Slashdot Mirror


Unix To Beef Up Longhorn

An anonymous reader writes "VNUnet has a story about Longhorn having the ability to run unix or linux code via SFU." Microsoft's site has a lot more information about SFU itself. Regardless of ideological bent, it's an interesting piece o' technology.

58 of 723 comments (clear)

  1. Bender's Take by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting. No, wait...that other thing. Tedious.

  2. But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    does it run Linux ?

    Ohwait...

  3. STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody else first read that as STFU? Seems oddly appropriate somehow.

  4. Now I can write UNIX code... by mothz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Woohoo! Now I can write UNIX code to run on Windows! Then in twenty years or whenever Longhorn is released, they can change the standard, and I'll get to choose between compatibility with my UNIX code and UNIX, or Windows! This is great!

  5. uh.. by SpooForBrains · · Score: 5, Funny

    longhorn:~# cd / er, no, I mean, cd \ ... I mean ... ohsodit

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:uh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      you probably meant: rm -rf \

  6. Finally... by shackma2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, I can run my linux apps in a secure enviorment.

  7. SFU? by digidave · · Score: 5, Funny

    This Shut the Fuck Up technology sounds interesting. Can I use it on an airplane or bus when people around me too loud?

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:SFU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The next time a Microsoft salesman comes by our company, I'll say "I'm not interested in .NET. I'm more interested in SFU". :-)

    2. Re:SFU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      This Shut the Fuck Up technology sounds interesting. Can I use it on an airplane or bus when people around me too loud?
      So far you can only use it on the floor of the Senate. But depending on what happens in November, you may be able to use it everywhere!!
  8. Quick, someone all Apple... by pldms · · Score: 4, Funny

    "SFU is not shipped with Windows because SFU currently contains open-source software, such as the GNU C compiler, which cannot be distributed with commercial software."

    cue sound of one hand slapping forehead...

    --
    Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
    me a number based on the order in which I joined
  9. Aha! by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Any chance that Service Pack 1 for Longhorn (due to be released in early 2009) combines Microsoft's powerful FUD(tm) with this SFU into SFUD(tm)?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  10. SFU? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1, Funny

    stuff f**king up?

    oh, service for unix...

  11. Darl's take by spellraiser · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jackpot!

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Darl's take by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone wasn't paying attention at the meeting I gave on Microsoft's behalf.
      Someone in the crowd asked if it would support unix/linux code and I said STFU, not SFU.
      Big difference.

      Bill
      billg@microsoft.com

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  12. Obviously ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... they must have violated SCO's IP rights.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. Wow... by Ayaress · · Score: 5, Funny

    All the simplicity of Unix.
    All the stability of Windows.

    Didn't somebody at Microsoft think to reverse things? They'd be furthur ahead to try to fix what they have before adding what everybody else has.

    1. Re:Wow... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

      All the simplicity of Unix.
      All the stability of Windows


      Now that's reverse engineering!

  14. Re:Really? Does that now mean that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    its even better, the stability of Windows with the ease of Unix! finally i won't have to worry about my uptime anymore! no more hesitation about installing new hardware but killing my uptime.

  15. Wonderful by finkployd · · Score: 3, Funny

    In 4 years (or whenever, it is impossible to guess with them), Microsoft will have re-implemented Cygwin.

    Keep on innovatin' guys.

    Finkployd

  16. Wanna trade? by Nosf3ratu · · Score: 1, Funny

    With the recent stories of Winex's cedega, and that other little startup who claimed to magically have 100% windows interoperability, it sounds like we're trading software titles like baseball cards.

    Linux Community: "I'll give ya grep and less, for Photoshop."
    Microsoft: "Uhh...how about you throw in sendmail, and we give you notepad?"
    Linux Community: "WHAT?! No way, you give me Outlook, if you want sendmail!"
    Microsoft (chuckling, because they know Outlook is a shit deal): "Yeah, man! You got a deal!"

    --
    The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori
  17. Distributing GCC by WhyDoubt · · Score: 5, Funny

    > SFU is not shipped with Windows because SFU
    > currently contains open-source software, such as
    > the GNU C compiler, which cannot be distributed
    > with commercial software.

    Where's that clue-stick of mine? I feel the need to beat someone over the head with it.

  18. And in related news... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Carmax annouced that from now on 1000 watt Bose stereo/DVD systems and hand-sewn italian leather seats will be available in all used Ford Pintos.

  19. Re:S(T)FU by CdBee · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So, how did you compile KDE on Windows?"

    "SFU, noob!"

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  20. Re:Already getting slow, here's the (short) articl by finkployd · · Score: 4, Funny

    SFU is not shipped with Windows because SFU currently contains open-source software, such as the GNU C compiler, which cannot be distributed with commercial software.

    How does one become VUNet writer? Is there a rigorous screening process involved? Is any knowledge of them computer thingies required?

    Finkployd

  21. Re:Really? From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, because every single-mouse-button-pushing Flash animator is now an ELITE *NIX USER.

  22. Article summary. by khasim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some "analysists" say that something Microsoft might do sometime in the future might (or might not) hurt Linux deployments.

    Some people think SFU is really cool.

    Microsoft might upgrade SFU to 64bit sometime in the future.

    SFU lets you run *nix apps on Windows.

    There, now you don't have to wait for that page to load.

  23. Funny Joke!!! by justkarl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unix To Beef Up Longhorn

    I can't believe I didn't see it at first!
    BR Get it? Beef? Longhorn? Eh? Oh, forget it.

  24. Re:Longhorn and Unix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apple went to BSD. Novell is going to Linux. Windows...? It's the next generation. They just won't admit it. My bet's on GNU/HURD. No way they'll follow BSD & Novell

  25. all the goodness of UNIX... by k3v0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    with the price of windows....

  26. Spin yer wheels. by Stumbles · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would I want to run a Unix variant over Windows? That makes about as much sense as putting a Ferrrai engine in an unmodified VM bug.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  27. Re:heh... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    "first microsoft gives us bullcrap statistics about how "windows outpeforms linux" and now this? does anyone else find it comical?"

    No. This smells more of "make it easier to migrate if you're using *Nix" than "we'll work faster with their stuff". Comical is the use of the acronymn SFU for the services for Unix.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  28. Finally. by Mishkin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait for the first set of benchmarks from "UT2k4 for Linux for Windows"

  29. No, SnaFU. by Omega1045 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe this is short for SnaFU, "Situation normal all F@#ked Up", or "Situation F@#cked Up" for short.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:No, SnaFU. by grunt107 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, just a variation - "Simply F***ed Up"

  30. This will become the basis for... by rewt66 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... "studies" showing that Unix/Linux is slower than Windows.

  31. STFU? by John+Whorfin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else read "run unix or linux code via STFU."

    Now THAT would be interesting. Like your own Denis Leary in your computer.

  32. methinks by confused+one · · Score: 3, Funny
    I now understand why they liscensed unixware from SCO and then signed a cross liscensing agreement with Sun...

    What makes me laugh, though, is I can't help but think they're trying to build a *nix emulation layer for win32/winFX vis-a-vis Wine.

  33. In other acronyms.... by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    And you can tell they don't want to admit it because it's named Windows Services for UNIX. UNIX Services for Windows is more correct, but they want you to believe that Windows is empowering UNIX instead of the other way around.

    Why don't they just name it Functional Unix Distribution and get the whole acronym thing out in the open.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:In other acronyms.... by ShadeARG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Fugly UNIX Distribution anyway.

  34. Improved Acronym by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Funny

    If there are performance issues, and it represents a possible loss of face for Microsoft, wouldn't a better acronym be "Services Now Available For Unix"?

    That way, it could be Microsoft's SNAFU.

  35. Running Linux apps on Windows? by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    GREAT Now I can have the ease-of-use of Linux apps combined with the operational stability of Windows!!

    (Go ahead and mark me as a troll, but I was actually trying to be funny...)

    Do people really use SFU?? First of all, the name is deceptive. When I hear "Windows Services for Unix" I think "SaMBa." It's a Windows service and it's for Unix. This stuff runs under Windows! Shouldn't it be Unix services for Windows?

    Anyway, I'd be really interested to hear cases where people actually use this thing. To me it's easier and better to just load up another box with Linux to run Linux apps.

  36. Hmmm. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, finally, we'll be able to have a beowulf clus...

  37. Re:Really? From the article... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pish. You can't counter assumption with facts -- you'll set a deadly precedent.

    Instead, try anecdotes that don't prove anything other than how dorky your friends are.. That's the slashdot way.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  38. Re:No, actually, I'm not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You're right. And that matters because you're shipping over 12 million of them?

  39. How much do you want to bet... by curtis · · Score: 2, Funny

    That the developers at MS had originally called this "STFU"?

  40. This Is Good by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been developing some analysis software for the last few months. I'm nearly code-complete but have been vexed by several issues. In particular, I've been wondering how I can bring my software to systems that are routinely rootkitted by script kiddies. Thanks to SFU, I can finally deliver software with the Quality that Windows users Expect.

    1. Re:This Is Good by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even (especially?) the best programmers have a hard time meeting the demanding requirements of Windows Quality Assurance. I just can't bring myself to write bugs and security holes like that. ;)

  41. Re:Really? Does that now mean that.... by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would you want to run Linux apps on a less stable, less secure OS?

    Well haven't you heard? Open source software kills jobs. At least this way you can run OSS on an OS that keeps people employed, and Bill rich.

    Where do I sign up?

  42. Re:SCO code... by jmkaza · · Score: 3, Funny

    And there it is.
    1. Microsoft licenses Unix from SCO
    2. SCO revokes every other UNIX companies license
    3. MS adds a Unix emulation layer
    4. The whole world now has to license Windows to use their Unix systems
    5. Profit

  43. Billy the Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who's assimilating whom now?

  44. Universal Amiga emulator by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Funny
    That was done as early in 1996 with UAE, the Amiga emulator. Win-95 running UAE, running a PC emulator, running Win-95. It took two hours to boot up. The pull-quote from the Amazing Computing article was classic (from memory as best I can):
    After considering the philsophical implications of a PC emulating an Amiga emulating a PC, I decided that I need to get a life!
  45. Re:Really? From the article... by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

    enable PHBs to replace Unix servers with cheap Dell boxes running Windows admined by MCSEs.

    I'm not sure why this is preferable to cheap Dell boxes running Linux adminned by MCSEs, If they can't admin a unix service running on linux, they can't admin a unix service running on Windows either.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  46. Re:heh... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah. A plot. :-)

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  47. Re:Longhorn and Unix. by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple went to BSD.
    Novell is going to Linux.
    Windows...?


    The next generation of Windows will be based on UnixWare.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  48. MS diseases... by norminator · · Score: 0, Funny

    Now MS is "beefing" up "Longhorn"

    Now your PC can get Mad Cow disease!

  49. Re:Really? From the article... by Zordak · · Score: 3, Funny
    Obviously, there must be some reason they don't. Wonder why that could be....
    Well, obviously it's the monopolistic stranglehold Linux has on the computer industry. Just watch; if Linus Torvalds has his way, soon, you'll only be able to operate hardware and software that he has personally reviewed and approved.
    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  50. Re:Actually, you're completely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    "Learn To Count"

    We Unix users don't need to learn to count words - we have a program to do it for us.
    $ echo "Click on Terminal.app" | wc -w
    3
    I rest my case.