Slashdot Mirror


Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army

nerdb0t writes "Reuters is reporting that the Finnish Defense Forces have allowed some men to be excused from military service because of 'Internet Addiction.' The service period is 6 months - but that's too long away from the internet for these guys. Is this a joke? Is this a legitimate illness? Hm..where can I apply for disability..."

97 of 612 comments (clear)

  1. i have this illness by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 5, Funny

    apparent b/c i got first post.. i must be addicted to the net or at least slash dot

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
    1. Re:i have this illness by WebCrapper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is another odd rule in Europe as well - Stress Leave. Its a treatable illness here and you can take paid time off from work for it. Unfortunately, the US Military or GS's stationed here can't take advantage of such a rule...

      When I was younger, a bus load of American kids put on of their Dutch bus drivers on stress leave for 6 months... Unfortunately, I wasn't riding the bus the day it happened, but heard it was a blast.

  2. Slashdot is why by BillLeeLee · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If I can't get my daily dose of slashdot, I'll go crazy and kill some endangered animals" - Finnish soldier

    --
    www.google.com
    1. Re:Slashdot is why by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oooh boy! Someone fix these 503's!!!

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    2. Re:Slashdot is why by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      I finally got through the 503s. . .to a 500.

      KFG

    3. Re:Slashdot is why by rofa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, You're improving. Soon you'll be down to 404 :-)

      --
      No sig. Go away.
  3. Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, they were not excused from military service, they were sent home and told to grow up and return in a few years for another try.

    1. Re:Not quite by sopuli · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, this is standard practice in the Finnish army. If you break down and say you can't take it anymore, for whatever reason, you can get out. But you'll have to come back after a few years (the assumption being that you have grown up a bit).

    2. Re:Not quite by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, they were not excused from military service, they were sent home and told to grow up and return in a few years for another try.

      If my experience is any guide, the affliction doesn't get any better with age.

    3. Re:Not quite by value_added · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep, this is standard practice in the Finnish army. If you break down and say you can't take it anymore, for whatever reason, you can get out.

      So, if George Bush had been born elsewhere ...

    4. Re:Not quite by ma++i+ude · · Score: 4, Informative
      That reminds me, how come a country as small Finland is capable of producing two world class Formula One drivers (Mika Häkkinen and Kimi Raikkonen) and a world class rally car driver (Tommi Makkinen) among others?

      I think the rally driver bit can be explained by the fact that the countryside is full of small gravel roads which, in addition, are covered in snow and ice half of the year. The kids who are unfortunate enough to live there have nothing else to do so they end up driving around in old non-licensed cars. There even exists a term for these cards: peltoauto (field card). I never heard the word before I went to the army and actually met people from the Finnish periphery (kind of a tautology...)

      F1 is more of a mystery. The drivers seem to be coming from places with paved roads. Go-karting? Anyway, we have produced more than those two F1 drivers (I'd argue any F1 driver is by definition a world class driver): Keke Rosberg (1982 world champion), Mika Hakkinen, J.J. Lehto, Mika Salo, and Kimi Raikkonen.

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    5. Re:Not quite by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I totally agree. But where most foreigners fail to make the connection is that Bush != America. At least 50% of America doesn't like him and wants him out of office. He got into office through a lawsuit (which is a whole other topic) and alot of those who even do like him don't want to be at war. I personally think we need to focus more on our economy, etc... rather then going out trying to be some gun slinging hero. Bush is not the typical American, he's got millions, and I think the money and power just got to his head. Personally, some arguments make sense as far as freeing Iraq, but I mean we should of at least had NATO or several other large countries backing us up.
      Regards,
      Steve

  4. Cure? by macpell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems to me six months on duty, away from the Internet, just might be the cure for this terrible illness.

    1. Re:Cure? by Penguuu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can honestly say it is. I was (and still am, in some way) net-nerd.

      But 6 months in coastal infantry was very good change in life, and in my opinion helped me to gain some experiences i wouldn't otherwise had. And there was those leaves, when we went to city with our friends and got drunk. Helped me to get life of my own, outside of computers.

      So, if there is any young finnish people reading this, i would encourage you to stay in the army, and try to enjoy experiences you can't have, when you are playing counter-strike or hanging in irc.

      --
      The problem in the world today is communication. Too much communication - Homer Simpson
  5. apply... by dmitrygr · · Score: 2, Funny

    does constantly hitting F5 on slashdot, 24/7 count?

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
  6. eh.. by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About two years ago I spent 2 months as a counselor at a summer camp, most of which time I had no internet access, and when I did have access it was minimal. I know this is a little pathetic, but I really felt like I was being deprived. I mean, I wasn't sick over it or anything, but it was something I genuinely missed and I was really bothered that I couldn't use it the way I was used to. That said, I don't really think that this is a legitimate sickness worthy of being discharged because of, it's really quite managable. The main way I dealt with it was reading a lot. Generally I don't read that often, but that summer I went through a few tens of books.

    1. Re:eh.. by avij · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few years ago I was also on a summer camp, I was one of the people looking after the kids that were on that camp. I was perfectly happy for spending some time without internet access, but some of those kids (about age 12) genuinely missed their home PC. I'm used to kids feeling homesick, but back then it was the first time I heard someone miss their computer at home. Oh yes, this happened in Finland. Perhaps some of those children are now those net addicted persons.

      --

      Follow your Euro bills at EBT
  7. They didnt get out so easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They don't get pardoned forever. It seems they got 'E' which means 'go home and grow a little'. So they need to come back and do their service 2-3 years later.

    For record you can get 'E' just by requesting it, these guys were forced to 'E' due to addiction =)

    (status of different letters in Finnish Defence Forces:

    A - primary letter given to everyone, capable of active service
    B - Some problem, maybe bad allergy or old injury
    C - No service during peace time
    D - No service (even if it's war time)
    E - Service postponed )

  8. Yep, Finland is an interesting place by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Recall that about half the country is above the arctic circle, so cell phnes and computers are great when you can hop a reindeer to visit the next village over. They probably have more net addicts than Korea, since the Internet is an easy to stay in contact with people when it's -20 out.

    They also have one of the highest rates of alchoholisim in Europe, and I wonder how many people get waivers for that each year.

    But really, what self-respecting Army would pass on a soldier because he spent too much time practicing his BFG9000 skills...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by ravenlock · · Score: 5, Informative

      We use cell phones more than the internet, at least for now, so keeping in touch really isn't the thing internet is used for (cheap broadband is available in the south, the rest will have to pay their asses off on dialup or expensive broadband.)

      The alcoholism isn't a problem for the military, since the drinking occurs on the soldiers' free time.

      The thing about finnish military service is it's mandatory. If you don't want to do the punishment of 13 months of civil service, it's at least 6 months in the army. If you refuse both, you go to jail. Amnesty considers Finland one of the few countries that take prisoners because of their ideology.

      The way to avoid service is to come up with a reason for them not to want you. The most common would probably be mental illness of sorts. There are countless stories about people doing the weirders stuff to convince their superiors they should be dismissed.

      I think that would explain the net addiction. Somebody came up with a new way to avoid doing their time for another two years.

    2. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But really, what self-respecting Army would pass on a soldier because he spent too much time practicing his BFG9000 skills...


      They did't. Basically, they sent the rookies back home to their mommies in order to grow up. In few years, they will find themselves back in the army. So, being addicted to the net is not a valid excuse to get them out of the service.

      I was excused from the service back in my day, but that was because I got a severe allergic reaction the moment I reported for duty. It was propably the washing-powder (industrial strength) they use to wash the uniforms. Three days in the service, 30 days in the hospital and I was sent back home.

      Speaking as a Finn.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I work for a Swedish company, in which I've heard the following joke:

      Q: How do you spot an extroverted Finn?

      A: He looks at your shoes...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  9. Not excused by saunabad · · Score: 3, Informative

    But delayed and told to come back later after couple of years. At least according to the local Finnish media.

    (Totally crazy anyway. This is Finland for heavens sake, not some pansy-ass Sweden ;)

  10. WTF? by saden1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put them in a treatment program. Don't just let them go back and their computer.

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    1. Re:WTF? by Aviancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some might argue that military service IS a treatment program of sorts...

    2. Re:WTF? by Zone-MR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The question is, should this 'addiction' be treated in the first place?

      On one hand I think claiming to be 'internet addicted' to the extent that you cannot cope without the internet is a joke.

      On the other I would consider myself to have a dependancy on the internet which could be classed as a mild addiction - I begin to feel like a part of me is missing when I need to spend a prolonged time away from the Internet.

      I imagine the main reason I am so dependant on the Internet is convenient access to informaion. If I stumble accross anything I don't understand, or something I would like to know more about, I can obtain a wealth of information and endless user opinions after a few google queries.

      When I am at a computer, I almost consider it to be an extension of my brain. Whilst my own brain keeps a record of personal memories and knowledge, the Internet lets me augment my own experiences and knowledge with that of other people.

      Spending most of my life with access to the internet at my fingertips, I have got used to (and to a certain extend dependant on) the ability to instantly recall any phone number someone gave me 12 years ago. Or the ability to consult thousands of experts in any specialised field and receive a response within a few seconds. Or the ability to instantly share my experiences and discoveries with others who may find it interesting/useful. When that access isn't possible, is it that surprising that I feel as if something is missing?

      Is thirst for knowledge really an addiction that should be treated like a mental illness and cured?

    3. Re:WTF? by rofa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In one of the local neswpapers is a story about this, it say that the biggest reason is the very different life-rhytm. It's about a marginal group of yong men who havn't had anyone controlling their habits, they haven't been woken up at 6:00 and nobody has ordered them to do anything, they have been living without any limitations. When suddenly all this is true, they can't handle it. Net addiction is not a disease as such, but the other symptoms are, and they vary; panic disturbances, pressure handling problems and other psychological factors. These guys only have online friends and suddenly living in the same room with 10 other farting people is too much for them.

      They go on to say that these people are examined later (1-3 years), and that most of them are rid of the addicion at that point and then they can continue their service. About 80% finish their military service.

      -- [Partly (shamelessly) quoted and freely translated from "Iltalehti" http://www.iltalehti.fi ]

      --
      No sig. Go away.
    4. Re:WTF? by be951 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Is thirst for knowledge really an addiction that should be treated like a mental illness and cured?
      Do you really think people claiming "internet addiction" are doing research and trying to learn useful knowledge? I would wager that nearly all "internet addicts" spend virtually all their online time in a small set of activities such as: chat, "adult" content, and gambling. There are probably also subsets that are "addicted" to ebay, games (the term "EverCrack" comes to mind), and a few other areas.

      A sibling post describing the issue in more detail makes it sound like "internet addiction" is mainly a euphemism for "lazy, undisciplined and poorly socialized".

    5. Re:WTF? by Fishstick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, really. At one point in my life I was 'addicted' to sleeping past noon and staying out all night having fun. Then I graduated and got a job. I had to go cold turkey -- man that was a bitch.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  11. Oh hush by sim000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is ridiculous. Unfortunately, the story is true. What's ridiculous is that the service doesn't mean 6 months of no net -- it just means you can't get on the net _as much as you might want to_. First, the Finnish army gives you three out of four weekends off, which means you get to go home (=on the net if you just have to get your fix) for the weekend and report back on Sunday evening. Second, most if not all garrisons have computers with Internet-connections that the conscripts can freely use during the evenings. And if you still can't handle it? Growing up is exactly what you need.

    1. Re:Oh hush by klmth · · Score: 5, Informative

      People drop out of the military for many reasons. Most people can't cope with the sense of authority that the army instills. All of these are sent home to grow up for a couple of years - net addiction is not an excuse, it just means that you're psychologically unfit at the moment.

    2. Re:Oh hush by sim000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's certainly true. I didn't mean to be "pro-army" in any way -- the army, IMO, it's one of the most useless money-sucking institutions ever invented.

      Modern medicine is so advanced that there are no healthy people anymore

    3. Re:Oh hush by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It does seem to have less of a point what with NATO and all, but then again, the security of your nation isn't something you want to solely trust to others. Espically if all of Europe took that view and the US became the only NATO member with any military power to speak of. Would you REALLY want to rely on America as the sole source of your secrity if, say, the Norwegians got mad about one too many Viking jokes and decided to invade?

      Ok, ok, I know it's not real likely to happen, but do recall that there was a mand only around 50 years ago that was hell bent on conquering the entirety of Europe, and I seem to recall in 1939 Russia invaded Finland, and Finland won much to the supprise of most of the world. I'm just saying it's not an all bad idea to have your own army.

  12. Good news! I have a disability! by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure this does mean I get to sue the arse off my boss if I'm fired for inappropriate use of company resources when I'm caught surfing pr0n at work, right? I mean he's discriminating against my disability! Shame on him!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  13. Addiction problems by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can identify with these soldiers. I once spent a month at a house with no internet access whatsoever. I had no idea what to do with myself in my spare time. I had my laptop with me and spent hours playing solitaire. I couldn't get my mind off the internet, and what must be happenning in my absence. I tried watching tv but I usually watch tv while browsing /., so it was no help. News papers weren't much better because I couldn't adjust the font size or get the perfect lighting of the computer monitor. I even went through pages I had available offline. I ended up just signing up for a month of dial-up connection, but it possibly made it worse because I had an old modem and was used to broadband. I had exactly the same sensations that I had while trying to give up cocaine (a habit from my young and stupid days), except there was no real physical sensations except those produced from nervousness.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Addiction problems by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think internet addiction is really an extremely low tolerance for being bored.

      I've had the internet since 92 or 93, and before that Compuserve, and before that BBS's, and with each service came an increasing ability to *ALWAYS* be able to find something to entertain myself. If its reading an article, learning a new programming language, a piece of software to play with. That was 5 years ago.

      Now with mp3s, and bit torrent, the entire world of music, film, and television are avaliable online and I have no tolerance for being presented with entertainment a television network or someone else thinks I might want to see. I want to assemble my own entertainment, I watch/read/play what I want to, when I want to, on my schedule.

      After a few years of this, I just have no patience.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  14. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Military service is mandatory in Finland, and min. service time is 180 days, max. 362 days. You can also carry out the service as civil service (395 days) and in some cases as unarmed military service (330 days if I remember correctly).

    www.mil.fi

    Those that refuse to enter even civil service can be sentenced to (usually a minimum security) prison for 197 days (max.).

  15. You have no clue! by aralin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, if you could stay 2 months without net, you have no freakin' idea what you are talking about. No clue! Eight years ago I was supposed to spend two weeks without net with friends at a lake. Your typical summer holidays. I made it one week before hitchhiking over 600 miles back to "civilization". And that was 8 years ago. I know people who lost big bet that they could stay *one day* without cell phone. A "disconnect" is a serious problem for growing segment of population and net addiction is a real thing(tm).

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:You have no clue! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny
      Jesus...

      We take .75 Million years to move from the open veldt, to skin tents, mud-thatch huts, and finally stucco condos with AC.

      Who are these wiseacres who want to ignore this struggle, and revisit the "great" outdoors? Why don't y'all starve a bear, and stay in here - where the lights are on? There's a Red Bull in the 'fridge!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:You have no clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe some of us are tired of dealing the supposedly civilised "animals" in the city. You know the ones that look like walking billboard advertisment and try to murder people with their shitty ass driving skills.

  16. Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent home by CarlLaban · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a Finnish citizen I am very happy that our army sends these sissies home to grow up and is not trying to adjust the service easier for them. Our army is for self defence (not attacking poor people for some ;-) reason) and we really need good men (and women) to do the job.

  17. Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet ;-) by hadesan · · Score: 4, Informative
    Guess they gave the Ruskies a run for their money in WWII. Especially decent considering the odds they were against.
    http://reference.allrefer.com/encyclopedia/F/Finni shR.html/

    However, with this bullshit, you wonder how they would fair now...

  18. Re:oww by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    >max. 362 days.

    Do they have to import experienced officers?

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  19. The question is? by jimmydevice · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I get disability and/or workmans comp for this malady?

  20. If They Wanted To Get There Fix... by Snagle · · Score: 2, Funny

    they only need to look back to the 90's (yah i know its hard to remember) when MOST people got their porn from magazines! God the 90s sucked...

  21. Bah! by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, if Linus Torvalds can do it (He served in the Finnish army too, remember!) then any computer addict can. Suck it up and get a technical position, solider!

    1. Re:Bah! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, if Linus Torvalds can do it....then any computer addict can.

      According to legend, he pulled a McGuyver: he built a secret PC out of spare tank, riffle, and field radio parts.

      "Sarge, Why is that young man scooting that grenade around on his desk and clicking the pin like that, staring into a glowing helmet?"

  22. don't make fun, netadditiction is ligitimate! by randyest · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's right -- ligitimate!

    Check out the poll and submit your thoughts to their hi-tech CGI script, and you'll see for yourself:

    Thank You For Filling Out This Form
    Below is what you submitted to netaddic-data@netaddiction.com on Wednesday, August 4, 2004 at 02:12:49

    Ligitimate_Mental_Disorder: No


    Wait. I voted "no," so it's not ligitimate, but maybe it's still legitimate. I'm confused.

    Aw, screw it -- I'm going to play some Doom3.

    --
    everything in moderation
  23. Re:grow up? by sopuli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The purpose of the Finnish army is to defend Finland. It's purpose is not to psychologically damage its recruits.

  24. It's true but there's more in it... by VolatileSamu · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...and it has been happening for few years.

    It's really not just their addiction that excuses them from serving their country.

    I think the main reason is their lack of interest and ofcourse they are in a such a bad shape that it's impossible to manage the armyduties.

    I mean that if you sit in front of your computer for 12 hours a day and then you suddenly have to wear 30-40 kilos backpack and told to march 10 kilometres.

    --
    /* If everybody would be like me the world would be much better place to be - at least in my mind. */
    1. Re:It's true but there's more in it... by mkv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's really not just their addiction that excuses them from serving their country.

      First of all, they're not excused but their service is postponed.

      I think the main reason is their lack of interest and ofcourse they are in a such a bad shape that it's impossible to manage the armyduties.

      I mean that if you sit in front of your computer for 12 hours a day and then you suddenly have to wear 30-40 kilos backpack and told to march 10 kilometres.


      Second, you don't just pack you'r backpack and march the distance, before that you jog, go to the gym, run everywhere you are going and do marches with battle-gear only. Nobody in the army is so stupid to think that a normal guy could just all of a sudden become fit enough to do that, come on.
      There are different physical standards in the finnish army of course, and for example paratroopers have to be in great condition just to get accepted for training but the normal finnish conscript starts physical training gradually and should be in the best condition after ten or so weeks of training.

      --
      The secret to a successful /. career: Blame Microsoft
  25. What about television? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boatloads of people are zombified by television and movies, at least these soldiers were (hopefully) doing something interactive online, and possibly learning useful stuff. I'd rather be addicted to something I can learn from, than television full of infomercials and Jerry Springer.

  26. Elsewhere on Slashdot... by lewko · · Score: 4, Funny
    Meanwhile, further down Slashdot's front page is this article about next generation hi-tech combat gear.

    Tell the addicts about this stuff and they will sign up in a flash for the ultra-realistic first-person shooter immersion experience!

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  27. Re:oww by klmth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Umm, the conscripts serve 362 days at most. If you want to become an officer, you have several routes to choose from.

    1. Go to the military academy (Officers)
    2. School yourself in some civlian field and join later with your crendentials (i.e. electric engineers and the like) (Warrant officers)
    3. Sign up after the army (NCOs).

    It's entirely possible to make a career out of the army. Just because the conscription term is max. 362 days doesn't exclude anyone from staying longer as long as they work for the military.

  28. neat by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot took out a few soldiers. What service can't we deny?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  29. Re:Don't read anything into it by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have several friends here in Norway who were rejected by the military after their first meeting for compulsory service because they were deemed "too intelligent" to be worthy of service ;-)

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  30. What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Finnish army practices lying in the snow, waiting for enemies to take out with one shot of the rifle.

    If you want winter experience, learn from Finnish, Norwegian or Swedish soldiers.

    When I served my time in the Army, in Harstad, Norway (look it up)in jan-jul '97 there was a snowfall record. 2,5-3 meters of snow in valleys and -15 to -35 Celsius was the norm.

    Advantages: You learn to handle extreme cold. It's easy to dig trenches and to camouflage the tent.

    Disadvantages: It's bloody cold. When you've had your 4 hours of sleep inbetween watches, the uniform is not frozen anymore, but it's still damp/wet. When you get outside everything turns to ice.

    Super-duper-advantage: During watches I got to see the Hale-Bopp comet at night, in perfect sky conditions. With night vision goggles too, that was incredible (and quite green/white). I missed an attack on the base though, the enemy got first strike there... :)

    1. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (1) I was not punished, 'cause the platoon leader was asleep and you can't really hear the difference between weapons since all the grunts use Heckler&Koch AG3's. We (always two on watch detail but the other guy was busy looking at the comet too :) sounded the alarm after a couple of rounds so as far as the lieutenant knew we shot first.

      (2) It's not that hard even if the soldier is wearing full winter camo. The winter camo is (and should be) a bit dirty, that together with shadows and other things you just notice exposes the person quite fast. Unless he's really really good at crawling and sneaking. Slowly.

      The military service is something I learned a lot from. I already knew about safe weapons handling since I've been shooting rifles and pistols since I was twelve, but stuff like makeshift first-aid (making stretchers, wound handling, etc) and learning to calculate avalanche risk, rescuing people from avalanches, what to do if you're taken by an avalanche (surf's up - hold your breath. People mostly die from drowning in an avalanche since they breathe the fine snow on top of the avalanche before getting buried). We got to see avalanche rescue dogs in action - those canines are insanely amazingly fast at finding people!

      Navigation with map and compass, navigation without compass, how to make good shelter if you haven't got a tent etc. Lots and lots of valuable knowledge.

  31. They are... by toddhisattva · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I guess they are Finnished!

  32. Its true.... by andreyw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The internet IS like an addiction. I personally would go nuts without it - my mind just needs to be stimulated with the overabundant torrent of information... It gives us the ability to access anything, anywhere without much ado, and crutch or not, it gets pretty damn addictive - and is something the mind doesn't want to part with...

    Take something as simple as a word dictionary. Are you more likely to page through a 600+ book or quickly pop onto www.m-w.com? Exactly... We get used to that. And when we get denied Internet, its almost like sensory deprivation - losing a sense of touch with the world...

    Or maybe I just need to get some sleep...

    P.S: BTW, great excuse to avoid the army...

  33. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Once upon a time I had a psychology professor who started talking about how hard it was growing up in a predominantly Finnish neighborhood in, as I recall, Gary, Indiana ( Gary, Indiana, Gary Indiana. . .oh, sorry), because the Finns hated Americans.

    Someone in the class asked him, "If they hate Americans, why did the come here?"

    The answer?

    "Because they hate Russians even more."

    KFG

  34. Reasons by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All finnish men have to do their military service, which is 180, 270 or 360 days. Usually men go to this service after "basic" schools, at the age of 18 or 19. The military service starts either july or the next january. This leaves you time, when you have nothing to do ( if you can't get a job ).

    During this time some ppl get addicted to net. And it's not just the net, it's the hours. Pretty much every net addict has bizarre sleeping pattern. Usually you go on chatting/surfing/playing 15-24hours, and then get some sleep, when you get really really tired. You have no obligations to be awake at some given time.
    One finnish news site said, that the biggest problem was adjusting to regular sleeping pattern, not the actual net addiction.

    The first weeks in the army are ofcourse the worst. You are in a totally new enviroment, you don't know anyone, and you live in a single room with 8-12 other men. Lots of people keep yelling at you and bossing you around, and that makes people very stressed. During those first weeks, pretty much everyone wants to quit.
    When you add sleep disorder to this, you pretty much are done for it. There's no way you can maintain your mental health and motivation.

    I had no problems during my service time, but I know what those sleep disorders from too much computer using can do to you. It's total hell trying to live as a productive member of society, when you simply can't sleep during the nights. Almost screwed up my school because of that, but luckily I'm over it now.

    But it still bugs me that sleeping 7-8 hours a night and spending 9 hours a day of your time to work, it leaves you so very little spare time. Atleast to compared to the situation where you had nothing else than spare time.

    1. Re:Reasons by eetu · · Score: 2, Informative

      > All finnish men have to do their military service, which is 180, 270 or 360 days.

      Hmm, sounds exactly like the army propaganda, not mentioning the alternatives at all. The civil service lasts for 395 days and there's also the choice of serving around 200 days in prison (which is what I did).

      I agree with the rest of your post, though. It is a total hell trying to live as a productive member of the society when you can't sleep during the nights. Been there, done that.

      --
      "If I can't have a revolution, what is there to dance about?" - Albert Meltzer
    2. Re:Reasons by @madeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > All finnish men have to do their military service, which is 180, 270 or 360 days.

      Not true.

      They can come to any decent EU country (like the UK) and not do it. We are not still living in the 1900's.

      Finns can tell their government to fuck off, but so many find it's easier 'just to go along' with things and not rock the boat then justify that to themselves later (with some spurious trite reasoning).

      It amazes me that a nation of largely intelligent people fall for the propaganda that national service being useful, and that governments in countries like Finland and Germany still manage to get away with it. In reality it's a barbaric anachronism and in the face of so many other countries that have had it in the past having now phased it out, or having announced plans to end it, people in Finland should really be questioning this rather than going along with the idea out of a sense of tradition. The lack of recognition for conscientious objectors in Finland is something I find particularly morally repugnant (and let's not even get into the sexism debate).

      It would have been phased out by the EU by now, if it hadn't been for the dissent of countries like Germany that are so dependant on it for the success of the state, where it's used to make up for a shortfall of civil service employees (and so to allow the state to get away with not paying real wages) but that's a different matter that has to do with poor, neigh incompetent governance, it that's not a valid excuse for keeping in place a system of forced slave labour.

      The overwhelming chorus of advice from renowned intelligence organisations like Janes continues to be that it's not a way to create any sort of useful military force, and that's it detrimental to overall performance of what should a dedicated and professional organisation made up exclusively of people who want to be there to do what is a very important job.

      My advice to people in Finland would be to just go and live in another EU member state like the UK, where we don't force people to signup to work for the government (and where they don't get to tell you what weekends you can go home and what ones you cant).

      We don't have national service and it's precisely because of that (and because we do the Right Thing (TM) and choose to pay to have a large, competent and professional army rather than trying to scrape one together from kids who don't really want to be there) that we have one of the most powerful armies in the world (in the top 10, after the USA, India, Russia and Korea (north and south)). For such a small country, that's not bad going, and vastly better than the majority of the rest of the world, even with their swelled ranks fluffed with conscripts.

      Given the evidence against it, and the insistence by the intelligence community that it's not only of no value, but can be of negative value it's a wonder people still do it. It all comes back to 'doing what's right' vrs. 'doing what's easiest'. If more people had a backbone it would have been abolished long ago, the army would be stronger, the people would have more freedom and they'd be quite a bit happier.

      With a society that has the kind of outlook they do on issues like this, perhaps it is not surprising that Finland has the highest suicide rate of any western nation.

      Finns, the government are there to serve you, not the other way around. Do yourself and your entire nation a favour and them to get stuffed. National service costs your nation money overall (through lossed taxes, equipment and wages), it doesn't give you a useful fighting force and it is part of an oppressive environment that harms the physiological well being of the nations citizens.

    3. Re:Reasons by jukervin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Finland UK
      Land area (km2) 305 000 241 590
      Land boundaries (km) 2 628 360
      Population 5 214 512 60 270 708
      GDP (USD) 142 billion 1 664 billion
      Annual military budget (USD) 1.8 billion 43 billion
      Available manpower 1 200 000 15 000 000

      How do you suppose we could create a paid army to protect a bigger country with long border against Russia with a fraction of the budget? A paid army of 40 000 would cost three times more and would be able to defend only part of the country.

      You make it sound like we live in the North Korea or something. The conscription is preferred by 79% of Finns according to the polls.

      Unlike Americans, I think most Finns don't consider the government to be evil or sinister. The government _does_ serve the people as we live in a well-fare state (at least for the time being) and this is what majority of the Finns want.

      P.S. You really did the Right Thing (TM) with Iraq... It really improved the safety around the world.

  35. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by marsu_k · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As a Finnish citizen I cannot understand why these people don't go for "civilian service" (I'm not sure about the correct English term here, but basically it's working for a year for a governmental/communal/nonprofit organisation instead of going to the army), which I personally did. You get the nights off, and you're likely to get a net connection at work as well.

    (Mind you, internet addiction was not my reason for not going to the army - my "work computer" during my service was a glorious Schneider 386SX with W3.11 and no net connection. But during my year I got exceedingly good in Solitaire. ;-)

  36. Finland + Internet = Monty Python sites by HonkyLips · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finland.

    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I want to be,
    Pony trekking or camping,
    Or just watching TV.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    It's the country for me.
    Verse: You're so near to Russia,
    So far from Japan.
    Quite a long way from Cairo,
    Lots of miles from Vietnam.

    Chorus: Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I want to be,
    Eating breakfast or dinner,
    Or snack lunch in the hall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    Finland has it all.

    Verse: You're so sadly neglected,
    And often ignored,
    A poor second to Belgium,
    When going abroad.

    Chorus: Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    Finland has it all.

    Repeat: Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    Finland has it all.

    Fade: Finland has it all...

    --
    Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
  37. Heard on the news by RPoet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just heard a mention of this on the news. Someone was quoted as saying "for people who stay up all night playing computer games and don't have any friends, military service can be quite a shock."

    I'd say such people need that kind of shock more than most.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  38. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Armies must be constantly tested in the real world (that means wars) or they will not know what is effective

    Indeed. Where would the US be if all those valuable naked human pyramid skills would become obsolete?

  39. Degree in CS by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'm sorry I can't join the Army because I have to play Counterstrike."

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  40. BREAKING NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Slashdot Subscriber dies from shock after being deprived of slashdot for 30 minutes due to 503 server errors! Slashdot to be accused in court of negligence!

    News at 11!

  41. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Killeri · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Finnish performance in WW2 was mainly due to four factors. One, Stalin didn't send enough troops to the Finnish front so the Finnish army wasn't completely overrun. Two, the winter '39-'40 was very cold, even by Finnish standards, so the Soviet mechanical advantage was lost. Three, the Finnish army was very good in the use of artillery. Four, defending your homeland gives you some extra boost compared to simply invading some other country. I don't think that the "quality of the soldiers" was that much different.

    However, the recent studies have shown that most young Finnish people would jump to the arms if Finland were invaded, so I don't think this net addiction thing has any effect on that :)

  42. True by kopteri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this same news at our local TV news too (I live in Finland). 6 months is the minimum these days. I did spend my own service during 1998 and I was there for 11 months, but I admit that I had my laptop and GSM-modem with me almost all the time (I was remote working from army).

    You can just imagine how our commanding officer was surprised when he opened the door into our tent and I was there surfing Internet in middle of the forest during my night shift by the fire. Laptop and GSM were powered from generator that we filled with fuel oil between 5-6 hours. Usually people were sleeping and that's why they were checking the tents during nights. :)

  43. NetAddiction.com... *Web* Site? by kmactane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone other than me think that having a web site to combat net addiction is a little messed up? "Help, I've got net addiction, I need to spend less time online!" - "Oh, hey, there's this great web site that can help you with that, you want the URL?"

    Isn't that sort of like having your Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in a bar?

  44. Conscription in the US by carcosa30 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I often wonder if the United States is headed for a general conscription.

    Many other democratic countries have it, and arguably it's good for people. I often wonder how my life would have been changed by a term in the military.

    And hey, since we're now fighting an endless war, it seems more likely than ever.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:Conscription in the US by vidarh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And in most of those countries there are people being jailed for refusing because they consider it an infringement of their human rights to be forced into an organisation that can order them to take up arms.

      You'll also find that in most of these countries there is no such thing as "general conscription". It may be so in name, but most countries don't have the resources to operate a military that large, and in most cases only men are included to start with.

      In Norway, for instance, only about 40% of men complete their "compulsory" military service.

      What it boils down to is an arbitrary draft where whether or not you end up serving depends entirely on whether or not you put in an effort to stay out, whether or not you're ready to go to jail to stay out of the military (in some countries this isn't a particularly nice option - in Norway it often is, as unless you get the shortest duty period you're guaranteed to spend less time in prison than in the military, and in a "comfy" minimum security prison with possibility of leave and spending your time studying instead of working), or whether the officers at the camp you're directed to have a bad day or not the day you're ordered to report.

      Then, once you're enrolled, it is fairly arbitrary whether you'll stay beyond the first week or so depending on whether you happen to have a bad time and the mood of the officers again.

      In recent years, both Norway and many other countries who pretend to have general conscription have steadily decreased service periods. In Norway it used to be 12 months mandatory, 15 for the navy. Now it's quite common to get 6 months.

      They're also steadily easing up on people who refuse. During the 70's Norway had lots of people in jail for refusing, but due to the Vietnam war lots of youth started refusing stating Norway's membership in NATO as the reason and Amnesty started making a stink about political oppression, with the result that they now on the second refusal to turn up for the draft "take away your right to serve" to avoid having to try to draft you again.

      That was followed in the 80's by introducing opposition to the spread and use of nuclear weapons as a legal way of refusing the draft (you'll still have to serve a 16 month "civil" service period, usually working in kindergartens, nursery homes etc. as cheap labor) - it was a thinly veiled way of giving people who couldn't get away with using pacifism as their reason (which has been a legal excuse for ages, provided you can manage to convince a police interviewer that it's a serious conviction).

      Personally I think general conscription is a joke. There are bad sides to a career military, and I fully support encouraging people to serve. I don't even mind them taking the approach that you're by default being called in and have to refuse. I do mind being forced to take part in something where it is highly likely that I sometimes in the future might be ordered under threat of a military court martial to do something my convictions won't let me do.

      I'm not talking about a blanket refusal to take part in a military operation - I don't consider myself a pacifist though I have a strong aversion to violence - but a blanket refusal to put myself under the command of someone who might very well decide to send people to participate in the next illegal occupation force the US decides to put together, for instance.

      For my part I've made a very clear decision to refuse to serve on those grounds, NOT on one of the legal grounds (though I could perfectly well use the nuclear weapons excuse I mentioned earlier - it's sole purpose is to avoid having people like me make Amnesty complain about Norway after all), but it would be dishonest.

      I started out refusing by demanding to be exempted. You can't do that, and the Norwegian DOJ doesn't understand the concept, so the Department of Justice called me in to a police interview (with an officer that lacked the most basic understanding of Norwegian grammar, I was so tempted to refuse to

  45. Generals looking at this all wrong by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny


    "But Sir, I know how to slashdot the enemy!"

  46. That's more or less the idea by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most developed countries that practise conscription (manditory military service for all or at least all male citizens) anymore don't do it to maintain a serious force. The face of warfare has changed, as the latest Gulf conflict really demonstrated, such that lots of cannon fodder with machine guns, which is about all conscripts are good for, can't hold a candle to technology. Well you can't have a conscript flying a plane or driving a tank, that takes a volunteer.

    Doesn't mean it's worthless though. It's an "in case shit", to borrow a Chris Rock phrase, policy. Suppose someone was trying to invade Finland and NATO just wasn't able to send immediate help. Maybe it's WWIII or something. Whatever, just suppose. If everyone has had basic training, when you draft them it takes much less time to get them up to speed. You don't have to train them from scratch, or send them totally untrained against the enemy, you just give them a quick refresher and they can fight.

    This goes double for countries with Finland that have, shall we say, inhospitable terrain.

    Thing is, even if Finaland made every able citizen in their country serve in the military full time, they'd still not have a real military force to speak of only 1 million people and at conscript level abilityies. Never mind you'd destroy the economy doing that. So they don't, they have a small perminant military for the little things that need it, and then give everyone a little training, just in case.

    Switzerland takes theis to the extreme, actually requiring all their households to have a government issued machine gun, which their citizens learn how to use during manditory military service. That combine with the terrain would make Switzerand an iron clad bitch to invade. That, and the finincal cooperation, were the two reasons the Nazis didn't invade.

    It's not a real common practice these days, but it still works.

    1. Re:That's more or less the idea by duvin · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Switzerland takes theis to the extreme, actually requiring all their households to have a government issued machine gun...

      That would of course be an assault rifle. A machine gun would be a bit overkill :)...

    2. Re:That's more or less the idea by manu81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just like to address few things.

      Any serious military attempt to seize Finland would be noticed 2-6 months before the attack could be made. It is just not possible to move all needed manpower and equipment for attack to Finland to the border without anyone noticing, and if you close your borders, its kinda clear message. This means that army has decent time to mobilize and give some extra training. Of course all bridges, roads and such could be mined before any attempt to take them could be made. In example, all finnish bridges and tunnels have holes in their concrete structure, where the explosives will be placed in case they need to be destroyed. I have even heard that there is book which contains all information about all bridges, their locations and amount of explosives needed for their destruction.

      Our soldiers in peacekeeping missions get only 1-2 months of extra training before going to peacekeeping missions.

      Of course it is possible to make surprise (finnish air defence would have ~20 minutes to react) attack with airforce only without any warning. But still, ground attack would be months away.

      And about those pesky IR-thingies. do you people understand that they have very limited capability in forests. IR can be used to see in dark yes, but you can't see through things, such as forest. Thermal imaging can help with that, but mostly, thermal imaging equipment good enough to penetrate thick forest is in satellites, and in some recon planes and finland is very big country to sweep through constantly and accurately enough, to make any diffirence. When ever Finnish forces would be concentrated enough(like counter-attack) to use air force against them effectively, finnish forces would of course use their own air force and SAM power to counter enemy air superiority for small time period, so finnish forces can make their maneuver without full air power in their neck.

      And in the end, i'd like to remind that Finland has much more modern air defences that of serbs or iraq. Especially in southern Finland where the BUK M1 units are situated.

      And there is even more, i'd much more compare finnish situation to soviet vs. afgans than serbs or iraqis. Afgans were able to fight off soviet air attack with only stingers. While the terrain in Afganistan is very much diffirent than in Finland, when thinking about war, they give the same obstacles, just in diffirent form. I'd even say that when thinking of air defence, Finland is better country to defend than Afganistan. There is no better place to ambush air forces than country with lots of forests and modern air defence systems like BUK M1, Crotale NG and Igla.

      What comes to alcoholism, yeah, military personnel drinks like any other worker class dude here. Mostly the stories what i heard in army were urban legends, totally incorrect or just greatly exaggarated. Even my father had heard few of the same stories that go around nowadays, and he was in finnish army 1952. If you ask about the stories from someone who has been in army, lets say 1980 you probably get even more same stories :).

      And final part of my long post. I don't know if you have read the studies, but fins have one the highest ratings when they question the citizens will to defence their country against foreign invasion'. Me and most of my friends are ready to take arms if Finland is invaded. I have no will whatsoever to take arms to attack anywhere, or to fight in any other theater than Finland.

      So, i'm not forced against my will to defend my own country, my friends aren't, and i think most of fins aren't. Even most of those people who didn't like army and hated it because they though there wouldn't be war (waste of time) would be ready to take arm once they noticed that Finland is under attack. There is small portion of people who don't like to use arms, i accept their choice. There is small portion of people who would be there against their will to defend their country. But so small that they probably wouldn't have any serious input in war anyway, they can always serve elsewhere than in flashpoints.

      But mostly, above all, there would be determined finnish army with intention to fight off any invader.

  47. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by jaakkeli · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Finnish performance in WW2 was mainly due to four factors.... I don't think that the "quality of the soldiers" was that much different.

    Actually, the quality of soldiers was different, or rather the quality of the leadership. The Finns still had a lot of officers who had training and field experience from the old Imperial Russian army, but on the Russian side that talent had all been lost in the revolution, and even after that Stalin's purges had taken a heavy toll on the Red Army. Stalinism massively hurt almost everything important to any Soviet efforts, from science to the military, when the political leadership interfered with everything and replaced competent people with idiots that made bigger promises.

    And...

    Four, defending your homeland gives you some extra boost compared to simply invading some other country.

    The Soviets had also expected there to be a lot of Finnish communists who would defect and greet the Red Army as some great liberator, but there weren't because the Soviets had already killed them. There had been a lot of communists in Finland, but most of them had moved to the Soviet Union (this was not a big deal for a Finnish communist: there were a lot of ethnic Finns living in the Soviet Union, so it was just the border between a capitalist bourgeois democracy and the great socialist wonderland) and the paranoid Soviets had, of course, executed almost all of them as spies or unreliables. (The rumors that not all was well in the wonderland then, naturally, contributed a lot to the Finnish will to fight; for the Finns, it was not just Finland that was at stake, but the fate of Finns as a people.)

    Totalitarianism has a real habit of working against itself...

  48. Re:grow up? by jorleif · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I did the service we were told to protect against "the Enemy".

    When asked to elaborate the officer said something like: "Well, we are not allowed to say who the enemy is, but we can say this much: It's not the Swedes"

    I guess it's between Norway and Russia then, even though I find the two scenarios you presented more likely to occur :)

  49. Mandatory Full Metal Jacket Reference by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Funny

    COWBOY: Tough break for Hand Job. He was all set to get shipped out on a medical.
    JOKER: What was the matter with him?
    COWBOY: He was jerkin' off ten times a day.
    EIGHTBALL: It's no shit. At least ten times a day.
    COWBOY: Last week he was sent down to Da Nang to see the Navy head shrinker, and the crazy fucker starts jerking off in the waiting room. Instant Section Eight. He was just waiting for his papers to clear division.

    So, I guess the "net addiction" excuse isn't bad, comparatively, considering it cost me about 400 bucks in shrink's fees to get out of the Swiss army (like about 30% of their recruits every year, incidentally.)

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  50. addiction by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Technically, a person can become addicted to anything.

    There are two kinds of addiction. One is psychological, and the other is physiological. In other words, you can have a direct mental (emotional, whatever) dependence on something, or your body can be dependant on something. Sometimes a psychological addiction can cause physical withdrawl symptoms, too, and just because you're psychologically addicted doesn't mean there isn't a physical side effect/benefit.

    People allow addictions to continue in their lives because they're an escape from the mundane details and unpleasant things about life that they don't like. Caffine, the Internet, sex, routine, alcohol, spending money, being dumb, smoking, singleness - people get addicted to all these things, because they help the person avoid having to think about the real issues of life.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  51. Foreign armies adopting the same strategy by tezza · · Score: 2, Funny

    If a foreign Army did this they'd be *cough* Finnished [ducks for cover]

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  52. Application by Dizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hm..where can I apply for disability...

    Why, online of course.

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  53. Excuse me by hyperherod · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some of these people are likely to be using it just as an excuse, and if they get called back again in a few years they'll use another one until they have a family and then have a valid excuse... I know it's not Finland but I knew a guy from Sweden who got called up for their "compulsory" national service. He said that if you don't want to do it, all you had to do in the interview was say things like "I don't like people" and that they'd let you off, because you wouldn't be suitable in their eyes. So I get the impression it's just a formality thing and as long as not too many people are dodging out they're OK with it. Most people generally DO want to do it, it's not just Army work, it can be as a firefighter and things like that too.

  54. You do realise... by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the USSR's point of view Finland is the gateway/blockade to the entire Nordic penninsula, which is the most obvious staging area for attacks on Britain and North-Western Europe available.

    Additionally, western Norway is the nearest thing the USSR has to a defensible set of seaports usable in the depths of winter.

    If WWIII isn't just an unlimited ICBM exchange (unliklely I know), then Finland is gonna get it in the neck in the first few minutes, purely for blocking the way into Norway and Sweden (or possibly for blocking the way into St Petersburg, it really depends who's on the offensive).

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  55. Switzerland by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Switzerland takes theis to the extreme, actually requiring all their households to have a government issued machine gun.

    No, not all households. Only the active military have their gun (not machine-gun) at home. The peculiarity is that they are "active" until the age of 40 or something, going back to training for about 1 to 3 weeks every year, plus a few Saturdays going to shooting training.

    That, and the finincal cooperation, were the two reasons the Nazis didn't invade.

    I don't believe the miltary had anything to do with Switzerland not being invaded by Germany.
    To put it simply: you don't attack your own bank.

    BTW, the 2 countries which used to be poor and became rich after the World Wars are Switzerland and the US.

    1. Re:Switzerland by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BTW, the 2 countries which used to be poor and became rich after the World Wars are Switzerland and the US.

      Pre WW, the US wasn't so much "poor" as "isolationist." Just the US's behavior in the world wars (lend/lease et al) is enough to prove that.

  56. Re:Not just America, either by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well - the European countries contribute quite a lot of aid, plus their policies and international behavior are not quite as openly arrogant.. That, plus Europe being more willing to challenge Israel on their policies and actions, means that the evidence that "Europe is evil" is less convincing than the evidence that "America is evil".

    And - Europe don't export quite as much crap music and crap movies..

    Do as I say: Try to see things their way, don't nitpick and talk about "the reason" - I didn't.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  57. Re:grow up? by sopuli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is not the army's task to straighten these boys out. You should not focus on the internet addiction part, that is only one symptom of many. I suppose you have never trained 18 year old recruits. I have. There is no time to teach someone how to lace their shoes because their mommy never did (these types really exist). Shouting at them does not work, throwing them in the brig does not work, physical violence against them is not allowed (and I don't think it would work). Strangely, a few more years as a civilian usualy works wonders, after which you have a recruit who is actualy of some use, instead of an annoyance.

  58. United States Military by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    We're completely volunteer. In order to end up in the military here, you have to take yourself down to a recruiter's office, take a few tests, fill out a bunch of paperwork, and swear the enlistment oath in front of an officer.

    Sure, we have selective service, but that hasn't been activiated since almost the vietnam war, and it isn't likely too.

    Of course, my reaction was, "What, a military without internet access?"
    Why can't they get it during off duty hours?

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  59. The Winter War by Scot+Seese · · Score: 2, Informative

    Finns take the defense of their tiny country quite seriously! For those of you who may not remember, a quick refresher on one of history's most forgotten wars- The Winter War, 1939-1940.

    Soviet Russia sent 23 divisions (460,000 troops) and 2,000 tanks into Finland in an act of naked agression, seeking little more than land expansion. They were told not to stop until they reached Sweden. They were so sure of victory that one of their divisions had a military band complete with instruments for their victory performance in Helsinki, after which they would install a puppet government.

    Finland, with a whopping population of 3.6 million, managed to field 160,000 troops.

    The final result:
    -The Soviets suffered 400,000 casualties
    -Stalin suffered a humiliating defeat, and was forced to sign the "Peace Agreement" March 13 1940.

    Finland lost 10% of it's land, but survived as a free independent country. The Soviet army was recalled in defeat, with Stalin nervous about developments elsewhere in Europe as Hitler's war machine spun up.

    To this day, even with Perestroika, Glasnost, and the "collapse" of the Soviet Union, the citizens of the tightly culturally interconnected scandanavian countries (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland) maintain a deep mistrust of Russia and it's motives for -anything-.

    Do NOT mock the Finish army! ;)

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
  60. Well I spent 35 years without the internet by RocketSHE · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...prior to 1995.

    --
    ~==>RocketSHE
  61. Re:Oh Crap!! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rectally.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  62. Convincing Argument by Psymunn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    US contributes 'quite a lot of aid.' But you are right. There is nothing openly arrogant about anything done in Europe. After all, they are willing to criticise Israel on everything it does but are 'sensitive' enough to turn a blind eye to every other injustice that goes on in the world. The Spanish ellections where influenced by terrorist attacks. France is becoming a scary place to be if you are visibly religious (with both anti religous policy and hate crimes at an all time high). All in all, Europe is looking to become a 'United States of Europe' and I am not convinced that they will flex their power as a superpower any more responsibly then the US did.

    It's almost as if this world we live in has countries that do thigns that are both good and bad. America is a big place. it does a lot of questionable things. it does a lot of bad things. and it does a lot of good things. same can be said of europe. I'm sick of everyone trying to pretend the world is a dicotomy and proclaiming everything evil or good. This isn't starwars. There is no 'good side'

    And europe, like the US, has both some of the best music. And, like the US, Europe has some of the trashiest, cookie cutter music one can imagine.

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist