Slashdot Mirror


Distress Signal Emitted By Flat-Screen TV

pinqkandi writes "CNN is a running a story on an Oregon college student's flat-screen Toshiba TV which was releasing the 121.5 MHz international distress signal. He was unaware of the issue until local police, search and rescue, and civil air patrol members showed up at his apartment's door. Apparently the signal was strong enough to be picked up by satellite and then routed to the Air Force Rescue Center in Virginia. Quite impressive - luckily Toshiba is offering him a free replacement."

62 of 514 comments (clear)

  1. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It turns out it got stuck on the Lifetime network, so it really was in a state of distress.

    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it got stuck on Fox News' channel.

    2. Re:Actually by Hanno · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > It turns out it got stuck on the Lifetime
      > network, so it really was in a state of
      > distress.

      I had a TV (also by Toshiba, coincidently) that would crash when it showed the local community channel. When that happened, it did not accept any key presses on the remote or on the TV set itself, so I couldn't change the channel anymore.

      Basically, my TV forced me to watch the horrible Hamburg community channel.

      I complained to Toshiba and it turned out that this channel aired a non-standard Teletext that had the ability crash this particular TV's teletext decoder.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    3. Re:Actually by ThaReetLad · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you'll find it's "Faux News Channel"

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    4. Re:Actually by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, all TVs have been spying on us since the V-Chip was introduced. The real question here is what was this guy doing that set the alarm off. Maybe he was trying to disable the V-chip without knowing how to do it correctly.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  2. Must have been quite powerful by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I'd originally read this on CNet a while ago.

    And the (CNet) article points out something of relevance - with so many new devices and what not, our radio spectrum is increasingly becoming very muddled and interference a lot more commonplace. I wonder if existing regulations would do, or if new ones be required.

    Something to think about.

    And I wonder how powerful that signal must have been to have caused such interference. Either that, or the receiving satellites must be having one hell of a resolution capability.

    The latter also provides some food for thought - if their satellite equipment is sensitive enough to find out interfering signals from a Television set, wonder what else they can (and do) eavesdrop :)

    What kind of Tempest attacks do take place, I wonder. Satellite Van Eck Phreaking?

    ~adjusts tinfoil hat~

    1. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except the entire point of this particular satellite is to save peoples' lives. Good try, though.

    2. Re:Must have been quite powerful by overlord2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And even more depressing that someone would choose to see the capability of receiving a distress signal as something other than a good thing (TM).

      --
      -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -A.Einstein
    3. Re:Must have been quite powerful by tonsofpcs · · Score: 5, Informative

      The 121.5 MHz (as well as 243 MHz) Distress call response is being phased out, and the newer 406 MHz call is becoming a more accepted (and used) standard.

      See the official NOAA Press Release (PDF) for deteals.

    4. Re:Must have been quite powerful by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative
      Or the U.S. Coast Guard press release (HTML) here.

      Basically, that frequency was getting way too many false positives, so they're phasing it out. To quote the release, "121.5 MHz false alerts inundate search and rescue authorities. This is another major factor in influencing the decision to stop the satellite processing."

      121.5 MHz is in the middle of cable channel 14. Frankly, it's rather surprising that this doesn't happen -constantly-.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Must have been quite powerful by rob13572468 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      i have talked a few times with someone who worked in the TSCM business (surveillance countermeasures). these are the real guys, not the ones you see with the $99 bug detector. the standard range that they now perform sweeps in goes from DC-300 ghz. i was naturally very interested in what they would be looking for above 30ghz and while the person i talked to admitted that he never personally found anything up in those frequencies, it was well known in their community that such devices were known to exist though they would likely be the domain of only the top government agencies. at any rate the device that he described would look something like the size of a coin and be able to send data in the high ghz range using spread spectrum burst communications directly to an overhead LEO satellite; essentially the ability to bug someone from space using areas of the spectrum that most would never look at and even if they did would likely never actually "see' the transmission unless they were lucky enough to see it transmitting and then only if they were knowledgable enough to recognize the signal from the surrounding noise. scary, huh...

    6. Re:Must have been quite powerful by mercuryresearch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, not that powerful, relatively speaking. A typical 121.5 EPIRB puts out 75-125 milliwatts. Keep in mind this is VHF and the satellites are typically NOAA birds in low-earth orbit expecting a line of sight signal, so 100 milliwatts is very workable.

      The issue with 121.5 EPIRBs is all they do is send a warble tone -- no ID, location, nothing. All the processing is done by the rest of the infrastructure, and even then the output is basically a position (still no ID) to within a mile or so -- with people using radio-direction finders narrowing it down more.

      The newer 406 MHz EPIRBs have specific user data and location information transmitted in their digital packets, so not only do they know the where, but they also know the who -- so when they get a boat beacon originating at someone's house they pretty much already know it's a false alarm.

    7. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the technology that they have let us know about is able to pick up a signal generated by a plasma TV, I really wonder what they're keeping under their hats.

      Most of us only half-believe the stories about echelon and massive gov't surveillance but things like this tell me that our fears may be more reasonable than we think.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:Must have been quite powerful by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This isn't actually the first time something like this has happened. They actually started looking for a downed plane at the University of Arkansas's Razorback Stadium in 2000 when they fired up their new scoreboard. Talk about powerful... before they finished the enclosing the stadium, you could see it clearly from the interstate coming into town -- about five miles away.

      Google cache link

      It was really funny to watch them play DVDs to test out the screen because they would always have the "this video not meant for public viewing" warning before broadcasting it out to the entire south side of Fayetteville. :)

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    9. Re:Must have been quite powerful by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just checked the frequency of channels for TWC Austin. (digital cable)

      Ch 6 = 85Mhz
      Ch 7 = 177Mhz
      Ch 8 = 183Mhz
      Ch 9 = 189Mhz
      Ch 10 = 195Mhz
      Ch 11 = 201Mhz
      Ch 12 = 207Mhz
      Ch 13 = 213Mhz
      Ch 15 = 129Mhz
      Ch 16 = 135Mhz
      Ch 17 = 141Mhz
      Ch 18 and above keep climbing past 141Mhz

      Notice that Channel 14 doesn't exist and how the lower chanels skip around a bit. But the closest to 121.5Mhz is Channel 15.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IIRC, the FCC had to threaten the cable operators with "unfortunate consequences" if they didn't fix their leaky systems. My local cable company started using quad-shielded coax and quality connectors instead of the cheap crap that they used to use. They also replaced a lot of their distribution plant with new equipment.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative
      Probably not very strong. You can get ELTs built into a *watch* - not even a very chunky watch either. They are about as big as a decent diver's or "marine" watch, with a slightly fat cylinder worked into one edge (not exactly bulky). You unscrew the cap and pull out a wire aerial, which activates the transmitter. The wire is resonant (making it about 18" long) but it just dangles loosely. It runs for a couple of hours off a pair of watch batteries, so the signal must be in the order of tens of milliwatts. Even though the signal is pulsed, there is a limit to the maximum current you can draw from these tiny batteries.


      The signals are received by three satellites, to triangulate the position of the transmitter. I don't know what kind of antenna the receiver uses. Bloody big ones, I would think.

    12. Re:Must have been quite powerful by unitron · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cable Channel 14 does exist, they just aren't using it. The Minions of Satan, I mean Time-Warner Cable, in my area reshuffled the deck awhile back and quit using it as well. Cable channels 2-6 (low VHF) and 7-13 (high VHF) use the same frequencies as their over the air counterparts, but where over the air 14-83 (UHF) is in one continuous block of frequencies (around 470 to 890 MHz), cable uses frequencies for 14 and up that are used for many things other than television as far as over the air use is concerned.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    13. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This sort of thing is quite common.

      One of my old friends came home to finding his home in a mess after local authorities gained entry to investigate a signal causing interference with a local airport about 3 miles from him.

      The issue ended up being a problem with his cable box, which they had figured out before he even arrived.

    14. Re:Must have been quite powerful by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And even more depressing that someone would choose to see the capability of receiving a distress signal as something other than a good thing (TM).

      This is /. I've seen people argue in favor of getting rid of 911 because they don't think they should have to pay for something they rarely use when the injured person/person being raped/person reporting a lost child could just as easily look up the seven digit number for the local authorities. I mean gosh that E-911 charge on my last bill was like $1.49.

      Nobody ever said people were logical. Politics and human nature aside I want to know how powerful of a signal this thing was putting off -- what kind of receive gain do you suppose those satellites have?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:Must have been quite powerful by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even if the ELS frequency is being moved, it is still quite important to keep 121.5 clear, as that is also the standard voice aviation distress frequency. Aircraft voice radios can't tune into 406MHz.

      SirWired

    16. Re:Must have been quite powerful by AB3A · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod parent up.

      For those of you who might be wondering what this costs: Replacing an ELT on an aircraft is not like replacing an EPRIB on a ship. You need to ensure the shock switches fire appropriately, and that the unit is mounted such that it will survive a crash.

      The last time I explored that option for our airplane we were staring at something around $1200 to do this upgrade. It's hardly chump change.

      Further, we need to get our navigation gear coordinated so that the 406 MHz signal has GPS to feed to the world. That's not easy to do for aircraft without panel mounted GPS navigation receivers.

      Also, new regulations regarding the pointless ADIZ around Washington DC practically require pilots to monitor 121.5 to respond to an intercept if one happens. If you hear callsign "huntress" on the air and they're operating in your vicinity, remember to be on your very best behavior.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
  3. When in a bind by RC_Car · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So if you need to transmit an international distress signal then stop by any local store and turn on a Toshiba flat-screen TV. We should be able to locate you in a matter of minutes."

  4. I bet . . . by Mod+Point+Sink · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . this is the last time that guy is a smartass to the salesman at Best Buy when buying a TV, though!

  5. One of those smart TVs by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Funny

    The TV probably gained sentience and realized the crap that was being fed to it. It responded in the only way it knew how.

    1. Re:One of those smart TVs by secretsquirel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just wait till it figures out how to spoof the GPS targeting coordinates of smart bombs.

      Hello Dave
      This show is horrible Dave
      I'm sorry Dave, you have 30 seconds to change the channel Dave

  6. Idea for new feature by BongoBen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, this gives me an idea for a new TV feature. Whenever you lose the remote control, it sends out a destress signal until a search team shows up to find it. Now that's service!

    --
    The Dude abides.
  7. Shrug by ciurana · · Score: 4, Funny
    "CNN is a running a story on an Oregon college student's flat-screen Toshiba TV which was releasing the 121.5 MHz international distress signal."

    Big deal. Now, if that had been a free, unencrypted feed of the Spice or Playboy channels...

    Cheers!

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  8. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You've gotta wonder what that guy was doing to that poor TV. (and whether the teletubbies were involved...)

  9. Yeah.. by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a similar problem with my toaster emitting moorse code signals.

  10. I bet he was hacking Dishnetwork... by shepd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's well known that certain hardware hacks for Dishnetwork receivers emit this same frequency.

    What a coincidence that a college student (no money) would be doing something technical (education) to get TV for free.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:I bet he was hacking Dishnetwork... by ricochet81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      college student (no money)??

      the dude has a flat screen TV doesnt he?!

      --
      Error: Id10t detected
  11. FULL TEXT OF THE DISTRESS MESSAGE by ferrellcat · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Please Help! My plasma is burning out! I'll need to be replaced in 2 years!"

  12. EMI testing is a bitch. by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We just spent $10K+ on in-house EMI equipment, to mitigate the costs of having an outside lab help with troubleshooting.

    You have to do it if you make any kind of electronics, but it's a big burden for small manufacturers.

    It'd be nice to have the choice of saying "this passes" vs "this probably passes". Current FCC/CE regs require everyone to meet the spec, and this is a bit onerous IMHO. It locks some innovative small companies out of the game.

    1. Re:EMI testing is a bitch. by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that while in your particular instance it may seem stiffling to your company, those regulations are in place because not all companies can be trusted to stick with the specs in that case.

      It becomes a question of business ethics, and we all know how most companies are when it comes to those. This device probably passes the test, where probably has a probability of 0.00001.

      _That_ is why strict regulations are needed, IMHO.

      And oh btw, nice players at Slim Devices, quite the coolness.

  13. Signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those who are wondering what type of signal this is, check here:

    http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/epirb.ht m

    Animah S/V Solaris

  14. 406MHz Digital Distress signal by amigoro · · Score: 5, Informative
    There's another digital distress signal too. The 406 MHz distress beacon emits both an analogue 121.5 MHz signal and a digital 406 MHz signal. The digital signal carries a code which identifies the beacon while the analogue signal is to enable aircraft to home on location. That digital code can be cross referenced with a database of registered 406 MHz beacon owners held at AMSA which identifies who is in trouble and what type of situation they are in. This enables the search and rescue authorities to tailor a response to the emergency situation.

    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
    Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

    --


    Nothing to see here
    1. Re:406MHz Digital Distress signal by nick0909 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 121.5 and 243 MHz (ELT) signals are the original frequencies detected by the international COSPAS-SARSAT system. The 406MHz (PLB) system is *VERY* new, it just got the OK for use in the continential US last July. The US Air Force Rescue Coordination Center right now oversees the monitoring for the signals, and when the AFRCC detect an activation they notify the emergency services management agency of the state that contains the activation. Without a GPS-enabled 406MHz ELT beacon it can takes several hours for doppler shifting to narrow down the location of the victim to a relativly small area (small enough to begin a wide-area search), and once the more specific location is known the local Search & Rescue agency having authority is activated.

      Currently the 121.5/243MHz COSPAS-SARSAT system gets so many false alarms every day that teams do not respond rapidly to their calls. The San Diego Coast Guard Group has about 10 ELT's to investigate *every day* with nearly every single one an accidental activation. If there was one system I could use right now it would be a 406MHz PLB with GPS enabled. Because of the requirement to register your PLB and the serial number transmitted with the distress signal, instead of just a AM warble as on the 121.5/243MHz system, people are less likly going to set them off "just to test them" and are more likly to get in trouble if they do.

      Nick
      Butte County Search & Rescue

  15. In other news... by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    CNN is a running a story on an Oregon college student's flat-screen Toshiba TV which was releasing the 121.5 MHz international distress signal...

    In other news, a man's 4-door sedan was emitting the 1.21 jigawatts necessary to power the flux capacitor. Christopher Lloyd was unavailible for comment.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:In other news... by conway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a DeLorean coupe - it only had 2 doors.
      Can't believe someone on /. would get this wrong! :)

  16. A better writeup by RotJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Corvallis Gazette-Times has more details and a picture of the guy posing with his TV. Apparently, he mostly watches public broadcasting and has acquired a taste for all the quality children's programming it provides, especially "Arthur".

  17. Great idea! by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we are supposed to trust companies to use their judgement and ethics when slaping a "This device probably meets federal EMI regulations" sticker on a device. I feel better already.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  18. Almost a year? by ets960 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It scares me that it took them almost a year to get the distress signal. Remind me never to get lost at sea.

  19. Re:The Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, The TV Distresses YOU! ....oh wait...

  20. Re:Signal Details by flyboy974 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You'll be waiting ~ 3-4 hours before somebody comes and finds you, if they are really good at it.

    First, wait for a satellite pass will notify the Air Force. They will then verify it if they can, contact the FAA for missing flights, etc. The next call goes out to the Civil Air Patrol wing that is responsible for that area. They in turn will normally notify the local authorities who are in charge of S&R. Of course, when you broadcast on 121.5, that sound is audible in every Airtraffic Control center that it can reach.

    Once they have done this, they will organize a ground based S&R party and try get a general area of where the signal is coming from. Remember, this is non-directional, so they have to go to a few different places, measure the direction and approx. strength of the signal, and then they will know about where it is. Triangulation sucks, esp. with trees and mountains.

    Once they have done this, they'll start their search. Oh, if it's at night and it's not somewhere near them, they'll wait until the morning. Hope you don't keel over at night.

    Finally, once they triangulate it, they home in on it. In this case, they homed it to an apartment. Questioned the guy, and went back out into the hallway and confirmed it was coming from there.

    So, do you REALLY want a 121.5 ELT locator? I would get one of the new 406mhz ones which are digitally encoded with your information. In addition, some models offer GPS in them that will transmit your GPS coordinates when it sends it. Much nicer and easier to find.

    Oh, and I'm not a CAP member any more. But, it was fun while I did it. Not enough time now, but, maybe after I'm done building my airplane I'll have time.

  21. Error on the side of caution is great! by Smoodo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm certainly glad that it was detected and responded to. I hope the spectrum doesn't get too messy and create this situation often, but it does show that someone is paying attention when there is a cry for help. (Thinking out in the ocean here).

    1. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by nick0909 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am not sure if you have ever listened to marine radio near an ocean, but just from my time near the water and listening in, the US Coast Guard has about 10 ELT (121.5MHz) distress signal activations per day, per Coast Guard Group (IE, San Diego Group, Los Angeles Group, etc). They send someone to investigate each one, eventually, and they are all nearly accidental or malicous trips, not real emergencies. It has almost reached the point of too many cries of wolf.

      Nick
      Butte County Search & Rescue

    2. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      There was a guy in Glasgow, who lived not far from where I am now, that worked alongside one of my friends on a North Sea oilrig. He took a positioning beacon home with him (why? Who knows? It's four feet long, bright orange, and very heavy. How did he even get it about the helicopter?). He then placed his purloined "toy" in a cupboard. One of his children knocked it over, a couple of weeks later, activating it. Within 10 minutes, there was a Coastguard helicopter hovering over this house in the middle of Maryhill...

    3. Re:Error on the side of caution is great! by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      121.5 is very well monitored. For one thing almost any aircraft that has a radio that its not using for something else will probably have it on the guard frequency. This is a post 9/11 thing for the most part but a good one. IF you do broadcast on 121.5 every airliner up at 35,000 ft within a few hundred miles may hear you. One of them will relay your message to someone who can help you. Thats a very good thing!

      On the minus side sometimes a pilot will broadcast on 121.5 becuase he thought he was trasnmitting on the other radio. (Been there, done that)

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  22. Wait a minute.. by russint · · Score: 5, Funny

    On October 2, the 20 year-old college student was visited at his apartment in the small university town by a contingent of local police, civil air patrol and search and rescue personnel.
    [...]
    Authorities had expected to find a boat or small plane with a malfunctioning transponder, the usual culprit in such incidents, emitting the 121.5 MHz frequency of the distress signal used internationally.


    Why did they expect to find a boat/plane in a apartment building?

    --
    ^^
    1. Re:Wait a minute.. by SagSaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why did they expect to find a boat/plane in a apartment building?

      Boats can be hauled by trailters to various places, including parking lots. Somebody working on their boat in the parking lot could accidentally set off the emergency beacon. Airplanes can and do crash, although crashing near an apartment complex without being noticed might be a bit of a stretch.

      At the point the signal is localized to an apartment building, its probably pretty clear that it is not an intentional distress signal (although I suppose somebody could have been kidnapped and found an emergency beacon sitting in the kidnapper's closet...). They still need to find and disable whatever is creating the signal, though, to avoid interfearing with a real distress signal in the future.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
  23. Say what?!? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason for non-interference isn't to protect the manufacturer, it's to protect the public. What the holy blue devil makes you think this burden should be waived for small companies?

    Let's carry that concept on thru .... I'll start up a gas station, and since I'm a small company, I can dispense with all those silly safety regs. I'll put stickers on the pumps "You should probably not smoke around here."

    Or I can start selling homemade cars, put in some cheap airbags made of a CO2 cartridge and a mousetrap on a hairspring for a trigger, along with a "probably works" disclaimer. That should do the trick.

    Geez buddy, get a grip!

  24. Something to keep in mind by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a little something to keep in mind - all it takes is one (faulty) popular model putting out EMI interference to fuck up an entire range of the spectrum into unusability. So yes, I STRONGLY support keeping tight screws on EMI interference, because you can't rely on Corps to be ethical and act responsibly if it weren't legally mandated. And, as the Netgear NTP issue so eloquently demonstrates, even after you tell a company that they are doing harm and need to stop, they might not necessarily do it.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  25. 10 years ago, it was pizza ovens by Mr.+Majordomo · · Score: 5, Funny
    Here's the followup traffic from a Civil Air Patrol mission in California about 10 years ago, where the errant signal was traced to a self-serve hot pizza machine (a freezer full of pizza, a microwave oven, a chute to move frozen pizzas from the freezer to the oven, and a coin/cash machine to collect the money).
    ROUTINE
    072338Z MAY 93
    HEADQUARTERS CALIFORNIA WING/MCO [NAME DELETED]
    HEADQUARTERS ALL UNITS CALIFORNIA WING
    INFO CC DO CALO
    BT
    ATTENTION EMERGENCY SERVICES PERSONNEL
    SEARCH MISSION 93XM0956 OPENED 6 MAY AND CLOSED 7 MAY FOR A
    SIGNAL INTERFERENCE ON 121.5. SIGNAL LOCATED AND SECURED IN
    A HOT PIZZA MACHINE IN NORTH PALM SPRINGS. THANKS TO MAJOR
    [NAME DELETED], FIRST LIEUTENANT [NAME DELETED] AND SECOND LIEUTENANT
    [NAME DELETED] OF
    SQUADRON 11 FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE ON THIS MISSION.
    BT
    P.S. NO FREE PIZZA.
    END OF MESSAGE
  26. satellite TV by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    It turns out that those government satellites are monitoring our TVs. Luckily, Toshiba sells tinfoil hats for closeup viewing.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  27. The relationship of 121.5 Mhz to NTSC video by Skapare · · Score: 5, Informative

    The frequency of the NTSC color subcarrier (the TV color system used in analog video standards in North America and Japan) is defined as exactly 5 MHz times 63/88. That works out to 3.579545454.... (infinitely repeating 54's) MHz. The horizontal scanning frequency is then defined as a 2/455 times the color subcarrier frequency. That works out to 15734.26573426.... (infinitely repeating 573426's) Hz (very nearly the original monochrome horizontal frequency of 15750 Hz). This is where the problem lies. 121.5 MHz divided by 7722 is exactly the same frequency as the horizontal in an NTSC color video signal.

    The 7722nd harmonic shouldn't really be that strong, right? Usually not. But the harmonics can get to be very strong overall even at such high orders when dealing with modulating the high voltages needed for the horizontal sweep. There should be some low pass filters that prevent that from getting into the VHF range. But if the filters are absent, or were incorrectly installed, or were damaged somehow, and if some wires formed some resonance near 121.5 MHz (like wires going out to cable, speakers, etc) ... a wavelength of about 2.47 meters or 8.1 feet ... it is possible that harmonic, and a bunch of others near it, could be enhanced and radiated.

    The local oscillator in the tuner is a remote possibility. But it would have to be tuned to be receiving a video carrier at 75.75 MHz based on the common satndard of 45.75 MHz for the IF stage in the tuner. But there is no TV broadcast on that frequency in the US ... though I could not rule out there being something on that frequency from a cable system. Still, it wouldn't be an expected place for a TV to tune to. But if the TV has a non-standard IF frequency, the local oscillator getting on 121.5 MHz by some expected channel could be possible. Those leak a lot and it's how the snoops can tell what channel you are tuned to by spying on the RF emitted from your house.

    If just this one TV had the problem, then apparently it must be a manufacturing defect or shipping damage (or maybe user damage or tampering). If it were a design problem, I'd sure we'd hear more about it. That probably rules out the CPU clock frequency.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  28. An Oregon college student has heartattack by klang · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..because he thought that the RIAA had finally caught up with him...

  29. TWC is not a monopoly by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The Minions of Satan, I mean Time-Warner Cable"
    I'm not directed this to you, so please don't take offense. But its comments like these that I hear often that basically state that cable companies are evil and greedy. I'm not saying you're saying this, but for the most part that's the kind of flak I hear about TWC.
    What most people don't realize is that paying for the fiber and coax, installing it yourself, and maintaining it costs major money. And trust me when I say Mother Nature causes havoc on our network (slow modems, disconnects, poor reception, macro blocking = very irate customers). Also, TWC does NOT make money on TV stations. Where we do make our bread and butter is on the recording features and on-demand access, but also on the Road Runner subscriptions. Other then that, your local cable company in large cities are nothing more then a conduit for capturing content from satellite and piping it through your home. Also, lets not forget the employee and leased equipment expenses as well that customers are having to pay.
    I'm not saying TWC isn't a profitable business, because it is. But it's not like we are making hand-over-fist either. There is competition in Austin, and we know it....which is a good thing for the customer as a whole including myself. But please, would people stop this 1980s concept of cable companies being a monopoly!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  30. Re:Sorry, but you are totally clueless. by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are an idiot.

    And the competitors in India and China don't have this certification rubbish.

    Any and all electrical and electronic equipment in the US is subject to regulations, whether they are manufactured inhouse or imported - to prevent unwanted and potentially harmful interference.

    bureaucratic goverment drones like you impose a mountain of useless paperwork on small businesses.

    I happen to be the owner of a small business myself, and I find the regulations to be quite useful and justified, they're the reasons we do not have a million conflicting parts and standards out there.

    But a small business is killed by such stuff.

    Yes, and people are killed if there were no regulations. Would you rather have someone die because an CD-player interfered with their pacemaker interfered, or would you rather help small businesses "prosper".

    Btw, the reason China is providing cheap stuff is because they have little or no laws on labour condition and blatantly practice harmful trade practices like under-pricing. I guess if we could make you work in a sweatshop for 20 hours a day for a pittance, you would be happy?

    Get your facts straight before talking through your ass.

  31. Re:Dodgy TV software? by FLEB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meanwhile... IT'S A FREAKING TELEVISION! "TV" and "crash" should not be sharing the same sentence.

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  32. Can affect Air Traffic Control by p.rican · · Score: 5, Informative
    as well. Cable companies can be fined enormous amounts for failing to provide evidence of an ongoing leakge control/abatement program. When I was a cable TV tech, my primary job was to drive around the neighborhood looking for the "Leakage". It's called "CLI" or Cumulative Leakage Index. If the leakage was coming from someone's house and we could not gain access to the house to correct the problem, the customer's service was disconnected at the pole and a note was left on the door. The usual culprit was a crappy amplifier and those "high quality gold plated screw on RG6 connectors" you see sold in Radio Shack, Walmart etc.

    If you want to do wiring yourself, here's what you should be looking for:

    1. (at least) Dual shielded RG-56 coax cable
    2. (at least) 80% braid (no copper braid either)
    3. RG56 crimper
    4. RG56 crimp style connectors. Not the screw-on connectors
    5. Splitters with frequency rating of 5MHz-1GHz
    6. Install amplifiers in your house preferably before the first split of the coax.

    Hope that helps

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

  33. Re:Dodgy TV software? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

    > In Japan, I hear there are even toilet seats that occasionally require a reboot

    I wonder if the error messages include Kernel panic: You've been eating way too much corn.