Microsoft's Chief Linux Strategist Interviewed
sl0wp0is0n writes "Computerworld has published an interview with Microsoft's chief Linux strategist, Martin Taylor. It's interesting to find out that Microsoft thinks and predicts Novell (SuSE) will be the dominant Linux distribution they'll have to compete against. The interview also has Taylor talking about indemnification, IBM and his realization that customers generally adopt Linux to get a better TCO than Unix, not Windows."
Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
It's interesting to find out that Microsoft thinks and predicts Novell (SuSE) will be the dominant Linux distribution they'll have to compete against.
Novell? They'll be lucky....more like Knoppix!!
Could anyone explain that to me? This guy is explaining that people put KERNELS into DISTRIBUTIONS?
It could have been stranger:
An Interview With Microsoft Linux's Chief Strategist, Bruce Perens
You got to love the title.
It's like:
Chinese government's Chief human rights activist.
Vatican's Chief birth control strategist.
McDonald's Chief vegetarian strategist.
What a great title!
I mean, when have you ever heard of any reasonably competent Windows admin (yes, they do exist!) installing, say, a service pack without some serious testing beforehand?
HAND.
It should be Microsoft's Chief GNU/Linux Strategist, except if they feel that only the kernel threatens them.
Total cost of Ownership ?
I thought and it was Microsoft and its BSA/SPA satellite that software could not be owned, hence the EULAs.
So, they imply one might OWN a system ?
Oh, OWNing a system is easy...especially if it has as many security holes as Windows!
<ducks>
Practice Kind Randomness and Beautiful Acts of Nonsense.
It's rumored that Microsoft has in the past hired actors to behave like really obnoxious Linux fanboys at trade shows, damaging Linux's image
No, that was just the OSDN yearly outing. Taco just looks on with dismay as CowboyNeal goes mental!
liqbase
" LOL sorry, but I find it hard to believe MS found it necessary to pay people to act like really obnoxious Linux fanboys."
Yes they are much too ethical and moral to do anything like that.
evil is as evil does