Slashdot Mirror


Stunning, Classic Computer Console, from 1958?

Predicta Lover writes "It's widely believed that the late-50s Predicta series was the swansong for Philco. After its introduction, RCA's president David Sarnoff is quoted as having said "Philco has reinvented the industry and made TV more exciting again." Somehow, I can't imagine Bill reacting that way to an Apple product launch, at least not publicly. Years later, Philco's phenomenally-designed but questionably-engineered and over-priced TV sets are an icon of modern television design, and are even made in a stunning reproduction form. Maybe Philco would still be in business if they'd thought to shoehorn a contemporary computer into the box and put a high-resolution LCD up top (ahh, I guess that would've been tough...oh, the cruelties of history). At any rate, the researchers and designers at Onomy Labs did just that, 45 years later, and the result is an absolutely lust-worthy piece of computing hardware. Built to eventually house an experimental computer being produced by Sun Labs, the supercharged piece made its debut at their recent Open House held at the Computer History Museum.The Pedestal model that's used here was originally penned by Philco's Catherine Winkler, and is variously described as being inspired by the ideal female form and looking like a gas pump (I am not even going to touch that one). The perpetrators of this project have been mildly vilified by classic TV collectors (fearing imitators) and highly praised by most everyone else...some are calling it the 'best casemod ever'. I don't know about that, but it's definitely a beautiful object."

183 comments

  1. Best casemod ever? by SYFer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bah. I'm underwhelmed. It actually looks pretty ungainly to me with that tall pedestal base (not exactly an ergonomic delight unless you're a giraffe). I'd prefer a mod of the Holiday model if anything, but I'm afraid I'm with the angry Predicta collectors on this one. Must make 'em wince to see Windows 2000 leering out at them when it should be Lucille Ball.

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    1. Re:Best casemod ever? by liminality · · Score: 2, Informative

      i saw one of these at a garage sale some months ago and my first thought was "what an amazing casemod this would be!".

      admittedly, it doesnt look like much in these pictures, but in real life the thing would look totally wicked as your digital entertainment hub.

    2. Re:Best casemod ever? by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I can appreciate that it must have taken some work to get these setup, but I'd have to say even the Holiday model is not something I would be pulling out my wallet for anytime soon.

    3. Re:Best casemod ever? by JasdonLe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I COMPLETELY agree with you. Retro... Fuck Retro... The biggest problem with the 2000's (yes, STILL no one knows what to call them, four years into the deal) is that there is we still haven't moved in any one direction, there is no identity. Retro isn't huge just because everyone who grew up in the 80's has money now... There's this RANDOM lack of creativity. I'm not saying that *I* have the answer, or the vision for the 21st century... But I am saying that 100 years ago people were DEFINING a new century, not dredging up an old one.

      Fuck retro. Let's make something new

      --
      ** A Sketch a Week **
      http://www.sketchplease.com
    4. Re:Best casemod ever? by torpor · · Score: 1

      yeah ... i'd be far more impressed if it were just some text-mode interface or something ... mabye XMLTerm or some such thing, that could be neat ...

      Seeing Win2k in that thing is just too incongruous. Great that its a computer, suck that its a toy OS.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Best casemod ever? by baryon351 · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed at the workmanship that's gone into it. It doesn't LOOK like it's a 50s TV with a computer hacked into it.

      That being said, you could get a beer barrel to also not look like it's a beer barrel with a computer hacked into it, and I'd be as unimpressed with the case mod. This one's just a bit boring all up.

    6. Re:Best casemod ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're usually called the noughties by british tabloids. I suspect that will stick in britain/ireland/australia anyway...

    7. Re:Best casemod ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      arsehole. total fucking arsehole.

    8. Re:Best casemod ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bah. I'm underwhelmed. It actually looks pretty ungainly to me with that tall pedestal base (not exactly an ergonomic delight unless you're a giraffe).

      I have to agree. An LCD screen, ribbon speakers built into both sides for clear stereo sound, and a simple rectangular base containing the motherboard and removable media would better than this. No offense to those who like fancy casemods, but simplicity and efficiency has its own beauty -- think Shaker furniture applied to the computer era.

    9. Re:Best casemod ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And malcontents 100 years ago where saying the same thing. Fuck retro, let's make something new. Everything ever invented has swiped from previous inventions.

    10. Re:Best casemod ever? by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      I think it's beautiful, but then again I grew up with electronics and have been hooked ever since. Old enough to see the amazing technology of the past and hear the burn of a transistor tube in a guitar amp... young enough to see the digital age and hear square waves and bass heavy beats spilling out a wall of PA speakers...

      Now I'm waiting on the cusp of a new rennisance in human space travel. I'll play MAME on this thing while trading homemade music on this thing. I'm an 80s child and I love it.

    11. Re:Best casemod ever? by JasdonLe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's easy to say that kind of thing now, Mr. Monday Morning Quarterback. But keep in mind that just over 100 years ago Expressionism, Cubism, Surrealism, and not to mention ABSTRACT ART, had never really been done before. New tools were encouraging new ways of thinking. Photography challenged the traditional notion of painting and it didn't just end with art. Show me the Eiffel Towers before wrought iron.

      Man, even sans serif type isn't that old, and there you're talking about a completely new way of writing English. This idea that even 100 years ago everything was being stolen is off base, if that was even your point.

      --
      ** A Sketch a Week **
      http://www.sketchplease.com
    12. Re:Best casemod ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It's not a freakin' computer that's going to tower over you on a desktop, it's a console for computing and/or gaming....it sits on the floor, and you sit near it, in a chair, with controller in hand (or keyboard in lap).

      I'm in the "it's a beautiful thing" camp....it doesn't need to be all that practical.

    13. Re:Best casemod ever? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      No. It won't. Certainly not in Australia, although the Poms are another matter.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    14. Re:Best casemod ever? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I think it's as ugly as a hatfull of arseholes ... as a child of the fifties, I've never liked what passed for "contemporary" or, worse, "futuristic" back then.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    15. Re:Best casemod ever? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Bleh!!!

      Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. This beholder finds it absolutely and completely hideous...

  2. back in my day by thexdane · · Score: 4, Funny

    i remember back in my day we had punch cards all lined up in order and we would see who could feed them through the fastest and we liked it

    1. Re:back in my day by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

      *swipes one of the cards from the middle of the stack and puts it at the beginning* heh heh...

    2. Re:back in my day by SYFer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Luxury! In my day we used Windows 2000 on a lame Predicta vintage TV casemod!

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    3. Re:back in my day by arose · · Score: 1

      I think you misspellt "Windows Me"...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:back in my day by airdrummer · · Score: 1

      hell, i used my predicta as a monitor for my ti99/4a;-) taught myself assembly on it...

  3. useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm.. pretty but not very practical

  4. It's got /. on the display! by Compholio · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out the display! It has /. on it!

    http://www.onomy.com/blue/images/headshotf.jpg

    1. Re:It's got /. on the display! by mansa · · Score: 1

      And it's running windows. :) I wonder long long your server can take a pounding with that large image on there!

      (Good luck!)

    2. Re:It's got /. on the display! by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it's being displayed on IE... so it kinda balances out. I find this computer neutrally cool.

    3. Re:It's got /. on the display! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey Mom! Look, I'm on television!

    4. Re:It's got /. on the display! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Check out the display! It has /. on it!"

      Gee, I wonder if somebody'll make a joke about how it stopped working a minute later and it'll be modded up as windows innuendo.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  5. Translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot stories appear to be tilting more towards rabid hype of one kind or another recently. The best casemod ever! Really?

    Add it to some of the blatant use of Slashdot as a depot for the half-truths and promotion from various vendors, and it seems to me the editors are not being very balanced.

    1. Re:Translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And any type of commentary about the veracity of the editorialization gets modded down. It isn't so much dissenting voices that get modded down, because debates happen, its that the focus and content of the entire site is not subject to public scrutiny. Many articles strike me as being paid advertisements as they hold no other value. This seems to be one of the last great "imbalances" of the Slashcode engine: Article selection for the main page.

  6. RTFA??? by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this is the first time I didn't want to RTF-Summary. Longest one I've seen ever :)

    1. Re:RTFA??? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after that I had to take a break and notice the fruits of nature. What the fuck???

  7. too much text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not reading all that shit! This is /., give me the condensed form and link the rest so I can ignore it and make assinine comments.

  8. Huh? by istewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The television in my bedroom is branded Philco, yet it couldn't have been purchased more than seven or eight years ago. Yet they went out of business in the middle of last century? What's goin' on here? Cheap Asian knockoffs like those Commodore MP3 players?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The television in my bedroom is branded Philco, yet it couldn't have been purchased more than seven or eight years ago. Yet they went out of business in the middle of last century? What's goin' on here?


      Nothing special. Technically, RCA went completely out of business (in CE) in 1986. RCA brand is simply a stamp of Thomson Consumer Electronics (which likes to use the name GE Consumer Electronics mark depending on the current customer sentiment and the whim of GE corporate).

      Same goes for Magnavox which has really been Phillips for years.

    2. Re:Huh? by boffy_b · · Score: 1

      I don't care if its legal, working, or likely to microwave my dog, where can I get one of these Commodore MP3 players?

      --
      Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Look again.
      You have Phi1co, not a Philco!

  9. Re:One word..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats two words

  10. Reminds me of ... by value_added · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone seen Terry Gilliam's Brazil? The "monitors," while not quite so stylishly retro, resembled an old Underwood typerwriter with a screen in front of which was mounted a hilariously-oversized rectangular magnifying glass attachment. Brilliant.

    I'm not so sure I would want one, or a Philco update, but somewhere between CRT monoliths, plastic flat-screens striving to distinguish themselves, Apple's attempts at novelty and the uber-kewl designs we regularly see in Sci-Fi movies, I'm sure eventually we'll be face to face with something far more interesting.

  11. It's a sacrelige by sakusha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The classic Predicta TV, if well maintained in working order, still receives video as well as it did when it was new, and will continue to work for many years to come. But if you tear out the guts and put in a computer, you have a box that will be obsolete within months.

    1. Re:It's a sacrelige by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Your first sentence is a tautology. You could also
      say that this computer, if constantly updated with
      newest PC internals and maintained in working
      order will continue to work and wnot be obsolete
      for many years to come.

    2. Re:It's a sacrelige by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      "Years to come" ends when analog broadcasts stop. You'll probably get a few years, sure, but I wouldn't say "years to come".

    3. Re:It's a sacrelige by sakusha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You miss the obvious point. The Predicta has already worked for 40+ years without any upgrades. A vintage Predicta tube TV is a work of electronic art. A casemod CPU is a kluge of mass produced junk that is lucky to go 40 weeks before it's superceded by newer equipment.

    4. Re:It's a sacrelige by ndpatel · · Score: 0, Troll

      look. sorry. bullshit. first of all, you don't know what "tautology" means. second of all, you added a clause to the argument. you should try harder next time. thanks, bye, nilay.

      --
      london is drowning and i live by river
    5. Re:It's a sacrelige by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. The Predicta is obsolete. It can't display HDTV. I assume it doesn't have an s-video input; for that matter, I assume its only inputs are 300 and 75 ohm antenna wire. Its already obsolete; modifying it to accept modern video signals fed to a modern video screen makes it significantly less so.

      And I may be the only one, but while I can see the appeal of it as an example of 50s design, I personally find it ugly and would not allow it in my home.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:It's a sacrelige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RF and composite outputs. If they do away with analog RF modulators, then get an outbound one. I seriously doubt they'll be getting rid of analog outputs, every DTV tuner set-top I've seen includes analog outputs. Hollywood might want it that way, but I don't think the pols are THAT bought out.

    7. Re:It's a sacrelige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "would not allow it in my home."
      Or what? You're gonna whip the houseboy? What are you? Gay?

    8. Re:It's a sacrelige by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > "Years to come" ends when analog broadcasts stop. You'll probably get a few years, sure, but
      > I wouldn't say "years to come".

      Analog broadcasts ain't goin' nowhere. The majority of people do not own an HDTV set, and they won't when the supposed cutover date gets here. And they won't be pleased at the notion that Congress has mandated that they get a $150 digital tuner set-top box if they want to continue watching TV. I don't own an HDTV set myself, and I have no plans to get one. The cutover will be cancelled or indefinitely postponed; count on it.

      Chris Mattern

    9. Re:It's a sacrelige by bhima · · Score: 1
      Sad to say but I think it's a fair bet that digital signals and HDTV will wind up to be driven by copyright rather than technology.

      And [people] won't be pleased at the notion that [the RIAA & MPAA sponsored] Congress has mandated that they get a $150 DRM compliant digital tuner set-top box if they want to continue watching TV. That I think is more realistic

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    10. Re:It's a sacrelige by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, because only gay people are allowed to have a fucking sense of style, yeah?

      I think its ugly. I don't put ugly things in my house. Do you? I mean, beyond your boyfriend?

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    11. Re:It's a sacrelige by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      My HDTV can't display HD programs unless I buy a separate tuner or get an HD set-top box from the cable co. So, from the get-go, I'm in no better a position with my 2004 TV than someone with a Predicta. Aside from the differing resolutions, my Motorola HD box can work on my new TV or a Predicta (using a 75ohm-->300ohm adapter most likely).

    12. Re:It's a sacrelige by Compuser · · Score: 1

      If someone thinks this troll is for real,
      and they do not know the meaning of
      "tautology", look it up on dictionary.com:

      1. Needless repetition of the same sense in
      different words; redundancy.
      2. An instance of such repetition.
      3. An empty or vacuous statement composed of
      simpler statements in a fashion that makes it
      logically true whether the simpler statements
      are factually true or false; for example, the
      statement "Either it will rain tomorrow or it
      will not rain tomorrow".

    13. Re:It's a sacrelige by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I don't put ugly things in my house.

      So, what you're saying is, you don't allow yourself to enter your own house? I hope you have a big picture window out front so you can look in at your wunnerful house admiringly.

      --
      resigned
    14. Re:It's a sacrelige by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      If it has an analog output to send the signal to an ordinary legacy TV set, it won't be DRM compliant.

      Yep. It's a paradox, and the kind that will hold things back. Thank goodness.

      --
      resigned
    15. Re:It's a sacrelige by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Does your face hurt?

      That's funny, it's killing me!

      Your puerile sense of humor brings me back to my elementary school years. Thank you very much.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    16. Re:It's a sacrelige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, c'mon....the Predicta didn't even *ship* in working order...they broke the first time you turned them on.

      If you poke around, you'll see that these folks didn't take a pristine Predicta and gut it, they took a dead hulk and restored it to a slightly different functional form (but largely true to the original aesthetic).

      I suppose you think it's a travesty to put modern running gear into a 1950s car. There are a hell of a lot of hot rod afficinados out there who'd beg to differ. It's a slippery slope that you're on there, son.

    17. Re:It's a sacrelige by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      From the get-go, your TV is *capable* of displaying HD resolution. A Predicta is not.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    18. Re:It's a sacrelige by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one, I assure you.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    19. Re:It's a sacrelige by bhima · · Score: 1

      Ah... so now we know what's taking so long: DRM for analog

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    20. Re:It's a sacrelige by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I'm just referring to signals...neither can receive the HD signal w/o a box. There are also millions of people that are not about to buy an HD set when everything switches over to digital in (maybe) 2006.

    21. Re:It's a sacrelige by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      No, your set can receive an HD signal without a box. It just can't tune HD signals. I have the same sort of set - I can feed it an HD signal from my DVD player or PS2, but it can't tune in to HD signals from an HD cable or over-the-air. The other set can't receive an HD signal at all. Can't display it, not capable.

      I honestly feel that the utility of a built-in HD tuner is marginal anyway, given that most HD content is likely to be delivered over cable or satellite, not OTA, and as such the service provider is going to want you to use their box anyway, so why bother putting fancy electronics inside the TV. (Unless, of course, a standard for 'access cards' were developed, allowing the electronics to sit inside the TV and the provider just gives you a decryption card, but I'm not anticipating this to happen.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  12. No, actually, they're being vilified because... by John+Miles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The perpetrators of this project have been mildly vilified by classic TV collectors (fearing imitators) ... there are only so many Predictas left, and Philco isn't making any more of them.

    Here's an idea: modern Predicta reproductions are available, so why not buy a repro and case-mod it instead of trashing a really neat, really valuable technological artifact from another age?

    This is no better than gutting a classic Zenith console radio to make a fishtank. It's lame as hell.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    1. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by krymsin01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      C'mon. My antique egyptian mummy case mod is the leetnes.

      --
      stuff
    2. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by zangdesign · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's hilarious that the collectors are so up in arms about someone modding out a Predicta TV, when you consider that one less on the market raises the value of their collection ever so slightly.

      What's so damn sacred about the design anyway? Sure, it's a nice-looking TV, but it's obsolete which makes it a prime candidate for re-use as something a little more modern.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    3. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably feel an almost-uncontrollable temptation to loot the Louvre too, dontcha?

    4. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's hilarious that the collectors are so up in arms about someone modding out a Predicta TV, when you consider that one less on the market raises the value of their collection ever so slightly.

      No, actually, it's not "hilarious" once you realize that the more hardcore collectors aren't in it to make money, but to see rare and important examples of old-school tech preserved for posterity. Believe me, old TV sets aren't much better as investments than they are as PC cases.

      There is a certain aesthetic quailty to an old chassis full of hot, glowing vacuum tubes, capacitors that smell like beeswax, resistors that actually look big enough to block an electron or two, and wiring that might kill you with a touch. Some folks are into that. If you have to ask, you're probably not one of them. Which is fine.

      So, why not leave the genuine article to those who will appreciate it? Buy a reproduction Predicta, duct-tape your IDE disk-access light to the side, and pretend it's the real thing. If you're right, it doesn't really matter, does it?

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    5. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see it as that bad. What else are you going to do with the empty Predicta shells after cannibalizing the sets to restore other Predictas to original working condition?

    6. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Moofie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Who are you to tell somebody else what they should or should not do with their own Predicta? They have a different set of motivations and desires than you do, and they're free to do as they will.

      Of course, you are free to object, but you look pretty silly when you do it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, actually, it's not "hilarious" once you realize that the more hardcore collectors aren't in it to make money, but to see rare and important examples of old-school tech preserved for posterity.
      Sorry, but it's still hilarious.
    8. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Who are you to tell somebody else what they should or should not do with their own Predicta? ...
      Of course, you are free to object, but you look pretty silly when you do it.


      I disagree. What if I was an art collector who decided that my vast collection of classic art, some of which are considered historical milestones, would all look more modern with a few splashes of neon paint and some blinking LEDs embeded in the subject's eyes? It would be defacement of those pieces and I could certainly understand the art world to be rather upset.

      Granted - if those pieces were a part of my private collection, I would be legally allowed to do what I want with them. But it would still be tactless.
    9. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me guess; you're a Libertarian. You would find nothing wrong with somebody buying the Mona Lisa and setting fire to it, or tearing down the Parthenon to put up a Starbucks.

    10. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 1

      usually there is only one of each piece of art. how many of these shitty tellies were made?

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
    11. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by macshit · · Score: 1

      What if I was an art collector who decided that my vast collection of classic art, some of which are considered historical milestones, would all look more modern with a few splashes of neon paint and some blinking LEDs embeded in the subject's eyes?

      Some guy might also object if you deface your cheerios box, or scuff up that velvet clown painting you picked up at the flea market. You'd probably say he's nuts, and we'd probably all agree with you -- but between him and people crying out in horror when you paint a mustache on the Mona Lisa is a continuum.

      Fans and collectors of these old TVs are probabably going to place them nearer to the "art" end, but it's not really clear to me whether most people would agree that they're rare enough, or unique enough, that defacing them is analogous with defacing one-of-a-kind priceless masterpieces.

      The suggestion to "just use a replica" is hardly uncontroversial either -- some people who are doing modding want to use the "real thing" because it adds an air of authenticity that simply isn't going to be there with replicas (even if they're very good).

      You make a good point, I'm just trying to say that things are not quite so clear cut as you seem to think.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    12. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If you don't want somebody to do something to something, don't sell it to them.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You might have a case if this were The Last Predicta. But it's not. This person obviously paid market value for one instance of this mass-produced object, and then did what he wanted to do with it.

      I think it's faintly ridiculous to compare a TV to the Mona Lisa.

      The "defacer" obviously had the option to use a replica...it'd probably have cost him a lot less. But he didn't want to, and he's totally within his rights.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all that many, because, as you said, they were pretty "shitty tellies." The Predictas are respected for their industrial design, not their electronics.

    15. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      That's true. Property rights and all that.

      A photographer friend of mine once told me a story of a drunken party in the 1950's where they all sat around smashing glass photographic negatives of Native Americans from the 19th century.

      Apparently a good time was had by all participants.

      Sometimes it sucks, but history is owned.

      --
      resigned
    16. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The Predictas are respected for their industrial design, not their electronics.

      Wow. Now we know who the Apple Developers are copying.

      --
      resigned
    17. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      One of the cool things about electronics from that era is that almost all the components are generic and can be easily repaired with common parts. You seldom, if ever, have to 'gut' one chassis for parts for another. Hell, even if a transformer burns open you can tear it down and rewind it.

      I once owned a 1949 Crosley television, which is getting back far enough that it had a lot of hard to replace parts. (TV circuit design was still rather baroque and new back then) But electronics from about 1960 should work and be easily repairable indefinitely into the future.

      There are even hobbyists blowing their own vacuum tubes these days.

      --
      resigned
    18. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Valuable Technological Artifact? You've got to be joking. These original sets aren't really all that rare, and very few people seem to have thrown them out, so they pop up for sale, at reasonable prices, all of the time.

      It's *much* cheaper to work from a mediocre-condition original than to shell out the $2000 it takes to buy a reproduction, even if you had the months it takes to work your way up the waiting list.

      Do your homework before you start making idle claims about the scarcity and economics...this isn't the fine art world we're talking about. Not even close.

    19. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      Posterity? Really? Is that what it's called when it's locked up in someone's house rather than a museum? I could buy the posterity thing if these collectors were creating a publicly-viewable-for-free-or-nominal-fee collection, but otherwise, it's socially acceptable hoarding. I don't think there's anything terribly wrong with that, either, after all, who doesn't lust after a full set of original Star Wars figures or some other such thing? But I think it's a good use of dead technology and a whole lot more respectful than letting it gather dust in some collector's private hoard.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    20. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by macshit · · Score: 1

      You might have a case if this were The Last Predicta. But it's not. ...

      Um, you should read the post to which you're replying more carefully -- you just said exactly the same things I did, in a tone that suggests you're disagreeing with me!

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    21. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Well then, you're right and everybody else is wrong. I musta been on crack when writing the post. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    22. Re:No, actually, they're being vilified because... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Where do you draw the line?

      Should we preserve every building ever built? Every picture ever painted? Who decideds what things are "signifigant" enough to preserve. Who's to say what side of the line these obsolete and, if you ask me, ugly old televisions fall on? What makes something more worthy of preservation than something else?

  13. MBA Action 2004 by Dwonis · · Score: 1

    Where is this "MBA Action 2004" game? I want it, but Google turns up nothing.

    1. Re:MBA Action 2004 by Fancia · · Score: 1

      The one result Google turns up refers to it as a hypothetical game. Presumeably, it currently doesn't exist and may not ever.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    2. Re:MBA Action 2004 by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      The one result Google turns up refers to it as a hypothetical game. Presumeably, it currently doesn't exist and may not ever.


      Um, what part of

      an attract loop for a humerous hypothetical video game called "MBA Action 2004 (ref)

      don't you understand?
    3. Re:MBA Action 2004 by Fancia · · Score: 1

      I understood it completely and that is in fact the very page I was referring to.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    4. Re:MBA Action 2004 by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      This "one result" happens to be the article linked in the story summary. RTFA, for Diety of Choice's sake.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    5. Re:MBA Action 2004 by Fancia · · Score: 1

      Once more, I am completely aware of that. The person before was the one asking about the game, not me; I merely pointed out that Google's only result was on that page, which therefore implied that the game did not exist. Do calm down; this isn't worth getting nearly this excited/angry about.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  14. Meh, i want a desktop. by thegoogler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i wan't to see them do it to the "desktop" syle philco,ya' know the one that basically looked like an old compaq with one of those rounded picture tubes mounted on it? would look much better if you ask me. and you would be able to put it soemwhere where you coudl actully USE it, not on the floor in the living room where it will just be a display piece(i like my mods to be functional TYVM)

  15. Re:One word..... by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, it's 'orrid! There's a reason designs go out of style.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  16. Back at you grandad by taj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The space-age theme was promoted in ads promising "TV today from the world of tomorrow".

    Computer today from the world of the yesterday.

    Neat idea.

  17. As a kid, I had one of these TV sets.... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I pulled it out of a trash can, actually, It needed a flyback transformer, which cost something like 100 bucks at the time. Fortunately, my dad had a close friend that owned a TV repair shop and he was able to use one from a more common TV set (I think it was an RCA). The picture was pretty good. Mine had an analog clock on the right side that could turn the TV on (an alarm TV!). The screen rotated so you culd see it from anywhere in the room. Alas, when my family moved when I was 15, it stayed and likely wound up in a landfill. A truly stunning TV...As a 11 year old I didn't appreciate it fully though.

  18. Hrm.. by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    This is cool, but it seems more like an ad to me.

  19. It should have been a Mac by ScienceMan · · Score: 1

    Clearly an early prototype of the Luxor Jr. iMac here...

  20. Ewww by Itstoearly · · Score: 5, Funny

    That thing must be a black hole for feng shui. You'll need to pay some chinese guy thousands of dollars to remove it from your home.

    1. Re:Ewww by mikael · · Score: 1

      For some reason, the advert where the Feng Shui guy and his assistants go into a luxury home, remove everything but the TV, freezer, toilet and sofa comes to mind.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Ewww by nizo · · Score: 1

      Just imagine the radiation coming off these old TVs too. The ancient TV I had my TI-994a plugged into had a huge pile of vacuum tubes in it (and it looked like at one point it got so hot it melted part of the case!) I can only imagine the cancerous growths I will have on my face from spending so much time in front of that beast.

    3. Re:Ewww by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The vacuum tubes are irrelevant, what is relevant is the type of screen and glass used in the front of the tube.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Casemods aren't news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is anyone else bored with seeing casemods on slashdot? They're not relevant (or funny) news, they're almost always ugly, and they seem to largely be the province of high school or college-aged kids whose parents have too much money. (The same goes for Alienware and other vanity PC manufacturers, but that's not relevant to my immediate point.)
    It just doesn't take much skill or inspiration to look at something and say "I wonder if I could put a computer in there!"

  22. War... war never changes. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I the only one who saw this and immediately thought "Fallout" here? All they need is Pipboy with the thumbs up in a gas attendant uniform on the case and they're set to go. *Sigh*, Fallout.

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:War... war never changes. by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of Gilliams "Brazil", myself.

      nick ..

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  23. Brazil "Case Mod" by hanway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Somebody has already done one, based on an Underwood typewriter and a Macintosh SE: http://www.ahleman.com/ElectriClerk.html/

    1. Re:Brazil "Case Mod" by hanway · · Score: 3, Informative

      Remove trailing slash from URL to make it work:
      http://www.ahleman.com/ElectriClerk.html

    2. Re:Brazil "Case Mod" by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      That's cool, except to maintain a strong heritage to the movie Brazil, it should be a machine running a badly broken version of MS-DOS 2.1 on an old Novell network.

      --
      resigned
    3. Re:Brazil "Case Mod" by mojine · · Score: 1

      Page has been moved to another directory http://www.ahleman.com/Props/ElectriClerk.html very cool!

      --
      "It's not how many people I've killed - it's how I get along with the ones that are still alive."
  24. Not the point, but that controller? by WhiteLudaFan · · Score: 1

    I realize that this isn't really a focal point for the piece, but with all the work they put in I can't imagine why they would put that controller with it. If you've ever held one, you know what I mean.

  25. What the hell? by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you put your monitor on top of your tower case? Of course not, because you don't want your neck to throb with pain for the rest of your life. That thing looks like it's about three feet higher than the desk. Every time you use your computer you feel like you got to a movie late and had to settle for the front row. Wow sign me up for this case, it's a model of practicality and ergonomics.

    1. Re:What the hell? by corvus0 · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that's just for photography purposes, though i dont understand why they didn't just put it to the side. (Possibly some information I'm missing that involves the original tv?) If you scrolldown you'll notice a picture of a man using the monitor at eye-level.

    2. Re:What the hell? by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it's meant to go on a desk?

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    3. Re:What the hell? by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

      I don't get it then. If it's not supposed to go on a desk, and you want the monitor to be at eye level, where are you supposed to put your keyboard? On a TV dinner tray?

    4. Re:What the hell? by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      On your lap. I think it's meant as a gaming/media machine as opposed to a workstation.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  26. This Island Earth by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to make sure you knew that at least one person got the reference.

  27. "Hardware Hacking" icon? by JThundley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please pick something better for a hardware hacking icon, that orange 3 to 2 pin electricity adapter thing implies electricity too much.

    How about an icon involving a pci card and glue?

    1. Re:"Hardware Hacking" icon? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Glue? GLUE?

      What kind of n00b uses glue?

      Duct tape, baby! ;)

    2. Re:"Hardware Hacking" icon? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the orange 3 to 2 pin adapter is totally wrong.

      True hackers yank out the third ground pin on power cords with a universal plier.

      -Living well, with two wire outlets in every room of this house built in 1900-

      --
      resigned
  28. and for the dark side of Sarnoff.... by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After its introduction, RCA's president David Sarnoff is quoted as having said "Philco has reinvented the industry and made TV more exciting again."

    And now, for the dark side of Mr. Sarnoff, who did NOT invent the TV set:

    http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist/profi le/farnsworth03.html

    Sarnoff and RCA are the scum of the earth; they ruined a guy's life simply to not have to pay him royalties; thankfully, history has for the most part set the record straight for anyone who digs a little.

    Pretty sad; Farnsworth never saw a dime and went into deep depression over the whole thing. Farnsworth saw the waste of his invention almost from the get-go; as the Time article says, his son said "I suppose you could say that he felt he had created kind of a monster, a way for people to waste a lot of their lives."

    Nothing's changed in 50 years- corporations still bully the "little guy" like this. Back in the 80's, a company my father started had technology stolen from them by NCR (National Cash Register Corporation). Despite a signed NDA, NCR ripped off technology they were demo'd. There was clear evidence NCR had stolen the design, they had the NDA in hand, etc- but NCR managed to drag it out in court for years. I believe the suit was abandoned due to lack of funds, but I don't recall- it was a subject that was not discussed often or pleasantly in our house.

    I hope they rot in hell- they helped cripple the company, which was working on some really innovative touch screen technology. Much of the touchscreen technology, now in use by PDAs and whatnot, you can owe to DTI- Digital Techniques Inc- a tiny little Burlington, MA company nobody ever heard of. Probably their most "famous" product was the very early touchscreen system in Super Stop and Shop where you could enter a product name and get a map to where it was in the store; they also did some award winning videodisk based exhibits for the Museum Of Science. They were also bullied out of an air traffic control system project with the FAA...by Raytheon. DTI designed a system that, in the late 80's, would have allowed a controller to manage all his electronics(radios and whatnot) from one small touchscreen system. Decades ahead of its time.

    1. Re:and for the dark side of Sarnoff.... by davidu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry that happened, but I think you've missed the lesson here:



      Great technology isn't enough, you need the winning team and business side to go with it.


      I'm not a fan of business things and legal issues either but they are needed and you can't go into situations without the smartest people on your side of the table...that's just how it works, unfortunately.

      -davidu

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    2. Re:and for the dark side of Sarnoff.... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      Great technology isn't enough, you need the winning team and business side to go with it.


      Hey - great. Pay the guys who came up with the great technology their fair share (or at least, the bargained price). Then go off to market it for millions in profit. There's nothing wrong with that.
    3. Re:and for the dark side of Sarnoff.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many comments - such a lot of shite spoken. Is it not time for your bed yet grandpa?

  29. Obsolete desires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What's so damn sacred about the design anyway? Sure, it's a nice-looking TV, but it's obsolete which makes it a prime candidate for re-use as something a little more modern."

    Which tells me you don't understand how collectors and collecting works. Obsolete usually doesn't figure into the decision (except as it relates to scarcity). Scarity, and desirability. How many people "desire" what you have? How "rare" is your item? A Star Trek Voyager series cover TV Guide isn't going to be worth much because even if you had a lot of people wanting it? There were thousands printed up, and little time for them to deteriorate. Notice that obsolete doesn't even figure into it (printing still exists). How about a piece from the original Star Trek set? Rare and desirable.

  30. Sigh by TequilaJunction · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is possibly the most convoluted summary I've ever seen on /.

  31. Meh, i want a desktop.-TV, what a gas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Oh let the imagination fly. How about converting one of those old style gas pumps. Replacing the globe with an eye done in metal (copper) and glass. One could house a TV projector in there. Channel display were the old indicators use to be. Obviously remote controlled. The antenna could be hidden in the pump hose. Hmmm...or a portable pop-up TV built into a toaster. Lever makes screen (LCD) go up and down (bonus points if you make it look like a slice of bread). Channel changer is the darker/lighter knob. Remember when TV's were reflected by mirrors? Well now you have an idea for an old footstool.

  32. Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a child, my parents put their "Penthouse" model in my bedroom when they got a bigger, better TV. That was a long time ago (around 1959).

    1. Re:Memories by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was a child, my parents put their "Penthouse" model in my bedroom

      I've been trying to get a Penthouse model into my bedroom for years...
  33. And don't forget Atari, SCO, Napster... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nowadays it seems that the trend of wearing the skin of a deceased beloved company like a corporate Ed Gein is increasing in today's post-dot-com business climate.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:And don't forget Atari, SCO, Napster... by gilroy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Nowadays it seems that the trend of wearing the skin of a deceased beloved company like a corporate Ed Gein is increasing in today's post-dot-com business climate.

      Well, you're not allowed to cut off your enemy's head and carry it like a trophy anymore...
    2. Re:And don't forget Atari, SCO, Napster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Nowadays it seems that the trend of wearing the skin of a deceased beloved company like a corporate Ed Gein is increasing in today's post-dot-com business climate.

      I nominate this post for the Slashdot hall of fame.

    3. Re:And don't forget Atari, SCO, Napster... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      You're right. And it can get to where it seems sorta bulky, when the Slashdot skin is sloughed on top of the hAndover.net skin, which is sloughed on top of the VA Whatever skin, or is it VA.msn.com yet?

      --
      resigned
  34. Speaking of ads by lrucker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Found this Photoshop contest earlier today:

    Vintage Ads

    Contest Directions

    In this contest your challenge is to take modern products and display them in a vintage light, through advertisements. You can also reverse the challenge and take vintage products and display them in a modern way.

    1. Re:Speaking of ads by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1

      Awesome link. There are some really creative people out there!

  35. Um, no. by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This thing is ass ugly and has that "don't touch me, I came from goodwill and you don't know where I've been" look to it.

    I have no idea how anyone can compare this to an iMac. Hell, an average white box PC with a flat panel is about 10x more aesthetically pleasing.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Um, no. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      You're, uh, putting your iMac on a pedestal.

      Don't forget that the first iMac model was a hideous blob box that looked like a bad copy of a Lear-Siegler ADM3a.

      Apple can bribe somebody into stucking one of the 'makeup mirror' models into the Smithsonian, I guess. They'll throw it out eventually.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:Um, no. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      I don't own an iMac. I'm a ThinkPad user. Personally, I think that the sleek black of the thin ThinkPads is the sexiest look ever in PCs, but I'm wise enough to know that many will disagree.

      I'm pretty confident, though, that 90% of the population would prefer an iMac to this thing, at least in terms of looks.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    3. Re:Um, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damned right. This is "stylish" in the same way that the PT Cruiser is....

      Mind you, I also think the whole iMac line is also ugly as sin and wouldn't give one house room.

    4. Re:Um, no. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I am still happy with my Powerbook 165c. But, then, I have many computers to admire for various purposes. For overall performance/appearance/usability my TRS-80 Model 100 wins in a number of ways.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:Um, no. by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      I agree. I also think it was wise of IBM to choose a simple, sleek design that carries well from generation to generation. My wife's 6-year-old Thinkpad looks just fine next to my brand-new T40, while my 6-year-old Toshiba Satellite looks like something destined for Goodwill.

  36. 15 seconds of fame... by Bill_Royle · · Score: 1

    The 15 seconds of fame that the submitter anticipated must have spurred him to try to extend it to 30.

    Note to submitters: if you're going to write out a long submission, throw in some good porn at the end. We deserve *something* for suffering through your inability to WRAP IT UP!

  37. iMac by paz5 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else seriously think it was going to be an iMac right up until they saw the actualy mod pictures? Even when i was going to click on it i could have sworn it would send me here.

  38. Re:Go for the gusto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my interociter is way nicer than yours

    I had mine shipped all the way from Metaluna.

  39. a little long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't this posting a little long... I mean do they expect us to read it?

  40. A little too long for the front page. by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Could have saved some of this article for after you click on it, the topic doesn't appeal to everyone and yet it's taking up a huge bit of front page realestate.

    *TheDarb

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  41. lust worthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even geeks know THAT is NOT lust worthy.

    http://www.domai.com/index.html

    THIS is lust worthy.

  42. Casemods are not news. by Xargle · · Score: 1

    ...and are exceedingly tedious.

  43. iMacs, windows, and the mouse by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed? All things commonly associated with Apple were actually created in the 60's: iMacs (Predicta), windows (Xerox), and the mouse (Xerox). If we start digging deeper, what will we find next?

    1. Re:iMacs, windows, and the mouse by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      All things commonly associated with Apple were actually created in the 60's: iMacs (Predicta), windows (Xerox), and the mouse (Xerox).

      True, but I think windows are more often associated with, um, Windows. It's a good point to remember though; whenever MS is bashed of copying technology ideas from Apple, it is not always Apple that first invented it. I'd like to think that both MS and Apple draw from the work of Xerox, and Apple has a better implementation by an order of magnitude.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:iMacs, windows, and the mouse by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1
      LSD?

      Well, created in the fifties, but popularized in the sizties...

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    3. Re:iMacs, windows, and the mouse by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Apple has a better implementation by an order of magnitude.

      Yeah. Checkout a fresh copy of MacOS 9.1 sometime. (I have great Apple hardware orphaned to that OS version).

      Then, when you want to get some work done, move over to the keyboard/display of your Windows 2000 box. Not as pretty, just like a Ford F150 truck isn't as pretty as the bosses' secretary's little Fiero.

      --
      resigned
  44. i thought this was going to be an interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    article about retro gaming or some shit. no. a guy has made his pc look balls.

  45. And indeed Ferguson. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    You'll find Ferguson ICC9 boards in dozens of different makes of TV in Europe. They are all owned by SGS-Thomson.

  46. Re:One word..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? "Ugly" is one word. Are you confusing "word" and "syllable" or something? Are you chinese?

  47. Impractical? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    umm.. pretty but not very practical

    When is a case mod practical, aside from this one.

    I remember finding a few of those old Philco's on the curb come trash day and they were nasty beasts. We dragged one home look through it and the shielding wasn't very good, if one of these things, and several were not very stable, fell over you could have a fire in short order. These things undoubtably predated consumer product saftety testing and who knows what kind of radiation they leaked. It didn't become much of an issue until the late 60's

    For a case mod, I would only consider one of thse with a 17" or larger LCD display, but it would probably look fairly dorky and the beatuy of LCD displays is they're small enough that you can place them where you need, rather than being fixed to the computer, like laptops.

    Casemodding isn't my cuppa, though some do end up looking kinda cool.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  48. Heathkit TV kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen the only working Heathkit color TV kit in Europe. It has even been changed to PAL.
    Still impressive to see the circular tube with an extra protective glass cover glued to it.
    It still worked in the 1990ies even with some blotches of bacteria or funghi eating away the glue of the glass cover.

  49. I hope it was a reproduction by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If that moron destroyed a REAL unit, he should have his fingers cut off for such a obscene act...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  50. Not for many years... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Once the FCC"s digital rules take effect, they will render the classic TV's useless..

    Sad really, but we gotta have DRM in every home ya know...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  51. I've got a SAGE interceptor control console by hqm · · Score: 1

    http://boston.laszlosystems.com/photos/images/2004 -08-03/IMG_0503.JPG

    http://boston.laszlosystems.com/photos/images/20 04 -08-03/IMG_0511.JPG

    This is a console for controlling interceptor fighter jets. It was part of a SAGE (used a lot of vacuum-tubes) computer system.

    Note the cigaratte lighter in the upper left of the righthand picture with the joystick.

    Someday I'm going to put a computer into this thing.

  52. It's part of a series by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    The adapter goes with many of the other rather quaint icons -- the wheelbarrow for databases (what the?), the dial telephone for communication, the blackboard for education, the megaphone for announcements, and so forth. I think the last time a communication post was about old phones was the time Bell System Memorial got slashdotted (most communication posts aren't about telephones at all!), and the only Blackboard that gets /. coverage is the kind that universities use vigorously when they like malfunctioning technology more than happy, well-educated students. I don't think a database post has ever involved gardening. And the adapters are a hack of sorts -- they can be useful, but in many cases they are unreliable and dangerous.

    1. Re:It's part of a series by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Quaint? Quaint??

      Wanna come up with a few thousand bucks, so my whole house isn't filled with those 3-2 adapters?? The crawlspace sucks.

      Schools don't use blackboards any more??

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:It's part of a series by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Few thousand bucks? What the hell for? JUST REPLACE THE FRIGGEN OUTLETS! It isn't THAT hard. They are probably grounded, anyway. Test your outlets to see if the center screw is grounded. If it is, it is a simple matter of turning off the power to the circuit, and replacing the outlets. Should cost you around a hundred bucks and a couple hours of time.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    3. Re:It's part of a series by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      I said quaint, not obsolete.

    4. Re:It's part of a series by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Nope. They're not grounded. 1920's knob and tube wiring. I need to pull a lot of romex. It is tempting to just replace the outlets but that's nuts.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:It's part of a series by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Ouch. That sucks. I don't have any experience with wiring that old. Our old house was built in the '50s, so it had two-wire outlets, but they were grounded. We had a pile of three-wire outlets in the basement, and just replaced the two-wire ones whenever we painted a room and the plates were off anyway.

      It also had those nice old light switches that go CLUNK when you turn them on or off.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  53. I worked with Sarnoff's son by hqm · · Score: 1

    I worked for a summer with Sarnoff's son. He was a real asshole. We were all student interns at Atari's "research" lab in Sunnyvale. The evening we met him, a group of us (MIT students) were working late. He saw us and called security because he didn't know who we were and was too much of a chicken shit to even say hello.

  54. Old things attract bugs by The+Great+Wazzoo · · Score: 1

    I live in a rather old flat and I can tell from experience that old things tend to attract bugs. Here we have another example, though these bugs apparently have mutated into something more technologically advanced. Its a sad thing.

  55. lustworthy? by dioscaido · · Score: 1

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

  56. Fond Philco Memories by istartedi · · Score: 1

    We had a black-n-white Philco when I was a little kid. When my Mom told me to turn off the TV and go to bed, I would insist on waiting for the little white dot to disappear. "Mom, nooo... the little white dot's not gone yet".

    By the time I was a teenager, the Philco had be consigned to the basement for well over a decade, no longer used even as an emergency backup set.

    I plugged the TV-output of my Commodore-64 into the Philco one day and for a few brief moments the up-and-coming technology of the digital age met the post-war vacuum tube era. The image was distorted. Perhaps some of the old Phil's components were slightly out of value. It still would have been useable though. It was one of those moments that you have to be a true geek to appreciate. If only I could have gone back in time and shown that to the Philco guys.

    While I was away at college, the Philco was unceremoniously disposed of by my parents.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  57. Great, so they destroyed a piece of tech history by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    to build a computer that will be in a landfill in 10 years because it is completely obsolete. :(

    If they restored the original Predicta as a TV set and sold it to a collector, they could have purchased one of the modern repro cabinets to hack up for a computer case.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  58. Netcraft confirms, Philco is dying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    why would anybody spend so much $$$ when you can get a Dell with the same specs for much cheaper?

    oh wait, this isn't a Mac...

  59. And don't forget Atari, SCO, Napster.Geek olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I nominate this post for the Slashdot hall of fame."

    We have a hall of fame? Does that mean that the first geek to have sex will be found there?

  60. Lighten up! by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    The vintage Predicta tube TV was mass produced, and for picture quality it was superceded long ago. And what makes you so sure that a well done casemod can't be a "work of electronic art?" Many geeks can't seem to appreciate how idiosyncratic their standards for art and beauty are. Of course, I suppose that's what makes a person a 'geek.'

  61. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is one of the few insightful comments on this story.

  62. Stop & Shop touch screen by Finkbug · · Score: 1

    "Probably their most "famous" product was the very early touchscreen system in Super Stop and Shop where you could enter a product name and get a map to where it was in the store" I remember this! When Super Stop & Shop came to my town, we stayed up all night playing nuclear chess & bridge so we could be the first costumers. No reason other than being teens and able to waste the time. We even made a Welcome Stop & Shop banner. Car carrying us blew an axel so we left it in the new parking lot with the banner on it. Using the new fangly touchscreen search for Pez I learned the store carried none. This annoyed me and I've since claimed Stop & Shop is "a lie, a sham, and the devil's work". Sensible? Not at all. Fun? You bet! [The touch screens were awfully cool, even useful. If you didn't need Pez.]

    --
    Feeling so good natured I could drool
  63. Honest question by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    From the summary:

    Somehow, I can't imagine Bill reacting that way to an Apple product launch, at least not publicly.

    How is what Bill Gates might or might not say at all relevant to this story in any way, shape, or form?

    Sometimes I think Slashdotters spend 90% of their lives just thinking about Bill Gates (I'm sorry--I forgot it's hip now to refer to him as just Bill or Billy).

  64. Re:Great, so they destroyed a piece of tech histor by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

    It's being used for SOMETHING, rather than sitting in a landfill, like MOST Philco TVs probably are. I, for one, am glad it this was done. It looks cool, and keeps the thing out of the landfill.

    --
    /usr/games/fortune
  65. Congratulations guys... by Handover+Slashdot · · Score: 1

    You have successfully taken a vintage Fender guitar amp and shoved a digital effects processor inside it. Sheesh!

  66. Which keyboards are they using? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want one of those mini usb or wireless keyboards. Anyone know what are the brands in the pictures?

  67. undead by mzs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Philco is an undead company, driven out of business long ago and its name owned by one of the Asian contract manufactures. The same is true of the Sylvania, KLH, and Koss "brand names" which I have at home. When I bought the Koss stereo it was shortly after this happened. I should have realized that something was up when the price was so low. When I took it home and noticed there was no ground strip on the receiver I was very disappointed. I was young and naive back then. But now-a-days much of the once high-end equipment is made by the contract manufactures and it is all the same steaming pile anyways.