Slashdot Mirror


Detailed Reviews of Mac OS X "Tiger" Preview

An anonymous reader writes "AppleInsider has been publishing some very detailed articles on Apple's new Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' operating system, which include numerous screenshots of the system. So far the publication has discussed overall installation and Spotlight search technology, Safari with RSS, a new Mail revision with Smart Mailbox technology, and a websearch enabled Mac OS X Help application."

63 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Not much news... by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems like most of these features were explained at Jobs' keynote address at WWDC. The automatic knowledgebase search in Help was new tho. Can't wait until I get my hands on my developer copy.

    1. Re:Not much news... by Bearpaw · · Score: 4, Funny
      It seems like most of these features were explained at Jobs' keynote address at WWDC.

      I have a hunch that the lead-off to this story should have been "An anonymous AppleInsider editor writes ...".

  2. RSS? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now they have a broweser thats guaranteed to give you repetitive stress syndrome? How is THAT a good thing?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  3. Smart Mailboxes. by Luckboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, no matter how smart my mailbox is, my mail is still stupid.

    I'm tired of people trying to convince me that my breasts need to be larger, when clearly that would only make my penis look smaller.

    1. Re:Smart Mailboxes. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 4, Funny
      My spammers are just confused. They keep offering to increase the size of my mortgage by 30%.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  4. Smart Folders == Labels? by billstr78 · · Score: 4, Interesting


    It looks like Apple caught on quickly to the Gmail label paradigm shift away from folders and has put "smart folders" into Mail 2.0 for 10.4.

    IMHO labels and smart folders are long overdue for mail. They've been usefull in iTunes for months and just make good sense data that does not belong in only one bin.

    1. Re:Smart Folders == Labels? by System.out.println() · · Score: 5, Informative

      Smart folder and labels aren't quite the same, particularly in that Smart Folders are automatic, and labels aren't. This has both upsides and downsides, but they *aren't* the same thing.

    2. Re:Smart Folders == Labels? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ok, heres my way of redeeming myself (yes i know i'm also replying to myself)

      Apple had this feature (save searches for later use) in the ill fated Copland preview in the mid 1990's. in fact i got the impression that apple was resurrecting many features from Copland during the WWDC keynote (see Automator)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  5. Apple Link by mattyohe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is apple's own "Preview". It contains tons of screenshots and a webcast from WWDC.

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  6. photocopiers? by Down8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just one of those pot-kettle-black things, I guess: ...websearch enabled Mac OS X Help application.

    You mean like Office2003? And even OfficeXP, I think.

    I'm just sayin'...

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
    1. Re:photocopiers? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, like Window's Help and Support Center, in Windows XP, which also searches the web. The difference is that the OS X Help application is global and applies to all help applications, where in MS's case each app has it's own Help index, and for XP, Office, and Office XP, their own help tools. I'm pretty sure (don't have a copy yet, like you) that in Tiger, any and all apps will be able to search Apple's knowledge base as well as the web for stuff. The difference in implementation between Apple and Microsoft is scope and consistency.

      Microsoft's web enabled help applications are selective.

  7. Most inconsistent user interfaces by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the appleinsider link:
    Interestingly, sources noted that while the Tiger Finder interface contains no noticeable changes from Panther, Spotlight uses its own sleek window interface design, which is only accessible from windows that are spawned from Spotlight searches. The interface features windows with a smooth, grey-colored titlebar, with sharp webpage-like table results on one side, and an html-style control bar on the other. Details of these new webpage-like Mac OS X windows were first report by sources in an earlier report, though sources described them as Mac OS Finder windows.

    If you look at the screen shots you will notice weirdly blue colored bars, but just in that one application. Honestly I thought Macs were supposed to have a consistent UI. If I wanted a mish mash of colors and widgets I would just get a Windows PC.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by shawnce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These are screen shots from a developer release of an OS that will not be release until some time in 2005 (Apple is targeting first half of 05). So what you see may have no reflection on the final look of things nor show a complete implementation of any particular look.

    2. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      If I wanted a mish mash of colors and widgets I would just get a Windows PC.
      To be fair, I think you should consider looking into Linux. It can get quite exciting to have a qt app, a gtk1 app, and a gtk2 app running, all with different themes. Throw in an old motif app and xmms, and you can have a lot of variety.
    3. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      Given that it doesn't ship till 2005, I wouldn't get too worked up about cosmetic inconsistencies in the developer preview. The developer release is about getting new APIs out to developers. The look will no doubt be further refined before release.

    4. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by GregChant · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the Apple Human Interface Guidelines:

      You can use a brushed metal window if your application:
      • Provides an interface for a digital peripheral, such as a camera, or an interface for managing data shared with digital peripherals--iPhoto or iSync, for example
      • Strives to re-create a familiar physical device--Calculator or DVD Player, for example
      • Provides a source list to navigate information--for example, iTunes or the Finder

      I think that's pretty strict, and it provides a great way to distinguish between iLife-type applications from other non-"life experience" (that's a technical term) applications. Additionally, I challenge you to find an Apple-made program using brushed-metal that doesn't conform to the above guideline.

      Overall, if you actually read the AHIG, you'll find the guidlines make sense and serve a specific purpose; they aren't just some willy-nilly part of the system that changes at the whim of Steve Jobs or some apparently AD/HD influenced designers.

      I for one welcome our Apple Human Interface overlords.

    5. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by Smitty825 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Additionally, I challenge you to find an Apple-made program using brushed-metal that doesn't conform to the above guideline.

      Ummm...Let's see...

      Safari?

      --

      Doh!
    6. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by bnenning · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Press Command + Option + B. Note the source list to the left.

      That's *really* a stretch. The purpose of a web browser is to browse the web, not manage a list of bookmarks. That reasoning can be applied to just about any app (Mail uses a source list of mailboxes; Xcode uses a source list of project files, etc). Safari and iChat are metal because Steve wanted them to be; then the HIG were retroactively changed to make it a vaguely justifiable choice.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    7. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Interesting


      I challenge you to find an Apple-made program using brushed-metal that doesn't conform to the above guideline.

      Apple Remote Desktop v 2.0.

      Good pic if you haven't seen it yet. I think it's 100% stupid, too, and I don't mind the metal on most apps, really; but for an Enterprise Admin tool, it adds "pretty" when you really need better efficiency.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  8. Re:Why?! by bsartist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you pay premium for a closed source operating system and handicapped hardware (one button mouse)?

    It's cheaper than XP, it's mostly open (it's not Free, but that doesn't bother me), and my three-button+wheel mouse works just fine, thanks.

    Oh, and by the way - 1994 just called. They want their FUD back.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  9. Smart Folder == Opera M2 Mail Client by RinkRat · · Score: 5, Informative
    If anyone is interested in checking out 'smart folders' ahead of time, I encourage you to try the mail client included with Opera.

    It works under the 'everything is a database' premise for email, with 'smart filters', multiple views, multiple email integration, everything controlled via CSS and much, much more.

    It's free as in beer, too.

    --
    RinkRat
  10. Some common answers to Tiger questions by hkb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is Tiger usable as a daily OS, currently?

    No, Safari 2.0 currently does not work with HTTPS sites. Many common apps, including FireFox crash upon execution. Additionally, there seem to be some pretty serious filesystem bugs which can trash your entire hard disk (not just your Tiger partition).

    Do I need a DVD drive? My pirated copy of the Tiger DVD crashes upon boot up.

    No, you don't need a DVD drive. Visit the following URL for good installation steps:

    Install steps

    He also has a Tiger FAQ here:

    Tiger FAQ

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  11. Upgrade questions by hotspotbloc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you need Panther to use the Tiger upgrade or will any version of OS X work? Are the hardware requirements, both minimal and recommended, the same as Panther?

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:Upgrade questions by Henriok · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can upgrade from any previous OSX version. The system requrements will probably be the same as Pather, but the Tiger beta has some limitation, like a DVD drive (it will install from an image) and FireWire (probably due to the new migration tool), but it installs just fine on every machine that Panther supported. Some feature will require special hardware, stuff like CoreImage and CoreVideo.

      Since Apple continues to opmitize and hone the operating system I would guess that Tiger will be quicker that previous versions och the same hardware. I've noticed significant speed ups on a PowerBook G4/400 compared to the previous Panther install. This is consistent with the history as Jaguar was quicker than Puma (10.1) that was quicker than Cheetah (10.0).

      --

      - Henrik

      - when the Shadows descend -
  12. Re:Only DVD? by cmoney · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a developer version. The final copy won't be out until probably this time next year. It's probably cheaper to burn 1 dvd instead of 4-5 CDs. I'm pretty sure Apple's developer program has switched to DVDs for a lot of their software distribution. (I remember starting to get DVDs last year before my membership expired.)

  13. or in Evolution by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using "VFolders" in evolution for at least two years or so now. I wouldn't be surprised if outlook has had such a feature for a long time. Although Google is responsible for inventing a whole slew of tech, smart folders is not one of them.

  14. Mailbox feature I need... by stienman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since I don't email illiterate people, I'd like my mail program run spell check and grammer check on incoming mail. If it isn't at high school level then it's automatically binned.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by ColonelPanic · · Score: 5, Funny

      spell check and grammer check

      Heh heh heh heh.

      --
      "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
    2. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by bsartist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd like my mail program to run spell check and grammar check on incoming mail.

      Alternatively: Grammer check? What's that, filtering out all the gratuitous Frasier references?

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    3. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by rjstanford · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like my mail program run spell check

      I believe that you mean that you'd like your mail program to run a spelling check... or possibly to run a spellcheck. But unless you mean a program called spellcheck you need the indefinate article. And the "to" as well. At least, if you want to receive your own email...

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by bheer · · Score: 3, Funny

      indefinate

      Heh. I hereby propose (drumroll) bheer's law: "In any slashpost critical of another's grammar and/or spelling, the probability of a grammar/spelling error rises to twice the /. average."

  15. Will Linux ever catch up? by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It seems that Linux has been playing catch up for some years now in terms of user interface, and with the advent of OSX - it now has a whole new mountain to climb.

    Where are the free software projects investigating next generation UI concepts? Is Linux too wedded to the old ways of doing things to compete with commercial vendors like Apple? It seems to me that the Linux UI community has been very busy trying to emulate the functionality of yesterday's commercial desktops, when it should be pioneering new approaches and UI innovations, thus leap-frogging Apple and others.

    1. Re:Will Linux ever catch up? by billstr78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a good reason for this lag. Most Linux users (1% of all PC users) don't require slick UI to get their tasks done. Linux users primarily still use the terminal window and considering that KDE is ahead of Windows, I'd say they are doing pretty well.

    2. Re:Will Linux ever catch up? by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a good reason for this lag. Most Linux users (1% of all PC users) don't require slick UI to get their tasks done. Linux users primarily still use the terminal window and considering that KDE is ahead of Windows, I'd say they are doing pretty well.

      I don't require a slick UI. I also don't require air conditioning, diet cola, or a high speed internet connection, but they sure make my life nicer and easier.

  16. I'm holding out for OS X 10.5 by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Kitten"

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
  17. iTunes as a Teaching Tool by ChilyMack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people talk about how the Windows version of iTunes is a trojan horse idea, i.e., it gives Windows users a taste of the usability and flexibility of software designed by Apple, and so inspires them to switch. Looks like Apple's been using iTunes as more than a switching device, though - they've been training their user base. Everything's going to be smart in the Tiger, and it won't matter where the files are - just what you want to use, when you want to use it. iTunes is already like this - I can say I want all the movie music by John Williams, in addition to including all the classical titles he ripped off, and it will give it to me in a playlist. So, no massive shift for Mac users or Windows users who have iTunes - they already know exactly how to speed through and take advantage of this UI. Smart.

  18. Apple and Aliens by TheTXLibra · · Score: 4, Funny

    It takes a moment of background story, but this does relate...During the 4th of July celebrations (which for some reason, came on the 3rd of July this year) my sweetie and I joined my best friend and his wife and kids in the park to watch the fireworks. Being the "Evil Uncle" of his son, Gabe, I managed to convince him the previous year that we celebrate July 4th each year to commemorate our fending off the aliens attack on Earth. This year, he and I spoke further on the issue...

    GABE: "So, we fought off the Aliens with their own technology?
    ME: "Why...ah, yes, as a matter of fact, we did."
    GABE: "So aliens have laptops too?"
    ME: "Yes, well, sort of. Actually, no..."
    GABE: "Arrrgh!"
    ME: "See, they captured an alien ship back in the 50's and reverse-engineered the operating system."
    GABE: "Hmmm...And they used it to blow up the aliens?"
    ME: "Not quite. See, it takes money to fund these sorts of top-secret government wossnames. So what they did was eventually market the operating system in the private sector, as a competing OS. However, since it was the government that gave out the OS in the first place, they decided to keep it close to home, in federally funded areas... like Schools."
    GABE: "You mean..." his eyes went wide "Apple Computers are made by aliens? Oh no!"
    ME: "No, Apple Computers are made by Apple. However, their OS was originally hacked from an alien spaceship. That's why they never managed to produce clones like the PCs."
    GABE: "And we made the aliens blow up with an Apple computer?"
    ME: "No, we just used their technology to remove their shields, so that our weapons could blow them up."
    GABE: "Did we use alien weapons?"
    ME: "Nope, just good old fashioned American-made missiles and stuff."
    GABE: "Good," he nods sagely. "Cause next time, we might not be so lucky."
    ME: "Indeed. And THAT'S why we celebrate the 4th of July, every year."
    MY FIANCE: "Just for the record, Sweetie, our kids are never going to be home-schooled by you."

    --
    -The Libra
    "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
  19. Much more under the hood... by shawnce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just wanted to note that Tiger has a lot of very cool stuff under the hood that is taking place that will be a boon for developers and by extension customers (of course this stuff is still currently under NDA).

    It will be a great OS release... one that I feel will become a must have for every Macintosh user (with supported hardware). At least I hope it will be a must have because I really want to use some of he features that will exist to help speed the development and richness of applications.

  20. Fantastic Idea! by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, that's a really smart idea! Of course it would need a few tweaks- Maybe calculate the percentage of mistakes and trash it above a certain value (for the friends who make the occasional spelling mistake).

    The best part is, if spammers start using spell-check and correcting their mail before sending (changing V1@gr@ to Viagra) it will be caught by the spam filters instead! It's a win-win situation, less spam and correct spelling...

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  21. Re:Can't Wait by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's only one upgrade a year, if that. The last upgrade was in late 2003 and the new upgrade is in early to mid 2005.

    Six year cycle at one upgrade a year is $774. However, during that time you're likely to buy at least one new Mac, which would eliminate the need for one of the upgrades.

    If you're really keeping your computer for six years, that's a solid testimony to the quality of the Mac platform. You really need a new PC for every new major version upgrade since the system requirements change so radically. It's torture running Windows XP on a low-end machine designed for 2000. I bought a used two year old 400mhz PowerBook G4 about a week ago and am very impressed by how well it runs in Panther. It was a slowpoke in the version of MacOS X available at the time, but now it's a more than acceptable performer for most things I need to do with it.

    The reality is that the Mac platform's pretty cost-effective if you want to keep your machine running well. The horrors of dealing with Windows virus attacks easily make up for the price difference between Mac and PC.

    D

  22. Re:v^HsmartFolders by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Probably because iTunes uses Smart Playlists. "vFolder" is pretty uninspiring. Is it a "fifth generation" folder? Is it shaped like a 'V'? Will it be used in litigation? Is it associated with a verb, or action? Is it an assistant to a real Folder? Will it bring Victory? Does it does it refer to the designer's first experience of love, rolling around in a meadow, surrounded by violets?

  23. Re:What is it with men and lesbians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please do not pretend to be a girl on the Slashdot. It gets the nerds all hot and bothered.

  24. Re:Why?! by kannibal_klown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's see here. The yearly upgrade cycle of Mac OS versus the every-other-year upgrade cycle of Windows. Granted, the next windows (desktop) version won't be out for a while now, but Tiger is in 2005, when Panther was 2003.

    Windows retail is pretty dang expense (for the full NON-oem version). Likewise, the hardware requirements seem to go up quite nicely with each Windows release. Panther runs pretty well on hardware thats a few years old already (so long as its a G4 or later G3).

    Don't get me wrong, if you want to constantly upgrade with either system, it's going to cost you a pretty penny. But why upgrde so often? Jaguar is still supported now, and Panther will still be supported when Tiger comes out.

    But I agree that Mac OS needs to slow down a little. While they throw a LOT of stuff in each revision, it gets pretty pricey.

  25. before anyone starts on Dashboard by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have taken a look at it and currently own Konfabulator, and my honest impression is this.

    While dashboard might or might not be a konfabulator clone, it does it MUCH better than konfabulator could ever do it.

    One of the nasties of using konfabulator aside from the hideous amount of prossesor usage it seems to take and its tendancy to kill your system if your not online and using a widget that grabs online feeds, is the fact that well, every interface is different between widgets and sometimes they either dont work, or are hard to move around or close. The new version of Konfabulator fixed some of this, but its still bad. Apple has changed this, by not only making the moduals easy to close or move, and forcing them to keep simular preference interfaces, they also added the expose powered hide feature.

    Honestly I dont hate Konfabulator and wish it well, I think its creator is a ass as to the fact that he doesnt care about the fact that both Apple and Microsoft did it first and he was just reimplementing a old idea.... beleiving the PR all the media outlets put out about it being this amazing app, but he did create it and i think more importantly he renewed interest in a feature a lot of us didnt use back in the OS 6/7 Win98 days.... Here is hoping the modual makers can bring their work to Dashboard with minimal fuss.... cause honestly those are the people who made konfabulator shine, not the guy who made it.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:before anyone starts on Dashboard by foregather · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was rather swayed by this piece (with the most interesting point summarized below for the mentally slashdoted)

      http://daringfireball.net/2004/06/dashboard_vs_k on fabulator

      ---
      "Konfabulator = (Custom XML format) + (Custom JavaScript engine)

      Dashboard, on the other hand, is based on WebCore, the underlying open source layout and scripting engine behind Safari. Dashboard gadgets are indeed scripted using JavaScript, the same language used by Konfabulator, but Dashboard uses the JavaScript engine that's built into the system. And for UI layout, Dashboard gadgets are specified using HTML and CSS -- using the same rendering engine as Safari.
      . . .
      Do you see how huge this is? How it opens the door to gadget development to anyone with web design experience? Indeed, I've read the preliminary Dashboard developer documentation (generously provided by a source attending WWDC), and it is outstanding from the perspective of making gadgets easy-to-create.

      The idea that Dashboard is derivative because it's scripted via JavaScript is missing the point. Dashboard isn't using JavaScript just to use JavaScript -- it's using JavaScript because Dashboard gadgets are little floating Web Kit views."
      ---

      The article also argues, and offers documentation in support of the position, that you can trace the idea for such widgets all the way back to the first "desk accessories" like the puzzle and calculator from 1984. Then combines both points to paint Dashboard as a natural outgrowth of fundmental Apple ideas.

      While Konfabulator is an implementation of similar concepts, they were not the inventors of them and their chosen means of implementation makes their software practically useless to Apple from the buy-and-incorporate perspective.

    2. Re:before anyone starts on Dashboard by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      konfabulator is this java based package for the mac that displayed simular looking moduals onn the screen... it was given this big to do simply cause it used Java, and thus easy to program by anyone with a litle knowlage

      The problem was some of the reporters started touting about it like it was a new thing (it wasnt) and it gained this HUGE following from a lot of people who dont know the history of the app so they all think Apple ripped it off, which is not the case, it was the reverse, but apple stopped using it when it didnt see a market for it, as did microsoft.

      The biggest problem is the the guy who created it is now making himself out to be a shareware martyr whos fighting the man who stole his app.... which is bogus and just downright stupid cause he didnt make anything new, he just reused a old idea in a new package

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  26. suggested rewrite by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Funny
    The "private browsing" mode dialog box in the Safari preview is certainly well intentioned, but isn't sufficiently clear about its purpose. I suggest the following rewrite.
    When private browsing is turned on, webpages are not added to the history, items are automatically removed from the Downloads window, information isn't saved for AutoFill (including names and passwords), and no one will know that you went looking for "bukakke" [sic] on Google. But we're not cleaning up those skanky-ass tissues for you, so pick up after your damn self, okay? Perv.
  27. Re:One feature that I would like to see by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find the adaptive filter in Mail to be as goog as a Baysian filter - in fact it's supposed to be a superior adaptive algorithm to bayesian filtering. But it you really want to run a bayseian filter with OS X as well, you can.

  28. This is why it is called a DEVELOPERS release... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is for us DEVELOPERS. So we can DEVELOP. Sorta' like the development systems I work on here - blue wires, etc. yet it allows me to DEVELOP.

    Oh, BTW, did I mention it was a DEVELOPERS release?

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  29. Re:Why?! by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's a serious flaw in your argument. You don't need to buy an OSX upgrade every year. You could buy it every 2 years or any other period you choose. Just because there happens to be a choice of a new version for Mac and not for XP that shouldn't be counted as a positive for XP now should it.

    BTW, Virginia tech found Apple to be the cheapest fastest option when measured against other PCs. What do you know, a cheap, fast, cool supercomputer!

  30. Re:Sounds Familiar by Chucker23N · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) Tiger won't be out until spring 2005.

    2) Safari 1.3 and Xcode 1.5 will make it to Panther, and Panther will receive at least one more point release (10.3.5). Safari 2.0 and Xcode 2.0 will be Tiger-only, however, as they make use of updated frameworks.

    3) If you don't see why you need to upgrade, then just don't - 10.3 will continue to work fine and they will continue to supply you with security fixes.

  31. Re:Search, Indexing by Chucker23N · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Tiger includes a new indexing daemon, "mds", for this purpose.

    2) The daemon only becomes active when it notices that files have changed. The performance loss is minimal.

    3) Applications obviously need to make use of the provided APIs. That's what they're for.

  32. Re:Been running it for about a week by danigiri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remember some of the most exciting changes are under da hood.

  33. Re:Sounds Familiar by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't like it, keep 10.2. This isn't a forced upgrade. Besides Quartz Extreme, there haven't been any earth shattering interface changes since 10.1, and only a few increases since 10.2. Shit, I still compile with compatibility to version 10.0, just in case somebody's still running that three year old OS. Most commercial software is 10.1+ (though many free and shareware tools assume you have 10.2).

    New machines get the newest OS. Everybody else can buy it as an upgrade if they like. Where's the problem here? If you aren't willing to pay $130 for a fully 64 bit version of the MacOS with a few extra features, don't pay it.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  34. Re:Why?! by archen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wheither XP is more expensive than OSX is up to debate because it varies depending upon the situation. XP home is around, what $99? If you want better conictivitiy, XP pro is $199. Next upgrade is due a long time from now. Most of the time people are expected to have antivirus on a Windows machine: that's $50+ each year. An upgrade in windows can actually require an upgrade in the hardware as well.

    Mac OSX costs $125. For a 5 computer licence it's $199. Upgrades happen once per year, but you are not REQUIRED neccesarily to get them. Each upgrade of OSX (thus far) has made speed improvments on the same hardware - if you're okay with the speed now, then an upgrade will only make things better. Of course the hardware is usually[1] more expensive as well.

    Which is actually cheaper? As I said, that depends.

    [1] An iBook often works out to be cheaper than an equivelant PC laptop.

  35. Re:Only DVD? by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't support GPU-accelerated Core Image. CI has a fallback path for hardware that doesn't support fragment programs, which almost certainly involves AltiVec.

    Things like Final Cut Pro can already do real-time image and video effects on the CPU, CI is just exposing it as a system library alongside all the traditional bitmap manipulation libraries.

  36. Re:Any Real advantage to Smart Folders? by evenparity · · Score: 3, Informative
    The whole duplication thing is kludge, which is why I don't like it. I use folders as a means of filtering information -- it is a cognitive lense. But duplicating a message is more of a physical act than a cognitive concept.

    Moreover, it just doesn't make sense to have duplicate information. What happens when I want to delete a message that has been cloned into several folders? Or maybe add or delete something from it? That's why the virtual folder idea is useful. I love having folders that say "Today's Mail", "Yesterday's Mail," and "This Week's Mail."

    When I switched my primary machine from XP to OSX, I loved OSX, except for not having a suitable email client. Exceptfor security problems, I loved using Outlook with the Nelson Email Organizer (NEO). NEO added virtual folders and really changed the way I worked. I could file things under "To Do" and also under "Project1", etc. Of course, the security problems with Outlook were impossible to ignore.

    Right now, I'm running Evolution at work on a Dell laptop, but it still seems pretty buggy and unpolished. Whenever I get around to getting X working on my Mac, though, I'll probably switch from Entourage. (The MailApp lacks calendaring and Entourage implements it poorly.)

  37. Re:Why RSS if Safari is still "buggy?" by One+Louder · · Score: 3, Insightful
    However, when I use Safari (which I thought was loosely based on the Mozilla project's browser engine), I see even more rendering problems than in the other two browsers.
    Safari in not based on Mozilla, but rather KHTML.

    My suggestion is that you run the "problem" pages through the W3 Validator before suspecting a particular browser's implementation.

  38. Re:research & development by mbessey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft's research budget is nearly as large as Apple's annual income.

    No, really. For 2003, Apple's income was $6.2 billion. For the same year, Microsoft's R&D spending was $4.7 billion. That's almost exactly 10 times as much as Apple's R&D spending of $471 million

    -Mark

  39. Re:Been running it for about a week by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Umm.. what does the DC stand for in WWDC? Did you miss the guitar amp software demo which relies on low latency audio services provided by Core Audio? Did you miss the release of Core Image and Core Video which are built on tech from the soon to be released Motion? Those two knew Core services are really exciting to developers.

    Damn ungrateful end users always expecting flashy crap to get them excited. Why do you have a copy of the developer preview anyway? You don't sound like a developer to me.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  40. Re:research & development by Radon+Knight · · Score: 4, Insightful
    seems that apple can integrate better and faster new stuff that M$?

    Given that so much of OS X is built upon the NeXTStep code base, and that the NeXTStep code base was (from what I understand) amazingly well-designed from a software engineering point of view, and that Objective-C really is an incredibly powerful, easy to use object-oriented extension of C, I wonder of the rapid output of new stuff from Apple research is just proof of what can happen when you've got well-engineered software libraries with good RAD tools in the hands of extremely capable programmers.

    That's not intented to read like an Apple fanboy post (although it does). But it does seem that Microsoft "innovation" moves more slowly than Apple. And some of Microsoft's innovation just, well, sucks eggs. (MFC, anyone? Bob?)

  41. Other Ideas Borrowed from GMail by fupeg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the most interesting things in the articles:
    But lets not forget that Mail 2.0 is also 100% compliant with Apple's Spotlight search technology. Spotlight searches instantly search not only Mail headers, but the complete contents of Mail messages as well, displaying results to the user in a matter of seconds.
    This is one of the great strengths of GMail. Searching through thousands of mail messages is trivial and useful. Seems like a great addition to Mail. You get great email searching without the ads...
  42. Re:What is it with men and lesbians by wibs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time I get a new boyfriend, it won't take long before he's asking if I'd be willing to try a threesome with "some hot bi-girl he just met".

    And yet if some sheepish computer dork tried to ask you out, you'd call him a nice guy and say no way. If you go out with assholes, you get the asshole treatment. There's not a whole lot to figure out here.

    And no, I'm not posting this as some sheepish computer dork who's afraid of women. I'm posting this as someone who's tired of people complaining about their lot in life when they create the situations. It's not too hard to find a guy who at least pretends to care about you, ya know. If every guy you go out with has the same problem, perhaps it's time to start looking at other types of guys?

    --
    If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.