Slashdot Mirror


Projecting Video On Curved Surfaces

Jochen Bedersdorfer writes "According to golem.de, a research project in the area of Augmented Reality created a technology to project videos onto arbitrary existing screen surfaces, like wallpapered walls or window curtains. ... Quite awesome. Now I can use this ugly corner in my living room effectively."

177 comments

  1. Imagine by foidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    being able to project porn onto boobs! The possibilities are limitless

    1. Re:Imagine by Threni · · Score: 0

      That's been done...it's at the start of practically every Bond film...and frankly I like it that way!

    2. Re:Imagine by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Funny
      Er, don't you think your girlfriend would be upset if you were looking at what was moving over her boobs and not the boobs themselves?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Imagine by oasis3582 · · Score: 1

      If you gotz b00bz why you need pr0n? You are one kinky dude. :)

    4. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nigga please...

    5. Re:Imagine by IBX · · Score: 1

      Curved surfaces to cater warped tastes. (By chance - would it be possible to use a large stuffed plush hamster for the projection of my childhood videos?)

    6. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least now we won't have to worry about that wife standing in front of the TV to block our view of that crucial play!

    7. Re:Imagine by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

      Imagine being able to tape having sex with someone and while your taping it, project it onto the boobs ;)

    8. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex. With someone else? Wow, imagine....

    9. Re:Imagine by caluml · · Score: 1
      project porn onto boobs!

      Eeek! It's some kind of infinite loop - slowly sucking in all around it...

    10. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slowly sucking in all around it...

      Now you're getting somewhere...

    11. Re:Imagine by stridebird · · Score: 1
      1. Find b00bz
      2. Project pron on b00bz
      3. Make video of pron projected on b00bz
      4. Find more b00bz
      5. Project pron of pron projected on b00bz
      6. etc etc etc
      7. oh yeah, and Profit! somewhere along the line

      /* no comment */

    12. Re:Imagine by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Porn that is actually porn projected onto boobs that is actually porn projected onto boobs that is actually porn projected onto boobs

    13. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh no, my brother. You, are the 'nigger'".

      contest: where is this quote from?

    14. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiousity, how old are you?

    15. Re:Imagine by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      7. oh yeah, and Profit! somewhere along the line

      i'll buy a copy of that
  2. Omnimax @ Home? by Viral+Fly-by · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the rapid expansion of relatively high-end (5|6|7).1 surround sound stereo equipment in homes that is beginning to be joined by HDTV, could a technology like this bring a new option to table? Could we have something like omnimax theatres in our homes?

    1. Re:Omnimax @ Home? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that there's really a market for this in the home - most people get large tvs or use flat walls/screens for a home theatre and I don't see that changing, if only because it looks better normally.

  3. Interior Decorating from Slashdot by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

    You have an ugly corner in your living room, and you're going to "improve" it by projecting some arbitrary image onto it?

    Try paintings. Or a ficus.

    1. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yes, but you could project an image of a cool living room onto it and hide the fact that it was ugly.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by Cumstien · · Score: 5, Funny

      He seems like a normal guy, but why does he have a painting of a ficus projected in the corner of his house?

    3. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by CkB_Cowboy · · Score: 0

      "IMAX Smart Projector" - turn 85% of any room into a palace!

      --
      what, what?
    4. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could even be a Harry Potter type painting that interacts with the room's occupants;-) "Good morning Mrs. Smith, oh it looks like you put on a few pounds since the last I noticed" Or any message that you, the uber geek of the house, wanted to project...

    5. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that Mrs. Smith might not take too kindly to such a "painting." Or to the programmer behind such comments...

    6. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      It could be much worse. WallClippy: "I see that you appear to be pregnant. May I offer my congratulations?"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmmm ... what about "plastic surgery" from slashdot?

      If you don't like your face, just project a better looking image over it ...

      Or if you're in a conversation, and you don't like the face of the one you're talking to, well, that problem is easily solved now ...

    8. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by nomel · · Score: 1

      The keystone software that comes with the Nvidia cards could do some of thes.

    9. Re:Interior Decorating from Slashdot by 9Nails · · Score: 1

      I like that! There is a whole community of houses that one could market such a device to. "Got a single-wide, but wanted the look of a double?"

  4. Just Another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just another way to making visual media more exciting to enjoy. Now all we need is for the people producing the media to make something worth watching.

    1. Re:Just Another... by bsgk · · Score: 0

      Apparently you didn't watch Joe Schmo 2.

  5. curved surfaces? by deathazre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with projecting an image onto a non-flat surface is you can only get it to look proper from one small area. Anywhere else and it's still distorted.

    --
    Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    1. Re:curved surfaces? by jmrobinson · · Score: 1

      Not true. Most Projectors have shape adjustments to compensate for the shape of the wall, alot like the fine tuning settings on your monitor

    2. Re:curved surfaces? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How complex are those adjustments? I'm sure that they can handle a tilted or sloped wall, but with an irregular surface, anything mapped to look fine from one angle won't be from another.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:curved surfaces? by deathazre · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I said, you can still only make it look proper on an irregular surface from one small area. Leave that area and it's distorted again.
      What I probably should have said in the first post: all this technology does is make it so you can move that area around. (of course that area is always going to be where the camera is, in this case)

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    4. Re:curved surfaces? by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the parent *is* right. Consider the extreme case of projecting into a corner: the projection looks right when you view from the same area where the camera is/was, but try looking at the image from a significantly different angle (say, a right angle to one of the walls). The picture will be severely distorted then.

    5. Re:curved surfaces? by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      That could have some advantages. "In order to see this movie properly, we're going to have snuggle in close to see it without distortion. It's not me, you understand, it's just the projection system." (Which would be a disadvantage if you have the Trekkie XXXL Club over.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:curved surfaces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also old technology and commonly available.

    7. Re:curved surfaces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing happens when you project on a flat surface too, vagenius.

    8. Re:curved surfaces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with projecting an image onto a non-flat surface is you can only get it to look proper from one small area. Anywhere else and it's still distorted.
      Not true. Most Projectors have shape adjustments to compensate for the shape of the wall, alot like the fine tuning settings on your monitor

      Hrrm? If that were so, then it wouldn't matter where you sat in the movie theater, even first row extreme left, you wouldn't see a distorted image.

    9. Re:curved surfaces? by stilwebm · · Score: 1

      The extreme case of projecting in to the corner is accounted for in the example images on the linked page. I'm sure there is some distortion or focus problems, as the low-res images don't give full detail. Still, the corner selected contains blemishes as well, and the image looks pretty good. Sure the designer painstakingly selected images, but the corner image and curtain image are quite impressive.

    10. Re:curved surfaces? by SanLouBlues · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but think how nifty it would be to project a photo or painting onto a corner, then copy it like the masters did with the camera obscura, and let people ooh and ahh when the walk by it. Or, distort the image to fit an outward corner, then paint it on a flat wall to give the impression of more space.

      It would fit perfectly in any modern art museum.

    11. Re:curved surfaces? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      A projection onto a flat screen also looks wrong when you're not facing it directly. It's just that we've gotten used to sitting at a weird angle and watching a parallellogram screen.

    12. Re:curved surfaces? by deathazre · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about parallelogram distortion. On a curve, one side of the image would be more compressed than the other, a sudden dropoff would result in one part of the image being shifted, etc. if you're not at the same place as the image is supposed to be true at.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
  6. Well done. by Devar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good one guys, you just slashdotted Germany.

    --
    It's a Bagel.
    1. Re:Well done. by tehcyder · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Not to be modded as redundant
      Nice try.

      I think the official /. wording is "mod me down as troll/flamebait/redundant if you want, but..."

      Then you get modded up.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Well done. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      The link to Experiments in the vaults of castle Scharfenstein sounded interesting, but it died before I could check it. I guess someone decided that they just had to watch that 22M movie.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Well done. by bmf033069 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the topic of Slashdotting, I wonder if it is possible to include a link-quality-meter into the header of a story. It would be good to know beforehand that the site was heading downward, as I'm really tired of clicking on links that are never going to come up.

      A more general solution would be to do a ping through to the site when you mouse over a link and show the results as a hover tip. I'm sure that this might already be a Firefox extension already as some very useful ones have been popping up recently.

    4. Re:Well done. by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Then you get modded up.

      I thought that jumping on any story from Germany or Japan with little digs based on nationality was the way (?)...

    5. Re:Well done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that jumping on any story from Germany or Japan with little digs based on nationality was the way (?)...

      The Japanese Slashdot insults the Americans in the same way; Check this out!. See what I mean?

    6. Re:Well done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. Uber Ales !

    7. Re:Well done. by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      The one at the top about a menu based on the front panel, or the one underneath about transmitting the picture from a PSX to another machine with which it's networked? Didn't see anything about Americans...

  7. Re:DOOM 6 by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what if your home already is creepy, dark, and with strange noises from the corners?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Re:DOOM 6 by blakespot · · Score: 1
    Or by the time DOOM 3 comes out for OS X.

    :-(


    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
  9. Working link (for now) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  10. Solution looking for a problem? by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Video projectors will play a major role in future home entertainment and edutainment applications - ranging from movies and television, over computer games, to multimedia presentation.

    Before televisions became the norm, projectors were a common sight around middle-class homes. I remember my father used to show us home movies, Disney cartoons, and science documentaries on a compact Super 8mm projector on idle evenings.

    I don't remember the size or even the presence of the "canvas screen" being a big issue. A blank wall did just fine (without any significant loss of picture quality IMHO). If a smaller/larger image was desired, the projector was just moved nearer/away from the wall as necessary. Not such a big deal. Ofcourse the room had to be pitch dark because of the low contrast produced by the projector.

    IMHO, this is a solution looking for a problem. I agree the ability to project on curved surfaces might be a bonus, but the pictures did not reveal any significant advantage.

    I was more impressed by the "light insensitive" projector that was on /. a few weeks back - it could display images/video effectively in bright light - can't find the link.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lots of people don't have blank walls. Colored wallpaper, non-smooth plastered walls, walls covered with paintings etc. are all unusable with a normal projector.

    2. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Wizworm · · Score: 1

      And what about projecting onto moving surfaces... Waving flag anybody

      or how about ads on a moving subway car.

      and what is setup time like, does it take an hour to calibrate the camera.

      --
      I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
    3. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely with coloured walls not all colours will be reproduced? What happens if you project a red image onto a monochrome green wall?

    4. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Lots of people don't have blank walls. Colored wallpaper, non-smooth plastered walls, walls covered with paintings etc. are all unusable with a normal projector.

      Which is why we have Exhibit B: The white bedsheet.

      One bedsheet plus one TV plus one Fresnel lens plus one smaller lens = several fun childhood parties with friends. The room had to be pitch black, and we never did solve all of the distortion problems using a two-lens system, though.

    5. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      My color addition/subtraction memories are fuzzy at best so IDK if the system can solve this particular case, but the system does measure the wall's colors, and attempts to compensate for them.

    6. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by dabraham · · Score: 1
      I don't remember the size or even the presence of the "canvas screen" being a big issue. A blank wall did just fine (without any significant loss of picture quality IMHO).

      I remember that too, but a number of things have changed. The biggest one (to me anyway) is that we've become accustomed to many more pixels, and much less visual noise. Frankly back then the picture was so bad that bumps in the wall were not the biggest resolution problem.

      Second, those projectors threw a lot more lumens than affordable modern projection TVs do. A co-worker just got a projector for a pitch dark room. He started out projecting onto a white wall, then he got a screen from staples, then he got some special screen paint "goo" and applied it to a piece of plywood. At each step he's been amazed by how much the picture has improved.

    7. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by argent · · Score: 1

      It may not be a big deal for home use, but it's huge for commercial purposes, advertising, and so on.

      And if it's mostly software, it'll become a cheap add-in that'll become ubiquitous whether it's really useful or not, like "movie mode" in digital cameras or fancy ringtones in cellphones.

    8. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All pure science and a lot of technical research produces solutions looking problems. The PC was originally thought to have a market of a few dozen people.

    9. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you want to build your own planetarium?

    10. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Znork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it's unusable with a normal projector it'll still be unusable with projection technologies like this.

      If it's usable with a normal projector you'll get a better quality image with a projector like this.

      It isnt magic. It can compensate for color shifts that would cause distortion, but you still pay in image quality by losing contrast and color range. For an extreme example, take a black and white striped wall. As you're unlikely to have an entirely unreflective surface on a wall, you could create a compensated picture by strongly increasing illumination on the black parts and decreasing it on the white part. However, the maximum brightness of the image becomes the maximum brightness reflectable by the black parts, which decreases the contrast range. Same thing with any other surface, you'll lose quality, you just wont lose as much, or in such a visually disturbing fashion as you would with an ordinary projector.

      So if you care enough about image quality to bother getting an expensive projector you'd probably want to get a projection screen anyway.

      Still, it would be quite useful when you either dont care that much about the image quality, or in situations where you have to project on a not quite suitable surface and cant use a screen.

    11. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by vontrotsky · · Score: 1

      This could be awesome on laptops. Replace the monitor with a minaturized projector and display the image on any close by surgace...

      jeff

    12. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      What happens if you project a red image onto a monochrome green wall?

      Simple! The projector sees the green wall and attempts to compensate by increasing the intensity of the red component; eventually (if the green is pure enough), the projector turns up the intensity of the red so far that the wallpaper (which is absorbing the red light) catches fire, and your house burns down!

      Therefore, stick to white walls, or magnolia if you like living on the edge.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  11. Dear Slashdot by Letter · · Score: 0
    Dear Slashdot,

    That's true. The projected image will only look correct from a single user location (the "sweet spot.") One way around this would be to use a tracking device and recalibrate the projection warping when the user location changes. Still, that would only work correctly for a single viewer.

    Letter

  12. Is there an analysis of Slashdottings anywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be interested in reading something about typical request rates under a Slashdotting, whether most sites get bottlenecked at the router or ISP, and what the bottlenecks are in the webserver, disk access, or database connectivity or lookups.

    Maybe such info already exists somewhere?

    1. Re:Is there an analysis of Slashdottings anywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Essentially a "Slashdotting" is a form of "DDOS attack", so perhaps it is more useful to search for the effects of that with Google :)

      1. GOOGLE: "effects of" "DDOS attack" "internet infrastructure"

      2. To get ... (Note Slashdot parser has separated the 'oS.pdf' at the end ... STUPID :) )

      "http://www.k2defender.com/products/K2-Defender- DD oS.pdf"

      3. Search for the word "infrastructure" in the PDF

  13. Projecting onto clouds by otisg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Funny, I was just thinking about projecting video onto clouds the other day. You probably couldn't cut code using clouds as your gigant display unit, but you could probably watch some 'herbal movies' on them...

    --
    Simpy
    1. Re:Projecting onto clouds by dcigary · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Disney has already ventured into projecting videos on uncommon surfaces, such as the water spray screen in Fantasmic and the Grim Grinning Ghosts effect in the Haunted Mansion attraction.

      --
      ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
    2. Re:Projecting onto clouds by ZagNuts · · Score: 1

      In Disney World (FL) movies are projected onto sheets of water during the show that they have at the end of every day.

    3. Re:Projecting onto clouds by otisg · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to Disney World in 20 years.... :)
      What do these sheets of water look like? Water-fall like? White and foamy? Smooth and blue/clear?

      --
      Simpy
    4. Re:Projecting onto clouds by Wizworm · · Score: 1

      I saw a projection onto a sheet of FOG, they were using it as a screen you could walk through

      http://www.fogscreen.com/technology.html
      -snip
      The basic components of the screen are a laminar, non-turbulent airflow, and a thin fog screen (or any particles) injected into and inside a laminar flow. Created this way, the fog screen is an internal part of the laminar airflow, and remains thin, crisp, and protected from turbulence.

      --
      I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
    5. Re:Projecting onto clouds by quinkin · · Score: 1

      The light wattage/lumens/candela/luminous flux (choose your favourite) required would be enormous.

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    6. Re:Projecting onto clouds by TwoPumpChump · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The light wattage/lumens/candela/luminous flux (choose your favourite) required would be enormous.
      It's not impossible; ever notice spotlights illuminating clouds - usually originating from car dealearships and such? Last winter, I noticed a four-spotlight pattern swirling on the underside of some low clouds at night while heading out to the movies. By chance I passed the actual dealership where the spotlights were originating (the light patterns were visible 30 miles away.) The dealership was using some sort of large robotic spotlight platform, about half the size of VW bug, which moved a set of 4 spotlights in a simple spiral-graph like pattern. That set me to thinking, it should be relatively simple to paint text messages on the underside of clouds using a system like that. Granted, you'd have to be able to move those spotlights a bit quicker to give the illusion of text, but it should be in the realm of possibility. Next thing you know... sky spam...
    7. Re:Projecting onto clouds by ZagNuts · · Score: 1

      I think each sheet is sprayed into the air via a row of nozzles in the lake there. They weren't very thick, you could see through them to some extent, but they were much bigger than a movie screen. This had to take place at night of course because of contrast. The only unpleasant side effect was that pieces of "screen" were blown onto us spectators and it wasn't very warm out.

    8. Re:Projecting onto clouds by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Batman did.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    9. Re:Projecting onto clouds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, hail Deutschland!!! You all know what this means?? Rainy day pR0n!!! Just go to some predominently religious city (vatican city, salt lake city, etc) and just play debbie does dallas, or some other cool pR0n on the sky. Boy oh boy that would give me some good laughs :).

    10. Re:Projecting onto clouds by quinkin · · Score: 1
      If you want anything legible you will need a highly focused source - lots of light is easy, a highly collimated focused light source is hard. I agree with you in principle and was going to suggest a laser trace style "projection".

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
  14. This sort of technology was shown last year.... by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... at Siggraph 2003.

    There was one demonstration showing projection onto the inside of a translucent sphere, while in the paper "iLamps: Geometrically Aware and self-configuring projectors" Raskar et al showed a system that could also combine the output of several projectors. It was quite impressive.

    1. Re:This sort of technology was shown last year.... by pottsvillain · · Score: 1

      Or a few years ago (2001?) at UNC Chapel Hill by Yang and Welch. See http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/stc/publications/Ya ng_CECG01.pdf

  15. MOD PARENT DOWN by JAPrufrock · · Score: 1
    The comment above shows that the site wasn't read/understood before posting.

    The projector (both in stills and on the avaliable film) compensates for both surface color and configuration automatically and applies the transformation on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Good idea, IMHO. Sure seems to work. Seems to be arbitrarily flexible, to first order.

    There are definitely artifacts, but they seem to follow curved edges - not surprising when one realizes that pixels are finite and rectangular.

    I wonder how the reflectivity of the surface affects the adaptation.

    Watch the movie - it's pretty clear on the process.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by JAPrufrock · · Score: 1
      Watch me shoot my mouth off. Sorry - Parent is right after all. I sound like "Leave it to Beaver".

      That being said - just sit where you can see best. Same as I do watching movies on my laptop.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by slim · · Score: 1

      That being said - just sit where you can see best. ... but I hate watching TV alone. I want to trade comments, or at least glances, with someone else.

  16. Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by burnttoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At most cricket grounds over here (esp. for internationals like the current Windies tour) sponsor's logos are printed on the pitch (painted on the grass). BUT. The best camera angles for cricket are from a high up camera inthe stands. So the sponsors have to predistort their logos so that it looks good in a long, panoramic, high shot.

    I thought that it was quite clever when I first saw it.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    1. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by Hungry+Student · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, like the logos painted in the try areas at rugby games that are painted in such a way to look like they're standing up out of the ground from the broadcast cameras' point of view, clever.

    2. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by hplasm · · Score: 0

      This was actually designed as a distorted font for road markings which actually appears to be standing upright on the road. It was declined by the powers-that-be for some unknown reason, but was snapped up by the ad-monkeys.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    3. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's not forget the anamorphic skull in Holbein's painting "The Ambassadors" from 500 years ago.

    4. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by burnttoy · · Score: 1

      I also remember some "secret" paintings. I believe these were from the English Civil War when having a picture of the monarch was a VERY dangerous thing to have.

      Instead plates were painted with an apparently abstract pattern. However when a mirrored cyclinder is placed in the middle of the pattern the picture can be seen.... Can't find a link to a pic of it sadly.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    5. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by obergeist666 · · Score: 1
      I thought that it was quite clever when I first saw it.

      So did I. Then I started to hate it, because it messes with my sense of perspective.

    6. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      check out kurt wenner's sidewalk art. pretty amazing...

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
    7. Re:Not quite curved on a cricket ground.... by burnttoy · · Score: 1

      WOW! I'd forgotten about those! A few of those pictures were in a paper here a little while ago. I haven't seen them since. VERY nice! "Dies Irae" is the one I remember.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  17. One way to do it: by Janosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't RTFA (/.'ed) A norwegian company who specialices in exhibition designs use a procedure to project images on walls in smal spaces, or curved surfaces. They build the room or sphere in a 3d program, and maps the wall with the images they will project. Then place the camera where the projector will be placed, and render. Now you have a video you can project that will fit the wall precicely.

    --
    When i Moderate something -1 Flamebait, why do i not get another modpoint?
    5--1 = 6
  18. Useful by oasis3582 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does this mean I can project video onto my girlfriend to make her look like Keira Knightley? :) oh, and don't worry, I'm just kidding about having a girlfriend...

    1. Re:Useful by Fuzzums · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought they meant projecting ON curves.
      Not projecting curves ;)

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
  19. Disneyland by Therlin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Disneyland has been playing with something that sounds similar to this.

    If you go here and scroll down halfway to "Sleeping Beauty Castle gets a new look", you can see a couple tests that Disneyland did to "paint" the castle. One painting it gold with a ribbon around it, and another one turning it into a US flag.

    1. Re:Disneyland by solive1 · · Score: 1

      Also, Disney has been projecting images onto water screens for their Fantasmic show. Doesn't work all that great unless you look at the right one from the spot you are sitting, but it's still kinda cool. I was at Disney World about a week ago and they projected an image to make the castle look like the Fantasia sorceror's hat during a fireworks show, and it looked pretty decent.

  20. Half's been done? ... by unithom · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The first thing that comes to mind is this product:
    http://www.siliconoptix.com/products/index.shtml

    I work at a planetarium and we researched this product as a means to project video onto our dome theater. It can do any number of near-realtime distortions to the video, including hemispherical mapping, or you can use included software to create custom mappings (like corners).

    We concluded that this product was perhaps one generation early but looked promising. Hopefully they sold enough of them to stay afloat and work on v2.0...

    I realize that this only covers the 'geometry' portion and not the 'color' one, but to me it seems like the harder half to tackle. Maybe I don't have enough knowlege of the subject, but given the input from the camera, enough time and filters, solving the color problem seems doable too.

  21. Useful for odd projection angles? by ericzundel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In our church, we are having issues mounting a projector in a place that is inconspicuous. Most of the inconspicuous places introduce too much of a keystone effect. That means that we will have to fix a (very expensive) projector to project with a special lens to one and only one screen. It might work fine when there is a large group, but if a smaller group wanted to use it in a more intimate setting, everyone will be sitting up front craning their necks. It would be neat if we could just point the projector at any surface and have it automatically correct for whatever distortion happened to be there.

    1. Re:Useful for odd projection angles? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      (Amazing. Some has an actual application for this technology and it's modded offtopic.)

      You might want to check the existing digital projectors to see if any have features to suit your needs. If your screen is flat, the mapping to adjust for the projector location is a lot simpler than ajusting for irregular shapes and colours of the surface.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Useful for odd projection angles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a clue, that distortion is God's way of saying you belong to the wrong religion.

    3. Re:Useful for odd projection angles? by ericzundel · · Score: 1

      Hmm. The modding on this one is Offtopic to interesting, to insightful. Meta moderation will be fun!

      I am no expert - the experts at the meeting where There are some projectors out there with keystone projection. I was just thinking it would be neat if one could just move or re-point it to a differnet screen and it would sense how far out of perpendicular the screen was and the projector would automatically adjust. The more automatic the better. I don't know how many meetings I've been in where the first 20 minutes was fiddling with the projector.

    4. Re:Useful for odd projection angles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are doing this through a computer, you may be interested in a feature Nvidia has in their drivers. "NVKeystone" display correction they call it, and works on pretty much all nvidia gpus after the Geforce 256, so you could just purchase cheap Gf2 MX or such. http://www.nvidia.com/object/feature_nvkeystone.ht ml

  22. "I was a 98 Pound Weakling..." by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...until I discovered the Slashdot workout plan! Sure, I still spend 8 hours a day in a dim server room and all my cardio comes from playing Counter Strike, but with this new Slashdot brand portable non-optimal surface video projection system I now have a full-body projection of vintage Arnold Schwarzenegger on me at all times! Okay, so he's a lot taller than me and that puts his weiner in the middle of my chest, but that *still* gets me more chicks than before! Thanks, Slashdot!"

  23. try make-up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now I can use this ugly corner in my living room effectively"

    Sorry to disappoint you mate, i dont think your mirror is going to be any more effective than it already is.

  24. somebody tell IMAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    because they have been projecting high definition film onto curved surfaces since the 80's

    but re-inventing wheels seems to be fashionable thesedays so maybe it will work

    1. Re:somebody tell IMAX by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      I know you didn't RTFA (because that would be asking to much), but if you had, you would have seen that, unlike IMAX, which has to shoot the film distorted in order to project it "flat" onto a curved surface, this technology uses camera feedback and GPU pixel shaders to dynamically correct/distort the image in real time.

      But you didn't know that, because you didn't RTFA...

  25. Meep meep! by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is so much looking to be used as a "road runner" practical joke. Leave one of these projecting an "open door" and a "hallway" onto a solid brick wall. For the truly evil, project a "tunnel" complete with "diversion sign" onto the ground beside a road, at a sharp bend...

  26. Interactive Environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article: Such devices might make it possible to convert your bookshelf into a TV screen, or your kid's closet into an interactive virtual playground.

    Of course if your kid was bad, you could also turn his closet into a freakish nightmare...

    Ok, maybe you it to your house mate just to watch him go screaming out into the night.

    1. Re:Interactive Environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ok, maybe you it to your house mate just to watch him go screaming out into the night.

      Before you do such a cruel thing, stop and ask yourself one important question: Has he paid his share of the rent this month?

  27. Virtual Table by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys get a good look at "The Extended Virtual Table" on that page? Pretty Interesting.

  28. Taj Mahal by sita · · Score: 1

    So the sponsors have to predistort their logos so that it looks good in a long, panoramic, high shot.

    I thought that it was quite clever when I first saw it.


    So did I. At Taj Mahal. There are some passages from the quran around some of the archways. The size of the lettering increases towards the top of the arches to compensate for the perspective.

  29. Looks a lot better then I expected by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If the final image in the examples is the real result then wow. Projecting a movie into a corner and getting a normal picture is nothing to be sneezed at.

    Sure it won't replace regular screen in places where there is room for them, cinema, meeting room, entertainment room, but it seems perfect for holding a demonstration and not having to take a screen with you and for information/commercial displays.

    Eeek more commercials. Bad germans.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  30. Recursive Boob Porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could project porn of porn getting projected on boobs onto boobs!

  31. There's a reason they're called Marital Aids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hints for geeks: the only place she wants you to look is in her eyes- When they can project p0rn retina-to-retina- this will be a major advance. I shudder to think what women (geeky variety or otherwise) might want to watch on a such a device: Shopping channel maybe? (ducks!)

  32. camouflage by medvezhatnik · · Score: 0

    looks like the same technology of a camouflage that makes objects appear translucent by projecting a background over it.

  33. Lamping still a problem by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I own an LCD RPTV (Sony GW III), and IMHO lamping is still a big problem for projectors, even rear projection systems.

    My TV is pretty good in ambient light, but not great -- I still find myself closing the drapes closest to the TV for daytime watching. You can always jack up the lumens with brighter lights, but this leads to heat problems and lamp replacement costs. I'm already scared for the replacement bulb price for my TV, which is only good for 3 years -- supposedly its a couple of hundred dollars.

    Actual projectors are pretty worthless in any real ambient light in my experience; you need semi-darkness as best.

    And it's not just ambient light, it's image quality. Projection systems usually have pretty crappy black levels. I can live with mine since I'm not that much of an image zealot (no ISF calibration, etc). But you also have uniformity issues, focus, etc.

    1. Re:Lamping still a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, white LED's will be the solution/replacement to the incandescent lamps and the problems they bring to the table.

      Also, you've gotta go DLP to get a decent black level (you can't beat projecting NO light to induce black -- unless projecting black light would do the trick...)

      Of course with DLP you can use lasers instead of lamps OR LEDs...

    2. Re:Lamping still a problem by swb · · Score: 1

      I didn't like any of the DLP (which pretty much meant Samsung) sets image quality. They suffer from the rainbow problem (move your head and you see a rainbow color effect) and some other image issues related to the use of a single DLP chip and the color wheel.

      I also thought that the image was way too overprocessed -- it looked like a video image that had been transcoded between compression formats one too many times, particularly on standard-def content.

      Side-by-side with the GWIII, the GWIII offered a better *looking* picture, even if the black levels weren't as ideal as the Samsung DLPs.

      DLP would be a lot better if they used three DLP chips and ditched the color wheel. I don't know if that would be enough, or if Samsung would also have to significantly upgrade their video processing system as well. Sony appears to have them beat on that element as well.

    3. Re:Lamping still a problem by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      "Lamping"? Is there no noun that is safe from being verbed?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:Lamping still a problem by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

      Nope, that particular corner was turned back when the phrase "Slashdotted" was coined.

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
    5. Re:Lamping still a problem by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

      Oh, you can go DLP and get a tri-chip system for your living room but, as the guy says, "It'll cost ya!"

      But yeah, I know what you mean about the picture looking "funny" -- I wonder if some people just have a higher level of visual acuity than the people who design these things (I know I don't make my living staring into bright lights, so maybe my retinas aren't as crispy...) I mean, I can't tell the difference between a $30 boom box and a $300 stereo, but I almost can't stand to watch a show on the Spike channel because their picture looks like it's been compressed and decompressed a couple of times.

      Here's a link to one product (probably this manufacturer's most "affordable" 3-chip projector; the link at the Texas Instruments site pointing there ranked this one for "high-end home theaters" -- the "mid-range" systems below this category were mentioned at "price points as low as $20K-$30K", so I imagine this one is, er, a bit pricey...)

      I got on Texas Instruments' DLP mailing list as soon as I heard about it (and I already have the wall picked out in my living room, though I don't think I'll ever ever be able to afford one of the really nice projectors unless I save Brooke Shields from drowning or something...) and have always been fascinated with the whole MEMS thing anyway.
      BTW, here's a link to TI's DLP overview, for those who aren't interested in Googling for it.

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
    6. Re:Lamping still a problem by swb · · Score: 1

      Heh, if I have to hang a "Cineplex Odeon" sign outside my window and charge my visitors $7.50 per ticket, maybe I could afford one...

  34. Summary of My Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The way I project video on a curved surface is to point the projector at the curved surface.

  35. Beyond screens and monitors... by Vexler · · Score: 1

    I am looking forward to holographic projectors being available. You don't need a screen, you can see 3-D, and combined with the idea of a "touch-projection" technology (think "touch-screen"), we would be onto something like a Holodeck. Doom9 would be extremely cool.

    1. Re:Beyond screens and monitors... by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doom9 would be extremely cool.

      Or Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
  36. Re:Imagine...uh by eomnimedia · · Score: 1

    If you have a handy pair of boobs to project onto, why do you need this? Isn't that the point (or at least, a pair of points)?

    (Yes...yes...insert the obligatory 1024x768x38DD reference here.)

  37. I'll have one mini version for VR please by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 1

    I have been dreaming of a VR headset that contains a curved screen. If such a technology could be made small enough could be the enabler for turning these virtually not reality headsets to real VR headsets.

    mmmmm....

  38. Scroll down pages for other weird research... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Color Correction by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice the color correction that was going on in those pictures as well? It shaped the color redistribution so the movie looked normal on a checkerboard curtain... not to mention accounting for the irregular shape of the surface. The combination of those two features is amazing. You have always been able to keystone, but if you have, say, a painting on the wall and don't want to take it down every time you watch a movie...

    1. Re:Color Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last image in each of those is a picture of the projected image without any distortion at all, IE straight off of the computer/dvd player. There is no color correcting afaik, but that would be pretty cool. A nightmare to implement, of course.

  40. What Curves? by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Curves? You must be talking about a different actress.

    Seriously, I doubt a Keira Knightley projection will have problems making any woman appear to have the body of a teenage boy.

    1. Re:What Curves? by Fuzzums · · Score: 0, Redundant

      LOL :)

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
  41. siggraph yesterday, by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    I was at SIGGRAPH yesterday, and there were a number of exhibits that used these technologies.
    The internal projected sphere you mentioned was in the art gallery exhibit, and you could choose between a number of video/art projects (only one worth watching was a cool animation of plate tectonics).
    A commercial exhibit had setup using like 5 or 6 projectors to produce one *big* panorama animation of a 3d fish tank (or undersea, not sure), and it looked flawless.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  42. Predistorted images for people with bad vision by Wargames · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can they create a display that shows a distorted image such that someone with 20/20 vision and no astigmatism would see it blurry but someone with 20/400 and an astigmatism would see it perfectly?

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
    1. Re:Predistorted images for people with bad vision by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

      I wondered the same thing. here's a link to simulations of common visual disorders; it looks like mild macular degenration as well as certain types of retinal detachment might be compensated-for with a technique like you suggest.

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  43. Doom3 would rock on this :D by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
    Those people that thought they just upgraded to the best of the best... of the best ... for Doom 3 ,

    will be very very very disillusioned now ;)

  44. Maybe off topic by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

    OK, I think this is cool. But I have a pet peeve with people calling something like this "a technology." Isn't it really just an application of technology? Or a technique, or a method, or a system? Calling something a technology has become a cliche that immediately connotes--for me anyway--something that its overhyped. Like "an historical event" or "a software engineer." It's press release hyperbole.

    Or am I just jaded?

    This technique is a refinement of other systems that project on curved surfaces or correct alignment or create seamless panoramas using multiple projectors.

  45. Back to the future. by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny... until flat screen televisions came out, 99.99% of all video was "projected" onto curved surfaces.

    1. Re:Back to the future. by mjbkinx · · Score: 1
      Funny... until flat screen televisions came out, 99.99% of all video was "projected" onto curved surfaces.

      maybe the headline was misleading for people who don't RTFA.
      it's about projecting on irregular surfaces with irregular coloring, without expensive technology.

  46. If I could... by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

    If I could I'll give you a "Pervert" modding for this special comment :)

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
  47. Viscus Projection by c1t1zen · · Score: 1

    If the calibration is in real-time then could it possibly work on a liquid like milk or colored/dyed water? I'm even more interested in how they make those holographic images on that site! Projecting onto a corner is interesting but you would have to be directing under the beam from the projector to get the right effect.

    1. Re:Viscus Projection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the video they say the correction is done in realtime, but the calibration takes about 30 seconds to analyze the surface. Thus it would'nt work on liquids (yet ?)

  48. I thought ... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    for a second that it said:

    "Projecting VOODO on a curved surface."

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  49. Physics Majors Please Reply by DevCybiko · · Score: 1

    I'm confused by the images. I see a brown "screen" in the form of a castle wall. But I see white light reflecting back. Likewise with the "Finding Nemo" fish. Isn't this a physical impossibility? As I remember my basic optics, all light is made up of Red, Green, and Blue. If an object reflects all three of these colors, then you see it as White. If it absorbs some of them, and reflects the rest, then you see other colors, like brown. So, if a brown wall absorbs the components that make up anti-brown - how can it ever reflect white?

    1. Re:Physics Majors Please Reply by polecat_redux · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm no physics major, but I believe it all has to do with the intensity of each color component. Lets assume that the color brown has an RGB ratio of 150:100:25. All you should need to do to produce "white" (more like grey) would be to balance the values. So the projector should be outputting something like RGB 0:50:125 to compensate for the color of the surface. Overall brightness would be increased by increasing the intensity of each color equally.

    2. Re:Physics Majors Please Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm no physics major but here's how I understand the system :

      First you're right when you say that it would'nt work on a perfectly back surface, since no light at all would be reflected. However real surfaces always reflect some light, differently according to the wavelength, this is what we call color.

      For example, if you use a white light on a brown wall, the intensity if the RGB components of the light are (100, 100, 100) and the wall will reflect (80, 50, 30), which are the light components for brown. With this information you can deduce the reflectivity according to the wavelength, which would be (0.8, 0.5, 0.3) for this wall.

      Then when you want to display some color, divide it by the reflectivity and you get the intensity the projector needs to output. For instance to display the color (50, 50, 0) (dark yellow), the projector would output (50/.8, 50/.5, 0/.3) = (62.5, 100, 0). This way your eye will receive light intensities which corresponds to yellow.

  50. Physics Majors Please Reply by DevCybiko · · Score: 1

    as i recall my basic physics, light is made up of basic Red, Green, and Blue wavelengths. you combine them to make all other colors. an object that reflects all wavelengths looks white. to make an object look black, it reflects none of the colors. and to make brown (as in say, a castle wall) you reflect some combination of colors. in other words, objects absorb light to make it look some color - like brown. so, if a castle wall absorbs all but the brown wavelengths of RGB, how can you get White to reflect? I don't think you can. the best the castle wall can reflect is some combination of RGB that it does not absorb. To use an extreme example, imagine a plain black screen. it would not reflect any light and therefore the device would be useless if black were one of the colors you were displaying on using this projector. Less extreme, i think this projector could never do much better than display a sort of generalized brown image on the castle wall. Physics majors, shed some light on this?

  51. The inflatable toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will never look the same

  52. Perfect for rally games by superswede · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Me and friend has been playing with the idea to project a car racing game onto the wall in a narrow room or a hallway. With some simple algebra you could calibrate the sidewall and corners so that the scenery on the left and the right of the car is projected on the side walls and the road on the wall in front of you. Such scenary will not requiry much resolution since you will not look at it directly, but it will definitely add to your perception. That should quite a simple add-on to existing games since you only have to reserv some of the margin for the sidewalls and the ceiling. Imagine when you see/get a feeling of your oponent next to you... To bad I can't afford a projector though :(

  53. Invisible by maverel · · Score: 1

    if they can modify the image to sooth the eye, why can this be use to blend an object to hide it in plain view? (i.e. take the surroundings and make and object dissappear like a camouflage?)

  54. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A research group at the University of Kentucky did this several years ago. They actually used arrays of projectors overlapping in 360 degrees. They would run a brief pattern test, which was recorded by digital video cameras. The program would then align all the projector images to overlap correctly and pre-destort the images so they would be in focus in corners or on various objects in the room. The other cool thing is that the overlapping could be done so that it would greatly reduce shadows if someone/something was partially blocking a projector.

  55. This has been done before for some time by centipetalforce · · Score: 1

    These guys at http://obscuradigital.com/ have been doing this for quite a while now.
    They were at E3 the other year.
    The guys at obscura digital deserve credit for doing this first!

  56. We DoThis Already..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a company that owns a projection screen manfacturer. We have built a number of odd shaped and curved screens. An image processor called " SCREENSHAPER", made by Folsom Research in California is used to map the video onto the surface. The Screenshaper can bend the video to fit in many directions at the same time. We use it quite often in the corporate show market and the tradeshow market

  57. Immersive Virtual Reality Environment by qsqueeq · · Score: 1

    my professor at UNCW has been working on this http://people.uncw.edu/adharg/VR/vr.html (website isn't pretty). He can either take pre-made videos and display it on them, or he can use a video camera that runs through a hardware filter that he created that will turn the video feed into something that looks 3d on the curved screen. He uses SPI to convert the code into opengl that will appear to be curved correctly. The work is being done for future projects in Florida. The idea is to stream the video from undersea dives to the marine biology research lab in Wrightsville Beach, NC and displaying it on the surface. Eventually robots with cameras would be able to dive and the researchers and use remote controls to control movements of the robots. We got to use it some during my comp. graphics class. I posted some pics of it on my site at http://www.qsopht.com/school/index.htm

  58. I did some work in this area in 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using a Video Toaster, SVHS deck, goggles and a color Sony security camera. I'm glad someone's developing the idea further. My approach used chromakeying, making it quick and dirty and cheap, perfect for the home market.

    Toward Ultimate Reality

    I even worked it into a few joke articles on BeDoper:

    All Future Movie Studios and Televisions To Run BeOS

    404 Company Goes Pubic

  59. Nasa Has Been Doing This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since 1991 or so, at least. Some people have "bubbles" in their vision, which NASA scientists corrected using augmented reality, by distorting the image to compensate for their eye defect.

    I looked for a link, but my page came up first, and I didn't see any others.

  60. analogy by ronaldyang · · Score: 0

    (to me) this is just like using an EQ in a stereo. The idea behind the eq is to obtain an accurate playback of the original recording, where the eq fixes the "flaws" in your system and your environment.

    In fact, there are audio systems where you take a microphone and it listens to test sounds and the eq can auto adjust. Similarly there are systems to calibrate home theater projectors autonomously.

    This particular idea is like a natural extension. Good Job to Jun. Prof. Dr. Ing. Oliver Bimber.

  61. That would not be slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would not be slashdotted but Schmarrepunktiert or Schnittpunktiert.

  62. It's too late to post but here's an older solution by tweedlebait · · Score: 1

    http://www.laservideo.com/

    --
    Firefox & /. ? Use this often:
  63. technology old like earth itself by mr.+spike+2 · · Score: 1


    Image Geometric/Signal Linearity Predistortion is used since DSPs like dsp56000 in early 80ties came in. Now this technology is widely used for angled projections for business graphs and stuff like that.

    It's a matter of how good, precise and heavy you can calibrate it (not a piece of cake).

    You can make such things wih photoshop/corel/your own soft, your 486sx pc and videoprojector.

    And YES - it looks even worse when you watch the projection from angle (OR DISTANCE! - due to perspective distortions) different from which you calibrated it.

  64. Website also uses this by kamukwam · · Score: 1

    It seems this websites also projects the images over itself. The text is completely invisible to the reader, because of the perfect projection of the website's images!

  65. Olympic projections by brindafella · · Score: 1

    We did all see the projections on the stylised face 'statue' during the opening ceremony of the 2004 Summer Olympics, didn't we?

    There was also the projections onto the three linked loops later in the ceremony.

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.