Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars TV Show, And An Unmade Trilogy

Necromutant writes "Mark Hamill comments about Episodes 7, 8, and 9 really got everyone's attention. Mark told those in attendance what Lucas told him the third trilogy would be about. Also confirmed today officially, a Star Wars television show coming in the future. -- I don't know if I should be happy or scared..."

74 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. A big stick and a dead horse by Izago909 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lucas is going to milk this story for all it's worth. He won't be satisfied until Star Wars is the campiest sci-fi series ever put on film. If he would have stopped after the first 3 movies, he would have been remembered as one of the greatest sci-fi producers ever. After the first 2 new episodes came out, the franchise has started to become the ass end of sci-fi jokes. I don't see another 3 improving the image of the series.

    1. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by sqmagellan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can see another triology helping the Star Wars genre, but only if Lucas steps down as either Writer or Director. Sure, he can make some wonderful special effects, but he needs more creative imput if he plans his new saga touching more than just the most hardcore of fans.

    2. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Star Wars is NOT sci-fi!

      It's fantasy.

      That is all.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    3. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I posted this the last time this subject came up, but it's so funny that it deserves repeating. JK Rowling's hilarious offhand comment about George Lucas:

      Q: Will there be a book about Harry's Mum and Dad, about how they became friends and how they died?

      A: So it would be "Harry Potter: Episode One". [Laughter]. No, but a lot of people have asked that. It is all George Lucas's fault. You won't need a prequel; by the time I am finished, you will know enough. I think it would be shamelessly exploitative to do that. I am sure that Mr Lucas is doing it only for artistic reasons, but in my case I think that by the time you have had the seven books you will know everything you need to know for the story.

      "Artist reasons" -- She is hilarious.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by dukerobillard · · Score: 4, Insightful
      He won't be satisfied until Star Wars is the campiest sci-fi series ever put on film.

      Jeez, he should have been happy in 1978, then.

    5. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Fantasy is a sub-genere of Sci-fi. It was a reinvention of the dead heroic myth genere in the late 19th century after science fiction writers like Jules Verne (!) proved that the novel-reading audience would read blatantly not-true stories.

      Any definition you use for the difference between fantasy and sci-fi can be bent or broken by numerous excellent works, even though each subgenere is distinct into itself.

      So, "Science Fiction" has three subgenres:

      Fantasy, like LOTR or my own (unpublished) novel. Willing to change basic understandings of the universe and disregard Earth entirely.

      Hard Sci Fi, like The Time Machine or Asimov's Robot series. Doesn't change any basic knowledge, but instead introduces a few "future developments" and explores their ramification here on Earth.

      Soft Sci Fi, like 2001 or Asimov's foundation series, or Star Trek, which change something basic about reality.

      Hmm... yeah, SW is fantasy. But it's still part of Sci-Fi.

    6. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by adolfojp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly, I've got no mod points, so I will post instead.

      I agree 100%. Star wars is fantasy. The only diference between SW and Lord of The Rings type of movies is the background. One is technological and the other is not. Considering that this background is in another galaxy in another time frame it doesn't imply any future technology, but a mere definition of its alien background and status quo.

      There is no science behind star wars light sabers, ships, force (except the midiclorian mistake) or anything else in the universe. It is the analogy to magic swords, horses, unicorns, olifants and whaterer mechanical doomsday devices you might want to add.

      Just because it has blinking lights doesn't make it sci fi.

      Cheers,

      Adolfo

    7. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by shokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must have missed that Return of the Jedi movie, then. At 13 years old, I could not believe what I was seeing on the screen. After Empire I expected magic out of that third movie. Biggest Letdown Ever.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    8. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Izago909 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's very understandable that younger people are easily entertained. Just look at how much money can be made by cutting funding to screen writers and diverting the money to the CG department. I call it the "Shiney Nickel Effect". Special effects back when the first 3 were produced were not anything near what's available today. As a result, directors and producers had to rely more on practical action sequences, good dialogue, and a captivating story line. Modern film making techniques put CG special effects as a higher priority than the other 3 aspects. Personally, I'll take Blade Runner over any Sci-fi film made since then.

    9. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by JudgeFurious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can say only one thing about the viability of three more "sequels" following these "prequels" and that is they would have to be absolutely incredible films to even have a chance to pull the franchise up to even ground level.

      If you look at them in their intended sequence then you've got (And I don't care how good he makes Ep3) a very childish and frankly not very good story starting with Ep1 progressing to what the majority of people consider to be "the good ones" in Eps 4, 5, and 6. Of course Jedi wasn't up to Empire and really that's where things started getting pretty silly with those furry little previews of the abortion to come but we mostly tend to just lump those three movies together and call them "good" while we look at the prequels and call them (rightfully so) "lousy".

      So if there ever were to be a trilogy of sequels then they'd have to be far more adult targeted in nature to even have a chance and they'd have to be the coolest friggin Star Wars movies ever to clean the taste of "Phantom Menace" out of our mouths. They would need to grow up and be serious (probably overly serious) and in effect age with thier audience to make most Star Wars fans happy. Then when the whole nine were viewed in order the story would get better and more serious as it moved along.

      I don't see Lucas being capable of doing it. No way can he miracle up the ability to churn out three great pictures now. He is what he is, just a guy who had one really great idea, an excellent techician of film, a great editor, and a crummy director who's managed to pull a few pictures off.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    10. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yep - all those fantasy horses in those western/sci-fi's were crazy. just crazy.

    11. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is no science behind star wars light sabers, ships, force (except the midiclorian mistake) or anything else in the universe. It is the analogy to magic swords, horses, unicorns, olifants and whaterer mechanical doomsday devices you might want to add.

      Just because it has blinking lights doesn't make it sci fi.

      Actually, yes it does. Sci-fi, even "hard" sci-fi, introduces devices that cannot be manufactured at current technological level. Since these devices cannot be yet manufactured, their existence in future, as well as inner workings, are pure speculation.

      Simply because some author is good at giving "science-like" explanations about how things work in his universe doesn't make those things any more scientifically sound than any other sci-fi props. Don't be fooled by technobabble :).

      Think of it this way: There is some science behind magic swords - namely, the inclined plane (the cutting edge forms a wedge) and the fact that pressure increases as the surface decreases (which is why the blade cuts). There is also some unscientific things (the magical properties). There is a lot of science in several sci-fi spaceships (rocket engines, closed hull) and lots of unscientific things (faster-than-light drives in almost all of them, positronic robot brains - why would these be any different from normal electrons ?). It's just a matter of degree.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by LPetrazickis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, Fantasy and Science Fiction are both subgenres of Speculative Fiction (and so is Alternate History). For example, it is generally agreed that the sf in rec.arts.sf.written stands for Speculative Fiction.

      Your idea doesn't really make sense. There's nothing scientific about fantasy. Doing the opposite and calling science fiction a subgenre of fantasy would also seriously piss off quite a few people.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    13. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by TheSteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This would be a prime opportunity to make a completely different final trilogy - to complete the story and provide another feel. The first set was funny, adventurous and believeable - adolescent, even. The second was for a younger stage of life. What could the third be like? Starting with the feel at the end of the current storyline, using new technology, becoming more serious with the story and portrayal? Not so much an apology as a completion. Their quality scales may have been reversed, but then so was the order in which we watched them. The best may be yet to come.

      The final three could be like he's never done and we've never seen before - they could be larger in size, scale and epicness than even the Lord of the Rings films. They could be mature, thoughtful, genuinely funny, dramatic and moving films that could sweep the Oscars and be everything anyone ever could have hoped for in Star Wars movies!

      We can only hope to find the force is strong with Lucas.

    14. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by bfields · · Score: 2, Informative
      Star Wars is NOT sci-fi!

      It's fantasy.

      I'm less certain.

      American Heritage Dictionary, 4th edition (by way of dictionary.com):

      A literary or cinematic genre in which fantasy, typically based on speculative scientific discoveries or developments, environmental changes, space travel, or life on other planets, forms part of the plot or background.

      The OED:

      Imaginative fiction based on postulated scientific discoveries or spectacular environmental changes, freq. set in the future or on other planets and involving space or time travel.

      Google turns up a fascinating compilation of definitions of science fiction from science fiction authors and others.

      Star Wars would fit well under some of these definitions, less well under others.

      Most people think of any kind of fantastic fiction with space ships in it as being science fiction, and clearly it would be hard to write such a work without at least betraying some influence from that genre.

      I find it makes communication easier if I use words in a way which other people will understand. So I'm inclined to accept a broader definition of science fiction and reserve some other term ("hard science fiction", maybe?) for works that are more focused on the technical underpinnings of an alternate world (which I'm assuming is closer to the definition you're working from).

      --Bruce Fields

    15. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your idea doesn't really make sense

      It's not my idea. Leave USENET and go talk to a bookseller -- like the GM or owner of a local bookstore. Odds are that they'll be able to backup my statement.

      "Speculative Fiction" isn't a historic genere. It's an attempt to redefine "S/F" to mean something broader, and it does make more sense than "Science Fiction". But it's still not a classic genere, and you probably won't find "Speculative fiction" as a section in a bookstore.

    16. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So LOTR is science fiction too? Right, because there is so much science there?

      Actually, there is. LOTR was in many ways a speculative exposition to backup the myriad of languages and linguistic shifts that Tolkein devised.

      There's easily as much science behind LOTR as there is behind, oh, 2001 or Issac Assimov's Robot series. It's just not technological science, so it has a clearly different feel.

      (and to be really anal, it fits science's "if X, then Y, right?" mold very well.)

    17. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Mark+Hood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, yes it does. Sci-fi, even "hard" sci-fi, introduces devices that cannot be manufactured at current technological level.

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" - Arthur C. Clarke.

      Now the magic abilities of LOTR & similar fantasy is presented as innate abilities of (some of) the 'people' who populate the world.
      Compare this with the Jedi, force users and adepts. Until the 'midichlorians' were introduced, this was accepted as certain people being able to tap into the 'force which surrounds all living beings' - sounds pretty magical to me, not technological.

      As for the tools of these 'magic force users', in LOTR magic rings & swords are, if not common, at least known of and accepted as such. In Star Wars we accept that the basis for the 'magical' devices is technology ("I see you have constructed a new light saber"), but then in LOTR 'people' created the magic rings, magic swords and all the rest - so isn't that advanceed technology?

      I think it's tricky to draw a line, but if I had to, it couldn't be solely on the basis of technobabble, as you rightly point out, but it would be based on the attitude of the inhabitants of the universe. If we try and say 'I made this, and I used scientific principles' (even if those principles are technobabble, look at Star Trek!) then I'd say it's Sci-Fi. If we accept 'it's magic, and I made this device to tap the magical energies' then it's fantasy. Even if the device gathers magical rays from the air and produces a picture of things from far away.... Is it a TV? or a scrying stone?

      I feel there's a very wide grey area between Sci-Fi and Fantasy, and the division is one of tone - the author gets to decide which it is, and he writes in that fashion. Perhaps this is why my local bookshop lumps them all together into 'sci-fi/fantasy' - to avoid this argument!

      Mark

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    18. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by lee7guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fantasy is a sub-genere of Sci-fi.

      Um, yeah. Right.

      Would you please be kind enough, pointing out the scientific parts of LOTR, The Belgariad or The sword of truth (bad series)? These are afaik, prime examples of what is considered Fantasy.

      Sure, not all stuff that people label Science Fiction is that scientific either, but at least SF mostly tries to tell us what might happen in the future and what technology, society and science of the era might have evolved into.

      SF could be seen as a genre of Fantasy, but imo SF and Fantasy are already defined as two separate generes (where overlaps occur, which you mentioned) by most of their readers. Fantasy is the genre where you will find magic, dragons, orchs, goblins, swordfighters or other similar characters, set in an enviroment that more often than not bear some resemblace of medieval or pre medieaval Europe.

      If you take the overlaps as proof of point, then it is probaly useless trying to convince you otherwise. But, I can assure you most fans of these kinds of litterature relatively easily can single out what genre the book in question belongs to, by reading a few chapters.

      Hint:

      If it is Fantasy with elements of SF, place it in the Fantasy bookcase.

      If it is SF with elements of Fantasy, place it in the SF bookcase.

      Some cases like Stephen King's gunslinger series are very hard to define. In these cases you can always use the classification: good novels (or bad).

      --
      Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
    19. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Fantasy is a sub-genere of Sci-fi. It was a reinvention of the dead heroic myth genere in the late 19th century after science fiction writers like Jules Verne (!) proved that the novel-reading audience would read blatantly not-true stories."

      Oh, really? Then E.A.Poe (1809-1849) wasn't writing fantasy? Gulliver's Travels (1675) isn't fantasy?

      Ummm, bullshit.

    20. Re:A big stick and a dead horse by pthisis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may choose to define it however you want, but to the average English-speaking person it is precisely the technobabble and backdrop that make the difference between sci-fi and fantasy.

      There's a genre jargon definition of sci-fi that is along the lines of having a rational explanation for how things work, but in English it means having blinkenlights and cool tech instead of dragons and magic wands. The only real difference between a blaster and a magic wand is a technobabble/backdrop one, but it turns out to most people that's a very large distinction (so much so that most people would consider the first Pern book to be fantasy even though to a hardcore fan there's an argument to be made that it fits the jargon definition of sci-fi).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  2. Heh by cbrocious · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anyone else wondered if there's a competition between Star Wars and Star Trek as to who can drive their respective franchises into the ground farther and faster?

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    1. Re:Heh by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Has anyone else wondered if there's a competition between Star Wars and Star Trek as to who can drive their respective franchises into the ground farther and faster?

      I think a Star Wars TV series is a great step forward. Rick Berman has been well ahead of Lucas for years now, due to the sheer volume of crap that can be produced with a weekly TV show. As hard as Lucas has worked, particularly with the new reworked special edition versions for DVD, Berman has, what, 5 seasons of Voyager behind him (okay, disregarding time travel, holodeck, and other "it never really happened episodes, maybe only 1 or 2 seasons)? You just can't compete with that sort of thing. While continuing to make some of the worst Star Trek feature films ever, Berman has been pumping out Enterprise.

      But that's all going to change. Lucas has wised up. His glory years (Caravan of Courage, and Battle for Endor anyone?) are behind him, but he's still capable of of making everything cutesy and pointless for no good reason. Given an opportunity to get crap on air on a weekly basis can really bury the franchise - you only need to look at Droids, or the Star Wars Christmas Special to see what truly amazing things Lucas can do with the TV medium. That level of spectacularly awful work could undercut Berman's years of effort in under a season.

      Star Wars' prospects are definitely looking up (or down, as the case may be).

      Jedidiah.

    2. Re:Heh by Masque · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's still a competition for the silver medal, however, after the last two Matrix films set a world record in the 200 Minute Suck.

    3. Re:Heh by shigelojoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's still a competition for the silver medal, however, after the last two Matrix films set a world record in the 200 Minute Suck.

      That number can't be right, because I distinctly remember Trinity's death scene from "Matrix Revolutions" being at least five hours long.

  3. I know... by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't know if I should be happy or scared

    Be afraid. Be very afraid.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:I know... by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  4. Scared or happy? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Scared. Definitely scared - maybe I'm a pessimist, but I think that this will be just more commercialization.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  5. A Bink's Tale by Ch3schir3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So we watch 4,5,6, and think its about Luke. We watch 1,2,3, and realize that its about Vader. We watch 7,8,9 and maybe we will finally realize it's just about an old man who doesn't know when to let someone else take over.

  6. I always wanted to do this... ;) by grm_wnr · · Score: 5, Informative
    Server's going down. Here's the text:
    Mark Hamill Talks Star Wars Epis. 7, 8, & 9 Source: Scott Chitwood Friday, September 10, 2004 This past Wednesday, ComingSoon.net had the opportunity to attend Lucasfilm and Fox Home Entertainment's roll-out of the "Star Wars Trilogy" DVD set (Coming Sept. 21st.) One of the surprise guests at the event was Luke Skywalker himself, Mark Hamill. He ended up being one of the highlights of the presentation as he enthusiastically recalled humorous anecdotes about the making of the original films, working with Kevin Smith, seeing TROOPS for the first time, and more. However, his comments towards the end about Episodes 7, 8, and 9 really got everyone's attention. Mark told those in attendance what Lucas told him the third trilogy would be about. Hamill also went into detail about Lucas' original plans for those films, when they would be made, and more. Plus, Lucasfilm's Jim Ward confirmed that a "Star Wars" TV series is on the way in the near future (though he didn't say when it would be set). We thought you might like to hear Mark Hamill's comments in his own voice. Simply download this 5 minute MP3 file and enjoy! It's only 2 MB in size: MARK HAMILL TALKS STAR WARS EPISODES 7, 8, & 9 Check back soon for more on this presentation as well as a full review of the DVD set. Look for Q&A sessions with "Empire Strikes Back" director Irvin Kershner, DVD guru Van Ling, documentary filmmaker Ken Burns, and more!
    Only 2MB, eh? Let's see if you can handle it...
  7. he by Spytap · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mark told those in attendance what Lucas told him the third trilogy would be about.
    How Long ago did Lucas tell Mark Hamill about this, was this sometime back when they were originally filming?

  8. Ob. Spaceballs Reference by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    Star Wars Ep 7: The Search for More Money

    Think Mel Brooks would actually mind that?

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Ob. Spaceballs Reference by Murdock037 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slighty off-topic, but funny nonetheless:

      A friend once told me, after watching Mel Brooks' commentary on the Spaceballs DVD, that Brooks said he'd wanted to do a sequel.

      The title he wanted to use, though, wasn't Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money, as Yogurt had prophesized. He wanted the title to be Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2.

    2. Re:Ob. Spaceballs Reference by rd_syringe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone else think a new Spaceballs sequel in this day and age would be funny as hell? Imagine all the jabs at Lucas and the prequel trilogy.

    3. Re:Ob. Spaceballs Reference by Rotting · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I for one would love to see this but I just don't know if it would feel quite right without John Candy.

      I suppose he could get around this with a prequel though.

  9. A great disturbance in the Force. by torpor · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was like a million geeks crying out in unison, then suddenly disappointed.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  10. Mirror of mp3 by vanadium4761 · · Score: 5, Informative
  11. Charlie Rose interview by captaineo · · Score: 5, Informative

    In George Lucas' interview with Charlie Rose two days ago, he very firmly stated "no more Star Wars movies," he wants to do other films. Take that for what it's worth...

    1. Re:Charlie Rose interview by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      he very firmly stated "no more Star Wars movies"

      Yeah, "American Graffiti: Episode 1 - Opie Goes Cruising for Chicks"

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Charlie Rose interview by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's said that before. Several times. Shortly before announcing the next Star Wars film.

      I remember back in 1977, Lucas swore up and down that the original Star Wars was a standalone film and there absolutely would NEVER be a sequel, because he didn't believe in sequels, period (he said something to the effect that only losers with no ability to create new material ever made sequels). Then Star Wars became a big hit -- and suddenly it was the first of a trilogy, and soon afterward was transmogrified into the 4th of nine that Lucas *now* swore up and down "he'd always planned to do".

      Lucas is a master of "Hollywood truth": only what I say TODAY is true, and how dare you imply that I said something different yesterday!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. Money by Viceice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dispite all the rants, If Episodes 7, 8 and 9 were made, they'd all do well at the box office. So is there any reason why they won't do it?

    Good creative shows have been pulled because of money and stereotypical, nonsensical tripe put in replacement all in the name of money.

    So whats makes SW diffrent?

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  13. tv based on brian daley novels? by welloy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This could be great. If Lucas et al took something like the brian daley novels (Han Solo at Stars' End, (1979), Han Solo's Revenge (1979) and Han Solo and the Lost Legacy (1982)) --stories that involved the SW characters but not really the plot line of the movies-- and made a bunch of television episodes out of them that could be really interesting. That could give lots of very creative people a great way to flesh out the rest of the SW universe and provide some neat backstory, without worrying too much about stepping on the Canon of SW. How neat would it be to see Lando and Han back in the bad old days smuggling spice or gambling for each other's ship? Or following Biggs through the Academy? Or watching the Empire take over a planet or two?

    The problem is of course, most all TV shows and movies produced are crap. And I dont think the SW TV show is any more or less likely to be crappy TV than any other sci-fi/fantasy show.

    1. Re:tv based on brian daley novels? by dspeyer · · Score: 4, Funny
      Han Solo at Star's End?
      Han: I'm here for the money, and I'm going to get the money.
      First Speaker: [looks skepticla]
      Han: On second thought, I really just want to be with Leah. Bye!
      First Speaker [to novice]: HE'll be a happier man, but he'll never threaten The Plan again.
      Novice: Is it always that easy?
      First Speaker: Yes
      Seems sort of silly, doesn't it?

      Really, the power of the Force is nothing compared to the power of psychohistory.

    2. Re:tv based on brian daley novels? by connorbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Zahn novels (and to a lesser extent the Correllian trilogy of Roger McBride Allen) were very well-written books and worthy additions to the world of Star Wars. If you think Zahn sucked, you haven't read the work of uberhack Kevin Anderson.

    3. Re:tv based on brian daley novels? by welloy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, i'd agree that the Zahn novels are quite good, but these deal with main plot line stories and probably would not make it into a TV show IF lucas is really making episodes 7-9. Though if lucas could work Thrawn and mara jade in that would be nice.

      and i completely agree about Anderson. Some of the worst stuff i ever read.

    4. Re:tv based on brian daley novels? by magefile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd rather see Zahn's books as TV miniseries. The Thrawn trilogy, and the later duo about the Camaas debacle.

  14. Was Mark Muzzled? by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I find strange about this article is that supposedly Mark made these comments on Wednesday of this past week.

    On Friday, Mark did two live radio interviews in my market to promote the upcoming DVD releases. In both interviews the host asked about the next trilogy. Although he did not give the same answer word-for-word, he basically said, "I don't know, most of the time the fans know more than I do"

    Did Mark say too much on Wednesday and was told to keep his mouth shut?

  15. If Lucas has half a brain by multiplexo · · Score: 5, Interesting
    and can contain his ego he'll option Timothy Zahn's series of Star Wars novels, hire someone else to direct, put his name on it as executive producer and then STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM IT! . The Timothy Zahn novels, along with Alan Dean Foster's Splinter in the Mind's Eye were the best Star Wars novels written. For those of you who haven't read them they are:

    Heir to the Empire

    Dark Force Rising

    The Last Command

    There would be problems with the fact that the actors are older than their characters are portrayed in the Zahn books, but hey, George is a wizard with CGI, let's see him do something useful with it instead of creating more characters like Jar-Jar Binks or editing the cantina scene so that Greedo shoots first.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  16. Ah... by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would like to coin a new phrase for Lucas's continued desecration of Star Wars: "Beating a dead tauntaun".

  17. Holy cow by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Holy cow, hopefully they'll make it a reality TV show... I can see it now...

    Six strangers live inside the star wars universe (A huge studio in Hollywood) for six months, where they can become a bounty hunter, pod racer, force-user (only for the very gifted!) Smuggler (Please, no real 'spice' or other illegal substances on the set) among many other professions!

    Each 'period' consists of a voting day, where each player votes "the most annoying" player off the studio.

    The winner recieves royalty rights to the Star Wars franchise after George Lucas has died, but 50% of the profits MUST be used to beautify his burial ground.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  18. A better idea... by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could do without a star wars TV show. I would be much more interested in a show starring "The Star Wars Kid".

  19. The Lucas Problem by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Lucas Problem is that he is considered such a God (or Jedi Master) of science fiction films that no one dares tell him when he's wrong about something. And everybody's wrong some of the time.

    I'm certain that is the only reason Jar Jar Binks ever survived being edited out of Episode 1 is that no one would dare say to George, "Uh, George, you may not have realized it, but this character is nothing more than an offensive racial stereotype that will not go down well with anyone."

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:The Lucas Problem by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm certain that is the only reason Jar Jar Binks ever survived being edited out of Episode 1 is that no one would dare say to George, "Uh, George, you may not have realized it, but this character is nothing more than an offensive racial stereotype that will not go down well with anyone."

      I've seen plenty of 8 year olds whose favorite Star Wars character is Jar Jar Binks. I guess it just goes to show who Lucas considers to be his audience.

      -a

    2. Re:The Lucas Problem by glsunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, guess what age 1/2 the people who obsess over star wars were when ep 4 came out. I'd be willing to bet alot of them/us grew up in the 70s and 80s. Jar Jar isn't any worse than the ewoks were. Heck, he's a better actor than the guy who played aniken in ep 2.

  20. The Audio did real well. by DelawareBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you like Brian Daley, check out the NPR Audio Series done by Brian. Especially the first one of Star Wars. If the TV series is 1/2 as good as these tapes, It will be worth watching.

  21. Re:SW v ST by spektr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Star Wars verses Star Trek

    OMG, Chewbacca reciting his favourite poetry to a horde of cute muppet tribbles, as they rally for a devastating strike against the evil Klingon empire (Episode VII). I think I'm calling in sick.

  22. Transcript by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got the file, and aside from a mention that Lucas originally told him that there would be three trilogies, and asking him on the earlier set if he wanted to be in Ep9 (to be made around 2011), there's nothing new in there. It's a lot of talk about what went on behind the scenes in standard studio politics.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  23. Animated Zahn by qui-bay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Make an animated series

    CGI the ships etc...

    Hire as many old & current cast members to do the voices.

    One hour long each episode. If they did the Zahn books like this they could have an entire series plotted out and it would be a huge hit.

    Also, needs to be an HBO series. With Lucas' stand on not wanting to be influenced by studios, wouldn't it make sense to not want censors or suits influenceing the product? I'm sure HBO does much of the same, but I bet they would steer his old ass into a great product.

  24. Inside Scoop; Episodes 7 8 & 9 by Teahouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Episode 7 (The Voyage Home): Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) is now old and broke. After 2 decades of training new Jedi, he now sits around on Dagoba all day complaining about humidity. One day he is contacted by his geriatric friend Han Solo (now King of a planet called Indiana). He tells Luke that a new Sith named Darth Glukas has developed a time machine and has sent back a droid called THX1138 to kill young Anakin in a time-period called "EPISODE 1". Solo explains that if THX1138 isn't stopped, Anakin and his servant Jar Jar Binks will be killed, thus making Luke cease to exist. After a long and perilous journey (where they encounter humpback whales for some reason) Luke and Solo defeat THX1138, but learn on their return that that was Darth Glukas' plan from the beginning. Now Glukas can create an army made entirely of something he calls "director's cuts" and steal all the money in the universe. This will allow him to buy the entire republic and restore the empire. Luke and SOlo are bummed out as we begin;

    EPISODE 8 (Lost in Space); Luke and Solo must defeat Darth Glukas' army of director's cuts, but they have no idea where they are or even WHAT they are, so they begin searching randomly throughout the worlds of the republic. They come across a planet and discover a family of beautiful humans who claim they are called the Robinsons, and their ship is the "Jupiter 2". Although the ship they have looks nothing like the one in the republic database, and the Robinsons are far too pretty and have the vacuous acting talent of bannana slugs, they do point out that they have seen the dark side. They point our geratric twosome in the direction of Darth Dr. Smith, who is Darth Glukas' apprentice. Smith doesn't look human at all, but he does look a helluva lot better than the crappy paint on Darth Maul (and he does have the cool black robe) so our duo fights with Darth Smith and strike him down for questioning. After Darth Smith stops whining about his injury "Oh the pain, the pain!" He tells them Darth Glukas and the directors cuts can be found on a planet called Skywalker Ranch and that Darth Glukas will surely defeat them and buy the entire republic unless our heroes can get more help. Off they go

    EPISODE 9 (Finally over); Luke and Solo go to get help. They stop at the planet of Angles, where they find Princess Leah (in tight vinyl) and her band of female jedi (Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, and Lucy Liu). Accompanying them is Leah's Obi Wan (jedi teacher), Obi Wan Morpheus and his assistant Neo. All 8 of them fly to planet Skywalker Ranch and confront Darth Glukas, but alas, Glukas has a suprise for them. He has THREE young apprentice siths working for him. Darth Elrond (Hugo Weaving), Darth Psycho (Crispien Glover), and Darth Bitch (Demi Moore). An epic battle ensues where almost everyone dies while fighting in slow motion with lots of wire fighting and physics-ignoring acrobatics. In the end, Luke and Glukas are the only ones left. Luke tells Glukas he has lost, but Glukas laughs and says "Lost? My boy you have much to learn about the dark side. I have been following your every move throughout this entire epic with hidden cameras. Your every action has been a part of a thing I call reality television, and I have already made my billions on this tripe. All is lost. I now have the money to buy the republic."

    It all does seem lost, but then, Luke informs him; "It is you who has lost Glukas, I have known about your treachery all along, and informed the one force in the universe more powerful than you." From the wings enters Obi Wan Schlocky- Ending (Stephen Spielberg) "I thought you might try a "sad" ending Glukas, I have prepared for this moment with a series of horrible sequels of my own. We can't have people believing that any story can end without a happy ending! This is my mission, my destiny." With that, Obi Wan Schlocky-ending pulls out his glowing blue......checkbook and buys the entire Star Wars series, (copyright, and merchandising!) with the money he made from Indiana Jones 4,5,6,7,8,9, and 10 a

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  25. partial transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Q: if george decided to do a 7,8,9 - would you do it?

    MH: He talked about doing 7,8,9. You know when I first did this, it was four trilogies. 12 movies! And out on the desert there's big time between setups 'cause of whatever, ya know, the robots are... can you imagine robots rolling mechanically- oil on sand in the desert? That's the kind of stuff you don't [inaudible] we should prepare for this, so they're digging out sand and putting planks and moving the cameras so you can't see he's on wood. Lots of free time. And George was talking about this whole... and I'm listening to this thing, cause I said, "Why are you starting at 4,5,6? It's crazy." [imitates Lucas] 'Well, that's the most commercial section of the movie.' I went, "Oh, ok." Yeah, he said that the first one, or the first trilogy's darker and more serious. The impression that I got, he said, [imitates Lucas] "How would you like to be in episode 9?" This is 1976. I said, "When's that gonna be?" Heh. [imitates Lucas] "Like, two thousand, eleven." [laughter]

  26. Mirror of 5 minute talk here by Szplug · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Someday we'll all be negroes
  27. Re:The sad thing is... by Rallion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Particularly the Thrawn Trilogy. God, would I love that...Hey, Thrawn and Palleon are confirmed to exist by Lucas, anybody remember the opening movie in TIE Fighter?

    And for a time it was rumored to be in the works, too.

  28. 1976! by rd_syringe · · Score: 2, Informative

    This isn't really news at all. Mark doesn't say what the next trilogy is about. I'm not sure why it's being reported that way. He just talks about how Lucas asked him to do four trilogies total. This was back in 1976. Mark mentions being in Episode 9 and handing his light sabre off to the new Jedi. Nothing more.

  29. Text better than voiced words... by aepervius · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can't somebody here write up a quick summary of what is said in the MP3 by Hammil ? I dunno for you all, but 1) I can't access the web site in the article summary 2) anyway the MP3 I downloaded from a mirror is so down in quality that as a foreigner which understand only oxford english, it is useless to me.

    My kingdom for a quick summary in WRITTEN WORD. Ok maybe not my kingdom but at least my thanks...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  30. Re:To be fair to Lucas by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Informative

    George Lucas didn't invent the prequel-- he was imitating the epic style of starting the action "in medias res". Virgil, for instance, devotes the second book of his Aeneid to describing events (the fall of Troy) that predated the narrative in the first book (Juno's storm, and the landing of the Trojan fleet in Africa).

    Moreover, Asimov's two prequels predate Lucas's prequels.

  31. The Biggest Threat to Star Wars is.. by darthtrevino · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Fanboys. Seriously, just let Lucas do his thing. Every time ANYTHING is posted about Star Wars, all the posts are of the tone: I'm not buying **** until Lucas releases the original originals without Digital anything, straight from the masters!!!

    Honestly, let it go. If you want to complain about the pillaging and raping of a franchise, go complain about Star Trek.

  32. The Pitch by Poietes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GL: Thanks for seeing me, Harvey. I've got this great idea for a TV show, and I wanted you to be the first to hear it.

    HW: Okay, George, shoot.

    GL: Great, okay. Picture this: the camera pans in to the gates of Dathomir Imperial prison, at night, where a crowd has gathered, holding picket lines. They are holding a candlelight vigil, and it is raining: the faces in the crowds are lit up like Japanese lanterns.

    HW: Japanese lanterns, nice. Okay, I'm listening.

    GL: The gates of the prison open, revealing a hair covered humanoid in a bandolier. It's a wookie.

    HW: A wha?

    GL: A wookie: but not just any wookie. It's Chewbacca. The crowd has been waiting for him. He begins to speak.

    HW: What does he say?

    GL: He says: RowRWAROOR.

    HW: Uh-huh. Why's he in prison again?

    GL: He was imprisoned for a crime he didn't commit. And now he's out to right the wrong: one wookie against the world who wronged him. On his planet, Kashyyyk, there's a special breed of justice. Eighteen thrusters of justice.

    HW: Keep going.

    GL: Cut to the forests of Endor. Our hero, Chewbacca touches down on the Endor moon, and enters a tree-top Ewok village. He is crowned king of the Ewoks! The Ewoks party hard, getting drunk on tree-root ale and rubbing up against tree-bark until the static electricity sends them flying across the clearing. He speaks to the crowd of drunk of drunk Ewoks.

    HW: What does he say?

    GL: He says: RowRWAROOR.

    HW: I like it.

    GL: Shmi, after giving her son Anakin away to Jedi training, starts going a bit wild and gets a name for herself on Tatooine. She started hanging out with wookies, and ended up going steady with Chewbacca's grandfather. Cut to a Christmas dinner scene, where Shmi and Chewbacca Snr. are meeting Shmi's parents for the first time.

    HW: Sort of Guess Who's Coming To Dinner meets My Stepmother Is An Alien?

    GL: Exactly. So, can I have some money?

    HW: Sure, take these two big bags of money and make your show.

    GL: Woohoo!

  33. A Question by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know nothing of this at all. But it would seem to the casual observer that sci-fi should be a sub-genre of fantasy. Quite simply, where's the science in a fantasy tale about elves and faeries etc.?

    I'm of the belief that if it isn't this way allready it damn well should be for sanity's sake.

    --
    Photos.
  34. Re:maybe it's porn by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 2, Funny

    porn is so in right now
    When was porn out?

  35. Re:To be fair to Lucas by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What irked me was that in one interview with Lucas and a couple of other Hollywood heavyweights (I think Copola was there, as well as someone else extremely famous...it looked like an old homes get-together, seriously!), Lucas mentions that he didn't want to direct TPM. But then he said all his (ass-kissing, upsucking) friends told him he could do it, no, he /should/ do it, so he did.

    Now maybe I'm reading way to much into this one offhand comment, but something about the way he said it made me think that Lucas knew he wasn't that good a director (eps 5&6 where the best SW, ep 4 was good because it was new, not because the directing was any good), and the only reason he did direct TPM was because his friends convinced him that he should do it anyway.

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  36. Re:maybe it's porn by Johnny318 · · Score: 3, Funny

    porn is so in right now
    When was porn out?


    Porn is both in AND out.

  37. Re:maybe it's porn by toddestan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    porn is so in right now. since there are so few jedi left it could their adventures in repopulating the jedi population across the galaxy

    Finally, we'll get to find out just how Anakin Skywalker was concieved!

  38. What the devil are you talking about. by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People are constantly telling him what they think is wrong. That's why we get Greedo shooting first. That's why the Ewok song gets cut (yes, I liked the Ewok song. It's a God damn childrens' movie people). Watch the commentary on Ep2. People bitched left and right about Yoda kicking ass. Did it rock? Yes, I think that it did. Lucas sucks most when he listens to his critics.

    This isn't to say Lucas is some genious who ought to be left along to create. For God's sake, somebody should have pointed out that if Ep 1 was going to be a childrens' movie, Ep 2 damn well better be. And how the hell did Natile Portman get hired? Anyway, both movies seem to me more like a bunch of cool ideas with a script hung on them than the other way around. But I think the worst stuff (mitochondrians and virgin births) where crappy reponses to critics.

    As for Jar-Jar, I think he was something the Special Effects guys really wanted to do. A completely CG character who was also totally believable. It's really quite a feat, it's just a pity the accomplishment is overshadowed by how god damned annoying he his. Like I said, lots of cool ideas, no solid foundation to hang 'em on.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/