Slashdot Mirror


High Performance Gaming Laptops On A Budget?

Cory Tunney writes "In my quest to find a gaming laptop that will fulfill my gaming fantasies, but not kick me in the wallet at the same time, I've come across many options. Alienware is out of the question, as are companies like VooDooPC, but out of the rough comes companies less known but with impressive hardware. Sager seems to have won over a pretty large group of fans, and iBuyPower also seems to put out a decent amount of bang for the buck. However, when it comes down to it, I am still left with several options and I do not know what road to travel. So here's the jist of it - a system with a price tag around $2,000, a high-end video card (Radeon or the equivalent NVidia) and a system with an AMD would be a plus, but I will not rule out Intel if they can offer similar performance. So, Slashdot readers, what systems can you recommend?"

106 comments

  1. PowerBook Gaming by MBCook · · Score: 1

    This is something I've been wondering about, and since it's on topic (at least slightly) I'd like to ask: Can anyone tell me how well the current 15" PowerBooks work for gaming? I'm seriously looking at them to replace my 4 year old Dell but I'd like to be able to play games now and then.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:PowerBook Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My Powerbook 15" 1.5GHz with 1.5GB of RAM kernel panics whenever I try to run Warcraft III. So it is useless to me for gaming.

    2. Re:PowerBook Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The PowerBook G4s are far and away the best laptops on the market, but I wouldn't buy one for games unless I specifically wanted the games offered: there are far fewer Mac games, they release later, etc.

      That said, Macs seem to be substantially faster MHz for MHz. I've owned several OS X machines and recommend them without hesitation to anybody who doesn't want specific software not available.

      Have you tried going to CompUSA to play with one? They tend to have a popular game or two.

      I've only seen one or two kernel panics using Macs as my main computers (including while a full-time software engineer) since 10.2. Those I saw were identified bugs and fixed in short order. I believe the other poster, but strongly suspect he has a hardware flaw in his video card.

      Contrary to popular belief, when you consider the whole package, including weight and typical use patterns, the PowerBook laptops tend to be the best financial value. I helped a family member buy a laptop recently and PowerBooks were actually cheaper than similar PC laptops. This may not be true in math-intensive applications like gaming.

    3. Re:PowerBook Gaming by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the info. If Macs never played a single game, I would almost certanly still buy the machine as that's what I want and most games I play now are console or online (pop-cap type stuff). That said, the ability is there so I was curious about it. If I do play games, they will probably be Sims 2, Doom 3, UT, etc. They are BIG name games and I know they have (or at least will get) Mac ports. I'm in no hurry, so I don't maid waiting for the port either.

      Thanks for the info.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:PowerBook Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powerbooks, especially the 15"ers, get hot enough to fry an egg on just using Safari. Unless you're Alaskan, I wouldn't attempt gaming on one.

      As for "high performance gaming laptops", why should price be an issue for someone interested in one of those? If you're going to throw money away, right into the toilet, why does it matter how exactly much gets flushed?

      No gaming component remains "high performance" rated longer than 6 months, and laptops typically use static components. You might as well just burn your money.

    5. Re:PowerBook Gaming by MMeldrum · · Score: 1
      Powerbooks, especially the 15"ers, get hot enough to fry an egg on just using Safari. Unless you're Alaskan, I wouldn't attempt gaming on one.

      Troll troll troll. What a load of shite.

      My 15" PB averages 45-50C at worst when "just using Safari". Only when the CPU is at 100% constantly for 1hr+ does it get noticably hot. That's why the fan comes on and cools it down (never above 60C if I remember correctly).

    6. Re:PowerBook Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should still be under warranty - Why don't you send it in to Apple?

    7. Re:PowerBook Gaming by grocer · · Score: 1

      Apple has an extensive list of freeware/shareware games on their website. Macsoft Games and Aspyr both offer a fairly wide selection of ported games.

      I downloaded the Ureal Tournament 2003 demo just to see if my 12" iBook (G3 900/384 mb/ATI Moblity Radeon 7500 32mb) would choke...and I was shocked to find it runs quite nicely and looks great.

      (not affliated with any of the above companies, just like to game on iBook)

  2. powerbook G4 by trans_err · · Score: 1, Redundant

    My powerbook cost around $2000 (admittedly after student discounts). The slick bugger tends to perform quite well with anything I've thrown at it. I can't wait to play DOOM 3 on it!

    1. Re:powerbook G4 by mrluisp · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's funny, I was actually wondering what games you would play on a powerbook...

  3. Build your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the components you like, and put it together yourself. 2000 bucks is more than enough to build whatever high-end gaming box you need.

    1. Re:Build your own... by addaon · · Score: 2, Informative

      While that may result in a machine with great specs, it's unlikely to be a LAPTOP. Reading the summary is hard, I know, but do try the title next time.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    2. Re:Build your own... by mriker · · Score: 1, Troll
      Who modded this twit up? ASUS is one company that offers barebones laptops, allowing you to buy many/most of the components seperately and install them yourself.

      Reading the summary is hard, I know, but do try the title next time.

      Knowing what you're talking about can be hard, I know, but if you don't want to make an ass out of yourself in the future, do try to do a little research before you take a shot at someone.

  4. Uhhhhhhhhh, I apologize for the incoming comment.. by schild · · Score: 1

    Dude, you're getting a dell.

    Seriously, get an 8600 with whatever the best graphics card they offer now happens to be. You can find coupons at get a 1.6 or 1.7 centrino at a pretty decent price. You will be more than happy. It runs Farcry better than my desktop (which is a p4-2.8ghz with a gig of ram). And their warranty is just icing.

    --
    schild
    editor, f13.net
  5. Hmm... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 5, Funny

    " So, Slashdot readers, what systems can you recommend?"

    A desktop computer and a midget to carry it around?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A female midget.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... with a flat head.

    3. Re:Hmm... by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And no teeth...

      --
      No reason to lie.
    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and big hooters.

  6. Dunno if this counts by Sentry21 · · Score: 2, Informative

    To be honest, I haven't checked benchmarks for it yet, but I just purchased a Dell Inspiron 5150 (should arrive on the 18th). The reason I picked this one in particular was that it was dell's lowest-priced laptop that still had decent video hardware.

    The specs I got were as follows:

    - 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 HT
    - 15" SXGA+ LCD
    - 512 MB RAM
    - 60 GB HD
    - 64 MB nVidia GeForce FX Go5200

    Adding a more powerful battery and a 4x DVD burner put me up to CDN $2200 after tax and shipping.

    The 5150 on the US website starts at 256 megs of ram, 3.06 GHz P4, 15" XGA at $1079 after a 10% discount.

    Another Dell option is $2319 USD after 15% off (about $400 savings) for the Inspiron XPS - a little more than your target price, but the specs are impressive to say the least.

    I don't know how well my system is going to handle games - they're mostly a secondary priority, and the system is going to have enough power to run FFXI at least, so that's all I'm really concerned about - but as far as a mixture of cheap and effective (assuming you're not going to want to play Doom 3 on it), Dell is probably the best way to go.

    1. Re:Dunno if this counts by joeljkp · · Score: 3, Informative
      I also purchased a 5150, but I got mine last fall for $2k (student discount):

      • 3.06 Ghz Mobile Pentium 4
      • 15" UXGA LCD
      • 512 MB RAM
      • 60 GB HD
      • 64 MB nVidia GeForce FX Go5200


      I enjoy using it, but I would not recommend it for a hardcore gaming system. The go5200 is essentially a "value" chip, and performs worse than the older ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 (although it has DX9 support). What they don't tell you is that the chip is 50% underclocked and hardcoded that way. Look on rojakpot.com for a review.
      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    2. Re:Dunno if this counts by PhreakMac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      DON"T BUY DELL!!!!! They only have a handfull of people in the us anymore. They basically moved to india by outsourcing and keep an office here so they can be an "american" company

    3. Re:Dunno if this counts by ajutla · · Score: 1

      Actually...that system should be able to run Doom 3 just fine. If you care about such things.

    4. Re:Dunno if this counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have almost the exact same system as you, and quite frankly, I hate it for gaming. I originally bought it as a gaming machine, but it has forced me to migrate to console games only. Its not a bad little computer really, but I have had only heat problems after heat problems with it. It frequently performs like crap when any sort of advanced graphics are started (even Flash), and it frequently locks up while playing 3D games (like FFXI.. $100 later and I moved to the PS2 version cause the PC version was unplayable for me). As I am typing my 5150 is propped up on four hackie sacks that at least get some air flow underneath it and help it perform better. All in all, be warned!

    5. Re:Dunno if this counts by JWhiton · · Score: 1

      My friend had an Inspiron this summer. He told me it had desktop-level hardware in it, including a full Radeon (I dunno if that part is true or not). So he brings it in one day and I wonder "What's the thing he's setting the laptop on?" Then I noticed it was actually the case. Just the keyboard section of the laptop itself was something like two inches thick. The whole thing weighed ten pounds and the power adaptor was the size of about two DVD cases.

      It was absolutely ridiculous. It must be basically a mini ATX motherboard in a laptop-shaped case. It's literally about the size of an XBox. He ended up selling it.

      So my advice for anyone looking at an Inspiron or any other laptop is this: Make sure you take the size of the thing into account! There reaches a certain point where size becomes totally impractical, and you'll have to decide what that point is yourself. But don't get a battleship-sized laptop just because it's cheap. Oh yeah, and I'm aware that there are several different Inspiron sizes...but watch out for this sucker.

  7. Honestly... by consolidatedbord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but you have GOT to be kidding me. You just can't realistically find that in your price range. Sure, you can skimp out on HD space, or maybe drop the pre-installed software, but as soon as you sacrafice a brand name, you lose things like a decent warranty, and quality parts.

    Bottom line.

    --
    while true ; do echo this is my sig; done
    1. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... but as soon as you sacrafice a brand name, you lose things like a decent warranty, and quality parts."

      I hope you don't mean "brand name" like Dell or HP, because it is generally well known that the big OEMs skimp on the cheapest and lowest quality hardware to get the biggest margin for their money.

    2. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell remarkets another company's hardware.

      There are only 3 companies that I know of that still make their own laptop systems and would trust:

      Apple, IBM and Sony.

      It's nice to have an inside connection with IBM sales too.

    3. Re:Honestly... by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      IBM can make the laptops, i.e. their A31p isnt bad for what it was made for - 15" 1600x1200 screen, near Radeon 8500 performance w/ GL oriented games with the Mobility FireGL 7800, 5400rpm disk, up to 1GB memory, and 2 open media bays (1 occupied by a CDRW/DVDROM). However, an equivalent would still cost around $3500 today, and that's well out of the range, even with possible discounts. If someone could update those specs, come down to about $1500 without using integrated video, have a solid construction, and keep the battery life, then you might just have something there. It's possible to have All Three, you just have to push for someone to do it.

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
    4. Re:Honestly... by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://emachines.com/products/products.html?prod=e Machines_M6811

      15.4 1280x800 widescreen
      Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 1MB cache (or so it says - it also says 2GHz, not 2.2)
      512MB PC2700 (so that's where you skimp)
      80GB HDD
      DVD+/-RW
      6-in-1 flash card reader
      ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 w/64MB VRAM
      $1599 after rebate

      Drop the 3400+ and go down to a 3200+, and drop the DVD burner and go down to a CD-RW/DVD combo, and it's $1399 after rebate. And, remember that the 3000+ (although that is a Newcastle, and the mobile 3000+ is a Hammer) kicked the 3.2GHz P4EE in Doom...

      They DO skimp on the software - only XP Home, but you're getting all of the eMachines crap that you always get there...

      I've heard that the hardware quality on the M68xx laptops is pretty damn good. One thing - they use VIA chipsets, so if you've hate those, forget about it (or any A64 laptop - you'll have to go Intel).

    5. Re:Honestly... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      There are weak spots (RAM, maybe HDD speed, open media bays), but other than that, the eMachines laptops do that, and at $1399 to $1599. MR9600 64MB (not the best, but...), A64 3200/3400+, etc., etc.

  8. Don't get a laptop by mrluisp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know this isn't exactly on topic, but don't get a laptop for gaming. My last two computers have been "gaming" laptop. It just isn't worth it. It really isn't. The cost of a laptop is so much higher than a desktop, and the performance is so much lower. A Geforce4Go 5600 isn't anything like a Geforce 5600 FX. Laptops are essentially crippled by their graphic cards, no matter how hard Ati and nVidia try otherwise. My biggest argument against laptop is that the graphic drivers aren't updated. nVidia specifically states on their driver pages that laptop users should get updated drivers from their manufacturers. Maybe this issue is limited to Toshiba, but my graphics card's drivers have not been updated once by Toshiba since I bought my laptop a year ago. If you get a laptop, it will be fine for the first 6-8 months, but as soon as new games come out which rely on updated drivers, you will start missing out. I've tried upgrading my drivers, and all that does is create sub par performance and quite a few artifacts. Simply put, the graphic drivers are not optimized for laptops.

    1. Re:Don't get a laptop by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I strongly agree with the parent. If you intend to play games on a PC, the laptop is not the form factor you want.

      Laptops are popular for LAN gamers and I can see the appeal, but seriously, for the same kind of outlay you can buy a flat panel LCD display and a shuttle or similar small form factor PC. These small systems cost more than a full sized desktop but they will easily outperform any laptop in the same price range. They're also significantly more upgradable than a laptop, and the drivers are much better.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    2. Re:Don't get a laptop by mrluisp · · Score: 1

      (Christ, I apologize for not using the preview button)

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. Can you guess what type of computer I'll purchase next?

      Seriously, I nearly cried when I got outside in Far Cry, and everything started fucking up. I can't decide whether I want to install Doom 3 or just wait.

    3. Re:Don't get a laptop by Jesterboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unforunately, this ailment isn't simply limited to nVidia or Toshiba; I got a Dell SmartStep 200N with an ATI Radeon Mobility about 2 years ago, and they have yet to produce an update.

      I'm becoming of the opinion that a laptop gaming isn't worth it. I've had an experience much like mrluisp stated; it was great when I first got it, and held up for a few months, but lacking driver updates and upgradeability, I was left out in the cold. Now that everything depends on pixel shaders and I can't upgrade the graphics card in it, the only gaming I get out of it is emulation and looking for 2+ year old PC titles.

      If you really have your heart set on mobile gaming, you can go ahead and try, but I would seriously consider dishing out the extra money for one with an upgradeable graphics card. Otherwise, your hot new laptop is going to be next to worthless in about 6 months for playing the latest games.

    4. Re:Don't get a laptop by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I actually had the opposite experience. My laptop a few years ago was an Inspiron 8100 with a GeForce2 Go card in it. It performed just fine for the games of the era, but where our stories divurge even more is that Dell actually put out fairly regular driver updates. I checked their website about every 3 months, and it seems like nearly every time I went there, there was an update.

      Now I never benchmarked, and I never noticed a huge difference in framerates, but there were distinct improvements in artifacting and such. I was so pleased that I'm looking at Dell for my next notebook--I'd absolutely love to get a small, portable notebook, but they simply don't put those out with a decent graphics card (except for the Sony Vaio S series, but damn, I don't want to buy a Vaio). The Dell 9100 looks like a nice brick to play games on, and can be configured with ATI's latest graphics offerings.

    5. Re:Don't get a laptop by vjmurphy · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Maybe this issue is limited to Toshiba, but my graphics card's drivers have not been updated once by Toshiba since I bought my laptop a year ago."

      Generally, the Nvidia drivers for the same model number will work with the laptop graphics cards. I've got a Toshiba with a GeForce Go 460, and I am currently using the latest GeForce 460 MX drivers with no problems. Mileage, of course, may vary. Looks like that the more recent Toshiba laptops might not have that luxury, by your example.

      One of the newer features of some gaming laptops (Dell and Alienware, at least) is a replaceable video card. I know that I'd definitely get that were I buying a new laptop. That would be worth spending more money to me.

      Something to keep in mind, generally, as well: since the laptop has limited upgrade options (normally) you should not skimp on getting as much as you can afford. I've had my laptop for about 2 years now, and it still tends to play the majority of games fairly well. Sure, I can't play Doom 3 on it, but UT2004 plays very well, as does City of Heroes and Everquest. And it'll still be useful for work related activities for another couple of years (heck, it's still twice as powerful as my new work desktop, damn budget cuts).

      So, my opinion is a lot like it was last time this topic surfaced: buy the best you can afford, and if possible, get a laptop with a replaceable video card.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    6. Re:Don't get a laptop by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      If you thought Far Cry was resource intensive... DooM3 from my first hand accounts is revolutionising the PC industry. So many people wanting new graphics cards...

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    7. Re:Don't get a laptop by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " If you intend to play games on a PC, the laptop is not the form factor you want."

      It is if you travel a lot like I used to. You don't get as many neat effects. BFD. You're still not bringing your desktop to the hotel.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Don't get a laptop by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Three letters (or five, if ATI is your company of choice): MXM (or AXIOM). See, with a Dell or Alienware, you still have to get a Dell or Alienware branded upgrade. With MXM, you could get whatever brand you prefer (especially if ATI, XGI, and S3 make MXM cards or some company drops their mobile PCI-E chips on MXM cards).

    9. Re:Don't get a laptop by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Don't use the manufacturer's drivers. Get drivers from places like OmegaDrivers and install those instead (after updating your chipset's BIOS.) That will keep you current and up to date.

      I have a 1.5 year old Inspiron 8200 that I'm still quite happy with. In another year, I may upgrade to another Dell. I game almost everywhere except home - I particularly like playing on wireless networks in the library and cafes - and I've had no problems. Desktop systems just take up way too much real estate, and where I live, space is more expensive than computing power.

    10. Re:Don't get a laptop by x0n · · Score: 1
      My biggest argument against laptop is that the graphic drivers aren't updated. nVidia specifically states on their driver pages that laptop users should get updated drivers from their manufacturers. Maybe this issue is limited to Toshiba, but my graphics card's drivers have not been updated once by Toshiba since I bought my laptop a year ago.

      Yep, i've got a HP Pavilion ze4400, and the drivers are updated about every 6 months, however... the main reason they ask you to get the drivers from the OEM is because often a laptop's display runs at a weird custom resolution, e.g. 1280 x 600 or something strange like that. But, my laptop's max resolution is a standard 1024 x 768 and as such I can use the latest catlyst drivers from ATI -- they work perfectly. Right now, I'm running 4.9 and my card is an IGP320 (radeon 7000) . So if your laptop's resolution is either 640x480,800x600,1024x768 or one of the other standard multiples, you should be able to install the latest Nvidia drivers. If the setup executable detects your laptop, you can add the drivers manually by using the INF file instead via the standard "update driver" dialogue.

      - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    11. Re:Don't get a laptop by afidel · · Score: 1

      That shouldn't be a problem, just hack the inf file to add the custom resolution. It's not hard and would allow you to run up to date detonators/catalyst's.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  9. Laptop Choices by Donjo · · Score: 1

    I am shopping for a sub 2000 dollar laptop myself and the ABS Mayhem 2 looked like a winner. It is pretty light and sports nice hardware, however I haven't really seen any reviews for it so I don't know if they are supposed to be any good. http://www.abspc.com is the site.

  10. waste of time cause u need AC by adamshelley · · Score: 1

    the fact of the matter is, you will get no battery life. u're gonna have to be jacked in to power. if u're gonna be jacked into ac, u might as well just build a pc that fits into a backpack and buy the best lcd u can with u're $$$. you will get better performance for u're buck.

  11. ABS Mayhem notebooks by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mayhem. Nice stuff outfitted with ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 or 9700s. Your choice of Intel Pentium 4, Pentium M, or Athlon64, in order of least-to-most expensive. I'd go with the Pentium M version, based on your budget. The Athlon64 machine is $2100 with only 512Meg of RAM, whereas the Pentium M model is $1900 with 1Gig of RAM. That would also leave you enough money to upgrade to the 7200rpm HD.

    1. Re:ABS Mayhem notebooks by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      I'll second that - my boss has an ABS he bought just for gaming, and I took it for a test drive at a few LAN parties we went to, very impressive considering the price!

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    2. Re:ABS Mayhem notebooks by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      One thing I've wondered about - what kind of battery life goes he get? (And what model is it?)

    3. Re:ABS Mayhem notebooks by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure on the exact model, it has a P4 3.06, 1GB ram, 80GB hdd, 128mb radeon on it.

      He says the battery life is terrible, something like 1.5 - 2 hours, but for him it's worth it, since he only bought it to bring to LAN parties, so there's no need for it to have a killer battery life.

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  12. Go Small Form Factor by pat_trick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know you say you're looking for a laptop, but for that price range, you're not going to find what you really want.

    I'd say build yourself a small form factor pc. The plus side of this is that you get something that's still portable and will cost /much/ less than a laptop. The downside is that you'll need to haul / find a monitor wherever you go.

    I have a Shuttle SN41G2 (http://www.shuttle.com/) and it works wonders.

    1. Re:Go Small Form Factor by jcenters · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The downside is that you'll need to haul / find a monitor wherever you go.

      Not necessarily. Here's an idea, but I'm not sure of how well it would work.

      Ditch the small form factor. Use a regular ATX case. Install carry handles on top and lightweight wheels on bottom.

      Then, cut out a hole in the side of the case and mount an LCD there. I've never really seen a hack like this, but I've seen similar (Small LCD mounted in the front).

      Oh well, an idea.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    2. Re:Go Small Form Factor by zentu · · Score: 1

      There was a guy who did this very thing in MaximumPC like 2 or 3 years ago (at most) (can be certain, the mags only have a 4 month shelf life in my house since I loan them to my brother to read and then they vanish complete to me unless I nag my Bro). But he did a case out of wood and made it into a brief case that could have the top (holding a 15 or 17 inch lcd) removed and turned around to be used standing up, with the PS/2 connectors on one side to play games).

  13. A good reason to skip the laptop by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    If you have a problem and call or email for support, alot of publisher's call centers will just get rid of you since laptops aren't generally supported. Its not enough reason alone to not get the laptop if you see enough pluses to it, but it is a factor to consider.

  14. powernotebooks by Tyreth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't checked them out for a while, but these guys seemed to have good prices: http://www.powernotebooks.com/

  15. Since You Like Sager... by DerKlempner · · Score: 2, Informative

    The NP4790-C seems to be a good deal, and just under the $2000 you wanted to spend.

    --
    UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
  16. Re:Sager by addaon · · Score: 2, Funny

    wtf? read the summary much?

    --

    I've had this sig for three days.
  17. powernotebooks by kosamae · · Score: 0

    check out powernotebooks.com, you can get something REALLY good for about 1700

  18. Re:Sager by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    So, I'm now curious as to whether the story and this comment are just an astroturfing scheme.

  19. E-Machines M6811 at Best Buy $1600 by paladino · · Score: 1

    I have the E-Machines M6811 from Best Buy for $1600 after Rebate.
    AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
    512 MB PC2700
    80GB HD
    Radeon 9600 64MB
    15.4" WideScreen
    DVD+-RW
    4 USB2.0
    1 1394

    Plays UT2004 Great!!

    1. Re:E-Machines M6811 at Best Buy $1600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine got an emachines laptop from futureshop, the canadian version of Best Buy before Best Buy came to Canada. He bought it for school and took good care of it, when the screen started messing up he had to give it to futureshop for repair and was without his computer for over half a semester. Aside from that one problem he was generally very disappointed with almost everything else about it.

    2. Re:E-Machines M6811 at Best Buy $1600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also bought an emachines M6811 and it runs FarCry full out with no problem.

  20. Problems with AMDs by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    a system with an AMD would be a plus.

    I've got a Sony Vaio laptop with an AMD Athlon. It works fine for most games, although it freezes frequently and crashes once in awhile too, but i have no idea if that's Sony's fault, AMD's fault, or Microsoft's fault.

    However, i've been trying to get Master of Magic and Master of Orion running on here for awhile. Both the Windows XP emulation mode and VDMSound report that there isn't enough expanded memory to run the program, no matter how much virtual expanded memory i set up in the preferences for either program. DosBox works, but is painfully slow for both programs. VDMSound is supposed to be faster than DosBox, but i couldn't get the memory error to go away.

    After poking around on a lot of forums someone finally mentioned that some (all?) AMD motherboards have problems allocating EMS and there was probably no way to get VDMSound or the native emulation working.

    Disclaimer: I am not a hardware person, and i don't know if the information is accurate or which chipsets/motherboards have the problem, but it certainly matches the difficulies i've been having. If you plan on running any DOS games in emulation, you should probably look into the issue more. (It's kind of a moot point for me since i can't aford a new computer until i find a job.)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Problems with AMDs by Malor · · Score: 1

      I spent a great deal of time on this problem too, although with a desktop machine.

      If you are into retrogaming, you do not want an AMD chip, from what I can see. It appears that none of the XP processors will provide expanded memory under Windows XP. I believe the A64 is even worse in this regard... in 64-bit mode, a lot of the old addressing modes just go away. Windows XP 64-bit version won't run old games well at all.

      You can kind of limp along with DOSBOX, but that's slow. I was hoping VMWare might work, but the sound emulation in VMWare sucks rocks.

      Basically, if you're a retrogamer, you're better off with Intel chips.

    2. Re:Problems with AMDs by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, if you're a true retrogamer, you want one of these, and that's most definitely an AMD chip. 386DX-40, and that's 40 FSB * 1, w00t! If you can't find the 40MHz chip, then Intel's fair game too - their chips are identical to the AMD chips.

      It also seems that other PGA132 chips (even 486DLC chips) had the same Dhrystone performance at the same clock speed, though, on this benchmark (reading graphs, don't know French).

      If you need a 486, it gets trickier. Intel was probably the way to go at a certain clock speed, but didn't hit the highest clocks. Still, the Intel DX4-100 was the fastest on Dhrystone. However, Cyrix's 5x86 100MHz owned the Intels on Whetstone. AMD was slightly slower at 100MHz, though.

      If you need a Pentium-class chip, determine how much Quake-playing there is. The more Quake, the closer you need to be to Intel (careful about PPros, but it might be 16-bitness on the part of the benchie app), and the further from AMD or Cyrix (and forget NexGen - there are no mobos that take the Nx587, and the Nx586FP is quite rare). However, with integer work, the AMD K6 0wns the Pentium. Then again, anything other than a Cyrix/IBM/ST or a PPro 0wned the Pentium (something tells me the benchie WAS 16-bit).

      So, here's what you should have for each situation:

      386: As long as it's 40MHz, it doesn't matter. AMD or some 486DLC, IT DOESN'T MATTER. If you can't hit 40MHz, then all 33MHz chips are the same performance according to this benchmark.

      486: If you're doing Quake, get a Cyrix 5x86. Otherwise, go Intel.

      Pentium: If you're doing Quake, get exactly that - a Pentium. If not, go AMD (but not a late K5).

    3. Re:Problems with AMDs by afidel · · Score: 1

      Set the CPU cycles for DOSBOX, I run 40K cycles per second and MOM plays just as fast as it did on my 486-SX 33. It won't play any faster no matter how many cycles above that I throw at it, seems to have a delay loop built it. Also have you tried virtual PC, I think the sound emulation is better there.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  21. Powernotebooks.com by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Seems to get pretty high marks (though I've never bought from them.)

    They sell the Sager laptops that I believe Alienware sells, but without fancy paint jobs, for a grand or so less. I've done price comparisons but don't really need a "gamer" spec laptop.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  22. SFF computer by Will+Sargent · · Score: 1
    I have a Sager 5670, but I just got an Athlon 64 to play games.

    The Sager is good for things like Half-Life, but anything recent like Far Cry will kill it instantly. There's just no comparison between graphics cards for FPS. However, it plays Total Annihilation like no-one's business.

    If you want a games machine, get a small form factor PC. Arstechnica has a handy buyer's guide, and the hot rod comes out to less than 2K (although w/o monitor).

  23. An Old Maxim by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally you pay 2X for a laptop what you'd pay for a PC equivalent. For $2000, you'd be better off just buying a $1500 gaming PC and a $500 laptop to do work on. Towers, especially with LCD displays, can typically be carried in a backpack (normal cases) or smaller (small form factor). Battery life really isn't an issue since a gaming laptop dies after about an 1-2 hours anyway.

    That, and you can't upgrade laptops easily. It's cheaper to go buy a reasonable GFX card (~$200) and then buy a new one when you need it for a game than buying $600 card to start out with. You don't have that freedom with a laptop.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  24. Of course it counts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    two words: DELL REFURBISHED.

    9 times out of 10 this is the best deal on desktops and laptops anywhere, especially when you consider the quality of what you're getting (I'm sorry, but Dell is better than most of these fly-by-nite operations by a long shot). The inventory changes almost daily, so if they don't have what you want, try again the next day.

    That being said, I *have* had a Dell refurbished part fail on me, four months after purchase. Of course I thought "well, you can't get something for nothing..". However, after a quick chat with customer service they had a replacement on my doorstep two days later, with a RMA and a box for the old part. I'm so happy about this that I'm writing this post.

  25. Hypersonic-pc.com by elasticwings · · Score: 1

    If I had the money, I would seriously consider a laptop from Hypersonic-PC. They seem to have decent priced gaming laptops.

  26. Best Buy by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    The other day I was amazed to find a sweet widescreen (15.4") laptop with an AMD 64, 512 MB of ram a Radeon 9200 mobile (or something similar) for around $1400 (if you trust the rebate). Perhaps a bit underpowered for Doom 3 but it looked decently mobile enough. Might be a bit lower than what you were shooting for but it would certainly be close, and you could by several games/accessories with the savings.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    1. Re:Best Buy by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      It was this guy with a $200 or $250 rebate. I didn't even need a laptop and almost bought it. Still trying to decide whether to get a g5 system or build my own AMD 64 system. Any advice?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Best Buy by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Get an A64 3200+, 512MB RAM, an 80GB HDD, and an ATI MR9600 64MB for $1399 after rebate. There's a catch, though - the maker's eMachines.

    3. Re:Best Buy by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      All laptops are third party designed and bilt by one of several Taiwanese firms. The US branded company largely slaps a logo on it (Dell & HP order the parts from suppliers). Besides eMachines has gotten a whole lot better in the last few years, completely new management team and they got bought by Gateway earlier this year.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:Best Buy by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I know eMachines did do a complete turn around from the daily new PSU days in 2001. However, I'm still going to be cautious when it comes to eM (I didn't get burned because I didn't give them a chance, but they did use the Trigem Cognac motherboard also used in several HP models, and it's SHIT. I know from personal experience after having gone through two.) However, that's not the main reason I wouldn't buy the M6810 (can't afford the 6811) - the main reason is that they used an MR9600. It's not the performance of that card that's the problem - I wouldn't mind that performance at all. It's the fact that it's an ATI card, and I am running Linux. I'd go ATI if they had better Linux drivers (then again, with Doom 3 loving GF6xxx cards...)

      Myself, I'm going to probably get an Averatec 3220H1 (easier to find with awesome rebates than the 3225, and then I don't have to pay an XP Pro tax, as the XP Home model with 512MB RAM has been discontinued) - I've heard they make Toshiba's laptops, and I've had good luck with my old Toshiba laptop (except for it's speed, but can you blame Toshiba for that when it's a P75 with 16MB RAM?) I looked at IBM, but I can't afford what I want with them.

  27. it's an emachines, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eMachines M6811
    athlon64 3400+
    512mb ram
    mobility radeon 9600
    80gb hd
    dvd+/-rw
    usb2.0/firewire
    802.11b/g

    $1699

  28. Re:Uhhhhhhhhh, I apologize for the incoming commen by thentil · · Score: 1

    Unless you go the XPS route, the best ATI gfx card you can get seems to be the 9600. The XPS thing lasts under an hour, and weighs in at something like 8 lbs. Granted, that's what you get for a gaming laptop, but I'm trying to shoot for the middle ground somewhere between there. I also want a somewhat normal aspect ratio instead of these wide screen laptops...

  29. This is a contradiction in terms by JeffHunt · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as a "High Performance Gaming Laptop On A Budget"

    --

    "It was hell!" recalls former child.

  30. eMachines by gruntled · · Score: 1

    As several other posters have noted, eMachines offers zippy laptops well under $2000 (under $1500 with rebates from Best Buy). I've been running a model M6805 since January; it's my eighth laptop and it's by far the best I've had (including Apple, Compaq, Dell, and HP). Memory board shorted out in March -- cause it wouldn't be a computer if I didn't have to have it repaired/returned within the first 90 days -- and had to ship it back for remplacement, but turnaround time was 48 hours. Other than that, it's been a perfect machine. It's the very first time I can play current games on my laptop. With its exceptionally fine and wide screen, the 6805 is both big and heavy (comes close to 10 pounds), but it's a good tradeoff; I'm also running dual boot with SUSE 9.1 with no major problems except power management is funky under Linux. Here are the specs:

    deon 9600 mobility graphics solution, DVD/CD-RW, wireless and more. Here are the full specs:

    Display: 15.4" Widescreen TFT LCD WXGA (1280 x 800 max. resolution)
    Operating System: Microsoft® Windows® XP Home Edition
    CPU: Mobile AMD Athlon(TM) 64 3000+ Processor
    64-bit Architecture operates at 1.800 GHz
    System Bus uses HyperTransport(TM)
    Technology operating at 1600 MHz
    1 MB L2 Cache
    Memory: 512 MB DDR SODIMM (PC 2700)
    Hard Drive: 60 GB HDD
    Optical Drives: DVD/CD-RW Combo Drive (24x24x24 CD-RW; 8x Max. DVD-ROM); Media Reader (Compact Flash, Micro Drive, MultiMedia Card, Secure Digital (SD), Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro)
    Video: ATI® RADEON(TM) 9600 Discrete Graphics with built in 64MB Video RAM
    Sound: PC2001 Compliant AC '97 Audio
    Built-in Stereo Speakers
    Modem: 56K* ITU V.92 Fax/Modem
    Network: Integrated 802.11g Wireless LAN (up to 54Mbps); 10/100Mbps built-in Ethernet
    Pointing Device: Touchpad with Vertical Scroll Zone
    Battery: 8-cell Lithium-ion (Li-ion)
    Dimensions: 1.6"h x 14.0"w x 10.4"d
    Weight: 7.5 lbs. (8.65 total travel weight)
    Internet: AOL 3 month membership included, click here for details
    Ports/Other: 4 USB 2.0 ports, 1 IEEE 1394, 1 VGA External Connector, 1 S-Video Out, Microphone In, Headphone/Audio Out, 1 PCMCIA Slot (Card Bus type I or type II)
    Pre-Installed Software: Microsoft Works 7.0, Microsoft Money 2004, Encarta Online, Adobe® Acrobat® Reader(TM), Microsoft Media Player, Real Player, PowerDVD, Internet Explorer, Roxio Easy CD & DVD Creator (DVD Edition), BigFix®, MSN®, CompuServe®, AOL 9.0 (with 3 months membership included**), Norton AntiVirus 2004 (90 day complimentary subscription)

  31. You missed the 9100 by Sancho · · Score: 1

    The 9100 actually has support for the Radeon 9700 or the new mobility Radeon 9800 (which just screams) although the latter will delay your shipment by about a week.

  32. Age old paraphrase.... by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

    High performance, laptop, cheap. Choose any two.

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
  33. Get a P-P-P-Powerbook! by nlindstrom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Excellent performance for an unbeatable price! Check out the all-new series of P-P-P-Powerbooks!

    1. Re:Get a P-P-P-Powerbook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful that site has a nasty link where the photo gallery should be :(

  34. Everything you're looking in a shiny red package. by Mr.Cookieface · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You should check out the Acer Ferrari 3200. I know, you're probabbly thinking Acer? WTF? But it's just under $2000 and has everything your looking for. Check out these specs:

    Operating System:

    Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional

    Processor:

    Low-power mobile AMD Athlon(TM) 64 processor 2800+

    Memory:

    512MB (256/256)

    Hard drive:

    80GB

    Optical drive:

    (Slot loading)Super Multi Write Plus (DVD -RW, +RW, -RAM)

    Display:

    15.0" TFT SXGA+ (1400 x 1050)

    Graphics:

    ATI® MOBILITY(TM) RADEON(TM) 9700, 128MB DDR

    Connectivity:

    802.11b/g WLAN, Bluetooth(TM), Gigabit LAN, V.92 modem, 4-in-1 card reader, infrared, 4 USB 2.0 ports and Firewire.

    Did I mention that it's RED?

  35. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High-Performance, Gaming, Laptop, On A Budget
    Pick three.
  36. $1700? by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CyberPower Xplorer X64-8000

    I don't know about tech support or quality (never bought from these guys), but you could configure a nominally good gaming laptop for about $1700.

    Athlon64 3200+
    1GB RAM (the low-latency Corsair stuff, even)
    Radeon Mobility 9700
    802.11g mini-PCI
    XP Pro (wimp...)

    $1774.00
    Again, on paper this is a steal. YMMV.

    1. Re:$1700? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      After reading the rest of the comments:
      I agree, SFF is a better route to go for "mobile gaming only" machines.

      OK...
      One of these, $499
      Two of these, $250.98 x2
      And so on...

      Come on, be the ultimate performance whore. Take the performance hit of registered RAM. Spend the $3500-4000 for one bitchin' portable system. Just wait until the dual-cored chips; you'll have four effective processors. Don't listen to those who say SMP doesn't isn't worth it. If even the sound mixes in a different thread, even if the other processor only handles OS tasks, you'll gain some performance.

      Or maybe I'm just obsessed with dual procs and power. I mean, what do you think I'm saving up for right now?

    2. Re:$1700? by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      Surprised nobody's come up with nothing but AMD SFF PC's - remember that the P4 EE came from the Xeon core. I'd not mind a SFF 2x socket 604 533 FSB system that do PCI-E and AGP at the same time, powered by a pair of SL6RQ's.

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  37. power management works too by atrader42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    As of the 2.6.7 kernel, all of the stupid bios issues with this laptop are fixed, so you can turn acpi and speed governing on and it works. The only problem I still have is that it doesn't know when I plug it in or unplug it without restarting acpid (doesn't affect charging, just power profiles and the battery meter)

  38. Sager.... Cringe...... by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My company used to seel Sagers about 10 years ago. Yes they have been around that long. We had to take back more systems with them than I can count. It was a nightmare to deal with them. Unless you know for a fact that they have changed I would stay far a way from them.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  39. Re:Uhhhhhhhhh, I apologize for the incoming commen by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually for gaming Centrino is a twosided sword. The Pentium-M kicks with 1.7 GHz every other Intel Prozessors butt, litterally spoken. This thing is faster than a 4 GHz P4 and uses only a fraction of energy the P4 uses. But most centrino notebooks blow the gaming performance away with the dog slow and under linux rather problematic i855/xTreme2 graphics processor. Which is fast enough for occasional games (nwn still runs ok on this one) but never try it for high end gaming, you will end with a slideshow.

  40. Re:Uhhhhhhhhh, I apologize for the incoming commen by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    what kind of video card do you have in your desktop that you get such low performance on farcry?

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  41. Not happening. by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Fast / Cheap / Good

    Pick two. You cannot have all three. This is a universal law of computing (and life in general).

    1. Re:Not happening. by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      Obviously you havent looked hard enough.

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  42. PC Torque by Rinisari · · Score: 3, Informative

    PC Torque has about the best customer service in the laptop industry. They sell both Sager and Acer notebooks. I got a Sager 5680 from them a year ago and it has been the most solid machine I've ever owned (and I've owned A LOT of machines, from Macs to store-boughts to homebrew). You aren't going to find a better place to discuss laptops than NotebookForums.com.

  43. Ok by veritron · · Score: 1

    First, understand this -

    For whatever amount of money you spend on your laptop, a desktop built with the same amount of money will be roughly 1.5x - 2x as powerful, no contest.

    However, you can still have a very decent gaming experience with a laptop.

    First decision - Screen Size.

    If you get a laptop that has a widescreen, some games will support it natively - but MOST WON'T. Either your game will be distorted, or you'll have vertical bars on the side of your game. Look for the W in front of the description to figure out whether a laptop is widescreen or not.

    Widescreen IS actually better for playing DVDs and actually doing real work though. The best screen I've ever seen on a computer, ever, was on a widescreen SONY VAIO with that weird reflective technology. Look around in CompUSA or Circuit City for one of those, it's really amazing looking.

    Second decision - Screen resolution:

    If you play games at the native resolution of the laptop, they will look sharper. This is a warning for you folks looking at laptops with a screen resolution of 1450 x 1050 - not many games support that resolution natively. The lower the native resolution of the screen, the better your framerate will be, but the games will look worse - but not as bad on a laptop that's actually high res, but displaying in low-res.

    Third decision - CPU.

    Basically, you have three choices - you spend a lot of money on a Pentium 4-M that's super-fast, but chews up batteries in mere minutes, you spend some money on an AMD Athlon 64 laptop that gets good performance and "decent" battery life, or you spend a lot of money on a Pentium-M that gets good performance and excellent battery life.

    Most games aren't CPU dependant these days - if you get a mobility Radeon 9700, there's no earthly reason to get a processor that's faster than a Pentium-M at 1.7 ghz.

    Fourth decision: GPU

    If possible, get a Mobility Radeon 9800 when that comes out. That thing is based off of the desktop Radeon X800, and is almost 80% faster than the Mobility Radeon 9700, which is basically a Radeon 9600 XT, and the best mobile gpu you can get right now. Don't bother with Nvidia - it can't compete performance-wise with ATI chipsets on laptops.

    Fifth decision: RAM size. 512 mb is sufficient for most purposes, and you really won't notice the difference much by going higher. 1 gig is probably overkill, but if it's cheap enough, then why not?

    Regarding hard drives, I would go for slower-but-bigger over faster-but-smaller. Sure, the load times will be longer, but a faster hard drive will chew up batteries. Don't get a RAID array on your laptop, that's a really, really bad idea.

    For 2k, go with a Pentium at 1.7 ghz with a mobility radeon 9700 with 512 mb of RAM, a 15-inch SXGA+ screen, and a Radeon 9700 card - I know someone who's played through Doom III on one of those using only a touchpad. It should play all currently released games very well.

    1. Re:Ok by veritron · · Score: 1

      I mean the Pentium-M in the above post. No point in going past a 1.7 ghz Pentium-M with a Radeon 9700, all games will be GPU bound using any faster processor.

  44. good gamer laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Emachine M6811 (made by Arema, same guys who supply Voodoo laptops) goes for around $1600 after rebates. I've been setting it up for Linux, but it plays all the high end game just fine and is very overclock frindly on the AMD64 fsb and the ATI mem and core.

  45. Re:Defective E-Machines by Xenolith · · Score: 1

    How long ago was this? What model was it? The M68xx series of e:machines is very capable. I am running Doom 3 quite well on my M8605.

    --

    Journal
  46. Sager + leet paintjob == Alienware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are made by the same company. Hardly anyone (even some of the 'top tier' companies like Dell) make their own laptops. They contract with some Tawainese OEM and then put their own decorations & company literature in the box and ship it to you.

  47. Re:Everything you're looking in a shiny red packag by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    I own a Ferrari 3200 and I must say it's the best damn fucking laptop I've ever owned. I'm not sure how Acer managed to pull this off, but it's one hellava quality notebook. Everytime I bring it to work, I get all sorts of comments. All of the been positive to boot too.

    And sure, laptops come and go in the marketplace. But even after your Ferrari 3200 becomes "outdated" in a few years, it still will be RED!

    Warning: If you do not want public attention, do NOT buy this laptop.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  48. Re:Everything you're looking in a shiny red packag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow that laptop looks pretty sweet, if Toshiba made a Ferrari themed laptop I'd buy.

  49. And for you VH fans... by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    The 5150 is the preferred laptop of Edward Van Halen!

    Rock on!

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  50. HP zd7000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've recently purchased and HP Pavillion zd7000, and love the thing. You can customize it from the web site with lots of nice options. Previous to this I had a Toshiba P25-507.

    The Toshiba had a 32 meg nVidia go5200. The HP has an option (which I took!) for a 128 meg nVidia 5700! I only play Second Life, but the difference is STAGGERING. It also has an option for a new brightview screen, 16:9 ratio, 1680x1050 resolution - GORGEOUS. You can also get a 7200 RPM 60 gig drive with it... built in wireless, etc, etc. I went with a 3.2 ghz processor with hyper threading. It performs WONDERFULLY. All this for a tick under $2000...