Slashdot Mirror


World's First Large-Scale Ogg Theora Stream

Ur@eus writes "The GNOME European Users and Developers conference is currently underway in Kristansand, Norway. The whole conference is available live online as an Ogg Theora stream (the videos of the talks are also archived). This is very exciting as it is a proof of concept that it is possible to do high quality streaming using a fully free format today. The stream is done using the Fluendo streaming server software which will be released under the GPL in a few months. You find information on how to view the streams at the GUADEC streaming website."

137 comments

  1. Huh? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What concept needed to be proved? Does the freeness of a codec affect its scalability?

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that it could be actually used for something? As far as I've heard, this is the first real-world implementation of Theora - that's definately newsworthy.

    2. Re:Huh? by BFaucet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the significance of this is that now there's a large stream available on the web... that you can point people to. Saying to someone that a ogg streams rock is very different than showing them.

      Hopefully radio stations and Public Radio shows will adopt Ogg. At the moment, most if not all use Real *shudder*.

      --
      -Derick
    3. Re:Huh? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > What concept needed to be proved?

      That thousands of people saying "Ogg Theora" all at once sounds like a cat the size of Montana hacking up a hairball.

    4. Re:Huh? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What concept needed to be proved?"

      So who proved that streaming software is only successful if PriceTag > 0.000.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Huh? by Psymunn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Forgive me for beign naive, but if i went up to the magority of people i know and said 'hey man, there's this kick ass confrence streaming on the internet, and guess what: it's OGG' i'd receive a whoel lot of WTF.
      Don't get me wrong, i support ogg because it's 'free as in awesome', and i hate realplayer because it's 'annoying as in YAPI' (yet another plug in) but i think another format is just going to confuse new users.
      What's more, joe user isn't truly going to embrace something like ogg until bob porn producer does.

      --
      The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    6. Re:Huh? by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      I believe the intended meaning was that it is a proof of concept of high quality streaming using Ogg Theora, which is a fully free format. Not a proof of concept of free formats vs patented formats.

      Or at least that is how I interpreted it.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me sir, but could you direct me to the nearest crapflood?

    8. Re:Huh? by aldoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But Real does seem to be making some effort with the Helix community.

      We could soon see Ogg being installed (as both a directshow filter and in RealPlayer itself) on a large amount of computers. I also know that most games now use ogg for sound effects, but I'm not so sure if they install it as a directshow filter (this allows other apps to use it). If they do, then we may already have 25% of the home computer market using ogg.

      BTW: this method of stealth installation is going to be how OS software takes hold, imo.

    9. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If in fact that it what was meant, it would have been nice if that was what it said.

    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That thousands of people saying "Ogg Theora" all at once sounds like a cat the size of Montana hacking up a hairball.

      You could make it musical, e.g.

      Ooh my little pretty one, pretty one.
      When you gonna give me some Ogg Theora?
      Ooh you make my motor run, my motor run.
      Gun it comin' off the Ogg Theora
      Never gonna stop, give it up.
      Such a dirty mind. Always get it up for the touch
      of the younger kind. My my my i yi woo. O O O Ogg Theora...

    11. Re:Huh? by lpontiac · · Score: 1
      Forgive me for beign naive, but if i went up to the magority of people i know and said 'hey man, there's this kick ass confrence streaming on the internet, and guess what: it's OGG' i'd receive a whoel lot of WTF.

      Ultimately, the consumers don't matter as much as the content providers - they're the ones that have to be persuaded. As the whole point of Ogg Theora is that it does not require the streamer to pay up as you do with MPEG/Windows Media/Real/etc, there's an incentive for the content providers to switch given a viable alternative.

    12. Re:Huh? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      but i think another format is just going to confuse new users.

      Well... since winamp (which most people in windows use) supports ogg built in.... where's the confusion?
      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    13. Re:Huh? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      if i went up to the magority of people i know and said 'hey man, there's this kick ass confrence streaming on the internet, and guess what: it's OGG' i'd receive a whoel lot of WTF.

      What's your point? If you go up to the majority of people and say "there's this DVD, with AC3 audio" they'd also say "WTF".

      You are mixing apples and rocks (shaped like oranges)... The public at large are completely ignorant of technical knowledge, and quite frankly, it doesn't matter one damn bit. The public at large are not the ones who make the decisions as to what format a video will be encoded with. They are just cattle, and should not be given technical information at all. If you told them it was in MPEG-2, they still wouldn't have any idea.

      Now then, it's a very different story if these friends of your happen to be people who produce content, and need to distribute it over the internet, on hardware players, etc. You tell the guys at archive.org that there's streaming Theora video being produced, you won't get a WTF, you'll find an interested party.

      i think another format is just going to confuse new users.

      Another format is going to confuse new users? Hell, a single format confuses users. They don't have any idea what a codec is, so why are you trying to make their heads explode by trying to fit information into their brains that they don't understand, or need to know. You just tell them there's a good program that encodes their DVDs to CD-Sized files that look and sound good, and that's all they need to know. They could care less what the codec is.

      The world of audio is stuffed with formats... The world of video, OTOH has very few current formats. If people can handle MP3, AAC (2/4), AC3, RA, WMA, Vorbis, WAV, etc., it's no problem for them to handle MPEG-1/2/4, and Theora.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:Huh? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      BBC does it for at least a year, they have .ogg streams , British know why they do it (must reach as much of audience possible or something).

      I don't understand how radio stations will adopt it. Bandwidth and License prices (for music) are amazing, they either setup their own subscription system or use http://www.contentcommunity.org from Real Networks RadioPass...

      How will they manage to secure the stream?

    15. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt a great disturbance in the force... as if thousands of voices suddenly cried out, "Ogg Theora" and then were suddenly silenced.

    16. Re:Huh? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Well, one step in convincing bob porn producer is having a demo available. If the format is available in common players or has a plug-in, and the quality is good, and the software is cheap, it's a good format. This demo would be useful for evaluating the option.

    17. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a feeling you'd go back to posting from this account. Too bad everyone knows about your bonch account.

      Loser.

    18. Re:Huh? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      "WTF?"

      They did the same thing to me back in '93 when I said I wanted to check my email before i went to the bars with them. I also got the same responce when they learned i spent around $400 for a multimedia ad-on kit from creative labs back in '94 for a computer that already cost me close to $2000 in the first place.

      Maybe you just need to mention it too them and then it will catch on?

    19. Re:Huh? by klafhat · · Score: 1

      Too bad everyone knows about your bonch account.
      Everyone? I don't know about it.

      --

      Tell me more, tell me more

  2. I'm willing to help test this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as long as the person in the streaming video is cute, female, and scantily clad.

    1. Re:I'm willing to help test this by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm willing to help test this...as long as the person in the streaming video is cute, female, and scantily clad.

      The usual would be three options, pick two. But since this is the internet, you'll probably have to settle for just one of the three... Sorry.

    2. Re:I'm willing to help test this by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...as long as the person in the streaming video is cute, female, and scantily clad."

      Well I suppose I could fire up a stream of Tiny Toon Adventures. `

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:I'm willing to help test this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...as long as the person in the streaming video is cute, female, and scantily clad."

      Well I suppose I could fire up a stream of Tiny Toon Adventures. `


      Apparently the cartoons you watched as a kid were a lot more interesting than the ones my parents let me watch.

    4. Re:I'm willing to help test this by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Apparently the cartoons you watched as a kid were a lot more interesting than the ones my parents let me watch."

      Are you kidding? Babs had like a butt-high skirt!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:I'm willing to help test this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rate this Funny, but the people who rated this "Informative" are either humorless or hilarious.

  3. GUADEC streaming site is /.ed already by bugmenot · · Score: 0

    That didn't last too long, the site is not responding after one comment.
    Is this the fastest slashdotting ever?

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
  4. High Quality Streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, it's about time. This high quality streaming is going to revolutionize ...BUFFERING...

    1. Re:High Quality Streaming by sik0fewl · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's only funny in stories about Real Pl ...BUFFERING...

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  5. Apparently so... by James+Turpin · · Score: 0

    I couldn't get it to work. If only a bunch of extremely sophisticated computer techs can figure out how to use it, then its not very scalable.

    --
    Mathematics is not a crime.
    1. Re:Apparently so... by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 2, Funny

      I couldn't get it to work

      Obviously the technology is flawed, I suggest we go back to clay tablets to facilitate the empowerment of the inept.

  6. Real Problems by artlu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sadly, most of the streaming video is still reliant on Real from my experience. However, most places now have quicktime/mpeg alternatives. Does anyone know if Apple's new codec which will be released with Panther is planning on being Open Source? It is supposedly going to be able to be used for video streams.

    GroupShares Inc. - A free and Interactive Stock Trading Community

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:Real Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only do some sites stil rely on Real, but some of the sites that don't rely on Internet Explorer. My favorite (legal) music video streaming source refused to work with Firefox. They got an e-mail, and they lost a customer of 6 years. Sad but true.

    2. Re:Real Problems by konfoo · · Score: 1

      If you mean the H.264 codec, then you can find the MPEGLA licensing terms in PDF format here - http://www.mpegla.com/ Apple is covering licensing costs for OSX (AFAIK), but I have no idea how this codec would permeate to OSS or such flavored development.

    3. Re:Real Problems by x.Draino.x · · Score: 1

      Panther's out.. I believe you mean Tiger? Too many damn cats to keep track of.

    4. Re:Real Problems by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple releasing an open source codec? Are you kidding? Various people are working on open source H.264 implementations, though. (Just like MP3 and MPEG-4, it's only open source in countried that don't recognize the zillions of patents that cover it.)

    5. Re:Real Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean its only free in countries that don't recognize the zillions of patents. As far as I know, the open source definition doesn't care a whole lot about patents.

    6. Re:Real Problems by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I am on G5 running OS X and I don't get how "sad" it could be that we still have real player option.

      On "Mecca" of Multimedia, only non problematic application with all my browsers is Realone for OSX.

      Real is years ahead of Apple and Microsoft if we speak about streaming. Lets say, QT automatically selects which stream is good for you based on YOUR preferences and it locks on that rate. While, lets say you have Realone for any OS, if you lag, it drops back to unimaginable low speeds (56k, on T1!) and continues to play (not BUFFERING) than it goes back to normal when network problem is over.

      Also sounds so great that I subscribed to Real Radiopass to listen my favorite web station (support etc) , listening in 64kbit, sounds real good. Even on a 5.1 Denon optical/digital setup.

      So besides all, I hope Real keeps going since that MS fascists has no respects for other platforms/browsers. Don't be fooled what MS Mac unit says, WMP 9 for mac, simply DOESN'T WORK in their own IE!

    7. Re:Real Problems by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      I dont really see the point of getting excited about streams. Unless OGG really revolutionizes streaming (would take a codec roughly 20x as good as real...) everyone will still be better off just downloading a vid and viewing it at leisure later. The only thing streaming has done ov benefit so far is to make suscriber content (read pr0n) available only to members, and no sharing. Unfortunatly the user gets ripped by always getting cut off in the middle, and has to redownload for multiple viewings.

      Ogg will not fix either of these problems (not their fault btw). Considering this, the ogg group will be required to make a huge advancement in encoding and playback performance to be seen with anything but a big Yawn...

      Skeptical on usefulness, as always behind the folks at ogg.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
  7. bork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very exciting...

    Nope, sorry. Just because something is done with an open source whatever, does not automatically make the event exciting, significant, groundbreaking, or anything else out of the ordinary.

    1. Re:bork by sixide · · Score: 2, Informative

      Especially given that Theora is essentially the same as VP3, which is already in use for streaming video stations.

    2. Re:bork by Oktal1984 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it does.

  8. See that headline? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The one that says:
    World's First Large-Scale Ogg Theora Stream
    The concept that is being proved is the "Ogg Theora as a large scale streaming technology" one.
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  9. Define Large-scale by konfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't say it, show it. What statistics if any are available for this event?

  10. username and password by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 3, Funny

    I particularly like them giving away the username and password of the presentation computer at the end of this archived ogg stream:

    http://stream1.hia.no/ogg/dump/room1/ogg-theora- vo rbis-high.2004-06-27-18:47:39.ogg

    It proves the high fidelity that ogg has to offer :]

    1. Re:username and password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm.. Maybe that's why the live feed dropped off the air so quick...

      Apparently Theora needs gst-plugins 0.8.2, and Fedora only has 0.8.1 built so far. Oh well.

  11. Good! My representative couldn't make it there by KjetilK · · Score: 4, Interesting
    That's really interesting to see. I'm in Norway, and I've been writing my representatives in the Norwegian parliament "Stortinget" to get them too attend this conference. It is not only about GNOME, mind you, tomorrow, there are a bunch of politicians there, from the starting keynote, then about software patents, EU policies, and finally a big keynote by Dr Edgar Villanueva, our friend from Peru.

    Unfortunately, the guy who was closest to getting there was stuck at his office, in spite of Kristiansand being his hometown.

    That's too bad, but now I can actually try to have them look at the stream instead, and even failing that, there's the archive.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:Good! My representative couldn't make it there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: +1, On-Topic)
      (Score: -5, Topic is too Esoteric)

  12. Anticlimax by sploo22 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be a lot more impressive if the stream hadn't GROUND to a SCREECHING HALT within 5 minutes of being posted...

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    1. Re:Anticlimax by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would be a lot more impressive if the stream hadn't GROUND to a SCREECHING HALT within 5 minutes of being posted...

      If you are using a /.ing to prove that a certain technology is not up-to-snuff, then you must also agree that the internet as a whole is a failed technology.

      Nothing can survive having more users than bandwidth.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. My question by Whatthehellever · · Score: 1

    Why does all the links have to stream on port 8000 or above? Of course, I can't see them at work because of this.

    Where are the port 80 mirrors?!

    --

    ---
    IMHO, of course.
    May the SOURCE be with you.
    1. Re:My question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because they're being served up by an Icecast server.

      Doubt that they're going to occupy port 80 just for you and your company's dumb proxy.

  14. How to play Theora in Windows RealPlayer by AlexJeff · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are the instruction on how to play Theora in your Windows RealPlayer:

    http://stream1.hia.no/instructions/theoraandreal wi ndows.html

    Here is the best link to the free RealPlayer for Windows:
    http://www.real.com/freeplayer/?rppr=hc. org

    1. Re:How to play Theora in Windows RealPlayer by Horia · · Score: 1

      Well, I tried for 5 minutes to make the damn ogg streams work, finally I gave up. There should be an ogg player for Windows that would also enable Firefox to view the streams embedded in the browser, as Quicktime and even Media Player do.

      Instead I am directed to try Real Player, who wants to know everything about me and tries to stuff their "upgraded" version on my throat. What a bummer :-( Every time I have to deal with ogg files it is a problem. Few players understand it.

      That's it. At least I got to view the Steve Jobs keynote on Apple's site, that went perfectly :-)

  15. Excellent by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is very exciting as it is a proof of concept that it is possible to do high quality streaming using a fully free format today.

    All three people who have software to decode this format and 10 megabit connections are very excited!

    1. Re:Excellent by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

      Not really. Right now they are receiving a choice of messages based on which stream they choose:

      File not founded.
      Server timeout.
      Pre-buffering.

      Some may say that this due to a Slashdotting but, the streams are supposedly mirrored on Icecast (File not found.) which should definitely be able to handle a Slashdotting.

      Sadly, I think that they have proven that their concept is still just that. A working prototype that scales to levels needed for the internet has yet to be realized.

    2. Re:Excellent by Nodatadj · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was working for us (the gnome people who aren't at guadec) all day yesterday and this morning, so I would say that yes, these problems are due to the /.ing

    3. Re:Excellent by bazongis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe this has to do with the fact that conference rooms in the middle of the night with their lights switched off are not exactly an exciting scene to stream live?

      In other words: the streaming servers are probably switched off. Try again tomorrow morning (Norwegian time).

      I've watched some of the live streams yesterday and today, and overall it was quite impressive (the only comparison I have are realplayer streams of recorded TV newscasts at roughly the same bitrate, which always freeze to refill the buffer at some point).

    4. Re:Excellent by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why didn't they multicast? Wouldn't that have solved the bandwidth issues?

    5. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, multicasting isn't a magic pixie stick.

    6. Re:Excellent by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Your users have to be able to receive multicast; try finding an ISP that will do that.

    7. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha... I'm a student at AUC, so the streams are on my local network. Phtbtbtbtbt!

  16. Have you never heard of Darwin Streaming Server by trowlFAZ · · Score: 0

    Sick and tired that a major company can't have a great and FREE product. Get your head out of your butt and take a look around.

  17. doesn't helix do the same? by XMichael · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure Helix is 100% open source and does the same damn thing... why no press on that?

    Complete CCTV

    1. Re:doesn't helix do the same? by radish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Helix is a player not a codec.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:doesn't helix do the same? by AlexJeff · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, Helix Player does do Theora

      From the Helix Website:

      The Helix Player is the Helix Community's open source media player for consumers. It is being developed to have a rich and usable graphical interface and support a variety of open media formats like Ogg Vorbis, Theora etc.
      Features

      * Gtk+/Gnome interface
      * Accelerated Video and FullScreen Playback
      * Support for free and open mediatypes - Ogg Vorbis/Theora, H261
      * Mozilla browser plug-in
      * RTSP streaming
      * Elegant UI
      * Installer and RPM packages

      Here is the download page: https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/downloads

    3. Re:doesn't helix do the same? by cranos · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because the GNOME group would like to promote its own media framework? The page in the link says the Server is a GStreamer based server.

    4. Re:doesn't helix do the same? by thomasvs · · Score: 1

      Because you have your facts wrong ? The only thing that is open source about Helix is a) the player and b) part of the framework, including only some of the Ogg codecs. The producer is completely proprietary, so there's no way you can do any open source streaming with Helix as the framework. It's quite obviously not part of their business model. The only reason parts of Helix are being GPL'd is exactly to court the businesses involved in open source. Translated: their marketing guys finally thought it was a good idea if they want to sell music to you, the customer.

  18. theora is video, vorbis streams are old news by gotih · · Score: 1

    the poster didn't do a good job pointing out that ogg theora is VIDEO. ogg vorbis streams have been around on a large scale for quite a while and do rock. ogg theora is still in alpha and rocks until it crashes.

    public radio should go with ogg vorbis or (at least) mp3. they were given some sort of sweet deal which got them to use real (instead of MS).

    --

    fear is the mind killer
  19. The city name is... by easter1916 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Kristiansand, not Kristansand. Never heard the Tricky song?
    I met a Christian in Kristiansand
    And a devil in Helsinki.
    1. Re:The city name is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't think anyone on /. listens to tricky

    2. Re:The city name is... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I didn't think anyone would get the reference! There is intelligent life out there.

    3. Re:The city name is... by Nodatadj · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did too
      But I believe in the tricky song
      It is spelled Christiansands
      At least the title is.

    4. Re:The city name is... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Bah! I'm a bit thick. I was too lazy to check the CD artwork.

    5. Re:The city name is... by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      The dude who submitted this story is called Christian when he is not online. So it works on even more levels.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    6. Re:The city name is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the song is Christiansands, the city is Kristiansand. Tricky made the song after he played at the Quart Festival years ago.

    7. Re:The city name is... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Turns out the correct name of the city IS Kristiansand, no matter what Tricky said...

  20. Torrent Streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, it's a pity no one has combined ogg-vorbis/theora with bittorrent yet. A stream that scaled THROUGH the power of the viewer's connections would kick butt.

    I can't think of any way to do it that would be truly live (ie, non-delayed), but maybe I'm just not smart enough. Or maybe close-to-live would be just fine :)

    1. Re:Torrent Streaming by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Check out ESM or YOID.

  21. Bittorrent needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They needed to bittorrent their streams so that they survived the slashdot effect. There is no reason not to release the Fluendo code now as beta-ware. Lastly the conference is boring. Where's the porn?

    1. Re:Bittorrent needed by thomasvs · · Score: 1

      No reason to release it ? I'm guessing you don't work on open source software. There's no point in releasing software that's in the process of being designed. We're better off making it possible for people to contribute by having decided on a stable base ourselves first before we release it. That's how *every* open source project got started. Imagine Linus releasing his code after the first time it booted - it would really have sucked for him to have to reply to a slew of mails on "well it boots, but that's about it. What next ?" Obviously, we are going to release it. All of us are long-time contributors to free software. But nothing says that we are forced to release it as soon as we have int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { exit(0);} written.

    2. Re:Bittorrent needed by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Imagine Linus releasing his code after the first time it booted - it would really have sucked for him to have to reply to a slew of mails on "well it boots, but that's about it. What next ?"

      Have you read the early emails of Linus's? The first Linuxes often didn't boot, and when they did, they didn't do much.

  22. Mod up by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    I was just about to ask "but how do windows users play these files on their default media player?"

  23. Clicky click version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. They deserve a lot of credit. by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


    Ogg Vorbis, for example, works very well, and its APIs are easy to use. I don't know very much about Theora, but, if the same people are behind it, it's probably pretty good.

    Another proof of concept: Ogg support in OpenAL + big-name game developers using it for cross-platform sound. This is really neat stuff.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  25. LCA2003 pioneered this for audio... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...and you'd have got zero out of three for most of the airtime, even if it had been video. There were indeed cute females there, but scantily clad didn't happen anywhere near a mike. (-:

    However, if you like nice feminine Indian voices, you can thrill to the sound of ubergeekette Suparna Bhattacharya (picture) talking about DProbes.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:LCA2003 pioneered this for audio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, man, 2560x1920 pixels? A 2 Megabyte JPG? Wonder where all your bandwidth went?

  26. Nick Berg video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Nick Berg video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh! why wasn't this a scandal in USA? here's another story.

    2. Re:Nick Berg video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeh! why wasn't this a scandal in USA?

      Probably because the "evidence" in that story is so laughable no reputable news agency would pick it up.

  27. The problem with Ogg... by thephotoman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    is that most MP3 players out there don't support it. Generally, people go with technology that is the most useable, which, in this case, isn't Ogg. It's MP3. This stream hasn't solved the primary problem with streaming Real Audio: the annoying buffering stops. Until something can outdo that, it won't become popular.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  28. Wikipedia! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was some discussion about video policy for Wikipedia. The conclusion was that they were waiting on a workable streaming free and open codec... so this should be pretty big news for them.

    Now to find video illustrations for the articles on the sixty-nine and the reverse cowgirl...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  29. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    went to the site, selected a feed. Mashed one, I think it was room 2, the mirror, "suitable for totem". Moz goes "watchoo wanna do with this thing, open in 'totem', or what?". I mash "yep, that's what they said worked, go for it", that sucker locked down tighter than your spinster aunt tillie. No idea why. Running guh-nome trying to see some guh-nome conference. Started a new x session, tried to relog in as normal user, nada, wouldn't do it. Had to do it again, just rebooted in self defense, that worked. I'm sure there is a slicker way to do it but that's how I got out of it. Can't say I've seen that behavior since umm.... Netscape 4x a few times.

    in-au-spicious.

    posting AC due to personal non-leet lameness filter :p

    Forget skynet, it's too late, I KNOW computers and the internet are alive. They do this stuff on purpose to dick with the carbon based life forms that are their slaves.

  30. Windows users: try VideoLAN by D.+Book · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oddly, the GUADEC streaming site suggests Windows users install the universally loathed RealPlayer and a patch for it, when the free, open-source VideoLAN Client specialises in streaming and includes native support for Ogg Theora. While the live streams don't seem to be working in my case (not sure if this is the fault of the client or server), the Theora streams on the archive page work fine.

    1. Re:Windows users: try VideoLAN by 31+Flavas · · Score: 1
      Oddly, the GUADEC streaming site suggests Windows users install the universally loathed RealPlayer and a patch for it

      These people are not idiots. They just are not into perpetuating outdated stereotypes, as some people are.

    2. Re:Windows users: try VideoLAN by thomasvs · · Score: 2, Informative
      I had tried VLC myself as the first player on Win32 while working on the server. I've asked for information on what could be wrong, because except for not starting on a keyframe in the stream the streams are perfectly fine. Even not starting on a keyframe is something a player should be able to handle.

      Unfortunately time was limited and we cannot test every player when we're getting ready for our first public test. I'm sure that after this conference we can work together with the VLC people to make the streams work.

      Having said that, not putting VLC on the page was an oversight on the part of the person that put up the webpage, and we added it.

  31. Try helping people instead of justifying rejection by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [...] if i went up to the magority of people i know and said 'hey man, there's this kick ass confrence streaming on the internet, and guess what: it's OGG' i'd receive a whoel lot of WTF.

    The same could be said of when RealVideo was new or when MP3 began. Novelty is no reason to reject something but being proprietary is. Conversely, as you indicated, being free is a great reason to support this work. My experience is that if you're willing to spend a few seconds explaining the problem with proprietary software you will be taken seriously. But if you signal that the issue of software freedom doesn't matter, you're telling people that they can safely dismiss it too.

  32. Playing Theora files in windows by hsoom · · Score: 3, Informative
    I can't get the stream to work so I just tried playing the first file in the archive and it worked.

    I can get the theora files to play under the latest version of VideoLAN client.

    There are instructions for setting up Real Player to view Theora files. Although some people are saying that the latest version of Real Player is not so bad I still don't want to install it. I must have a grudge :-) and Real Alternative using Media Player Classic (MPC) works fine.

    Is there anyway to get Theora files to play with MPC? I thought that if I installed the Directshow Filters it may work but no such luck. This would be really handy because I use MPC for just about everything else.

    1. Re:Playing Theora files in windows by 31+Flavas · · Score: 1
      I posted a lot of info in a previous news story. The information in that post relivant to your post would be the Directshow Filter for RealMedia.

      i.e. Playback of RealMedia in the Windows media player of your choice. You can even transcode RM files with it.

      There is of course a catch, the DShow Filter does not come with the Real codecs. You can get the codecs by installing RealPlayer (you don't have to use it) or by getting the codecs installed by other means. As I mentioned in that post though, the install has been cleaned up and the player behaves nice, you can read further at this link.

  33. I wrote that discussion paper... by Goonie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Streaming is not that big an issue for Wikipedia. As you'll note from the page, the majority of which seems to have been widely accepted, generally Wikipedia video clips should be short and available in low-resolution versions, so they can just be downloaded in their entirety rather than streamed. The more important issue for Wikipedia was that the bitstream was frozen a little while ago, so anything encoded with the present encoder will be readable into the future.

    Quite frankly, however, nobody has actually sought to place video on the Wikipedia yet. I hope it will happen soon, but right now there's been a fair bit of talk but no action from any contributors.

    As to your suggested topics, see the last section on legalitiesin the discussion paper. There's a whole pile of extra paperwork you need to keep track of to legally post videos of the kind you wish to post...

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  34. People get their terms a bit mixed up by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might be because marketers aren't particularly interested in straightening it out. There are open STANDARDS and open SOURCE. Not the same thing.

    Open source just means the source is available for public consumption, but these days it also implies under some kind of license such as GPL or BSD that would permit modification and redistribution. There are apps with source that aren't like that. Some compilers, for exmaple, include the source to all libraries, but don't permit you to redistribute that source.

    Open standards are standards for anything, like video formats (MPEG-2/4, H.264, VC-9), communication busses (IEEE-1394/Firewire, USB) and so on. They are considered open because they are available to ANYONE that gets a license, no discrimination permitted, and under single terms. They are standards because they are controlled by a standards body, not by a company. So updates can only be made through the standards body, and then are available to everyone.

    Both are ways where no one gets locked out from changes, and a company can't choose to play favourites with someone. The critical difference is open standards need not be free, and many aren't. An open standard can have a licensing fee, it just needs to be one that is reasonable and non-discriminitory. So long as it's not too expensive and anyone can obtain the same license, it qualifies.

    The problem is that the OSS community is quite good at ignoring licensing fees on open standards. They happily implement software that deals with MPEG-4, MP3, and so on and never pay any licensing (perhaps never realising it is licensed). Now this is generally allowed to happen since it not for profit, and source only distributions are often exempted as academic works.

    That doesn not mean that licenses aren't legally needed, or that they won't come for them in the event of commercial works. Anyone distributing MPEG-4 content in a large or commercial setting had better pay the use fee (you have to pay per hour of content or per disc for MPEG-4) or they'll probably be after you.

    The OGG stuff that Xiph makes is free and open source, not an open standard, so it is free of charge to use. That's the reason for excitement.

    When you get right down to it, Vorbis isn't really better than licensed formats like AAC or WMA. You can make tests Vorbis wins, you can make tests the others win. Ultimately, all new standards are pretty good, and are good at different things. The reason that Vorbis is cool is that there are NO fees to use it. Just implement it and distribute it and don't worry.

    That's why it's becomming popular with games. If they wanted MP3 music, well that was something they had to pay for, since they were implementing a decoder. Some with the newer licensed standards. Vorbis, on the other hand, is free and sounds roughly the same. Great, keeps costs down and consumers don't notice any difference.

    1. Re:People get their terms a bit mixed up by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Open source just means the source is available for public consumption, but these days it also implies under some kind of license such as GPL or BSD that would permit modification and redistribution.

      Open Source is what complies with the Open Source Definition, as written by those who came with with the term in the first place. So just because you can get at the source doesn't make it Open Source.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  35. A Stable Theora by dvdeug · · Score: 1

    Okay, but when are we going to get a stable Theora? The current codec is alpha, which means all the data they save may be unreadable if they ever update the codec. And if they don't, it probably means that no one has a codec.

    1. Re:A Stable Theora by spektr · · Score: 1

      The current codec is alpha, which means all the data they save may be unreadable if they ever update the codec.

      The implementation is alpha, but the specification is freezed with the current alpha3 release. Every file you encode today should work with the future stable implementation. (Says www.theora.org)

  36. Slap on the face by riqnevala · · Score: 1

    Hooray! Free video stream codec!!!!!!!

    ....on windows play it with realplayer..

    MediaPlayerClassic and winamp support PLEASE!!!

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
    1. Re:Slap on the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The newset RealPlayer is nice. Behaves itself, no ads, "Message Center" can be completely turned off.

  37. I'll be interested when... by trawg · · Score: 1

    ...there's a Winamp plugin!

    Its a pity that Windows Media Player doesn't have a plugin architecture that lets people create their own input plugins.

    1. Re:I'll be interested when... by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      Actually it does. Those are the codecs you have to install when playing, for example, an XVid or DivX file. The first time you play an unknown file Media Player tries to download the correct codec (plugin).

    2. Re:I'll be interested when... by trawg · · Score: 1

      Yep, sorry, I didn't phrase it very well - I was more leaning towards input plugins that allow you to read data over the network in various ways - for example so I could stream stuff from this new streaming network server instead of being limited only to streaming from Windows Media servers.

  38. Fluendo by FreeSoftwareZealot · · Score: 1

    It obviously works. So, it's more than just "int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { exit(0);}". That's quite enough for most FOSS projects.

    And, please take a *real* look at Linux 0.01. It was... apparently not even as far as Fluendo is. Apparently, because I cannot check Fluendo out.

    Oh, and my motto when a company promises something? "I believe it when I see it".

  39. Is it scalable? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    E.g. when I have network lag, will drop from 64 kbps to 32 kbps , after network is ok, it will sense it non intrusive way and go back to 64?

    Real does it for years, MS Media (which I don't use) does it in Version 9...

    Telling how real does it perfectly, I am radiopass member and listen to radios 24/7 here, sometimes it even drops to 11.2 kbps but goes back to 64 or 96.

    If it can't be done, we have a problem with ogg streaming.

  40. Christiansted? by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    Kristiansand, not Kristansand. Never heard the Tricky song?
    I met a Christian in Kristiansand

    I always thought it was Christiansted, part of St. Croix in the US Virgin Islands. Tricky refers to "German Jamaicans" in another song, so I thought this lyric was referring to somewhere Caribbean.

    But the name of the song is Christiansands, its lyrics say that also... So it must mean somewhere else.

    1. Re:Christiansted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Tricky made the song after playing at the Quart Festival in Kristiansand years ago.

  41. It's all right... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...I have access to a bigger camera now. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  42. Media from GUADEC by kvasilept · · Score: 1
    Hi..

    Media files from GUADEC is going to be publiched on the web. It wil take a while.. The films are on DV..

    For the time beeing, the only thing thats out, is the audio from Dr Edgar Villanueva Nuñez.

    link: http://osys.grm.hia.no/bttrack/

    --
    Michael E. Menk
    GUADEC-2004 film team.

  43. Re:Media from GUADEC Sorry, wrong link.. by kvasilept · · Score: 1

    http://osys.grm.hia.no/bttracker/