Slashdot Mirror
SciFi Channel To Air A New Galactica Series
EvilBuu writes "The Sci-Fi Channel has begun airing ads announcing a full Battlestar Galactica series following the surprisingly (to some) good new mini series starring Edward James Olmos. Looks like it will be a straight forward continuation of the mini, with the same cast and more Cylon goodness!" According to this press release, Richard Hatch will guest star, and the show will air starting in January 2005.
New Battlestar Galactica Series Greenlighted
...can be misleading from time to time, but i gotta say this looks like it's going to be very nice for the eyes :) i know, i know, that won't carry everything, but meh, i think it'll be fun to watch :)
Granted, I wasn't old enough to have watched the original Galactica (I'm not even 30 yet), but I did watch part of the mini-series and was thoroughly bored. Why they're going to make a regular series out of it, I'll never know.
One thing I *do* know is that as good as Stargate SG-1 is, it pisses me off that Stargate gets 8 seasons and counting *AND* a spinoff while Farscape got three years and change with an abrupt axing without doing the characters justice in the "ending".
That was enough to tick me off originally. But then Sci-Fi made it worse by continuing with that idiot John Edwards who "talks to stupid people"... oh - and supposedly their dead loved ones too (*cough* cold read *cough*). And then they had those two retarded "dream experts" that made everything in their show about *sex*. Sci-Fi is turning into the fucking LifeTime network. Then that terrible "Taken" by Spielberg (or lucas - I can't seperate the two anymore) and then that attrocious three hour guerilla marketing (disguised as a documentary) for The Village which investigated how M. Night Shyamalan is really some sort of voodoo shaman kind of guy with magical powers really did me in for good.
I canceled my cable last week due specifically to my dislike for the Sci-Fi network. I'll put that $120/mo into something more worth while and any shows that I deem worthy enough to waste my time watching, I'll just grab from bit torrent.
Anyway, back to the original point. What is it with Battlestar Galactica? It's about as exciting and interesting as that really crappy "Dark Shadows" series (and don't even get me started on the Mormony Goodness of the show). Is it just that SciFi couldn't find the funding for their 400th Sci-Fi Original movie about killer bees, killer anacondas, killer bats, killer dragons, killer spiders, killer rats, killer mosquitos, killer cats, or alien viruses?
They don't find the ratings too low and revamp it into Galactica 2006. "Hey, look, we're on Earth now!"
They've been advertising this for months.
The mini-series didn't suck anywhere near as much as I thought it would. It was actually pretty good. But then, considering how horrible the original series was, there was nowhere to go but up.
I'll be cancelled.
Yeah, this is flamebait, but that doesn't change its veracity.
If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
If they mean this Richard Hatch
i chard.shtml
http://www.cbs.com/primetime/survivor/survivors/r
All I can say is... FRACK.
Am I the only one who finds the fact that nostalgia is driving the current Science Fiction series aired to be supremely ironic?
Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
God, I hope he keeps his clothes on this time. And Olmos better watch out, or he'll find that everyone has voted him off the Galactica
*yes I know it's a different Richard Hatch.
---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
One trick pony. He was only good on Survivor.
CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
No, it's the same one.
a full Battlestar Galactica series following the surprisingly (to some) good new mini series starring Edward James Olmos.
Okay, we were obviously not watching the same show...
Terrible nightmares of naked homosexual Cylons hell-bent on manipulating the universe...
Bring back Mystery Science Theater 3000 ;)
I loved BG as a child and I recently watched some re-runs for the first time since, all I can say is that the original series have not aged well, the whole thing looks cheesy and very early-80s. The scripting is laughable on occasions.
Contrast this to when I saw repeats of Dr Who, Blake's 7 etc from the same era. They seemed to have aged very well like a good wine, and despite some very dubious sets and sfx they make you realise that it's the quality of writing that make shows like these a classic.
For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
So they turned the McGuyver action hero character central to the SG theme into a desk jockey.... Yeah.. that'll boost ratings as they replace his anger fed machine gun sprees with angst fed stapler accidents.
I can't figure out why they did that. While the other characters are interesting, they aren't the glue that holds the show together and keeps people watching. If they got rid of his character entirely, the show would fall apart. I suspect that he'll end up back running the show - or will somehow continue to play vital roles in the action parts - however they manage that.
All I could figure is that maybe he has another project he's working on for a few months or a year and needed to have less of a prominance in SG-1 so that he could focus on the other project. Because, as a plot-line, taking your main character out is just stupid.
Of course, SG Atlantis has started up, too. I thought it would suck but I actually like it so far. It could use some hotter chicks, but oh well. I thought it was stupid that they landed Robert Patrick to play one of the marines in the pilot, but then he was killed off in the same episode. When I saw him, I thought he was going to be a regular. That would have been awesome.
StarGate is the only series I'll miss now that I ditched cable TV. I'll probably still download what I can off the net to keep up with it, but... meh. It isn't worth $120/mo just to watch stargate.
Also of note:
Farscape is coming back as Farscape: Peacekeeper Wars. Old News.
New series based on Ursula K LeGuin's EarthSea coming in December. Old News.
Firefly is coming back in movie form as Serenity next summer. Old News.
SciFi channel is also contemplating a Larry Niven Ringworld miniseries. Old News.
And most likely, there's going to be another 8 or so Tremors spinoffs...
I was frankly surprised by a few events during the mini series, and I'm looking forward to the new season. However, now that they've shown us the 6 (ahem)chassis models, we know who the bad guys are. How many episodes can they go using that suspicion as a fundamental backdrop in the story line ... 3-5? Hopefully it won't turn into a lame attempt at a series ala Voyager, Deep Space 9, Enterprise.
I'm hoping for something more like Babylon 5 but moving through space...
...I saw the mini-series and yes, it was surprisingly good. I really really liked it. I liked that they avoided a lot of sci-fi cliches, except one.
So let's face, the invention of human cylons is a big horrible mistake and one of the worst sci-fi cliches ever. Obviously, they wanted to save on the CGI-effects budget and wanted to avoid cheesy robot costumes. So they came up with human-looking cylons. The pilot movie made it clear that the following series will revolve around the question which of the Galactica crew members is actually a cylon, possibly without even knowing about it.
But I see no suspense whatsoever from a plot point that was innovative in 1927's "Metropolis" but that has been worn off ever since: Is that person human or isn't it? Am I talking to the original or not? The idea of non-human enemies posing as humans to subvert the human forces has been done to death by every incarnation of Star Trek and practically almost every other sci-fi show ever made. I see no new idea coming from this. Too bad.
I just wish they would have avoided that and come up with some non-cheesy robot cylons.
------------------
You may like my a cappella music
I thought the miniseries was stupid. Maybe I'm missing something. It seems a lot of people liked it, though. I thought it was shallow, cheesy, and a sorry attempt to use sex to sell it half the time. I just couldn't get into it for some reason. In fact, I hardly remember anything about it. To me, that's a decent sign it wasn't very good. But.. maybe I'm just missing something. I didn't watch the original BG growing up, so perhaps that has something to do with it.
Hexy - a strategy game for iPhone/iPod Touch
Woohooooooooooooo!
Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
But what about Farscape?
/. people are taking themselves too seriously. Bad posting indeed!]
[And what the fuck is this? I think
Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, anonymous comment posting has temporarily been disabled. You can still login to post. However, if bad posting continues from your IP or Subnet that privilege could be revoked as well. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner or login and improve your posting . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down. If you think this is unfair, please email moderation@slashdot.org with your MD5'd IPID and SubnetID, which are
This is news how? There shouldn't be a single geek out there that hasn't been aware of this for months now.
"On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
Boring? How can you say you found the new Battlestar Galactica boring? It sucked through and through. Didn't you orgasm?
The mini was one of the best pieces of SciFi that I've seen in a long, long time. I only hope that they're able to maintain the standard on a weekly basis. Anyone who hasn't seen this miniseries should seriously look into it. It's too bad that there's so much negativity surrounding this project, mainly from supporters of the original series.
He's stated that he wanted more time to be with his family/daughter. By taking a lighter role he can hopefully do that.
In the "From Stargate to Atlantis" thing they said that season 7's ending wasn't how they wanted to end the series, and basically implied that season 8 would be it. We'll see.
Yep. I was disappointed to see him killed off. But with about 40 years of sci fi consumption under my belt - it was refreshing that somebody finally came up with actual scary bad guys in "The Wraith." It would be interesting if - as life sucking immortal monsters - they were also a vampire race, and Patrick came back as one of them.
That's kind of the same reason why Don S. Davis (Gen. Hammond) left the show entirely. He's had some health problems, and the stress of a shooting schedule wasn't helping. He wanted to spend the rest of his time relaxing with his family.
Asking once again, add the ability to meta moderate the people who post stories.
It is just getting ridiculous. The reposts have gone from sad, to so sad it is funny, to so sad it is just... sad.
This is just wonderful. maybe now they can put some new material into the show. I mean is it just me or watching the same thing with better cg and starbuck as a girl. Of course i could be wrong and we could get the same old stuff. Who knows the kids beingg able to jump 10times higher than regular earthilings might make another appearance. Well heres to new material that wont suck.
You would think that they could have come up with something more interesting than him becoming a desk jockey then. Maybe he could have somehow played a more vital role to that alien race (the greys who were like.. super super super advanced - and benevolant). And in that, he could have a periodic role, but without the dullness of the desk job thing.
Or maybe they thought the desk job bit was an unexpected twist that would normally not be pursued in a sci-fi show.
I saw the sci-fi special about stargate and the impression I was left with from some of the comments was that the 8th may or may not be the final season. They made it sound like they would continue to do both series simultaneously and didn't really appear to indicate that this *would* be it.
If they do end it, I hope they do the show justice with the ending. I really can't take anymore of this bullshit where we invest an hour every week for most of a decade into a show only to have the producers fuck us in the ass in the last season and feeds is melted cheese rather than tenderloin.
That's what pissed me off about X-Files and Farscape. Invested a lot of time and emotion into those shows and loved both only to have them tossed in the trash without an ounce of respect to the loyal audience that stayed along for the ride all those years.
Dammit! Screw Edward James Olmos and his pock-faced character. To hell with that lebian-ish looking chick that plays Starbuck, forever ruining the original series' mac daddy version of Starbuck (who later trolled the A-Team series). I don't care that the 2nd of two black guys from the original series has been turned into an Asian woman...that might actually be a humanoid Cylon fabricated for the sheer ease of reducing the CGI effects budget!
:-p
WHAT ABOUT THE DAMNED TOYS?!
I want my little Galactica starfighter back -- from when I was only about 6 or 7 years old. I want figures to put into the starfights -- ones WITHOUT arms that bend at the elbows wrists. They better have less arm/leg motion than a Barbie doll on downers! I want the toys to require batteries so I can keep replacing them over and over again -- JUST TO HEAR THE CHEEZY LASTER BLASTER SOUNDS!
Oh -- and I want a Cylon fighter this time. My brother got a Lincoln Log set last time I owned Galactica toys, and dammit -- it's time I had my Cylong fighter! Fuck you, bro -- let's see how your "cabin" fairs against my army of silver badass Cylons!
IronChefMorimoto
It wants it's dupe back.
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
That apostrophe really shouldn't be there in my parent post. That's what you get when you visit Slashdot after a long, hot Sunday spent plastering and sanding walls rather than catching some sun.
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
Do I really want more?
Maybe the Cylons and Daleks can once and for always
make space safe for inorganics.
As long as they don't stop StarGate.
Unfortunately, I think most people are just not going to "get it." I had a discussion with a friend who is the true "but this isn't like the original show, so it sucks!" The most fascinating thing about of this series is the fact that the Cyclons are now human. The pilot ended up with some great philosophical (for the Slashdot crowd, this won't work because it requires thinking about other positions than your own, I know..) ideas and plot points:
-- Are the Cyclons more human that we are? Can they have all their emotions without being socially destructive? Or, are they less human because they are so reigned in? Do they have freewill? Can they have freewill and yet also be sleeper programmed?
-- Is Baltar just psychologically unsound or did they plan a device in his head? We know that there are at least one other Cyclon on board, but I seriously suspect another. Are they the perpetrators or is Baltar unconsciously being controlled?
-- How will Starbuck deal with having passed Zack? In theory, this should lead to her resignation, but we cannot afford to lose any valuable pilots.
-- How with the X.O. handle his daemons now that his job isn't plush anymore?
This series has a lot more drama to it, which is probably why the "old crowd" doesn't care for it. I can say that the people I know who weren't raised on the old show really like this one.
Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
It's about money .
Dr Who and SciFi channel should be a perfect match.
...by the matter, it was a really not-too-fun computer game, why should it be made into a movie?
There are all kinds of antagonists to use.
I believe the current crop of writers and producers just don't understand the protagonist/antagonist concept.
Example:
#1. Man, stranded in the snow, struggles to find shelter.
-vs-
#2. Man, stranded in the snow, struggles to find shelter from evil ice wizard's storm.
There's a huge difference between the two.
With the Borg, they were initially introduced as #1. They were impersonal.
Then, with the addition of the Borg Queen, they became #2.
"The idea of having an enemy be just a force that's Out There(tm) and not interactive just doesn't occur to some people.
But a force does make for a better antagonist in some situations. You cannot argue with it, persuade it, find out why it doesn't like you, etc.
I think the problem is that the writers/producers don't WANT anything to be BIGGER than their characters. The antagonist must have a voice and you must be able to tell when it has been defeated.
Humans vs Cylons:
Easy back in the 80's. People worried about losing their jobs to machines. Now we worry about being replaced by some guy in India. Robots from outer space just are not that effective as a generic threat now.
The other thing I found disappointing is how the writers never let any of the humans make a wrong decision.
#1. Must abandon the slower ships to be killed by the Cylons. But right then the Cylons show up so it isn't "abandon", it becomes "escape".
#2. "Bad" human guy tries to shift suspicion away from him by blaming an innocent person. But the "innocent person" turns out to be a robot.
"Bidibidibidi, nice ass, Wilma!"
You must think in Russian.
You would think so, but they haven't shown Dr. Who on Sci-Fi in over a decade. I suspect that they realize the show is too over-their-heads for the SCi-Fi channels "Scare Tactics / John Edwards" audience.
That "Mormony Goodness" you lament led me to a deeper understanding of Satan.
I am hoping that the God-worshipping Cylons will similarly enrich my devotion to Satan .
ive been seeing the damned commercials for months.. Wishing it was just a bad dream..
Man it was a terrible 'mini-series'.. i had hoped that was the end of it..
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Americans in Ba.... oooh, sorry, wrong Rant.
We can't have a new Galactica. It is simply not possible, so it isn't there. It is all that Win XP SP 2 thing that has gotton into your heads. You all see things that simply aren't there. See. Okay, repeat after me: a new Galactica doesn't exist.
Now, off you go, do something usefull. How about downloading Win XP SP3 at: www.suse.com
That guy sucked on Survivor All Stars. I mean so what, he's big, he's gay, he's covered in hair, he bit a shark (ok that was kinda cool). Oh wait...... the OTHER Richard Hatch, gotcha.
Either you hate it or you love it. Haven't seen much indifference. I for one welcome our nuclear strike cylon enemy overlords.
You misspelled "goddesses". I agree, we need more of those hot, kissing ambassador models.
Please help metamoderate.
When you have learned that your shit stinks then comment about Battlestar Galactica. otherwise go play your X-Box
Wow. Now *there's* a comment that made any kind of sense at all.
I can afford to pay for cable and watch the new Battlestar: Gallactica series. But then I will have to pay for therapy due to my sexual fantasies about Starbuck. Then I will not be able to afford cable.
You miss the point - this news item is about the NEW SPOTS they are running on Scifi! They didn't have them i February!
If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
Who knows? It might get really good and we'll get to see a gang of Cylons slide it into Katee Sackhoff, or into the Cylon-posing-as-a-hot-human.
Stargate SG1: Spinoff of a pretty good movie
;)
0 7.turner.html
Stargate Atlantis: Spinoff of a spinoff
BS: Galactica: Remake
Andromeda (LBX): Bought from syndication
Scare Tactics: science FICTION channel REALITY series.
They have a couple other "original" series that I have not seen so I do not feel comfortable talking about. Good for them that there seem to still be a few original shows. See here for their seriously weakened lineup when compared to a few years ago: http://www.scifi.com/onair/shows/
Apparently original ideas are no longer acceptable on SciFi channel.
Why else cancel the amazing show that is Farscape? Farscape takes science fiction to a new level, and a lot of people are picking up on it after the huge fan response to the cancellation.
(Okay actually SciFi didn't "approve" of Farscape because they didn't own it top to bottom. The Farscape game, the little action figures, everything, was under Henson's control. Under the surface the Farscape cancellation is about media consolidation; SciFi Channel doesn't like what they can't own completely.) See this Ted Turner article about this general trend in the industry: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/04
A lot of people still haven't seen Farscape, so I invite you to watch it Monday through Friday, 9AM-4PM, from Friday, Oct. 1, through Friday, Oct. 15. SciFi channel is airing all 4 seasons so people can catch up.
I beg of you; spread the word about this amazing show.
p.s. I do not wish to offend on Stargate fans or Andromeda fans. Im just extremely passionate about Farscape, I hope you will not be turned off by my enthusiasm.
John Susek
* The sequence of events during and immediately following the Cylon attack was well-handled, IMHO. It had the feeling of a real event, where nobody knew quite what was going on and people who were not expected to be leaders had to step up and take responsibility.
* The environment on Galactica, the crew reactions, and the overall tone of a fleet that had been on guard duty for years without seeing any combat, and was now engaged in combat felt right to me.
* The "combat journalism" style of dogfight footage was great. I definitely prefered it to the smooth, effortless and artificial feel of most Trek space combat.
* The characters were set up with individual personalities without reliance on alien cliches. It's a lot more difficult to make a show based on mere humans seem interesting to SF fans, but I wanted to know more about these characters, and I felt that there was a lot more to explore in each of them.
I loved the old show when I was a kid, primarily because of Starbuck, and because I could picture myself flying around in a Viper waxing Cyclon Raiders. But this is a very different show for a different audience. In my opinion it's better acted and richer, and it has the potential to be a solid series. I'm looking forward to seeing more of it.
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
And now this months-old post shows that Slashdot just turned South. It's all downhill from here.
..does every scifi channel discussion bring out the 'scifi sucks cuz they cancelled farscape' trolls? get over it. nobody cared about the show and it got canned. same thing happened to the 1st star trek show too ya know.
back on topic...
BG could be interesting... if they don't keep it centric to the cylons _looking_ human. what is humanity? is it a flesh and blood (ie genetics) thing... or more a state of mind? what is a mind? what is a soul?
these are just some of the interesting ways to go with the plot and general story arcs.
we shall see what happens i suppose.
oh yes, i though farscape sucked.
...for every "Farscape Troll" there's a "Farscape Sucked" troll. Sorry troll-boy, but it's common knowledge that Farscape wasn't cancelled because of poor ratings, but because the rising production costs cut into Sci-Fi's budget. (Some also believe Bonnie Hammer - the devil incarnate herself - got into a pissing match with the German company who owned Henson Productions at the time, and cancelled Farscape as a final "fuck you". The fact that Farscape's airing is back on less than a year after Brian Henson and friends spent personal fortunes to reacquire the franchise makes this seem plausible.)
You paid $120 a month for cable ?????!!!!
Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
Even the fruitiest geek would rather watch the new Battlestar than timothy's butt boofin cum burpin porns.
I say this with some sorrow, because I enjoyed the original series when I was in grade school, but Galactica has suffered a number of indignities over the years and between rewriting, editing, and corporations that were more concerned about cashing in on the nostalgia than producing a good quality science fiction series the series has lost much of its luster for me. Now, to be fair to the Sci-Fi channel and some of the original cast members the recent miniseries was a good intentioned attempt to recapture some of what made the Galactica concept so compelling. However, Galactica has always, even during the original run, suffered from lack of budget. The original series for example, cost $1,000,000 per episode in 1978 and it was cancelled even though it was the number one show that year. The hard truth is that advertisers, even if your show is number one in ratings, will only pay so much for a 30 second commercial spot. Thus, in order to make the show profitable there have always been compromises. I really wanted to like the new miniseries...I really did. I watched it in its entirety, even though I winced at some of acting and most of the dialog. Perhaps the series will prove me wrong...I hope so...but I am not getting my hopes up.
I don't know about you guys but i think that when you remake a popular 80's series or movie, you need to retain that 80's feel. the 80's music, hairstyle, corniness etc. Star Wars I-II could have been much better done that way, instead of "improving" eps 4-6 the way we all bitch about, and it would be consistent with the star wars universe. Ah... the 80's....
Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
The idea of non-human enemies posing as humans to subvert the human forces has been done to death by every incarnation of Star Trek and practically almost every other sci-fi show ever made.
I think you missed one of the aspects that I found most compelling: the tension between military and civilian authority.
The Cylons aren't just "almost human machines" like Commander Data or 7-of-9. They're terrorists. How do you stop a terrorist who blends into the crowd and may be any one of us? How much of your freedom are you willing to give up? What is freedom worth? Those are going to be some of the fundamental questions of the new BSG.
I find this refreshing and intriguing. I loved TNG, but the Star Trek universe has always been laughably civilian. I think the new Battlestar Galactica resonates with our zeitgeist in much the same way as the original Star Trek did with its own. I'm looking forward to seeing what they do with it.
P.s. There were those two robot Cylons in the first 15 minutes, and the idea that the enemy ships themselves are robots is a great one. The one thing I do miss is the vocoderized Cylon salute: "By your command!" Their voices scared the pants off me as a kid.
Oooh, space vampires! Scaaaaarrry!
Not.
Love how the show takes place in an entirely different galaxy but everybody still speak the English, looks vaguely human, and by some miracle, that "one shot" gate transfer from earth somehow managed to include full hospital gurneys and plenty of power bars.
pls keep this stuff to the nerd blogs & off /.
Thx.
I want my little Galactica starfighter back ...
Yeah, what he said. And not the "safe" version with the missiles glued into place, either! I want the original one!
Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
Sigh. Back in 1979, I wasn't rich enough to afford toys from the old show but I *was* able to get -and actually assemble- a Viper model kit, complete with rubberband powered missile launcher in the nose.
This is important to mention because Mattel was being sued at the same time because the Galactica toys had missile launchers and kids were putting out eyes and stuff. It caused a major safety revolution for the toy industry. Meanwhile, the models were exempt because they were supposed to be for adults or something.
So anyway, I built this model and it turned out OK considering I was about 9 years old and didn't know jack about models. And then it was time to load the missile and push the button and.... BANG the !@#$ing missile hit the wall on the other side of my room and *vanished*. That's right, the damn thing disappeared. Tore that room up, even pulled the carpet up and never saw the missile again.
Oh well.
Later on, the kid who lived in the apartment building behind mine got a Cylon toy and a Buck Rogers Starfighter toy so we used to go play "Glen Larson Wars" for no particular reason. Everyone agreed: Erin Gray was THE solid reason to watch Buck Rogers but we were all too young at the time to figure out why, exactly.
She'll probably be the reason I go buy the Buck Rogers DVD set too, but I am fully aware of the why now.
Yes, I have seen her lately and I don't care. Hot is hot.
Recently watched the mini series and I thought it was really good. Okay, it was not oscar material. But it was good, solid entertainment; and I really enjoyed the fact that they used all the old designs as a basis for the up-to-date CGI stuff. Only the cylon fighters were a bit boring.
And changing Boomer and Starbuck into chicks was, well, just plain WRONG.
Anyway, the news that this will be a series comes to no surprise. The mini-series was SO obviously a pilot. Anyway, it's all good. Finally some good space opera TV. Let's just hope the show won't get cancelled or made more marketable by having the girls wear skintight outfits etc.
What I'd really like to see in the show is more exploration of Cylon "culture" and history than in the original show. Who are they, where do they come from, and why do they hate humans so much?
....ooooooh boy.....Betcha dollars to donuts that SCIFI network will be soon adding the upcoming new release's commericials to their godawful annoying commericial/advertisement schedule... Just like tha last BattleStar Gallactica (just like every other 'major event' on their network in the past 3-4 years).... ---> brace yourselves for the exact same 30 second commericials being iinserted into EVERY FSCKING COMMERCIAL BREAK -- EVERY DAY -- for 5 to 6 goddamned MONTHS STRAIGHT.... This may just be enough to justify jumping on the friggin' Tivo bandwagon... it's bad enough SCIFI beats us viewers over the head nearly every comm. break each week with repeated blurbs for say, the next "New" Stargate SG-1 -- but half a year's worth?
Bah.... SciFi must have hired on a whole bunch of complete motards to run their advertising/marketing dept over recent years, 'coz nearly the entire station/network has turned to crap (and it's only getting worse...)
hey, thought you'd want to know, Blue Thunder was a Westland(U.K.)/Aerospatiale(FR) SA.341 "Gazelle", not a Hughes(US) (now Boeing/McD-D(US)) AH-64.
A formidible aircraft in it's own right, but not the Apache. Trademark of the Gazelle is the shrouded tail rotor and a 3 bladed main rotor . The Apache's tail rotor isn't shrouded and it runs 4 main rotor blades.
A strange twist of history put "blue thunders" vs. "blue thunders" in Bosnia and Kosovo during peacekeeping operations. UK runs Westland Gazelle "AH.Mk-'x'"s and the Serbians, who were licensed by Aerospatiale to build the Gazelle, also use them. They've also been serving in Iraq.
Probably more than you wanted to know, but I thought you'd want to be accurate. Googling about Gazelles will turn up tons of info.
I can tell you from personal experience, the "chop" of the two helicopters (sa.341 vs. ah-64) sound nothing alike when approaching, and the Gazelle has a very distinctive turbine/exhaust noise you can never forget. A UH-60 Blackhawk's chop sounds closer to the AH-64, and the exhaust noise of a Bell AH-1W SuperCobra sounds closer to an AH-64.
I am not sure I want to see Erin Grey in her skimpy white outfit at her age. Bring back the reruns!
O'Neill has always been essentially second in command of the base, and would assume command automatically anyway if anything happened to Hammond. He would also assume command of the alphasite if the SGC ever got really compromised.
I think him taking command when Hammond simply moved on is a natural assumption. The only reason anyone else ever held that position was because of some sort of outside pressure (NID, President).