Slashdot Mirror


Behind The Coolest Gadgets - Linux or Windows?

An anonymous reader submits "Sister sites LinuxDevices and WindowsForDevices have kicked off what they're calling the Great Embedded Device Smack-Down, to see whether Linux or Windows Embedded powers the best and coolest devices. The Smackdown highlights more than 350 gadgets in nine categories, along with some entertaining "pre-game commentary" featuring the latest market share figures for the two OSes and a whacky clipart image of Stone Cold Bill Gates taking on The Tux."

25 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Popcorn by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My Linux popcorn maker maximizes the popped to unpopped kernel ratio. Far superior to my older Windows model.

    --

    --
    Are you a Chipotle Fan?
    1. Re:Popcorn by wackysootroom · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not Fair!!!

      The Linux version of the popcorn maker uses a much better kernel than the windows version.

    2. Re:Popcorn by fbrain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought the Windows kernel popped more ofter?

      --
      Avontech | Play dirty! They started it!
    3. Re:Popcorn by VistaBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the Linux popcorn maker put more kernels into a panic.

    4. Re:Popcorn by tyler_larson · · Score: 4, Funny
      The Linux version of the popcorn maker uses a much better kernel than the windows version.

      The Linux popper does infact use a much more solid kernel than the Windows version. Microsoft tried to harden their kernels by popping modified microkernels instead.

      Unfortunately, over time, the unpopped pieces tend to accumulate at the bottom of the Windows popper, substantially slowing the popping process, and periodically requiring the user to completely wipe the machine and start over fresh with a new batch.

      The Windows popper also seems to be highly susceptible to contamination by foreign elements, affecting output performance and popcorn quality. Microsoft, in response to this problem, simply stated that "well-behaved butter would not damage the popper". Unfortunately, there's a wide selection of low-grade butter available for the Windows popper; some of it actually targets the weaker aspects of the Microsoft kernels and can cause substantial damage to the popper and anything connected to it.

      The Linux popper is much better adapted for mission-critical kitchens, though the Windows popper is extremely popular in the home.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
    5. Re:Popcorn by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tried typing that into my popper, and it didn't work... What are you running, BTW? I'm on a pretty old setup, so let me guess- you're running the new version of the corn shell?

      HAHA. god. that hurts.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  2. At least by Hitch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it seems like this is all in good fun...
    it's nice to see good-natured rivalry based on merits rather than name-calling and finger pointing.

    --
    You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
    http://propheteer.org
    1. Re:At least by doofusclam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Definitely. Some folks round here could do with remembering this, rather than taking any Linux/MS remarks personally.

  3. Love our Cyclades console port servers by csoto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our old TS models are great, but the new ACS are even better. Darn easy to use, and rock solid.

    They run Linux, BTW...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  4. Choosy Robots Choose Linux by grunt107 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a recent study, 100% of all robots that reported chose Linux.

  5. Number of Devices by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The table of how many devices of which type run which OS seems to only list which OS devices ship with. Linux has been ported to many Windows devices, so you cna flash them to Linux. While windows should work with many of the linux devices, I think it isn't trivial to buy a license to put it on your device that shipped with Linux & to then flash it to run windows.

  6. Scary Future by robespierremax · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Microsoft wins the embedded device war, we can look forward to the following things:
    1) Self driving cars which when infested w/ the Sassar2030 worm will all drive us off a cliff
    2) All your personal information stored in a handheld device for your convience... and the convience of the 200+ Spyware programs that are automatically installed as you checkout at walmart
    3) We will finally reach Jupiter only to find out the computer is controlled by a very evil looking red eye "I'm sorry Dave, but you need to download security patches"

  7. How could they miss the HomePod? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MacSense makes the "iPod for the home", in the form of their HomePod. It doesn't run MacOS; it runs Linux and Java (J9).

    More info at GlooLabs.

  8. iPod? by mblase · · Score: 4, Informative

    The iPod's OS isn't MacOS. It isn't even made by Apple. They bought the OS and most of the hardware spec from PortalPlayer and then customized it to their liking.

  9. Linux or Windows on the best devices? by airjrdn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tivo runs Linux....nuff said.

  10. Re:Neither? by koi88 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not mac os, not linux, not windows.
    Apple bought the iPod's operating system from Pixo, a small company, that meanwhile has been acquired by Sun (try www.pixo.com).
    It seems to be a proprietary OS.
    Some information: http://www.fact-index.com/p/pi/pixo.html

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  11. One of the coolest gadgets: Tomtom GO by MrBoombasticfantasti · · Score: 4, Informative
    I recently got a Tomtom GO navigation system and it is absolutely awesome. Link may be a bit flash heavy.

    It runs Linux and it's miles better (pun intended) than the Windows CE counterpart Tomtom Navigator 3 which has occasional glitches.

    If only it could run *BSD... ;-)

    --
    !ERR: Signature not found.
  12. My fav by doombob · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite embedded device has always been the Windows CE gas station pumps. Because something like pumping gas, ordering Big Macs, and asking for directions all at the same time was just too vital a service for people not to utilize.

  13. Sharp Zaurus? by Spyro+VII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, I haven't read the article yet (and by the looks of things I won't be doing it either), but offhand the only thing that I have to say is that I've never seen a Pocket PC that can stack up to the Zaurus line of handhelds made by Sharp, on either the coolness factor or the gadget factor.

    It will be interesting seeing how they weighed the Pocket PC PDAs against the Linux ones, and how the fact that a number of iPaqs can be ran with either PPC or some kind of Linux.

    1. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by TrevorDoom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As I've owned a Zaurus 5500, Tungsten T3, and currently own a HP iPAQ 4155, I definately have to give the "coolness," "gadget," and "power" to the iPAQ hands down.

      User replaceable battery (one of the issues with the Tungsten), 400 MHz XScale processor (whole lot more powerful than the 5500), integrated Bluetooth (more than the Zaurus has) and WiFi (more than the T3 has) and with a couple of third-party apps to "fix" the annoying things about the Pocket PC operating system I'm most definately in love with this iPAQ...

      I'm sorry, the handwriting recognition on the Zaurus sucks (Decuma OnSpot for PocketPC, OTOH is able to decypher my hardly intelligable chicken-scratch) and my fingers are fat enough that trying to use the thumb keyboard is annoying at best. WiFi, while not essential in a PDA, is damn nice (access to the fileshares on the Windows network at work while doing things where a laptop isn't readily accessable but I'm in WiFi range is schweet) and gives me the ability to use Pocket Putty to ssh into my fileserver at home while sitting on the couch.

      The Zaurus has a cool "geek" factor, but really, I got tired of the shitty quality of the PIM apps and fighting with the device to try and get it to sync got old after about 3 weeks.

  14. Re:Mars Rovers by bsd4me · · Score: 3, Informative

    IIRC, Wind River had a picture on their homepage of one of the previous Mars projects with a blurb saying that it ran VxWorks

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  15. Well, looking at those numbers again.... by carlmenezes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looking at the direction mobile phones are moving, I think it's a pretty good possibility that the the PDA, handhelds and Audio/Video Devices of the future will essentially be mobiles phones with these features.

    Adding up the counts in those categories we have :

    Linux : 38+17+36 = 91
    Windows: 74+24+8 = 106

    If you add in the "other" category, you have :

    Linux : 91+38=134
    Windows:106+22=128

    Either way, it's really close, except for one thing - the future trend and the contributions made back to the OSS community as a result of the devices that use Linux.

    The thing is, as more of these devices are released, more code and/or documentation and bugfixes will be released by companies back to the OSS community because they will be using many OSS tools in the development of these products, improving them if necessary in the process and finally releasing some of the improvements to the OSS community.

    This will make it easier for more companies to re-use OSS tools and software and we have a potential cascade effect that could create a very wide development base for embedded Linux devices.

    On the windows side, the situation is not the same - companies usually don't release their any portion of their code into a "public pool" for use by the community.

    This essentially means, that while the numbers are an even split now, it looks like the Linux numbers will grow faster than the Windows numbers.

    Now, also remember that with the devices comes whatever the devices are connected to - namely PCs, Macs and the like. Therefore, at the very minimum, this could lead to a much better awareness of the Linux OS. What follows awareness is usually curiosity - and since Linux is a quality product, curiosity can only be a good thing.

    Therefore, I'd just say that although the numbers are an even split now, they actually represent the success of Linux in the embedded devices market and given time, this will seep into the desktop and that will be a good thing. Competition always is.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  16. Be there! SUNDAY! by jav1231 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've rounded up 150 of the COOLEST Linux devices from all over the far east! (And...uh..the 1 or 2 available in the U.S.)

  17. Not to be a nitpicker or anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But if a windows worm causes my car to kill me, I want it to be MyDoom. No offense, but if I'm going to die a horrible screaming death, I think it should at least be ironic.

  18. Re:Nope. by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
    Considering Compaq does support iPaqs with Linux (send a borked install to their Research Lab, and it comes back with Linux), I'd say that it's at least semi-official that Linux runs on iPaqs even if it's not a shipping option. Compaq even hosts handhelds.org and has paid engineers to work on the distros for the iPaq.

    Iffy, sure, but not unreasonable to include iPaqs under both categories as a 'Windows' and 'Linux' device.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien