for coming so early.

    I wonder what other technologies dreamed up as fiction in the old days are reality today that we take for granted.

  36. Borrow the phone by $exyNerdie · · Score: 2, Funny


    *Can I borrow your phone?*

    *Uh Yeah, here you go* ::Sticks his finger in her ear::

  37. Like on Knight Rider! by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I've been waiting for this since the 1980s. Just pull my left wrist up toward my chin and speak loudly into my watch: "KITT, I'm in trouble!"

  38. Re:I guess I'm a Luddite by HalfStarted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Owning a cell phone != being reachable 24/7. For a long time I felt the same way you did and avoided purchasing a cell phone, eventually we changed on call procedures at work which required having a company provided phone while you were on your on-call shift. The upside of this is that we were allowed to use the phones for personal use as well since they had a generous number of minutes on them. I realized a couple of things after having the phone for a while...

    The convenience of a cell phone is amazing. Cell phones can be very, very handy when you are meeting people on the go or want to do something spontaneously. They are great to have with you on long drives in case of emergencies, and for staying in touch while traveling.

    There is no rule that you always have to keep your phone with you, that you always have to keep it on, or that you always have to answer it. It is really no different than your normal phone except now you have the OPTION to take it with you. I have not once encountered someone that expected me to answer just because I have a cell phone. That is, after all, what voice mail is for.

    Not wanting a cell phone is fine, land lines in most areas are still preferable for some uses (if you have the line for DSL already, if your area does not have enhanced 911... etc.) and if you do not talk to others often then it may not be worth the cost to pay for two phone services. But honestly the argument "I do not want to be connected 24/7" is rather silly when you think about it.

    --


    Have you thought for yourself today?
  39. I can't keep up by Mannerism · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look, I just stopped wearing a wristwatch because my cell phone has a clock in it. Now you want me to stop wearing a cell phone because my wristwatch is going to have a phone in it. Make up your damn minds.

  40. Already happens by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I actually know quite a few girls who have bought new cellphones because the old one is, well, older, and not as cute as the new design. No, the reception isn't better, and they don't use any of the bazillion extra features, but they wanted a cuter phone.

    Cellphones are part of a fashion trend... I know the parent was a joke but it wouldn't be unheard of for people to buy newer phones that are "in fashion"

  41. Do people really use this stuff? by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...uses a hand's bone structure to make a wrist watch phone easier to manage and operate. Here's how it works: When a call arrives, the phone sends vibrations through the bones in the index finger. When the finger is slipped into the ear canal, those vibrations turn into voice

    "No, I'm not flipping you off, my phone is ringing..."

    ..U.S. consumers, always behind the Old World in most things wireless, have been left out.

    The mental image cracks me up. I can't imagine walking by someone talking with a finger in their ear and not chuckling to myself. Do people actually use this stuff?

    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
  42. Dear citizen - by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 2, Funny

    We trust that you have been enjoying the benefits of your Eartrans 5.2 implant. You will no doubt have received a message from OCS Non-industrial requesting backpayment for use of patents without permission.

    We wish to assure you that we will continue to fight these claims so that you may avoid the surgery required for a firmware downgrade.

    Faithfully

    B. L. Owngasket (acting chairman)

    P.S. Please contact us if you would like to take advantage of a special offer on our new 5.6 beta
    implant. This device offers similar performance with reduced running costs, subsidised by irregular broadcasts from our new sponsors:

    Igo Tcha marketing - a subsidiary of OCS Non-industrial.

    Be seeing you!

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  43. Is this really any better than bluetooth headsets? by Simon+Spero · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've had people mistake my Motorola HS810 headset for jewlery before

    Leaving aside a few bugs in Motorola's bluetooth implementation, it seems to me that there's not much difference between a true wearable and a phone that you never have to take out of your pocket.

    Simon

    of course, I wear a lot of cargo pants, and I only got the V600 because my nokia 9290 died and I couldn't get hold of a 9500, so I'm probably not a good test case