Slashdot Mirror


Sun Rays For Linux

Tarantolato writes "According to an eweek story Sun Microsystems will be debuting a Linux port of their Sun Ray Server at Linux World this week. This would allow Sun Ray thin clients to be run off of a SuSE or Red Hat box, where you previously needed a Solaris-SPARC setup to do that."

131 comments

  1. 503 Errors Out the Wazoo Today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What the hell's going on with /. ? 503 errors are not surprise here, but it's impossible for me to load of /. while I'm logged in. Anyone else?

    1. Re:503 Errors Out the Wazoo Today! by gtoomey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I've started getting them all the time with slashdot here in Australia

  2. Not yet Available it seems by hypermike · · Score: 5, Informative
    SunRay for Linux will not immediately be shipped for Sun's own Java Desktop System, as a server version of JDS has not yet been completed. However, Baer says that users will be able to configure JDS to work with SunRay, and that a full SunRay-ready version of JDS is in the works.

    Wonder how long until thats available? Thats probable what most of the crowd here would use.

    --
    1. Re:Not yet Available it seems by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 1
      ...as a server version of JDS has not yet been completed.

      Not too surprising, because JDS is intended for the desktop, and Sun already has a server OS...

      --
      Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
    2. Re:Not yet Available it seems by zakalwe · · Score: 1

      Thats probable what most of the crowd here would use.

      Is it? Why would anybody use JDS when you have Debian (disclaimer: other dists are available)?

      SunRay (at least the no-monitor version) is a super sweet piece of kit, it was my work desktop for a year and I loved it. Up until now it has just been a shame that you have to have Solaris installed to run it.

      SunRay on Debian, yay! \o/

  3. In Related News.... by njcoder · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Sun has also anounced their Soft Ray thin client solutions as well. This allows users to turn their laptop or desktop into a thinray client without buying a Sun Ray NC.

    If you've looked into Sun's Sun Ray Technology it's pretty neat. It offers a lot of features that similar windows technology does not.

    1. Re:In Related News.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Sun has also anounced their Soft Ray thin client solutions as well.

      Uh, that's a labs project, it isn't slated to become a product.

    2. Re:In Related News.... by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      Sun announces that some large Aerospace company, after replacing 10,000 of its Solaris seats with Liunx, will then replace those back with 10,000 Sun Ray machines.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    3. Re:In Related News.... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      If you've looked into Sun's Sun Ray Technology it's pretty neat. It offers a lot of features that similar windows technology does not.

      Out of curiosity, what ?

    4. Re:In Related News.... by njcoder · · Score: 1

      One of the nice things is hot desking. In a demo, I've seen someone pull a smart card out of one sun ray, stick it in another and his desktop was just how he left it. The sun ray clients also don't need much configuration, unlike other solutions that need windows cd to be installed and configured. There some claims in the real world of one administrator to around 1,000 users.

    5. Re:In Related News.... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      One of the nice things is hot desking. In a demo, I've seen someone pull a smart card out of one sun ray, stick it in another and his desktop was just how he left it.

      Terminal Services does this (well, I'm assuming the RDP client can use smart cards - but it certainly maintains the desktop across sessions).

      The sun ray clients also don't need much configuration, unlike other solutions that need windows cd to be installed and configured.

      Well, this is more a matter of what you're doing. If the client is going to be dedicated only to using TS, the only "setup" needed is to run the RDP client on login. I imagine those standalone RDP terminals don't need much setup either.

  4. ... and Sun's potential acquisition of Novell by otisg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is VERY interesting, considering there are rumours about Sun thinking about buying Novell (which recently bought SuSe). Time to hit trading accounts! :)

    --
    Simpy
    1. Re:... and Sun's potential acquisition of Novell by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to this Ars Technica column, Sun's CEO was just playing the media.

    2. Re:... and Sun's potential acquisition of Novell by bayerwerke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sun also considered the purchase of the moon, the second law of thermodynamics, and Walt Disney's frozen head during the same meeting. However it was decided the media would none respond as favorably if such suggestions were made.

    3. Re:... and Sun's potential acquisition of Novell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux keeps getting stronger and stronger. Finally Microsoft is getting a little competition. At least overseas, MS has had to offer deep discounts to hold on to their eroding customer base. Many former Microsoft customers are turning to Linux so that they can increase reliability and save money at the same time.

    4. Re:... and Sun's potential acquisition of Novell by killjoe · · Score: 0

      Sun is thinking about buying novell because they think novell owns linux. They have followed the SCO case and novell is asserting rights to the sysV codebase and apparently this has them pretty confused.

      They are probably thinking they can buy novell, get ownership of sysV, sue IBM. Chances are pretty strong that this is what that deal with MS was all about. MS is going to use Sun as their next puppet to attack linux with.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  5. How soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do they expect integration with NDS???

  6. So what is it? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    The links aren't very technical. Is it an X server?

    1. Re:So what is it? by tonyr60 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it is not an X server. It has no real intelligence and is little more than a framebuffer, keyboard, mouse and smart card slot connected to a network interface.

    2. Re:So what is it? by 0racle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sun Ray is a Terminal Server/Thin Client thing. In addition to providing the thin client, they handle several authentication methods such as smart cards, and session management so you can detach from one thin client, authenticate on another, and resume your session as you left it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:So what is it? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to a VNC client. What existing Linux applications would support it?

    4. Re:So what is it? by jekewa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, basically.

      The SunRay appliance is a thin client that basically runs an X "client" allowing connection to remote servers. The SunRay server software (currently only available for Sparc, but as the article portends, will be ported to LINUX) provides the SunRay appliances with the information to get going (a list of login servers, for example). The appliance basically connects to a Sun server's X.

      The SunRay appliance hardware is pretty small, and individually unimpressive--which makes it kind of impressive. The SunRay appliance boots entirely from flash, so they're quiet and light. The small processors make them generate little heat, as well.

      They behave similar to something like PXES or the myriad of other thin client solutions. That software turns your system into a remote workstation for any xdm server. That works on any Intel system (maybe there are ports?_ from floppy, USB, flash, TFTP...

      An interesting thing is, if you have a LINUX box running xdm, you can use the SunRay appliance as a remote thin client for that server. You still need a SunRay server to get the appliance to behave on the network first, though.

      --
      End the FUD
    5. Re:So what is it? by tonyr60 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it is not like a VNC client, I should have been clearer in my earlier comment. There is no processing in the terminal, it is effectively all hardware.

    6. Re:So what is it? by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Interesting


      They also handle audio and video. It's pretty neat (but not necessarily all that useful) to watch a movie on a SunRay, detach, log into another and see and hear the movie still playing.

    7. Re:So what is it? by Kenja · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Sounds similar to a VNC client."

      No, is closer to what Microsoft did with RDP

      "What existing Linux applications would support it?"

      Um, all of them?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:So what is it? by Jahf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not true ... the appliance is not an X client at all.

      SunRay server software keeps framebuffers for multiple X sessions on the server. Those sessions are sent over the network via a completely different protocol from X. Very similar in high-level concept to VNC.

      This allows some neat things, the neatest of which you also don't mention :) The SunRay terminals have smart card interfaces.

      To put in practical perspective (I almost skipped my Disclaimer: I work for Sun here since it should be painfully obvious), my employee ID badge is a smartcard that I can use for entrance to the building. When I get to my terminal I can plug that smartcard in before I log in. If I want to walk away, I pull my card and my session stays open on the server, but not on the terminal. I can walk to any other terminal in the building, plug it in, and my session pops onto the terminal. I can leave things running in the session, since it never dies. I don't -have- to use my smartcard. I can log in without it, but I lose portability for that session.

      It is quite cool.

      Now of course the OS needs support for smartcard stuff, so the easiest way -today- is to use Solaris SPARC, but put the smartcard framework on Linux and use the Linux SunRay Server software and voila, portable network Linux sessions (as you mentioned, but pointing out the portability).

      Additionally, the SunRay terminals have USB connectors and audio. With proper support (it's being worked on) these will really enhance things.

      There are other neat things that I really wanna talk about, but can't ... they know my ID here ;)

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    9. Re:So what is it? by Sesse · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The most impressive part of the Sunrays is definitely that they don't feel like thin clients. Things zap around like as if you were on a local computer -- in contrast, a terminal server running Windows feels extremely sluggish, even with a powerful server and dedicated thin clients (which is basically what you have with the Sunrays :-) ).

      /* Steinar */

      --
      (This comment is of course GPLed.)
    10. Re:So what is it? by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, RDP, VNC, and SunRays *are* the same thing. Their client sides are all networked framebuffers, they just use different protocols to get the bits from the server to the client. In addition, some of them try to optimize things by adding compression, caching, and higher level drawing operations. Then, some of them add authentication features like the SunRay smartcards.

      To put it in terms of X, in a thin-client system, both the X clients and the X server are on the server side (thus the name). However, the X server doesn't draw pixels on a locally installed video card, but on the remote thin client. In fact, both Sunray and VNC use a modified X server to do this.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    11. Re:So what is it? by spinozaq · · Score: 5, Informative

      I actually did an undergrad project reverse engineering these little things. Now, (not then) there are a few web sites online that have info on how they operate. Like someone said, very similar to VNC, The protocol is actually called THIN. There is a short paper from Sun on the protocol. It mentions how they ran quake 2 on it. There are a few extra auth tricks as well. For instance, after it gets a DHCP lease it expects to keep a TCP connection open to the server forever more, and do nothing with it by keep alives. Everything else is UDP packets. We had nearly 100 of these running off a single 8 way V880 server using a gigabit switch to feed dedicated 100t lines to each ray.
      My goal was to write a server in Java that could at least auth and issue a few commands, draw a rectangle, draw an image. They actually send images and image change data in ascii pixel maps. I was impressed.
      The coolest feature for college anyway was the smartcards. They could store your session key and you could go to any other ray and use the card to bring back the screen right where you left off.

    12. Re:So what is it? by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The idea of Sun Rays is to save sysadmin's the hassle of fighting viruses/trojans/spamware/malware by constantly having to clean hard disk drives. The thin client has no hard disk drive; everything is downloaded off the network. It's like an X-server which can handle audio, video and 3D graphics. Access is gained by using ID cards.

      Corporate customers were complaining about the cost of maintaining PC networks. Sun saw there was demand for low-cost multimedia terminals (companies still wanted to their staff to be able to view training videos) which would have access to a centralised server.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    13. Re:So what is it? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The most impressive part of the Sunrays is definitely that they don't feel like thin clients. Things zap around like as if you were on a local computer -- in contrast, a terminal server running Windows feels extremely sluggish, even with a powerful server and dedicated thin clients [...]

      Your TS or your local client is severely misconfigured. I'm usually RDPed into several machines during the day and they feel no less responsive than a local display.

    14. Re:So what is it? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      The most impressive part of the Sunrays is definitely that they don't feel like thin clients. Things zap around like as if you were on a local computer

      Yeah, but you need a dedicated 100Mbps switched network for your SunRays.

      Other protocols may fair better under similar configurations.

      Don't get me wrong, they're Frosted Flakes great, but it's not for free.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:So what is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "fare," not "fair."

    16. Re:So what is it? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Unless I am confused, VNC does not and never did base itself off of an X server. Yes - there is an X11 to--to VNC server, but thats about it. All the other servers (for other platforms) hook into whatever windowing system used.

      Nowadays when people say VNC, they instantly think to one of the software flavors implementing the RFB protocol. Originally AT&T made the whole cute thing for... you guessed it.... thin clients with the whole protocol processed in hardware.

    17. Re:So what is it? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      There are other neat things that I really wanna talk about, but can't ... they know my ID here ;)

      Ha! I know what you're talking about. I stopped going to the SunLabs Open Houses 'cause it filled my head with things that I cannot talk about.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    18. Re:So what is it? by bolind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The most impressive part of the Sunrays is definitely that they don't feel like thin clients. Things zap around like as if you were on a local computer

      You have obviously never been to the Technical University of Denmark, or the CS Department of Copenhagen University.

      Those places, especially DTU, almost soil them selves from the sheer joy of deploying hundreds of SunRay thin clients. Problem is, people want their browser, their java apps, their animated gifs and (shudder) their Xitrix Windows sessions.

      End result is a very thin client like experience. When I matriculated in 2000, we had a large, bad Sun server (24CPU/24Gig IIRC). This has now been demoted to lowly X-server, and it still runs slow as mollasses.

      I think SunRay is a kickass technology, I would love to have one on my desk, quiet, cold, connected to a powerful Linux server in the basement. And I would love to see them in action where there was sufficient power for a good user experience.

      I totally understand the Universities that deploy them. A three man team and a bunch of cable plugging monkeys can administrate a four digit seat deployment. But the fact of the matter is that users, in my experience, tend to find other alternatives (the Windows Lab, bring their own laptops.), because the responsiveness is so low.

      Well, I'm ranting, and it's pre-coffee, so it's probably coming out a little more bitter than it should. This news about SunRays being able to run off linux is good news in my world, as this will allow administrators to buy very powerful commodity hardware at a fraction of the price of Sun iron.

    19. Re:So what is it? by Albanach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well one question - what about folk that want to work from home? Roadwarrior and executive types with a laptop who might work fro home in the evening or at the weekend? Does this work over DSL or is that way to slow? Is there any way for an exec to sync their files to a laptop when leaving the building and resync when getting back in the morning?

    20. Re:So what is it? by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "They actually send images and image change data in ascii pixel maps. I was impressed."?

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
    21. Re:So what is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since this is a framebuffer only... No, there is no way to sync your files to a laptop. That would have to be done with a normal laptop and normal sync software.

    22. Re:So what is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "connected to a powerful Linux server in the basement."

      The performance benefits of Linux are actually those
      of X86.

      "his will allow administrators to buy very powerful commodity hardware at a fraction of the price of Sun iron."
      Sun does commodity (i.e. X86) hardware and does it
      cheaper than Dell in most cases.

    23. Re:So what is it? by dunstan · · Score: 1

      Like this?

      Dunstan

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    24. Re:So what is it? by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Right, the VNC protocol has nothing to do with X. I should say, the default Linux VNC *implementation* is based on an X server.

      As I recall AT&T was trying to create devices which combined the various technologies found in an average office-- a computer, a phone, video conferencing, etc.; hence, "Virtual Network Computing." Their device was a hardware VNC client (though I doubt it was really hardware; even the SunRay boxes are software based) connecting to some beefy centralized server. In the end the protocol took off since it was so simple and portable.

      AT&T Cambridge really did some interesting things over the years. Their later pervasive computing research is quite cool.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    25. Re:So what is it? by Sesse · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've tested a lot (well, at least several) of different RDP solutions, from multiple different clients (both rdesktop, Microsoft's own Remote Desktop Client and dedicated RDP thin clients) to multiple different servers (both Windows XP machines and dedicated Win2000/Win2003 terminal servers), and most of these are just painful to work with, even when I'm virtually alone on the server. (The machines are also mostly administrated by different people, so if there is a severe misconfiguration it must obviously be very easy to make. :-) )

      I must admit the Sunrays I've used are rarely ever really loaded, though -- I guess any solution becomes slow under too heavy load. :-)

      /* Steinar */

      --
      (This comment is of course GPLed.)
    26. Re:So what is it? by harikiri · · Score: 1

      Thin-client computing harkens back to ye olden days when the computer administrators were able to actually administer the system. These days, everyone has a system on their desktop that could double as a server, and ends up running so much malware/spyware/etc that they become hobbling pieces of crud that bog down their networks.

      I would prefer a thin-client solution at my office for a few reasons. 1) Noise, 2) heat, 3) I might actually have a decent response system. The main issue that I have to face however, is that my apps are all pretty much tied to Windows. Which would mean that my company would have to negotiate some nasty citrix or remote desktop solution which would be rather expensive.

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    27. Re:So what is it? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Just think of the SunRay as "VNC in an embedded box", only the server-software connects it to X, and it has support for USB, audio, and video capture (albeit only supported by SunForum, as far as I know) Oh, and it works a lot better than VNC too. It isn't quirky, and it isn't sluggish.

    28. Re:So what is it? by vranash · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened with that project? I dug around all over the internet looking for something similiar since I picked one up, and I'll be damned if I could find anything that would even initialize the darn thing, much less draw to the screen.

    29. Re:So what is it? by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      I do this with vnc 4.0. All you have to do is edit the gdm.conf file for the Gnome Login Manager and replace X with Xvnc. Also set up a few gdm instances so that you can have multiple users logged into the same box. I put my desktop on :0 and my wife's desktop on :1. You can disable vnc's authentication so that you don't get a double password prompt (one from VNC and one from GDM). I set the screensaver to lock the desktop after 15 minutes of inactivity. So when I reconnect, my apps are right where I left them and I can connect from any machine in the house no matter what OS it's running.

      I've been running like this since November. It's been wonderful. Even sweeter is that with ssh as a tunnel for vnc, I can access my desktop from anywhere on the net without needing to open ports on my firewall for VNC. Now, if only I could find an easy way to reconfigure the ESPEAKER variable at the click of a button to use the esd running on the machine I am connected from, I'd be all set. As it is, I just manually set the variable and start up ESD on my local workstation. Of course this means I have to run all esd aware apps from CLI which sucks... Anyone else have any suggestions for sound servers that allow you to just point and click or even better that work with VNC? There's one project I looked at but it's as good as dead right now.

    30. Re:So what is it? by Jahf · · Score: 1

      SunRay appliance firmware 2.0 is too slow to utilize over most broadband links. But firmware gets upgraded. And that's all I have to say about that.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    31. Re:So what is it? by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      It's like Citrix but for Unix/Linux. Cool. We use Citrix on some Windows 2000 servers here at work, and feed about 50% of our 250 users off of them. Works pretty well.

      Wonder if I could get the bosses to switch 'em over to Sun Ray....

    32. Re:So what is it? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Funny, I've tested a lot (well, at least several) of different RDP solutions, from multiple different clients (both rdesktop, Microsoft's own Remote Desktop Client and dedicated RDP thin clients) to multiple different servers (both Windows XP machines and dedicated Win2000/Win2003 terminal servers), and most of these are just painful to work with, even when I'm virtually alone on the server. (The machines are also mostly administrated by different people, so if there is a severe misconfiguration it must obviously be very easy to make. :-) )

      Well, I can only assume we have different ideas of "painful to work with". I leave on of my screens permanently logged into our main TS and use that TS session to access Outlook, Word and various other SOE apps all the time and never find it lacking in performance. I run in 16 bit colour, but I do turn off some of the flashier things like menu animations (the menu animations make a big difference) - although I leave full window dragging and resizing on. This is over a 100Mb network, but I've also spent days at a time on remote sites using it over 64k ISDN and even 56k modems with little complaint (although I do turn the colour depth down to 8 bit and turn off _all_ the graphical effects in these cases).

      The TS isn't particularly flash - a Dell PE650 with a 2.6Ghz P4, 1GB RAM and IDE RAID1. There's ~15 users on it constantly and it currently peaks around the 20 - 25 user mark (we're in the process of migrating all of our regional branches to TS). CPU usage typicall hovers around 25%, so I figure with another gig or two of RAM we should be able to get ~50 users on without too much worry.

      I must confess I've never used a SunRay, but certainly IME Terminal Services and RDP clients are pretty much as fast as a local machine (it's certainly more responsive than my brand new 12" iBook) and quite usable even over slow lines like a 56k modem (how well do Sunrays work over slow links ?).

  7. Obligitory: by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can it run Slashdot?

    1. Re:Obligitory: by tonyr60 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only if it can render 503 errors!

    2. Re:Obligitory: by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it's some sort of failed attempt at bandwidth limiting...

      I can load the main page, but if I try to reload or go to any of the toplevel section pages, it 503s on me, but I can follow any of the links to stories, it works just fine.

      That doesn't make it suck any less, however.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:Obligitory: by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      It's pretty bad when slashdot gets slashdotted.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  8. Assault and Battery Lawsuit Pending? by Tony+Freakin+Twist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Against whomever smacked Sun with the ClueStick(tm)

  9. Re:License? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't look very hard. I managed to download the upgrade for free from Sun's website. Took me about 20 minutes to find
    it but it is there and free.

  10. Re:License? by Kenja · · Score: 1, Troll
    "You didn't look very hard. I managed to download the upgrade for free from Sun's website. Took me about 20 minutes to find it but it is there and free."

    So it is, wonder when they put that there. For what its worth, it only takes about 5 seconds if you type "SunRay Server Software" into Google. Guess I have no reason not to get my CompactPCI Ultrasparc server running then.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  11. Thank God! by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    I bought two Sun Ray terminals on eBay, thinking they were standard X terminals.

    Now I can actually make use of them.

    I hope.

  12. Revenue for sun by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Well this is interesting. Sun needs to do something pretty drastic to keep their market share and keep the revenue coming in.

    At the moment at the large educational/research facility where I work, all our Solaris Sparc boxes are going the way of the dodo (so long Sun). FreeBSD (and not Linux) is slated to be the replacement.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  13. Sun has some great ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has always been the execution that is lacking.

  14. This is GREAT news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kudos Sun!

    I for one am extremely happy if this goes through as planned. Hopefully, Sun will not charge for the server software and only cash in on Sunray sales.

    In a not so distant past, we fell on the following website of a university student's project to reverse engineer the sunray protocol. Our only hope (out of expensive SPARC gear) was that this guy's project would work out in the end. I guess this won't be needed anymore, at least not with the perspective of simply running the thing of a lintel box.

    Our environment at work is composed exclusively of Sunrays, approximately 25 of them to be accurate. When we close in the 20 concurrent user, it gets pretty bogged down, especially with our venerable quad cpu E450.

    Shelling out money for a better Sparc-Sunray-driving-server was not desired, mainly because of the price (a 4-way V880 costs 10-20 times the price of a quad opteron, and doesn't perform nearly as well). In other words, were stuck with the current setup. The least we could do was to run Mozilla and related apps of a separate Linux X86 box and X11 forward everything. Still, driving the graphical environment for 20 users tends to bring the machine to a crawl once in a while.

    For those who will ask, connecting through XDMCP on a Linux box to drive the environment was even worse: those little XSun processes would eat up to a single CPU under heavy usage of the desktop, and it would feel pretty slugish. Understandable, since the screen refreshes would go LinuxBox -> Sunray server -> Sunray (one hop too many).

    Enough said: I am thrilled with this piece of news. Sun has made my day (and I haven't said that in a LONG while). Running Sunray enterprise software on a quad x86 box is a dream come true.

    1. Re:This is GREAT news! by amalcon · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, Sun will not charge for the server software and only cash in on Sunray sales.

      As making money off the hardware has always been SUN's business model, this is a very strong possibility.

      --
      -Amalcon
    2. Re:This is GREAT news! by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Just out of interest, why didn't you consider using a low cost box like a V240 or V440? A quad V440 can be less than 20K.

      I agree though that it will be nice to see Sun Ray available for Linux. It'll make the entry costs lower, particularly if all you're using the Sun Ray server for is to manage the Sun Ray network and displays, with all apps being run on Windows app servers, a fairly typical deployment for most businesses.

      For users who are happy with a Solaris/Linux desktop it's also good news. You can make Solaris look nice with a lot of fiddling, but a Linux desktop will just look nice 'out of the box', which is a great deal easier to support.

    3. Re:This is GREAT news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > a 4-way V880 costs 10-20 times the price of a quad opteron

      Point me at those $2200 - $4500 quad opteron boxes please, I want one! (4 CPU V880 has $44,995 list price, though admittedly no one ever pays list on Suns.)

    4. Re:This is GREAT news! by JacobKreutzfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't get the appeal. I've used 'em, and I like the zero-admin aspect of thin clients. But I've been doing the same with diskless X Terminals for 10 years, and lately, diskless net-booting FreeBSD boxes. Like the SunRay, something like a diskless VIA EPIA is silent and zero-admin: it just works, has access to all the stuff on the boot/NFS server. Any such machine in the house has access to the same stuff, like the SunRay does.

      Oh, I don't have a "smartcard" to store my stuff on like the SunRays do. Guess I'll have to use that USB memory stick that someone gave me for free instead.

      What's the attraction? On a diskess box, the box itself does much of the work, so the boot/NFS server just has to worry about serving files. The SunRay server, from the PR and people here, can't handle many clients cuz the server is doing ALL the work. Doesn't scale.

      So why is Sun's porting SunRay server SW to Linux better than just booting a cheap box from a Linux or *BSD? It's still proprietary, and IMHO the architecture doesn't scale. And you still have to buy non-commodity SunRays.

    5. Re:This is GREAT news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      From an administration perspective, they're interchangable parts. If you have a sunray die, you drop another one in place, punch in the smartcard (which has no storage, btw) and you have your old session back with no lost data. Not so if an old diskless X terminal keels over. The software also handles load balancing for the session servers (and may handle failover with Sun Cluster, not sure about that.)

      The smartcard is just a cryptographic session token so that the server can uniquely identify a user, not a workstation. Each workstation has the equivalent of a smartcard built in, but that requires two commands by the administrator to relocate a session to a different token. All storage is on the server.

      General desktop use isn't an ideal purpose for these -- it's gotten a lot better with Sun Ray Server Software 2.0 (SRSS), and from talking to a person at Sun, 3.0 will use quite a bit less bandwidth. What this is ideal for is where you have a limited set of applications and the employees are close to interchangable parts. Think a call center, or data entry, not an engineer.

  15. ltsp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been using www.ltsp.org stuff for awhile now. You can use commodity pcs (and parts) or get their 150's, jammin's or what not to get going.

    I don't know much about the Sun Rays, but I do know of one feature that the Sun Rays have that I think is pretty cool... the ability to "save" your desktop "as-is" and continue your session on any other thin client, without doing much. (i.e., logging out) I think there was someone messing with Fedora Core 3 (testing 1?) and vnc to do something similar.

    There are about 40 workstations in the retail lumber business that have them in place now.

  16. the story is -1: irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sunrays are not well received in the market. They are expensive, and the portability of the virtual desktop is nifty but not as nifty as actual portability of a powerbook or windows laptop.

    1. Re:the story is -1: irrelevant by WebCrapper · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you actually look at pricing between the Sun Ray's vs someone like Dell, with required software like Antivirus and Ghost (for a larger networking environment) and add them all together, you'll see that you're wrong. Don't believe me? Price 40 machines at the small to mid level business pricing bracket at Dell, Gateway, Compaq/HP, IBM, etc with Enterprise licenses of Ghost and Antivirus and you'll find that you actually save money by buying the Sun Building blocks.

      As for portability - sun also has a laptop version of these things with wireless capability. Oh yea, they have batteries that actually last 6-8 hours compared to your normal laptops...

      Just another AC thats shooting their mouth off on something they know nothing about...

    2. Re:the story is -1: irrelevant by daBass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Add the cost of support and you save even more. I once did a cost analysis for a fictional 1000 desktop enterprise. The outcome was basicaly that because of the lower wage and benfit costs for desktop support personel, the _entire_ hardware/software license cost (including some massive Sun servers) was recouped in ONE year. The next three years of the write off, we are talking a couple of million saved each year.

      Now tell me if they are really that expensive. I think not. If a Linux server version does come out and works properly, I might be very tempted to scatter a couple of these around the house.

    3. Re:the story is -1: irrelevant by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the support on the client-end for the hardware should be practically nothing. Heck, the user could replace a broken unit. You just plug a new one in. No configuration whatsoever on the client-end.

    4. Re:the story is -1: irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and nobody mentioned the 5 year guarantee of Sun Ray 1s. If anything goes wrong with them, Sun exchanges it for free...

    5. Re:the story is -1: irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just another AC thats shooting their mouth off on something they know nothing about

      1. Sunrays are not well received in the marketplace. Anonymous or not, there is no argument there. Rather than pretend that the marketplace is full of idiots who just need to see the light, sun should think about WHY sunrays are a failure and what they could do differently with other products to prevent future failures of this magnitude. That is the kind of thing I say when I want to shoot my mouth off.

      2. Sunrays and tadpoles, regardless of how niftyness, are mutually exclusive. You can't use one with the other, so you have yourself a red herring there.

      3. Sun is having their lunch eaten by linux, not by a bunch of dell/gateway/antivirus crap. Sunrays are expensive compared to linux on a 1999 era pentium telnetted to a server with the DISPLAY variable set. These are way cheaper and fairly simple to administer but no one wants them either.

      Next time you see this anonymous coward, we'll be having a little chat about Java.

  17. Completely silent by AmicoToni · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is another scarcely mentioned, but equally great feature of the Sunray stations: they have no fans!!
    If you think that is no big deal, enter your standard computer lab again and pay attention to all the noise... I have worked in a large institution where the whole building was Sunray-based. A completely silent computing environment. You can actually hear the birds chirping outside. You have no idea what it feels like until you've tried it!!

    1. Re:Completely silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but are the monitors noisy? Seriously, I have sensitive hearing, and a lot of the bigger monitors can drive me crackers.

    2. Re:Completely silent by Sesse · · Score: 1

      You can AFAIK connect any monitor you'd like to them -- the newer Sun Rays even have DVI output.

      /* Steinar */

      --
      (This comment is of course GPLed.)
  18. Opening Solaris? by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    We have read about the possible opening of the Solaris operating system. Opening up some of the technology involved is a nice step but falls short in my eyes. I think that sun should come out with a new open version of Solaris that is fully compatible with the current version but integrates some flavor of BSD. (I am personally favorable to UNIX) Just a thought...

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
    1. Re:Opening Solaris? by multipartmixed · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I think that sun should come out with a new open version of Solaris that is fully
      > compatible with the current version but integrates some flavor of BSD.

      How would that be more beneficial than simply opening up the current sources? What parts of BSD would you include? Certainly, you don't mean the kernel, because you want full Solaris compatibility.

      Oh, wait, you must be one of *those*.

      Here's how to transform your Solaris box into a BSD box:

      1. Install gcc and gnu make packages from sunfreeware.com
      2. usermod -s /bin/csh cow007
      3. Add this to your .cshrc: "setenv PATH=/usr/ucb:$PATH"
      4. Add this to all Makefiles: LOADLIBES += -lbsdmalloc -lucb

      That oughta do it.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Opening Solaris? by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      I think that sun should come out with a new open version of Solaris that is fully compatible with the current version but integrates some flavor of BSD.

      Solaris does integrate some flavour of BSD - SunOS. The predecessor to Solaris was BSD based, as Suns founders were ex-Berkeley people who had worked on Unix. When Sun bought a license for SVR4 from USL (or it may have still been AT&T at the time), they integrated much of the extra bits that their BSD version of Unix had.

      Now if they open sourced it, that would be great, but I guess that really depends on the fine detail of their SVR4 license.

  19. I'm using a Sun Ray right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work everyday on a Sun ray. I'm running KDE 3.2.2 on a Solaris Ultra Sparc III. It certainly does not feel like being at a local machine, but it's not far off. We're on a gigabit network here. Sometimes if somebody is bogging down the network, it becomes unusable, but that's pretty rare.

    Overall, I think I would rather use a Sun ray simply because of the silence. The constant sound of a high performance PC with 3+ fans in it gets to me after a while.

    1. Re:I'm using a Sun Ray right now by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Overall, I think I would rather use a Sun ray simply because of the silence.

      The fact that the SunRay server might be an SMP box with FibreChannel disks and gobs of RAM doesn't hurt either :) In fact, there is a distinct possibility that SunRay could actually be better than a local desktop (except for OpenGL work, of course).

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    2. Re:I'm using a Sun Ray right now by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Actually, here's an interesting tidbit I've observed first-hand. It seems some 2D graphics operations (such as scrolling in a web browser) actually feel signifigantly *faster* on a SunRay than on the local framebuffer of a Sun Workstation.

      I think this stems from the fact that once upon a time, Sun said "Our new UPA interconnect is so great, these new UPA cards no longer need the 2D acceleration hardware we had in the old TurboGX". (might have made sense at the time, but today it means that those cards are quite sluggish for normal non-special 2D stuff)

  20. The important question is though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you be able to use SunRays with LINUX as the operating system, rather than Solaris? SunRays are a GREAT technology but no one uses them because no one wants to use Solaris. (At least not on a desktop machine, which is sort of the intent of a SunRay.)

    If all this does is make it possible to use Linux boxes as SunRay-like terminals for Solaris, though, that's no help, people would rather just use the Linux box.

    1. Re:The important question is though by buysse · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody read the freakin' articles? Jebus.

      --
      -30-
  21. Itll take a more than a Sun Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to bring Sun back as a Major player,
    its best that they opensource their OS
    cause BSD is right on top o them.....

  22. "stupid conspiracy theory" moderation option? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

    Can't we get one of these mod options?

    If anything, buying Novell and thus SUSE, would indemnify all the SUSE users against SCO since Sun has a defined relationship with SCO allowing use of any SCO unix works. This might even put a crimp in some of SCO's complaints against IBM since they use SUSE.

    Yeah -- I work for Sun but I don't drink the Kool Aide.

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    1. Re:"stupid conspiracy theory" moderation option? by killjoe · · Score: 0

      "If anything, buying Novell and thus SUSE, would indemnify all the SUSE users against SCO since Sun has a defined relationship with SCO allowing use of any SCO unix works."

      Of course it would. But then again Novell has already imdenified all the SUSE users so that's pretty much useless. It would not however imdenify IBM or anybody else would it? SUN and MS have a common enemy in IBM. MS just gave sun a buttload of money for no apparent reason (supposedly some ip cross licensing). It's not farfetched to think that MS and sun are about gang up on IBM is it?

      If you work for sun I feel sorry for you. Your company is about to embark upon a lawsuit strategy that's going to make SCO look like angels. They have nothing left to sell that anybody wants so they are going to see if they can squeeze money out of people who use linux.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:"stupid conspiracy theory" moderation option? by Znork · · Score: 1

      Any indemnification by buying a license from SCO is worthless as you'd be in violation of the GPL by limiting redistribution.

  23. Do the Sun Rays still require a dedicated LAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two years ago, I remember our Sun salesman trying to convince us to deploy Sun Rays for all our staff. They lost the sale when they admitted that the Sun Rays didn't run over the existing LAN - they needed a physically separately cabled LAN.

    Just wondering if anything has changed in the last two years ...

    1. Re:Do the Sun Rays still require a dedicated LAN? by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 3, Informative

      maybe we were just lucky, but we were running them over port-based vlans just fine. cisco 2924s, so it's not like they were high end switches. we also had a few hanging off an unmanaged switch (which was uplinked to one of the 2924s). this was about 18 months ago. over 10M was ok ... 100M was much better though

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    2. Re:Do the Sun Rays still require a dedicated LAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've been using sunrays on 10 Mbit hubs shared with computers without hassle since before the 2.0 version of the software. Of course it's not supported by Sun but it works, and pretty well on top of that.

    3. Re:Do the Sun Rays still require a dedicated LAN? by bajan_on_ice · · Score: 1

      Actually, SunRay 2.0 allows you to run on a non-dedicated LAN. It can even use the general environment DHCP instead of the SRSS built in one. I've also heard about hardware data compression being built into the next gen of these things, so that you can run em across lower bandwidth lines (DSL etc). High latency can still grind these things to unusability, tho...

      --
      "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
  24. Re:License? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

    You have a CompactPCI sparc server you weren't using? That would make it an enterprise server (3800, 4800, 4810, 6800). I'll give you just about any x86 linux box you want in exchange for it. I'll even throw in a copy of SUSE! :)

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  25. Not true by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

    You can use it over public networks as well now. That functionality has been there for a while now. It initially required a dedicated 100mbs network, but that requirement is no longer there. You may be able to use it over the internet as well over DSL and/or cable.

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
    1. Re:Not true by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's good to know. Do you know if they've changed protocols as well? i.e. did they drop the requirement because it was no longer necessary or because it was a hard sell? At the time they protocol could peak to a significant percentage of the hundred megabits.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Not true by buysse · · Score: 1

      SRSS 2.0 got quite a bit lighter, rumors say that the next version will work acceptably well over a DSL-speed connection. ;)

      --
      -30-
    3. Re:Not true by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are rumors as I've seen customer demonstrations. The even sent over a VP from Sun to the customer site and had him plug in a SunRay (outside their firewall, of course) and pull up his Sun work session over the internet. I'm told it was a t1 drop, but still over the internet with no performance hit that we could see. That's my kind of "working from home".
      The implications go far beyond that. That's the kind of easy system my grandma could use. No equipment on the user side except SunRay, Monitor (HD TV perhaps?) and keyboard/mouse. No patching, updating software, backups, etc. Just reliable computing at home.
      Anyway, I should shut up.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  26. In Related News....A Blue Mood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Out of curiosity, what ?"

    Absense of a blue screen.

    1. Re:In Related News....A Blue Mood. by vranash · · Score: 1

      Yeah... theirs is black :)

  27. Completely silent-Dead giveaway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking these would be perfect for the educational market. The majority of the software that runs on an educational machine doesn't require lots of power. And yes all the other advantages thin-clients buy you. i.e. maintainability, quiet, low cost, etc.

    1. Re:Completely silent-Dead giveaway. by Bazzargh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure what the pricing is like now, but I looked into buying 50 of them at one point. In the UK it was going to cost me around £500 per station, plus of course the extra beef the servers needed (our network was ok so at least I didn't need to upgrade that). I couldn't justify the cost in comparison to PCs, which we were buying at arouns £1k at the time; for £500 extra the PC could be repurposed as a build machine, a test server, or whatever a project needed; they also came with 40Gb of disk, which would have cost us $$$ on the server. We could also save on PCs by not buying a new monitor for each PC replaced.

      User's PCs weren't backed up, everyone had space on the servers which was raided and backed up; the cost of providing that much disk space, and backing it up, with the Sunray solution was prohibitive, and it would have been a single point of failure.

      In the end, while it was cool, there were too many down sides. If I had been buying for a faily homogenous 'office' population, instead of developers, it would have been a closer-run thing.

    2. Re:Completely silent-Dead giveaway. by nathanh · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not sure what the pricing is like now, but I looked into buying 50 of them at one point. In the UK it was going to cost me around £500 per station, plus of course the extra beef the servers needed (our network was ok so at least I didn't need to upgrade that). I couldn't justify the cost in comparison to PCs, which we were buying at arouns £1k at the time; for £500 extra the PC could be repurposed as a build machine, a test server, or whatever a project needed; they also came with 40Gb of disk, which would have cost us $$$ on the server. We could also save on PCs by not buying a new monitor for each PC replaced.

      You only compared hardware prices. Throw in the cost of PC software (including all the support software like Ghost, Antivirus, etc) plus the extra maintenance of having to package software for deployment, and a SunRay solution suddenly is surprisingly cheap.

      User's PCs weren't backed up, everyone had space on the servers which was raided and backed up; the cost of providing that much disk space, and backing it up, with the Sunray solution was prohibitive, and it would have been a single point of failure.

      You don't have an entire PC image per user on the server, silly person. User directories run 1-2GB each. The system software is shared across all users. You can get away with 200GB RAID-1 for 50 users without any trouble. Get a V880 with 12x FCAL slots and you have in-box growth up to 1TB easily.

  28. cable-plugging monkeys? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    i like the idea of these a *lot*. have you got a part number for one? if they do a winged variety it'd solve all my rollout headaches in one fell swoop...

  29. Sun rays! by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

    Yeah, some more sun rays wouldn't hurt the pale linux crowd.

    --
    Free as in mason.
  30. I can't resist asking... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
    What is it with SUN and keyboards? I've gotten used to every SUN I'm working with having yet another keyboard layout, but the SunRays really push that inconvenience to the limit: someone decided it would be cool to switch the control and the Caps Lock keys.

    Perhaps it's possible to reconfigure that (any pointers appreciated) or to use another keyboard - but really: why doesn't SUN switch to PC keyboards already and stops punishing their users?

    Just curious. :-)

    1. Re:I can't resist asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is the PC that swapped the location of caps lock and control. No, really. Traditionally old keyboards had control next to A and sun stayed with it for most of their keyboards (to not piss off UNIX users), if you don't like it I think sun makes PC style layouts too. Actually, the earliest PC keyboards had control next to A as well.

    2. Re:I can't resist asking... by buysse · · Score: 1
      Sun sells both the "US" layout and the "US Unix" layout. You have the Unix layout, which I actually prefer (as an occasional emacs user).

      Modern Sun systems (any Blade or Sun Ray) use standard USB. You can swap that keyboard with anything you want -- I use a MS Natural Pro with my SunRay. They are similarly agnostic about mice, and the newest builds of Mozilla from Sun actually support the wheel (finally).

      The only limitation is that a few of the older systems (at least the Blade 100) require that the keyboard be attached directly to the root hub (ie, don't put your keyboard for the Blade 100 on a KVM or it's going to decide that it should use a serial console). The workaround is to throw a keyboard on the root hub and hide it behind the machine, then attach another one to the KVM.

      --
      -30-
    3. Re:I can't resist asking... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Thanks, this will help us a lot. Our Sun rep didn't even mention these options. :-(

    4. Re:I can't resist asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ask about them?

    5. Re:I can't resist asking... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      No, I didn't occur to me that they would have these options, hence I didn't ask. He says he did not know that there were these options though.

      He'll now tell his other customers about this, too - he feels many will be interested. (BTW: he's actually a distributor, not a SUN employee.)

  31. Re:License? by buysse · · Score: 1
    Actually, the only one of those that was cPCI was the 3800. My department has the misfortu^Wprivelege of owning one. Sun has never made a copper GigE card for it, they stopped making FC cards, and we got the original defective US-III(Al) CPUs, not the US=III+(Cu).

    There were a few boards tossed around, but not sold as end-user products by Sun. There's a couple of other companies that made them.

    --
    -30-
  32. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the technology sun should be pushing.

  33. Excellent! We're struggling with XPe thin clients! by csoto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We're currently evaluating Windows XP Embedded thin clients from Wyse, Neoware and HP. They leave a lot to be desired. Not only do you still have a lot of the vulnerabilities and management hassles of Windows, you also have to deal with the weird, difficult to install, generally PITA management software they require. Plus, they're not cheap - about $600 each, without monitor!

    Sun Rays have always been very interesting, but up until this, they have only had a Solaris server. Not bad for general browsing and business apps, but we need something that can run MPEG4 stream players, and Solaris isn't the first place to look for that. Linux has solutions, however. This is something we will look into...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  34. Re:License? by Kenja · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mine is based off the cPCI board found in the 1U netra series. So not an enterprise server, just a 333mhz ultra sparc with two cPCI expansion slots (quad nic and scsi cards installed right now).

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  35. Re:omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, penis thinks you is gay!

  36. Re:License? by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

    Not true. The 6800 allowed for using either a 8 slot PCI I/O assy or a 6 slot cPCI assy. Since there were 4 I/O assemblys, you could mix, but no one does. The Sun System Handbook on sunsolve.sun.com can confirm this. Actually, the WCI I/O boats have cPCI slots as well. The are two slots for paroli cards and two cPCI slots bookending the Parolis.
    I am not sure which netra the poster was referring to, but I don't doubt it. There is a lot of netra crap that I don't care to remember.

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  37. Re:License? by buysse · · Score: 1
    Didn't know about that one. Interesting. Somehow I doubt that many people went for the cPCI. Unfortunately, to swap cPCI for PCI on the 3800 requires a new centerplane (ie, upgrade to a 48x0.)

    --
    -30-