Slashdot Mirror


Internet Publishing Can Pay Off

An anonymous reader writes "Leander Kahney of Wired News has an article (Net Publishing Made Profitable) about how the publishers of the free, online newsletter TidBITS have hit the jackpot with their highly focused Take Control ebook series (nicely formatted PDFs that are easy to read on screen or print). Authors earn 50% royalties, and the books cost $5 or $10, with free updates. All the books out right now are about Mac topics, but maybe they'll branch out in the future."

161 comments

  1. Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by melted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now these books will appear on every god damn P2P network out there.

    1. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's a bad thing?

    2. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by motardo · · Score: 1

      well, good think they're mac books ;)

    3. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Now these books will appear on every god damn P2P network out there.

      For those too lazy to RTFA: None of the books has any kind of copy protection, though Adobe's PDF format contains various digital-rights management mechanisms. "It's not worth doing it all, because it just causes problems," Engst said.
      ...Engst asks his customers to treat the books as they would physical books: Feel free to share with a couple of friends, but don't post them on the Net. Engst has been aware of no abuse, and none of the books has shown up on file-sharing networks.

      Now admittedly I download now and then, but in this instance we've got a content producer that is:
      - Small and independent
      - Compensating writers fairly
      - Charging a very reasonable price
      - Choosing not to use DRM, despite having the option to do so, and even *gasp* encouraging people to share with their friends.

      I have nothing but contempt for someone that would violate the copyright on this. After all, isn't this the direction the Slashthink wants the music industry to take?

    4. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But the content's got to be worth it ;). We've got this new tech that can copy things all over and circulate ideas like wildfire, yet money always gets in the way because writers have got to eat.

      I think they'd make more money by providing the books for the cost of download ($2 or $3 a e-book) and then offering exclusive paperbacks/hardbacks to people who want them at $20 or $30 a pop, or they can offer books that'll last forever for mroe. After a year, they begin throwing books up free to download with advertisements in the front and back for paperbacks. The good books will gross a lot of sales for paperbacks, as the demand for them is still there. If I had the money I'd certainly buy or print a number of books I have, and a few (scabbed wings of abadon, www.rantradio.ca for that one) I *REALLY* want a paperback of, not only because the book is so damn kewl, but so I can loan it to friends.

      An electronic medium can is only as good as it's medium, but a good book can last years. Frankly, without DRM authors will be doomed, and with DRM people will be doomed since multinationals will seek to lisence everything. I can't really see any middleground right now. People really can't make money selling intangible objects like data because once data is created it can be copied at nearly no cost. They can make money at selling tangible objects, like paperbacks, however.

    5. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Frankly, without DRM authors will be doomed, and with DRM people will be doomed since multinationals will seek to lisence everything. I can't really see any middleground right now. People really can't make money selling intangible objects like data because once data is created it can be copied at nearly no cost. They can make money at selling tangible objects, like paperbacks, however.

      But it's been shown time and time again that the DRM is just big media's security blanket. CSS, FairPlay and Adobe's eBook DRM have all been cracked. Sure there's some technical knowledge required, but it only takes one person to share it on Kazaa before it's everywhere. Does this mean big media (the greedy middlemen, in most cases) is doomed? Possibly.

      But that doesn't necessarily mean artists are left out in the cold. I know it might be hard to remember in the iTunes age, but I remember the first online music store worth giving a crap about was eMusic, because it was the only major player without major DRM restrictions (and it actually had none, since it used MP3s). We don't hear much about eMusic anymore, but the fact that it's still around says something: there's money to be made selling unprotected content. Maybe the multi-millionaire musicians are in danger, but as a whole I think artists might just come out on top by replacing the recording industry with an indie label and an online music store.

    6. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      The problem is that small print runs have extremly high per-unit costs. You would be looking at a run of several thousand paperbacks, and even more for hardbacks, to be able to offer them at any kind of sane price.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    7. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Donny+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I think they'd make more money by providing the books for the cost of download ($2 or $3 a e-book) and then offering exclusive paperbacks/hardbacks to people who want them at $20 or $30 a pop, or they can offer books that'll last forever for more.

      If someone did that, I'd print hardbacks in China and sell them on eBay at $10 a pop.

    8. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      http://www.futureprint.kent.edu/articles/henke01.h tm

      http://www.bookmachine.com/news_dal.html

      Per-unit costs can be reasonable even for single-copy runs. Actually there's at least one machine specializing in single-copy runs, but I can't find that company on Google right now...

    9. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother to read the links? The machine costs $65,000. At $20 a pop, and figuring, say, $7.50 per book for the paper, ink, parts, power, labor, etc, that's a profit of $12.50 per book. Which means you'd need to sell over 4,000 copies before you could even think about breaking even, much less MAKING money.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    10. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by huchida · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now these books will appear on every god damn P2P network out there.

      With titles like "Take Control of Email with Apple Mail" and "Take Control of What's New in Entourage 2004", I seriously doubt there're many P2P users interested in the titles. If they can figure out how to access the networks in OSX (which takes a bit more savviness than downloading Kazaa for Windows) they probably have enough knowledge to "master" their e-mail programs. (Who's using Entourage anymore, anyway? I didn't know they even updated it!)

      Anyone else think these books are overpriced, considering the low-level topics? Ten dollars for an electronic pamphlet on how to share files in Panther? I just bought a three hundred page (real) book on DVD Studio Pro for twenty!

    11. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by pgnas · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I have nothing but contempt for someone that would violate the copyright on this"

      geesh, does anyone get it? anyone?

      "Small and independent"

      ok, their small, I applaud their zeal to break some new ground, I truly wish them well! What does that have to do with anything? Do you steal or encourage/condone stealing from Walmart ( after all, they are BIG)?

      "Compensating writers fairly"

      complete rubbish! Do you feel you are compensated fairly? if not, is it ok then to steal from your employer? What is fair? eveyone has a different opinion of fair, fair is over-rated, nothing is fair.
      Are you suggesting that "artists" like Brittney Spears are not being "fairly" compensated? I tell you who isn't be compensated fairly, the engineers who work miracles with her "talent".

      "Charging a very Reasonable Price"

      You know, you almost got me on that one, however riddle me this: what is reasonable? this is another ridiculous word that everyone has their own opinion of. This is a CAPITALISTIC society, prices are determined by what people are willing to pay, if people stop buying, trust me, they will be forced to lower their prices(whoever they are.

      "Choosing not to use DRM"

      what is the problem with DRM? if it can be delivered to you in a "reasonable" manner by which you can enjoy the book, music, video, what-ever, than what is the problem in someone trying to prevent you from rifling out copies to all of your friends, neighbors and the entire Kazaa network? If it's worth it, and you want it, you will pay for it.

      There is simply no justification for stealing.

    12. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Dude, the machine is NOT meant to be purchased by each individual writer :-)

    13. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      We've got this new tech that can copy things all over and circulate ideas like wildfire, yet money always gets in the way because writers have got to eat.

      Actually it's the writers who get in the way. Don't anthropomorphize money. It's the writers who decide to wait until they find someone willing to pay them before they release their works.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    14. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by koreth · · Score: 1
      what is the problem with DRM? if it can be delivered to you in a "reasonable" manner by which you can enjoy the book, music, video, what-ever,
      The problem with DRM is that that's a very, very big "if."

      The other problem is that copyright expires (theoretically, anyway) but DRM schemes don't have to.

    15. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have nothing but contempt for someone that would violate the copyright on this.

      As with everything else, it depends. I certainly wouldn't violate the copyright today, but ten years from now I might. That's because I don't agree with the increasingly common idea that copyrights should last forever.

    16. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by adamengst · · Score: 1

      I think they'd make more money by providing the books for the cost of download ($2 or $3 a e-book) and then offering exclusive paperbacks/hardbacks to people who want them at $20 or $30 a pop, or they can offer books that'll last forever for mroe. After a year, they begin throwing books up free to download with advertisements in the front and back for paperbacks. The good books will gross a lot of sales for paperbacks, as the demand for them is still there. If I had the money I'd certainly buy or print a number of books I have, and a few (scabbed wings of abadon, www.rantradio.ca for that one) I *REALLY* want a paperback of, not only because the book is so damn kewl, but so I can loan it to friends.

      You may actually be more prescient than you know. :-) However, keep in mind a few things. Paperbacks in the computer book world may last for years, but they're obsolete in months in many cases. Ebooks can last forever, in contrast, because they can be updated.

      Also, if you backload all your recompense for a book (giving an ebook away to goose print sales), you as the author have to be able to survive for a long time with no income from that particular work. That's because it would take six months from the time the print book came out to see any of those royalties with the royalty payment schedules of many print publishers (they pay quarterly, for the previous quarter). I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just that it's one that requires an author who's willing to invest a lot of time for little known reward (until such a model could be proven) or reward that's far in the future. It's a cash flow problem, in essence.

      All that said, watch this space - we have lots of things we want to try.

      cheers... -Adam (Take Control publisher)
    17. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by adamengst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone else think these books are overpriced, considering the low-level topics? Ten dollars for an electronic pamphlet on how to share files in Panther? I just bought a three hundred page (real) book on DVD Studio Pro for twenty!

      Only you can decide if any one book is overpriced, of course, but "Take Control of Sharing Files in Panther" is 104 pages, highly detailed, completely searchable, and comes with free updates for that $10. And it's not a low-level book by any means; it has instructions for reconfiguring httpd.conf to turn on WebDAV, twiddling smb.conf to share specific folders, and editing the AppleShare .plist file to turn off guest access. Perhaps you know all of those things, but plenty of people don't and have been grateful for the assistance provided in the book.

      One of the points of the Take Control model is that we can write about topics that aren't big enough to fill an entire paper book. That doesn't make them less interesting, or readers less desirous of reading them, just shorter.

      cheers... -Adam (Take Control publisher)

    18. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Casualposter · · Score: 1

      I sure hope you're not advocating taking someone's else's creative effort, printing it in China from a digital copy you bought and underpricing them by selling on EBAY. That's copyright infringement, and if you did it to me, I'd sue your ass into the ground. The current penalty is $150,000 per copy.

      I don't see how you'd do better by printing in China and then selling on Ebay because books are HEAVY and cost a lot to ship. the whole idea of charging extra for shipping is one thing, but Amazon and Barnes and Nobles do have free shipping on some size orders. You're certainly not going to be a low price leader if the shipping from China is too high. And you're assuming that you can actually do this in China. Maybe you can, but that is not something that you can JUST DO. Doing business in China is complex.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    19. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by eggboard · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wrote the file sharing book, so I'll respond to you directly. It's not an electronic pamphlet. It's over 100 pages of focused advice. It's $10 because that was the optimum price that allows us to sell a relatively small number of books (about 2,000 so far) while compensating me in a reasonable manner for the time it took to write it, and the ongoing time I spend in answering email and revising it. It's actually worked out perfectly.

      The book isn't (as I noted in another Slashdot post), select this menu item, click start, next task. I explain how to modify Apache to set up WebDAV under Mac OS X. I have details on creating custom Samba shares. I explain the bugs in Apple's implementation of lukemftpd which prevents proper use of chroot and how to get around it.

      Low-level topics these ain't if you've seen the book. This thread on Slashdot has given us a lot of good feedback, but the critique is all coming from people who are IMAGINING what's in the books, not actually looking at the site, downloading the free samples, and then responding.

      The economics of publishing are really weird, too. The DVD Studio Pro book you bought for $20 gives a royalty of between $1.50 and $3 to the author or authors per copy sold. The book has to sell over 10,000 copies at that price and size to really make any money for the publisher. If the author worked alone, they might wind up making between $30 and $50 an hour for their time. Not bad at all, but not a massive return.

      We're producing these niche -- not low-level -- books for intermediate users who need specific information and don't want to buy $40 and $50 exhaustive books. The exhaustive books are great for general reference, but my file sharing book has details that I was unable to find in any of the giant Panther books: they perversely don't have the space to cover every scenario in each topic because they have to cover EVERY topic.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    20. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by eggboard · · Score: 1

      Please let me join your glorious writers' paradise in which writers can produce anything and still eat! Ah, to live in Switzerland in the 1920s again...

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    21. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone RTFA. It doesn't say anything about them hitting the jackpot (ie making money) yet. Only that the business has just started up, and a description on how they hope to hit the jackpot (make money). The /. ubermods are clearly drunk again...perhaps with hubris. That, and they appear to have a twisted fetish for idiot stories from idiot people who didn't RTFA or score poorly on reading comprehension...

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    22. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      ??? Where did that come from? Were you replying to a different post?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    23. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      First off, I'm a writer too and I also would like to be fairly compensated. However, two points perhaps you might consider.

      One, why should someone pay ten dollars for a book that might only be worth five to them. Or, in other words, why are author's (creator's) financial needs more important than their audience's requirements and ability to pay?

      Two, the economics of publishing include the economics of scale. By setting the price point at the point of maximum return relies on many assumptions. I have found that products priced very low, often become much more popular than can be anticipated. Enough so that, in the end, the author actually makes much more. I believe many media and online efforts (MMGs esp) fail due to excessively high prices. Many senior managers, the type who make these decisions, simply cannot appreciate the budget perspectives of their customers. This will get worse as the gap between rich and poor grows and globalization increases.

      Is it really so hard to understand that ten dollars US is more than a day's labour for most of the world.

      Of course, you are writing for the Mac, so I doubt high prices would be of much concern, ;~)

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
    24. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by eggboard · · Score: 1

      Good points.

      Re: One: This is sort of the Glenn Gould argument, that an artist holds the audience in a tyranny, but he was talking about performance. Really, the only answer is the market response. If what we charged for our time and efforts weren't repaid by sales of the book and positive response, we'd have to change our position. But the market (so far) has spoken.

      Re: Two: Elsewhere in this thread, I and Adam Engst, one of the two people responsible for the Take Control series, have talked about how the books we're producing are special niche items that are short enough to not exhaust readers and long enough to comprehensively cover one aspect of a topic that's typically not enough for a print book. We're not finding price elasticity for those items: that is, charging $1 wouldn't 10 times as many books as charging $10. Instead, we're pricing against the utility in the books we write versus the utility in print books.

      Now, as far as global equity, we're not selling these books to the large number of people in the world who live on a dollar a day or less. For the people we write for, $10 is 10 minutes to 1 hour of work.

      Per the high prices for the Mac column: that canard has been refuted many times. You can't buy a cheap Mac for as little as a cheap PC, but the cheapest Macs outperform PCs of the same price, all the way up to the most expensive Macs.

      On the Windows side, add to that the fact that virus software, firewall software, and other protections haven't been needed, and that you don't lose you productivity or data when some new virus takes over your computer, and I think the dollar balance goes entirely away.

      Mac compared to Linux: different purposes, apples and oranges.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    25. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Heh, heh... That post of mine was at first modded Funny, then later Insightful, both of which were my purpose.

      I wanted to say that no matter what one does regarding content pricing, there will always be people who will pirate it - especially P2P scumbags who always bitch about pricing even when it's more than reasonable (or, indeed, those who put those PDFs on P2P for no personal gain)

      (I've done business in China; if I were to do this thing, I wouldn't sell on eBay and wouldn't ship to the U.S.)

    26. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      With all due respect sir, I still feel that you've failed to either appreciate or address the actual point of my reply directly. Here, let me quote your own words, "we're not selling these books to the large number of people in the world", which, again, is my point. Indeed, lets boil it down even further, to "You are not selling" as many books as you could. Therefore, it's clearly obvious that you're not helping as many as you could. It's also most likely you're not making as much as you could. Oh, and by the way, I don't just mean financially.

      Your prices are surely one reason you are not selling more booklets to more people. Period. We may dance around and around this but I really don't think anything will change or be done as long as authors write for affluence rather than art.

      As well, there is a common market fundamentalism that equates high prices with high profits. Think Wal-Mart.

      As for market response, perhaps you could lead, rather than just follow?

      Furthermore, as for the market, I believe people will always seek maximal value. The reason the PC platform did so well had to do with its value being greater than that of the Mac platform. The sole reason for this, I believe, was the lack of open standards on the part of Apple's management. In a word, greed. In my humble opinion, I believe you to be suffering from exactly the same ineffective market philosophy.

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
    27. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      In rereading this, I've come to the conclusion that a better term would have been elitism, rather than greed.

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
    28. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by eggboard · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    29. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      I'd like to change, "the lack of open standards" to "the failure to base development on open standards".

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
    30. Re:Good thing you've mentioned them on Slashdot by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      Hmm, well I still think it may have had more to do with being better than just be wealthier.

      BTW, I'm sorry if it sounds condescending or harsh, I didn't intend it to, but I find it's quite hard not to when dealing with such weighty matters.

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
  2. Music by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've often wondered why this very business method wouldn't work in the music business. Part of the problem, I think, is that music success nowadays is too dependant on radio. The whole indy process keeps those that can't afford to push bribe their way into radio stations from being heard. I think this is a business method that Apple should embrace with iTunes. The artist could pay $X dollars to sell their music on iTunes. The artist could then make 50% of the procedes. Apple could even charge to burn the music to CDs and mail it out. I think this would work very well.

    1. Re:Music by lavaface · · Score: 1
      music success nowadays is too dependant on radio. The whole indy process keeps those that can't afford to push bribe their way into radio stations from being heard.

      That's why college radio rules! I used to think it was a bunch of weird noise and crap, but as I've matured, I find a great deal of new music from the college radio stations. I rarely stray right of 92 on the FM dial. Then agian, perhaps I'm just lucky to live in Atlanta, where we have several wonderfully diverse stations on the lower end of the spectrum. Not sure how worthy it is elsewhere. Anybody?

    2. Re:Music by nkh · · Score: 3, Informative

      But Magnatune has a lot of great music you can try before you buy, it's cheap (between $5 and 18$, it's for you to decide), you can choose your own file format once you have paid: Vorbis, mp3, FLAC, WAV... and the artists get 50% of the price.

    3. Re:Music by darkstream · · Score: 1
      The problem with Magnatune's business model is that they have no published playlists for their music streams, no searchable database on their website, and lousy customer support.

      • Playlists: How many of you listen to music in the background? Almost all of you? Me, too. And when I am streaming one of Magnatune's internet radio stations and hear something I like, I have to stop everything I am doing and quickly call up iTunes before the song changes. Otherwise, there is no way to find out the name of that song. Unlike other internet radio stations, Magnatune doesn't offer a dynamically updated playlist on their website. So unless you got lucky, you're out of luck. The song has passed into the ether.
      • Searchable Database: Let's say you were too busy writing that report/paper/novel/webpage/program to bother switching tasks to see the title of a song you just heard and write it down to investigate later. I once heard some beautiful chamber music with recorders that I thought would be nice to buy. A trip to Magnatune's website reveals there is no way to search for "chamber music recorders". Sure, the entire catalog of chamber music is available for me to listen to for free, but if I want to purchase one in particular I have to listen to all of them one at a time until I find the one I heard. Effective searching? Not really. I don't have time for that.
      • Customer Support: Giving up on searching for that song and hoping to get help from Magnatune? They don't respond to email. I've sent multiple emails to Punky, the Emailclown, and not a single one of them has been responded to. If that guy wasn't having so much fun dying his hair and posing for the webcam maybe he'd be able to answer a few emails once in a while. Any email stating "I am looking for a song played at x:xxpm write before (name of song I did catch). I have money and and prepared to give it to you." should elicit some sort of response - even a canned one. But I received nothing, nor did I receive a response on a follow-up I sent later. Good-bye Magnatunes; Hello iTMS
      In the end, as a consumer, I just don't feel any confidence in spending money with them. I've purchased well over a hundred songs at the iTMS. I've also purchased music at Bleep. In contrast to Magnatunes, I have emailed Apple on several occassions about authorization problems and even corrupt downloads and have always received courteous, prompt responses. Both Bleep and iTMS allow me to search their catalogs. Magnatunes doesn't. Guess where I spend my money.

      I have hundreds of CDs, cassettes, and LPs (ooh, dating myself there). I put my money where my mouth is. I buy, buy, buy. But not with Magnatunes. If they won't make it easy for me to find what I want, and won't help me find it when I can't, then I won't spend any money there.

      I see Magnatune praised a lot here. I wonder if any of you have honestly bought music with them, or are just using them as a proof of concept in the noble fight against the RIAA.

      --
      Fun with Inkwell | www.coo
    4. Re:Music by PedroDeAlvarado · · Score: 1

      Another part of the problem is that the music industry needs oligopoly rents in order to sustain the expensive lifestyles of its executives and entertainers.

    5. Re:Music by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. The only problem I see now is that they don't have any country artists onboard yet. :-)

  3. Wow. Time to Publish... by dbottaro · · Score: 1

    Windows for Linux Users! Text File format Only.

    Ahem - First Post :-D

    --
    Coding my way to the next BSOD!
  4. Effects of free online publishing? by oostevo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is great news for internet publishers and people who like to read books on the internet, but I'd be quite interested to know the effects of offering a book online for free while concurrently releasing it in print, like several of our favorite computer manuals.

    --
    In soviet russia, You ask not what country do for you, but what you do for country!
    Oh wait...
    1. Re:Effects of free online publishing? by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative

      Baen has done it, and it worked great. Cory Doctorow has done it (I think his publisher is Tor), and it worked great. I've done it, and it worked great.

    2. Re:Effects of free online publishing? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Someone actually stole my Halliday & Resnick out of my back hall. It was a third edition, so they hardly did so for current class work. I was shocked and stunned to find out what a current edition goes for.

      I've bookmarked your page. I'll look over your stuff. If I like what I see you just might get some of my money one of these days, as well as the money of those who ask me for recommendations.

      Hey, maybe you're right and this giving away samples thingy works great.

      I know I enjoy the cheese.

      KFG

    3. Re:Effects of free online publishing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? First of all, I don't understand at all what you meant and second, all I'm doing is asking for some advise. F-U if you're talking to me!

    4. Re:Effects of free online publishing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving away samples or even free books is a good idea for computer books at least. When your computer
      throws a fit it is nice to have a hard copy to refer to when trouble shooting as a computer is not needed.

      So as far as I am concered there will always be a market for non computerized books.

  5. Astroturfing? was: Re:Waiting for these to... by macdaddy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is this an example of the astroturfing we were warned about?

  6. eBooks are great. by g-to-the-o-to-the-g · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I personally love ebooks. I have a $100 Palm m500, which has a backlight, so I can read without having to worry about the lighting or turning the page. Not to mention, I can have 50 books on a SD card. Why more people haven't caught on, I don't know. My favourite part is laying in bed and reading until I fall asleep (which is convenient, seeing as the thing powers itself off eventually, and I don't have to worry about the lights).

    Aswell, I've heard other people criticize the whole ebook thing because they think its not as clear (to look at) or something. If you doubt me, you should just walk into a best buy or something and play with them yourself.

    1. Re:eBooks are great. by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      Reasons this type of ebook was an abysmal failure:
      • proprietary formats
      • expensive readers, which may be obsolete instantly, and require you to buy into a format that may fail
      • digital books that are sold at the same price as paper books, even though for most purposes, most people prefer paper
      • tiny, lame catalogs
    2. Re:eBooks are great. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I have an m515, and a kyocera smartphone with whats basically equivalent built in.. I've read some ebooks, and found that it annoyed my eyes, too muchh of it gives me a headach. It's just a little bit too small. Guess I'm getting too old.

      It's convenient to have on site, I got a bunch of relevent technical manuals, but dead tree is still much easier on my eyes. Maybe a device about the size of a paperback, maybe one the size of a hardback too for when my vision deteriorates a little more.

      Stupid CRTs.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:eBooks are great. by Cyn · · Score: 1

      I've had a Palm IIIxe, a Sony T415, and a Zaurus C7x0 - and I enjoy reading on all of them.

      I think the key point, is that it be easy on the eyes. If you're reading in bed, with all the lights out - the backlight has to be very dim. I can turn the backlight on my c7x0 down enough that it's pretty nice - but even though its screen is much higher resolution than the other two, the other two are better at being read for long periods of time (in the dark). That's not to say I don't do it and enjoy it, but I stub my toes more when shuffling off after reading on my Z, because my eyes are more tired (and have a higher burn in from the brighter light).

      It could also have to do with the fact that it's backlit with a strong white light, while the other two were subtler green lumin jobs.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  7. Yes, but by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mac users like/can pay for stuff.

    Beginning with their ridiculously overpriced PPC's, to iTunes, shareware software...

    Your typical Linux geek or Windows pirate isn't really used to the concept of "paying for computer stuff". He just downloads it. Can it work?

    Then again, good weblogs can lead to dead-trees publishing deals. I hope someone will pick me up some time :)

    1. Re:Yes, but by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You're gonna get EATEN alive by the mods. But you hit the nail on the head. I've lost a lot of mod points myself trying to explain to people,that the only reason Apple can do the things it does is because there is a legion of fanboys willing to purchase whatever stupid idea steve jobs dreams up at a 30% markup. Apple is a *BRAND* like Nike. For my money I'd rather wear my insanely comfortable TX Traction shoes which cost 39.99 instead of Nike's which cost 3x as much. Same damn thing with my computer. My identity is not my brand of computer.

      IPOD? Had it back when it was called the Archos Jukebox, nobody cared. Itunes? Had it when it was called "eMusic.com" Nobody praised emusic or archos as visionaries. I wasn't a cosmopolitan hipster for having these things.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Yes, but by lavaface · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm cheap. Well, poor. But I bought a Powerbook (with student loans : ) because video work on a PC blows. For many users a Mac is overpriced. But for folks that like a machine that offers a smooth user experience with well-designed apps bundled, it's a dream.

    3. Re:Yes, but by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Ehh, you deserve to get eaten alive by the mods. Sneakers are not a valid comparison at all. Do you really believe that having a completely different OS is the same as having slightly different shoes?

      (don't mod this up, it's a 1 minute response)

    4. Re:Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, you make that sound like a bad thing.

      Mac users are scavengers -- when I'm in geek mode, I build computers with scraps. When I want something that works without having to think about it -- I go with a Mac.

      Is it a brand? Fuck yes its a brand. Why do folks go with certain brands? Because they are built well enough that they have gone past just making them work, they make them look good too. I know PC users that have bought great looking PC components and thought that was all there was to the Mac Fanboys and bragged about having a machine that looked just as good to me -- unfortunately, it was also me that he asked to fix it all the time, and I never failed to tell him that if he had a mac, this wouldn't happen.

      So, you'd rather use something that is cheaper and almost as good. Fine. Some of think that its that 10% that is better *IS* worth paying 3x as much. That 10% is time that you are not working...I've paid for my Macs time after time...hell a week after getting my new Powerbook I was showing a friend iMovie...he needed some video edited for a 30 second commercial, and while I have FinalCut, he wanted to see it done in that easy to use app. I was paid $500 for that commercial. Not bad for a free piece of software, and it paid a forth of my machine right then and there.

      As for iTunes vs. eMusic? There is no choice...iTunes wins out. I've tried eMusic and if they'd polish it up (and I'm not talking about the fucking graphics), it might had had a chance. As for Archos Jukebox, I picked up several MP3 players because I didn't want to pay the Apple Tax and thought they were all the same. I still have one or two that I couldn't return (and my girlfriend thought they were too fucking geeky to use to even give them to her). A friend from Apple sent me one as a loaner and told me if I didn't like it, I could send it back...if I liked it, he'd sell it to me...I've had that Gen1 iPod for a couple of years now. It was the only device that felt natural and didn't feel like either a computer interface on a box or a limited device that was confusing to use.

      Pretend all you want that its just fanboys that make Apple what it is and the idea of shiny chick magnet electronics (ok thats a bit useful -- no girls ever asked about my work provided dell, but I've had a few dozen ask my about my Powerbook -- actually they liked my old iBook more) -- its because Apple pays attention to detail in ALL areas. OSX is my new unix. I'll still run Linux for my servers, but I have no need to ever consider it on the desktop again...

    5. Re:Yes, but by clifyt · · Score: 1

      I reread that, I should have previewed (but then it wouldn't be /. -- I make sure I turn off Safari's spell check before I show up here).

      The opening lines should be:

      Mac users are NOT scavengers.

      Changes the whole idea...

    6. Re:Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you explain why it's a bad comparison? Otherwise STFU.

    7. Re:Yes, but by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ya had me scratching my head for a few minutes there. :)

      KFG

    8. Re:Yes, but by huchida · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How'd this troll get marked up to "interesting?"

      Anyway... May be hard for you to believe, but some of us buy a computer based on, say, our fucking careers. If you're in a creative field, you'll probably use a Mac. That's just the way it is, it's a better experience, and if you don't understand why that us, that's fine. I wouldn't expect you to justify your choice of system to me.

      Oh, and the "30% markup" is only for those who must buy the latest and greatest from the Apple store at the mall. If you can stomach the idea of buying last year's latest-and-greatest from a reseller like Powermax or Smalldog, you can get amazing deals. Not that you should buy one, I could care less if you use a Mac.

    9. Re:Yes, but by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Amen to that!

      I'm a new convert to the Mac religion, after about 7 years of Linux at home and Windows at work, and many years of DOS and Windows before that. I just picked up my first Mac (a Powerbook) recently. The first thing I noticed when I opened the box was the power adapter. Yes, the power adapter. It impressed the hell out of me, mostly because of what it boded for the design of the rest of the system. When something as seemingly mundane as the power adapter displays the elegance of design, and thought given user convenience, that the Apple power adapter does, you can pretty much count on the computer itself being a joy to use. And it has been so far. I definitely understand why Apple has so many devoted fans now.

    10. Re:Yes, but by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Can you figure out basic things without me holding your hand (like how a modern OS is a hell of a lot more complicated than a shoe)?

    11. Re:Yes, but by centipetalforce · · Score: 1

      Video work on a pc does not blow if you have anew pc and vegas 5 like I do. FCP may be better, but my system does the job, and has all the bells and whistles FCP does. And I can play Far Cry. :p

    12. Re:Yes, but by clifyt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gawd damn, don't remind me of the power adapter.

      I'm renovating part of my work area, and now I've got to go out and buy an apple white surge protector. The only one actually looks good, but compared to the Apple stuff plugged into it, it looks shitty.

      I was just thinking about this last night as I was tinting my new desk and chairs. Normally, I'd have just ignored this stuff...but damn...even the power supply looks good enough you'd be an idiot not to upgrade the rest if you like aesthetics.

      Looks ain't everything -- but for the area that clients stop by, I want things to look good. My PC sits in a very unimposing area -- and the linux servers are now sitting in my industrial steel powder blue racks in the basement out of site / out of mind.

      Good to have you as a convert -- I see this as a big plus for everyone. The more unix users, the more we can all use our skills elsewhere. Knowing unix has taught me to do things that most mac users never need to do. Knowing OS X means there are things I never thought to try, and find out it works the same elsewhere. Having some cross compatibility is always good.

    13. Re:Yes, but by clifyt · · Score: 1

      " Not that you should buy one, I could care less if you use a Mac."

      More to the point, the minute unfashionable geeks like him start using the machine, these idiots will ruin our social status.

      Its like going backstage or a vip room and finding all the losers you went to high school hanging back there as if they have a right to do so.

      This motherfucker knows his place in the hierarchy, let him do what he wants as long as the plebes don't try to fucking look at our girlfriends.

      NERDS!!!

      Having said that, I'd rather be a geek over a nerd any day of the week :-) Geeks get chicks, nerds never do except in bad 80s movies.

    14. Re:Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...video work on a PC blows.

      Wrong.

      But you keep drinking Technomessiah Steve's Kool-Aid.

      And remember - total acceptance of establishment dogma is the sign of a true artist!

    15. Re:Yes, but by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      these idiots will ruin our social status.

      On this we agree, I'm glad you're not using MY OS.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  8. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by GeekBird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the US it's spelled "tidbit", and has been for many years. Linguistic drift due to American cultural puritanism at its finest, but the term is here to stay. Remember the whole Janet Jackson boob blowup...

    --
    use Sig::Witty;
  9. Because of the audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mac users are used to paying for things. Software, shareware, etc. Linux users expect everything for free, and Windows users just pirate it.

    1. Re:Because of the audience by Quobobo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bullshit. Have you ever checked out the Mac-specific piracy scene? Bittorrent, Carracho, and others, all with tons of software being pirated. On top of that, what about the (not going to mention name here) Mac database of serial numbers that's regularily kept up to date? Mac users pirate just as much as other users if you ask me.

    2. Re:Because of the audience by downbad · · Score: 1

      Surfers' Serials

    3. Re:Because of the audience by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Grandparent gets modded to +5 insightful, and I get modded down to troll for bringing up a relevant point. Great. You might want to believe that all Mac users are shining examples for the rest of us, but it's not true.

    4. Re:Because of the audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: your comment "linux users want everything for free". Well, I purchased: 1.My copy of Java Desktop System (Sun's Linux distro) 2.My copy of StarOffice 7 (sorry, OOo is not good enought for me) 3.SNAP (aka Scitech Display Doctor) for Linux. 4. Pre-ordered my Netscape 7.2 CD (Linux/Mac/Win32 versions in there) at www.netscapestore.com because I like the idea of AOL continuing distribution of the Mozilla based browser, so more Gecko based browsers will continue to eat M$IE market share -plus I can't live without ICQ on my browser's sidebar tab. So... your comment about linux users is just BS.

  10. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by grolschie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude you fail it. Even googlewar says so. ;-)

  11. Re:FP? by dbottaro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yep - more like 4th post - looked like a good shot at the time I wrote it

    --
    Coding my way to the next BSOD!
  12. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is an american company and therefore doesn't know any better.

  13. Magnatune.com is trying to do that by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    The artist could then make 50% of the procedes

    You've even guessed correctly the percentage that the artist gets from each sale.

    As long as they cover the genre's that you like, they've got some great music. Highly recommended.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  14. PDF Books Online... by Liskl · · Score: 1, Informative

    based on this news here i'd love to see more of my favorite e-zines to be in pdf format

    2600.com
    phrack.org

    i know others i've talked to would love them in downloadable pdf format even if we had to pay for them

    what do other /.'ers think about phrack.org using txt and pdf for there following issues

    --
    --- Website: http://spinhex.sytes.net/
    1. Re:PDF Books Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phrack would be great if it had pictures for some of the hardware projects.

  15. Doesn't Always Work by oasis3582 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just look at when Stephen King tried to do a similar system with "The Plant." Sales were so abysmal that he didnt even finish it after writing a few parts.

    See the story http://slashdot.org/features/00/11/30/1238204.shtm l

    1. Re:Doesn't Always Work by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Insightful
      IIRC, sales were actually OK, but not as high as the target he'd set. It was a very atypical case anyway, because he was such a popular author. His books normally sold a lot of copies, and he expected to make a boatload of money off of each one. It's a whole different story for most authors. Most authors are only supplementing their income by writing books anyway.

      It's also no secret that digital books can be a big failure if you choose the wrong model. Maybe his model (donate, or I'll stop writing chapters) was simply a bad one. Personally, I think it sounds like a huge hassle to have to pay the author periodically to read each chapter, after it's been so long that I've probably forgotten what happened in the last chapter.

    2. Re:Doesn't Always Work by MaineCoon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sales were so abysmal

      So was the book. Kind of explains the sales, eh?

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    3. Re:Doesn't Always Work by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      All true, but in my case, I bought the first section of The Plant, and found it so poor that I didn't even want to download the rest for free! I'd also second the whole time delay thing.. who wants to read a book over so many months!?

      To be honest, even if the book were good, his attitude would have turned me off. He made it sound like it was some major act of philanthropy and personal hardship to release the book in the way he did. Come on.. the guy is a multi-multi-millionaire!

    4. Re:Doesn't Always Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The sales were so abysmal he died from it *ducks*

    5. Re:Doesn't Always Work by webmaven · · Score: 1

      Bah. If you look at the numbers, King's sales were actually pretty good (in terms of total actual dollars), but he didn't like the downloads-to-sales ratio (in terms of numbers of copies), so he pulled the plug.

      Pretty stupid, actually.

      Some users were buying extra paid copies to help ensure the success of the experiment, too.

      The lesson that should have been learned is that this kind of business model encourages readers to self-select for discriminatory pricing (ie, uber-fans will pay more 'just because'), resulting in greater total revenue, but King focused instead on the growing number of people who were reading for free (ie. the try-before-you-buy crowd).

      In short, his criteria for success were totally screwed up, and rather divorced from the actual bottom line.

      --
      The real Webmaven is user ID 27463. I don't rate an imposter, because my ID is such a lame-ass high number.
  16. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    duh, it's nothing to do with google the "company" per se, but instead the sheer number of pages that use the correct spelling vs those that don't.

  17. What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You mean all this time I've been doing it wrong by placing tiny classified ads?

  18. ill choice by lavaface · · Score: 1

    I must say, this seems like a bad example. First of all, the books are all about Mac software. Why would I want to read that on a PDA? If we're talking about downloading to a computer, why would I want to pay money when a few minutes of Google will help me out? Sure, it's convenient. But it's not even guaranteed. And $10 seems like a high price for an electronic document covering basic material. I suppose neophyte Macaddicts may spring for it but there are plenty of free resources. All in all, I think Baen books are a much better example.

    1. Re:ill choice by eggboard · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm the author of two of these books and have been using a Mac since 1985. I'm not going to pump up my own effort, but I can tell you how much of these books arise specifically from the fact that we, as authors and experienced Mac users, couldn't find complete and/or accurate answers to the questions that the books address, nor could we find the comprehensive start to finish advice that we needed.

      Our books aren't "here's menu A, here's menu B." The whole point is that they're not exhaustive, but they focus in on specific details. The books try to solve problems and to do it in finite space.

      It would also be another thing if you could spend a few minutes and find the answer on Google for everything in the 50 to 100 pages in the books. But you can't. It might take you a few minutes per page to find what's in the book. So if you spent, say, 2 to 4 hours, you might save $5 to $10 -- if you could find the information.

      My first book on file sharing took me about 60 hours to write on top of my experience with Unix (1994 to present), Linux (1997 to present), and Mac OS X (10.0.0 to present). The AirPort book that I just released a few weeks ago took less time in the first edition, but we commit to releasing updates with new and updated material--version 1.0 was about 90 pages; 1.1 (a free update for 1.0 book buyers) will be about 160.

      Another interesting interaction with the ebooks is that we hear from readers and can practically immediately make changes. People who bought my AirPort books first version gave me great feedback. I incorporated almost all of it into new information for the 1.1 release, which all of these readers will get for free. I love that.

      I hope this clears up a few of the issues. Almost all of the writers involved to date are freelancers, and it's really quite difficult to make a good living writing about using technology, which, I hope, helps other people. These ebooks make it financially possible for me to write books on topics that people are asking us for but that aren't available in a few minutes of Google searching, and that aren't cost effective for a print book, which has to sell 5,000 to 10,000 copies (depending on size) to be even a reasonable success.

      Imagine, for instance, a 50-page book on regular expression pattern matching for Mac OS X users. It's a possibility, and would be highly useful. But you can't write a print book like that. (Although O'Reilly has a more generalized book on the topic in print!)

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    2. Re:ill choice by DistroDuck · · Score: 1

      This is all wonderful news! Thanks for sharing your thoughts here, as I'm always amazed at the useful information I sometimes find here. I have just purchased my first PowerBook after being a long time Windows, OS/2, Linux, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD user. I am quite impressed with my experiences thus far and would recommend Mac OS X to anyone. These books are exactly what I'm looking for and in exactly the format that I need/desire at this time! Again, thanks. I'm on my way to get the entire series now 8^)

      Edd

  19. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1

    If titbit blows some tiny american mind, find that person and discuss the nesting habits of the Great Tit with them...

    --
    -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
  20. pdf publications are wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I recently purchased several hiking trail guides in PDF version from a website. It was extremely convienent having the information readily accessible via my iPaq while hiking.

    Great idea :)

  21. Bullshit. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, have you not all been reading the on-line mags and such? Your local newspaper? There is no way to make money on the internet giving away things for free. Rob Enderle of SCO has something to say about this (Free Software and the Fools That Use it). Thank you very much.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Bullshit. by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, have you not all been reading the on-line mags and such? Your local newspaper? There is no way to make money on the internet giving away things for free

      That's funny, just a few days ago, our local newspaper (the Oregonian) called up and offered a free two week trial, and it was easier to say "uh, sure, why not" than politely end the conversation. And no, I don't intend to read it, except for the fry's ad and the funnies. I guess they believe information wants to be free, too.

      PS I'm proud to be regarded as a fool by Rob Enderle.

      -jim

    2. Re:Bullshit. by jarich · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, have you not all been reading the on-line mags and such? Your local newspaper? There is no way to make money on the internet giving away things for free.

      hmmm.... how much are you paying to read "on-line mags and such?" Are you paying to read Slashdot? Last I heard Roblimo and Taco were getting by giving this "stuff" away...

    3. Re:Bullshit. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      hmmm.... how much are you paying to read "on-line mags and such?" Are you paying to read Slashdot? Last I heard Roblimo and Taco were getting by giving this "stuff" away..."RobLimo" and "Taco" made a shitload of money selling Slashdot to OSDN nee OSTG several years ago, they no longer need to work. Check your facts dude.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  22. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by irongrip · · Score: 1, Informative

    According to Dictionary.com, it's either.

  23. Ignore This. by karmatic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I truly do have karma to burn, so I'm going to test out a thoery...

    Do people with low UIDs go around looking for Low UID threads, and reply?

    Time will tell...

    1. Re:Ignore This. by Zorilla · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, what usually happens is that somebody with a six-figure UID will reply to a user with a four-figure UID with this:

      "You must be new here."

      Disclaimer: I have a high six-figure UID

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:Ignore This. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i suspect that some people with low UIDs have each other on thir friends lists, and with a bonus set to friend posts are more likely to see the threads

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Ignore This. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I use this phrase, at times, responding to anybody no matter what their UID is.

      It's a joke, son!

  24. Caveat Emptor by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These Take Control books are really short (less than 70 pages). I've bought a lot of professional books. Most of them approach 1000 pages. Even the index is over 40 pages.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    1. Re:Caveat Emptor by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 page written by a wise man is more valuable than 1001 pages written by a fool.

      KFG

    2. Re:Caveat Emptor by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I think the comments on Slashdot stories are a testament to that!

  25. One important caveat! by mveloso · · Score: 1

    One great thing that Engst mentioned (but it was sort of glossed over by the writer) was this: these e-things are promoted in Tidbits.

    This gives them -the- major advantage over most eBooks: PR.

    What people seem to have forgotten (though it was talked about a lot) is what publishing houses and music companies have: marketing channels. Marketing channels are huge, expensive to build, and expensive to maintain. But they're really the only barrier to entry in a lot of markets...but that's a big barrier.

    How do you get your book noticed? Word of mouth? Internet newsgroups? Maybe you send free copies to book clubs or the local radio station?

    Without the majors, your life will be tougher.

    The companies that are succeeding are the ones that are trying to become marketing channels. Tidbits is one. google, of all things, is another. eBay is one. iTMS is one. Even O'Reilly is one - all the hot tech comes out in their books first.

    The question is, how can you tell which companies are doing this? I don't think about it a lot, so I don't know the answer. It would be nice to hear other companies that are channels.

    1. Re:One important caveat! by jarich · · Score: 1
      How to do this?

      Build on the brand you already have!

      http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/starter_kit/ind ex.html/

    2. Re:One important caveat! by jarich · · Score: 1
      (doh)

      trying again, w/o the trailing slash this time

      http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/starter_kit/ind ex.html

    3. Re:One important caveat! by adamengst · · Score: 1

      One great thing that Engst mentioned (but it was sort of glossed over by the writer) was this: these e-things are promoted in TidBITS. This gives them -the- major advantage over most eBooks: PR.

      You're absolutely right. We've spent 14 years publishing TidBITS every week for free to tens of thousands of readers, which makes all this possible. We're not complacent about it; we're certainly working to expand the audience beyond TidBITS in both traditional and non-traditional ways, but it's good to have a base from which to work. To be clear, we generally promote the ebooks in TidBITS with an excerpted article that we would have published happily even if there had been no ebook to publish. So hopefully even our marketing is useful.

      cheers... -Adam (Take Control publisher)

  26. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Languages are OSS for your brain. Anyone is free to contribute to them, expand them, specialize them toward some particular purpose and those changes are given freely back to the community. The community then automatically decides if those changes were beneficial or not and either adopts them or doesn't. For the english language alone there are dozens of distributions available that are all more or less interoperable. If your distro does something a little different than someone else's that doesn't mean either is right or wrong. Differences are bound to pop up, some exist for a reason, others are basically arbitrary. As someone who uses the distro you're criticizing, I'll just say that the alternative spelling you've suggested seems a little awkward to pronounce while the one we use flows easily.

    Anyway, my point is that you are free to contribute to English or any other human language as much as you want but you must remember that you don't own any of them even if one of them happens to be named after your nationality.

  27. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    her boobs were blowup? well they must have been underinflated when they came out during the superbowl.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  28. ESR wrote about this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  29. eBooks can be great by gidds · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The key there is when you said 'this type'. I agree that e-books as something in a proprietary format, which only work on dedicated machines, is stupid.

    However, e-books as I use and love 'em are a very different beast. I have a large library (>100MB) of stuff in Palm DOC format -- an open format, easily convertible to/from plain text. (This means I can edit the texts as needed to fix formatting, errors, convert to British English spellings, &c.) I keep them on my Psion 5mx -- a PDA that I already carry in my pocket anyway. I read them on its 640x240 backlit LCD, which I find easy enough on my eyes. I get them from various sources; legit ones include Fictionwise, which has a reasonable range of DRM-free stuff, though the biggest names are DRM-only; author's web sites Gutenberg; Baen Books; and various others.

    The advantages are numerous: I always have reading material, without having to carry a book around with me, so when I find myself sitting in trains or in the Chinese take-away, the time's never wasted. I always have reference material to refer to (dictionaries, 3 Bible translations, the Jargon File, you name it -- shortly to include a full cut of Wikipedia), and can quote straight from my favourite books. I don't need to faff around with bookmarks. I can read in bed with the lights out. I have backups. I don't need to buy any more bookcases (and I've got enough already...) And so on. I'm not saying this would be right for you; but it certainly works for people like the grandparent poster and me.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  30. It pays for Jim Baen who gives it away. by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Informative

    As mentioned in slashdot before, Baen publishing puts out Webscriptions and also gives away ebooks for free on the net and they also provide a CD in several of their books with a large number of novels included. All of the free ebooks in the free library and on CD can be shared but not sold.

    Here are several ISO images of Baen's free science fictional goodness, please leave up your bittorrent client for others to share.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:It pays for Jim Baen who gives it away. by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to say, Webscriptions is a really good deal. You get a month's worth of releases for $15, and you can get most of the books months before that particular set of books is released. So, for example, if you were dying to get your Rats, Vats, and the Ugly fix, after getting hooked by reading the sample chapters that they have online, you could read the rest of the book, RIGHT NOW.

      Baen operates on the "rats pushing levers to get crack" model of publishing - they give away free product because once you get addicted, you'll gladly pay to buy dead-tree and e-book versions of new stuff. Not everybody can do this, but Baen has been getting it right so far...

  31. Not in Fort Wayne by tepples · · Score: 1

    The FM band in 88.1 through 91.9 MHz in Fort Wayne, Indiana, has two Christian stations (one operated by a university), one NPR classical station, and one NPR talk radio station. Unlike many towns, we don't have secular college radio.

  32. Publishers Missing Out by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

    I think that what the TidBITS people are doing with ebooks is a good example of what a lot of traditional publishers are missing out on. There have been a number of publishers that have made articles freely accessible online and tried to sell banner advertising. When that doesn't work out, they simply make their articles "subscriber only," which shrinks their online audience greatly (and sinks search engine rankings since nobody is motivated to link to inaccessible articles) and eliminates the possibility of making "add on" revenue producers like ebooks impractical.

    For example, an industry publication could make articles freely accessible to bring in traffic and then earn revenue through ebooks, vendor directory lisings, "ask the expert" services, RFP services, industry reports, forum subscriptions, etc. Some publications have dabbled in such things, and some such efforts will inevitably fail, but it seems that many publications don't even try to branch beyond their print approach of simply selling ads.

  33. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Under this analogy, wouldn't female dogging about deviations from an English "standard" correspond to female dogging about deviations from specifications such as Single UNIX, LSB, or GNOME HIG?

  34. small writers co op by zogger · · Score: 1

    a small (whatever size is needed I mean) writers co-op might work, they all chip in and get one machine for those various small runs. It's a possibility anyway.

    To me it's like distros, I can't afford full price ones, and I can't download being on dialup, so the clone copy/sellers hit the sweet spot with me at price and convenience. Books might be a similar deal for a lot of people. I prefer dead trees myself for reading, but I can get by with digital on the screen, but it just doesn't feel the same and isn't as comfortable. A lot of people are just going to be incredibly cheap about it and always try to find comopletely free, but enough would be willing to pay reasonable fees. To me,cash wise were I the producer of the book or software or music or video, and needed some coin for it, reasonable and some is better than unreasonable and none.

  35. Yeah, but how profitable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20,000 copies at $7.5 (it mentions $5 or $10), that's $150,000. 50% royalties, so the publisher keeps $75,000.

    After expenses that's not even much for the publisher to pay himself a decent salary. So maybe profitable, but hardly an example of a booming business.

    1. Re:Yeah, but how profitable? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, I know you posted late at night, so you may be smoking crack, but $75,000 can be a significant amount to a small business. Expenses are, generally, negligible. I know their payment processor takes 10%-15%, and beyond that perhaps someone needs to maintain the sub-section of the site dedicated to these books. It's only a side section of TidBITS, and $75,000 for (almost) nothing isn't to be sniffed at!

  36. Low cost, high volume by migstradamus · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been running my own online publishing service since December 2002. Weekly e-mail chess training newsletters in html/pdf. It's been quite successful as a one-man show. I don't use any DRM and encourage subscribers to share with friends. Going on the "pixels are cheap" formula I priced things very low. Apart from the "lemonade game" aspect of having more subscribers with a lower price vs fewer paying more, having more happy subscribers works on word of mouth.

    I could put bugs in the html and DRM into the PDF to see who is forwarding the newsletters to a dozen friends, but all you do is force people to take more care with their piracy. Since you'll never stop a determined pirate, why hassle everyone else? I'm sure this is "Doh!" material for the /. crowd.

  37. Piracy issues? Customize the products! by msclark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One way to fight e-book piracy is to customize the books for the customer. This makes the books less attractive to pass on.

    My company ImageJester personalizes its e-books with the names and faces of people. Folks can even read the customized e-books online for free, and high-quality PDF files can be purchased and printed on home color printers.

    This busines model works for picture books for children, but perhaps a customized technical manual for an operating system doesn't have quite the same appeal. :^)

    Matthew Clark

  38. about the formats by zoloto · · Score: 1

    pdf is good for many things. and with adobe's tagged pdf's that's ok but for small files/zines like phrack and 2600, txt is ok. If you could include in the tagged pdf the code in the actual "example.cpp" and have tiff schematics that would seriously be awesome.

    not sure if it'll change, but i'd pay for the 2600 one. and maybe phrack if they substantially changed their format to include binaries, code and images that were embedded into the document.

    just perhaps

  39. I dont think so... by maxdamage · · Score: 1

    I mean, I highly doubt online publishing is even worth the effort. You would need to do so much advertising and get so much television publicity that it would just be more worth it to be invited to a real book signing. Maybe publishing both real books and online books may be worth it, but not going online only.

  40. Cost Estimate by MrNonchalant · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a note for those not inclined to do the math. There are 2 $10 books and 7 $5 books for an average of $6.111 per book. The Wired article states that roughly 20,000 have been sold. If we assume that every book sold equally, which we know to be false but will accept for the purposes of this estimate, that's $122,222.22 in revenue. 50%, or $61,111.11, of which goes to the authors. There are 9 books. If we stick by our earlier assumption that's $6,790.12 for the author per book. Now we could add in what we do know about "Upgrading to Panther," but it would distribute evenly anyway. I know what you're thinking, and no I do not get outside much.

    1. Re:Cost Estimate by eggboard · · Score: 1

      I can't confirm your numbers (that would be telling), but there are two great factors that accompany your analysis: no marketing budget -- all work of mouth or existing content channels -- and only a few months' sales history on most books!

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
  41. 50% is better than 5%.... by init256 · · Score: 1

    50% royalty is damn good for publishing business. Anyone who buys paper books pays 95% to publishers, printers, salesmen and hordes of managers around.

    1. Re:50% is better than 5%.... by shokk · · Score: 1

      The publisher for this is ESellerate, which is just a software selling outfit. PDF files are no different than a copy of some antivirus software when it comes to publishing.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  42. outdated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Surfers Serials has long been supplanted by the (OSX app) Serial Box. Get with the times!

  43. Actually a Great Choice by ablair · · Score: 1

    Well, don't read the Take Control books on your PDA if you don't want to. They're in PDF format so you can read them on your desktop or print them out. A key advantage to them is their short publishing cycle- they're often updated and relevant. And buddy, these books may only be 50-150pgs but aren't not skimpy on the info. Finding the same info on Google will take your quite a few hours, I guarantee it. I guess if a half-dozen hours is not worth $5-10 to ya, knock yourself out.

    Before you dump on them too much, subscribe to the TidBITS mailing list itself and you can get an idea of what the books will be like. I have been on the list for well over a decade and out of all the numerous mailing lists I've been on, this one is the one that always gets read. The articles are useful, very well-written and in-depth on the topics they cover: this is why TidBITS is one of the longest-running lists on the internet. It's actually useful.

  44. Pay less for books by citadelgrad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I could buy books cheaper in an electronic format I would have about a 1000 books by now. I'm addicted to books but I don't have the space for them. I have purchased e-books but I have not been too impressed with the readers. I wish you could read MS reader books in Adobe and Word just for general versatility.

    --
    Losers whine about doing their best ....

    Winners go home and f*ck the prom queen!
  45. Sounds like a make-a-fast-buck scheme to me by idlerich · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    $10 for an 89 page book that promises this: You'll discover smart ways to address outgoing mail, send and receive attachments successfully, and view incoming mail? I don't think so.

  46. Another model - sourcebeat by fastdecade · · Score: 1

    Another interesting publishing model is Sourcebeat. Not self-publishing, but a publisher where new online editions are released each month, to keep up with open source projects as they develop.

    Nice to see these new models by people who "get it".

  47. Still in transition by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

    These are user manuals. Books in digital formats will not succeed until they begin to use available enhancements.

    i.e. "He heard an eerie sound." {cue(eeriesound.midi)}

    I suspect that eventually digital books will become something half way between print and movies, rather like the radio dramas of old.

    1. Re:Still in transition by klmth · · Score: 1

      Any such "enhancements" will be shot down immediately. Nobody wants their reading to be interrupted by skidding vehicles, gunshots and eerie music.

    2. Re:Still in transition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously do not read much!

      "He heard an eerie sound." {cue(eeriesound.midi)}

      No! Part of the reason I didn't take to audio books (I have a 45 minute commute, so I thought it would be ideal for me) is because of the idiocy that audio book producers all subscribe to by including appropriate (??) background sounds. My own imagination supplies all that, thank you very much! And usually in a more appropriate style for me, which is what reading is all about anyway, right? In the same vein, I can't tell you how many times I have been disapointed when a book moves to movie and the actors/actresses picked for the leads didn't match my mental image of the characters.

  48. Wot press run? - print at lulu.com by Jayfar · · Score: 1

    Red Hat co-founder Bob Young's current venture is lulu.com. They are geared to print on demand self publishing.

  49. Interesting. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Do people with low UIDs go around looking for Low UID threads, and reply?

    I've not noticed that trend myself, but if there is a pattern, then perhaps it has something to do with experience on a couple of fronts. . .

    For instance, low UID users automatically have at least 5 years of on-line experience by virtue of the fact that low UID's on /. were created five years ago.

    Also, those who were 'in the know' then, had enough world-savvy to get on board with /. when it was first starting up. This means foresight and an instinctive sense for, 'being where it counts'. --Those who have low UID's who still post also suggests that they have spent the last 5 years honing their skills in how to contribute useful and well-written material.

    Age and experience will always trump youth and beauty. Not that this says much about the /. crowd. I save all my most juvenile posts for this arena. There are few forums where I let myself swear and swagger and be very open about my thoughts and beliefs. Interestingly, it is this aspect which makes /. very powerful! This is truly a free-thought, no holds barred self-auditing arena. Quite a success, it seems to me.

    It'll be interesting to see the day when the one millionth UiD is reached! At about 100,000 new users per year, it should happen around the end of 2006, assuming the internet doesn't alter significantly between now and then.


    -FL

    1. Re:Interesting. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, fer Christ's sake! Talk about taking yourself too seriously!

      I have been posting to /. for 3 or 4 years now and I don't even have a UID. I have always posted AC. Now where does that leave me? I could say that it makes me superior because I don't particularly care whether anyone associates my posts with a particualr individual or history. Or I could say that it makes me better because I never got hung up in this whole smaller/bigger UID number thing. But all that would be rather pretentious, wouldn't it?

  50. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The company i work for www.netaim.info
    as been doing this for ages. Its called information marketing on the web and it works.

    Let them share books with friends, and the friends in turn buy more books from you. no one wants to be restricted woth drm.

  51. Be Still by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Imagine, for instance, a 50-page book on regular expression pattern matching for Mac OS X users.

    Oh be still my beating heart.

    --

    Da Blog
  52. It might not pay that well due to scale but by agristin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    RPG publishers are doing this at an alarming rate.

    PDF publishing is popular not only with small houses, but with a couple established industry leaders (Monte Cook dual publishes his supplements for D&D).

    There are several sites dedicated to selling these (I'm not going to pimp one here). But there is a battle between DRM and non-DRM now as a new site opened up recently with DRM.

    There is some argument in the community about p2p distribution of these pdfs, because it is not legal. But people are not sure if it helps or hurts legitimate sales.

    Anyway, it may be an interesting bell weather for other PDF publishers.

  53. Ebooks Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I followed the link to "Mr. SCO Man" Rob Enderle's FUD and lies, and his one comment that made any sense: namely that the biggest weapon against open source is the vast amount of time that people spend reading and replying to slashdot posts instead of DOING SOMETHING USEFUL for the larger community.

    This Slashdot thread and many replies are genuinely useful and enlightening. Cheers to michael and adam and all the insightful readers and commenters. You are genuinely adding value.

    Now, in order to practice what I preacn ( showing disdain for PhB's ) I notice that I don't have time right now to read all the comments, but I've saved the flat listings as HTML and will later on copy them to a single Mozilla composer page, and print as PS, later converting to PDF. AS AN EBOOK OF SORTS!!

    So, Mozilla doesn't quite understand how to print to pdf, so here's my "distill" script for the ps files. Hasn't failed me yet.

    distill

    #!/bin/csh
    foreach file ($*)
    set outfile = `echo $file | sed -e 's/.ps$/.pdf/' `
    echo "$file -> $outfile"
    gs -dNOPAUSE -q -sOutputFile=$outfile -sDEVICE=pdfwrite $file & /dev/null
    end

    Yes, kiddies, I predate BASH, so it's a csn script. Not needed on a mac. Proof left to reader.

    HAPPY DISTILLING

  54. Why I hate Wired News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another example of some zealous cub reporter extrapolating a general rule from a single instance.

    Statistically, it's nearly impossible to make money as a traditionally-publishing writer. Ask your favorite publishing editor about the "slush pile". But in spite of this, now Wired News is going to convince me that a minority subdivision of this group, who publishes in a medium where, as far as distribution rights control goes, they necessarily don't have any, has a snowball's chance in hell of making money... all based on the existence of one entity doing so. They may as well run a piece on why playing the lottery is a smart idea, focusing on a past winner as "evidence".

    How about if instead of diligently seeking out successes Wired just picked some online-selling writers at random? Heh, heh.

  55. Vanity by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Oh, fer Christ's sake! Talk about taking yourself too seriously!

    I have been posting to /. for 3 or 4 years now and I don't even have a UID. I have always posted AC. Now where does that leave me? I could say that it makes me superior because I don't particularly care whether anyone associates my posts with a particualr individual or history. Or I could say that it makes me better because I never got hung up in this whole smaller/bigger UID number thing. But all that would be rather pretentious, wouldn't it?


    Sounds to me like you are hung up to some degree because you just did say all of that stuff.

    The AC poster is a whole other type of animal! Registered users, by virtue of registering do indeed attach a level of importance to their names and 'histories', as it were. I know I do. This certainly carries with it a level of vanity. --But then I've always squinted rather at the concept of vanity being a sin in the biblical sense; seems suspiciously like yet another way of controlling people and stopping them from trying to excel and find their light.

    --That's 'Vanity' in the sense of striving to be a unique individual who has found their sovereignty (what gall!) and doesn't particularly want to die on some cross a good little flock member who was miserable through life because they didn't want to 'offend' anybody by standing up and speaking out for the things they believe in. --Or doing the things they believed were right and special. There are a lot of people out there who are miserable because they did what they were told rather than listen to the inner voice. Joseph Campbell called it, "Following Your Bliss," and it seems to me that most people have been beaten down to the point where they are too terrified to do this. This isn't any way to run a planet!

    Of course, there are negative ways of utilizing any sort of energy. This is why I don't judge the post on the UiD number, (or on an AC marker), but on the content. But I won't let this stop me from considering the why's and wherefor's of a pattern if somebody brings it up and I've never really noticed or thought on it before. Thinking is fun, after all!


    -FL

    1. Re:Vanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like you are hung up to some degree because you just did say all of that stuff.

      Help me! The intelligence level on /. is dropping.

      The point was that you could twist the interpretation of these things any damned way you want to. The mere fact that unlogged posters are labeled "Anonymous Coward" is also one such twisting. Point is: UID is a number; trying to attach any other meaning to it or ranking based on the size of it is as foolish as comparing penis size in the schoolyard!

      As for the rest of your reasoning: you are making mountains out of molehills! What a helluva lot to assume out of my original statement! Methinks thou dost protest too much. It all says more about you than it does the original post.

    2. Re:Vanity by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      As for the rest of your reasoning: you are making mountains out of molehills! What a helluva lot to assume out of my original statement! Methinks thou dost protest too much. It all says more about you than it does the original post.

      Aw, I'm just playing with words and ideas. I really enjoy this stuff; looking at patterns and trying to interpret responses. If you don't think as you go, it's like sleep-walking through life. Plus, having an awareness of one's output and internal processes tends to purify, because there is usually a LOT of broken garbage in most people and when you start to notice it in yourself, you naturally want it gone. I'm still working to clear all the crap out of my own system! Phew.


      -FL

  56. Why is a Macintosh computer "overpriced?" by mhollis · · Score: 1

    I'm still puzzling over this comment that keeps coming up again and again. I bought my current Macintosh in 1999. It is running the current Apple operating system. I did max out the RAM and I did get a faster processor for my box but that was all planned when I purchased it. I figure to get a solid five to six years out of my one Macintosh and that is a lot more life than you get out of a pee cee -- assuming you want to run current software.

    Apple computers are easier to use and learn. There are costs associated with that.

    I, for one, think that what Real is doing is just fine, though it is probably wrong to sell something at a loss in order to gain market share. I would have been happy to see an agreement between Real and Apple to increase the available titles on the iTunes Music Store. I find it wholly and completely unsurprising that Real's music download site does not work with Macintosh computers. Their other software requires a lot more out of a Power PC Processor than it does out of an Intel processor and the Power PC Processor has more capacity to do the kind of work I would expect of a video codec (or two or three) and Real tends to update Apple-compatible software as an afterthought.

    Or could it be that they don't want a judge to pronounce summary judgement against them by supporting Macintosh with their music store...

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  57. Re:Piracy issues? Customize the products! by mgcarley · · Score: 1

    What you could do if you wanted to protect your online version, would be to either
    a) sell it seperately, and
    b) sell it as part of the book in print - have it as a free-download "alternative" for those of us who would rather read it on our PDAs or whatever.

    Have like... a sticker inside the cover of each book with a number you use to download the book. When you first download the book, you put a 'password' of sorts on the book (3-4 digits or whatever, and user generated, rather than algorithm - this way its harder to electronically generate a combination that will work with the book) so that its still quick to open, but means that there is some form of protection on there, in case someone acquires themselves an illegitimate copy.

    of course, this method won't necessarily stop piracy altogether - there is not much that will - and there would probably be little to stop someone from writing a brute force thing to crack the combination (4 tries and they're out for good without re-setting the code again using the same software/product id combo?)...

    however, it probably wouldn't be worth the time for someone to write a program like that for breaking the password on a $10 ebook - would I be right in saying that there seems to be fewer cracks around for $10-30 software than there is for $50 to $5000 software?

    --
    Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  58. Re:American stupidity or political correctness ? by jejones · · Score: 1

    dictionary.com lists "titbit" as the variant. Had you asked me, I'd have guessed that "titbit" might be an Anglicism, but OTOH, the quote dictionary.com gives for "tidbit" is from Sir Alec Guinness, who I (admittedly an American) would think very English indeed.