Slashdot Mirror


Krita/KOffice Preview Version and Video Available

xiando writes "Developers aim at making Krita a user-friendly image manipulation program where users with no computer experience or slim experience with other light-duty image programs like Paint Shop Pro should feel right at home. LinuxReviews has a 5.5 MB preview video by developer Bart Coppens available, showing how the app looks and feels. Check it out or download the source preview packages by Daniel Molkentin to try it yourself. Developers hope to make Krita a part of the KDE office suite KOffice 1.4, scheduled spring 2005."

181 comments

  1. Krita Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Krita" means 'chalk' or 'crayon' in Swedish. "rita" means 'to draw'.

    IKN.

    1. Re:Krita Fun Facts by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you telling me that the K in the name actually has a meaning?

      I never thought I'd see the day...

    2. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spolied kids and their newfangled crayons these days. When I was a kid, we had one kind of crayon ... Crayola. And it has a hole in the side of the box where you sharpened the 5 or 6 colors you used all the time while nibbling on the rest of the colors. We didn't have, nor did we need, any stinkin' "rita".

      Don't even get me started on the walk to school...

    3. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Seehund · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Krita" is also the Swedish name for the Cretaceous period. It's also Swedish slang for "credit" (debt).

      Obsolete software for people with debts? ;)

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    4. Re:Krita Fun Facts by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Informative
      Why wouldn't it? Other fun facts: konsole means "console" in German. Many of the "k" words are either German spelling or stand for KDE - kate is "KDE Advanced Text Editor".

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's a fancy box of crayons. We didn't use to have the fancy 64-crayon boxes with the built-in sharpeners - we had 8 colors, and we peeled back the paper. And we liked it.

    6. Re:Krita Fun Facts by revery · · Score: 1

      well according to this page, Krita means "done"

      I don't think this was one of the meanings they intended.

    7. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't even get me started on the walk to school...

      Well maybe if you *had* started on the walk to school more often you wouldn't be such a loser now.

    8. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What page? What language?

    9. Re:Krita Fun Facts by revery · · Score: 1

      groan... I think I even previewed this...

      according to this page, Krita means "done"

    10. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Henk+Poley · · Score: 0

      A smartass reply would be to point at the fact that the K in KDE stands for nothing but K (as in 'K Desktop Environment').

    11. Re:Krita Fun Facts by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      K stands for Kool as in Kool Desktop Env. Check the orifinal announcement email.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    12. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Zigmund555 · · Score: 0

      www.dictionary.com - try looking up humor.

    13. Re:Krita Fun Facts by blixel · · Score: 1

      K stands for Kool as in Kool Desktop Env.

      Is Kool a German word?

    14. Re:Krita Fun Facts by mattdm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes; it means "an American brand of cigarettes".

    15. Re:Krita Fun Facts by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      Wow! you had 8 colors! When I was a kid, after walking 8 miles - in the snow-- to get to scholl, we only had two colors: black and white. And we liked it too. Tell that to the kids of today... and they'll never believe you.

    16. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Jahf · · Score: 1

      *lol*

      Ah if only I had mod points.

      So a box using KDE with Java is not just caffeinated, it's also mentholated!

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    17. Re:Krita Fun Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black AND white? What rich elite suburb did you grow up in? Where we lived we had one color crayon, sort of a waxy yellow color, uh, well, because they were made out of beeswax, from our own killer bee hives. If you wanted anything else, you had to trudge up the mountain and gather roots and berries and distill your own tint, then melt the crayons down, stir in the tint, and re cast them. Freeking hard to stuff them babies back into the paper wrapper, tell you what.

      Both ways, uphill, fighting off badgers the whole time, and you can guess what we used as a tint to get a dark red.

      And we LIKED it that way!

    18. Re:Krita Fun Facts by falonaj · · Score: 2, Informative
      K stands for Kool as in Kool Desktop Env.
      You are both right - or both wrong. The "K" in KDE used to stand for "Kool", but now it only means "K".
    19. Re:Krita Fun Facts by kwr2k · · Score: 1

      So your next task is to find meanings for all the "G"'s in gnome apps ...

    20. Re:Krita Fun Facts by arose · · Score: 1

      Gnu?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  2. finally by dwgranth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    after messing with the gimp for a bit (sounds dirty doesnt it).. i am relieved to know there is a simpler program for linux out there where i can do my image editing... not saying gimp is bad.. just a little hard to figure out at certain points

    1. Re:finally by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's gimp 2.x that you tried. Since 2.x the gimp has come a long way. I started messing with it, in minutes I was doing all sorts of nice affects.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    2. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EFFECTS. The word is EFFECTS, you fucking imbecile. And while the Gimp may certainly have "come a long way" since 1.0, its interface remains a morass of doubt and confusion.

  3. Re:Same ol' joke. by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I never bother with software if there isn't screenshots available (assuming it has a GUI). In the future do you think that will be movies instead of screenshots?

  4. Techn-Babelfish Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Developers aim at making Krita a user-friendly image manipulation program where users with no computer experience or slim experience with other light-duty image programs like Paint Shop Pro should feel right at home."
    • Translation: We don't know how Adobe does all that other cool stuff, so we're going to just deliver the basics that have been around for about a decade.
    1. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      There is already Gimp for the other stuff.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is standard compliant... in Japan !

      Um... it *so* doesn't validate. It's full of entities because they've not escaped ampersands correctly, uses various deprecated attributes and doesn't appear to offer a correct encoding string.

    3. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about slashdot.jp?

    4. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better Translation: Most users (myself included) think that Adobe's programs have terrible interfaces and are unnecessarily difficult to use for the average person.

    5. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Well of course! You don't run before you learn to walk. You don't build the roof before you lay the foundation. While the basics have been around for over a decade, users still demand them. They're not going to accept an automobile that won't drive, no matter how advanced the emission control system is.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well... This particular announcement didn't come from me, Krita's maintainer. I was rather surprised to read that this is what I want to do. I thought I was working on a rock-solid paint app that provides enough flexibility to extend with natural media tools, a bit like Corel Painter (not photopainter, the art app), but done right.

      Boudewijn Rempt

    7. Re:Techn-Babelfish Translation by byolinux · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm talking about.

  5. I have used by dfiguero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Paint Shop Pro in the past because it was a good and easy program compared to Photoshop and have used Gimp but find it to be a bit more complicated than PSP. Still Gimp is an excellent choice for mst image manipulation operations. I just hope Krita brings the ease of use and intuitive part of PSP to Linux.

    --
    My penguin ate my sig
  6. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems to be an application linux has been missing. While gimp is great imho it's simply overkill for most users and though I don't think gimp's interface is nearly as terrible as a lot of people want us to believe it is simply unfamiliar for someone who has only experience with paint shop pro for example. /me is looking forward to krita being released.

  7. Paint Shop Pro basic? by darkwhite · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Paint Shop Pro's functionality has been anything but basic for the past three releases. In fact, in some areas (like vector layers) it's been far superior to Photoshop for a long time.

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    1. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 1

      Yes, after watching my brother get completely confused with basic stuff such as the concept of multiple types of pasting in PSP I really don't think you could describe it as something a computer-illiterate person could pick up and use.

    2. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by willy134 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think Paint Shop pro is called basic because of it's basic pricing. Heck, it can't be good if it costs less than a new car ;)
      I have used PSP since version 5 and I have also played with photoshop. I think psp is very competitive in features people use.

      I especially like the new scripting functionality. You can automate a lot of common fixes/thumbnailing...

      --
      Can you ping me now?... Good!
    3. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      The other issue is the name is very close to some of the crappiest software you can find known as Print Shop Pro. Back when I used windows, I prefered Paint Shop Pro over Photoshop. My Mac buddy insisted I was using amatuer software since obviously on a Mac he used Photoshop. After explaining the huge difference between Paint Shop Pro and and Print Shop Pro, I got him to atleast believe Paint Shop Pro was just a step below Photoshop. Then once you compare price/features/performance (smaller memory footprint) Paint Shop Pro is actually better. He didn't buy that of course.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    4. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      I agree with parent.

      I have been using PSP professionally in both web graphics design and photographic work for years. The last few releases have had both macro language capabilities at the top end and customizable filters at the pixel by pixel bottom end. I haven't done much with PSP's vector graphics, but I understand that it, too, is solidly done. There is no way that PSP can be called "basic". These are amazing features for a package that can also be used by a graphics neophyte.

      Krista will have to provide similar features to be competitive with PSP. I'll try to read up on Krista after the slashdot tsunami-- maybe these features are there already?

      To my mind, the best thing that could happen would be for Jasc to wake up and produce a Linux version of PSP. PSP is the only remaining Windows app that I have to have. (Then if Canon and Minolta would come out with Linux drivers for their printers and cameras, I could be done with Windows for good.)

    5. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by Scaba · · Score: 1

      My Canon A40 works just fine in Linux, using Digikam (via gphoto2). A large number of Canon and Minota cameras are supported under Linux. Also, many Canon and Minolta printers are supported.

      I agree about a native PSP for Linux - that would rock - but have you tried it with Wine?

    6. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      I would agree. PSP can do some amazing things. Even though this may get me modded into oblivion - I think it's functionality is at least as good as GIMP, and the interface is more intuitive.

      If Jasc would come out with a linux version, it would probably be the first commercial product for linux I would buy.

    7. Re:Paint Shop Pro basic? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      many Canon and Minolta printers are supported.

      I spent a fair bit of time trying to find a workable linux driver for a Canon i560 printer a few months ago. There isn't one. Since then, I've upgraded to the Canon i9900, which does awesome large format photographic prints, but AFAIK there is no linux driver for this one either.

      I think it would be easy to get most of the Canon office printers to work under linux, but their newer line of photographic printers is another story.

      OTOH, you are right about the Minolta cameras and I was wrong to suggest that there is a problem with linux support for these. Minolta has been complying with the USB storage device standard.

      I agree about a native PSP for Linux - that would rock - but have you tried it with Wine?

      I haven't. I would be very much interested in seeing any reviews of PSP v8.x running under Wine...

  8. Looks Interesting by polyp2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It looks like this project has been going for some time and potentially very interesting. I am primarily a KDE user although I run GIMP under KDE and have done for several years. I've learned enough of GIMP to be fairly competent with it. I kinda like it now I've learned how to use it. Although I've always hoped for a "Kimp" using the QT toolkit although with the exact same functionality.

    I might give this thing a try but as of yet I'm not about to unlearn my Gimp!

    Nick...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Looks Interesting by Illissius · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try the GTK-Qt Theme Engine; with it, widgets in the GIMP (and GTK apps in general) look exactly the same as widgets in any other Qt app ;).

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    2. Re:Looks Interesting by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      I havent tried this yet; but does it integrate menu's also (I have KDE set up like an Amiga or Mac (Where the applications menu's appear accross the top bar of the screen.

      Nick.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    3. Re:Looks Interesting by Illissius · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt it. All this does is make GTK widgets look like Qt widgets; as I understand it, it draws GTK things by first getting Qt to draw the same thing offscreen, and then copying it to where the GTK thing is. Works damn well, though.

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
  9. Huh? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 5, Funny
    Developers aim at making Krita a user-friendly image manipulation program where users with no computer experience or slim experience...

    Are these people running Linux?

    1. Re:Huh? by telstar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Developers aim at making Krita a user-friendly image manipulation program where users with no computer experience or slim experience...

      Are these people running Linux?"

      • Which came first ... the chicken or the egg?

    2. Re:Huh? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly...very well said. If only it were a different way, but you know your [insert computer-illiterate family member] isn't going to be running this.

    3. Re:Huh? by addaon · · Score: 1

      the omelette.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    4. Re:Huh? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Which came first ... the chicken or the egg?
      A good question, but getting people like my kids to want to use Linux means they have to be able to do what they want and need to do. OpenOffice is solving lots of this, so is gaim and FireFox. Can you imagine trying to teach a 12 year old to use GIMP? I showed my kids ms paint when they were less than 10 and they got it, this would not be true of the GIMP. Any application that requires a whole website as a tutorial is not going to attract the casual users.
      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Archaeopteryx.

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Which came first ... the chicken or the egg?

      The egg.^ Next question?

      ^. (Chickens weren't the first creatures to hatch from a shell.)

    7. Re:Huh? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Can you Imagen giving a kid TRS-DOS and a BASIC Interpreter? how about even just MS-DOS? I learned a lot when I was 10-12 working on these same environments. What makes GIMP so much more difficult. For the most part the GIMP is a fairly simple application that I learned to use in less than an hour. Previous experience was watching someone use Paint shop pro for a few minutes to edit a picture with some cool effects.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least one KDE developer already thought about it:

      http://www.pycs.net/lateral/stories/7.html

    9. Re:Huh? by rd_syringe · · Score: 0

      Well, before you're going to get users with no computer experience running Linux, you need to fix all the other things with Linux. Krita isn't going to convert anybody.

    10. Re:Huh? by Deagol · · Score: 1
      No shit. When did people get so lazy? (I was about to use "dumb" instead of lazy, but I don't think that would be accurate.)

      15 years ago, the average computer user was comfortable with the command line (DOS) and the hot word processor was Word Perfect 5.1.

      Nowadays, people bitch and moan when one mentions the command promp or having to learn a new desktop or word processor GUI. Oh, the horror!

      I just don't buy the ease-of-use argument in most cases.

    11. Re:Huh? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1
      GIMP is a fairly simple application
      Stunned silence
      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    12. Re:Huh? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      15 years ago or more, the only people using computers were generally more technically inclined than the average and very motivated. Or they didn't accomplish very much!

      That's the point.

      If you want high levels of adoption in the 21st century you have to aim a little lower.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Developers" didn't write this announcement... This particular Krita developer has been running Linux since 1994.

      Boudewijn Rempt, Krita maintainer

    14. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. It sounds just like the security issues that will get better with the *next* OS version of a popular OS people use. But after 7 years of hearing the same thing, it doesn't seem to improve. I guess everyone has their vaporware.

    15. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Which came first ... the chicken or the egg?"

      In the beginning was GNU, and GNU was at MIT... GNU came to linux, but linux did not recognise it.

    16. Re:Huh? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Most people seem to have trouble understaning ANYTHING which they don't get paid for. At least, that's my experience. For example: I'm 14, one of my computers runs linux (RH8). I spend a weekend or two learning the basic stuff, and when I'm finished, and go to have lunch, I leave it at the console, because that's what I've been working on. My parents, however, only understand how to use programs in X. I say to press Alt+F7, and that goes back into X. I have to say this again EVERY TIME I leave the computer at the CLI. People don't learn.

    17. Re:Huh? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Don't underestimate your kids - they are smarter than you.

      By 10 I was coding spectrum basic, and by 12 had a qualification from college in C, advanced C and advanced C++.

      Jeeez

  10. Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    here.

  11. Coral link by g-to-the-o-to-the-g · · Score: 4, Informative

    I managed to coralize the first video just before the server went bye-bye: here

  12. Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Looking at that video this app looks very similar to photoshop! this would be a great app to get people to move from windows to linux, and leave photoshop behind... now we just need the ever important CMYK support and some poweruser features, and we'll finally have a photoshop killer, maybe?

    I know the gimp is too different for many people to replace photoshop, but maybe this will do it. Well, if it can't replace photoshop, at least it will take the place of paintshop pro. Very nice job!

    1. Re:Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you'd read the Faq and feature list, you'd notice there is already support for CYMK(A) through LittleCMS.

    2. Re:Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I must fess up that our CMYK module is so buggy as to be unusable in this release. But the will is there, and there's nothing in Krita's core that's 8-bit rgba dependent.

      Boudewijn Rempt, Krita maintainer

  13. full announcement: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Re:Same ol' joke. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    Most software that needs a movie to show off the capabilities use movies. Games in particular.

    Palm software uses double size animated gifs. I've always thought that was handy.

    --
    Evan "height='320' width='320', double on screen"

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  16. 5.5MB Video? by alta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why do people bother posting stuff like this? Of course the first thing that's going to happen, is everyone clicks on the video. A few billion hits to their server, and bam, no more server.

    There's no way anyone can keep a 5.5MB video going against this type of traffic. Posters just need to expect that and don't inlcude links to movies. Just let the users find it and the site may have a chance.

    It should read "There will be a 5.5MB video available sometime after this story falls off the front page of /."

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:5.5MB Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use coral.

    2. Re:5.5MB Video? by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      100+ comments in the article and the videos loaded for me just fine.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    3. Re:5.5MB Video? by fsterman · · Score: 1

      Why can't Slashdot take some initiative and do a bittorrent of the videos? I mean even if they didn't use their own server there are plenty of free seeders out there! It would take a little extra time but would save these projects money and us exasperation. And the Corral link is already down!

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  17. Paint Shop Pro by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "light-duty image programs like Paint Shop Pro"... What the hell are they talking about!? PSP can do everything Photoshop can! I think it's a far superior program b/c of it's ease of use. I do tons of graphics and I never touch that Adobe filth... Thank God that someone is trying to make a better art program for Linux, Gimp tries to be Photoshop way too much, so I have to boot into Windows when I want to do graphics....

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    1. Re:Paint Shop Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gimp tries to be Photoshop way too much"

      Wow, usually people complain that Gimp isn't nearly enough like Photoshop and therefor unusable. Mind if I quote you next time I read such a post?

    2. Re:Paint Shop Pro by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Thank god that there still are people like you who think psp is enogh for their needs. It's called "competitive advantage", knowing how to fully understand and work with Photoshop. Even if you only talk about the low-level optimizations that the Adobe team does for some operations (for example, it has MMX optimizations since version 4) - this makes Photoshop one of the fastest editors. What about layer styles (no-one else have those), layer sets, a powerfull brush engine, tons of freely available training oportunities on the net and so many other advantages that photoshop has?

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    3. Re:Paint Shop Pro by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0

      Go ahead... I can't stand how adobe tries to be the microsoft of 2d graphics.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    4. Re:Paint Shop Pro by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0

      That was supposed to be funny, right?

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    5. Re:Paint Shop Pro by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely. The only thing Photoshop is better at IMHO is image compression. Photoshop's "save for web" is simply beautiful. PSP wins every other battle though. My favorite PSP feature is the scroll wheel zooming.

      Take a large image, something huge, say 3200x2400. It will open zoomed at a faction of its actual size. But much of the time, you're not going to want it that small. In PSP, just place the mouse cursor in the the direction you want to go to and zoom in and out via the scroll wheel. Because the zooming process also has the side effect of changing the center focus of the image to wherever your mouse cursor is, you can navigate the entire image without ever clicking. It is very speedy, elegant, and natural.

      To do this in other image editing programs, you have to mess with moving scrollbars around, which is ridiculously clumsy compared to PSP's elegant solution.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    6. Re:Paint Shop Pro by apdt · · Score: 1

      To do this in other image editing programs, you have to mess with moving scrollbars around, which is ridiculously clumsy compared to PSP's elegant solution.

      Or how about Photoshop's 'Hold down spacebar, click and drag to move the viewport'. I think most of the people who find Photoshop unwieldy haven't discovered the keyboard shortcuts (z selects the zoom tool for example (and Why oh Why isn't there a keyboard shortcut for the zoom tool in Gimp)). Once you start to use them you'll find the workflow very efficient. This is my main gripe with the Gimp, I have to be constantly moving out of the image window to find tools. Add to that the image information window that will disappear every time you close an image.</rant>

      --
      I lay awake last night wondering where the sun had gone, then it dawned on me.
    7. Re:Paint Shop Pro by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0

      In PSP all you have to do is click in the scroll wheel (ie...mouse button 3) and hold it and you can pan freely.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    8. Re:Paint Shop Pro by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Nope, there's a reason why photoshop is the king of 2d compositing apps. I have a lot of "unresolved issues" with it, I wish it would evolve faster, but really, it offers the biggest set of features of all 2d compositing apps.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    9. Re:Paint Shop Pro by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0

      oops...wrong program. I was thinking of 3Ds Max...too bad it's not in there...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  18. Shortcuts please by .+visplek+. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a shortcut junkie I really hope it uses some similar shortcuts as Photoshop or Paintshop Pro by default. This will make the switch much easier and make it more productive.

    --
    - Save a tree, eat more woodpeckers
    1. Re:Shortcuts please by danimo · · Score: 1

      Every action in KDE can be assinged a shortcut. If there isn't one by default or you dislike the default, simply change it to use your favourite shortcut.

  19. Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographers by egghat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IMHO the open source world needs a simple piece of software that does what every digital photographer needs:

    * Eliminate red eyes
    * Lighten, darken picture (or areas of the picture)
    * change contrast
    * sharpen contrast of picture
    * cut picture frames
    * import pictures from camera
    * archive pictures
    * send pictures to online printer

    Every piece is there. But not in one package and not user friendly.

    When you read about GIMP, many people think it's not as good as Photoshop, cause it does no colour separation. But GIMP is featurewise more than enough for millions of digital photographers. But sadly not usable for Joe Sixpack.

    IMHO open source could attract much more new users by making specialized solutions, that are simple to use, than by making the featurewise ultimate solution. But of course every developer is free to do what he wants to do ...

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  20. I always liked... by starseeker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Koffice, although its import/export filters historically have left something to be desired. Unlike OpenOffice, you just get a "clean" feel when you start it up. Not super bloated, and the default layout doesn't waste lots of screen space with wide margins around the image of the paper (I know that's a stupid nitpick, but it's been driving me nuts about OpenOffice.org)

    Now the KDE integration efforts for OO have made it quite a bit nicer to look at under KDE, for which I am grateful. But I still have to say I hope KOffice becomes a front runner for Linux office suites. If everybody uses the OO XML document standard that's in the works they can all compete on an equal footing, and Koffice documents could be read by OO on Windows. Koffice is a nice piece of work, but (partially due to their KDE only status) they have had a hard time getting the critical mass of developers needed to do what they're trying to do. Without the power of KDE+QT they wouldn't be anywhere NEAR where they are now, as far as I can tell.

    I wish Apple or someone would decide to use the KOffice setup (yeah that would be a lot of work, but still...) and give KOffice enough full time developers to get all the annoying little features stuffed in. Feature parity with OpenOffice.org is a must, and with MSOffice would be ideal. People are used to those features, and in a game like Office software that's all that matters.

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    1. Re:I always liked... by tyrione · · Score: 2, Informative

      The day Apple uses Qt for an Office setup will be the day OS X is dead.

      Either people are dense or just too damn lazy to learn Cocoa/Objective-C or they just don't understand the direction Apple intends for its Operating System and Applications--100% Cocoa.

      It's taken too damn long and like myself many former NeXT/Apple employees got tired of waiting for this transition but it is beginning to be exactly what Steve assured us during the merger between NeXT and Apple.

      Apple didn't develop Xcode so folks could have a really cool C++ IDE. They developed it so that people could easily use several existing languages available in Cocoa but discover that the most useful language is ObjC.

    2. Re:I always liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apple already has wrappers for at least some QT functions. The Safari browser is based on a khtml core.

    3. Re:I always liked... by tyrione · · Score: 1

      It's called WebCore.
      http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/webcore /index.html

      And yes they are ObjC++ wrappers around KHTML/KJS including their own fixes to KHTML/KJS that fits within their model.

      KDE folks then reintegrate as much of these changes as they can within their model.

      This leveraging of KHTML/KJS made sense to Apple by joining two areas of technology well-developed, open and not nearly as big as Gecko. Expect when WebCore matures that it will have many portions of its code that have nothing to do with KHTML/KJS. Dave Hyatt has said as much.

    4. Re:I always liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The showstopper that has always stopped me from using Koffice, or Abiword, or anything else other than (the bloated mess that is) Openoffice - the ridiculous lack of column support in anything else.
      Only Openoffice seems to be able to have per-paragraph columns, unless you feel like messing around manually with KWord's frames. Is this feature so difficult to implement?

  21. gotta love that lens flare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love the basics plus the lens flare feature

  22. Better Translation by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the 60% of people that just want to view their picture, resize it, and do some various simple edits... he's a program for you.

    Seriously, whilst Adobe is an excellent program for high-end image editing, it's not the be-all-end-all. For many users, Adobe is very much overkill.

    While I do use the functionality of strong programs such as PhotoShop every now and then, I've found the PSP interface quite convenient for much of what I use. At this point I'm stuck between PSP and GIMP, with GIMP having been my only choice for 'nix.

    Based on the comparison to PSP though, I'll probably check out Krita (wish there were screenshots). Sometimes you don't want to do a lot of cool "stuff," in fact most of the time I just want to resize my image and fiddle with the colour depth to make thumbnails for my webpage...

    1. Re:Better Translation by EachLennyAPenny · · Score: 1

      Seriously, whilst Adobe is an excellent program for high-end image editing, it's not the be-all-end-all. or many users, Adobe is very much overkill.

      Yeah, dude. Microsoft too is an excellent program for low-end disk operating, it's not the be-all-end-all. or many users, Microsoft is very much overkill.

    2. Re:Better Translation by perseguidor · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you don't want to do a lot of cool "stuff," in fact most of the time I just want to resize my image and fiddle with the colour depth to make thumbnails for my webpage...


      I'm not questioning your future probable choice of Krita, but for resizing, adjusting color en masse and other things related, perhaps a script that made good use of ImageMagick could do the trick. Just a suggestion.
      --
      O make me a mask
    3. Re: Better Translation by 16384 · · Score: 1

      I like PSP. That's why I run PSP 4.12 under wine :)

    4. Re:Better Translation by phorm · · Score: 1

      Actually, the end result will be a Perl-based gallery system, with images being uploadable and resized by imagemagick upon upload, and/or when viewed.

      At the moment though, not enough time for the scripts so I'll settle for a simple graphics program. And of course, average Joe would probably prefer the simple program

      (don't suppose you have any perl image sizing scripts to make my work faster?)

    5. Re:Better Translation by perseguidor · · Score: 1

      You're right, and I wasn't dismissing Krite as trivial or not adequate in a range of settings.

      And I don't, as I'm ignorant of perl : )
      Perhaps something in cpan?

      Have fun with that,

      perseguidor.

      --
      O make me a mask
  23. Version "pre-development" by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Pre-development", do you mean this is before any code is written? Were those screenshots drawn in crayon? If you're releasing code for public consumption it's no longer pre-development. Call it alpha/beta whatever, but it's time to stop hedging bets and call everything "pre-pre-pre-release".

    If part of the greatness of the open source model is people using code early and often and giving you feedback, then punting all issues back saying "we're not going to support you, this is pre-pre-pre-release" just goes against that model.

  24. Seed by Daemonik+CyCow · · Score: 0

    Did anyone grab this who would be willing to seed it out to others? Seems to need the bandwidth more @ spread spectrum. Would love to see this development though.

  25. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by H0p313ss · · Score: 1
    GIMP is featurewise more than enough for millions of digital photographers. But sadly not usable for Joe Sixpack
    See my other comment.
    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  26. Kai's Photo Soap by nuxx · · Score: 5, Informative

    If they want to make it easy, they are going to need to do something like what was done in Kai's PhotoSoap. This is the *only* image editing app (besides iPhoto) that I've seen computer novices be able to figure out. The tools were simple, made sense, and the UI was great. And it worked well, too.

  27. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Luckily, Digikam performs all of these functions except for the last one. Try it! You might like it:

    http://digikam.sf.net

  28. does'nt really compare to Openoffice... by xot · · Score: 1

    KOffice being good and all, I still find OpenOffice better to use than KOffice.The features that openofice gives are excellent.
    For a windows migrator(is that a word?) like me I found OpenOffice the perfect office suite.Maybe its got to do with me like Gnome. :-P

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
    1. Re:does'nt really compare to Openoffice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Maybe its got to do with me like Gnome. :-P

      ???
      OpenOffice and Gnome have nothing in common...

  29. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    Google's PICASA does pretty much all you mentionned. Go give it a try, It's free and it's very good.

  30. Re:Why by hfolkers · · Score: 1

    excuse me, that's not what I want :( But I tried to explain KDE is such a big 'thing' but also has some good points. For a faster computer (+800Mhz) it's not a problem, but slower computers become realy slow with KDE (in my opinion).

  31. the movies by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    those movies are great quality. you can see whats going on perfectly. anyone know how they did the screencapture? who do i talk to to ask how those movies were made for krita?

    kudos to the software writers. wow. simple and nice.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

    1. Re:the movies by bkor · · Score: 1

      Probably xvidcap

  32. The Ugly Duality by GroundBounce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the web page regarding "Why another paint program":

    "This program will integrate with KDE better than GIMP does."

    Great. Half of my applications integrate with KDE, and half integrate GNOME. (Actually, a few integrate with nothing).

    I've had to explain this to my Windows-using friends who I am trying to convince to use Linux, and not surprisingly they answer "Well, why not just use Windows, where everything integrates with everything else?". They don't buy the idealistic "more choice" argument when more choice means less functionality.

    1. Re:The Ugly Duality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then make an effort to only use one DE. It's not hard. The only GTK application I currently use is The Gimp (I used to use Firefox as well, but found that moving to Konqueror wasn't bad at all).

      Most KDE apps have Gnome analogues, and vice versa, and most non-integrating apps have integrating analogues. They might not do everything the exact same way as each other, and some might have features that the others don't. But by and large, anything you can do in one you can do in the other.

      Further, you can get similar themes for both Qt and GTK so that they at least look integrated with each other.

      If you don't get the functionality you need from integrated programs on one DE or another, file bugs and wishes against those applications so that they eventually do.

      Also, how exactly do Windows apps integrate with one another. Many have the same widgets, but many don't. Many store settings in many different places. It's certainly not anywhere near KDE where the text editor part is starting to be used across many applications, and you can swap it out for other text editor.

      Basically, your argument comes down to, "I choose to use applications from several different DEs, so they don't integrate." It's very possible to have nearly all your applications integrated with one another, which is no less than Windows can claim.

    2. Re:The Ugly Duality by curne · · Score: 1

      Half of my applications integrate with KDE, and half integrate GNOME. (Actually, a few integrate with nothing).

      I pray every night that FreeDesktop will eventually save us from Multi-DE hell. Hopefully my prayers have been heard.

      --
      All interpreted languages are abstractions over Lisp
    3. Re:The Ugly Duality by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean windows where Adobe have their own interface, every media player has a different interface, and Microsoft invent a new interface with each release of MS Office?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    4. Re:The Ugly Duality by GroundBounce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Most KDE apps have Gnome analogues, and vice versa"

      This is part of the problem. First of all, it's a waste of developer resources. True, most open source projects begin because the lead developer want's to "scratch an itch", but in many cases, with the KDE people insisting that there be a "K" version of everything and the GNOME people insisting that there be a "G" version of everything, the only "itch" was that the existing project wasn't using Qt or GTK, which ever the case may be.

      The second problem is that although there are both "K" and "G" versions of most types of programs, it is often the case that one or the other is much more mature. You yourself use GIMP even though you are otherwise a KDE fan. In my case, I have found that even more of a mix is right for me. For example, I use GIMP, Evolution, and InkScape (GTK+), and Scribus, Quanta, and a few other smaller KDE applications (Qt), as well as Mozilla and Firefox, which use their own interface. If you tell a windows or Mac user that if they want interoperability, then they can only choose from half of the available apps (the ones that match their main DE), they will think you are crazy, and in a way they are correct. I would like to choose the *best* applications (according to my own preferences) *and* have full interoperability (see below).

      The problem is not so much the different toolkits, rather it's the different standards for things like drag and drop, clipboard formats, and compound documents. Many times, you can't even do things as simple as drag a file from your file manager window to the applications if one is GNOME based and the other is KDE based.

      In Windows, even though different applications use different toolkits and have different user interfaces (someone mentioned Adobe), certain interactions are always guaranteed. I can always drag a file from the explorer to an application, regardless of which development environment was used to build the application. If the developer chose to support drag-and-drop, it will work with any other Windows app that supports drag-and-drop.

      This kind of consistency is important to many end users, and Linux currently lacks it. Hopefully, freedesktop.org will eventually have some success in standardizing some of these interoperability functions between the various DE's. This would be the best of both worlds - pick a DE that you like because of it's features, and still have basic interoperability between the DE and all the available applications, regardless of whigh DE it was "written to".

    5. Re:The Ugly Duality by cortana · · Score: 1

      Except for every release of Microsoft Office since Office 97. And Visual Studio.NET and above. And of course .NET applications, which use the classic UI by default. And don't forget Media Player! Not to mention every third party DVD player I've seen on the platform. Oh, and Winamp.

      I won't even go in to detail about how every single App on Windows seems to invent its own standard dialog boxes.

      At the end of the day, if you want to use KDE, but find yourself running Gnome apps, then it sounds like you have a problem with KDE. The same is true if you are in the opposite situation.

  33. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by egghat · · Score: 1

    Yepp, know it. But sadly not Open Source and not for Linux.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  34. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by egghat · · Score: 1

    Thanks. Looks like a very good match for my (and a lot of others) needs.

    I'll definitly check it out!

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  35. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...in CVS. 0.7.0 isn't out yet. Those who follow your links are bound to be disappointed if they don't know this.

  36. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The program you linked to, only runs on obsolete platforms.

  37. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by darrylo · · Score: 1
    But GIMP is featurewise more than enough for millions of digital photographers.

    Only if they don't care about getting the best possible results. The gimp is of minimal use for advanced amateur photographers (IMO), as it only supports 8-bit color depth. Until gimp gets support for 16-bit (or greater) color depth, it is, sadly, not good enough. At the moment, anyone wanting to do serious photographic processing on linux, has to use something like Cinepaint.

    (For the unwashed, uninformed hordes: while 8-bits (24bpp) is fine for printing on inkjets, you NEED 16-bits (48bpp) or more to do decent image processing, such as bringing out detail in shadows. Of course, this assumes that you're using one of the camera output formats that use more than 8bits per color channel.)

  38. Buy a Mac by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    if you REALLY want "everything to integrate with everything else".
    True story: A friend retired his powerbook, bought a new one. He linked them via Firewire, and _dragged his home folder from 1 to the other_. That's it, it just magically copied all his settings, desktop setup, applications, EVERYTHING.
    Ever try to back up a Windows box? Look at Mozilla, some stuff in C:\Docuements and Settings\Foo\Application Data\Mozilla, others in C:\WINDOWS\mozilla.org, some other stuff, well, who knows where. MS apps are worse.
    Not trying to troll, I have XP and like it, but heck, if you want an "appliance", i.e. something that just works with no fuss or futzing, then get a new Mac.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Buy a Mac by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Funny, I did the same thing with my last Intel based PC running FreeBSD. Drag over home directory from NFS. Done!

      Of course not all of the application got copied over, nor did system-wide configurations. But it was the same with your Mac if you would be honest. Not every Mac app is installed to a specific user's desktop, and not every Mac configuration is user specific.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:Buy a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Buy a Mac"

      He probably isn't a flaming homosexual.

  39. Paint Shop Pro vs Photoshop Elements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you recommend Paint Shop Pro 9 vs Photoshop Elements 3.0? I can't decide which to get.

    1. Re:Paint Shop Pro vs Photoshop Elements by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      IMHO it really depends on what you're wanting to do. I still use paintshop from time to time to correct red-eye (i prefer the PSP's tool to PS's) and to make basic graphics, and quick edits (PSP loads in half the time of PS)

      BUT, PS Elements and full fledged Photoshop own PSPS in terms of photo editing and manipulating

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  40. Re:Why by teprrr · · Score: 1

    why should it be part of KOffice, I hope it's possible to install it alone on a system without KOffice or even KDE.
    Maybe that's because KOffice apps depend on KOffice and KDE libraries? And for sure you can install it without KOffice or without KDE, you just need the libs to make it work.

  41. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have made this suggestion other places but I have always wondered why don't applications make UI profiles or modes that scale the options as what would be needed for a particular task.

    With a word processor as an example you could fit in the same application 3 main profiles:

    basic pure text notepad like interface
    basic formating wordpad like interface
    advanced formating word/openoffice writer like interface
    page layout advanced desktop publishing like interface.

    In each mode you would have only the options available that make sense for that mode. You would always be able to switch between modes and promote/demote to/from other modes as is possible.

    The gimp could be a little different. Instead of a graduated level of features you could have UI profiles for different types of tasks:

    1. Digital photo cleanup, just has basic features to eliminate red eye, clean up blur/sharpen resize brighten darken, crop etc... easy to get to on the tool bar.

    2. Digital manipulation, similar to above but put the photo based features in the back ground and have script-fu stuff in the tool bars and easy to get to.

    3. Media creation, similar to what the gimp has now.

    4. Others that people can come up with.

    Gnome has gone on a spree of getting rid of un-needed features in the UI but I think they should have a tiered approach to the UI.

    Just my idea. go and whip it up real quick :)

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  42. My mother is by metamatic · · Score: 1

    My mother runs Linux, because Windows kept getting destroyed by worms and viruses. She could definitely use a really simple image viewer and editor.

    In fact, what I'd *really* like is a simple drag-drop application that prepares digital camera images to make them suitable for e-mailing. It would resize them to be no bigger than (say) 600 pixels in any dimension, apply a little sharpening, and save the result in the same directory as the original image, in JPEG format, with a "-email.jpg" file suffix.

    Explaining unsharp masks, DPI and image sizes to my mother is just too difficult.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:My mother is by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Imagemagick?

      You could probably do something along those lines with a really simple shell script (heh), which could live on her desktop as a little icon.

      Drag the images on, and watch the new files magically appear...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:My mother is by crayiii · · Score: 1

      Try LPhoto, it does what you want.

    3. Re:My mother is by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's getting it to appear as a drag-drop icon that's the hard part.

      If someone could make a tool to turn Perl or shell scripts into drag-drop KDE applications, I could do the rest...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:My mother is by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's getting it to appear as a drag-drop icon that's the hard part.

      If someone could make a tool to turn Perl or shell scripts into drag-drop KDE applications, I could do the rest...


      You don't need any special tool in KDE. Just make an application shortcut and drop files onto it, they get passed as the first and only command line argument. One disadvantage (for me) is that if you drop multiple files, you get multiple instances launched instead of a single one with N arguments.

      --
      Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
  43. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You browse at +4! Wuss!

  44. Re:Same ol' joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard the phrase "Don't Judge a Book by it's cover!" I didn't think so, otherwise you might actually take a chance on software that works, but isn't pretty.

    It irks me to no end when I spend I beefload of time on a project, put it on sourforge, and then get a bunch of emails in my inb0xen that are all like: D00d, cool proggy, but the icons aren't high resolution. It don't jibe with my desktop man. I'll pay you as soon as I ya do that, okay.

    Yeah, why don't you over and use that pretty software then, jacko. Sure, it crashes every two minutes and is slow as a constipated mule, but it shore looks pretty.

    Give me a break. Software should work. Not look pretty.

  45. "other light-duty image programs like Paint Shop" by doktorstop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if the author has, by any chance, had the possibility to play around with PaintShopPro lately. To call it a "light-duty" is one of the biggest over-simplifications I have ever seen. Just have a look at its features, it almost beats Gimp and is as close to Photoshop as one can get (treating, of course, PhotoShop CS as a reference point!)

    --
    http://www.automatiq.se
  46. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by SendBot · · Score: 1

    Here Here! As much as I like advocating open source, I have a hard time setting people up with GIMP because it's not very friendly to average users. I'm much more inclined to suggest something like Google's picasa even though it lacks features such as text overlay and specific image resizing (sizes are preset, non-editable).

    I'm accustomed to photoshop and always find myself frustrated with trying to perform simple tasks in GIMP. Not to mention all the dialogs dogpiling on each other. Windows (the OS interface) is cluttered enough without all those damn subwindows!

  47. Krita doesn't even touch GIMP in capabilities by tyrione · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given: I use Debian Sid/KDE 3.3 daily

    Observations: Krita has years to go. GIMP is not difficult to use. What people are describing as difficult seems to be weighed on the amount of time one has to read up on the GIMP tutorials versus reading up on the Help for Krita.

    Note: Digikam is what you want if you just want to touch up your digital images recently shot from your personal camera.

    GIMP and Cinepaint are what you want to use if you want to utilize your digital images and turn them into a portfolio.

    Comparing Krita to GIMP and declaring Krita the easy-to-use alternative is really misleading people. That's like comparing Scribus 1.2 to LaTeX/Kile and declaring Scribus 1.2 the only choice for PDF documentation publishing. Any one can tell you that if you are doing large technical documentation (books, presentations, etc..) you want to leverage LaTeX. But then you might have to get off your butt and learn it. Scribus isn't a breeze to learn but nothing like that visual feedback mechanism of instant gratification to give one a sense it is more intuitive, powerful and thus easier to utilize.

    Both Scribus 1.2 and LaTeX are wonderful tools. I recommend learning both and leveraging them where they make sense.

    Scribus 1.2 is like a poor man's scaled down version of Create 11, by Stone Design that runs only on OS X (100% Pure Cocoa app).

    Stone Design Create
    http://www.stone.com/Create_Screenshot.html

    1. Re:Krita doesn't even touch GIMP in capabilities by Illissius · · Score: 1
      Comparing Krita to GIMP and declaring Krita the easy-to-use alternative is really misleading people.

      Indeed, when according to the Krita FAQ itself:
      Yet another Paint Program?

      ...different projects can work towards different design goals. The Gimp isn't designed for the creation of original art; it is an image manipulation application, not a paint application. Krita could become that free paint application that is still missing.

      What are Krita's Development Goals?

      Krita is primarily a painting program, although it has image processing capabilities. This means that Krita is intended for creative people who desire to paint and draw with computer software as they do with real-world tools in an art studio. If you are looking for a tool primarily to apply effects to existing images or photos, to catalog images, or to view images other software may be more suitable. Ease of use and power as a painting application will always have a higher priority in Krita's ongoing development.
      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    2. Re:Krita doesn't even touch GIMP in capabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Leverage"

      Please die.

  48. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by printman · · Score: 2, Informative

    My flPhoto application does all but the last (it does support local printing, of course), available at:

    http://www.easysw.com/~mike/flPhoto/
    --
    I print, therefore I am.
  49. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

    At the moment, anyone wanting to do serious photographic processing on linux, has to use something like Cinepaint.

    ... Which is a fork of the Gimp (albeit v1.x) to work with 16-bit (or greater) colour depth...

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  50. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cinepaint is a Gimp fork commonly used in the movie industry. It features 48-bit color depth and functionality for editing individual frames of video.

  51. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

    The program you linked to, only runs on obsolete platforms.

    Dang thing won't install on my Sinclar Spectrum - do I need the even older ZX-81 for it to run properly?

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  52. krita mmmm by comet69 · · Score: 1

    honestly, it looks hella cool to me..

    one thing that I like about it, is that its not GTK!!! jesus.. i just freakin hate the way gtk apps look, feel, and operate.. the dialouge is definitely not my cup of tea.. so this, is like a blessing..

    the layout in itself, seems much more presentable, easier, and modern..

    i'm looking forward to atleast giving it a shot when I get home..

    i'll still love GIMP for some of the more technical things its able to do.. but i do get tired of gtk apps randomly crashing from time to time.. don't know why.. don't know how.. but this definitely appeals and promotes itself to the people, much more than the gimp ever has..

    --
    - Hi I'm Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux, Lih-nix..
    1. Re:krita mmmm by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      i just freakin hate the way gtk apps look, feel, and operate.. the dialouge is definitely not my cup of tea.. so this, is like a blessing..

      gimp2 looks pretty good using the GTK-Qt theme.

      But I'll definitely try anything native Qt as long as it includes gimp's featureset...

  53. sweet! by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this and the QT/cocoa bindings will make it a good alternative to photshop on OSX.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  54. Re:Why by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Yes, but you don't need to use KDE to run Koffice AFAIK... Just Qt...

    Use something like Xfce or IceWM if you need something for slower, older computers.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  55. also... vector based? by comet69 · · Score: 1

    is anyone gonna develop a vector based art creation program like illustrator??

    get these damn pixels away from me..

    --
    - Hi I'm Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux, Lih-nix..
    1. Re:also... vector based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sure, there's Krita's sister application, Karbon. Not as actively developed, though, so could use some attention & patches.

      Boudewijn, Krita maintainer

    2. Re:also... vector based? by takev · · Score: 1

      Sodipodi

      http://www.sodipodi.com/

      Very nice. For the simple cad like drawings I like xfig.

    3. Re:also... vector based? by comet69 · · Score: 1

      hey thanks for the link.. that program looks pretty kick ass.. lookin forward to checkin it out.. i never cease to be amazed when it comes to some of the software these people develop..

      take care

      --
      - Hi I'm Linus Torvalds and I pronounce Linux, Lih-nix..
    4. Re:also... vector based? by tyrione · · Score: 2, Informative

      Inkscape. It's farther along than Sodipodi.

      http://www.inkscape.org

  56. Paint Sho Pro far from "light duty" by frkiii · · Score: 1

    I have been using Paint Shop Pro since 1996.

    It has many features which make it easy to use for just about any level of computer literacy.

    However, it also has many other features which, for its price, gives PhotoShop a run for its money.

    I have created web site graphics, published science fiction book cover artwork, CD label artwork, animation frames for manipulation using Java, etc.

    Paint Shop Pro, at one point, was promoted directly (or via a person endorsing it) as "everything you can do in PhotoShop for $99.00". In my personal experience, this is and has been true of Paint Shop Pro since I started using it (version 5.0).

    It may only be "light duty" in regards to its ease-of-use, it has plenty of "heavy duty" features, plug-ins, filters, etc. to keep many computer graphic artists, animators, etc. very very happy. Again, this is all in my humble opinion, but based on my direct experience with the Paint Shop Pro and PhotoShop.

  57. Re:Why by True+Grit · · Score: 1
    Way to get yourself modded down as a troll


    Agreed, but next time don't quote the troll in your response. You're doing what the troll wants you to do: transferring his stupidity from a modded down post to one that isn't modded down.

    Just an FYI. :)
  58. Re:Much needed IMHO: GIMP for digital photographer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE does something like this... Kwrite and Kate are two different interfaces to the same text editor.

  59. Real world tools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it is like Painter? Yeah... they better start adding tools that emulate real world, like in Painter... wait, there is no such thing in the FAQ's feature list, done or planned. And you can forget being simple then, Painter is no simple.

  60. don't you love open source... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...someone can fork your own brain, and you don't even know it until you read about it on slashdot!

  61. how long is... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...subscriber preview again? 15 minutes? Seems like they would have to bump that up some to give any interested folks a chance to make a torrent or get a coral link going. I mean, if folks pay for a page, they want to go read the articles primarily, not remake a website for someone else. And even then, who knows some folks at websites may be totally against anyone taking their stuff and cacheing it, even if they get slashdotted.

    But ya, it's a problem, what I do is make an executive decision if I want to chance the link or not, because I want to read the article. If it's a big site, like a commercial web page, I usually click on it because it's their lookout to have a server that can serve some decent number hits, if it's joe hobbiest personal site or obvious small and obscure site,based on what the URL looks like, I'll wait a day or at least a few hours.

  62. try kolourpaint by bhhenry · · Score: 1

    If you need a Linux program for "users with no computer experience or slim experience with other light-duty image programs," you may want to give KolourPaint a try. I'd say it falls somewhere in-between Krita and MS Paint on the difficulty scale.

    --
    signature not found
  63. Re:Why by puddpunk · · Score: 1

    You don't need to "Run" KDE to get Koffice to work. You just need the KDE Base libraries and the Qt libraries to get it going. You don't have to run it as your desktop environment.

    Cheers,
    Chris.

  64. iPhoto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A clone of Apple's iPhoto would be a nice start. Though iPhoto could certainly be better, it does a good job at managing and importing your images, and making gimmicky slideshows with cool transitions and music.

    iPhoto does do everything you mentioned, however.