Slashdot Mirror


System Recovery with Knoppix

An anonymous reader writes "This article shows how to access a non-booting Linux system with a Knoppix CD, get read-write permissions on configuration files, create and manage partitions and filesystems, and copy files to various storage media and over the network. You can use Knoppix for hardware and system configuration detection and for creating and managing partitions and filesystems. You can do it all from Knoppix's excellent graphical utilities, or from the command line."

270 comments

  1. Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if the Linux that you can't boot already is Knoppix? Can you swap this recovery CD with your regular Knoppix CD during the boot process?

    1. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those not in the know, "Knoppix is a GNU/Linux distribution that boots and runs completely from CD." (Source: www.knoppix.net).

      So it is kind of hard for a Knoppix installation to become corrupt; worst case scenario is you just burn new copy of the Knoppix CD. :-) The parent comment is in fact funny (and quite so!), rather than insightful as it's currently moderated. ;-)

    2. Re:Yes, but.... by MS_is_the_best · · Score: 1

      What would happen with the price of the Apple Macintosh computer if everyone followed your advice and there is only one closed standard left?

    3. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would go down. Economy of scale.

    4. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My advice? Sell your machine, and buy a Mac.


      But what if I just don't like Macs and I want to run Linux?

      This is a good utility to have.
    5. Re:Yes, but.... by the_shaitan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Umm... Knoppix can be installed on to the hard disk and many people actually do so because then they get a Debian-like OS on their hard-disk.

      Knoppix itself ships with a hard-disk install script. See this page for more info - http://www.knoppix.net/docs/index.php/HdInstallHow To

      Regards,
      The Shaitan

    6. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have four Knoppix hard drive installs around the house. Love it and have set it up for a half dozen former Windows uers.
      But although I do love Knoppix, DSL has come a long way with its on-line install program that lets you basically customize your distro from almost scratch. Why Knoppix still refuses to pack the Nano editor still escapes me. Emacs is way too overweight for little setup script editing on the command line.
      Just this weekend I replaced a dying notebook system that was dual booting SUSE and Win2K with DSL and all the problems went away.
      The downside with DSL is no info or man pages. You can get the man pages once you're on-line, but no info pages? That's kinda fucked up. How can you tell someone to RTFM when they stripped it out?

    7. Re:Yes, but.... by grolschie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would go down. Economy of scale.

      What BS. Ever heard of Microsoft? Ever hear of their prices going down due to economies of scale? If there was zero competition, would their price go down? I think not.

    8. Re:Yes, but.... by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      I guess this was meant to be funny and it is but it highlights a key point about software which is that software doesn't require economies of scale which is why FOSS is unstoppable. You can't out-produce open source to shut it down and drive it out of the market. This is a common tactic with conventional products that no longer applies to software because it scales so easily that scalability is not longer a significant factor.

    9. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    10. Re:Yes, but.... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      I bought a 386 with 8Mb RAM ten years ago or so for about 1500UKP (about 2700USD at the time). It was an ok machine. Nowadays I can buy a top-of-the-range workstation for much less than that. I can even buy a Powermac for less than 2700USD.

      What is your point?

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    11. Re:Yes, but.... by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 0
      It would go down. Economy of scale.
      Economies of scale apply to costs, not prices.
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    12. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people do, but this guy isn't one of them, if you bothered to read what the top post said.

    13. Re:Yes, but.... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      This isn't geared toward people who are new to linux unfortunately. The problem is, the people well introduced to linux are likley to be able to pull this off.

      Author should go over how to create a new partition using cfdisk (or the equivilent in KDE) before she goes on in how to create a filesystem using mkfs.ext2. Just in case the person has a 'new drive' or if their 'old drive' was NTFS.

      Other than that good article. In fact, recently a couple of weeks ago I used knoppix to copy backups because my distro went bad. I had to learn how to by myself and using google, because this article wasn't published yet.

      Hopefully this will help guide people who aren't as good at google get their system backed up so they can format and reinstall.

  2. So weird... by TheApocalypse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just two days ago I just had to use Knoppix to recover my system after a failed attempt to upgrade the kernel. Very good to have as a recovery tool.

    1. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Using knoppix is easier than using other tools that are all command base. It's even better when you can burn your files to CD.

      And juding by your logic, if you have to use a boot floppy to fix your system then you're probably the cause of the break in the first place.

    2. Re:So weird... by TheApocalypse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm still kind of a Linux newbie. I knew that I would mess up with installing the kernel, but it gives me the experience to learn from my mistakes.

    3. Re:So weird... by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And juding by your logic, if you have to use a boot floppy to fix your system then you're probably the cause of the break in the first place.

      No, if someone is using a floppy then they have the sense to use the tools appropriate for the job, and are not likely to head crying for the nearest GUI. It's people like that who are more likely to have broken a system in the first place than those who know what they're doing, which leads me to wonder; should they be using a computer at all?

      --
      RST
    4. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Does not compute. Why didn't you copy your new kernel as a different name in your /boot directory and add a new lilo.conf entry (if you are using lilo) and then run lilo? Even if you can't boot, most Linux installation cds allow command line boot parameters something like
      :boot /dev/hda2 linuxtest (linuxtest being /boot/linuxtest)
      On a side note, Linux install cds or apps like Knoppix are excellent tools if you are forced to administer a Windows server. It should be no suprise that a boot with the ntfs driver is vastly superior to the Windows Recovery Console. But suprisingly, the ntfs driver is robust enough that it can access hard drives that Windows will spit out saying a hardware error has occurred. Saved my ass twice already.
    5. Re:So weird... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Pretty much the same here. I asked for RedHat (it was 2002) to be installed when I purchased the new machine but, oops, Linux has to be installed before Windows. Vendor screwup.

      I've played around with the Knoppix CD but don't quite know what to do with Linux yet, it seems complicated.

      I guess I've been dumbified from too much Windows usage and it'd be great to get Linux working, but I feel it would be too time-consuming.

    6. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an amplifying note, most linux install kernels do not have vfat or ntfs drivers, so you will need to build one that does before you use it to recover a windows box.

    7. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I just did this tonight, but with an age old debian iso. XP overwrote my MBR, but all it took was a chroot so I could run lilo.

      It was the strangest thing. By all outward experiences XP was behaving properly but it wouldn't dhcp, or ping. Took a complete reinstall to fix. I wish there was a Winoppix to help me fix that, there just aren't the troubleshooting options there should be on windows. It could be my ignorance, but the cable guy was stumped too.

    8. Re:So weird... by typobox43 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But suprisingly, the ntfs driver is robust enough that it can access hard drives that Windows will spit out saying a hardware error has occurred. Saved my ass twice already. Amen to that. It's the only reason I have any data left off of a hard drive that failed a few months ago. While the data was copied at a disgustingly slow pace to my USB flash drive, it was preserved, even when Windows refused to even boot off of the drive.

    9. Re:So weird... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Why bother with using bloated tools that only get in the way when you can do the exact same thing with a boot floppy."

      GUI != bloat. Web browser != bloat, especially during system recovery.

      Come to think of it, why am I even wasting time spelling out the obvious reasons why Knoppix is an awesome recovery tool?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:So weird... by drsquare · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I heard about Knoppix about a month ago and decided to download it. I'll let you know if it's any good once I've got it all down over my 56k.

    11. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's been out for a couple of years, but hey, we'll all wait for your review.

    12. Re:So weird... by olderchurch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe off-topic, but I had the same problem yesterday. Got an error when trying to get a dhcp address. The trick was in reinstalling TCP/IP (at least for me). Firewall settings corrupted the stack , but don't know what precisely what I did to deserve this. To install the TCP/IP again, go to your interface properties and choose install and select add protocol. Use the have disk option and select \windows\inf dir. There should be a tcp/ip protocol there, which will allow you to reinstall it.

      Hope this helps next time.

      --
      Disclaimer: This opinion was created without the use of any facts
    13. Re:So weird... by Rallion · · Score: 1

      If you have to use something like knoppix to fix your system then you're probably the cause of the break in the first place.

      So if your system breaks, it's what, automagic?

    14. Re:So weird... by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a sort-of Winnopix available. It's called BartPE. It's a CD bootable version of WinXP that lets you add almost any software package. YOu can use it for data recovery, forensics or as a temp OS. YOu can find it here.

    15. Re:So weird... by Krunch · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I wish there was a Winoppix
      You might be interested in BartPE.
      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    16. Re:So weird... by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      That sucks. In Windows XP (at least) it is difficult to reinstall TCP/IP. In older versions of windows, it's easy enough to just remove the protocol, delete the affected files, and then install it again. Windows XP considers TCP/IP "core" to the OS and there is no good way to uninstall/reinstall it. I made that mistake once... and only once.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    17. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother with using bloated tools that only get in the way when you can do the exact same thing with a boot floppy.

      My notebook does not have a floppy drive. Thank you.

    18. Re:So weird... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I think you've hit upon one of the most interesting things about Knoppix: it's useful to Windows sysadmins. I work on a multi-platform network, and I've used this distro many times on both Windows and Linux machines. The NTFS driver works great, and recently helped me restore a DLL that a user had "accidentally deleted." Of course it's also a Samba client, so you can drag and drop their files from the damaged machine to the file server for safe keeping.

      It's all shown me how good a job Microsoft could do if they actually cared. Knoppix really is better than Microsoft's own recovery console, and makes me wonder why (a) Windows doesn't simply restore missing DLLs on its own when they turn up missing (copies are in the i386 folder, and sometimes other places, so what the heck?), and (b) why there isn't a bootable Windows CD for recovery (maybe because it would be the most pirated CD ever?).

      These experiences left me unsurprised when Google released a desktop search tool that renders Longhorn's WinFS obsolete ... two years before the release of Longhorn. Is Bill asleep at the wheel?

    19. Re:So weird... by mchawi · · Score: 1

      For Windows something called 'ERD Commander' is also very good. Also better than the Windows recovery console, allows you to change Windows passwords, etc.

      Basically like running Windows in safe mode, even if it can't boot from the hard drive. I would (and do) find this a lot more useful on a Windows server than Knoppix, because it gives me access to parts of the Windows subsystems that Knoppix wouldn't.

    20. Re:So weird... by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 1, Informative
      ... are not likely to head crying for the nearest GUI.
      Leaving aside the fact that machines without a floppy are hardly rare these days, knoppix will boot in text mode.
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    21. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Sometimes I wonder if the whole world has forgotten the meaning of efficiency in computing.
      I bet it remembers how to spell "Rebecca", though.
    22. Re:So weird... by irgu · · Score: 1

      On an amplifying note, most linux install kernels do not have vfat or ntfs drivers

      In my experience, all major distros include these drivers with the exception of RedHat/Fedora. Red Hat refers to non-existent patents.

    23. Re:So weird... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Pretty much the same here. I asked for RedHat (it was 2002) to be installed when I purchased the new machine but, oops, Linux has to be installed before Windows.
      Not strictly true. The Windows installer buggers up the boot manager (lilo or grub) somehow. But there are ways to restore it - I believe it can be done with knoppix, or sometimes just 'dummy' an upgrade with your linux distro disk. Or even (just to keep rebeka quiet) a boot floppy.

      Don't be put off by some of the linux blowhards who like newbie bashing - there are also some very helpful people out there. I set up my first linux box as a means, not an end in itself, but I learned a lot and it was fun too. Enjoy.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > why there isn't a bootable Windows CD for recovery (maybe because it would be the most pirated CD ever?).

      Your wish is granted :-), BartPE awaits you:

      http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/

      I've used this at work several times, and would NEVER consider the """Windows Recovery Console""" (ROTFLMAO) as a valid substitution for BartPE ever again.

    25. Re:So weird... by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      I just finished reinstalling SUSE Linux 9 on my hard-disk and Windows XP Home on my PC.

      If you install XP OEM edition, it will take up all harddisk space. First install SuSE Linux on 10+1GB partitition.

      Then install XP and ask it to take over remaining free space. This will wipe out boot sector GRUB and install XP.

      Reinstall SUSE Linux onto same location (as earlier). GRUB will be rewritten and you can dual-boot

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    26. Re:So weird... by toremini · · Score: 0

      I was also able to recover a Windows 2000 partition with Knoppix. I was able to mount the ntfs partition as read-only, and then transfer the data over ftp to one of my *nix boxes.

      Thank god for knoppix!
      It's a life saver.

    27. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do what you did when started using Windows, LEARN how to do things you now do with Windows. It will be fun and you surely have time for fun, Don't you?

    28. Re:So weird... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      Of course it's also a Samba client, so you can drag and drop their files from the damaged machine to the file server for safe keeping.

      It is a samba client _and_ a samba server. Talk about versatile! I had to do it this way in an environment with no windows servers running (novell shop).

      --
      music lover since 1969
    29. Re:So weird... by abirdman · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of a "veteran" newbie (have had Linux servers in the house for four or five years, since RH 5.x) who has never mastered it. I've fscked up my machines often (part of learning, I guess), and even gotten rooted in the past. So maybe I'm just naive, but when I tried to get FC2 to create a boot floppy for me, it said it was unable to do so because of the size of the kernel or something. I tried a couple of times, but no go for me. I didn't bother to pursue it. Since then the floppy drive on that server has been reycled.

      The way I look at it, with the number of machines out there without floppy drives, and the problem of non-bootable CD drives (remember that?) gone away, the idea of having a complete linux distro on a CD to use just for this purpose seems like an advance of sorts. The blank CD costs about the same as a blank floppy, and we get all those extra megabytes of goodness.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    30. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      when I tried to get FC2 to create a boot floppy for me, it said it was unable to do so because of the size of the kernel or something

      There should be a "bzImage" option somewhere. Find it and try selecting it - most modern kernels require this compression to fit on a floppy.

    31. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google's desktop search tool can't compete with what WinFS is supposed to be. WinFS adds arbitrary metadata and plain-language searching.

    32. Re:So weird... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Poor Microsoft; they're forced to make subpar tools of all kinds - recovery, defrag, etc, because if the "world's greatest programmers" were to make kickass tools, they could be sued by third-party software vendors, no doubt. My heart bleeds for them - I've spent the last several days helping diehard Windows users deal with XP problems so don't expect me to be charitable towards the Gates Gang until I catch up with the work I was supposed to be doing instead of playing Windows Fix-it.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    33. Re:So weird... by weapon · · Score: 0

      I actualy downloaded it over dialup, about 3 weeks downloading all night, but then a couple of months later my cd stoped working

      Dave

    34. Re:So weird... by mcsuper5 · · Score: 1

      I tried that, and caved and ordered a copy after they updated the image when I was in the middle of downloading:)

    35. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix is great for this purpose. Every time a windoze box goes dumb, you pop the disk in, mount a network share, and move everything you need off prior to re-installation.

    36. Re:So weird... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Thanks. My next computer will definitely have a version of Linux on it. I forget if I mentioned in my original message that I messed around with Knoppix and liked what I saw.

    37. Re:So weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll add also that knoppix is darn good at probing your hardware. For example, I've used it before to find the correct X86 settings, save them to a scratch partition or removable storage, then copy them over after you've installed the 'main' distro (back them all up, of course). Be careful with X86 though, you could fry your monitor!

  3. New Kid on the block? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Knoppix, the hot new kid on the block

    New? Wow, I'm glad I don't live in that neighborhood.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to explain?

  6. So do other distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't most distributions provide a boot disk to give you the kind of access you need?

    1. Re:So do other distros by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      Not like Knoppix and in many cases, not as good as knoppix. Redhat's "rescue" option is a joke. Simple things like lilo corrupt/cannot use grub/kernel screwed up can be bypassed usually with an extra command on the CD boot stage. More serious work like a lost disk which you intend to backup over the net to start again cannot be done (at least) with Redhat's and SuSE's rescue modes that easily.

      Knoppix is pretty good at detecting hardware, giving you something to work with. Then it's up to you.

    2. Re:So do other distros by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      idiots. wait and watch. this will be made a troll.

      Wow, -1, Troll. You must be a psychic.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  7. What I like... by zoloto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is that IBM has done this, right off their own website and helping the system admins, techies and anyone else interested in learning how to fix your defunct or otherwise broken system.

    1. Re:What I like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is that IBM has done this, right off their own website and helping the system admins, techies and anyone else interested in learning how to fix your defunct or otherwise broken system

      Google for some more articles by the same author. There are gems there.

  8. Oldie but a goodie by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Informative

    This one's been around for a while. It's a useful resource, but some of the more specialised distros are easier to use for rescue disks.
    http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php has a good list of them.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    1. Re:Oldie but a goodie by Soko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even better, go get this book:

      http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/knoppixhks/

      I know the author - he is what IMHO most would call an "uber hacker", when it comes to Linux in general.

      Highly reccomended.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Oldie but a goodie by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 4, Informative

      FWIW, there's also a dedicated rescue distro based on Knoppix and Damn Small Linux - INSERT.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    3. Re:Oldie but a goodie by Soko · · Score: 1

      Friend, if I could mod you up I would. Rules being what they are - and the fact I have no mod points - I cannnot do so.

      I will try your distro at some point, I'm sure, and $DIETY bless you for providing a service to us forlorn systems admins - even though !=$DIETY keeps on giving us Windows machines to take care of.

      Again, thank you, from the bottom of a BOFH's cold, dark heart.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  9. "Really? I had no Idea!!!" by Zzootnik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, apart from the "Duh- What else are you gonna use it for?" line, I suppose its nice to RE-distribute the info to those 3 or 4 around here that haven't heard of knoppix...And also nice that IBM is running the piece. That kinda lends some pointy-haired massive corporate legitimacy to the tool...
    But maybe I'm mistaken...Okay, then--- Quick Poll- Who HAS NOT heard of and tried a Knoppix disk?

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    1. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I was thinking the same thing.

      However, it is useful enough for Linux evangelism -- print it out and give it [along with the Knoppix CD itself] to people who want to try out Linux.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by End11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I haven't even used a computer yet.

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    3. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by swordsaintzero · · Score: 1

      I believe its shigata ga nai, or in english roughly "it cant be helped"

      --
      Panel F, Relay #70
    4. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      I usually hand copies of Knoppix to people who want to try Linux, telling them this will be the slowest Linux system they will ever get. Many report back that it is actually faster and more responsive compared to their Windows systems: Shows you how much adware/spyware are there on people's machines.

    5. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

      Probably, and yep, that's a decent translation. I'm a bit fown etik that way...

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    6. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by gallir · · Score: 1
      I haven't even used a computer yet.

      Nice to see how standards allow you to access Slashdot via the microwave. Very nice.

      --
      sgis ddo ekil t'nod i
    7. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by CdnYoda · · Score: 1

      Ah...stronger, the Light Side of the Force grows! :-) Wow...slashdot and linux really are state-of-the-art...even available through telepathy! Kinda puts windoze to shame, don't you think?

      --
      -- "May the Source be with you!"
    8. Re:"Really? I had no Idea!!!" by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      I haven't even used a computer yet.
      Nice to see how standards allow you to access Slashdot via the microwave. Very nice.

      Probably uses windows... For some people, when you use MS windows, you're not using the computer,, the computer uses You.

      (( and not just in Soviet Russia ))

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  10. Re:Obligatory Joke by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

    OMG! We slashdotted IBM!

    [would have been funnier if it were true]

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  11. There are many other alternatives by auzy · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can also use the gentoo live CD (you can even get an experimental one for reiser4) at www.gentoo.org.

    There are also lots of speecialised ones. generally, the only time a linux box wont boot though is just a lilo or grub problem...

    By the way, the coralised link is: http://www-106.ibm.com.nyud.net:8090/developerwork s/linux/library/l-knopx.html?ca=dgr-lnxw01-obg-Sys Recover

    1. Re:There are many other alternatives by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and the HTMLised coralised link is: this.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:There are many other alternatives by novakreo · · Score: 1

      By the way, the coralised link is: http://www-106.ibm.com.nyud.net:8090/developerwork s/linux/library/l-knopx.html?ca=dgr-lnxw01-obg-Sys Recover

      Does IBM really require a Coral link?
      I don't think I've ever seen them get Slashdotted.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    3. Re:There are many other alternatives by auzy · · Score: 1

      well, when I tried to access them, they seemed pretty dead to me surprisingly.. might have just have been the routing to their server from mine though

    4. Re:There are many other alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Generally, the only time a linux box wont boot though is just a lilo or grub problem... Or when the file system is corrupt.

    5. Re:There are many other alternatives by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um??? The gentoo live CD is just to install gentoo. All it contains are portage files and source tarballs for installing software. There is even the minimal CD that only contains a working kernel and the least amount required to start the installation.

      They called it a live CD, I guess, because you can boot into a console unlike some other distro's installations. But I don't think they intended for it to be used as a recovery for systems other than gentoo.

      I've only used it as a recovery once when I compiled a kernel that wasn't configured properly and I over wrote the working kernel. However, I still had to mount all the partitions and chroot into my system from the live cd.

    6. Re:There are many other alternatives by Enucite · · Score: 1

      "I've only used it as a recovery once when I compiled a kernel that wasn't configured properly and I over wrote the working kernel."

      So you've found gentoo works as a recovery CD?
      Good to hear.

  12. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by rixdaffy · · Score: 4, Informative


    I think NTFS is probably read-only so you can't fix it directly. But in case you weren't smart enough to keep backups around, you can use Knoppix to backup your files over the network. I did the same thing for a friend who couldn't boot up her XP installation anymore after Norton Antivirus "cleaned" a bit too much (even safe mode didn't work). But I ended up copying the data to an external firewire disk 'cause the network (which Knoppix didn't have any problems to detect) was too slow.

    Go Linux/Knoppix!

    Ricardo.

  13. Linux has come a long way ... by alanbs · · Score: 1

    It is amazing to me that you can basically have the power of a full operating system all boot on a live cd.

    I used a Suse live cd a while ago to fix grub on my desktop, so I am a beleiver in live cds. I have heard a lot about knoppix, so I think that it is about time I downloaded an iso, especially now that there are some good acticles on it.

    It's always good to be prepared just in case you do something stupid, and in my case, there are an abundance of those situations.

    1. Re:Linux has come a long way ... by fatphil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Toms Root Boot was always enough for me.
      1 floppy.

      TRB, Lepton and other floppy distributions I've tried (for real use, not just recovery situations) have all been exceptionally high quality. The guys who put them together really know what they're doing. Any idiot can stick half a gig of programs on a CD, it takes smarts to get them onto 1 o 2 floppies.

      FP.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    2. Re:Linux has come a long way ... by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      A neat little niche distro, but from their site:

      Floppix has no hard drive support; you cannot access, modify, damage or destroy anything installed on the hard drive.

      Kinda makes it hard to do any kind of recovery on a hosed system.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    3. Re:Linux has come a long way ... by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      Amen brother! I was installing Gentoo about a week ago on an old laptop (PII 266, 96Mb RAM) that would not boot from cdrom. With Tom's Root Boot I was able to do a stage3 install. The only problem that I ran into was that there is no text browser or ftp client (yes, I know, hard to fit on a floppy distro!) so that I had to use wget to get the tarball. A note for anyone else thinking about trying this: a slow machine like this is *not* what I would recommend for a Gentoo machine -- compiling a 2.6 kernel took over 2 hours!

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    4. Re:Linux has come a long way ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that it is about time I downloaded an iso, especially now that there are some good acticles on it.

      Good articles? I guess you aren't talking about this article. It's not really about Knoppix or recovering files... it should be titled "Basic Linux system administration for people who have never heard of Linux." Seriously... the lady that wrote it talks about how to use cp to copy files and how to mount partitions.

  14. Boot floppies are hard to use in a box without a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without a floppy drive in them.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Re:knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and for Windows users learning linux. *ahem*

  17. Re:Boot floppies are hard to use in a box without by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 0

    You choose to use a mac then that's what you get. Might pay to buy more sensibly next time.

    --
    RST
  18. Just used Knoppix... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...with Samba to copy shit off a dead-in-the-water winderz 98 box. Pest Patrol had found 3,212 nasties on the box in question. I retrieved enough data to not worry about a crash on a re-install of winderz 98. I'm thinkin' of puttin' them up to win2k, but WTF, they're not payin' that much. (they have an XP License, FWIW)

    Tbe Knoppix Distro has been helpful at this point - and I'm glad that I kept it around, because I needed to get these people's email transferred without much hassle

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
    1. Re:Just used Knoppix... by say · · Score: 1

      re-install of winderz 98. I'm thinkin' of puttin' them up to win2k, but WTF, they're not payin' that much. (they have an XP License, FWIW)

      You sound like you are sysadmining these people. You should be fired. Windows 98 is no longer supported by Microsoft. It is not strange that Pest Patrol found xK "nasties" there. And they nasties will come back quite quickly unless they get Windows 2000, Windows XP SP2, with adequate virus software.

      Then you wouldn't have to sysadmin them so much! Oh wait, you get paid?

      So, it's like:

      1. Install win98 and get paid
      2. ...
      3. Re-install win98 and get paid
      4. ...
      5. Repeat 3-4
      6. Profit!
      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    2. Re:Just used Knoppix... by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      The profit steps should be 2a and 4a :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:Just used Knoppix... by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      wow. what a judgemental asshole. it could have been a friend who insisted on 98. you just dont have enough info to go pissing off like that. what is wrong with assholes like you? are you just waiting for people to ambush ? drink a beer and relax. your making the rest of us uptight.

    4. Re:Just used Knoppix... by say · · Score: 1

      You talk about relaxing? Maybe you should read my post again and try to notice whether the post was a. funny or b. a serious request about changing a practice with a person I know nothing about.

      That said, I'd say the original post did not imply the people in question insisted on Win98 (considering the admin considered moving them to W2K). And I do consider it a security risk to run Win98 as long as it is unsupported (and therefore without security patches). I would certainly not advice that.

      But I was probably wrong trying to say that in a funny way. Uptight people seem to think other people's opinion on slashdot is a raison d'être and the ultimate life achievement is good karma.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    5. Re:Just used Knoppix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yet another "you should be fired" asshole who think that they know everything.

      It's aparent you DON'T work in the IT industry with comments like that, since OS upgrades are far more complex than "oh, MS dropped that one, let's all upgrade". It involves cost, testing, effort that depends on number of seats, and compatibility issues that may nix any upgrade whatsoever.

      There are still large corporations out there using OS/2 and Win95 that haven't upgraded yet for the reasons above.

      So go back to playing starcraft and quit with the armchair sysadmining, ok?

  19. Toolbox by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In my bag, I always carry:
    1. Knoppix
    2. Windows Usual Stuff
      • MS service packs
      • Antivirus / Ad-aware
      • Putty, Ghostscript
      • Cygwin installer and scripts
    3. Solaris patches / packages / scripts
    4. 64MB compact flash card / USB reader
      (Mini Usual Stuff)
      • MS monthly patch of the week
      • Antivirus / Ad-aware
      • Putty
    5. Leatherman and mini-nutdriver set
      1. It's been a long time since I've needed anything else. I used to carry a Trinux CD, but now it's Knoppix.

        I use the compact flash card because it fits in both my camera and my PDA.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Toolbox by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Only tools wear condoms.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    2. Re:Toolbox by RichDice · · Score: 1

      That's a good kit, but what, no Tom's Root/Boot disk? It's the most GNU/Linux you can put on 1 floppy disk! I swear, this little sucker has saved my bacon so many times, and I learned a lot about Linux by using it. You wanna talk about good foo? It's got a freaking 67k version of emacs on it! This disk is stripped down to the wires and yet still kick-ass functional.

      Go, Tom!

      Cheers,
      Richard

      P.S. I love the Leatherman tool, too, but ever since 9/11 I have lost more of them than I would like to count to the *&%^# nice security people at airports. Sometimes it has been just stupidity on my part, other times I put it in my checked luggage, only to have the minimum wage baggage handling fuckos steal it from me. I'm finally going to give up on taking it with me travelling. If my laptop craps out while on business, I'll just go and buy anther one locally I guess.

    3. Re:Toolbox by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isnt a 67k version of emacs called "vi"

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Toolbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can even store multiple boot floppies in a boot cd using syslinux or something. I use that to keep erase disk tool and others available in my boot.

      About Windows, it's not worth the trouble to try to track down the problem from a closed source if the system cannot boot and you know it's not a simple boot problem. The wasted time accumulated over a period can be significant.

      I just use linux to wipe and cleanly restore a backed up windows. No worry, no hassle, and most times I know it wasn't my fault that Windows crashed in the first place.

  20. MEPIS rocks for this too... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yes, I'm distro whoring here. Personally, I'd recommend MEPIS over Knoppix. Knoppix is fine as a boot disk, but MEPIS is by far the easiest-to-use distro and most overall enjoyable to work with that I know of. MEPIS started as a bootable CD, but it's grown into a full-fledged Debian-based distribution now, and I'd say a good 80%-90% of MEPIS users now use it as their primary distribution, not just a rescue disk or "Linux test" distro.


    No, I'm not a weenie who needs things spoon fed to them, I've been using Linux since long before it was cool or chic, starting with Slack back in '96, then RedHat, then Mandrake. After Win2k came out I moved back to using Windows for most of my day-to-day desktop needs (now mostly Win XP), but recently I've installed MEPIS on my laptop and I find it quite enjoyable to use. The things that stand out to me are 1) fabulous hardware compatibility, including out of the box support for almost every component of my Dell Inspiron 8500 laptop, with NVidia GeForce4 Go graphics and so on (I did have to make a quick manual edit to XF86Config-4 to get widescreen support, and my Microsoft MN-720 802.11b card took about half an hour of screwing around to get running, but ndiswrapper was already there, I just had to find the right driver version and run it.


    Okay, that's all the ranting I can do for now. Did I mention that MEPIS makes a great recovery CD? That's how I first discovered it. Give it a try, funny name aside.

    1. Re:MEPIS rocks for this too... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Did I mention how MEPIS was annoyingly easy to install for me. ANNOYINGLY

      It needs to be more difficult, or at least spew more arcane stuff during install.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:MEPIS rocks for this too... by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      Does Mepis support ACPI Suspend/hibernate out of the box?

  21. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Partition image. Knoppix + partimage has saved me so many times after a failed dist-upgrade, that I keep a copy of Knoppix on top of every machine I own.

  22. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > Knoppix might be useful for rescuing a system, but as an
    > overal distro, it suffers from the problem that you can't install
    > it to your hard driv

    Yeah, cos using the Knoppix "Install to Hard Drive" menu option and waiting is difficult.

  23. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by mobets · · Score: 1

    Never done it myself, but I've heard that the knopix CDs include a debian installer. Also, you can use an external hard drive or flash drive to hold your home directory and just install stuff there.

    --

    It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  24. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by jschottm · · Score: 1

    Except that Knoppix will happily install to your hard drive. It may not be pretty-shiney(tm) like some installers, but I don't find these to be "complex workarounds":

    http://www.bytebot.net/geekdocs/debian-knoppix.h tm l
    http://www.freenet.org.nz/misc/knoppix-install. htm l

  25. news? by pe1chl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this news?
    The article was written a year ago, and even then it was not news (I have used Knoppix for this purpose longer than that)

  26. Yes, you can: knx-hdinstall by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Informative

    "You can't install it to your hard drive."

    Yes, you can: knx-hdinstall.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Yes, you can: knx-hdinstall by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      True, but MEPIS has pretty much been built from the beginning as a dual purpose distro (bootable CD / rescue disk, and full-featured distro), and has a wide community of day-to-day users now (check out MEPISLovers.com. There's probably nothing you can do with MEPIS that you can't do with Knoppix, and vice versa, but I still think Knoppix is first and foremost a rescue disk and "Linux intro" CD for newbies. MEPIS is the new Mandrake, and has basically been able to take mindshare by working with the (IMHO) superior apt-get system, and providing the best, most working hardware support out there.


      In theory, URPMI is fabulous, but in practice, I've had far, far better luck keeping a clean, consistent system without weird, incompatible RPMs and other stuff mucking up my install when using MEPIS, and find I almost never have to go outside of the pre-configured repositories. And Mandrake's lack of working out of the box Nvidia support (at least as of the last version I used, probably a year and a half ago) killed it for me. MEPIS is the first distro I've been able to use extensively without encountering some hitch that required a kernel recompile.


      Don't get me wrong, I have been doing Linux kernel compiles since around '96 (when I was a freshman in college, and I thought compiling the kernel was pretty 3733+), but I just don't want to screw around with that stuff for a day-to-day use desktop system. Custom compiled kernels for special purpose server boxes is fine, but it just doesn't fly for a desktop distro for me - I want to get work done, not screw around with kernel settings.

    2. Re:Yes, you can: knx-hdinstall by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 3, Informative

      knx-hdinstall is not maintained and should no longer be used. knoppix-installer is the way to go. www.knoppix.net/docs/index.php/HdInstallHowTo

  27. Me by billybob · · Score: 1

    I've heard of knoppix a long time ago. I've burned a CD of knoppix. But I've never actually used it.

    I think knoppix is a cool idea and I know they've put in a lot of hard work to put as many fucntional tools as possible on to one bootable cd, but I've just never gotten the oppurtunity to boot into it. :P So sue me.

    --
    Joseph?
  28. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by kazoosandinstruments · · Score: 4, Informative

    captive-ntfs 1.14 works just fine for me w/Knoppix 3.4 (though 1.15 w/Knoppix 3.6 failed to mount my NTFS partitions, that is another story altogether) ... so, you can actually read/write to NTFS from Knoppix if you manually configure captive and mount the NTFS partition(s) yourself.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

    Check again, the SimplyMEPIS-2004.03.iso is nowhere near a year old.

  31. Re:Boot floppies are hard to use in a box without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah! I've had my floppy disconnected for over 2 years and I have no clue if I still have any floppy disks around. Doesn't stop me from recovering a linux box. Once the boot cd starts its kernel, you can alt-fx to another shell and do whatever you want (remembering that you haven't actually booted your linux system yet and must mount everything and take care of initializations manually). You typically have to put a few entries in the boot program though (or have them detected with the newer ones).

  32. "manage [...] filesystems" - or plain ranting by l3v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't say K/Gnoppix is no good, because it's just great, imho the best live linux version for jumpstarting linux illiterates (other people check this. And I don't argue you can do lots of things with it. But for accessing and managing filesystems in general... well, access my xfs partitions with a knoppix please. or better not, keep away :)

    If one wants to have rescue stuff ready, ones prepares good rescue stuff. E.g. an usb drive with a mini distro with >2 kernel versions helluvalot compiled modules, all possible filesystem support, disk fscking tools (for all supported filesystems) and you don't relly need much more.

    A general purpose 2.4.x-based live distro for the masses jsut doesn't always qualify for such uses.

    You know the drill, use the right tool for the job.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:"manage [...] filesystems" - or plain ranting by cygnus · · Score: 1
      You know the drill, use the right tool for the job.
      wait... you're saying i should use a *drill*?
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    2. Re:"manage [...] filesystems" - or plain ranting by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      AFAIC a USB drive isn't the right tool for the job of system recovery. How long have PCs been shipping with BIOS support for booting from USB? Certainly not long enough for me to have one. So the choice is between a floppy with just enough stuff to recover (which is what I use ATM) or a CD, in which case there's no point wasting 600MB of space.

  33. Security?!?!? by spotmonk · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just what I needed... someone drawing attention to the fact that they can access all my porn, I mean sensitive files, on my computer with just a knoppix disk but in all seriousness, how safe is it to be able to access anything just by putting a disk in the drive?

    1. Re:Security?!?!? by l3v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      how safe is it to be able to access anything just by putting a disk in the drive

      Well, on my machines (i.e. which I use, @home or @work) only booting from the main hdd is allowed, everythig else is disabled, bios pass'ed. If I want to boot from something else, I enable it. One would need many minutes long work to open the cases and reset the bioses especially if they don't know the specific mobo.

      Not a very good protection by any means, but it stops giggling coworkers from being jerks on my machine.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    2. Re:Security?!?!? by ticktockticktock · · Score: 2, Informative
      One would need many minutes long work to open the cases and reset the bioses especially if they don't know the specific mobo.

      They wouldn't even have to open the case if they know some BIOS override passwords.

    3. Re:Security?!?!? by cowens · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Without physical security you have no security at all. I don't even need a boot disk to root your linux box. When the box hits the LILO or Grub protion I can interupt the boot and add "single" to boot options of the kernel. The machine will now start in single user mode (which does not require the root password). I can now make a back of shadow password file, change the root password, and telinit(8) to whatever level your distro uses for network connectivity. I can then upload your "sensitive" files to box I own. To civer my tracks I can remove my presence from all of your logs (or if I was smart, just restore backed up version of logs), restore the shadow password file, touch(1) all of the files back to their original mtimes, and voila.

    4. Re:Security?!?!? by Secrity · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This post isn't even worth the match to flame it.

    5. Re:Security?!?!? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everything on my drive is 128 bit AES encrypted on the fly when I use it - you and your knoppix CD can take your best shot. It's not the fault of the Knoppix people that your data is insecure enough to be read by anyone with a boot disk.

    6. Re:Security?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      Funny, I seem to recall that it's possible to disable the "init=" kernel parameter and still require a password for single-user mode.

      I usually find that removing the drive from the box and modifying /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow directly though is far easier. (Not that I've ever had to do this or anything).

    7. Re:Security?!?!? by cowens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that takes more time. The point is that there is no security without physical security. many people still don't know about the "single" argument to the kernel and fewer still know that they can set a password on the bootloader (which would stop my attack).

    8. Re:Security?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda *giggle* *giggle*

  34. I just used Damn Small Linux to overhual a Susebox by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend brought me his machine to upgrade.
    A Frys cheapo Linux special, originally it came with a 30g, 128m ram and Thiz Linux. I Thized the disc straight into the trash and installed Suse 9.0 on it for him when he first got it.

    Well, as time went on he realized that his system needed upgrading. So I sent him to the store and he brought back another 128m ram, a 120g drive and Suse 9.1 Pro.

    The plan was to have the old doggy 30g as his boot/OS/work drive (hda) and his new 120g as /home (hdb)....

    Well, booting up 9.1 does not come up and say
    "Hey, I see you have data on your drive already and a new blank drive. Would you like to move it around in anyway before we procede?"

    No, Suse just suggests that you wipe everything out and start over. Even if you tell it you want to do an upgrade, it has NO PROVISION what-so-ever to allow you to format the new drive then move your old /home from hda to hdb then reformat hda and partition it up in a useful way.

    Ok, so in light of this, I took Damn Small Linux 0.8.2
    and booted up. Opened a root terminal, fdisked hdb, formated it for ext3 then moved all of his old /home data from hda to hdb.

    It copied EVERYTHING. Hidden files, configurations, email, cookies, bookmarks, music, photos, the whole works.

    When it was done I booted into Suse 9.1 pro, did a NEW INSTALLATION and wiped hda clean, installed the OS on it and told it that /home is on hdb1.

    I created the same user and password as the old system so Suse looked at the /home on the new 120g drive and asked me if I wanted to change the permissions and ownership over. I said yes.

    The install proceded normally to completion.
    When it was finished and I rebooted the system, it was identical to the way it was brought to me except that he now has a 120g /home directory instead of the 10gigs he had before.

    Damn Small Linux is the very best tool a tech can carry with him. I keep a copies on biz cards in all of my tool boxes and in each of my vehicles.
    I don't leave home without it.

    I also carry standard Knoppix in case I run into a case where I need k3b on the ailing machine.
    I have several other versions of Knoppix I keep handy for various network jobs, like knoppix-std
    and a few other network related Knoppix knock offs..

  35. What am I missing? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I can rescue my system from my Mandrake CD. At the menu type in "rescue" and you get access to everything you need.

    I had to do this once when I had some directory corruption.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  36. coincidence by splint3r · · Score: 1, Troll

    Heh, funny this story should come up now, I used Knoppix to recover customer web sites from a couple of disks from a compramised machine just the other day. Saved my life (coz if Knoppix wasn't there then I'd have to use a boot disk with vi on it, and I'd rather die, than use vi).

  37. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by M1FCJ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is what you do: You use Knoppix to boot the box and dd the filesystem onto a network drive somewhere (nfs/smb, doesn't matter). Then you work on the backup image as a loop mount. You never, never do anything on the corrupt disk, ever. This is why: If you screw up, you don't have anything to fall back to. You can't screw up a loop mount or a backup.

    If you can't loop-mount it, dd it back to an other disk, then use your favourite Windows NTFS tool, if there is any.

  38. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Windows XP I had used, more than once, Bart's PE.
    Give it a chance, it's kind of knoppix for windows (it supports r/w to NTFS)

  39. One thing your missing.. by msimm · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a computer networking student I'm absolutely AMAZED this hasn't gotten more attention then it has.

    Under your MS stuff (I know, I know, but in industry it really is a necessary evil) you should definitely have a Windows Boot CD. And I don't mean a DOS floppy! Its basically a live, say Windows XP disk with preinstalled software (virus scan, adware removers, registry editors, complete networking setup). It really has all the tools you commonly use when fixing the obligatory windows box and probably a few you've never even known you'd need.

    I highly recommend you build one, and if the directions sound a little complicated, just take your time and reread them, there's about 3 step and none of the are actually complicated.

    The worst thing you can do is boot a infected PC from an infected hard drive, not to mention the trouble accessing NTFS with FULL read-write.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:One thing your missing.. by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I don't do that. I don't use Windows servers. If a Windows client breaks to the extent that it needs a bootable CD to fix, I wipe it. Users know this drill.

      But still and all, it's a good idea to have set aside just in case someone's life just will *end* if they can't get that Powerpoint file out of My Documents.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    2. Re:One thing your missing.. by msimm · · Score: 1

      Thats what we're paid for. Sometimes small miricles.

      With a vanilla client ghosting would probably be quicker anyway.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    3. Re:One thing your missing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If a Windows client breaks to the extent that it needs a bootable CD to fix, I wipe it. Users know this drill.

      I bet that keeps them from actaully bothering you with problems, since it seems at the drop of a hat you'll erase their hard drive on them. Good on you, mate!

    4. Re:One thing your missing.. by mattOzan · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Windows Boot CD is based on Bart Lagerweij's PE Builder. Go to the BartPE website to learn how to brew your own customized Windows Boot CD.

      There are scads of folks out there busily building their own add-ons and plugins for the BartPE environment which you can just download and include in your own installation- everything from Java Runtime to Citrix ICA client to Trillian. And literally a hundred more.

      I've found it an indispensible Windows recovery tool. I can boot off the CD and run Adaware, Spybot and McAfee scans on the system hard drive, removing all the IE trojan nonsense before it starts up and get resident in memory. I can connect to network shares and transfer data from machines that won't boot.

      You don't even have to boot from the CD- it will autorun in an active Windows XP session and give you the same NU2 menu. So it can be used to run applications locally that you don't want to install on the client's machine.

    5. Re:One thing your missing.. by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      interesting... would you know anyone with success including MS office on the CD?

    6. Re:One thing your missing.. by mattOzan · · Score: 1
      Yes, me, but with caveats.

      Just as BartPE is not a full XP installation (due to both size and technical limitations), this MS Office plugin doesn't create a full Office suite, but rather a set of MS Office viewers.

      Use Natasha's Microsoft Office 97 Standard SR-2 plugin:

      It requires system files from a (licensed) Office 97 SR-2 CD, but uses the Microsoft 2003 Office Converter Pack to enable viewing of Word 2003, Excel 2003 and Powerpoint 2003 files.

      So you can open these files on a disabled machine for rescue purposes (which is the primary use of BartPE, at least for me) but you can't create new documents.

    7. Re:One thing your missing.. by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I went and tried the Windows Ultimate Boot CD based on the parent post, and I've gotta say, that disc is definitely going in my CD wallet. It was very easy to get all the needed files and build a disc. I'm booted in and posting from within it right now, with K-Meleon browser. It's not what I was expecting, it's actually much cooler. Give it a try people!

    8. Re:One thing your missing.. by msimm · · Score: 1

      Isn't it nice when things like this just work! Effectively, with the disk you can rebuild a broken Windows computer if you have to. Thats job security!

      --
      Quack, quack.
  40. But what about winmodem support? by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm dying to figure this part out...

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  41. Re:I just used Damn Small Linux to overhual a Suse by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course you could have done this with SuSE as well, but you should not have tried two things (upgrade and drive reassignment) in one go.
    You could have upgraded from 9.0 to 9.1 first and then add the new drive and move /home to it, or first add the new drive and move /home, then re-install from scratch on the old drive.

  42. menu option and waiting is difficult by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yeah, cos using the Knoppix "Install to Hard Drive" menu option and waiting is difficult.

    Actually, the gripe is a legitimate one, although very poorly presented. I'm a regular on the Knoppin forums at www.knoppix.net and I constantly see people posting problems with things (mostly simple networking) that worked fine under Knoppix when running from the CD but stopped working as soon as Knoppix was installed to hard disk. Most of the time this seems to be simple permission issues or something that for some reason I don't understand needs to be added to a configuration file. But it's been going on for years and the install scripts never seem to get around to addressing it and making the premissioins right. See for yourself by scanning this forum.

    I just write it off to the arogance that almost all Linux geeks seem to have for newcomers who don't know the cryptic commands to change permissions or all the magic places startup configuration stuff is stored. The geeks who master Knoppix must come across the same problems, but just know where to go to twiddle the right bits to make everything right. That they don't "bother" to go back and make the HD install scripts do this seems strange.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:menu option and waiting is difficult by MyHair · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the knx-hdinstall scripts were contributed. I believe Klaus has been less interested in hard drive installs except for copying the cloop image to the HDD and running it from there. Each way has its advantages and disadvantages, but I gather the core developers don't really care about maintaining the knx-hdinstall scripts and resulting installation.

    2. Re:menu option and waiting is difficult by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. And I can certainly see how Klaus would prefer to focus on what Knoppix is really intended to be, a CD distro. However, I would question his wisdom of accepting and including scripts that have proven to have problems over years of time. It doesn't reflect well on Knoppix. Better would be to just include a link to a web based source of the scripts. With that relatively simple extra step to get the scripts, it would be much easier for the script writers to continue to update and refine the scripts as problems with the install are found, and it would give the users a better communication path to get this information back to the script writers. But as things stand now, while there are hacks included on the CD to "install" Knoppix, it just doesn't work well, thus my respons to Yeah, cos using the Knoppix "Install to Hard Drive" menu option and waiting is difficult , which would have you think that Knoppix does have a good install system.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    3. Re:menu option and waiting is difficult by xcomm · · Score: 1

      >>... that worked fine under Knoppix when running from the CD but stopped working as soon as Knoppix was installed to hard disk.

      Yeah, but why install a live CD instead of of giving the Debian GNU/Linux Iso's a try (with the new Sarge installer) and learn it from the roots?

      >>I just write it off to the arogance that almost all Linux geeks seem to have for newcomers who don't know the cryptic commands to change permissions or all the magic places startup configuration stuff is stored. The geeks who master Knoppix must come across the same problems, but just know where to go to twiddle the right bits to make everything right.

      You are right in some way. But from time to time I come on thinking how good some hurdles are to keeps the 'unwashed masses' (MCSE's, Management, etc ...) out of the wizardom of our for them too fine OS Debian GNU/Linux... :-)

  43. You mean linux NTFS support... by msimm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last I heard write was still experiencing random failures, not that it matters for data recovery.

    But I'd recommend using this to work on/repair Windows computers. You get read/write (its really just Windows, so..) and a lot of crap can be repaired with a virus/adware scan (or two). If your comfortable enough with Windows there really isn't much you can't recover from once you can read the disk (sort of a complete hardware failure).

    As a side note, it also reads ext2 and 3. Handy for working on your friends dual-boot systems too.

    Personally, I carry on of these and either Knoppix or an older Gentoo live disk.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:You mean linux NTFS support... by UnseenEnigma · · Score: 1

      NTFS writing is reliable in my experience (Ive used it several dozen times without a problem). Their is also a tool (not sure if its in knoppix) that lets you use microsofts own ntfs loader to access it.

    2. Re:You mean linux NTFS support... by irgu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last I heard write was still experiencing random failures [...]

      That was 4-5 years ago. Then Anton Altaparmakov disabled the unreliable write support and started to write a new driver from scratch. Today that one is included in Linux 2.6 kernels and it's reliable. Altough the write support is still limited but for example NTFS resizing is widely used and very reliable for over two years.

      There are also two additional binary-only, full-featured, read-write NTFS drivers. One of them is Captive NTFS, using Windows' own NTFS driver the Wine way, and the other one is Paragon's NTFS driver.

      Knoppix has four of the NTFS drivers:
      1) old, broken NTFS in 2.4 kernels
      2) new, safe NTFS in 2.6 kernels
      3) Captive NTFS
      4) userspace utilities: shared code with 2) but no kernel driver needed

  44. Why is this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article is dated October 23, 2003. Nearly a year old!

    There must be newer versions of almost everything mentioned in the article, and probably better ways of doing most of the tasks...

    And most /. readers know about Knoppix already.

  45. Re:I just used Damn Small Linux to overhual a Suse by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Well, the whole point of the exercise was to install 9.1 on the 30g and use the entire 30g for the OS. The way I did it allowed me to wipe the old drive totally out and start over with it fresh and 100% dedicated to the OS and nothing else.

    hda is strictly for the OS and hdb is strictly for /home.. I saw no other way to accomplish this task in as few steps as this method took.

    The other thing that was nice about using DSL, I just had to mount the partitions, they were already full R/W without playing the permission games you normally have to play with standard Knoppix 3.6

    DSL was really a whole lot easier, oh so easy but oh that scary, scary CLI.....

  46. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by Kethinov · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yeah, cos using the Knoppix "Install to Hard Drive" menu option and waiting is difficult.
    Have you ever actually DONE a Knoppix hd install? Sure the install is easy, but have you ever actually used a hard disk installed knoppix system? It always results in broken apt. And no matter how many times I've tried to beat a knoppix hdinstall's apt into submission to TRULY convert it into Debian, I simply can't.

    Knoppix is a great livecd, but a horrible installer. It's less trouble to just install straight Debian.
    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  47. just don't expect it to work by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are scripts right in Knoppix that let you do a HD install; but that doesn't mean everything is going to work as you would expect. I've been a regular at www.knoppix.net for a couple of years, and I'm always seeing problems that just shouldn't happen with HD installs. Simple things like permissions being set wrong on the install and networking that worked from to CD no longer working after the HD install. In fact, if you look at the specialized forums, you will see that there are nearly twice as many posts in the HD install forumthan even the hardware forum , and nearly three times as many posts as in the networking forum (yet many of the posts in the networking forun are about network access stopping after a HD install). So you can install to HD, just don't expect it to work even as well as it did from CD after you do!

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  48. KNOPPIX 3.7 OUT (kind of) by otisaardvark · · Score: 1

    Check out official forums for confirmation. ISO available here, why not use the Coral Cache and save a /.ing? It has nifty new firewalling in addition to all the usual updates. This version was released from the German PC-Welt magazine and is in German only, but using lang=whatever at boot time will cure that. It will obviously differ from the 'official' 3.7 CD which should come out soon, but not by much - so worth a CD-RW for the curious I suppose. md5sums are spewed around the net, no point me quoting one as I am not to be trusted (TM). testcd is a useful check.

  49. Re:I just used Damn Small Linux to overhual a Suse by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think you could have added the new disk to the old running system, fdisk and format it using yast or commandline tools, move your home there, and then re-install the system on the 30GB disk.
    I would have done:
    - login as root
    - cd /
    - mv home home.orig
    - mkdir home
    - yast
    (add the disk, say it will be /home, format it)
    - df
    (make sure the /dev/sdb1 is now mounted as /home)
    - mv /home.orig/* /home
    - rmdir /home.orig

    home is now on the new disk.
    reboot system from CD, install 9.1 on 30GB and during partition selection tell it that /home is /dev/sdb1.
    that should do it.

  50. First rate device detection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Luckily I haven't had to use Knoppix to recover any crashed systems...

    However I did use it to tweak the device settings on my install of FreeBSD. Knoppix has always detected anything I threw at it, while FreeBSD isn't quite up to the same level (but getting better). So, I gave Knoppix a whirl and got enough driver info for the noname videocard that shipped in the used computer I was setting up as a server.

    Rock on Knoppix!

  51. ntfsclone by phrasebook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where is ntfsclone in the latest KNOPPIX? I tried version 3.4 I think it was - couldn't find it anywhere, so had to revert to 3.3. There was an ntfsprogs package but it didn't seem to include all the tools. That's all I use KNOPPIX for - making an image of my Win2K partition.

    1. Re:ntfsclone by irgu · · Score: 1
      Due to Captive NTFS the ntfsprogs version was downgraded (I don't know why, Captive works fine with the latest ntfsprogs too).

      The other very annoying consequence is that, ntfsresize from ntfsprogs became also too old hereby and QTParted or ntfsresize can't resize fragmented NTFS. I had to switch to SystemRescueCD. A very cool, up-to-date admin & rescue CD!

  52. Tom's by grolschie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tom's Root Boot" is the only Linux boot CD needed to fix a Linux system. Although I use Knoppix occasionally to test hardware.

    1. Re:Tom's by Krunch · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it fits on a floppy so you can boot it on your CD reader-less computers too.

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  53. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can mount the partition, it will be read only. Start up Samba and browse your network with LinNeiborhood. Copy your files from the non-booting system to a network share on another machine. No need to lose anything.

  54. Command Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    new versions use knx2hd

  55. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by Nichotin · · Score: 1

    Knoppix-std has full ntfs support via captive ntfs. Only requirement is that you have a copy of ntfs.sys by hand.

  56. Very best tool? by don.g · · Score: 1
    Damn Small Linux is the very best tool a tech can carry with him.

    My swiss army knife beats your damn small linux any day of the week :-)

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    1. Re:Very best tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My USB Swiss Army Knife with damn small linux on it beats you both.

  57. Real world application by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had a fault on my home system, so I tried to knoppix my wife around. I did not recover from the attempt no matter what utilities I tried. I tried to reiser, I tried to fsck her. I even tried mem86 check her and remind her of all the good times we had. In the end, she rebooted me no matter how many times I tried to replug her.
    Knoppix not good for everything.
    Yep, this is bad. Baaaddd joke if you can call it that.
    Oh, by the way, this is nothing but flaimbait.
    Burn karma, burn.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  58. Also... by RWerp · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  59. Re:I just used Damn Small Linux to overhual a Suse by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

    No, Suse just suggests that you wipe everything out and start over. Even if you tell it you want to do an upgrade, it has NO PROVISION what-so-ever to allow you to format the new drive then move your old /home from hda to hdb then reformat hda and partition it up in a useful way.

    Handy feature about the SuSE installation stuff - while it comes up with a nice, graphical interface, virtual console Alt-F(something) has a full bash prompt with lots of useful utilities.

    It's possible to bring up network connectivity at a very early stage (done automatically if you're doing an FTP install) so if you need to get old data off a machine, an NFS mount is also a possibility. As is using w3m to read Slashdot while the installation progresses. :-)

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  60. Wrong Linux INSERT from sourceforge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And on sleuthkit and you are setup to recover (this does mean patching the disk but it is worth it).

    Knoppix does not have read write support. INSERT can read and write NTFS partion when mix with sleuthkit can read into a damaged NTFS partion.

    Question was the partition was stuffed or was windows to badly damaged to reinstall.

    Note g4u image of the partion is the best option before making any changes to the disk. Even g4u back on to a new drive before working on it.

  61. BitTirrent of KNOPPIX_V3.6-2004-08-16-EN-Live-CD by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0, Informative

    http://home.earthlink.net/~leon.gandalf/KNOPPIX_V3 .6-2004-08-16-EN-Live-CD.torrent/
    If you have not tried Knopix Live CD, here is a BitTorrent link.
    If anyone has a Bittorrent to 3.7 POST IT... :)

  62. Better safe than sorry by Deorus · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, there are a couple of basic steps people can take to ensure their systems are rescuable and secure regardless of any patches they have applied.

    • Make sure your root filesystem is as small as possible to minimize the chances of corruption there and that you can have it mounted read-only. This not only improves your security (since you can simply remove CAP_SYS_ADMIN from all your daemons and they won't be able to remount anything), but also makes it even harder to corrupt the root filesystem. Your user and group information files will need to be moved to /var and appropriate symbolic links created in /etc so that users can still change user and group passwords and you can create accounts without remounting the root filesystem read-write.
    • Never remove your legacy device inames from /dev, ever! Even if you use devfs or udev, a new /dev is mounted over the original one, so the legacy inames disappear magically from VFS. The legacy device inames may come in handy in a system recovery later. If you use devfs or udev, make sure your /dev filesystem is mounted with the noexec option enabled for security reasons.
    • Make sure your /var is always mounted noexec and nodev. If you use qmail, switch to Postfix (yes, I've done it, DJB is such a dumbass with his lack of respect for standard directory hierarchies).
    • Make sure your /tmp is not in your root filesystem. You can mount a tmpfs for your /tmp and point /usr/tmp, /var/tmp, and /anything-else/.../tmp to your /tmp with a symbolic link. If you do mount a tmpfs or any other kind of filesystem, make sure you do it with the noexec and nodev options enabled. If you can't or are not willing to use another filesystem for /tmp (tmpfs sometimes is too small for CVS, and you may not have enough space for a dedicated /tmp), use /var/tmp instead (assuming you've mounted /var according to my instructions above).
    • Grab a copy of the GNU fileutils from a mirror close to you, compile it statically, and install the resulting binaries in /sbin (not /bin). If anytime later something terrible happens to your libc, you can always make /sbin have precedence over /bin in your $PATH and use the static binaries in /sbin instead for recovery. Always remember to make add /sbin first in your $PATH if you ever upgrade your libc from the sources, especially if it is your first time doing so (believe me, everyone I know, including me, had problems with their first libc installations from the source). Doing this can save you from a lot of trouble.
    • Even when you know your kernel binary will boot perfectly (because perhaps you used the same configuration file to compile the same kervnel version), make a backup of your old kernel by renaming (not copying) it and specifying the new name in lilo.conf. LILO knows nothing about filesystems (never used grub, so I can't talk about it, but I suspect the same thing happens with it), so if your kernel, for some reason, gets fragmented in your filesystem, you will be in trouble to boot from it, since LILO assumes the kernel is never fragmented.

    Following above steps is usually enough to prevent rescue situations because the root filesystem is vital, so protecting it is the first line of defense, but if the worse comes to worst and you ever get into trouble, you must learn with the problem. If the kernel loads and init doesn't, it may be a libc problem. Try booting with init=/bin/sh, remount your filesystems read-write, examine the problem, umount them (or remount them read-write, when unmount is not possible), sync, reboot and watch the changes. If the kernel does not load, you may need a

  63. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Little tip, Spinrite will save you. Just recovered the contents of an NTFS drive after the sectors started dying. Took 55 hours to run the program but i got back all my data.

  64. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by say · · Score: 1
    I was able to get windows booting in safe mode up till a point though (which confused me if it was hardware related) and then it would freeze.

    I've seen this a few times. It seems as though the boot process uses a different method of accessing the disk, but when Windows loads the real IDE/SCSI driver, the machine freezes.

    This actually means that your entire drive is not dead, and recovery through Knoppix indeed could be a possibility. Maybe read-only, but then again, you don't wanna go changing those tax records!

    --
    Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
  65. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by dmaxwell · · Score: 4, Informative

    captive-ntfs needs a captive user and group to work properly. Manually adding them allows it to work correctly again on 3.6. I even made a personal remaster of Knoppix with fix and the XP drivers captive-install-acquire already done. That last is handy because I have had NICS that XP didn't recognize and it gets the driver install files on the disk.

  66. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by mAineAc · · Score: 1

    Insert linux is a knoppix based recovery linux that has read/write access to ntfs partitions. Very handy and has some nice recovery tools. It still needs a few more things but they are working on it from what I read.

  67. Yawn - where is the innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow - Solaris has been doing this for years - SunOS even used to do it off tape.

    Ever hear of "boot [cdrom|net|root-mirror] -s"? Come up in single user off alternate media, mount your root disk and proceed to fix as necessary.

    Even DOS was able to do this - it was called a boot floppy.

    Just because something puts a new wrapper on the process and because its based of Linux doesnt make it incredible.

    1. Re:Yawn - where is the innovation? by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1


      It's been a while for me (5 years ago, last time I was in SASH, for the IRIX aware), but all the UNIX recovery tools I saw
      booted you into a shell. Knoppix is as if it booted straight into the equivalent of CDE (KDE) and puts an icon of each of your partitions on the screen, that you can just click on to mount and navigate in GUI fashion. Sure, you still need to understand chroot to be able to fix things properly, but it is a heck of a lot easier to use than the older methods. You can check for doc on the internet with a browser (you can GOOGLE!), repartition with a GUI tool.

      A problem you don't have with UNIX (because the supported hardware variety is tiny) that is really a killer on PC's is hardware detection. Typically, if you are running a distribution that is a little older, you won't be able to detect some stuff, and you did some magic to get it working. Keeping your rescue disks uptodate with your magic is far more hassle than just downloading the latest knopppix every six months.

    2. Re:Yawn - where is the innovation? by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, but don't tell anyone here that. They might mod you troll/flaimbait for it ;)

  68. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by thephotoman · · Score: 1

    Where can I get a copy of that remaster? That's one of the most useful things about Knoppix, after all.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  69. knoppix HDIsntall sucks by mekkab · · Score: 2, Informative
    You USED to be able to install knoppix to a HD...

    however if you read the FAQ on the new version of knoppix, they explicitly state
    Q: Can one also install the distribution from the CD onto a hard drive?

    A: In principal, yes (after all, the "master" system also runs on a hard
    drive before it is burned to CD). However there is currently no
    installation GUI for this, so installation to a hard drive should probably
    only be attempted by more knowledgeable Linux users.

    ...

    .) Reboot, try the system out, fix any broken settings.
    (No guarantees.)
    Which is all well and good; if you speak/read German. Otherwise you get a bunch of errors in German that you can't decipher.

    Instead, I installed slackware.
    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:knoppix HDIsntall sucks by emj · · Score: 3, Informative

      It works perfectly, I'm writing this on a laptop where Knoppix was installed. It autodetected everything and installed faster tahn any distro I have ever seen.

      With a good GUI as well, letting me choose alot of diffrent options.

    2. Re:knoppix HDIsntall sucks by mekkab · · Score: 1

      then color me jealous. The live CD was the bees knees, but the hd install flomped, floundered, and failed.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    3. Re:knoppix HDIsntall sucks by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Do your own partitioning before you run hd-install. It's worked well for over a year now.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    4. Re:knoppix HDIsntall sucks by mekkab · · Score: 1

      I always do my own partitioning. I think the problem is that my boot partition was type ext3. Shouldn't matter, right? But it couldn't get mounted as read/write and wouldn't pass an fsck. re-formatting as ext2 fixed it. Granted, at this time, I was using slackware, because I need error messages I can understand.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  70. Re:But what about winmodem support?- yup! by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 2, Informative
    That article is over a year old things have changed significantly:
    • article claims all knoppix is german by default. No, there are two flavours of images you can download -EN (English) and -DE (deutsch umm that's german in german to non german speakers :-) ).iso
    • talks about 3.2 (understandably). 3.6 is out, and it includes kernel 2.6.7, (you have to invoke knoppix26 on the command line) which is pretty close to the latest and greatest.
    • in 3.6, there are softmodem drivers. Some of them are truly free, others are free versions of linuxant drivers, which are limited to 14.4 kbps (you pay for a license key to run at full speed.) They work (this was on a redhat 8 system, though.)
  71. Re:BitTirrent of KNOPPIX_V3.6-2004-08-16-EN-Live-C by dentar · · Score: 1

    HAHAHAHA.. frelled..

    hey.. that's on tomorrow!! woo hoo!!

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  72. Knoppix Hacks by StoneTable · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Knoppix can do that and a whole lot more.

    Knoppix Hacks

    Virus scanning, emergency router, write to NTFS, even fire up a mythtv box.

  73. This is so last-millennium. by argent · · Score: 1

    Not only is this old, but it was old news back when I first started using computers with hard disks... the only difference is the mechanism you use to get a kernel booted from another device.

  74. ho hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linux guy uses linux tools to work on linux...

    how about an article on using knoppix CD to recover winDohs when it won't boot and files when winDohs is
    xtra phucked.

    yes, NTFS mounts OK with CD booted knoppix

    1. Re:ho hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way, every windows crash, every virus, every negitave thing about windows pushes people away from microsoft and towards Linux, so fuck you and your MS-kludgeware...

    2. Re:ho hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! Learn to read lest you get yourself fucked by way of a Mac XL up your ass.

      Or fix your script...

      The following is a translation of my earlier post suitable for those lacking in imagination, humor, social skills, and distinguishable sex organs...

      Recovering Windohs Xtra Phucked or other version with Linux is a great way to promote Linux.

  75. Linux systems need recovery? by johansalk · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked and horrified.

  76. What about Firefox, etc?` by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    In addition to these, a CD with Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, Gaim, and Audacity installers can be quite useful. And Emacs can be a lot nicer than Notepad for editing Windows config files, so I'd bring that too.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  77. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by foo23 · · Score: 1
    I had this problem at work ... One PC (W2k) had a severe hard drive problem, even the bios complained on startup. The guy working on this computer found nothing dodgy in hitting del before Win started up. Until, one day, it didn't any more. All recovery disks and CD-Roms from Microsoft didn't even recognize that there was an OS installed.

    Knoppix booted fine, found the drive, read the NTFS without problems (read only, but I think you can mount it with write access) and within the first two clicks we started samba and sshd so that we could save the data. I was quite glad about that ...

    On the other hand ... we didn't fix the partition afterwards, we had to throw the disk away.

  78. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
    My wife's machine did something similar. I could access the NTFS partition through Knoppix and burn the important files to CDROM before dealing with the hardware and OS isssues.

    It was nice to be able to use the boot CD to recover.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  79. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Everytime Knoppix is mentioned as a Live CD 10 people come out and remind everyone there is a script that will install it to the hard drive. They say you'll have a great debian system.

    Well, I've tried that a few times and my luck wasn't so great. It would install and I could boot, but apt wasn't working nicely at all. I think I ended up killing apt when I tried to do a simple update. Other programs didn't work as nicely as from the Live CD.

    So yeah, Knoppix is great from a Live CD, but it has too many problems for every day use as a hard drive based distro. I think there are lots of other better choices for that.

  80. slashdotted? by Krunch · · Score: 3, Informative
    Our apologies...
    The IBM developerWorks Web site is currently under maintenance.
    Please try again later.

    Thank you.
    Here is the Google cached version.
    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  81. ...and if you're using some OTHER OS... by peteforsyth · · Score: 1
    ...Knoppix could still be helpful in recovering data, etc.

    http://www.shockfamily.net/cedric/knoppix/

  82. I lived on knoppix for a month by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    I lived on it for a month while evaluating which distro I was going to go with.

    I chose Gentoo, but I always have the latest Knoppix boot-cd with me because I frequently screw up my system.

    That's what has amazed me since abandoning Windows last year; with Linux, you always seem to be able to go in and fix whatever is broken.

    In the Windows world, often, there is NO other alternative but backing up the data and reformatting.

    Knoppix embodies just how powerful open source is; it's a modular distro, able to boot from a CD with no need of a hard-disk.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  83. Re:I just used Damn Small Linux to overhual a Suse by pvcf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just one minor modification to this. You should probably use tar or cpio instead of mv. For example:

    cd /home.orig

    tar cf - . | ( cd /home; tar xf - )


    The reason? The mv command will not keep any hard links when mv'd across filesystems; tar will. Unless of course, you are absolutely 100% sure you have no hard linked files in /home.

    And whatever you do, *don't* use cp; otherwise both your hard and sym-links will go bye-bye too.

    --
    F U NE X N M? Son: "Dad... How do you spell 'hourly'?" Dad: "0 * * * *"
  84. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by nolife · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been using a scaled down version of a Linux recovery CD at work. I use it at least once a week to backup data from a non booting XP/W2K computer. Even if the person only needs Favorites and My/ Documents, it provides a method for recovery that my Microsoft stacked IT department did not have before.

    It is not as robust as Knoppix but simple, quick and to the point.

    Boot with CD, start the network through an included script, manually mount the Win partition, manually mount the network share, run MC and copy off what you need. I know that does not sound exciting and sexy but if you know the commands and what you need to mount and where, it is a faster process then booting up Knoppix and using the GUI.

    I believe the iso I am using is from here. I am not completely sure as I've been using the same thing for over a year now and at the time, I downloaded several different recovery iso's to test them out (kind of makes my entire post useless if I can not reference what ISO I actually use ;)). I picked this one because it was the easiest and quickest to use for what I need, at around 25MB is was relatively small also.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  85. Using Knoppix to recover non-Linux boxes by Announcer · · Score: 1

    On more than on occasion, now, I've successfully resurrected "dead" Windows machines by using Knoppix as a (very powerful) diagnostic tool. It not only has allowed me to recover files from a WIN-XP drive that a fresh install of XP wouldn't touch, it also is very helpful at determining if a system failure is hardware or software related.

    I give Knoppix an enthusuastic two thumbs-up as an indispensible tool in my PC "repairman's kit". :)

    It really adds to the "geek factor" when you can recover someone's valuable data from a machine that someone else said was "beyond hope".

    --
    Willie...
  86. I lived on [knowledge] for a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's what has amazed me since abandoning Windows last year; with Linux, you always seem to be able to go in and fix whatever is broken."

    True, howver you need to know WHAT to do in order to fix the system. That's not on the disk.

  87. Also works well for hardware drivers :) by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    I was upgrading a laptop from Fedora Core 1 to Core 2 and encountered a problem with Fedora's support for the ATi Rage Mobility.

    I remembered that with the install of Core 1 that text installation was needed as graphical installation would fail. Fortunately though, video would work after installation. Unfortunately, Core 2 wasn't so kind.

    I grabbed my trusty Knoppix disc and copied the working video driver over and restarted X. Problem solved and with framebuffer support even.

    It was much quicker than trying to find working drivers on-line, downloading, compiling, and then installing them. It may not have been the "correct" method, but it worked and is still working.

  88. We /.'d IBM? by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Funny
    That server is offline this am.

    Hey, IBM, that was only a demonstration of our power.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  89. Also offtopic, sorry by sjalex · · Score: 1
    That's not really true... It's not possible to uninstall TCP/IP in XP but reinstalling it is relatively easy.

    The most certain way to make it happen in my experience is the following:

    1. Use regedit (Start, Run, regedit) to get in the registry and delete any "Winsock" and "Winsock2" keys in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\system\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\
    2. Reboot
    3. Open network control panel
    4. Click install
    5. Select "protocol", click OK
    6. Select "have disk"
    7. Type in c:\windows\inf in the path, click OK
    8. Select TCP/IP, click OK
    9. Reboot

    Then you're back online. Again, it could be easier but really it's not that hard.

    FWIW I don't think the first reboot is supposed to be necessary according to M$, but I have had mixed luck without it, and seeing as certain common spyware (such as new.net) causes this corruption to happen, I have had to run through this procedure a lot of times. It works well.

    1. Re:Also offtopic, sorry by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      I was battling viruses at the time and my first thought was to remove TCP/IP. Didn't help and didn't work right - was just as easy to reinstall the machine.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  90. IBM slashdotted? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our apologies...

    The IBM developerWorks Web site is currently under maintenance.
    Please try again later.

    Thank you.

    Wow... We slashdotted IBM! But to the point: I wonder what is your experience. What is better for system recovery? Standard Knoppix which is a general purpose desktop system meant to be an impressive demonstration tool but lacking many security programs, or some specialised versions like Knoppix STD or Local Area Security which have more tools but are kind of "script kiddie friendly" and look very unprofessional with their Martix themes, leet-speak, "proving no localhost is safe" slogans etc. making them look more like intrusion than recovery tools? Or maybe Morphix is the answer thanks to its ease of customisation and apt-getting new packages on the fly? Do you have any Real World(TM) experience?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  91. Re:So weird... I've been doing this for 2-3 years by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    I've had a knoppix cd in my arsinal for about 2-3 years now. With it and an external CD-RW (now a DVD+/-RW) I've been saving data off corrputed installs of both linux and windows systems. I havn't tried the latest knoppix for a while though since I custom built a CD that included the ability to mount read/write NTFS filesystems (using window's own NTFS drivers). Since then, I havn't seen the need of upgrading the knoppix version since it does everything I need it to do and more.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  92. Tax records??? by melandy · · Score: 1

    You leave tax records on your hard drive? Ballsy.

    Yeah, in a perfect world nobody gains access to your box and jacks your files. But here in Real Life(tm), crap happens. Why not limit your exposure in case it does? CD burners and blanks are cheap.

  93. More useful in the Linux lab! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My school has a few Linux labs (they use Debian). EVERY computer has a CD-RW drive, and EVERY system has it disabled for regular users. So, I bring Knoppix so I can use the CD-RW (this is not strictly playing by the school rules, though). Also, sometimes when nobody is looking I grab the now unshadowed password file and crack the root password :)

  94. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 1

    you should've used ERD commander to try and fix an XP install imo, there's a free emergency download edition

    http://www.winternals.com/products/repairandreco ve ry/erdcommander2002.asp?pid=erd

    --
    Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
  95. ACPI, Mepis, hardware and configuration ease. by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative
    Does Mepis support ACPI Suspend/hibernate out of the box?

    That depends on what version you use and what kernel you install and what hardware you have. Some laptops, such as my Thinkpad T600, have notoriously buggy BIOS. Both ACPI and APM in newer kernels work well using Sarge. The same packages, of course, are available for Mepis and Mepis is easier with new hardware. The upshot is that you can install the last stable release of Mepis, knock out everything but Sarge from /etc/apt/sources.list, and get a nifty version of Sarge that has Spam Assassin for Kmail, MANY funky hardware drivers and MANY working commercial goodies like flash and real player configured and working. Mepis, especially the release candidates, does a very good job configuring newer hardware and can be used to test and repair X configurations.

    The only downside to Mepis is that it instals freaking EVERYTHING. I don't need Apache and MySQL on my laptop, so I'd have to spend some time removing those and other packages. Also, I hate flash and prefer that my browser ignore it 99% of the time. That too takes some time. For an older laptop, Sarge works better for me. Mostly, hardware support is a kernel function and newer kernels do it better. The kernels available in Sarge are generally good enough and the install works.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  96. Knoppix can virus-scan Winduhs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How To Do A Virus Scan With Knoppix
    Starting with 3.4, it comes with a f-prot installer. It scans and cleans viruses, except not on NTFS, it only tells you if your NTFS partition is infected, which it probably is. Because Linux NTFS support is still unreliable. But the advantage is you scan from a known clean disk and the latest virus definitions. And it's free.

  97. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by Imagix · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago one of our people brought in a laptop that XP wouldn't boot anymore. ERD Commander couldn't find Windows. However, I popped in Knoppix and backed up all of her files onto the network. Read-only NTFS and network access was all we needed....

  98. DUP DUP DUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    So not only is this a dup of an earlier story from last year, but this posting is the EXACT SAME TEXT as the earlier story. Is Slashdot now rerunning stories that reach or approach their 1-year anniversary???

  99. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have to make it yourself. That remaster has files that are copyright MS on it. You'll need a fairly beefy machine to do it in less than geological time. A machine that is at least 1GHz and 512MB(+ 1GB swap) of memory gets tolerable. I use a 2.4Ghz PIV with a GB of RAM. That will spit an iso out in about 7 minutes. You will also need at least 3GB of disk space to hold the uncompressed distro and the iso you will make from it. Follow the instructions here.

    Knoppix IS Debian so you'll need some Debian knowledge to update the package database and to add and remove files. You will be doing most of the work in a chroot so you DON'T need a Debian machine to make a remaster. You can even boot from a KNOPPIX cd and create it that way.

    Once you've created your Knoppix development environment according to the instructions, you do these things to enable captive.

    1. Create a captive user.
    2. Create a captive group.
    3. captive-install-acquire

    Cheers!

  100. GRUB Re:Better safe than sorry by MyHair · · Score: 1

    LILO knows nothing about filesystems (never used grub, so I can't talk about it, but I suspect the same thing happens with it)

    GRUB understands filesystems. ext2, ext3 and I think FAT are all available, and there are different "stage1.5"s for other filesystems.

    With GRUB you can load an arbitrary kernel with arbitrary initrd with arbitrary parameters at boot time. Or arbitrarily chainload another OS like DOS or Win*.

    Just last night I tried using KNOPPIX to setup grub on my boot hd (root (hd1,0) then setup (hd0)), but it didn't work. For some reason I have to use a GRUB boot floppy for that to work. Don't know why it doesn't work from KNOPPIX's GRUB command line (after booting; KNOPPIX uses SYSLINUX to start).

  101. There's knoppix, and then also clusterknoppix by toremini · · Score: 0

    Off the cd clustering:
    http://bofh.be/clusterknoppix/

    Hmm, bofh? Bastard operator from hell.

  102. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 1

    I suffered a major Windows crash a couple months ago on my 3 year old IBM T21 laptop (which has been my only computer in college) and was able to recover all my Windows data through Linux. I was dual booting the system with Fedora Core 2, and after the crash Windows would not go further than the loading screen (froze on the notorious agp440.sys). I tried recovering with both the XP install CD as well as NTFS diskettes, but neither could see the XP partition (which was the first on the disk). I saved everything by booting to Linux, mounting the NTFS using the read only module, and scp-ing all my data to a FAT32 partition on another Linux machine. From there I said screw Windows and wiped the disk and only use Linux on that laptop (which I'm typing on now).

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  103. Doing this right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife's XP machine crashed while trying to upgrade to Service Pack 2. We spent at least an hour of trying to get it to boot and dealing with tech support and they told us "Sorry, but you have lost everything. You will need to use the system recovery CD to get it working again."

    That was when I decided to download the newest version of knoppix and copy all the data to an external drive which we had just purchased. In half an hour we had everything we needed and are now restoring her computer.

    Maybe this will be enough to get her to consider the switch.

  104. Knoppix System Recovery by Code+Ridge · · Score: 1

    The short: Knoppix Rocks!

    The long: I am a system administrator for a very small network. Back in May of this year, our Win2K file server crashed hard. After reinstalling the OS, I found that Windows refused to import a NTFS disk containing the users files. We had everything backed up on tape, but found the cranky tape drive wasn't working properly. No dice there. Around 8 PM I decided to give Knoppix a try. I was introduced to Knoppix while in school, but I am by no means a Linux Guru. To my surprise it booted the first time and successfully mounted the troubled drive. After a bit of searching, I found the instructions on the Net detailing system recovery using Knoppix. Using the methods detailed, I recovered 40 Gigs off of the drive. Talk about saving my hide! Now, Knoppix is a part of my recovery toolkit.

    If you've never tried Knoppix, now is the time!

  105. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  106. great for rescuing unbootable windows machines too by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    I am a macintosh admin that ended up doing tons of windows desktops too. I was surprised by the lack of rescue tools for our windows systems at work. On a mac it is easy, boot from firewire drive, or boot from cd, or boot as a target of another machine. Then you can rescue data and move it easily. I asked the other admins about booting from a cd and moving stuff over the network, etc and nobody had a cd for this. I decided to try using my knoppix cd to get data from a non booting dell XP laptop. Basically I figured it out in less than 15 minutes. I booted from knoppix, mounted the local hard drive, started samba service (dont remember the gui name) and shared it. Then I went to my pc, typed in the ip address, username knoppix and a password set by me. Full access to the unbootable machine's HD over the network. Thanks slashdot and knoppix !

    --
    music lover since 1969
  107. BartPE by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    mod parent up re: BartPE

    --
    music lover since 1969
  108. It saved my bacon... by jejones · · Score: 1

    I botched the setup for ivtv and lirc in /etc/modules.conf on my wife's computer, so that it panicked during boot. Fired up Knoppix, pulled the bogus lines from /etc/modules.conf, and all was well again. Whew.

  109. not only linux recovery by Cynikal · · Score: 1

    a few months ago while trying to re-partition my 200gig drive, partition magic came up with some random error and then refused to even read the partition table, simply stating the entire drive had become one large partition of unknown type, as well as windows would not read anything on the hard drive.

    several partitioning repair software choices later, i decided to see what my knoppix boot cd would give me for options, and low and behold the partition options actually gave me a list of all the seperate partitions on that drive, alowing me to see what was causing the problem (something like another smaller partition that was created that made the whole drive messed up), simply using knoppix to delete it and reboot, saved me a few gigs of data.

    Since then Knoppix has replaced ERD for when i need to recover a pc, even on windows boxes.

  110. Works for Windows also.. by WerewolfOfVulcan · · Score: 1

    When we have need to repair or reinstall a Windows box and don't yet have the network card working, we found it to be much easier to boot from Knoppix, download the drivers for the network card, store them on the windows partition, and reboot to Windows to install them. (Yes, I know that this is kind of like taking blood thinner to make the arsenic work faster, but...)

  111. Re:But what about winmodem support?- yup! by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

    Okay, why is my post modded funny.

    Why has anyone assumed that I have read the article?

    And back to my original question, where can I find useful information on driving winmodems from live linux CDs?

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  112. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a fine article, but I am not sure why it was posted here, since apparently everyone at slashdot already uses Knoppix.

  113. No by willie150 · · Score: 1

    On a locked-down box, you will not get any 'sensitive' data, even with physical access.
    Some distros (Suse is one I'm sure of) require the root password even in runlevel 1, out of the box.

    I lost the root password to a suse box and had to knoppix boot to fix. (And then tripwire notified me of this quicksmart when things were going again.)

    --
    Better to stay silent, and let people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
    1. Re:No by cowens · · Score: 1

      Ummm, you were still able to root the box. Your "sensitive" infomation was compromised. That you were told after the fact makes no difference. In fact given the knoppix route you could have stolen data and the only clue the owner would have had was the short uptime.

    2. Re:No by willie150 · · Score: 1

      The box in question didn't have any sensitive data, so it's not really relevant. (general access web-broswing PC)

      That said, I encryt sensitive data on any box that people I don't trust have access to. It would take someone a long time to decrypt, by which time it wouldn't be sensitive anyway.

      --
      Better to stay silent, and let people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
    3. Re:No by cowens · · Score: 1

      Yes it is relevent becuase the question is not whether or not the data on your machine was compromised but rather how much you could protect the data on your machine when an attacker has physical access to it. You proved that you could take over the machine, hence you proved the point.

      With encryption your data is only safe if the key is not left on the hard drive (or is not easily guessed). The danger of encrypting your own data is losing the data if you don't remember the key. And don't tell me that you never forget your keys: you had to root your own box to reset the password.

    4. Re:No by willie150 · · Score: 1

      It is only relevant if someone managed to gain access to information they shouldn't have, the whole point is 'sensitive data'. I have no doubt that CPU cycles on the machine could be 'borrowed' for any reason whatsoever.
      I was alerted to the fact that the password was changed, as would any changes to system files.

      I don't know anyone that would keep the key together with an encrypted file. I typically keep a key with me on a USB key or floppy and passphrase in my head.

      I've got the passphrase written down, but I'm more likely to forget where I put the paper its written on than I am to forget the passphrase itself.

      Yes, I have forgotten passwords to useless boxes on a number of occasions, but only because I know I don't have to know them.

      --
      Better to stay silent, and let people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
  114. Cleaning up after a Windows install. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    I asked for RedHat (it was 2002) to be installed when I purchased the new machine but, oops, Linux has to be installed before Windows.

    This is because Windows (willfully) stomps on the boot loader for any non-MS OS during installation. Once you understand this, it's more annoying than anything else.

    It's not that hard to fix... boot into knoppix (or the rescue mode of your install CDs), and mount the Linux partition.
    (replace /dev/hda1 with the name of your Linux partition... cat /etc/fstab for a list of what's where.}

    chroot /mnt/hda1
    grub-install /dev/hda
    exit
    reboot
    Red Hat /Fedora (and other distros, I presume) have a 'rescue' mode for their installation CDs that allow you to do much the same thing.
    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  115. A funny thing happened on the way to graduation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My HD gave up the ghost while preparing my MBA oral defense. After pulling the drive, I booted to Knoppix and ordered a new one on line. Still makes me giggle when I think about it.

  116. this works nicely on Windows crashes as well by tsu+doh+nimh · · Score: 1
    excellent primer on using Knoppix to help recover from linux system problems. but at the risk of starting a flame war, I'd like to relate my own experience rescuing precious data from a hard drive with a Windows XP install.

    after installing some video driver on my XP box, the dang thing refused to boot up. after it failed several diagnostics tests, I knew something was seriously wrong. I had already resigned myself to getting a new, fatter hard drive, but I wanted to get several important folders with photos, documents and addresses off of the dang thing before I trashed it, or reformatted. i remembered that I had burned a copy of Knoppix-STD a few months earlier, and after booting up with it on the damaged box things went really smoothly from there. I managed to find a program that autodetected my DVD burner and without any configuration allowed me to burn two DVDs worth of data from my hard drive without any problems.

    I can't remember the exact name of the program on the STD disc (I think it was something like KD3) but it saved my life.

    --
    ...because you never know who you're dealing with.
  117. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.

  118. Writable NTFS with Knoppix by syberdave · · Score: 1

    NTFS is read-only in 2.4 kernels. In the latest knoppix CD, I believe that there is an option to use the 2.6 kernel to write to NTFS.

  119. Re:But what about winmodem support?- yup! by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    boot knoppix up, under the penguin menu, select Network/Internet-> /dev/modem setup, then there are checkboxes, one of which is for "unsupported winmodem".
    YMMV.

  120. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1


    used to be true for sure. at 3.6, if you want to run "testing/sarge", it's pretty easy now. I installed one a few weeks ago, and apt-get against the debian repositories "just works."

    I even tried swapping repositories back and forth and it never got confused.

    The one thing that is messy is the kernel. The knoppix kernel documentation is just wrong. It says it is a straight debian kernel, but there are many fiddly bits added (ie. ipw2100 wlan, wavelan, & winmodem drivers, etc...) but the rest is pretty straight forward.

  121. Re:So you can fix Linux.... by BrianHursey · · Score: 0

    You cant write to NTFS but you can read and backup to the net. Knoptix is one of the many tools we use at my schools help desk to recover files off of a corrupted install either windows or Linux installs. I have found it myself usefully when bash got corrupted on my Debian system. It has made it a ease to move files over to an external source when having to back up after a system crash. I have saved a good amount of peoples data through this method.

    --
    Linux is like a teepee. It has no windows, no gates, and there's an Apache inside.
  122. Re:Knoppix is good, but MEPIS rocks! by chl · · Score: 1
    Have you ever actually DONE a Knoppix hd install?

    I have. Version 3.4 did not introduce any new trouble in the hd install. apt worked.

    chl

  123. The next step - remastering by rwa2 · · Score: 1
    I've been using Knoppix at work as the rescue disk for most of our computers. Found that it had a few shortcomings. Fortunately for us, it's very easy to create customized knoppix CDs, viz the: Remastering Howto

    In a day, I was basically able to create a new Knoppix CD that can:

    • run gkrellm & xosview (I have no idea why they omitted these very useful system status packages)
    • run extra network utilities like etherape and netcat
    • has ntfs.sys & ntoskernel.dll for captive-ntfs already in /var/lib/captive/ (unfortunately, knoppix creates symlinks from the readonly /var to a rw /var on ramdisk, which captive-ntfs doesn't like for some reason. Anyway, need a bootup script that removes those symlinks and copies the actual files to the /var ramdisk)
    • run freedos under xdosemu, with the filesystem already populated with some DOS-based system rescue software such as Ghost and PowerQuest DriveImage. This gives the added benefit that I can do backups and restores using these programs over the network by mounting the file server with the images via NFS or SMB (unfortunately, this only works with Ghost, PowerQuest fails to write large files to the Linux filesystem which dosemu exposes as a "DOS network drive" with lredir). Wish dosemu.conf still allowed "wholedisk" access, but should be able to hack up a script that will automatically add detected partitions to dosemu.conf
    • updated mozilla / firefox browser
    • be free of cruft (games, openoffice-de, etc.)
    • boot kernel 2.6 by default (change the syslinux.conf boot options)
    • use a custom work-related desktop background :P