Slashdot Mirror


Detailed Reviews of Mac OS X "Tiger" Preview

An anonymous reader writes "AppleInsider has been publishing some very detailed articles on Apple's new Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' operating system, which include numerous screenshots of the system. So far the publication has discussed overall installation and Spotlight search technology, Safari with RSS, a new Mail revision with Smart Mailbox technology, and a websearch enabled Mac OS X Help application."

115 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Not much news... by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems like most of these features were explained at Jobs' keynote address at WWDC. The automatic knowledgebase search in Help was new tho. Can't wait until I get my hands on my developer copy.

    1. Re:Not much news... by Bearpaw · · Score: 4, Funny
      It seems like most of these features were explained at Jobs' keynote address at WWDC.

      I have a hunch that the lead-off to this story should have been "An anonymous AppleInsider editor writes ...".

  2. RSS? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now they have a broweser thats guaranteed to give you repetitive stress syndrome? How is THAT a good thing?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  3. Smart Mailboxes. by Luckboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, no matter how smart my mailbox is, my mail is still stupid.

    I'm tired of people trying to convince me that my breasts need to be larger, when clearly that would only make my penis look smaller.

    1. Re:Smart Mailboxes. by andawyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's ok - they have creams and stuff to help you fix that too...

    2. Re:Smart Mailboxes. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 4, Funny
      My spammers are just confused. They keep offering to increase the size of my mortgage by 30%.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  4. Smart Folders == Labels? by billstr78 · · Score: 4, Interesting


    It looks like Apple caught on quickly to the Gmail label paradigm shift away from folders and has put "smart folders" into Mail 2.0 for 10.4.

    IMHO labels and smart folders are long overdue for mail. They've been usefull in iTunes for months and just make good sense data that does not belong in only one bin.

    1. Re:Smart Folders == Labels? by System.out.println() · · Score: 5, Informative

      Smart folder and labels aren't quite the same, particularly in that Smart Folders are automatic, and labels aren't. This has both upsides and downsides, but they *aren't* the same thing.

    2. Re:Smart Folders == Labels? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 2, Informative

      old news.

      Microsoft Entourage has been able to save searches for later use (a smart folder) since its debut in 2001.

      hmm... thats twice in as many weeks that i've put microsoft in better light... whats happening to me?!

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    3. Re:Smart Folders == Labels? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ok, heres my way of redeeming myself (yes i know i'm also replying to myself)

      Apple had this feature (save searches for later use) in the ill fated Copland preview in the mid 1990's. in fact i got the impression that apple was resurrecting many features from Copland during the WWDC keynote (see Automator)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    4. Re:Smart Folders == Labels? by bluk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Smart Folders are dynamic from what I read and Labels are applied by incoming mail filters on Gmail only so far (or applied manually). So if you wanted to store a new "view" of your e-mail for all Apple e-mails, you'd just create a Smart Folder in the Mail app versus having to do a search in Gmail. A very minor detail but something that I wish Gmail could implement as an option since I usually would like a filter to apply to all the old e-mails as well as to the new ones.

  5. Apple Link by mattyohe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is apple's own "Preview". It contains tons of screenshots and a webcast from WWDC.

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  6. photocopiers? by Down8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just one of those pot-kettle-black things, I guess: ...websearch enabled Mac OS X Help application.

    You mean like Office2003? And even OfficeXP, I think.

    I'm just sayin'...

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
    1. Re:photocopiers? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, like Window's Help and Support Center, in Windows XP, which also searches the web. The difference is that the OS X Help application is global and applies to all help applications, where in MS's case each app has it's own Help index, and for XP, Office, and Office XP, their own help tools. I'm pretty sure (don't have a copy yet, like you) that in Tiger, any and all apps will be able to search Apple's knowledge base as well as the web for stuff. The difference in implementation between Apple and Microsoft is scope and consistency.

      Microsoft's web enabled help applications are selective.

    2. Re:photocopiers? by NTworks · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually Active Desktop didn't become available until you installed Internet Explorer 4.0, which came out in 1998 I believe

    3. Re:photocopiers? by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nonsense! I was up in Seattle for the launch party (with Jay Leno!) Bill Gates personally handed me a signed Win 95 box (which I have here on a shelf.)

      Apple had a billboard truck driving across the street that said C:\NGRULAT.ONS (making fun of the old DOS file length limitation. They shouldn't have been so cocky because Win95 had 255 character file names, while Mac was stuck at 32.)

  7. Most inconsistent user interfaces by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the appleinsider link:
    Interestingly, sources noted that while the Tiger Finder interface contains no noticeable changes from Panther, Spotlight uses its own sleek window interface design, which is only accessible from windows that are spawned from Spotlight searches. The interface features windows with a smooth, grey-colored titlebar, with sharp webpage-like table results on one side, and an html-style control bar on the other. Details of these new webpage-like Mac OS X windows were first report by sources in an earlier report, though sources described them as Mac OS Finder windows.

    If you look at the screen shots you will notice weirdly blue colored bars, but just in that one application. Honestly I thought Macs were supposed to have a consistent UI. If I wanted a mish mash of colors and widgets I would just get a Windows PC.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by shawnce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These are screen shots from a developer release of an OS that will not be release until some time in 2005 (Apple is targeting first half of 05). So what you see may have no reflection on the final look of things nor show a complete implementation of any particular look.

    2. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      If I wanted a mish mash of colors and widgets I would just get a Windows PC.
      To be fair, I think you should consider looking into Linux. It can get quite exciting to have a qt app, a gtk1 app, and a gtk2 app running, all with different themes. Throw in an old motif app and xmms, and you can have a lot of variety.
    3. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      Given that it doesn't ship till 2005, I wouldn't get too worked up about cosmetic inconsistencies in the developer preview. The developer release is about getting new APIs out to developers. The look will no doubt be further refined before release.

    4. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by fiftyvolts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the few things that are totally customizable in OS X is the highlight color. There are 6 or 7 apple made ones and then an option for "other" where you can pick any ugly color you want. Those blue bars are probably taking their color from a user's prefs.

    5. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by GregChant · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the Apple Human Interface Guidelines:

      You can use a brushed metal window if your application:
      • Provides an interface for a digital peripheral, such as a camera, or an interface for managing data shared with digital peripherals--iPhoto or iSync, for example
      • Strives to re-create a familiar physical device--Calculator or DVD Player, for example
      • Provides a source list to navigate information--for example, iTunes or the Finder

      I think that's pretty strict, and it provides a great way to distinguish between iLife-type applications from other non-"life experience" (that's a technical term) applications. Additionally, I challenge you to find an Apple-made program using brushed-metal that doesn't conform to the above guideline.

      Overall, if you actually read the AHIG, you'll find the guidlines make sense and serve a specific purpose; they aren't just some willy-nilly part of the system that changes at the whim of Steve Jobs or some apparently AD/HD influenced designers.

      I for one welcome our Apple Human Interface overlords.

    6. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by Smitty825 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Additionally, I challenge you to find an Apple-made program using brushed-metal that doesn't conform to the above guideline.

      Ummm...Let's see...

      Safari?

      --

      Doh!
    7. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by GregChant · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can see my response regarding Safari. Another questionable program is iChat... many people say that its because iChat AV is an interface to iSight, but we all know iChat pre-AV was also brushed metal. What's the reason? The contact list is again, a source list.

      Didn't realize pointing out your lack of understanding regarding the AHIG would hurt your feelings, but your second paragraph is again, addressed in it. If you actually think about what you're doing when you use configuration panels, you'll notice that if the program conforms to the AHIG, the functionality makes sense.

      A lot (and a I mean a lot) of third party developers do not even bother to skim the AHIG: how is that the fault of the system? Apple merely puts the tools in the hand of the developers, and makes a list of recommendations. Short of only allowing Apple-approved programs run on the system (akin to what Microsoft seems to be doing with Longhorn), you can't possibly force developers to follow the AHIG.

    8. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by bnenning · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Press Command + Option + B. Note the source list to the left.

      That's *really* a stretch. The purpose of a web browser is to browse the web, not manage a list of bookmarks. That reasoning can be applied to just about any app (Mail uses a source list of mailboxes; Xcode uses a source list of project files, etc). Safari and iChat are metal because Steve wanted them to be; then the HIG were retroactively changed to make it a vaguely justifiable choice.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    9. Re:Most inconsistent user interfaces by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Interesting


      I challenge you to find an Apple-made program using brushed-metal that doesn't conform to the above guideline.

      Apple Remote Desktop v 2.0.

      Good pic if you haven't seen it yet. I think it's 100% stupid, too, and I don't mind the metal on most apps, really; but for an Enterprise Admin tool, it adds "pretty" when you really need better efficiency.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  8. Re:Why?! by bsartist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you pay premium for a closed source operating system and handicapped hardware (one button mouse)?

    It's cheaper than XP, it's mostly open (it's not Free, but that doesn't bother me), and my three-button+wheel mouse works just fine, thanks.

    Oh, and by the way - 1994 just called. They want their FUD back.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  9. Smart Folder == Opera M2 Mail Client by RinkRat · · Score: 5, Informative
    If anyone is interested in checking out 'smart folders' ahead of time, I encourage you to try the mail client included with Opera.

    It works under the 'everything is a database' premise for email, with 'smart filters', multiple views, multiple email integration, everything controlled via CSS and much, much more.

    It's free as in beer, too.

    --
    RinkRat
    1. Re:Smart Folder == Opera M2 Mail Client by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also see this in action in, of all things, iTunes (for Windows or Macs) in Smart Playlists

  10. Some common answers to Tiger questions by hkb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is Tiger usable as a daily OS, currently?

    No, Safari 2.0 currently does not work with HTTPS sites. Many common apps, including FireFox crash upon execution. Additionally, there seem to be some pretty serious filesystem bugs which can trash your entire hard disk (not just your Tiger partition).

    Do I need a DVD drive? My pirated copy of the Tiger DVD crashes upon boot up.

    No, you don't need a DVD drive. Visit the following URL for good installation steps:

    Install steps

    He also has a Tiger FAQ here:

    Tiger FAQ

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  11. Upgrade questions by hotspotbloc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you need Panther to use the Tiger upgrade or will any version of OS X work? Are the hardware requirements, both minimal and recommended, the same as Panther?

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:Upgrade questions by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple doesn't have "upgrade editions" of OS X like Microsoft or other vendors. You buy the disk and the whole thing is on there. Personally, I get every *other* version of OS X because I don't want to spend $129 every year on incremental features. I'll probably pass on Tiger (got Panther now) and wait for OS X - "Big Pussy" in 2006.

    2. Re:Upgrade questions by Henriok · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can upgrade from any previous OSX version. The system requrements will probably be the same as Pather, but the Tiger beta has some limitation, like a DVD drive (it will install from an image) and FireWire (probably due to the new migration tool), but it installs just fine on every machine that Panther supported. Some feature will require special hardware, stuff like CoreImage and CoreVideo.

      Since Apple continues to opmitize and hone the operating system I would guess that Tiger will be quicker that previous versions och the same hardware. I've noticed significant speed ups on a PowerBook G4/400 compared to the previous Panther install. This is consistent with the history as Jaguar was quicker than Puma (10.1) that was quicker than Cheetah (10.0).

      --

      - Henrik

      - when the Shadows descend -
    3. Re:Upgrade questions by larkost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well... you need to be a registered apple developer to have it at this point.

      As a general note: Apple has rarely sent out paid upgrades as anything but a combination of both a full and upgrade installer. They are almost always bootible media (CD's or DVD's) that have disk tools on them so that you can choose to erase/repartition the disk, and "clean" upgrade options (in MacOS X's case it offers to move the "system" folder aside and the option to migrate user folders and system settings).

      Next year when this is available for sale you will undoubtedly be able to move any computer capable of using 10.4 to the new OS, probably from MacOS 9.2 onward (since all of the computers that meet the minimum requirements would not run lower anyways).

  12. Re:Only DVD? by cmoney · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a developer version. The final copy won't be out until probably this time next year. It's probably cheaper to burn 1 dvd instead of 4-5 CDs. I'm pretty sure Apple's developer program has switched to DVDs for a lot of their software distribution. (I remember starting to get DVDs last year before my membership expired.)

  13. or in Evolution by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using "VFolders" in evolution for at least two years or so now. I wouldn't be surprised if outlook has had such a feature for a long time. Although Google is responsible for inventing a whole slew of tech, smart folders is not one of them.

    1. Re:or in Evolution by furball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And if you knew your history, Evolution didn't originate vfolders. vfolders came out of VMail application that runs in XEMacs.

      A lot of people have been using the concept of search query defined foldering for a very long time now.

    2. Re:or in Evolution by moongha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      'Smart Folders' are to normal folders what SQL Views are to normal SQL Tables.

      I suspect that is the origin.

  14. Re:Only DVD? by switcha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um. It' s been quite awhile since Apple shipped a drive that won't read DVDs. Even if you can't burn them, you can install with them.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  15. Re:Grrrr by Llywelyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cougar, Lynx, and Leopard. No clue what order they will use, but those seem to be the names for their future releases (through 10.7).

    Lion is conspicuously absent.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  16. Mailbox feature I need... by stienman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since I don't email illiterate people, I'd like my mail program run spell check and grammer check on incoming mail. If it isn't at high school level then it's automatically binned.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by ColonelPanic · · Score: 5, Funny

      spell check and grammer check

      Heh heh heh heh.

      --
      "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
    2. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by bsartist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd like my mail program to run spell check and grammar check on incoming mail.

      Alternatively: Grammer check? What's that, filtering out all the gratuitous Frasier references?

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    3. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by rjstanford · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like my mail program run spell check

      I believe that you mean that you'd like your mail program to run a spelling check... or possibly to run a spellcheck. But unless you mean a program called spellcheck you need the indefinate article. And the "to" as well. At least, if you want to receive your own email...

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:Mailbox feature I need... by bheer · · Score: 3, Funny

      indefinate

      Heh. I hereby propose (drumroll) bheer's law: "In any slashpost critical of another's grammar and/or spelling, the probability of a grammar/spelling error rises to twice the /. average."

  17. cats-a-plenty by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually as of a few months ago they had a few other cats trademarked for OS name use.... offhand i think puma, lynx and cougar maybe? i may be wrong on the names, but i know there are a few more in the name pool..... even if theya re never used, they were trademarked for use as a name for an operating system...

    yes, i know lynx in the unix shell web browser thingy..... but it can still be trademarked for OS use (i think?). whatever the list consisted of, it was found because Apple trademarked the names.

  18. Re:v^HsmartFolders by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The short answer is that it is a development of the "Smart Playlists" in iTunes. Thus "Smart Folders" means something to Mac users.

    The deeper answer is that the Mac UI is designed so you don't need to be a geek to understand it. Joe Sixpack knows what smart means but not what virtual means, let alone know that the v in vFolders stands for virtual.

    BTW, I've never heard the term vFolders before so I suspect it doesn't have that much mindshare. It looks like a Linux thing.

  19. Will Linux ever catch up? by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It seems that Linux has been playing catch up for some years now in terms of user interface, and with the advent of OSX - it now has a whole new mountain to climb.

    Where are the free software projects investigating next generation UI concepts? Is Linux too wedded to the old ways of doing things to compete with commercial vendors like Apple? It seems to me that the Linux UI community has been very busy trying to emulate the functionality of yesterday's commercial desktops, when it should be pioneering new approaches and UI innovations, thus leap-frogging Apple and others.

    1. Re:Will Linux ever catch up? by billstr78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a good reason for this lag. Most Linux users (1% of all PC users) don't require slick UI to get their tasks done. Linux users primarily still use the terminal window and considering that KDE is ahead of Windows, I'd say they are doing pretty well.

    2. Re:Will Linux ever catch up? by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a good reason for this lag. Most Linux users (1% of all PC users) don't require slick UI to get their tasks done. Linux users primarily still use the terminal window and considering that KDE is ahead of Windows, I'd say they are doing pretty well.

      I don't require a slick UI. I also don't require air conditioning, diet cola, or a high speed internet connection, but they sure make my life nicer and easier.

    3. Re:Will Linux ever catch up? by davechen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not an either/or proposition. I use tcsh and vim and all the other *nix goodness all the time on OS X. The problem with the GUIs on X11 is their lack of consistency and most of them are butt ugly.

  20. I'm holding out for OS X 10.5 by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Kitten"

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:I'm holding out for OS X 10.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Other upcoming OS X releases:

      Mac OS X 10.6 Tiger Lily
      Mac OS X 10.7 Cougar (which will be renamed Mellencamp for 10.7.2)
      Mac OS X 10.8 Snagglepuss
      Mac OS X 10.9 Hello Kitty (which will replace Aqua with Pink)

    2. Re:I'm holding out for OS X 10.5 by Philippe · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean like this?

  21. iTunes as a Teaching Tool by ChilyMack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people talk about how the Windows version of iTunes is a trojan horse idea, i.e., it gives Windows users a taste of the usability and flexibility of software designed by Apple, and so inspires them to switch. Looks like Apple's been using iTunes as more than a switching device, though - they've been training their user base. Everything's going to be smart in the Tiger, and it won't matter where the files are - just what you want to use, when you want to use it. iTunes is already like this - I can say I want all the movie music by John Williams, in addition to including all the classical titles he ripped off, and it will give it to me in a playlist. So, no massive shift for Mac users or Windows users who have iTunes - they already know exactly how to speed through and take advantage of this UI. Smart.

    1. Re:iTunes as a Teaching Tool by blugu64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps I'm falling for a troll here, but what are you talking about? I'm running XP Pro, with iTunes 4.6.0.15, and the "right click" is working pretty much everywhere. I can right click on songs, playlists, most everything actually. The joy of contextual menus huh? Just for what it's worth, at least make sure you know what your talking about before making unfounded, and blatently false claims.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    2. Re:iTunes as a Teaching Tool by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 2, Informative
      My apologies, my initial message was not meant as a troll

      No worries, didn't take it that way. I refuse to start assuming that because some one does not know something they are a troll, just figured I would answer your complaints.

      do want to use it with other software, primarily Linux software.

      Not sure about that, but I would give a shot to the manual manage function, if you have not already.

      I had been trying to right-click on the playlist area to add a new playlist and was annoyed that it did not work.

      That would make sense though wouldn't it? On a side note, under the file menu is "Make new playlist from selection" (Ctrl-Shift-N) which is a really nice handy feature, which also seems to be lacking from the song contextual menu.

      Are you really saying that iTunes continues to be responsive for you during this time? I just checked that I really am using iTunes 4.6 and not some early beta version.

      I just tried it, and it worked fine, but, I did not have a large amount of data to sync. But, my experience is irrelevant, how it is working for you is what matters, try apples support docs, they have some answers to some pretty esoteric questions and situations in them.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    3. Re:iTunes as a Teaching Tool by Cloud+K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know... I just ordered a Powerbook, my first Mac ever (though I used a Classic back in school) and aside from much research afterwards, iTunes and the iPod I got recently were major factors in making me take Apple seriously.

      Of course, I'd heard all about its Unix base, awesome interface etc but it was the sheer elegance of both iTunes and the iPod that triggered me to take serious action.

  22. Re:v^HsmartFolders by bogie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shold have known better than to joke about Apple. The mods here who like apple don't appear have much of a sense of humor.

    You should have saved the comment for the next piece of KDE software named Kxxx. Long rants about how OSS sucks at naming software always get modded +5 Informative.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  23. Apple and Aliens by TheTXLibra · · Score: 4, Funny

    It takes a moment of background story, but this does relate...During the 4th of July celebrations (which for some reason, came on the 3rd of July this year) my sweetie and I joined my best friend and his wife and kids in the park to watch the fireworks. Being the "Evil Uncle" of his son, Gabe, I managed to convince him the previous year that we celebrate July 4th each year to commemorate our fending off the aliens attack on Earth. This year, he and I spoke further on the issue...

    GABE: "So, we fought off the Aliens with their own technology?
    ME: "Why...ah, yes, as a matter of fact, we did."
    GABE: "So aliens have laptops too?"
    ME: "Yes, well, sort of. Actually, no..."
    GABE: "Arrrgh!"
    ME: "See, they captured an alien ship back in the 50's and reverse-engineered the operating system."
    GABE: "Hmmm...And they used it to blow up the aliens?"
    ME: "Not quite. See, it takes money to fund these sorts of top-secret government wossnames. So what they did was eventually market the operating system in the private sector, as a competing OS. However, since it was the government that gave out the OS in the first place, they decided to keep it close to home, in federally funded areas... like Schools."
    GABE: "You mean..." his eyes went wide "Apple Computers are made by aliens? Oh no!"
    ME: "No, Apple Computers are made by Apple. However, their OS was originally hacked from an alien spaceship. That's why they never managed to produce clones like the PCs."
    GABE: "And we made the aliens blow up with an Apple computer?"
    ME: "No, we just used their technology to remove their shields, so that our weapons could blow them up."
    GABE: "Did we use alien weapons?"
    ME: "Nope, just good old fashioned American-made missiles and stuff."
    GABE: "Good," he nods sagely. "Cause next time, we might not be so lucky."
    ME: "Indeed. And THAT'S why we celebrate the 4th of July, every year."
    MY FIANCE: "Just for the record, Sweetie, our kids are never going to be home-schooled by you."

    --
    -The Libra
    "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
  24. Much more under the hood... by shawnce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just wanted to note that Tiger has a lot of very cool stuff under the hood that is taking place that will be a boon for developers and by extension customers (of course this stuff is still currently under NDA).

    It will be a great OS release... one that I feel will become a must have for every Macintosh user (with supported hardware). At least I hope it will be a must have because I really want to use some of he features that will exist to help speed the development and richness of applications.

    1. Re:Much more under the hood... by Xyde · · Score: 2, Informative
      Since I pirated it (flame on), I'm not under NDA, so I took some screenshots of a feature which interested me. Resolution independant UI.

      It's still quite buggy (lots of graphical glitches) but apart from that everything works as expected. The OS X GUI is made up of bitmapped tiff's at 72dpi at the moment, so scaled up it doesn't look too crash hot, but this could easily be changed with a quick revision to quartz, and I expect it will be. Because changes only affect newly opened applications in the present implementation, I was able to make a screenshot with different programs running at different scalefactors.

      I'm more excited about being able to scale everything down - yay, more usable space on my 1024x768 12" PowerBook!

      quartzdebug.png

      applications.png

  25. Fantastic Idea! by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, that's a really smart idea! Of course it would need a few tweaks- Maybe calculate the percentage of mistakes and trash it above a certain value (for the friends who make the occasional spelling mistake).

    The best part is, if spammers start using spell-check and correcting their mail before sending (changing V1@gr@ to Viagra) it will be caught by the spam filters instead! It's a win-win situation, less spam and correct spelling...

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  26. Re:Why?! by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's cheaper than XP

    This one is not entirelycorrect, if you want to stay up to date. The yearly upgrade cycle so far made OSX quite more expensive than XP if you started with the first released version on both. And if you're talking OEM, XP might be actually cheaper now.

    Granted, if the software would be the only difference, OSX would have XP beat hands down. However, if you're out to buy a cheap and reasonably fast computer, Apple is not exactly in the top 10 choices (emphasis on both cheap and fast).

    Adapting the old saying: cheap, fast, cool - pick two.

  27. Re:Can't Wait by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's only one upgrade a year, if that. The last upgrade was in late 2003 and the new upgrade is in early to mid 2005.

    Six year cycle at one upgrade a year is $774. However, during that time you're likely to buy at least one new Mac, which would eliminate the need for one of the upgrades.

    If you're really keeping your computer for six years, that's a solid testimony to the quality of the Mac platform. You really need a new PC for every new major version upgrade since the system requirements change so radically. It's torture running Windows XP on a low-end machine designed for 2000. I bought a used two year old 400mhz PowerBook G4 about a week ago and am very impressed by how well it runs in Panther. It was a slowpoke in the version of MacOS X available at the time, but now it's a more than acceptable performer for most things I need to do with it.

    The reality is that the Mac platform's pretty cost-effective if you want to keep your machine running well. The horrors of dealing with Windows virus attacks easily make up for the price difference between Mac and PC.

    D

  28. Re:v^HsmartFolders by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Probably because iTunes uses Smart Playlists. "vFolder" is pretty uninspiring. Is it a "fifth generation" folder? Is it shaped like a 'V'? Will it be used in litigation? Is it associated with a verb, or action? Is it an assistant to a real Folder? Will it bring Victory? Does it does it refer to the designer's first experience of love, rolling around in a meadow, surrounded by violets?

  29. "Smart" buzzwords by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love it when marketing drones (or programmers) think adding "Smart" to reflect new technology is valid. The mail technology described isn't "smart".

    "Smart" would be a filtering system that recognizes senders based on last name, and realize that people named "Smith" are probably in my family. "Smart" would automatically recognize messages about the Bernoulli account after a few back and forths and organize them by sender and time (kind of like how I have my filing cabinets). When it matches a personal assistant, it's "smart".

    1. Re:"Smart" buzzwords by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Having the computer make clever guesses about what you probably want it to do (instead of just doing what you tell it to do) usually comes out as "really annoying". Remember Clippy?


      For example: People named "Smith" may well not be in my family, since Smith is a common last name. Furthermore, so what if they are? Maybe I don't want to have a "My Family" category, and a non-annoying program wouldn't assume that I do.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  30. Re:What is it with men and lesbians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please do not pretend to be a girl on the Slashdot. It gets the nerds all hot and bothered.

  31. Re:Why?! by kannibal_klown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's see here. The yearly upgrade cycle of Mac OS versus the every-other-year upgrade cycle of Windows. Granted, the next windows (desktop) version won't be out for a while now, but Tiger is in 2005, when Panther was 2003.

    Windows retail is pretty dang expense (for the full NON-oem version). Likewise, the hardware requirements seem to go up quite nicely with each Windows release. Panther runs pretty well on hardware thats a few years old already (so long as its a G4 or later G3).

    Don't get me wrong, if you want to constantly upgrade with either system, it's going to cost you a pretty penny. But why upgrde so often? Jaguar is still supported now, and Panther will still be supported when Tiger comes out.

    But I agree that Mac OS needs to slow down a little. While they throw a LOT of stuff in each revision, it gets pretty pricey.

  32. Re:v^HsmartFolders by furball · · Score: 2, Insightful

    vFolders isn't a linux thing. It's an XEmacs VMail thing. It was a concept popularized with Linux via the Evolution mail client which borrowed heavily from the earlier work of VMail and it's approaches.

  33. before anyone starts on Dashboard by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have taken a look at it and currently own Konfabulator, and my honest impression is this.

    While dashboard might or might not be a konfabulator clone, it does it MUCH better than konfabulator could ever do it.

    One of the nasties of using konfabulator aside from the hideous amount of prossesor usage it seems to take and its tendancy to kill your system if your not online and using a widget that grabs online feeds, is the fact that well, every interface is different between widgets and sometimes they either dont work, or are hard to move around or close. The new version of Konfabulator fixed some of this, but its still bad. Apple has changed this, by not only making the moduals easy to close or move, and forcing them to keep simular preference interfaces, they also added the expose powered hide feature.

    Honestly I dont hate Konfabulator and wish it well, I think its creator is a ass as to the fact that he doesnt care about the fact that both Apple and Microsoft did it first and he was just reimplementing a old idea.... beleiving the PR all the media outlets put out about it being this amazing app, but he did create it and i think more importantly he renewed interest in a feature a lot of us didnt use back in the OS 6/7 Win98 days.... Here is hoping the modual makers can bring their work to Dashboard with minimal fuss.... cause honestly those are the people who made konfabulator shine, not the guy who made it.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:before anyone starts on Dashboard by foregather · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was rather swayed by this piece (with the most interesting point summarized below for the mentally slashdoted)

      http://daringfireball.net/2004/06/dashboard_vs_k on fabulator

      ---
      "Konfabulator = (Custom XML format) + (Custom JavaScript engine)

      Dashboard, on the other hand, is based on WebCore, the underlying open source layout and scripting engine behind Safari. Dashboard gadgets are indeed scripted using JavaScript, the same language used by Konfabulator, but Dashboard uses the JavaScript engine that's built into the system. And for UI layout, Dashboard gadgets are specified using HTML and CSS -- using the same rendering engine as Safari.
      . . .
      Do you see how huge this is? How it opens the door to gadget development to anyone with web design experience? Indeed, I've read the preliminary Dashboard developer documentation (generously provided by a source attending WWDC), and it is outstanding from the perspective of making gadgets easy-to-create.

      The idea that Dashboard is derivative because it's scripted via JavaScript is missing the point. Dashboard isn't using JavaScript just to use JavaScript -- it's using JavaScript because Dashboard gadgets are little floating Web Kit views."
      ---

      The article also argues, and offers documentation in support of the position, that you can trace the idea for such widgets all the way back to the first "desk accessories" like the puzzle and calculator from 1984. Then combines both points to paint Dashboard as a natural outgrowth of fundmental Apple ideas.

      While Konfabulator is an implementation of similar concepts, they were not the inventors of them and their chosen means of implementation makes their software practically useless to Apple from the buy-and-incorporate perspective.

    2. Re:before anyone starts on Dashboard by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      its only too bad I posted, cause your post deserves to be modded up!

      This is exactly a lot of peopls points, the idea is simular, but Apples execution of the idea is well beyond what they did with konfabulator. It may be simular in idea, but in the end Apple did it much better....

      Its funny but people pissed their pants about "oh apples copying this, apples copying that" but talk about copyrighting a idea and people go apeshit.... well thats all this is is a idea, the underlying implementations are totally different

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    3. Re:before anyone starts on Dashboard by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      konfabulator is this java based package for the mac that displayed simular looking moduals onn the screen... it was given this big to do simply cause it used Java, and thus easy to program by anyone with a litle knowlage

      The problem was some of the reporters started touting about it like it was a new thing (it wasnt) and it gained this HUGE following from a lot of people who dont know the history of the app so they all think Apple ripped it off, which is not the case, it was the reverse, but apple stopped using it when it didnt see a market for it, as did microsoft.

      The biggest problem is the the guy who created it is now making himself out to be a shareware martyr whos fighting the man who stole his app.... which is bogus and just downright stupid cause he didnt make anything new, he just reused a old idea in a new package

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  34. Re:Grrrr by ratell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally, I can't wait for the Thundercats version... Thundercats Ho!!!

  35. suggested rewrite by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Funny
    The "private browsing" mode dialog box in the Safari preview is certainly well intentioned, but isn't sufficiently clear about its purpose. I suggest the following rewrite.
    When private browsing is turned on, webpages are not added to the history, items are automatically removed from the Downloads window, information isn't saved for AutoFill (including names and passwords), and no one will know that you went looking for "bukakke" [sic] on Google. But we're not cleaning up those skanky-ass tissues for you, so pick up after your damn self, okay? Perv.
  36. Re:One feature that I would like to see by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find the adaptive filter in Mail to be as goog as a Baysian filter - in fact it's supposed to be a superior adaptive algorithm to bayesian filtering. But it you really want to run a bayseian filter with OS X as well, you can.

  37. Re:Only DVD? by discstickers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the rumor is that Tiger will only be available on DVD.

    --
    I have a shitty sig!
  38. This is why it is called a DEVELOPERS release... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is for us DEVELOPERS. So we can DEVELOP. Sorta' like the development systems I work on here - blue wires, etc. yet it allows me to DEVELOP.

    Oh, BTW, did I mention it was a DEVELOPERS release?

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  39. Why RSS if Safari is still "buggy?" by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I should preface my comments with this -- I'm new to OS X (IT/developer working in creative environment), so my experience with Safari may not be totally up to snuff. Correct me if I terribly skew off track with comments about Safari.

    That said, I'm wondering if Apple has improved Safari to be more compatible with websites. And if not, why not before doing this RSS application?

    When I do testing of websites with Mozilla 1.x and FireBird 0.9 on my PC, I run into some "damn you Internet Explorer"-specific pages that limit the features that I see with these alternative browsers. However, when I use Safari (which I thought was loosely based on the Mozilla project's browser engine), I see even more rendering problems than in the other two browsers.

    Do I just need to spend more time with Safari, or are there still major issues with how it renders some pages and code? And if the latter is true, was it wise for Apple to add another Safari-esque feature with this RSS application when they need to fix some rendering issues with what could be a really sweet browser?

    It's sad, but on many pages that work fine in Mozilla 1.x and FireBird 0.9 on a PC, I have to send designers who want to see their work BACK to IE for Mac so that the pages properly render what they designed. Of course, my code could just really suck too. ;-)

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:Why RSS if Safari is still "buggy?" by bastardsquadmuzz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Safari is based on KDE's KHTML rendering engine used in Konqueror, not Mozilla's Gecko engine. While I've seen a few pages go funny in Konqueror I can recall only one that doesn't work with Safari. But then maybe I don't look at enough websites.

      --
      --Muzz
    2. Re:Why RSS if Safari is still "buggy?" by One+Louder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      However, when I use Safari (which I thought was loosely based on the Mozilla project's browser engine), I see even more rendering problems than in the other two browsers.
      Safari in not based on Mozilla, but rather KHTML.

      My suggestion is that you run the "problem" pages through the W3 Validator before suspecting a particular browser's implementation.

  40. Re:Why?! by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's a serious flaw in your argument. You don't need to buy an OSX upgrade every year. You could buy it every 2 years or any other period you choose. Just because there happens to be a choice of a new version for Mac and not for XP that shouldn't be counted as a positive for XP now should it.

    BTW, Virginia tech found Apple to be the cheapest fastest option when measured against other PCs. What do you know, a cheap, fast, cool supercomputer!

  41. Re:Any Real advantage to Smart Folders? by Chucker23N · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, as you figured out yourself, Smart Folders are just dynamic search queries. The e-mail physically remains at the same place. Think of Smart Folders as a way to store search queries that you do frequently.

  42. Re:Sounds Familiar by Chucker23N · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) Tiger won't be out until spring 2005.

    2) Safari 1.3 and Xcode 1.5 will make it to Panther, and Panther will receive at least one more point release (10.3.5). Safari 2.0 and Xcode 2.0 will be Tiger-only, however, as they make use of updated frameworks.

    3) If you don't see why you need to upgrade, then just don't - 10.3 will continue to work fine and they will continue to supply you with security fixes.

  43. Re:Search, Indexing by Chucker23N · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Tiger includes a new indexing daemon, "mds", for this purpose.

    2) The daemon only becomes active when it notices that files have changed. The performance loss is minimal.

    3) Applications obviously need to make use of the provided APIs. That's what they're for.

  44. I'd like Mail rules like those in Pine by pauljlucas · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Even though I run OS X on my desktop, I still run Pine in a shell because I've yet to find a GUI mail reader that has the feature in Pine whereby you can auto-set the From header (when composing a reply) based on other headers.

    For example, if I receive e-mail that contains at least one e-mail address containing mycompany.com, then I want the mailer, upon selecting Reply, to auto-set the From header to my work e-mail address rather than my home e-mail address. (All my e-mail routes my my home Linux server and is split into mailbox files by procmail.)

    Anybody know of a GUI mail client with rules like Pine's? (Oh, and it has to be able to support IMAP over SSL and SMTP AUTH too.)

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    1. Re:I'd like Mail rules like those in Pine by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 2, Informative
      For example, if I receive e-mail that contains at least one e-mail address containing mycompany.com, then I want the mailer, upon selecting Reply, to auto-set the From header to my work e-mail address rather than my home e-mail address.

      I use PowerMail on OSX, and it allows a filter to be set up with the following rules.

      FROM contains XYZCOMPANY.COM then SET ACCOUNT to XYZCOMPANY.COM

      As the program automatically responds using the designated accounts e-mail address, that should work.

      Oh, and it has to be able to support IMAP over SSL and SMTP AUTH too.

      Yes, it does.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    2. Re:I'd like Mail rules like those in Pine by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2, Informative
      When reply to an e-mail it brings up the right from address.

      At least in my experience, it often does, but it doesn't always do so. From some experimentation I just did, it appears to base it on the address to which the mail was sent - but if it was sent to a mailing list, so that none of my e-mail addresses appear in the To: or Cc: header, it doesn't pick the address I happen to use on that list.

      If it could be given rules to say "if it's to any of these addresses, use address XXX in replies", as I infer (perhaps incorrectly) Pine can, that could be fixed.

  45. Re:Grrrr by Teese · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't think Apple would use eMac
    emacs is already a text editor.

    I don't think Apple would use Safari
    Internet Safari is already a web browser.

    I don't think Apple would use iTools
    iTools is already a Suite of server applications for macs.

    I don't think Apple would use Apple
    Apple is already a record label.

    I don't think Apple would use System 9
    System 9 is already a the name of an OS by Microware.

    Anymore out there ;)

    --
    "I'm a Genius!"*


    *Not an actual Genius
  46. Re:v^HsmartFolders by nmk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, for one there really isn't any precidence for the way Apple is implementing smart folders. BeOS had something like this, but I'm not sure if the feature was as powerful. The "smart folders" name is derived from the iTunes "smart playlists". So since they are inventing this feature, they can call it whatever they want. Perhaps they should call them "fuck you troll" folders.

  47. Re:Been running it for about a week by danigiri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remember some of the most exciting changes are under da hood.

  48. Fix Printing to Linux CUPS Queues? by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah yeah graphics, search, safari... Can we PLEASE Finally fix the HUGE bug where you can't print from Adobe (or any other app that uses PICT rather than PDF) to Linux CUPS queues? Its been in the dev tree since before the last relase...

    Contrary to all rules of CUPS when Apple ported it to OSX they decided to add client side filters which means when you send a job to a shared queue hosted on a linux box, the local printbox hangs and the linux box either bounces the job or prints garbage.

    For details go here

    Please!?!

  49. Re:Sounds Familiar by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't like it, keep 10.2. This isn't a forced upgrade. Besides Quartz Extreme, there haven't been any earth shattering interface changes since 10.1, and only a few increases since 10.2. Shit, I still compile with compatibility to version 10.0, just in case somebody's still running that three year old OS. Most commercial software is 10.1+ (though many free and shareware tools assume you have 10.2).

    New machines get the newest OS. Everybody else can buy it as an upgrade if they like. Where's the problem here? If you aren't willing to pay $130 for a fully 64 bit version of the MacOS with a few extra features, don't pay it.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  50. Re:Search, Indexing by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There are 2 ways for an application to "support" Spotlight:
    • Use the Spotlight SDK to write a plugin that parses the app's file format and metadata. This allows the global Spotlight feature to index and search the contents of files created by that app.
    • Use the Spotlight API to integrate Spotlight into its own interface, letting the user search from the app directly.
    As to how many apps will support this, I'd guess that plugins will be far more common that built-in searching, since they are not an integral part of the app and could even conceivably be written by third parties if the original developer doesn't bother to.
  51. Re:Can't Wait by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

    Incidentally, if you're willing to wait 6 months after the release of a new Apple OS, you can usually get it for half price. You can get the previous release for even less (just saw 10.2 for $20). Or get four of your friends together and buy a "family" license (5 licenses with one DVD for $250 or so).

    This is quite a contrast to Windows -- the Windows 2000 Upgrade is still in the $190 range 4 years later.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  52. Re:Why?! by archen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wheither XP is more expensive than OSX is up to debate because it varies depending upon the situation. XP home is around, what $99? If you want better conictivitiy, XP pro is $199. Next upgrade is due a long time from now. Most of the time people are expected to have antivirus on a Windows machine: that's $50+ each year. An upgrade in windows can actually require an upgrade in the hardware as well.

    Mac OSX costs $125. For a 5 computer licence it's $199. Upgrades happen once per year, but you are not REQUIRED neccesarily to get them. Each upgrade of OSX (thus far) has made speed improvments on the same hardware - if you're okay with the speed now, then an upgrade will only make things better. Of course the hardware is usually[1] more expensive as well.

    Which is actually cheaper? As I said, that depends.

    [1] An iBook often works out to be cheaper than an equivelant PC laptop.

  53. Re:Only DVD? by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't support GPU-accelerated Core Image. CI has a fallback path for hardware that doesn't support fragment programs, which almost certainly involves AltiVec.

    Things like Final Cut Pro can already do real-time image and video effects on the CPU, CI is just exposing it as a system library alongside all the traditional bitmap manipulation libraries.

  54. Re:Any Real advantage to Smart Folders? by evenparity · · Score: 3, Informative
    The whole duplication thing is kludge, which is why I don't like it. I use folders as a means of filtering information -- it is a cognitive lense. But duplicating a message is more of a physical act than a cognitive concept.

    Moreover, it just doesn't make sense to have duplicate information. What happens when I want to delete a message that has been cloned into several folders? Or maybe add or delete something from it? That's why the virtual folder idea is useful. I love having folders that say "Today's Mail", "Yesterday's Mail," and "This Week's Mail."

    When I switched my primary machine from XP to OSX, I loved OSX, except for not having a suitable email client. Exceptfor security problems, I loved using Outlook with the Nelson Email Organizer (NEO). NEO added virtual folders and really changed the way I worked. I could file things under "To Do" and also under "Project1", etc. Of course, the security problems with Outlook were impossible to ignore.

    Right now, I'm running Evolution at work on a Dell laptop, but it still seems pretty buggy and unpolished. Whenever I get around to getting X working on my Mac, though, I'll probably switch from Entourage. (The MailApp lacks calendaring and Entourage implements it poorly.)

  55. Re:Search, Indexing by Henriok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They do maintain indexes fot Spotlight serach and in file content search.

    It will drag the system somewhat since this file will be wquite large and there wll be frequent read/writes to it, but the OS seems to do this quite transparently and I havn't noticed any noticable drag. OSX does multitask quite good and my computer mainly sits idle anyway.

    Spotlight is an API that developeras can use istead of building theri own search tool. Old apps will not automagically benefit from Spotlight.

    Mor info on spotlight:
    http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/spot lighttech.ht ml

    --

    - Henrik

    - when the Shadows descend -
  56. System Requirements by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Informative

    It appears from this photo of the install screen that the current system requirements for Tiger are:

    G3, G4 or G5 processor
    a DVD Drive
    builtin Firewire
    128 MB Ram
    2 GB disk space

  57. Re:research & development by mbessey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft's research budget is nearly as large as Apple's annual income.

    No, really. For 2003, Apple's income was $6.2 billion. For the same year, Microsoft's R&D spending was $4.7 billion. That's almost exactly 10 times as much as Apple's R&D spending of $471 million

    -Mark

  58. Re:Been running it for about a week by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Umm.. what does the DC stand for in WWDC? Did you miss the guitar amp software demo which relies on low latency audio services provided by Core Audio? Did you miss the release of Core Image and Core Video which are built on tech from the soon to be released Motion? Those two knew Core services are really exciting to developers.

    Damn ungrateful end users always expecting flashy crap to get them excited. Why do you have a copy of the developer preview anyway? You don't sound like a developer to me.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  59. Re:research & development by Radon+Knight · · Score: 4, Insightful
    seems that apple can integrate better and faster new stuff that M$?

    Given that so much of OS X is built upon the NeXTStep code base, and that the NeXTStep code base was (from what I understand) amazingly well-designed from a software engineering point of view, and that Objective-C really is an incredibly powerful, easy to use object-oriented extension of C, I wonder of the rapid output of new stuff from Apple research is just proof of what can happen when you've got well-engineered software libraries with good RAD tools in the hands of extremely capable programmers.

    That's not intented to read like an Apple fanboy post (although it does). But it does seem that Microsoft "innovation" moves more slowly than Apple. And some of Microsoft's innovation just, well, sucks eggs. (MFC, anyone? Bob?)

  60. Other Ideas Borrowed from GMail by fupeg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the most interesting things in the articles:
    But lets not forget that Mail 2.0 is also 100% compliant with Apple's Spotlight search technology. Spotlight searches instantly search not only Mail headers, but the complete contents of Mail messages as well, displaying results to the user in a matter of seconds.
    This is one of the great strengths of GMail. Searching through thousands of mail messages is trivial and useful. Seems like a great addition to Mail. You get great email searching without the ads...
  61. Re:Can't Wait by payndz · · Score: 2, Informative
    The iMac - running OS8.6 - I'm typing this on is five years old, fairly stable (apart from an intermittent USB glitch reading the mouse, and the occasional Mozilla crash - far less frequent than when I used IE, though!) and hopefully still has a couple of years in it. Fingers crossed!

    My four-year-old iBook (9.2.2) is even more stable, reboots needed months apart rather than weeks or days.

    Macs are more cost-effective in the long term, partly because the hardware and OS don't need upgrading as frequently, and partly because you don't have spend half your time installing patches and fighting viruses and worms...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  62. Re:Why?! by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, on both counts. Quotes were taken from Dell and other PC companies as well as Apple. Apple quoted list price and still beat the other quotes. And 2 other Big Mac super computers have been ordered for other organisations since.

  63. Re:What is it with men and lesbians by wibs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time I get a new boyfriend, it won't take long before he's asking if I'd be willing to try a threesome with "some hot bi-girl he just met".

    And yet if some sheepish computer dork tried to ask you out, you'd call him a nice guy and say no way. If you go out with assholes, you get the asshole treatment. There's not a whole lot to figure out here.

    And no, I'm not posting this as some sheepish computer dork who's afraid of women. I'm posting this as someone who's tired of people complaining about their lot in life when they create the situations. It's not too hard to find a guy who at least pretends to care about you, ya know. If every guy you go out with has the same problem, perhaps it's time to start looking at other types of guys?

    --
    If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
  64. Re:Only DVD? by TheXRayStyle · · Score: 2, Informative
    True, but the original poster said he had a flatscreen iMac (screen-stick-blob). Was a non-DVD reading drive ever an option for that family?
    The very first original 15-inch ones shipped without a DVD reading drive.
  65. Re:This is why it is called a DEVELOPERS release.. by hkb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No shit, where in my post did I say it wasn't for developers? I actually got that it was a developer release from the name "Developer Preview" and "World-Wide Developer Conference", that it was presented at, pretty nifty eh?

    You'll note that my post is about Tiger questions people will probably ask and your reply has nothing to do with my post.

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  66. Re:Any Real advantage to Smart Folders? by Dwebb · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you receive an email from your bank regarding your recent registration to access your home mortgage online, which folder do you file it in? Home? Finances? Registrations? Smart Folders solve the problem. That email can appear in multiple folders at once.

    Aliases don't solve the problem because you have to decide which folder to store the original file in. If you delete a folder containing the alias, you're fine. But if you delete the folder containing the original, you're screwed.

    Use iPhoto keywords for a while, and you'll understand why smart folders are superior to traditional folders.

  67. Re:Looks interesting... by martinX · · Score: 2

    2005. some time.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  68. Re:still can't import bookmarks by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Run in a terminal:

    defaults write com.apple.Safari IncludeDebugMenu 1

    Then use hte debug menu to import them

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  69. Higher utility? by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My feeling is that it probably won't be too hard to integrate (I haven't looked at the API yet), but the main difference is that Spotlight is a feature that regular people will use and probably start to expect, whereas AppleScript was really only for a smaller group of "power users". Perceived utility is often a stronger factor for developers when selecting features than ease of implementation (unless they're wimps! ;)

    Also, for applications that just use files, Spotlight will still be able to find these documents based on filename and other metadata. For my personal use, I predict that I will use Spotlight all the time for searching files, contacts, e-mails, and maybe songs/photos (which will all be supported since I just use the Apple applications for these tasks), and so whether or not 3rd-party apps support it will not be a big factor to me.

    I don't know much about Automator, their new GUI-based batch system, but I'm guessing that it will be much more widely-used than AppleScript. You'd think there would be a way to write shims to let Automator talk to apps that have AppleScript bindings and leverage that capability for more users.