Slashdot Mirror


Flexible Sensors Make Robot Skin

Roland Piquepaille writes "In recent years, lots of efforts have been made to give robots the ability to hear and see. But what about the sense of touch? Unlike us, robots don't have sensitive skin. But this is about to change. By using organic, or plastic, field-effect transistors as pressure sensors deposited on a flexible material, researchers at the University of Tokyo have created an artificial skin which will give robots the sense of touch. The prototype has a density of 16 sensors per square centimeter, far from the 1,500 of our fingertips. When this density increases and when the problem of the reliability of this kind of transistors is solved, the researchers say this artificial skin will also be used for car seats or gym carpets. Expect to see them in four or five years. More details and a picture of a robotic hand using organic transistors as pressure sensors."

148 comments

  1. Fo real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    More real realdoll.

    *big smile*

    Oh yeah

    1. Re:Fo real by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what I thought of first, the pr0n impact.

      Then of course during the first 'interface' with your new sensitive doll, it would remark... "is that all you got?"

    2. Re:Fo real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sad, but this was my first thought too... robot vaginas.... *u** I love electronics!!!

    3. Re:Fo real by sacremon · · Score: 1

      Nah, the real sex application is for a strap-on, with the sensors wired to an array of vibrating microwidgets molded in a particular form for each sex...

      --
      If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
    4. Re:Fo real by siegesama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *ahem* Now that's science!

      --
      what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
    5. Re:Fo real by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Throw in an ethernet port and bring teledildonics to the 21st century!

    6. Re:Fo real by freqres · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a Scientology term.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    7. Re:Fo real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could mean big bucks for the condom industry!! Bob Dole wouldn't have to take Viagra any more.

  2. Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


    he just plaigarises other peoples content

    if you add
    127.0.0.1 radio.weblogs.com
    127.0.0.1 blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 ww2.blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 ww3.blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 www.blogads.com

    to your hosts file, he disappears !

    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by TarlCabbot · · Score: 1
      Nothing but Slashvertising.

      He does it for the ad revinue on his radio weblogs, which every post links at least once.

    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yeah... Twice in one day. Check out the Science section.

    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, that dirty one Roland.

      He and his colleagues, those journalists. Always bringing interesting news to us. He's despicable.

      And Isaac Asimov, too. Did you know how vulgar he made science to be?

      Now, seriously, think for a minute. And then post. We both will have a lot less work.

      And Roland will keep doing his job (of course, I never paid him a dime).

    4. Re:Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Seems someone has an axe to grind against Roland P.

      See this post.

  3. Prosthetics by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't read the article yet, but my first thought when I read the blurb was whether or not this would have applications for prosthetics?

    One of the most difficult parts of rehabilitation for amputees, even with the most expensive and advanced prosthesis, is that the most sensitivity available nowadays is a highly generalied "touching something/not touching something" or a translation of general amounts of pressure (and thats only on the most advanced: most models have no sensors at all). If we could provide amputees with limbs that felt, albeit in a much reduced fashion, many behaviors that require positive feedback (i.e. to be able to adjust your movements based on what you feel in that limb) could become accesible for the disabled.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
    1. Re:Prosthetics by erick99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think it is very likely. If 16 sensors per sq cm is their first go 'round, you gotta figure it will be close to 100 before too long. Once the density is higher and the size of each sensor correspondingly smaller, the "skin" can be even thinner and can be wrapped more tightly and around things such as "fingers." Well, anyway, it sure sounds like a good idea. I hope it happens.

      -erick

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:Prosthetics by Impeesa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It could work, but other technology needs to catch up first. Fairly detailed sensors could be installed in current prosthetics, I'm sure, but the machine-nerve interface just doesn't carry enough data yet. It doesn't matter whether we know what that data means, since the brain can probably learn to interpret it on its own, but we just don't have the fine control over the interface that we would need. In related news, an article in this month's Discover (full text viewable to subscribers) discusses a lot of these limitations, although it comes at it from the angle of whether mind-reading (or controlling) computer chips are possible.

    3. Re:Prosthetics by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I believe the most successful prosthetics actually just apply the sensation to the skin of the stump itself. For instance, a heat sensor in the hand will activate something that heats up against the stump, imparting the sensation.

      I've read of some that have quite a few pressure sensors in them, that apply some sort of electrical 'tickle' to what's left of the leg... supposedly makes it much easier to walk with them.

    4. Re:Prosthetics by Impeesa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly - by applying sensations straight to the skin, you're whitewashing a huge number of nerves with the same sensation. With such inefficient input to the nervous system, you'd have pads and stuff all the way up your arm just to transmit the kind of data this skin could generate. It can't be used efficiently until we can more accurately send signals to just a small number of nerves at once.

  4. How new is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw the same picture in a Scientific American article last month.

    1. Re:How new is this? by cyclop · · Score: 1

      It surely just shows my ignorance, but...

      ...how technologically different is this from a touchpad?
      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    2. Re:How new is this? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The biggest difference? Well, there're a couple. First, it's flexible.

      Second, you can register contact at more than one point at a time. Most touchpads use an XY coordinate system for determining the point where the pad is touched; if you have more than one active row or column region, you no longer know for certain which, or even how many, points are making contact.

    3. Re:How new is this? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you can wrap it around a 'hand'.
      also, you can detect the pressure (and apparently more than on/off?) in multiple locations(iirc there's touchpads like that for pc usage too, but the usual one's can just detect 1 point).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. Every time I sit down in my car... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    KITT: "You know, Mike, we need to talk about how you're doing on your diet."

    1. Re:Every time I sit down in my car... by cybersaga · · Score: 0

      more than that, whenever you're driving your car seat's feeling you up....

    2. Re:Every time I sit down in my car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you'd hear the car seat say 'did you just fart in me ?'

  6. "Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by Sialagogue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Look at yourself, standing there, cradling the new flesh I've given you. If it means nothing to you, why protect it?"

    "I... I am simply imitating the behavior of humans."

    "You're becoming more human all the time. . .Now you're learning how to lie."

    "My programming was not designed to process these sensations."

    "Then tear the skin from your limb as you would a defective circuit...Go ahead...! We won't stop you! Do it! Don't be tempted by flesh!"

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
    1. Re:"Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Mod: +1 (Quote from my favorite ST movie)

    2. Re:"Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by Sneeper · · Score: 3, Funny


      And thousands of slashdotters pause to fantasize about the Borg Queen. Sexiest. Villain. Ever.

    3. Re:"Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      No, that'd be Radu Radu.

    4. Re:"Is it becoming clear to you yet?" by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny
      And thousands of slashdotters pause to fantasize about the Borg Queen. Sexiest. Villain. Ever.

      Well, she gives good head anyway, but that's probably because hers is detachable.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  7. If your name is Roland, the message is clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your parents hate you and want to see you suffer.

    1. Re:If your name is Roland, the message is clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what's up with all the angst against this roland guy? did he insult a range of slashdot userid's mothers or something? his blog seems harmless enough, even kind of cool. what am I missing?

  8. You know where the money is by Frac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make the inflatable dolls play audio clips when certain sensors are touched.

    My parents would be so proud.

    1. Re:You know where the money is by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Make the inflatable dolls play audio clips when certain sensors are touched.

      And make them get louder when touched in certain areas.

    2. Re:You know where the money is by cryms0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Hey that's sexual harrassment!"

      "Put your finger there again and lose it!"

      "Don't touch me, weirdo!"

      And, my favorite,

      "Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?"

    3. Re:You know where the money is by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      "you are killing me!"
      "you are killing me!"
      "you are killing me!"

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:You know where the money is by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I heard my ex-wife has a new boyfriend. Congrats.

      -Peter

  9. Roland Piquepaille is a plagiarist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    like he cribs everything else, you think he took that photo with permission to repost it on his blog for profit ?

    you think he wrote the text on his site or copy and pasted it from the original article ?

    Roland Piquepaille is a well know troll but the editors are too stupid to spot a form letter when they see one

  10. Terminator by ufoman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This reminds me of the T-100 from the Terminator movies. I wonder how long before we really do build something like the T-100?

    --
    The following statement is false.
    The previous statement is true.
    Welcome to my world.
  11. So are fingertips the most sensitive body part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or are they avoiding other sensitive parts that are more risque?

    1. Re:So are fingertips the most sensitive body part? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The tongue is the most sensitive body part (in multiple senses no less). Whether you consider that a risque part or not depends entirely on your predilections.

      KFG

  12. Roland Piquepaille writes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    he just plaigarises other peoples content and sells it on his blog

    but if you add
    127.0.0.1 radio.weblogs.com
    127.0.0.1 blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 ww2.blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 ww3.blogads.com
    127.0.0.1 www.blogads.com

    to your hosts file, he and his revenue stream disappears !

  13. New Gillette Robo-Shave by koreth · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Unlike us, robots don't have sensitive skin.

    So they'll save lots of money on aftershave and electric razors.

    All hail our new cleanshaven robot masters.

    1. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by kfg · · Score: 1

      All hail our new cleanshaven robot masters.

      Personally, I've never really understood male shaving, unless you think you're a woman trapped in a man's body or something.

      A clean chinned man is nearly as much of an oddity as a bearded lady (racial characteristics not withstanding). It's one of our more bizarre fashions (and that's all it is, fashion).

      It makes about as much sense as men wearing prosthetic breasts or padding their hips.

      KFG

    2. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then I guess you also don't understand cutting your hair and nails... yup, your average slashdotter!

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    3. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by kfg · · Score: 1

      Then I guess you also don't understand cutting your hair and nails. . .

      Keeping them clean and neatly trimmed I understand perfectly. "Dapper" is one of the words not uncommonly used to describe me.

      However, I don't understand removing them.

      KFG

    4. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by nbowman · · Score: 1

      Lets just say your average 14 year old grows a better beard than me (and I am in my middling 20s). Trust me, its better that I shave.

    5. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by kfg · · Score: 1

      Ah, well. I admit that that problem is not one of mere fasion.

      It's vanity. :)

      KFG

    6. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by ak_hepcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      It probably has something to do with different tactile sensations being more pleasing to some people than others.

      For instance, there are a large group (*gasp*) of people who shave all of the hair around their genitals. Crazy! So either they're rushing, on a swim team, or perverts, right?

      Try it once or twice.

      --
      Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
    7. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by kfg · · Score: 1

      So either they're rushing, on a swim team, or perverts, right?

      Or fashionable.

      By the way, I race bicycles.

      KFG

    8. Re:New Gillette Robo-Shave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about, it too hot here to have a beard. I tried letting a beard grow, but after a month or two, I need to shave it off because it's too hot here.

      Comfort is important too.

      Now if I lived in Alaska, I might just let it grow, but in balmy California, I just can't stand all that extra warmth. Even SF is too warm.

  14. What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everybody complaining about Slashdot becoming Piquepaille's personal soapbox for plagiarisim seems to get instantly modded down. Is he a pseudonym for one of the Slashdot editors or something?

    Anyway, what is the robot ability up to now?

    * Has skin
    * Eats flies
    * Can transform into other robots
    * Walks on water

    It sounds like the plans are coming together nicely for overlord robots.

    1. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by pHatidic · · Score: 1
      It sounds like the plans are coming together nicely for overlord robots.

      I am skeptical this technology will ever actually take off in carpets like the article suggests. Who would want to have their carpet tell them they were a fatass every time they got up to walk around?

    2. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by kbahey · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you are trolling. I wish I had mod points to mod you down. Nice tactic to get your gripe against Roland thru, by adding some links, and getting a +5 Interesting. Way to go moderators.

      It seems that you posted other posts as well again Roland Piquepaille, as an AC.

      You have a point that Roland gets more air time here on Slashdot than most.

      But he does not plagiarize any more than any news site who relies on various news sources. He collects the info and provides links to the source with some commentary. Just like Slashdot, Engadget, and a million other sites out there.

      Seems proper to me.

    3. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you think he has permission to repost other peoples content for commercial gain through advertising ? real news sites actually get permission first or *pay writers* for content or do you think AP CNN etc just do it for free ?

      slashdot links to the original articles where possible, they dont copy and paste them here as articles cos if they did they would get their asses sued into oblivion, copyright does apply to writings and photographs especially when exploiting content for commercial gain

    4. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do you think I am trolling? It's a genuine question.

      As for the other posts, I didn't make them. If I wanted to post something like that, I would have put it in my original post rather than make separate posts. No doubt you are aware that more than one person can post as AC. I fail to see what's so bad if I was responsible for posting them though.

      You are right in saying that he doesn't plagiarise more than any news site; I used the wrong word mistakenly - plagiarism is when you claim the article to be your own, which he is not.

      The correct term is copyright infringement, and his methods certainly differ from other news sites. The news sites that post articles verbatim have prexisting agreements to do so with organisations like the Associated Press. The news sites that do not have such arrangements quote a small portion as provided for by fair use and link to the full article. Piquepaille, on the other hand, quotes far more than that - enough for me to suspect it would be very difficult for him to claim fair use in court.

      Fair use, in case you are unaware, relies on a number of different factors, including the amount quoted and the nature of the duplication. Since he is copying for commercial gain (note the adverts on the website) and copying a very substantial portion of the original articles, I can only reasonably conclude he is infringing upon copyrights.

    5. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have been known to make a few anti-Roland posts in the past. When I first started paying attention to Roland's posts, I couldn't understand why many people hated him, either. But, now, I understand why. On one hand, Maybe part of it is overexposure. However, I think more of it has to do with his neverending spam and questionable approach to copyright law.

      If you look here, you will see the T's & C's for using information from the source of Roland's story. If you read the fine print, you will see a sentence that reads "Use of this material for commercial purposes without explicit, written permission from Technology Research News, LLC is strictly prohibited".

      Roland's blog is purely a commercial enterprise. He uses the ads on his blog to collect money. By copying and pasting entire paragraphs from the Technology Research News article, he is breaking the copyright.

      Of course, maybe he does have 'explicit written permission'. But I doubt it. Why do I say this? Look at how he writes the article. Where is isn't copying and pasting, he is purely summarizing what was originally written by anybody else. Now, look at this link. Look at how he writes. No new information. he just collects information from dozens of web sites and either plagiarizes those sites or points to them through his blog. He must be collecting dozens of RSS feeds and picking and choosing what he thinks are the best.

      Even worse, some of his posts are nothing but advertisements for products.

      Now, let us say Roland DOES have legal explicit permission from all of those sites to copy and paste articles for his personal profit. I could live with that, IF he was adding additional insight into technology. Unfortunately, he isn't. His blog adds nothing to society.

      No insight. No thoughts on where technology is heading. No review of how technology has come this far. He is just parroting what somebody else has written. The only logical explanation for him even having a web log is for the hope that you will be dumb enough to click one of his revenue-generating ads.

    6. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      After reading another post, I realize that I am guilty of misusing the term plagiarize. Roland does not plagiarize, but he appears to be guilty of some copyright infringement.

    7. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      He gets a lot of coverage on Nanodot as well. (4 of the front page articles are his.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      I am skeptical this technology will ever actually take off in carpets like the article suggests. Who would want to have their carpet tell them they were a fatass every time they got up to walk around?

      Or, worse yet, your carpet informs you that the "hot chic" you slept with last night (who was brought home via 'beer goggles') was much heavier than you (many beers and several shots of peppermint Schnapp's later) had thought...

      Of course this is NOT from personal experience... despite what my so-called "friends" and "family" might tell you... ;)

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    9. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the plans are coming together nicely for overlord robots.

      Didn't you watch The Matrix? We still have the good ole fashion trusty EMP SHOCKWAVE!

      That'd pawn the asses of our robot overlords good!

    10. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      Everybody complaining about Slashdot becoming Piquepaille's personal soapbox for plagiarisim seems to get instantly modded down. Is he a pseudonym for one of the Slashdot editors or something?

      Hmmmmmm yeah Roland pipsqueak annoys me too, most of his articles display a poor understanding of technology, he's a bit of a non-event. I would love to know how come so many of his articles get posted.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    11. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by WillWare · · Score: 1
      No insight. No thoughts on where technology is heading. No review of how technology has come this far...

      Aggregation by itself is valuable. Google News is only an aggregation service. With both of them, I learn about stuff I'd probably never stumble across on my own.

      The ads are clearly identifiable as such, you're not being deceived and you don't need to click on them.

      Deeper insight would be nice, esecially from somebody who's got his eye on things. But I'm inclined to cut the guy some slack.

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    12. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Sigh! Moronic moderators...

      How is this a troll?

      I noticed what appears as a coordinated attack on Roland, and stood up and defended the guy. Not that I like him (I neither like nor dislike him), but because these attacks seem unwarranted, and all by Anonymous Cowards.

    13. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Aggregation by itself is valuable. Google News is only an aggregation service. With both of them, I learn about stuff I'd probably never stumble across on my own.

      True. After all, isn't Slashdot an aggretation service? And, I find it to be valuable. However, note that Roland has a tendency to link to his blog. He points you to his blog and from there, you can link to the source. When submitting an ariticle to Slashdot, why doesn't Roland point most, or, better yet, ALL of his links to the source?

      In both of the stories he submitted yesterday (the one here and the one in the Science section), he has at least two links to his blog (I am counting the one on his name) and only one link to the source. And, his blog is purely a copy of the source. What is the point of going to the blog? Maybe if he had something new in his blog, I could see it (such as an interview related to the source article).

      Maybe I am being harsh. But, IMHO, Roland is only doing this to drive traffic to his blog. I thought Slashdot was all about going beyond self-promotion and instead spreading news and ideas around for the good of the community.

      OK. That almost sounds silly. It's as if I'm expecting a great light to shine down upon Slashdot and have angels singing in the background, but you know what I mean....

    14. Re:What's with the Piquepaille posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed what appears as a coordinated attack on Roland, and stood up and defended the guy.

      Actually, the majority of your post was attacking me, not defending him, and I've posted detailed reasoning that can be verified by STFW for copyright and fair use discussions, whereas you have simply stated your opinion, so you do look a lot like a troll. Perhaps if you responded to that instead of calling people morons you would look less like a troll.

  15. Cool by pimpdaddywrinkles · · Score: 1

    Not much longer until we have sex-bots

    I wonder if having a harem sex-bots will be considered immoral

    Support Free Trade Campus
    get a free account Now!

    1. Re:Cool by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the bright side, you could use strong sterilization methods; less risk of STDs.

    2. Re:Cool by kfg · · Score: 1

      I wonder if having a harem sex-bots will be considered immoral

      Yes.

      That won't, however, prevent them from also being quite popular and common. People will indulge their "base" instincts, even the people who consider it immoral.

      It reminds me of an old Playboy cartoon. It shows a bunch of Puritans going to meeting and all the women (of every age) have large, red As on their backs. One guy is saying to another, "Well, it was a long winter."

      The problem, of course, is that the people who consider it immoral, but do it anyway, will try to repress their guilt by running for office and making it a criminal offense.

      KFG

    3. Re:Cool by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      wonder if having a harem sex-bots will be considered immoral

      FSVO "immoral" approaching "expensive as all hell." So you'll have to be a CEO, RIAA/MPAA exec, or Politician to afford one.

      Yep, fsck morality.

  16. Complaining Robots by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh great, one more thing for Marvin to complain about.

    I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed, and my leg hurts too.

    1. Re:Complaining Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marvin was always complaining about the terrible pain in all the diodes down his left hand side.

  17. Best opening sentence ever? by e9th · · Score: 1
    Skin is very useful.

    I remember writing a term paper that began this way.

  18. Eeew I can see it now by aarku · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mom: Joey! Stop bouncing around in your seat!
    Joey: But Maaa!
    Back Seat: .... Please don't stop...

  19. I for one by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    welcome our new golden skinned robotic overlords.

    Seriously, that picture kinda creeps me out.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  20. Article repost and image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://radio.weblogs.com/0105910/images/flexible_s kin.jpg
    Flexible Sensors Make Robot Skin

    In recent years, lots of efforts have been made to give robots the ability to hear and see. But what about the sense of touch? Unlike us, robots don't have sensitive skin. But this is about to change. By using organic, or plastic, field-effect transistors as pressure sensors deposited on a flexible material, researchers at the University of Tokyo have created an artificial skin which will give robots the sense of touch . The prototype has a density of 16 sensors per square centimeter, far from the 1,500 of our fingertips. When this density increases and when the problem of the reliability of this kind of transistors is solved, the researchers say this artificial skin will also be used for car seats or gym carpets. Expect to see them in four or five years. Read more...

    Here are selected excerpts from the Technology Research News article.

    Researchers from the University of Tokyo have devised pressure-sensor arrays that promise to give objects like rugs and robots the equivalent of one aspect of skin -- pressure sensitivity.
    The researchers' pressure sensor arrays are built from inexpensive organic, or plastic, transistors on a flexible material. This allows for dense arrays that can be used over large areas.
    The arrays could be used in pressure-sensitive coverings in hospitals, homes, gyms and cars to monitor people's health and performance, and eventually as skin that would give robots the means to interact more sensitively with their surroundings, said Takao Someya, an associate professor of electrical engineering at the University of Tokyo.
    The sensor skin works even when rolled around a cylinder as small as 4 millimeters in diameter, said Someya. The researchers' prototype is an eight-centimeter-square sheet containing a 32-by-32 array of organic sensors -- a density of 16 sensors per square centimeter. In contrast, humans have 1,500 pressure sensors per square centimeter in the fingertips, though far fewer in most other places.
    Here is a picture of a robotic hand using organic transistors as pressure sensors. (Credit: Takao Someya)

    And what are possible applications?

    The active-matrix design allows the arrays to be smart enough to enable specific sensors at certain feedback points to, for instance, monitor the heart and breathing rate of a hospital patient who has fallen to the floor, said Someya. The skin could measure whether an elderly patient is just taking a rest, or needs help, he said.
    The skin could also be used in car seats to monitor drivers' mental and physical conditions, Someya said. "Our large-area pressure [sensing abilities] would be helpful" in obtaining information through drivers seats, he said.

    And, of course, we'll see home robots able to pick an egg in the fridge.

    The research work has been published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on July 6, 2004, under the title "A large-area, flexible pressure sensor matrix with organic field-effect transistors for artificial skin applications." Here is a link to the abstract .

    1. Re:Article repost and image by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      When I need to rest I often just fall on the floor. They do not have beds or chairs in this hospital. Common sense will tell one if someone falls to the floor they need help.

  21. If the robot doesn't behave.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...at least you can tickle it.

    --
    Try Nuggets , the mobile search engine. We answer your questions via SMS, across the UK.

  22. did anyone else read that as.. by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1


    More details and a picture of a robotic hand using orgasmic transistors as pressure sensors.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  23. Maybe he's the replacement for Jon Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ever think of that?

    Huhhhh???

  24. GelForce by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

    At SIGGRAPH this year there was a material that could measure force and direction, it was called GelForce, and it was one of the most amazing things I saw. I was on the E-Tech subcommittee, and it was in our venue; it was so fun to play with, and their demo was great!

    This looks to be a bit more advanced and a lot more expensive (than GelForce), but nonetheless, there are other people who have been creating these materials with the same applications.

  25. THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    sensor data != Sensation

    the aggregate array of sensor data can be thus analyzed,
    but as comander data asks in TNG 'first contact' -- how does
    one overcome the sensor-sensation gap?

    regards,
    j

    1. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      how does one overcome the sensor-sensation gap?

      In the case of a sex android one does not even bother trying, as it's only the sensations produced in the human componant that matter.

      All the android has be able to do is adeptly fake it, making it more of an android wife than an android girlfriend.

      KFG

    2. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by piecewise · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't be so hopeful my friend. Android girlfriends would fake it too if we're building these things to be realistic.

      --
      The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    3. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by kfg · · Score: 1

      That's because the average girlfriend starts to think of herself as a wife long before the guy catches on.

      Men tend to think they do the chosing just because they're the ones that tend to do the pursuing, but, on the whole, it is the women who actually do the chosing.

      You'll find evidence of this in the fact that traditionally it is the men that must do the asking.

      KFG

    4. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      True that. If the girlfriend is faking - but staying anyway, and not cheating - she's thinking of the long term wife stuff...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    5. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the title of my new book. "Do androids have electric orgasms ?". Move over philip K dick.

    6. Re:THE SENSOR-SENSATION GAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so funny to watch a bunch of geeks theorize about women and sex :)

      Happilly married with the second on the way, and the wife has a higher sex drive than me... life is good :)

  26. Good stuff... by Frennzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As already mentioned, I see great things ahead for prosthetics. If this is a first shot at 16sensors/cm^2, surely it will be easy to make advances in not only materials but simple manufacturing processes that could greatly increase that.

    It looks like the first in a long series of hurdles may just about be cleared.

    There are also numerous industrial/scientific/sporting applications for something like this...imagine having NFL sidelines undercoated with this stuff...no more debate or bad vision angles....he was in or he was out. Or what about measuring even more precisely the impact at each discreet point on a runners feet? Or the force of a boxer's punch? Or the accuracy of a baseball bat or golf club as it comes into contact with the ball?

    Cool stuff.

  27. This Isn't New by holderofthering · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nasa has had a working version of some of this technology since the late ninties i believe, they were using it experimentaly on the new generation of CanadaArms for the ISS. It was being developed so that there would be another way to see if the arm was hitting anything, besieds just looking out the window. If i rember correctly the project was having some problems becuase it was taking a huge amount of power to run the touch sensative surface.

    Haven't hered anything about it in the last 2-3 years, but Yeah, not new.

    1. Re:This Isn't New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, this is far from new.

      A company called Tactex Controls owns the technology (which was indeed developed for the Canadarm) now.

      They've already developed car seats embeded with it. These seats can detect your position and tell an airbage whether or not to deploy, for example.

      http://www.tactex.com/

  28. Sex Dolls and Slashdot by TheDisturbedOne · · Score: 1

    Why am I not suprised? I think as others have said...it could have many uses. Curious if the density will rise like HDD density was/is rising...

  29. What?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, I can't dip my girlfriend in bleach???

  30. yeah, right! by somepunk · · Score: 1

    The prototype has a density of 16 sensors per square centimeter, far from the 1,500 of our fingertips.

    Most of that is redundant. I'd like to see you sense 1500 independent locations within a sq cm of your fingertips. I bet you'd have difficulty with 16. Where's that number from anyway? I wouldn't be surprised if its wrong anyway. Nerve endings, maybe, but not all of those are for touch, some are for temperature and probably other things.

    Still, some of those extra pressure senstive nerve endings would be good for detecting subtle shifts of whatever is being touched, or texture, etc. But its nothing like 1500 a sq cm.

    --
    Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov)
    1. Re:yeah, right! by blakestah · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can sense the difference between two and one point on your skin when they are separated by a little less than a mm.

      Low threshold mechanoreceptors, of two different types, each have about 1/mm2 density in the fingertip, or about 100/sq cm. These two types are different in temporal sensitivity and dynamic range, but allow sensation of skin deflections from a few microns to a few millimeters - roughly three orders of magnitude range.

      16 will not allow a reasonable assessment of surface texture. It will not allow you to discriminate 100 grit from 200 grit sandpaper. It will not allow you to read Braille, or find the right key in your pocket.

      But certainly it will allow lots of function.

  31. no..... by hdd · · Score: 1
    this artificial skin will also be used for car seats

    holyshit, the robot wants to feel my ass...wonder if they can also detect farts...

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  32. I can think of one application by El · · Score: 1

    The pressure sensor arrays could be used in pressure carpets that distinguish family members from strangersHmm... this could be very usefull in front of a pet door! Think it can distinguish between a cat and a skunk?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  33. Re:Anyone recommend a better site? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

    Or not. Do I need to mention the moderation system?

  34. from my blog... by feelyoda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    check out my blog, where i post comments interesting stuff related to robotics...

    My post on this topic is here and below.

    Flexible sensors make robot skin. This could have a number of applications. The first two I imagine are a richer interface between machines and humans and advanced manipulation.

    If cheap enough, the machine can understand the precise location and posture of a human. Mentioned in the article are car seats. Imagine a bed which adjusted itself to minimize pressure points.

    I should mention a project out of CMU by Chris Atkeson and Daniel Wilson, where he put only a few cheap accelerometers in the floorboard of a house. The algorithm processing these sensors could localize humans in the rooms with remarkable accuracy. The challenge then becomes sensor fusion and system integration, in using this information to boost performance of the entire system. For instance, a human tracker using vision alone would be dwarfed by such a system which had a reasonable seed guess from pressure sensors.

    The second application is for rich manipulation. A robot grasping a glass must do so with enough pressure to not drop it, but also enough sensitivity to not break it. I doubt humans use significant higher reasoning in this process, unlike the advantage humans have over computer vision programs. Rather, robots could sense the weight fairly easily, but also the type of surface, and learn how brittle such a surface is.

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
  35. Oh yeah, greeeeat... by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "this artificial skin will also be used for car seats or gym carpets"

    Car Seat: You seem to have put on a bit of weight mam.
    Driver: I have not, how dare you.
    Car Seat: And, if I feel correctly you... yup, oh yeah, over there, feel that... you've got some cellulite on your thighs too.
    Driver: My god! I never!
    Car Seat: I feel you are now tensing your buttocks madam...

  36. Why this is not going to help much + a better way by zytheran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I started a Masters degree on this issue in the 1980's and it's sad to see the same *wrong* approach to touch still being applied if the end use is a robotic hand/finger. At the time MIT was doing work on this, as were a few other places, all with the wrong approach. Here's the problem:
    It's not the sensors or the density or how long they last or their accuracy or anything like that, even though these are real problems. The big killer problem is wiring. You get all these signals and at some point you need to get the wiring over joints that have to bend a real lot. And the more sensors you have the wires your typically going to have. Eventually you end up with bundles of wires and the simple fact is bundles of wires do not like being bent repeatedly, apart from which fingers need to be skinny to be useful and this is at odds with fat bundles of wires.

    One solution however is physically simple and was presented at a National robotics conference in Australia in 1990. In summary I proposed and had made a working 2D slice of finger that used only 4 sensors. A 3D finger tip would require about 9 sensors, and by finger tip I mean measuring the major contact, magnitude and direction anywhere beyond the joint. The method was based on normal engineering and had the 4 sensors buried into a compliant skin. An external force caused a reading on all 4 strain gauges. From this small amount of data a PC worked out the magnitude, position and direction of the applied force using data collected from earlier testing. As a 2D finger slice it could successfully follow an edge when attached to a robot arm. I can scan and email the paper (this was pre net days) if any researchers want to extend this work and come up with practical robotic fingers. Email me.
    Another solution is to put the smarts into the skin so only a "summary" signal needs to go back through the various joints. This couldn't be done in the 80's but could be now?

  37. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by BubbleNOP · · Score: 1

    Why can't one use miniature wireless transmitters/receivers instead of wires in this case?

  38. Hand job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A mechanical hand can go for hours, baby... and be gentle too.

    Now you can hold your pr0n with both hands.

    No more stress on the freeway.

    The possibilities are endless.

    (I know, pretty sad. It's a slow day).

  39. Same approach, different technology, 25 years ago by real+gumby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is the same class of technology that Danny Hillis invented 25 years ago at the MIT AI Lab. At that time it wasn't organic transistors (just the plain 'ol inorganic kind) of course!

    I can't find any specific references to it on the web, only some in passing. If I remember he used pantyhose to separate two conductive layers...

  40. master luke! by IronMagnus · · Score: 1

    ..that hand kinda looks like c3p0

  41. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by zytheran · · Score: 1

    You could these days. Size needs to be no more than about a 5mm cube. But you still have to get power, which at least is only 2 wires. But bear in mind you need a minimum of 5 per hand if just measuring finger tips, or 14 if measuring total finger touch. Per hand. But at least polling update would only need to be about every 10 mili-seconds so bandwidth would not be a issue. The smallest wireless transmitters I have seen used are about 15x10x3 mm though.
    And using a matrix skin without local processing is still dumb, in animals the milions of "touch sensor" signals don't go back to the brain in a raw form, for good reason. We should understand why this is good and/or bad.

  42. Woah! by LS · · Score: 1

    That robotic hand looks a lot like C3P0!

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  43. Pressure sensitive Alarms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is going into car seats and gym carpets, expect to see alarm systems using this technology when it becomes available, as well. Someone breaks into a house, and it'd not only set off the alarm, but also track where the offender went. Possibly also car alarms? Who knows.

  44. We are already disabled. by Thinkit4 · · Score: 1

    Every one of us. At some point we will have full control over inputs and outputs of our sentience. When we know just what that means, going back will feel like reincarnating as an ant.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
  45. Great for the "disabled" by Thinkit4 · · Score: 1
    Meaning every one of us. At some point--the singularity--we will have control over the inputs and outputs of our sentience. No more suffering. No need to itch or pee.

    I can only imagine it like having sight and hearing for the first time, but far greater than that.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
  46. Re:Anyone recommend a better site? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

    You don't have to mention the moderation system to me. Sorry about the 'troll' rating.

  47. Sense of touch, someones been watching too.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    much Star Trek. At best you mean tactile feedback. Touch is something you might require, say.. sentience to appreciate and we aren't there quite yet.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  48. Re:from my blog... Starship Troopers. by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm reminded of the Suit-interface from the Book 'Starship Troopers'. It was described as a large sensor-suit that felt the pressures exereted by your human body, which then fed into the computer of the suit and produced a negative feedback---trying to relieve pressure on the sensor... and that was the mechanism for lifting your own leg and causing the suit to lift and amplify the force several times...

    Woo-Hoo!! One more step towards my robo-suit!

    Just a random snippet of memory from a cool book...

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
  49. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    The problem is not that you can't do it. It's that the market is so dinky that tooling up to do it isn't worth it.

    It should be feasible to make integrated silicon strain gauge/amplifier/interface chips, embed them in a flexible printed circuit, and laminate them into a skin-like laminate with appropriate tough, soft, and hard layers. But the processes involved are all high-volume ones - it's hard to do this economically in small volume. And there's no market for a process that turns out big rolls of this stuff.

    There's a lot of stuff in robotics that's like that. Linear motors and laser scanners both cost about 20x what they should. because the volume is tiny. Even basic servomotos and servo amps cost 5x as much as they should, based on parts cost.

    It's getting better, though. More and more parts needed in robotics are becoming off the shelf. I run a DARPA Grand Challenge team, and over the last year, many of the components you need for that have become far more available.

  50. Obligatory Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Robot: Why?! Why was I made to feel pain?!

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by NLG · · Score: 1

      Marge(to Homer): What is it with you and Robots?

      --
      Flash is the Herpes of the Internet.
      your.opinion > /dev/null
  51. Second skin by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Why should robots have all the fun? How about clothing sensitive as skin, but maskable. Not just work gloves, but sandals, too - hell, a motorcycle suit that switches off when the accelerometer rises to impact levels.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Second skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but, what the hell are you talking about?

    2. Re:Second skin by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about this sensor material crafted into protective coverings that don't prevent the sensation of touch that traditional materials do when covering the skin.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  52. robotics progress sooooo slow by monsterhead78 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The closest we have to a robot is the Honda robot - which still cannot handle many basic functions. AI has gradually increased, but nothing spectacular. Why has there not been more progress?

    1. Re:robotics progress sooooo slow by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And where's my damn jetpack!

      (Maybe you should read one of the innumerable books describing how this is a NOT EASY problem)

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    2. Re:robotics progress sooooo slow by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of robots out there, which are indeed fully functional. Perhaps you are looking for a term such as "android" to refer to a humanoid robot. But under current definitions, a "robot" could simply refer to the programmable arm which welds together or paints your new car.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  53. Finally! Anti-Ninja surfaces! Affair Detectors! by digital+photo · · Score: 3, Funny

    After decades of research, there is now the technology to defeat those wall clinging, ceiling hiding, floor light-footing ninjas!(and web slingers, kung fu masters, ballerinas, etc).

    Just apply the new "feel it" intelligent surface film to every surface inside and outside of your home!

    Know instantly by pattern recognition and fuzzy logic, when your loved one is cheating on you and know exactly on what table, floor, wall, or patio! You will know the exact time(s) and how many times your loved one has gotton the good vibration from your neighbor, your cook, your best friend... all this data can then be converted to full motion, surround sound video footage for personal review, use in court, and on a variety of daytime talk shows. (Video footage generation available when using "Feel It" intelligent films with "See It" intelligent films. Please consult your local informational technology contractor for proper installation procedures!)

    Know when that den of roaches comes out for their nightly snack attack on your pet's food and your early morning english muffins!

    Know when expensive vat grown ninjas are clamboring into your home to assasinate you for pissing off the wrong multi-national artificial intelligence!

    All this can be yours if you are willing to apply the new "feel it" intelligent surface sheets to each and every possible surface in your home.

    Coming Soon!

    "Know It" intelligent pleasure film for when you want to know who's faking it! Designed to carefully measure pressure, moisture, and hormones, this new wave technological material not only protects you from STD's, but also from fake orgasms, recurring genital warts, another lover's fluids, etc.... (note: use of "Know It" intelligent pleasure film may not be legal to use in all states. Please consult your local laws before purchase and/or use!)

  54. yeah, oh, great by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    So what now, they can fsck each other, and uhh, oh, sensitive hands and stuff, even themselves.

    So what's the next step ? :D I probably shouldn't suggest anything :D

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  55. Linux sexbot by seitentaisei · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you made a "sexbot" running linux (fine, fine, any OS), you could have it start playing cheesy porn mp3s on cue!

  56. God solved this problem with hair by Deorus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the touch sensivity is provided by hair, not the skin itself. In fact, the skinn doesn't feel anything since it's made of dead cells. What gives us the perception of feeling are the nerves beneath the skin which connect to the small hairs outside. High detailed pressure and directional sensivity (used to feel textures) is provided by hair. The remaining touch feeling is the low detailed pressure one described in this article.

    We have milions of small hairs all over the skin, even on the fingertips. Try placing two fingertips close to each other in front of your eyes and you will notice that you feel them touching before they actually touch each other, this is because of the small hairs there.

    This is also the reason why people have hair on top of their heads, to protect them from accidentally colliding with stuff (and to keep the heat for that matter), my hair has helped me a lot avoidiong painful collisions with solid objects above me in the dark several times.

    If you ever tried to shave to the point where there was no more hair on your face (pretty easy if you do it with a shaving blade), you've probably noticed that your touch sensivity decayed a lot for a while (until hair grown bck there later).

    1. Re:God solved this problem with hair by uglyduckling · · Score: 4, Informative
      Utter rubbish.

      I'm a med student - I had to respond to this one. There are 6 types of tactile receptors, of which nerve endings attached to hairs are one. Hairs provide basic information about movement - the wind or your clothes moving past your skin etc.

      The tips of your fingers are hairless. That's obvious - look at them under a magnifying glass or microscope if you have one. Fine touch sensation is provided by Tactile Discs and Tactile Corpuscles located in the ("live") skin of the dermis. The skin is not made exclusively of "dead" cells, but of many layers, and the ("dead") epidermis at the surface is quite capable of transmitting movement down to these cells.

      You can check all of this out if you want.

      People have hair on their heads mainly for insulation (get a crew cut in the middle of winter if you want to prove this!) although I agree that hair on the head has a limited use in avoiding collisions. I suspect that subjective loss of sensation in the face after shaving is due to the trauma of having run a blade over your skin, and the stinging sensation from the damage to hair follicles.

    2. Re:God solved this problem with hair by halcyonon · · Score: 1

      It's actually the shaving gel that causes the temporary loss of sensation.

  57. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey,

    I'm interested in eventually getting a robotic hand to work -- connect to segway RMP, a few webcams, and have it re-stack / retrieve my books.

    Although I don't really qualify as a "researcher" (just a rising sophmore) and am unlikely to ever get the funding for such a project, I'd be really interested in reading the paper.

    My email address is: gbatxr@tznvy.com (apply ROT13 on first two parts).

    Thanks,
    --TongKe

    BTW, I've heard that the cheapest robotic arm (with five finger hand) run around $100K ... a bit too much for an undergrad to ask for when proposing a project -- any idea where it'd be possible to buy a cheaper robotic hand?

  58. Flexible Wires by AndOne · · Score: 1

    Actually, researchers at Johns Hopkins developed flexible wires that can flex and stretch upto 1.5 times their own length without suffering damage. The article was in Nature back in March, but you need to have a subscription to view it now.

    --
    I don't care what you say, all I need is my Wumpabet soup.
  59. hrrmm... by subtropolis · · Score: 1
    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  60. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    Another solution is to put the smarts into the skin so only a "summary" signal needs to go back through the various joints.

    And and each summariser may be given a new factor depending on what's most necessary to pay attention to. "Walking...Walking...Falling Over...FALLING OVER!..." Nerves are 2-way. Lots that could be done with this.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  61. Ok, I will admit it. by CommanderData · · Score: 1

    I was tempted. But I came through in the end- If I had destroyed the Phoenix, where would you all be now?

    Oh, that awful crew of NX-01. Maybe I should have blown up the Phoenix after all ;)

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  62. fantasize about the Borg Queen by WillWare · · Score: 1

    And why not? Cute as a button, and handy with machinery.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  63. Re:Why this is not going to help much + a better w by BalloonMan · · Score: 1

    Why not put a 1000 simple sensors plus one small "aggregator" in each fingertip? Then reduce 1000 inputs down to one digital datastream on one wire. Add another aggregator in each hand to do the same for all the nearby fingertips. Repeat design pattern ad infinitum.

    Human biology evolved very thin "wires" (neurons) that do a full homerun to the CPU, but we are not constrained to emulate that design.

  64. So many sensors not really needed by conrius · · Score: 1

    As mentioned in this post, A number of force sensors are not going to do much good in this case (if picking up of an egg is all that is required) . If mimicking position and the biomechanics of the human arm is what is required, then all we need is the exact position information (along with velocities and accelarations) of all corresponding points. By mimicking the force position with relevant velocity and accelaration profiles for all points, theoretically the force values get replicated (force is after all a second derivative of position, given the first two force can be accurately predicted). So all that needs to be done is to set up the robotic arm, train it using a neural networks to mimick human arm positions for desired actions (success of the actions can be measured using the position/velocity/accelaration values). The key advantage to doing this is, this reduces the hard-wire requirements on the number of sensors and uses software more extensively. Get a fast processor , hook it up and u have a lot less circuits to deal with ... but the same results. G

  65. Re:from my blog... Starship Troopers. by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, the DOD/DARPA establishment is actually working on exoskeleton technology for troopers.

    see this:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1112411.s tm

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  66. Biological Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    During research over the summer with tactile perception in humanoid robotics Ive come to believe that a type of flesh substance should be made. When mounting the sensors on a flat surface which would be the metal of the robot, non useful readings were shown with plots. After a few experiments with a 'skin' material we could see a considerable change in the readings, readings that possibly could be used to identify different structures.

    In humans we note that our nerves are not mounted onto or bones but more suspended in flesh, this accounts for quite a bit of how we percieve cutaneous perception.